CA2750788A1 - Uv air treatment method and device - Google Patents

Uv air treatment method and device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2750788A1
CA2750788A1 CA2750788A CA2750788A CA2750788A1 CA 2750788 A1 CA2750788 A1 CA 2750788A1 CA 2750788 A CA2750788 A CA 2750788A CA 2750788 A CA2750788 A CA 2750788A CA 2750788 A1 CA2750788 A1 CA 2750788A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
phpg
air
hydrogen peroxide
water
environment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA2750788A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
James D. Lee
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
LEE ANTIMICROBIAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Original Assignee
LEE ANTIMICROBIAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by LEE ANTIMICROBIAL SOLUTIONS LLC filed Critical LEE ANTIMICROBIAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Publication of CA2750788A1 publication Critical patent/CA2750788A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L9/00Disinfection, sterilisation or deodorisation of air
    • A61L9/16Disinfection, sterilisation or deodorisation of air using physical phenomena
    • A61L9/18Radiation
    • A61L9/20Ultra-violet radiation
    • A61L9/205Ultra-violet radiation using a photocatalyst or photosensitiser
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2/00Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor
    • A61L2/02Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor using physical phenomena
    • A61L2/08Radiation
    • A61L2/10Ultra-violet radiation
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F24HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
    • F24FAIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
    • F24F1/00Room units for air-conditioning, e.g. separate or self-contained units or units receiving primary air from a central station
    • F24F1/0007Indoor units, e.g. fan coil units
    • F24F1/0071Indoor units, e.g. fan coil units with means for purifying supplied air
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F24HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
    • F24FAIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING
    • F24F8/00Treatment, e.g. purification, of air supplied to human living or working spaces otherwise than by heating, cooling, humidifying or drying
    • F24F8/20Treatment, e.g. purification, of air supplied to human living or working spaces otherwise than by heating, cooling, humidifying or drying by sterilisation
    • F24F8/22Treatment, e.g. purification, of air supplied to human living or working spaces otherwise than by heating, cooling, humidifying or drying by sterilisation using UV light

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Disinfection, Sterilisation Or Deodorisation Of Air (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Apparatus For Disinfection Or Sterilisation (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Water By Oxidation Or Reduction (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to methods and devices for providing microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation of an environment. The methods generally comprise: generating a Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) that is substantially free of, e.g., hydration (in the form of water in solution or water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces), ozone, plasma species, and/or organic species; and directing the gas comprising primarily PHPG into the environment such that the PHPG acts to provide microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation in the environment, preferably both on surfaces and in the air.

Description

UV AIR TREATMENT METHOD AND DEVICE

RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of the filing date of US
Provisional Application No. 61/152,581, filed February 13, 2009, and US Provisional Application No.
61/258,005, filed November 4, 2009, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
FIELD OF INVENTION
[0002] The present invention generally relates to infection and microbial control methodologies and devices related thereto.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
[0003] Pathogenic microbes, molds, mildew, spores, and organic and inorganic pollutants are commonly found in the environment. Microbial control and disinfection in environmental spaces is desirable to improve health. Numerous ways have been used to in the past in an attempt to purify air and disinfect surfaces. For example, it is already known that Reactive Oxidizing Species (ROS) produced by, e.g., photocatalytic oxidation process can oxidize organic pollutants and kill microorganisms. More particularly, hydroxyl radical, hydroperoxyl radicals, chlorine and ozone, end products of the photocatalytic reaction, have been known to be capable of oxidizing organic compounds and killing microorganisms.
However, there are limitations to the known methods and devices, not only due to efficacy limitation but also due to safety issues.
[0004] ROS is the term used to describe the highly activated air that results from exposure of ambient humid air to ultraviolet light. Light in the ultraviolet range emits photons at a frequency that when absorbed has sufficient energy to break chemical bonds.
UV light at wavelengths of 250-255 nm is routinely used as a biocide. Light below about 181 nm, up to 182-187 nm is competitive with corona discharge in its ability to produce ozone.
Ozonation and UV radiation are both being used for disinfection in community water systems. Ozone is currently being used to treat industrial wastewater and cooling towers.
[0005] Hydrogen peroxide is generally known to have antimicrobial properties and has been used in aqueous solution for disinfection and microbial control. Attempts to use hydrogen peroxide in the gas phase, however, have previously been hampered by technical hurdles to the production of Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG). Vaporized aqueous solutions of hydrogen peroxide produce an aerosol of microdroplets composed of aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution. Various processes for "drying" vaporized hydrogen peroxide solutions produce, at best, a hydrated form of hydrogen peroxide. These hydrated hydrogen peroxide molecules are surrounded by water molecules bonded by electrostatic attraction and London Forces. Thus, the ability of the hydrogen peroxide molecules to directly interact with the environment by electrostatic means is greatly attenuated by the bonded molecular water, which effectively alters the fundamental electrostatic configuration of the encapsulated hydrogen peroxide molecule. Further, the lowest concentration of vaporized hydrogen peroxide that can be achieved is generally well above the 1.0 ppm OSHA
workplace safety limit, making these processes unsuitable for use in occupied areas.
[0006] Photocatalysts that have been demonstrated for the destruction of organic pollutants in fluid include but are not limited to Ti02, ZnO, Sn02, W03, CdS, Zr02, SB204 and Fe203. Titanium dioxide is chemically stable, has a suitable bandgap for UV/Visible photoactivation, and is relatively inexpensive. Therefore, photocatalytic chemistry of titanium dioxide has been extensively studied over the last thirty years for removal of organic and inorganic compounds from contaminated air and water.
[0007] Because photocatalysts can generate hydroxyl radicals from adsorbed water when activated by ultraviolet light of sufficient energy, they show promise for use in the production of PHPG for release into the environment when applied in the gas phase.
Existing applications of photocatalysis, however, have focused on the generation of a plasma containing many different reactive chemical species. Further, the majority of the chemical species in the photocatalytic plasma are reactive with hydrogen peroxide, and inhibit the production of hydrogen peroxide gas by means of reactions that destroy hydrogen peroxide.
Also, any organic gases that are introduced into the plasma inhibit hydrogen peroxide production both by direct reaction with hydrogen peroxide and by the reaction of their oxidized products with hydrogen peroxide.
[0008] The photocatalytic plasma reactor itself also limits the production of PHPG for release into the environment. Because hydrogen peroxide (reduction potential 0.71 eV) has greater chemical potential than oxygen (reduction potential -0.13 eV) to be reduced as a sacrificial oxidant, it is preferentially reduced as it moves downstream in photocatalytic plasma reactors as rapidly as it is produced by the oxidation of water.
Oxidation 2photons + 2H20 -4 20H* + 2H+ + 2e"
20H* 4 H202 Reduction H202 + 2H+ + 2e" - 2H20 Additionally, several side reactions generate a variety of species that become part of the photocatalytic plasma, and which inhibit the production of PHPG for release into the environment as noted above.
[0009] The wavelengths of light used to activate photocatalysts are also energetic enough to photolyze the peroxide bond in a hydrogen peroxide molecule and are also an inhibitor in the production of PHPG for release into the environment. Further, the practice of using wavelengths of light that produce ozone introduces yet another species into the photocatalytic plasma that destroys hydrogen peroxide.
03 + H202 4 H2O + 202 [0010] In practice, photocatalytic applications have focused on the production of a plasma, often containing ozone, used to oxidize organic contaminants and microbes. Such plasmas are primarily effective within the confines of the plasma reactor itself, by nature have limited chemical stability beyond the confines of the plasma reactor, and actively degrade the limited amounts of hydrogen peroxide gas that they may contain.
Further, because the plasma is primarily effective within the plasma reactor itself, many designs maximize residence time to facilitate more complete oxidation of organic contaminants and microbes as they pass through the plasma reactor. Since hydrogen peroxide has such a high potential to be reduced, the maximized residence time results in minimized hydrogen peroxide output.
[0011] Also, most applications of photocatalysis produce environmentally objectionable chemical species. First among these is ozone itself, an intentional product of many systems.
Further, since organic contaminants that pass through a plasma reactor are seldom oxidized in one exposure, multiple air exchanges are necessary to achieve full oxidation to carbon dioxide and water. As incomplete oxidation occurs, a mixture of aldehydes, alcohols, carboxylic acids, ketones, and other partially oxidized organic species is produced by the plasma reactor. Often, photocatalytic plasma reactors can actually increase the overall concentration of organic contaminants in the air by fractioning large organic molecules into multiple small organic molecules such as formaldehyde.
[0012] In summary, the production of PHPG for release into the environment is not achieved in the prior art. Methods of vaporizing aqueous hydrogen peroxide solutions produce, at best, hydrated forms of hydrogen peroxide. Also, though photocatalytic systems are capable of producing hydrogen peroxide, they have multiple limitations that severely inhibit PHPG production for release into the environment.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0013] In one aspect of the invention, a method of providing microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation of an environment is disclosed. The method generally comprises (a) providing a photocatalytic cell that preferentially produces hydrogen peroxide gas; (b) generating a Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) that is substantially free of, e.g., hydration (in the form of water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces), ozone, plasma species, and/or organic species; and (c) directing the gas comprising primarily PHPG into the environment such that the PHPG acts to provide microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation in the environment, preferably both on surfaces and in the air.
[0014] In certain embodiments, the method comprises (a) exposing a metal, or metal oxide, catalyst to ultraviolet light in the presence of humid, purified ambient air under conditions so as to form Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) that is substantially free of, e.g., hydration (in the form of water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces), ozone, plasma species, and/or organic species; and (b) directing the PHPG into the environment such that the hydrogen peroxide gas acts to provide infection control and/or disinfection/remediation in the environment, preferably both on surfaces and in the air.
[0015] Another aspect of the invention relates to a diffuser devic for producing PHPG
that is substantially free of, e.g., hydration (in the form of water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces), ozone, plasma species, and/or organic species. The diffuser device generally comprises: (a) a source of ultraviolet light; (b) a metal oxide catalyst substrate structure; and (c) an air distribution mechanism.
[0016] Another aspect of the invention relates to methods for the control of the production of PHPG. In certain embodiment, the production of PHPG is controlled via selection of wavelength in the photocataylic cell so as to improve PHPG yield, through balancing feed air between fresh air containing no PHPG and recirculated air that contains a desired level of PHPG, and combinations thereof.
[0017] Another aspect of the invention relates to the oxidation/removal of VOC's from ambient air by PHPG once it is released into the environment.
[0018] Another aspect of the invention relates to the removal of ozone from ambient air by PHPG once it is released into the environment.
[0019] These and other aspects of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present disclosure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0020] Figure 1 is a cross-section of a particular embodiment of a diffuser device of the invention [0021] Figure 2 is a cut away view of a particular embodiment of a diffuser device of the invention.
[0022] Figure 3 is a cross-section of a 360 degree pedestal-mounted embodiment of the diffuser device.
[0023] Figure 4 is a cross-section of an airfoil-shaped embodiment of the diffuser device, e.g., intended for use inside building air ducts.
[0024] Figure 5 is a cross-section of an embodiment of the diffuser device that may be, e.g., retrofitted to overhead fluorescent lighting fixtures.
[0025] Figure 6 is a cross-section of a humidified embodiment of the diffuser device.
[0026] Figure 7 is a cross-section of an embodiment of the diffuser device including a humidity sensor.
[0027] Figure 8 is a cross-section of an embodiment of the diffuser device, e.g., for use in small areas.
[0028] Figure 9 is a cross-section of an on-board embodiment of the diffuser device, e.g., for use inside aircraft, ground vehicle, and mass transportation air supply systems.
[0029] Figure 10 is a frontal view of a preferred embodiment of a diffuser device of the invention [0030] Figure 11 is a cut away view of a preferred embodiment of a diffuser device of the invention.
[0031] Figure 12 is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the diffuser device of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0032] The present invention relates generally to microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation methods and devices related thereto. In certain embodiments, photocatalytic processes may be utilized in the methods and devices described herein.
[0033] The fundamental nature of a photocatalytic process is to create active intermediates in a chemical reaction by absorption of light. This occurs when a photon of the appropriate wavelength strikes the photocatalyst. The energy of the photon is imparted to a valence band electron, promoting the electron to the conduction band, thus leaving a "hole"
in the valence band. In the absence of an adsorbed chemical species, the promoted electron will decay and recombine with the valence band hole. Recombination is prevented when the valence band hole captures an electron from an oxidizable species -preferentially molecular water - adsorbed to an active surface site on the photocatalyst. Concurrently, a reducible species adsorbed on the catalyst surface - preferentially molecular oxygen -may capture a conduction band electron.
[0034] Upon initiation of the photocatalytic process, or at the entrance point of a photocatalytic plasma reactor, the following reactions occur.
Oxidation 2photons + 2H20 4 2OH* + 2H+ + 2e"
20H* 4 H2O2 Reduction 02+2H++2e 4 H202 Once hydrogen peroxide has been produced, however, the photocatalyst preferentially reduces hydrogen peroxide (reduction potential 0.71 eV) instead of molecular oxygen (reduction potential -0.13 eV), and the reaction shifts to the following equilibrium which takes place within the majority of the plasma reactor volume.
Oxidation 2photons + 2H20 4 20H* + 2H+ + 2e"
20H* 4 H2O2 Reduction H2O2 + 2H+ + 2e" 4 2H20 [0035] In the context of the present invention, Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) may be produced using a photocatalytic process with a purpose-designed morphology that enables the removal of hydrogen peroxide from the PHPG reactor before it is forced to undergo subsequent reduction by the photocatalyst. Denied ready availability of adsorbed hydrogen peroxide gas, the photocatalyst is then forced to preferentially reduce oxygen, rather than hydrogen peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide gas may then generally be produced simultaneously by both the oxidation of water and the reduction of dioxygen in the photocatalytic process. Without intending to be limited, in operation the amount of hydrogen peroxide produced may be doubled, then removed from the system before the vast majority of it can be reduced - thereby resulting in an output of PHPG that is thousands of times greater than the incidental output of unpurified hydrogen peroxide from an equal number of active catalyst sites within a photocatalytic plasma reactor under the same conditions. This purpose-designed morphology also enables the production of PHPG at absolute humidities well below those at which a photocatalytic plasma reactor can effectively operate. For example, PHPG outputs greater than 0.2 ppm have been achieved at an absolute humidity of 2.5 milligrams per Liter. In the purpose-designed morphology the dominant reactions become:
Oxidation 2photons + 2H2O - 20H* + 2H+ + 2e"
20H* 4 H202 Reduction 02 + 2H+ + 2e -4 H202 However, without being limited by theory, it should be noted that the microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation methods and devices of the invention are not achieved as a result of the photocatalytic process, but by the effects of PHPG once it is released into the environment.
[0036] Using morphology that permits immediate removal of hydrogen peroxide gas before it can be reduced, PHPG may be generated in any suitable manner known in the art, including but not limited to, any suitable process known in the art that simultaneously oxidizes water in gas form and reduces oxygen gas, including gas phase photo-catalysis, e.g., using a metal catalyst such as titanium dioxide, zirconium oxide, titanium dioxide doped with cocatalysts (such as copper, rhodium, silver, platinum, gold, etc.), or other suitable metal oxide photocatalysts. PHPG may also be produced by electrolytic processes using anodes and cathodes made from any suitable metal, or constructed from metal oxide ceramics using morphology that permits immediate removal of hydrogen peroxide gas before it can be reduced. Alternatively, PHPG may be produced by high frequency excitation of gaseous water and oxygen molecules on a suitable supporting substrate using morphology that permits immediate removal of hydrogen peroxide gas before it can be reduced.
[0037] In one aspect of the invention, a method of providing microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation of an environment is disclosed. The method generally comprises (a) generating a gas comprised of Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) that is substantially free of, e.g., hydration (in the form of water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces), ozone, plasma species, and/or organic species; and (b) directing the gas comprised of PHPG into the environment such that the PHPG acts to provide microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation in the environment, preferably both on surfaces and in the air.
[0038] As used herein, the term "Purified Hydrogen Peroixde Gas" or PHPG
generally means a gas form of hydrogen peroxide that is substantially free of at least hydration (in the form of water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces) and substantially free of ozone.
[0039] In certain embodiments, the method comprises (a) exposing a metal, or metal oxide, catalyst to ultraviolet light in the presence of humid purified ambient air under conditions so as to form Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) that is substantially free of, e.g., hydration (in the form of water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces), ozone, plasma species, and/or organic species; and (b) directing the PHPG into the environment such that the PHPG acts to provide infection control and/or disinfection/remediation in the environment, preferably both on surfaces and in the air, removal of ozone from the ambient air, and removal of VOC's from the ambient air.
[0040] In one embodiment, the ultraviolet light produces at least one wavelength in a range above about 181 nm, above about 185 nm, above about 187 nm, between about 182 nm and about 254 nm, between about 187 nm and about 250 nm, between about 188 nm and about 249 nm, between about 255 nm and about 380 nm, etc. In certain embodiments, wavelengths between about 255 urn and 380 nm may be preferred to improve yields of PHPG.
[0041] Another aspect of the invention relates to a diffuser device for producing Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) that is substantially free of, e.g., hydration (in the form of water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces), ozone, plasma species, and/or organic species. With reference to, e.g., Figures 1 and 2, the diffuser device generally comprises: (a) a source of ultraviolet light 4; (b) a metal or metal oxide catalyst substrate structure 3; and (c) an air distribution mechanism 5, 6, and/or 7.
[0042] In certain embodiments, the air distribution mechanism may be a fan 5 or any other suitable mechanism for moving fluid, e.g., air, through the diffuser device. In accordance with certain aspects of the invention, the selection, design, sizing, and operation of the air distribution mechanism should be such that the fluid, e.g. air, flow through the diffuser device is generally as rapid as is practical. Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that optimal levels of PHPG are generated for exiting the diffuser device under rapid fluid flow conditions.
[0043] The ultraviolet light source 4 may generally produce at least one range of wavelengths sufficient to activate photocatalytic reactions of the humid ambient air, but without photolyzing oxygen so as to initiate the formation of ozone. In one embodiment, the ultraviolet light produces at least one wavelength in a range above about 181 nm, above about 185 nm, above about 187 nm, between about 182 nm and about 254 nm, between about 187 nm and about 250 nm, between about 188 rim and about 249 nm, between about 255 nm and about 380 nm, etc. In certain embodiments, wavelengths between about 255 rim and 380 run may be preferred to improve yields of PHPG including non-hydrated hydrogen peroxide in the substantial absence of ozone.
[0044] In accordance with the present invention, the terms "substantial absence of ozone"
"substantially free of ozone", etc., generally mean amounts of ozone below about 0.015 ppm, down to levels below the LOD (level of detection) for ozone. Such levels are below the generally accepted limits for human health. In this regard, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires ozone output of indoor medical devices to be no more than 0.05 ppm of ozone. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that workers not be exposed to an average concentration of more than 0.10 ppm of ozone for 8 hours. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommends an upper limit of 0.10 ppm of ozone, not to be exceeded at any time. EPA's National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone is a maximum 8 hour average outdoor concentration of 0.08 ppm. The diffuser devices described herein have consistently demonstrated that they do not produce ozone at levels detectable by means of a Draeger Tube.
[0045] In certain embodiments, PHPG may, however, be used for the removal of ozone from the ambient environment by means of the following reaction:
03 + H202 4 H2O + 202 [0046] In certain embodiments, PHPG may be used for the removal of VOC's from the ambient environment by means of direct oxidation of VOC's by the PHPG.
[0047] In certain embodiments, PHPG may be used for microbial control, including but not limited to, as a biocide, for indoor air treatment, as a mold and/or fungus eliminator, as a bacteria eliminator, and/or as an eliminator of viruses. The PHPG method may produce hydrogen peroxide gas sufficient to carry out a desired microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation process. A sufficient amount is generally known by those skilled in the art and may vary depending on the solid, liquid, or gas to be purified and the nature of a particular disinfection/remediation.
[0048] In certain embodiments, with reference to the microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation of air and related environments (including surfaces therein), the amount of PHPG may vary from about 0.005 ppm to about 0.10 ppm, more particularly, from about 0.02 ppm to about 0.05 ppm, in the environment to be disinfected. Such amounts have been proven effective against, e.g., the Feline Calicivirus (an EPA approved surrogate for Norovirus), Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), Vancomyacin Resistant Enterococcus Faecalis (VRE), Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff), Geobacillus Stearothermophilus, and Aspergillus Niger. Such amounts of PHPG are safe to use in occupied areas (including, but not limited to, schools, hospitals, offices, homes, and other common areas), disinfect surface contaminating microbes, kill airborne pathogens, and provide microbial control, e.g., for preventing the spread of Pandemic Flu, controlling nosocomial infections, and reducing the transmission of common illnesses.
[0049] In certain embodiments, with reference to the microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation of air and related environments (including surfaces therein), the amount of PHPG may vary from about 0.005 ppm to about 0.40 ppm. PHPG levels of 0.2 ppm using a feed of untreated air containing absolute humidity as low as 3.5 mg/L can consistently be achieved. More particularly, PHPG levels from about 0.09 ppm to about 0.13 ppm using humid recirculated air, can be produced in the environment to be disinfected.

Such amounts have been proven effective against, e.g., the H1N1 virus. Such amounts of PHPG are also safe to use in occupied areas (including, but not limited to, schools, hospitals, offices, homes, and other common areas), disinfect surface contaminating microbes, kill airborne pathogens, and provide microbial control, e.g., for preventing the spread of Pandemic Flu, controlling nosocomial infections, and reducing the transmission of common illnesses.
[0050] In certain aspects of the invention, the humidity of the ambient air is preferably above about 1% relative humidity (RH), above about 5% RH, above about 10% RH, etc. In certain embodiments, the humidity of the ambient air may be between about 10%
and about 99% RH. In one embodiment, the method of the invention includes regulating the humidity of the ambient air within the range of about 5% to about 99% RH, or about 10 to about 99%
RH.
[0051] The metal, or metal oxide, catalyst may be selected from titanium dioxide, copper, copper oxide, zinc, zinc oxide, iron, and iron oxide or mixtures thereof, and more preferably, the catalyst is titanium dioxide. More particularly, titanium dioxide is a semiconductor, absorbing light in the near ultraviolet portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Titanium dioxide is synthesized in two forms - anatase and rutile - which are, in actuality, different planes of the same parent crystal structure. The form taken is a function of the preparation method and the starting material used. Anatase absorbs photons at wavelengths less than 380 nm, whereas ruffle absorbs photons at wavelengths less than 405 nm.
[0052] A layer of titanium dioxide approximately 4 gm thick will absorb 100%
of incident low wavelength light. Titanium dioxide is known to have approximately 9-14 x 1014 active surface sites per square centimeter. An active surface site is a coordinatively unsaturated site on the surface which is capable of bonding with hydroxyl ions or other basic species. Its photocatalytic activity is influenced by its structure (anatase or ruffle), surface area, size distribution, porosity, and the density of hydroxyl groups on its surface. Anatase is generally considered to a more active photocatalyst than rutile. It is known to adsorb dioxygen more strongly than rutile and remains photoconductive longer after flash irradiation than rutile. Anatase and rutile have band gap energies of 3.2 and 3.0 electron volts (eV), respectively.
[0053] Numerous agents have been shown to have an influence on photocatalysis.
Such agents may be added to the reaction environment to influence the photocatalysis process. As recognized by those skilled in the art, some agents enhance the process, while others degrade it. Still others act to enhance one reaction while inhibiting another.
[0054] From acid-base chemistry, it has been found that basic agents may bond at the active site on the catalyst. Without being limited by theory, reducible agents which adsorb on the catalyst more strongly than dioxygen may substitute as the electron acceptor. Small molecule chemicals, metals, and ions have all shown this capability. In these cases, the impact on formation of PHPG are dictated by the efficiency with which the agent accepts electrons relative to dioxygen and hydrogen peroxide.
[0055] Some additive agents involve radical species in side reactions or in the formation of less reactive radicals incapable of performing the desired reaction. Yet others physically alter the photocatalyst, changing its performance. In accordance with the present invention, additive agents may be selected to optimize the formation of PHPG (optionally while minimizing or eliminating the formation of ozone, plasma species, or organic species).
[0056] In one aspect, as mentioned above, additive agents may include co-catalysts. Co-catalysts may be metals or coatings deposited on the surface of a catalyst to improve the efficiency of selected PHPG reactions. Cocatalysts may alter the physical characteristics of catalyst in two ways. First, they may provide new energy levels for conduction band electrons to occupy. Second, co-catalysts may possess different absorption characteristics than the supporting photocatalyst. This may cause the order in which competing reactions take place on the co-catalyst to be different from that on the catalyst itself. Cocatalysts are generally most effective at surface coverages of less than five percent.
Typical co-catalysts may be selected from platinum, silver, nickel, palladium, and many other metal compounds.
Phthalocyanine has also demonstrated cocatalytic capabilities.
[0057] A diffuser device in accordance with the invention may be of any suitable shape or size, including spherical, hemispherical, cubic, three dimensional rectangular, etc. By way of non-limiting example, the diffuser device may be configured as a sail shape, a 360 degree pedestal-mount, an airfoil-shape (e.g., intended for use inside building air ducts); an design that may be retrofitted to overhead fluorescent lighting fixtures, an design specifically configured for use in small areas (e.g., for use on-board aircraft, ground vehicles, and mass transportation air supply systems). Diffusers may also be configured in any number of fanciful shapes such as teddy bears, piggy banks, mock radio's, etc.
[0058] The core of the diffuser device may be comprised of an ultraviolet light source.
The ultraviolet light source 4 may be positioned at the center, or interior, of the diffuser device, may be of varied intensity depending on the size of the device and the application for which it is intended.
[0059] By way of example, in certain embodiments, with reference to Figures 1 and 2, the diffuser device may be of a general elongated wedge-shape. The ultraviolet source 4, e.g., may be tubular in shape may be contained within the elongated wedge-shaped, or tube shaped diffuser shell 2. In certain configurations a reflector 1 may serve to focus light in a specific direction within the interior of a device as required by its specific shape.
[0060] The shell 2 of the diffuser device may be formed from any suitable substrate material, including ceramic, porcelain, polymer, etc. By way of example, the polymer may be a porous or vented polymer that is both hydrophobic and resistant to degradation by ultraviolet light in the 380 nm to 182 rim range. Polymers that are resistant to some wavelengths within this range, but not all, may be used in conjunction with UV
lamps that only produce light in the ranges to which they are resistant. A diffuser shell may be molded into any desired size and shape, and formed as any color desired. In certain embodiments, a phosphorescent material may be incorporated into the shell material so as to emit visible light upon absorption of UV light.
[0061] The diffuser device also generally includes a fluid distribution mechanism. The fluid distribution mechanism generally serves to move fluid, such as air through the diffuser device. More particularly, the air distribution mechanism will generally direct fluid into the diffuser device, which will then diffuse out through the diffuser substrate.
[0062] In one embodiment, with reference to Figure 2, the fluid distribution mechanism will direct fluid through an intake vent 7 to a small fan (not shown) framed within an opening in the diffuser device. The fan may also have a replaceable hydrophobic gas and/or dust filter 6 on the upstream side to prevent organic gases and/or dust from entering the diffuser device, thus ensuring that the PHPG remains substantially free of organic species. Based on need, in certain embodiments, it may be desirable for the fluid distribution mechanism to be of the lowest power necessary to create a gentle overpressure within the diffuser; in other embodiments, a rapid fan speed may be more desirable.
[0063] In another embodiment, depicted in Figure 3, a cross-section of a 360 degree pedestal-mounted embodiment of the diffuser device is illustrated. This is a variation of a diffuser device similar to that of Figures 1 and 2, e.g., that can be placed in the center of a large area.
[0064] In yet another embodiment, depicted in Figure 4, a cross-section of an airfoil-shaped embodiment of the diffuser device, e.g., intended for use inside building air ducts is illustrated. As shown, the device is configured so as to provide a perpendicular vented surface to oncoming airflow at its leading edge, forcing air to flow into the device. The bank of light-emitting diodes and the photocatalytic sail are arrayed parallel to the trailing edge of the airfoil shape, taking advantage of the lower air pressure created by the trailing edge of the airfoil to draw PHPG from the device as it is produced. In certain embodiments, the diffuser device of Figure 4 may optionally be equipped with a supplementary internal fan (not shown)to facilitate greater airflow, an airflow sensor (not shown) to turn the device off when no air is flowing through the air duct, then on again when air flow resumes, or both.
[0065] In yet another embodiment, depicted in Figure 5, a cross-section of an embodiment of the diffuser device that can be retrofitted to overhead fluorescent lighting fixtures is illustrated. As shown, the fluorescent bulbs of the original fixture are removed, the fixture is provided with an airtight seal and wiring to power fans. Bulbs appropriate for PHPG production are then installed and the bottom of the fixture is fitted with an assembly containing intake fans and filters, a, e.g., rectangular photocatalytic sail, and a, e.g., rectangular vented diffuser.
[0066] In yet another embodiment, depicted in Figure 6, a cross-section of a humidified embodiment of the diffuser device is illustrated. As shown, a wick is located downstream of the filter with its lower section immersed in a water tray. The tray can be refilled manually, or by automatic feed regulated by a water level sensor (not shown).
[0067] In yet another embodiment, depicted in Figure 7, a cross-section of an embodiment of the diffuser device containing a humidity sensor is illustrated.
In one embodiment, the humidity sensor may be used, e.g., to turn off the device if an operating humidity above a predetermined operating parameter (e.g., 95%, 98%, 99%, etc.) is detected.
[0068] In yet another embodiment, depicted in Figure 8, a cross-section of an embodiment of the diffuser device for small areas is illustrated. This small device is designed to plug directly into a power outlet in a small room. The intake fan and filter on the edge of the device provide air to a small photocatalytic sail activated by a small array of light emitting diodes to produce PHPG.
[0069] In yet another embodiment, depicted in Figure 9, a cross-section of an on-board embodiment of the diffuser device, e.g., for use inside aircraft, ground vehicle, mass transportation air supply systems, etc., is illustrated. The on-board device may be placed directly in the supply air flow and may be configured with an internal fan to offset the pressure drop that occurs as air passes through the device. In certain embodiments, the device may be configured so that it has the same external cross section as the internal cross section of the air flow duct for each particular application of the embodiment.
[0070] In yet another embodiment, depicted in Figure 10, the frontal view of a preferred embodiment of a diffuser device is illustrated. This device is symmetrical in all three dimensions, and can be set into a pedestal-shaped bottom sleeve to stand upright as shown or mounted horizontally from a wall or ceiling by means of a bracket.
[0071] In yet another embodiment, depicted in Figure 11, a cross-section of a preferred embodiment of a diffuser device is illustrated. This device employs an arc-shaped dust and VOC filter to provide improved filtration and to supply the intake plenum with filtered air.
The arced filter more evenly distributes the air flow through a larger surface area, reducing pressure losses through the filter. The intake plenum supplies a bank of three fans that direct air perpendicularly through the arced photocatalytic sail positioned just inside the output vent. In this embodiment air flows in a direct line from the back to the front of the device.
Two ultraviolet bulbs are offset out of the airflow to provide even illumination of the photocatalytic sail. This embodiment provides better performance, improving filtration by a factor of 7.66, improving airflow by a factor of 7.5, and doubling photon flux. This supplies humid air to the photocatalytic sail at a greatly improved rate (increasing PHPG production), and greatly reduces the dwell time of PHPG on the photocatalytic surface once produced, insuring that more PHPG survives to exit the system.
[0072] Depicted in Figure 12 is the side view of the embodiment of the diffuser device of Figure 11.
[0073] In one embodiment, the interior surface of the diffuser shell may generally be used as the substrate by coating it with photocatalyst, which may include titanium dioxide doped with one or more other metals in certain embodiments. By way of example, the photocatalyst may be applied to the interior of the diffuser substrate as a paint. The application should generally be applied so as to prevent clogging of the pores within the diffuser substrate. In one embodiment, air may be applied to the substrate, and forced through the pores of the substrate after application of the photocatalyst paint, both causing the coating to dry and keeping the pores clear by means of forced air. It may be preferred for the combination of photocatalytic coating and diffuser substrate to be opaque enough to prevent UV light from escaping the assembled diffuser device.
[0074] In another embodiment, the diffuser shell and the catalyst substrate are separate components, with the substrate layer situated just inside, and very close to, the interior surface of the diffuser shell.
[0075] In certain embodiments, the diffuser device may be designed to operate over a pre-determined range of wavelengths so as to specifically improve PHPG yield, as described herein. In addition, in certain embodiments, the diffuser device may be humidified (see, e.g., Figure 6), or may be designed to operate at the specific humidity of operation, and operation parameters may be adjusted accordingly. In this regard, the diffuser device may include a humidity sensor (see, e.g., Figure 7). In certain embodiments, the diffuser device may optionally include a control system to optimize PHPG yield based on the humidity of the operating environment, and/or to cease operation if humidity conditions are unfavorable.
[0076] The diffuser design optimizes PHPG production by spreading the air permeable photocatalytic PHPG reactor surface thinly over a large area that is perpendicular to air flow (e.g., in certain embodiments, over a sail-like area), rather than by compacting it into a volume-optimizing morphology designed to maximize residence time within the plasma reactor. By configuring the PHPG reactor morphology as a thin, sail-like air-permeable structure, just inside the diffuser's interior shell, the exit path length for hydrogen peroxide molecules produced on the catalyst becomes diminishingly short, and their residence time within the PHPG reactor structure is reduced to a fraction of a second, preventing the vast majority of hydrogen peroxide molecules from being subsequently adsorbed onto the catalyst and reduced back into water. Also, by placing the catalyst substrate just inside the interior surface of the diffuser shell, not only is PHPG reactor surface area maximized, but the PHPG
produced also passes out of the diffuser almost immediately and thus avoids photolysis from prolonged exposure to the UV light source. By means of this morphology, PHPG
output concentrations as high as 0.40 ppm have been achieved.
[0077] In preferred embodiments, PHPG concentrations may be self-regulating due to the electrostatic attraction between PHPG molecules, which degrade to water and oxygen upon reacting with each other. PHPG self-regulation occurs whenever the concentration of PHPG

results in intermolecular spacing that is closer in distance than the electrostatic attraction range of the PHPG molecules. When this occurs, PHPG molecules are attracted to, and degrade each other until the concentration drops sufficiently that the intermolecular spacing is greater than the electrostatic attraction range of the PHPG molecules. By this means PHPG
concentrations are maintained at levels well below the OSHA workplace safety limit of 1.0 parts per million.
[0078] In some embodiments, where active control of PHPG output levels is desirable, production of PHPG can be regulated by the PHPG reactor itself. PHPG
production levels can be set at any level from 0.01 ppm up to 0.40 ppm by recirculating a small regulated fraction of treated air containing PHPG back through the PHPG reactor. When this is done, the PHPG output levels are governed by the following set of reactions.
Oxidation 2photons + 2H20 4 20H* + 2H+ + 2e' 20H* - H202 Reduction (100%- x%)02+ 2(100%- x%)H+ + 2(100%- x%)e" 4 (100%- x%)H202 x%H202 + 2x%H+ + 2x%e" 4 2x%H2O
[0079] Because the reduction potential of the peroxide bond in PHPG (+0.71eV) is so much higher than the reduction potential of the double bond between oxygen atoms in an oxygen molecule (-0.13eV), PHPG is preferentially reduced over oxygen and it takes only a small amount of recirculated PHPG to lower net production levels. By this means of regulated fractional recirculation a PHPG reactor that is otherwise designed for highest output can be set to a lower level simply by redirecting some of the air it has already treated back through the PHPG reactor.
[0080] It should be noted that this PHPG optimizing morphology also minimizes the residence time for any organic contaminants that may enter and pass through the system, dramatically reducing the probability that they will be oxidized. Effectively, photocatalytic systems optimized for PHPG production, are, by design, less likely to oxidize organic contaminants as they pass through the catalyst structure; and photocatalytic systems optimized for the oxidation of organic contaminants will, by design, inhibit hydrogen peroxide gas production.
[0081] In accordance with certain aspects of the invention, PHPG may be produced in the substantial absence of ozone, plasma species, and/or organic species, e.g., by the photocatalytic oxidation of adsorbed water molecules when activated with UV
light in the ranges described herein. In one embodiment, the diffuser substrate, coated with photocatalyst on its interior (or diffuser shell lined on the interior with a thin sail-like air-permeable photocatalyst structure), may be placed over and around the ultraviolet lamp.
An opening in the diffuser may serve as a frame into which the UV light's power source and structural support will fit. When assembled, the diffuser device may function as follows:
(a) the fluid distribution mechanism directs air into the diffuser through an organic vapor and dust filter, creating an overpressure; (b) air moves out of the diffuser through the pores or vents in the substrate and/or diffuser shell; (c) moisture contained in the air adsorbs onto the photocatalyst; (d) when illuminated, the UV light produced by the lamp activates the photocatalyst, causing it to oxidize adsorbed water and reduce adsorbed oxygen, producing PHPG; and (e) the PHPG produced in the interior of the diffuser device then moves rapidly out of the diffuser through its pores or vents into the surrounding environment.
[0082] In some embodiments, PHPG may be generated by a Medium Pressure Mercury Arc (MPMA) Lamp. MPMA lamps emit not only ultraviolet light, but also visible light, and wavelengths in the infrared spectrum. It is important that when selecting a lamp, output in the ultraviolet spectrum should be closely examined. The ultraviolet spectral output is sometimes expressed graphically, showing the proportional output at the important ultraviolet wavelengths. The broad spectrum of the MPMA lamp is selected for its functionality.
[0083] In other embodiments, PHPG may be generated by Ultraviolet Light Emitting Diodes (UV LED's). UV LED's are more compact and banks of UV LED's can be arrayed in a variety of sizes and ways, enabling the production of smaller, more rugged systems.
[0084] In other embodiments, PHPG output may be regulated by control systems managing devices singly, or in groups. Such control systems may regulate operation by: (a) turning devices on and off; (b) regulating light intensity and/or fan speed;
(c) monitoring ambient PHPG levels directly by means of automated colorimetric devices, by automated Draeger indicators, by means of flash vaporization of PHPG accumulated in an aqueous trap, by measuring the change in conductivity of a substrate sensitive to hydrogen peroxide accumulation, or by thermal means, measuring the heat evolved by the exothermic reaction between PHPG and a stable reactant to which it is electrostatically attracted;
and (d) monitoring ambient PHPG levels indirectly through relative humidity.

EXAMPLES
[0085] Without intending to be limited by the following performance example, one embodiment of the invention was constructed as follows: (a) the device was constructed in the shape of a quarter-cylinder 20 inches in length, and with a radius of 8.5 inches; (b) the quarter cylinder was designed to fit into the 90 degree angle formed where a wall meets a ceiling, with the quarter-cylinder's straight sides fitting flush against the wall and ceiling, and the curved face of the cylinder facing out and down into the room; (c) as viewed from below, the right end of the quarter-cylinder supported a variable speed fan with a maximum output of 240 cubic feet per minute, and a high efficiency, hydrophobic, activated charcoal intake filter; (d) the left end of the quarter cylinder supported the power connection for the fan, and a fourteen inch Medium Pressure Mercury Arc (MPMA) lamp, positioned so that the lamp was centered within, and parallel to, the length of the quarter-cylinder; (e) a vented metal reflector was placed behind the MPMA lamp to reflect light toward the interior surface of the curved face of the quarter-cylinder; and (f) the curved face of the cylinder was vented to allow air, but not light, to flow out of the device.
[0086] A curved sail-like photocatalyst structure was placed just inside, and parallel to, the interior surface of the curved face of the quarter-cylinder; (a) the catalyst substrate was eighteen inches long, eleven inches high, framed, and had a curvature from top to bottom with a radius of 8.25 inches; (b) was formed of fiberglass, and was coated with crystalline titanium dioxide powder; and (c) the titanium dioxide was applied to the fiberglass in five coats to ensure complete coverage of all fibers, then sintered in an oven to cause the photocatalyst crystals to bond both to each other and to the fiberglass.
[0087] During operation, both the fan and the MPMA lamp were turned on: (a) intake air was drawn into the device through the high efficiency, hydrophobic, activated charcoal intake filter which removed by adsorption Volatile Organic hydroCarbons (VOC's), without removing moisture from the intake air; (b) the intake air was supplied to the back of the device, where the vented metal reflector redirected it evenly toward the photocatalyst structure, and the interior of the vented face of the quarter-cylinder; (c) moisture and oxygen from the intake air adsorbed onto the photocatalyst, which was activated by 255 nm to 380 mn light from the MPMA lamp; (d) the activated photocatalyst oxidized water to hydroxyl radicals, which then combined to form hydrogen peroxide, while dioxygen was simultaneously reduced on the photocatalyst to hydrogen peroxide; and (e) the Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) generated was immediately carried by the air flow off of the photocatalyst, through the light-impermeable vented face of the device, and out into the room.
[00881 The Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) thus produced was: (a) substantially free of bonded water because it was produced by catalytic means rather than by the vaporization of aqueous solution; (b) the PHPG was substantially free of ozone because the MPMA lamp did not use any wavelengths capable of photolyzing dioxygen; (c) the PHPG
was substantially free of plasma species because the morphology of the photocatalyst permitted the rapid removal of hydrogen peroxide from its surface before it could subsequently be reduced photocatalytically; (d) the PHPG was protected from Ultraviolet (UV) photolysis because it passed out through the light-impermeable, vented face of the quarter-cylinder immediately upon exiting the photocatalyst surface; and (e) the PHPG was substantially free of organic species because VOC's were adsorbed by the high efficiency, hydrophobic, activated charcoal intake filter.
[00891 The device was subjected to tests designed and implemented by two accredited laboratories to: (a) measure the output of Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG); (b) confirm that the output was substantially free of ozone; (c) confirm that the output was substantially free of VOC's; (d) measure the efficacy of PHPG against the Feline Calicivirus (an EPA-approved substitute for noroviruses), Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureous (MRSA), Vancomyacin Resistant Enterococcus Faecalis (VRE), Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff), Geobacillus Stearothermophilus, (a stable bacteria used by the insurance industry to verify successful microbial remediation), and Aspergillus Niger (a common fungus); and (e) test at a variety of ambient relative humidities including 35% to 40 % at 70 to 72 degrees Fahrenheit, 56% to 59% at 81 to 85 degrees Fahrenheit, and 98% at 78 degrees Fahrenheit.
[00901 Measurements for ozone, VOC's, temperature, and humidity were all accomplished using standard devices. Since no device is yet readily available to measure hydrogen peroxide gas at levels below 0.10 ppm, three new means were devised:
(a) hydrogen peroxide test strips, normally used to measure approximate concentrations in aqueous solution, were found to detect the presence of PHPG over time; (b) hydrogen peroxide test strips, normally designed to be read after 20 seconds of exposure, were found to accumulate PHPG, and to provide approximate readings of PHPG concentration accurate to within 0.01 ppm, when normalized for exposure time over periods of less than an hour - for example, a test strip that accumulated 0.5 ppm over the course of five minutes was exposed for 15 twenty-second intervals, indicating an approximate concentration of 0.5 ppm divided by 15, or 0.033 ppm; (c) Draeger tubes, designed to detect hydrogen peroxide concentrations as low as 0.10 ppm after drawing 2000 cubic centimeters of air, were found to provide readings of lower concentrations accurate within 0.005 ppm, as larger volumes were drawn by a calibrated pump - for example, a Draeger tube that indicated 0.10 ppm after drawing 4000 cubic centimeters measured an approximate PHPG concentration of 0.05 ppm, and a Draeger tube that indicated 0.10 ppm after drawing 6000 cubic centimeters, measured an approximate PHPG concentration of 0.033 ppm; and (d) measurements taken with both hydrogen peroxide test strips and Draeger tubes were found to closely agree with each other.
[0091] In tests designed to measure hydrogen peroxide levels at varying humidities, the following data was collected:

Relative Temperature PHPG Means of Humidity (Fahrenheit) Concentration Detection/Measurement 98% 78 0.08 ppm Test strip/Draeger tube/
Microbial reduction 56%-59% 81 - 85 0.05 - 0.08 ppm Test strip/Draeger tube/
Microbial reduction 35%-40% 70 - 72 0.005 - 0.01 ppm Test strip/
Microbial reduction [0092] The PHPG measurement data indicated that the concentration of PHPG
produced is highly dependent on the relative humidity. This is predictable, because the production of PHPG is directly dependent on the availability of water molecules in the air.
It should be noted that the US Department of Health and Human Services requires that hospital operating rooms be maintained between 30% and 60% relative humidity.
[0093] The PHPG measurement data also remained constant over time and indicated an upper equilibrium limit of approximately 0.08 ppm. This is also predictable due to the electrostatic attraction of PHPG molecules to each other whenever their intermolecular spacing becomes less than their mutual electrostatic attraction ranges. Under this condition excess PHPG reacts with itself to produce oxygen and water molecules. This upper limit of 0.08 ppm is also well below the OSHA workplace safety limit of 1.0 ppm and thus safe to breathe, indicating that PHPG systems can be safely and continuously used in occupied areas.
[0094] All testing also indicated a complete absence of ozone in the device's output.
[0095] In VOC testing, an approximate ambient concentration of 7 ppm of 2-propanol was established 2500 cubic foot room. The device was found to rapidly reduce VOC levels throughout the room.

VOC m H202 m -Drae er Ozone m Station: 1 2 3 4 5 Distance 2" 9' 12' 16' 20' Zero Time 6.8 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 Unit's Light and fan ~high) turned on min 6.0 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.6 min 4.2 4.4 3.7 3.9 3.6 min 3.6 3.6 3.1 3.1 2.9 30 min 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 60 min 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.05 at room center 90 min 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.000 all St 24 hr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.08 at center & S-5 0.000 all St [00961 In qualitative microbial testing, chips inoculated with Geobacillus Stearothermophilus were placed in the environment in several tests, and in all cases showed significant reduction of the bacteria within a matter of hours.
[0097] In quantitative microbial testing at ATS labs in Eagan, Minnesota the following data was collected. It should be noted that these impressive kill rates were achieved with a PHPG concentration of just 0.005 ppm to 0.01 ppm, produced at a relative humidity of 35%
to 40%.

Percent Percent Reduction Exposure Time Average Virus Reduction as Compared to Infectivity Observed Compared to Test Organism (hrs) After Exposure Time Zero Corresponding Virus Control Natural Die-off Feline 2 4.3loglo 99.5% 96.8%
Calicivirus 6 2.3loglo 99.995% 99.8%
(Norovirus 50.6 loglo (virus substitute) 24 detected in only one >_99.9999% 99.8%
replicate) Percent Percent Reduction Average CFU / Test Reduction as Test Organism Time point carrier Compared to Compared to (Survivors in the test) Time Zero Corresponding Natural Die-off Control 2 hours <1 (no survivors) >99.9999% >99.9999%
MRSA (ATCC
33592) 6 hours <1(no survivors) >99.9999% >99.9999%
24 hours <1 (no survivors) >99.9999% >99.9999%
2 hours <1 (no survivors) >99.9999% >99.999%

VRE (ATCC 6 hours <1 (no survivors) >99.9999% >99.99%
51575) 24 hours <1 (no survivors) >99.9999% >99.9%
2 hours 2.18 x 105 CFU / 27.3% 9.2%
Carrier C. difficile 6 hours 1.1 x 105 CFU / 63.3% 60.6%
(ATCC 700792) Carrier 24 hours 7.3 x 10 CFU / 75.7% 70.4%
Carrier 2 hours 1.9 x 105 CFU / 19.1% 13.6%
Carrier A. niger (ATCC 6 hours 4.67 x 104 CFU / 80.1% 81.3%
16404) Carrier 24 hours 1.2x104CFU/ 9490/0 90.8%
Carrier [00981 At higher humidities, higher concentrations of PHPG are produced, and microbial reduction rates will increase. Data collected since this test using an improved prototype has achieved PHPG concentrations as high as 0.40 ppm, forty times higher than used in this quantitative test.
[00991 Also, a comparison test indicated that the PHPG test device produces a PHPG
equilibrium concentration thousands of times greater than the incidental output of unpurified hydrogen peroxide from an equal number of active catalyst sites within a photocatalytic plasma reactor under the same conditions.
Generally, the invention has been described in specific embodiments with some degree of particularity, it is to be understood that this description has been given only by way of example and that numerous changes in the details of construction, fabrication and use, including the combination and arrangement of parts, may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as shown in the following example embodiments.

Claims (17)

1. A method for microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation of an environment, the method comprising: (a) generating a gas comprising Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) that is substantially free of associated water in the form of water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces; ozone;
plasma species; and/or organic species; (b) directing the PHPG into the environment such that the hydrogen peroxide gas acts to provide microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation in the environment, both on surfaces and in the air.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the generated PHPG is electrostatically attracted to complimentary positively and negatively charged structures and/or sites on microbes thereby raising its efficacy in microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation as compared to either hydrated hydrogen peroxide or ozone.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the PHPG produced is between 0.005 ppm and 0.40 ppm in concentration.
4. The method of claim 1, wherin the PHPG produced can be actively regulated to a desired concentration by balancing feed air between untreated air and fractional recirculation of air already treated with PHPG.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein said microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation of an environment includes indoor air treatment, water purifier, mold eliminator, bacteria eliminator, and virus eliminator.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the percent humidity of the air is within the range of 5-99%, or regulated therein.
7. A method for microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation of an environment, the method comprising: (a) exposing a metal, or metal oxide, catalyst to ultraviolet light in the presence of humid purified ambient air under conditions so as to form Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas (PHPG) that is substantially free of associated water in the form of water in solution or water molecules bonded by covalence, van der Waals forces, or London forces;
ozone; plasma species; and/or organic species; (b) directing the PHPG into the environment such that the hydrogen peroxide gas acts to provide infection control and/or disinfection/remediation in the environment, both on surfaces and in the air.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said microbial control and/or disinfection/remediation of an environment includes indoor air treatment, water purifier, mold eliminator, bacteria eliminator, and virus eliminator.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the percent humidity of the air is within the range of 5-99%, or regulated therein.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein said metal or metal oxide catalyst is titanium dioxide.
11. The method of claim 7, wherein said PHPG production also results in the removal of both ozone and VOC's from the ambient air by means of direct chemical reaction of these species with PHPG, said removal comprising (a) reacting with ozone to produce oxygen and water, and (b) reacting with VOC's to produce carbon dioxide and water.
12. The method of claim 7, wherein said metal, or metal oxide, catalyst is exposed to ultraviolet light at a wavelength at least between about 255 nm and 380 nm.
13. A diffuser device for producing PHPG comprising: (a) a source of ultraviolet light;
(b) a metal or metal oxide, catalyst substrate structure; and (d) an air distribution mechanism.
14. The device of claim 13, wherein the morphology of the catalyst on its substrate is a thin, sail-like air-permeable structure, situated perpendicular to air flow through the diffuser device; and wherein said morphology alters the reaction equilibrium of the catalyst such that it produces hydrogen peroxide from both the oxidation of water and from the reduction of dioxygen; and said morphology substantially prevents the reduction of hydrogen peroxide on the catalyst by causing the hydrogen peroxide to rapidly flow off of and away from the catalyst before it can be reduced.
15. The device of claim 13, wherein said air distribution mechanism is a fan.
16. The device of claim 13, wherein said ultraviolet light source produces at least one range of wavelength.
17. The device of claim 13, wherein said ultraviolet light produces more than one range of wavelength.
CA2750788A 2009-02-13 2010-02-11 Uv air treatment method and device Abandoned CA2750788A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15258109P 2009-02-13 2009-02-13
US61/152,581 2009-02-13
US25800509P 2009-11-04 2009-11-04
US61/258,005 2009-11-04
PCT/US2010/023903 WO2010093796A1 (en) 2009-02-13 2010-02-11 Uv air treatment method and device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2750788A1 true CA2750788A1 (en) 2010-08-19

Family

ID=42062413

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA2750788A Abandoned CA2750788A1 (en) 2009-02-13 2010-02-11 Uv air treatment method and device

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2396043A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2012517862A (en)
CN (1) CN102316909A (en)
AU (1) AU2010213703A1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI1008435A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2750788A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2011137536A (en)
WO (1) WO2010093796A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8168122B2 (en) 2007-08-07 2012-05-01 Lee Antimicrobial Solutions Llc Purified hydrogen peroxide gas microbial control methods and devices
US20140229414A1 (en) 2013-02-08 2014-08-14 Ebay Inc. Systems and methods for detecting anomalies
DK2996474T3 (en) * 2013-05-17 2020-11-30 Synexis Llc Methods for controlling arthropods using hydrogen peroxide in a near-ideal gas phase
PL223973B1 (en) * 2013-05-31 2016-11-30 Phu Dytrych Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością Apparatus for photocatalytic removal of volatile organic impurities, inorganic compounds and microorganisms, especially in the car air-conditioning system
US20160193248A1 (en) * 2013-08-20 2016-07-07 James D. Lee Methods for Improving Respiratory System Health and Increasing the Concentration of Hypothiocyanate Ion in Vertbrate Lungs
JP6297704B2 (en) * 2013-12-30 2018-03-20 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェKoninklijke Philips N.V. Method and apparatus for performing a PCO reaction, and an air purifier having the apparatus
SG10201805181UA (en) 2014-05-05 2018-08-30 Synexis Llc Purified hydrogen peroxide gas generation methods and devices
USD814006S1 (en) 2014-07-18 2018-03-27 Synexis Llc Device for producing non-hydrated purified hydrogen peroxide gas
USD744627S1 (en) 2014-07-23 2015-12-01 Lee Antimicrobial Solutions, Llc Air-permeable substrate structure
DE102015102882B4 (en) 2015-02-27 2017-10-05 Dinies Technologies GmbH Apparatus and method for combined air and surface disinfection
DE202015100959U1 (en) 2015-02-27 2016-05-30 Dinies Technologies GmbH Device for combined air and surface disinfection
CN107921163A (en) * 2015-04-20 2018-04-17 塞尼斯有限责任公司 Toilet and its application method with dilution hydrogen peroxide (DHP) gas
JP6212100B2 (en) * 2015-12-02 2017-10-11 東芝エレベータ株式会社 Elevator car
CN106196354A (en) * 2016-07-29 2016-12-07 瑞安市智造科技有限公司 A kind of central air-conditioning
EP3565405A2 (en) 2017-01-09 2019-11-13 Synexis LLC Application of dry hydrogen peroxide (dhp) gas to methods of poultry production
US11565017B2 (en) 2017-05-12 2023-01-31 Biomoneta Research Pvt Ltd. Air decontamination device
USD890898S1 (en) 2018-01-09 2020-07-21 Synexis Llc Device for producing non-hydrated purified hydrogen peroxide gas
CN110101886A (en) * 2019-05-30 2019-08-09 宁波方太厨具有限公司 A kind of disinfection cabinet
CN110101885A (en) * 2019-05-30 2019-08-09 宁波方太厨具有限公司 A kind of disinfection cabinet
ES2864155B2 (en) * 2020-04-09 2023-01-19 Orta Jordi Oltra debugging equipment
CN111484176A (en) * 2020-05-26 2020-08-04 清华大学 Dual-waveband ultraviolet light catalytic advanced oxidation device and process
US20220357067A1 (en) * 2021-05-05 2022-11-10 Trane International Inc. Personal comfort variable air volume diffuser with improved air quality elements
WO2023041811A1 (en) * 2021-09-14 2023-03-23 Human Wellness Solutions Sl Air and surface purifying device
WO2023177837A2 (en) * 2022-03-17 2023-09-21 Uv Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for automatic air pathogen mitigation

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4892712A (en) * 1987-09-04 1990-01-09 Nutech Energy Systems Inc. Fluid purification
TR199800400T1 (en) * 1995-09-06 1998-05-21 Universal Air Technology, Inc Photocatalytic air disinfection.
KR20000016856A (en) * 1998-08-05 2000-03-25 가마이 고로 Air cleaning unit
US6500387B1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2002-12-31 Nukuest, Inc. Air actinism chamber apparatus and method
EP1491218A1 (en) * 2003-05-30 2004-12-29 Taiwan Fluorescent Lamp Co., Ltd. Illuminator capable of cleaning air
US20050191205A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2005-09-01 Federico Uslenghi Indoor air quality module including a shield to minimize the leakage of ultraviolet light
CN1853760A (en) * 2005-04-19 2006-11-01 张德麟 Light catalyst filter in computer
US8168122B2 (en) * 2007-08-07 2012-05-01 Lee Antimicrobial Solutions Llc Purified hydrogen peroxide gas microbial control methods and devices

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2010213703A1 (en) 2011-08-11
JP2012517862A (en) 2012-08-09
CN102316909A (en) 2012-01-11
EP2396043A1 (en) 2011-12-21
RU2011137536A (en) 2013-03-20
WO2010093796A1 (en) 2010-08-19
BRPI1008435A2 (en) 2015-08-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11207436B2 (en) Purified hydrogen peroxide gas microbial control methods and devices
CA2750788A1 (en) Uv air treatment method and device
US20210308316A1 (en) Purified Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Generation Methods and Devices
KR101260937B1 (en) System for ventilating barn and cleaning air
KR20060004629A (en) Air clean sensor lamp use ultra violet led
KR20060031396A (en) Photocatalytic filter equipment
KR200312719Y1 (en) Artificial flowers comprising photocatalyst for air cleaning
KR200371800Y1 (en) Photocatalytic filter equipment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FZDE Discontinued

Effective date: 20150211

FZDE Discontinued

Effective date: 20150211