CA2979954C - Method for the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of h2 and co2 into ch4 - Google Patents
Method for the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of h2 and co2 into ch4 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2979954C CA2979954C CA2979954A CA2979954A CA2979954C CA 2979954 C CA2979954 C CA 2979954C CA 2979954 A CA2979954 A CA 2979954A CA 2979954 A CA2979954 A CA 2979954A CA 2979954 C CA2979954 C CA 2979954C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- gas
- hydrogen
- storage facility
- natural gas
- gas mixture
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 52
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 172
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 96
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 84
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 74
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 74
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 74
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 57
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 48
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 230000000696 methanogenic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 160
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 claims description 15
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 241001074903 Methanobacteria Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241001074893 Methanococci Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000274223 Methanomicrobia Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241001083901 Methanopyri Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 75
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 13
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 13
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 5
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 241000203069 Archaea Species 0.000 description 3
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011049 filling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon monoxide Chemical compound [O+]#[C-] UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 241000186541 Desulfotomaculum Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000202974 Methanobacterium Species 0.000 description 2
- BAVYZALUXZFZLV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methylamine Chemical compound NC BAVYZALUXZFZLV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000178985 Moorella Species 0.000 description 2
- IOVCWXUNBOPUCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M Nitrite anion Chemical compound [O-]N=O IOVCWXUNBOPUCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 241001112694 Peptococcaceae Species 0.000 description 2
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sulfate Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910002091 carbon monoxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N carbonic acid Chemical compound OC(O)=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005868 electrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005429 filling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007483 microbial process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002912 waste gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M Acetate Chemical compound CC([O-])=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241001430149 Clostridiaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000565686 Dehalobacter Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001149877 Desulfitibacter Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000605716 Desulfovibrio Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000657530 Desulfurispora Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000605809 Desulfuromonas Species 0.000 description 1
- BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-M Formate Chemical compound [O-]C=O BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 241001143801 Gelria Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000168423 Kosmotoga Species 0.000 description 1
- PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Manganese Chemical compound [Mn] PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000203065 Methanobacteriaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000203353 Methanococcus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000204675 Methanopyrus Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910002651 NO3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 241000033351 Natronincola Species 0.000 description 1
- NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241001135648 Petrotoga Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001411251 Proteiniclasticum Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000589516 Pseudomonas Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000589614 Pseudomonas stutzeri Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000863430 Shewanella Species 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241001646521 Syntrophaceticus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001112743 Thermoanaerobacteraceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001128997 Thermotogaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010044565 Tremor Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910021529 ammonia Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000032770 biofilm formation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001311 chemical methods and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004146 energy storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004817 gas chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002309 gasification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000005431 greenhouse gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000265 homogenisation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- LIKBJVNGSGBSGK-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(3+);oxygen(2-) Chemical compound [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Fe+3].[Fe+3] LIKBJVNGSGBSGK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002906 microbiologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- JCXJVPUVTGWSNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen dioxide Inorganic materials O=[N]=O JCXJVPUVTGWSNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000021232 nutrient availability Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000020477 pH reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000013049 sediment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002195 synergetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009044 synergistic interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 241001148471 unidentified anaerobic bacterium Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000010792 warming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
- C12P5/00—Preparation of hydrocarbons or halogenated hydrocarbons
- C12P5/02—Preparation of hydrocarbons or halogenated hydrocarbons acyclic
- C12P5/023—Methane
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B41/00—Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
- E21B41/005—Waste disposal systems
- E21B41/0057—Disposal of a fluid by injection into a subterranean formation
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B41/00—Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
- E21B41/005—Waste disposal systems
- E21B41/0057—Disposal of a fluid by injection into a subterranean formation
- E21B41/0064—Carbon dioxide sequestration
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02C—CAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
- Y02C20/00—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
- Y02C20/40—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/30—Hydrogen technology
- Y02E60/32—Hydrogen storage
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/30—Hydrogen technology
- Y02E60/36—Hydrogen production from non-carbon containing sources, e.g. by water electrolysis
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P20/00—Technologies relating to chemical industry
- Y02P20/10—Process efficiency
- Y02P20/133—Renewable energy sources, e.g. sunlight
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
- Filling Or Discharging Of Gas Storage Vessels (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of H2 and CO2 to form CH4, characterized in that a gas mixture comprising natural gas, hydrogen generated and CO2 having a minimum natural gas concentration of 10 % and preferably having a ratio of hydrogen and CO2 that is stoichiometric for the formation of CH4 is fed into an underground storage facility which comprises a gas zone and is stored there in the presence of methanogenic microorganisms. The present invention further relates to the use of such a method for regulating the CO2 and/or hydrogen content in a natural gas.
Description
METHOD FOR THE HYDROGENOTROPHIC
The present invention relates to a method for the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of H? and CO2 to CH4 using renewable energy.
In order to balance the availability of renewable energy sources that depend on the time of day and/or the weather situation, such as wind and sunlight, and to provide a corresponding adjustment to the respective power demands, storage facilities for said renewable energies are required. In this manner it is possible to store energy produced in excess, e. g. in times of strong wind, and to utilize it at a later point in time, e. g. in times of high power demand, or to supply it to other energetic gas applications.
Energy storage facilities serve to store energy which is to be utilized at a later point in time. If the storage of one form of energy is not favorable, e. g. due to technical difficulties, insufficient capacity or downtime losses, said energy is converted to another form of energy that is more suitable for storage, is then stored and may later be reconverted as required. One example in this context is the conversion of chemical energy (fuel) to thermal energy (heat) or the conversion of electrical energy (electricity) to chemical energy (fuel) or thermal energy (heat).
In both storage and conversion of energy, losses are bound to Occur.
The direct storage of electrical energy is very difficult to achieve and it is thus usually required to convert electrical energy to another form of energy and later reconvert it as required. =
In this context, the power-to-gas approach has been developed in recent years and already been demonstrated in initial demonstration plants. In this approach, electrical energy is converted to gases and can thus be more easily stored. In Falkenhagen (Germany), for example, a plant has been established in which water is electrolytically split into hydrogen and oxygen using wind energy and is subsequently fed into the local natural gas network. Another plant in Werlte (Germany) also uses electrical energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen,
The present invention relates to a method for the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of H? and CO2 to CH4 using renewable energy.
In order to balance the availability of renewable energy sources that depend on the time of day and/or the weather situation, such as wind and sunlight, and to provide a corresponding adjustment to the respective power demands, storage facilities for said renewable energies are required. In this manner it is possible to store energy produced in excess, e. g. in times of strong wind, and to utilize it at a later point in time, e. g. in times of high power demand, or to supply it to other energetic gas applications.
Energy storage facilities serve to store energy which is to be utilized at a later point in time. If the storage of one form of energy is not favorable, e. g. due to technical difficulties, insufficient capacity or downtime losses, said energy is converted to another form of energy that is more suitable for storage, is then stored and may later be reconverted as required. One example in this context is the conversion of chemical energy (fuel) to thermal energy (heat) or the conversion of electrical energy (electricity) to chemical energy (fuel) or thermal energy (heat).
In both storage and conversion of energy, losses are bound to Occur.
The direct storage of electrical energy is very difficult to achieve and it is thus usually required to convert electrical energy to another form of energy and later reconvert it as required. =
In this context, the power-to-gas approach has been developed in recent years and already been demonstrated in initial demonstration plants. In this approach, electrical energy is converted to gases and can thus be more easily stored. In Falkenhagen (Germany), for example, a plant has been established in which water is electrolytically split into hydrogen and oxygen using wind energy and is subsequently fed into the local natural gas network. Another plant in Werlte (Germany) also uses electrical energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen,
2 followed by a further catalytic process step in which methane is formed from hydrogen and carbon dioxide and is in turn fed into the natural gas infrastructure.
Hydrogen at a concentration of 4 to 75 % forms a flammable mixture with air; an explosive mixture (oxyhydrogen) is only obtained with a hydrogen concentration of 18 % and more. Having the lowest atomic weight of all elements, hydrogen evaporates in an open environment before it can form an explosive mixture, or it already combusts at a concentration of 4 % in a hot environment (unless indicated otherwise, any percentage values given in the present description or the patent claims denote percent by volume when relating to mixtures of gases and percent by mass when relating to solids and liquids).
The most commonly known and frequently utilized storage form of hydrogen is the so-called pressure gas storage which is based on pressure vessels, such as gas cylinders. In this case, hydrogen is stored in suitable vessels at pressures of about 200 to 800 bar; pressure vessels with a storage pressure of up to 1,200 bar are also known. Owing to the required stability of the pressure vessels, the storage density is about 1 kg hydrogen in 70 to 80 kg vessel mass, which renders pressure gas storage highly uneconomical in terms of transport. For this reason, only about 1 % of the hydrogen produced worldwide is stored and transported in this manner.
In the natural gas industry, the storage of natural gas in underground storage facilities is state of the art. A distinction is made between natural storage formations, such as depleted oil and gas deposits and aquifers, and artificially created cavities, such as salt cavities and mining tunnels. The natural storage formations are also referred to as pore storage facilities as the gas is stored directly in the rock pores.
One indicator for the storage of gases from extraneous deposits is the storage of city gas. For example, the municipal utilities of Kiel, Germany, have operated since 1971 a gas cavity the size of 32,000 m3 for the storage of city gas having a hydrogen concentration of up to 50 %. The cavity is located at a depth of 1,330 m and the gas is stored at a pressure of 80 to 160 bar, with a total annual gas loss of only 1 to 3 % of the total storage volume. Contrary to common belief, city gas storage cannot be
Hydrogen at a concentration of 4 to 75 % forms a flammable mixture with air; an explosive mixture (oxyhydrogen) is only obtained with a hydrogen concentration of 18 % and more. Having the lowest atomic weight of all elements, hydrogen evaporates in an open environment before it can form an explosive mixture, or it already combusts at a concentration of 4 % in a hot environment (unless indicated otherwise, any percentage values given in the present description or the patent claims denote percent by volume when relating to mixtures of gases and percent by mass when relating to solids and liquids).
The most commonly known and frequently utilized storage form of hydrogen is the so-called pressure gas storage which is based on pressure vessels, such as gas cylinders. In this case, hydrogen is stored in suitable vessels at pressures of about 200 to 800 bar; pressure vessels with a storage pressure of up to 1,200 bar are also known. Owing to the required stability of the pressure vessels, the storage density is about 1 kg hydrogen in 70 to 80 kg vessel mass, which renders pressure gas storage highly uneconomical in terms of transport. For this reason, only about 1 % of the hydrogen produced worldwide is stored and transported in this manner.
In the natural gas industry, the storage of natural gas in underground storage facilities is state of the art. A distinction is made between natural storage formations, such as depleted oil and gas deposits and aquifers, and artificially created cavities, such as salt cavities and mining tunnels. The natural storage formations are also referred to as pore storage facilities as the gas is stored directly in the rock pores.
One indicator for the storage of gases from extraneous deposits is the storage of city gas. For example, the municipal utilities of Kiel, Germany, have operated since 1971 a gas cavity the size of 32,000 m3 for the storage of city gas having a hydrogen concentration of up to 50 %. The cavity is located at a depth of 1,330 m and the gas is stored at a pressure of 80 to 160 bar, with a total annual gas loss of only 1 to 3 % of the total storage volume. Contrary to common belief, city gas storage cannot be
3 directly compared to the storage of hydrogen or the generation of biogas because, in particular, the carbon monoxide contained in city gas is another highly reactive component which triggers further chemical processes. However, empirical values with respect to the industrial storage of hydrogen have already been obtained in Teeside (Great Britain) and Bakniev (Russia) and can be used as a comparative reference. Finally, the experience in the field of CO2-supported EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery) may also be utilized.
Accordingly, the behavior of hydrogen present underground or stored in the geological subsoil according to the state of the art can be predicted based on many years of practical experience.
The admixture of hydrogen to natural gas is subject to the Natural Gas Standards which at present provide a decentralized regulation to allow different hydrogen concentrations in different countries. In Austria, for example, the Ovow guideline G31 defines a maximum hydrogen concentration of 4 % in each part of a natural gas network. If the feed point is located in the vicinity of a natural gas fuel station, the hydrogen concentration is further limited to a maximum of only 2 %. In Germany, the DVGW Worksheet G
260 'Gasbeschaffenheit (gas quality) allows hydrogen admixtures in a one-digit percentage range, wherein the corresponding actual limit has to be determined for each case individually.
In the atmosphere, CO2 acts as a greenhouse gas and is considered to be the principal cause of global warming. The separation of CO2, for example from power plant exhaust gases, can be achieved using various methods, e. g. by CO2 washing of the exhaust gas after combustion or by separation of CO2 after coal gasification or combustion in an oxygen atmosphere. One of the suggested options for storing CO2 that is obtained, e. g., by washing out or separation consists in geological storage, for example in geological formations such as depleted deposits of fossil oil and natural gas and in deep saltwater-bearing aquifers.
The most favored option among researchers is the storage of CO2 in deep sediment layers whose pores are filled with saltwater. At a depth of about 800 m and more, pressures prevail at which the injected CO2 is compressed to such an extent that it remains in an over-critical state. In order to virtually exclude any resurfacing of the carbon dioxide, these layers must be covered by an impermeable top layer. The pressure prevailing in these depths
Accordingly, the behavior of hydrogen present underground or stored in the geological subsoil according to the state of the art can be predicted based on many years of practical experience.
The admixture of hydrogen to natural gas is subject to the Natural Gas Standards which at present provide a decentralized regulation to allow different hydrogen concentrations in different countries. In Austria, for example, the Ovow guideline G31 defines a maximum hydrogen concentration of 4 % in each part of a natural gas network. If the feed point is located in the vicinity of a natural gas fuel station, the hydrogen concentration is further limited to a maximum of only 2 %. In Germany, the DVGW Worksheet G
260 'Gasbeschaffenheit (gas quality) allows hydrogen admixtures in a one-digit percentage range, wherein the corresponding actual limit has to be determined for each case individually.
In the atmosphere, CO2 acts as a greenhouse gas and is considered to be the principal cause of global warming. The separation of CO2, for example from power plant exhaust gases, can be achieved using various methods, e. g. by CO2 washing of the exhaust gas after combustion or by separation of CO2 after coal gasification or combustion in an oxygen atmosphere. One of the suggested options for storing CO2 that is obtained, e. g., by washing out or separation consists in geological storage, for example in geological formations such as depleted deposits of fossil oil and natural gas and in deep saltwater-bearing aquifers.
The most favored option among researchers is the storage of CO2 in deep sediment layers whose pores are filled with saltwater. At a depth of about 800 m and more, pressures prevail at which the injected CO2 is compressed to such an extent that it remains in an over-critical state. In order to virtually exclude any resurfacing of the carbon dioxide, these layers must be covered by an impermeable top layer. The pressure prevailing in these depths
4 compresses the CO2 to a density approximately equal to that of saltwater and thus enables the compressed CO2 to displace the saltwater from and occupy the pores. In this process, the saltwater is displaced in the deposit laterally with respect to the injection site. The lateral expansion of the pressure anomaly can be a multiple of the distribution of the CO2 in an aquifer.
Deep injection of CO2 and displacement of saltwater performed at pressures significantly higher than the formation pressure and tensile stress of the rock may lead to the occurrence of induced earthquakes, which in some cases may even yield tremors exceeding the tactility threshold. The underground storage of CO2 is thus problematic and, in addition, the utilization of deep aquifers competes with other utilizations, for example with the utilization of these aquifers for sustainable geothermic power generation.
Moreover, the storage capacity of aquifers is limited.
Document EP 0 963 780 Al discloses a method in which hydrogen and CO2 are stored in a pore storage facility in the presence of methanogenic bacteria (correctly: microorganisms). It is thus already known from this document to separate CO? from combustion exhaust gases using known technical means and to subsequently store said CO2 underground. Hydrogen in pure form or, e. g., in the form of ammonia, methanogenic bacteria, bacterial substrates, catalysts and/or inhibitors can be added to the CO2 in order to reduce CO2 to CH4 during the underground storage period. In this process, the CO2 that has been separated from an exhaust gas using conventional means, purified, liquified and dried is rendered pumpable through a long-distance pipeline and injected into a neighboring aquifer, an artificially created underground cavity or a deposit of natural gas and fossil oil, respectively. The first two instances are preceded by an inoculation of the geological structure with corresponding bacterial cultures and the pertaining organic substrate, whereas methanogenic bacteria and organic substrates are, of course, already present in the third instance.
If this teaching is adhered to, carbonic acid will form in the deposit due to the dissolution of pressure-injected CO2 in water, which decreases the pH to about 4 at least in the vicinity of the pressure injection probe, which in turn renders the methanogenic microorganisms inactive. Besides, the low pH also has the effect of irreparably damaging carbonate rock present in the deposit. The carbonic acid formed simply dissolves carbonate rock, which could pose a risk with respect to the stability of the pore storage facility. Moreover, natural gas, hydrogen and CO2 are not blended, which represents another stress factor for the methanogenic microorganisms.
Document WO 2008/128331 Al discloses a method in which hydrogen and CO2 are converted to methane by methanogenic microorganisms in an underground deposit. CO2 and hydrogen are fed to the deposit.
Most commonly, the microbial formation of methane is performed with acetate (acetoclastic methanogenesis) or H2 and CO2 (hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis) as starting materials. Low-molecular organic compounds, such as methanol, methylamine and formate, are also known as further substrates. In the process of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, inorganic carbon is reduced with hydrogen, which is either formed by substrate oxidation or taken up from the environment.
Methanogenic microorganisms (formerly referred to as methane bacteria) are members of the Archaea domain. They have a capacity of forming methane and are capable of obtaining energy from this metabolic process. These microorganisms are divided into the classes Methanobacteria, Methanococci, Methanomicrobia and Methanopyri, which altogether comprise six orders. H2-oxidizing methanogens utilize exergonic methanogenesis, 1. e. the reduction of CO2 with molecular hydrogen to form methane and water, as an energy source. Among the ohligately H2-oxidizing methanogens are, e. g., the classes of methanococcus, Methanobacterium and Methanopyrus. These are strictly anaerobic microorganisms which are active at temperatures between 0 and 70 C. In general, the metabolic activity of methanogens increases with the temperature.
Some of these microorganisms can survive temperatures of more than 70 to 90 C, but the survival rate decreases with further increasing temperatures.
The present invention thus relates to a method of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, 1. e. the microbial formation of CH4 from CO2 and H2, characterized in that a gas mixture comprising natural gas, hydrogen and CO2 having a minimum natural gas concentration of 10 96 and preferably having a ratio of hydrogen and CO2 that is stoichiometric for the formation of CH4 is fed into an underground storage facility which comprises a gas zone and is stored there in the presence of methanogenic microorganisms. The production of hydrogen is preferably conducted using renewable energy, particularly preferably directly at the storage location by the electrolysis of, e. g., water, followed by mixing the hydrogen thus produced with the natural gas or already present mixtures of natural gas and hydrogen and feeding the resulting mixture into the storage facility through an injection bore. The CO2 is preferably obtained by one of the above-mentioned separation methods. The CO2 to be converted can also be admixed with the the natural gas before the addition of hydrogen. If the hydrogen is obtained by the electrolysis of water, the oxygen recovered as a waste product can also be utilized for the production of particularly pure CO2. The presence of methanogens can be ensured by injecting such microorganisms into the storage facility, either before or after filling said storage facility, or during the filling process by adding the methanogenic microorganisms to the gas mixture to be stored. Alternatively, the addition of methanogenic microorganisms may also be omitted if such organisms are already present in the storage facility in a sufficient amount. In the method according to the present invention it was surprisingly found that in the operation of an underground storage facility, in particular of an underground natural gas storage facility, it is possible to convert CO2 and 1-12 to CH4 simultaneously with the normal gas storage operation. The method according to the present invention has significant advantages over the prior art, which are obvious from the increased productivity of the methanogenic microorganisms with the given specific ratio of natural gas (of course, methane and/or methane-rich gas mixtures similar to natural gas can also be employed in the method according to the present invention instead of natural gas), hydrogen and CO2. Surprisingly, the relatively high concentration of natural gas in the feed gas does not cause end product inhibition with respect to methanogenesis; on the contrary, the presence of the specified minimum proportion of natural gas rather increases productivity. Preferably, the minimum natural gas proportion is at least 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % or 87.5 %. In case of a stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen and CO2 for the formation of CH4, the minimum proportion of natural gas can also be calculated based on values lying between the above-mentioned minimum proportions; correspondingly, the same applies to the amounts of hydrogen and CO2 specified in the following. The method according to the present invention allows the conversion of CO2 separated from waste gas to form natural gas with the aid of H2. In a particular embodiment, the present invention also allows the purification and CO2-depletion of a 002-contaminated natural gas directly at a deposit or storage site thereof. In such a case the ratio of hydrogen and CO2 in the gas mixture to be fed needs to be adapted such that the stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen and CO2 that is required for the formation of CH, is only achieved with the addition of the 002 which is already present in the deposit and contaminates the stored natural gas. The purified natural gas, i. e. CH4, can then be withdrawn from the storage facility on demand through a withdrawal bore.
According to a preferred embodiment, the present invention is characterized in that the residence time of the gas mixture in the underground storage facility is determined by the distance between injection and withdrawal bore such that natural gas having a content of less than 18 %, preferably less than 10 %, particularly preferably less than 5 %, of the injected CO2 is withdrawn at the withdrawal bore. It has surprisingly turned out - provided that the distance between injection and withdrawal bore is suitably selected depending on the geology of the underground storage facility - that already after a few duty cycles, i. e. cycles of conversion of CO2 and H2 to CH4 by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, the reaction rate of the conversion, even without the addition of a substrate, is already high enough to allow a continuous conversion of CO2 and H2 to CH4 by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, i. e. that the CO2 and H2 fed into the storage facility through the injection bore is already fully converted to CH4 upon reaching the withdrawal bore. As will be shown in the following Examples, the duty cycle period is shortened by a factor of three and more as soon as a sufficiently large population of methanogenic microorganisms has formed in the underground storage facility. In this context, it has also turned out that the hydrogen required for the formation of CH4 does not originate from the water contained in the pores but rather from the added gaseous H2, which contradicts the teaching of prior art document EP 0 963 780 Al.
In the fields of geology, hydrogeology and pedology, the porosity denotes the ratio of the total volume of all cavities of a porous soil or rock to the outer volume thereof. It is a measure of the space within a given volume that is filled by the rock based on its grain size or jointing, respectively of the cavities it leaved within said volume. The pores or capillaries are usually filled with air and/or water. The porosity (also referred to as pore space or pore volume) refers to the volume and is usually expressed as a percentage or fraction (fractions of 1 = 100 %) and designated with the Greek letter 0 in formulas.
With a proportion of pore water in the underground storage facility of preferably at least 15 % of the pore space, it has surprisingly turned out that the conversion of CO2 and H2 to CH4 by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis can be performed in a continuous operation of the storage facility. A continuous operation is defined such that the gas volume withdrawn from the storage facility corresponds to the gas volume fed to the storage facility. A specific spatial distance between injection and withdrawal bore is not required in this case.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the pH value in the gas zone of the storage facility is regulated by means of a controlled addition of hydrogen and/or CO2 and is kept within a range that is optimal with respect to the productivity of the methanogenic microorganisms. This range varies depending on the microorganism population present and is in general between pH 5 and pH 10, preferably between pH 6 and pH 9 and particularly preferably between pH 7 and pH 8. The pH value is adjusted as follows: if the pH value is too high, the supply of CO2 to the gas zone is increased, which causes a pH reduction, and if the pH value is too low, the supply of molecular hydrogen is increased, which causes a pH increase. Optionally, the supply of CO2 and/or hydrogen may be automated to maintain the pH value within a predetermined range based on the evaluation of data obtained by a pH probe that is located in the gas zone of the storage facility.
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the methanogenic microorganisms are provided by means of inoculating the storage facility with deposit water from other storage facilities that are already in operation. The deposit water from a second storage facility already in operation has proved to be advantageous due to the population of microorganisms suitable for methanation that has already formed in said deposit water. After the inoculation, this population also propagates more rapidly in the new storage facility than a new population would have been able to. During the growth period in the new storage facility the composition of the population will, if necessary, undergo changes and adapt to the prevailing conditions. In general, the bacteria populations of the storage facilities have basically identical compositions; however, the compositions may differ, in particular with respect to the Archaea that are capable of performing hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, but in most cases this difference will only relate to the percentages.
The microbial community in the reactors used in the evaluation of the method according to the present invention may be considered as an example of a population present in a storage facility. In a total of eight reactors used, the microbial consortium contained identical genera in all reactors.
In H2-exposed reservoirs there are bacteria and archaea that are responsible for microbial processes such as methanogenesis, homoacetogenesis as well as sulfate and iron reduction.
Methanobacteriaceae are the only family hitherto known to be capable of generating methane from carbon dioxide or monoxide and hydrogen. Moreover, the individual species are capable of adapting to a wide range of environmental conditions, such as pH value, temperature and nutrient availability. In the microbial community present in the reactors, a low proportion (0.3 to 1.2 %) of the genus Methanobacterium was found, which is known to have an obligately anaerobic and chemolithotrophic metabolism.
Also of significance is the Thermotogaceae family, which is known for its ability to degrade oil. In the microbial community present in the reactors used, this family is represented by the genera Kosmotoga (detected in percentages of 1.7 to 6.4 %) and Petrotoga (detected in percentages of 2.4 to 6.9 %). Both genera are typical for anaerobic oil reservoirs and occur within a wide range of temperatures from mesophilic (20 to 45 C) to thermophilic (45 to 80 C). They have been described as fermentative bacteria which are also capable of reducing elemental sulfur to H2S.
Furthermore, a synergistic interaction between methanogenic bacteria and hydrogenic bacteria is known.
Another important family, the Peptococcaceae family (detected in percentages of 12.7 to 17.1 %) is present in the microbial community in the reactors and is represented, e. g., by the following genera: Desulfotomaculum (about 1.2 %), Desulfurispora (about 0.6 %), Dehalobacter (about 0.3 %), Desulfitibacter (about 1.7 %) and further Peptococcaceae which are still uncultivated (14.03 to 7.92 %) at present. The genus Desulfotomaculum represents mesophilic, obligately anaerobic bacteria that have a capacity for the sulfate reaction and the formation of H2S. They are predominantly found in microbial biofilms, in which they often form synergistic consortia with fermentative bacteria.
The Clostridiaceae family, which has also been detected (in percentages of 1.10 to 1.96 %) in the microbial community present in the reactors used, is capable of reducing amorphous iron(III) oxide by means of peptide fermentation. This family is represented by the genera Natronincola and Proteiniclasticum. Further bacteria that have a capacity to reduce iron and may thus be present in the microbial community of a storage facility when performing the method according to the present invention are Shewanella, Desulfovibrio and Desulfuromonas. These bacteria, however, have an additional capacity for the reduction of manganese.
The family of Thermoanaerobacteraceae (detected in percentages of up to 5 %), represented by Gelria (about 1.40 %), Moorella (about 2.35 %) and Syntrophaceticus (about 1.15 %), is typically found in 002-reducing anaerobic conditions. Several species of the genus Moorella are known that are capable of producing hydrogen and directly transferring it to methanogens.
Pseudomonas (detected in percentages of 14.26 to 30.71 %) are members of a group of bacteria which are most versatile with respect to metabolism and habitat. Pseudomonas stutzeri, for example, is capable of reducing nitrate to nitrite and further forming molecular nitrogen from said nitrite under anaerobic conditions.
As already mentioned, the legal regulations in Austria limit the maximum hydrogen concentration in natural gas to 4 %, while Germany, for example, allows 5 %. Thus, the hydrogen concentration provided according to the present invention in the gas mixture to II
be injected into the storage facility depends on the legal regulations in the respective countries and may be lower than 70 %, 40 %, 30 %, preferably lower than 25 %, 24 %, 23 %, 22 %, 21 %, 20 %, 19 %, 18 %, 17 %, 16 %, 15 %, 14 %, 13 %, 12 %, 11 %, %, 9 %, 8 %, 7 %, 6 %, 5 %, 4 %, 3 % or lower than 2 %. Such a gas mixture (containing, e. g., in Austria less than 4 % hydrogen in the natural gas) may be transported via the existing infrastructure of the gas network and then be depleted of hydrogen during a comparatively short storage period, wherein simultaneously CO2, which is present, e. g., in the form of a separated fraction of a waste gas, is advantageously converted to methane. In connection with the storage facilities used, the method according to the present invention can also provide a homogenization of fluctuating renewable energy by infiltrating the hydrogen produced using renewable energy into the natural gas network and then methanating said hydrogen on demand while simultaneously utilizing excess CO2 in the storage facility.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is envisaged that the concentration of CO2 in the gas mixture to be stored is less than 20 %, preferably less than 19 %, 18 %, 17 %, 16 %, 15 %, 14 %, 13 %, 12 %, 11 %, 10 %, 9 %, 8 %, 7 %, 6 %, 5 %, 4 %, 3 %, 2 %, 1 % or less than 0.5 %. The CO2 concentration can be provided by feeding CO2 into a mixture of natural gas and hydrogen which is already present in a storage facility. Alternatively, a desired CO2 content can be adjusted during the storage process using the method according to the present invention, wherein defined amounts of hydrogen produced using renewable energy are added to a stored natural gas having a known concentration of CO2 according to the chemical equation:
CO2 +4 H2 ¨4 CH4 +2 H20 In the method according to the present invention, hydrogen can preferably be transported in an already existing natural gas network in the form of an admixture with natural gas according to the legal regulations, and the resulting mixture of natural gas, hydrogen and CO2 is preferably stored in underground pore storage facilities. Subsequently to withdrawing the stored gas mixture from the deposit and prior to feeding it into the natural gas network, the gas mixture may optionally be subjected to a membrane separation process, whereby the gas mixture is separated into natural gas having a hydrogen content according to the legal regulations for feeding into the natural gas network or, if desired, into one portion of pure natural gas and another portion of a gas mixture to be fed back into the storage facility.
In the method according to the present invention, the methanogenic microorganisms may preferably be selected from the classes of Methanobacteria, Methanococci, Methanomicrobia and Methanopyri as well as mixtures thereof. The selection of suitable methanogenic microorganisms is well within the knowledge of a person skilled in the art and not least also depends on the microorganisms already present in the storage facility, the environmental conditions prevailing in the storage facility, the water content of the storage facility and the gas mixture to be stored. As already mentioned, methanogenic microorganisms may optionally also be provided from other storage facilities that are already in operation by transferring the bacteria to the new storage facility, either before or after filling the new storage facility, or by introducing the microorganisms during the filling process of the new storage facility by adding the methanogenic microorganisms to the gas mixture to be stored.
Particularly preferably, the storage facility used in the method according to the present invention is an underground pore storage facility. Storage in aquifers is also conceivable, but is associated with increased technical and microbiological effort. On the one hand, an aquifer storage facility must be operated at high pressures and on the other hand an aquifer does not contain the same microbes as a formation that is saturated with hydrocarbons.
The use of artificially created cavities (caverns and mining tunnels) is also possible, at least in theory, although such cavities only provide a surface area for biofilm formation that is much smaller than that of a pore storage facility.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, the gas mixture used in the method is an L-gas. An L-gas (low (calorific) gas) is a natural gas with a methane content of 80 to 87 96 by volume which, in addition to methane, contains larger amounts of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. By means of the method according to the present invention, such an L-gas can rapidly and easily be converted to H-gas (high (calorific) gas) having a methane content of up to 99 % by volume. In case of utilizing an already existing storage facility for L-gas, the method according to the present invention may comprise the introduction of hydrogen produced using renewable energy, optionally in admixture with methanogenic microorganisms, as mentioned above, into the already existing deposit, followed by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of present CO2 using up the hydrogen added, which occurs in the storage facility and results in the formation of a natural gas which has a high methane content and, if desired, is entirely depleted of CO2 and hydrogen.
Likewise, it is envisaged that the method according to the present invention may be used for regulating the CO2 and/or hydrogen content of a natural gas. To this end, it is either possible to reduce a given amount of CO2 added to a desired amount using methanogenic microorganisms with the addition of an optionally stoichiometrically calculated amount of hydrogen during the storage period, or the total amount of CO2 in the stored gas mixture may be removed by adding an excess of hydrogen, wherein the gas mixture remaining in the deposit may optionally be depleted from the remaining excess hydrogen by means of membrane separation upon withdrawal.
As a so-called accompanying gas, which may also be loaded with 002, is also co-extracted from fossil oil deposits, a preferred embodiment of the present invention provides the introduction of hydrogen for reducing CO2 according to the present invention in fossil oil deposits. To this end, the method according to the present invention is used to reduce the CO2 content in the gas zone of a naturally occurring fossil oil or natural gas deposit, either before or after the extraction. Hydrofracking of higher hydrocarbons as well as EOR are also conceivable as positive side effects due to pressure maintenance.
It is noted in this context that for the purposes of the present invention both the above-mentioned accompanying gas of fossil oil deposits and any other 002-containing gases occurring in connection with the presence or the underground deposition and/or storage of fossil oil or natural gas are considered as being encompassed by the term 'natural gas' as used in the present description.
In particular in the new implementation of the method according to the present invention in an already existing conventional natural gas storage facility it must be expected, at least during the initialization phase and/or the first duty cycles, that the residence time below ground may not be sufficient for a complete conversion of hydrogen and CO2 to form CH4.
Accordingly, the method according to the present invention may provide the installation of a separator (membrane or ceramic) at the gas outlet of the withdrawal bore for processing the gas withdrawn from the storage facility according to the standardized specifications. Subsequently, the resulting separated, non-converted CO2/H2 gas mixture may be re-injected into the underground storage facility and thus be recycled into the conversion process.
The present invention will now be explained in more detail in the following Examples, without being limited thereto.
Into a total of eight bioreactors, each of which contained a microbial community according to the preceding description, a mixture of CO2 and H2 was injected in order to recover CH4 by means of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. The injected gas mixture contained 10 % of H2, 2.5 % of CO2 and 87.5 % of CH4; the gas conversion was detected using gas chromatography. The results obtained are depicted in Figure 1.
In the experiments it was unambiguously established that the conversion time of the components CO2 and H2 is reduced with an increasing number of duty cycles (filling cycles), i. e. from 29 days in the initialization phase to 12 days in =the second duty cycle. It was found that this was based on the fact that the microorganisms present in the reactor require a certain initialization time in order to adapt to the injected gas mixture.
During this initialization period, microbial processes are established that occur within a community of microorganisms and are required for processing newly introduced substrates. In addition, there is an increase in microbial growth, i. e. in the number of substrate-processing microorganisms, which then in turn convert the injected gas mixture, which results in a substantial acceleration of the process.
A further reduction of duty cycles is certainly to be expected in continuous operation. With respect to the initialization phase, a solution in terms of operational management is conceivable. For instance, the residence time of the gas mixture in the underground storage facility may be increased as is required for its complete conversion; alternatively, a circulating operation may be provided, in which excess CO2/H2 is separated from the withdrawn gas using membranes. At the present stage, the ideal system is expected to establish itself after 3 to 4 duty cycles.
In the experiments according to Figures 2 and 3, the above-mentioned eight bioreactors were used, each containing a microbial community according to the above description. According to Figure 2, a gas mixture of 20 % of H2, 5 % of CO2 and 75 % of CH4 was used; according to Figure 3, a mixture of 40 % of H2, 10 % of CO2 and 50 % of CH4 was used. Surprisingly, a higher hydrogen content in the stored gas has a negative effect on the conversion rate as calculated from the linear region of the hydrogen partial pressure progression after the onset of the experiment (Figure 4). The conversion rate with an initial content of 10 % of H2 (2.5 % of CO2, 87.5 % of CH4) is 0.54 bar/d, with 20 % of H2 (5 96 of CO2, 75 %
of CH4) it is 0.44 bar/d and with 40 % of H2 (10 % of 002, 50 % of CH4) it is 0.34 bar/d. In the absence of methane (80 % of H2, 20 %
of COA no hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis could be observed at all, which led to the surprising conclusion that the presence of methane in the initial gas mixture is mandatory in the method according to the present invention.
Deep injection of CO2 and displacement of saltwater performed at pressures significantly higher than the formation pressure and tensile stress of the rock may lead to the occurrence of induced earthquakes, which in some cases may even yield tremors exceeding the tactility threshold. The underground storage of CO2 is thus problematic and, in addition, the utilization of deep aquifers competes with other utilizations, for example with the utilization of these aquifers for sustainable geothermic power generation.
Moreover, the storage capacity of aquifers is limited.
Document EP 0 963 780 Al discloses a method in which hydrogen and CO2 are stored in a pore storage facility in the presence of methanogenic bacteria (correctly: microorganisms). It is thus already known from this document to separate CO? from combustion exhaust gases using known technical means and to subsequently store said CO2 underground. Hydrogen in pure form or, e. g., in the form of ammonia, methanogenic bacteria, bacterial substrates, catalysts and/or inhibitors can be added to the CO2 in order to reduce CO2 to CH4 during the underground storage period. In this process, the CO2 that has been separated from an exhaust gas using conventional means, purified, liquified and dried is rendered pumpable through a long-distance pipeline and injected into a neighboring aquifer, an artificially created underground cavity or a deposit of natural gas and fossil oil, respectively. The first two instances are preceded by an inoculation of the geological structure with corresponding bacterial cultures and the pertaining organic substrate, whereas methanogenic bacteria and organic substrates are, of course, already present in the third instance.
If this teaching is adhered to, carbonic acid will form in the deposit due to the dissolution of pressure-injected CO2 in water, which decreases the pH to about 4 at least in the vicinity of the pressure injection probe, which in turn renders the methanogenic microorganisms inactive. Besides, the low pH also has the effect of irreparably damaging carbonate rock present in the deposit. The carbonic acid formed simply dissolves carbonate rock, which could pose a risk with respect to the stability of the pore storage facility. Moreover, natural gas, hydrogen and CO2 are not blended, which represents another stress factor for the methanogenic microorganisms.
Document WO 2008/128331 Al discloses a method in which hydrogen and CO2 are converted to methane by methanogenic microorganisms in an underground deposit. CO2 and hydrogen are fed to the deposit.
Most commonly, the microbial formation of methane is performed with acetate (acetoclastic methanogenesis) or H2 and CO2 (hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis) as starting materials. Low-molecular organic compounds, such as methanol, methylamine and formate, are also known as further substrates. In the process of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, inorganic carbon is reduced with hydrogen, which is either formed by substrate oxidation or taken up from the environment.
Methanogenic microorganisms (formerly referred to as methane bacteria) are members of the Archaea domain. They have a capacity of forming methane and are capable of obtaining energy from this metabolic process. These microorganisms are divided into the classes Methanobacteria, Methanococci, Methanomicrobia and Methanopyri, which altogether comprise six orders. H2-oxidizing methanogens utilize exergonic methanogenesis, 1. e. the reduction of CO2 with molecular hydrogen to form methane and water, as an energy source. Among the ohligately H2-oxidizing methanogens are, e. g., the classes of methanococcus, Methanobacterium and Methanopyrus. These are strictly anaerobic microorganisms which are active at temperatures between 0 and 70 C. In general, the metabolic activity of methanogens increases with the temperature.
Some of these microorganisms can survive temperatures of more than 70 to 90 C, but the survival rate decreases with further increasing temperatures.
The present invention thus relates to a method of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, 1. e. the microbial formation of CH4 from CO2 and H2, characterized in that a gas mixture comprising natural gas, hydrogen and CO2 having a minimum natural gas concentration of 10 96 and preferably having a ratio of hydrogen and CO2 that is stoichiometric for the formation of CH4 is fed into an underground storage facility which comprises a gas zone and is stored there in the presence of methanogenic microorganisms. The production of hydrogen is preferably conducted using renewable energy, particularly preferably directly at the storage location by the electrolysis of, e. g., water, followed by mixing the hydrogen thus produced with the natural gas or already present mixtures of natural gas and hydrogen and feeding the resulting mixture into the storage facility through an injection bore. The CO2 is preferably obtained by one of the above-mentioned separation methods. The CO2 to be converted can also be admixed with the the natural gas before the addition of hydrogen. If the hydrogen is obtained by the electrolysis of water, the oxygen recovered as a waste product can also be utilized for the production of particularly pure CO2. The presence of methanogens can be ensured by injecting such microorganisms into the storage facility, either before or after filling said storage facility, or during the filling process by adding the methanogenic microorganisms to the gas mixture to be stored. Alternatively, the addition of methanogenic microorganisms may also be omitted if such organisms are already present in the storage facility in a sufficient amount. In the method according to the present invention it was surprisingly found that in the operation of an underground storage facility, in particular of an underground natural gas storage facility, it is possible to convert CO2 and 1-12 to CH4 simultaneously with the normal gas storage operation. The method according to the present invention has significant advantages over the prior art, which are obvious from the increased productivity of the methanogenic microorganisms with the given specific ratio of natural gas (of course, methane and/or methane-rich gas mixtures similar to natural gas can also be employed in the method according to the present invention instead of natural gas), hydrogen and CO2. Surprisingly, the relatively high concentration of natural gas in the feed gas does not cause end product inhibition with respect to methanogenesis; on the contrary, the presence of the specified minimum proportion of natural gas rather increases productivity. Preferably, the minimum natural gas proportion is at least 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % or 87.5 %. In case of a stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen and CO2 for the formation of CH4, the minimum proportion of natural gas can also be calculated based on values lying between the above-mentioned minimum proportions; correspondingly, the same applies to the amounts of hydrogen and CO2 specified in the following. The method according to the present invention allows the conversion of CO2 separated from waste gas to form natural gas with the aid of H2. In a particular embodiment, the present invention also allows the purification and CO2-depletion of a 002-contaminated natural gas directly at a deposit or storage site thereof. In such a case the ratio of hydrogen and CO2 in the gas mixture to be fed needs to be adapted such that the stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen and CO2 that is required for the formation of CH, is only achieved with the addition of the 002 which is already present in the deposit and contaminates the stored natural gas. The purified natural gas, i. e. CH4, can then be withdrawn from the storage facility on demand through a withdrawal bore.
According to a preferred embodiment, the present invention is characterized in that the residence time of the gas mixture in the underground storage facility is determined by the distance between injection and withdrawal bore such that natural gas having a content of less than 18 %, preferably less than 10 %, particularly preferably less than 5 %, of the injected CO2 is withdrawn at the withdrawal bore. It has surprisingly turned out - provided that the distance between injection and withdrawal bore is suitably selected depending on the geology of the underground storage facility - that already after a few duty cycles, i. e. cycles of conversion of CO2 and H2 to CH4 by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, the reaction rate of the conversion, even without the addition of a substrate, is already high enough to allow a continuous conversion of CO2 and H2 to CH4 by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, i. e. that the CO2 and H2 fed into the storage facility through the injection bore is already fully converted to CH4 upon reaching the withdrawal bore. As will be shown in the following Examples, the duty cycle period is shortened by a factor of three and more as soon as a sufficiently large population of methanogenic microorganisms has formed in the underground storage facility. In this context, it has also turned out that the hydrogen required for the formation of CH4 does not originate from the water contained in the pores but rather from the added gaseous H2, which contradicts the teaching of prior art document EP 0 963 780 Al.
In the fields of geology, hydrogeology and pedology, the porosity denotes the ratio of the total volume of all cavities of a porous soil or rock to the outer volume thereof. It is a measure of the space within a given volume that is filled by the rock based on its grain size or jointing, respectively of the cavities it leaved within said volume. The pores or capillaries are usually filled with air and/or water. The porosity (also referred to as pore space or pore volume) refers to the volume and is usually expressed as a percentage or fraction (fractions of 1 = 100 %) and designated with the Greek letter 0 in formulas.
With a proportion of pore water in the underground storage facility of preferably at least 15 % of the pore space, it has surprisingly turned out that the conversion of CO2 and H2 to CH4 by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis can be performed in a continuous operation of the storage facility. A continuous operation is defined such that the gas volume withdrawn from the storage facility corresponds to the gas volume fed to the storage facility. A specific spatial distance between injection and withdrawal bore is not required in this case.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the pH value in the gas zone of the storage facility is regulated by means of a controlled addition of hydrogen and/or CO2 and is kept within a range that is optimal with respect to the productivity of the methanogenic microorganisms. This range varies depending on the microorganism population present and is in general between pH 5 and pH 10, preferably between pH 6 and pH 9 and particularly preferably between pH 7 and pH 8. The pH value is adjusted as follows: if the pH value is too high, the supply of CO2 to the gas zone is increased, which causes a pH reduction, and if the pH value is too low, the supply of molecular hydrogen is increased, which causes a pH increase. Optionally, the supply of CO2 and/or hydrogen may be automated to maintain the pH value within a predetermined range based on the evaluation of data obtained by a pH probe that is located in the gas zone of the storage facility.
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the methanogenic microorganisms are provided by means of inoculating the storage facility with deposit water from other storage facilities that are already in operation. The deposit water from a second storage facility already in operation has proved to be advantageous due to the population of microorganisms suitable for methanation that has already formed in said deposit water. After the inoculation, this population also propagates more rapidly in the new storage facility than a new population would have been able to. During the growth period in the new storage facility the composition of the population will, if necessary, undergo changes and adapt to the prevailing conditions. In general, the bacteria populations of the storage facilities have basically identical compositions; however, the compositions may differ, in particular with respect to the Archaea that are capable of performing hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, but in most cases this difference will only relate to the percentages.
The microbial community in the reactors used in the evaluation of the method according to the present invention may be considered as an example of a population present in a storage facility. In a total of eight reactors used, the microbial consortium contained identical genera in all reactors.
In H2-exposed reservoirs there are bacteria and archaea that are responsible for microbial processes such as methanogenesis, homoacetogenesis as well as sulfate and iron reduction.
Methanobacteriaceae are the only family hitherto known to be capable of generating methane from carbon dioxide or monoxide and hydrogen. Moreover, the individual species are capable of adapting to a wide range of environmental conditions, such as pH value, temperature and nutrient availability. In the microbial community present in the reactors, a low proportion (0.3 to 1.2 %) of the genus Methanobacterium was found, which is known to have an obligately anaerobic and chemolithotrophic metabolism.
Also of significance is the Thermotogaceae family, which is known for its ability to degrade oil. In the microbial community present in the reactors used, this family is represented by the genera Kosmotoga (detected in percentages of 1.7 to 6.4 %) and Petrotoga (detected in percentages of 2.4 to 6.9 %). Both genera are typical for anaerobic oil reservoirs and occur within a wide range of temperatures from mesophilic (20 to 45 C) to thermophilic (45 to 80 C). They have been described as fermentative bacteria which are also capable of reducing elemental sulfur to H2S.
Furthermore, a synergistic interaction between methanogenic bacteria and hydrogenic bacteria is known.
Another important family, the Peptococcaceae family (detected in percentages of 12.7 to 17.1 %) is present in the microbial community in the reactors and is represented, e. g., by the following genera: Desulfotomaculum (about 1.2 %), Desulfurispora (about 0.6 %), Dehalobacter (about 0.3 %), Desulfitibacter (about 1.7 %) and further Peptococcaceae which are still uncultivated (14.03 to 7.92 %) at present. The genus Desulfotomaculum represents mesophilic, obligately anaerobic bacteria that have a capacity for the sulfate reaction and the formation of H2S. They are predominantly found in microbial biofilms, in which they often form synergistic consortia with fermentative bacteria.
The Clostridiaceae family, which has also been detected (in percentages of 1.10 to 1.96 %) in the microbial community present in the reactors used, is capable of reducing amorphous iron(III) oxide by means of peptide fermentation. This family is represented by the genera Natronincola and Proteiniclasticum. Further bacteria that have a capacity to reduce iron and may thus be present in the microbial community of a storage facility when performing the method according to the present invention are Shewanella, Desulfovibrio and Desulfuromonas. These bacteria, however, have an additional capacity for the reduction of manganese.
The family of Thermoanaerobacteraceae (detected in percentages of up to 5 %), represented by Gelria (about 1.40 %), Moorella (about 2.35 %) and Syntrophaceticus (about 1.15 %), is typically found in 002-reducing anaerobic conditions. Several species of the genus Moorella are known that are capable of producing hydrogen and directly transferring it to methanogens.
Pseudomonas (detected in percentages of 14.26 to 30.71 %) are members of a group of bacteria which are most versatile with respect to metabolism and habitat. Pseudomonas stutzeri, for example, is capable of reducing nitrate to nitrite and further forming molecular nitrogen from said nitrite under anaerobic conditions.
As already mentioned, the legal regulations in Austria limit the maximum hydrogen concentration in natural gas to 4 %, while Germany, for example, allows 5 %. Thus, the hydrogen concentration provided according to the present invention in the gas mixture to II
be injected into the storage facility depends on the legal regulations in the respective countries and may be lower than 70 %, 40 %, 30 %, preferably lower than 25 %, 24 %, 23 %, 22 %, 21 %, 20 %, 19 %, 18 %, 17 %, 16 %, 15 %, 14 %, 13 %, 12 %, 11 %, %, 9 %, 8 %, 7 %, 6 %, 5 %, 4 %, 3 % or lower than 2 %. Such a gas mixture (containing, e. g., in Austria less than 4 % hydrogen in the natural gas) may be transported via the existing infrastructure of the gas network and then be depleted of hydrogen during a comparatively short storage period, wherein simultaneously CO2, which is present, e. g., in the form of a separated fraction of a waste gas, is advantageously converted to methane. In connection with the storage facilities used, the method according to the present invention can also provide a homogenization of fluctuating renewable energy by infiltrating the hydrogen produced using renewable energy into the natural gas network and then methanating said hydrogen on demand while simultaneously utilizing excess CO2 in the storage facility.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is envisaged that the concentration of CO2 in the gas mixture to be stored is less than 20 %, preferably less than 19 %, 18 %, 17 %, 16 %, 15 %, 14 %, 13 %, 12 %, 11 %, 10 %, 9 %, 8 %, 7 %, 6 %, 5 %, 4 %, 3 %, 2 %, 1 % or less than 0.5 %. The CO2 concentration can be provided by feeding CO2 into a mixture of natural gas and hydrogen which is already present in a storage facility. Alternatively, a desired CO2 content can be adjusted during the storage process using the method according to the present invention, wherein defined amounts of hydrogen produced using renewable energy are added to a stored natural gas having a known concentration of CO2 according to the chemical equation:
CO2 +4 H2 ¨4 CH4 +2 H20 In the method according to the present invention, hydrogen can preferably be transported in an already existing natural gas network in the form of an admixture with natural gas according to the legal regulations, and the resulting mixture of natural gas, hydrogen and CO2 is preferably stored in underground pore storage facilities. Subsequently to withdrawing the stored gas mixture from the deposit and prior to feeding it into the natural gas network, the gas mixture may optionally be subjected to a membrane separation process, whereby the gas mixture is separated into natural gas having a hydrogen content according to the legal regulations for feeding into the natural gas network or, if desired, into one portion of pure natural gas and another portion of a gas mixture to be fed back into the storage facility.
In the method according to the present invention, the methanogenic microorganisms may preferably be selected from the classes of Methanobacteria, Methanococci, Methanomicrobia and Methanopyri as well as mixtures thereof. The selection of suitable methanogenic microorganisms is well within the knowledge of a person skilled in the art and not least also depends on the microorganisms already present in the storage facility, the environmental conditions prevailing in the storage facility, the water content of the storage facility and the gas mixture to be stored. As already mentioned, methanogenic microorganisms may optionally also be provided from other storage facilities that are already in operation by transferring the bacteria to the new storage facility, either before or after filling the new storage facility, or by introducing the microorganisms during the filling process of the new storage facility by adding the methanogenic microorganisms to the gas mixture to be stored.
Particularly preferably, the storage facility used in the method according to the present invention is an underground pore storage facility. Storage in aquifers is also conceivable, but is associated with increased technical and microbiological effort. On the one hand, an aquifer storage facility must be operated at high pressures and on the other hand an aquifer does not contain the same microbes as a formation that is saturated with hydrocarbons.
The use of artificially created cavities (caverns and mining tunnels) is also possible, at least in theory, although such cavities only provide a surface area for biofilm formation that is much smaller than that of a pore storage facility.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, the gas mixture used in the method is an L-gas. An L-gas (low (calorific) gas) is a natural gas with a methane content of 80 to 87 96 by volume which, in addition to methane, contains larger amounts of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. By means of the method according to the present invention, such an L-gas can rapidly and easily be converted to H-gas (high (calorific) gas) having a methane content of up to 99 % by volume. In case of utilizing an already existing storage facility for L-gas, the method according to the present invention may comprise the introduction of hydrogen produced using renewable energy, optionally in admixture with methanogenic microorganisms, as mentioned above, into the already existing deposit, followed by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of present CO2 using up the hydrogen added, which occurs in the storage facility and results in the formation of a natural gas which has a high methane content and, if desired, is entirely depleted of CO2 and hydrogen.
Likewise, it is envisaged that the method according to the present invention may be used for regulating the CO2 and/or hydrogen content of a natural gas. To this end, it is either possible to reduce a given amount of CO2 added to a desired amount using methanogenic microorganisms with the addition of an optionally stoichiometrically calculated amount of hydrogen during the storage period, or the total amount of CO2 in the stored gas mixture may be removed by adding an excess of hydrogen, wherein the gas mixture remaining in the deposit may optionally be depleted from the remaining excess hydrogen by means of membrane separation upon withdrawal.
As a so-called accompanying gas, which may also be loaded with 002, is also co-extracted from fossil oil deposits, a preferred embodiment of the present invention provides the introduction of hydrogen for reducing CO2 according to the present invention in fossil oil deposits. To this end, the method according to the present invention is used to reduce the CO2 content in the gas zone of a naturally occurring fossil oil or natural gas deposit, either before or after the extraction. Hydrofracking of higher hydrocarbons as well as EOR are also conceivable as positive side effects due to pressure maintenance.
It is noted in this context that for the purposes of the present invention both the above-mentioned accompanying gas of fossil oil deposits and any other 002-containing gases occurring in connection with the presence or the underground deposition and/or storage of fossil oil or natural gas are considered as being encompassed by the term 'natural gas' as used in the present description.
In particular in the new implementation of the method according to the present invention in an already existing conventional natural gas storage facility it must be expected, at least during the initialization phase and/or the first duty cycles, that the residence time below ground may not be sufficient for a complete conversion of hydrogen and CO2 to form CH4.
Accordingly, the method according to the present invention may provide the installation of a separator (membrane or ceramic) at the gas outlet of the withdrawal bore for processing the gas withdrawn from the storage facility according to the standardized specifications. Subsequently, the resulting separated, non-converted CO2/H2 gas mixture may be re-injected into the underground storage facility and thus be recycled into the conversion process.
The present invention will now be explained in more detail in the following Examples, without being limited thereto.
Into a total of eight bioreactors, each of which contained a microbial community according to the preceding description, a mixture of CO2 and H2 was injected in order to recover CH4 by means of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. The injected gas mixture contained 10 % of H2, 2.5 % of CO2 and 87.5 % of CH4; the gas conversion was detected using gas chromatography. The results obtained are depicted in Figure 1.
In the experiments it was unambiguously established that the conversion time of the components CO2 and H2 is reduced with an increasing number of duty cycles (filling cycles), i. e. from 29 days in the initialization phase to 12 days in =the second duty cycle. It was found that this was based on the fact that the microorganisms present in the reactor require a certain initialization time in order to adapt to the injected gas mixture.
During this initialization period, microbial processes are established that occur within a community of microorganisms and are required for processing newly introduced substrates. In addition, there is an increase in microbial growth, i. e. in the number of substrate-processing microorganisms, which then in turn convert the injected gas mixture, which results in a substantial acceleration of the process.
A further reduction of duty cycles is certainly to be expected in continuous operation. With respect to the initialization phase, a solution in terms of operational management is conceivable. For instance, the residence time of the gas mixture in the underground storage facility may be increased as is required for its complete conversion; alternatively, a circulating operation may be provided, in which excess CO2/H2 is separated from the withdrawn gas using membranes. At the present stage, the ideal system is expected to establish itself after 3 to 4 duty cycles.
In the experiments according to Figures 2 and 3, the above-mentioned eight bioreactors were used, each containing a microbial community according to the above description. According to Figure 2, a gas mixture of 20 % of H2, 5 % of CO2 and 75 % of CH4 was used; according to Figure 3, a mixture of 40 % of H2, 10 % of CO2 and 50 % of CH4 was used. Surprisingly, a higher hydrogen content in the stored gas has a negative effect on the conversion rate as calculated from the linear region of the hydrogen partial pressure progression after the onset of the experiment (Figure 4). The conversion rate with an initial content of 10 % of H2 (2.5 % of CO2, 87.5 % of CH4) is 0.54 bar/d, with 20 % of H2 (5 96 of CO2, 75 %
of CH4) it is 0.44 bar/d and with 40 % of H2 (10 % of 002, 50 % of CH4) it is 0.34 bar/d. In the absence of methane (80 % of H2, 20 %
of COA no hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis could be observed at all, which led to the surprising conclusion that the presence of methane in the initial gas mixture is mandatory in the method according to the present invention.
Claims (17)
1. Method for the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of H2 and CO2 to form CH4, characterized in that a gas mixture comprising natural gas, hydrogen and CO2 having a minimum natural gas concentration of 10 % is fed into an underground storage facility which comprises a gas zone and is stored there in the presence of methanogenic microorganisms.
2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the gas mixture comprises a ratio of hydrogen and CO2 that is stoichiometric for the formation of CH4.
3. Method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the residence time of the gas mixture in the underground storage facility is determined by the distance between injection and withdrawal bore such that natural gas having a content of less than 18% of the injected CO2 is withdrawn at the withdrawal bore.
4. Method according to claim 3, characterized in that natural gas having a content of less than 10% of the injected CO2 is withdrawn at the withdrawal bore.
5. Method according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that natural gas having a content of less than 5% of the injected CO2 is withdrawn at the withdrawal bore.
6. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the underground storage facility has a water content of at least 15% of the pore space of the reservoir rock and the conversion occurs during the continuous operation of the storage facility.
7. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the pH value in the gas zone of the storage facility is regulated by means of a controlled addition of hydrogen and/or CO2 and is kept within a range that is optimal with respect to the productivity of the methanogenic microorganisms.
8. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the methanogenic microorganisms are provided by means of inoculating the storage facility with deposit water from other storage facilities that are already in operation.
9. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the hydrogen concentration in the gas mixture to be stored is lower than 72%.
10. Method according to claim 9, characterized in that the hydrogen concentration in the gas mixture to be stored is lower than 40%.
11. Method according to claim 9 or 10, characterized in that the hydrogen concentration in the gas mixture to be stored is lower than 30%, 20%, 13%, 12%, 11%, 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3 % or 2%.
12. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 11, characterized in that the concentration in the gas mixture to be stored is lower than 18%.
13. Method according to claim 12, characterized in that the CO2 concentration in the gas mixture to be stored is lower than 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1% or 0.5%.
14. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, characterized in that bacteria selected from the classes of Methanobacteria, Methanococci, Methanomicrobia, Methanopyri and mixtures thereof are used.
15. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 14, characterized in that the underground storage facility is a pore storage facility.
16. Use of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 15 for reducing the CO2 content in the gas zone of a naturally occurring fossil oil or natural gas deposit, either before or after the extraction of fossil oil from the deposit.
17. Use of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 15 for regulating the CO2 and/or hydrogen content in a natural gas.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP15161055 | 2015-03-26 | ||
EP15161055.7 | 2015-03-26 | ||
PCT/EP2016/056521 WO2016151078A1 (en) | 2015-03-26 | 2016-03-24 | Method for the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of h2 and co2 into ch4 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2979954A1 CA2979954A1 (en) | 2016-09-29 |
CA2979954C true CA2979954C (en) | 2019-12-31 |
Family
ID=52780879
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2979954A Active CA2979954C (en) | 2015-03-26 | 2016-03-24 | Method for the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of h2 and co2 into ch4 |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3280807B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6666424B2 (en) |
AR (1) | AR104102A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2016238788B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2979954C (en) |
DK (1) | DK3280807T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2764722T3 (en) |
HU (1) | HUE047068T2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016151078A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP4017934A4 (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2024-03-27 | Cemvita Factory, Inc. | Methods and systems for producing organic compounds in a subterranean environment |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2601690B1 (en) * | 1986-07-17 | 1990-02-16 | Gaz De France | PROCESS FOR PRODUCING HIGH-YIELD METHANE BY CULTURE OF METHANOBACTERIUM THERMOAUTOTROPHICUM OR ANY METHANOGENIC BACTERIA HAVING THE SAME GROWTH PHYSIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES |
PT963780E (en) * | 1998-06-08 | 2006-05-31 | Wild Vaucher Pierrette | PROCESS FOR SEPARATING CO2 FROM FUEL GASES, HIS CONVERSATION IN CH4 AND STORAGE OUTSIDE THE EARTH ATMOSPHERE. |
WO2008128331A1 (en) | 2007-04-18 | 2008-10-30 | University Technologies International Inc. | Process for sequestering carbon dioxide |
JP2010022957A (en) * | 2008-07-22 | 2010-02-04 | Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd | System for disposing of co2 and system for recovering methane |
WO2012110256A1 (en) * | 2011-02-17 | 2012-08-23 | Krajete GmbH | Method of converting carbon dioxide and hydrogen to methane by microorganisms |
JP6202371B2 (en) * | 2013-06-03 | 2017-09-27 | 国立研究開発法人海洋研究開発機構 | Carbon dioxide recycling method |
-
2016
- 2016-03-23 AR ARP160100775A patent/AR104102A1/en unknown
- 2016-03-24 ES ES16713366T patent/ES2764722T3/en active Active
- 2016-03-24 HU HUE16713366A patent/HUE047068T2/en unknown
- 2016-03-24 WO PCT/EP2016/056521 patent/WO2016151078A1/en active Application Filing
- 2016-03-24 CA CA2979954A patent/CA2979954C/en active Active
- 2016-03-24 EP EP16713366.9A patent/EP3280807B1/en active Active
- 2016-03-24 DK DK16713366T patent/DK3280807T3/en active
- 2016-03-24 JP JP2018500858A patent/JP6666424B2/en active Active
- 2016-03-24 AU AU2016238788A patent/AU2016238788B2/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2016238788A1 (en) | 2017-10-12 |
ES2764722T3 (en) | 2020-06-04 |
AU2016238788B2 (en) | 2019-10-10 |
EP3280807B1 (en) | 2019-10-09 |
WO2016151078A1 (en) | 2016-09-29 |
DK3280807T3 (en) | 2019-11-25 |
JP6666424B2 (en) | 2020-03-13 |
EP3280807A1 (en) | 2018-02-14 |
JP2018510654A (en) | 2018-04-19 |
HUE047068T2 (en) | 2020-04-28 |
CA2979954A1 (en) | 2016-09-29 |
AR104102A1 (en) | 2017-06-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Strobel et al. | Underground bio-methanation: Concept and potential | |
US20210115477A1 (en) | System for the production of methane from co2 | |
US20220411733A1 (en) | Method and System for Converting Electricity into Alternative Energy Resources | |
EP3874053B1 (en) | Method to use industrial co2-containing gas for the production of a methane enriched gas composition | |
Luo et al. | Integrated biogas upgrading and hydrogen utilization in an anaerobic reactor containing enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogenic culture | |
Martin et al. | A single‐culture bioprocess of Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus to upgrade digester biogas by CO2‐to‐CH4 conversion with H2 | |
Molíková et al. | Underground gas storage as a promising natural methane bioreactor and reservoir? | |
CA2655474C (en) | System for the production of methane from co2 | |
Zhang et al. | Simultaneous production of acetate and methane from glycerol by selective enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in extreme-thermophilic (70 C) mixed culture fermentation | |
Baykara et al. | Hydrogen from hydrogen sulphide in Black Sea | |
Wang et al. | Hydrogen and carbon dioxide mixed culture fermentation in a hollow-fiber membrane biofilm reactor at 25 C | |
US20120199492A1 (en) | Bioelectrochemical conversion and sequestration of carbon dioxide into organic compounds | |
CA2979954C (en) | Method for the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis of h2 and co2 into ch4 | |
Hao et al. | Response of anaerobes to methyl fluoride, 2-bromoethanesulfonate and hydrogen during acetate degradation | |
Vítězová et al. | In situ field experiment shows the potential of methanogenic archaea for biomethane production from underground gas storage in natural rock environment | |
Nazina et al. | Radiotracer assay of microbial processes in petroleum reservoirs | |
Ravichandran et al. | The Mystery of Methanogenic Archaea for Sustainable Development of Environment | |
ES2562073B2 (en) | Selective bioconversion process of gases containing carbon monoxide, in ethanol, without accumulation of acetic acid | |
Lindeboom et al. | Autogenerative high pressure digestion: Future potentials and constraints | |
Hidalgo-Ulloa et al. | Review of the window of viability of the different microbial metabolisms relevant for subsurface H2 storage application | |
Bateja | Paper ID: 20100891 Biotechnology–Tool for Transforming Residual Oil Deposits to Clean Gaseous Fuel. | |
Haklidir et al. | The possibilities for hydrogen production from H2S and storage in the Black Sea |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20171129 |