CN101888657A - Mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis - Google Patents
Mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN101888657A CN101888657A CN 201010227725 CN201010227725A CN101888657A CN 101888657 A CN101888657 A CN 101888657A CN 201010227725 CN201010227725 CN 201010227725 CN 201010227725 A CN201010227725 A CN 201010227725A CN 101888657 A CN101888657 A CN 101888657A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- success rate
- network element
- fault
- route
- test assignment
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis, which is applied to the field of test of communication networks. The method comprises the following steps of: finding out a route with a fault network element and a route with all normal network elements; then removing the same network elements by comparing the route with a fault network element and the route with all normal network elements to retain the fault network elements; and visually displaying the positions of the fault network elements by matching with a window. The mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis initiates a complete combination business for carrying out intelligent trail and error by adopting a multipoint access network, is shown at a practical topological fault node, provides an advanced fault positioning tool for an operation and maintenance staff and ensures the completeness and timeliness of the operation and maintenance of a network.
Description
The method field
The present invention relates to the communication network field tests, relate in particular to a kind of mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis.
Background method
Data network is made up of a series of complexity, unstable state, operation system and equipment non-linear, irreversible, self-organizing.But because the influence of buterfly effect, equipment self or extraneous gathering of disturbance all will cause business even network decreased performance and business/equipment obstacle to occur, and this all needs to carry out operations such as obstacle diagnosis and test position fix.
Because the coupling of working between the data networking equipment makes that network obstacles quick diagnosis and location are height point and the difficult points in the telecommunications maintenance technology always.Although telecommunication technology develop rapidly, but according to safeguarding practice effect, the method of network fault diagnosis is still with the means of traditional " receive complaint → network segmentation pocket watch to monitor → investigation " piecemeal afterwards, maintenance service is serious to lag behind and insufficient, for the running quality of whole network control is lacked effective technical solution.
Summary of the invention
The object of the present invention is to provide in one and can find fault prior to the client, and the mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis of quick, the accurate localization of faults.
To achieve these goals, the technical solution used in the present invention is as follows:
Mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis of the present invention may further comprise the steps:
Design some test assignments, the corresponding route of each test assignment;
A success rate threshold value A is set, is higher than the success rate threshold value A and represents all network elements in this route all normal, a success rate threshold value B is set, be lower than success rate threshold value B and represent and have the fault network element in this route;
Carry out described test assignment, and write down the success rate of each test assignment;
Find out the test assignment that described success rate is lower than described success rate threshold value B, find out the test assignment that success rate is higher than described success rate threshold value A simultaneously;
The test assignment that a described success rate is lower than described success rate threshold value B successively with each described success rate be higher than described success rate threshold value A test assignment the route comparison of process; If two test assignments are all passed through same network element, then eliminating changes network element; Through comparison, if last only surplus next network element, then this network element is the fault point, if at last by a more than network element, then the fault point is in this remaining at last network element scope; Repeat this step, the test assignment that is lower than described success rate threshold value B up to all success rates is finished comparison.
Preferably, the route of described test assignment correspondence should cover all permutation and combination methods of core network element;
Preferably, described test assignment the route of process be rendered in the window.
Preferably, when new test assignment, the route of its process is in time added to described window.
Preferred, also comprise step: the route that success rate is lower than the test assignment of described success rate threshold value B is shown as eye-catching in window and is different from the form of other routes, record is through the success rate of all tasks of each network element, when the success rate through all tasks of a network element all is lower than described success rate threshold value B, then locatees this network element and be the fault network element.Further, also comprise step: described fault network element is marked with distinguishing mark.
The technical solution used in the present invention is as follows:
Mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis of the present invention adopts multipoint access network, initiate complete composite service and carry out intelligent trial and error, and represent at the practical topology malfunctioning node, for the O﹠M personnel provide advanced fault location instrument, guaranteed the completeness of network O﹠M and ageing.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of accident analysis localization method of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a concrete network element structural representation;
Fig. 3 is the schematic diagram that shows the fault network element by window.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments, technical scheme of the present invention is further set forth.
Referring to accompanying drawing 1, the principle of method of the present invention is to find route and all normal route of all network elements that has the fault network element earlier, identical network element is got rid of in the normal route comparison of route through there being the fault network element and all network elements then, and remaining is exactly the fault network element.
Referring to accompanying drawing 2, it is a concrete network, network shows and arrives the path that 163 websites come out through all permutation and combination of network element from PCU1, be specially path 1 (A-B-D-F-H), path 2 (A-B-D-G-H), path 3 (A-B-E-F-H), path 4 (A-B-E-G-H), path 5 (A-C-D-F-H), path 6 (A-C-D-G-H), path 7 (A-C-E-F-H), path 8 (A-C-E-G-H), design 8 test assignments of passing through different paths respectively, and to be arranged to power threshold A be 95%, success rate is higher than 95% and represents all network elements in this route all normal, being arranged to power threshold B is 40%, and success rate is lower than 40% and represents and have the fault network element in this route;
Test according to this 8 paths simultaneously from the A point, the result is as follows:
Through the test assignment of path 1 (A-B-D-F-H), success rate 97%;
Through the test assignment of path 2 (A-B-D-G-H), success rate 98%;
Through the test assignment of path 3 (A-B-E-F-H), success rate 20%;
Through the test assignment of path 4 (A-B-E-G-H), success rate 13%;
Through the test assignment of path 5 (A-C-D-F-H), success rate 99%;
Through the test assignment of path 6 (A-C-D-G-H), success rate 100%;
Through the test assignment of path 7 (A-C-E-F-H), success rate 33%;
Through the test assignment of path 8 (A-C-E-G-H), success rate 7%;
Be lower than 40% through the success rate of the test assignment in path 3, path 4, path 7, path 8 wherein, represent in this four paths the fault network element is arranged, success rate through the test assignment in path 1, path 2, path 5, path 6 is higher than 95%, then represents all network elements in this four paths all normal.Successively with path 3, path 4, path 7, path 8 respectively with other four paths in the comparison of every paths:
With path 3 and path 1 contrast, there are identical network element: A, B, F, H, can determine that then network element E is the fault network element.
With path 4 and path 1 contrast, there are identical network element: A, B, H, then earlier with its eliminating, continue network element remaining in the comparison path 4 and the network element in the path 2, comprise network element G, and then get rid of network element G, then only remain next network element E this moment, can determine that network element E is the fault network element.
With path 7 and path 1 contrast, there are identical network element A, F, H, earlier with these three eliminatings, network element that is left in the continuation comparison path 7 and the network element in the path 2 do not have identical network element, network element that continuation comparison path 7 is left and the network element in the path 5, there is identical network element C, then C is got rid of, this moment, only surplus next network element E can determine that network element E is the fault network element.
With path 8 and path 1 contrast, there are identical network element A, H, with these two eliminatings, continue network element remaining in the comparison path 8 and the network element in the path 2 earlier, comprise identical network element G, so with its eliminating, there are identical network element C in network element that continuation comparison path 8 is left and the network element in the path 5, then C are got rid of, this moment, only surplus next network element E can determine that network element E is the fault network element.
Of the present inventionly can mark the fault network element in eye-catching mode by window, concrete method is, be illustrated in all paths in the window in advance, when testing, determine the mode that the path shows according to the success rate of the every paths that records, finally in window, mark this fault network element, concrete, referring to accompanying drawing 3, according to above-mentioned test structure, can know, through path 3 wherein, path 4, path 7, the success rate of the test assignment in path 8 is lower than 40%, then the path that these four link testers are crossed dots, other path is represented with solid line, can certainly mark different colors, not as failure path is represented with redness, other is represented with black, as long as eye-catching just passable, be dotted line from scheming to go up the path that just can find out significantly through network element E like this, determine that then E is the fault network element, and go out with empty collimation mark, to warn.
Claims (6)
1. mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis is characterized in that: may further comprise the steps:
Design some test assignments, the corresponding route of each test assignment;
A success rate threshold value A is set, is higher than the success rate threshold value A and represents all network elements in this route all normal, a success rate threshold value B is set, be lower than success rate threshold value B and represent and have the fault network element in this route;
Carry out described test assignment, and write down the success rate of each test assignment;
Find out the test assignment that described success rate is lower than described success rate threshold value B, find out the test assignment that success rate is higher than described success rate threshold value A simultaneously;
The test assignment that a described success rate is lower than described success rate threshold value B successively with each described success rate be higher than described success rate threshold value A test assignment the route comparison of process; If two test assignments are all passed through same network element, then get rid of this network element; Through comparison, if last only surplus next network element, then this network element is the fault point, if at last by a more than network element, then the fault point is in this remaining at last network element scope; Repeat this step, the test assignment that is lower than described success rate threshold value B up to all success rates is finished comparison.
2. according to claim 1 based on accident analysis location mobile core network method of testing, it is characterized in that: the route of described test assignment correspondence should cover all permutation and combination methods of core network element.
3. according to claim 1 based on accident analysis location mobile core network method of testing, it is characterized in that: described test assignment the route of process be rendered in the window.
4. according to claim 3 based on accident analysis location mobile core network method of testing, it is characterized in that: when new test assignment, the route of its process is in time added to described window.
5. according to claim 3 or 4 described based on accident analysis location mobile core network method of testing, it is characterized in that: the route that success rate is lower than the test assignment of described success rate threshold value B is shown as eye-catching in window and is different from the form of other routes, record is through the success rate of all tasks of each network element, when the success rate through all tasks of a network element all is lower than described success rate threshold value B, then locatees this network element and be the fault network element.
6. according to claim 4 based on accident analysis location mobile core network method of testing, it is characterized in that: also comprise step: described fault network element is marked with distinguishing mark.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010227725A CN101888657B (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2010-07-16 | Mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010227725A CN101888657B (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2010-07-16 | Mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN101888657A true CN101888657A (en) | 2010-11-17 |
| CN101888657B CN101888657B (en) | 2012-10-03 |
Family
ID=43074327
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010227725A Expired - Fee Related CN101888657B (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2010-07-16 | Mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN101888657B (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110995584A (en) * | 2019-10-31 | 2020-04-10 | 苏州浪潮智能科技有限公司 | Multipath selection method, system and equipment applied to virtualization environment |
| CN112242910A (en) * | 2019-07-16 | 2021-01-19 | 中国移动通信集团浙江有限公司 | Network element fault positioning method and device, computing equipment and computer storage medium |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101360014A (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2009-02-04 | 电子科技大学 | Method implementing network exception location by multi-point dislocation combined detection |
| WO2009048358A1 (en) * | 2007-10-09 | 2009-04-16 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | An arrangement and a method for handling failures in a network |
| CN101540932A (en) * | 2008-03-21 | 2009-09-23 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | Method and device for fault location of multi-channel device |
-
2010
- 2010-07-16 CN CN201010227725A patent/CN101888657B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2009048358A1 (en) * | 2007-10-09 | 2009-04-16 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | An arrangement and a method for handling failures in a network |
| CN101540932A (en) * | 2008-03-21 | 2009-09-23 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | Method and device for fault location of multi-channel device |
| CN101360014A (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2009-02-04 | 电子科技大学 | Method implementing network exception location by multi-point dislocation combined detection |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112242910A (en) * | 2019-07-16 | 2021-01-19 | 中国移动通信集团浙江有限公司 | Network element fault positioning method and device, computing equipment and computer storage medium |
| CN110995584A (en) * | 2019-10-31 | 2020-04-10 | 苏州浪潮智能科技有限公司 | Multipath selection method, system and equipment applied to virtualization environment |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN101888657B (en) | 2012-10-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN102724071B (en) | The power communication fault pre-alarming analytical method of model Sum fanction model Network Based and system thereof | |
| ES2423607T3 (en) | Reliability calculation for Substation Automation systems | |
| CN103166774B (en) | With route arrange distinguish method and device | |
| CN107040413B (en) | Method for positioning fault of communication link of process layer of intelligent substation | |
| CN106556765B (en) | The test method and RTDS emulator of distributed distribution automation system | |
| CN109204389A (en) | A kind of subway equipment fault diagnosis and self-healing method, system | |
| CN108199891B (en) | Cps network attack identification method based on artificial neural network multi-angle comprehensive decision | |
| CN101251835A (en) | Method for evaluating reliability of +/- 800kV current exchanging station main wire connection | |
| CN102377484B (en) | Method for detecting business security of station in-out cable of transmission network station | |
| CN104468191A (en) | Electric power telecommunication fault early warning method and system based on time window and network model | |
| Lin et al. | A general framework for quantitative modeling of dependability in cyber-physical systems: A proposal for doctoral research | |
| CN101715203B (en) | Method and device for automatically positioning fault points | |
| CN106464542B (en) | Network operation, the system and method for managing and maintaining (OAM) | |
| CN104796193A (en) | Method for quick querying and locating of optical cable link relation | |
| CN109246495A (en) | A kind of optical network service method for evaluating quality of oriented multilayer, multi objective | |
| CN110045207A (en) | A kind of complex fault diagnostic method based on power grid architecture and multisource data fusion | |
| CN104135390A (en) | Novel electric power communication system reliability analysis algorithm | |
| CN103001812A (en) | Intelligent electric power communication fault diagnosis system | |
| CN101888657B (en) | Mobile data core network fault positioning method based on multipoint access multipath analysis | |
| CN110474801A (en) | Powerline network fault simulation method based on service reliability | |
| CN103607292A (en) | Fast distributed monitoring method for electric-power communication network services | |
| CN109218140A (en) | A kind of method of software definition deployment NFV network measuring system | |
| CN108988496A (en) | A kind of diagnostic method, device and the equipment of secondary system of intelligent substation failure | |
| CN109377044A (en) | A kind of trouble hunting Cost Analysis Method of intelligent substation protection equipment | |
| CN101931462A (en) | Testing control method and device for optical transmission network |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20121003 Termination date: 20150716 |
|
| EXPY | Termination of patent right or utility model |