CN101251850A - Internet topics ranking system and method based on user prestige - Google Patents
Internet topics ranking system and method based on user prestige Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN101251850A CN101251850A CNA2008100451104A CN200810045110A CN101251850A CN 101251850 A CN101251850 A CN 101251850A CN A2008100451104 A CNA2008100451104 A CN A2008100451104A CN 200810045110 A CN200810045110 A CN 200810045110A CN 101251850 A CN101251850 A CN 101251850A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- user
- prestige
- theme
- score
- rank
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to an internet subject ranking system and a method based on user prestige. The invention relates to the internet field and solves the problems of too simple basis, evenness and subjectivity when various person subjects, affair subjects and objects subjects on the internet are ranked. The invention introduces the concept of user prestige during the ranking process. A user input subject information for recommendation; different users grade the recommended subject; the system calculates the score and the ranking of the subject according to grades and the prestige of the users participating in the evaluation and calculates the user prestige of the presenter according to the score of the recommended works, and finally integrates the subject ranking and related information and then reveals the subject ranking and the related information to all the users. By adoption of the system and the method, correlation and interaction of recommendation and evaluation are realized; the ranking system can gradually distinguish the users into valuators with different appreciation abilities and endow the users with different evaluation influences through analyzing recommendation quality of the users, thereby the ranking results are more objective and more persuasive.
Description
Technical field:
The present invention relates to internet arena, propose a kind of system and method that all kinds of people, thing, owner's topic on the internet is carried out rank based on user prestige.
Background technology:
There are following one or more deficiencies in all kinds of people, thing, the ballot of owner's topic, scoring, ranking system on the internet at present.
1) there is clear and definite requirement Ping Bi beginning and ending time, and the user can only participate in the time period of appointment.
2) sponsor that has only selects so-called " expert " as the judging panel, and domestic consumer can only be as the passive recipient of ranking result.
3) sponsor that has only selects domestic consumer to participate in evaluation and electing, all qualifications that participate in ballot or rating staff are the same, do not distinguish expert and domestic consumer, can not embody the difference of personnel's appreciation level that participates in evaluation and electing, they also are the same for the scoring of theme, the rank influence degree of theme.
3) expert and colony of domestic consumer have been distinguished by the sponsor that has, and also for different groups are provided with different scoring weights, but the standard of distinguishing expert and domestic consumer determines by sponsor is subjective, lacks objective basis.
4) appraisal result does not influence the evaluation to the personnel of participating in evaluation and electing.
6) theme that participates in evaluation and electing determines that by sponsor domestic consumer can not freely recommend.
7) subject information that participates in evaluation and electing all is kept in the database of sponsor, makes the time of selecting activity and the restriction that scope is subjected to system's storage and processing power.
8) on the computing method of scoring and rank, often also only the votes by theme or each user scoring simply add and, ask average, or simply distinguish expert and domestic consumer and the comprehensive grading of expert and domestic consumer such as is weighted at final score and the rank that mode is determined theme, can not really embody the level of theme.
Summary of the invention:
Main contents of the present invention address the above problem exactly, and the user that it participates in the rank of theme on the internet and every scoring associates the scoring of theme, and " prestige " with user itself associates simultaneously.Prestige is high more, and is powerful more to appraisal result.Prestige is by user's integrate score decision of proposed topic once.The integrate score of institute's proposed topic is high more, and user's prestige is just high more.Have only the people that always can recommend outstanding theme could obtain higher prestige, and he more can embody the level of theme to the evaluation of theme.This is a kind of brand-new design, and it has realized that the user recommends and evaluation activity related, by a kind of justice, just operating mechanism, the reflection of science the objective difference of human percipient.Absolute equalitarianism and subjective drawback of specifying the expert person that participates in evaluation and electing have been avoided.Make the result of rank more possess science and cogency.In order to write down and calculate user's prestige, require the user who participates in subject recommending and scoring in native system, to register.
The present invention is the system of not limitting a participation time, can accept subject recommending and scoring in 7 * 24 hours, and generates ranking list according to the rank cycle of setting automatically.Just preserve exercise question, the owner, source, link and classification and other relevant information of theme in the system, do not preserve the full text of theme, so the restricted number of theme is very little.Can read subject information (comprising exercise question, the owner, source, link, classification and other relevant informations) by the Any user of internent access system, the theme score, topics ranking, nominator's information (comprising user's name, the subject recommending time) and user prestige.
The present invention includes following steps:
1) setting total system normally starts and moves needed system information (comprising that system start-up time, rank cycle and user base prestige are with reference to coefficient, basic prestige weight, prestige attenuation coefficient).The system start-up time is the start time point of the calculating institute reference of various and time correlation in the native system.The rank cycle is the difference of each rank start time and concluding time in the native system.If set the rank cycle, system is a unit with the rank cycle just, periodically generates ranking result.If it is infinitely great not setting the rank cycle then looking the rank cycle.Basis prestige is set forth when the 7th step was described user prestige calculating in the embodiment with reference to coefficient, basic prestige weight, being defined in of prestige attenuation coefficient.
2) all Internet users become the registered user by user's Accreditation System.When user registration success, system can generate user's basic prestige automatically, and user's registration information (comprising user's name, password, hour of log-on and other relevant informations) and basic prestige are exported to the information stores repeater system.
3) registered user exports to the information stores repeater system by the subject recommending system with subject information.
4) utilize the information stores repeater system to be the theme and distribute unique ID, and subject information and nominator's information are saved in the database.
5) registered user marks to theme by User Evaluation System, and whether scoring effectively depends on theme whether in the scoring phase, and whether theme is commented too by this user.Theme by successfully the scoring after, score information (comprise theme ID, the user's name that participates in evaluation and electing, the scoring score value) be saved in the database by the information stores repeater system.Wherein, reaching herein all " in scoring phases " herein is meant that all the difference of current time in system when carrying out a certain operation and subject recommending time is less than the rank cycle.
6) utilize theme score computing system to calculate the score of theme, and the theme score is kept in the database by the information stores repeater system.
7) utilize the user prestige computing system to calculate subject recommending person's user prestige, and user prestige is kept in the database by the information stores repeater system.
8) ranking system is according to the score of theme, generates the theme ranking list by the rank cycle of setting, i.e. the rank of theme, and export to page generation system.
9) subject information, the theme score, topics ranking, nominator's information, user prestige is presented to all users by page generation system.
The function of system used in the present invention and each system is as follows:
1) initialization system: the system manager is by this default system information (comprising that system start-up time, rank cycle and user base prestige are with reference to coefficient, basic prestige weight, prestige attenuation coefficient), and exports to the information stores repeater system.
2) user's Accreditation System: all Internet users become the registered user by this system.When the user registered, system judged automatically whether this user registers.If just withdraw from Accreditation System, avoid the user to bear the same name; Just generate user's basic prestige if not automatically, and user's log-on message and user base prestige are exported to the information stores repeater system.
3) subject recommending system: the registered user can pass through this system recommendation theme at any time.When registered user's proposed topic, system judges automatically whether theme is recommended.If just withdraw from the subject recommending system, do not repeat proposed topic; If not, just recommended subject information is exported to the information stores repeater system.
4) User Evaluation System: the registered user can mark to recommended theme by this system at any time.System judges that theme whether in the scoring phase, if not, just withdraws from points-scoring system; If system just judges whether theme is commented too by this user.If it is undue not comment, just score information is exported to the information stores repeater system; If mark, just withdraw from points-scoring system, do not repeat scoring.
5) theme score computing system: participate in user's the prestige of scoring and user to the scoring of theme according to all, utilize the formula that is provided with to calculate the theme score, and export to the information stores repeater system.
6) user prestige computing system: the score of the theme of once recommending according to the registered user, utilize the formula that is provided with to calculate this user prestige, and export to the information stores repeater system.
7) ranking system: according to the score of theme, generate the theme ranking list by the rank cycle of setting, i.e. the rank of theme, and export to page generation system.The rule of rank is: the theme that score is high more, rank are forward more; When the theme score was identical, recommendation time topics ranking more early was forward more.
8) information stores repeater system: the system information that the system manager is set leaves database in or reads from database and passes to other system.Leave user's registration information in database or read and pass to other system from database.For each theme distributes unique ID.With the subject information that the registered user recommends, nominator's information leaves database in or reads from database and passes to other system.With the theme score information, the theme score, user prestige leaves database in or reads from database and passes to other system.
9) page generation system: adopt the webpage format template of design in advance, according to different display requirements, with subject information, the theme scoring, the theme score, topics ranking, nominator's information, user prestiges etc. are presented to all users.
Theme score of the present invention and user prestige more new model can adopt following one or more combinations.
1) after theme was successfully marked, system recomputated theme score and nominator's user prestige immediately according to the formula of setting.
2) nominator or the system manager when theme sends " refreshing " order, and when promptly recomputating order, system recomputates theme score and nominator's user prestige according to the formula of setting.
3) system regularly upgrades theme score and user's prestige, and promptly system regularly recomputates theme score and nominator's user prestige according to the formula of setting.
No matter adopt which kind of more new model, the theme in the scoring phase not, its score can not recomputate.
The invention has the beneficial effects as follows that the outstanding theme of certain type embodies a concentrated reflection of in the native system on the internet, choose out and outstanding theme is all registered users.By recommending outstanding theme, " expert " that obtain this class theme of all registered user's approvals grown up, thereby can manyly recommend outstanding theme better.
Below in conjunction with embodiment and accompanying drawing, the invention will be further described.Explain " input " earlier, " output " two nouns.
Input: refer to start the condition precedent of certain system's needs, perhaps the needed data of the normal operation of this system.
Output: after referring to the normal operation of certain system, pass to the data of another system.
Description of drawings:
Fig. 1 is the general system set-up and the process flow diagram of the inventive method.
Fig. 2 is the workflow diagram of user's Accreditation System of the inventive method.
Fig. 3 is the workflow diagram of the subject recommending system of the inventive method.
Fig. 4 is the workflow diagram of the User Evaluation System of the inventive method.
Fig. 5 is the workflow diagram of the theme score computing system of the inventive method.
Fig. 6 is the workflow diagram of the user prestige computing system of the inventive method.
Fig. 7 is the workflow diagram of the ranking system of the inventive method.
Embodiment:
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, embodiments of the present invention are described.Embodiment disclosed herein only is for the preferred version of principle of the present invention and feature is described.
The first step
The start-up time of initialization system.Be assumed to be on January 7th, 2008.
The rank cycle of initialization system.Be assumed to be 7 days.
The basic prestige of initialization system is with reference to coefficient.Be assumed to be 2.
The basic prestige weight of initialization system.Be assumed to be 40%.
The prestige attenuation coefficient of initialization system.Be assumed to be 0.95.
Second step
All Internet users utilize user's Accreditation System, submit personal information to, become the registered user.User's registration information is saved in the database by the information stores repeater system.Groundwork flow process such as Fig. 2.
User's Accreditation System is a system software that operates on the application server, and it is finished by the http agreement of standard with extraneous communicating by letter, and promptly all Internet users are promptly addressable by browser.Basis prestige inputs to native system (Fig. 2-21) after being extracted by the information stores repeater system with reference to coefficient and system start-up time from database.All users can be in register interface typing log-on message (Fig. 2-22), whether this user of systems inspection registers (Fig. 2-23), if just withdraw from Accreditation System; If not, system is user's formation base prestige (Fig. 2-24) with following formula automatically.Set forth when the 7th step description user prestige calculates about being defined in of basic prestige.
| User base prestige=basic prestige is with reference to coefficient * (when basic prestige is calculated current time in system-system start-up time). |
Then, system exports to information stores repeater system (Fig. 2-25) with user's registration information and basic prestige.
System judges whether the user registers, and can guarantee the uniqueness of registered user in system, avoids the user prestige miscount, and the theme score and the rank mistake that cause thus.
For example, typing personal information is as follows:
User's name: canoe; Password: 123456
Whether systems inspection user's name " canoe " exists.Check result, " canoe " do not exist.
System is set to user's hour of log-on the current time.
Suppose that the current time is on January 9th, 2008, the basic prestige that system-computed goes out the user is:
2 * (on January 7th, 1 2008 on January 9th, 2008)=4.
User's " canoe " succeeds in registration.
Suppose according to above step the user's " dolly " in addition who succeeds in registration simultaneously.Its basic prestige also equals 4.
The 3rd step
The registered user exports to the information stores repeater system by the subject recommending system with exercise question, the owner, source, link, classification and other relevant informations of theme.Groundwork flow process such as Fig. 3.
Nominator's user's name inputs to native system (Fig. 3-31) after being extracted from database by the information stores repeater system.System judges that whether the nominator is registered user (Fig. 3-32), just withdraws from the subject recommending system if not; If, the recommended subject information of registered user's typing (Fig. 3-33) so.For example,
Nominator: canoe
Exercise question: " making " as dream
The owner: little fat
Source: little fat community
Link:
Http:// www.example.com/1.htm
Classification: speech
Current time in system (being the subject recommending time): on January 9th, 2008
Then, whether this theme of systems inspection is recommended (Fig. 3-34) by other user, if just withdraw from commending system; Just recommended subject information and nominator's information are exported to information stores repeater system (Fig. 3-35) if not.
System takes a decision as to whether the registered user and whether theme is recommended, can guarantee effectively record and calculating user prestige, so that calculate theme score and rank, it is recommended to guarantee that also same theme can not repeat, and avoids influencing the real rank of theme.
Suppose that theme " making as dream " recommends successfully.
The 4th step
Utilize the information stores repeater system that subject information and nominator's information are saved in the database.
Here database is a general reference notion, represents the relevant database of various forms, can select business database such as Oracal for use, and SQLServer also can select free database such as MySQL for use.
Suppose that theme " making as dream " successfully is saved in database.
The 5th step
The registered user marks to theme by User Evaluation System, scoring whether effectively depend on theme whether in the scoring phase and theme whether commented too by this user.After theme was successfully marked, score information was saved in the database by the information stores repeater system.Groundwork flow process such as Fig. 4.
Subject information, the user's name that participates in evaluation and electing, the rank cycle inputs to native system (Fig. 4-41) after being extracted from database by the information stores repeater system.
System judges that whether the user is registered user (Fig. 4-42), just withdraws from User Evaluation System if not; If the registered user is to theme scoring (Fig. 4-43) so.Then, system judges that theme whether in the scoring phase (Fig. 4-44), just withdraws from User Evaluation System if not; If system just checks that whether theme is by this user's scoring (Fig. 4-45).Just withdraw from User Evaluation System if marked; If it is undue not comment, just this user is exported to information stores repeater system (Fig. 4-46) to the score information of theme.
System judges whether scoring phase and theme have been commented too, can guarantee that the topics ranking in each rank cycle of definite and issue can not be affected because of scoring afterwards; Guaranteed that also identical user can not repeat scoring to theme, avoids topics ranking is impacted.
For example,
Registered user's dolly, canoe are given theme " making as dream " scoring 5 minutes, 4 minutes respectively on January 10th, 2008.
The rank cycle of default is 7 because January 9 days=1＜7 in-2008 on January 10th, 2008, so theme in the scoring phase, and user's " dolly ", " canoe " do not comment too this theme.
Scoring is effective, and score information is stored in the database by the information stores repeater system.
The 6th step
Utilize the score of theme score computing system calculating theme, and the theme score is kept in the database by the information stores repeater system.Groundwork flow process such as Fig. 5.
The score information of theme, user's name and user prestige input to native system (Fig. 5-51) after being extracted from database by the information stores repeater system.System judges that theme whether in the scoring phase (Fig. 5-52), if not, just withdraws from theme score computing system; If system adopts following formula to calculate total prestige (Fig. 5-53) of all registered users:
| Total prestige=user's 1 prestige of user+user's 2 prestige+... user m prestige |
Then, system adopts following formula to calculate the score (Fig. 5-54) of theme:
| Theme score=user 1 scoring * user 1 prestige/total prestige+user 2 scoring * the users of user 2 prestige/total prestige of user+... the total prestige of user n scoring * user n prestige/user |
Wherein m is registered user's number, and n is the scoring number of users of this theme.
At last, system exports to information stores repeater system (Fig. 5-55) with the theme score.
The general condensed summary that the theme score is calculated: the first, the score of theme is relevant to the appraisal result of this theme with each user; The second, the score of theme is relevant with each user prestige that participates in evaluation and electing; The 3rd, use accounting rather than the absolute value of unique user prestige in the total prestige of user influence the factor of score as user prestige, can be so that the branch result calculated be unlikely to occur because of the change of prestige algorithm the variation of the order of magnitude.
For example,
The score of theme " making as dream " is calculated by system on January 10th, 2008.
The rank cycle of default is 7, because January 9 days=1＜7 in-2008 on January 10th, 2008, so theme is in the scoring phase.
Scoring is that 5 fens prestige is 4 to registered user's " dolly " to theme, and " canoe " scoring is that 4 fens prestige is 4 to theme
Have only two users " dolly ", " canoe " in the supposing the system.
Must being divided into of theme " making ": (5 * 4+4 * 4)/(4+4)=4.5 minute as dream
Score is calculated successfully.
The 7th step
Utilize user prestige computing system calculating subject recommending person's user prestige, and user prestige is kept in the database by the information stores repeater system.Groundwork flow process such as Fig. 6.
System information, theme ID, theme score, user's name input to native system (Fig. 6-61) after being extracted from database by the information stores repeater system.
User's recommendation prestige (Fig. 6-62) is calculated by system by following formula:
| The user recommend prestige=(mean value * prestige attenuation coefficient of all theme scores of this user's recommendation in mean value+n-1 rank cycle of all theme scores that this user recommends in n rank cycle+... mean value * prestige the attenuation coefficient of all theme scores that interior this user of the 1st rank cycle recommends n-1) * rank the cycle, wherein n=rounded ((recommend that prestige calculates current time-system start-up time)/rank cycle)+1 |
Then, system-computed user's basic prestige (Fig. 6-62).The formula that adopts when the formula that calculates basic prestige is registered with the user is identical.
Then, user's prestige (Fig. 6-64) is calculated by system with following formula:
| User prestige=user recommends prestige * (1-basis prestige weight)+user base prestige * basic prestige weight |
At last, system exports to information stores repeater system (Fig. 6-65) with user prestige.
The general condensed summary that user prestige calculates:
1. recommend the explanation of prestige about the user: the first, obtain higher prestige for fear of the user by a large amount of proposed topics, so we have adopted the mean value algorithm that calculates the theme score.The second, recommend single or the only a few theme obtains that high score is permanent to have higher prestige for fear of the user because of accidental, so we have taked the algorithm to suing for peace behind each rank computation of Period mean value.The 3rd, ageing because the percipient of some professional domain and judgment have, can recommend good theme in the past, do not represent and still have higher appreciation and judgement now, so it is we have designed the prestige attenuation coefficient,, more little to the influence power of prestige from the prestige rank cycle far away more computing time.The 4th, recommend the read group total between prestige and the user base prestige to be complementary in order to make the user, the user must be recommended prestige conversion for identical chronomere " my god ", so also will multiply by " rank cycle " at last.
2. about the explanation of user base prestige: the first, if prestige is 0 after each user's Accreditation System, then Any user result that prestige is multiply by in the scoring of theme is zero.And total prestige of all users also is zero.This causes, and the circulative metabolism of prestige and score calculation can't run well forever in the total system.In addition, we think that any registered user has the most basic judgement, and proposed topic is not as should be as the restrictive condition that whether can participate in the theme scoring.Based on these 2 reasons, we have set a user base prestige for all registered users.Second, because the user recommends prestige to increase gradually along with the time, if user base prestige and time are irrelevant, can make user base prestige along with the growth influence power of system operation time is more and more littler, so we are set at the time of prestige calculating user base prestige linear.The 3rd, for and the user recommend the read group total between the prestige to be complementary, we set the user all a basic prestige value every day---be that basic prestige is with reference to coefficient.The 4th, take the proportion of family prestige in order to determine user base prestige, we have designed basic prestige weight.
Suppose that user's " canoe " has only recommended a first theme " making as dream ", must be divided into 4.5 fens, prestige computing time is on January 10th, 2008.Recommendation prestige=4.5 * the 7=31.5 of canoe then, basic prestige=2 * (on January 7th, 1 2008 on January 10th, 2008)=6.Final prestige=31.5 * (1-40%)+6 * 40%=21.3 of canoe.
If system the time has adopted the multiple rank cycle (for example week, month, year) simultaneously in operation, can be with reference to above algorithm, recommend prestige result of calculation to compute weighted to the user in different rank cycle, recommend the end value of prestige as the user.
The 8th step
Ranking system is according to the score of theme, generates the theme ranking list by the rank cycle of setting, i.e. the rank of theme, and export to page generation system.
System information, theme ID, the subject recommending time, the theme score inputs to native system after being extracted from database by the information stores repeater system; The rank (representing with n) that needs to calculate which rank cycle inputs to native system (Fig. 7-71) by the user who inquires about rank.
Screening system satisfies the theme set (Fig. 7-72) of following conditional:
| Round ((subject recommending time-system start-up time)/the rank cycle)+1=n |
Then, system is according to the score and the subject recommending time of the theme that filters out, calculated for rank (Fig. 7-73).The rule of rank is: the theme that score is high more, rank are forward more; When the theme score was identical, recommendation time theme score more early was forward more.
At last, system exports to page generation system (Fig. 7-74) with the topics ranking result.
For example:
The system start-up time is on January 7th, 2008.
The rank cycle is 7.
Suppose to need to calculate the rank in the 2nd rank cycle.
Following theme is arranged in the supposing the system:
| Theme ID | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Score | 4.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 7.7 | 6.3 |
| The subject recommending time | On January 14th, 2008 | On January 18th, 2008 | On January 16th, 2008 | On January 17th, 2008 | On January 24th, 2008 |
The rank cycle that calculates theme 1,2,3,4 according to screening conditions is 2, and the rank cycle of theme 5 is 3.That therefore, satisfies the rank condition themes as 1,2,3,4.
According to the rank rule, theme 4 scores are the highest, are 7.7 minutes, rank the first.Theme 1 score was number two in 4.5 minutes.Theme 2,3 scores are identical, are 3.2 fens.But because the recommendation time of theme 3 early, rank should be more forward, so theme 3 is number three, theme 2 is number four.
The final ranking result in the 2nd rank cycle is as follows:
| Topics ranking | First place | Second place | Third | Fourth |
| Theme ID | ?4 | ?1 | ?3 | ?2 |
The 9th step
Topics ranking and relevant information are presented to all users by page generation system.
Ranking system input ranking result (comprising theme ID, topics ranking); Information stores repeater system input subject information, theme score, nominator's information, user prestige.Page generation system is organized above information according to the web page template of design in advance, and presents to all users.
Check in all systems whether the user is the registered user, and whether theme is recommended, and whether theme has been marked all is based on the retrieval of database, and its implementation can be a lot.The mode that can use language such as JDBC or ODBC and JSP, ASP, PHP, ASP.NET to combine realizes retrieval, also can develop corresponding software and support this retrieval.
The present invention's statement:
Content disclosed in this invention can make those skilled in the art with reference to enforcement, and content involved in the present invention itself and improvement on its basis and amplification all belong to protection scope of the present invention.
The applied in any combination of feature of the present invention:
All features of the present invention all are to realize the scheme key element of technique effect; one of feature of the present invention can consist of a technical scheme of the present invention; feature two, three; any combination to whole features also is technical scheme of the present invention by that analogy, and the combination that consolidates former any one or more features of invention all is the claimed technical scheme of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. one kind is carried out the method for rank based on user prestige to the theme on the internet, it is characterized in that, the rank of theme on the internet and every user who participates in scoring are associated the scoring of theme, and " prestige " with user itself associates simultaneously.Prestige is high more, and is powerful more to appraisal result.Prestige is by user's integrate score decision of proposed topic once.The integrate score of institute's proposed topic is high more, and user's prestige is just high more.It may further comprise the steps:
1) setting total system normally starts and moves needed system information.
2) all Internet users become the registered user by user's Accreditation System.Whether registration successfully depends on whether there has been this user in the system.
3) registered user utilizes the subject recommending system, and subject information is saved in the database by the information stores repeater system.Whether subject recommending is successful, depends on whether there has been this theme in the system.
4) utilize the information stores repeater system to be the theme and distribute unique ID, and subject information and nominator's information are saved in the database.
5) registered user marks to theme by User Evaluation System, and whether scoring effectively depends on theme whether in the scoring phase, and whether theme is commented too by this user.After theme was successfully marked, score information was saved in the database by the information stores repeater system.
6), and the theme score is kept in the database by the information stores repeater system if theme in the scoring phase, utilizes the score of theme score computing system calculating theme.
7) utilize the user prestige computing system to calculate subject recommending person's user prestige, and user prestige is kept in the database by the information stores repeater system.
8) ranking system is according to the score of theme, generates the theme ranking list by the rank cycle of setting, i.e. the rank of theme, and export to page generation system.
9) subject information, the theme score, topics ranking, nominator's information, user prestige is presented to all users by page generation system.
2. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, system preserves following information:
1) system information comprises that system start-up time, rank cycle and user base prestige are with reference to coefficient, basic prestige weight, prestige attenuation coefficient.
2) information of registered users comprises user's name, password, hour of log-on and other relevant informations.
3) subject information comprises exercise question, the owner, source, link, classification and other relevant informations.
4) nominator's information comprises user's name, the recommendation time.
5) score information, comprise theme ID, the user's name that participates in evaluation and electing, the scoring score value.
6) theme score.
7) topics ranking.
8) user prestige comprises that user base prestige and user recommend prestige.
3. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, the user who participates in subject recommending and scoring must be the registered user of system.
4. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, the rank cycle is the difference of each rank start time and concluding time in the native system.
5. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, " in the scoring phase " that requires in the system is meant that the difference of current time in system when carrying out a certain operation and subject recommending time is less than the rank cycle.
6. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, calculates the theme score in the step 6 and may further comprise the steps:
1) system judges that theme is whether in the scoring phase.
2) if theme in the scoring phase, and has m registered user, calculate total prestige of all registered users:
3), calculate the score of theme if there be n user to mark:
4) output theme score.
7. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, calculates user prestige in the step 7 and may further comprise the steps:
1) calculate the user and recommend prestige:
2) calculate user base prestige:
3) calculate user prestige:
4) output user prestige.
8. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that theme score and user prestige more new model can adopt following one or more combinations:
1) after theme was successfully marked, system recomputated theme score and nominator's user prestige immediately according to the formula of setting.
2) nominator or the system manager when theme sends " refreshing " order, and when promptly recomputating order, system recomputates theme score and nominator's user prestige according to the formula of setting.
3) system regularly upgrades theme score and user prestige, and promptly system regularly recomputates theme score and nominator's user prestige according to the formula of setting.
9. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that, the theme that score is high more, and rank is forward more; When the theme score was identical, recommendation time topics ranking more early was forward more.The rank form of expression can be a Chinese character, and is English, digital, also can icon, image.
10. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, system adopts the search method based on database, and the database that system is used refers to the database of various relationship types, as Oracle, and SQLServer, MySQL.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA2008100451104A CN101251850A (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2008-01-04 | Internet topics ranking system and method based on user prestige |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA2008100451104A CN101251850A (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2008-01-04 | Internet topics ranking system and method based on user prestige |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN101251850A true CN101251850A (en) | 2008-08-27 |
Family
ID=39955241
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA2008100451104A Pending CN101251850A (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2008-01-04 | Internet topics ranking system and method based on user prestige |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN101251850A (en) |
Cited By (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101819587A (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2010-09-01 | 北京志腾新诺科技有限公司 | Network information processing method and system |
| CN102298752A (en) * | 2010-06-25 | 2011-12-28 | 微软公司 | Market for social promotion of digital goods |
| CN102479202A (en) * | 2010-11-26 | 2012-05-30 | 卓望数码技术（深圳）有限公司 | Recommendation system based on domain expert |
| CN103455938A (en) * | 2013-09-03 | 2013-12-18 | 小米科技有限责任公司 | Data-processing method and device and server equipment |
| CN103593355A (en) * | 2012-08-15 | 2014-02-19 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | User original content recommending method and device |
| CN103686145A (en) * | 2013-11-15 | 2014-03-26 | 悉地（北京）国际建筑设计顾问有限公司 | Method and device for determining image quality |
| CN104102813A (en) * | 2014-06-04 | 2014-10-15 | 百度移信网络技术（北京）有限公司 | White noise compensation method and device |
| CN104463594A (en) * | 2013-09-23 | 2015-03-25 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and device for computing object influence |
| WO2015113240A1 (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2015-08-06 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Method, apparatus and system for content recommendation |
| CN105723402A (en) * | 2013-10-25 | 2016-06-29 | 西斯摩斯公司 | Systems and methods for determining influencers in a social data network |
| CN105740473A (en) * | 2016-03-14 | 2016-07-06 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | User-generated content display method and device |
| CN105787287A (en) * | 2016-05-06 | 2016-07-20 | 广州爱九游信息技术有限公司 | System, equipment, device and method for generating list data |
| CN107424283A (en) * | 2017-04-22 | 2017-12-01 | 孙正义 | A kind of voting method and system |
| CN108615167A (en) * | 2018-03-15 | 2018-10-02 | 宁波思库网络科技有限公司 | a kind of ranking system |
-
2008
- 2008-01-04 CN CNA2008100451104A patent/CN101251850A/en active Pending
Cited By (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101819587A (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2010-09-01 | 北京志腾新诺科技有限公司 | Network information processing method and system |
| CN102298752A (en) * | 2010-06-25 | 2011-12-28 | 微软公司 | Market for social promotion of digital goods |
| CN102479202A (en) * | 2010-11-26 | 2012-05-30 | 卓望数码技术（深圳）有限公司 | Recommendation system based on domain expert |
| CN103593355A (en) * | 2012-08-15 | 2014-02-19 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | User original content recommending method and device |
| CN103455938B (en) * | 2013-09-03 | 2016-07-20 | 小米科技有限责任公司 | A kind of data processing method, device and server apparatus |
| CN103455938A (en) * | 2013-09-03 | 2013-12-18 | 小米科技有限责任公司 | Data-processing method and device and server equipment |
| CN104463594B (en) * | 2013-09-23 | 2018-05-29 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | The method and its device of computing object influence power |
| CN104463594A (en) * | 2013-09-23 | 2015-03-25 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and device for computing object influence |
| CN105723402A (en) * | 2013-10-25 | 2016-06-29 | 西斯摩斯公司 | Systems and methods for determining influencers in a social data network |
| CN103686145A (en) * | 2013-11-15 | 2014-03-26 | 悉地（北京）国际建筑设计顾问有限公司 | Method and device for determining image quality |
| WO2015113240A1 (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2015-08-06 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Method, apparatus and system for content recommendation |
| CN105993028A (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2016-10-05 | 诺基亚技术有限公司 | Method, apparatus and system for content recommendation |
| CN105993028B (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2020-04-24 | 诺基亚技术有限公司 | Method, device and system for content recommendation |
| CN104102813A (en) * | 2014-06-04 | 2014-10-15 | 百度移信网络技术（北京）有限公司 | White noise compensation method and device |
| CN105740473A (en) * | 2016-03-14 | 2016-07-06 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | User-generated content display method and device |
| CN105787287A (en) * | 2016-05-06 | 2016-07-20 | 广州爱九游信息技术有限公司 | System, equipment, device and method for generating list data |
| CN107424283A (en) * | 2017-04-22 | 2017-12-01 | 孙正义 | A kind of voting method and system |
| CN108615167A (en) * | 2018-03-15 | 2018-10-02 | 宁波思库网络科技有限公司 | a kind of ranking system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN101251850A (en) | Internet topics ranking system and method based on user prestige | |
| Sangwan | Virtual community success: A uses and gratifications perspective | |
| Hazelkorn | Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence | |
| Aguinis et al. | Cumulative advantage: Conductors and insulators of heavy‐tailed productivity distributions and productivity stars | |
| Kovács et al. | Authenticity and consumer value ratings: Empirical tests from the restaurant domain | |
| Lou et al. | Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q & A communities | |
| US8806598B2 (en) | System and method for authenticating a user through community discussion | |
| Lee et al. | Research quality rankings of heterodox economic journals in a contested discipline | |
| CN103699626B (en) | Method and system for analysing individual emotion tendency of microblog user | |
| Rosen | Crowdsourcing lessons for organizations | |
| CN103198086A (en) | Information processing device, information processing method, and program | |
| Lobera et al. | Decentralizing electoral campaigns? New-old parties, grassroots and digital activism | |
| Bakhshi et al. | Understanding online reviews: Funny, cool or useful? | |
| Reich et al. | The effects of minimum wages on food stamp enrollment and expenditures | |
| US20080208911A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for evaluating internet contents, and recording media for storing program implementing the same | |
| Liu | Agglomeration, urban wage premiums, and college majors | |
| CN112001739A (en) | Method and system for generating user learning portrait | |
| Wilson | Tactical SEO: The theory and practice of search marketing | |
| Carradini et al. | The effects of multimodal elements on success in Kickstarter crowdfunding campaigns | |
| Moon et al. | Improving quality of life via blogs and development of a virtual social identity | |
| Kim et al. | Depreciation and transfer of knowledge: an empirical exploration of a shipbuilding process | |
| Barra et al. | Managerial efficiency in higher education using individual versus aggregate level data. Does the choice of decision making units count? | |
| CN117217808A (en) | Intelligent analysis and prediction method for activity invitation capability | |
| Castillo et al. | Using employee‐generated content from digital platforms to understand the luxury culture | |
| Rashkova | Learning the game: explaining party system convergence in European democracies |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Open date: 20080827 |