CN101604479B - Method for evaluating service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment - Google Patents

Method for evaluating service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN101604479B
CN101604479B CN2009100882595A CN200910088259A CN101604479B CN 101604479 B CN101604479 B CN 101604479B CN 2009100882595 A CN2009100882595 A CN 2009100882595A CN 200910088259 A CN200910088259 A CN 200910088259A CN 101604479 B CN101604479 B CN 101604479B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
index
evaluation
service level
traffic environment
mixed traffic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN2009100882595A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN101604479A (en
Inventor
钱大林
秦雪梅
李年源
李珊珊
王九洲
胡盼
钮志强
唐勍勍
陈小红
刘红元
季全刚
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Jiaotong University
Original Assignee
Beijing Jiaotong University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Jiaotong University filed Critical Beijing Jiaotong University
Priority to CN2009100882595A priority Critical patent/CN101604479B/en
Publication of CN101604479A publication Critical patent/CN101604479A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN101604479B publication Critical patent/CN101604479B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for evaluating service level of a plane signal intersection under a mixed traffic environment in the field of urban road traffic planning and management. The method comprises the following steps: determining evaluation indexes of the service level of the plane signal intersection under the mixed traffic environment; calculating the weight of the plane signal intersection under the mixed traffic environment of each index by using an analytic hierarchy process; calculating central points and standard differences of five service levels of the plane signal intersection under the mixed traffic environment by using a fuzzy clustering method, and solving a membership function of each evaluation index; acquiring index data of each index under the mixed traffic environment; calculating and controlling the membership degree of each level of each index to form a single-factor evaluation matrix; and using the single-factor evaluation matrix and the index weight to carry out integrated evaluation for each index under each level, and determining the service level according to the maximum membership rule. The method integrally considers the influences of various traffic factors comprising non-motor vehicle and pedestrian on the plane signal intersection, and evaluates the service level of the plane signal intersection more accurately.

Description

The evaluation method of service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment
Technical field
The invention belongs to urban highway traffic planning and management domain, relate in particular to a kind of evaluation method of service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment.
Background technology
Since eighties of last century the fifties; The traffic engineering researchist of more external developed countries just is devoted to tolerance of seeking and method and the model of estimating signalized intersections service quality always, and the effort of passing through decades has formed relatively independent theory and method.The most representative with U.S.'s " HCM " (HighwayCapacity Manual is abbreviated as HCM), influence is also maximum, and some countries and regions are carried out service level research based on this.The signalized intersections service level that new edition HCM2000 proposed is on average controlled to incur loss through delay with per car and is index and it is divided into six grades of A-F; And confirmed that control incurs loss through delay computing method.
With abroad compare, China is starting late aspect the research of signalized intersections service level, but has also obtained certain achievement.The signalized intersections service level evaluation index of advising in " traffic engineering " book of appointing Feitian etc. to write comprises traffic loading coefficient, efficiency factor, crossing be obstructed vehicle, delay time at stop and queue length, and is five grades with this with level of service division; The suggestion of Beijing municipal administration designing institute is I-IV level through on average hold up traffic length and traffic user's the index that is felt as of crossing mean delay time, red light with level of service division with load factor of intersection, vehicle; Xiao Qianjin etc. estimate employing saturation degree, efficiency index, all delays of car, safety coefficient and indexs such as traffic administration and environmental baseline to the crossing in Chongqing City's urban road reorganization and expansion technological project; Money cold wind etc. has also been accomplished research in this respect, with the per car road traffic capacity, saturation degree, delay and twice parking rate as the crossing evaluation index and provided the grade scale of A-E Pyatyi.
Above achievement in research has been enriched the theory and the method for crossing service level evaluation; But not enough in conjunction with the research of Chinese mixed traffic characteristic; The crossing service level evaluation index and the index calculating method that are proposed, all with single motor-driven wagon flow as considering object.Therefore, existing service level evaluation method is not suitable for the traffic flow situation of China's high mixed.The service level of being estimated out can't correctly reflect objective reality.Influence shows the following aspects to the crossing service level in mixed traffic:
1, pedestrian, bicycle are to the interference of motor vehicle operation
For the planed signal crossing, in the same green light signals cycle, there are the pedestrian, bicycle of different directions and the mutual interference mutually of motor vehicle, cause the service condition of motor vehicle, user's impression to change, and then service level is exerted an influence.And domestic and international crossing service level evaluation system does not all reflect the index of this respect content, and this phenomenon can't obtain embodying in service level;
2, to the influence of evaluation index
In the crossing service level evaluation index of domestic proposition, the more indexs such as saturation degree, efficiency factor that have appear.Owing to there be the phase mutual interference of mixed traffic in the crossing, the traffic capacity loss with causing the crossing reduces the passage rate of motor vehicle in the crossing, and then can influence saturation degree, efficiency factor; And current calculating to saturation degree, efficiency factor, being mostly of employing is external based on the computing method under the single automobile traffic environment, thereby can't calculate the desired value under the mixed traffic environment effectively.The computing method of these indexs need to study again.
Summary of the invention
The objective of the invention is to; In the evaluation method to existing service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment; Fail the deficiency of non-disturbance regime of consideration machine and domestic mixed traffic environment; Thereby cause the irrational problem of evaluation result, propose a kind of method of service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment.
Technical scheme of the present invention is, a kind of evaluation method of service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment is characterized in that, said evaluation method comprises the following steps:
Step 1: confirm the service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment evaluation index, comprising: control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, queue length;
Step 2: utilize analytical hierarchy process to calculate control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, the efficiency factor of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment, the weights separately of 5 evaluation indexes of queue length;
Step 3: use fuzzy clustering method, obtain the central point and the standard deviation of crossing service level each item at different levels evaluation index under the mixed traffic environment, try to achieve the subordinate function of evaluation indexes at different levels;
Step 4: utilize motor vehicle and bicycle in the INSSIM simulation software to produce model, pass through decision model with speed model, pedestrian's generation model, queuing model and right-hand rotation motor vehicle motor vehicle, bicycle and the pedestrian's of hybrid cross mouth operation conditions is carried out emulation, thereby obtain the desired value of mixed traffic environment control delay down, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, 5 evaluation indexes of queue length;
Step 5: use the subordinate function of each evaluation index of service level at different levels, the degree of membership of calculation control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, 5 each grades of evaluation index of queue length forms single factor and passes judgment on matrix respectively;
Step 6: utilize single factor to pass judgment on matrix and index weight value, following 5 evaluation indexes of each rank are carried out multifactorial evaluation, confirm the service level rank by maximum subjection principle.
In the said step 2, utilize analytical hierarchy process to calculate control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, the efficiency factor of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment, the weights separately of 5 evaluation indexes of queue length, comprise the following steps:
Step 21: set up the hierarchical structure of estimating;
Step 22: structure judgment matrix;
Step 23: carry out single preface of level and consistency check;
Step 24: carry out total ordering of level and consistency check;
Step 25: calculate each index weight value.
Said right-hand rotation motor vehicle passes through decision model and sets up based on the BP neural network, comprising:
Step 41: set up three layers of BP network structure respectively, confirm input layer, output layer neuron number and hidden neuron number range;
Step 42: train the interior neural network of number range of hidden neuron, confirm the number of hidden neuron.
In the said step 5, the degree of membership of the delay of difference calculation control, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, 5 each grades of evaluation index of queue length, specifically:
Figure GSB00000357770100041
Wherein, c jBe the achievement data of control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, 5 indexs of queue length, x IjBe the central point of service levels at different levels, y IjThe standard deviation of service levels at different levels.
Said single factor is passed judgment on matrix: R = r 11 r 12 . . . r 15 r 21 r 22 . . . r 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . r 51 r 52 . . . r 55 .
In the said step 6, following 5 indexs of each rank are carried out multifactorial evaluation specifically:
For each index weights W that calculates by step 1 T=(W 1, W 2... W 5), with it and single factor pass judgment on matrix R carry out model M (∧ ∨) calculates, multifactorial evaluation
Figure GSB00000357770100043
In the said step 6, confirm the service level rank, specifically be, get max (b by maximum subjection principle 1, b 2... b 5)=b k, then service level is confirmed as the k level.
Its effect of method that the present invention proposes is; Take all factors into consideration the influence of the various traffic factors that comprise bicycle and pedestrian and index to planed signal crossing service level contribution degree, more accurate to the evaluation of service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the evaluation method process flow diagram of the service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment that proposes of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is the hierarchical chart that utilizes each item index of the plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment that analytical hierarchy process sets up.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, preferred embodiment is elaborated.Should be emphasized that following explanation only is exemplary, rather than in order to limit scope of the present invention and application thereof.
The present invention utilizes magnitude of traffic flow sensor, traffic signal light condition sensor and traffic simulation server to realize the evaluation of service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment.Wherein, Magnitude of traffic flow sensor links to each other with server through data transmission link respectively with the traffic signal light condition sensor; The traffic signal light condition sensor is arranged on intersection; Magnitude of traffic flow sensor is arranged on car lane, cycle track and the walkway of crossing adjacency; Server is accepted from the data-signal of magnitude of traffic flow sensor and traffic signal light condition sensor and is stored in the database, and the traffic simulation server comprises a cover and is equipped with the computer system of network interface and runs on the planed signal crossing service level evaluation software-INSSIM simulation software on this computer system.Traffic simulation software is divided into traffic simulation program and basic database two parts.
Fig. 1 is the evaluation method process flow diagram of the service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment that proposes of the present invention.Among Fig. 1, the implementation procedure of the method that the present invention proposes is:
Step 1: confirm the service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment evaluation index, comprising: control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, queue length.
Appoint in " traffic engineering " book that the Feitian professor writes, service level is defined as: an index weighing traffic flow service condition and the service quality that driver and passenger experienced.Therefore, in conjunction with China's mixed traffic environment, the service level of crossing should be defined as: the service condition of signalized intersections mixed traffic flow and user (comprising automobile driver or cycling person) are to the satisfaction of service that the crossing provides.From key concept, the present invention confirms that the service level evaluation index of hybrid cross mouth is control delay, queue length, saturation degree, efficiency factor and jamming rate.
Control is incured loss through delay: control is incured loss through delay and is comprised stop delay and the acceleration and deceleration lost time of vehicle in the scope of crossing.
Queue length: queue length is meant that stopped vehicle takies the space length of road.
Saturation degree (traffic loading coefficient): this index is meant under mixed traffic environment, and entrance driveway actual traffic amount is (v) with the ratio of the entrance driveway traffic capacity (c).
Efficiency factor: this index is meant under mixed traffic environment, the ratio of vehicle Vehicle Speed on the road speed of crossing and highway section.
Saturation degree (loading coefficient), efficiency factor index in calculating of the present invention, have all been considered the mutual disturbing factor of mixed traffic.
Jamming rate: be that the present invention combines the characteristics of China's mixed traffic to propose.Its implication is meant in the planed signal crossing, and motor vehicle is owing to the loss of time that the non-interference of machine causes, and accounts under the noiseless situation the normally ratio of current required time of motor vehicle.Jamming rate can be used for describing in the crossing bicycle and pedestrian to the interference of motor vehicle.
Step 2: utilize analytical hierarchy process to calculate control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, the efficiency factor of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment, the weights separately of 5 evaluation indexes of queue length.Detailed process is:
Step 21: set up the hierarchical structure of estimating.Fig. 2 is a hierarchical structure of utilizing each item index of the plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment that analytical hierarchy process sets up.Among Fig. 2, setting the service evaluation level is destination layer A; Type formation B comprises the outer evaluation index B of stop line 1With fare inner evaluation index B 25 indexs are arranged in type formation C, belong to the outer evaluation index B of stop line 1With fare inner evaluation index B 2, wherein, the outer evaluation index B of stop line 1Under comprise: C is incured loss through delay in control 1, saturation degree C 2, queue length C 3, fare inner evaluation index B 2Comprise: jamming rate C 4, efficiency factor C 5
Step 22: structure judgment matrix.From the 2nd layer (type formation B) beginning of the hierarchy Model set up, for the same one deck factors that are subordinated to each factor of last layer, with 1~9 relatively yardstick construct judgment matrix through expert's scoring, up to orlop.Promptly, compare yardstick to the relative importance degree assignment between each element by 1~9 to the important in twos degree of the index in type formation B and the type formation C.What following table (table 1) was represented is the implication of 1~9 comparison yardstick.
Figure GSB00000357770100071
Table 1: compare yardstick implication table
For example, draw judgment matrix according to expertise wherein: A-B, B 1-C, B 2-C:
Matrix A - B = 1 1 1 1
Matrix B 1 - C = 1 4 3 1 / 4 1 1 / 2 1 / 3 2 1
Matrix B 2 - C = 1 3 1 / 3 1
Step 23: carry out single preface of level and consistency check.
The single preface of level is exactly to confirm the influence degree of each factor of this layer to the upper strata factor, calculates the maximum characteristic root and the characteristic of correspondence vector of judgment matrix, and the most frequently used method is and amasss method and root method.Method is selected and is amassed in this calculating for use, and its concrete steps are following:
(1) each column element of judgment matrix A being done normalization handles;
(2) judgment matrix of each row after normalization is handled pressed the row addition, get vectorial
Figure GSB00000357770100075
(3) to vector
Figure GSB00000357770100076
Carry out normalization and handle resulting W=(W 1, W 2... W n) T
Be proper vector;
(4) the maximum characteristic root of calculating judgment matrix:
λ max = Σ i = 1 n ( AW ) i nW i - - - ( 1 )
(5) consistency check:
Reasonable in order to guarantee the conclusion that analytical hierarchy process obtains, must will carry out consistency check the deviation limits of judgment matrix within the specific limits.Generally judge with CI and two indexs of CR.
Coincident indicator: CI = λ Max - n n - 1 - - - ( 2 )
Consistency Ratio at random: CR = CI RI - - - ( 3 )
RI wherein, i.e. average homogeneity property index is repeatedly to repeat to get arithmetical mean after the calculating of judgment matrix eigenwert at random to obtain.
When CR<0.1 item thinks that the consistance of judgment matrix is an acceptable, otherwise, think that inconsistency is too serious, need construct judgment matrix again or do necessary adjustment.
Step 24: carry out total ordering of level and consistency check.Calculate the sequencing weight of all factors of same level, claim that level always sorts whole general objective relative importance.It is with the combination weights of the weights of next each factor of level and last layer time factor, obtains the relative importance of orlop factor with respect to whole general objective.
Calculate the A-C weight, computing formula is following:
W A-C=W A-B×W B-C (4)
Wherein, W A-BThe weight of expression B layer index, W B-CExpression C layer index is with respect to the weight of the B layer index of affiliated associated layers.
Total ordering also need be done consistency check to level, and check is still successively carried out to low layer by high level as level always sorts.Each level has all passed through the consistency check of the single preface of level though this is, each compares judgment matrix in pairs and has all had comparatively satisfied consistance.But when integrated survey, the nonuniformity of each level still might accumulate, and causes the nonuniformity that the final analysis result is more serious.
If in the C layer with B jThe paired relatively judgment matrix of relevant factor in single preface through consistency check; Trying to achieve single preface coincident indicator is CI (j); (j=1 ..., m); Corresponding mean random coincident indicator is RI (j) (CI (j), RI (j) try to achieve when the single preface of level), and then the C layer always sorts at random that the consistance ratio does
CR = Σ j = 1 m CI ( j ) b j Σ j = 1 m RI ( j ) b j - - - ( 5 )
Wherein, b jBe factor B 1..., B nAbout A jThe single preface weight of level.When CR<0.10, think that the total ranking results of level has satisfied consistance and accepts this analysis result.
Step 25: calculate each index weight value.
After a plurality of expert's marking, obtain the total sorting calculation result of level separately.It is comprehensive, obtain the final weights W=(W of each index of assessment indicator system 1, W 2... W n) TWherein, W jBe the comprehensive weights of j index.
ω j = Σ i = 1 s λ i W ij Σ i = 1 s λ i , ( j = 1,2 , . . . n ) - - - ( 6 )
S is expert's number in the formula; λ iBe i position expert's weights; W IjBe the weights of i position expert to j index.
Step 3: the utilization fuzzy clustering method obtains the central point and the standard deviation of crossing service level each item at different levels evaluation index under the mixed traffic environment, and tries to achieve the subordinate function of evaluation indexes at different levels.
The fuzzy c means clustering algorithm (FCM) of based target function is grouped into the nonlinear programming problem of a belt restraining with cluster analysis, finds the solution through optimization that the optimum that obtains data set is fuzzy to be divided and cluster.
FCM fuzzy clustering problem can be expressed as the objective function below optimizing on mathematics, obtain to make it reach the degree of membership matrix U={ u of minimum value Ik} C * nWith cluster centre P={p 1, p 2... p c,
Figure GSB00000357770100093
∀ i ∈ { i | 1 ≤ i ≤ c } :
J m ( U , P ) = Σ k = 1 n Σ i = 1 c ( u ik ) m d 2 ( x k , p i ) - - - ( 7 )
Constraint condition is:
Σ i = 1 c u ik = 1,1 ≤ k ≤ n u ik ∈ [ 0,1 ] , 1 ≤ i ≤ c , 1 ≤ k ≤ n - - - ( 8 )
In the formula; M is a weighted index, is called level and smooth index or fuzzy parameter again
5 evaluation index control delays, saturation degree, queue length, efficiency factor, jamming rate that the front is selected are designated as x respectively i(i=1,2,3,4,5) are as the index domain: X=(x 1, x 2..., x 5; Obtain 360 data samples under the different traffic environments through emulation, as sample domain: U={x 1, x 2..., x 360, thereby obtain one 360 * 5 matrix.
Use the Fuzzy C clustering method of objective function, calculate the central point of service levels at different levels, step is following:
Step (1) initialization, delivery is stuck with paste Weighting exponent m=2, and the classification of cluster is counted c=5, the number n of data sample point=360, iteration stopping threshold epsilon=0.001.Represent iterations with l.
Step (2) adopts random approach to select the initial cluster center point Put as initial cluster center for c before the picked at random, and calculate initial degree of membership matrix U (0)
Step (3) algorithm begins iteration.According to formula (7), (8), bring in constant renewal in cluster centre p i(l) and the degree of membership matrix U (l), up to || p (l+1)-p (l)||<ε, (U P) converges to minimal value to objective function J at this moment.
This paper utilizes the programming of MATLAB simulation software according to the aforementioned calculation step, and the cluster centre that obtains (central points of service levels at different levels) sees the following form (table 2).
Figure GSB00000357770100111
Table 2: crossing service level central points at different levels under the mixed traffic environment
Under calculating mixed traffic environment, in the central point of the 5 grades of service levels in crossing, can also obtain the standard deviation of the 5 grades of service levels in crossing under the mixed traffic environment.Following table (table 3) is the standard deviation of service levels at different levels.
Figure GSB00000357770100112
Table 3: crossing LOS criterias at different levels are poor under the mixed traffic environment
Step 4: utilize motor vehicle and bicycle to produce model, pass through decision model with speed model, pedestrian's generation model, queuing model and right-hand rotation motor vehicle motor vehicle, bicycle and the pedestrian's of hybrid cross mouth operation conditions is carried out emulation, thereby obtain the desired value of mixed traffic environment control delay down, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, 5 indexs of queue length.
The present invention has used for reference the existing model of forefathers when the parameter data, and to craspedodrome bicycle and the pedestrian influence to the generation of right-hand rotation motor vehicle, has creatively proposed the right-hand rotation motor vehicle and passed through decision model.Right-hand rotation is passed through decision model and is meant: the motor vehicle of no right turn signal control, because of not receiving the influence of signal lamp, vehicle all can get into the crossing at any time, so in equidirectional straightgoing vehicle green light phase time, possibly produce with the same-phase straight-going bicycle and disturb.When go in right-hand rotation motor vehicle entering crossing, in interference range,, then need to pass through decision model and judge whether to obtain right-of-way, if can then pass through according to the motor vehicle that trains if run into synchronous straight-going bicycle; Otherwise, ramp to stop is waited for.
The present invention's motor vehicle of turning right passes through decision model and sets up based on the BP neural network, comprises the following steps,
Step 41: set up three layers of BP network structure respectively, confirm input layer, output layer neuron number and latent number of layers scope.
This paper adopts three layers of BP neural network structure of typical case: input layer, the latent layer of individual layer and output layer.Input layer is accepted outside input data, and the input parameter that this paper confirms is respectively: quantity, the bicycle of the interior bicycle of interference range provide a motor vehicle crossing gap and a back bicycle speed when speed before the right-hand rotation motor vehicle passes through, motor vehicle entering interference range.At random the sample that collects is divided into two parts, is respectively training set and test set.
Output layer node number gets 2, when input sample decision-making when passing through, desirable output result be (1,0), when the decision-making of input sample for not passing through, it is (0,1) that ideal is exported the result.To the output result of output layer is 1 neuron, if the output result, thinks then that the output result is 1 more than or equal to 0.9 o'clock; To the output result of output layer is 0 neuron, if the output result, thinks then that the output result is 0 smaller or equal to 0.1 o'clock; As output result between 0.1 and 0.9 time, think that then this output valve can not pass through or not pass through and make corresponding judgment the right-hand rotation motor vehicle.Hidden neuron is counted n and is calculated with experimental formula,
Figure GSB00000357770100121
(n iBe the input neuron number; n 0The output neuron number; A is the constant between 1~10).
Step 42: train the interior neural network of number range of hidden neuron, confirm the number of hidden neuron.
When confirming the number of hidden neuron, the number of training hidden neuron respectively is from 10 neural networks such as 3~12 grades, and every type all keeps error and satisfies the convergence target (the convergence target is for smaller or equal to 1 * 10 among the present invention -3) 20 neural networks carry out emulation and statistical study; Add up the total degree of all kinds of neural metwork trainings in the time of training.20 network utilisation checking sample sets that satisfy performance index are carried out the emulation statistical study; Calculate the average correct recognition rata of every type of network simulation; From 20 training results of every type, pick out the best simulation result of best simulation result simultaneously as disparate networks.
Table 4 and table 5 are respectively the training and the tables of simulation results of right-hand rotation motor vehicle crossing gap experiment and the training and the tables of simulation results of passing through the time-delay experiment.In the table 4; The hidden neuron number is that the average correct recognition rata of emulation of 5 and 7 neural network is 99.21%; And the hidden neuron number is 7 neural metwork training total degree is 58 times; Less than the hidden neuron number is 5 neural network, and therefore, it is 7 the neural network simulation result as the best that right-hand rotation motor vehicle crossing gap model is selected the hidden neuron number.
Figure GSB00000357770100131
Table 4: the training and the tables of simulation results of the experiment of right-hand rotation motor vehicle crossing gap
And in the table 5, the hidden neuron number is that 3 the average correct recognition rata of neural network emulation is the highest, is 99.04%, passes through decision model so to select the hidden neuron number be 3 neural network as the right-hand rotation motor vehicle of accepting based on time-delay of the best.
Figure GSB00000357770100141
Table 5: the right-hand rotation motor vehicle passes through the training and the tables of simulation results of time-delay experiment
Step 5: use the subordinate function of the evaluation index of service levels at different levels, calculate control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, every grade of other degree of membership of 5 indexs of queue length respectively, form single factor and pass judgment on matrix.
With reference to the central point and the standard deviation of the service level that obtains in the step 3, the subordinate function of each evaluation index of service level at different levels
Figure GSB00000357770100142
Wherein, c jBe the achievement data that calculates in the step 4, x IjBe the central point of service level, y IjBe standard deviation.
Single factor is passed judgment on matrix R:
R = r 11 r 12 . . . r 15 r 21 r 22 . . . r 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . r 51 r 52 . . . r 55
Step 6: utilize single factor to pass judgment on matrix and index weight, following 5 indexs of each rank are carried out multifactorial evaluation, confirm the service level rank by maximum subjection principle.
By the definite weights W of step 1 T=(W 1, W 2... W 5) and single factor of confirming of step 5 pass judgment on matrix R, with model M (∧, ∨) calculating can get multifactorial evaluation:
Figure GSB00000357770100151
B promptly is the evaluation result to service level, presses maximum subjection principle, gets max (b 1, b 2... b 5)=b k, then service level is confirmed as the k level.
The present invention has overcome can't reflect in the existing service level evaluation technology that the non-disturbance regime of mixed traffic machine in service, some evaluation indexes fail to consider the deficiency of mixed traffic environment, and the evaluation that makes service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment more rationally and science.
The above; Be merely the preferable embodiment of the present invention, but protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, any technician who is familiar with the present technique field is in the technical scope that the present invention discloses; The variation that can expect easily or replacement all should be encompassed within protection scope of the present invention.Therefore, protection scope of the present invention should be as the criterion with the protection domain of claim.

Claims (1)

1. the evaluation method of a service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment is characterized in that, said evaluation method comprises the following steps:
Step 1: confirm the service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment evaluation index, comprising: control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, queue length;
Said control is incured loss through delay and is comprised stop delay and the acceleration and deceleration lost time of vehicle in the scope of crossing;
Said jamming rate is meant in the planed signal crossing, and motor vehicle is owing to the loss of time that the non-interference of machine causes, and accounts under the noiseless situation the normally ratio of current required time of motor vehicle;
Said saturation degree is meant under mixed traffic environment, the ratio of entrance driveway actual traffic amount and the entrance driveway traffic capacity;
Said efficiency factor is meant under mixed traffic environment, the ratio of vehicle Vehicle Speed on the road speed of crossing and highway section;
Step 2: utilize analytical hierarchy process to calculate control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, the efficiency factor of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment, the weights separately of 5 evaluation indexes of queue length; Comprise the following steps:
Step 21: set up the hierarchical structure of estimating;
Step 22: structure judgment matrix;
Step 23: carry out single preface of level and consistency check;
Step 24: carry out total ordering of level and consistency check;
Step 25: calculate each index weight value;
Step 3: use fuzzy clustering method, obtain the central point and the standard deviation of crossing service level each item at different levels evaluation index under the mixed traffic environment, try to achieve the subordinate function of evaluation indexes at different levels;
Step 4: utilize motor vehicle and bicycle in the INSSIM simulation software to produce model, pass through decision model with speed model, pedestrian's generation model, queuing model and right-hand rotation motor vehicle motor vehicle, bicycle and the pedestrian's of hybrid cross mouth operation conditions is carried out emulation, thereby obtain the desired value of mixed traffic environment control delay down, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, 5 indexs of queue length; Said right-hand rotation motor vehicle passes through decision model and sets up based on the BP neural network, comprising: set up three layers of BP network structure respectively earlier, confirm input layer, output layer neuron number and hidden neuron number range; Neural network in the number range of retraining hidden neuron is confirmed the number of hidden neuron;
Step 5: use the subordinate function of each evaluation index of service level at different levels, respectively the degree of membership of calculation control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, 5 each grades of evaluation index of queue length; Specifically:
Figure FSB00000748337400021
J=1,2,3,4,5 wherein, c jBe the achievement data of control delay, jamming rate, saturation degree, efficiency factor, 5 indexs of queue length, x IjBe the central point of service levels at different levels, y IjStandard deviation for service levels at different levels; Form single factor and pass judgment on matrix, said single factor is passed judgment on matrix and is:
R = r 11 r 12 . . . r 15 r 21 r 22 . . . r 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . r 51 r 52 . . . r 55 ,
Step 6: utilize single factor to pass judgment on matrix and index weight value, following 5 evaluation indexes of each rank are carried out multifactorial evaluation, specifically: for each index weight value W that calculates by step 2 T=(W 1, W 2W 5), with it and single factor pass judgment on matrix R carry out model M (∧ ∨) calculates, multifactorial evaluation
Figure FSB00000748337400023
Confirm the service level rank by maximum subjection principle, specifically: get max (b 1, b 2... b 5)=b k, then service level is confirmed as the k level.
CN2009100882595A 2009-07-14 2009-07-14 Method for evaluating service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment Expired - Fee Related CN101604479B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2009100882595A CN101604479B (en) 2009-07-14 2009-07-14 Method for evaluating service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2009100882595A CN101604479B (en) 2009-07-14 2009-07-14 Method for evaluating service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN101604479A CN101604479A (en) 2009-12-16
CN101604479B true CN101604479B (en) 2012-08-08

Family

ID=41470194

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN2009100882595A Expired - Fee Related CN101604479B (en) 2009-07-14 2009-07-14 Method for evaluating service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN101604479B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108932855A (en) * 2017-05-22 2018-12-04 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Road traffic control system, method and electronic equipment

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102436742A (en) * 2011-10-12 2012-05-02 北京世纪高通科技有限公司 Method and device for evaluating traffic information service level of floating vehicle system
CN103366582B (en) * 2012-04-06 2015-04-29 同济大学 Traffic safety evaluation method of signal control intersection
CN103116697A (en) * 2013-01-16 2013-05-22 东南大学 Road plane intersection multi-target comprehensive evaluating method based on grey clustering analysis
CN103942410B (en) * 2014-03-12 2017-04-19 华南理工大学 Expressway operation comprehensive service quality real-time assessment method
CN103942359B (en) * 2014-03-13 2017-01-04 华南理工大学 The modeling method of unsignalized intersection bicycle conflict avoiding behavior simulation model
CN104504531B (en) * 2014-12-30 2018-08-31 大连楼兰科技股份有限公司 A kind of vehicle drive methods of risk assessment
CN106157643B (en) * 2015-04-07 2019-03-12 中国科学院沈阳自动化研究所 A kind of traffic signal optimization alternative manner based on message matrix gridding
CN106530684B (en) * 2015-09-11 2019-08-20 杭州海康威视系统技术有限公司 Handle the method and device of traffic route information
CN105787094A (en) * 2016-03-17 2016-07-20 北京小米移动软件有限公司 Data optimizing method and device
CN106251065A (en) * 2016-07-28 2016-12-21 南京航空航天大学 A kind of Effectiveness of Regulation appraisal procedure moving behavioral indicator system based on eye
CN106683442A (en) * 2016-12-28 2017-05-17 安徽科力信息产业有限责任公司 Multi-index based intersection signal timing plan evaluation method
CN106530725B (en) * 2017-01-11 2019-09-03 上海工业控制安全创新科技有限公司 A kind of cloud big data analysis system applied to urban transportation
CN107680393B (en) * 2017-11-07 2021-07-09 长沙理工大学 Intelligent control method of crossroad traffic signal lamp based on time-varying domain
CN107945517A (en) * 2017-12-29 2018-04-20 迈锐数据(北京)有限公司 A kind of traffic data processing apparatus
CN108280999B (en) * 2018-01-31 2021-03-09 迈锐数据(北京)有限公司 Traffic saturation determination system, method and device
CN113283762B (en) * 2018-04-16 2024-03-15 三峡大学 Device for evaluating road planning of parking lot
CN108417057B (en) * 2018-05-15 2023-06-23 哈尔滨工业大学 Intelligent signal lamp timing system
CN108776650A (en) * 2018-06-05 2018-11-09 浙江大学 A kind of non-motorized lane service level evaluation method based on mixed Gauss model
CN109871738B (en) * 2018-12-18 2021-08-06 青岛科技大学 Pedestrian movement intention identification method adaptive to self-mixed pedestrian environment
CN109583797B (en) * 2019-01-28 2022-08-02 吉林大学 Commercial complex fuzzy clustering method for parking generation rate acquisition
CN110136443B (en) * 2019-05-24 2020-09-29 辽宁工业大学 Traffic signal lamp optimization method based on vehicle driving state
CN110276393A (en) * 2019-06-19 2019-09-24 西安建筑科技大学 A kind of compound prediction technique of green building energy consumption
CN110322961B (en) * 2019-06-24 2021-09-07 北京联世科技有限公司 Traditional Chinese medicine viscera syndrome differentiation quantitative method and device based on symptom degree
CN110335478B (en) * 2019-07-10 2021-01-12 江苏航天大为科技股份有限公司 Cross-subarea linkage control method based on deep learning
CN111862600A (en) * 2020-06-22 2020-10-30 中汽研智能网联技术(天津)有限公司 Traffic efficiency assessment method based on vehicle-road cooperation
CN113409571B (en) * 2021-05-12 2022-05-06 北京北大千方科技有限公司 Judging method and device for setting bus lane, storage medium and terminal
CN115457766B (en) * 2022-08-31 2023-08-08 华迪计算机集团有限公司 Method and system for predicting road congestion state

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1845202A (en) * 2005-04-08 2006-10-11 王大海 Traffic coordination control system between crossings

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1845202A (en) * 2005-04-08 2006-10-11 王大海 Traffic coordination control system between crossings

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
杨露萍等.混合交通条件下信号交叉口服务水平研究.《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库》.2008,全文. *
欧阳陈海等.北京公共交通通勤出行者满意度研究.《北京公共交通通勤出行者满意度研究》.2007,第7卷(第5期),第37-43页. *
袁晶矜.基于可靠性分析的城市道路交通系统运营状态评价.《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库》.2007,全文. *
钱大琳等.信号平交路口右转机动车穿越直行自行车决策行为研究.《系统工程理论与实践》.2006,(第5期),140-144页. *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108932855A (en) * 2017-05-22 2018-12-04 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Road traffic control system, method and electronic equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN101604479A (en) 2009-12-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101604479B (en) Method for evaluating service level of plane signal intersection under mixed traffic environment
Shang et al. A unified framework for multicriteria evaluation of transportation projects
CN109993223A (en) Pavement Condition prediction technique, storage medium, electronic equipment
CN107358357A (en) Urban track traffic transfer station evaluation method
CN107766969B (en) Large station fast line layout method based on subway service capacity bottleneck section identification
CN106384509A (en) Urban road driving time distribution estimation method considering taxi operation states
CN111582750B (en) Method and system for identifying reverse passengers and determining riding class of rail transit
CN106485359A (en) A kind of urban track traffic section passenger flow estimation method based on train schedule
CN102867408A (en) Method and system for selecting bus trip route
CN106781489A (en) A kind of road network trend prediction method based on recurrent neural network
CN103761138A (en) Parameter correction method for traffic simulation software
CN103456163B (en) The city expressway interchange traffic capacity and running status method of discrimination and system
CN104732286A (en) Method for sensing safety situation of urban rail transit station
CN109243178A (en) Town way Traffic Safety Analysis and evaluation method under the conditions of a kind of bad climate
Mahut et al. Calibration and application of a simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment model
CN105930914A (en) City bus optimal charging structure charge determination method based on origin-destination distance
CN107767011B (en) Pedestrian characteristic acquisition system and service level dynamic evaluation method for railway station
CN106651181A (en) Bus passenger flow congestion risk evaluation method under network operation condition
CN106548272A (en) A kind of electric automobile fills the evaluation methodology of facility combination property soon
CN110807651A (en) Intercity railway passenger ticket time-sharing pricing method based on generalized cost function
CN107180534A (en) The express highway section average speed method of estimation of support vector regression fusion
Wang et al. A rank-dependent bi-criterion equilibrium model for stochastic transportation environment
CN111723871B (en) Estimation method for real-time carriage full load rate of bus
Chang et al. An integrated computer system for analysis, selection, and evaluation of unconventional intersections.
Chen et al. Social welfare maximization of multimodal transportation: Theory, metamodel, and application to Tianjin Ecocity, China

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20120808

Termination date: 20140714

EXPY Termination of patent right or utility model