CN101719060A - Memory-aid software design method - Google Patents
Memory-aid software design method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN101719060A CN101719060A CN200910219220A CN200910219220A CN101719060A CN 101719060 A CN101719060 A CN 101719060A CN 200910219220 A CN200910219220 A CN 200910219220A CN 200910219220 A CN200910219220 A CN 200910219220A CN 101719060 A CN101719060 A CN 101719060A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- review
- clauses
- subclauses
- user side
- reviewing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a memory-aid software design method. By reviewing items, the management for a large amount of knowledge with complex contents and need of reviewing is implemented; by reviewing rules, on the one hand, the regularization of a knowledge reviewing process is implemented, and on the other hand, the memory characteristic of a learner and the knowledge characteristics are matched; and through a presenting unit, a working engine and cooperation between the presenting unit and the working engine, a timely, effective and convenient mode for reviewing the knowledge is provided. On the basics, the method achieves the aim of permanent and accurate memory of a client for specific knowledge in limited reviewing time.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the software processing technology in the computer system, particularly a kind of method for designing of the software that is memonic.
Background technology
Knowledge is power, and each strong-willed people who seeks knowledge understands the importance of knowledge.Can remember important knowledge accurately, muchly, be a kind of very important ability to the modern.But the process of memory is not to put things right once and for all, and, will soon forget totally as if untimely review for certain thing of remembeing.
So just produced a problem: how to keep permanent, accurately memory to specific knowledge? traditional answer is: repeat.But the method has following several deficiency:
The first, do not provide the specific embodiments how to repeat, therefore operability is not high in the practical activity of memory.The knowledge quantity that this shortcoming is reviewed at needs is huge, of a great variety, and content is ever-changing, and performance is particularly evident under time and the energy condition of limited.
In above-mentioned situation, memory person is easily in a rush, attends to one thing and lose sight of another.Take one the high school student who reads as example, need the course of study roughly to have following several: Chinese language, mathematics (algebraically, plane geometry, solid geometry), English, physics, chemistry, biology, politics, history, geography.Every day, the knowledge of study was a lot, and the limited time that can be used for reviewing although sensation is being reviewed always, after a period of time, just finds to have a lot of other important knowledge to lie on the table for a long time, forgets already.Constantly learn new knowledge, constantly forget old knowledge again, if things go on like this, form a kind of vicious cycle.This phenomenon can cause learner's self-confidence to reduce, and learning and memory is produced weary mood, and then hinders personal growth.
The second, do not consider individual difference on memory characteristic.On the characteristics of memory, be discrepant between individuality and the individuality.Behind certain knowledge point of study, the somebody reviewed every upper several days again and also can accurately remember, and the somebody but just needed every upper several hours to review, otherwise will forget; On the other hand, for certain knowledge point, the somebody reviews 5 times will reach more satisfactory memory effect, and some people then needs 8 times, even more.So, to certain individual method that is suitable for, might not be applicable to other individualities.
The 3rd, do not consider the characteristics of knowledge itself.Same person also is different for the needed methods of review in different knowledge points, some oneself very interested, impressive knowledge point only need to be reviewed several times very few, each blanking time of reviewing is long a bit can remember fine; But, oneself lose interest in but very important knowledge point for some, more careful, reasonable and effective plan of review just can reach accurately with regard to needing, the purpose of permanent memory.
Therefore, in the process of reviewing, need so a kind of mechanism badly: can effectively manage knowledge a large amount of, the content complexity, that need to review; Simultaneously, can be in the limited review time, with a kind of in time, effectively, mode helping learning person reviews these knowledge easily, and this mode can fully cooperate learner's memory characteristic and the characteristics of knowledge point.Otherwise,, will produce unnecessary time, energy waste and memory pressure to the learner.
Summary of the invention
In view of this, fundamental purpose of the present invention is to provide a kind of method for designing of the software that is memonic.This method can effectively be managed numerous knowledge that need to review; Simultaneously, with a kind of in time, effectively, mode helps the learner to review these knowledge easily, and this mode can fully cooperate the memory characteristic of user side and the characteristics of knowledge point.And then in the limited review time, reach specific knowledge effect permanent, that accurately remember.
According to above-mentioned purpose, technical scheme of the present invention is achieved in that
A kind of method for designing of the software that is memonic is characterized in that, under software runtime environment, realizes effective management a large amount of, the content complexity, that need the knowledge of review; Simultaneously in the limited review time, with a kind of in time, effectively, mode helps the user to review these knowledge easily, and this method can fully not be used person's memory characteristic and the characteristics of knowledge.This method may further comprise the steps:
A, behind running software, user side judge to be reviewed clauses and subclauses and is presented condition and whether meet expectation, if do not meet, then selects the review clauses and subclauses of expectation to present condition.Display unit presents qualified review clauses and subclauses;
B, user side judge whether display unit review time spent sum meets expectation.If do not meet, this value then is set, change step a over to;
C, user side judge all review in the rule whether have the review rule that meets expectation.If there is no, then create new review rule, change step a over to;
D, user side judge all review in the clauses and subclauses whether have the review clauses and subclauses that meet expectation.If there is no, then create new review clauses and subclauses, change step a over to;
E, user side judge whether the review clauses and subclauses that presenting one of are proceeded as follows: indicated resource, deletion review clauses and subclauses, the propelling of review clauses and subclauses reviewed clauses and subclauses, rollback review clauses and subclauses and revised the review clauses and subclauses.If user side has been selected an operation, carry out this operation, change step a over to:
F, end.
Described review rule comprises: general review number of times, the time interval of each time review, sign.On this basis, the well-formedness constraint that rule is reviewed in definition is as follows:
A. the general review number of times can not be less than 1;
B. the time interval of each time review must be greater than 0;
C. sign can not and can not repeat with existing review rule sign for sky.
In addition, this method provides acquiescence to review rule.Simplify the process that user side uses this method on the one hand; Help user side to be familiar with reviewing the content and the constraint of rule on the other hand, thereby make user side to create the review rule that matches according to individual memory characteristic or knowledge characteristics.
Procedure of rule is reviewed in described establishment: user side creates by the display unit request and reviews rule.Display unit provides corresponding operation interface to user side, and user side is filled to create at this operation interface and reviewed regular necessary attribute information.After finishing, if user side is selected to preserve, then display unit at first calls the checking of reviewing the regulation management unit and reviews regular legitimacy interface to check the legitimacy of this review rule.If it is illegal to review rule, then display unit provides corresponding error message for user side, and user side is made correction accordingly then; If it is legal to review rule, then display unit calls the increase of reviewing the regulation management unit and reviews regular interface to store this review rule; If user side is selected to abandon creating, then display unit abandons user side and reviews the attribute information that rule provides for establishment.
Described review clauses and subclauses comprise: title, classification, review number of times, resource address, review time spent, review time, the review rule sign, the review state that rely on.Wherein, review number of times, review time and review state and can only be revised by this method, user side can not be revised.On this basis, the well-formedness constraint that clauses and subclauses are reviewed in definition is as follows:
A. title can not and can not repeat with existing review clauses and subclauses title for sky;
B. reviewing the time spent must be greater than 0;
C. the review rule sign that is relied on can not be sky.
In addition, review the review rule that clauses and subclauses rely on according to this, the review state of reviewing clauses and subclauses is divided into following three classes:
1) completion status: these review clauses and subclauses have been finished all forward operations.This moment, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses was the review number of times of the review rule that it relied on;
2) active state: these review clauses and subclauses also need forward operation at least one times.This moment these review clauses and subclauses the review number of times between 0 and the review number of times of its review rule that relies between;
3) backup status: these review clauses and subclauses were not carried out forward operation as yet.This moment, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses was 0.
Described review clauses and subclauses present condition three kinds:
A. presenting the review state is the review clauses and subclauses of completion status;
B. presenting the review state is the review clauses and subclauses of active state;
C. presenting the review state is the review clauses and subclauses of backup status.
It is b that the review clauses and subclauses of display unit acquiescence present condition.At this moment, the review clauses and subclauses that present in the tabulation also need to satisfy following constraint:
1) the review time of any review clauses and subclauses can not be greater than current system time;
2) the review time spent sum of all review clauses and subclauses can not be reviewed the time spent sum greater than display unit.
Described display unit is reviewed the time spent sum must be greater than 0.This method is reviewed the time spent sum for display unit default value is provided.
The described display unit review time spent sum process that arranges is: user side arranges by the display unit request and reviews the time spent sum.Display unit provides revises the interface, and user side arranges at this interface reviews the time spent sum, and after finishing, if user side is selected to abandon, then display unit abandons the configuration information of user side; Otherwise whether display unit verifies these settings greater than 0, if greater than 0 then preserve these settings, if less than 0 then point out corresponding error message to user side.
The clauses and subclauses process is reviewed in described establishment: user side creates by the display unit request and reviews clauses and subclauses.Display unit provides corresponding manipulation interface to user side, and user side is filled to create at this operation interface and reviewed the necessary attribute information of clauses and subclauses.After finishing, if user side is selected to preserve, then display unit at first calls the checking of reviewing the clauses and subclauses administrative unit and reviews clauses and subclauses legitimacy interface to check the legitimacy of these review clauses and subclauses.If it is illegal to review clauses and subclauses, then display unit provides corresponding error information for user side, and user side is made correction in view of the above then; If it is legal to review clauses and subclauses, then display unit calls the increase of reviewing the clauses and subclauses administrative unit and reviews entry interface to store this review clauses and subclauses, then, the review time that review clauses and subclauses administrative unit should be reviewed clauses and subclauses is set to current system time, review number of times and be set to 0, the review state is set to backup status; If user side is selected to abandon creating, then display unit abandons user side and reviews the attribute information that clauses and subclauses provided for establishment.
The indicated resource process of clauses and subclauses is reviewed in described review: user side calls by display unit and checks the instruction of reviewing the indicated resource of clauses and subclauses.Existed if should review the indicated resource of the resource address attribute of clauses and subclauses, and then opened this resource, user side is reviewed this resource then; Otherwise, provide corresponding error message to user side, user side can select to revise the resource address attribute of these review clauses and subclauses, and then carries out this operation, perhaps selects manually to seek and open this resource to review.In addition, this process to the review state of operated review clauses and subclauses without limits.
The clauses and subclauses process is reviewed in described deletion: user side calls deletion by display unit and reviews the clauses and subclauses instruction.Display unit provides deletion to review the items for information bag, imports into then to review the clauses and subclauses administrative unit.Whether the information that the deletion review items for information bag that the judgement of review clauses and subclauses administrative unit is imported into comprises is effective.If effectively, then attempt seeking the review clauses and subclauses that are complementary with this contents of packet, then delete this review clauses and subclauses if find; Otherwise, corresponding error information is provided.In addition, this process to the review state of operated review clauses and subclauses without limits.
The clauses and subclauses process is reviewed in described propelling: user side calls by display unit and advances the instruction of reviewing clauses and subclauses.The review number of times of current review clauses and subclauses increases by 1 time, if the review number of times of this review clauses and subclauses reaches the review number of times of the regular defined of review that it relies on, the review state that then should review clauses and subclauses is set to completion status, then it is deleted from present tabulation; Otherwise the review rule that relies on according to the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses and it calculates the review time next time, and this time is set to the review time of these review clauses and subclauses then; At last, if the review time that should review clauses and subclauses greater than the current system time, then should review clauses and subclauses and from present tabulation, delete.In addition, this review state of crossing the operated review clauses and subclauses of range request is necessary for active state.
The clauses and subclauses process is reviewed in described rollback: user side is reviewed the instruction of clauses and subclauses by the display unit calls rollback.If the review number of times that should review clauses and subclauses is greater than 0, the review number of times that then will review clauses and subclauses subtracts 1; Otherwise the review state of these review clauses and subclauses is set to backup status, should review then clauses and subclauses and delete from present tabulation.In addition, this review state of crossing the operated review clauses and subclauses of range request is necessary for active state.
Described propelling or rollback are reviewed the clauses and subclauses process and also comprised: all review the review time spent sum of clauses and subclauses less than display unit review time spent sum in the tabulation if this operation causes presenting, then display unit attempts obtaining one or more review state the review clauses and subclauses that are active state or backup status according to this time difference, adds then and presents tabulation.At last, these review states of reviewing clauses and subclauses are set to active state, and the review time is set to current system time.The review clauses and subclauses process of obtaining that this process is related has two steps:
A, obtain the review clauses and subclauses that the review state is an active state: call review the clauses and subclauses administrative unit obtain the review entry interface, will comprise obtaining of this time difference and review the items for information bag and import into, if do not obtain reviewing clauses and subclauses, then change the b step over to; If obtain one or more review clauses and subclauses, then these are reviewed the clauses and subclauses adding and present tabulation, calculate the current review time spent sum that presents all review clauses and subclauses in the tabulation then, if this result reviews the time spent sum less than display unit, then computing time difference, change the b step then over to; Otherwise this process finishes;
B, obtain the review clauses and subclauses that the review state is backup status: call review the clauses and subclauses administrative unit obtain the review entry interface, will comprise obtaining of time difference and review the items for information bag and import into, if do not obtain reviewing clauses and subclauses, then this process finishes; If obtain one or more review clauses and subclauses, then these are reviewed the clauses and subclauses adding and present tabulation.
The clauses and subclauses process is reviewed in described modification: user side is revised by display unit and is reviewed clauses and subclauses.If amended review clauses and subclauses meet the well-formedness constraint of reviewing clauses and subclauses, then preserve this modification information; Otherwise, point out corresponding error message to user side.In addition, if the information of revising comprises the review state of reviewing clauses and subclauses, then also need to carry out following processing procedure:
A, when the review state of these review clauses and subclauses becomes active state by completion status, perhaps become active state by backup status, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is set to 0, the review time is set to current system time.Should review clauses and subclauses at last deletes from present tabulation:
B, when the review state of these review clauses and subclauses becomes backup status by completion status, perhaps become backup status by active state, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is set to 0.Should review clauses and subclauses at last deletes from present tabulation;
C, when the review state of these review clauses and subclauses becomes completion status by backup status, perhaps become completion status by active state, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is set to this, and it relies on the review number of times of reviewing rule.Should review clauses and subclauses at last deletes from present tabulation.
In addition, this process to the review state of operated review clauses and subclauses without limits.
From such scheme as can be seen, the present invention's improvement that the drawback of tradition review method is done is as follows:
1) by reviewing clauses and subclauses, solved a large amount of, the content complexity, as to need to review knowledge store and management problem.User side has not only reduced the granularity of reviewing by create reviewing clauses and subclauses, and has effectively prevented in the review process omission to important knowledge;
2) by reviewing rule, realized the review regularization.Simultaneously, review the design of rule and considered individual memory characteristic and the characteristics of knowledge, user side can create the review rule that is fit to self memory characteristic, so just so that this method can cooperate the memory characteristic of individuality; On the other hand, can specify different review rules for different review clauses and subclauses, thereby so that the different review process of reviewing the knowledge that clauses and subclauses refer to dissimilate;
3) by display unit and it provide to reviewing the operation of clauses and subclauses, reached the purpose that helps in time, effectively, easily user side to review.Display unit presents the review clauses and subclauses according to certain mode to user side, reviews that clauses and subclauses present condition so that user side can be selected the review clauses and subclauses of self expectation.In addition, display unit also provides following operation: review the indicated resource of clauses and subclauses, advance and review clauses and subclauses, clauses and subclauses are reviewed in rollback, revise and review clauses and subclauses.Reviewing the indicated resource operation of clauses and subclauses can be so that user side be reviewed knowledge easily; Advance to review that entry operation is reviewed in clauses and subclauses and rollback so that user side to controlling flexibly the review process of reviewing the indicated knowledge of clauses and subclauses; Revise and review clauses and subclauses so that user side can carry out necessary modification to reviewing clauses and subclauses, more meet expectation so that review clauses and subclauses;
4) review the time spent sum by display unit, controlled the quantity of the review clauses and subclauses that present in the tabulation effectively, alleviated the psychological pressure of user side to a certain extent; In addition, carry out the operation of propelling or rollback review clauses and subclauses when user side after, if presenting when all clauses and subclauses are reviewed the time spent sum less than display unit review time spent sum in the tabulation of display unit, this method can load active or reserve review clauses and subclauses according to the mistiming between the two automatically, thereby makes the knowledge of not reviewed in time to be reviewed by user side.
In sum, the present invention has realized:
A. to management a large amount of, that complex contents is arranged, that need the knowledge of review;
B., effective mode of operation is provided, and the review process of the indicated knowledge of clauses and subclauses is reviewed in regularization, and user side is freed from the loaded down with trivial details work that tissue is reviewed;
C. cooperate the memory characteristic of user side and the characteristics of knowledge point itself;
D. in the limited review time, help the user side realization to the purpose of lasting, the accurate memory of specific knowledge.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the frame diagram of software design approach of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is the specific embodiments of the invention synoptic diagram.
Embodiment
In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearer, below lift specific embodiment and with reference to accompanying drawing, the present invention is further elaborated.
Method provided by the present invention has realized effective management of the knowledge huge to quantity, that content is complicated, needs are reviewed by reviewing clauses and subclauses; Simultaneously, realized reviewing the regularization of the review process of the indicated knowledge of clauses and subclauses by reviewing rule; In addition, user side can cooperate individual memory characteristic to create the review rule that matches, and can specify different review rules for different review clauses and subclauses.On these bases, this method provide a kind of in time, convenient, effectively mode helps the user to review specific knowledge, thereby reach in the limited review time to specific knowledge accurately, the purpose of permanent memory.
Fig. 1 is the frame diagram of software design approach of the present invention, and this frame diagram comprises:
1) stores and provides the review regulation management unit 100 of reviewing rule;
2) store and provide the review clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 of reviewing clauses and subclauses;
3) according to reviewing clauses and subclauses and the review rule that it relies on, realize the work engine unit 102 of knowledge review process rule;
4) provide and review clauses and subclauses and review regular related interfaces operation, the management display unit is reviewed the display unit 103 of time spent sum.
Reviewing regulation management unit 100 is to be responsible for storage and the part of reviewing rule is provided.Reviewing rule is the foundation of reviewing regularization and individual memory characteristic of coupling and knowledge characteristics.This unit provides following interface for display unit 103: the regular legitimacy interface of checking review, increase are reviewed regular interface, are obtained and review regular interface and the regular interface of deletion review.Respectively for display unit 103 at the legitimate verification of reviewing rule, create and review rule, obtain and review rule and deletion and review in the process of rule and use.When display unit 103 carries out information interaction by these several interfaces and review regulation management unit 100, handle it after regulation management unit 100 is judged according to concrete operation information by reviewing.
Below respectively above-mentioned each process is described in detail:
1, reviews the legitimate verification process of rule
The legitimate verification process of reviewing rule refers to the process of respective attributes being carried out the constraint satisfaction checking according to the constraint of reviewing regular every attribute.This process is finished by reviewing regulation management unit 100.
The well-formedness constraint of reviewing rule comprises following 3 aspects:
1) review number of times altogether can not be less than 1;
2) time interval between each time reviewed must be greater than 0;
3) sign can not and can not repeat with existing review rule sign for sky.
If review rule to be verified satisfies the constraint of these 3 aspects simultaneously, it is legal that then this reviews rule; Otherwise, illegal.
2, review the constructive process of rule
The constructive process of reviewing rule is meant that user side provides required attribute information, creates then and reviews process of rule.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 100 cooperations of review regulation management unit.
User side is created by display unit 103 requests and is reviewed rule.Display unit 103 provides corresponding operation interface to user side, and user side is filled to create at this operation interface and reviewed regular necessary attribute information.After finishing, if user side is selected to preserve, then display unit 103 at first calls the checking of reviewing regulation management unit 100 and reviews regular legitimacy interface to check the legitimacy of this review rule.If it is illegal to review rule, then display unit 103 provides corresponding error message for user side, and user side is made accordingly and revised or select to abandon this time to create then; If it is legal to review rule, then display unit 103 calls the increase of reviewing regulation management unit 100 and reviews regular interface to store this review rule; If user side is selected to abandon creating, then display unit 103 abandons user side and reviews the attribute information that rule provides for establishment.
3, review the acquisition process of rule
The acquisition process of reviewing rule refers to according to obtaining the process that the Rule Information bag obtains with it corresponding review rule of reviewing.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 100 cooperations of review regulation management unit.
User side is reviewed rule by display unit 103 acquisition request.Display unit 103 provides to obtain reviews the Rule Information bag, imports into then and reviews regulation management unit 100.Review regulation management unit 100 and judge whether obtaining of importing into reviewed the information that the Rule Information bag comprised effective.If effectively, then attempt seeking the review rule that is complementary with this contents of packet.If find, then return these and review rule; Otherwise, corresponding error information is provided.
4, review the delete procedure of rule
The delete procedure of reviewing rule is meant according to deletion reviews the corresponding with it review process of rule of Rule Information bag deletion.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 100 cooperations of review regulation management unit.
User side is reviewed rule by display unit 103 request deletions, and display unit 103 provides deletion to review the Rule Information bag, imports into then to review regulation management unit 100.Whether the information that the deletion review Rule Information bag that 100 judgements of review regulation management unit are imported into comprises is effective.If effectively, then attempt seeking the review rule that is complementary with this contents of packet.If find, then delete these and review rule; Otherwise, corresponding error information is provided.
The review clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 of user side is to be responsible for storage and the part of reviewing clauses and subclauses is provided.Reviewing clauses and subclauses is that knowledge is reviewed process ruleization and the infrastructure elements that realizes the large amount of complex information management.This unit provides following interface for display unit 103: verify review clauses and subclauses legitimacy interface, increase the review entry interface, obtain and review entry interface, delete the review entry interface and revise the review entry interface.Reviewing the clauses and subclauses legitimate verification, creating the review clauses and subclauses, obtaining the review clauses and subclauses, deleting in the process of reviewing clauses and subclauses and revising the review clauses and subclauses and use for display unit 103 respectively.When display unit 103 by these several interfaces with when reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and carrying out information interaction, handle it after clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 is judged according to concrete action type and relevant information by reviewing.
Below respectively above-mentioned each process is described in detail:
1, reviews the legitimate verification process of clauses and subclauses
The legitimate verification process of reviewing clauses and subclauses is meant the process of respective attributes being carried out the constraint satisfaction checking according to the constraint of reviewing the every attribute of clauses and subclauses.This process is finished by reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101.
The well-formedness constraint of reviewing clauses and subclauses comprises 3 aspects:
1) title can not and can not repeat with existing review clauses and subclauses title for sky;
2) reviewing the time spent must be greater than 0;
3) the review rule sign that is relied on can not be sky;
If review clauses and subclauses to be verified satisfy the constraint of these 3 aspects simultaneously, it is legal that then this reviews clauses and subclauses; Otherwise, illegal.
2, review the constructive process of clauses and subclauses
The constructive process of reviewing clauses and subclauses is meant that user side provides required attribute information, creates the process of reviewing clauses and subclauses then.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 101 cooperations of review clauses and subclauses administrative unit.
User side is created by display unit 103 requests and is reviewed clauses and subclauses.Display unit 103 provides corresponding manipulation interface to user side, and user side is filled to create at this operation interface and reviewed the necessary attribute information of clauses and subclauses.After finishing, if user side is selected to preserve, then display unit 103 at first calls the checking of reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and reviews clauses and subclauses legitimacy interface to check the legitimacy of these review clauses and subclauses.If it is illegal to review clauses and subclauses, then display unit 103 provides corresponding error information for user side, and user side is made in view of the above and revised or select to abandon this time to create then; If it is legal to review clauses and subclauses, then display unit 103 calls the increase of reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and reviews entry interface to store this review clauses and subclauses, then, the review time that review clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 should be reviewed clauses and subclauses is set to current system time, review number of times and be set to 0, the review state is set to backup status; If user side is selected to abandon creating, then display unit 103 abandons user side and reviews the attribute information that clauses and subclauses provided for establishment.
3, review the acquisition process of clauses and subclauses
The acquisition process of reviewing clauses and subclauses refers to according to obtaining the process that the items for information bag obtains with it corresponding review clauses and subclauses of reviewing.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 101 cooperations of review clauses and subclauses administrative unit.
User side is reviewed clauses and subclauses by display unit 103 acquisition request.Display unit 103 provides to obtain reviews the items for information bag, imports into then and reviews clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101.Review clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and judge whether obtaining of importing into reviewed the information that the items for information bag comprised effective.If effectively, then attempt seeking the review clauses and subclauses that are complementary with this contents of packet, if find, then return these and review clauses and subclauses; Otherwise, corresponding error information is provided.In addition, this process to the review state of operated review clauses and subclauses without limits.
4, review the delete procedure of clauses and subclauses
The delete procedure of reviewing clauses and subclauses refers to review the with it process of corresponding review clauses and subclauses of items for information bag deletion according to deletion.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 101 cooperations of review clauses and subclauses administrative unit.
User side is reviewed clauses and subclauses by display unit 103 request deletions.Display unit 103 provides deletion to review the items for information bag, imports into then to review clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101.Whether the information that the deletion review items for information bag that 101 judgements of review clauses and subclauses administrative unit are imported into comprises is effective.If effectively, then attempt seeking the review clauses and subclauses that are complementary with this contents of packet, then delete these review clauses and subclauses if find: otherwise, corresponding error message is provided.In addition, this process to the review state of operated review clauses and subclauses without limits.
5, review the modification process of clauses and subclauses
The modification process of reviewing clauses and subclauses is meant the process that changes some property value of reviewing clauses and subclauses.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 101 cooperations of review clauses and subclauses administrative unit.
User side is revised by display unit 103 requests and is reviewed clauses and subclauses.Display unit 103 provides the modification interface of these review clauses and subclauses, and user side is revised correlation attribute value at this interface.After finishing, if user side is abandoned revising, then display unit 103 abandons all modifications information; Otherwise, call the modification of reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and review entry interface, and the modification packets of information of transmitting these review clauses and subclauses give to review clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101, reviews clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and calls checking and review clauses and subclauses legitimacy interface and verify whether these modifications are legal; If illegal, then provide corresponding error message; Otherwise, review 101 these modifications of storage of clauses and subclauses administrative unit.In addition, comprise the review state of reviewing clauses and subclauses if revise in the packets of information, then reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 also needs to carry out following processing procedure:
A, when the review state of these review clauses and subclauses becomes active state by completion status, perhaps become active state by backup status, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is set to 0, the review time is set to current system time.Should review clauses and subclauses at last deletes from present tabulation;
B, when the review state of these review clauses and subclauses becomes backup status by completion status, perhaps become backup status by active state, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is set to 0.Should review clauses and subclauses at last deletes from present tabulation;
C, when the review state of these review clauses and subclauses becomes completion status by backup status, perhaps become completion status by active state, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is set to this, and it relies on the review number of times of reviewing rule.Should review clauses and subclauses at last deletes from present tabulation.
In addition, this process to the review state of operated review clauses and subclauses without limits.
Work engine unit 102 in the user side is to be responsible for reviewing the part that clauses and subclauses are reviewed regularization.This unit is providing following interface for display unit 103 aspect the review clauses and subclauses: open and review the indicated resource interface of clauses and subclauses, advance and review entry interface and rollback review entry interface.Use in review, propelling and the rollback process of reviewing clauses and subclauses for display unit 103 respectively.When display unit 103 carries out information interaction by these interfaces and work engine unit 102, judge how to process by work engine unit 102 according to the correlation behavior of concrete operation requests and current review clauses and subclauses.
Below respectively above-mentioned each process is described in detail:
1, reviews the review process of clauses and subclauses
The review process of reviewing clauses and subclauses is meant that user side checks the process of reviewing the indicated resource of clauses and subclauses.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 102 cooperations of work engine unit.
User side is reviewed the indicated knowledge resource of clauses and subclauses by display unit 103 requests.Display unit 103 request of will reviewing passes to work engine unit 102 with relevant review clauses and subclauses, and work engine unit 102 judges whether the indicated address of resource address attribute of these review clauses and subclauses exists.If exist, then open this resource and check for user side; Otherwise, corresponding error message is provided, user side can select to revise the resource address attribute of these review clauses and subclauses, and then carries out this operation, perhaps selects manually to seek and open this resource to review.
2, review the progradation of clauses and subclauses
The review rule that the progradation of reviewing clauses and subclauses refers to rely on according to it is so that the process that it takes a step forward in reviewing the regularization process.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 102 cooperations of work engine unit.
User side advances by display unit 103 requests and reviews clauses and subclauses.Display unit 103 will advance request to pass to work engine unit 102 with relevant review clauses and subclauses.Work engine unit 102 calls the modification review entry interface of reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and carries out following modification: at first, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is added 1, if the review number of times that calculates has surpassed the review number of times of the review rule that this review clauses and subclauses rely on, then will review the review state of clauses and subclauses and change into completion status from active state, display unit 103 is deleted these review clauses and subclauses from present tabulation then; If the review number of times that calculates does not have to surpass the review number of times of the review rule that these review clauses and subclauses rely on, the review rule that then relies on according to it, current review number of times and current review Time Calculation go out the next review time, and with the set of time that the calculates review time for these review clauses and subclauses.If the review time that should review clauses and subclauses, then display unit 103 was deleted these review clauses and subclauses from present tabulation greater than the current system time.
3, review the rollback process of clauses and subclauses
The review rule that the progradation of reviewing clauses and subclauses refers to rely on according to it is so that the process that it takes a step back in reviewing the regularization process.This process is finished by display unit 103 and 102 cooperations of work engine unit.
User side is reviewed clauses and subclauses by display unit 103 request rollbacks.Display unit 103 passes to work engine unit 102 with the rollback request with relevant review clauses and subclauses.Work engine unit 102 calls the modification review entry interface of reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and carries out following modification: if the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is not less than 1, then the review number of times with it subtracts 1; If the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is 0, the review state of these review clauses and subclauses is set to backup status, should review then clauses and subclauses and delete from present tabulation.
Display unit 103 among the present invention is responsible for reviewing rule and is reviewed presenting and the interactive function of they and user side of clauses and subclauses.This unit has for the user side interactive function of reviewing rule and providing: present review rule, create review rule, rule is reviewed in deletion.The implementation procedure of this partial function please refer to reviews the description that regulation management unit 100 correlated processes realize; This unit has for the user side interactive function of reviewing clauses and subclauses and providing: present and review clauses and subclauses, create and review clauses and subclauses, deletion and review clauses and subclauses, review clauses and subclauses, advance and review clauses and subclauses, rollback and review clauses and subclauses and revise and review clauses and subclauses.The realization of this partial function please refer to the description of reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and the realization of work engine unit 102 correlated processes.
In addition, this unit also is in charge of display unit and is reviewed the time spent sum, relevant interface has: obtain display unit review time spent sum interface, revise display unit review time spent sum interface, check display unit review time spent sum, revising in the display unit review time spent sum process and use for user side respectively.Below respectively above-mentioned two processes are described in detail:
1, checks display unit review time spent sum process
User side is checked by display unit 103 requests and is reviewed the time spent sum.Display unit 103 obtains this value, provides then to check the interface, this value is presented at checks on the interface at last.
2, revise display unit and review time spent sum process
User side arranges by display unit 103 requests and reviews the time spent sum.Display unit 103 provides revises the interface, and user side arranges at this interface reviews the time spent sum, and after finishing, if user side is selected to abandon, then display unit 103 abandons the configuration information of user side; Otherwise whether display unit verifies these settings greater than 0, if greater than 0 then preserve these settings, if less than 0 then point out corresponding error message to user side.
Lift a specific embodiment explanation the present invention.
Fig. 2 is the specific embodiments of the invention synoptic diagram.
Suppose that the knowledge that user side need be reviewed can be split as two review clauses and subclauses K1 and K2, and need two to review regular R1 and R2.In addition, the review rule that K1 relies on is R1, and the review rule that K2 relies on is R2.
User side starts software.Display unit presents condition loading review clauses and subclauses according to the review clauses and subclauses of acquiescence, because do not review clauses and subclauses, so present tabulation for empty.
The acquiescence display unit that this method of user side choice for use provides is reviewed the time spent sum.
The constructive process of reviewing regular R1 and R2 is as described below:
User side is created by display unit 103 requests and is reviewed rule.Display unit 103 is cooperated with review regulation management unit 100 and is finished following steps:
Step 10, display unit 103 provide to be reviewed the rule creation interface and shows user side;
Step 11, user side are filled every attribute information of reviewing rule according to the relevant prompting of reviewing the rule creation interface;
Step 12, user side are selected to preserve this and are reviewed rule, and display unit 103 calls the checking of reviewing regulation management unit 100 and reviews regular interface and verify;
If the result is legal in step 13 checking, then display unit 103 calls the increase of reviewing regulation management unit 100 and reviews regular interface to preserve this review rule; Otherwise, corresponding error message is provided, jump to step 11.
The constructive process of reviewing clauses and subclauses K1 and K2 is as follows:
User side is created by display unit 103 requests and is reviewed clauses and subclauses.Display unit 103 is cooperated with review clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and is finished following steps:
Step 20, display unit 103 provide to be reviewed clauses and subclauses establishment interface and shows user side;
Step 21, user side are filled every attribute information of reviewing clauses and subclauses according to the relevant prompting of reviewing clauses and subclauses establishment interface; Wherein, for the review rule attribute that the review clauses and subclauses rely on, setting and reviewing clauses and subclauses K1 is R1, and K2 is R2;
Step 22, user side are selected to preserve this and are reviewed clauses and subclauses.Display unit 103 calls the checking review entry interface of reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and verifies;
If the result is legal in step 23 checking, then display unit 103 calls the increase of reviewing clauses and subclauses administrative unit 101 and reviews entry interface to preserve this review clauses and subclauses; Otherwise, corresponding error message is provided, jump to step 21.
Step 24, display unit present condition according to the review clauses and subclauses and present the review clauses and subclauses.
The review process of reviewing clauses and subclauses K1 or K2 is as described below:
User side is reviewed clauses and subclauses by display unit 103 requests.Following steps are finished in display unit 103 and 102 cooperations of work engine unit:
Step 30, display unit 103 will be somebody's turn to do the pre-review clauses and subclauses of reviewing and pass to work engine unit 102;
Step 31, work engine unit 102 judge whether the indicated address of resource address attribute of these review clauses and subclauses exists.If exist, then open this resource and review for user side; Otherwise, corresponding error message is provided, user side can select to revise the resource address attribute of these review clauses and subclauses, and then carries out this operation, perhaps selects manually to seek and open this resource to review.
The progradation of reviewing clauses and subclauses K1 or K2 is as described below:
User side advances by display unit 103 requests and reviews clauses and subclauses.Display unit 103 is cooperated with work engine unit 102 and is finished following steps:
Step 40, display unit 103 will be somebody's turn to do the pre-review clauses and subclauses that advance and pass to work engine unit 102;
The review number of times that step 41, work engine unit 102 will be reviewed clauses and subclauses adds 1;
Step 42, work engine unit 102 call the review rule that the regular interface of review is relied on to obtain these pre-review clauses and subclauses that advance of obtaining of reviewing regulation management unit 100.After obtaining reviewing rule, judge with the review number of times of the review clauses and subclauses that should advance in advance according to this review number of times of reviewing rule:
Relied on the review number of times of reviewing rule if should advance the review number of times of reviewing clauses and subclauses to reach it in advance, the review state that then will be somebody's turn to do the pre-review clauses and subclauses that advance is changed to completion status, and it is deleted from present tabulation;
If the review number of times that calculates does not have to surpass the review number of times that review rule that these review clauses and subclauses rely on sets, the review rule that then relies on according to it, review number of times and current review Time Calculation goes out the next review time, and with the set of time that the calculates review time for these review clauses and subclauses.If then display unit 103 was deleted this and was reviewed clauses and subclauses from present tabulation greater than the current system time review time that should review clauses and subclauses.
The rollback process of reviewing clauses and subclauses K1 and K2 is as described below:
User side is reviewed clauses and subclauses by display unit 103 request rollbacks.Display unit 103 is cooperated with work engine unit 102 and is finished following steps:
50, the review clauses and subclauses that display unit 103 will this pre-rollback pass to work engine unit 102;
51, work engine unit 102 judges according to the review number of times of the review clauses and subclauses of this pre-rollback: if the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is not less than 1, then the review number of times with it subtracts 1; If the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is 0, the review state of these review clauses and subclauses is set to backup status, should review then clauses and subclauses and delete from present tabulation.
The above only is preferred embodiment of the present invention, not in order to restriction the present invention.All any modifications of making within the spirit and principles in the present invention are equal to replacement and improvement etc., all should be included within protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. the method for designing of a software that is memonic is characterized in that, under software runtime environment, realizes effective management a large amount of, the content complexity, that need the knowledge of review; Simultaneously in the limited review time, with a kind of in time, effectively, mode helps the user to review these knowledge easily, and this method can fully not be used person's memory characteristic and the characteristics of knowledge.This method may further comprise the steps:
A, behind running software, user side judge to be reviewed clauses and subclauses and is presented condition and whether meet expectation, if do not meet, then selects the review clauses and subclauses of expectation to present condition.Display unit presents qualified review clauses and subclauses;
B, user side judge whether display unit review time spent sum meets expectation.If do not meet, this value then is set, change step a over to;
C, user side judge all review in the rule whether have the review rule that meets expectation.If there is no, then create new review rule, change step a over to;
D, user side judge all review in the clauses and subclauses whether have the review clauses and subclauses that meet expectation.If there is no, then create new review clauses and subclauses, change step a over to;
E, user side judge whether the review clauses and subclauses that presenting one of are proceeded as follows: indicated resource, deletion review clauses and subclauses, the propelling of review clauses and subclauses reviewed clauses and subclauses, rollback review clauses and subclauses and revised the review clauses and subclauses.If user side has been selected an operation, carry out this operation, change step a over to;
F, end.
2. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, described review rule comprises: general review number of times, the time interval of each time review, sign.On this basis, the well-formedness constraint that rule is reviewed in definition is as follows:
A. the general review number of times can not be less than 1;
B. the time interval of each time review must be greater than 0;
C. sign can not and can not repeat with existing review rule sign for sky.
In addition, this method provides acquiescence to review rule.Simplify the process that user side uses this method on the one hand; Help user side to be familiar with reviewing the content and the constraint of rule on the other hand, thereby make user side to create the review rule that matches according to individual memory characteristic or knowledge characteristics.
3. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, described review clauses and subclauses comprise: title, classification, review number of times, resource address, review time spent, review time, the review rule sign, the review state that are relied on.Wherein, review number of times, review time and review state and can only be revised by this method, user side can not be revised.On this basis, the well-formedness constraint that clauses and subclauses are reviewed in definition is as follows:
A. title can not and can not repeat with existing review clauses and subclauses title for sky;
B. reviewing the time spent must be greater than 0;
C. the review rule sign that is relied on can not be sky.
In addition, review the review rule that clauses and subclauses rely on according to this, the review state of reviewing clauses and subclauses is divided into following three classes:
1) completion status: these review clauses and subclauses have been finished all forward operations.This moment, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses was the review number of times of the review rule that it relied on;
2) active state: these review clauses and subclauses also need forward operation at least one times.This moment these review clauses and subclauses the review number of times between 0 and the review number of times of its review rule that relies between;
3) backup status: these review clauses and subclauses were not carried out forward operation as yet.This moment, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses was 0.
4. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, described review clauses and subclauses present condition three kinds:
A. presenting the review state is the review clauses and subclauses of completion status;
B. presenting the review state is the review clauses and subclauses of active state;
C. presenting the review state is the review clauses and subclauses of backup status.
It is b that the review clauses and subclauses of display unit acquiescence present condition.At this moment, the review clauses and subclauses that present in the tabulation also need to satisfy following constraint:
1) the review time of any review clauses and subclauses can not be greater than current system time;
2) the review time spent sum of all review clauses and subclauses can not be reviewed the time spent sum greater than display unit.
5. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, described display unit is reviewed the time spent sum must be greater than 0.This method is reviewed the time spent sum for display unit default value is provided.
6. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, described review is reviewed the indicated resource process of clauses and subclauses and is: user side calls by display unit and checks the instruction of reviewing the indicated resource of clauses and subclauses.Existed if should review the indicated resource of the resource address attribute of clauses and subclauses, and then opened this resource, user side is reviewed this resource then; Otherwise, provide corresponding error message to user side, user side can select to revise the resource address attribute of these review clauses and subclauses, and then carries out this operation, perhaps selects manually to seek and open this resource to review.In addition, this process to the review state of operated review clauses and subclauses without limits.
7. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, described propelling is reviewed the clauses and subclauses process and is: user side calls by display unit and advances the instruction of reviewing clauses and subclauses.The review number of times of current review clauses and subclauses increases by 1 time, if the review number of times of this review clauses and subclauses reaches the review number of times of the regular defined of review that it relies on, the review state that then should review clauses and subclauses is set to completion status, then it is deleted from present tabulation; Otherwise the review rule that relies on according to the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses and it calculates the review time next time, and this time is set to the review time of these review clauses and subclauses then; At last, if the review time that should review clauses and subclauses greater than the current system time, then should review clauses and subclauses and from present tabulation, delete.In addition, this review state of crossing the operated review clauses and subclauses of range request is necessary for active state.
8. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, described rollback is reviewed the clauses and subclauses process and is: user side is reviewed the instruction of clauses and subclauses by the display unit calls rollback.If the review number of times that should review clauses and subclauses is greater than 0, the review number of times that then will review clauses and subclauses subtracts 1; Otherwise the review state of these review clauses and subclauses is set to backup status, should review then clauses and subclauses and delete from present tabulation.In addition, this review state of crossing the operated review clauses and subclauses of range request is necessary for active state.
9. the method for claim 1, it is characterized in that, described propelling or rollback are reviewed the clauses and subclauses process and also comprised: all review the review time spent sum of clauses and subclauses less than display unit review time spent sum in the tabulation if this operation causes presenting, then display unit attempts obtaining one or more review state the review clauses and subclauses that are active state or backup status according to this time difference, adds then and presents tabulation.At last, these review states of reviewing clauses and subclauses are set to active state, and the review time is set to current system time.The review clauses and subclauses process of obtaining that this process is related has two steps:
A, obtain the review clauses and subclauses that the review state is an active state: call review the clauses and subclauses administrative unit obtain the review entry interface, will comprise obtaining of this time difference and review the items for information bag and import into, if do not obtain reviewing clauses and subclauses, then change the b step over to; If obtain one or more review clauses and subclauses, then these are reviewed the clauses and subclauses adding and present tabulation, calculate the current review time spent sum that presents all review clauses and subclauses in the tabulation then, if this result reviews the time spent sum less than display unit, then computing time difference, change the b step then over to; Otherwise this process finishes;
B, obtain the review clauses and subclauses that the review state is backup status: call review the clauses and subclauses administrative unit obtain the review entry interface, will comprise obtaining of time difference and review the items for information bag and import into, if do not obtain reviewing clauses and subclauses, then this process finishes; If obtain one or more review clauses and subclauses, then these are reviewed the clauses and subclauses adding and present tabulation.
10. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, described modification is reviewed the clauses and subclauses process and is: user side is revised by display unit and is reviewed clauses and subclauses.If amended review clauses and subclauses meet the well-formedness constraint of reviewing clauses and subclauses, then preserve this modification information; Otherwise, point out corresponding error message to user side.In addition, if the information of revising comprises the review state of reviewing clauses and subclauses, then also need to carry out following processing procedure:
A, when the review state of these review clauses and subclauses becomes active state by completion status, perhaps become active state by backup status, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is set to 0, the review time is set to current system time.Should review clauses and subclauses at last deletes from present tabulation;
B, when the review state of these review clauses and subclauses becomes backup status by completion status, perhaps become backup status by active state, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is set to 0.Should review clauses and subclauses at last deletes from present tabulation;
C, when the review state of these review clauses and subclauses becomes completion status by backup status, perhaps become completion status by active state, the review number of times of these review clauses and subclauses is set to this, and it relies on the review number of times of reviewing rule.Should review clauses and subclauses at last deletes from present tabulation.
In addition, this process to the review state of operated review clauses and subclauses without limits.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN200910219220A CN101719060A (en) | 2009-11-30 | 2009-11-30 | Memory-aid software design method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN200910219220A CN101719060A (en) | 2009-11-30 | 2009-11-30 | Memory-aid software design method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN101719060A true CN101719060A (en) | 2010-06-02 |
Family
ID=42433638
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN200910219220A Pending CN101719060A (en) | 2009-11-30 | 2009-11-30 | Memory-aid software design method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN101719060A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107003802A (en) * | 2014-09-24 | 2017-08-01 | 三星电子株式会社 | Export the method and apparatus of content and perform the recording medium of this method |
-
2009
- 2009-11-30 CN CN200910219220A patent/CN101719060A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107003802A (en) * | 2014-09-24 | 2017-08-01 | 三星电子株式会社 | Export the method and apparatus of content and perform the recording medium of this method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Frank | Domain-specific modeling languages: requirements analysis and design guidelines | |
| US20160055226A1 (en) | Method and system for syncing data structures | |
| US11144309B2 (en) | Changeset conflict rebasing | |
| CN101441563A (en) | Automated solution for generating architectural design models for service-oriented architecture (SOA) information services | |
| Ellis et al. | Computer science and office information systems | |
| CN108037937A (en) | A kind of method of dynamic more new resources | |
| CN111666355B (en) | Model construction method and device for field, data and scene three-layer model | |
| Potts | Requirements models in context | |
| CN107729561A (en) | The method that the table handling of paired data storehouse is reversely given birth to based on database table structure | |
| CN104915412A (en) | Method and system for connecting dynamic management database | |
| CN111460779B (en) | Method for rendering and accessing flow form data based on Activiti | |
| Dahchour et al. | A role model and its metaclass implementation | |
| CN110941422B (en) | Code automatic generation method, code generator and readable storage medium | |
| Kornatzky et al. | Conceptual design of object-oriented database schemas using the binary-relationship model | |
| CN101719060A (en) | Memory-aid software design method | |
| CN110321462A (en) | Information dynamic updating method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN116244301A (en) | Space-time process mechanism model service chain arrangement method based on directed acyclic graph | |
| CN115510072A (en) | Main data engine based on multi-tenant SaaS application platform | |
| Graw et al. | Process management in-the-many | |
| CN105302586A (en) | Software upgrade processing method and device, terminal and server | |
| US10095805B2 (en) | Instructional design tool | |
| Lee et al. | Customizing the capture of software architectural design decisions | |
| Ali et al. | The five ws taxonomy on customization of software as a service applications | |
| CN115221895A (en) | Cross-scene task type dialogue method and system | |
| Cong et al. | A model-driven architecture approach for developing e-learning platform |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| DD01 | Delivery of document by public notice |
Addressee: Lu Xiangliang Document name: the First Notification of an Office Action |
|
| DD01 | Delivery of document by public notice |
Addressee: Lu Xiangliang Document name: Notification that Application Deemed to be Withdrawn |
|
| C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20100602 |