CA2856865C - Digital beam-forming for simultaneously mitigating weak and strong interference in a navigation system - Google Patents
Digital beam-forming for simultaneously mitigating weak and strong interference in a navigation system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2856865C CA2856865C CA2856865A CA2856865A CA2856865C CA 2856865 C CA2856865 C CA 2856865C CA 2856865 A CA2856865 A CA 2856865A CA 2856865 A CA2856865 A CA 2856865A CA 2856865 C CA2856865 C CA 2856865C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- optimization process
- constraint
- spatial
- signal
- processing system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000000116 mitigating effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 6
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 48
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000237519 Bivalvia Species 0.000 claims 1
- 235000020639 clam Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005311 autocorrelation function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S19/00—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
- G01S19/01—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
- G01S19/13—Receivers
- G01S19/21—Interference related issues ; Issues related to cross-correlation, spoofing or other methods of denial of service
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S19/00—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
- G01S19/01—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
- G01S19/13—Receivers
- G01S19/21—Interference related issues ; Issues related to cross-correlation, spoofing or other methods of denial of service
- G01S19/215—Interference related issues ; Issues related to cross-correlation, spoofing or other methods of denial of service issues related to spoofing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S19/00—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
- G01S19/01—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
- G01S19/13—Receivers
- G01S19/35—Constructional details or hardware or software details of the signal processing chain
- G01S19/36—Constructional details or hardware or software details of the signal processing chain relating to the receiver frond end
Abstract
An adaptive cascaded electronic protection processing system for global navigation satellite system (GNSS) threat mitigation is provided. The system includes a precorrelation characterization component configured to provide at least one parameter characterizing a plurality of received signals. A correlator is configured to provide a plurality of correlation results, each representing one of the plurality of received signals. A spatial weight contribution component is configured to determine an optimal set of digital beam-forming weights via an optimization process according to the at least one parameter. A postcorrelation characterization component is configured to determine at least one constraint on the optimization process according to the plurality of correlation results.
Description
DIGITAL BEAM-FORMING FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY MITIGATING WEAK
AND STRONG INTERFERENCE IN A NAVIGATION SYSTEM
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] This invention relates to navigation systems, and more particularly, to the use of digital beam-forming to mitigate both weak and strong interference in a navigation system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
AND STRONG INTERFERENCE IN A NAVIGATION SYSTEM
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] This invention relates to navigation systems, and more particularly, to the use of digital beam-forming to mitigate both weak and strong interference in a navigation system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The fundamental baseband digital signal-processing component used in a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver is known as a correlator. It correlates digitized samples of a received GNSS signal output by an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with locally generated replicas of the carrier and spreading code components of the signal being received. If the local replica is adequately aligned with the carrier and code components of the received signal, a large correlation result is produced. The signal can be processed according to parameters of the signal derived from the aligned local replica, thereby providing observability of the actual received signal parameters whose power level can be well below that of thermal noise. Fundamentally, these received signal parameters are the magnitude of the despread signal and phase of its carrier with respect to the locally generated carrier.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0003] In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a cascaded electronic protection system for a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) is provided that maintains the capabilities of traditional beam forming systems for strong interference while adding a capability to mitigate weak interference which minimizes impact on measurement fidelity. Traditional digital beam forming electronic protection systems are historically designed to operate independently from a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver and only address the strong interference sources distinct from thermal noise, but are challenged to deal with the weak ones which are below the thermal noise floor such as spoofing or meaconing.
=
The cascaded approach utilizes covariance estimates from the digital signal samples as well as autocorrelation estimates from the correlators to calculate the optimal spatial and temporal weights to form nulls towards undesired emitters such as interference, jamming, spoofing, and meaconing while directing gain toward desired GNSS satellites. Cascading allows the electronic protection system to simultaneously mitigate weak and strong signal threats by combining multi-stream post-correlation spatial filtering and pre-correlation temporal filtering respectively within the GNSS receiver itself.
=
The cascaded approach utilizes covariance estimates from the digital signal samples as well as autocorrelation estimates from the correlators to calculate the optimal spatial and temporal weights to form nulls towards undesired emitters such as interference, jamming, spoofing, and meaconing while directing gain toward desired GNSS satellites. Cascading allows the electronic protection system to simultaneously mitigate weak and strong signal threats by combining multi-stream post-correlation spatial filtering and pre-correlation temporal filtering respectively within the GNSS receiver itself.
[0004] To this end, a precorrelation characterization component is configured to provide at least one parameter characterizing a plurality of received signals. A
correlator is configured to provide a plurality of correlation results, each representing one of the plurality of received signals. A post-correlation spatial weight computation component is configured to determine an optimal set of digital beam-forming weights via an optimization process according to the at least one parameter. A post-correlation constraint component is configured to apply at least one constraint on the optimization process according to the plurality of correlation results
correlator is configured to provide a plurality of correlation results, each representing one of the plurality of received signals. A post-correlation spatial weight computation component is configured to determine an optimal set of digital beam-forming weights via an optimization process according to the at least one parameter. A post-correlation constraint component is configured to apply at least one constraint on the optimization process according to the plurality of correlation results
[0005] In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a second space time adaptive processing system for a GNSS system is provided. A pre-correlation characterization component is configured to provide at least one parameter characterizing a plurality of received signals. A digital antenna electronics component is configured to downconvert the received signal to an intermediate frequency, digitize the intermediate frequency signal into a stream of digital samples at an associated sampling rate, and downconvert the stream of digital samples to a baseband digital signal. A temporal filter for each baseband digital signal is configured to provide a temporal cancelation of emitters to mitigate narrow-band jamming using an adaptive minimization technique. A correlator is configured to provide a plurality of correlation results, with each correlation result representing one of the plurality of baseband digital signals. A spatial weight computation component is configured to determine an optimal set of digital beam-forming weights via an optimization process according to the at least one parameter to mitigate wideband jamming and weak signal threats. A post-correlation constraint component is configured to determine at least one constraint on one of several existing optimization techniques- according to the plurality of correlation results.
[0006] In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for adaptive processing in a navigation system. Temporal filtering is applied to each of a plurality of input streams to provide a plurality of filtered input streams which each mitigate temporally correlated interference. A covariance matrix representing the plurality of filtered input streams is generated. A plurality of correlation results is generated, each representing one of the plurality of filtered input streams. A beam-forming weight is calculated for each input stream from the covariance matrix and the plurality of correlation results to mitigate spatially correlated interference.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0007] FIG. 1 illustrates a cascaded Electronic Protection (EP) assembly for a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
[0008] FIG. 2 illustrates one implementation of a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
[0009] FIG. 3 illustrates a method for adaptive processing in a navigation system in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
= DETAILED DESCRIPTION
= DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0010] The present invention relates generally to electronic protection systems and can be implemented within any appropriate navigation system that relies on spread spectrum navigation systems. For the purpose of example, the foregoing description is drawn specifically to implementations of GNSS receivers, but it will be appreciated that the invention is generally applicable to any navigation system. The fundamental baseband digital signal processing component used in a GNSS
receiver is known as a correlation engine, or correlator. A correlation engine correlates digitized samples of a received GNSS signal output by an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with locally generated replicas of the carrier and spreading code components of the signal being received. If the local replica is adequately aligned with the carrier and code components of the received signal, a large correlation result is produced.
The signal can be processed according to parameters of the signal derived from the aligned local replica, thereby providing observability of the actual received GPS
signal parameters whose power level can be well below that of thermal noise.
These received signal parameters represent the magnitude of the de-spread signal and phase of its carrier with respect to the locally-generated carrier.
receiver is known as a correlation engine, or correlator. A correlation engine correlates digitized samples of a received GNSS signal output by an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with locally generated replicas of the carrier and spreading code components of the signal being received. If the local replica is adequately aligned with the carrier and code components of the received signal, a large correlation result is produced.
The signal can be processed according to parameters of the signal derived from the aligned local replica, thereby providing observability of the actual received GPS
signal parameters whose power level can be well below that of thermal noise.
These received signal parameters represent the magnitude of the de-spread signal and phase of its carrier with respect to the locally-generated carrier.
[0011] In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a post-correlation characterization of emitters is added to a spatial filtering process in order to identify threats that stay below the noise floor, and thus cannot be detected at the pre-correlation stage, but can still significantly degrade the tracking quality of GPS
signals. These threats can include spoofers and meaconers. The post-correlation step first implements multi-directional beam-steering, with weights varied to steer the array beam simultaneously in multiple directions while nulling out those jamming sources that are characterized by the signal covariance matrix calculated at the pre-correlation step. If a signal energy peak is found in any steering direction other than the direction of the satellite, an interfering signal coming from that direction is identified. The procedure can be repeated for every value of the code phase from the open-loop search space to enable identification of emitters whose code phase differ from the direct signal by more than a code chip. It will be appreciated that multi-directional post-correlation beam-steering can be implemented at the correlator rate with weights applied in software to reduce the overall computational load.
signals. These threats can include spoofers and meaconers. The post-correlation step first implements multi-directional beam-steering, with weights varied to steer the array beam simultaneously in multiple directions while nulling out those jamming sources that are characterized by the signal covariance matrix calculated at the pre-correlation step. If a signal energy peak is found in any steering direction other than the direction of the satellite, an interfering signal coming from that direction is identified. The procedure can be repeated for every value of the code phase from the open-loop search space to enable identification of emitters whose code phase differ from the direct signal by more than a code chip. It will be appreciated that multi-directional post-correlation beam-steering can be implemented at the correlator rate with weights applied in software to reduce the overall computational load.
[0012] Accordingly, the proposed GNSS receiver combines postcorrelation and precorrelation data to achieve a complete view of potential threats to the integrity of the navigation system. Specifically, precorrelation estimation identifies the presence of jammers and includes estimation of the noise covariance matrix between individual antenna elements for the computation of digital beam-forming spatial weights. Post-correlation estimation is used to protect against emitters below the noise floor while mitigating broadband threats.
[0013] FIG. 1 illustrates a cascaded electronic protection (EP) system assembly 10 for a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. The received signals from the various elements of the antenna are provided to a preprocessing engine 12 that prepares digital representations of the received signals for further processing. For example, each signal can be downcoverted at an analog downconverter to an intermediate frequency, and digitized into a stream of digital samples. These digitized input streams are then downconverted to baseband as respective in-phase, i(t), and quadrature, q(t), components.
[0014] The baseband in-phase and quadrature components can be used to represent a radio signal, s(t), as a complex vector (phasor) with real and imaginary parts. Two components are required so that both positive and negative frequencies, relative to the channel center frequency, can be represented:
s(t) = x(t) + jy(t) Eq. 1
s(t) = x(t) + jy(t) Eq. 1
[0015] For the stream of digital samples from each antenna element, the preprocessing engine 12 first provides a temporal cancelation of emitters at a bank of finite impulse response (FIR) filters 14 and subjects each input stream to a correlation with a replica GNSS code at a correlation engine 16. Filter coefficients for the back of FIR filters 14 are computed at a precorrelation characterization component 18 based on covariance between signal samples on different filter taps.
Temporal filtering efficiently mitigates narrow-band jamming and can utilize any one of several optimizations for computation of the filter coefficients such as an adaptive transversal filter or a least mean squares minimuzation.
Temporal filtering efficiently mitigates narrow-band jamming and can utilize any one of several optimizations for computation of the filter coefficients such as an adaptive transversal filter or a least mean squares minimuzation.
[0016] The illustrated EP assembly uses a cascaded approach that separates temporal filtering and digital beam-forming operations. Accordingly, temporal filtering is carried out before the correlation process, whereas the digital beam-forming function is performed after the correlation. The cascaded implementation has a number of advantages such as reduction in the execution rate of the digital beam-forming, which results in reduced computational load, as well as capability for post-correlation characterization of RF environments, which enables identification of emitter signals that stay below the noise floor (such as spoofing and meaconing) and cannot be observed at pre-correlation.
[0017] A precorrelation component to the spatial filtering can be determined at a spatial weight computation component 22, which utilizes data from the precorrelation characterization component 18 to determine an optimal set of weights for digital beam-forming. For beam-forming, the complex baseband signals are multiplied by the complex weights to apply the phase shift and amplitude scaling required for each antenna element, Wk = akejsin(6.k) Eq. 2 where wk is the complex weight for a kth antenna element, ek is the phase shift of the weight, and ak is an amplitude of the weight.
[0018] The specific beam-forming algorithm utilized with postcorrelation characterization component 22 can utilize any one of a number of optimization criteria for the computation of spatial array weights such as minimum variance (MV), minimum variance distortion-less response (MVDR), and adaptive filtering with bias constraints. Each of these algorithms for the computation of digital beam-forming weights generally requires characterization of the emitter signal environment.
In the illustrated implementation, emitters are characterized by a multi-element signal covariance matrix that is computed based on both pre-correlation characterization 18 and post-correlation characterization 24. Signal covariance between different array elements can be computed based on down-sampled GPS signal at the output of the FIR filter bank 14. For emitter-free cases, this matrix has a diagonal form, but the presence of emitters introduces off-diagonal terms which can be minimized by optimization. Estimates of signal covariance are directly incorporated into the weight computation procedures for most optimization algorithms.
In the illustrated implementation, emitters are characterized by a multi-element signal covariance matrix that is computed based on both pre-correlation characterization 18 and post-correlation characterization 24. Signal covariance between different array elements can be computed based on down-sampled GPS signal at the output of the FIR filter bank 14. For emitter-free cases, this matrix has a diagonal form, but the presence of emitters introduces off-diagonal terms which can be minimized by optimization. Estimates of signal covariance are directly incorporated into the weight computation procedures for most optimization algorithms.
[0019] To provide the postcorrelation contribution to the weight computation, the temporally filtered outputs of the FIR filter bank 14 are fed into the correlation engine 16, which wipes-off code and carrier signals (for code and carrier parameters from a certain search space) and accumulates the results over a predetermined interval (e.g., one millisecond). The correlation results are provided to a postcorrelation characterization component 24 where outputs of individual antenna elements are combined for digital beam-forming to enable spatial cancellation of emitters. For example, the array beam can be steered in multiple directions using one millisecond correlation outputs. Local energy maxima in angular directions other than the satellite's identify emitter signals, and the digital beam-forming algorithms implemented at the spatial weight computation component 22 can be augmented by nulling constraints in order to suppress the influence of these additionally observed sources of interference on the signal tracking quality.
[0020] Each of the determined weights and the correlation results are provided to a weighting and summation component 26 that provides a weighted linear combination of the correlation results reflecting the determined digital beam-forming weights. The results of this weighted linear combination can then be provided to a navigation component (not shown) for further processing.
[0021] FIG. 2 illustrates one implementation of an electronic protection system 50 in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. The receiver 50 includes a multi-element antenna 52 that provides a plurality of received signals to respective digital antenna electronics (DAE) assemblies 54-56. in one implementation, the antenna 52 has seven elements, and produces a signal at each element. Each DAE
;
assembly 54-56 prepares digital representations of the received signals for further processing. For example, each DAE can downconvert its received analog signal to an intermediate frequency, digitized the intermediate frequency signal into a stream of digital samples, and downconvert the digital signal to baseband.
;
assembly 54-56 prepares digital representations of the received signals for further processing. For example, each DAE can downconvert its received analog signal to an intermediate frequency, digitized the intermediate frequency signal into a stream of digital samples, and downconvert the digital signal to baseband.
[0022] The baseband digital samples are provided to a bank of temporal filters 60-62 which provides a temporal cancelation of emitters, as to mitigate narrow-band jamming. To this end, each input stream is provided to an associated shift register 64-66 that applies a coarse delay to the input streams. Specifically, the shift registers 64-66 can delay their respective input streams by integer increments of samples. A fine delay can be applied to each input stream at respective finite impulse processing elements (FIR-PE) 68-70. Temporal interference suppression is implemented in a form of finite impulse response (FIR) filter with adaptively selected weights. For discrete time tn, the output of the (2N+1)-tap filter is defined as:
xFIR(n) = akx(n + k) Eq. 3 where x(n+k) is the signal samples at individual taps of the filter, and ek is the filter weight.
xFIR(n) = akx(n + k) Eq. 3 where x(n+k) is the signal samples at individual taps of the filter, and ek is the filter weight.
[0023] The resulting delayed input streams are provided to each of a covariance estimation component 72 and a correlation engine 74. The covariance estimation component 72 calculates a signal covariance matrix based on GPS
signal samples, and an autocorrelation vector is precalculated and stored. The weights for the FIR-PE filter bank 68-70 are selected adaptively minimizing the filter output error via a technique such as the least mean-squares (LMS) where the tap weight vector is computed to minimize the filter output error using the sample variance and autocorrelation. Since Signal samples of different taps are processed by exactly the same RF chain, the autocorrelation function is computed by representing the GPS
signal as x[n] = PRN(n).sin(277,f/F=to) ,where PRN is a pseudorandom code and fiF is an intermediate carrier frequency after a down conversion at the DAE 54-56.
The determined weights can be provide to the FIR-FE filter bank 68-70, as well as a spatial weight computation element 76.
(00241 The correlation engine 74 compares each signal stream to a replica GNSS code, representing an expected pseudorandom code in the received signal, to determine an associated correlation result for each signal stream representing its similarity to the replica code. The correlation results are provided to respective multipliers 80-82, as well as a postcorrelation weight component 84 that determines the locations of emitters exhibiting interference below the noise floor (e.g., spoofers and meaconers). To this end, the postcorrelation weight component 84 steers the array beam simultaneously in multiple directions to apply gain toward multiple satellites. The directions of any located emitters are identified by detection of multiple correlation peaks whose detection parameters are provided to the spatial weight computation element 76.
[0025] The spatial weight computation element 76 implements a digital beam-forming function (DBF) by optimizing the adaptive criteria with any supplied constraints for individual satellites, the location of which is provided by from associated navigation data 86. For instance, if the beam steering is optimized for all satellites in view, it significantly reduces the number of spatial nulls that can be =
generated for interference suppression: the total number of nulls is N-K where N is the number of antenna elements and K is the number of satellites. If the DBF
is performed to optimize the jamming suppression only (i.e., without considering satellite signals) it increases the null availability to N-1 but can potentially degrade or cancel-out signal reception for some satellites. Integration of DBF into the signal tracking process eliminates these disadvantages. Specifically, undisturbed signal reception in the satellite's direction can be used as an optimization constraint.
Similarly, if the postcorrelation weight component 84 finds strong emitter peaks, generation of spatial nulls in the emitter signal direction can also be added as an optimization constraint to the computation of spatial weights.
[0026] The spatial weight computation element 76 calculates spatial beam-forming weights in order to eliminate spatially-correlated jamming signals.
This can be accomplished via any of a number of optimization algorithms, subject to the additional constraints imposed by the navigation data 86 and the postcorrelation weight component 84. These weights are provided as second inputs to the multipliers 80-82 and the outputs of the multipliers are summed at a summation component 90 to provide a final, spatially and temporally filtered correlation result.
[0027] It will be appreciated that, since the DBF is performed at the correlator level, carrier phase measurement fidelity is preserved. Specifically, since all phase manipulations are known to both the beam former and receiver, it is possible to explicitly compensate for carrier phase biases that are due to spatial beam-forming.
This compensation is performed at a carrier phase repair component 92. It will be appreciated, however, that the phase repair can instead be performed implicitly, for example, as optimization constraints during the beam-forming process. The phase corrected sample can then be provided to an integrator 94, where correlation results are accumulated over an extended period for retrieval by an associated navigation system (not shown).
[0028] In view of the foregoing structural and functional features described above, a methodology in accordance with various aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated with reference to FIG. 3. While, for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies of FIG. 3 is shown and described as executing serially, it is to be understood and appreciated that the present invention is not limited by the illustrated order, as some aspects could, in accordance with the present invention, occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other aspects from that shown and described.
[0029] FIG, 3 illustrates a method 100 for adaptive electronic protection in a navigation system in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. At 102, temporal filtering is applied to each of a plurality of input streams to provide a plurality of filtered input streams. In one implementation, a coarse delay of an integer increment of samples at an associated sampling rate is applied, and the delayed input stream is provided to a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, having adaptively selected weights, to apply a fine delay to the input stream. At 104, a covariance matrix representing the plurality of filtered input streams is generated. At 106, a plurality of correlation results are generated, with each correlation result representing one of the plurality of filtered input streams.
[0030] At 108, a beam-forming weight is calculated for each input stream from the covariance matrix and the plurality of correlation results. In one implementation, the beam-forming weight for each input steam is calculated via an optimization process having at least one optimization constraint determined from the covariance matrix. The optimization process can also include, for example, further constraints derived from an integrated navigation data representing the position of a set of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) satellites as well locations of one or more other emitters not affiliated with the set of GNSS satellites, such as a spoofer or meaconer.
[0031] At 110, a spatially filtered correlation result is determined from the plurality of correlation results and the beam-forming weight for each input stream.
For example, each correlation result can be multiplied by its associated weight, and the weighted correlation results can be summed to provide the spatially filtered correlation result, At 112, the spatially filtered correlation result is compensated for carrier phase biases due to spatial beam-forming if not the carrier phase bias compensation is not performed implicitly via optimization constraints. Once the phase compensation is complete, the spatially filtered correlation result can be provided to an associated navigation system for further processing, [0032] What have been described above are examples of the present invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of the appended claims.
signal samples, and an autocorrelation vector is precalculated and stored. The weights for the FIR-PE filter bank 68-70 are selected adaptively minimizing the filter output error via a technique such as the least mean-squares (LMS) where the tap weight vector is computed to minimize the filter output error using the sample variance and autocorrelation. Since Signal samples of different taps are processed by exactly the same RF chain, the autocorrelation function is computed by representing the GPS
signal as x[n] = PRN(n).sin(277,f/F=to) ,where PRN is a pseudorandom code and fiF is an intermediate carrier frequency after a down conversion at the DAE 54-56.
The determined weights can be provide to the FIR-FE filter bank 68-70, as well as a spatial weight computation element 76.
(00241 The correlation engine 74 compares each signal stream to a replica GNSS code, representing an expected pseudorandom code in the received signal, to determine an associated correlation result for each signal stream representing its similarity to the replica code. The correlation results are provided to respective multipliers 80-82, as well as a postcorrelation weight component 84 that determines the locations of emitters exhibiting interference below the noise floor (e.g., spoofers and meaconers). To this end, the postcorrelation weight component 84 steers the array beam simultaneously in multiple directions to apply gain toward multiple satellites. The directions of any located emitters are identified by detection of multiple correlation peaks whose detection parameters are provided to the spatial weight computation element 76.
[0025] The spatial weight computation element 76 implements a digital beam-forming function (DBF) by optimizing the adaptive criteria with any supplied constraints for individual satellites, the location of which is provided by from associated navigation data 86. For instance, if the beam steering is optimized for all satellites in view, it significantly reduces the number of spatial nulls that can be =
generated for interference suppression: the total number of nulls is N-K where N is the number of antenna elements and K is the number of satellites. If the DBF
is performed to optimize the jamming suppression only (i.e., without considering satellite signals) it increases the null availability to N-1 but can potentially degrade or cancel-out signal reception for some satellites. Integration of DBF into the signal tracking process eliminates these disadvantages. Specifically, undisturbed signal reception in the satellite's direction can be used as an optimization constraint.
Similarly, if the postcorrelation weight component 84 finds strong emitter peaks, generation of spatial nulls in the emitter signal direction can also be added as an optimization constraint to the computation of spatial weights.
[0026] The spatial weight computation element 76 calculates spatial beam-forming weights in order to eliminate spatially-correlated jamming signals.
This can be accomplished via any of a number of optimization algorithms, subject to the additional constraints imposed by the navigation data 86 and the postcorrelation weight component 84. These weights are provided as second inputs to the multipliers 80-82 and the outputs of the multipliers are summed at a summation component 90 to provide a final, spatially and temporally filtered correlation result.
[0027] It will be appreciated that, since the DBF is performed at the correlator level, carrier phase measurement fidelity is preserved. Specifically, since all phase manipulations are known to both the beam former and receiver, it is possible to explicitly compensate for carrier phase biases that are due to spatial beam-forming.
This compensation is performed at a carrier phase repair component 92. It will be appreciated, however, that the phase repair can instead be performed implicitly, for example, as optimization constraints during the beam-forming process. The phase corrected sample can then be provided to an integrator 94, where correlation results are accumulated over an extended period for retrieval by an associated navigation system (not shown).
[0028] In view of the foregoing structural and functional features described above, a methodology in accordance with various aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated with reference to FIG. 3. While, for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies of FIG. 3 is shown and described as executing serially, it is to be understood and appreciated that the present invention is not limited by the illustrated order, as some aspects could, in accordance with the present invention, occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other aspects from that shown and described.
[0029] FIG, 3 illustrates a method 100 for adaptive electronic protection in a navigation system in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. At 102, temporal filtering is applied to each of a plurality of input streams to provide a plurality of filtered input streams. In one implementation, a coarse delay of an integer increment of samples at an associated sampling rate is applied, and the delayed input stream is provided to a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, having adaptively selected weights, to apply a fine delay to the input stream. At 104, a covariance matrix representing the plurality of filtered input streams is generated. At 106, a plurality of correlation results are generated, with each correlation result representing one of the plurality of filtered input streams.
[0030] At 108, a beam-forming weight is calculated for each input stream from the covariance matrix and the plurality of correlation results. In one implementation, the beam-forming weight for each input steam is calculated via an optimization process having at least one optimization constraint determined from the covariance matrix. The optimization process can also include, for example, further constraints derived from an integrated navigation data representing the position of a set of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) satellites as well locations of one or more other emitters not affiliated with the set of GNSS satellites, such as a spoofer or meaconer.
[0031] At 110, a spatially filtered correlation result is determined from the plurality of correlation results and the beam-forming weight for each input stream.
For example, each correlation result can be multiplied by its associated weight, and the weighted correlation results can be summed to provide the spatially filtered correlation result, At 112, the spatially filtered correlation result is compensated for carrier phase biases due to spatial beam-forming if not the carrier phase bias compensation is not performed implicitly via optimization constraints. Once the phase compensation is complete, the spatially filtered correlation result can be provided to an associated navigation system for further processing, [0032] What have been described above are examples of the present invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (20)
What is claimed is:
1. An adaptive electronic protection system for a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) threat mitigation comprising:
precorrelation characterization component configured to provide at least one parameter characterizing a plurality of received signals, wherein the at least one parameter during an optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an interfering signal above a noise floor;
a correlator configured to provide a plurality of correlation results, each representing one of the plurality of received signals;
a postcorrelation characterization component configured to determine at least one constraint on the optimization process according to the plurality of correlation results, wherein the at least one constraint during the optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an another interfering signal below the noise floor; and a spatial weight computation component configured to determine an optimal set of digital beam-forming weights via an optimization process based on the at least one parameter and the at least one constraint.
precorrelation characterization component configured to provide at least one parameter characterizing a plurality of received signals, wherein the at least one parameter during an optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an interfering signal above a noise floor;
a correlator configured to provide a plurality of correlation results, each representing one of the plurality of received signals;
a postcorrelation characterization component configured to determine at least one constraint on the optimization process according to the plurality of correlation results, wherein the at least one constraint during the optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an another interfering signal below the noise floor; and a spatial weight computation component configured to determine an optimal set of digital beam-forming weights via an optimization process based on the at least one parameter and the at least one constraint.
2. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 1, wherein precorrelation characterization component provides a covariance matrix representing the plurality of received signals.
3. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 1, the spatial weight computation component applying at least one constraint on the optimization process according to navigation data representing the position of at least one GNSS
satellite.
satellite.
4. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 1, further comprising, for each received signal, a digital antenna electronics component configured to downconvert the received signal to an intermediate frequency, digitize the intermediate frequency signal into a stream of digital samples at an associated sampling rate, and downconvert the stream of digital samples to a baseband digital signal.
5. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 4, further comprising, for each of the baseband digital signals, a temporal filter configured to provide a temporal cancelation of emitters to mitigate narrow-band jamming.
6. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 4, a given temporal filter comprising:
a shift register configured to apply a coarse delay to the baseband digital signal, the coarse delay comprising an integer increment of samples at the sampling rate; and a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, having adaptively selected weights, configured to apply a fine delay to the baseband digital signal.
a shift register configured to apply a coarse delay to the baseband digital signal, the coarse delay comprising an integer increment of samples at the sampling rate; and a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, having adaptively selected weights, configured to apply a fine delay to the baseband digital signal.
7. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 6, wherein the precorrelation characterization component further comprises a covariance estimation component to provide a signal covariance matrix representing the plurality of received signals and determine the adaptively selected weights for each FIR
filter from at least the covariance estimation component.
filter from at least the covariance estimation component.
8. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 7, wherein a tap weight vector representing the adaptively selected weights for the FIR
filters is calculated as the product of an inverse of the signal covariance matrix and an autocorrelation vector of the plurality of received signals.
filters is calculated as the product of an inverse of the signal covariance matrix and an autocorrelation vector of the plurality of received signals.
9. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 1, wherein the postcorrelation characterization component is configured to locate a spread-spectrum emitter, the at least one constraint on the optimization process determined by the spatial weight computation component comprising introducing a spatial null in a direction of the spread-spectrum emitter as an optimization constraint.
10. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 1, the at least one constraint on the optimization process determined by the spatial weight computation component comprising an optimization constraint to compensate for carrier phase biases due to spatial beam-forming.
11. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 1, comprising:
a set of multipliers configured to generate respective weighted correlation results from the plurality of correlation results; and a summation component configured to sum the weighted correlation results into a spatially filtered correlation result.
a set of multipliers configured to generate respective weighted correlation results from the plurality of correlation results; and a summation component configured to sum the weighted correlation results into a spatially filtered correlation result.
12. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 11, further comprising a carrier phase repair component configured to compensate the spatially filtered correlation result for carrier phase biases due to spatial beam-forming.
13. A method for adaptive processing in a navigation system comprising:
applying temporal filtering to each of a plurality of input streams to provide a plurality of filtered input streams;
generating a covariance matrix representing the plurality of input streams;
generating a plurality of correlation results, each representing one of the plurality of filtered input streams; and calculating a beam-forming weight for each input stream via an optimization process that has at least one parameter determined from the covariance matrix and at least one constraint determined based on the plurality of correlation results, wherein the at least one parameter during the optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an interfering signal above a noise floor and the at least one constraint during the optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of another interfering signal below the noise floor.
applying temporal filtering to each of a plurality of input streams to provide a plurality of filtered input streams;
generating a covariance matrix representing the plurality of input streams;
generating a plurality of correlation results, each representing one of the plurality of filtered input streams; and calculating a beam-forming weight for each input stream via an optimization process that has at least one parameter determined from the covariance matrix and at least one constraint determined based on the plurality of correlation results, wherein the at least one parameter during the optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an interfering signal above a noise floor and the at least one constraint during the optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of another interfering signal below the noise floor.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein applying temporal filtering to each of a plurality of input streams comprises:
applying a coarse delay to the input stream comprising an integer increment of samples at an associated sampling rate; and applying a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, having adaptively selected weights, to apply a fine delay to the input stream.
applying a coarse delay to the input stream comprising an integer increment of samples at an associated sampling rate; and applying a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, having adaptively selected weights, to apply a fine delay to the input stream.
15. The method of claim 13, wherein calculating a beam-forming weight for each input stream from the covariance matrix and the plurality of correlation results comprises calculating the beam-forming weight for each input stream via an optimization process having at least one optimization constraint determined from the covariance matrix.
16. The method of claim 15, the optimization process comprising one of a minimum variance process, a minimum variance distortion-less response process, or adaptive filtering with bias constraints.
17. The method of claim 15, the optimization process being constrained by each of navigation data representing the position of a set of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) satellites and a location of an emitter that is not affiliated with the set of GNSS satellites.
18. The method of claim 13, further comprising:
determining a spatially filtered correlation result from the plurality of correlation results and the beam-forming weight for each input stream; and compensating the spatially filtered correlation result for carrier phase biases due to spatial beam-forming.
determining a spatially filtered correlation result from the plurality of correlation results and the beam-forming weight for each input stream; and compensating the spatially filtered correlation result for carrier phase biases due to spatial beam-forming.
19. A adaptive electronic protection processing system for a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) threat mitigation comprising:
a precorrelation characterization component configured to provide at least one parameter characterizing a plurality of received signals, wherein the at least one parameter during an optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an interfering signal above a noise floor;
a digital antenna electronics component configured to downconvert the received signal to an intermediate frequency, digitize the intermediate frequency signal into a stream of digital samples at an associated sampling rate, and downconvert the stream of digital samples to a baseband digital signal;
a temporal filter for each baseband digital signal configured to provide a temporal cancelation of emitters to mitigate narrow-band jamming;
a correlator configured to provide a plurality of correlation results, each representing one of the plurality of baseband digital signals;
a postcorrelation characterization component configured to determine at least one constraint on the optimization process according to the plurality of correlation results, wherein the at least one constraint during the optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an interfering signal below the noise floor; and a spatial weight computation component configured to determine an optimal set of digital beam-forming weights via an optimization process based on the at least one parameter and the at least one constraint.
a precorrelation characterization component configured to provide at least one parameter characterizing a plurality of received signals, wherein the at least one parameter during an optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an interfering signal above a noise floor;
a digital antenna electronics component configured to downconvert the received signal to an intermediate frequency, digitize the intermediate frequency signal into a stream of digital samples at an associated sampling rate, and downconvert the stream of digital samples to a baseband digital signal;
a temporal filter for each baseband digital signal configured to provide a temporal cancelation of emitters to mitigate narrow-band jamming;
a correlator configured to provide a plurality of correlation results, each representing one of the plurality of baseband digital signals;
a postcorrelation characterization component configured to determine at least one constraint on the optimization process according to the plurality of correlation results, wherein the at least one constraint during the optimization process provides a spatial null in a direction of an interfering signal below the noise floor; and a spatial weight computation component configured to determine an optimal set of digital beam-forming weights via an optimization process based on the at least one parameter and the at least one constraint.
20. The adaptive electronic protection processing system of claim 19, the spatial weight computation component applying at least one constraint on the optimization process according to navigation data representing the position of at least one GNSS
satellite and at least one constraint on the optimization process.
satellite and at least one constraint on the optimization process.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201161576205P | 2011-12-15 | 2011-12-15 | |
US61/576,205 | 2011-12-15 | ||
PCT/US2012/069505 WO2013090571A1 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2012-12-13 | Digital beam-forming for simultaneously mitigating weak and strong interference in a navigation system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2856865A1 CA2856865A1 (en) | 2013-06-20 |
CA2856865C true CA2856865C (en) | 2017-08-22 |
Family
ID=48609595
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2856865A Active CA2856865C (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2012-12-13 | Digital beam-forming for simultaneously mitigating weak and strong interference in a navigation system |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US9709681B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2791703B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6378091B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2856865C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013090571A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR3017716B1 (en) * | 2014-02-14 | 2016-03-18 | Thales Sa | ANTI-BROWNING PROCESS FOR A RADIO SIGNAL, COMPUTER MODULE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM |
US9237513B2 (en) * | 2014-06-13 | 2016-01-12 | Hong Kong Applied Science And Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. | Method for performing a cell search in multiple antenna wireless systems |
CN104536014A (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2015-04-22 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Anti-transfer deceptive jamming method based on Relax algorithm |
KR101681993B1 (en) * | 2015-03-05 | 2016-12-02 | 국방과학연구소 | Anti-jamming signal processing apparatus and method using a dual-polarized antenna |
CN104865585A (en) * | 2015-06-11 | 2015-08-26 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Distributed serial subspace projection navigation receiver deceptive jamming elimination method |
KR101708381B1 (en) * | 2015-10-15 | 2017-02-20 | 연세대학교 산학협력단 | Anti-jamming signal processing apparatus and method using a dual-polarized antenna array |
US10145959B2 (en) | 2016-03-21 | 2018-12-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Weighting algorithm for signal processing |
KR101737802B1 (en) * | 2016-04-12 | 2017-05-19 | 국방과학연구소 | Apparatus for determining weight value in time-space in array antenna for GPS anti-jamming and method therefor |
CN105929415A (en) * | 2016-04-13 | 2016-09-07 | 中国电子科技集团公司第五十四研究所 | Interference prediction based self-adaptive wave trap method |
US10389464B2 (en) | 2016-04-28 | 2019-08-20 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | System and method for improved data decoding, tracking, and other receiver functions in the presence of interference |
KR101871908B1 (en) * | 2016-12-01 | 2018-07-03 | 넵코어스 주식회사 | Anti-jamming apparatus for global navigation satellite system and anti-jamming method for global navigation satellite system |
KR101891670B1 (en) * | 2016-12-09 | 2018-08-24 | 주식회사 텔에이스 | Satellite navigation device and operating method of satellite navigation device |
KR101887404B1 (en) * | 2016-12-20 | 2018-09-11 | 한밭대학교 산학협력단 | Multi-Beam MVDR Technique for Removing Interference Signals in Array Antenna Based GPS Receivers |
CN107015253B (en) * | 2017-03-09 | 2021-06-18 | 沈阳理工大学 | Search detection method capable of dynamically predicting threat in navigation receiver |
US10505572B1 (en) * | 2017-08-22 | 2019-12-10 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Active canceller for electronically scanned array |
WO2020036556A2 (en) * | 2018-05-04 | 2020-02-20 | Havelsan Hava Elektroni̇k Sanayi̇ Ve Ti̇caret Anoni̇m Şi̇rketi̇ | A gnss protection system and method thereof |
KR102075468B1 (en) * | 2018-10-24 | 2020-02-10 | 국방과학연구소 | Anti-jamming signal processing apparatus and method for a misaligned antenna array |
CN109633692B (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2022-07-08 | 西南电子技术研究所(中国电子科技集团公司第十研究所) | GNSS navigation satellite signal anti-interference processing method |
FR3093819B1 (en) * | 2019-03-14 | 2021-02-12 | Thales Sa | Method for checking the integrity of a satellite radionavigation signal |
CN110412620B (en) * | 2019-06-29 | 2022-10-28 | 西南电子技术研究所(中国电子科技集团公司第十研究所) | Anti-interference antenna signal processing device |
EP3783811A1 (en) * | 2019-08-19 | 2021-02-24 | Vodafone IP Licensing Limited | Configuration of high altitude platform-based cellular radio access network |
US11454726B2 (en) * | 2019-10-09 | 2022-09-27 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Indoor localization with LTE carrier phase measurements and synthetic aperture antenna array |
US11108451B1 (en) * | 2019-10-11 | 2021-08-31 | Tarana Wireless, Inc. | Systems and methods for calculating frequency-localized adaptive beamformer weights using sliding windows across subcarriers |
US11550062B2 (en) | 2019-12-24 | 2023-01-10 | All.Space Networks Ltd. | High-gain multibeam GNSS antenna |
KR102321422B1 (en) * | 2020-01-29 | 2021-11-04 | 울산과학기술원 | Signal Generation Method of Radar-Communication Combination System |
CN111510193B (en) * | 2020-03-27 | 2022-03-25 | 中国人民解放军海军工程大学 | Non-cooperative interference suppression device for satellite ground station and control method thereof |
US11929798B2 (en) * | 2021-08-30 | 2024-03-12 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Technique for post-correlation beamforming |
CN113507307B (en) * | 2021-09-09 | 2021-12-07 | 国网四川省电力公司电力科学研究院 | Space-time joint anti-interference method, device and equipment suitable for satellite communication |
CN114384559B (en) * | 2022-03-25 | 2022-07-08 | 军事科学院系统工程研究院网络信息研究所 | Signal processing method and system based on space-time adaptive anti-interference algorithm |
CN115372998B (en) * | 2022-08-22 | 2023-04-07 | 中国矿业大学 | Low-complexity robust wide-linear beam forming method for satellite navigation receiver |
DE102022123663A1 (en) | 2022-09-15 | 2024-03-21 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Method for distortion-reduced interference signal suppression when receiving satellite navigation signals |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6234799B1 (en) * | 1998-04-06 | 2001-05-22 | American Gnc Corporation | Real-time IMU simulator |
US6115409A (en) | 1999-06-21 | 2000-09-05 | Envoy Networks, Inc. | Integrated adaptive spatial-temporal system for controlling narrowband and wideband sources of interferences in spread spectrum CDMA receivers |
US6421000B1 (en) | 2000-06-08 | 2002-07-16 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | GPS multipath mitigation using a multi-element antenna array |
US6952460B1 (en) | 2001-09-26 | 2005-10-04 | L-3 Communications Corporation | Efficient space-time adaptive processing (STAP) filter for global positioning system (GPS) receivers |
US6999027B1 (en) | 2003-07-28 | 2006-02-14 | Rockwell Collins | Accommodation of anti-jamming delays in GNSS receivers |
US8131463B2 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2012-03-06 | Gmv Aerospace And Defence, S.A. | GNSS navigation solution integrity in non-controlled environments |
US7440988B2 (en) | 2004-04-08 | 2008-10-21 | Raytheon Company | System and method for dynamic weight processing |
TWI241790B (en) | 2004-07-16 | 2005-10-11 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Hybrid beamforming apparatus and method for the same |
US7250903B1 (en) | 2006-04-17 | 2007-07-31 | Rockwell Collins | GPS spoofer and repeater mitigation system using digital spatial nulling |
US20090006657A1 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2009-01-01 | Asad Azam | Enabling consecutive command message transmission to different devices |
US7868819B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2011-01-11 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Arrangements for satellite-based navigation and methods therefor |
-
2012
- 2012-12-12 US US13/712,633 patent/US9709681B2/en active Active
- 2012-12-13 CA CA2856865A patent/CA2856865C/en active Active
- 2012-12-13 EP EP12858580.9A patent/EP2791703B1/en active Active
- 2012-12-13 JP JP2014547427A patent/JP6378091B2/en active Active
- 2012-12-13 WO PCT/US2012/069505 patent/WO2013090571A1/en active Application Filing
-
2017
- 2017-03-17 US US15/462,123 patent/US10288742B2/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2791703A1 (en) | 2014-10-22 |
JP6378091B2 (en) | 2018-08-22 |
JP2015505048A (en) | 2015-02-16 |
WO2013090571A1 (en) | 2013-06-20 |
EP2791703A4 (en) | 2015-10-21 |
US9709681B2 (en) | 2017-07-18 |
EP2791703B1 (en) | 2017-02-08 |
US20170192100A1 (en) | 2017-07-06 |
CA2856865A1 (en) | 2013-06-20 |
US20130154880A1 (en) | 2013-06-20 |
US10288742B2 (en) | 2019-05-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10288742B2 (en) | Digital beam-forming for simultaneously mitigating weak and strong interference in a navigation system | |
US7250903B1 (en) | GPS spoofer and repeater mitigation system using digital spatial nulling | |
US8301677B2 (en) | System and method for dynamic weight processing | |
US5694416A (en) | Direct sequence spread spectrum receiver and antenna array for the simultaneous formation of a beam on a signal source and a null on an interfering jammer | |
US6664921B2 (en) | Apparatus for receiving ranging signals | |
Li et al. | Switchable beam steering/null steering algorithm for CW interference mitigation in GPS C/A code receivers | |
US6727846B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for minimizing multipath signal errors during tracking of GPS satellite signals | |
Marathe et al. | Assessment of measurement distortions in GNSS antenna array space-time processing | |
US20030025633A1 (en) | System and method for forming a beam and creating nulls with an adaptive array antenna using antenna excision and orthogonal eigen-weighting | |
O'Brien et al. | Comparison of output SINR and receiver C/N_0 for GNSS adaptive antennas | |
Daneshmand et al. | GNSS interference and multipath suppression using array antenna | |
Brown | High accuracy GPS performance using a digital adaptive antenna array | |
US20190372695A1 (en) | System and method for improved data decoding, tracking, and other receiver functions in the presence of interference | |
Cai et al. | Low-complexity reduced-dimension space–time adaptive processing for navigation receivers | |
Rouabah et al. | GPS/Galileo multipath detection and mitigation using closed-form solutions | |
Kesteven | Radio-frequency interference mitigation in radio astronomy | |
Xu et al. | Weak GPS interference direction of arrival estimation using GPS signal cancellation | |
Lee et al. | Performance analysis of pseudorange error in STAP beamforming algorithm for array antenna | |
Bamberg et al. | Carrier Phase Distortions with anti-jamming Techniques using GNSS Array Receivers | |
Marathe | Space-Time Processing Methods to Enhance GNSS Signal Robustness under Electronic Interference | |
Zhuang et al. | Performance analysis of DBF algorithm in GPS software receiver | |
Letestu | Space-time adaptive processing for navigation | |
Behar et al. | Parameter optimization of the adaptive MVDR QR-based beamformer for jamming and multipath supression in GPS/GLONASS receivers | |
Morton et al. | Broadband interference cancellation using digital beam forming and a software receiver | |
Yang | Constrained Adaptive Monopulse for GPS Attitude Determination under Jamming |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20140523 |