CA2676380C - System and method for detection and analysis of speech - Google Patents

System and method for detection and analysis of speech

Info

Publication number
CA2676380C
CA2676380C CA 2676380 CA2676380A CA2676380C CA 2676380 C CA2676380 C CA 2676380C CA 2676380 CA2676380 CA 2676380 CA 2676380 A CA2676380 A CA 2676380A CA 2676380 C CA2676380 C CA 2676380C
Authority
CA
Grant status
Grant
Patent type
Prior art keywords
child
key
segments
segment
audio
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CA 2676380
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
CA2676380A1 (en )
Inventor
Terrance Paul
Dongxin Xu
Umit Yapanel
Sharmistha Gray
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Infoture Inc
Original Assignee
Infoture Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Grant date

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L17/00Speaker identification or verification
    • G10L17/16Hidden Markov models [HMMs]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L15/00Speech recognition
    • G10L15/04Segmentation; Word boundary detection

Abstract

Certain aspects and embodiments of the present invention are directed to systems and methods for monitoring and analyzing the language environment and the development of a key child. A key child's language environment and language development can be monitored without placing artificial limitations on the key child's activities or requiring a third party observer. The language environment can be analyzed to identify words, vocalizations, or other noises directed to or spoken by the key child, independent of content. The analysis can include the number of responses between the child and another, such as an adult and the number of words spoken by the child and/or another, independent of content of the speech. One or more metrics can be determined based on the analysis and provided to assist in improving the language environment and/or tracking language development of the key child.

Description

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTION AND ANALYSIS OF SPEECH
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to signal processing and automated speech recognition and, specifically, to processing recordings of a key child's language environment and generating metrics associated with the language environment and key child language development.
BACKGROUND
The language environment surrounding a young child is key to the child's development.
A child's language and vocabulary ability at age three, for example, can indicate intelligence and test scores in academic subjects such as reading and math at later ages.
Improving language ability typically results in a higher intelligent quotient (IQ) as well as improved literacy and academic skills.
Exposure to a rich aural or listening language environment in which many words are spoken with a relatively high number of affirmations versus prohibitions may promote an increase in the child's language ability and IQ. The effect of a language environment surrounding a child of a young age on the child's language ability and IQ may be particularly pronounced. In the first four years of human life, a child experiences a highly intensive period of speech and language development due in part to the development and maturing of the child's brain. Even after children begin attending school or reading, much of the child's language ability and vocabulary, including the words known (receptive vocabulary) and the words the child uses in speech (expressive vocabulary), are developed from conversations the child experiences with other people.
In addition to hearing others speak to them and responding (i.e.
conversational turns), a child's language development may be promoted by the child's own speech. The child's own speech is a dynamic indicator of cognitive functioning, particularly in the early years of a child's life. Research techniques have been developed which involve counting a young child's vocalizations and utterances to estimate a child's cognitive development.
Current processes of collecting information may include obtaining data via a human observer and/or a transcription of an audio recording of the child's speech. The data is analyzed to provide metrics with which the child's language environment can be analyzed and potentially modified to promote increasing the child's language development and IQ.
The presence of a human observer, however, may be intrusive, influential on the child's performance, costly, and unable to adequately obtain information on a child's natural environment and development. Furthermore, the use of audio recordings and transcriptions is a costly and time-consuming process of obtaining data associated with a child's language environment. The analysis of such data to identify canonical babbling, count the number of words, and other vocalization metrics and determine content spoken is also time intensive.
Counting the number of words and determining content spoken may be particularly time and resource intensive, even for electronic analysis systems, since each word is identified along with its meaning. Accordingly, a need exists for methods and systems for obtaining and analyzing data associated with a child's language environment independent of content and reporting metrics based on the data in a timely manner.
SUMMARY
Certain embodiments of the present invention provide methods and systems for providing metrics associated with a key child's language environment and development in a relatively quick and cost effective manner. The metrics may be used to promote improvement of the language environment, key child's language development, and/or to track development of the child's language skills. In one embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided for generating metrics associated with the key child's language environment. An audio recording from the language environment can be captured. The audio recordings may be segmented into a plurality

2 of segments. A segment ID can be identified for each of the plurality of segments. The segment ID may identify a source for audio in the segment of the recording. Key child segments can be identified from the segments. Each of the key child segments may have the key child as the segment ID. Key child segment characteristics can be estimated based in part on at least one of the key child segments. The key child segment characteristics can be estimated independent of content of the key child segments. At least one metric associated with the language environment and/or language development may be determined using the key child segment characteristics.
Examples of metrics include the number of words or vocalizations spoken by the key child in a pre-set time period and the number of conversational turns. The at least one metric can be outputted.
In some embodiments, adult segments can be identified from the segments. Each of the adult segments may have the adult as the segment ID. Adult segment characteristics can be estimated based in part on at least one of the adult segments. The adult segment characteristics can be estimated independent of content of the adult segments. At least one metric associated with the language environment may be determined using the adult segment characteristics.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a system for providing metrics associated with a key child's language environment is provided. The system may include a recorder and a processor-based device. The recorder may be adapted to capture audio recordings from the language environment and provide the audio recordings to a processor-based device. The processor-based device may include an application having an audio engine adapted to segment the audio recording into segments and identify a segment ID for each of the segments. At least one of the segments may be associated with a key child segment ID. The audio engine may be further adapted to estimate key child segment characteristics based in part on the at least one of the segments, determine at least one metric associated with the language environment or language development using the key child segment characteristics, and output the at least one metric to an

3 output device. The audio engine may estimate the key child segment characteristics independent of content of the segments.
According to another embodiment, there is provided a method comprising:
capturing an audio recording from a language environment of a key child, segmenting the audio recording into a plurality of segments; identifying a segment ID for each of the plurality of segments, the segment ID identifying a source for audio in the segment, wherein segmenting the audio recording into the plurality of segments and identifying the segment ID
for each of the plurality of segments comprises: using a Minimum Duration Gaussian Mixture Model (MD-GMM), wherein the segments identified using the MD-GMM are at least a minimum duration D, and any segments with a duration longer than 2*D are broken down into several segments with a duration between D and 2*D; identifying a plurality of key child segments from the plurality of segments each of the plurality of key child segments having the key child as the segment ID; estimating key child segment characteristics based in part on at least one of the plurality of key child segments, wherein the key child segment characteristics are estimated independent of content of the plurality of key child segments;
determining at least one metric associated with the language environment using the key child segment characteristics; and outputting the at least one metric.
According to another embodiment, there is provided a method comprising:
capturing an audio recording from a language environment of a key child;
segmenting the audio recording into a plurality of segments and identifying a segment ID for at least one of the plurality of segments using a Minimum Duration Gaussian Mixture Model (MD-GMM), the segment ID identifying a key child, wherein the segments identified using the MD-GMM
are at least a minimum duration D, and any segments with a duration longer than 2*D are broken down into several segments with a duration between D and 2*D;
estimating key child segment characteristics based in part on the at least one of the plurality of segments, wherein the key child segment characteristics are estimated independent of content of the plurality of

4 = CA 02676380 2013-07-22 segments; determining at least one metric associated with the language environment using the key child segment characteristics; and outputting the at least one metric.
According to still another embodiment, there is provided a system comprising: a recorder adapted to capture audio recordings from a language environment of a key child and provide the audio recordings to a processor-based device; and the processor-based device comprising an application having an audio engine adapted to segment the audio recording into a plurality of segments and identify a segment ID for each of the plurality of segments, wherein at least one of the plurality of segments is associated with a key child segment ID, wherein the audio engine segments the audio recording and identifies the segment ID for each of the plurality of segments using a Minimum Duration Gaussian Mixture Model (MD-GMM), and wherein the segments identified using the MD-GMM are at least a minimum duration D, and any segments with a duration longer than 2*D are broken down into several segments with a duration between D and 2*D, the audio engine being further adapted to: estimate key child segment characteristics based in part on the at least one of the plurality of segments, wherein the audio engine estimates key child segment characteristics independent of content of the at least one of the plurality of segments; determine at least one metric associated with the language environment using the key child segment characteristics; and output the at least one metric to an output device.
These embodiments are mentioned not to limit or define the invention, but to provide examples of embodiments of the invention to aid understanding thereof. Embodiments are discussed in the Detailed Description and advantages offered by various embodiments of the present invention may be further understood by examining the Detailed Description and Drawings.
4a BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention are better understood when the following Detailed Description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 illustrates a key child's language environment according to one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 2a is a front view of a recorder in a pocket according to one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 2b is a side view of the recorder and pocket of Figure 2a;
Figure 3 is a recording processing system according to one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 4 is flow chart of a method for processing recordings according to one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 5 is a flow chart of a method for performing further recording processing according to one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 6 illustrates sound energy in a segment according to one embodiment of the present invention; and 4b = 76135-102 Figures 7-11 are screen shots illustrating metrics provided to an output device according to one embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Certain aspects and embodiments of the present invention are directed to systems and methods for monitoring and analyzing the language environment, vocalizations, and the development of a key child. A key child as used herein may be a child, an adult, such as an adult with developmental disabilities, or any individual whose language development is of interest. A
key child's language environment and language development can be monitored without placing artificial limitations on the key child's activities or requiring a third party observer. The language environment can be analyzed to identify words or other noises directed to or vocalized by the key child independent of content. Content may include the meaning of vocalizations such as words and utterances. The analysis can include the number of responses between the child and another, such as an adult (referred to herein as "conversational turns"), and the number of words spoken by the child and/or another, =independent of content of the speech.
A language environment can include a natural language environment or other environments such as a clinical or research environment. A natural language environment can include an area surrounding a key child during his or her normal daily activities and contain sources of sounds that may include the key child, other children, an adult, an electronic device, = and background noise. A clinical or research environment can include a controlled environment or location that contains pre-selected or natural sources of sounds.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the key child may wear an article of clothing that includes a recording device located in a pocket attached to or integrated with the article of clothing. The recording device may be configured to record and store audio associated with the child's language environment for a predetermined amount of time. The audio recordings can include noise, silence, the key child's spoken words or other sounds, words spoken by others,

5 sounds from electronic devices such as televisions and radios, or any sound or words from any source. The location of the recording device preferably allows it to record the key child's words and noises and conversational turns involving the key child without interfering in the key child's normal activities. During or after the pre-set amount of time, the audio recordings stored on the recording device can be analyzed independent of content to provide characteristics associated with the key child's language environment or language development. For example, the recordings may be analyzed to identify segments and assign a segment ID or a source for each audio segment using a Minimum Duration Gaussian Mixture Model (MD-GMM).
Sources for each audio segment can include the key child, an adult, another child, an electronic device, or any person or object capable of producing sounds.
Sources may also include general sources that are not associated with a particular person or device.
Examples of such general sources include noise, silence, and overlapping sounds. In some embodiments, sources are identified by analyzing each audio segment using models of different types of sources. The models may include audio characteristics commonly associated with each source.
In some embodiments, certain audio segments may not include enough energy to determine the source and may be discarded or identified as a noise source. Audio segments for which the key child or an adult is identified as the source may be further analyzed, such as by determining certain characteristics associated with the key child and/or adult, to provide metrics associated with the key child's language environment or language development.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the key child is a child between the ages of zero and four years old. Sounds generated by young children differ from adult speech in a number of respects. For example, the child may generate a meaningful sound that does not equate to a word; the transitions between formants for child speech are less pronounced than the transitions for adult speech, and the child's speech changes over the age range of interest due to physical changes in the child's vocal tract. Differences between child and adult speech may be

6

7 recognized and used to analyze child speech and to distinguish child speech from adult speech, such as in identifying the source for certain audio segments.
Using the independent of content aspects of certain embodiments of the present invention rather than a system that uses speech recognition to determine content may result in greatly reduced processing time of an audio file using a system that is significantly less expensive. In some embodiments, speech recognition processing may be used to generate metrics of the key child's language environment and language development by analyzing vocalizations independent of content. In one embodiment, the recommended recording time is twelve hours with a minimum time of ten hours. In order to process the recorded speech and to provide meaningful feedback on a timely basis, certain embodiments of the present invention are adapted to process a recording at or under half of real time. For example, the twelve-hour recording may be processed in less than six hours. Thus, the recordings may be processed overnight so that results are available the next morning. Other periods of recording time may be sufficient for generating metrics associated with the key child's language environment and/or language development depending upon the metrics of interest and/or the language environment. A one to two hour recording time may be sufficient in some circumstances such as in a clinical or research environment. Processing for such recording times may be less than one hour.
Audio Acquisition As stated above, a recording device may be used to capture, record, and store audio associated with the key child's language environment and language development.
The recording device may be any type of device adapted to capture and store audio and to be located in or around a child's language environment. In some embodiments, the recording device includes one or more microphones connected to a storage device and located in one or more rooms that the key child often occupies. In other embodiments, the recording device is located in an article of clothing worn by the child.

Figure 1 illustrates a key child, such as child 100, in a language environment 102 wearing an article of clothing 104 that includes a pocket 106. The pocket 106 may include a recording device (not shown) that is adapted to record audio from the language environment 102. The language environment 102 may be an area surrounding the child 100 that includes sources for audio (not shown), including one or more adults, other children, and/or electronic devices such as a television, a radio, a toy, background noise, or any other source that produces sounds.
Examples of language environment 102 include a natural language environment and a clinical or research language environment. The article of clothing 104 may be a vest over the child's 100 normal clothing, the child's 100 normal clothing, or any article of clothing commonly worn by the key child.
In some embodiments, the recorder is placed at or near the center of the key child's chest.
However, other placements are possible. The recording device in pocket 106 may be any device capable of recording audio associated with the child's language environment.
One example of a recording device is a digital recorder of the LENA system. The digital recorder may be relatively small and lightweight and can be placed in pocket 106. The pocket 106 can hold the recorder in place in an unobtrusive manner so that the recorder does not distract the key child, other children, and adults that interact with the key child. Figures 2a-b illustrate one embodiment of a pocket 106 including a recorder 108. The pocket 106 may be designed to keep the recorder 108 in place and to minimize acoustic interference. The pocket 106 can include an inner area 110 formed by a main body 112 and an overlay 114 connected to the main body 112 via stitches 116 or another connecting mechanism. The main body 112 can be part of the clothing or attached to the article of clothing 104 using stitches or otherwise. A stretch layer 118 may be located in the inner area 110 and attached to the main body 112 and overlay 114 via stitches 116 or other connecting mechanism. The recorder 108 can be located between the main body 112 and the stretch layer 118. The stretch layer 118 may be made of a fabric adapted to stretch but provide a force against

8 the recorder 108 to retain the recorder 108 in its position. For example, the stretch layer may be made from a blend of nylon and spandex, such as 84% nylon, 15% spandex, which helps to keep the recorder in place. The overlay 114 may cover the stretch layer 118 and may include at least one opening where the microphone of recorder 108 is located. The opening can be covered with a material that provides certain desired acoustic properties. In one embodiment, the material is 100% cotton.
The pocket 106 may also include snap connectors 120 by which the overlay 114 is opened and closed to install or remove the recorder 108. In some embodiments, at least one of the stitches 116 can be replaced with a zipper to provider access to the recorder 108 in addition or alternative to using snap connectors 120.
If the recorder 108 includes multiple microphones, then the pocket 106 may include multiple openings that correspond to the placement of the microphones on the recorder 108. The particular dimensions of the pocket 106 may change as the design of the recorder 108 changes, or as the number or type of microphones change. In some embodiments, the pocket 106 positions the microphone relative to the key child's mouth to provide certain acoustical properties and secure the microphone (and optionally the recorder 108) in a manner that does not result in friction noises. The recorder 108 can be turned on and thereafter record audio, including speech by the key child, other children, and adults, as well as other types of sounds that the child encounters, including television, toys, environmental noises, etc.. The audio may be stored in the recorder 108. In some embodiments, the recorder can be periodically removed from pocket 106 and the stored audio can be analyzed.
Illustrative Audio Recording Analysis System Implementation Methods for analyzing audio recordings from a recorder according to various embodiments of the present invention may be implemented on a variety of different systems. An example of one such system is illustrated in Figure 3. The system includes the recorder 108

9 connected to a processor-based device 200 that includes a processor 202 and a computer-readable medium, such as memory 204. The recorder 108 may be connected to the processor-based device 200 via wireline or wirelessly. In some embodiments, the recorder 108 is connected to the device 200 via a USB cable. The device 200 may be any type of processor-based device, examples of which include a computer and a server. Memory 204 may be adapted to store computer-executable code and data. Computer-executable code may include an application 206, such as a data analysis application that can be used to view, generate, and output data analysis. The application 206 may include an audio engine 208 that, as described in more detail below, may be adapted to perform methods according to various embodiments of the present invention to analyze audio recordings and generate metrics associated therewith. In some embodiments, the audio engine 208 may be a separate application that is executable separate from, and optionally concurrent with, application 206. Memory 204 may also include a data storage 210 that is adapted to store data generated by the application 206 or audio engine 208, or input by a user. In some embodiments, data storage 210 may be separate from device 200, but connected to the device 200 via wire line or wireless connection.
The device 200 may be in communication with an input device 212 and an output device 214. The input device 212 may be adapted to receive user input and communicate the user input to the device 200. Examples of input device 212 include a keyboard, mouse, scanner, and network connection. User inputs can include commands that cause the processor 202 to execute various functions associated with the application 206 or the audio engine 208.
The output device 214 may be adapted to provide data or visual output from the application 206 or the audio engine 208. In some embodiments, the output device 214 can display a graphical user interface (GUI) that includes one or more selectable buttons that are associated with various functions provided by the application 206 or the audio engine 208. Examples of output device 214 include a monitor, network connection, and printer. The input device 212 may be used to setup or otherwise configure audio engine 208. For example, the age of the key child and other information associated with the key child's learning environment may be provided to the audio engine 208 and stored in local storage 210 during a set-up or configuration.
The audio file stored on the recorder 108 may be uploaded to the device 200 and stored in local storage 210. In one embodiment, the audio file is uploaded in a proprietary format which prevents the playback of the speech from the device 200 or access to content of the speech, thereby promoting identify protection of the speakers. In other embodiments, the audio file is uploaded without being encoded to allow for the storage in local storage 210 and playback of the file or portions of the file.
In some embodiments, the processor-based device 200 is a web server and the input device 212 and output device 214 are combined to form a computer system that sends data to and receives data from the device 200 via a network connection. The input device 212 and output device 214 may be used to access the application 206 and audio engine 208 remotely and cause it to perform various functions according to various embodiments of the present invention. The recorder 108 may be connected to the input device 212 and output device 214 and the audio files stored on the recorder 108 may be uploaded to the device 200 over a network such as an internet or intranet where the audio files are processed and metrics are provided to the output device 214.
In some embodiments, the audio files received from a remote input device 212 and output device 214 may be stored in local storage 210 and subsequently accessed for research purposes such on a child's learning environment or otherwise.
To reduce the amount of memory needed on the recorder 108, the audio file may be compressed. In one embodiment, a DVI-4 ADPCM compression scheme is used. If a compression scheme is used, then the file is decompressed after it is uploaded to the device 200 to a normal linear PCM audio format.

Illustrative Methods for Audio Recording Analysis Various methods according to various embodiments of the present invention can be used to analyze audio recordings. Figure 4 illustrates one embodiment of a method for analyzing and providing metrics based on the audio recordings from a key child's language environment. For purposes of illustration only, the elements of this method are described with reference to the system depicted in Figure 3. Other system implementations of the method are possible.
In block 302, the audio engine 208 divides the recording in one or more audio segments and identifies a segment ID or source for each of the audio segments from the recording received from the recorder 108. This process is referred to herein as segmentation and segment ID. An audio segment may be a portion of the recording having a certain duration and including acoustic features associated with the child's language environment during the duration.
The recording may include a number of audio segments, each associated with a segment ID or source. Sources may be an individual or device that produces the sounds within the audio segment. For example, an audio segment may include the sounds produced by the key child, who is identified as the source for that audio segment. Sources also can include other children, adults, electronic devices, noise, overlapped sounds and silence. Electronic devices may include televisions, radios, telephones, toys, and any device that provides recorded or simulated sounds such as human speech.
Sources associated with each of the audio segments may be identified to assist in further classifying and analyzing the recording. Some metrics provided by some embodiments of the present invention include data regarding certain sources and disregard data from other sources.
For example, audio segments associated with live speech ¨ directed to the key child ¨ can be distinguished from audio segments associated with electronic devices, since live speech has been shown to be a better indicator and better promoter of a child's language development than exposure to speech from electronic devices.

To perform segmentation to generate the audio segments and identify the sources for each segment, a number of models may be used that correspond to the key child, other children, male adult, female adult, noise, TV noise, silence, and overlap. Alternative embodiments may use more, fewer or different models to perform segmentation and identify a corresponding segment ID. One such technique performs segmentation and segment ID separately.
Another technique performs segmentation and identifies a segment ID for each segment concurrently.
Traditionally, a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) with minimum duration constraint has been used to perform segmentation and identify segment IDs concurrently. A
number of HMM
models may be provided, each corresponding to one source. The result of the model may be a sequence of sources with a likelihood score associated with each based on all the HMM models.
The optimal sequence may be searched using a Viterbi algorithm or dynamic programming and the "best" source identified for each segment based on the score. However, this approach may be complex for some segments in part because it uses transition probabilities from one segment to another ¨ i.e. the transition between each segment. Transition probabilities are related to duration modeling of each source or segment. A single segment may have discrete geometric distribution or continuous exponential distribution ¨ which may not occur in most segments.
Most recordings may include segments of varying duration and with various types of sources.
Although the HMM
model may be used in some embodiments of the present invention, alternative techniques may be used to perform segmentation and segment ID.
An alternative technique used in some embodiments of the present invention to perform segmentation and segment ID is a Minimum Duration Gaussian Mixture Model (MD-GMM).
Each model of the MD-GMM may include criteria or characteristics associated with sounds from different sources. Examples of models of the MD-GMM include a key child model that includes characteristics of sounds from a key child, an adult model that includes characteristics of sounds from an adult, an electronic device model that includes characteristics of sounds from an electronic device, a noise model that includes characteristics of sounds aitiibutable to noise, an other child model that includes characteristics of sounds from a child other than the key child, a parentese model that includes complexity level speech criteria of adult sounds, an age-dependent key child model that includes characteristics of sounds of a key child of different ages, and a loudness/clearness detection model that includes characteristics of sounds directed to a key child.
Some models include additional models. For example, the adult model may include an adult male model that includes characteristics of sounds of an adult male and an adult female model that includes characteristics of sounds of an adult female. The models may be used to determine the source of sound in each segment by comparing the sound in each segment to criteria of each model and determining if a match of a pre-set accuracy exists for one or more of the models.
In some embodiment of the present invention, the MD-GMM technique begins when a recording is converted to a sequence of frames or segments. Segments having a duration of 2*D, where D is a minimum duration constraint, are identified using a maximum log-likelihood algorithm for each type of source. The maximum score for each segment is identified. The source associated with the maximum score is correlated to the segment for each identified segment.
The audio engine 208 may process recordings using the maximum likelihood MD-GMM
to perform segmentation and segment ID. The audio engine 208 may search all possible segment sequence under a minimum duration constraint to identify the segment sequence with maximum likelihood. One possible advantage of MD-GMM is that any segment longer than twice the minimum duration (2*D) could be equivalently broken down into several segments with a duration between the minimum duration (D) and two times the minimum duration (2*D), such that the maximum likelihood search process ignores all segments longer than 2*D. This can reduce the search space and processing time. The following is an explanation of one implementation of using maximum likelihood MD-GMM. Other implementations are also possible.
1. Acoustic Feature Extraction.
The audio stream is converted to a stream of feature vectors {Xi, X2 ..... XT1 X eRn using a feature extraction algorithm, such as the MFCC (mel-frequency cepstrum coefficients).
2. Log likelihood calculation for a segment {X1, X, X s} :
L= Elog(fe(X1)), where L(X) is the likelihood of frame Xi being in class c i=1 The following describes one procedure of maximum likelihood MD-GMM search:
3. Initialize searching variables: S(c,0,0) = 0, c =1,...,C , where c is the index for all segment classes. Generally, the searching variable S(c,b,n) represents the maximum log-likelihood for the segment sequence up to the frame b-1 plus the log-likelihood of the segment from frame b to frame n being in class c.
4. Score frames for n =1,...,T , i.e. all feature frames:
S(c,b,n)= S(c,b,n ¨1) + log(fe(X n),Vb,c,n¨b < 2 * Dc, i.e. the current score at frame n could be derived from the previous score at frame n-1. The searching variable for segments less than twice the minimum duration is retained.
5. Retain a record of the optimal result at frame n (similarly, segments under twice the minimum duration will be considered):
S* (n) max S(c,b,n) c,b,2*D, >(n-b)>D, B* (n) = arg max S(c,b,n) b,(c,b,2* D,>(n-b)>D,) C* (n) = arg max S(c,b,n) c,(c,1),2*D,>(n-1))>D,) 6. Initialize new searching variables for segments starting at frame n:

S(c,n,n)= S* (n),V c 7. Iterate step 4 to step 6 until the last frame T.
8. Trace back to get the maximum likelihood segment sequence.
The very last segment of the maximum likelihood segment sequence is (Cs (T), Bs (T),T) , i.e. the segment starting from frame B* (T) and ending with frame T with class id of Cs (T) . We can obtain the rest segments in the best sequence by using the following back-tracing procedure:
8.1. Initialize back-tracing:
t =T ,m =1 S(m) = (C* (t), B* (t),t) 8.2. Iterate back-tracing until t = 0 C _ current = C (t) t = B* (t) if Cs (t) = C_ current, then do nothing Otherwise, m = m +1, S(m) = (C* (t),B* (0,0 Additional processing may be performed to further refine identification of segments associated with the key child or an adult as sources. As stated above, the language environment can include a variety of sources that may be identified initially as the key child or an adult when the source is actually a different person or device. For example, sounds from a child other than the key child may be initially identified as sounds from the key child. Sounds from an electronic device may be confused with live speech from an adult. Furthermore, some adult sounds may be detected that are directed to another person other than the key child. Certain embodiments of the present invention may implement methods for further processing and refining the segmentation and segment ID to decrease or eliminate inaccurate source identifications and to identify adult speech directed to the key child.

Further processing may occur concurrently with, or subsequent to, the initial MD-GMM
model described above. Figure 5 illustrates one embodiment of an adaptation method for further processing the recording by modifying models associated with the MD-GMM
subsequent to an initial MD-GMM. In block 402, the audio engine 208 processes the recording using a first MD-GMM. For example, the recording is processed in accordance with the MD-GMM
described above to perform an initial segmentation and segment ID.
In block 404, the audio engine 208 modifies at least one model of the MD-GMM.
The audio engine 208 may automatically select one or more models of the MD-GMM to modify based on pre-set steps. In some embodiments, if the audio engine 208 detects certain types of segments that may require further scrutiny, it selects the model of the MD-GMM that is most related to the types of segments detected to modify (or for modification). Any model associated with the MD-GMM may be modified. Examples of models that may be modified include the key child model with an age-dependent key child model, an electronic device model, a loudness/clearness model that may further modify the key child model and/or the adult model, and a parentese model that may further modify the key child model and/or the adult model.
In block 406, the audio engine 208 processes the recordings again using the modified models of the MD-GMM. The second process may result in a different segmentation and/or segment ID based on the modified models, providing a more accurate identification of the source associated with each segment.
In block 408, the audio engine 208 determines if additional model modification is needed.
In some embodiments, the audio engine 208 analyzes the new segmentation and/or segment ID to determine if any segments or groups of segments require additional scrutiny.
In some embodiments, the audio engine 208 accesses data associated with the language environment in data storage 210 and uses it to determine if additional model modification is necessary, such as a modification of the key child model based on the current age of the child. If additional model modification is needed, the process returns to block 404 for additional MD-GMM
model modification. If no additional model modification is needed, the process proceeds to block 410 to analyze segment sound.
The following describes certain embodiments of modifying exemplary models in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention. Other models than those described below may be modified in certain embodiments of the present invention.
Age-Dependent Key Child Model In some embodiments of the present invention, the audio engine 208 may implement an age-dependent key child model concurrently with, or subsequent to, the initial MD-GMM to modify the key child model of the MD-GMM to more accurately identify segments in which other children are the source from segments in which the key child is the source. For example, the MD-GMM may be modified to implement an age-dependent key child model during the initial or a subsequent segmentation and segment ID.
The key child model can be age dependent since the audio characteristics of the vocalizations, including utterances and other sounds, of a key child change dramatically over the time that the recorder 106 may be used. Although the use of two separate models within the MD-GMM, one for the key child and one for other children, may identify the speech of the key child, the use of an age dependent key child model further helps to reduce the confusion between speech of the key child and speech of the other children. In one embodiment, the age-dependent key child models are: 1) less than one-year old, 2) one-year old, 3) two-years old, and 4) three-years old. Alternative embodiments may use other age grouping and/or may use groupings of different age groups. For example, other embodiments could use monthly age groups or a combination of monthly and yearly age groups. Each of the models includes characteristics associated with sounds commonly identified with children of the age group.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the age of the key child is provided to device 200 via input device 212 during a set-up or configuration. The audio engine 208 receives the age of the key child and selects one or more of the key child models based on the age of the key child.
For example, if the key child is one year and ten months old, the audio engine 208 may select key child model 2) and key child model 3) or only key child model 2) based on the age of the key child. The audio engine 208 may implement the selected key child model or models by modifying the MD-GMM models to perform the initial or a subsequent segmentation and segment ID.
Electronic Device Model In order to more accurately determine the number of adult words that are directed to the key child, any segments including sounds, such as words or speech, generated electronically by an electronic device can be identified as such, as opposed to an inaccurate identification as live speech produced by an adult. Electronic devices can include a television, radio, telephone, audio system, toy, or any electronic device that produces recordings or simulated human speech. In some embodiments of the present invention, the audio engine 208 may modify an electronic device model in the MD-GMM to more accurately identify segments from an electronic device source and separate them from segments from a live adult without the need to determine the content of the segments and without the need to limit the environment of the speaker. (e.g.
requiring the removal of or inactivation of the electronic devices from the language environment.) The audio engine 208 may be adapted to modify and use the modified electronic device model concurrently with, or subsequent to, the initial MD-GMM process. In some embodiments, the electronic device model can be implemented after a first MD-GMM process is performed and used to adapt the MD-GMM for additional determinations using the MD-GMM for the same recording. The audio engine 208 can examine segments segmented using a first MD-GMM to further identify reliable electronic segments. Reliable electronic segments may be segments that are more likely associated with a source that is an electronic device and include certain criteria.
For example, the audio engine 208 can determine if one or more segments includes criteria commonly associated with sounds from electronic devices. In some embodiments, the criteria includes (1) a segment that is longer than a predetermined period or is louder than a predetermined threshold; or (2) a series of segments having a pre-set source pattern. An example of one predetermined period is five seconds. An example of one pre-set source pattern can include the following:
Segment 1 ¨ Electronic device source;
Segment 2 ¨ A source other than the electronic device source (e.g. adult);
Segment 3 ¨ Electronic device source;
Segment 4 ¨ A source other than the electronic device source; and Segment 5 ¨ Electronic device source.
The reliable electronic device segments can be used to train or modify the MD-GMM to include an adaptive electronic device model for further processing. For example, the audio engine 208 may use a regular K-means algorithm as an initial model and tune it with an expectation-maximization (EMV) algorithm. The number of Gaussians in the adaptive electronic device model may be proportional to the amount of feedback electronic device data and not exceed an upper limit. In one embodiment, the upper limit is 128.
The audio engine 208 may perform the MD-GMM again by applying the adaptive electronic device model to each frame of the sequence to determine a new adaptive electronic device log-likelihood score for frames associated with a source that is an electronic device. The new score may be compared with previously stored log-likelihood score for those frames. The audio engine 208 may select the larger log-likelihood score based on the comparison. The larger log-likelihood score may be used to determine the segment ID for those frames.

In some embodiments, the MD-GMM modification using the adaptive electronic device model may be applied using a pre-set number of consecutive equal length adaptation windows moving over all frames. The recording signal may be divided into overlapping frames having a pre-set length. An example of frame length according to one embodiment of the present invention is 25.6 milliseconds with a 10 milliseconds shift resulting in 15.6 milliseconds of frame overlap. The adaptive electronic device model may use local data obtained using the pre-set number of adaptation windows. An adaptation window size of 30 minutes may be used in some embodiments of the present invention. An example of one pre-set number of consecutive equal length adaptation windows is three. In some embodiments, adaptation window movement does not overlap. The frames within each adaptation window may be analyzed to extract a vector of features for later use in statistical analysis, modeling and classification algorithms. The adaptive electronic device model may be repeated to further modify the MD-GMM process.
For example, the process may be repeated three times.
Loudness/Clearness Detection Model In order to select the frames that are most useful for identifying the speaker, some embodiments of the present invention use frame level near/far detection or loudness/clearness detection model. Loudness/clearness detection models can be performed using a Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) after an initial MD-GMM process is performed. At the frame level, the LRT is used to identify and discard frames that could confuse the identification process. For each frame, the likelihood for each model is calculated. The difference between the most probable model likelihood and the likelihood for silence is calculated and the difference is compared to a predetermined threshold. Based on the comparison, the frame is either dropped or used for segment ID. For example, if the difference meets or exceeds the predetermined threshold then the frame is used, but if the difference is less than the predetermined threshold then the frame is dropped. In some embodiments, frames are weighted according to the LRT.

The audio engine 208 can use the LRT to identify segments directed to the key child. For example, the audio engine 208 can determine whether adult speech is directed to the key child or to someone else by determining the loudness/clearness of the adult speech or sounds associated with the segments. Once segmentation and segment ID are performed, segment-level near/far detection is performed using the LRT in a manner similar to that used at the frame level. For each segment, the likelihood for each model is calculated. The difference between the most probable model likelihood and the likelihood for silence is calculated and the difference is compared to a predetermined threshold. Based on the comparison, the segment is either dropped or processed further.
Parentese Model Sometimes adults use baby talk or "parentese" when directing speech to children. The segments including parentese may be inaccurately associated with a child or the key child as the source because certain characteristics of the speech may be similar to that of the key child or other children. The audio engine 208 may modify the key child model and/or adult model to identify segments including parentese and associate the segments with an adult source. For example, the models may be modified to allow the audio engine 208 to examine the complexity of the speech included in the segments to identify parentese. Since the complexity of adult speech is typically much higher than child speech, the source for segments including relatively complex speech may be identified as an adult. Speech may be complex if the formant structures are well formed, the articulation levels are good and the vocalizations are of sufficient duration ¨
consistent with speech commonly provided by adults. Speech from a child may include formant structures that are less clear and developed and vocalizations that are typically of a lesser duration. In addition, the audio engine 208 can analyze formant frequencies to identify segments including parentese. When an adult uses parentese, the formant frequencies of the segment typically do not change. Sources for segments including such identified parentese can be determined to be an adult.
The MD-GMM models may be further modified and the recording further processed for a pre-set number of iterations or until the audio engine 208 determines that the segments IDs have been determined with an acceptable level of confidence. Upon completion of the segmentation and segment ID, the identified segment can be further analyzed to extract characteristics associated with the language environment of the key child.
During or after performing segmentation and segment ID, the audio engine 208 may classify key child audio segments into one or more categories. The audio engine 208 analyzes each segment for which the key child is identified as the source and determines a category based on the sound in each segment. The categories can include vocalizations, cries, vegetative, and fixed signal sounds. Vocalizations can include words, phrases, marginal syllables, including rudimentary consonant-vowel sequences, utterances, phonemes, sequence phonemes, phoneme-like sounds, protophones, lip-trilling sounds commonly called raspberries, canonical syllables, repetitive babbles, pitch variations, or any meaningful sounds which contribute to the language development of the child, indicate at least an attempt by the child to communicate verbally, or explore the capability to create sounds. Vegetative sounds include non-vocal sounds related to respiration and digestion, such as coughing, sneezing, and burping. Fixed signal sounds are related to voluntary reactions to the environment and include laughing, moaning, sighing, and lip smacking. Cries are a type of fixed signal sounds, but are detected separately since cries can be a means of communication.
The audio engine 208 may classify key child audio segments using rule-based analysis and/or statistical processing. Rule-based analysis can include analyzing each key child segment using one or more rules. For some rules, the audio engine 208 may analyze energy levels or energy level transitions of segments. An example of a rule based on a pre-set duration is segments including a burst of energy at or above the pre-set duration are identified as a cry or scream and not a vocalization, but segments including bursts of energy less than the pre-set duration are classified as a vocalization. An example of one pre-set duration is three seconds based on characteristics commonly associated with vocalizations and cries.
Figure 6 illustrates energy levels of sound in a segment associated with the key child and showing a series of consonant (/b/) and vowel (/a/) sequences. Using a pre-set duration of three seconds, the bursts of energy indicate a vocalization since they are less than three seconds.
A second rule may be classifying segments as vocalizations that include formant transitions from consonant to vowel or vice versa. Figure 6 illustrates formant transitions from consonant /b/ to vowel /a/ and then back to consonant /b/, indicative of canonical syllables and, thus, vocalizations. Segments that do not include such transitions may be further processed to determine a classification.
A third rule may be classifying segments as vocalizations if the formant bandwidth is narrower than a pre-set bandwidth. In some embodiments, the pre-set bandwidth is 1000 Hz based on common bandwidths associated with vocalizations.
A fourth rule may be classifying segments that include a burst of energy having a first spectral peak above a pre-set threshold as a cry. In some embodiments, the pre-set threshold is 1500 Hz based on characteristics common in cries.
A fifth rule may be determining a slope of a spectral tilt and comparing it to pre-set thresholds. Often, vocalizations include more energy in lower frequencies, such as 300 to 3000 Hz, than higher frequencies, such as 6000 to 8000 Hz. A 30 dB drop is expected from the first part of the spectrum to the end of the spectrum, indicating a spectral tilt with a negative slope and a vocalization when compared to pre-set slope thresholds. Segments having a slope that is relatively flat may be classified as a cry since the spectral tilt may not exist for cries. Segments having a positive slope may be classified as vegetative sounds.

A sixth rule may be comparing the entropy of the segment to entropy thresholds.
Segments including relatively low entropy levels may be classified as vocalizations. Segments with having high entropy levels may be classified as cries or vegetative sounds due to randomness of the energy.
A seventh rule may be comparing segment pitch to thresholds. Segments having a pitch between 250 to 600 Hz may be classified as a vocalization. Segments having a pitch of more than 600 Hz may be classified as a cry based on common characteristics of cries.
An eighth rule may be determining pitch contours. Segments having a rising pitch may be classified as a vocalization. Segments having a falling pitch may be classified as a cry.
A ninth rule may be determining the presence of consonants and vowels.
Segments having a mix of consonants and vowels may be classified as vocalizations.
Segments having all or mostly consonants may be classified as a vegetative or fixed signal sound.
A rule according to various embodiments of the present invention may be implemented separately or concurrently with other rules. For example, in some embodiments the audio engine 208 implements one rule only while in other embodiments the audio engine 208 implements two or more rules. Statistical processing may be performed in addition to or alternatively to the rule-based analysis.
Statistical processing may include processing segments with an MD-GMM using 2000 or more Gaussians in which models are created using Me-scale Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) and Subband Spectral Centroids (SSC). MFCC's can be extracted using a number of filter banks with coefficients. In one embodiment, forty filter banks are used with 36 coefficients.
SSC's may be created using filter banks to capture formant peaks. The number of filter banks used to capture formant peaks may be seven filter banks in the range of 300 to 7500 Hz. Other statistical processing may include using statistics associated with one or more of the following segment characteristics:

Formants;
Formant bandwidth;
Pitch;
Voicing percentage;
Spectrum entropy;
Maximum spectral energy in dB;
Frequency of maximum spectral energy; and Spectral tilt.
Statistics regarding the segment characteristics may be added to the MFCC-SSC
combinations to provide additional classification improvement.
As children age, characteristics associated with each key child segment category may change due to growth of the child's vocal tract. In some embodiments of the present invention, an age-dependent model may be used in addition or alternatively to the techniques described above to classify key child segments. For example, vocalization, cry, and fixed signal/vegetative models may be created for each age group. In one embodiment, twelve different models are used with Group 1 corresponding to 1-2 months old, Group 2 corresponding to 3-4 months old, Group 3 corresponding to 5-6 months old, Group 4 corresponding to 7-8 months old, Group 5 corresponding to 9-10 months old, Group 6 corresponding to 11-12 months old, Group 7 corresponding to 13-14 months old, Group 8 corresponding to 15-18 months old, Group 9 corresponding to 19-22 months old, Group 10 corresponding to 23-26 months old, Group 11 corresponding to 27-30 months old, and Group 12 corresponding to 31-48 months old.
Alternative embodiments may use a different number of groups or associate different age ranges with the groups.
The audio engine 208 may also identify segments for which an adult is the source. The segments associated with an adult source can include sounds indicative of conversational turns or can provide data for metrics indicating an estimate of the amount or number of words directed to the key child from the adult. In some embodiments, the audio engine 208 also identifies the occurrence of adult source segments to key child source segments to identify conversational turns.
In block 304, the audio engine 208 estimates key child segment characteristics from at least some of the segments for which the key child is the source, independent of content. For example, the characteristics may be determined without determining or analyzing content of the sound in the key child segments. Key child segment characteristics can include any type of characteristic associated with one or more of the key child segment categories. Examples of characteristics include duration of cries, number of squeals and growls, presence and number of canonical syllables, presence and number of repetitive babbles, presence and number of phonemes, protophones, phoneme-like sounds, word or vocalization count, or any identifiable vocalization or sound element.
In some embodiments, the number and type of phonemes may be identified and tracked.
Typically, children age six months or less generally express the same types of phonemes. As children age, they may decrease their use of certain types phonemes and increase their use of the phonemes commonly used within the language environment. In one embodiment used in an English language environment, approximately thirty-nine different types of phonemes are tracked. The number of phonemes may be tracked for each type of phoneme or for a combination of types of phonemes to provide a metric with which the key child's language environment and development can be analyzed.
The length of cry can be estimated by analyzing segments classified in the cry category.
The length of cry typically decreases as the child ages or matures and can be an indicator of the relative progression of the child's development.

The number of squeals and growls can be estimated based on pitch, spectral intensity, and dysphonation by analyzing segments classified as vocalizations. A child's ability to produce squeals and growls can indicate the progression of the child's language ability as it indicates the key child's ability to control the pitch and intensity of sound.
The presence and number of canonical syllables, such as consonant and vowel sequences can be estimated by analyzing segments in the vocalization category for relatively sharp formant transitions based on formant contours.
The presence and number of repetitive babbles may be estimated by analyzing segments classified in the vocalization category and applying rules related to formant transitions, durations, and voicing. Babbling may include certain consonant/vowel combinations, including three voiced stops and two nasal stops. In some embodiments, the presence and number of canonical babbling may also be determined. Canonical babbling may occur when 15% of syllable produced are canonical, regardless of repetition. The presence, duration, and number of phoneme, protophones, or phoneme-like sounds may be determined. As the key child's language develops, the frequency and duration of phonemes increases or decreases or otherwise exhibits patterns associated with adult speech.
The number of words or other vocalizations made by the key child may be estimated by analyzing segments classified in the vocalization category. In some embodiments, the number of vowels and number of consonants are estimated using a phone decoder and combined with other segment parameters such as energy level, and MD-GMM log likelihood differences. A least-square method may be applied to the combination to estimate the number of words spoken by the child. In one embodiment of the present invention, the audio engine 208 estimates the number of vowels and consonants in each of the segments classified in the vocalization category and compares it to characteristics associated with the native language of the key child to estimate the number of words spoken by the key child. For example, an average number of consonants and vowels per word for the native language can be compared to the number of consonants and vowels to estimate the number of words. Other metrics/characteristics can also be used, including phoneme, protophones, and phoneme-like sounds.
In block 306, the audio engine 208 estimates characteristics associated with identified segments for which an adult is the source, independent of content. Examples of characteristics include a number of words spoken by the adult, duration of adult speech, and a number of parentese. The number of words spoken by the adult can be estimated using similar methods as described above with respect to the number of words spoken by the key child.
The duration of adult speech can be estimated by analyzing the amount of energy in the adult source segments.
In block 308, the audio engine 208 can determine one or more metrics associated with the language environment using the key child segment characteristics and/or the adult segment characteristics. For example, the audio engine 208 can determine a number of conversational turns or "turn-taking" by analyzing the characteristics and time periods associated with each segment. In some embodiments, the audio engine 208 can be configured to automatically determine the one or more metrics. In other embodiments, the audio engine 208 receives a command from input device 212 to determine a certain metric. Metrics can include any quantifiable measurement of the key child's language environment based on the characteristics.
The metrics may also be comparisons of the characteristics to statistical averages of the same type of characteristics for other persons having similar attributes, such as age, to the key child.
Examples of metrics include average vocalizations per day expressed by the key child, average vocalizations for all days measured, the number of vocalizations per month, the number of vocalizations per hour of the day, the number of words directed to the child from an adult during a selected time period, and the number of conversational turns.
In some embodiments, metrics may relate to the key child's developmental age.
Alternative or in addition to identifying delays and idiosyncrasies in the child's development as compared to an expected level, metrics may be development that may estimate causes of such idiosyncratic and developmental delays. Examples of causes include developmental medical conditions such as autism or hearing problems.
In block 310, the audio engine 208 outputs at least one metric to output device 114. For example, the audio engine 208 may, in response to a command received from input device 212, output a metric associated with a number of words spoken by the child per day to the output device 214, where it is displayed to the user. Figures 7-11 are screen shots showing examples of metrics displayed on output device 214. Figure 7 illustrates a graphical vocalization timeline showing the number of vocalizations in a day per hour. Figure 8 illustrates a graphical adult words report showing a number of adult words directed to the key child during selected months. Figure 9 illustrates a graphical words timeline showing the number of words per hour in a day attributable to the key child. Figure 10 illustrates a graphical representation of a turn-takings report showing the number of conversational turns experienced by the key child on selected days per month. Figure 11 illustrates a graphical representation of a key child's language progression over a selected amount of time and for particular characteristics.
In one embodiment, a series of questions are presented to the user to elicit information about the key child's language skills. The questions are based on well-known milestones that children achieve as they learn to speak. Examples of questions include whether the child currently expresses certain vocalizations such as babbling, words, phrases, and sentences. Once the user responds in a predetermined manner to the questions, no new questions are presented and the user is presented with a developmental snapshot of the speaker based on the responses to the questions. In one embodiment, once three "No" answers are entered, indicating that the child does not exhibit certain skills, the system stops and determines the developmental snapshot. The questioning may be repeated periodically and the snapshot developed based on the answers and, in some embodiments, data from recording processing. An example of a snapshot may include the language development chart shown in Figure 11. In an alternative environment, the series of =questions is answered automatically by analyzing the recorded speech and using the information obtained to automatically answer the questions.
In yet another alternative, the recorded speech is analyzed to detect and identify phoneme, protophones, and phoneme-like sounds, which are then further analyzed using statistical processing to determine a key-child's developmental age. The statistical processing includes determining a probability model of the phoneme, protophones, and phoneme-like sounds decoded in the key child segments and applying a linear regression model to estimate the developmental age.
Certain embodiments of the present invention do not require that the key child or other speakers train the system, as is required by many voice recognition systems.
Recording systems according to some embodiments of the present invention may be initially benchmarked by comparing certain determinations made by the system with determinations made by reviewing a transcript. To benchmark the performance of the segmenter, the identification of 1) key child v.
non-key child and 2) adult v. non-adult were compared, as well as the accuracy of the identification of the speaker/source associated with the segments.
Although the foregoing describes the processing of the recorded speech to obtain metrics, such as word counts and conversational turns, other types of processing are also possible, including the use of certain aspects of the invention in conventional speech recognition systems.
The recorded speech file could be processed to identify a particular word or sequence of words or = the speech could be saved or shared. For example, a child's first utterance of "mama" or "dada"
could be saved much as a photo of the child is saved or shared via e-mail with a family member.
The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has been presented only for the purpose of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed.. Numerous modifications and adaptations are apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention.

Claims (28)

CLAIMS:
1. A method comprising:
capturing an audio recording from a language environment of a key child, segmenting the audio recording into a plurality of segments;
identifying a segment ID for each of the plurality of segments, the segment ID

identifying a source for audio in the segment, wherein segmenting the audio recording into the plurality of segments and identifying the segment ID for each of the plurality of segments comprises: using a Minimum Duration Gaussian Mixture Model (MD-GMM), wherein the segments identified using the MD-GMM are at least a minimum duration D, and any segments with a duration longer than 2*D are broken down into several segments with a duration between D and 2*D;
identifying a plurality of key child segments from the plurality of segments each of the plurality of key child segments having the key child as the segment ID;
estimating key child segment characteristics based in part on at least one of the plurality of key child segments, wherein the key child segment characteristics are estimated independent of content of the plurality of key child segments;
determining at least one metric associated with the language environment using the key child segment characteristics; and outputting the at least one metric.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
identifying a plurality of adult segments from the plurality of segments, each of the plurality of adult segments having the adult as the segment ID;

estimating adult segment characteristics based in part on at least one of the plurality of adult segments, wherein the adult segment characteristics are estimated independent of content of the plurality of adult segments; and wherein determining at least one metric associated with the language environment comprises using the adult segment characteristics.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein adult segment characteristics comprise at least one of:
a word count;
a duration of speech;
a vocalization count; and a parentese count.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the at least one metric comprises at least or one of:
number of key child vocalizations in a pre-set time period;
number of conversational turns, wherein the conversational turns comprise a sound from one of the adult or key child and a response to the sound from one of the adult or key child; and number of adult words directed to the key child in a pre-set time period.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein using the MD-GMM comprises:
performing a first segmentation and a first segment ID using a first MD-GMM, the first MD-GMM comprising a plurality of models;
generating a second MD-GMM by modifying at least one of the plurality of models; and segmenting the audio recording into the plurality of segments and identifying the segment ID for each of the plurality of segments using the second MD-GMM.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the plurality of models comprise a key child model, an electronic device model, and an adult model, wherein:
the key child model comprises criteria associated with sounds from a child;
the electronic device model comprises criteria associated with sounds from an electronic device;
and the adult model comprises criteria associated with sounds from adults.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising at least one of:
modifying the key child model using an age-dependent key child model, wherein the age-dependent key child model comprises criteria associated with sounds from children of a plurality of ages;
modifying the electronic device model;
modifying at least one of the key child model and the adult model using a loudness/clearness detection model, wherein the loudness/clearness detection model comprises a likelihood Ratio Test; and modifying at least one of the key child model and the adult model using a parentese model, wherein the parentese model comprises complexity levels associated with sounds of adults.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
classifying each of the plurality of key child segments into one of:
vocalizations;
cries;

vegetative sounds;
fixed signal sounds; and wherein key child segment characteristics are estimated using key child segments classified into at least one of vocalizations and cries.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein classifying each of the plurality of key child segments comprises using at least one of rule-based analysis and statistical processing.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein key child segment characteristics comprises at least one of:
duration of cries;
number of squeals;
number of growls;
presence of canonical syllables;
number of canonical syllables; presence of repetitive babbles; number of repetitive babbles; presence of protophones;
number of protophones;
duration of protophones;
presence of phoneme-like sounds; number of phoneme-like sounds; duration of phoneme-like sounds; presence of phonemes;
number of phonemes;
duration of phonemes;
word count; and vocalization count.
11. A method comprising:
capturing an audio recording from a language environment of a key child;
segmenting the audio recording into a plurality of segments and identifying a segment ID for at least one of the plurality of segments using a Minimum Duration Gaussian Mixture Model (MD-GMM), the segment ID identifying a key child, wherein the segments identified using the MD-GMM are at least a minimum duration D, and any segments with a duration longer than 2*D are broken down into several segments with a duration between D
and 2*D;
estimating key child segment characteristics based in part on the at least one of the plurality of segments, wherein the key child segment characteristics are estimated independent of content of the plurality of segments;
determining at least one metric associated with the language environment using the key child segment characteristics; and outputting the at least one metric.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the key child segment characteristics comprises a number of vowels and a number of consonants in the at least one of the plurality of segments.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein determining at least one metric associated with the language environment using the key child segment characteristics comprises:
comparing the number of vowels and number of consonants in the at least one of the plurality of segments to attributes associated with a native language of the key child to determine a number of words spoken by the key child.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the MD-GMM comprises a key child model;

modifying the key child model using an age-dependent key child model; and wherein segmenting the audio recording into the plurality of segments and identifying the segment ID for at least one of the plurality of segments using the MD-GMM
comprises using the MD-GMM comprising the modified key child model.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the age-dependent key child model comprises:
a first model group comprising characteristics of sounds of children of a first age; and a second model group comprising characteristics of sounds of children of a second age.
16. A system comprising:
a recorder adapted to capture audio recordings from a language environment of a key child and provide the audio recordings to a processor-based device; and the processor-based device comprising an application having an audio engine adapted to segment the audio recording into a plurality of segments and identify a segment ID
for each of the plurality of segments, wherein at least one of the plurality of segments is associated with a key child segment ID, wherein the audio engine segments the audio recording and identifies the segment ID for each of the plurality of segments using a Minimum Duration Gaussian Mixture Model (MD-GMM), and wherein the segments identified using the MD-GMM are at least a minimum duration D, and any segments with a duration longer than 2*D are broken down into several segments with a duration between D
and 2*D, the audio engine being further adapted to: estimate key child segment characteristics based in part on the at least one of the plurality of segments, wherein the audio engine estimates key child segment characteristics independent of content of the at least one of the plurality of segments;

determine at least one metric associated with the language environment using the key child segment characteristics; and output the at least one metric to an output device.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein the audio engine uses the MD-GMM by:
performing a first segmentation and a first segment ID using a first MD-GMM, the first MD-GMM comprising a plurality of models;
generating a second MD-GMM by modifying at least one of the plurality of models; and segmenting the audio recording into the plurality of segments and identifying the segment ID for each of the plurality of segments using the second MD-GMM.
18. The system of claim 17, wherein the plurality of models comprise a key child model, an electronic device model, and an adult model.
19. The system of claim 18, further comprising at least one of: the audio engine adapted to modify the key child model using an age-dependent key child model, the age-dependent key child model comprising:
a first model group comprising characteristics of sounds of children of a first age; and a second model group comprising characteristics of sounds of children of a second age;
the audio engine adapted to modify the electronic device model, the electronic device model comprising criteria associated with sounds generated by an electronic device;

the audio engine adapted to modify at least one of the key child model and the adult model using a loudness/clearness detection model, the loudness/clearness detection model comprising a Likelihood Ratio Test; and the audio engine adapted to modify at least one of the key child model and the adult model using a parentese model, the parentese model comprising a complexity level of speech associated with adult sounds.
20. The system of claim 16, wherein the audio engine uses the MD-GMM by:
scoring each of the plurality of segments using log-likelihood scoring and a plurality of models; and analyzing the scored plurality of segments to assign the segment ID to each of the plurality of segments.
21. The system of claim 16, wherein the MD-GMM comprises a plurality of models, each model comprising criteria associated with sounds and sources of sounds, the plurality of models comprising at least one of:
a key child model comprising criteria associated with sounds from the key child;
an adult model comprising criteria associated with sounds from an adult;
a noise model comprising criteria associated with sounds attributable to noise;
an electronic device model comprising criteria associated with sounds from an electronic device;
an other child model comprising criteria associated with sounds from a child other than the key child;
an age-dependent key child model comprising criteria associated with sounds from key children of plurality of ages; and a parentese model comprising a complexity level characteristics of sounds of adults.
22. The system of claim 21, wherein the audio engine is adapted to:
use the other child model to identify at least one of the plurality of segments comprising sounds from a child other than the key child; and assign an other child segment ID to the identified at least one of the plurality of segments.
23. The system of claim 21, wherein the audio engine is adapted to:
use the noise model to identify at least one of the plurality of segments comprising sounds from noise; and assign a noise segment ID to the identified at least one of the plurality of segments.
24. The system of claim 21, wherein the audio engine is adapted to:
use the key child model to identify at least one of the plurality of segments comprising sounds with characteristics associated with the sounds from the key child; and assign the key child segment ID to the identified at least one of the plurality of segments.
25. The system of claim 21, wherein the audio engine is adapted to:
use the adult model to identify at least one of the plurality of segments comprising sounds from an adult; and assign an adult segment ID to the identified at least one of the plurality of segments.
26. The system of claim 21, wherein the audio engine is adapted to:

use the electronic model to identify at least one of the plurality of segments comprising sounds having criteria associated with electronic device sounds, the criteria associated with electronic device sounds comprising at least one of:
duration longer than a pre-set period;
a series of segments having a pre-set source pattern; and assign a noise segment ID to the identified at least one of the plurality of segments.
27. The system of claim 21, wherein the age-dependent key child model comprises:
a first model group comprising criteria of sounds of children of a first age;
and a second model group comprising criteria of sounds of children of a second age; and wherein the audio engine is adapted to:
select one of the first model group and the second model group based on information associated with the key child;
use the selected model group to identify at least one of the plurality of segments comprising sounds having characteristics of the selected model group;
and assign the key child segment ID to the identified at least one of the plurality of segments.
28. The system of claim 21, wherein the audio engine is adapted to:
use the parentese model to identify at least one of the plurality of segments comprising sounds having the complexity level characteristics; and assign an adult segment ID to the identified at least one of the plurality of segments.
CA 2676380 2007-01-23 2008-01-23 System and method for detection and analysis of speech Active CA2676380C (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US88612207 true 2007-01-23 2007-01-23
US88616707 true 2007-01-23 2007-01-23
US60/886,122 2007-01-23
US60/886,167 2007-01-23
PCT/US2008/051799 WO2008091947A9 (en) 2007-01-23 2008-01-23 System and method for detection and analysis of speech

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2676380A1 true CA2676380A1 (en) 2008-07-31
CA2676380C true CA2676380C (en) 2015-11-24

Family

ID=39529392

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA 2676380 Active CA2676380C (en) 2007-01-23 2008-01-23 System and method for detection and analysis of speech

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US8744847B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2126901B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2676380C (en)
WO (1) WO2008091947A9 (en)

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8938390B2 (en) * 2007-01-23 2015-01-20 Lena Foundation System and method for expressive language and developmental disorder assessment
US9355651B2 (en) 2004-09-16 2016-05-31 Lena Foundation System and method for expressive language, developmental disorder, and emotion assessment
US9240188B2 (en) * 2004-09-16 2016-01-19 Lena Foundation System and method for expressive language, developmental disorder, and emotion assessment
US8078465B2 (en) * 2007-01-23 2011-12-13 Lena Foundation System and method for detection and analysis of speech
CA2676380C (en) * 2007-01-23 2015-11-24 Infoture, Inc. System and method for detection and analysis of speech
WO2010019831A4 (en) 2008-08-14 2010-05-27 21Ct, Inc. Hidden markov model for speech processing with training method
US8870575B2 (en) * 2010-08-03 2014-10-28 Industrial Technology Research Institute Language learning system, language learning method, and computer program product thereof
US20140207456A1 (en) * 2010-09-23 2014-07-24 Waveform Communications, Llc Waveform analysis of speech
US20120078625A1 (en) * 2010-09-23 2012-03-29 Waveform Communications, Llc Waveform analysis of speech
CN103828252B (en) * 2011-09-09 2016-06-29 接合技术公司 Intraoral tactile biofeedback methods for speech and language training, apparatus and system
US9195656B2 (en) * 2013-12-30 2015-11-24 Google Inc. Multilingual prosody generation
CN106486129A (en) * 2014-06-27 2017-03-08 华为技术有限公司 Audio coding method and apparatus thereof
WO2017008075A1 (en) * 2015-07-09 2017-01-12 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Systems and methods for human speech training
CN106816150A (en) * 2015-11-27 2017-06-09 富泰华工业(深圳)有限公司 Baby sign interpretation method and system based on environment

Family Cites Families (147)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4139732A (en) * 1975-01-24 1979-02-13 Larynogograph Limited Apparatus for speech pattern derivation
US4087632A (en) * 1976-11-26 1978-05-02 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Speech recognition system
US4408616A (en) 1981-05-15 1983-10-11 The Children's Medical Center Corporation Brain electricaL activity mapping
US4464119A (en) * 1981-11-10 1984-08-07 Vildgrube Georgy S Method and device for correcting speech
US4675904A (en) * 1983-08-11 1987-06-23 Compusonics, Inc. Method for detecting suicidal predisposition
DE3514286A1 (en) * 1985-04-19 1986-10-23 Siemens Ag A system for detecting individually spoken words
US4852181A (en) * 1985-09-26 1989-07-25 Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Speech recognition for recognizing the catagory of an input speech pattern
JPS63501603A (en) * 1985-10-30 1988-06-16
US4857030A (en) * 1987-02-06 1989-08-15 Coleco Industries, Inc. Conversing dolls
US5014327A (en) * 1987-06-15 1991-05-07 Digital Equipment Corporation Parallel associative memory having improved selection and decision mechanisms for recognizing and sorting relevant patterns
US5033087A (en) * 1989-03-14 1991-07-16 International Business Machines Corp. Method and apparatus for the automatic determination of phonological rules as for a continuous speech recognition system
US5167004A (en) 1991-02-28 1992-11-24 Texas Instruments Incorporated Temporal decorrelation method for robust speaker verification
DE4111995A1 (en) * 1991-04-12 1992-10-15 Philips Patentverwaltung A circuit arrangement for speech recognition
US5169316A (en) * 1991-07-09 1992-12-08 Lorman Janis S Speech therapy device providing direct visual feedback
US5260869A (en) * 1991-08-21 1993-11-09 Northeastern University Communication and feedback system for promoting development of physically disadvantaged persons
US5765127A (en) * 1992-03-18 1998-06-09 Sony Corp High efficiency encoding method
JPH0743598B2 (en) 1992-06-25 1995-05-15 株式会社エイ・ティ・アール視聴覚機構研究所 Speech recognition method
GB9223066D0 (en) 1992-11-04 1992-12-16 Secr Defence Children's speech training aid
US5497447A (en) * 1993-03-08 1996-03-05 International Business Machines Corporation Speech coding apparatus having acoustic prototype vectors generated by tying to elementary models and clustering around reference vectors
US5572624A (en) 1994-01-24 1996-11-05 Kurzweil Applied Intelligence, Inc. Speech recognition system accommodating different sources
DE69520515T2 (en) * 1994-02-25 2001-08-09 Electrolux Zanussi Elettrodome Washing machine with a device for water recovery
JP3745403B2 (en) * 1994-04-12 2006-02-15 ゼロックス コーポレイションXerox Corporation Clustering method of audio data segment
US5729658A (en) * 1994-06-17 1998-03-17 Massachusetts Eye And Ear Infirmary Evaluating intelligibility of speech reproduction and transmission across multiple listening conditions
US5617855A (en) 1994-09-01 1997-04-08 Waletzky; Jeremy P. Medical testing device and associated method
GB9419388D0 (en) * 1994-09-26 1994-11-09 Canon Kk Speech analysis
EP0797822B1 (en) * 1994-12-08 2002-05-22 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Method and device for enhancing the recognition of speech among speech-impaired individuals
US5812972A (en) 1994-12-30 1998-09-22 Lucent Technologies Inc. Adaptive decision directed speech recognition bias equalization method and apparatus
DE69619284T3 (en) 1995-03-13 2006-04-27 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Kadoma Apparatus for extending the voice bandwidth
US5717828A (en) * 1995-03-15 1998-02-10 Syracuse Language Systems Speech recognition apparatus and method for learning
US5873728A (en) * 1995-05-23 1999-02-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Sound pronunciation comparing method in sound signal reproducing apparatus
US6157913A (en) 1996-11-25 2000-12-05 Bernstein; Jared C. Method and apparatus for estimating fitness to perform tasks based on linguistic and other aspects of spoken responses in constrained interactions
WO1997027578A1 (en) * 1996-01-26 1997-07-31 Motorola Inc. Very low bit rate time domain speech analyzer for voice messaging
US5893720A (en) * 1996-03-25 1999-04-13 Cohen; Hannah R. Development language system for infants
EP0954854A4 (en) * 1996-11-22 2000-07-19 T Netix Inc Subword-based speaker verification using multiple classifier fusion, with channel, fusion, model, and threshold adaptation
US5884259A (en) * 1997-02-12 1999-03-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for a time-synchronous tree-based search strategy
US6029124A (en) * 1997-02-21 2000-02-22 Dragon Systems, Inc. Sequential, nonparametric speech recognition and speaker identification
US6006188A (en) 1997-03-19 1999-12-21 Dendrite, Inc. Speech signal processing for determining psychological or physiological characteristics using a knowledge base
US5966691A (en) 1997-04-29 1999-10-12 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Message assembler using pseudo randomly chosen words in finite state slots
US5960397A (en) 1997-05-27 1999-09-28 At&T Corp System and method of recognizing an acoustic environment to adapt a set of based recognition models to the current acoustic environment for subsequent speech recognition
US6341267B1 (en) * 1997-07-02 2002-01-22 Enhancement Of Human Potential, Inc. Methods, systems and apparatuses for matching individuals with behavioral requirements and for managing providers of services to evaluate or increase individuals' behavioral capabilities
US6073095A (en) * 1997-10-15 2000-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Fast vocabulary independent method and apparatus for spotting words in speech
US6304846B1 (en) 1997-10-22 2001-10-16 Texas Instruments Incorporated Singing voice synthesis
US6173260B1 (en) * 1997-10-29 2001-01-09 Interval Research Corporation System and method for automatic classification of speech based upon affective content
US5927988A (en) * 1997-12-17 1999-07-27 Jenkins; William M. Method and apparatus for training of sensory and perceptual systems in LLI subjects
US6061646A (en) * 1997-12-18 2000-05-09 International Business Machines Corp. Kiosk for multiple spoken languages
US5953701A (en) 1998-01-22 1999-09-14 International Business Machines Corporation Speech recognition models combining gender-dependent and gender-independent phone states and using phonetic-context-dependence
US6134529A (en) * 1998-02-09 2000-10-17 Syracuse Language Systems, Inc. Speech recognition apparatus and method for learning
US6185534B1 (en) * 1998-03-23 2001-02-06 Microsoft Corporation Modeling emotion and personality in a computer user interface
US6714909B1 (en) * 1998-08-13 2004-03-30 At&T Corp. System and method for automated multimedia content indexing and retrieval
US6246985B1 (en) * 1998-08-20 2001-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for automatic segregation and routing of signals of different origins by using prototypes
US6141644A (en) * 1998-09-04 2000-10-31 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Speaker verification and speaker identification based on eigenvoices
US6336089B1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2002-01-01 Michael Everding Interactive digital phonetic captioning program
US6400310B1 (en) * 1998-10-22 2002-06-04 Washington University Method and apparatus for a tunable high-resolution spectral estimator
US6395482B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2002-05-28 The Rockfeller University Method of determining susceptibility to schizophrenia
US6253181B1 (en) * 1999-01-22 2001-06-26 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Speech recognition and teaching apparatus able to rapidly adapt to difficult speech of children and foreign speakers
US7668718B2 (en) * 2001-07-17 2010-02-23 Custom Speech Usa, Inc. Synchronized pattern recognition source data processed by manual or automatic means for creation of shared speaker-dependent speech user profile
US6404925B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2002-06-11 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Methods and apparatuses for segmenting an audio-visual recording using image similarity searching and audio speaker recognition
US6554617B1 (en) * 1999-04-05 2003-04-29 Dolan F. J. "Steve" Vocabulary teaching aid system and method
US6296489B1 (en) * 1999-06-23 2001-10-02 Heuristix System for sound file recording, analysis, and archiving via the internet for language training and other applications
US6405167B1 (en) * 1999-07-16 2002-06-11 Mary Ann Cogliano Interactive book
US6468084B1 (en) * 1999-08-13 2002-10-22 Beacon Literacy, Llc System and method for literacy development
US7222075B2 (en) 1999-08-31 2007-05-22 Accenture Llp Detecting emotions using voice signal analysis
US6275806B1 (en) * 1999-08-31 2001-08-14 Andersen Consulting, Llp System method and article of manufacture for detecting emotion in voice signals by utilizing statistics for voice signal parameters
US20070110042A1 (en) * 1999-12-09 2007-05-17 Henry Li Voice and data exchange over a packet based network
US7423983B1 (en) * 1999-09-20 2008-09-09 Broadcom Corporation Voice and data exchange over a packet based network
US6676412B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2004-01-13 Learning By Design, Inc. Assessment of spelling and related skills
US6661345B1 (en) 1999-10-22 2003-12-09 The Johns Hopkins University Alertness monitoring system
US6662162B2 (en) 2000-08-28 2003-12-09 Maureen Casper Method of rating motor dysfunction by assessing speech prosody
JP4297602B2 (en) * 2000-09-18 2009-07-15 パイオニア株式会社 Voice recognition system
US6665642B2 (en) 2000-11-29 2003-12-16 Ibm Corporation Transcoding system and method for improved access by users with special needs
US20020150869A1 (en) 2000-12-18 2002-10-17 Zeev Shpiro Context-responsive spoken language instruction
US7143044B2 (en) 2000-12-29 2006-11-28 International Business Machines Corporation Translator for infants and toddlers
US6732076B2 (en) * 2001-01-25 2004-05-04 Harcourt Assessment, Inc. Speech analysis and therapy system and method
US6714911B2 (en) * 2001-01-25 2004-03-30 Harcourt Assessment, Inc. Speech transcription and analysis system and method
WO2002082271A1 (en) * 2001-04-05 2002-10-17 Audible Magic Corporation Copyright detection and protection system and method
JP4898015B2 (en) 2001-04-26 2012-03-14 東芝テック株式会社 Distance learning systems, storage server and a computer-readable recording medium recording a program used for this storage server used in the system
CA2451401A1 (en) 2001-06-19 2002-12-27 Securivox Ltd. Speaker recognition system
US8354438B2 (en) * 2001-08-08 2013-01-15 Michael Chez Neurological functions
US7013276B2 (en) * 2001-10-05 2006-03-14 Comverse, Inc. Method of assessing degree of acoustic confusability, and system therefor
US20030088565A1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2003-05-08 Insightful Corporation Method and system for mining large data sets
US6941265B2 (en) 2001-12-14 2005-09-06 Qualcomm Inc Voice recognition system method and apparatus
US7063535B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2006-06-20 Jill Stamm System and method for facilitating early childhood brain development
US7016839B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2006-03-21 International Business Machines Corporation MVDR based feature extraction for speech recognition
DE60215296T2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2007-04-05 Sony Corp. Method and apparatus for speech synthesis program, recording medium, method and apparatus for generating a forced information and robot means
WO2004003887A2 (en) * 2002-06-28 2004-01-08 Conceptual Speech, Llc Multi-phoneme streamer and knowledge representation speech recognition system and method
US7011525B2 (en) * 2002-07-09 2006-03-14 Literacy S.T.A.R. Encoding system combining language elements for rapid advancement
US7620547B2 (en) * 2002-07-25 2009-11-17 Sony Deutschland Gmbh Spoken man-machine interface with speaker identification
US7295970B1 (en) 2002-08-29 2007-11-13 At&T Corp Unsupervised speaker segmentation of multi-speaker speech data
JP4069715B2 (en) * 2002-09-19 2008-04-02 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Acoustic model creation method and voice recognition device
WO2004030532A1 (en) 2002-10-03 2004-04-15 The University Of Queensland Method and apparatus for assessing psychiatric or physical disorders
JP3667332B2 (en) * 2002-11-21 2005-07-06 松下電器産業株式会社 Standard model creating apparatus and the standard model creation method
US20040143434A1 (en) * 2003-01-17 2004-07-22 Ajay Divakaran Audio-Assisted segmentation and browsing of news videos
US7062436B1 (en) 2003-02-11 2006-06-13 Microsoft Corporation Word-specific acoustic models in a speech recognition system
JP4103639B2 (en) 2003-03-14 2008-06-18 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Acoustic model creation method and an acoustic model creating apparatus and a voice recognition device
US20040197750A1 (en) 2003-04-01 2004-10-07 Donaher Joseph G. Methods for computer-assisted role-playing of life skills simulations
US6931374B2 (en) 2003-04-01 2005-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Method of speech recognition using variational inference with switching state space models
US7999857B2 (en) * 2003-07-25 2011-08-16 Stresscam Operations and Systems Ltd. Voice, lip-reading, face and emotion stress analysis, fuzzy logic intelligent camera system
US7778680B2 (en) 2003-08-01 2010-08-17 Dexcom, Inc. System and methods for processing analyte sensor data
US20050112534A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2005-05-26 Mccarton Cecelia Methods for the treatment of autistic spectrum disorders
US20050176057A1 (en) * 2003-09-26 2005-08-11 Troy Bremer Diagnostic markers of mood disorders and methods of use thereof
US7272559B1 (en) 2003-10-02 2007-09-18 Ceie Specs, Inc. Noninvasive detection of neuro diseases
CA2486128C (en) * 2003-10-30 2011-08-23 At&T Corp. System and method for using meta-data dependent language modeling for automatic speech recognition
EP1531478A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-05-18 Sony International (Europe) GmbH Apparatus and method for classifying an audio signal
US20080208581A1 (en) 2003-12-05 2008-08-28 Queensland University Of Technology Model Adaptation System and Method for Speaker Recognition
US7412377B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2008-08-12 International Business Machines Corporation Voice model for speech processing based on ordered average ranks of spectral features
US20050142522A1 (en) * 2003-12-31 2005-06-30 Kullok Jose R. System for treating disabilities such as dyslexia by enhancing holistic speech perception
JP2007525702A (en) * 2004-01-08 2007-09-06 アンヘル・パラショス・オルエタAngel Palacios Orueta By learning and understanding of phonetics and phonology, a method for facilitating language learning, system, program, data set
US7664642B2 (en) 2004-03-17 2010-02-16 University Of Maryland System and method for automatic speech recognition from phonetic features and acoustic landmarks
US7302451B2 (en) * 2004-05-07 2007-11-27 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Feature identification of events in multimedia
US20060093997A1 (en) * 2004-06-12 2006-05-04 Neurotone, Inc. Aural rehabilitation system and a method of using the same
US7720012B1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2010-05-18 Arrowhead Center, Inc. Speaker identification in the presence of packet losses
KR100571574B1 (en) * 2004-07-26 2006-04-17 한양대학교 산학협력단 Similar speaker recognition method and system using a non-linear analysis
US8412521B2 (en) * 2004-08-20 2013-04-02 Multimodal Technologies, Llc Discriminative training of document transcription system
US8335688B2 (en) * 2004-08-20 2012-12-18 Multimodal Technologies, Llc Document transcription system training
US8024128B2 (en) * 2004-09-07 2011-09-20 Gene Security Network, Inc. System and method for improving clinical decisions by aggregating, validating and analysing genetic and phenotypic data
US20060058999A1 (en) * 2004-09-10 2006-03-16 Simon Barker Voice model adaptation
US9240188B2 (en) * 2004-09-16 2016-01-19 Lena Foundation System and method for expressive language, developmental disorder, and emotion assessment
US8708702B2 (en) * 2004-09-16 2014-04-29 Lena Foundation Systems and methods for learning using contextual feedback
US8938390B2 (en) * 2007-01-23 2015-01-20 Lena Foundation System and method for expressive language and developmental disorder assessment
JP4220449B2 (en) * 2004-09-16 2009-02-04 株式会社東芝 Indexing apparatus, indexing methods and indexing program
WO2006033104A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-30 Shalon Ventures Research, Llc Systems and methods for monitoring and modifying behavior
US20060105305A1 (en) * 2004-11-13 2006-05-18 Baby Chatterbox, Inc. Early speech development system
US20060136217A1 (en) * 2004-11-27 2006-06-22 Mullin Sheila A Portable speech and language video monitor
EP1829025A1 (en) * 2004-11-30 2007-09-05 Oded Sarel Method and system of indicating a condition of an individual
US20070055151A1 (en) * 2005-01-20 2007-03-08 Shertukde Hemchandra M Apparatus and methods for acoustic diagnosis
US8135728B2 (en) * 2005-03-24 2012-03-13 Microsoft Corporation Web document keyword and phrase extraction
US20060278532A1 (en) 2005-05-02 2006-12-14 Power3 Medical Products, Inc. Assay for neuromuscular diseases
US7457753B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2008-11-25 University College Dublin National University Of Ireland Telephone pathology assessment
US20070010998A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2007-01-11 Regunathan Radhakrishnan Dynamic generative process modeling, tracking and analyzing
US8478596B2 (en) * 2005-11-28 2013-07-02 Verizon Business Global Llc Impairment detection using speech
US20080133141A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2008-06-05 Frost Stephen J Weighted Scoring Methods and Use Thereof in Screening
US20070168187A1 (en) * 2006-01-13 2007-07-19 Samuel Fletcher Real time voice analysis and method for providing speech therapy
US7590513B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2009-09-15 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Automated modeling and tracking of transaction flow dynamics for fault detection in complex systems
US7778831B2 (en) 2006-02-21 2010-08-17 Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. Voice recognition with dynamic filter bank adjustment based on speaker categorization determined from runtime pitch
US20070239441A1 (en) 2006-03-29 2007-10-11 Jiri Navratil System and method for addressing channel mismatch through class specific transforms
US20080133221A1 (en) * 2006-05-17 2008-06-05 Smith Sharon S Threat assessment based on written communication
US8009193B2 (en) 2006-06-05 2011-08-30 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Unusual event detection via collaborative video mining
US20080096172A1 (en) * 2006-08-03 2008-04-24 Sara Carlstead Brumfield Infant Language Acquisition Using Voice Recognition Software
US7724961B2 (en) * 2006-09-08 2010-05-25 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Method for classifying data using an analytic manifold
EP1906386B1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2009-11-11 Honda Research Institute Europe GmbH Using child directed speech to bootstrap a model based speech segmentation and recognition system
WO2008074076A1 (en) 2006-12-19 2008-06-26 Torqx Pty Limited Confidence levels for speaker recognition
US9966085B2 (en) * 2006-12-30 2018-05-08 Google Technology Holdings LLC Method and noise suppression circuit incorporating a plurality of noise suppression techniques
CA2676380C (en) * 2007-01-23 2015-11-24 Infoture, Inc. System and method for detection and analysis of speech
US8078465B2 (en) 2007-01-23 2011-12-13 Lena Foundation System and method for detection and analysis of speech
JP2008233678A (en) 2007-03-22 2008-10-02 Honda Motor Co Ltd Voice interaction apparatus, voice interaction method, and program for voice interaction
US20080243503A1 (en) 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Minimum divergence based discriminative training for pattern recognition
US20090024050A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2009-01-22 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Computational user-health testing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
WO2008091947A3 (en) 2008-09-25 application
EP2126901B1 (en) 2015-07-01 grant
US8744847B2 (en) 2014-06-03 grant
EP2126901A2 (en) 2009-12-02 application
CA2676380A1 (en) 2008-07-31 application
US20090155751A1 (en) 2009-06-18 application
WO2008091947A9 (en) 2008-11-20 application
WO2008091947A2 (en) 2008-07-31 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Traunmüller et al. Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children
Kappas et al. Voice and emotion
Basu Conversational scene analysis
US6275806B1 (en) System method and article of manufacture for detecting emotion in voice signals by utilizing statistics for voice signal parameters
Kogan et al. Automated recognition of bird song elements from continuous recordings using dynamic time warping and hidden Markov models: A comparative study
US5621857A (en) Method and system for identifying and recognizing speech
Temko et al. CLEAR evaluation of acoustic event detection and classification systems
Teissier et al. Comparing models for audiovisual fusion in a noisy-vowel recognition task
US6151571A (en) System, method and article of manufacture for detecting emotion in voice signals through analysis of a plurality of voice signal parameters
Thomas Sociophonetics: an introduction
US20030023444A1 (en) A voice recognition system for navigating on the internet
Arias-Londono et al. Automatic detection of pathological voices using complexity measures, noise parameters, and mel-cepstral coefficients
Hansen et al. Speaker recognition by machines and humans: A tutorial review
Van Bezooijen Characteristics and recognizability of vocal expressions of emotion
US7340393B2 (en) Emotion recognizing method, sensibility creating method, device, and software
Traunmüller Conventional, biological and environmental factors in speech communication: A modulation theory
Leinonen et al. Expression of emotional–motivational connotations with a one-word utterance
Moran et al. Telephony-based voice pathology assessment using automated speech analysis
US6353810B1 (en) System, method and article of manufacture for an emotion detection system improving emotion recognition
US6697457B2 (en) Voice messaging system that organizes voice messages based on detected emotion
US6480826B2 (en) System and method for a telephonic emotion detection that provides operator feedback
US6427137B2 (en) System, method and article of manufacture for a voice analysis system that detects nervousness for preventing fraud
Patterson et al. A comparative study of human and parrot phonation: Acoustic and articulatory correlates of vowels
Markel et al. Text-independent speaker recognition from a large linguistically unconstrained time-spaced data base
Evangelopoulos et al. Multiband modulation energy tracking for noisy speech detection

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request