CA3203136A1 - Use of a paraffinic gasoil - Google Patents

Abstract

Use of a paraffinic gasoil in a fuel composition for reducing microbial growth, The present invention is relevant for a wide range of fuel compositions including diesel fuels, heating oils, aviation fuels, marine fuels, and the like.

Description

USE OF A PARAFFINIC GASOIL
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to the use of a paraffinic gasoil in a fuel composition for reducing microbial growth.
Background of the Invention Fuel tanks and distribution systems provide an environment where microorganisms can flourish. There are three main types of spoilage and corrosive hydrocarbon-utilising microorganisms in fuel systems, namely bacteria, yeasts and moulds, the latter two often named as fungi. Microbes are ubiquitous and can infect fuel at any point in the distribution chain, surviving and proliferating in water/aqueous phase associated with the fuel and drawing their nutrients across the fuel/water interface (most nutrients diffuse into the cell in aqueous solution). Microbes require elements such as carbon, hydrogen, sulphur, nitrogen and phosphorus in substantial amounts, trace amounts of other elements and some form of oxygen. The rate and type of microbial proliferation is dependent on factors such as water phase pH, oxygen availability, ambient temperature, nutrient availability, etc. Optimum growth is achieved in the temperature range 15 C to 40 C and a neutral/slightly acidic pH. Most of these conditions are met in fuel tanks and distribution systems thereby providing an ideal environment for microbial growth. Water as one key contributor exacerbates the situation and can never be completely eradicated due to condensation effects, leaking tank roofs, poor housekeeping, etc. A fuel storage system is therefore never sterile and at best,

2 the aim is to restrict microbial growth to an acceptable level by the adoption of good housekeeping practices.
There are several undesirable consequences of microbial growth in fuel systems. One such consequence is Microbially Induced Corrosion (MIC) which is corrosion that is caused by or promoted by microorganisms.
Microbial cells can exist in planktonic (single cells floating/swimming in the fuel) or sessile forms (attached to a surface). A biofilm forms when a collection of microorganisms (mainly bacteria) adhere irreversibly to a surface and begin to excrete slimy, extracellular biopolymers. Biofilms enhance microbial interactions, giving more access to nutrients, environmental stability, protection from viruses and biocides. These microbial communities can attach to the sidewalls and bottoms of fuel storage tanks causing Microbially Induced Corrosion (MIC).
MIC is one of the most serious consequences of microbial growth. Aerobes produce organic acids and deplete oxygen supplies, creating an oxygen-deficient zone around them. Oxygen gradients develop causing the formation of anodic corrosion pits. Sulphate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) can increase this corrosion by producing H25, HS and S2f all of which are very aggressive to steel.
Other consequences of microbial growth in fuel systems are blocked filters, valves and pipelines, increased pump wear and production of biosurfactants that can cause stable water hazes and coalescer disarming. In particular, fungi are implicated in filter blocking in vehicle fuel systems. Fuel filter plugging is often caused by mould growth, which manifests itself as a mat of hyphae (long filaments of fungi) at the fuel/water

3 interface. Loss of product quality, foul odour, cloudiness and discolouration and injector fouling can also be undesirable consequences of microbial growth.
Biofuels (e.g. FAMEs) can play a role in fossil fuel replacement to meet reduction targets of greenhouse gas emissions. Globally, many countries have established or are developing biofuel mandates, with some countries (e.g. Indonesia) introducing B30 (30% biofuel), which is well above the current EU mandated levels of B7.
However, it is well established that biodiesel and its blends, particularly at the EU mandated levels, are more susceptible to microbial growth than conventional hydrocarbon diesel. The reasons cited for this are that FAME is easier for microorganisms to digest and more hydroscopic than conventional diesel leading to greater free water entrainment.
Gas-to-liquid (GTL) technology converts CH4/methane currently from natural gas - the cleanest-burning fossil fuel - into high-quality liquid fuel products that would otherwise be made from crude oil. GTL fuel can help to reduce local emissions in conventional diesel vehicles.
GTL fuel also has other applications, e.g. as a synthetic marine fuel in inland water way vessels in conventional marine diesel engines. It is known that GTL fuel is more biodegradable than conventional diesel due to its negligible aromatic content and simple structure (it is fully saturated) but may be more susceptible to microbial growth than conventional diesel. Fuel handling and storage conditions with respect to microbial growth could be considered as even more severe for inland water way vessels than for road applications due to the potential presence of water inside the tank, during fuelling and on board bunker ships.

4 Attempts have been made in the past to solve microbial spoilage incidents in fuels and fuel systems.
Chemical treatments such as biocides and biostats are currently used to control and eliminate microbial growth in fuel systems in conjunction with physical control methods such as good housekeeping, settling, filtration, centrifugation and heat treatment.
Unfortunately, chemical treatments by their nature are toxic and their handling presents serious health, safety and environmental issues. The commonly used isothiazolinone chemistry, for example, is a skin sensitiser. Further, it is necessary to dispose of waste biomass after chemical treatment which can be time consuming and expensive.
It would therefore be desirable to provide alternative ways of reducing microbial growth in fuels and fuel systems.
Summary of the Invention According to the present invention there is provided the use of a paraffinic gasoil in a fuel composition for reducing microbial growth.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for reducing microbial growth in a fuel composition, which method comprises a step of introducing a paraffinic gasoil into said fuel composition.
It has surprisingly been found that use of a paraffinic gasoil as described herein can reduce the microbial growth in a fuel composition to which the paraffinic gasoil is added. Hence, the invention can lead to a reduction in microbial spoilage incidents in a wide range of fuel compositions.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a graphical representation of the experimental data generated in Example 1.
Figure 2 is a graphical representation of the data shown in Table 5, and in particular shows the average dry

5 biomass weight (g) after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks of all fuels tested in Example 2, with and without GTL (i.e.
those fuels based on B100, EN590 or GTL).
Figure 3 is graphical representation of the data shown in Table 8, and in particular shows the average dry biomass weight (g) after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks for the fuels of Example 3 based on EN590 or GTL.
Detailed Description of the Invention As used herein there is provided the use of a paraffinic gasoil in a fuel composition for reducing microbial growth in said fuel composition.
In the context of this aspect of the invention, the term "reducing microbial growth" embraces any degree of reduction in microbial growth. Microbial growth may be measured by any suitable method such as the biomass method described in the Examples below. The reduction in microbial growth may be of the order of 10% or more, preferably 20% or more, more preferably 50% or more, and especially 70% or more compared to the microbial growth in an analogous fuel formulation which does not contain a paraffinic gasoil, in particular during the time period where the fuel composition is stored in a fuel tank, for example a time period of up to 12 weeks. As used herein, the term "reducing microbial growth" also encompasses the prevention of microbes growing in the first place.
The present invention is relevant for a wide range of fuel applications such as diesel fuels, heating oils, aviation fuels, marine fuels, and mixtures thereof.
Preferred fuel applications include diesel fuels and

6 aviation fuels.
A first essential component herein is a paraffinic gasoil. The paraffinic gasoil suitable for use in the present invention can be derived from any suitable source as long as it is suitable for use in a fuel composition, especially a diesel fuel composition.
Suitable paraffinic gasoils include, for example, Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoils, and gasoils derived from hydrogenated vegetable oil (HVO), and mixtures thereof.
A preferred paraffinic gasoil for use herein is a Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil fuel. The paraffinic nature of Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil means that diesel fuel compositions containing it will have high cetane numbers compared to conventional diesel.
While Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil is a preferred paraffinic gasoil for use herein, the term "paraffinic gasoil" as used herein also includes those paraffinic gasoils derived from the hydrotreating of vegetable oils (HVO). The HVO process is based on an oil refining technology. In the process, hydrogen is used to remove oxygen from the triglyceride vegetable oil molecules and to split the triglyceride into three separate chains thus creating paraffinic hydrocarbons.
When present, the paraffinic gasoil (i.e. the Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil, the hydrogenated vegetable oil derived gasoil) will preferably consist of at least 95% w/w, more preferably at least 98% w/w, even more preferably at least 99.5% w/w, and most preferably up to 100% w/w of paraffinic components, preferably iso- and normal paraffins, preferably comprising from 80% w/w or greater of iso-paraffins.
By "Fischer-Tropsch derived" is meant that a fuel or base oil is, or derives from, a synthesis product of a

7 PCT/EP2021/084935 Fischer-Tropsch condensation process. The term "non-Fischer-Tropsch derived" may be interpreted accordingly.
A Fischer-Tropsch derived fuel may also be referred to as a GTL (gas-to-liquid) fuel.
The Fischer-Tropsch reaction converts carbon monoxide and hydrogen into longer chain, usually paraffinic, hydrocarbons:
n(CO + 2H2) = (-CH2-), + nH20 + heat, in the presence of an appropriate catalyst and typically at elevated temperatures (e.g. 125 to 300 C, preferably 175 to 250 C) and/or pressures (e.g. 5 to 100 bar, preferably 12 to 50 bar). Hydrogen: carbon monoxide ratios other than 2:1 may be employed if desired.
The carbon monoxide and hydrogen may themselves be derived from organic or inorganic, natural or synthetic sources, typically either from natural gas or from organically derived methane. More recently techniques to derive carbon monoxide and hydrogen from other sources, including more sustainable ones are being explored and used. For example, starting with carbon dioxide and water, the water can be electrolysed to give free hydrogen, typically using electricity from a sustainable source. This hydrogen can react with the carbon dioxide in the 'reverse water shift reaction' to give a source of carbon monoxide. This carbon monoxide can then be reacted with the remaining hydrogen in the typical Fischer-Tropsch synthesis process. Because of the use of electrolysis, some of these production processes are referred to as 'Power-to-liquids'.
Gas oil, kerosene fuel and base oil products may be obtained directly from the Fischer-Tropsch reaction, or indirectly for instance by fractionation of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis products or from hydrotreated Fischer-

8 Tropsch synthesis products. Hydrotreatment can involve hydrocracking to adjust the boiling range (see, e. g.
GB2077289 and EP0147873) and/or hydroisomerisation which can improve cold flow properties by increasing the proportion of branched paraffins. EP0583836 describes a two-step hydrotreatment process in which a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis product is firstly subjected to hydroconversion under conditions such that it undergoes substantially no isomerisation or hydrocracking (this hydrogenates the olefinic and oxygen-containing components), and then at least part of the resultant product is hydroconverted under conditions such that hydrocracking and isomerisation occur to yield a substantially paraffinic hydrocarbon fuel or oil.
Desired diesel fuel fraction(s) may subsequently be isolated for instance by distillation.
Other post-synthesis treatments, such as polymerisation, alkylation, distillation, cracking-decarboxylation, isomerisation and hydroreforming, may be employed to modify the properties of Fischer-Tropsch condensation products, as described for instance in US-A-4125566 and US-A-4478955.
Typical catalysts for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of paraffinic hydrocarbons comprise, as the catalytically active component, a metal from Group VIII of the periodic table, in particular ruthenium, iron, cobalt or nickel.
Suitable such catalysts are described for instance in EP0583836.
An example of a Fischer-Tropsch based process is the SMDS (Shell Middle Distillate Synthesis) described in The Shell Middle Distillate Synthesis Process", van der Burgt et al (vide supra). This process (also sometimes referred to as the Shell "Gas-to-Liquids" or "GTL"

9 technology) produces diesel range products by conversion of a natural gas (primarily methane) derived synthesis gas into a heavy long-chain hydrocarbon (paraffin) wax which can then be hydroconverted and fractionated to produce liquid transport and other fuels such as gasoils and kerosene. Versions of the SMDS process, utilising fixed-bed reactors for the catalytic conversion step, are currently in use in Bintulu, Malaysia, and in Pearl GTL, Ras Laffan, Qatar. Kerosenes and (gas)oils prepared by the SMDS process are commercially available for instance from the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies.
By virtue of the Fischer-Tropsch process, a Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil has essentially no, or undetectable levels of, sulphur and nitrogen. Compounds containing these heteroatoms tend to act as poisons for Fischer-Tropsch catalysts and are therefore removed from the synthesis gas feed. Further, the process as usually operated produces no or virtually no aromatic components.
For example, the aromatics content of a Fischer-Tropsch gasoil, as determined for instance by ASTM D4629, will typically be below 1% w/w, preferably below 0.5% w/w and more preferably below 0.1% w/w.
Generally speaking, Fischer-Tropsch derived fuels have relatively low levels of polar components, in particular polar surfactants, for instance compared to petroleum derived fuels. It is believed that this can contribute to improved antifoaming and dehazing performance. Such polar components may include for example oxygenates, and sulphur and nitrogen containing compounds. A low level of sulphur in a Fischer-Tropsch derived fuel is generally indicative of low levels of both oxygenates and nitrogen-containing compounds, since all are removed by the same treatment processes.

A preferred Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil fuel for use herein is a liquid hydrocarbon middle distillate fuel with a distillation range similar to that of a petroleum derived diesel, that is typically within the 160 C to 5 400 C range, preferably with a 195 of 360 C or less.
Again, Fischer-Tropsch derived fuels tend to be low in undesirable fuel components such as sulphur, nitrogen and aromatics.
A preferred Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil for use

10 herein meets the EN15940 specification.
A preferred Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil fuel will typically have a density (as measured by EN ISO 12185) of from 0.76 to 0.80, preferably from 0.77 to 0.79, more preferably from 0.775 to 0.785 g/cm3 at 15 C.
A preferred Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil fuel for use herein has a cetane number (ASTM D613) of greater than 70, suitably from 70 to 85, most suitably from 70 to 77.
A preferred Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil fuel for use herein has a kinematic viscosity at 40 C (as measured according to ASTM D445) in the range from 2.0 mm2/s to 5.0 mm2/s, preferably from 2.5 mm2/s to 4.0 mm2/s.
A preferred Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil for use herein has a sulphur content (ASTM D2622) of 5 ppmw (parts per million by weight) or less, preferably of 2 ppmw or less.
A preferred Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil fuel for use in the present invention is that produced as a distinct finished product, that is suitable for sale and used in applications that require the particular characteristics of a gasoil fuel. In particular, it exhibits a distillation range falling within the range normally relating to Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil

11 fuels, as set out above.
A fuel composition used in the present invention may include a mixture of two or more paraffinic gasoils, such as two or more Fisher-Tropsch derived gasoil fuels.
The Fischer-Tropsch derived components used herein (i.e. the Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil) will preferably comprise no more than 3% w/w, more preferably no more than 2% w/w, even more preferably no more than 1% w/w of cycloparaffins (naphthenes), by weight of the Fischer-Tropsch derived component.
The Fischer-Tropsch derived components used herein (i.e. the Fischer-Tropsch derived gasoil) preferably comprise no more than 1% w/w, more preferably no more than 0.5% w/w, of olefins, by weight of the Fischer-Tropsch derived component.
A preferred component for use herein is a detergent additive, by which is meant an agent (suitably a surfactant) which can act to remove, and/or to prevent the build-up of, combustion related deposits within an engine, in particular in the fuel injection system such as in the injector nozzles. Such materials are sometimes referred to as dispersant additives.
Detergent-containing diesel fuel additives are known and commercially available. Examples of suitable detergent additives include, but are not necessary limited to, polyolefin substituted succinimides or succinimides of polyamines, aliphatic amines, Mannich bases or amines, polyolefin maleic anhydrides, and quaternary ammonium salts, and mixtures thereof. A preferred detergent additive for use herein is a nitrogen-containing detergent. A particularly preferred detergent additive for use herein is a polyolefin substituted succinimide, such as a polyisobutylene succinimide.

12 Many of the detergents mentioned above are nitrogen-containing detergents.
The detergent additive is preferably present in the fuel composition at a level from 5 ppmw to 10000ppmw, preferably 5 ppmw to 1000ppmw, more preferably in the range 5 to 500 ppmw, even more preferably in the range from 5 to 100 ppmw active matter detergent based on the overall fuel composition.
In one embodiment of the present invention the detergent additive is a component of a detergent additive package together with one or more other additive components. Examples of other suitable additive components are provided in more detail hereinbelow.
A further preferred component of the fuel composition herein is a biodiesel fuel. Biodiesel fuels are fuels which derive from biological materials.
The biodiesel component is preferably present in the fuel composition herein at a level of 5% v/v or greater up to a level of 50% v/v, preferably from 5% v/v to 30% v/v, for example at levels of 7%v/v, 10%v/v, 20%v/v and 30%v/v.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the fuel composition herein is free of biodiesel component (i.e. a so-called 'BO' fuel).
A preferred biodiesel component for use herein is a fatty acid alkyl ester (FAAE). It is known to include fatty acid alkyl esters (FAAEs), in particular fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), in diesel fuel compositions.
Examples of suitable F.AAEs include rapeseed methyl ester (RME), palm oil methyl ester (POME), and soy methyl ester (SME). F.AAEs are typically derivable from biological sources and are typically included to reduce the environmental impact of the fuel production and consumption process or to improve lubricity.

13 PAAEs, of which the most commonly used in the context of diesel fuels are the methyl esters, are already known as renewable diesel fuels (so-called 'biodiesel' fuels).
They contain long chain carboxylic acid molecules (generally from 10 to 22 carbon atoms long), each having an alcohol molecule attached to one end. Organically derived oils such as vegetable oils (including recycled vegetable oils) and animal fats (including fish oils) can be subjected to a transesterification process with an alcohol (typically a C1 to C5 alcohol) to form the corresponding fatty esters, typically mono-alkylated.
This process, which is suitably either acid- or base-catalysed, such as with the base KOH, converts the triglycerides contained in the oils into fatty acid components of the oils from their glycerol backbone.
PAAEs can also be prepared from used cooking oils and can be prepared by standard esterification from fatty acids.
In the present invention, the PAAE may be any alkylated fatty acid or mixture of fatty acids. Its fatty acid component(s) are preferably derived from a biological source, more preferably a vegetable source. They may be saturated or unsaturated; if the latter, they may have one or more, preferably up to 6, double bonds. They may be linear or branched, cyclic or polycyclic. Suitably, they will have from 6 to 30, preferably 10 to 30, more suitably from 10 to 22 or from 12 to 24 or from 16 to 18, carbon atoms including the acid group(s) -CO2H. A PAAE will typically comprise a mixture of different fatty acid esters of different fatty acid esters of different chain lengths, depending on its source.
A preferred PAAE for use in the present invention is selected from a natural fatty oil, for instance tall oil, rapeseed oil, palm oil or soy oil.

14 The FAAE is preferably a C1 to C5 alkyl ester, more preferably a methyl, ethyl, propyl, (suitably iso-propyl) or butyl ester, yet more preferably a methyl or ethyl ester and in particular a methyl ester. In one embodiment herein, the FAAE is selected from methyl ester of palm oil (POME) and methyl ester of rapeseed oil (RME, and mixtures thereof.
In general, it may be either natural or synthetic, refined or unrefined ('crude').
The FAAE may contain impurities or by-products as a result of the manufacturing process.
The FAAE suitably complies with specifications applying to the rest of the fuel composition, and/or to the base fuel to which it is added, bearing in mind the intended use to which the composition is to be put (for example, in which geographical area and at what time of year). In particular, the FAAE preferably has a flash point (IP 34) of greater than 101 C; a kinematic viscosity at 40 C (IP 71) of 1.9 to 6.0 m2/s, preferably 3.5 to 5.0 m2/s; a density of 845 to 910 kg/m3, preferably from 860 to 900 kg/m3, at 15 C (IP 365, EN ISO 12185 or EN ISO
3675); a water content (IP 386) of less than 500 ppm; a T95 (the temperature at which 95% of the fuel has evaporated, measured according to IP 123) of less than 360 C; an acid number (IP 139) of less than 0.8mgKOG/g, preferably less than 0.5mgKOH/g; and an iodine number (IP
84) of less than 125, preferably less than 120 or less than 115, grams of iodine (12) per 110g of fuel. It also preferably contains (e.g. by gas chromatography (GC)) less than 0.2% w/w of free methanol, less than 0.02% w/w of free glycerol and greater than 96.5% w/w esters. In general it may be preferred for the FAAE to conform to the European specification EN14214 for fatty methyl esters for use as diesel fuels.
Two or more FAAEs may be added to the fuel composition in accordance with the present invention, either separately or as a pre-prepared blend.
5 The FAAE can be incorporated into the fuel composition typically as a blend (i.e. a physical mixture) and optionally with one or more other fuel components (such as diesel base fuels) and optionally with one or more fuel additives. The FAAE is conveniently 10 incorporated into the fuel composition before the composition is introduced into the engine which is to be run on the fuel composition.
The fuel compositions described herein for use in the present invention are particularly suitable for use

15 as a diesel fuel, in which case the fuel composition is a diesel fuel composition, and can be used for arctic applications, as winter grade diesel fuel due to the excellent cold flow properties.
For example, a cloud point of -10 C or lower (EN
23015) or a cold filter plugging point (CFPP) of -20 C or lower (as measured by EN 116) may be possible with fuel compositions herein.
The diesel fuel compositions described herein may comprise a diesel base fuel in addition to a paraffinic gasoil and/or biodiesel fuel component.
The diesel base fuel may be any petroleum derived diesel suitable for use in an internal combustion engine, such as a petroleum derived low sulphur diesel comprising <50 ppm of sulphur, for example, an ultra-low sulphur diesel (ULSD) or a zero-sulphur diesel (ZSD).
Preferably, the low sulphur diesel comprises <10 ppm of sulphur.
The petroleum derived low sulphur diesel preferred

16 for use in the present invention will typically have a density from 0.81 to 0.865, preferably 0.82 to 0.85, more preferably 0.825 to 0.845 g/cm3 at 15 C; a cetane number (ASTM D613) at least 51; and a kinematic viscosity (ASTM
D445) from 1.5 to 4.5, preferably 2.0 to 4.0, more preferably from 2.2 to 3.7 mm2/s at 40 C.
In one embodiment, the diesel base fuel is a conventional petroleum-derived diesel.
Generally speaking in the context of the present invention the fuel composition may be additivated with fuel additives, in addition to the detergent additive already mentioned.
Unless otherwise stated, the (active matter) concentration of each such additive in a fuel composition is preferably up to 10000 ppmw, more preferably in the range from 5 to 1000 ppmw, advantageously from 75 to 300 ppmw, such as from 95 to 150 ppmw. Such additives may be added at various stages during the production of a fuel composition; those added to a base fuel at the refinery for example might be selected from anti-static agents, pipeline drag reducers, middle distillate flow improvers (MDFI) (e.g., ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers or acrylate/maleic anhydride copolymers), lubricity enhancers, anti-oxidants and wax anti-settling agents.
Other components which may be incorporated as fuel additives, for instance in combination with a detergent additive, include lubricity enhancers; dehazers, e.g.
alkoxylated phenol formaldehyde polymers; anti-foaming agents (e.g. commercially available polyether-modified polysiloxanes); ignition improvers (cetane improvers) (e.g. 2-ethylhexyl nitrate (EHN), cyclohexyl nitrate, di-tert-butyl peroxide and those disclosed in U54208190 at column 2, line 27 to column 3, line 21); anti-rust agents

17 (e.g. a propane-1,2-diol semi-ester of tetrapropenyl succinic acid, or polyhydric alcohol esters of a succinic acid derivative, the succinic acid derivative having on at least one of its alpha-carbon atoms an unsubstituted or substituted aliphatic hydrocarbon group containing from 20 to 500 carbon atoms, e.g. the pentaerythritol diester of polyisobutylene-substituted succinic acid);
corrosion inhibitors; reodorants; anti-wear additives;
anti-oxidants (e.g. phenolics such as 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol, or phenylenediamines such as N,N'-di-sec-butyl-p-phenylenediamine); metal deactivators; static dissipator additives; and mixtures thereof.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the other additive components in the detergent additive package are selected from anti-corrosion additives, metal passivators, antioxidants, metal deactivators, re-odorants, and the like, and mixtures thereof.
The present invention may in particular be applicable where the fuel composition is used or intended to be used in a direct injection diesel engine, for example of the rotary pump, in-line pump, unit pump, electronic unit injector or common rail type, or in an indirect injection diesel engine. The fuel composition may be suitable for use in heavy-and/or light-duty diesel engines, and in engines designed for on-road use or off-road use.
In order to be suitable for at least the uses listed above, it is preferred that the final fuel composition is a diesel fuel composition, preferably which meets the EN590 specification (October 2017).
In the case of a GTL base fuel being included in the fuel composition herein, it is preferred that the final fuel composition fuel meets the EN15940 specification

18 (2019).
The present invention may also be applicable where the fuel composition is used or intended to be used in a stationary application such as a heating oil system, heating oil burner, and/or stationary power generators.
A suitable heating oil composition for use herein has characteristics according to standard DIN 51603 (2020).
The invention is illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.
Examples Example 1 Four fuel samples were used in Example 1 as set out in Table 1 below.
Table 1 Fuel Fuel Type Performance Additive No. Package 12 (ppm) 1 GTL Fuel' 0 2 GTL Fuel' 500 3 B7 (93% EN590 diesel base 0 fuel, 7% FAME) 4 B7 (93% EN590 diesel base 500 fuel, 7% FAME) 1.
GTL fuel according to DIN EN15940 2019-10, class A, commercially available from Shell having the physicochemical characteristics set out in Table 2 below.
2. Commercially available additive package containing a PIBSI detergent additive. None of the other components present in Performance Additive Package 1 have a biocidal effect.
Table 2 (GTL fuel used in Example 1) Test Test Method Units Parameter Density at ASTM D 4052 kg/m3 778.8 Distillation ASTM D86 IBP ASTM D86 C 177.0

19 5% v/v ASTM D86 C 199.1 10% v/v ASTM D86 C 206.3 15% v/v ASTM D86 C 213.7

20% v/v ASTM D86 C 221.4 30% v/v ASTM D86 C 237.7 40% v/v ASTM D86 C 253.7 50% v/v ASTM D86 C 268.3 60% v/v ASTM D86 C 282.4 70% v/v ASTM D86 C 296.6 80% v/v ASTM D86 C 311.6 85% v/v ASTM D86 C 320.3 90% v/v ASTM D86 C 329.2 95% v/v ASTM D86 C 341.2 FBP ASTM D86 C 346.2 Recovery ASTM D86 %vol 97.4 Residue ASTM D86 %vol 1.4 Loss ASTM D86 %vol 1.2 E250 ASTM D86 %vol 28.6 E300 ASTM D86 %vol 73.5 Water Content DIN EN ISO mg/kg 42 Cloud Point DIN EN 23015 C -20 Kv20 ASTM D445 mm2/ s 3.8369 Test Procedure Test microorganisms A defined inoculum with known hydrocarbon degrading capacity was used, ex. contaminated field diesel sample.
lml was withdrawn from the contaminated field diesel sample and used to inoculate an aqueous medium/fuel mixture in the ratio 70:30m1. This was done for each of the fuels in Table 1 above and allowed to grow for 8 days to form cultures or microbial communities. Incubation was carried out in the dark at 25 C. 100p1 from the aqueous phase of each microbial community was then used to inoculate the microcosms.
Microcosm set up A stainless steel coupon (to promote biofilm growth) was inserted into a vial. 5m1 of Bushnell Haas nutrient medium (aqueous phase) was decanted in and overlaid with 5m1 of fuel. Microbial communities were then inoculated with either the GTL fuel or B7 cultures. Therefore, two inocula were derived from one field sample.
Testing protocol 5 Microbial growth and diversity was assessed over 1 month by dry biomass weight to determine the amount of growth. This is a simple technique designed to give a direct measurement of the total microbial burden at the end of the experiment. Growth visible at the interface 10 was captured, solvent washed to remove fuel residues, dried in an oven, cooled and weighed. The results of Example 1 are shown in Figure 1. In Figure 1 the key to the fuel samples is as follows:
GA1 = GTL fuel (additivated) (Community 1) 15 GU1 = GTL fuel (unadditivated) (Community 1) DA1 = B7 fuel (additivated) (Community 1) DU1 = B7 fuel (unadditivated) (Community 1) GA2 = GTL fuel (additivated) (Community 2) GU2 = GTL fuel (unadditivated) (Community 2) 20 DA2 = B7 fuel (additivated) (Community 2) DU2 = B7 fuel (unadditivated) (Community 2) As can be seen from Figure 1 there was a reduction in biomass growth for Community 1 in the fuels containing GTL fuel compared with the comparative fuels not containing GTL fuel.
Example 2 The fuels used in Example 2 are set out in Table 5 below. Each fuel contained a EN590 base fuel or a GTL
EN15940 base fuel, either with or without FAME, and either with or without a performance additive package as indicated. The physicochemical properties of the EN590 base fuel used in this example are set out in Table 3 below. The physicochemical properties of the GTL fuel

21 used in this example are set out in Table 4 below. The FAME in the B7 fuels (containing 7% biofuel) was derived from SME/RME. The FAME used in the B30 fuels (containing 30% of biofuel, respectively) was derived from RME and POME. The FAME used in the B50 fuels (containing 50% of biofuel) was derived from POME.
The additives used were as follows:
Performance Additive Package 2: containing detergent additives. None of the other components present in Performance Additive Package 2 have a biocidal effect.
Performance Additive Package 2 is used in all fuel formulations apart from EN 590 BO.
Performance Additive Package 3: containing detergent additives. None of the other components present in Performance Additive Package 3 have a biocidal effect.
Performance Additive Package 3 is used in GTL and EN590 BO fuel formulations. Performance Additive Package 3 is a special additive formulation tailored for heating fuel formulations typically containing no FAME. The fuel formulations tested herein also contain no FAME.
Detergent Additive 1: PIBSI detergent additive (used in EN 590 B7 fuel formulations).
Detergent Additive 2: quaternary ammonium based detergent additive (used in EN 590 B7 fuel formulations).
Table 3 (EN590 base fuel used in Example 2) Test Test Method Units Parameter Density at ASTM D 4052 kg/m3 833.4 Flash Point DIN EN ISO C 68.5 CN DIN EN ISO 53.3 Distillation ASTM D86 IBP ASTM D86 C 177.1 5% v/v ASTM D86 C 202.6 10% v/v ASTM D86 C 215.0

22 15% v/v ASTM D86 C 223.2 20% v/v ASTM D86 C 229.8 30% v/v ASTM D86 C 241.9 40% v/v ASTM D86 C 253.5 50% v/v ASTM D86 C 263.2 60% v/v ASTM D86 C 273.7 70% v/v ASTM D86 C 285.2 80% v/v ASTM D86 C 299.2 85% v/v ASTM D86 C 307.9 90% v/v ASTM D86 C 319.4 95% v/v ASTM D86 C 337.4 FBP ASTM D86 C 351.4 Residue & ASTM D86 %vol 2.0 Loss E250 ASTM D86 %vol 37.6 E300 ASTM D86 %vol 81.1 E350 ASTM D86 %vol 97.9 S DIN EN ISO mg/kg <5 Cloud Point ASTM D 2500 C -11 kV40 ASTM D445 =2/kg 2.6027 HFRR (WS DIN ISO pm 345 Avg.) 12156-1 Aromatic type DIN EN
(IP391) 12916:2006 Mono DIN EN %wt 20.1 aromatics 12916:2006 Di aromatics DIN EN %wt 2.4 12916:2006 Tri+ DIN EN %wt 0.2 aromatics 12916:2006 FAME content DIN EN 14078 %vol <0.1 NZ DIN 51558 Ti mgKOH/g 0.00 Water Content DIN EN ISO mg/kg 41 Rancimat - DIN EN 15751 H 25.1 mod.
Table 4 (GTL fuel used in Example 2) Test Test Method Units Parameter HFRR (WS DIN ISO pm 630 Avg.) 12156-1 Water Content DIN EN ISO mg/kg 26 CN DIN 51773 70.2 Density at DIN EN ISO kg/m3 776.2

23 Distillation DIN EN ISO

IBP DIN EN ISO C 175.9 5% v/v DIN EN ISO C 195.0 10% v/v DIN EN ISO C 203.0 20% v/v DIN EN ISO C 220.5 30% v/v DIN EN ISO C 238.5 40% v/v DIN EN ISO C 255.1 50% v/v DIN EN ISO C 269.7 60% v/v DIN EN ISO C 283.6 70% v/v DIN EN ISO C 297.5 80% v/v DIN EN ISO C 312.1 90% v/v DIN EN ISO C 328.4 95% v/v DIN EN ISO C 338.9 FBP DIN EN ISO C 343.5 Residue & DIN EN ISO %vol 2.2 Loss 3405 E250 DIN EN ISO %vol 37.5 E300 DIN EN ISO %vol 72.6 Kv40 DIN EN ISO mm2/5 2.520 FAME Content DIN EN 14078 %vol <0.1 Flash Point DIN EN ISO C 67.5 DIN EN ISO mg/kg <5 Cloud Point DIN EN 23015 C -18 C m/m % ASTM D 5291 %m/m 84.90 mod H m/m % ASTM D 5291 %m/m 15.10 mod 0 m/m % ASTM D 5291 %m/m <0.50

24 mod The testing protocol was the same as that in Example 1 with assessment of the observed microbial growth in all tested fuel types over a period of 3 months (2 time points of 4 weeks and 12 weeks) based on total biomass dry weight. Three replicate microcosms were set up for each time point. One microbial community was used as inoculum.
The results are shown in Table 5 below. Figure 2 is a graphical representation of the data shown in Table 5, and in particular shows the average dry biomass weight (g) after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks of all fuels tested in Example 2, with and without GTL (i.e. those fuels based on B100, EN590 or GTL).
As can be seen from the results in Table 5 and Figure 2 there was a reduction in biomass growth in the fuels containing GTL fuel compared with the comparative fuels not containing GTL fuel.

Table 5 Fuel 1y-be (A = FAME
Additive additi ) k EAML Additive 1y-be Origin Biomass (g) No GTL k 4 BO None None 0.0397 No GTL , ek 4 BO None ae 0.0 6 No GTL week 4 BO
None 0.0 1 ]
Yes GTL+A week 4 BO Performance Additive Package _ _ O. 11 Yes GTL+A week 4 BO Performance Additive Package 2 ae C.
Yes GTL+A Week 4 BO
Performance Additive Package 2 None 0.0--3 Yes GTL+A week 4 BO
Performance Additive Package 3 None 0.07 Yes GTL+A week 4 BO
Performance Additive Package 3 None 0.0381 Yes GTL+A week 4 BO
Performance Additive Package 3 None 0.042 No GTL week 4 B7 None SÃ/RÃ 0.0686 No GTL week 4 B7 None SÃ/RÃ 0.0475 No GTL week 4 B7 None SÃ/RÃ 0.0751 Yes GTL+A week 4 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.0595 Yes GTL+A week 4 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.0475 Yes GTL+A week 4 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.0489 No GTL week 4 B30 None SÃ/RÃ 0.1513 No GTL week 4 B30 None SÃ/RÃ 0.1217 No GTL week 4 B30 None SÃ/RÃ 0.1425 Yes GTL+A week 4 B30 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.1053 Yes GTL+A week 4 B30 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.0878 Yes GTL+A week 4 B30 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.1102 No EN590 week 4 BO None ae 0.085 No EN590 week 4 BO None ... -0.0284 No EN590 week 4 BO None ] 0.1764 Yes EN590+A week 4 BO Performance Additive Package 3 ae 0.1687 Yes EN590+A week 4 BO Performance Additive Package 3 None 0.0777 Yes EN590+A week 4 BO Performance Additive Package 3 None 0.14 No EN590 week 4 B7 None SÃ/RÃ
C. 11 No EN590 week 4 B7 None SÃ/RÃ
0.0 72 No EN590 week 4 B7 None SÃ/RÃ
0.C= ., Yes EN590+A week 4 B7 Deter: It Additive 1 SÃ/RÃ
0.C= =2 Yes EN590+A week 4 B7 De 1 : It Additive 1 SÃ/RÃ
0.0348 Yes EN590+A week 4 B7 Det 1 : It Additive 1 SÃ/RÃ
0.0539 Yes EN590+A week 4 B7 Det : t Additive 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.0524 Yes EN590+A week 4 B7 Det 1 : It Additive 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.0428 Yes EN590+A week 4 B7 Det_L: t Additive 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.0351 Yes EN590+A week 4 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.0313 Yes EN590+A week 4 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.0318 Yes EN590+A week 4 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 ,,LE/RME 0.0444 No EN590 week 4 B30 None 7E, 0.1348 No EN590 week 4 B30 None _ = 1E, 0.096 No EN590 week 4 B30 None = E
0.0557 Yes EN590+A week 4 B30 Performance Additive Package _ = 1E, 0.0761 Yes EN590+A week 4 B30 Performance Additive Package = E 0.1( 3 Yes EN590+A week 4 B30 Performance Additive Package _ = _E 0.C= 7 No EN590 week 4 B50 None = E O.
No EN590 week 4 B50 None 7E, O. 33 No EN590 week 4 B50 None 7E, 0.2121 Yes EN590+A week 4 B50 Performance Additive Package _ 7E, 0.1178 Yes EN590+A week 4 B50 Performance Additive Package 2 7E, 0.0916 Yes EN590+A week 4 B50 Performance Additive Package 2 POME
0.0796 No GTL week 12 BO None None 0.1224 No GTL week 12 BO None None 0.0954 No GTL week 12 BO None None 0.0756 Yes GTL+A week 12 BO Performance Additive Package 2 None 0.1984 Yes GTL+A week 12 BO Performance Additive Package 2 None 0.2239 Yes GTL+A week 12 BO Performance Additive Package 2 ae 0.0625 Yes GTL+A week 12 BO Performance Additive Package 3 ] 0.1107 Yes GTL+A week 12 BO Performance Additive Package 3 0.0371 Yes GTL+A week 12 BO Performance Additive Package 3 ae 0.0559 No GTL week 12 B7 None SÃ/RÃ
0.0571 No GTL week 12 B7 None SÃ/RÃ
0.0631 No GTL week 12 B7 None SÃ/RÃ
0.1005 Yes GTL+A week 12 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.0508 Yes GTL+A week 12 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.0489 Yes GTL+A week 12 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.0455 No GTL week 12 B30 None SÃ/RÃ
0.1336 No GTL week 12 B30 None SÃ/RÃ
0.1367 No GTL week 12 B30 None SÃ/RÃ
0.1075 Yes GTL+A week 12 B30 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.1529 Yes GTL+A week 12 B30 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.4002 Yes GTL+A week 12 B30 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ
0.0633 No EN590 week 12 BO None ae 0.1201 No EN590 week 12 BO None 0.0756 No EN590 week 12 BO None ]
0.0631 Yes EN590+A week 12 BO Performance Additive Package 3 ae 0.(- 2 Yes EN590+A week 12 BO
Performance Additive Package 3 None 0.1( 9 Yes EN590+A week 12 BO
Performance Additive Package 3 None O.
No EN590 week 12 B7 None SÃ/RÃ
0.0 9 No EN590 week 12 B7 None SÃ/RÃ
0.0407 No EN590 week 12 B7 None SÃ/RÃ
0.0367 Yes EN590+A week 12 B7 Detergent Additive 1 SÃ/RÃ 0.0447 Yes EN590+A week 12 B7 Detergent Additive 1 SÃ/RÃ 0.0429 Yes EN590+A week 12 B7 De'-- t Additive 1 SÃ/RÃ 0.0345 Yes EN590+A week 12 B7 Det 1 It Additive 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.0475 Yes EN590+A week 12 B7 Deter It Additive 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.0483 Yes EN590+A week 12 B7 Detergent Additive 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.0563 Yes EN590+A week 12 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.3515 Yes EN590+A week 12 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.0513 Yes EN590+A week 12 B7 Performance Additive Package 2 SÃ/RÃ 0.06 No EN590 week 12 B30 None POMP
0.5307 No EN590 week 12 B30 None - ./IE
0.2122 No EN590 week 12 B30 None E
0.163 Yes EN590+A week 12 B30 Performance Additive Package - E 0.1895 Yes EN590+A week 12 B30 Performance Additive Package E 0.2436 Yes EN590+A week 12 B30 Performance Additive Package - E 0.4804 No EN590 week 12 B50 None E
0.394 No EN590 week 12 B50 None JE
0.4321 No EN590 week 12 B50 None _ E
0.2501 Yes EN590+A week 12 B50 Performance Additive Package ' E 0.4049 Yes EN590+A week 12 B50 Performance Additive Package _ E 0.2606 Yes EN590+A week 12 B50 Performance Additive Package 2 ,IE 0.2285 No B100 week 4 B100 None SYE/RME
0.2148 No B100 week 4 B100 None SÃ/RÃ
0.3724 No B100 week 4 B100 None FIE/RME
0.5325 No B100 week 4 B100 None ,IE
0.2574 No B100 week 4 B100 None ,IE
0.2787 No B100 Week 4 B100 None ,IE
0.2049 No B100 Week 12 B100 None SÃ/RÃ
0.4553 No B100 Week 12 B100 None SÃ/RÃ
0.5345 No B100 Week 12 B100 None SÃ/RÃ
0.7203 No B100 Week 12 B100 None POMP
0.5963 No B100 =-k 12 B100 None 0.8098 No B100 = k 12 B100 None 0.4027 Example 3 The fuels used in Example 3 are set out in Table 8 below. Each fuel contained an EN590 base fuel or a GTL
EN15940 base fuel, either with or without FAME. The 5 physicochemical properties of the EN590 base fuel used in this example are set out in Table 6 below. The physicochemical properties of the GTL fuel used in this example are set out in Table 7 below.
The testing protocol was the same as that in Example 10 1 with assessment of the observed microbial growth in all tested fuel types over a period of 3 months (2 time points of 4 weeks and 12 weeks) based on total biomass dry weight. Three replicate microcosms were set up for each time point. One microbial community was used as 15 inoculum.
The results are shown in Table 8 below. Figure 3 is graphical representation of the data shown in Table 8, and in particular shows the average dry biomass weight (g) after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks for the fuels of 20 Example 3 based on EN590 or GTL.
Table 6 (EN590 fuel used in Example 3) Test Test Method Units Result Parameter Water Content DIN EN ISO mg/kg 38 FAME Content DIN EN 14078 %vol <0.1 HFRR (Avg) DIN ISO 12156-1 pm 565 mod Rancimat - DIN EN 15751 h >48.0 mod.
Cetane Number DIN 51773 52.2 Density at DIN EN ISO kg/m3 830.2 Distillation DIN EN ISO 2405 IBP DIN EN ISO 2405 C 187.7 5% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 204.8 10% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 214.7 20% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 235.0 30% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 257.8 40% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 281.3 50% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 295.0 60% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 304.6 70% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 312.5 80% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 320.3 90% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 330.6 95% v/v DIN EN ISO 2405 C 339.3 FBP DIN EN ISO 2405 C 344.3 Residue & DIN EN ISO 2405 %vol 2.1 Loss E250 DIN EN ISO 2405 %vol 27.7 E300 DIN EN ISO 2405 %vol 55.8 Kinematic DIN EN ISO 3104 mm2/s 3.0388 Viscosity at Flash Point DIN EN ISO 2719 C 78.0 S DIN EN ISO mg/kg <5 Contamination DIN EN 12662 mg/kg <3 Conductivity ASTM D4308 pS/m 43 Temperature ASTM D4308 C 20.0 MCRT DIN EN ISO %wt <0.30 NZ DIN 51558 Ti mgKOH/g <0.03 Aromatic type DIN EN
(IP391) 12916:2006 Mono- DIN EN %wt 16.7 aromatics 12916:2006 di-aromatics DIN EN %wt 5.2 12916:2006 tri+- DIN EN %wt <0.1 aromatics 12916:2006 Ash ASTM D 482 %wt <0.010 Rating ASTM D 130 lA
Table 7 (GTL fuel used in Example 3) Test Test Method Units Results Parameter CN DIN 51773 71.0 Visual visual Bright and Appearance clear Density at DIN EN ISO kg/m3 777.9 Distillation DIN EN ISO 3405 IBP DIN EN ISO 3405 C 175.4 5% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 202.9 10% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 211.1 15% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 219.1 20% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 227.9 30% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 244.9 40% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 260.1 50% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 273.1 60% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 284.9 70% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 297.4 80% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 311.1 85% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 318.2 90% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 326.5 95% v/v DIN EN ISO 3405 C 336.9 FBP DIN EN ISO 3405 C 341.6 Recovery DIN EN ISO 3405 %vol 97.9 Residue & DIN EN ISO 3405 %vol 2.1 Loss E250 DIN EN ISO 3405 %vol 33.7 E300 DIN EN ISO 3405 %vol 72.8 Kv40 ASTM D445.446 mm2/s 2.661 Flash Point DIN EN ISO 2719 C 72.0 S DIN EN ISO mg/kg <5 Cloud Point DIN EN 23015 C -20 Water Content DIN EN ISO mg/kg <25 C/H/O-Ratio ASTM D5291 mod C m/m % ASTM D 5291 mod %m/m 84.60 H m/m % ASTM D 5291 mod %m/m 15.20 0 m/m % ASTM D 5291 mod %m/m <0.05 HFRR (WS DIN ISO 12156-1 pm 385 Avg.) Conductivity ASTM D4308 pS/m 684 Temperature ASTM D4308 C 20.0 Induction DIN EN 16091 1:26:25 Period (h:min:s) Table 8 Dry biomass Fuel FAME weight Description Additive Type Week FAME Origin (g) GTL diesel BO No GTL week 4 BO None 0.0164 GTL diesel BO No GTL week 4 BO None 0.0207 GTL diesel BO No GTL week 4 BO None 0.0161 GTL diesel B7 (UCOME) No GTL week 4 B7 UCOME 0.0233 GTL diesel B7 (UCOME) No GTL week 4 B7 UCOME 0.0367 GTL diesel B7 (UCOME) No GTL week 4 B7 UCOME 0.0302 GTL diesel B20 (UCOME) No GTL week 4 B20 UCOME 0.0362 GTL diesel B20 (UCOME) No GTL week 4 B20 UCOME 0.0370 GTL diesel B20 (UCOME) No GTL week 4 B20 UCOME 0.0172 GTL diesel B30 (UCOME) No GTL week 4 B30 UCOME 0.0658 GTL diesel B30 (UCOME) No GTL week 4 B30 UCOME 0.0475 GTL diesel B30 (UCOME) No GTL week 4 B30 UCOME 0.0460 GTL diesel B7 (RME) No GTL week 4 B7 RME 0.0214 GTL diesel B7 (RME) No GTL week 4 B7 RME 0.0326 GTL diesel B7 (RME) No GTL week 4 B7 RME 0.0248 GTL diesel B20 (RME) No GTL week 4 B20 RME 0.0333 GTL diesel B20 (RME) No GTL week 4 B20 RME 0.0306 GTL diesel B20 (RME) No GTL week 4 B20 RME 0.0405 GTL diesel B30 (RME) No GTL week 4 B30 RME 0.0619 GTL diesel B30 (RME) No GTL week 4 B30 RME 0.0354 GTL diesel B30 (RME) No GTL week 4 B30 RME 0.0526 (UCOME) No EN590 week 4 B7 UCOME 0.0000 (UCOME) No EN590 week 4 B7 UCOME 0.0188 EN590 B7 No EN590 week 4 B7 UCOME 0.0155 (UCOME) (POME) No EN590 week 4 B30 POME 0.0886 (POME) No EN590 week 4 B30 POME 0.1093 (POME) No EN590 week 4 B30 POME 0.1460 GTL diesel week BO No GTL 12 BO None 0.0474 GTL diesel week BO No GTL 12 BO None 0.0395 GTL diesel week BO No GTL 12 BO None 0.0341 GTL diesel week B7 (UCOME) No GTL 12 B7 UCOME 0.0564 GTL diesel week B7 (UCOME) No GTL 12 B7 UCOME 0.0394 GTL diesel week B7 (UCOME) No GTL 12 B7 UCOME 0.0405 GTL diesel week B20 (UCOME) No GTL 12 B20 UCOME 0.0455 GTL diesel week B20 (UCOME) No GTL 12 B20 UCOME 0.0464 GTL diesel week B20 (UCOME) No GTL 12 B20 UCOME 0.0433 GTL diesel week B30 (UCOME) No GTL 12 B30 UCOME 0.0458 GTL diesel week B30 (UCOME) No GTL 12 B30 UCOME 0.0648 GTL diesel week B30 (UCOME) No GTL 12 B30 UCOME 0.0694 GTL diesel week B7 (RME) No GTL 12 B7 RME 0.0398 GTL diesel week B7 (RME) No GTL 12 B7 RME 0.0491 GTL diesel week B7 (RME) No GTL 12 B7 RME 0.0298 GTL diesel week B20 (RME) No GTL 12 B20 RME 0.0533 GTL diesel week B20 (RME) No GTL 12 B20 RME 0.0502 GTL diesel week B20 (RME) No GTL 12 B20 RME 0.0313 GTL diesel week B30 (RME) No GTL 12 B30 RME 0.0326 GTL diesel week B30 (RME) No GTL 12 B30 RME 0.0497 GTL diesel week B30 (RME) No GTL 12 B30 RME 0.0444 EN590 B7 week (UCOME) No EN590 12 B7 UCOME
0.0014 EN590 B7 No EN590 week B7 UCOME 0.0000 (UCOME) 12 EN590 B7 week (UCOME) No EN590 12 B7 UCOME 0.0000 EN590 B30 week (POME) No EN590 12 B30 POME
0.0830 EN590 B30 week (POME) No EN590 12 B30 POME
0.0742 EN590 B30 week (POME) No EN590 12 B30 POME
0.1085 As can be seen from the results in Table 8 and Figure 3 there was a reduction in biomass growth in the fuels containing GTL fuel compared to the fuels 5 containing EN590 diesel fuel.

Claims (9)

36

1. Use of a paraffinic gasoil in a fuel composition for reducing microbial growth.

2. Use according to Claim 1 wherein the paraffinic gasoil is selected from hydrotreated vegetable oil, Fischer-Tropsch derived base fuels, and mixtures thereof.

3. Use according to Claim 1 or 2 wherein the paraffinic gasoil is a Fischer-Tropsch derived base fuel.

4. Use according to any of Claims 1 to 3 wherein the level of paraffinic gasoil is from 5% v/v to 100% v/v based on the total fuel composition.

5. Use according to any of Claims 1 to 4 wherein the fuel composition is selected from a diesel fuel composition, a heating oil composition, an aviation fuel composition, and a marine fuel composition.

6. Use according to any of Claims 1 to 5 wherein the fuel composition is a diesel fuel composition.

7. Use according to Claim 6 wherein the diesel fuel composition comprises a petroleum derived diesel base fuel.

8. Use according to Claim 6 or 7 wherein the diesel fuel composition comprises a biodiesel component, preferably a fatty acid alkyl ester.

9. Method for reducing microbial growth in a fuel composition, which method comprises a step of introducing a paraffinic gasoil into said fuel composition.