CN101567902B - Service selection method for supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs - Google Patents
Service selection method for supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN101567902B CN101567902B CN2009100328640A CN200910032864A CN101567902B CN 101567902 B CN101567902 B CN 101567902B CN 2009100328640 A CN2009100328640 A CN 2009100328640A CN 200910032864 A CN200910032864 A CN 200910032864A CN 101567902 B CN101567902 B CN 101567902B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- service
- quality requirement
- synergetic
- collaborator
- affairs
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a service selection method for supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs, which comprises the following steps: reading information on each participant in the current synergy and storing the information in a storing device by a main server CPU; obtaining service lists used by each synergetic participant in the current synergy; analyzing and obtaining shared services of the synergetic participants; determining quality requirements of the synergetic participants on shared services; constructing a decision space for performing shared services candidate objects; determining the weight of each quality requirement through pairing comparison matrixes established by each synergetic participant, and transmitting the weight to a main server; normalizing the weight of the quality requirement of each synergetic participant; calculating the satisfaction degree of each shared service candidate object in the decision space to the quality requirement of each synergetic participant; and selecting a suitable service by the main server. From the establishment of service descriptions, in the whole selection process, the automatic calculation is realized by a computer, thus the reliability and the running efficiency are improved.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of service selection method of supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs, be particularly useful for choosing under the mainframe computer network business platform service logic and participate in implementing to stride under the service groups cyclization border of organizing the businesses process service selection method in describing based on synergetic affairs.
Background technology
Under the inter-organization synergetic environment, finish a certain business objective alternately by information, resource between the different tissues.When these realize that by service the coordination of own service function is finished a certain business objective, need consideration how to select to be participated in collaborative by the collaborator services shared.What proposed at present carries out in the method for services selection based on service quality (QoS), seldom has method to consider to be united by a plurality of collaborator services shared and the different quality requirement that how different collaborator proposed to select the problem of its share service.Liangzhao Zeng, Boualem Benatallah, Marlon Dumas, Jayant Kalagnanm, the paper of and Henry Chang have provided the quality that 5 service quality critical parameters are passed judgment on service.[QoS-Aware?Middleware?for?web?service?composition(IEEE?Transaction?on?Software?Engineering，vol.30，no.5，May?2004)]。But, in the share service of utilizing the inter-organization synergetic affairs under the Computer Processing service groups cyclization border, and when carrying out the system service computing, no longer be that single service user judges to the judgement of service quality, but a plurality of teamworkers judge jointly in this synergetic affairs.How the quality requirement of comprehensive all collaborator the and how requirement of each collaborator is converted into objective quantifiable standard from subjectivity all is the problem that share service is selected under the inter-organization synergetic affairs environment.More than have only second problem to have a small amount of related work to pay close attention in two problems.
Summary of the invention
Goal of the invention: technical problem to be solved by this invention is at the deficiencies in the prior art, and a kind of service selection method of supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs is provided.
Technical scheme: the invention discloses a kind of service selection method of supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs, deposit the service logic data of description in the master server memory after, further comprising the steps of:
The service logic that master server CPU reads in the business procedure that deposits memory in is described;
The analysis service logic is described, and obtains the service list that each collaborator is used in the synergetic affairs;
Analyze between each collaborator and serve shared relationship, obtain the share service between all collaborator;
Determine that collaborator in each synergetic affairs is to the quality requirement of share service;
Set up share service candidate target decision space according to the quality requirement of each collaborator in the synergetic affairs;
Obtain its weight ordering for the paired comparator matrix analysis of the collaborator utilization in each synergetic affairs to the share service quality requirement;
Obtain their significance level ordering for the paired comparator matrix analysis of each collaborator utilization in the synergetic affairs;
Utilize the method for maximum characteristic root iteration to obtain the common quality requirement ordering of all collaborator of synergetic affairs;
For each share service to be chosen, quantize the quality requirement of its quality judging side to it, promptly utilize the simple weighted method that each share service candidate target is carried out quality evaluation;
CPU selects suitable share service candidate target to the satisfaction degree ordering of each share service candidate target to the quality requirement of all collaborator in the synergetic affairs.
Among the present invention, the described share service candidate target decision space of setting up may further comprise the steps:
Step 201 reads service logic and obtains all share service that collaborator is used in the inter-organization synergetic affairs;
Step 202 for any share service, reads each collaborator in the synergetic affairs of sharing this service to its quality requirement;
Step 203 is set up the quality requirement of this share service and is gathered QS, is initialized as empty set;
Step 204 reads a quality requirement;
Step 205 is judged the shared quality requirement that this quality requirement is proposed by a plurality of collaborator, and still the non-shared quality requirement that is only proposed by a collaborator carry out step 207 if share after quality requirement then carry out step 206; Otherwise directly carry out step 207;
Step 206 for the shared quality requirement of synergetic affairs share service, is determined unitized quality requirement codomain according to the quality requirement that the collaborator of sharing this service is different, and with this codomain as new quality requirement;
Step 207 adds quality requirement set QS with quality requirement;
Step 208 judges that whether quality requirement is read to the greatest extent, if read carry out step 209 to the greatest extent, otherwise carry out step 204;
Step 209 is gathered the set that QS determines the object to be selected of this share service, i.e. share service candidate target decision space according to quality requirement;
Step 210 finishes.
Among the present invention, each collaborator in described service logic description, synergetic affairs, the synergetic affairs provides by the XML document form of having set up label the quality requirement of service.
Beneficial effect: a kind of service selection method of supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs disclosed by the invention, from setting up description to service, the whole process of choosing is calculated by the computer realization automation, need not the adding of human factor, objectivity and operational efficiency have been improved, adopt step analysis model (AHP model), make the relative previous methods of selection result also more objective.The service of comprehensively having considered simultaneously choose that quality judging under the situation requires and more options person between require unitized problem, make the service that is selected can better satisfy collaborative needs.
Description of drawings
Below in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments the present invention is done further to specify, above-mentioned and/or otherwise advantage of the present invention will become apparent.
Fig. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is for being the flow chart of setting up the unitized quality requirement codomain of all collaborator among the present invention.
Service Triangle Model under service combination among Fig. 3 embodiment, the service selection environment.
Fig. 4 is the AHP model of unified all collaborator quality requirements.
Embodiment:
The invention discloses a kind of service selection method of supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs, deposit the service logic data of description in the master server memory after, further comprising the steps of:
The service logic that master server CPU reads in the business procedure that deposits memory in is described;
The analysis service logic is described, and obtains the service list that each collaborator is used in the synergetic affairs;
Analyze between each collaborator and serve shared relationship, obtain the share service between all collaborator;
Determine that collaborator in each synergetic affairs is to the quality requirement of share service;
Set up share service candidate target decision space according to the quality requirement of each collaborator in the synergetic affairs;
Obtain its weight ordering for the paired comparator matrix analysis of the collaborator utilization in each synergetic affairs to the share service quality requirement;
Obtain their significance level ordering for the paired comparator matrix analysis of each collaborator utilization in the synergetic affairs;
Utilize the method for maximum characteristic root iteration to obtain the common quality requirement ordering of all collaborator of synergetic affairs;
For each share service to be chosen, quantize the quality requirement of its quality judging side to it, promptly utilize the simple weighted method that each share service candidate target is carried out quality evaluation;
CPU selects suitable share service candidate target to the satisfaction degree ordering of each share service candidate target to the quality requirement of all collaborator in the synergetic affairs.
Embodiment 1:
More particularly, as shown in Figure 1, the present invention may further comprise the steps after the start program operation after master server deposits the service logic data of description of each collaborator in computer storage: step 1, and the service logic that master server CPU reads in the business procedure that deposits computer storage in is described; Step 2 is analyzed service logic and is described, and obtains the service list that each collaborator is used; Step 3, the service shared relationship in the Analysis Service tabulation between each collaborator is determined by the common share service of using of a plurality of collaborator; Step 4 is analyzed the quality requirement of each collaborator for share service for each share service; Step 5 obtains shared quality requirement and the non-shared quality requirement of collaborator for share service; Step 6 for each shared quality requirement, obtains unitized quality requirement codomain; Step 7, the decision space that quality requirement codomain that foundation is unitized and non-shared quality requirement are determined the share service candidate target; Step 8 is utilized the significance level ordering of maximum each collaborator of characteristic root iteration Method for the sole mass requirement; Step 9, the significance level of utilizing maximum characteristic root iteration Method to share between the collaborator of this service to all collaborator sorts; Step 10, all collaborator quality requirements of sharing this share service are unitized; Step 11 utilizes the simple weighted method that share service candidate target in the decision space is assessed, and step 12 judges whether to still have not evaluated share service, does not finish as having then, otherwise forwards step 6 to, continues to obtain not evaluated share service; All described service logics are described, collaborator all provides by the XML document form of having set up label for the quality requirement of share service.
As shown in Figure 2, describedly share quality requirement according to collaborator and determine that the decision space of share service candidate target may further comprise the steps: step 201, read service logic and obtain all share service that collaborator is used in the inter-organization synergetic affairs; Step 202 for any share service, reads each collaborator in the synergetic affairs of sharing this service to its quality requirement; Step 203 is set up the quality requirement of this share service and is gathered QS, is initialized as empty set; Step 204 reads a quality requirement; Step 205 is judged the shared quality requirement that this quality requirement is proposed by a plurality of collaborator, and still the non-shared quality requirement that is only proposed by a collaborator carry out step 207 if share after quality requirement then carry out step 206; Otherwise directly carry out step 207; Step 206 for the shared quality requirement of synergetic affairs share service, is determined unitized quality requirement codomain according to the quality requirement that the collaborator of sharing this service is different, and with this codomain as new quality requirement; Step 207 adds quality requirement set QS with quality requirement; Step 208 judges that whether quality requirement is read to the greatest extent, if read carry out step 209 to the greatest extent, otherwise carry out step 204; Step 209 is gathered the set that QS determines the object to be selected of this share service, i.e. share service candidate target decision space according to quality requirement; Step 210 finishes.
Described share service refer to participate in the whole service flow process, independently, the main body of service is provided.Describing its just in logic description of stage in service logic, is not an entity.Under service groups cyclization border, need to select suitable share service candidate target by service Triangle Model as shown in Figure 2.Comprise service register center among Fig. 2, service requester and ISP.Service requester can send service request or require service-seeking to service register center to the ISP, and the ISP can require service registry to service register center.In computer server, obtain the main body that all can finish the requirement in logic of this share service, then in all candidates, choose only one by the inventive method.When an ISP provided a new Web service for use, the ISP issued its interface to service register center, mainly comprises I/O parameter (I/O), type of message, operation and functional description etc.The ISP also needs to provide the information of self simultaneously, and as title, contact etc., a key message that also needs to provide is the URL of this service of request.What service requester was desired is the Web service that meets self-demand by request, finishes this demand thereby can spend under the less cost situation of (not needing oneself this service function of exploitation).For this reason, service requester need be sought the service that needs in the available service that registration center is enumerated, bind this service then, asks this service according to service describing to the ISP.
Service logic is described the set that the service that each collaborator is used in the inter-organization synergetic is provided.It provides with following form by the XML file:
Above file format is to use mandatory form when of the present invention.Collaborator represents to participate in a collaborator in the synergetic affairs; Wherein name represents the title of collaborator, and ctname represents the title of the inter-organization synergetic affairs that collaborator participates in.
The quality requirement file provides collaborator to use the set of the quality requirement of service for himself, and it provides with following form by the XML file:
Above file format is to use mandatory form when of the present invention.User represents to use the collaborator title of this service, and servicename represents service name.Quality-dimension represents each quality requirement; Wherein maxreq represents biggest quality requirement, and minreq represents the minimum mass requirement, if certain requirement represents then that for null collaborator does not propose the occurrence of this requirement.It is to count variable set one by one that quality judging requires set, five given critical parameters come from document [QoS-Aware Middleware for web service composition in IEEE Transaction On Software Engineering (Liangzhao Zeng in the example file, Boualem Benatallah, Marlon Dumas, Jayant Kalagnanm, and Henry Chang, IEEE Transactions On Software Engineering, VOL.30, No.5, May 2004)] the middle service quality critical parameter that proposes.When carrying out this method, the quality judging parameter can be carried out additions and deletions to satisfy the concrete needs of using according to the difference of specifically serving user's requirement.
It is described that to obtain the process of all share service according to each collaborator own service logical description in the synergetic affairs as follows:
Read in the service logic description document (promptly participate in service and the collaborator that all collaborator are used in the synergetic affairs it is used the description set of quality of service requirement) of each collaborator in the synergetic affairs; Read each collaborator label, set up storage it; Read the service that all these collaborator in this collaborator use; Travel through the content of each contract label in reading most all contract labels.All tag storage contents of traversal are set up the service list that each collaborator self is used after the content in reading most all contract labels; Obtain the share service of being used simultaneously by a plurality of collaborator in all synergetic affairs and set up the share service synergetic affairs relation of representing with following form: S-CT
I-j-...-n=＜Shared-ServiceName:Useri, Userj ..., User
n; Expression collaborator User
i, User
j..., User
nShare service Shared-ServiceName.
Described as follows to the unitized codomain process of the definite shared quality requirement of quality requirement of its share service according to all collaborator:
Concern S-CT for the share service synergetic affairs
I-j-...-n=＜Shared-ServiceName:User
i, User
j..., User
n, collaborator provides the quality requirement file for share service separately.Travel through the quality requirement file that each collaborator provides; Read the quality-dimension value set in the qualityfile file label that the corresponding share service of this collaborator provides and set up the quality requirement tabulation that this collaborator proposes, maximum for each quality-dimension internal labeling requires and the minimum formation quality requirement space that requires, form with [minreq, maxreq] is represented.If the minreq respective value is null in the mark, then get 0, the maxreq respective value is null, then gets positive infinity.After the quality requirement of the collaborator in all share service synergetic affairs relations of traversal, obtain the quality requirement of being shared by a plurality of collaborator; For each shared quality requirement, obtain the quality requirement space that all collaborator of sharing it propose; Relatively the minimum value in the quality requirement space of the collaborator of all shared these quality requirements proposition is got wherein the maximum; Relatively the maximum in the quality requirement space of the collaborator of all shared these quality requirements proposition is got wherein reckling; More than minimum, maximum in two steps constitute new quality requirement space, be the unitized codomain of unitized shared quality requirement.
Step 8 is application processes of typical analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to step 10.Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is proposed the seventies in last century by the U.S. scholar T.L.Saaty that plans strategies for, be a kind of be simple and easy to, effectively, decision tool that applicability is strong.The initial application of AHP focuses mostly in the decision making through operations research field, and it is a recent studies on that the share service under the inter-organization synergetic of the present invention is chosen.For choosing of each share service, all to carry out the process that step 8 is described to step 10, all choose end until all share service.
The 1-9 theory that needs foundation in the step 8 is to advance a theory simultaneously when Saaty proposes the AHP model: a series of criterion of needs when whether meeting the demands for a certain target of judgement, these judge that the significance level that " relatively " arranged between the mark compares.Determine in the quality requirement file that this degree relatively needs collaborator to provide in step 4 in this method.Be created as more respectively comparing matrix by the significance level of each collaborator for the quality requirement that self proposes in the step 8, the maximum characteristic vector of calculating this paired comparator matrix is ordering vector ω
(i)And the CR of matrix eigenvalue of maximum is relatively carried out consistency check by being calculated to be; The service logic file that reads in the then logical step 9 mistake step 2 is set up the paired comparator matrix between the collaborator, calculate the eigenvalue of maximum of this paired comparator matrix and carry out consistency check, if by then with its maximum characteristic vector γ as the ordering vector between collaborator.
The 1-9 theory of the Saaty of institute's foundation can see Table 1:
Table 1
| Yardstick a ij | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Comparison criterion | Identical | Strong slightly | By force | Obviously strong | Absolute strong |
2,4,6,8 corresponding intermediate degree of closing on comparison criterion about them wherein.
Consistency check is used in the step 8,9 formula and check table: see Table 2
CR＝CI/RI；
Wherein: CI=(λ
Max-n)/(n-1); λ in the formula
MaxTie up the eigenvalue of maximum of paired comparator matrix for n;
Table 2:RI table is as follows:
| ? |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| ?RI n | 0 | 0 | 0.52 | 0.89 | 1.11 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.45 |
If calculate CR＜0.15, then think by consistency check, otherwise notice provides the collaborator of this quality requirement comparison or provide the synergetic affairs that compares between the collaborator to be adjusted to matrix.
Step 10 is as follows according to the process that maximum characteristic root alternative manner calculates unitized quality requirement: the collaborator for the share service that calculates in the step 8 is combined into a matrix A for the quality requirement ordering vector of serving
(m*n)(n equals the collaborator number of share service, and m is the number of the quality requirement maximum that proposes of the collaborator of n share service.Other collaborator that do not propose this aspect quality requirement component value herein are 0), obtain unified quality requirement weights by the ordering vector γ that obtains in the calculation procedure 9 and the product of A.
Step 11 is according to the simple weighted method, utilize on the decision space that the quality requirement weights that obtain in the step 10 obtain in step 7 to have living space in share service calculate its score and ordering for the collaborator quality requirement of sharing it.
The quality yardstick (quality dimension) of the following formula calculation services of foundation on the QoS index:
Utilize formula (1) to calculate for the quality requirement (being the more for a short time quality requirement that shows that quality is good more of its required value) of those " passiveness " types, utilize formula (2) calculating for the quality requirement (being the big more quality requirement that shows that quality is good more of its required value) of those " actively " types; After obtaining the quality yardstick of each quality requirement, utilize formula
(3) " score " of each share service in the calculating decision space." score " high more service quality that shows is high more, and service all in the decision space " score " is sorted, select " score " the highest as share service.If there be a plurality of the highest " score ", then select one of them at random.
Embodiment 2
Be based on based on the basic point of departure of the share service choosing method of synergetic affairs under the inter-organization synergetic environment and analyze service logic and describe, obtain the share service in the synergetic affairs, and determine the decision space of share service according to automatic analysis; The collaborator that obtains share service in the synergetic affairs unitizes to the quality requirement of share service and with it, then uses the SAW method and carries out choosing of share service.
The process of choosing with following service logic is the specific embodiment that example is introduced the inventive method.
Certain manufacturer (Manufacture) wishes to find a proper raw material supplier (Supplier) to provide it to produce needed raw material by the pattern that service is chosen.As shown in Figure 2, in by the service register center in the service Triangle Model, can obtain a collection of supplier that its needed raw material can be provided.Most its transportation service of material supplier's outsourcing are given logistics carrier (Shipment) under present market situation.
In the synergetic affairs under the inter-organization synergetic environment that above-mentioned service logic is described, 3 collaborator: Manufacture, Supplier and ShipmentCompany have been comprised.Carry out choosing of share service in the synergetic affairs according to step as shown in Figure 1.Step behind the initial actuating (1) is read in the service logic description document that comprises all collaborator information; Service logic description document (service logic) in this example is as follows:
The quality requirement file that uses in this example is as follows:
In the above-mentioned service logic file collaborator label record information on services that collaborator uses in the synergetic affairs; Analyze service logic according to step 2 and obtain collaborator: Manufacture, Supplier, the service list that ShipmentCompany and each collaborator are used.Collaborator name, ctname in the service logic file represent the collaborator title with and the synergetic affairs title of subordinate.Step 2 can determine that the service list of each collaborator use is as follows:
(1)Manufacture：ProductInfo、Bank、Advertisement；
(2)Supplier：Accepter、Bank、AfterService；
(3)ShipmentCompany：Accepter、Bank；
Can judge the share service that obtains the common use of collaborator: Bank by step 3.
Step 4 reads the quality requirement file of each collaborator for share service Bank: qualityfile.The quality requirement that this document provides the service that collaborator needs self with and significance level information relatively; Wherein the quality requirement implication of Chu Xianing is followed successively by: the availability (available) of price (price), service execution time (duration), service, service success rate (successful rate) and reputation (reputation).
By being extracted, the automatic analysis of above-mentioned file obtains each collaborator for the quality requirement of share service and according to sharing quality requirement and non-shared quality requirement between the definite collaborator of step 5.
The unitized codomain of sharing quality requirement according to step 6 pair definite collaborator is as follows:
Price：[0，0.2]
Duration[0workdays，2workdays]
Available[1，1]
Successful?Rate：[0.95，1]
Reputation[4S，5S]
The candidate service that pair has a Bank function by step 7 is screened and is obtained share service candidate target decision space: { ICBC, CBC, CMB}.
The quality requirement file content that step 8 reads according to step 4 is set up between the quality requirement that each collaborator proposes comparator matrix in pairs: see Table 3, table 4, table 5;
Table 3: collaborator Manufacture is for the paired comparator matrix of quality requirement:
| Manufacture | Available | Successful?rate | Reputation | ω |
| Available | 1 | 1/6 | 1/3 | 0.0953 |
| Successful?rate | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0.6548 |
| Reputation | 3 | 1/3 | 1 | 0.2499 |
Table 4 collaborator Supplier is for the paired comparator matrix of quality requirement:
| Supplier | Duration | Available | Successful?rate | Reputation | | ω |
| Duration | ||||||
| 1 | 1/5 | 1/7 | 2 | 5 | 0.0979 | |
| Available | 5 | 1 | 1/2 | 6 | 8 | 0.3211 |
| Successful?rate | 7 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 0.4827 |
| |
1/2 | 1/5 | 1/7 | 1 | 4 | 0.0680 |
| |
1/5 | 1/8 | 1/9 | 1/4 | 1 | 0.0303 |
Table 5 collaborator ShipmentCompany is for the paired comparator matrix of quality requirement:
| ShipmentCompany | Duration | Available | Successful?rate | Reputation | | ω |
| Duration | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 0.3482 | |
| Available | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 0.3482 |
| Successful? |
1/6 | 1/6 | 1 | 1/4 | 5 | 0.0697 |
| |
1/2 | 1/2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 0.2096 |
| |
1/9 | 1/9 | 1/5 | 1/8 | 1 | 0.0270 |
The consistency check result of each collaborative matrix is respectively: 0.016,0.0678,0.0423, all satisfy consistency check;
When definite share service Bank, use its collaborator to have: therefore Manufacture, Supplier, ShipmentCompany need to adopt multilayer AHP model as shown in Figure 3.
Step 9 reads in the service logic file about the information of significance level between the collaborator and sets up between the collaborator relatively paired comparator matrix: see Table 6:
Table 6:
| ?Manufacture | Supplier | ShipmentCompany | γ | |
| Manufacture | ?1 | 1/5 | 1 | 0.1111 |
| Supplier | ?5 | 1 | 5 | 0.7778 |
| ShipmentCompany | ?1 | 1/5 | 1 | 0.1111 |
The procedure level structure such as accompanying drawing 3 ground floors of unified all collaborator quality requirements are target: choose only share service Bank; The second layer is a collaborator of sharing the Bank service when selecting Bank; The 3rd layer is the quality requirement of each collaborator to it, and specific requirement is read in step 4 and preserved; The 4th layer of the candidate that the Bank function can be provided for all (in this example being 3) candidates.
Step 10 is unitized for the quality requirement of share service with each collaborator according to the characteristic root alternative manner, obtains unified quality requirement weights:
Step 11 utilizes simple weighted (SAW) method to being marked by the service in the decision space of determining in the step 7 and according to ordering from high to low, selecting " score " the highest service:
Utilize formula
Calculate " score " of each share service candidate target in the decision space:
Score(ICBC)
＝1×0.1148+1×0.2991+0.5×0.4558+0.125×0.0758+0×0.0544
＝0.1148+0.2991+0.2279+0.009475+0＝0.651275；
Score(CBC)
＝0×0.1148+1×0.2991+1×0.4558+0×0.0758+0.5×0.0544
＝0+0.2991+0.4558+0+0.0272
＝0.7821
Score(CMB)
＝1×0.1148+1×0.2991+0×0.4558+1×0.0758+0.5×0.0544
＝0.1148+0.2991+0+0.0758+0.0272
＝0.5169
Maximum " score " is: CBC, " score " is 0.7821.Therefore select the share service of CBC as synergetic affairs in the inter-organization synergetic.
The invention provides a kind of thinking and method of supporting the service selection method of inter-organization synergetic affairs; the method and the approach of this technical scheme of specific implementation are a lot; the above only is a preferred implementation of the present invention; should be understood that; for those skilled in the art; under the prerequisite that does not break away from the principle of the invention, can also make some improvements and modifications, these improvements and modifications also should be considered as protection scope of the present invention.The all available prior art of each component part not clear and definite in the present embodiment is realized.
Claims (3)
1. service selection method of supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs, deposit the service logic data of description in the master server memory after, it is characterized in that, further comprising the steps of:
The service logic that master server CPU reads in the business procedure that deposits memory in is described;
Read the service logic description document and obtain the service list that each collaborator is used in the synergetic affairs;
Thereby the common factor of asking for each collaborator service list is determined services shared between the collaborator;
Determine that each collaborator is to the quality requirement of share service in the synergetic affairs;
Set up share service candidate target decision space according to the quality requirement of each collaborator in the synergetic affairs;
Obtain its weight ordering for the paired comparator matrix analysis of the collaborator utilization in each synergetic affairs to the share service quality requirement;
Obtain their weight ordering for the paired comparator matrix analysis of each collaborator utilization in the synergetic affairs;
Utilize maximum characteristic root iterative method to obtain each the index weight ordering of the common quality requirement of all collaborator of synergetic affairs;
For each share service to be chosen, quantize the quality requirement of its quality judging side to it, promptly utilize the simple weighted method that each share service candidate target is carried out quality evaluation, assessment result is the quality requirement satisfaction degree of share service to all collaborator in the synergetic affairs;
CPU selects suitable share service candidate target to the satisfaction degree ordering of each share service candidate target to the quality requirement of all collaborator in the synergetic affairs.
2. a kind of service selection method of supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs according to claim 1 is characterized in that, the described share service candidate target decision space of setting up may further comprise the steps:
Step (201) reads service logic and obtains all share service that collaborator is used in the inter-organization synergetic affairs;
Step (202) for any share service, reads each collaborator in the synergetic affairs of sharing this service to its quality requirement;
Step (203) is set up the quality requirement of this share service and is gathered QS, is initialized as empty set;
Step (204) reads a quality requirement;
Step (205) is judged the shared quality requirement that this quality requirement is proposed by a plurality of collaborator, and still the non-shared quality requirement that is only proposed by a collaborator then carries out carrying out step (207) after the step (206) if share quality requirement; Otherwise directly carry out step (207);
Step (206) for the shared quality requirement of synergetic affairs share service, is determined unitized quality requirement codomain according to the quality requirement that the collaborator of sharing this service is different, and with this codomain as new quality requirement;
Step (207) adds quality requirement set QS with quality requirement;
Step (208) judges that whether quality requirement is read to the greatest extent, if read to carry out step (209) to the greatest extent, otherwise carries out step (204);
Step (209) is gathered the set that QS determines the object to be selected of this share service, i.e. share service candidate target decision space according to quality requirement;
Step (210) finishes.
3. a kind of service selection method of supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs according to claim 1 and 2, it is characterized in that each collaborator in described service logic description, synergetic affairs, the synergetic affairs provides by the XML document form of having set up label the quality requirement of service.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2009100328640A CN101567902B (en) | 2009-06-04 | 2009-06-04 | Service selection method for supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2009100328640A CN101567902B (en) | 2009-06-04 | 2009-06-04 | Service selection method for supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN101567902A CN101567902A (en) | 2009-10-28 |
| CN101567902B true CN101567902B (en) | 2011-12-21 |
Family
ID=41283851
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2009100328640A Expired - Fee Related CN101567902B (en) | 2009-06-04 | 2009-06-04 | Service selection method for supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN101567902B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109241119A (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2019-01-18 | 杭州市商务委员会（杭州市粮食局） | Trans-departmental data sharing method and system |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102394934B (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2015-08-26 | 东南大学 | A kind of web service negotiation method associated with subject under discussion based on benefit discount |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1482566A (en) * | 2003-01-22 | 2004-03-17 | 余育新 | Distributed work-flow management platform |
| CN101325601A (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2008-12-17 | 南京大学 | Method for choosing service based on quality dependency relationship under service composite surroundings |
-
2009
- 2009-06-04 CN CN2009100328640A patent/CN101567902B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1482566A (en) * | 2003-01-22 | 2004-03-17 | 余育新 | Distributed work-flow management platform |
| CN101325601A (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2008-12-17 | 南京大学 | Method for choosing service based on quality dependency relationship under service composite surroundings |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109241119A (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2019-01-18 | 杭州市商务委员会（杭州市粮食局） | Trans-departmental data sharing method and system |
| CN109241119B (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2020-09-04 | 杭州市商务委员会（杭州市粮食局） | Cross-department data sharing method and system |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN101567902A (en) | 2009-10-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Jauhar et al. | Integrating DEA with DE and MODE for sustainable supplier selection | |
| Bae et al. | Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry | |
| Karam et al. | Analysis of the barriers to implementing horizontal collaborative transport using a hybrid fuzzy Delphi-AHP approach | |
| Cook et al. | Creating a consensus ranking of proposals from reviewers’ partial ordinal rankings | |
| Mubarik et al. | Fostering supply chain integration through blockchain technology: A study of Malaysian manufacturing sector | |
| Tornjanski et al. | Towards sustainability: Effective operations strategies, quality management and operational excellence in banking | |
| Wei et al. | A multi-criteria decision-making framework for electric vehicle supplier selection of government agencies and public bodies in China | |
| Chang et al. | Matching knowledge suppliers and demanders on a digital platform: A novel method | |
| Saglietto | Bibliometric analysis of sharing economy logistics and crowd logistics | |
| TW201818304A (en) | Method for product service system classification and service transformation | |
| CN101325601B (en) | Method for choosing service based on quality dependency relationship under service composite surroundings | |
| Mead | Requirements prioritization introduction | |
| CN101567902B (en) | Service selection method for supporting inter-organization synergetic affairs | |
| Liu et al. | Prioritization of digital capital measures in recruiting website for the national armed forces | |
| Volk et al. | Ask the Right Questions: Requirements Engineering for the Execution of Big Data Projects. | |
| Fu et al. | A study of the CSFs of an e-cluster platform adoption for microenterprises | |
| Ramanathan | Successful transfer of environmentally sound technologies for greenhouse gas mitigation: a framework for matching the needs of developing countries | |
| Witkowski et al. | A comparative analysis of electronic freight exchanges in the United States and Europe with the use of the multiple criteria decision-making method “Promethee” | |
| Liu et al. | Formulating service business strategies with integrative services model from customer and provider perspectives | |
| Chen | Determinants of industry performance: region vs. country effects in knowledge-intensive service industries | |
| Wang et al. | The Construction of ‘User-Knowledge-Product’Co-creation Knowledge Cyberspace Served for Product Innovation | |
| Cheng et al. | Analyzing relationships between project team compositions and green building certification in green building projects | |
| Rezaie et al. | Evaluating effective factors of implementing knowledge management based on FAHP method | |
| Somiah et al. | Success strategies for competitive advantage in the Ghanaian construction industry: a Delphi study | |
| Chen | Information sharing model of upstream supply chain based on embedded technology |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20111221 Termination date: 20150604 |
|
| EXPY | Termination of patent right or utility model |