CN101593106A - A kind of evaluation method of programming questions - Google Patents
A kind of evaluation method of programming questions Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN101593106A CN101593106A CNA2008101140278A CN200810114027A CN101593106A CN 101593106 A CN101593106 A CN 101593106A CN A2008101140278 A CNA2008101140278 A CN A2008101140278A CN 200810114027 A CN200810114027 A CN 200810114027A CN 101593106 A CN101593106 A CN 101593106A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- appraising
- point
- program
- source code
- condition
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of evaluation method of programming questions, comprise: the appraising point and the corresponding appraising standard thereof that set in advance described program design topic, described appraising standard comprises: the condition of appraising that code key word and key sequence constitute and the score value of appraising, carry out following step then: gather the program source code in the program design topic of waiting to appraise; When the program source code of being gathered mates with the condition of appraising that presets appraising point, this appraising point is scored according to presetting the score value of appraising; Receive the score value of appraising that the outside is imported for the appraising point of scoring, and this appraising point is scored with this score value of appraising.Utilize method provided by the present invention not only can the simplification group inscribe process, can also improve the speed of declaring volume, improve the consistance of declaring volume.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to computer technology, relate to a kind of evaluation method of programming questions especially.
Background technology
Continuous development along with network technology, computer technology, the computer-assisted examination system not only obtains using at present in the school-based examinations of many schools, and is used more and more in such as public examinations of large-scale society such as TOFEL, GRE, common english grade examinations.So-called computer-assisted examination generally carries out on computers, computing machine can provide the paper that meets the pre-defined rule examination question to specific tester according to actual needs, after the tester finishes the answer of corresponding examination question on computers, the program source code file of finishing is submitted to, and the person utilizes computer networking or off-grid to appraise by declaring the volume.
The program design course of various language is subjects of often examining in the computer studies, its method of examination is: arrange exercise question to the tester, require the tester to program with designated program language (as C, C++, Java, Pascal, Basic etc.), its content of examination mainly comprises program structure, data type, control structure, expression formula, function, program statement, file processing or the like.In the examination of program design topic, can the appraising point that several needs tester answers be set according to the needs of examination knowledge point usually.
In a kind of prior art, the method for setting a question and taking the description formula to set a question of program design topic, wherein, it is that examination person records item content and the form of examination knowledge point with the language narration in the examination question that the description formula is set a question; Finish the group topic of program design topic as the people that sets a question after, it is issued by computing machine, in examination, use for the tester.
The tester finishes its answer to the program design topic by terminal computer in the examination process, and the program source code of finishing is submitted to by network or preservation and submission in local computer.After this, the person is docile and obedient the program source code file that preface is manually opened every part of paper to declare the volume, and the appraising standard that requires in the program source code that the tester is submitted to and the exercise question compares, and manually provides corresponding answer mark.In this appraised process, the person that declares the volume, by part appraising manually that is, appraised to a paper and just to descend appraising of a paper after finishing all papers.
The process of setting a question of above-described program design topic and the examinee submitted to the process of appraising of answer paper is whole to have constituted the examination process that program design is inscribed in computer-assisted examination, and there is following shortcoming in the examining method that program design is inscribed in the above-mentioned prior art:
When setting a question with the method for describing formula, the paper of its formation can not be appraised automatically, the person opens the program source code file that the tester submits to by volume need to declare the volume when declaring volume, thereby appraise manually, problems such as labour intensity is big, inefficiency can appear thus, and there is the inconsistent result that appraises in the different periods in the person that also occurs declaring the volume easily for different testers' same program source code, and this also obviously is inequitable for the tester.
In another kind of prior art, in the process of setting a question of program design topic, examination person directly is programmed into appraising point in the program of appraising, and this moment can be by the program operation of simply appraising.But there is following significant deficiency in this prior art:
(1) each examination all needs to remodify program, and examination person can't independently set a question, and is very big to the dependence of program;
(2) the program mechanism of appraising is fairly simple, generally has only " correct give divide " and " the incorrect zero of giving " two kinds of mechanism of appraising, and makes partly and presets the program source code that answer not exclusively conforms to and be mistaken for mistake and non-score.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention provides a kind of evaluation method of programming questions, make program design topic when computer-assisted examination set a question with the process of appraising in, examination person's dirigibility increases, and person's efficient improves, labour intensity reduces and accuracy rate improves to declare the volume.
In order to solve the problems of the technologies described above, the invention provides a kind of evaluation method of programming questions, comprise: the appraising point and the corresponding appraising standard thereof that set in advance described program design topic, described appraising standard comprises: the condition of appraising that code key word and key sequence constitute and the score value of appraising, carry out following step then:
The collection program source code in the program design topic of waiting to appraise;
When the program source code of being gathered mates with the condition of appraising that presets appraising point, this appraising point is scored according to presetting the score value of appraising;
Receive the score value of appraising that the outside is imported for the appraising point of scoring, and this appraising point is scored with this score value of appraising.
Further, this method also comprises: show the appraising point and the program source code to be appraised of scoring.
Further, this method also comprises: when not existing in the program source code of being gathered when presetting the code of first keyword matching in the condition of appraising of appraising point, this appraising point is counted zero.
Further, show the appraising point and the program source code to be appraised of scoring according to the strategy that presets, the described strategy that presets comprises: according to the appraising point ordering or according to the key sequence ordering of presetting in the condition of appraising.
Further, judge the program source code gathered and preset the appraising point condition and whether mate and comprise:
Obtain the condition of appraising that each appraising point presets;
The traversal program source code obtains bead as the described condition keyword of appraising with the mode that reads character string;
Judge whether to exist the bead of same sequence according to key sequence in the appraising standard that presets, if, then the program source code of being gathered this appraising point with preset appraising point condition coupling.
Further, this method also comprises: in the program design topic of waiting to appraise, when program source code of being gathered and presetting of certain appraising point are appraised condition part coupling and above-mentioned identical part coupling proportion are higher than predetermined value in remain to be appraised program design topic, according to the appraising standard generation strategy that presets the information of this part coupling is increased to the pairing condition of appraising that presets of this appraising point, perhaps with this part match information as the condition of appraising to be confirmed.
Further, after receiving outside and being the score value of appraising imported of an appraising point of scoring, the identical appraising point that has same code in this score value of appraising other program design of waiting to appraise being inscribed is scored.
Further, receiving outside is the score value of appraising that an appraising point of scoring is imported, and after with this score value of appraising this appraising point being scored, also comprises: the score score value of all appraising point that program design is inscribed is added up.
Further, determine to carry out the program design topic of appraising of waiting of capture program source code according to the information of outside input.
Compared with prior art, utilize the evaluation method of programming questions in the embodiment of the invention to have following remarkable advantage:
(1) in the process of setting a question, content of examination still offers the tester in the mode of describing, and appraising point can be determined arbitrarily according to actual needs by examination person.This revises the appraising standard of appraising point easily, and has made things convenient for examination person's group topic process;
(2) in the process of appraising, adopt batch fashion to appraise for the program source code incomplete same with presetting the condition of appraising in the appraising standard (comprising string and the right string of program in program left side string, the program), the person needn't select paper repeatedly and consult appraising point to declare the volume, appraise continuously but concentrate, the continuity of person's thinking of like this not appraising is better, and efficient can be higher.In yet another aspect, there is the inconsistent phenomenon of appraising in the different periods in the person that also avoided occurring declaring the volume for different testers' same program source code.Certainly, the person that declares the volume also can independently appraise at certain or some testers' paper, the dirigibility that this has increased the person that declares the volume when declaring volume.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the method flow diagram of setting a question of the program design topic of the embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 2 is the appraising method process flow diagram of the program design topic of the embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 3 is the examination device of the program design topic of the embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 4 is the examination device of the program design topic of further embodiment of this invention.
Specific embodiment
A kind of evaluation method of programming questions, comprise: the appraising point and the corresponding appraising standard thereof that set in advance described program design topic, described appraising standard comprises: the condition of appraising that code key word and key sequence constitute and the score value of appraising, carry out following step then:
The collection program source code in the program design topic of waiting to appraise;
When the program source code of being gathered mates with the condition of appraising that presets appraising point, this appraising point is scored according to presetting the score value of appraising;
Receive the score value of appraising that the outside is imported for the appraising point of scoring, and this appraising point is scored with this score value of appraising.
From said method as seen, in the evaluation method of programming questions that the embodiment of the invention proposes, adopt batch fashion to appraise for the program source code inequality with presetting the condition of appraising in the appraising standard, the person needn't select paper repeatedly and consult appraising point to declare the volume, appraise continuously but concentrate, the continuity of person's thinking of like this not appraising is better, and efficient can be higher.Certainly, the person that declares the volume also can independently appraise at certain or some testers' paper, the dirigibility that this has increased the person that declares the volume when declaring volume.
Below in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments the present invention is done to introduce further, but not as a limitation of the invention.
In the computer-assisted examination system, by computing machine examination paper are presented in face of the tester usually, the tester is online to answer, and the paper that will finish answer is submitted to by network or preserve and submit at local computer.As the program design topic that generally adopts in the examination, because that it adopts branch is more, adopting the branch answer may not unique singularity, each appraising point in the program design topic can be extracted, and independently appraises so that realize.
Comprise the process of setting a question of examination question and the process of appraising of examination question finished in test for the examination process of program design topic, below employed method in these two processes is illustrated respectively:
In the process of setting a question of program design topic, as shown in the figure, adopt following steps:
Table 1
Wherein:
The appraising point numbering can be to preset special strategy according to certain to work out, and also can be the appraising point sequential organization according to the topic face;
The knowledge point is the knowledge point classification of appraising point, for example, and program structure, read statement, output statement, conditional statement etc.
The condition of appraising comprises string and the right string of program in program left side string, the program, for determining that tester's program source code is the standard of correct option; String and the right string of program are set according to sample code key word and key sequence in described program left side string, the program;
The score value of appraising, the score value that should charge to when correct for the program source code of this appraising point correspondence.
Below with a further example the above-mentioned method of setting a question is described, it is as follows to offer tester's test question information in the mode of describing in this example:
" Pascal program design topic: import two number a, b exports bigger number.”
This test question information is included in the program design topic that offers tester's use, finding test question information when taking an examination for the tester.
The model answer of this examination question is as follows:
| program?tt； var?a，b：integer； begin write(′please?input?a，b：′)； readln(a，b)； if?a＞b?then?writeln(a) else?writeln(b)； end. |
Determine that for above-mentioned content of examination the knowledge point that needs to investigate the tester is: program structure, read statement, output statement, conditional statement.Above-mentioned knowledge point is the appraising point in tester's feedback.Thus, can set up the appraising standard of this part Pascal program design topic that is described in table 2 below.
Table 2
Above-mentioned appraising standard is preserved with certain predetermined format, and sets up corresponding relation with corresponding program design topic identification information.For example: appraising standard can be stored with the form of set, and is as follows:
{12345，7，8，
1, program structure, { program, begin, end}, 1}
2, program structure, { program, var, integer}, 1}
3, program structure, { var, integer, begin}, 1}
4, read statement, { readln, a, b}, 1}
5, read statement, write, readln,, 1}
6, output statement, write,, }, 1}
7, output statement, writeln,, }, 1}
8, conditional statement, { if, then, else}, 1}
9, conditional statement, { if, a＞b, then}, 1}
10, conditional statement, else, writeln (b),, 1}
}
Illustrate: in above-mentioned set, the 1st row " this program design topic the numbering in exam pool of 12345 in { 12345; 7; 8, " for supposing, 7 expression topic types are that machine is declared operation questions, what 8 expressions were submitted to is the program source code file, thus, above-mentioned three key elements have been formed the identification information of described program design topic, have comprised the corresponding relation between appraising standard and the corresponding program design topic in the above-mentioned set.In other embodiments, appraising standard is inscribed between the identification information with corresponding program design and also can be adopted other mode to set up corresponding relation.
With reference to said method, promptly can finish setting a question of a program design topic, and can this examination question be offered the tester by the computer-assisted examination system.
When the tester finishes the answer of said procedure design topic, and after program source code submitted to, the person declared volume to all papers that receive according to batch fashion to declare the volume, and this declares the volume method as shown in Figure 2, comprising:
Step 201 receives the outside test question information of importing, and determines this program design that need appraise topic;
Described test question information can be: test duration, Test No., information such as examination question number in batches, can select the program design topic that will appraise thus easily according to actual needs, rather than remain to be appraised program design topic is appraised.
Step 202 is extracted the program source code file in tester's paper, generates its corresponding instance objects according to this program source code file.
In this step, gather when waiting to appraise program source code, obtain appraising point information and place test question information thereof, specifically can be appraising point institute corresponding program design topic identification information, appraising point numbering; And the identification information of program design topic can also comprise the numbering of topic information and this examination question place paper.
Specifically, in above-mentioned example, according to appraising point the program source code gathered successively, it can be realized with following step particularly:
According to the instance objects in the above-mentioned steps 202, open the file that comprises program source code that the tester submits to, following situation may appear in this moment:
(1) do not have any document, this expression tester does not upload annex, then this program design topic is directly counted zero, finishes appraising of this examination question;
(2) there is the document that to open with text mode, this expression tester submits to may not be the program source code file (for example, may compress and submit the .RAR condensed document to, also may be .doc document) with the Word establishment, then change this part paper over to unusual paper, by follow-up artificial manual process;
(3) have the program source code file that can normally open, the expression tester has successfully submitted the program source code file to.At this moment, at all appraising point in this program source code file, by the right string of string and program in appraising point traversal program source code file extraction procedure left side string, the program, promptly in the extraction procedure source code corresponding to the code of appraising point.
Step 204 compares program source code of being gathered and the condition of appraising of storing in advance, and carries out following respective handling according to result relatively:
(1) when can't an extraction procedure left side in the test volume during string, that is: when not existing in the program source code of being gathered when presetting the code of first keyword matching in the condition of appraising of appraising point, show that the examinee does not write related command, directly count zero with this appraising point this moment;
(2) when the program source code of being gathered and the condition of appraising when coupling of presetting appraising point (comprising that string and the right string of program are identical in program left side string, the program), directly this appraising point is scored according to presetting the score value of appraising;
(3) when not belonging to above-mentioned two kinds of situations, write down this appraising point information and test question information, wait for that this appraising point is carried out craft appraises.This craft is appraised and can be carried out in mode in batches, also can carry out at certain or some testers.
For example, in the above-mentioned steps example, certain test volume answer result is as follows:
| program?tt； var?a，b：integer； begin write(′please?input?a，b：′)； read(a)； readln(b)； readln(a，b)； if?b＜a?then?writeln(b) else?writeln(a)； |
For example: each appraising point place code of actual extracting and the result that appraises automatically are as shown in table 3 below:
Table 3
As seen, the 2nd, 3,5,6,7,8 is identical with this appraising point corresponding appraising condition, and it is appraised according to presetting the score value of appraising; 1st, 4,9,10 appraising point find program left side string, but string or right string are not inconsistent with default answer in the program, and then they being changed over to manually appraises waits to declare in the formation, and the system for the treatment of finishes after the process of appraising automatically by the artificial batch or the processing of appraising separately.
Step 206 after all appraising point score of all program design topics have all been finished, is added up per pass program design topic mark.
By said method as can be seen, adopt batch fashion to appraise for the program source code inequality with presetting the condition of appraising in the appraising standard, the person needn't select paper repeatedly and consult appraising point to declare the volume, appraise continuously but concentrate, the continuity of person's thinking of like this not appraising is better, and efficient can be higher.
Further, in the step 205 of the foregoing description, the person declares volume work fast for the ease of declaring the volume, can be according to presetting strategy ordering back when showing appraising point and waiting to appraise program source code, the described strategy that presets includes but not limited to: according to the appraising point ordering or according to the key sequence ordering of presetting in the condition of appraising.Thus, the person can judge at a glance to identical or similar answer to declare the volume, and need not repeatedly to repeat to judge, and also can avoid occurring two kinds of evaluation results for same code; For example: the c program data type of examination request is the floating point type " float " of single precision, but the code of gathering but is the floating point type " double " of double precision, this situation when paper is corrected, can select " to " or " mistake " be a standard, unified then correcting, and need not between various data types, repeatedly to consider.
Again further, can also be after receiving outside and being the score value of appraising imported of an appraising point of scoring, the identical appraising point that has same code in this score value of appraising other program design of waiting to appraise being inscribed is scored.Thus, further improve the person's that declares the volume work efficiency, also alleviated its labour intensity.
In another embodiment, in the program design topic of waiting to appraise, when program source code of being gathered and presetting of certain appraising point are appraised condition part coupling and above-mentioned identical part coupling proportion are higher than predetermined value in remain to be appraised program design topic, the information of this part being mated according to the appraising standard generation strategy that presets increases to the pairing condition of appraising that presets of this appraising point, perhaps with this part match information as the condition of appraising to be confirmed, increase to the pairing appraising standard that presets of this appraising point again after examining affirmation for the person that declares the volume.
In order to illustrate that better described scheme, the present invention also provide a kind of examination device of program design topic, as shown in Figure 3, this device comprises:
The sample module is used to set in advance appraising point and the corresponding appraising standard thereof that described program design is inscribed, and described appraising standard comprises: the condition of appraising and the score value of appraising that code key word and key sequence constitute;
The programmed acquisition module is used for gathering and waits to appraise the program source code of program design topic;
Processing module is used for indicating the module of appraising according to presetting the score value of appraising this appraising point to be scored when the program source code of being gathered mates with the condition of appraising that presets appraising point; And the appraising point that will score and corresponding program source code thereof offer external interface module;
External interface module is used to receive the score value of appraising that the outside is imported for the appraising point of scoring, and indicates the module of appraising with the score value of being imported of appraising this appraising point to be scored.
Further, this device also comprises:
Display module is used to show the appraising point and the program source code to be appraised of scoring.
Further, described processing module also is used for not existing when presetting the code of first keyword matching in the condition of appraising of appraising point at the program source code of being gathered, and the indication module of appraising is counted zero to this appraising point.
Further, this device also comprises:
The pre-matching module, be used for waiting the program design topic of appraising, when program source code of being gathered and presetting of certain appraising point are appraised condition part coupling and above-mentioned identical part coupling proportion are higher than predetermined value in remain to be appraised program design topic, according to the appraising standard generation strategy that presets the information of this part coupling is increased to the pairing condition of appraising that presets of this appraising point, perhaps with this part match information as the condition of appraising to be confirmed.
Further, this device also comprises: matching module, be used for after described external interface module receives the outside and is the score value of appraising imported of an appraising point of scoring, the corresponding code of appraising point in all the other other program design topics of waiting to appraise of not importing the score value of appraising is mated, and indicate described score module the appraising point that the match is successful to be scored with this score value of having appraised.
Further, this device also comprises: statistical module, be used for when there is not the appraising point of scoring in described external interface module, and the score score value that belongs to same program design topic is added up.
Further, described external interface module also is used to receive the outside test question information of importing;
At this moment, the described device of appraising also comprises: the examination question chosen module, be used for the test question information that receives according to described outside receiver module, and determine program design topic qualified to be appraised.
The device of appraising of a kind of program design topic that in another specific embodiment of the present invention, provides, as shown in Figure 4, comprising: sample module, programmed acquisition module, processing module, external interface module, display module, score module, pre-matching module, matching module, statistical module and examination question chosen module.
Illustrate a bit: examining method is inscribed in the program design that reaches of the present invention, not only can be used for the computer-assisted examination system of the network edition, also can be used in the computer-assisted examination system of standalone version.
Obviously, those skilled in the art can carry out various changes and modification to the present invention and not break away from the spirit and scope of the present invention.Like this, if of the present invention these are revised and modification belongs within the scope of claim of the present invention and equivalent technologies thereof, then the present invention also is intended to comprise these changes and modification interior.
Claims (9)
1. evaluation method of programming questions, comprise: the appraising point and the corresponding appraising standard thereof that set in advance described program design topic, described appraising standard comprises: the condition of appraising that code key word and key sequence constitute and the score value of appraising, carry out following step then:
The collection program source code in the program design topic of waiting to appraise;
When the program source code of being gathered mates with the condition of appraising that presets appraising point, this appraising point is scored according to presetting the score value of appraising;
Receive the score value of appraising that the outside is imported for the appraising point of scoring, and this appraising point is scored with this score value of appraising.
2. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, this method also comprises: show the appraising point and the program source code to be appraised of scoring.
3. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, this method also comprises: when not existing in the program source code of being gathered when presetting the code of first keyword matching in the condition of appraising of appraising point, this appraising point is counted zero.
4. the method for claim 1, it is characterized in that, show the appraising point and the program source code to be appraised of scoring according to the strategy that presets, the described strategy that presets comprises: according to the appraising point ordering or according to the key sequence ordering of presetting in the condition of appraising.
5. whether the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, judge the program source code gathered and preset the appraising point condition and mate further and comprise:
Obtain the condition of appraising that each appraising point presets;
The traversal program source code obtains bead as the described condition keyword of appraising with the mode that reads character string;
Judge whether to exist the bead of same sequence according to key sequence in the appraising standard that presets, if, then the program source code of being gathered this appraising point with preset appraising point condition coupling.
6. the method for claim 1, it is characterized in that, this method also comprises: in the program design topic of waiting to appraise, when program source code of being gathered and presetting of certain appraising point are appraised condition part coupling and above-mentioned identical part coupling proportion are higher than predetermined value in remain to be appraised program design topic, according to the appraising standard generation strategy that presets the information of this part coupling is increased to the pairing condition of appraising that presets of this appraising point, perhaps with this part match information as the condition of appraising to be confirmed.
7. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, after receiving outside and being the score value of appraising imported of an appraising point of scoring, the identical appraising point that has same code in this score value of appraising other program design of waiting to appraise being inscribed is scored.
8. the method for claim 1, it is characterized in that, receiving outside is the score value of appraising that an appraising point of scoring is imported, and after with this score value of appraising this appraising point being scored, also comprises: the score score value of all appraising point that program design is inscribed is added up.
9. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, determines to carry out the program design topic of appraising of waiting of capture program source code according to the information of outside input.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA2008101140278A CN101593106A (en) | 2008-05-30 | 2008-05-30 | A kind of evaluation method of programming questions |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA2008101140278A CN101593106A (en) | 2008-05-30 | 2008-05-30 | A kind of evaluation method of programming questions |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN101593106A true CN101593106A (en) | 2009-12-02 |
Family
ID=41407776
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA2008101140278A Pending CN101593106A (en) | 2008-05-30 | 2008-05-30 | A kind of evaluation method of programming questions |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN101593106A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103413470A (en) * | 2013-07-24 | 2013-11-27 | 西南大学 | C language programming teaching and test comprehensive system and method |
| CN104794060A (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2015-07-22 | 广州视源电子科技股份有限公司 | Background processing method and system of online scoring system |
| CN109712044A (en) * | 2018-12-29 | 2019-05-03 | 华中师范大学 | Program assessment method, device and read/write memory medium |
| CN110060530A (en) * | 2019-04-23 | 2019-07-26 | 南京邮电大学 | It is a kind of towards programming topic operation companion mutually comment system and method |
-
2008
- 2008-05-30 CN CNA2008101140278A patent/CN101593106A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103413470A (en) * | 2013-07-24 | 2013-11-27 | 西南大学 | C language programming teaching and test comprehensive system and method |
| CN104794060A (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2015-07-22 | 广州视源电子科技股份有限公司 | Background processing method and system of online scoring system |
| CN109712044A (en) * | 2018-12-29 | 2019-05-03 | 华中师范大学 | Program assessment method, device and read/write memory medium |
| CN110060530A (en) * | 2019-04-23 | 2019-07-26 | 南京邮电大学 | It is a kind of towards programming topic operation companion mutually comment system and method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109800761A (en) | Method and terminal based on deep learning model creation paper document structural data | |
| CN109816118A (en) | A kind of method and terminal of the creation structured document based on deep learning model | |
| CN112631997A (en) | Data processing method, device, terminal and storage medium | |
| CN107153844A (en) | The accessory system being improved to flowers identifying system and the method being improved | |
| CN110909035A (en) | Personalized review question set generation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN101593106A (en) | A kind of evaluation method of programming questions | |
| CN110556173A (en) | intelligent classification management system and method for inspection report | |
| CN112163553A (en) | Material price accounting method and device, storage medium and computer equipment | |
| CN101593107A (en) | A kind of appraisal system of program design topic | |
| CN109408803A (en) | A method of it semantic understanding for subjective item natural language and corrects | |
| CN101587512A (en) | Appraising method for gap filling questions in computer auxiliary test system | |
| CN101587511A (en) | Appraising method for short answer questions in computer auxiliary test system | |
| CN110795630B (en) | Learning scheme recommendation method and device | |
| CN116166717B (en) | Artificial intelligence information extraction method applied to resume | |
| CN112396395A (en) | System and method for homework correction | |
| CN101587513A (en) | Appraising system for short answer questions in computer auxiliary test system | |
| CN101593233A (en) | A kind of appraisal system of Word operation questions | |
| CN111242427A (en) | Method and system for evaluating relation between nutrition and growth development of children | |
| CN201196783Y (en) | Examination device for Word operation test | |
| CN116541711A (en) | Model training method, course recommendation method, device, equipment and medium | |
| CN101593243A (en) | A kind of examining method of Word operation questions | |
| CN201196787Y (en) | Examination device for Word operation test | |
| CN201196789Y (en) | Examination device for Excel operation test | |
| CN101593242A (en) | A kind of appraisal system of Excel operation questions | |
| CN201196786Y (en) | Examination device for Access operation test |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Open date: 20091202 |