CA3140962A1 - Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, compositions comprising it, and its use as bio-stimulant and endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium - Google Patents
Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, compositions comprising it, and its use as bio-stimulant and endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA3140962A1 CA3140962A1 CA3140962A CA3140962A CA3140962A1 CA 3140962 A1 CA3140962 A1 CA 3140962A1 CA 3140962 A CA3140962 A CA 3140962A CA 3140962 A CA3140962 A CA 3140962A CA 3140962 A1 CA3140962 A1 CA 3140962A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- strain
- nov
- methylobacterium
- nitrogen
- plants
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 241000589309 Methylobacterium sp. Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 101
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 241000589152 Azotobacter chroococcum Species 0.000 title abstract description 6
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 235
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims description 142
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 118
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 57
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000003973 irrigation Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000002262 irrigation Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000009630 liquid culture Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 241001354220 Rhizophagus iranicus Species 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium carbonate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]C([O-])=O VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- ZTOKUMPYMPKCFX-CZNUEWPDSA-N (E)-17-[(2R,3R,4S,5S,6R)-6-(acetyloxymethyl)-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-6-(acetyloxymethyl)-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxan-2-yl]oxy-4,5-dihydroxyoxan-2-yl]oxyoctadec-9-enoic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CCCCCCC/C=C/CCCCCCC(C)O[C@@H]1O[C@H](COC(C)=O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](COC(C)=O)O1 ZTOKUMPYMPKCFX-CZNUEWPDSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-{[2-carboxy-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(phosphanyloxy)oxan-3-yl]oxy}-4,5-dihydroxy-3-phosphanyloxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound O1C(C(O)=O)C(P)C(O)C(O)C1OC1C(C(O)=O)OC(OP)C(O)C1O FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000206761 Bacillariophyta Species 0.000 claims description 2
- AFWTZXXDGQBIKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N C14 surfactin Natural products CCCCCCCCCCCC1CC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(C(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)O1 AFWTZXXDGQBIKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 240000006162 Chenopodium quinoa Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920002101 Chitin Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000005913 Maltodextrin Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920002774 Maltodextrin Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 240000003183 Manihot esculenta Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000016735 Manihot esculenta subsp esculenta Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 244000269722 Thea sinensis Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 229940072056 alginate Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000010443 alginic acid Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920000615 alginic acid Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000010216 calcium carbonate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910000019 calcium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000001727 glucose Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 229940035034 maltodextrin Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- 229940096992 potassium oleate Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- MLICVSDCCDDWMD-KVVVOXFISA-M potassium;(z)-octadec-9-enoate Chemical compound [K+].CCCCCCCC\C=C/CCCCCCCC([O-])=O MLICVSDCCDDWMD-KVVVOXFISA-M 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000001397 quillaja saponaria molina bark Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- FCBUKWWQSZQDDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N rhamnolipid Chemical compound CCCCCCCC(CC(O)=O)OC(=O)CC(CCCCCCC)OC1OC(C)C(O)C(O)C1OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(C)O1 FCBUKWWQSZQDDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229930182490 saponin Natural products 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000007949 saponins Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000020183 skimmed milk Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- NJGWOFRZMQRKHT-UHFFFAOYSA-N surfactin Natural products CC(C)CCCCCCCCCC1CC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(C(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)O1 NJGWOFRZMQRKHT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- NJGWOFRZMQRKHT-WGVNQGGSSA-N surfactin C Chemical compound CC(C)CCCCCCCCC[C@@H]1CC(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)O1 NJGWOFRZMQRKHT-WGVNQGGSSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000454 talc Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052623 talc Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 240000006365 Vitis vinifera Species 0.000 claims 2
- 235000014787 Vitis vinifera Nutrition 0.000 claims 2
- 235000021028 berry Nutrition 0.000 claims 2
- 235000021374 legumes Nutrition 0.000 claims 2
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 230000009418 agronomic effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000004720 fertilization Effects 0.000 description 75
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 72
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 description 31
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 23
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 22
- 239000003337 fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 19
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 19
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 18
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 17
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 16
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 16
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 16
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 13
- -1 MMMNF Substances 0.000 description 12
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 238000009331 sowing Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 11
- 239000011785 micronutrient Substances 0.000 description 11
- 235000013369 micronutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 239000000618 nitrogen fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 11
- 230000001332 colony forming effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 10
- 239000002054 inoculum Substances 0.000 description 10
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 description 7
- 229930002875 chlorophyll Natural products 0.000 description 7
- 235000019804 chlorophyll Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- ATNHDLDRLWWWCB-AENOIHSZSA-M chlorophyll a Chemical compound C1([C@@H](C(=O)OC)C(=O)C2=C3C)=C2N2C3=CC(C(CC)=C3C)=[N+]4C3=CC3=C(C=C)C(C)=C5N3[Mg-2]42[N+]2=C1[C@@H](CCC(=O)OC\C=C(/C)CCC[C@H](C)CCC[C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)[C@H](C)C2=C5 ATNHDLDRLWWWCB-AENOIHSZSA-M 0.000 description 7
- 210000000805 cytoplasm Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 7
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 235000016623 Fragaria vesca Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 240000009088 Fragaria x ananassa Species 0.000 description 6
- 235000011363 Fragaria x ananassa Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- VWDWKYIASSYTQR-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium nitrate Chemical compound [Na+].[O-][N+]([O-])=O VWDWKYIASSYTQR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 description 6
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 description 6
- 241000605014 Herbaspirillum seropedicae Species 0.000 description 5
- 241000821682 Methylobacterium dankookense Species 0.000 description 5
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 240000006740 Cichorium endivia Species 0.000 description 4
- WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(O)=O WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 4
- CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium sulfate Chemical compound [Mg+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 239000005708 Sodium hypochlorite Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000016383 Zea mays subsp huehuetenangensis Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 235000010419 agar Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 235000003733 chicria Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 239000002361 compost Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 4
- ZPWVASYFFYYZEW-UHFFFAOYSA-L dipotassium hydrogen phosphate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].OP([O-])([O-])=O ZPWVASYFFYYZEW-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 235000019797 dipotassium phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 229910000396 dipotassium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000003621 irrigation water Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000009973 maize Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium hypochlorite Chemical compound [Na+].Cl[O-] SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241001057636 Dracaena deremensis Species 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glutamic acid Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCC(O)=O WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241000589323 Methylobacterium Species 0.000 description 3
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000006199 nebulizer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002688 persistence Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008635 plant growth Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013207 serial dilution Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000010344 sodium nitrate Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- YBJHBAHKTGYVGT-ZKWXMUAHSA-N (+)-Biotin Chemical compound N1C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](CCCCC(=O)O)SC[C@@H]21 YBJHBAHKTGYVGT-ZKWXMUAHSA-N 0.000 description 2
- BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-REOHCLBHSA-N (S)-malic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](O)CC(O)=O BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-REOHCLBHSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229930192334 Auxin Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 244000060011 Cocos nucifera Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000013162 Cocos nucifera Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229910021578 Iron(III) chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000007836 KH2PO4 Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910002651 NO3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- PVNIIMVLHYAWGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Niacin Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=CN=C1 PVNIIMVLHYAWGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241001494479 Pecora Species 0.000 description 2
- 101000888131 Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) Glutamate synthase [NADH] Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 235000007244 Zea mays Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 2
- BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N alpha-hydroxysuccinic acid Natural products OC(=O)C(O)CC(O)=O BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium sulfate Chemical compound N.N.OS(O)(=O)=O BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052921 ammonium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 235000011130 ammonium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000002363 auxin Substances 0.000 description 2
- CBHOOMGKXCMKIR-UHFFFAOYSA-N azane;methanol Chemical compound N.OC CBHOOMGKXCMKIR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 244000116025 chicria Species 0.000 description 2
- RMRCNWBMXRMIRW-BYFNXCQMSA-M cyanocobalamin Chemical compound N#C[Co+]N([C@]1([H])[C@H](CC(N)=O)[C@]\2(CCC(=O)NC[C@H](C)OP(O)(=O)OC3[C@H]([C@H](O[C@@H]3CO)N3C4=CC(C)=C(C)C=C4N=C3)O)C)C/2=C(C)\C([C@H](C/2(C)C)CCC(N)=O)=N\C\2=C\C([C@H]([C@@]/2(CC(N)=O)C)CCC(N)=O)=N\C\2=C(C)/C2=N[C@]1(C)[C@@](C)(CC(N)=O)[C@@H]2CCC(N)=O RMRCNWBMXRMIRW-BYFNXCQMSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002538 fungal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035784 germination Effects 0.000 description 2
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N glutamine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000005396 glutamine synthetase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108020002326 glutamine synthetase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000008240 homogeneous mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- RBTARNINKXHZNM-UHFFFAOYSA-K iron trichloride Chemical compound Cl[Fe](Cl)Cl RBTARNINKXHZNM-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 2
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052943 magnesium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 235000019341 magnesium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000011090 malic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000001630 malic acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000007003 mineral medium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910000402 monopotassium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 235000019796 monopotassium phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000003715 nutritional status Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 2
- GNSKLFRGEWLPPA-UHFFFAOYSA-M potassium dihydrogen phosphate Chemical compound [K+].OP(O)([O-])=O GNSKLFRGEWLPPA-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- LXNHXLLTXMVWPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N pyridoxine Chemical compound CC1=NC=C(CO)C(CO)=C1O LXNHXLLTXMVWPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- JZRWCGZRTZMZEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N thiamine Chemical compound CC1=C(CCO)SC=[N+]1CC1=CN=C(C)N=C1N JZRWCGZRTZMZEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 2
- QOPBEBWGSGFROG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(1h-indol-2-yl)acetic acid Chemical compound C1=CC=C2NC(CC(=O)O)=CC2=C1 QOPBEBWGSGFROG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PAWQVTBBRAZDMG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(3-bromo-2-fluorophenyl)acetic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CC1=CC=CC(Br)=C1F PAWQVTBBRAZDMG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- KPGXRSRHYNQIFN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-oxoglutaric acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CCC(=O)C(O)=O KPGXRSRHYNQIFN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZPLCXHWYPWVJDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one Chemical compound C1=CC(O)=CC=C1CC1NC(=O)OC1 ZPLCXHWYPWVJDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 244000291564 Allium cepa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002732 Allium cepa var. cepa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000193830 Bacillus <bacterium> Species 0.000 description 1
- ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Boron Chemical compound [B] ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 241000159846 Centrosema pascuorum Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000207199 Citrus Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910021580 Cobalt(II) chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710088194 Dehydrogenase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 239000005781 Fludioxonil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000307700 Fragaria vesca Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000287828 Gallus gallus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000206672 Gelidium Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000235503 Glomus Species 0.000 description 1
- 101001015612 Halomonas elongata (strain ATCC 33173 / DSM 2581 / NBRC 15536 / NCIMB 2198 / 1H9) Glutamate synthase [NADPH] large chain Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001040070 Halomonas elongata (strain ATCC 33173 / DSM 2581 / NBRC 15536 / NCIMB 2198 / 1H9) Glutamate synthase [NADPH] small chain Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 244000020551 Helianthus annuus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000003222 Helianthus annuus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000408495 Iton Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000008415 Lactuca sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000003228 Lactuca sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Manganese Chemical compound [Mn] PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241001542929 Methylobacterium fujisawaense Species 0.000 description 1
- NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010020943 Nitrogenase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 231100000674 Phytotoxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000012891 Ringer solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003639 Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000219094 Vitaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005273 aeration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004378 air conditioning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005576 amination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000001014 amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910021529 ammonia Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N beta-D-glucose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000031018 biological processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960002685 biotin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000020958 biotin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011616 biotin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052796 boron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000011148 calcium chloride Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000001746 carotenes Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000005473 carotenes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- SILSDTWXNBZOGF-KUZBFYBWSA-N chembl111058 Chemical compound CCSC(C)CC1CC(O)=C(\C(CC)=N\OC\C=C\Cl)C(=O)C1 SILSDTWXNBZOGF-KUZBFYBWSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000460 chlorine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052801 chlorine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000020971 citrus fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000009508 confectionery Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000366 copper(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000006071 cream Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960002104 cyanocobalamin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000000639 cyanocobalamin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011666 cyanocobalamin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010612 desalination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000645 desinfectant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003651 drinking water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020188 drinking water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000021038 drupes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001815 facial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003495 flagella Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- MUJOIMFVNIBMKC-UHFFFAOYSA-N fludioxonil Chemical compound C=12OC(F)(F)OC2=CC=CC=1C1=CNC=C1C#N MUJOIMFVNIBMKC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000417 fungicide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001295 genetical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229930195712 glutamate Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 235000013922 glutamic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004220 glutamic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000021021 grapes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003324 growth hormone secretagogue Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- BAUYGSIQEAFULO-UHFFFAOYSA-L iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) Chemical compound [Fe+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O BAUYGSIQEAFULO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229910000359 iron(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000002879 macerating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 description 1
- SQQMAOCOWKFBNP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(II) sulfate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O SQQMAOCOWKFBNP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229910000357 manganese(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- ZQEIXNIJLIKNTD-GFCCVEGCSA-N metalaxyl-M Chemical compound COCC(=O)N([C@H](C)C(=O)OC)C1=C(C)C=CC=C1C ZQEIXNIJLIKNTD-GFCCVEGCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000003470 mitochondria Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000001968 nicotinic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229960003512 nicotinic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011664 nicotinic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen group Chemical group [N] QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000000050 nutritive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001543 one-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000029553 photosynthesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010672 photosynthesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000243 photosynthetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004962 physiological condition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000010482 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920000053 polysorbate 80 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 235000008160 pyridoxine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011677 pyridoxine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013049 sediment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006152 selective media Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000001694 spray drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002352 surface water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019157 thiamine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011721 thiamine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940011671 vitamin b6 Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000003911 water pollution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- NWONKYPBYAMBJT-UHFFFAOYSA-L zinc sulfate Chemical compound [Zn+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O NWONKYPBYAMBJT-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229910000368 zinc sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011686 zinc sulphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000009529 zinc sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N63/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi, animals or substances produced by, or obtained from, microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi or animals, e.g. enzymes or fermentates
- A01N63/20—Bacteria; Substances produced thereby or obtained therefrom
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N25/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N25/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
- A01N25/02—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests containing liquids as carriers, diluents or solvents
- A01N25/04—Dispersions, emulsions, suspoemulsions, suspension concentrates or gels
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N25/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
- A01N25/08—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests containing solids as carriers or diluents
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N63/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi, animals or substances produced by, or obtained from, microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi or animals, e.g. enzymes or fermentates
- A01N63/30—Microbial fungi; Substances produced thereby or obtained therefrom
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01P—BIOCIDAL, PEST REPELLANT, PEST ATTRACTANT OR PLANT GROWTH REGULATORY ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR PREPARATIONS
- A01P21/00—Plant growth regulators
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C05—FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
- C05F—ORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C, e.g. FERTILISERS FROM WASTE OR REFUSE
- C05F11/00—Other organic fertilisers
- C05F11/08—Organic fertilisers containing added bacterial cultures, mycelia or the like
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C05—FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
- C05G—MIXTURES OF FERTILISERS COVERED INDIVIDUALLY BY DIFFERENT SUBCLASSES OF CLASS C05; MIXTURES OF ONE OR MORE FERTILISERS WITH MATERIALS NOT HAVING A SPECIFIC FERTILISING ACTIVITY, e.g. PESTICIDES, SOIL-CONDITIONERS, WETTING AGENTS; FERTILISERS CHARACTERISED BY THEIR FORM
- C05G3/00—Mixtures of one or more fertilisers with additives not having a specially fertilising activity
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/205—Bacterial isolates
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/32—Processes using, or culture media containing, lower alkanols, i.e. C1 to C6
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12R—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES C12C - C12Q, RELATING TO MICROORGANISMS
- C12R2001/00—Microorganisms ; Processes using microorganisms
- C12R2001/01—Bacteria or Actinomycetales ; using bacteria or Actinomycetales
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P60/00—Technologies relating to agriculture, livestock or agroalimentary industries
- Y02P60/20—Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions in agriculture, e.g. CO2
- Y02P60/21—Dinitrogen oxide [N2O], e.g. using aquaponics, hydroponics or efficiency measures
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/40—Bio-organic fraction processing; Production of fertilisers from the organic fraction of waste or refuse
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Virology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
- Mycology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
- Fertilizers (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to the agronomic field. Specifically, it relates to a Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, deposited under accession number CECT 9580, to compositions comprising it, and to its use as bio-stimulant and endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium in plants.
Description
Methylobacterium sp. nov. STRAIN, COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING IT, AND
ITS USE AS BIO-STIMULANT AND ENDOPHYTE NITROGEN-FIXING
BACTERIUM
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the agronomic field. Specifically, it relates to a Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, to compositions comprising it, and to its use as bio-stimulant and endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium in plants.
BACKGROUND ART
Many fertilizers are known in the field of agriculture. In particular, nitrogen-based fertilizers, such as, ammonia, ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) and urea, are commonly used in order to maintain the crop yield as high as possible. In fact, many biological processes in plants involve nitrogen; for example, nitrogen is involved in the production of amino acids and, therefore, proteins.
However, only a fraction of the nitrogen-based fertilizers that are applied to crops is converted to plant matter. The amount of fertilizer that is not converted into plant matter may accumulate in the soil or may flow out into surface water, or groundwater, thereby causing water pollution.
In order to reduce chemical fertilizers usage, inoculants including nitrogen-fixing bacteria may be used to partially replace such chemical fertilizers.
The main reservoirs of methylotrophic bacteria are, generally, soil and water (both sweet and salt), but these bacteria are also present in a wide variety of natural and artificial environments, including dust, lake sediments, air, facial creams, fermented products, water supply networks, bathrooms and air conditioning systems.
However, known inoculants do not allows a satisfactory results in plants' growth stimulation and also do not allow for the replacement of chemical fertilizers, nor for a significant reduction in the use of such chemical products.
Most of known microorganisms that act as growth stimulators and/or Nitrogen fixing are not able to produce a significant Nitrogen content in order to reduce significantly nitrogen units needed for plants growth. These known microorganisms produce some kinds of auxins, like indolacetic acid and promote rootling more that Nitrogen fixation.
US 2015/101373 Al discloses nitrogen fixing and plant growth promoting Methylobacterium NRRL B-50628 and NRRL B-50629.
KR 2007 0106867 A discloses nitrogen fixing and plant growth promoting Methylobacterium fujisawaense CBMB 20.
US 2018/168167 Al discloses plant growth promoting fungi Glomus lranicum var.
tenuihypharum BOOM 54871.
SI-WON LEE ET AL: "Methylobacterium dankookense sp. nov., isolated from drinking water", THE JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, vol. 47, no. 6, (2009-12-01), pages 716-720, XP055350364, DOI: 10.1007/s12275-009-0126-6, discloses enzymatic activity and genetical similarity of Methylobacterium dankookense.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An aim of the present invention is thus to provide a strain of Methylobacterium sp.
nov., as well as compositions comprising it, to provide a positive impact to crops.
Another aim of the invention is to provide a strain of Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
which allows to at least reduce the usage of chemical nitrogen-based fertilizers.
These and other aims are achieved by the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain according to claim 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the following description, the features of the invention will be described with reference to exemplary embodiments; however, any feature of the invention disclosed herein, may be combined with one or more other features here disclosed to provide further embodiments of the present invention. Such embodiments shall be considered as disclosed by the present application.
An object of the present invention is thus a strain of Methylobacterium sp.
nov., deposited under accession number CECT 9580.
The strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention, identified by the depositor with the reference 5B0023/3, was deposited on 21/03/2018 at the International Depositary Authority Coleccion Espanola De Cultivos Tipo (CECT), Edificio 3 CUE, .. Parc Cientific Universitat de Valencia, Catedratico Agustin Escardino, 9,
ITS USE AS BIO-STIMULANT AND ENDOPHYTE NITROGEN-FIXING
BACTERIUM
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the agronomic field. Specifically, it relates to a Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, to compositions comprising it, and to its use as bio-stimulant and endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium in plants.
BACKGROUND ART
Many fertilizers are known in the field of agriculture. In particular, nitrogen-based fertilizers, such as, ammonia, ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) and urea, are commonly used in order to maintain the crop yield as high as possible. In fact, many biological processes in plants involve nitrogen; for example, nitrogen is involved in the production of amino acids and, therefore, proteins.
However, only a fraction of the nitrogen-based fertilizers that are applied to crops is converted to plant matter. The amount of fertilizer that is not converted into plant matter may accumulate in the soil or may flow out into surface water, or groundwater, thereby causing water pollution.
In order to reduce chemical fertilizers usage, inoculants including nitrogen-fixing bacteria may be used to partially replace such chemical fertilizers.
The main reservoirs of methylotrophic bacteria are, generally, soil and water (both sweet and salt), but these bacteria are also present in a wide variety of natural and artificial environments, including dust, lake sediments, air, facial creams, fermented products, water supply networks, bathrooms and air conditioning systems.
However, known inoculants do not allows a satisfactory results in plants' growth stimulation and also do not allow for the replacement of chemical fertilizers, nor for a significant reduction in the use of such chemical products.
Most of known microorganisms that act as growth stimulators and/or Nitrogen fixing are not able to produce a significant Nitrogen content in order to reduce significantly nitrogen units needed for plants growth. These known microorganisms produce some kinds of auxins, like indolacetic acid and promote rootling more that Nitrogen fixation.
US 2015/101373 Al discloses nitrogen fixing and plant growth promoting Methylobacterium NRRL B-50628 and NRRL B-50629.
KR 2007 0106867 A discloses nitrogen fixing and plant growth promoting Methylobacterium fujisawaense CBMB 20.
US 2018/168167 Al discloses plant growth promoting fungi Glomus lranicum var.
tenuihypharum BOOM 54871.
SI-WON LEE ET AL: "Methylobacterium dankookense sp. nov., isolated from drinking water", THE JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, vol. 47, no. 6, (2009-12-01), pages 716-720, XP055350364, DOI: 10.1007/s12275-009-0126-6, discloses enzymatic activity and genetical similarity of Methylobacterium dankookense.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An aim of the present invention is thus to provide a strain of Methylobacterium sp.
nov., as well as compositions comprising it, to provide a positive impact to crops.
Another aim of the invention is to provide a strain of Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
which allows to at least reduce the usage of chemical nitrogen-based fertilizers.
These and other aims are achieved by the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain according to claim 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the following description, the features of the invention will be described with reference to exemplary embodiments; however, any feature of the invention disclosed herein, may be combined with one or more other features here disclosed to provide further embodiments of the present invention. Such embodiments shall be considered as disclosed by the present application.
An object of the present invention is thus a strain of Methylobacterium sp.
nov., deposited under accession number CECT 9580.
The strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention, identified by the depositor with the reference 5B0023/3, was deposited on 21/03/2018 at the International Depositary Authority Coleccion Espanola De Cultivos Tipo (CECT), Edificio 3 CUE, .. Parc Cientific Universitat de Valencia, Catedratico Agustin Escardino, 9,
2 Paterna (Valencia) ESPAN. A, by Symborg S.L., with address Campus de Espinardo, 7, edificio CEEIM, 30100 Murcia, Spain, with the number CECT 9580.
The strain of the invention was isolated from the interior of the spores of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum. Glomus iranicum var.
tenuihypharum is an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus that is known per se in the art.
Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum was deposited on 19/04/2013, under BCCM
deposit number 54871, at the international depositary authority Belgian Coordinated Collections of Micro-Organisms (BCCM) with the address at Universite Catholique de Louvain, Mycotheque de l'Universite catholique de Louvain (MUCL), Croix du Sud 2, Box L7.05.06, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, by Symborg, S.L.
Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum is disclosed in W02015/000612 and W02015/000613.
The strain according to the invention, shows a high similarity to Methylobacterium dankookense (98.7% based on the sequence of the gen 16S).
A phylogenomic analysis through UBCG showed Methylobacterium dankookense as the closest relative to the strain of the invention. Data collected supported the creation of a novel species to accommodate the strain of the invention, for which, for example, the name Methylobacterium symbioense nov. could be proposed.
To demonstrate if it could be considered as a new specie, phenotypically and genotypically characterization was assayed.
The strain of the invention is Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, it is in a shape of a bacillus (0.8-1 pm width and 1.2-1.6 pm length) with a lateral flagellum, shown as individually or pairs in two, with no spore forming. The colonies grown on MMM
Agar or NFbM Agar for 5 to 7 days are circular, pink colour with a defined clear border, that it has not been described in other similar strains. It has an optimal temperature of 28 C. In the presence of NaCI, the growth rate was reduced till 3 % NaCI
or higher where it does not grow.
A multigene, genome-based phylogenetic approach was achieved by using UBCG
tool in order to better identify the closest relatives to the strain of the invention, CECT 9580. The position of the strain according to the invention was explored in a UBCG tree containing 15 genomes of the relative inside the genus. The tree (Figure 13) shows a specific relationship to M. dankookense.
The strain of the invention was isolated from the interior of the spores of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum. Glomus iranicum var.
tenuihypharum is an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus that is known per se in the art.
Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum was deposited on 19/04/2013, under BCCM
deposit number 54871, at the international depositary authority Belgian Coordinated Collections of Micro-Organisms (BCCM) with the address at Universite Catholique de Louvain, Mycotheque de l'Universite catholique de Louvain (MUCL), Croix du Sud 2, Box L7.05.06, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, by Symborg, S.L.
Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum is disclosed in W02015/000612 and W02015/000613.
The strain according to the invention, shows a high similarity to Methylobacterium dankookense (98.7% based on the sequence of the gen 16S).
A phylogenomic analysis through UBCG showed Methylobacterium dankookense as the closest relative to the strain of the invention. Data collected supported the creation of a novel species to accommodate the strain of the invention, for which, for example, the name Methylobacterium symbioense nov. could be proposed.
To demonstrate if it could be considered as a new specie, phenotypically and genotypically characterization was assayed.
The strain of the invention is Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, it is in a shape of a bacillus (0.8-1 pm width and 1.2-1.6 pm length) with a lateral flagellum, shown as individually or pairs in two, with no spore forming. The colonies grown on MMM
Agar or NFbM Agar for 5 to 7 days are circular, pink colour with a defined clear border, that it has not been described in other similar strains. It has an optimal temperature of 28 C. In the presence of NaCI, the growth rate was reduced till 3 % NaCI
or higher where it does not grow.
A multigene, genome-based phylogenetic approach was achieved by using UBCG
tool in order to better identify the closest relatives to the strain of the invention, CECT 9580. The position of the strain according to the invention was explored in a UBCG tree containing 15 genomes of the relative inside the genus. The tree (Figure 13) shows a specific relationship to M. dankookense.
3 Advantageosly, according to embodiments, the strain according to the invention is characterized by the fact that is an endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacteria able to provide nitrogen to a plant, allowing reduction of external nitrogen input until 60 %.
In other words, the strain according top the invention allows a reduction of external nitrogen input up to 60 %, with respect to the external nitrogen input that it would be necessary in the absence of said strain.
Advantageously, the strain of the invention is able to move through the plant from the roots to the leaves and vice versa.
A process for the isolation of the strain of the invention comprises the following steps:
= providing one or more spores of Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum;
= extracting the cytoplasm from the spores;
= inoculating the extracted cytoplasm in a methanol-containing medium; and = incubating the inoculated medium to grow the Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the invention.
According to embodiments, the process for the isolation of the strain of the invention comprises the following steps:
= Isolating from spores of Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum, previously disinfected surfacely through of a process of external disinfection cycles, to obtain spore solution;
= after said process, spore solutions are macerated and the fungal cytoplasm is cultivated in a Minimum salt Methanol Medium (MMM);
= colonies of the strain of the invention are identified, and one of those, that showed pink colour were picked up and re-isolated from the medium.
According to embodiments, before extracting the cytoplasm, the spores are treated with a disinfectant, to disinfect the outer walls of the spores.
Disinfection of the outer walls of the spores may be carried out according to techniques that are per se known in the art. For example, disinfection of the outer wall of the spores may be carried out by treating the spores with sodium hypochlorite (e.g., a 5 % sodium hypochlorite solution in a buffer, for example Tweene 80).
In other words, the strain according top the invention allows a reduction of external nitrogen input up to 60 %, with respect to the external nitrogen input that it would be necessary in the absence of said strain.
Advantageously, the strain of the invention is able to move through the plant from the roots to the leaves and vice versa.
A process for the isolation of the strain of the invention comprises the following steps:
= providing one or more spores of Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum;
= extracting the cytoplasm from the spores;
= inoculating the extracted cytoplasm in a methanol-containing medium; and = incubating the inoculated medium to grow the Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the invention.
According to embodiments, the process for the isolation of the strain of the invention comprises the following steps:
= Isolating from spores of Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum, previously disinfected surfacely through of a process of external disinfection cycles, to obtain spore solution;
= after said process, spore solutions are macerated and the fungal cytoplasm is cultivated in a Minimum salt Methanol Medium (MMM);
= colonies of the strain of the invention are identified, and one of those, that showed pink colour were picked up and re-isolated from the medium.
According to embodiments, before extracting the cytoplasm, the spores are treated with a disinfectant, to disinfect the outer walls of the spores.
Disinfection of the outer walls of the spores may be carried out according to techniques that are per se known in the art. For example, disinfection of the outer wall of the spores may be carried out by treating the spores with sodium hypochlorite (e.g., a 5 % sodium hypochlorite solution in a buffer, for example Tweene 80).
4
5 Extraction of the cytoplasm from the spores of Glomus iranicum var.
tenuihypharum may be carried out according to techniques that are per se known in the art, for example, by macerating the spores in a suitable buffer, preferably Ringer solution's.
After the inoculation of the extracted cytoplasm in a methanol-containing medium (e.g., Minimum salt Methanol Medium (MMM)). Preferably, the methanol-containing medium has the following composition: Methanol, 20,0 ml; NaNO3, 0,5 g;
(NH4)2SO4, 0,5 g; MgSO4.7H20, 0,5 g; K2HPO4, 1,0 g; FeSO4.7H20, 0,01 g; CaC12.2H20, 0,01 g;
KCI, 0,5 g; Vitamins Sol., 1,0 ml; Micronutrients Sol.,2,0 ml; Agar, 12g; pH
7,20. The inoculated medium is incubated, preferably at 28 C for 5 days, to allow the growing of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention.
According to embodiments, the incubation may be carried out at a temperature ranging from 25 C to 30 C (preferably at 28 C).
According to embodiments, the incubation may be carried out at a pH ranging from 5 to 9 (preferably 7).
.. After the incubation and the growing of the strain of the invention, the colonies are visually identified, by the production of typical pink colour. Then, one or more colonies are picked up and re-isolated, preferably, at least three times to assure that they are clean of any possible contamination.
The strain of the present invention is suitable to be included into a composition.
.. Another object of the present invention is thus a composition comprising a strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov., deposited under accession number CECT 9580.
According to embodiments, the composition of the invention may comprise one or more agriculturally acceptable carrier and/or one or more agriculturally acceptable co-formulants.
Agriculturally acceptable carriers and agriculturally acceptable co-formulants are per se known in the art.
According to embodiments, carriers and/or co-formulants may be selected from the group consisting of talc, clay, maltodextrin, skimmed milk, glucose, vegetable dry extracts, such as those of tea, cassava and quinoa, caolin, coir, Diatomea earth, chitin, CaCO3, alginate, carragens, surfactin, rhamnolipid, sophorolipid, saponin, potassium oleate and mixtures thereof.
According to embodiments, the composition may be in solid form, aqueous liquid form, oily liquid form, emulsion form, semi-solid form or in the form of gel.
Preferably, the composition is in solid form, more preferably, the composition is in powder form.
Also object of the invention is a process for the production of a composition comprising the strain of the invention, i.e., the strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov., deposited under accession number CECT 9580.
According to embodiments, the composition of the invention is characterized by the fact that it is applied as seed coating, by soil application, for example, by drip irrigation system or drench, or by foliar application.
The process for producing the composition of the invention comprises the following steps:
= Providing at least one Methylobacterium sp. nov. deposited under accession number CECT 9580 according to the invention, = Inoculating said Methylobacterium sp. nov. in a liquid culture medium including methanol, = Culturing said Methylobacterium sp. nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria and;
= Drying said liquid culture to obtain a dry composition.
Advantageously, at the end of the culturing step, the final production of Methylobacteria of the invention, is confirmed by measuring of the optical density of the bacteria in the culture and the biomass production.
According to embodiments, Methylobacterium sp. nov. deposited under accession number CECT 9580 of the invention is isolated from the inner of the spores of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum, deposited under BCCM
deposit number 54871.
According to embodiments, the medium including methanol is MMMM, i.e., Minimal Mineral Medium with Methanol.
According to embodiments, said step of culturing said Methylobacterium sp.
nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria may be carried out by incubation
tenuihypharum may be carried out according to techniques that are per se known in the art, for example, by macerating the spores in a suitable buffer, preferably Ringer solution's.
After the inoculation of the extracted cytoplasm in a methanol-containing medium (e.g., Minimum salt Methanol Medium (MMM)). Preferably, the methanol-containing medium has the following composition: Methanol, 20,0 ml; NaNO3, 0,5 g;
(NH4)2SO4, 0,5 g; MgSO4.7H20, 0,5 g; K2HPO4, 1,0 g; FeSO4.7H20, 0,01 g; CaC12.2H20, 0,01 g;
KCI, 0,5 g; Vitamins Sol., 1,0 ml; Micronutrients Sol.,2,0 ml; Agar, 12g; pH
7,20. The inoculated medium is incubated, preferably at 28 C for 5 days, to allow the growing of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention.
According to embodiments, the incubation may be carried out at a temperature ranging from 25 C to 30 C (preferably at 28 C).
According to embodiments, the incubation may be carried out at a pH ranging from 5 to 9 (preferably 7).
.. After the incubation and the growing of the strain of the invention, the colonies are visually identified, by the production of typical pink colour. Then, one or more colonies are picked up and re-isolated, preferably, at least three times to assure that they are clean of any possible contamination.
The strain of the present invention is suitable to be included into a composition.
.. Another object of the present invention is thus a composition comprising a strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov., deposited under accession number CECT 9580.
According to embodiments, the composition of the invention may comprise one or more agriculturally acceptable carrier and/or one or more agriculturally acceptable co-formulants.
Agriculturally acceptable carriers and agriculturally acceptable co-formulants are per se known in the art.
According to embodiments, carriers and/or co-formulants may be selected from the group consisting of talc, clay, maltodextrin, skimmed milk, glucose, vegetable dry extracts, such as those of tea, cassava and quinoa, caolin, coir, Diatomea earth, chitin, CaCO3, alginate, carragens, surfactin, rhamnolipid, sophorolipid, saponin, potassium oleate and mixtures thereof.
According to embodiments, the composition may be in solid form, aqueous liquid form, oily liquid form, emulsion form, semi-solid form or in the form of gel.
Preferably, the composition is in solid form, more preferably, the composition is in powder form.
Also object of the invention is a process for the production of a composition comprising the strain of the invention, i.e., the strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov., deposited under accession number CECT 9580.
According to embodiments, the composition of the invention is characterized by the fact that it is applied as seed coating, by soil application, for example, by drip irrigation system or drench, or by foliar application.
The process for producing the composition of the invention comprises the following steps:
= Providing at least one Methylobacterium sp. nov. deposited under accession number CECT 9580 according to the invention, = Inoculating said Methylobacterium sp. nov. in a liquid culture medium including methanol, = Culturing said Methylobacterium sp. nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria and;
= Drying said liquid culture to obtain a dry composition.
Advantageously, at the end of the culturing step, the final production of Methylobacteria of the invention, is confirmed by measuring of the optical density of the bacteria in the culture and the biomass production.
According to embodiments, Methylobacterium sp. nov. deposited under accession number CECT 9580 of the invention is isolated from the inner of the spores of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum, deposited under BCCM
deposit number 54871.
According to embodiments, the medium including methanol is MMMM, i.e., Minimal Mineral Medium with Methanol.
According to embodiments, said step of culturing said Methylobacterium sp.
nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria may be carried out by incubation
6 at a temperature ranging from 25 C to 30 C (preferably at 28 C) for 3-10 days, preferably for 5-7 days.
According to embodiments, the above mentioned step of providing at least one Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention, may comprise a step of recovering the strain of the invention using a nitrogen free medium, for example, NFBG
(Nitrogen Free Bacterial Medium supplemented with Glucose) for example NFBG medium may have the following composition: Glucose, Malic acid 5,0 g, Methanol 20,0 ml, (NH4)6Mo7024 4H20 0,002 g, MgSO4 7H20 0,2 g, K2HPO4 0,1 g, KH2PO4 0,4 g, FeCl3 0,01 g, NaCI 0,1 g, KOH 4,8 g, Micronutrients sol. 2,0 ml, Vitamins sol.
1,0 ml, Bromothymol blue sol. 0,5% on KOH 2N 2,0 ml, pH 6,9.
According to embodiments, recovering of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention using a nitrogen free medium may be carried out by incubation at a temperature ranging from 25 C to 30 C (preferably at 28 C) for 3-10 days, preferably for 5-7 days.
Advantageously, the strain of the invention forms colonies of a red-pink color. Thus, colonies of the strain of the invention may be easily identified.
According to embodiments, the above mentioned step of providing at least one Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention, may further comprise a step of select a colony of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention and selectively grow said Methylobacterium sp. nov. using a nitrogen-free, methanol-including medium (e.g., MMMNF, Mineral Minimal Medium with Methanol Nitrogen Free).
According to embodiments, after the selectively grown using a nitrogen-free, methanol-including medium a colony of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention may be selected and inoculated in a liquid culture medium including methanol. According to embodiments, the said step of selectively growing may be carried out by incubation at a temperature ranging from 25 C to 30 C
(preferably at 28 C) for 3-10 days, preferably for 5-7 days.
According to embodiments, the above mentioned step of culturing said Methylobacterium sp. nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria may be carried out by fermentation.
According to embodiments, the above mentioned step of culturing said Methylobacterium sp. nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria,
According to embodiments, the above mentioned step of providing at least one Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention, may comprise a step of recovering the strain of the invention using a nitrogen free medium, for example, NFBG
(Nitrogen Free Bacterial Medium supplemented with Glucose) for example NFBG medium may have the following composition: Glucose, Malic acid 5,0 g, Methanol 20,0 ml, (NH4)6Mo7024 4H20 0,002 g, MgSO4 7H20 0,2 g, K2HPO4 0,1 g, KH2PO4 0,4 g, FeCl3 0,01 g, NaCI 0,1 g, KOH 4,8 g, Micronutrients sol. 2,0 ml, Vitamins sol.
1,0 ml, Bromothymol blue sol. 0,5% on KOH 2N 2,0 ml, pH 6,9.
According to embodiments, recovering of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention using a nitrogen free medium may be carried out by incubation at a temperature ranging from 25 C to 30 C (preferably at 28 C) for 3-10 days, preferably for 5-7 days.
Advantageously, the strain of the invention forms colonies of a red-pink color. Thus, colonies of the strain of the invention may be easily identified.
According to embodiments, the above mentioned step of providing at least one Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention, may further comprise a step of select a colony of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention and selectively grow said Methylobacterium sp. nov. using a nitrogen-free, methanol-including medium (e.g., MMMNF, Mineral Minimal Medium with Methanol Nitrogen Free).
According to embodiments, after the selectively grown using a nitrogen-free, methanol-including medium a colony of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. of the invention may be selected and inoculated in a liquid culture medium including methanol. According to embodiments, the said step of selectively growing may be carried out by incubation at a temperature ranging from 25 C to 30 C
(preferably at 28 C) for 3-10 days, preferably for 5-7 days.
According to embodiments, the above mentioned step of culturing said Methylobacterium sp. nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria may be carried out by fermentation.
According to embodiments, the above mentioned step of culturing said Methylobacterium sp. nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria,
7 may comprise a first step of growing to obtain a culture of Methylobacterium sp. nov.
to be used as pre-inoculum, and a second step of massive growing, preferably by fermentation.
A further object of the present invention is the use of the strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov. , deposited under accession number CECT 9580 of the invention as bio-stimulant and/or endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium in plants.
In fact, it has been surprisingly observed that the strain of the invention, as well as composition comprising it, is able to stimulate the plant in order to increase the health and the yield of the plant.
Also, advantageously, it has been surprisingly observed that the strain of the invention, as well as composition comprising it, can be used to provide nitrogen to plants. In particular, it has been observed that, by providing the strain of the present invention to a plant, the use of chemical nitrogen fertilizer can be substantially reduced; for example, it has been been observed that a reduction in the amount of chemical nitrogen fertilizer of up to 60 % may be obtained using the strain of the invention, or a composition comprising it.
Also object of the invention is, thus, the use of Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the present invention for reducing nitrogen external input, preferably until 60 %.
Advantageously, the strain of the invention may be provided to a plant alone, or as a component of a composition including other agriculturally acceptable components.
It has been observed that the strain of the invention can stimulate the plant from the root and / or the aerial part by fixing atmospheric nitrogen. Without being bound to a specific scientific explanation, it has been observed that the strain of the invention penetrates in the tissues of the plant and activates a microbial enzymatic system, comprising a nitrogenase enzyme complex, which reduces the atmospheric nitrogen to NH4, which might be directly incorporated into Glu (glutamic acid) by amination of 2-oxoglutarate via mitochondria! Glu dehydrogenase (NADH-GDH) and, subsequently, into Glutamine by cytosolic Glutamine synthetase 1 (GS1), under particular physiological conditions. Glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase is an enzyme, frequently abbreviated as GOGAT, that produces glutamate from glutamine and a-ketoglutarate and, along with glutamine synthetase, plays a central role in the regulation of nitrogen assimilation in photosynthetic assimilated by the plant.
to be used as pre-inoculum, and a second step of massive growing, preferably by fermentation.
A further object of the present invention is the use of the strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov. , deposited under accession number CECT 9580 of the invention as bio-stimulant and/or endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium in plants.
In fact, it has been surprisingly observed that the strain of the invention, as well as composition comprising it, is able to stimulate the plant in order to increase the health and the yield of the plant.
Also, advantageously, it has been surprisingly observed that the strain of the invention, as well as composition comprising it, can be used to provide nitrogen to plants. In particular, it has been observed that, by providing the strain of the present invention to a plant, the use of chemical nitrogen fertilizer can be substantially reduced; for example, it has been been observed that a reduction in the amount of chemical nitrogen fertilizer of up to 60 % may be obtained using the strain of the invention, or a composition comprising it.
Also object of the invention is, thus, the use of Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the present invention for reducing nitrogen external input, preferably until 60 %.
Advantageously, the strain of the invention may be provided to a plant alone, or as a component of a composition including other agriculturally acceptable components.
It has been observed that the strain of the invention can stimulate the plant from the root and / or the aerial part by fixing atmospheric nitrogen. Without being bound to a specific scientific explanation, it has been observed that the strain of the invention penetrates in the tissues of the plant and activates a microbial enzymatic system, comprising a nitrogenase enzyme complex, which reduces the atmospheric nitrogen to NH4, which might be directly incorporated into Glu (glutamic acid) by amination of 2-oxoglutarate via mitochondria! Glu dehydrogenase (NADH-GDH) and, subsequently, into Glutamine by cytosolic Glutamine synthetase 1 (GS1), under particular physiological conditions. Glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase is an enzyme, frequently abbreviated as GOGAT, that produces glutamate from glutamine and a-ketoglutarate and, along with glutamine synthetase, plays a central role in the regulation of nitrogen assimilation in photosynthetic assimilated by the plant.
8 Advantageously, it has also been observed that the strain of the present invention increases the solubility of phosphorus (which is particularly useful in seedling stages), is able to produce auxins and carotenes, that stimulate the development of secondary roots.
Advantageously, the strain of the invention may be provided to a variety of crops.
For example, the strain of the present invention is particularly useful when provided to horticultural cultivations, graminaceous plants, citrus cultivations, cultivation of stone fruits (drupe), vine cultivation and forestry.
Another advantage of the strain of the present invention is that it favors photosynthesis in the host plant, and therefore an increase in plant biomass.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
= Figure 1 shows plants growing in alveoli in growth chamber.
= Figure 2 shows vegetable tissue samples (roots (a), stems (b) and leaves (c)) exposed to specific culture media after disinfection for the growth of methylobacteria.
= Figure 3 shows images of plant tissues samples of plants treated with the strain of the invention by seed dressing (a-c), by irrigation (d-f) and foliar application (g-i), exposed to a specific nutrient medium for metilobacteria.
= Figure 4 shows images of the distribution of trials with treatment 1 with the strain of the invention and treatment 2 control. Field 1 (a), Field 2 (b), Field 3 (c).
= Figure 5 shows a graph with SPAD measurements after 30 days of application.
= Figure 6 shows NDVI index for field 1 (a), field 2 (b) and field 3 (c).
= Figure 7 shows combined CIR index for field 1(a), field 2(b) and field 3(c).
= Figure 8 shows images of the distribution of trials with treatment 1 with the strain of the invention and treatment 2 control. Field 1 (a), Field 2 (b).
= Figure 9 shows a graph with SPAD measurements after 30 days of application.
Advantageously, the strain of the invention may be provided to a variety of crops.
For example, the strain of the present invention is particularly useful when provided to horticultural cultivations, graminaceous plants, citrus cultivations, cultivation of stone fruits (drupe), vine cultivation and forestry.
Another advantage of the strain of the present invention is that it favors photosynthesis in the host plant, and therefore an increase in plant biomass.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
= Figure 1 shows plants growing in alveoli in growth chamber.
= Figure 2 shows vegetable tissue samples (roots (a), stems (b) and leaves (c)) exposed to specific culture media after disinfection for the growth of methylobacteria.
= Figure 3 shows images of plant tissues samples of plants treated with the strain of the invention by seed dressing (a-c), by irrigation (d-f) and foliar application (g-i), exposed to a specific nutrient medium for metilobacteria.
= Figure 4 shows images of the distribution of trials with treatment 1 with the strain of the invention and treatment 2 control. Field 1 (a), Field 2 (b), Field 3 (c).
= Figure 5 shows a graph with SPAD measurements after 30 days of application.
= Figure 6 shows NDVI index for field 1 (a), field 2 (b) and field 3 (c).
= Figure 7 shows combined CIR index for field 1(a), field 2(b) and field 3(c).
= Figure 8 shows images of the distribution of trials with treatment 1 with the strain of the invention and treatment 2 control. Field 1 (a), Field 2 (b).
= Figure 9 shows a graph with SPAD measurements after 30 days of application.
9 = Figure 10 shows index NDVI in Field 1 after 45 days of treatment, measured every 15 days.
= Figure 11 shows index NDVI in Field 2 after 45 days of treatment, measured every 15 days.
= Figure 12A
shows the nebulizer at the time of application of the treatment(s) and Figure 12B shows the grain size at the time of application of the treatment(s).
= Figure 13 shows a phylogenetic tree generated with UBCG by using amino acid sequences. The numbers at the nodes indicate the gene support index (maximal value is 92). Genome accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Bar, 0.05 substitutions per position.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Further aspects and advantages of the present invention will be illustrated with reference to the following non-limiting examples.
The strain of the invention was obtained from Glomus iranicum var.
tenuihypharum' s spores.
It was isolated from the inner of the spores, through a process of several disinfection of the external spore walls by washing them with 0.5 % sodium hypochlorite plus Tween 80 for 5 minutes, carrying out 5 disinfection cycles. After it, spore solutions were macerated and sowing the fungal cytoplasm in a Minimum Salt Methanol Medium (MMM) (Methanol, 20,0 ml; NaNO3, 0,5 g; (NH4)2504, 0,5 g; MgSO4.7H20, 0,5 g; K2HPO4, 1,0 g; FeSO4.7H20, 0,01 g; CaC12.2H20, 0,01 g; KCI, 0,5 g;
Vitamins Sol., 1,0 ml; Micronutrients Sol.,2,0 ml; Agar, 12g; pH 7,20) at 28 C for 5 days.
From the medium, 5 different colonies were identified, and the ones that showed pink colour were picked up and re-isolated at least three times to assure that they were clean of any other possible contamination.
Example 1 Trial I. Routes of application of the strain of the invention.
Experiments have been conducted in cultivation chamber applying the strain of the invention, i.e., Methylobacterium sp. nov., strain deposited under accession number CECT 9580, by foliar application, soil application and seed coating, i.e., seed dressing.
The presence of the strain of the invention was assessed in leaves, stems and roots. Travel time of the strain in the plant, from root to leaf and from leaf to root, and penetration of the strain through roots stomata and seed were also evaluated.
In order to corroborate the entry of methylobacteria into the plant and the colonization of different tissues, a trial was carried out, inoculating seeds in alveoli and maize plants in culture pots. In this case three treatments were applied:
seed coating, application through irrigation and foliar application. The presence of colonies of the strain of the invention was analyzed in root, stem and leaves of three biological replicas at different hours and days after inoculation ("h.a.i.", and "d.a.i.").
= Materials and methods Plant material and microorganisms used.
Corn seeds (Zea mays L.) coated with Fludioxonil and Mefenoxam fungicides were used as plant material. Bacteria belonging to the strain Methylobacterium sp.
nov. of the invention and Herbaspirillum seropedicae were used as microbial inoculants.
Growing conditions of maize plants.
For the growth of maize plants, small plastic containers were used, with a mixture of sterile substrate based on silica sand and coconut fibre in a ratio of 2:1, arranged in a growth chamber at 24 C and 60 % relative humidity (RH) in the presence of light, as shown in Figure 1, for 4 weeks. The plants were watered twice a week with sterile decalcified water. After 15 days from sowing, the plants were watered only once with a nutritive solution N:P:K: 4:1.7:4.5 at 0.3 %, plus a solution of micronutrients.
Treatments with the strain of the invention in corn plants.
Different treatments were carried out on corn plants with i.e., the strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov. deposited under accession number CECT 9580 by means of seed coating (i.e., seed dressing), by irrigation and by foliar application, i.e., foliar route. The inoculum was used in solid form (powder). The bacterial concentration in the powder was in the order of 1 x-109 CFU/g. Each treatment studied was compared with plants not treated as negative control. In addition, the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae was used as positive control of the trial at a solid format concentration of 1.2-x 106 CFU/g.
a) Seed coating.
The corn seeds were coated with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention powder inoculum.
b) Irrigation route After 4 days after sowing, Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention and Herbaspirillum seropedicae were inoculated via irrigation with a concentration between 1-1.2 x 106 CFU per plant. For this purpose, the bacterial inoculum in solid form was diluted in water for further treatment.
c) Foliar route When the plants presented between two and three true leaves, corresponding with the classification BBCH 12-13, Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention and Herbaspirillum seropedicae were inoculated by foliar route. The solid bacterial inoculum was diluted in water to a concentration of 1-x 106 CFU/plant.
Previously, the substrate was covered with plastic to prevent contamination with the treatment.
The bacterial treatment was carried out by spraying the leaves with a sprayer.
= Detection of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention colonies in root, stem and leaf.
After treatments with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention, the presence of this bacterium together with its positive control Herbaspirillum seropedicae in different plant tissues was analysed. These were disinfected superficially in order to avoid false positives. To do this, they were immersed for 30 seconds in a solution of ethanol (70 %) and sodium hypochlorite (1 %) for 2 minutes, with subsequent .. washing with doubly distilled water. Once disinfected (root and leaf), longitudinal and transverse cuts were made in the stem for subsequent transfer to a specific culture medium for methylobacteria. Figure 2 shows such plant tissue samples, exposed to specific culture media after disinfection for the growth of methylobacteria.
In particular, panel "a" of Figure 2 shows roots samples, panel "b" of Figure 2 shows stems samples and panel "c" of Figure 2 shows leaves samples. Tissue samples placed in culture medium were incubated for 7 days at 28 C. Colony growth was observed in a Leica Wetzlar stereomicroscope, and photos were taken with a MC170 HD Leica camera. The plants were harvested for analysis between 1 and 24 h of the first day and between 2-10 days after inoculation (irrigation and foliar) or germination (coating). Three biological replicas were used for each of the three treatments and times analyzed.
= Statistical analysis of the results obtained For the statistical analysis of the results, the method used was a simple ANOVA
together with the Fisher test of minimal significant difference, for a significance level of p<0.05. The software STATGRAPHICS Centurion 18 has been used, as well as Microsoft Excel for data processing and graphical representation.
= Results Effect of application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention:
Infection and colonization of the plant.
(a) Seed dressing The first evaluation to detect bacterial colonies in the treated plants inoculated by coating was made at 48 hours, coinciding with the time of germination of the seeds.
The analyses revealed that after two days Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was present in the internal tissue, after 4 days they were in the stem and after 6 days they appeared in the leaves. Therefore, the passage of the bacteria towards the new structures took place as the plant developed.
b) Irrigation In the case of inoculation via irrigation, the bacteria were in the internal tissues of the root 1 hour and rose to the stem between 4 and 8 days, reaching the leaves
= Figure 11 shows index NDVI in Field 2 after 45 days of treatment, measured every 15 days.
= Figure 12A
shows the nebulizer at the time of application of the treatment(s) and Figure 12B shows the grain size at the time of application of the treatment(s).
= Figure 13 shows a phylogenetic tree generated with UBCG by using amino acid sequences. The numbers at the nodes indicate the gene support index (maximal value is 92). Genome accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Bar, 0.05 substitutions per position.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Further aspects and advantages of the present invention will be illustrated with reference to the following non-limiting examples.
The strain of the invention was obtained from Glomus iranicum var.
tenuihypharum' s spores.
It was isolated from the inner of the spores, through a process of several disinfection of the external spore walls by washing them with 0.5 % sodium hypochlorite plus Tween 80 for 5 minutes, carrying out 5 disinfection cycles. After it, spore solutions were macerated and sowing the fungal cytoplasm in a Minimum Salt Methanol Medium (MMM) (Methanol, 20,0 ml; NaNO3, 0,5 g; (NH4)2504, 0,5 g; MgSO4.7H20, 0,5 g; K2HPO4, 1,0 g; FeSO4.7H20, 0,01 g; CaC12.2H20, 0,01 g; KCI, 0,5 g;
Vitamins Sol., 1,0 ml; Micronutrients Sol.,2,0 ml; Agar, 12g; pH 7,20) at 28 C for 5 days.
From the medium, 5 different colonies were identified, and the ones that showed pink colour were picked up and re-isolated at least three times to assure that they were clean of any other possible contamination.
Example 1 Trial I. Routes of application of the strain of the invention.
Experiments have been conducted in cultivation chamber applying the strain of the invention, i.e., Methylobacterium sp. nov., strain deposited under accession number CECT 9580, by foliar application, soil application and seed coating, i.e., seed dressing.
The presence of the strain of the invention was assessed in leaves, stems and roots. Travel time of the strain in the plant, from root to leaf and from leaf to root, and penetration of the strain through roots stomata and seed were also evaluated.
In order to corroborate the entry of methylobacteria into the plant and the colonization of different tissues, a trial was carried out, inoculating seeds in alveoli and maize plants in culture pots. In this case three treatments were applied:
seed coating, application through irrigation and foliar application. The presence of colonies of the strain of the invention was analyzed in root, stem and leaves of three biological replicas at different hours and days after inoculation ("h.a.i.", and "d.a.i.").
= Materials and methods Plant material and microorganisms used.
Corn seeds (Zea mays L.) coated with Fludioxonil and Mefenoxam fungicides were used as plant material. Bacteria belonging to the strain Methylobacterium sp.
nov. of the invention and Herbaspirillum seropedicae were used as microbial inoculants.
Growing conditions of maize plants.
For the growth of maize plants, small plastic containers were used, with a mixture of sterile substrate based on silica sand and coconut fibre in a ratio of 2:1, arranged in a growth chamber at 24 C and 60 % relative humidity (RH) in the presence of light, as shown in Figure 1, for 4 weeks. The plants were watered twice a week with sterile decalcified water. After 15 days from sowing, the plants were watered only once with a nutritive solution N:P:K: 4:1.7:4.5 at 0.3 %, plus a solution of micronutrients.
Treatments with the strain of the invention in corn plants.
Different treatments were carried out on corn plants with i.e., the strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov. deposited under accession number CECT 9580 by means of seed coating (i.e., seed dressing), by irrigation and by foliar application, i.e., foliar route. The inoculum was used in solid form (powder). The bacterial concentration in the powder was in the order of 1 x-109 CFU/g. Each treatment studied was compared with plants not treated as negative control. In addition, the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae was used as positive control of the trial at a solid format concentration of 1.2-x 106 CFU/g.
a) Seed coating.
The corn seeds were coated with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention powder inoculum.
b) Irrigation route After 4 days after sowing, Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention and Herbaspirillum seropedicae were inoculated via irrigation with a concentration between 1-1.2 x 106 CFU per plant. For this purpose, the bacterial inoculum in solid form was diluted in water for further treatment.
c) Foliar route When the plants presented between two and three true leaves, corresponding with the classification BBCH 12-13, Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention and Herbaspirillum seropedicae were inoculated by foliar route. The solid bacterial inoculum was diluted in water to a concentration of 1-x 106 CFU/plant.
Previously, the substrate was covered with plastic to prevent contamination with the treatment.
The bacterial treatment was carried out by spraying the leaves with a sprayer.
= Detection of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention colonies in root, stem and leaf.
After treatments with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention, the presence of this bacterium together with its positive control Herbaspirillum seropedicae in different plant tissues was analysed. These were disinfected superficially in order to avoid false positives. To do this, they were immersed for 30 seconds in a solution of ethanol (70 %) and sodium hypochlorite (1 %) for 2 minutes, with subsequent .. washing with doubly distilled water. Once disinfected (root and leaf), longitudinal and transverse cuts were made in the stem for subsequent transfer to a specific culture medium for methylobacteria. Figure 2 shows such plant tissue samples, exposed to specific culture media after disinfection for the growth of methylobacteria.
In particular, panel "a" of Figure 2 shows roots samples, panel "b" of Figure 2 shows stems samples and panel "c" of Figure 2 shows leaves samples. Tissue samples placed in culture medium were incubated for 7 days at 28 C. Colony growth was observed in a Leica Wetzlar stereomicroscope, and photos were taken with a MC170 HD Leica camera. The plants were harvested for analysis between 1 and 24 h of the first day and between 2-10 days after inoculation (irrigation and foliar) or germination (coating). Three biological replicas were used for each of the three treatments and times analyzed.
= Statistical analysis of the results obtained For the statistical analysis of the results, the method used was a simple ANOVA
together with the Fisher test of minimal significant difference, for a significance level of p<0.05. The software STATGRAPHICS Centurion 18 has been used, as well as Microsoft Excel for data processing and graphical representation.
= Results Effect of application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention:
Infection and colonization of the plant.
(a) Seed dressing The first evaluation to detect bacterial colonies in the treated plants inoculated by coating was made at 48 hours, coinciding with the time of germination of the seeds.
The analyses revealed that after two days Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was present in the internal tissue, after 4 days they were in the stem and after 6 days they appeared in the leaves. Therefore, the passage of the bacteria towards the new structures took place as the plant developed.
b) Irrigation In the case of inoculation via irrigation, the bacteria were in the internal tissues of the root 1 hour and rose to the stem between 4 and 8 days, reaching the leaves
10 after treated. It is good to emphasize that in this case it was not homogeneous in all the replicas.
c) Foliar route By foliar route, the bacteria were found in the internal tissue of the leaves 1 hour after inoculation, after 6 hours after treatment, they were detected both in the stem and in the roots.
Figure 3 shows images of the plant tissues samples of plants treated with the strain of the invention by seed dressing (a-c), by irrigation (d-f) and foliar application (g-i), exposed to a specific nutrient medium for metilobacteria.
Table 1, here below reported, shows data related to the detection of colonies of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in different parts of the plant for 10 days. Legend: H: hours, d: day, presence of bacteria in 20-40 % (+), 50-80 %
(++) and 90-100 % (+++). Stem A: Apical Stem; Stem B: Basal Stem.
TABLE
Treatments Ram 3 h 6 12 21h 2d 3 Stem A . õ
Catatei Stem B - - = - -+++ ++4- +++ +++
Stem A - - - - - +++ +*+ I.+
4, Selhi treatment Eton B - - - - - - +++ +*+
Leal.
Root ++ +4 +4 ++ +4 + +++ ++4-+++
irrigatiOn Stem A tdA NA NA NA NA NA - +
+ +4-E-tem B NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - -Leaf NA NA NA NA tdA NA = = - . ++
Ra,:=1 NA NA NA NA NA t=iA. - = -Fonar apoication. Stem A NA NA NA NA NA NA - -+ + ++
Stem a riA NA NA NA NA NA - -t2-.at ++4. +14, +4+ +4. ++ ++ 1.
+ et +4+
= Conclusions In this trial it was determined that the entry of the microorganism was effective both through the root zone and by the aerial part. Therefore, in the plants treated by any method, colonies of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention were located, which indicates that this endophyte microorganism is transported from the root to the leaf and back.
Example 2Trial 2. Efficacy of the use of the strain of the invention in the reduction of 40 A of nitrogen fertilizer in the cultivation of long-cycle maize.
= Objectives.
To know the efficacy of the strain of the invention on the development of corn (maize), against the reduction of 40 % of nitrogen cover fertilization in conventional growing conditions, through the evolution of the green color of the leaf (SPAD), vegetation indexes, levels of nitrogen in the plant, concentration of the microorganism in leaf and production yield.
= Materials and methods.
Trial fields and fertilization.
The trial was carried out in Spain, in three farms in Huesca. The first farm with coordinates 41 52'12.7"N 0 2311.1" Win Montesusin, Huesca; the second farm with coordinates 410 40'47.6"N 0 1709.5" E Belver de cinca, Huesca; the third farm with coordinates 410 47'58.1"N 0 2356.0" E Tamarite de litera, Huesca.
The fertilization recommendations were conventional fertilization and a 40 %
reduction in nitrogen reduction treatments. For this purpose, fertilizer was distributed with a fertilizer spreader with the quantities specified in Table 2, here below reported.
Table 2 shows quantity, type of fertiliser and nitrogen fertiliser units (NFU) used in each fertiliser on each plot.
Control Treated Fund Feization Cover Fertilization Fund Fertilization Cover Fertilization Field 'I 500 kg NPK 6-9-11+ 260 kg 700 kg N32 500 kg NPK 6-9-11+ 333 Kg N32 NPK 16-46-0 280 kg NPK '1646-0 Field 2 10 ton thicken compost 452 kg urea N 10 or chicken 250 kg urea N4.6 46 compost Field 3 35 ton sheep compost + 600kg '650 kg 301'4-15S 35 ton sheep 3344 30N-15$
D-Curier'& compost+ 60}g Total UFN Total UFN Common Control Treated Control Treated Fertilization 100% NEtt NFU Fund (NFU) Cover (NEU) Cover (NFU) Field 1 293 175 69 224 104 Field 2 480 295 180 600 115 Field 3 ,.$)? 142 42 195 100 = Distribution of the treatments in the fields.
The fields had the following surface: Field 1 (5.43 ha), Field 2 (3.28 ha) and Field 3 (2.34 ha). Two contiguous areas of 16 meters wide were taken for the evaluation of the parameters. The area marked with "1" is the treated area and the area marked with "2" is the control area.
Figure 4 shows the distribution of tests with treatment 1 (in area 1) with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention and treatment 2 control (in area 2).
In particular, panel "a" of Figure 4 shows Field 1, panel "b" of Figure 4 shows Field 2and panel "c" of Figure 4 shows Field 3.
= Characteristics of the culture and application of Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
strain of the invention in corn of long cycle.
.. Corn seeds (Zea mays) were selected for grain of the variety "40F" with a plantation ratio of 300 kg/ha, sown at a depth of 3 cm with a separation between rows of 75 cm and separation within the same row of 15 cm. The width of each sowing lane is 16 m between sprinklers. The date of sowing was from 1 to 5 May 2018, after five days the stem emerged and the date of application of Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the invention was 40 days after sowing, on 12 June 2018 and was sown, using a seed drill in the fields indicated by farmers, representative area of corn cultivation in Spain. A random design was made choosing a plot of the field for each treatment.
The Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was applied at a dose of g/ha (3 x 107 CFU/g) by foliar application, with a 40 % reduction in nitrogen fertilization. The results were compared with a conventional fertilization treatment.
Foliar application was performed with a sprayer with 300-400 liters of broth per hectare, when the plant was in stage 13-14 of the BBCH scale, with an air temperature of 17 C and a relative humidity of 52 %, with a wind speed of 2.3 mps north direction, without the presence of dew on the leaves and a cloudiness of 60 %.
= Parameters and evaluation methodology Counting colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/g) This parameter was measured to be certain that the microorganism is in the whole culture cycle and in what quantity on the leaves. It is measured by taking one gram of leaves from the fourth leaf from below 20 plants and making serial dilutions by .. sowing them in nitrogen-free selective culture media with methanol as the carbon source.
SPAD (Chlorophyll level in leaf) This parameter is an indicator of the plant's good nutritional status and is closely related to nitrogen and iron levels. For this, a meter known as SPAD (Soil Plant .. Analisys Development) was used and 100 measurements were made of the fourth leaf from below 100 plants of each treatment.
Nitrogen in leaf, stem and cob grain This parameter is an indicator of the amount of nitrogen in each plant tissue accumulated at the time of harvest. The leaf, stem and cob grain are taken from 100 plants to analyse total nitrogen by Kjeldahl's method.
Photos of dron (Flight of dron to obtain different indexes) .. NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index). Contrasts the bands of red light and near infrared reflected in the leaves of the plants. It is a general indicator of canopy density and is often used to distinguish living green vegetation from soil that looks blue the more chlorophyll it has.
Combined CIR (Color InfraRed). Infrared composite color that combines NIR
(near infrared), Red and Green bands. Healthy vegetation reflects a high level of NIR
(near infrared) and looks red. Latent vegetation is often green or bronzed, while sandy soils are light brown and clay soils are dark brown or bluish green.
Yield In order to evaluate the yield of the harvest, 6 random blocks are taken and .. square meters of surface area are harvested. The obtained grain is weighed discounting the loss by humidity in each zone.
Statistical analysis The factors (SPAD and performance) and their interaction were analyzed for each parameter by ANOVA, using Statgraphics Plus software for Windows 5.1 (Manugistics, Inc., USA).
= Results Counting of Colony forming units (cfu) Table 3, here below reported, shows data related to colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of leaf and in the application tank, after treatment (4/6/18) and after one month .. from treatment (4/6/18).
June 04/2018 July 04/2018 CFU/ml application CFU/gr Leaf CFU/gr Leaf Tank Field 1 2.50E+04 4.40E+02 7.00E+02 Field 2 2.50E+04 3.30E+03 4.20E+03 Field 3 2.50E+05 8.00E+02 1.20E+03 In the application tank there was a homogeneous mixture of the product and a correct application in the plant that, after one month of application in corn leaf the populations are maintained and increase their growth as can be seen in all the plots.
SPAD
Figure 5 shows SPAD measurement 30 days after application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention.
After one month from the application plants maintained SPAD levels equal to the control, without significant differences in all the fields, verifying that the reduction of chemical nitrogen has not had a negative effect on the plant since it has been contributed by the bacteria.
Nitrogen in leaf, stem and cob Table 4, here below reported, shows data concerning, nitrogen concentrations (g/plant) found in the different tissues of the maize plant at the time of harvest.
Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Control Treated Control Treated Control Treated Leave 0,39 0,37 0,58 0,37 0,35 0,36 Stem 0,71 0,76 1,80 0,51 0,72 0,76 Grain 1,63 2,08 1,81 3,16 1,70 1,71 Total 2,73 3,22 4,19 4,05 2,76 2,84 Drone photos (45 dat) Figure 6 shows drone photos used for NDVI index determination, for field 1 (panel "a"), field 2 (panel "b") and field 3 (panel "c").
Figure 7 shows drone photos used for combined CIR index determination, for field 1(panel "a"), field 2 (panel "b") and field 3 (panel "c").
Considering indexes NDVI and combined CIR, no differences were observed in the density of the plant canopy, chlorophyll and plant health (intensity of blue and red color) in any of the fields, compared to the control, except in field, 3 where there was a problem with the irrigation water pressure and a color difference is observed in the crop in the areas where the sprinkler did not water properly.
Yield Tabla 5, here below reported, shows data concerning the yield of each field.
Yield (kg/ha) Increase % (kg/ha) control Treated treated Field 1 16881 a 17511 b 3.96 Field 2 14346 a 18335b 27.8 Field 3 14312 a 17539b 22.5 In Table 5, the averages followed by different letters on the line differ significantly from each other.
In field 1, the control had a yield of 16881 kg/ha. With the application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention, a yield of 17511 kg/ha was obtained; which meant 4 % more production.
In field 2 the control had a yield of 14346 kg/ha. The application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention produced a yield of 18335 kg/ha, i.e., a productive increase of 28%.
In field 3, the control yielded 14312 kg/ha. The application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention generated a yield of 17539 kg/ha, resulting an increase in net production of 22.5 %
Tabla 6, here below reported, shows data concerning Nitrogen balance- nitrogen provided (input) via fertilization, nitrogen assimilated by the plant after extraction, balance of assimilation between the input and extracted in the plant. Nitrogen requirement (i.e., input required) per ton of grain and nitrogen extraction per ton of grain.
Input Extraction of piant Balance of Input required (UFN Extraction (kg N i UFNItta (Kg N I ha) asation (UFNittal /ton grain) ton grain) (Extraction ¨ Input) Fleicil 175 266,63 111,63 9,V9 16.36 Treated Field 1 293 24349 -0.59 17..35 14,41 Control Field 2 295 361,00 66.00 16,98 2061, Treater;
Field 2 460 373,38 -106,61 33,45 22.11 Control Field 142 246,23 104,22 6,09 14.96 Treated Field 3 237 25345 144 16.55 I
Control = Conclusions Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention has an efficient application in the cultivation of corn and persistence of the microorganism in the plant.
The strain of the invention maintains a level of SPAD (chlorophyll), plant health and plant canopy density (NDVI index and combined CIR index) equal to the conventional fertilization, wherein a higher amount of nitrogen fertilizer is used.
The strain of the invention provides 40 % of the total nitrogenous fertilizer units that were reduced in the fertilization of cover and also provides an increase in the production of between 4 and 27 %. As the plants only had one cob per plant, this increase would be linked to the specific weight of the grain and/or number of runs.
If we observe the balance of the nitrogenous fertilizer units contributed via fertilization and the extraction of the nitrogen in the plant that was carried out, there is a nitrogen gain of between 66 and 111 kg of nitrogen per hectare. This means that those kilograms of nitrogen were fixed by the strain of the invention during the culture cycle. This result is indirectly observed in the nitrogen requirement per ton of grain produced in the treated plants, since the requirement to produce one ton of grain is less than the controls. It must also be borne in mind that the requirements to produce a ton of treated grain are lower than the extraction of nitrogen that was made to produce that ton of grain. It is the opposite in the control, since more nitrogen is needed to produce the same amount of grain.
Example 3 Trial 3. Efficacy of the use of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in the reduction of 30 A of the nitrogen fertilizer in the short cycle cultivation of maize.
= Obiectives.
To know the effectiveness of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention on the development of corn (maize), against the reduction of 30 % of nitrogen cover fertilization under conventional growing conditions through the evolution of green color of the leaf (SPAD), vegetation indexes, nitrogen levels in the plant, concentration of the microorganism in the leaf and the productive yield.
= Materials and methods Trial fields and fertilization.
The trial was carried out in Spain, in two fields: a field of Pomar de Cinca in Huesca with coordinates 41 5013.8 "N 0 0538.0" E and the other in Finca Oran, Albacete with coordinates 38 4955.3" N 1 5027.1W.
Fertilization recommendations were conventional fertilization and a 30 %
reduction in nitrogen reduction treatments. For this, fertilizer was distributed with a fertilizer spreader with the quantities specified in table 7, here below reported.
Table 7 shows quantity, type of fertiliser and nitrogen fertiliser units (NFU) used in each fertiliser on each plot.
Control Treated Fund Fertilization Cover Fund fertilization cover fertilization fertilization Field 1 250 kg Urea 46 250 kg Urea 46 150 kg Urea 46 100 kg Urea 46 Field 2 700 kg NPK 8-14-14 550 kg N 40-0-0 700 kg NPK 8-14-14 330 kg N
Control Treated Common Control Treated Fertilization 100% NFU 60% NFU Fund (NFU) Caver;NFU) Cover(NFU) Field 1 0 161 115 115 46 Field 2 276 188 56 220 '132 = Distribution of the treatments in the fields The fields had the following surface: Field 1 (74 ha), Field 2 (3.67 ha) and two contiguous areas of 16 meters wide were taken for the evaluation of the parameters.
The area marked with "1" is the treated area and the area marked with "2" is the control area.
Figure 8 shows the distribution of tests with treatment 1 (in area 1) with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention and treatment 2 control (in area 2).
In particular, panel "a" of Figure 8 shows Field 1 and panel "b" of Figure 8 shows Field 2.
= Characteristics of the culture and application of the Methylobacterium sp.
nov. strain of the invention Corn seeds of the variety "Guasi" were selected in field 1 and variety DKC
in field 2, with a planting ratio of 300 kg/ha, sown to a depth of 3 cm with a separation between rows of 75 cm and separation within the same row of 15 cm.
The width of each sowing lane is 16 m. The sowing date was 20 June on field 1 and 30 June on field 2, after ten days the stem emerged and the date of application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was 22 and 20 days respectively after sowing, 12 July (Field 1) and 20 July 2018 (Field 2).
Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was applied at a dose of 333 g/ha (3 x 107 CFU/g) by foliar application.
Foliar application was performed with a sprayer machine with 300-400 liters of broth per hectare, when the plant was in stage 13-14 of the BBCH scale, with an air temperature of 22 and 20 C and a relative humidity of 72 and 58 A), with a wind speed of 2.3 and 12 mps north and northwest direction, without the presence of dew on the leaves and a cloudiness of 0 and 15 % respectively.
= Parameters and evaluation methodology Counting colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/q) This parameter was measured to be certain that the microorganism is in the whole culture cycle and in what quantity on the leaves. It is measured by taking one gram of leaves from the fourth leaf from below 20 plants and making serial dilutions by sowing them in nitrogen-free selective culture media with methanol as the carbon source.
SPAD (chlorophyll level in leaf) This parameter is an indicator of the plant's good nutritional status and is closely related to nitrogen and iron levels. For this, a meter known as SPAD (Soil Plant Analisys Development) was used and 100 measurements were made of the fourth leaf from below 100 plants of each treatment.
Nitrogen in leaf, stem and cob grain This parameter is an indicator of the amount of nitrogen in each plant tissue accumulated at the time of harvest. The leaf, stem and cob grain are taken from 100 plants to analyse total nitrogen by Kjeldahl's method.
Satellite photos The photos from the ESA Copernicus satellite are downloaded and processed with the Qgis program to obtain the NDVI index.
NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index). It contrasts the bands of red light and near infrared reflected in the leaves of the plants. It is a general indicator of canopy density and is often used to distinguish living green vegetation from soil that looks blue the more chlorophyll it has.
Yield In order to evaluate the yield of the harvest, 6 random blocks are taken and square meters of surface area are harvested. The obtained grain is weighed discounting the loss by humidity in each zone.
Statistical analysis The factors (SPAD and yield) and their interaction were analyzed for each parameter by ANOVA, using Statgraphics Plus software for Windows 5.1 (Manugistics, Inc., USA).
= Results Counting of Colony forming units (CFU) Table 8, here below reported, shows data related to colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of leaf in and the application tank (12-20/7/18), after treatment (12-20/7/18) and after one month from treatment (15/8/18).
CFU/ml Application CFU/gr leaf CFU/gr Hoja tank Field 1 2.70E+02 5.40E+03 1.00E+04 Field 22 1.20E+03 3.00E+03 8.10E+03 In the application tank there was a homogeneous mixture of the product and a correct application in the plant that, after one month of application in corn leaf, the populations are maintained and increase their growth as can be seen in all the fields.
SPAD
Figure 9 shows SPAD measurements 30 days after application.
After one month from the application plants maintained SPAD levels equal to the control, without significant differences in all the fields, verifying that the reduction of chemical nitrogen has not had a negative effect on the plant since it has been contributed by the bacteria.
Nitrogen in leaf, stem and cob Table 9, here below reported, shows data concerning amount of nitrogen (grams) of each tissue of the corn plant.
Field 1 Field 2 Control Treated Control Treated Leaf 0,35 0,49 0,49 0,58 Stem 0,46 0,58 0,58 0,86 Grain 1,09 1,38 1,30 1,14 Total 1,90 2,45 2,37 2,58 Satellite photos.
Figure 10 shows satellite photos used for NDVI index determination for field 1 after 45 days of the treatment measured every 15 days Figure 11 shows satellite photos used for NDVI index determination for field 2 after 45 days of the treatment measured every 15 days.
A homogeneity in the value of NDVI (intensity of green color) is observed throughout the cultivation cycle comparing the control, with the treatment with the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention with reduction of fertilization.
Yield Table 10, here below reported, shows data concerning the yield of each field Yield Increasec/o (kg/ha) (kg/ha) Control Treated Treated Field 1 10515a 11828b 12.48 Field 2 12525a 12863b 2.7 In Field 1 the control had a yield of 10515 kg/ha, however with the application of the strain of the invention a yield of 11828 kg/ha was obtained, with a productive increase of 12.5 %.
In field 2 the control had a yield of 12525 kg/ha, and with the strain of the invention a yield of 12863 kg/ha was obtained, for an increase of 2.7 %.
Table 11 shows data concerning nitrogen balance: nitrogen provided via fertilization, nitrogen assimilated by the plant after extractions, balance of assimilation between the input and extracted in the plant. Nitrogen requirement per ton of grain and nitrogen extraction per ton of grain.
input Extraction or prams Balance ot input required 4sst.iFisi Extraction kg N
Unsifila (Kg i ha} assation (Uniihal iton grain) ton grain (Extraction ¨ input) Field 1 161 218.4 7A6 13,81 18,47 Treated Field 230 170.88 -58,97 21,87 10,95 Control Field 2 18 361.00 43,30 14,e1 1.7,se Tfeeted FeH 2 27E 875.38 -6508 2203 Cciltrel = Conclusions Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention has an efficient application in the cultivation of corn and persistence of the microorganism in the plant.
Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention maintains a level of SPAD
(chlorophyll), plant health and plant canopy density (NDVI Index) equal to the conventional fertilization, wherein a higher amount of nitrogen fertilizer is used.
With respect to the yield, the strain of the invention provides 30 % of the total nitrogenous fertilizer units that were reduced in the cover fertilization and also provides an increase in the production of between 2.7 and 12.5 %. As the plants only had one cob per plant, this increase would be linked to the specific weight of the grain and / or number of runs.
If we observe the balance of the nitrogenous fertilizer units provided via fertilization and the extraction of nitrogen in the plant that was carried out, there is a nitrogen gain of between 43 and 57 kg of nitrogen per hectare. This means that those kilograms of nitrogen were fixed by the strain of the invention during the growing cycle. This result is indirectly observed in the nitrogen requirement per ton of grain produced in the plants treated with the strain of the invention, since the requirement to produce one ton of grain is lower than the controls. It must also be taken into account that the requirements to produce one ton of treated grain are lower than the extraction of nitrogen that was made to produce that ton of grain and in the control it is the opposite, since more nitrogen is needed to produce the same amount of grain.
Example 4 Trial 4 - Evaluation of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in strawberry culture for different doses of nitrogen fertilization = Objectives.
To know the efficacy of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention on the development of the strawberry crop subjected to different doses of nitrogen fertilization of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 % of the conventional fertilization, through the evolution of the green color of the leaf (SPAD), nitrogen levels in the plant, concentration of the microorganism in the leaf and the productive yield.
= Materials and methods Trial field and fertilization.
The trial was carried out in a field located in the experimental farm of Symborg with coordinates 37 4859.6 "N 1 05'43.6" W in Los Martinez del Puerto, Murcia. The field consists of 192 m2, and was 8 m wide and 24 m long.
The management of irrigation and fertilization is different for all treatments. The mineral fertilization program consists of 5 solutions with different nitrogen content.
Table 12 shows the different fertilizations of the treatments, measured in UFN.
UFN
100% nitrogen fertilization 670 75% nitrogen fertilization 502.5 50% nitrogen fertilization 335 25% nitrogen fertilization 167.5 0% nitrogen fertilization 0 = Treatments Table 13 refers to 10 treatments based on 5 levels of fertilization that in turn are divided into treated with Methylobacterium strain of the invention and untreated.
T1. 0 % nitrogen fertilization T2. 25 % nitrogen fertilization T3. 50 % nitrogen fertilization T4. 75 % nitrogen fertilization T5. 100 % nitrogen fertilization T6. 0 % nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention T7. 25 % nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention T8. 50 % nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention T9. 75 % nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention T10. 100% nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention = Characteristics of the culture and application of Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
strain of the invention Vegetal Material.
Strawberry plants with bare root, variety Fortuna, were planted provided by nurseries.
Frame and density of plantation.
The planting frame is 2 m between cultivation rows, 0.1 m between plants, planted in coconut fiber sacks of 1 m x 0.18 m x 0.15 m in quincunx, giving a density of 100,000 plants per hectare, 10 plants per m2, the field consists of 192 m2 so that there are 1920 plants for the entire trial.
Date of planting and removal of the crop.
The transplant of the strawberry was made on 2/11/2017, producing the removal of the crop on 01/06/2018.
Hydraulic design A 3.5 kv electric pump, that goes to a secondary pipe of 32 mm, that connects with 16 mm hoses with self-compensating external dripper of 3 l/h was used.
Irrigation water The irrigation water used in carrying out the trial comes from desalination plant and in the whole trial, 130 liters of water per plant were applied, with a concentration of 0.1 grams per liter of nitrate (13 grams per plant). The characteristics of said water are summarized in the following table (Table 14). Table 14, here below reported, shows data concerning the characteristics of the irrigation water.
Parameters Results pH 7.86 EC (dSm-1) 0.96 Total dissolved solids (g/1) 0.507 Chlorine anions (g/1) 0.245 Sulfate anions (g/1) 0.0157 Hydroxide anions (g/1) 0.0001 Carbonate anions (g/1) 0.074 Nitrate anions (g/1) 0.101 Soluble phosphorous anions (g/1) 0.0005 Calcium cations (g/1) 0.0202 Magnesium cations (g/1) 0.0084 Sodium cations (g/1) 0.134 Potassium cations (g/1) 0.01 Ammonium cations (g/1) 0.00077 Boron micronutrients (g/1) 0.99 Iron micronutrents (g/1) 0.05 Manganese micronutrients (g/1) 0.01 Copper micronutrients (g/1) 0.01 Zinc micronutrients (g/1) 0.01 The strain of the invention was applied at the dose 333 g/ha (3 x 107 CFU / g) by foliar application.
The foliar application was carried out with a spray backpack at a rate of 200 liters of broth per hectare when the plant was in stage 13-14 of the BBCH scale, with an air temperature of 20 C and a relative humidity of 50 %, without presence of dew on the leaves, and a cloudiness of 15 %.
= Parameters and evaluation methodology Counting colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/g) This parameter was measured to be certain that the microorganism is in the whole culture cycle and in what quantity on the leaves. It is measured by taking one gram of leaves from 50 plants and making serial dilutions by sowing them in nitrogen-free selective culture media with methanol as the carbon source.
Nitrogen in leaf.
This parameter is an indicator of the amount of nitrogen in each plant tissue accumulated at the time of analysis. 100 plants are taken from the leaf, stem and fruit to analyze total nitrogen by Kjeldahl's method.
Yield To evaluate crop yield, 30 plants are randomly selected from each treatment and harvested throughout the crop cycle.
Statistical analysis.
The factor (yield) and their interaction were analyzed for each parameter by ANOVA, using Statgraphics Plus software for Windows 5.1 (Manugistics, Inc., USA).
= Results Counting colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/g) Table 15, here below reported, shows results concerning Colony forming units per gram of leaf measured monthly from the application.
Treatment/Sampling 18/01/2018 15/02/2018 15/03/2018 15/04/2018 date T 6 9.00E+03 2.00E+03 2.00E+03 2.50E+03 T7 2.00E+03 1.00E+03 8.00E+03 8.00E+03 T8 2.00E+03 1.00E+03 6.40E+03 5.00E+03 T9 1.80E+04 3.00E+03 1.00E+03 3.00E+03 T 10 2.60E+03 1.00E+03 1.00E+03 1.00E+03 By means of colony sampling, a permanence of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention is observed throughout the culture cycle in the plant.
Total nitrogen Table 16, here below reported, shows data related to concentration of Nitrogen (g /100 g of plant), Total Nitrogen (g/plant) and Fresh weight of plants in the strawberry crop.
Treatmens Nitrogen (grams /100 Average plant Total Nitrogen grams of plant) weight(grams) (grams /
plant) Ti 1.86 7.5 0.14 T2 2.52 41.4 1.04 T 3 3.20 92.1 2.94 T4 3.23 96.6 3.12 T 5 3.31 94.7 3.13 T6 1.69 8.4 0.14 T7 2.87 65.5 1.87 T 8 3.24 90.1 2.91 T 9 3.28 98.8 3.24 T 10 3.24 90.2 2.92 Table 16 shows that there is an increase in nitrogen concentration as nitrogen fertilization increases, in both control and those treated with Methylobacterium sp.
nov. strain of the invention.
An increase of total nitrogen is observed until reaching 75 % of nitrogen fertilizer in the plants treated with the strain of the invention, the highest value being found in 3.28, the highest value of nitrogen concentration in plants treated with the strain of the invention. With 100 % of the fertilization the N content in the treated plant is reduced.
Production From the moment they start producing, 30 plants are harvested weekly, randomly selected from each treatment during the entire culture cycle.
Table 17, here below reported, shows the yield in kilograms per plant for each treatment.
Treatments Production (Kg /plant) Ti 0.24a T2 0.8b T3 1.07 c T4 1.05 c T5 1.15 c T6 0.17a T7 1.04 c T8 1.12 c T9 1.4 d T 10 1.02 c The treatment with the highest production was 9 (75 % of nitrogen with the application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention) with 1.4 kilos per plant, significantly different from the other treatments.
Treatments with 0 UFN were those with the lowest production of strawberry kg per plant, with significant differences.
Table 18, here below reported, shows data concerning nitrogen balance:
nitrogen provided via fertilization, nitrogen assimilated by the plant after extraction, balance of assimilation between the input (i.e., nitrogen provided) and extracted in the plant.
Treatments lnputL1Mha Extr.ntMn at plant (isg N Balance-at assimilation (ltrigation water inpul ha) 0.1FNMa)(Extratti*n 13 UN) lnputl TI
T2 167.S *13 104.'3 -76,2 T 3 335 + 1:3 3472:?1 T 502..5 -I- 13 312.01 -203.49 67:3 + 13 313.45 -369.f.15 T. + 13 14.19 T 167.5 +13 .167.1l6 T 335 + 13 2.91.02. -56,013 I + 13 324.06 -191.44 T 10 670 *- 13 202.24 -3.00,76 = Conclusions Colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/g of leaf) A persistence of microorganisms in leaf is observed throughout the strawberry 10 growing cycle.
Total Nitrogen Plants treated with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in treatment 9 have the highest nitrogen concentration in leaf, compared with all control treatments.
Production 15 The application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in treatment 9 (503 UFN), promoted an increase in the production of 21 % with respect to the control Treatment 5 (671 UFN) and an increase of 33 % with respect to its homologue fertilized Treatment 4 (503 UFN).
Example 5 Trial 5 - Field validation trial in the vine culture = Objective.
To know the efficacy of the strain of the invention on the development of the culture of vine, subjected to a conventional dose of nitrogen fertilization, through the evolution of the green color of the leaf (SPAD), concentration of the microorganism in the leaf and the production yield.
= Materials and methods Trial fields and fertilization.
The trial was carried out in two fields, located in Jumilla, with coordinates 38 33'13.9"N 1 21'16.5"W, and Tomelloso, with coordinates 39 11'22.4"N
2 59'15.8W.
Fertilization recommendations were conventional fertilization with backgorund fertilization with 700 kg NPK (15-15-15), corresponding to 105 UFN for the entire culture cycle.
= Distribution of the treatments in the fields.
The fields had the following surface: Field 1 (1 ha), Field 2 (2.20 ha) and two adjacent 16 meter wide blocks (i.e., areas) were taken for the evaluation of the parameters.
= Characteristics of the culture and application of Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
strain of the invention In Field 1 the vine variety is petit verdot in Field 2 the variety is Grenache, the application date of the strain of the invention was on 10 May 2018 (Field 1) and 15 May 2018 (Field 2).
The Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was applied at a dose of g/ha (3 x 107 CFU/g) by foliar application.
The foliar application was carried out with a nebulizer with 350 liters of broth per hectare when the plant was in the peppercorn stage with an air temperature of and 20 C and a relative humidity of 20 and 38 A), with a speed of wind of 5.4 and 9 mps south and northwest direction, without presence of dew on the leaves and a cloudiness of 10 and 25 % respectively.
Figure 12A shows the nebulizer at the time of application of the treatment(s) and Figure 12B shows the grain size at the time of application of the treatment(s).
= Parameters and evaluation methodolocw Yield To evaluate the yield of the crop, 6 blocks are taken at random and 30 square meters of surface are harvested, weighing the grapes obtained in the plants.
Statistical analysis.
The factor (yield) and their interaction were analyzed for each parameter by ANOVA, using Statgraphics Plus software for Windows 5.1 (Manugistics, Inc., USA).
= Results Yield Table 19A and Table 19B, here below reported, shows results concerning yield in kilograms per plant for each treatment.
TABLE 19A - Field 1 Tretament Total weight (kg/p1) Brix Kg/ha Treated 6,02 24,8667 16464 Control 5,09 24,5778 13937 TABLE 19B ¨ Field 2 Treatment Total weight (kg/p1) Brix Kg/ha Treated 19,77 17,5 49440 Control 14,02 18 35065 Conclusion In the Field 1, the application of Methylobacterium sp. now. strain of the invention could increase the yield in a 18 % respect to the untreated control.
In the Field 2, the application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention could increase the yield in a 41 % respect to the untreated control.
Example 6 Trial 6 ¨ Evaluation of the effects of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention on the yield on escarole crop (Cichorium endivia latifolia, variety Lempika) The following test was carried out by an independent accredited entity for the realization of GEP trials.
The design, analysis of results and reporting of this study were carried out following whenever possible the EPPO-Guidelines PP 1/152(4), PP 135(4) and PP 1/181(4).
General information of the trial The trial began on 17 August 2018 in Vila-Sacra, province of Gerona in Spain, ending on 12 November of the same year. The date of the transplant was 21 August 2018. Conventional fertilization was performed on 23 August and the application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was on 28 September, once the culture has reached the suitable stage of development (BBCH 17-19).
Design of the trial The trial consisted of a randomized block system with 4 treatments and 5 replications. Each elementary field (plot) was 2.5 meters wide and 7 meters long, with an area of 17.5 m2. The rows of plants were 0.56 meters spaced apart and the space in the row was 0.35 m giving rise to a total of 80 plants in 4 rows.
Culture The effect of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was studied in the endive crop (Cichorium endivia latifolia, variety Lempika). Previous crops in that area were onions in 2018 and sunflower and lettuce in 2017.
Soil The soil showed a good level of fertilization:
% MO: 2.02 Texture: clay loam pH: 7.70 CEC: 0.22 Soil drainage: fair Maintenance Throughout the culture cycle, the phytosanitary treatments necessary to maintain plant health were applied.
Statistical Comments Statistical analysis and reports have been realized with the software of the Manager of Agricultural Investigation (ARM) (developed by Gylling Dates Management Inc.) The data evaluated was analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) combined with a Student-Newman-Keuls in a = 5 % for comparison of means. The means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly.
Objetives of the trial 1.- To evaluate the effects of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention on the crop behaviour and yield on escarole crop, applied with normal rate of fertilization or reduced fertilization.
2.- To compare the effects of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention compared to a standard commercial fertilization 3.- To evaluate any unintended effect of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the inventionon the target crop.
Trial Summary The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effects of the Methylobacterium sp.
nov. strain of the invention, (3 x 107 CFU/g) when the dose of Nitrogen (fertilization) is reduced, on the yield of escarole crop. The trial was located in Northeast of Spain, in Vila-Sacra municipality (Girona), in open field, in a typical small area for the cultivation of vegetables. The study was conducted in compliance with the principles of Good Experimental Practices as defined by Regulation 1107/2009 of the European Union.
The strain of the invention was tested at the same rate (300 g f.p./ha) in three areas with different Nitrogen fertilization rates (100 % (usual), 60 % and 40 %), and it was evaluated and compared to an "untreated" control (with the 100 % of N
fertilization, but without the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention).
Fertilization was done before transplant (23/Aug/2018). The product was applied at BBCH stage 17-19 (28/Sep/2018), using a calibrated knapsack sprayer HONDA
WRJ2525.
Three assessments were done on crop vigor during the crop development as percentage. At harvest or close to harvest it were recorded the yield parameters evaluating the two central rows of the plots, with 20 plants each, and the two border rows were not considered for the assessments. The plant diameter (cm), the number of plants present (distinguishing marketable, unmarketable, dead and chlorotic plants), the plant weight and the yield (number and kg on the 2 central rows (7.84 m2)) were assessed. The yield and the number of marketable plants per hectare and the % of increase versus the treatment without with standard fertilization (treatment 1) was calculated automatically calculated using ARM
software. Phytotoxicity and vigor assessments were carried out throughout the trial.
Table 20, here below reported,shows the treatment list Trt Treatment Rate Rate Growth Appl Appl No. Name Unit Stage Code Description UF 1000 kg/ha BEFTRA A
Before transplant 2 M.s. 300 g/ha BBCH 16- B Crop BBCH 16-UF 1000 kg/ha BEFTRA A
Before transplant 3 M.s. 300 g/ha BBCH 16- B Crop BBCH 16-F (DOSE N=60%) 600 kg/ha BEFTRA A
Before transplant 4 M.s. 300 g/ha BBCH 16- B Crop BBCH 16-F (DOSE N=40%) 400 kg/ha BEFTRA A
Before transplant In Table 20, the following reference are used:
UTC: Untreated Control UF: Usual fertilization F: Fertilization M.s.: Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, i.e., the Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the invention Conclusions Effects Of The Product According to the trial conditions, it can be concluded that the application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention with a reduced dose of Nitrogen obtained a numerical increase of the mean plant weight (kg) and commercial yield (number of plants per hectare) compared with only one application of conventional fertilizer (without Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention), which means that the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention provided the necessary nitrogen for a correct development of the plant.
Treatments 3 and 4 achieved a crop yield increase of 3.8 and 13.89 %
respectively when compared to treatment 1, obtaining significant statistic differences. No significant differences were obtained among the Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the invention treatments with different doses of Nitrogen in the rest of assessed parameters, despite the obtained results suggested best results at higher Nitrogen reduction.
Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was applied at dose 300 g/ha (3 x 107 cfu/g) when crop had between 7 and 9 leaves (BBCH 17-19).
The strain of the invention applied at 300 g/ha (3 x 107 cfu/g) with conventional fertilization (N= 40 %) showed the best results of the trial with a yield increase of 13.89 %, with statistic significant diference.
Regarding the other parameters assessed, there were not significant statistical differences among treatments, which indicates that the Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
strain of the invention was able to provide the necessary nitrogen for the correct development of the plants.
The use of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention reduces the amount of nitrogen fertilization required in the crops since the results of the assessed parameters were similar or even better to those obtained with conventional fertilization.
Example 7 ¨ Process for the production of an exemplary composition according to the invention = Recover Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain NFBG Medium (Nitrogen Free Bacterial Medium supplemented with Glucose).
Growth parameters:
o Growth temperature 20-35 C.
o Incubation time 5 - 7 days.
= Select an isolated pink-red colony and reseed it in selective medium MMMNF (Minimal Medium with Methanol Nitrogen Free).
Growth parameters:
o Growth temperature 20-35 C.
o Incubation time 5 - 7 days.
= Select an isolated colony (pink-red) and reseed it in MMM (Minimal Mineral Medium with Methanol), to grow a liquid culture to be used as a pre-inoculum Fermentation parameters:
o Growth temperature 20-35 C.
o Agitation (r.p.m.) 50-250.
o Fermentation time 5 - 7 days.
= Inoculation of the complete volume of the bioreactor with the pre-inoculum of the microorganism.
Fermentation parameters:
o Growth temperature 20-35 C.
o Agitation (r.p.m.) 50-250.
o Aeration 0.3-3.2 N*m3/h.
o Fermentation time 80-130 hours.
= Mix with the carriers and dry with spray drying = Each liter of fermented broth with the microorganism is mixed with agriculturally acceptable carriers = After the mixture is spray dried, waccording to the following drying parameters:
o Feed flow 7-11 m1/1.
o Compressed air flow 225-375 l/h.
o Drying air flow 35-50 m3/h.
o Entry temperature 100-180 C.
o Cyclone performance 25-40 %.
= Mix of products for final product formulation Each 1 g of dry product (powder + microorganism) is mixed with the following co-formulators, until obtaining 101-550 g of final product, to be used in the fertilization of one hectare.
o 1-50 g agriculturally acceptable co-formulant.
o 100-500 g agriculturally acceptable carrier.
Table 21, here below reported, shows the composition in g / L of the culture media used throughout the manufacturing process.
NFM MMM MMMNF
Malic acid 5,0 g Methanol (sterilized by filtration 0.22 pm) 20 ml 20 ml 20 ml NaNO3 0,5 g (NH4)2SO4 0,5 g (NH4)6M 07024 4H20 0,002 g 0,002 g MgSO4 7H20 0,2 g 0,5 g 0,5 g K2HPO4 0,1 g 1,0 g 1,0 g KH2PO4 0,4 g FeCl3 0,01 g FeSO4 7H20 0,01 g 0,01 g KCI 0,5g 0,5g NaCI 0,1 g CaCl2 2H20 0,01 g 0,01 g KOH 4,8g Sol. Micronutrients 2,0 ml 2,0 ml 2,0 ml Sol. Vitamins (sterilized by filtration 0.22 pm) 1,0 ml 1,0 ml 1,0 ml Bromotimol blue (0.5% sol. in 2N KOH) 2,0 ml pH 6,9 7,2 7,2 Agar-Agar 12,0 g 12,0 g Components sterilized by filtration are added after autoclaving, once the culture medium has cooled to a temperature <60 C.
Table 22, here below reported, refers to the amount in grams of the micronutrients and vitamins.
MICRONUTRIENTS VITAMINS
H3B03 1,85g MnSO4 4H20 2,45 g ZnSO4 7H20 0,28 g Na2Mo04 2H20 0,034 g CoCl2 6H20 0,005 g CuSO4 5H20 0,005 g Nicotinic acid 0,2 g Biotin 0,0018g Calcium pantotheate 0,18 g Pyridoxine 0,18g Cyanocobalamin 0,08 g Thiamin 0,2g
c) Foliar route By foliar route, the bacteria were found in the internal tissue of the leaves 1 hour after inoculation, after 6 hours after treatment, they were detected both in the stem and in the roots.
Figure 3 shows images of the plant tissues samples of plants treated with the strain of the invention by seed dressing (a-c), by irrigation (d-f) and foliar application (g-i), exposed to a specific nutrient medium for metilobacteria.
Table 1, here below reported, shows data related to the detection of colonies of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in different parts of the plant for 10 days. Legend: H: hours, d: day, presence of bacteria in 20-40 % (+), 50-80 %
(++) and 90-100 % (+++). Stem A: Apical Stem; Stem B: Basal Stem.
TABLE
Treatments Ram 3 h 6 12 21h 2d 3 Stem A . õ
Catatei Stem B - - = - -+++ ++4- +++ +++
Stem A - - - - - +++ +*+ I.+
4, Selhi treatment Eton B - - - - - - +++ +*+
Leal.
Root ++ +4 +4 ++ +4 + +++ ++4-+++
irrigatiOn Stem A tdA NA NA NA NA NA - +
+ +4-E-tem B NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - -Leaf NA NA NA NA tdA NA = = - . ++
Ra,:=1 NA NA NA NA NA t=iA. - = -Fonar apoication. Stem A NA NA NA NA NA NA - -+ + ++
Stem a riA NA NA NA NA NA - -t2-.at ++4. +14, +4+ +4. ++ ++ 1.
+ et +4+
= Conclusions In this trial it was determined that the entry of the microorganism was effective both through the root zone and by the aerial part. Therefore, in the plants treated by any method, colonies of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention were located, which indicates that this endophyte microorganism is transported from the root to the leaf and back.
Example 2Trial 2. Efficacy of the use of the strain of the invention in the reduction of 40 A of nitrogen fertilizer in the cultivation of long-cycle maize.
= Objectives.
To know the efficacy of the strain of the invention on the development of corn (maize), against the reduction of 40 % of nitrogen cover fertilization in conventional growing conditions, through the evolution of the green color of the leaf (SPAD), vegetation indexes, levels of nitrogen in the plant, concentration of the microorganism in leaf and production yield.
= Materials and methods.
Trial fields and fertilization.
The trial was carried out in Spain, in three farms in Huesca. The first farm with coordinates 41 52'12.7"N 0 2311.1" Win Montesusin, Huesca; the second farm with coordinates 410 40'47.6"N 0 1709.5" E Belver de cinca, Huesca; the third farm with coordinates 410 47'58.1"N 0 2356.0" E Tamarite de litera, Huesca.
The fertilization recommendations were conventional fertilization and a 40 %
reduction in nitrogen reduction treatments. For this purpose, fertilizer was distributed with a fertilizer spreader with the quantities specified in Table 2, here below reported.
Table 2 shows quantity, type of fertiliser and nitrogen fertiliser units (NFU) used in each fertiliser on each plot.
Control Treated Fund Feization Cover Fertilization Fund Fertilization Cover Fertilization Field 'I 500 kg NPK 6-9-11+ 260 kg 700 kg N32 500 kg NPK 6-9-11+ 333 Kg N32 NPK 16-46-0 280 kg NPK '1646-0 Field 2 10 ton thicken compost 452 kg urea N 10 or chicken 250 kg urea N4.6 46 compost Field 3 35 ton sheep compost + 600kg '650 kg 301'4-15S 35 ton sheep 3344 30N-15$
D-Curier'& compost+ 60}g Total UFN Total UFN Common Control Treated Control Treated Fertilization 100% NEtt NFU Fund (NFU) Cover (NEU) Cover (NFU) Field 1 293 175 69 224 104 Field 2 480 295 180 600 115 Field 3 ,.$)? 142 42 195 100 = Distribution of the treatments in the fields.
The fields had the following surface: Field 1 (5.43 ha), Field 2 (3.28 ha) and Field 3 (2.34 ha). Two contiguous areas of 16 meters wide were taken for the evaluation of the parameters. The area marked with "1" is the treated area and the area marked with "2" is the control area.
Figure 4 shows the distribution of tests with treatment 1 (in area 1) with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention and treatment 2 control (in area 2).
In particular, panel "a" of Figure 4 shows Field 1, panel "b" of Figure 4 shows Field 2and panel "c" of Figure 4 shows Field 3.
= Characteristics of the culture and application of Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
strain of the invention in corn of long cycle.
.. Corn seeds (Zea mays) were selected for grain of the variety "40F" with a plantation ratio of 300 kg/ha, sown at a depth of 3 cm with a separation between rows of 75 cm and separation within the same row of 15 cm. The width of each sowing lane is 16 m between sprinklers. The date of sowing was from 1 to 5 May 2018, after five days the stem emerged and the date of application of Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the invention was 40 days after sowing, on 12 June 2018 and was sown, using a seed drill in the fields indicated by farmers, representative area of corn cultivation in Spain. A random design was made choosing a plot of the field for each treatment.
The Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was applied at a dose of g/ha (3 x 107 CFU/g) by foliar application, with a 40 % reduction in nitrogen fertilization. The results were compared with a conventional fertilization treatment.
Foliar application was performed with a sprayer with 300-400 liters of broth per hectare, when the plant was in stage 13-14 of the BBCH scale, with an air temperature of 17 C and a relative humidity of 52 %, with a wind speed of 2.3 mps north direction, without the presence of dew on the leaves and a cloudiness of 60 %.
= Parameters and evaluation methodology Counting colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/g) This parameter was measured to be certain that the microorganism is in the whole culture cycle and in what quantity on the leaves. It is measured by taking one gram of leaves from the fourth leaf from below 20 plants and making serial dilutions by .. sowing them in nitrogen-free selective culture media with methanol as the carbon source.
SPAD (Chlorophyll level in leaf) This parameter is an indicator of the plant's good nutritional status and is closely related to nitrogen and iron levels. For this, a meter known as SPAD (Soil Plant .. Analisys Development) was used and 100 measurements were made of the fourth leaf from below 100 plants of each treatment.
Nitrogen in leaf, stem and cob grain This parameter is an indicator of the amount of nitrogen in each plant tissue accumulated at the time of harvest. The leaf, stem and cob grain are taken from 100 plants to analyse total nitrogen by Kjeldahl's method.
Photos of dron (Flight of dron to obtain different indexes) .. NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index). Contrasts the bands of red light and near infrared reflected in the leaves of the plants. It is a general indicator of canopy density and is often used to distinguish living green vegetation from soil that looks blue the more chlorophyll it has.
Combined CIR (Color InfraRed). Infrared composite color that combines NIR
(near infrared), Red and Green bands. Healthy vegetation reflects a high level of NIR
(near infrared) and looks red. Latent vegetation is often green or bronzed, while sandy soils are light brown and clay soils are dark brown or bluish green.
Yield In order to evaluate the yield of the harvest, 6 random blocks are taken and .. square meters of surface area are harvested. The obtained grain is weighed discounting the loss by humidity in each zone.
Statistical analysis The factors (SPAD and performance) and their interaction were analyzed for each parameter by ANOVA, using Statgraphics Plus software for Windows 5.1 (Manugistics, Inc., USA).
= Results Counting of Colony forming units (cfu) Table 3, here below reported, shows data related to colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of leaf and in the application tank, after treatment (4/6/18) and after one month .. from treatment (4/6/18).
June 04/2018 July 04/2018 CFU/ml application CFU/gr Leaf CFU/gr Leaf Tank Field 1 2.50E+04 4.40E+02 7.00E+02 Field 2 2.50E+04 3.30E+03 4.20E+03 Field 3 2.50E+05 8.00E+02 1.20E+03 In the application tank there was a homogeneous mixture of the product and a correct application in the plant that, after one month of application in corn leaf the populations are maintained and increase their growth as can be seen in all the plots.
SPAD
Figure 5 shows SPAD measurement 30 days after application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention.
After one month from the application plants maintained SPAD levels equal to the control, without significant differences in all the fields, verifying that the reduction of chemical nitrogen has not had a negative effect on the plant since it has been contributed by the bacteria.
Nitrogen in leaf, stem and cob Table 4, here below reported, shows data concerning, nitrogen concentrations (g/plant) found in the different tissues of the maize plant at the time of harvest.
Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Control Treated Control Treated Control Treated Leave 0,39 0,37 0,58 0,37 0,35 0,36 Stem 0,71 0,76 1,80 0,51 0,72 0,76 Grain 1,63 2,08 1,81 3,16 1,70 1,71 Total 2,73 3,22 4,19 4,05 2,76 2,84 Drone photos (45 dat) Figure 6 shows drone photos used for NDVI index determination, for field 1 (panel "a"), field 2 (panel "b") and field 3 (panel "c").
Figure 7 shows drone photos used for combined CIR index determination, for field 1(panel "a"), field 2 (panel "b") and field 3 (panel "c").
Considering indexes NDVI and combined CIR, no differences were observed in the density of the plant canopy, chlorophyll and plant health (intensity of blue and red color) in any of the fields, compared to the control, except in field, 3 where there was a problem with the irrigation water pressure and a color difference is observed in the crop in the areas where the sprinkler did not water properly.
Yield Tabla 5, here below reported, shows data concerning the yield of each field.
Yield (kg/ha) Increase % (kg/ha) control Treated treated Field 1 16881 a 17511 b 3.96 Field 2 14346 a 18335b 27.8 Field 3 14312 a 17539b 22.5 In Table 5, the averages followed by different letters on the line differ significantly from each other.
In field 1, the control had a yield of 16881 kg/ha. With the application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention, a yield of 17511 kg/ha was obtained; which meant 4 % more production.
In field 2 the control had a yield of 14346 kg/ha. The application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention produced a yield of 18335 kg/ha, i.e., a productive increase of 28%.
In field 3, the control yielded 14312 kg/ha. The application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention generated a yield of 17539 kg/ha, resulting an increase in net production of 22.5 %
Tabla 6, here below reported, shows data concerning Nitrogen balance- nitrogen provided (input) via fertilization, nitrogen assimilated by the plant after extraction, balance of assimilation between the input and extracted in the plant. Nitrogen requirement (i.e., input required) per ton of grain and nitrogen extraction per ton of grain.
Input Extraction of piant Balance of Input required (UFN Extraction (kg N i UFNItta (Kg N I ha) asation (UFNittal /ton grain) ton grain) (Extraction ¨ Input) Fleicil 175 266,63 111,63 9,V9 16.36 Treated Field 1 293 24349 -0.59 17..35 14,41 Control Field 2 295 361,00 66.00 16,98 2061, Treater;
Field 2 460 373,38 -106,61 33,45 22.11 Control Field 142 246,23 104,22 6,09 14.96 Treated Field 3 237 25345 144 16.55 I
Control = Conclusions Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention has an efficient application in the cultivation of corn and persistence of the microorganism in the plant.
The strain of the invention maintains a level of SPAD (chlorophyll), plant health and plant canopy density (NDVI index and combined CIR index) equal to the conventional fertilization, wherein a higher amount of nitrogen fertilizer is used.
The strain of the invention provides 40 % of the total nitrogenous fertilizer units that were reduced in the fertilization of cover and also provides an increase in the production of between 4 and 27 %. As the plants only had one cob per plant, this increase would be linked to the specific weight of the grain and/or number of runs.
If we observe the balance of the nitrogenous fertilizer units contributed via fertilization and the extraction of the nitrogen in the plant that was carried out, there is a nitrogen gain of between 66 and 111 kg of nitrogen per hectare. This means that those kilograms of nitrogen were fixed by the strain of the invention during the culture cycle. This result is indirectly observed in the nitrogen requirement per ton of grain produced in the treated plants, since the requirement to produce one ton of grain is less than the controls. It must also be borne in mind that the requirements to produce a ton of treated grain are lower than the extraction of nitrogen that was made to produce that ton of grain. It is the opposite in the control, since more nitrogen is needed to produce the same amount of grain.
Example 3 Trial 3. Efficacy of the use of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in the reduction of 30 A of the nitrogen fertilizer in the short cycle cultivation of maize.
= Obiectives.
To know the effectiveness of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention on the development of corn (maize), against the reduction of 30 % of nitrogen cover fertilization under conventional growing conditions through the evolution of green color of the leaf (SPAD), vegetation indexes, nitrogen levels in the plant, concentration of the microorganism in the leaf and the productive yield.
= Materials and methods Trial fields and fertilization.
The trial was carried out in Spain, in two fields: a field of Pomar de Cinca in Huesca with coordinates 41 5013.8 "N 0 0538.0" E and the other in Finca Oran, Albacete with coordinates 38 4955.3" N 1 5027.1W.
Fertilization recommendations were conventional fertilization and a 30 %
reduction in nitrogen reduction treatments. For this, fertilizer was distributed with a fertilizer spreader with the quantities specified in table 7, here below reported.
Table 7 shows quantity, type of fertiliser and nitrogen fertiliser units (NFU) used in each fertiliser on each plot.
Control Treated Fund Fertilization Cover Fund fertilization cover fertilization fertilization Field 1 250 kg Urea 46 250 kg Urea 46 150 kg Urea 46 100 kg Urea 46 Field 2 700 kg NPK 8-14-14 550 kg N 40-0-0 700 kg NPK 8-14-14 330 kg N
Control Treated Common Control Treated Fertilization 100% NFU 60% NFU Fund (NFU) Caver;NFU) Cover(NFU) Field 1 0 161 115 115 46 Field 2 276 188 56 220 '132 = Distribution of the treatments in the fields The fields had the following surface: Field 1 (74 ha), Field 2 (3.67 ha) and two contiguous areas of 16 meters wide were taken for the evaluation of the parameters.
The area marked with "1" is the treated area and the area marked with "2" is the control area.
Figure 8 shows the distribution of tests with treatment 1 (in area 1) with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention and treatment 2 control (in area 2).
In particular, panel "a" of Figure 8 shows Field 1 and panel "b" of Figure 8 shows Field 2.
= Characteristics of the culture and application of the Methylobacterium sp.
nov. strain of the invention Corn seeds of the variety "Guasi" were selected in field 1 and variety DKC
in field 2, with a planting ratio of 300 kg/ha, sown to a depth of 3 cm with a separation between rows of 75 cm and separation within the same row of 15 cm.
The width of each sowing lane is 16 m. The sowing date was 20 June on field 1 and 30 June on field 2, after ten days the stem emerged and the date of application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was 22 and 20 days respectively after sowing, 12 July (Field 1) and 20 July 2018 (Field 2).
Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was applied at a dose of 333 g/ha (3 x 107 CFU/g) by foliar application.
Foliar application was performed with a sprayer machine with 300-400 liters of broth per hectare, when the plant was in stage 13-14 of the BBCH scale, with an air temperature of 22 and 20 C and a relative humidity of 72 and 58 A), with a wind speed of 2.3 and 12 mps north and northwest direction, without the presence of dew on the leaves and a cloudiness of 0 and 15 % respectively.
= Parameters and evaluation methodology Counting colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/q) This parameter was measured to be certain that the microorganism is in the whole culture cycle and in what quantity on the leaves. It is measured by taking one gram of leaves from the fourth leaf from below 20 plants and making serial dilutions by sowing them in nitrogen-free selective culture media with methanol as the carbon source.
SPAD (chlorophyll level in leaf) This parameter is an indicator of the plant's good nutritional status and is closely related to nitrogen and iron levels. For this, a meter known as SPAD (Soil Plant Analisys Development) was used and 100 measurements were made of the fourth leaf from below 100 plants of each treatment.
Nitrogen in leaf, stem and cob grain This parameter is an indicator of the amount of nitrogen in each plant tissue accumulated at the time of harvest. The leaf, stem and cob grain are taken from 100 plants to analyse total nitrogen by Kjeldahl's method.
Satellite photos The photos from the ESA Copernicus satellite are downloaded and processed with the Qgis program to obtain the NDVI index.
NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index). It contrasts the bands of red light and near infrared reflected in the leaves of the plants. It is a general indicator of canopy density and is often used to distinguish living green vegetation from soil that looks blue the more chlorophyll it has.
Yield In order to evaluate the yield of the harvest, 6 random blocks are taken and square meters of surface area are harvested. The obtained grain is weighed discounting the loss by humidity in each zone.
Statistical analysis The factors (SPAD and yield) and their interaction were analyzed for each parameter by ANOVA, using Statgraphics Plus software for Windows 5.1 (Manugistics, Inc., USA).
= Results Counting of Colony forming units (CFU) Table 8, here below reported, shows data related to colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of leaf in and the application tank (12-20/7/18), after treatment (12-20/7/18) and after one month from treatment (15/8/18).
CFU/ml Application CFU/gr leaf CFU/gr Hoja tank Field 1 2.70E+02 5.40E+03 1.00E+04 Field 22 1.20E+03 3.00E+03 8.10E+03 In the application tank there was a homogeneous mixture of the product and a correct application in the plant that, after one month of application in corn leaf, the populations are maintained and increase their growth as can be seen in all the fields.
SPAD
Figure 9 shows SPAD measurements 30 days after application.
After one month from the application plants maintained SPAD levels equal to the control, without significant differences in all the fields, verifying that the reduction of chemical nitrogen has not had a negative effect on the plant since it has been contributed by the bacteria.
Nitrogen in leaf, stem and cob Table 9, here below reported, shows data concerning amount of nitrogen (grams) of each tissue of the corn plant.
Field 1 Field 2 Control Treated Control Treated Leaf 0,35 0,49 0,49 0,58 Stem 0,46 0,58 0,58 0,86 Grain 1,09 1,38 1,30 1,14 Total 1,90 2,45 2,37 2,58 Satellite photos.
Figure 10 shows satellite photos used for NDVI index determination for field 1 after 45 days of the treatment measured every 15 days Figure 11 shows satellite photos used for NDVI index determination for field 2 after 45 days of the treatment measured every 15 days.
A homogeneity in the value of NDVI (intensity of green color) is observed throughout the cultivation cycle comparing the control, with the treatment with the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention with reduction of fertilization.
Yield Table 10, here below reported, shows data concerning the yield of each field Yield Increasec/o (kg/ha) (kg/ha) Control Treated Treated Field 1 10515a 11828b 12.48 Field 2 12525a 12863b 2.7 In Field 1 the control had a yield of 10515 kg/ha, however with the application of the strain of the invention a yield of 11828 kg/ha was obtained, with a productive increase of 12.5 %.
In field 2 the control had a yield of 12525 kg/ha, and with the strain of the invention a yield of 12863 kg/ha was obtained, for an increase of 2.7 %.
Table 11 shows data concerning nitrogen balance: nitrogen provided via fertilization, nitrogen assimilated by the plant after extractions, balance of assimilation between the input and extracted in the plant. Nitrogen requirement per ton of grain and nitrogen extraction per ton of grain.
input Extraction or prams Balance ot input required 4sst.iFisi Extraction kg N
Unsifila (Kg i ha} assation (Uniihal iton grain) ton grain (Extraction ¨ input) Field 1 161 218.4 7A6 13,81 18,47 Treated Field 230 170.88 -58,97 21,87 10,95 Control Field 2 18 361.00 43,30 14,e1 1.7,se Tfeeted FeH 2 27E 875.38 -6508 2203 Cciltrel = Conclusions Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention has an efficient application in the cultivation of corn and persistence of the microorganism in the plant.
Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention maintains a level of SPAD
(chlorophyll), plant health and plant canopy density (NDVI Index) equal to the conventional fertilization, wherein a higher amount of nitrogen fertilizer is used.
With respect to the yield, the strain of the invention provides 30 % of the total nitrogenous fertilizer units that were reduced in the cover fertilization and also provides an increase in the production of between 2.7 and 12.5 %. As the plants only had one cob per plant, this increase would be linked to the specific weight of the grain and / or number of runs.
If we observe the balance of the nitrogenous fertilizer units provided via fertilization and the extraction of nitrogen in the plant that was carried out, there is a nitrogen gain of between 43 and 57 kg of nitrogen per hectare. This means that those kilograms of nitrogen were fixed by the strain of the invention during the growing cycle. This result is indirectly observed in the nitrogen requirement per ton of grain produced in the plants treated with the strain of the invention, since the requirement to produce one ton of grain is lower than the controls. It must also be taken into account that the requirements to produce one ton of treated grain are lower than the extraction of nitrogen that was made to produce that ton of grain and in the control it is the opposite, since more nitrogen is needed to produce the same amount of grain.
Example 4 Trial 4 - Evaluation of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in strawberry culture for different doses of nitrogen fertilization = Objectives.
To know the efficacy of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention on the development of the strawberry crop subjected to different doses of nitrogen fertilization of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 % of the conventional fertilization, through the evolution of the green color of the leaf (SPAD), nitrogen levels in the plant, concentration of the microorganism in the leaf and the productive yield.
= Materials and methods Trial field and fertilization.
The trial was carried out in a field located in the experimental farm of Symborg with coordinates 37 4859.6 "N 1 05'43.6" W in Los Martinez del Puerto, Murcia. The field consists of 192 m2, and was 8 m wide and 24 m long.
The management of irrigation and fertilization is different for all treatments. The mineral fertilization program consists of 5 solutions with different nitrogen content.
Table 12 shows the different fertilizations of the treatments, measured in UFN.
UFN
100% nitrogen fertilization 670 75% nitrogen fertilization 502.5 50% nitrogen fertilization 335 25% nitrogen fertilization 167.5 0% nitrogen fertilization 0 = Treatments Table 13 refers to 10 treatments based on 5 levels of fertilization that in turn are divided into treated with Methylobacterium strain of the invention and untreated.
T1. 0 % nitrogen fertilization T2. 25 % nitrogen fertilization T3. 50 % nitrogen fertilization T4. 75 % nitrogen fertilization T5. 100 % nitrogen fertilization T6. 0 % nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention T7. 25 % nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention T8. 50 % nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention T9. 75 % nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention T10. 100% nitrogen fertilization Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention = Characteristics of the culture and application of Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
strain of the invention Vegetal Material.
Strawberry plants with bare root, variety Fortuna, were planted provided by nurseries.
Frame and density of plantation.
The planting frame is 2 m between cultivation rows, 0.1 m between plants, planted in coconut fiber sacks of 1 m x 0.18 m x 0.15 m in quincunx, giving a density of 100,000 plants per hectare, 10 plants per m2, the field consists of 192 m2 so that there are 1920 plants for the entire trial.
Date of planting and removal of the crop.
The transplant of the strawberry was made on 2/11/2017, producing the removal of the crop on 01/06/2018.
Hydraulic design A 3.5 kv electric pump, that goes to a secondary pipe of 32 mm, that connects with 16 mm hoses with self-compensating external dripper of 3 l/h was used.
Irrigation water The irrigation water used in carrying out the trial comes from desalination plant and in the whole trial, 130 liters of water per plant were applied, with a concentration of 0.1 grams per liter of nitrate (13 grams per plant). The characteristics of said water are summarized in the following table (Table 14). Table 14, here below reported, shows data concerning the characteristics of the irrigation water.
Parameters Results pH 7.86 EC (dSm-1) 0.96 Total dissolved solids (g/1) 0.507 Chlorine anions (g/1) 0.245 Sulfate anions (g/1) 0.0157 Hydroxide anions (g/1) 0.0001 Carbonate anions (g/1) 0.074 Nitrate anions (g/1) 0.101 Soluble phosphorous anions (g/1) 0.0005 Calcium cations (g/1) 0.0202 Magnesium cations (g/1) 0.0084 Sodium cations (g/1) 0.134 Potassium cations (g/1) 0.01 Ammonium cations (g/1) 0.00077 Boron micronutrients (g/1) 0.99 Iron micronutrents (g/1) 0.05 Manganese micronutrients (g/1) 0.01 Copper micronutrients (g/1) 0.01 Zinc micronutrients (g/1) 0.01 The strain of the invention was applied at the dose 333 g/ha (3 x 107 CFU / g) by foliar application.
The foliar application was carried out with a spray backpack at a rate of 200 liters of broth per hectare when the plant was in stage 13-14 of the BBCH scale, with an air temperature of 20 C and a relative humidity of 50 %, without presence of dew on the leaves, and a cloudiness of 15 %.
= Parameters and evaluation methodology Counting colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/g) This parameter was measured to be certain that the microorganism is in the whole culture cycle and in what quantity on the leaves. It is measured by taking one gram of leaves from 50 plants and making serial dilutions by sowing them in nitrogen-free selective culture media with methanol as the carbon source.
Nitrogen in leaf.
This parameter is an indicator of the amount of nitrogen in each plant tissue accumulated at the time of analysis. 100 plants are taken from the leaf, stem and fruit to analyze total nitrogen by Kjeldahl's method.
Yield To evaluate crop yield, 30 plants are randomly selected from each treatment and harvested throughout the crop cycle.
Statistical analysis.
The factor (yield) and their interaction were analyzed for each parameter by ANOVA, using Statgraphics Plus software for Windows 5.1 (Manugistics, Inc., USA).
= Results Counting colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/g) Table 15, here below reported, shows results concerning Colony forming units per gram of leaf measured monthly from the application.
Treatment/Sampling 18/01/2018 15/02/2018 15/03/2018 15/04/2018 date T 6 9.00E+03 2.00E+03 2.00E+03 2.50E+03 T7 2.00E+03 1.00E+03 8.00E+03 8.00E+03 T8 2.00E+03 1.00E+03 6.40E+03 5.00E+03 T9 1.80E+04 3.00E+03 1.00E+03 3.00E+03 T 10 2.60E+03 1.00E+03 1.00E+03 1.00E+03 By means of colony sampling, a permanence of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention is observed throughout the culture cycle in the plant.
Total nitrogen Table 16, here below reported, shows data related to concentration of Nitrogen (g /100 g of plant), Total Nitrogen (g/plant) and Fresh weight of plants in the strawberry crop.
Treatmens Nitrogen (grams /100 Average plant Total Nitrogen grams of plant) weight(grams) (grams /
plant) Ti 1.86 7.5 0.14 T2 2.52 41.4 1.04 T 3 3.20 92.1 2.94 T4 3.23 96.6 3.12 T 5 3.31 94.7 3.13 T6 1.69 8.4 0.14 T7 2.87 65.5 1.87 T 8 3.24 90.1 2.91 T 9 3.28 98.8 3.24 T 10 3.24 90.2 2.92 Table 16 shows that there is an increase in nitrogen concentration as nitrogen fertilization increases, in both control and those treated with Methylobacterium sp.
nov. strain of the invention.
An increase of total nitrogen is observed until reaching 75 % of nitrogen fertilizer in the plants treated with the strain of the invention, the highest value being found in 3.28, the highest value of nitrogen concentration in plants treated with the strain of the invention. With 100 % of the fertilization the N content in the treated plant is reduced.
Production From the moment they start producing, 30 plants are harvested weekly, randomly selected from each treatment during the entire culture cycle.
Table 17, here below reported, shows the yield in kilograms per plant for each treatment.
Treatments Production (Kg /plant) Ti 0.24a T2 0.8b T3 1.07 c T4 1.05 c T5 1.15 c T6 0.17a T7 1.04 c T8 1.12 c T9 1.4 d T 10 1.02 c The treatment with the highest production was 9 (75 % of nitrogen with the application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention) with 1.4 kilos per plant, significantly different from the other treatments.
Treatments with 0 UFN were those with the lowest production of strawberry kg per plant, with significant differences.
Table 18, here below reported, shows data concerning nitrogen balance:
nitrogen provided via fertilization, nitrogen assimilated by the plant after extraction, balance of assimilation between the input (i.e., nitrogen provided) and extracted in the plant.
Treatments lnputL1Mha Extr.ntMn at plant (isg N Balance-at assimilation (ltrigation water inpul ha) 0.1FNMa)(Extratti*n 13 UN) lnputl TI
T2 167.S *13 104.'3 -76,2 T 3 335 + 1:3 3472:?1 T 502..5 -I- 13 312.01 -203.49 67:3 + 13 313.45 -369.f.15 T. + 13 14.19 T 167.5 +13 .167.1l6 T 335 + 13 2.91.02. -56,013 I + 13 324.06 -191.44 T 10 670 *- 13 202.24 -3.00,76 = Conclusions Colony-forming units per gram of leaf (CFU/g of leaf) A persistence of microorganisms in leaf is observed throughout the strawberry 10 growing cycle.
Total Nitrogen Plants treated with Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in treatment 9 have the highest nitrogen concentration in leaf, compared with all control treatments.
Production 15 The application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention in treatment 9 (503 UFN), promoted an increase in the production of 21 % with respect to the control Treatment 5 (671 UFN) and an increase of 33 % with respect to its homologue fertilized Treatment 4 (503 UFN).
Example 5 Trial 5 - Field validation trial in the vine culture = Objective.
To know the efficacy of the strain of the invention on the development of the culture of vine, subjected to a conventional dose of nitrogen fertilization, through the evolution of the green color of the leaf (SPAD), concentration of the microorganism in the leaf and the production yield.
= Materials and methods Trial fields and fertilization.
The trial was carried out in two fields, located in Jumilla, with coordinates 38 33'13.9"N 1 21'16.5"W, and Tomelloso, with coordinates 39 11'22.4"N
2 59'15.8W.
Fertilization recommendations were conventional fertilization with backgorund fertilization with 700 kg NPK (15-15-15), corresponding to 105 UFN for the entire culture cycle.
= Distribution of the treatments in the fields.
The fields had the following surface: Field 1 (1 ha), Field 2 (2.20 ha) and two adjacent 16 meter wide blocks (i.e., areas) were taken for the evaluation of the parameters.
= Characteristics of the culture and application of Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
strain of the invention In Field 1 the vine variety is petit verdot in Field 2 the variety is Grenache, the application date of the strain of the invention was on 10 May 2018 (Field 1) and 15 May 2018 (Field 2).
The Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was applied at a dose of g/ha (3 x 107 CFU/g) by foliar application.
The foliar application was carried out with a nebulizer with 350 liters of broth per hectare when the plant was in the peppercorn stage with an air temperature of and 20 C and a relative humidity of 20 and 38 A), with a speed of wind of 5.4 and 9 mps south and northwest direction, without presence of dew on the leaves and a cloudiness of 10 and 25 % respectively.
Figure 12A shows the nebulizer at the time of application of the treatment(s) and Figure 12B shows the grain size at the time of application of the treatment(s).
= Parameters and evaluation methodolocw Yield To evaluate the yield of the crop, 6 blocks are taken at random and 30 square meters of surface are harvested, weighing the grapes obtained in the plants.
Statistical analysis.
The factor (yield) and their interaction were analyzed for each parameter by ANOVA, using Statgraphics Plus software for Windows 5.1 (Manugistics, Inc., USA).
= Results Yield Table 19A and Table 19B, here below reported, shows results concerning yield in kilograms per plant for each treatment.
TABLE 19A - Field 1 Tretament Total weight (kg/p1) Brix Kg/ha Treated 6,02 24,8667 16464 Control 5,09 24,5778 13937 TABLE 19B ¨ Field 2 Treatment Total weight (kg/p1) Brix Kg/ha Treated 19,77 17,5 49440 Control 14,02 18 35065 Conclusion In the Field 1, the application of Methylobacterium sp. now. strain of the invention could increase the yield in a 18 % respect to the untreated control.
In the Field 2, the application of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention could increase the yield in a 41 % respect to the untreated control.
Example 6 Trial 6 ¨ Evaluation of the effects of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention on the yield on escarole crop (Cichorium endivia latifolia, variety Lempika) The following test was carried out by an independent accredited entity for the realization of GEP trials.
The design, analysis of results and reporting of this study were carried out following whenever possible the EPPO-Guidelines PP 1/152(4), PP 135(4) and PP 1/181(4).
General information of the trial The trial began on 17 August 2018 in Vila-Sacra, province of Gerona in Spain, ending on 12 November of the same year. The date of the transplant was 21 August 2018. Conventional fertilization was performed on 23 August and the application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was on 28 September, once the culture has reached the suitable stage of development (BBCH 17-19).
Design of the trial The trial consisted of a randomized block system with 4 treatments and 5 replications. Each elementary field (plot) was 2.5 meters wide and 7 meters long, with an area of 17.5 m2. The rows of plants were 0.56 meters spaced apart and the space in the row was 0.35 m giving rise to a total of 80 plants in 4 rows.
Culture The effect of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was studied in the endive crop (Cichorium endivia latifolia, variety Lempika). Previous crops in that area were onions in 2018 and sunflower and lettuce in 2017.
Soil The soil showed a good level of fertilization:
% MO: 2.02 Texture: clay loam pH: 7.70 CEC: 0.22 Soil drainage: fair Maintenance Throughout the culture cycle, the phytosanitary treatments necessary to maintain plant health were applied.
Statistical Comments Statistical analysis and reports have been realized with the software of the Manager of Agricultural Investigation (ARM) (developed by Gylling Dates Management Inc.) The data evaluated was analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) combined with a Student-Newman-Keuls in a = 5 % for comparison of means. The means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly.
Objetives of the trial 1.- To evaluate the effects of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention on the crop behaviour and yield on escarole crop, applied with normal rate of fertilization or reduced fertilization.
2.- To compare the effects of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention compared to a standard commercial fertilization 3.- To evaluate any unintended effect of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the inventionon the target crop.
Trial Summary The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effects of the Methylobacterium sp.
nov. strain of the invention, (3 x 107 CFU/g) when the dose of Nitrogen (fertilization) is reduced, on the yield of escarole crop. The trial was located in Northeast of Spain, in Vila-Sacra municipality (Girona), in open field, in a typical small area for the cultivation of vegetables. The study was conducted in compliance with the principles of Good Experimental Practices as defined by Regulation 1107/2009 of the European Union.
The strain of the invention was tested at the same rate (300 g f.p./ha) in three areas with different Nitrogen fertilization rates (100 % (usual), 60 % and 40 %), and it was evaluated and compared to an "untreated" control (with the 100 % of N
fertilization, but without the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention).
Fertilization was done before transplant (23/Aug/2018). The product was applied at BBCH stage 17-19 (28/Sep/2018), using a calibrated knapsack sprayer HONDA
WRJ2525.
Three assessments were done on crop vigor during the crop development as percentage. At harvest or close to harvest it were recorded the yield parameters evaluating the two central rows of the plots, with 20 plants each, and the two border rows were not considered for the assessments. The plant diameter (cm), the number of plants present (distinguishing marketable, unmarketable, dead and chlorotic plants), the plant weight and the yield (number and kg on the 2 central rows (7.84 m2)) were assessed. The yield and the number of marketable plants per hectare and the % of increase versus the treatment without with standard fertilization (treatment 1) was calculated automatically calculated using ARM
software. Phytotoxicity and vigor assessments were carried out throughout the trial.
Table 20, here below reported,shows the treatment list Trt Treatment Rate Rate Growth Appl Appl No. Name Unit Stage Code Description UF 1000 kg/ha BEFTRA A
Before transplant 2 M.s. 300 g/ha BBCH 16- B Crop BBCH 16-UF 1000 kg/ha BEFTRA A
Before transplant 3 M.s. 300 g/ha BBCH 16- B Crop BBCH 16-F (DOSE N=60%) 600 kg/ha BEFTRA A
Before transplant 4 M.s. 300 g/ha BBCH 16- B Crop BBCH 16-F (DOSE N=40%) 400 kg/ha BEFTRA A
Before transplant In Table 20, the following reference are used:
UTC: Untreated Control UF: Usual fertilization F: Fertilization M.s.: Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, i.e., the Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the invention Conclusions Effects Of The Product According to the trial conditions, it can be concluded that the application of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention with a reduced dose of Nitrogen obtained a numerical increase of the mean plant weight (kg) and commercial yield (number of plants per hectare) compared with only one application of conventional fertilizer (without Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention), which means that the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention provided the necessary nitrogen for a correct development of the plant.
Treatments 3 and 4 achieved a crop yield increase of 3.8 and 13.89 %
respectively when compared to treatment 1, obtaining significant statistic differences. No significant differences were obtained among the Methylobacterium sp. nov.
strain of the invention treatments with different doses of Nitrogen in the rest of assessed parameters, despite the obtained results suggested best results at higher Nitrogen reduction.
Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention was applied at dose 300 g/ha (3 x 107 cfu/g) when crop had between 7 and 9 leaves (BBCH 17-19).
The strain of the invention applied at 300 g/ha (3 x 107 cfu/g) with conventional fertilization (N= 40 %) showed the best results of the trial with a yield increase of 13.89 %, with statistic significant diference.
Regarding the other parameters assessed, there were not significant statistical differences among treatments, which indicates that the Methylobacterium sp.
nov.
strain of the invention was able to provide the necessary nitrogen for the correct development of the plants.
The use of the Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain of the invention reduces the amount of nitrogen fertilization required in the crops since the results of the assessed parameters were similar or even better to those obtained with conventional fertilization.
Example 7 ¨ Process for the production of an exemplary composition according to the invention = Recover Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain NFBG Medium (Nitrogen Free Bacterial Medium supplemented with Glucose).
Growth parameters:
o Growth temperature 20-35 C.
o Incubation time 5 - 7 days.
= Select an isolated pink-red colony and reseed it in selective medium MMMNF (Minimal Medium with Methanol Nitrogen Free).
Growth parameters:
o Growth temperature 20-35 C.
o Incubation time 5 - 7 days.
= Select an isolated colony (pink-red) and reseed it in MMM (Minimal Mineral Medium with Methanol), to grow a liquid culture to be used as a pre-inoculum Fermentation parameters:
o Growth temperature 20-35 C.
o Agitation (r.p.m.) 50-250.
o Fermentation time 5 - 7 days.
= Inoculation of the complete volume of the bioreactor with the pre-inoculum of the microorganism.
Fermentation parameters:
o Growth temperature 20-35 C.
o Agitation (r.p.m.) 50-250.
o Aeration 0.3-3.2 N*m3/h.
o Fermentation time 80-130 hours.
= Mix with the carriers and dry with spray drying = Each liter of fermented broth with the microorganism is mixed with agriculturally acceptable carriers = After the mixture is spray dried, waccording to the following drying parameters:
o Feed flow 7-11 m1/1.
o Compressed air flow 225-375 l/h.
o Drying air flow 35-50 m3/h.
o Entry temperature 100-180 C.
o Cyclone performance 25-40 %.
= Mix of products for final product formulation Each 1 g of dry product (powder + microorganism) is mixed with the following co-formulators, until obtaining 101-550 g of final product, to be used in the fertilization of one hectare.
o 1-50 g agriculturally acceptable co-formulant.
o 100-500 g agriculturally acceptable carrier.
Table 21, here below reported, shows the composition in g / L of the culture media used throughout the manufacturing process.
NFM MMM MMMNF
Malic acid 5,0 g Methanol (sterilized by filtration 0.22 pm) 20 ml 20 ml 20 ml NaNO3 0,5 g (NH4)2SO4 0,5 g (NH4)6M 07024 4H20 0,002 g 0,002 g MgSO4 7H20 0,2 g 0,5 g 0,5 g K2HPO4 0,1 g 1,0 g 1,0 g KH2PO4 0,4 g FeCl3 0,01 g FeSO4 7H20 0,01 g 0,01 g KCI 0,5g 0,5g NaCI 0,1 g CaCl2 2H20 0,01 g 0,01 g KOH 4,8g Sol. Micronutrients 2,0 ml 2,0 ml 2,0 ml Sol. Vitamins (sterilized by filtration 0.22 pm) 1,0 ml 1,0 ml 1,0 ml Bromotimol blue (0.5% sol. in 2N KOH) 2,0 ml pH 6,9 7,2 7,2 Agar-Agar 12,0 g 12,0 g Components sterilized by filtration are added after autoclaving, once the culture medium has cooled to a temperature <60 C.
Table 22, here below reported, refers to the amount in grams of the micronutrients and vitamins.
MICRONUTRIENTS VITAMINS
H3B03 1,85g MnSO4 4H20 2,45 g ZnSO4 7H20 0,28 g Na2Mo04 2H20 0,034 g CoCl2 6H20 0,005 g CuSO4 5H20 0,005 g Nicotinic acid 0,2 g Biotin 0,0018g Calcium pantotheate 0,18 g Pyridoxine 0,18g Cyanocobalamin 0,08 g Thiamin 0,2g
Claims (20)
1. Strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov., deposited under accession number CECT 9580.
2. Composition comprising a strain of Methylobacterium sp. nov., deposited under accession number CECT 9580.
3. Composition according to claim 2, further comprising one or more agriculturally acceptable carrier and/or one or more agriculturally acceptable co-formulant.
4. Composition according to claim 3, wherein said carrier and/or co-formulant is selected from the group consisting of talc, clay, maltodextrin, skimmed milk, glucose, vegetable dry extracts, such as those of tea, cassava and quinoa, caolin, coir, Diatomea earth, chitin, CaCO3, alginate, carragens, surfactin, rhamnolipid, sophorolipid, saponin, potassium oleate and mixtures thereof.
5. Composition according to claim 2, said composition being in a form selected from solid form, aqueous liquid form, oily liquid form, emulsion form, semi-solid form or gel form.
6. Composition according to claim 5, wherein said composition is in solid form.
7. Composition according to claim 6, wherein said composition is in powder form.
8. Composition according to claim 2, characterized by the fact that it is applied as seed coating, by soil application, preferably drip irrigation system or drench, or by foliar application.
9. A process for the production of a composition according to claim 2, comprising the following steps:
= Providing at least one Methylobacterium sp. nov. deposited under accession number CECT 9580 according to the invention, = Inoculating said Methylobacterium sp. nov. in a liquid culture medium including methanol, = culturing said Methylobacterium sp. nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria = Drying said liquid culture to obtain a dry composition.
= Providing at least one Methylobacterium sp. nov. deposited under accession number CECT 9580 according to the invention, = Inoculating said Methylobacterium sp. nov. in a liquid culture medium including methanol, = culturing said Methylobacterium sp. nov. to obtain a liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria = Drying said liquid culture to obtain a dry composition.
10. Process according to claim 9, wherein said Methylobacterium sp. nov.
deposited under accession number CECT 9580 is isolated from the inner of the spores of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum, deposited under BCCM deposit number 54871.
deposited under accession number CECT 9580 is isolated from the inner of the spores of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum, deposited under BCCM deposit number 54871.
11. Process according to claim 9, further comprising a step of adding one or more agriculturally acceptable carriers to the liquid culture comprising Methylobacteria before drying.
12. Process according to claim 9, further comprising a step of adding one or more agriculturally acceptable co-formulant.
13. Process according to claim 12, wherein said one or more agriculturally acceptable co-formulants are added to said dry composition.
14. Use of Methylobactetium sp. nov. strain according to claim 1 as a bio-stimulant in plants.
15. Use according to claim 14, wherein said plants are horticultural crops, extensive herbaceous and gramineous crops, wood crops as grapevine, berries, and legumes.
16. Use according to claim 14, for increasing the yield of said plants.
17. Use of Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain according to claim 1 for reducing nitrogen external input until 60 %.
18. Use of a composition according to claim 2 as a bio-stimulant in plants.
19. Use according to claim 18, wherein said plants are horticultural crops, extensive herbaceous and gramineous crops, wood crops as grapevine, berries, and legumes.
20. Use according to claim 18, for increasing the yield of said plants.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP19382457.0 | 2019-06-03 | ||
EP19382457.0A EP3747267B1 (en) | 2019-06-03 | 2019-06-03 | Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, compositions comprising it, and its use as bio-stimulant and endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium |
PCT/IB2020/054319 WO2020245675A1 (en) | 2019-06-03 | 2020-05-07 | Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, compositions comprising it, and its use as bio-stimulant and endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA3140962A1 true CA3140962A1 (en) | 2020-12-10 |
Family
ID=66821146
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA3140962A Pending CA3140962A1 (en) | 2019-06-03 | 2020-05-07 | Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, compositions comprising it, and its use as bio-stimulant and endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium |
Country Status (28)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20220248684A1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP4230043A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2022538745A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20220016154A (en) |
CN (2) | CN116970526A (en) |
AR (1) | AR119045A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2020288736A1 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112021024415A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3140962A1 (en) |
CL (1) | CL2021003210A1 (en) |
CO (1) | CO2021018249A2 (en) |
CR (1) | CR20210680A (en) |
DK (1) | DK3747267T3 (en) |
EA (1) | EA202192916A1 (en) |
EC (1) | ECSP21091556A (en) |
ES (1) | ES2962935T3 (en) |
HR (1) | HRP20231365T1 (en) |
HU (1) | HUE064295T2 (en) |
IL (1) | IL288286A (en) |
MA (1) | MA53537B1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX2021014723A (en) |
PE (1) | PE20220493A1 (en) |
PL (1) | PL3747267T3 (en) |
PT (1) | PT3747267T (en) |
RS (1) | RS64763B1 (en) |
UY (1) | UY38704A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2020245675A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA202110898B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114591877B (en) * | 2022-05-09 | 2022-07-26 | 广东省科学院微生物研究所(广东省微生物分析检测中心) | Methylobacterium strain, fermentation product thereof and application of methylobacterium strain in inhibiting growth of algae |
CN118028136A (en) * | 2022-11-11 | 2024-05-14 | 慕恩(广州)生物科技有限公司 | Methylobacillus torvus and application of microbial agent thereof |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100873961B1 (en) * | 2006-05-01 | 2008-12-15 | 충북대학교 산학협력단 | Novel 20 strains of Methylbacterium fuzisawaens CMBM and methods for promoting plant growth using the same |
MY169690A (en) * | 2012-03-21 | 2019-05-13 | Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory Ltd | Nitrogen-fixing bacterial inoculant for improvement of crop productivity and reduction of nitrous oxide emission |
ES2571439T3 (en) | 2013-07-02 | 2016-05-25 | Symborg S L | Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum var. Nov. and its use as bionematicide |
HUE027082T2 (en) * | 2013-07-02 | 2016-08-29 | Symborg S L | Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum var. nov. strain and its use as biostimulant |
US20160376628A1 (en) * | 2013-12-10 | 2016-12-29 | Hyundai Motor Company | Method for screening antimicrobial agent |
CN108024545A (en) * | 2015-09-11 | 2018-05-11 | 诺维信生物农业公司 | Stable inoculation compositions and its production method |
US20180201549A1 (en) * | 2017-01-13 | 2018-07-19 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Use of fungal strains to solubilize phosphate and enhance plant growth/yield |
-
2019
- 2019-06-03 HU HUE19382457A patent/HUE064295T2/en unknown
- 2019-06-03 RS RS20230986A patent/RS64763B1/en unknown
- 2019-06-03 ES ES19382457T patent/ES2962935T3/en active Active
- 2019-06-03 EP EP23171059.1A patent/EP4230043A1/en active Pending
- 2019-06-03 HR HRP20231365TT patent/HRP20231365T1/en unknown
- 2019-06-03 DK DK19382457.0T patent/DK3747267T3/en active
- 2019-06-03 EP EP19382457.0A patent/EP3747267B1/en active Active
- 2019-06-03 PT PT193824570T patent/PT3747267T/en unknown
- 2019-06-03 PL PL19382457.0T patent/PL3747267T3/en unknown
-
2020
- 2020-05-07 KR KR1020217042673A patent/KR20220016154A/en unknown
- 2020-05-07 AU AU2020288736A patent/AU2020288736A1/en active Pending
- 2020-05-07 CR CR20210680A patent/CR20210680A/en unknown
- 2020-05-07 EA EA202192916A patent/EA202192916A1/en unknown
- 2020-05-07 WO PCT/IB2020/054319 patent/WO2020245675A1/en active Application Filing
- 2020-05-07 MX MX2021014723A patent/MX2021014723A/en unknown
- 2020-05-07 BR BR112021024415A patent/BR112021024415A2/en unknown
- 2020-05-07 CN CN202310939397.XA patent/CN116970526A/en active Pending
- 2020-05-07 MA MA53537A patent/MA53537B1/en unknown
- 2020-05-07 JP JP2021570422A patent/JP2022538745A/en active Pending
- 2020-05-07 CN CN202080041209.6A patent/CN114423291B/en active Active
- 2020-05-07 CA CA3140962A patent/CA3140962A1/en active Pending
- 2020-05-07 PE PE2021001940A patent/PE20220493A1/en unknown
- 2020-05-07 US US17/616,346 patent/US20220248684A1/en active Pending
- 2020-05-21 UY UY0001038704A patent/UY38704A/en unknown
- 2020-05-29 AR ARP200101526A patent/AR119045A1/en unknown
-
2021
- 2021-11-21 IL IL288286A patent/IL288286A/en unknown
- 2021-12-02 CL CL2021003210A patent/CL2021003210A1/en unknown
- 2021-12-23 ZA ZA2021/10898A patent/ZA202110898B/en unknown
- 2021-12-27 EC ECSENADI202191556A patent/ECSP21091556A/en unknown
- 2021-12-30 CO CONC2021/0018249A patent/CO2021018249A2/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2022538745A (en) | 2022-09-06 |
ECSP21091556A (en) | 2022-06-30 |
AU2020288736A1 (en) | 2021-12-09 |
CN116970526A (en) | 2023-10-31 |
ES2962935T3 (en) | 2024-03-21 |
HRP20231365T1 (en) | 2024-02-16 |
HUE064295T2 (en) | 2024-02-28 |
EA202192916A1 (en) | 2022-03-22 |
CL2021003210A1 (en) | 2022-10-07 |
EP3747267A1 (en) | 2020-12-09 |
EP3747267B1 (en) | 2023-08-02 |
CN114423291A (en) | 2022-04-29 |
BR112021024415A2 (en) | 2022-01-18 |
PT3747267T (en) | 2023-11-03 |
CR20210680A (en) | 2022-03-21 |
ZA202110898B (en) | 2023-10-25 |
WO2020245675A1 (en) | 2020-12-10 |
KR20220016154A (en) | 2022-02-08 |
CN114423291B (en) | 2023-08-18 |
PE20220493A1 (en) | 2022-04-07 |
US20220248684A1 (en) | 2022-08-11 |
DK3747267T3 (en) | 2023-10-23 |
IL288286A (en) | 2022-01-01 |
RS64763B1 (en) | 2023-11-30 |
PL3747267T3 (en) | 2024-02-12 |
CO2021018249A2 (en) | 2022-01-17 |
EP4230043A1 (en) | 2023-08-23 |
MX2021014723A (en) | 2022-01-18 |
UY38704A (en) | 2020-10-30 |
MA53537B1 (en) | 2023-11-30 |
AR119045A1 (en) | 2021-11-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR101199931B1 (en) | Promotion of nitrogen mineralization of organic fertilizers and control of plant diseases using bacillus velezensis KRICT934 | |
CN110724648B (en) | Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain and application thereof | |
WO2010109436A1 (en) | Microbial formulation for widespread uesd in agricultural practices | |
JP2015528296A (en) | Methods for enhancing abiotic stress resistance in plants | |
CN103497920B (en) | A kind of for gemma bacillus agent preventing and treating blight and its preparation method and application | |
BG67257B1 (en) | Bacterial strain of bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum bs89 as a means of increasing plant productivity and their protection against diseases | |
CN113862189A (en) | Corn growth promoting, probiotic and biocontrol bacterial fertilizer integrated preparation and preparation method thereof | |
US20220248684A1 (en) | Methylobacterium sp. nov. strain, compositions comprising it, and its use as biostimulant and endophyte nitrogen-fixing bacterium | |
CN106146194A (en) | A kind of anti-continuous cropping microbial inoculum | |
JP5374260B2 (en) | Agricultural materials | |
RU2459402C1 (en) | Methods of cultivation of spring rape for seeds | |
RU2558291C2 (en) | Polyfunctional means for plant growing | |
CN103907423A (en) | Cultivation method of chlorella organic rice | |
Nasim et al. | Impact of nitrogen and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on yield and yield components of sunflower in a glasshouse environment | |
KR100616408B1 (en) | Turfgrass growth promoter comprising Rhizopus oligosporus and methods of promoting growth of turfgrass by using it | |
CN113548923A (en) | Soil-activated plant regulating microbial inoculum for vegetable planting and preparation method thereof | |
RU2640286C1 (en) | Fibre flax growing method | |
RU2826882C1 (en) | Strain of endomycorrhizal fungus rhizophagus intraradices and microbiological fertilizer based on it | |
Biswas et al. | Use of Amritpani: An Excellent Bio-Enhancer for Sustainable Agriculture: An Overview | |
CN109868228A (en) | One plant of nearly rose color lock shadow yeast and its application | |
RU2803623C1 (en) | Phialocephala fortinii strain pcs. f-833mks661ch1n is a producer of a complex of biologically active substances with growth-regulatory properties | |
WO2019113255A1 (en) | A symbiont for enhancement of plant performance | |
CN110628685B (en) | Bacillus subtilis strain and application thereof in agricultural production | |
Kucuk et al. | Stimulation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) growth by local Trichoderma sp. İsolates | |
JP5052873B2 (en) | Control agent and method for biological control of soybean stem blight |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20240502 |
|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20240502 |