CA3167956C - Methods of treating water with powder activated carbon to reduce organic matter content - Google Patents
Methods of treating water with powder activated carbon to reduce organic matter content Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA3167956C CA3167956C CA3167956A CA3167956A CA3167956C CA 3167956 C CA3167956 C CA 3167956C CA 3167956 A CA3167956 A CA 3167956A CA 3167956 A CA3167956 A CA 3167956A CA 3167956 C CA3167956 C CA 3167956C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- activated carbon
- steel mill
- powder activated
- wastewater stream
- glycol
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 75
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 65
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 title abstract description 18
- LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethylene glycol Chemical compound OCCO LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 79
- WGCNASOHLSPBMP-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydroxyacetaldehyde Natural products OCC=O WGCNASOHLSPBMP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- MTHSVFCYNBDYFN-UHFFFAOYSA-N diethylene glycol Chemical compound OCCOCCO MTHSVFCYNBDYFN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 9
- DNIAPMSPPWPWGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propylene glycol Chemical compound CC(O)CO DNIAPMSPPWPWGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- ZCYVEMRRCGMTRW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 7553-56-2 Chemical compound [I] ZCYVEMRRCGMTRW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011630 iodine Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052740 iodine Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920001515 polyalkylene glycol Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 125000003827 glycol group Chemical group 0.000 claims 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 150000002334 glycols Chemical class 0.000 abstract description 16
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 18
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 3
- YNAVUWVOSKDBBP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Morpholine Chemical compound C1COCCN1 YNAVUWVOSKDBBP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001050 lubricating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004065 wastewater treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phenol Chemical compound OC1=CC=CC=C1 ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000000274 adsorptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000004432 carbon atom Chemical group C* 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005352 clarification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- ZBCBWPMODOFKDW-UHFFFAOYSA-N diethanolamine Chemical compound OCCNCCO ZBCBWPMODOFKDW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009300 dissolved air flotation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003925 fat Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000706 filtrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009970 fire resistant effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004519 grease Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010842 industrial wastewater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002480 mineral oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010446 mineral oil Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000021110 pickles Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010791 quenching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000171 quenching effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001223 reverse osmosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000108 ultra-filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241001148471 unidentified anaerobic bacterium Species 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/68—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition of specified substances, e.g. trace elements, for ameliorating potable water
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/28—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption
- C02F1/283—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption using coal, charred products, or inorganic mixtures containing them
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
- B01J20/02—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising inorganic material
- B01J20/20—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising inorganic material comprising free carbon; comprising carbon obtained by carbonising processes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
- B01J20/28—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
- B01J20/28002—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their physical properties
- B01J20/28004—Sorbent size or size distribution, e.g. particle size
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
- B01J20/28—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
- B01J20/28002—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their physical properties
- B01J20/28011—Other properties, e.g. density, crush strength
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
- B01J20/28—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
- B01J20/28014—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their form
- B01J20/28016—Particle form
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
- B01J20/28—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
- B01J20/28054—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
- B01J20/28078—Pore diameter
- B01J20/28083—Pore diameter being in the range 2-50 nm, i.e. mesopores
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/28—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption
- C02F1/281—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption using inorganic sorbents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/28—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption
- C02F1/285—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption using synthetic organic sorbents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/72—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2101/00—Nature of the contaminant
- C02F2101/30—Organic compounds
- C02F2101/34—Organic compounds containing oxygen
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
- C02F2103/06—Contaminated groundwater or leachate
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
- C02F2103/16—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from metallurgical processes, i.e. from the production, refining or treatment of metals, e.g. galvanic wastes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2209/00—Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
- C02F2209/20—Total organic carbon [TOC]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2303/00—Specific treatment goals
- C02F2303/18—Removal of treatment agents after treatment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2305/00—Use of specific compounds during water treatment
- C02F2305/02—Specific form of oxidant
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Nanotechnology (AREA)
- Water Treatment By Sorption (AREA)
- Removal Of Specific Substances (AREA)
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
Abstract
Methods are described that reduce the amount of organic matter in water, including reducing an amount of total organic carbon in water. The method includes adding powder activated carbon to the water; mixing the powder activated carbon in the water; and separating the powder activated carbon from the water. Also described are a method for reducing glycol content in water containing glycols, and a method for reducing glycol content in a steel mill wastewater stream containing glycols.
Description
METHODS OF TREATING WATER WITH
POWDER ACTIVATED CARBON TO REDUCE ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELAYED APPLICATION
100011 This application claims the benefit of U.S. Application No. 62/987,052, filed March 9, 2020.
BACKGROUND
[000.2] Many manufacturing operations can result in periodic accidental and/or anticipated discharges of orszanic or organic-modified liquids including, for example, hydraulic fluid, heat transfer fluids, and quenching [00031 These fluids may be used in production operations for many different purposes. For example, steel and other metals may be processed in hot strip or rolling mills that reduce a hot, slab, bloom, or billet from a cast shape into thin coils, plates, rebar, or other structural shapes. A typical arrangement is a roughing mill, followed by finishing stands that continuously reduce the cast product into its desired dimensions for final use or additional processing in pickle lines, cold mills, and annealing and cut-to-length lines.
The forces required to reduce a cast product to thinner shapes require roll stands with significant pressure requirements (>2000 psi). These pressures are maintained with hydraulic fluids.
[0004] From a hydraulics perspective, many industrial machines are designed to operate with fire-resistant hydraulic fluids, particularly water glycol-type hydraulic fluids, due to extremely high operating temperatures. Water glycol fluids usually contain glycols and about 30 to 60 wt% water (e.g., 30-50 wt% water, or 30-40 wt% water).
Typical glycols used in such fluids include diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and other polyalkylene glycols or combinations thereof. For example, the water glycol fluid can contain 20-60 wt% or 30-50 wt% diethylcne glycol, and/or 5-20 wt% or 10-15 wt%
other polyalkylene glycols.
[00051 While water is an important part of such water glycol fluids, its presence can also create performance issues for the fluid. Water, for example, does not exhibit the lubricating film strength of mineral oil or various synthetic lubricating base stocks and thus tends to limit the maximum operating pressure of the hydraulic system.
[00061 The high water solubility of water glycol fluids can present a range of difficulties in an industrial setting including, for example, establishing adequate control of wastewater discharges from industrial plants and facilities. Local municipalities, as well as state and federal agencies, may monitor water leaving an industrial site for contaminants such Date recue/Date Received 2024-01-08
POWDER ACTIVATED CARBON TO REDUCE ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELAYED APPLICATION
100011 This application claims the benefit of U.S. Application No. 62/987,052, filed March 9, 2020.
BACKGROUND
[000.2] Many manufacturing operations can result in periodic accidental and/or anticipated discharges of orszanic or organic-modified liquids including, for example, hydraulic fluid, heat transfer fluids, and quenching [00031 These fluids may be used in production operations for many different purposes. For example, steel and other metals may be processed in hot strip or rolling mills that reduce a hot, slab, bloom, or billet from a cast shape into thin coils, plates, rebar, or other structural shapes. A typical arrangement is a roughing mill, followed by finishing stands that continuously reduce the cast product into its desired dimensions for final use or additional processing in pickle lines, cold mills, and annealing and cut-to-length lines.
The forces required to reduce a cast product to thinner shapes require roll stands with significant pressure requirements (>2000 psi). These pressures are maintained with hydraulic fluids.
[0004] From a hydraulics perspective, many industrial machines are designed to operate with fire-resistant hydraulic fluids, particularly water glycol-type hydraulic fluids, due to extremely high operating temperatures. Water glycol fluids usually contain glycols and about 30 to 60 wt% water (e.g., 30-50 wt% water, or 30-40 wt% water).
Typical glycols used in such fluids include diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and other polyalkylene glycols or combinations thereof. For example, the water glycol fluid can contain 20-60 wt% or 30-50 wt% diethylcne glycol, and/or 5-20 wt% or 10-15 wt%
other polyalkylene glycols.
[00051 While water is an important part of such water glycol fluids, its presence can also create performance issues for the fluid. Water, for example, does not exhibit the lubricating film strength of mineral oil or various synthetic lubricating base stocks and thus tends to limit the maximum operating pressure of the hydraulic system.
[00061 The high water solubility of water glycol fluids can present a range of difficulties in an industrial setting including, for example, establishing adequate control of wastewater discharges from industrial plants and facilities. Local municipalities, as well as state and federal agencies, may monitor water leaving an industrial site for contaminants such Date recue/Date Received 2024-01-08
2 as phenol content, FOG (fats, oils, and grease), heavy metals, and CBOD
(carbonaceous biological oxygen demand) and COD (chemical oxygen demand).
[0007] As noted above, water glycol fluids are used widely throughout various industrial and hydraulic operations and tend to be applied, under high pressures, for actuating various components or for circulating through operating equipment for controlling operating temperature. As a result, leaks or other inadvertent discharges of water glycols during industrial operations are not uncommon. For example, in a steel mill, the hydraulic fluid might be applied at a pressure of 2,500 to 3,000 psi. At these high pressures, a leak can result in hundreds or thousands of gallons of the hydraulic fluid entering the wastewater stream.
[0008] Water glycol fluids that find their way into a wastewater stream are typically not removed during standard waste treatment methods and tend to contribute substantially to increased CBOD and COD levels in the effluent stream. The increased CBOD and COD
levels can result in significant changes to the biodiversity of the effluent stream. Although anaerobic bacteria can survive¨and perhaps thrive¨in the presence of the water glycols, the rest of the ecosystem will be depleted as oxygen levels are diminished. As a result, many industrial operations are faced with treatment surcharges from their local wastewater treatment facilities or permit violations due to high levels of CBOD.
[0009] To address this, industrial operations have attempted to implement methods for suppressing the impact of inadvertent glycol discharges. However, the glycols are 100%
water soluble, and are therefore difficult to remove from water streams because the glycols will not float, cannot be filtered, and are generally not reactive. To date, ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis have been the only measures believed to be effective for removing glycols from wastewater streams. However, these processes are expensive and cumbersome, requiring wastewater to be collected and moved off-site for biological wastewater treatment.
[0010] There is a need for a more efficient method for quickly removing glycol contaminants from wastewater streams without requiring off-site treatment.
SUMMARY
[0011] In accordance with one aspect of this invention, it has been discovered that powder activated carbon (PAC), previously believed to be ineffective at removing water glycols from water streams, can efficiently reduce glycol-associated contaminants from water streams. The water can be treated on-site (e.g., at a steel mill) without requiring the water to be collected and transferred to an off-site treatment location. This allows for real-time evaluation and treatment of elevated total organic carbon (TOC) in order to ensure that industrial operations comply with regulations governing TOC levels.
(carbonaceous biological oxygen demand) and COD (chemical oxygen demand).
[0007] As noted above, water glycol fluids are used widely throughout various industrial and hydraulic operations and tend to be applied, under high pressures, for actuating various components or for circulating through operating equipment for controlling operating temperature. As a result, leaks or other inadvertent discharges of water glycols during industrial operations are not uncommon. For example, in a steel mill, the hydraulic fluid might be applied at a pressure of 2,500 to 3,000 psi. At these high pressures, a leak can result in hundreds or thousands of gallons of the hydraulic fluid entering the wastewater stream.
[0008] Water glycol fluids that find their way into a wastewater stream are typically not removed during standard waste treatment methods and tend to contribute substantially to increased CBOD and COD levels in the effluent stream. The increased CBOD and COD
levels can result in significant changes to the biodiversity of the effluent stream. Although anaerobic bacteria can survive¨and perhaps thrive¨in the presence of the water glycols, the rest of the ecosystem will be depleted as oxygen levels are diminished. As a result, many industrial operations are faced with treatment surcharges from their local wastewater treatment facilities or permit violations due to high levels of CBOD.
[0009] To address this, industrial operations have attempted to implement methods for suppressing the impact of inadvertent glycol discharges. However, the glycols are 100%
water soluble, and are therefore difficult to remove from water streams because the glycols will not float, cannot be filtered, and are generally not reactive. To date, ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis have been the only measures believed to be effective for removing glycols from wastewater streams. However, these processes are expensive and cumbersome, requiring wastewater to be collected and moved off-site for biological wastewater treatment.
[0010] There is a need for a more efficient method for quickly removing glycol contaminants from wastewater streams without requiring off-site treatment.
SUMMARY
[0011] In accordance with one aspect of this invention, it has been discovered that powder activated carbon (PAC), previously believed to be ineffective at removing water glycols from water streams, can efficiently reduce glycol-associated contaminants from water streams. The water can be treated on-site (e.g., at a steel mill) without requiring the water to be collected and transferred to an off-site treatment location. This allows for real-time evaluation and treatment of elevated total organic carbon (TOC) in order to ensure that industrial operations comply with regulations governing TOC levels.
3 [0012] In one aspect, this disclosure provides a method for reducing an amount of total organic carbon (TOC) in water containing 5 to 100 gallons glycol / 100 lb TOC and more than 25 mg TOC/L water. The method includes adding powder activated carbon to the water; mixing the powder activated carbon in the water so that at least some of the glycols adsorb onto the powder activated carbon; and separating the powder activated carbon from the water.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0013] The FIGURE is a chart illustrating the effectiveness of PAC on removing glycols (as measured by TOC) using varying concentrations of PAC in a laboratory trial.
[0014] It should be noted that this figure is intended to illustrate the general characteristics of methods with reference to certain example embodiments of the invention and thereby supplement the detailed written description below.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0015] As described herein, methods are provided for reducing the amount of organic matter in a water stream.
[0016] The amount of organic matter in a water stream can be measured using various parameters. CBOD is a measurement of oxygen depletion in water as a result of biological activity facilitated by the carbonaceous organic matter in the sample. Higher concentrations of organic matter provide more "food" for microbes, resulting in greater microbial activity and thus greater oxygen depletion. Regulatory bodies generally monitor organic contaminants in industrial wastewater by evaluating CBOD. However, to monitor CBOD, effluent must first be collected and shipped to a treatment site (which can take about days), and the CBOD test itself requires a 5-day period to incubate the sample with microbes. Thus, a glycol leak could go undetected for 10 days before the industrial facility first becomes aware of the problem.
[0017] Also, because of the nature of the CBOD test, test results have a large standard deviation, and measurements can vary as much as from 80% to 160% of the actual CBOD. In order to ensure that effluent streams are found to be in compliance with regulations, CBOD must be minimized as much as possible (preferably eliminated) in order to ensure that CBOD tests do not report violating levels of organic matter.
[0018] TOC is a related parameter for measuring organic matter, and allows for substantially immediate feedback on amounts of organic matter in the waste stream. TOC
provides a measure of the total amount of carbon in a sample through determination of CO2 generation from an oxidation reaction. In other words, while CBOD measures the demand
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0013] The FIGURE is a chart illustrating the effectiveness of PAC on removing glycols (as measured by TOC) using varying concentrations of PAC in a laboratory trial.
[0014] It should be noted that this figure is intended to illustrate the general characteristics of methods with reference to certain example embodiments of the invention and thereby supplement the detailed written description below.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0015] As described herein, methods are provided for reducing the amount of organic matter in a water stream.
[0016] The amount of organic matter in a water stream can be measured using various parameters. CBOD is a measurement of oxygen depletion in water as a result of biological activity facilitated by the carbonaceous organic matter in the sample. Higher concentrations of organic matter provide more "food" for microbes, resulting in greater microbial activity and thus greater oxygen depletion. Regulatory bodies generally monitor organic contaminants in industrial wastewater by evaluating CBOD. However, to monitor CBOD, effluent must first be collected and shipped to a treatment site (which can take about days), and the CBOD test itself requires a 5-day period to incubate the sample with microbes. Thus, a glycol leak could go undetected for 10 days before the industrial facility first becomes aware of the problem.
[0017] Also, because of the nature of the CBOD test, test results have a large standard deviation, and measurements can vary as much as from 80% to 160% of the actual CBOD. In order to ensure that effluent streams are found to be in compliance with regulations, CBOD must be minimized as much as possible (preferably eliminated) in order to ensure that CBOD tests do not report violating levels of organic matter.
[0018] TOC is a related parameter for measuring organic matter, and allows for substantially immediate feedback on amounts of organic matter in the waste stream. TOC
provides a measure of the total amount of carbon in a sample through determination of CO2 generation from an oxidation reaction. In other words, while CBOD measures the demand
4 for oxygen, TOC measures the conversion of oxygen to CO2. TOC can be measured real-time, on-site, and with high accuracy. In a steel mill, for example, TOC
levels can be monitored at different locations (e.g., caster, flume, scale pit) on a periodic basis. To ensure prompt feedback, measurements can be made every 5-10 minutes. Alternatively, the facility could continuously monitor TOC levels at one or more locations.
[0019] Because CBOD and TOC are related, either can be used to measure organic content in the water stream according to the disclosed methods. However, TOC
is desirably used due to the ability to get immediate feedback on glycol levels with relatively high accuracy.
[0020] In methods of the disclosed embodiments, powder activated carbon (PAC) is introduced into a water stream and contacted with organic matter in the water stream in order to reduce the amount of the organic matter in the water stream. The effectiveness of organic matter (particularly glycol) removal can be determined by monitoring CBOD or TOC. For simplicity, the following discussion refers to monitoring TOC, but CBOD
measurements may also be used.
[0021] Activated carbon is a highly porous, high-surface-area adsorptive material with a largely amorphous structure. It is composed primarily of carbon atoms joined by random cross-linkages. The randomized bonding creates a highly porous structure with numerous cracks, crevices, and voids between the carbon layers, resulting in a very large internal surface area.
[0022] Activated carbon may be in the form of powder activated carbon (PAC), such as powder having a particle size of 80 mesh (177 pm) or smaller. For example, the PAC
can have a particle size of 100 mesh (149 jam) or smaller, 140 mesh (105 pm) or smaller, 200 mesh (74 pm) or smaller, 230 mesh (62 pm) or smaller, 270 mesh (53 lam) or smaller, or 325 mesh (44 p.m) or smaller. The PAC can be defined by a certain percentage of the particles passing through a given mesh size (e.g., at least 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 99%), or can be defined by a series of mesh sizes (e.g., a PAC in which 99% of the particles pass through 100 mesh, 95% pass through 200 mesh, and 90% pass through 325 mesh).
[0023] PAC particles can have an average pore size of, for example, 50 nm or less, such as from 2 to 50 nm, 5 to 40 nm, 7.5 to 30 nm, or 10 to 20 nm. Also, the PAC particles can have an iodine value of 600 to 1100, or even more than 1100 (e.g., 1100-1500). The iodine value is an indicator of porosity, and is defined according to ASTM
D4607-94 as the milligrams of iodine adsorbed by 1.0 g of the carbon when the iodine concentration of the filtrate is 0.02 mol/L.
[0024] The apparent density of the PAC can range from 22 to 35 lb/ft3, such as to 31 lb/ft3. For example, the PAC can have an apparent density of 29 lb/ft3.
[0025] In embodiments of the invention, PAC can be injected into the water stream in either powder form or as a slurry. For example, the PAC can be mixed with water in a batch tank to form a slurry containing 0.01 to 10 lbs PAC per gallon water.
For example, the concentration of PAC in the slurry could be 0.025 to 5 lbs PAC per gallon water, 0.05 to 2 lbs PAC per gallon water, or 0.1 to 1 lb PAC per gallon water. The slurry can be held in the tank, i.e., pre-made, or formed continuously and as needed. The PAC can then be injected into the system (either in powder form or as a slurry) in response to detected elevated TOC levels.
This process of injecting the PAC in response to reaching a TUC threshold (e.g., 20 or 30 ppm) can be automated or performed manually.
[0026] Effective PAC dosing will depend on TOC levels. Treatment levels and dosing will vary depending on system configuration and CBOD permit limitations.
Depending on system dynamics, the feed rate can be between 25 and 50 lbs of PAC per gallon of glycol. A total treatment amount of 10 to 1,000 lbs of PAC can be injected into the water stream for every 1 lb of TOC introduced in the water stream. For example, 50 to 800 lbs of PAC, 200 to 400 lbs PAC, 225 to 350 lbs PAC, or 250 to 300 lbs PAC can be added for every 1 lb of TOC. Depending on TOC levels and effluent flow rate, the PAC
feed rate can be from 5 to 20 lb/min, from 7.5 to 15 lb/min, or from 10 to 12 lb/min.
[0027] In the case of a hydraulic fluid leak, glycol levels can range from 5 to 100 gallons glycol / 100 lb TOC (for example, 20 to 50 gallons glycol / 100 lb TOC, or 30 to 40 gallons glycol / 100 lb TOC). The amount of fluid leaked into the system can depend on different factors such as flow rate and how long the leak progressed until it was detected. For example, a leak can introduce 50 lb, 100 lb, 150 lb, 300 lb, 750 lb, or more TOC into the system. TOC levels at the time of initiating treatment can be lower if detected early (e.g., 30 or 50 mg TOC/L water), or can be as high as 100 mg/L, 150 mg/L, 200 mg/L, 500 mg/L or higher.
[0028] Average TOC levels after 24 hours of treatment should ideally be lower than 25 mg/L, and preferably lower than 20 mg/L or lower than 15 mg/L. Treatment could result in complete removal of TOC or a decrease in average amount of TOC over the course of 24 hours. For example, the detected amount can decrease by 50%, 60%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or 99% over the course of treatment (e.g., within 24 hours from start of treatment).
[0029] The total treatment amount of PAC added with respect to glycol spilled into the system can be up to 100 lb PAC / gallon glycol, e.g. from 5 to 100 lb PAC
/ gallon glycol, from 20 to 90 lb PAC / gallon glycol, from 50 to 80 lb PAC / gallon glycol, or from 65 to 75 lb PAC / gallon glycol. For example, the amount of PAC introduced can be about 70 lb PAC/
gallon glycol.
[0030] In some aspects, to ensure sufficient interaction between the PAC and glycols, the PAC can be allowed to mix with the water containing organic matter (TOC) for a certain amount of time before being separated, such as for 1-5 minutes. For example, the PAC can be mixed into a water stream containing organic matter (where turbulent flow effectively mixes the PAC into the water stream) for at least 3 minutes, at least 5 minutes, at least 10 minutes, at least 30 minutes, or at least 60 minutes prior to being allowed to settle.
Or the PAC can be mechanically mixed with water containing organic matter in a tank for any of these mixing times.
[0031] In the case of a steel mill, the PAC can be added in the flume that leads to the scale pit or other clarification systems. The PAC is sufficiently mixed with the wastewater in the flume or other piping prior to the scale separating system, where it then settles together with the adsorbed glycols. In this case, the mixing time refers to the amount of time the PAC spends in the flume, mixing chamber, or piping before reaching the scale pit or other devices where it is allowed to settle. The settled PAC/glycols are removed from the scale pit, settler, dissolved air flotation (DAF) device, or other separation device, together with steel scale, and the clarified water can be recirculated.
[0032] The settled PAC/glycols can remain in the scale, which can be removed and recycled or disposed per normal handling processes.
EXAMPLE
[0033] The following test was performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the disclosed methods, and particularly to confirm the effect of various concentrations of PAC on treating TOC.
[0034] A control solution contained 108 ppm TOC (¨ 318 ppm glycol) in water.
The glycol product used was FR WG 300-D from American Chemical Technologies, Inc., and included 35-45 wt% diethylene glycol, 30-40 wt% water, 10-15 wt%
polyalkylene glycol, 0-1wt% morpholine, and 0-1 wt% diethanolamine. Test samples were prepared from the control solution by adding varying amounts of PAC, ranging from 1,000 ppm (0.1 wt%) to 10,000 ppm (1 wt%) PAC, and mixing the samples for 3-5 minutes. The samples were allowed to settle for approximately 20 minutes, and 50 mI, of water was decanted from the top of each sample and analyzed using a Teledyne TOC analyzer. Minimal PAC was included in the 50 mL aliquots due to settling; however, any incidental amounts of PAC
present in the samples is believed to have not affected the TOC analysis.
[0035] The results are summarized in the FIGURE. As shown, TOC levels decrease with increasing amounts of PAC. However, it becomes increasingly difficult to mitigate TOC levels below 30 ppm TOC. This demonstrates that PAC must be dosed carefully to ensure that TOC levels remain below regulated thresholds (which can require less than 20 or 30 ppm TOC).
[0036] As shown in the Example, PAC was surprisingly found to be effective for reducing TOC (and CBOD) when allowed to adequately mix with the water containing organic matter. Using the disclosed methods, water can be treated on-site (e.g., at a steel mill or airport deicing runoff) without requiring the water to be collected and transferred to an off-site treatment location. This allows for real-time evaluation and treatment of elevated amounts of organic matter (measured as TOC or CBOD) in order to ensure that industrial operations comply with environmental regulations.
[0037] While the invention has been described in conjunction with the specific exemplary embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, exemplary embodiments of the invention as set forth herein are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. There are changes that may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
levels can be monitored at different locations (e.g., caster, flume, scale pit) on a periodic basis. To ensure prompt feedback, measurements can be made every 5-10 minutes. Alternatively, the facility could continuously monitor TOC levels at one or more locations.
[0019] Because CBOD and TOC are related, either can be used to measure organic content in the water stream according to the disclosed methods. However, TOC
is desirably used due to the ability to get immediate feedback on glycol levels with relatively high accuracy.
[0020] In methods of the disclosed embodiments, powder activated carbon (PAC) is introduced into a water stream and contacted with organic matter in the water stream in order to reduce the amount of the organic matter in the water stream. The effectiveness of organic matter (particularly glycol) removal can be determined by monitoring CBOD or TOC. For simplicity, the following discussion refers to monitoring TOC, but CBOD
measurements may also be used.
[0021] Activated carbon is a highly porous, high-surface-area adsorptive material with a largely amorphous structure. It is composed primarily of carbon atoms joined by random cross-linkages. The randomized bonding creates a highly porous structure with numerous cracks, crevices, and voids between the carbon layers, resulting in a very large internal surface area.
[0022] Activated carbon may be in the form of powder activated carbon (PAC), such as powder having a particle size of 80 mesh (177 pm) or smaller. For example, the PAC
can have a particle size of 100 mesh (149 jam) or smaller, 140 mesh (105 pm) or smaller, 200 mesh (74 pm) or smaller, 230 mesh (62 pm) or smaller, 270 mesh (53 lam) or smaller, or 325 mesh (44 p.m) or smaller. The PAC can be defined by a certain percentage of the particles passing through a given mesh size (e.g., at least 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 99%), or can be defined by a series of mesh sizes (e.g., a PAC in which 99% of the particles pass through 100 mesh, 95% pass through 200 mesh, and 90% pass through 325 mesh).
[0023] PAC particles can have an average pore size of, for example, 50 nm or less, such as from 2 to 50 nm, 5 to 40 nm, 7.5 to 30 nm, or 10 to 20 nm. Also, the PAC particles can have an iodine value of 600 to 1100, or even more than 1100 (e.g., 1100-1500). The iodine value is an indicator of porosity, and is defined according to ASTM
D4607-94 as the milligrams of iodine adsorbed by 1.0 g of the carbon when the iodine concentration of the filtrate is 0.02 mol/L.
[0024] The apparent density of the PAC can range from 22 to 35 lb/ft3, such as to 31 lb/ft3. For example, the PAC can have an apparent density of 29 lb/ft3.
[0025] In embodiments of the invention, PAC can be injected into the water stream in either powder form or as a slurry. For example, the PAC can be mixed with water in a batch tank to form a slurry containing 0.01 to 10 lbs PAC per gallon water.
For example, the concentration of PAC in the slurry could be 0.025 to 5 lbs PAC per gallon water, 0.05 to 2 lbs PAC per gallon water, or 0.1 to 1 lb PAC per gallon water. The slurry can be held in the tank, i.e., pre-made, or formed continuously and as needed. The PAC can then be injected into the system (either in powder form or as a slurry) in response to detected elevated TOC levels.
This process of injecting the PAC in response to reaching a TUC threshold (e.g., 20 or 30 ppm) can be automated or performed manually.
[0026] Effective PAC dosing will depend on TOC levels. Treatment levels and dosing will vary depending on system configuration and CBOD permit limitations.
Depending on system dynamics, the feed rate can be between 25 and 50 lbs of PAC per gallon of glycol. A total treatment amount of 10 to 1,000 lbs of PAC can be injected into the water stream for every 1 lb of TOC introduced in the water stream. For example, 50 to 800 lbs of PAC, 200 to 400 lbs PAC, 225 to 350 lbs PAC, or 250 to 300 lbs PAC can be added for every 1 lb of TOC. Depending on TOC levels and effluent flow rate, the PAC
feed rate can be from 5 to 20 lb/min, from 7.5 to 15 lb/min, or from 10 to 12 lb/min.
[0027] In the case of a hydraulic fluid leak, glycol levels can range from 5 to 100 gallons glycol / 100 lb TOC (for example, 20 to 50 gallons glycol / 100 lb TOC, or 30 to 40 gallons glycol / 100 lb TOC). The amount of fluid leaked into the system can depend on different factors such as flow rate and how long the leak progressed until it was detected. For example, a leak can introduce 50 lb, 100 lb, 150 lb, 300 lb, 750 lb, or more TOC into the system. TOC levels at the time of initiating treatment can be lower if detected early (e.g., 30 or 50 mg TOC/L water), or can be as high as 100 mg/L, 150 mg/L, 200 mg/L, 500 mg/L or higher.
[0028] Average TOC levels after 24 hours of treatment should ideally be lower than 25 mg/L, and preferably lower than 20 mg/L or lower than 15 mg/L. Treatment could result in complete removal of TOC or a decrease in average amount of TOC over the course of 24 hours. For example, the detected amount can decrease by 50%, 60%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or 99% over the course of treatment (e.g., within 24 hours from start of treatment).
[0029] The total treatment amount of PAC added with respect to glycol spilled into the system can be up to 100 lb PAC / gallon glycol, e.g. from 5 to 100 lb PAC
/ gallon glycol, from 20 to 90 lb PAC / gallon glycol, from 50 to 80 lb PAC / gallon glycol, or from 65 to 75 lb PAC / gallon glycol. For example, the amount of PAC introduced can be about 70 lb PAC/
gallon glycol.
[0030] In some aspects, to ensure sufficient interaction between the PAC and glycols, the PAC can be allowed to mix with the water containing organic matter (TOC) for a certain amount of time before being separated, such as for 1-5 minutes. For example, the PAC can be mixed into a water stream containing organic matter (where turbulent flow effectively mixes the PAC into the water stream) for at least 3 minutes, at least 5 minutes, at least 10 minutes, at least 30 minutes, or at least 60 minutes prior to being allowed to settle.
Or the PAC can be mechanically mixed with water containing organic matter in a tank for any of these mixing times.
[0031] In the case of a steel mill, the PAC can be added in the flume that leads to the scale pit or other clarification systems. The PAC is sufficiently mixed with the wastewater in the flume or other piping prior to the scale separating system, where it then settles together with the adsorbed glycols. In this case, the mixing time refers to the amount of time the PAC spends in the flume, mixing chamber, or piping before reaching the scale pit or other devices where it is allowed to settle. The settled PAC/glycols are removed from the scale pit, settler, dissolved air flotation (DAF) device, or other separation device, together with steel scale, and the clarified water can be recirculated.
[0032] The settled PAC/glycols can remain in the scale, which can be removed and recycled or disposed per normal handling processes.
EXAMPLE
[0033] The following test was performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the disclosed methods, and particularly to confirm the effect of various concentrations of PAC on treating TOC.
[0034] A control solution contained 108 ppm TOC (¨ 318 ppm glycol) in water.
The glycol product used was FR WG 300-D from American Chemical Technologies, Inc., and included 35-45 wt% diethylene glycol, 30-40 wt% water, 10-15 wt%
polyalkylene glycol, 0-1wt% morpholine, and 0-1 wt% diethanolamine. Test samples were prepared from the control solution by adding varying amounts of PAC, ranging from 1,000 ppm (0.1 wt%) to 10,000 ppm (1 wt%) PAC, and mixing the samples for 3-5 minutes. The samples were allowed to settle for approximately 20 minutes, and 50 mI, of water was decanted from the top of each sample and analyzed using a Teledyne TOC analyzer. Minimal PAC was included in the 50 mL aliquots due to settling; however, any incidental amounts of PAC
present in the samples is believed to have not affected the TOC analysis.
[0035] The results are summarized in the FIGURE. As shown, TOC levels decrease with increasing amounts of PAC. However, it becomes increasingly difficult to mitigate TOC levels below 30 ppm TOC. This demonstrates that PAC must be dosed carefully to ensure that TOC levels remain below regulated thresholds (which can require less than 20 or 30 ppm TOC).
[0036] As shown in the Example, PAC was surprisingly found to be effective for reducing TOC (and CBOD) when allowed to adequately mix with the water containing organic matter. Using the disclosed methods, water can be treated on-site (e.g., at a steel mill or airport deicing runoff) without requiring the water to be collected and transferred to an off-site treatment location. This allows for real-time evaluation and treatment of elevated amounts of organic matter (measured as TOC or CBOD) in order to ensure that industrial operations comply with environmental regulations.
[0037] While the invention has been described in conjunction with the specific exemplary embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, exemplary embodiments of the invention as set forth herein are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. There are changes that may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (16)
- WHAT IS CLAIMED IS
I. A method for reducing glycol content in a steel mill wastewater stream containing at least one glycol species, the method comprising:
measuring an amount of total organic carbon (TOC) in the steel mill wastewater stream; and when the measured amount of TOC is greater than a predetermined threshold:
adding powder activated carbon to the steel mill wastewater stream;
mixing the powder activated carbon in the steel mill wastewater stream; and separatinu the powder activated carbon from the steel mill wastewater stream;
wherein the method is performed at a steel mill and the steel mill includes a scale pit;
and wherein the powder activated carbon is added to the steel mill wastewater stream upstream of the scale pit. - 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the powder activated carbon is added to the steel mill wastewater stream in an amount in the range of from 50 to 800 lbs powder activated carbon per 1 lb TOC in the steel mill wastewater stream.
- 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the powder activated carbon is added to the steel mill wastewater stream in an amount in the range of frorn 200 to 400 lbs powder activated carbon per I lb TOC in the steel mill wastewater stream.
- 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the powder activated carbon has an iodine value of in the range of from l 100 to 1500.
- 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the powder activated carbon prior to being added to the sted mill wastewater stream has an apparent density in the range of from 22 Iblft3 to 35 lb/ft3.
- 6. The method of claim 1, the powdered activated carbon is added to the steel mill wastewater stream in a flume, mixing chamber, or piping at the steel mill.
- 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the powder activated carbon is separated together with scale from the steel mill wastewater stream.
Date mem/Date Received 2024-01-08 - 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the glycol content in the steel mill wastewater stream is 5 to 100 gallons glycol/100 lb TOC before the powder activated carbon is added.
- 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the glycol content in thc steel mill wastewater stream is 30 to 100 gallons glyco1/100 lb TOC before the powder activated carbon is added.
- 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the powder activated carbon is added to the steel mill wastewater stream at a feed rate in the range of from 5 to 20 lb/min.
- l 1. The method of claim l, wherein the powder activated carbon is added to the steel mill wastewater stream at a feed rate in the range of from I() to 20 lb/min.
- 12. The method of claim l , wherein the predetermined threshold is 30 mg TOC/L water in the steel mill wastewater stream.
- 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the powder activated carbon is added to the steel rnill wastewater stream in the form of a slurry comprising from 0.01 to 10 lbs powder activated carbon per gallon water.
- 14. The method of claim I, wherein the at least one glycol species is a polyalkylene glycol.
- 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one glycol species is selected from the group consisting of: diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol.
- 16. The method of clairn 7, wherein the powder activated carbon is present in the scale after the powder activated carbon and scale are separated from the steel mill wastewater stream.
Date recue/Date Received 2024-01-08
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US202062987052P | 2020-03-09 | 2020-03-09 | |
US62/987,052 | 2020-03-09 | ||
PCT/US2020/067496 WO2021183204A1 (en) | 2020-03-09 | 2020-12-30 | Methods of treating water with powder activated carbon to reduce organic matter content |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA3167956A1 CA3167956A1 (en) | 2021-09-16 |
CA3167956C true CA3167956C (en) | 2024-06-18 |
Family
ID=77555494
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA3167956A Active CA3167956C (en) | 2020-03-09 | 2020-12-30 | Methods of treating water with powder activated carbon to reduce organic matter content |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US11814307B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP4118038A4 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112022015955A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3167956C (en) |
MX (1) | MX2022011185A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2021183204A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5047083A (en) * | 1989-06-15 | 1991-09-10 | Nalco Chemical Company | Process for de-oiling mill scale |
US5125966A (en) * | 1990-12-20 | 1992-06-30 | Nalco Chemical Company | Process for de-oiling mill sludge |
CN101522572A (en) * | 2006-06-27 | 2009-09-02 | 技术研究及发展基金有限公司 | Method for adsorption of fluid contaminants and regeneration of the adsorbent |
US8883099B2 (en) | 2012-04-11 | 2014-11-11 | ADA-ES, Inc. | Control of wet scrubber oxidation inhibitor and byproduct recovery |
WO2014195364A1 (en) * | 2013-06-04 | 2014-12-11 | Basf Se | Process for reducing the total organic carbon in wastewater |
US20190381478A1 (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2019-12-19 | Metawater Co., Ltd. | Activated carbon slurry supply method |
JP6631817B2 (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2020-01-15 | 株式会社エコロ | TOC measuring method and TOC measuring device used for the same |
CN112135796A (en) | 2018-05-17 | 2020-12-25 | 沙特基础工业全球技术公司 | Method for recycling condensed water of CO2 waste gas stream |
-
2020
- 2020-12-30 CA CA3167956A patent/CA3167956C/en active Active
- 2020-12-30 MX MX2022011185A patent/MX2022011185A/en unknown
- 2020-12-30 BR BR112022015955A patent/BR112022015955A2/en unknown
- 2020-12-30 WO PCT/US2020/067496 patent/WO2021183204A1/en unknown
- 2020-12-30 EP EP20923960.7A patent/EP4118038A4/en active Pending
- 2020-12-30 US US17/138,317 patent/US11814307B2/en active Active
-
2023
- 2023-10-05 US US18/377,029 patent/US20240034653A1/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
MX2022011185A (en) | 2022-10-18 |
CA3167956A1 (en) | 2021-09-16 |
US20210276896A1 (en) | 2021-09-09 |
US11814307B2 (en) | 2023-11-14 |
EP4118038A1 (en) | 2023-01-18 |
EP4118038A4 (en) | 2024-01-17 |
WO2021183204A1 (en) | 2021-09-16 |
US20240034653A1 (en) | 2024-02-01 |
BR112022015955A2 (en) | 2022-10-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Chen et al. | Kinetics of natural organic matter (NOM) removal during drinking water biofiltration using different NOM characterization approaches | |
Howes et al. | Environmental aspects of grinding fluids | |
CN101519250B (en) | Emulsifiable solution waste water processing method | |
Tang et al. | The relationship between discolored water from corrosion of old iron pipe and source water conditions | |
Zolfaghari et al. | Investigation on removal pathways of Di 2-ethyl hexyl phthalate from synthetic municipal wastewater using a submerged membrane bioreactor | |
Fereidonian Dashti et al. | Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of ammoniacal nitrogen removal from palm oil mill wastewater using limestone roughing filter | |
CA3167956C (en) | Methods of treating water with powder activated carbon to reduce organic matter content | |
Moreira et al. | Restrictions in water treatment by conventional processes (coagulation, flocculation, and sand-filtration) following scenarios of dam failure | |
Scalize et al. | Reuse of alum sludge for reducing flocculant addition in water treatment plants | |
Teli et al. | Treatment of metalworking fluids using a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) | |
Storck et al. | Effects of boundary conditions on the cleaning efficiency of riverbank filtration and artificial groundwater recharge systems regarding bulk parameters and trace pollutants | |
KR20170072579A (en) | Purification method and apparatus for polluted water | |
Pacini et al. | Transformation of an existing physicochemical plant for iron and manganese removal by the application of biological processes | |
Matsumoto et al. | Filtration of primary effluent | |
Pathak et al. | Vivianite occurrence and remediation techniques in biosolids pre-treatment process | |
Erten-Unal et al. | Determination of inhibitory concentrations of the surfactant AFFF on biological nitrification process and pass-through toxicity | |
Gao et al. | Petroleum refinery secondary effluent polishing using freezing processes—toxicity and organic contaminant removal | |
Gao et al. | Clogging mechanisms of biological aerobic filter in a petro-chemical wastewater treatment plant: A field study | |
Maritim et al. | Quantification of Physiochemical Characteristic Wastewater Effluents: A Case Study of Bata Tanneries, Kenya | |
Assou et al. | Removal of turbidity in tannery waste water: modelling by the experimental design | |
Lokman et al. | Effect of Filtered Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) via Close Loop In-Line Microbubbles Treatment Chamber for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Treatment | |
Hedin et al. | Passive Removal of Mn from Mine Water Using Oxic Aggregate Beds: Results of Two Pilot Systems | |
Malley Jr Assistant Professor Erg | Removal of organic halide precursors by dissolved air flotation vs. conventional water treatment | |
Kozak et al. | The effect of ferric chloride addition for phosphorus removal on ultraviolet radiation disinfection of wastewater | |
Wang | Use of acid mine drainage in recycling of Marcellus Shale flowback water: Solids removal and potential fouling of polymeric microfiltration membranes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20220812 |
|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20220812 |
|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20220812 |
|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20220812 |
|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20220812 |
|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20220812 |
|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20220812 |