CN101727466A - Method and device for verifying service data object - Google Patents
Method and device for verifying service data object Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN101727466A CN101727466A CN200810225627A CN200810225627A CN101727466A CN 101727466 A CN101727466 A CN 101727466A CN 200810225627 A CN200810225627 A CN 200810225627A CN 200810225627 A CN200810225627 A CN 200810225627A CN 101727466 A CN101727466 A CN 101727466A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- attribute
- validity
- object data
- user
- rule
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013524 data verification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a device for verifying a service data object for solving the problem of low accuracy of effectiveness verification for the service data object in the conventional technology. The invention adopts a main technical scheme that: the method for verifying the service data object comprises the following steps: searching an effectiveness rule corresponding to an attribute name and an attribute type in a preset effectiveness rule according to the attribute name and attribute type of a service object extended by a user request; verifying the service data object input by a user according to the found effectiveness rule; and when the service data object passes the verification, saving the service data object. Through the technical scheme, the effectiveness and the availability of the service data object input by the user are improved, and the efficiency of effectiveness verification of the service data object is improved.
Description
Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of information processing, and in particular, to a method and an apparatus for verifying business object data in an information system.
Background
In the implementation and use process of an information system (especially an enterprise information system), with the continuous development of services, the original description information (i.e. attribute information) of the same service object in the information system gradually fails to meet the requirement of service diversity, and users often need to enrich the attribute information of the original service object. In order to avoid modification of a large number of program codes caused by adding attribute information to a service object, an extended attribute definition method is proposed in the industry.
The main technical principle of the traditional extended attribute definition method is as follows: on the premise of ensuring that the existing realization of the information system is unchanged, a user requests the information system for the attribute information of the extended service object, wherein the attribute information comprises: basic information (attribute name, attribute type) and auxiliary information (default, form presentation, etc.). The basic information, which is the information essential for describing the attributes of the business object, determines whether the extended attributes can generate the column information of the corresponding data table in the database. After the user submits the request for extending the attribute information, the information system automatically generates the corresponding database field and the business object form according to the attribute information submitted by the user. Thus, without modifying the system code, the user can use the extended attribute information to describe the business object and enter the business object data in the business object form automatically generated by the system, which will be stored by the system in the newly generated physical database table.
In the above extended attribute definition method, it is an important process to verify the validity of the service object data input by the user, and the currently adopted verification method mainly verifies the validity of the service object data input by the user according to the attribute type included in the extended attribute information, that is, determines whether the service object data input by the user is valid according to whether the service object data input by the user can be correctly converted into the corresponding attribute type (that is, the database data type) when the attribute information is defined. However, the types and formats of the business object data input by the user are often various, so that the accuracy of validity verification of the business object data input by the user simply according to the attribute type is low, and the requirement of the information system on the validity of the business object data is difficult to meet.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a method and a device for verifying business object data, which are used for solving the problem of low accuracy of validity verification of the business object data in the prior art.
The embodiment of the invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
the embodiment of the invention provides a method for verifying service object data, which comprises the following steps:
searching validity rules corresponding to the attribute names and the attribute types from preset validity rules according to the attribute names and the attribute types of the service objects expanded by the user request;
and verifying the business object data input by the user according to the searched validity rule, and storing the business object data when the verification is passed.
The embodiment of the invention also provides a verification device of the business object data, which comprises the following steps:
the rule searching unit is used for searching validity rules corresponding to the attribute names and the attribute types from preset validity rules according to the attribute names and the attribute types of the service objects requested to be expanded by the user;
the verification unit is used for verifying the service object data input by the user according to the validity rule searched by the rule searching unit;
and the storage unit is used for storing the business object data when the verification unit passes the verification.
According to the technical scheme, before the business object data input by the user is verified, the validity rule used for the verification is searched from the preset validity rules according to the attribute name and the attribute type of the business object expanded by the user request, the business object data input by the user is verified according to the searched validity rule, and when the verification is passed, the business object data input by the user is determined to be valid, and the business object data is stored. Compared with the prior art that only the attribute type of the business object data is verified, the method and the device can more accurately verify the validity of the business object data input by the user, and improve the accuracy of verifying the business object data and the usability of the stored business object data. In addition, the invention presets the validity rule for verifying the business object before verifying the business object data, and only needs to verify according to the corresponding predefined validity rule in the verification process, thereby improving the efficiency of verifying the business object data.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of setting validity rules in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating validity verification of business object data according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a first schematic diagram of a device for verifying business object data according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a second schematic diagram of a verification apparatus for business object data according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 5 is a third schematic diagram of a verification apparatus for business object data in an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to improve the accuracy of validity verification of business object data to meet the requirement of an information system on the validity of the business object data, the embodiment of the invention provides a method and a device for verifying the business object data, and the following describes the main implementation principle, the specific implementation process and the corresponding beneficial effects of the embodiment of the invention in detail by combining the attached drawings of the specification.
In the embodiment of the present invention, before verifying the business object data input by the user according to the user request, validity rules respectively corresponding to different attributes need to be set according to the attributes (including attribute names and attribute types) of different business objects. The attribute name corresponds to a data column name generated by the extended attribute in the relational database table, and the attribute type corresponds to a data type in the relational database, such as a character string type (text type), a numeric type, a date type and the like.
In one embodiment, a specific process of setting the validity rule is shown in fig. 1, and includes the following steps:
And 102, determining the validity rule according to a validity rule template set for the attribute type of the service object and the attribute name of the service object.
In the step 101, different validity rule templates are set for the characteristics of different attribute types. For example, when the attribute type is a numeric type, according to the characteristic of the type, that is, a specific numerical value, a threshold interval in which the data is located may be defined in the validity rule template, and specifically, a maximum value and a minimum value of the threshold interval in which the numerical value is located may be defined; further, for the characteristic that the attribute type is the number type, the accuracy of the numerical value may be defined in the validity rule template, and specifically, the accuracy of the numerical value, the decimal place number, and the like may be defined. When the attribute type is other types, such as a character string type, a text type, or a date type, the validity rule template may be set according to substantially the same principle as the above-described setting of the validity rule template according to the number type, which is not listed here.
In a specific embodiment, the validity rule templates set for different attribute types may be as follows:
| attribute type | Field names included in validity rule templates |
| Character string/text type | Text length, whether text length is fixed, including fixed character string |
| Digital type | Minimum, maximum, numerical precision, decimal place |
| Type of date | Start date, end date |
It should be noted that the field names included in the validity rule templates shown in the above table are only one way to implement the embodiment of the present invention. In specific application, the validity rule template may be flexibly set according to different business objects, for example, when the attribute type is a text type, the set validity rule template may include any one or a combination of "text length", "whether the text length is fixed", "include a fixed character string", or further add a new field such as "exclude character string" on the basis of the above field; alternatively, when the attribute type is a text type, the set validity rule template may be a "regular expression".
After setting validity rule templates corresponding to different attribute types through the above process, in step 102, validity rules can be determined according to the attribute names of specific business objects and corresponding validity rule templates. For example, the fields included in the validity rule template set for the attribute type being the numeric type are "minimum value" and "maximum value", and when the attribute name is "age", the corresponding validity rule may be determined to be "minimum value 0 and maximum value 150".
For the validity rule determined by the above manner, the validity rule may be used as additional attribute information of the service object, and specifically, basic information in the extended attribute information in the conventional extended attribute definition method may be extended, and the basic information of the extended attribute information is described (defined) in the following triplet form:
basic information of the extended attribute (attribute name, attribute type, validity rule).
After the basic information of the extended attribute is submitted to the system, the system stores the information and generates a relational database table data column according to the attribute name and the attribute type.
After the validity rule is set through the above process, the process of verifying the validity of the business object data is shown in fig. 2, and includes the following steps:
And 202, verifying the business object data input by the user according to the searched validity rule, and executing the step 203 when the verification is passed, or executing the step 204.
In this step, before verifying the service object data input by the user by using the found validity rule, the attribute type of the service object data input by the user is verified first, and it is determined whether the service object data input by the user is consistent with the attribute type of the service object requested by the user, if it is determined that the data is inconsistent, that is, the verification is failed, the procedure is directly shifted to step 204 or the procedure is ended.
Step 205, determining that the business object data input by the user is valid, and storing the business object data.
In step 204, a threshold of the number of times for which the user is required to re-input may be set, and if it is determined that the number of times for which the user re-inputs the business object data has reached the set threshold of times, the process is ended. Further, the reason why the verification fails can be fed back to the user as a reference for the user to re-input the business object data. Or only the reason why the verification fails is fed back to the user, and then the process is ended, and if the user wants to input again, the user needs to request the corresponding service again.
In step 202, the process of verifying the service object data input by the user according to the found validity rule specifically includes: and determining validity conditions included in the validity rules, judging whether the service object data input by the user meets the validity conditions, if so, determining that the service object data input by the user passes verification, otherwise, determining that the service object data input by the user fails verification. For example, the basic information of the extended attribute information of the service object requested by the user is (age, number type), the corresponding validity rule is (minimum value is 0, maximum value is 150), if the service object data input by the user is 90, the service object data meets the validity condition included in the validity rule, that is, meets the condition that more than 0 is less than 150, and the service object data input by the user is determined to be 90 valid; if the business object data input by the user is-20, the business object data input by the user is determined to be invalid when the validity condition included in the validity rule is not met, namely, the business object data input by the user is determined to be invalid when the business object data does not meet the validity condition that the business object data is greater than 0 and less than 150.
When the method for verifying the business object data provided by the embodiment is applied to a specific information system, the implementation process is as follows: a user submits a request for loading a business object form comprising extended attribute information to an information system through a user interface provided by the information system; the system accesses a database according to a request of a user, loads basic information (attribute name, attribute type and validity rule) of extended attribute information requested by the user into a memory, automatically generates an extended attribute input control according to the attribute type, and generates a data verification control according to the validity rule; after a user inputs and submits business object data according to an extended attribute input control provided by an information system, the system automatically calls a data validity verification component of the system to verify the data validity by using the generated data verification control, if the data validity is verified to be passed, the system accesses the data access component and stores the business object data submitted by the user in a database; otherwise, the system will give a corresponding prompt asking the user to re-enter or interrupt the user request.
An embodiment of the present invention further provides a device for verifying business object data, as shown in fig. 3, the device includes: a rule lookup unit 301, a verification unit 302, and a storage unit 303. Wherein,
the rule searching unit 301 is configured to search, according to the attribute name and the attribute type of the service object requested to be extended by the user, an validity rule corresponding to the attribute name and the attribute type from preset validity rules.
A verifying unit 302, configured to verify the service object data input by the user according to the validity rule found by the rule searching unit 301.
A storage unit 303, configured to store the business object data input by the user when the verification unit 302 passes the verification.
Preferably, the verification unit 302 is further configured to determine a validity condition included in the validity rule searched by the rule search unit 301, and when the service object data input by the user meets the validity condition, determine that the service object data input by the user passes verification.
As shown in fig. 4, in one embodiment, the verification apparatus shown in fig. 3 further includes: an information feedback unit 304, configured to, when the verification unit 302 fails, feed back the reason for the failure of the verification to the user, or/and request the user to re-input the business object data.
As shown in fig. 5, in one embodiment, the verification apparatus shown in fig. 3 further includes: the rule presetting unit 305 is configured to preset validity rules corresponding to the attribute names and the attribute types according to the attribute names and the attribute types of the service objects.
Preferably, the rule presetting unit 305 is further configured to set a validity rule template corresponding to the attribute type according to the attribute type of the service object, and determine the validity rule according to the set validity rule template and the attribute name of the service object.
According to the technical scheme, before the business object data input by the user is verified, the validity rule used for the verification is searched from the preset validity rules according to the attribute name and the attribute type of the business object expanded by the user request, the business object data input by the user is verified according to the searched validity rule, and when the verification is passed, the business object data input by the user is determined to be valid, and the business object data is stored. Compared with the prior art that only the attribute type of the business object data is verified, the method and the device can more accurately verify the validity of the business object data input by the user, and improve the accuracy of verifying the business object data and the usability of the stored business object data.
In addition, the invention presets the validity rule for verifying the business object before verifying the business object data, and only needs to verify according to the corresponding predefined validity rule in the verification process, thereby improving the efficiency of verifying the business object data.
In addition, in the embodiment of the invention, when the business object data input by the verification user fails, the reason for failing to pass the verification is fed back to the user, so that the user can re-input the business object data according to the reason fed back by the system, and the accuracy of inputting the business object data is improved.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, if such modifications and variations of the present invention fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention and their equivalents, the present invention is also intended to include such modifications and variations.
Claims (10)
1. A method for verifying business object data, comprising:
searching validity rules corresponding to the attribute names and the attribute types from preset validity rules according to the attribute names and the attribute types of the service objects expanded by the user request;
and verifying the business object data input by the user according to the searched validity rule, and storing the business object data when the verification is passed.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein verifying the business object data input by the user according to the found validity rule and passing the verification comprises:
determining a validity condition included in the validity rule;
and when the service object data input by the user meets the validity condition, determining that the service object data passes verification.
3. The method of claim 1, when the verification fails, further comprising:
feeding back a reason why the verification fails to the user;
or/and, requiring the user to re-input the business object data.
4. The method of any of claims 1 to 3, further comprising:
and presetting validity rules corresponding to the attribute names and the attribute types according to the attribute names and the attribute types of the service objects.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein presetting validity rules corresponding to the attribute name and the attribute type according to the attribute name and the attribute type of the service object comprises:
setting an effectiveness rule template corresponding to the attribute type according to the attribute type of the service object;
and determining the validity rule according to the validity rule template and the attribute name of the service object.
6. An apparatus for validating business object data, comprising:
the rule searching unit is used for searching validity rules corresponding to the attribute names and the attribute types from preset validity rules according to the attribute names and the attribute types of the service objects requested to be expanded by the user;
the verification unit is used for verifying the service object data input by the user according to the validity rule searched by the rule searching unit;
and the storage unit is used for storing the business object data when the verification unit passes the verification.
7. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the verification unit is further configured to determine a validity condition included in the validity rule found by the rule finding unit, and determine that the service object data passes verification when the service object data input by the user meets the validity condition.
8. The apparatus of claim 6, further comprising:
an information feedback unit, configured to feed back, to the user, a reason for the failure of the verification when the verification by the verification unit fails; or/and, requiring the user to re-input the business object data.
9. The apparatus of any of claims 6 to 8, further comprising:
and the rule presetting unit is used for presetting validity rules corresponding to the attribute names and the attribute types according to the attribute names and the attribute types of the service objects.
10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the rule presetting unit is further configured to set a validity rule template corresponding to an attribute type of a service object according to the attribute type, and determine the validity rule according to the validity rule template and an attribute name of the service object.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN200810225627A CN101727466A (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2008-10-31 | Method and device for verifying service data object |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN200810225627A CN101727466A (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2008-10-31 | Method and device for verifying service data object |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN101727466A true CN101727466A (en) | 2010-06-09 |
Family
ID=42448365
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN200810225627A Pending CN101727466A (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2008-10-31 | Method and device for verifying service data object |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN101727466A (en) |
Cited By (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012100681A1 (en) * | 2011-01-26 | 2012-08-02 | 北京京东世纪贸易有限公司 | Data verification method and device |
| CN102819766A (en) * | 2011-06-09 | 2012-12-12 | 金蝶软件（中国）有限公司 | Method, device and enterprise system for checking forms |
| CN103020269A (en) * | 2012-12-26 | 2013-04-03 | 广州市西美信息科技有限公司 | Method and device for verifying data |
| CN103533522A (en) * | 2013-10-25 | 2014-01-22 | 从兴技术有限公司 | Short message auditing method and system |
| CN104317701A (en) * | 2014-09-28 | 2015-01-28 | 用友优普信息技术有限公司 | Device and method for realizing ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) parameter check through preset data |
| CN104378207A (en) * | 2014-10-29 | 2015-02-25 | 中国建设银行股份有限公司 | Information verification handling method and device |
| CN104391934A (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2015-03-04 | 深圳市银雁金融配套服务有限公司 | Data calibration method and device |
| CN105099813A (en) * | 2015-06-12 | 2015-11-25 | 北京信而泰科技股份有限公司 | Data verification method and device based on Ethernet tester |
| CN105653521A (en) * | 2016-01-15 | 2016-06-08 | 杭州数梦工场科技有限公司 | Data verification method and device |
| CN105760976A (en) * | 2014-12-17 | 2016-07-13 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and system for service verification |
| CN105989445A (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2016-10-05 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Rule management method and system |
| CN106919542A (en) * | 2015-12-24 | 2017-07-04 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Method and device for rule matching |
| CN107315958A (en) * | 2016-04-26 | 2017-11-03 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | The legality identification method and device of data object |
| CN107643904A (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-01-30 | 泰康保险集团股份有限公司 | Code submits detection method, device, medium and the electronic equipment of daily record |
| CN108647358A (en) * | 2018-05-17 | 2018-10-12 | 东软集团股份有限公司 | Quality of data method of calibration, device, storage medium and electronic equipment |
| CN109901892A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2019-06-18 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus of dynamic attribute verifying |
| CN111209027A (en) * | 2019-12-30 | 2020-05-29 | 航天信息股份有限公司广州航天软件分公司 | Method and system for service verification based on dynamic verification algorithm |
| CN112988857A (en) * | 2019-12-12 | 2021-06-18 | 北京沃东天骏信息技术有限公司 | Service data processing method and device |
-
2008
- 2008-10-31 CN CN200810225627A patent/CN101727466A/en active Pending
Cited By (28)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012100681A1 (en) * | 2011-01-26 | 2012-08-02 | 北京京东世纪贸易有限公司 | Data verification method and device |
| CN102819766A (en) * | 2011-06-09 | 2012-12-12 | 金蝶软件（中国）有限公司 | Method, device and enterprise system for checking forms |
| CN103020269B (en) * | 2012-12-26 | 2016-09-07 | 广州市西美信息科技有限公司 | A kind of method of data verification and device |
| CN103020269A (en) * | 2012-12-26 | 2013-04-03 | 广州市西美信息科技有限公司 | Method and device for verifying data |
| CN103533522A (en) * | 2013-10-25 | 2014-01-22 | 从兴技术有限公司 | Short message auditing method and system |
| CN104317701A (en) * | 2014-09-28 | 2015-01-28 | 用友优普信息技术有限公司 | Device and method for realizing ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) parameter check through preset data |
| CN104317701B (en) * | 2014-09-28 | 2018-01-12 | 用友优普信息技术有限公司 | The device and method of ERP parameter testings is realized by prefab data |
| CN104378207A (en) * | 2014-10-29 | 2015-02-25 | 中国建设银行股份有限公司 | Information verification handling method and device |
| CN104378207B (en) * | 2014-10-29 | 2019-05-07 | 中国建设银行股份有限公司 | A kind of Information Authentication processing method and processing device |
| CN104391934B (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2016-03-16 | 深圳市银雁金融服务有限公司 | Data verification method and device |
| CN104391934A (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2015-03-04 | 深圳市银雁金融配套服务有限公司 | Data calibration method and device |
| CN105760976A (en) * | 2014-12-17 | 2016-07-13 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and system for service verification |
| CN105760976B (en) * | 2014-12-17 | 2022-04-19 | 创新先进技术有限公司 | Service checking method and system |
| CN105989445A (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2016-10-05 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Rule management method and system |
| CN105099813B (en) * | 2015-06-12 | 2019-03-05 | 北京信而泰科技股份有限公司 | Data verification method and device based on ethernet test instrument |
| CN105099813A (en) * | 2015-06-12 | 2015-11-25 | 北京信而泰科技股份有限公司 | Data verification method and device based on Ethernet tester |
| CN106919542B (en) * | 2015-12-24 | 2020-04-21 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Rule matching method and device |
| CN106919542A (en) * | 2015-12-24 | 2017-07-04 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | Method and device for rule matching |
| US10796077B2 (en) | 2015-12-24 | 2020-10-06 | Beijing Gridsum Technology Co., Ltd. | Rule matching method and device |
| CN105653521A (en) * | 2016-01-15 | 2016-06-08 | 杭州数梦工场科技有限公司 | Data verification method and device |
| CN107315958A (en) * | 2016-04-26 | 2017-11-03 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | The legality identification method and device of data object |
| CN107643904A (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-01-30 | 泰康保险集团股份有限公司 | Code submits detection method, device, medium and the electronic equipment of daily record |
| CN109901892A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2019-06-18 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus of dynamic attribute verifying |
| CN108647358A (en) * | 2018-05-17 | 2018-10-12 | 东软集团股份有限公司 | Quality of data method of calibration, device, storage medium and electronic equipment |
| CN112988857A (en) * | 2019-12-12 | 2021-06-18 | 北京沃东天骏信息技术有限公司 | Service data processing method and device |
| CN112988857B (en) * | 2019-12-12 | 2024-10-18 | 北京沃东天骏信息技术有限公司 | Service data processing method and device |
| CN111209027A (en) * | 2019-12-30 | 2020-05-29 | 航天信息股份有限公司广州航天软件分公司 | Method and system for service verification based on dynamic verification algorithm |
| CN111209027B (en) * | 2019-12-30 | 2024-04-19 | 航天信息股份有限公司广州航天软件分公司 | Method and system for business verification based on dynamic verification algorithm |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN101727466A (en) | Method and device for verifying service data object | |
| CN108388604B (en) | User authority data management apparatus, method and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN109783555B (en) | Form template storage method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| US8214362B1 (en) | Intelligent identification of form field elements | |
| US9721015B2 (en) | Providing a query results page | |
| JP4856627B2 (en) | Partial query caching | |
| CN103678556A (en) | Method for processing column-oriented database and processing equipment | |
| CN111274263B (en) | Visual database change sentence generation method, device and storage medium | |
| JP6038894B2 (en) | Auto-suggested content item request | |
| US11620444B2 (en) | Providing action associated with event detected within communication | |
| CN110134705A (en) | A kind of data query method, cache server and terminal | |
| CN109471857A (en) | Data modification method, device and storage medium based on SQL statement | |
| CN109190062B (en) | Crawling method and device for target corpus data and storage medium | |
| WO2021008340A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for generating financial data, computer device and storage medium | |
| CN113626223A (en) | Interface calling method and device | |
| CN111090434B (en) | Page display method and device for custom column | |
| US20110302220A1 (en) | Sql processing for data conversion | |
| US11030304B2 (en) | Buffer overflow detection based on a synthesis of assertions from templates and k-induction | |
| US11132415B1 (en) | Dynamically creating custom hyperlinks for predefined search queries for multiple websites | |
| US7657502B2 (en) | Multimodal control device and multimodal control method | |
| CN112559914B (en) | Index data display method and device | |
| WO2024045725A1 (en) | Processing method for target insurance policy, electronic device and readable storage medium | |
| CN112434037A (en) | Data processing method, processing device, data processing apparatus, and storage medium | |
| US20080275959A1 (en) | Distributed Search in a Casual Network of Servers | |
| US10176152B2 (en) | Method and system for assigning a content item as a link target to a managed object |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C12 | Rejection of a patent application after its publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Open date: 20100609 |