CA2603153A1 - Tall gravity to electricity invention version ii - Google Patents

Abstract

We will possibly use ball bearings/rollers on top of the top wheel (which will be almost entirely be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel and/or platinum and/or carbon steel, eg. chisel material, and/or tungsten carbide...) rods and also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano particles, tubes, wires and/or nano fibers). The ball bearings/rollers maybe encased in -Option 1.- shell (--Option 2.- if the chain (Teflon... ) were to glide directly over the ball bearings/rollers some of the ball bearings may not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon to become misaligned). In -Option 1.- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is sandwiched between the ball bearings/rollers and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) would spin over.
We may place guards/rims (rollers can be positioned below the chain (Teflon/nano fibers..) and on both sides - rollers are probably more smooth than ball bearings, where the path of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers) is straight, and the rollers on the side are least friction alternative to guide the chain (teflon/nano fibers) and to on the side to prevent the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) from slipping off. We also many wheels made of light weight material whose grooves/spokes/teeth are caught and spun by the chain (Teflon... strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.
The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of the entire structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia clumsiness -although the downside to different sized wheels is the extra cost to customized sizes.
Re: DRAWING 4 and 5 The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings/rollers next to the surface, the difference is that it umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense concentration of weight is not focused on a small location. The downside is that more surface contact between the mechanisms (eg. surface - more ball bearings/rollers or larger ones and more horizontal spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes against and takes away from the movement of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... )) of the top wheel and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) taking away from the unbalanced force since an umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) to move more across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative Effects Theory says that the unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertically stacked up high; imbalance of tanks/reservoirs each couplet being heavier on one side, lighter on the other.

We plan to use strong/very thin/lightest weight of material for the skin of the tanks/reservoirs such as the material used to make air bags or thin Teflon...

We could also make the (many wheels and very high up - tall as a sky scrapper) shifting weights move by rollers/ball bearings on a guide that is at a horizontal angle from side to side on each side of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) with the weights made of carbon steel or iron.

We will possibly use ball bearings on top of the top wheel (which will be almost entirely be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel and/or platinum) rods and also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano particles, tubes, or spun nano wires and/or nano fibers) or other very strong/probably lightweight/material - that can be cast or moulded. The ball bearings maybe encased in --Option 1.- shell (-Option 2.- if the chain (Teflon .) were to glide directly over the ball bearings some of the ball bearings may not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon to become misaligned). In -Option 1.- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is sandwiched between the ball bearings and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) would spin over. We may place guards/rims on the side to prevent the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) from slipping off. We also many wheels made of light weight material whose grooves/spokes are caught and spun by the chain (Teflon...strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.
The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of the entire structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia clumsiness.
Regarding DRAWING April 6th, 2007 - 2.:
The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings next to the surface, the difference is that it umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense concentration of weight is not focused on a small location. The downside is that more surface contact between the mechanisms (eg. surface - more ball bearings/or larger ones and more horizontal spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes against and takes away from the movement of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...)) of the top wheel and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) taking away from the unbalanced force since an umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) to move more across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative Effects Theory says that the unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertical imbalance.
We could also dig a very deep vertical tunnel (100 to 1,000 floors deep) and lengthen the solid centre cylinders (core) of the wheels (some or probably not the wheels) (the outside of the wheel can be ball bearings (encased on each side?). The solid centre cylinder (core) can be reinforced with very strong forwards and backwards and sideways rods, and stuck into the sides of the tunnel walls with a big strong stopper plugged deep into the wall using concrete and very strong (eg. rebar) cage, and especially encased in a large chunk of concrete at the end of the centre cylinder anchored by the big strong stopper. We are not quite sure of the implications of gravity on the machine underground, since the walls have sideways gravity mass. Or we could combine a vertical tunnel down until the water table and rising hundreds of stories above ground.
Whereby the tunnel could support the wheels' solid centre cylinder (core)s, while the above ground could be supported by Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.

In this invention the chain will be made of spun/woven nano fibres. These chain is much lighter so the top wheel (fairly large with rollers/ball bearings and guard/rails that must carry the weight of the entire system can be smaller; thus the wheels in-between are also smaller, leading to an allowable height relative to width of the system.

Since nano fibres are stronger than steel, we could hang more weights/reservoirs/tanks vertically (optimizing size of weights/reservoirs/tanks relative to level lengths relative to number high - Cumulative Effects Theory).

Nano fibres are flexible enough to wrap around the rollers on the top wheel, yet strong enough to hold up a lot of weights/reservoirs/tanks. The Cumulative Effect Theory isolates the forces as primarily the height and number of weights/reservoirs/tanks on one side is offset by (a levered - weight on the outside end of lever - magnified) a heavier cumulative/sum the total of each weight on one side heavier than the other side.

The reason this model works where similar wheels have failed; is because firstly our width is small while our height is huge - this allows our invention to generate more movement forces in one direction that overcome's the weight's friction and inertia when they are at the top and bottom of the system - consider that on a wheel, the number of weights on the sides and on the top and bottom. The movement force's success is dependent on the huge number of weights/reservoirs/tanks stacked high up versus the few that are situated on the top and bottom (interfering with movement).

Additionally, Chain design updates are being applied for patents for all Gravity Chain Machines, and PCT/CA2005/000145, and Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention.

We will have a large wheel at the top (too carry all the weights below), it will have a pathway of rollers/ball bearings that are in size aligned to place the teeth of the chain in perfect unionson like a chainsaw, the reason for the teeth on the chain is to turn the wheels (which have counter teeth) below. In the alternative we could make the chain taut or weave/spin the nano fibers into sequences of knots that catch the wheels below's teeth. We could also make the chain have tiny wavy hills and valleys shape (intervals of nodules rather than teeth), avoiding the most friction with the top wheel (and its rollers and/or ball bearings) while catching the teeth of the wheels we need to spin below to generate the electricity.

A more complex design is to put longer teeth on the chain, and a micro hinge in-between.
The top wheel will have a protruding mechanism that folds the hinge (eg. by pokes into it, causing an unhooking) just before the chain's teeth reaches/approaches the top wheels rollers/ball bearings, thus avoiding friction. Then as the chain's teeth leaves the rollers/ball bearings, the Top Wheel mechanism such as a protruding poking mechanism unfolds/rearms the chain's teeth for catching and spinning the electricity generating wheels below.
Or we could have guards/rails all the way from top to bottom to keep the chain's teeth facing inside - the down side with this design is that the teeth of the chain the a not properly aligned my scrape against the guards/rail, unless we made it wide enough.

We could also have guards/rails that funnel in the chain just before each wheel to align the teeth of the chain to point inwards.

Another design is to design the chain widely and divide its width into center segment or segment on both sides surrounding the centre. Either the centre will have teeth in which case both surrounding sides will have no teeth or both sides will have teeth, in which case the centre will have no teeth (in this case the top wheel could be surrounded by larger roller with inner rollers adding to overcome friction inside the large roller; with rims/guards/rails or standing up rollers to keep the movement of the chain smooth and straight) -the inner rollers surround the non moving neck of the Top Wheel; it must strong enough to carry the total weight of the entire system. The Top Wheel will have rollers to match the area of the chain that has the no teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding sides while the lower wheels will have teeth aligned to match area of chain that has teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding sides of width of chain.

ADDITION: New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention;
Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs We are looking covering the entire Gravity Chain Machine of whatever versions with solar panels.

We are looking at developing Building windmills.

1. Our first design is to put the rotary blades (hereinafter referred to as blades) on the roof (with the blades horizontal) (see Drawing 1.).

2. Our second design is to put the blades on the side of the building (vertically) possible on all four sides (see Drawing 2.).

We prefer the first design because it allows clearance between buildings and the wind needed to may be blocked by other buildings in the second choice (in the case of vertical blades connected to the side of the building). There is usually more wind on the top of the buildings.

Even if there currently was clearance, in the future a developer may build a new building the blocks the wind needed for the blades.

We could also put windmill blades on our Gravity Chain Machine.

If the building is tall enough we could even line up the vertical blades one above the other (see Drawing 3.).

Additionally we could do a combination 1) roof, 2) on side, 3) on all four sides, 4) multiple vertical blades up along each side of the building (see Drawing 4.).

We could also add rings (at multiple levels) to allow the blades to catch the wind, the way normal windmills spin to catch the wind (see Drawing 5.) (Ch 2%).

As well we could put elongated neck with blades near the top, like a regular windmill, except under the circular disc base of the windmill(s) is a building.

1. We also have a design to vertical walls that funnel wind either inwards (in which case blades could be positioned on both sides of the funnel walls and wind would be channeled into the funnel. We could also stack the blades vertically.
2. The other design is to have the same funnel but position the blades on the narrow end of the funnel on the outside.
3. There is a base at the bottom that is circular or disc shaped that spins to channel the wind in the case of 1.) the wind goes inside the entrance of the funnel and in the case of 2.) the wind is divided by a sharp narrow divider (possibly vertical triangular shape - other end of the funnel.

We could place these designs on top of buildings.

We could also build windmills with multiples blades stacked vertically, and one horizontally on top and blades on each side of the stand.

We could also build a mixed use Energy focusing on the most productive/efficient use of the land - our buildings have zero effluent unlike oil/gas/nuclear never mind coal:

1. At the centre are Gravity Chain Machines.
2. Windmills stacked vertically or on each side or on horizontally top of the support walls of the Gravity Chain Machine.

3. On the side walls are possibly multiply stacked on each far end of the total length ends of the Gravity Chain Machine side by side condensed blue print design.
4. Pyramid/greenhouse, where each level has perhaps 10 trays (of corn) that rotate.
Each level further away from the Gravity Chain Machine centre extend out of the shade of the levels of trays above it and therefore each level extends further out sideways to capture maximum sunlight for the rotating trays of that level.
This sideways pyramid structure keeps extending out and down until level by level until the trays reach ground level. The trays and the Gravity Chain Machine reservoir/tanks are enclosed in the same structure, where heating sharing (best use of energy for heating) in winter may be needed.
5. Probably extending in between the green houses are the stands that carry windmills' whose blades may tower above the level/step of the pyramid/greenhouse beneath it.
6. Structurally strong yet transparent or translucent material to hold up the pyramid/greenhouses (if even necessary), since each pyramid/greenhouses' rotating trays component is really not that high.
7. As well we could use the space under each level's tray to grow mushrooms, or germinate the next crop of corn, or shred and pelletize, or logs or particle board, bag, spin/weave.. .

Smaller Scale Gravity Chain Machine Version 3 The main difference in this invention is that the chain, instead of being made from Teflon, we use spun, woven nano fibres that can be stronger than steel with possibility mixture of nano particles in plastic, and give the chain teeth (for spinning the wheels that generate electricity like a windmill).

Since the chain material is so light we don't need as high a structure (for cumulative effects theory to work).

The cumulative effects theory says that the higher the structure the more total net differing weight (accumulating into force more down on one side than the other), this differing force must overcome, friction and inertia.

If we use nano material for the chain, the chain is far lighter, and therefore less friction and inertia (probably more flexible - then Teflon and stronger - than steel, so even less material is needed) to hold back the entire system from working.

This could allow for micro GCM (Smaller Scale).

We could also make the reservoir/tank structural cage out of a mix of nano particles or spray on fibres, mixed with plastic We could also make the reservoir/tank structural cage out of a mix of nano particles or spray on fibres, mixed with plastic or other mixable substances that make strong/durable yet light cage. (GP).

The skin of the reservoir/tank could be made of nano textiles (eg. that are water proof, fabrics, or diver's suit except thinner and lighter).

We could also make the skin out of mylar or air bag material.

In addition to reflective mirror surrounding a solar panelled boiler and boiling salt water that spins a propeller under pressure and creates fresh water at the other end:

1. We could put magnifying glasses in between the sun the reflective mirrors and the solar panel boiler.

2. In fact all solar panels could have moving magnifying or moving solar panels to capture maximum sun exposure throughout the day.

We could build comprehensive energy farms...
1. solar cells roof 2. direction of flow of rainwater 3. drain for slanted roof to pour and collect rainwater to reservoir below 4. New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention; Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs; Overbalanced Endless Chain Motor - the walls are covered with reflective material to reflect light to outer surrounding level of crops 5. slanted panels (shine light on to crops from centre out) that catch light from reflective (mirrors) below on the surrounding ground floor (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy) 6. One level/floor of surrounding crops.
7. windmills on to of each Overbalanced Endless Chain Machine 8. Ground level, or some higher up (eg. crisscross cheap towers) to reflect sunlight to the slanted panels that then re-reflect light back down to the crops at each level/floor below (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy).

We are planning to use possibly a layer of Kevlar straps, Teflon straps, cordura nylon, ballistic nylon, leather for the wheel surface (and chain)(possibly steel threads - especially on the wheels), as well as stamp a crisscross pattern on the exposed surfaces meet.

We are also looking at chinks of titanium possibly linked together by tightly and greased spun Kevlar chords to make up the chain, where the wheels have spokes that poke into the open spaces where the chain, end of the hole catches and spins the wheel.

We are also looking at keeping chain taut (eg. possibly a layer of Kevlar straps, Teflon straps, cordura nylon, ballistic nylon, leather). The tight surfaces between the chain and the wheel contact points, uses friction to drag the wheel in the vector direction of the chain. We could also use knots.

We might even make the wheel out of rubber (An).

Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel) design will make the intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the most (peak) of cumulative effects theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of unbalanced weight such as closer stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we could also stack each level of tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg. carbon graphite), and tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and bottom of the system.

We have developed a modular Gravity Chain Machine blocks (that expand to fit a plot of land while maximize the amount of energy produced in that plot's size of space), windmills are situated on top of walls surrounding the Gravity Chain Machines and at the solid sides of the collective.

Bascially each unit (block) of Gravity Chain Machine is surrounded by windmills, by placing the unit/blocks together (on any of all sides) to squeeze the most out of the usage of the land and the modular design makes it flexible to fit odd land shapes.

Pertaining to DRAWING 3.5 - Compressed version so you can get more net forces (more yield) for the same height (you won't have to stack it up as high to get the same yield) - and furthermore once you reach the maximum buildable height you could increase yield compressing (plus it may save building costs) that according to the cumulative effects theory, the more additional amount of extra by way of weight (water) switching to extremity of each side of the lever(s) means a net force of one side being heavier than the other side. The system of chains and the levers (weights) connected to the chains must be flexible enough at the top and bottom to allow spinning around the top end of the Top and Bottom wheel.
Furthermore we are experimenting with shrinking the wheel making a shorter (some may say it creates a steeper change in drag but there should be an equal and opposite pull on the other side of the wheel - nullifying each other out - even some) and less space to cover (given that the top wheel is strong enough (reinforced) which would not make sense to try to spin, therefore we would use rollers/ball bearings) my hypothesis is to maximize the size of the reservoirs/tanks (sticking/jutting out and width) and optimize usage of vertical space;
while minimizing the resistance to the flow/spin of the system from handling the top and bottom part of the system

Description

June, 2007 Gerard Voon Note: not to be publicly published until International Patent Application has Occurred.
Description 1.i) PRIMARY NOVELTY: Our Invention increases height over width by shrinking the proportionate size (eg. diameter) of the wheels, we do this by stacking the wheels high up. The outcome is that the height is where the (increases in totalling net forces) of the cumulative effects theory is derived this net force is increased with a higher/tal{er design and results in the wheels being proportionatedly - relatively smaller. We note that most of the inertia, drag, friction, and bounciness (also dead weight - no net weight pushing down on one side of the chain over the other) occurs on the top and bottom wheels.
1.ii) We will dissect this invention from the inside out, like peeling an onion from the inside out.
1.iii) The Invention is compromised of a top wheel which is solid - with ball bearings or rollers for the chain (teflon/nanofibers...) and water tanks (eg the wheel can be made of tungsten carbide reinforced by cage shaped to and embedded into the wheel, which may also have casing and guards or we may use other very strong material since the top wheel will have hold up the weight of all the tanks all together).
1.iv) There will be hundreds light weight wheels (eg. spokes) at the stacked up the vertical centre of the invention. The closest invention to ours, explicitly says their invention is comprised of 2 wheels (see below).

Liste de la familie de brevets 1 family member for:

Derived from 1 application.

U Motor drivable by three different forces, viz. gravity, dans ma liste de tl ytÃrostatic force or aerostatic ~srPssur~ comprises two wheels on vertical axes and connected to link gear brevets Informations relatives 3 la pubiication: DE19919022 Al - 2000-03-02 Les donnees sont foumies par la banque de donnees esp@cenet - Woridwide We explicitly claim Our Invention needs possibly 100's if not 1,000's of wheels to operate.
1.v) Next outer layer is the chain it has grooves/spokes/teeth interact with and spins wheels, the chain might be made of Teflon... strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.

1.vi) Next layer out are the tanks/reservoirs levers that are slanted at an angle.

2.i) In order to for the invention to make the Cumulative Effects Theory work, the invention will need 100's if not 1000's of unbalanced weights. The only conceivable way to hold the invention erect (possibly as tall as a building) is to stick a solid pole, almost as thick in diameter as the top wheel's diameter allowing clearance for the inner tanks/reservoirs to pass above.

In de19919022 Al they explicitly state that their invention consists 2 wheels furthermore both their figures show 14 weights on each figure.

This is very different from Our Invention, where the Cumulative Effects Theory tells us to increase the number of net weights (cumulative overbalanced levels up) on each side, this invention needs 100's to 1000's weights/levers high (to accumulate the total of net/overbalanced; forces of levered mass on each side downwards).

We will possibly use ball bearings/rollers on top of the top wheel (which will be almost entirely be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel and/or platinum and/or carbon steel, eg. chisel material and/or tungsten carbide...) rods and also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano particles, tubes, wires and/or nano fibers).

The ball bearings/rollers maybe encased in -Option 1.- shell (-Option 2.- the chain (Teflon... ) may glide directly over the ball bearings/rollers some of the ball bearings may not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon to become misaligned).
In -Option 1- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is sandwiched between the ball bearings/rollers and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) would spin over.

We may place guards/rims (rollers can be positioned below the chain (Teflon/nano fibers..) and on both sides - rollers are probably more smooth than ball bearings, where the path of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers) is straight, and the rollers on the side are least friction altemative to guide the chain (teflon/nano fibers) and to on the side to prevent the chain (Teflon/nano flbers... ) from slipping off. We also many wheels made of light weight material whose grooves/spokes/teeth are caught and spun by the chain (Teflon... strong/lightweight/1ow frictionlflexible material.

The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of the entire structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia clumsiness -although the downside to different sized wheels is the extra cost to customized sizes.
Regarding DRAWING 4 and 5:

The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings/rollers next to the surface, the difference is that it umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense concentration of weight is not focused on a small location.

The downside is that more surface contact between the mechanisms (eg. surface -more ball bearings/rollers or larger ones and more horizontal spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes against and takes away from the movement of the chain (Teflon/nano tibers...)) of the top wheel and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) taking away from the unbalanced force since an umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) to move more across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative Effects Theory says that the unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertically stacked up high;
imbalance of tanks/reservoirs each couplet (each horizontal pair on each side of the chain/fulcrum) being heavier on one side, lighter on the other.

We plan to use strong/very thin/lightest weight of material for the skin of the tanks/reservoirs such as the material used to make air bags or thin Teflon...

We could also make the (many wheels and very high up - tall as a building) shifting weights move by rollers/ball bearings on a guide that is at a horizontal angle from side to side on each side of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) with the weights made of carbon steel or iron.
2.ii) The 100's to 1000's of light weight wheels vertically stacked up the middle of the invention. Each wheels whose sides' grooves/spokes/teeth are spun by the movement of the chain (Teflon/nanofibers... ). The purpose of the inbetween wheels are two fold. One. Each or some of the wheels have a rod in its centre that protrudes out and as it spins it generates electricity. Two. The many wheels are needed to keep the shape of the chain and tanks/reservoirs from twisting (since the invention will be the height of a building).

2.iii) The chain (Teflon/nanofiber...) must be made of strong/lightweight/lowfriction/flexible material. It will have holes or grooves that catch the teeth or the other way around to spin the wheels which generate electricity. We are looking at reinforcing the chain with duct tape like material - such as the mesh spread equally, possibly sandwiched by Teflon - or some flexible material to cover the mesh to smoothen out the surface - reduce friction.

2.iv) There is a tank/reservoir (or shifting weights - see DRAWING 6, 7 and 8) or square large weights stacked tightly with inner guides or outer rails using rollers or ball bearings to shift the weight from end to end of the levers (guides - rails 10% Ch).
On each end of a lever (eg. see saw). The longer the lever the more magnified the shift in weight position of one side's force downwards to the other side. Consider a see saw or a old doctor's weight scale, the further outwards towards the extreme length of the lever the weight is shifted the more force downwards the scale (see saw) will be tipped.

The second function of the lever is to be thick and hollow enough to let water drain from inner tank/reservoir to outer tank/reservoir.

The lever must be shaped and positioned to easily drain the higher tank/reservoir until empty, and therefore its hole must be connected to the bottom of the higher tank/reservoir.
The lever is positioned at an angle (we are experimenting with various angles) where the outside tank/reservoir is lower than the inner tank/reservoir on one (say the left) side of the chain then as the chain spins this particular lever/outer and inner tank under discussion spins underneath and to the other side.

The angle of the lever naturally becomes upside down. - Firstly, The outer tank/reservoir is situated lower than its matching inner tank/reservoir so naturally the lever drains the water from the higher upper inner tank/reservoir to the lower outer tank/reservoir.

- Secondly, look at the chain as a responsive fulcrum, meaning it will move around the wheels as more down force is added on one side of the chain relative to the other.

The water weight in the outer tankireservoir, being further out (ie. the shifting of weight on the doctor's scale or see saw that becomes magnified as the weight is shifted further and further out to the far end of the fulcrum) and thus will have more downwards force -Thirdly, relative to its counterpart on the other side of the chain, where the outer tank/reservoir becomes (the opposite in terms of relative positioning to the other side of the chain) higher (switches in relative height - just enough to drain all the water) than the inner tank/reservoir. Thus the water drains from the outer tank/reservoir to the inner tank/reservoir on the right side.

Based on the LAWS OF LEVERAGE - force downwards is lighter when the weight shifts closer to the fulcrum (chain) and is magnified on the other side where the weight is on the far end of the lever; further away from the fulcrum (chain) (see Drawing 1.).

2.v) Each set of weights (eg. take the example of the see saw again, the person's weight on each side of the fulcrum, where they are equal in mass, but the weight of one person over the other is magnified by the fact the person; say the left side is seated further away from the fulcrum while the person on the right side is seated closer (or even right next to the fulcrum) this imbalance in leverage causes the left side to sink and the right side to sink.

3.) The weakness in the system is the transition in the top and the bottom, where the weights wreak havoc on the invention. Here is where weights shift/transition from side to side, and are exert inertia, drag, can cause friction and bounciness. The weights interfere with the free flow of the chain that is critical to the success of the system. Fortunately we have the Cumulative Effects Theory, which was discovered by Gerard Voon.

3.i) The cumulative effects theory says that for each set of weights horizontally (think of a see saw) there is a net gain downwards. By adding up all the net gains the total becomes larger and larger the more sets of weights you stack each set on top of the other.
3.ii) By making the machine very tall (technically the taller you make it the more total net gains increase) and making the wheels very small (or at least using smooth ball bearings/rollers) the total net gains will become greater and greater than the inertia, drag, friction and bounciness.

4.) The main thing that's new in this design is the huge wheel at the top that rather than spinning, allows the chain to pass via rollers - ball bearings.

5.) Not knowing or understanding The Cumulative Effects Theory is where de 19919022 Al goes wrong, they have only two wheels and 14 weightsllevers - even if they build their invention as high as a building, both their figures in their drawings are in the same number 'of relative parts proportions which we are convinced is inoperable. We believe that their 14 weights are all so small they can't overcome the inertia (the propensity for the wheels which are so large to slow down and rest... stop), not to mention friction and drag of such large wheels relative to so few and small weights.

Furthermore for de 19919022, without wheels in the middle the chains may twist, losing its shape and getting caught and even breaking, especially at the height of a building.

We have enclosed a Drawing of de 19919022 model, you must realize the huge size of the wheels relative to the weights in width if their model were built to the height of building.

Our Invention increases height over width by shrinking the relative size of the wheels, we do this by stacking the wheels high up. The outcome is that the height is where the (increases in totalling net forces) of the cumulative effects theory is derived is increased with a the higher/taller the versus the slimmer (smaller wheels) the structure. We note that most of the inertia, drag, friction, and bounciness (also dead weight - no net weight pushing down on one side of the chain over the other) occurs on the top wheel.

I believe with the top wheel (see 3i) that we have designed is the only solution to holding the invention erect, the invention is weighted down by 100's to 1000's of weighted water tanks the invention is as high as a building.

Furthermore:
Firstly, 19919022 Al have round weights and their weights are not closely stacked (they use round weights we use squareish shaped weights) for maximum use of space -density.
Secondly, 19919022 Al's weights are not large enough for the space/amount of chain they occupy, their dispersal, along the chain - density Thirdly, 19919022 Al don't have long enough lever length for the amount of chain space (dispersal) allocated each lever - density.

Fourthly, 19919022 fail to come up with a solution to hold (errect) up the invention especially if it is as tall as a building.

Fifth, 19919022 Al's 14 weights (such small weights and levers) scaled to a building tall to two proportional - to their drawings - (adds up to two) very large (and huge inertia) wheels we don't think would accumulate enough total net gain down wards force.

The wheels are too large and the 14 weights and levers are neither heavy enough nor long enough to overcome the huge wheels' friction and inertia.
I believe de 19919022 Al is inoperable while Our Invention provides the novel solution that will work. Note the intemet website: LIST TITLE: PATENTS FOR UNWORKABLE
DEVICES
that de 19919022 cannot work. Further evidence that it does not work is that 6 years have past and they have not produced anything. However for Our Invention most of our people believe that the crucial novelties in our d sign makes working sense.

We will possibly use ball bearings on top of the top wheel (which wili be almost entirely be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel and/or platinum) _ rods and also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano particles, tubes, or spun nano wires and/or nano fibers) or other very strong/probably lightweight/material - that can be cast or moulded. The ball bearings maybe encased in -Option 1.- shell (-Option 2.- if the chain (Teflon... ) were to glide directly over the ball bearings some of the ball bearings may not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon to become misaligned). In -Option 1.- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is sandwiched between the ball bearings and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) would spin over. We may place guards/rims on the side to prevent the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) from slipping off. We also many wheels made of light weight material whose grooves/spokes are caught and spun by the chain (Teflon ...
strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.

The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of the entire structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia clumsiness.
Regarding DRAWING April 6th, 2007 - 2.:
The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings next to the surface, the difference is that it umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense concentration of weight is not focused on a small location. The downside is that more surface contact between the mechanisms (eg. surface - more ball bearings/or larger ones and more horizontal spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes against and takes away from the movement of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...)) of the top wheel and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) taking away from the unbalanced force since an umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) to move more across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative Effects Theory says that the unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertical imbalance.
We could also dig a very deep vertical tunnel (100 to 1,000 floors deep) and lengthen the solid centre cylinders (core) of the wheels (some or probably not the wheels) (the outside of the wheel can be ball bearings (encased on each side?). The solid centre cylinder (core) can be reinforced with very strong forwards and backwards and sideways rods, and stuck into the sides of the tunnel walls with a big strong stopper plugged deep into the wall using concrete and very strong (eg. rebar) cage, and especially encased in a large chunk of concrete at the end of the centre cylinder anchored by the big strong stopper. We are not quite sure of the implications of gravity on the machine underground, since the walls have sideways gravity mass. Or we could combine a vertical tunnel down until the water table and rising hundreds of stories above ground.
Whereby the tunnel could support the wheels' solid centre cylinder (core)s, while the above ground could be supported by Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.

In this invention the chain will be made of spun/woven nano fibres. These chain is much lighter so the top wheel (fairly large with rollers/ball bearings and guard/rails that must carry the weight of the entire system can be smaller; thus the wheels in-between are also smaller, leading to an allowable height relative to width of the system.

Since nano fibres are stronger than steel, we could hang more weights/reservoirs/tanks vertically (optimizing size of weights/reservoirs/tanks relative to level lengths relative to number high - Cumulative Effects Theory).

Nano fibres are flexible enough to wrap around the rollers on the top wheel, yet strong enough to hold up a lot of weights/reservoirs/tanks. The Cumulative Effect Theory isolates the forces as primarily the height and number of weights/reservoirs/tanks on one side is offset by (a levered - weight on the outside end of lever - magnified) a heavier cumulative/sum the total of each weight on one side heavier than the other side.

The reason this model works where similar wheels have failed; is because firstly our width is small while our height is huge - this allows our invention to generate more movement forces in one direction that overcome's the weight's friction and inertia when they are at the top and bottom of the system - consider that on a wheel, the number of weights on the sides and on the top and bottom. The movement force's success is dependent on the huge number of weights/reservoirs/tanks stacked high up versus the few that are situated on the top and bottom (interfering with movement).

Additionally, Chain design updates are being applied for patents for all Gravity Chain Machines, and PCT/CA2005/000145, and Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention.

We will have a large wheel at the top (too carry all the weights below), it will have a pathway of rollers/ball bearings that are in size aligned to place the teeth of the chain in perfect unionson like a chainsaw, the reason for the teeth on the chain is to turn the wheels (which have counter teeth) below. In the alternative we could make the chain taut or weave/spin the nano fibers into sequences of knots that catch the wheels below's teeth. We could also make the chain have tiny wavy hills and valleys shape (intervals of nodules rather than teeth), avoiding the most friction with the top wheel (and its rollers and/or ball bearings) while catching the teeth of the wheels we need to spin below to generate the electricity.

A more complex design is to put longer teeth on the chain, and a micro hinge in-between.
The top wheel will have a protruding mechanism that folds the hinge (eg. by pokes into it, causing an unhooking) just before the chain's teeth reaches/approaches the top wheels rollers/ball bearings, thus avoiding friction. Then as the chain's teeth leaves the rollers/ball bearings, the Top Wheel mechanism such as a protruding poking mechanism unfolds/rearms the chain's teeth for catching and spinning the electricity generating wheels below.
Or we could have guards/rails all the way from top to bottom to keep the chain's teeth facing inside - the down side with this design is that the teeth of the chain the a not properly aligned my scrape against the guards/rail, unless we made it wide enough.

We could also have guards/rails that funnel in the chain just before each wheel to align the teeth of the chain to point inwards.

Another design is to design the chain widely and divide its width into center segment or segment on both sides surrounding the centre. Either the centre will have teeth in which case both surrounding sides will have no teeth or both sides will have teeth, in which case the centre will have no teeth (in this case the top wheel could be surrounded by larger roller with inner rollers adding to overcome friction inside the large roller; with rims/guards/rails or standing up rollers to keep the movement of the chain smooth and straight) -the inner rollers surround the non moving neck of the Top Wheel; it must strong enough to carry the total weight of the entire system. The Top Wheel will have rollers to match the area of the chain that has the no teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding sides while the lower wheels will have teeth aligned to match area of chain that has teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding sides of width of chain.

ADDITION: New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention;
Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs We are looking covering the entire Gravity Chain Machine of whatever versions with solar panels.

We are looking at developing Building windmills.

1. Our first design is to put the rotary blades (hereinafter referred to as blades) on the roof (with the blades horizontal) (see Drawing 1.).

2. Our second design is to put the blades on the side of the building (verticaily) possible on all four sides (see Drawing 2.).

We prefer the first design because it allows clearance between buildings and the wind needed to may be blocked by other buildings in the second choice (in the case of vertical blades connected to the side of the building). There is usually more wind on the top of the buildings.

Even if there currently was clearance, in the future a developer may build a new building the blocks the wind needed for the blades.

We could also put windmill blades on our Gravity Chain Machine.

If the building is tall enough we could even line up the vertical blades one above the other (see Drawing 3.).

Additionally we could do a combination 1) roof, 2) on side, 3) on all four sides, 4) multiple vertical blades up along each side of the building (see Drawing 4.).

We could also add rings (at multiple levels) to allow the blades to catch the wind, the way normal windmills spin to catch the wind (see Drawing 5.) (Ch 2%).

As weil we could put elongated neck with blades near the top, like a regular windmill, except under the circular disc base of the windmill(s) is a building.

1. We also have a design to vertical walls that funnel wind either inwards (in which case blades could be positioned on both sides of the funnel walls and wind would be channeled into the funnel. We could also stack the blades vertically.
2. The other design is to have the same funnel but position the blades on the narrow end of the funnel on the outside.
3. There is a base at the bottom that is circular or disc shaped that spins to channel the wind in the case of 1.) the wind goes inside the entrance of the funnel and in the case of 2.) the wind is divided by a sharp narrow divider (possibly vertical triangular shape - other end of the funnel.

We could place these designs on top of buildings.

We could also build windmills with multiples blades stacked vertically, and one horizontally on top and blades on each side of the stand.

We could also build a mixed use Energy focusing on the most productive/efficient use of the land - our buildings have zero effluent unlike oil/gas/nuclear never mind coal:

1. At the centre are Gravity Chain Machines.
2. Windmills stacked vertically or on each side or on horizontally top of the support walls of the Gravity Chain Machine.
3. On the side walls are possibly multiply stacked on each far end of the total length ends of the Gravity Chain Machine side by side condensed blue print design.
4. Pyramid/greenhouse, where each level has perhaps 10 trays (of corn) that rotate.
Each level further away from the Gravity Chain Machine centre extend out of the shade of the levels of trays above it and therefore each level extends further out sideways to capture maximum sunlight for the rotating trays of that level.
This sideways pyramid structure keeps extending out and down until level by level until the trays reach ground level. The trays and the Gravity Chain Machine reservoir/tanks are enclosed in the same structure, where heating sharing (best use of energy for heating) in winter may be needed.
5. Probably extending in between the green houses are the stands that carry windmills' whose blades may tower above the level/step of the pyramid/greenhouse beneath it.

6. Structurally strong yet transparent or translucent material to hold up the pyramid/greenhouses (if even necessary), since each pyramid/greenhouses' rotating trays component is really not that high.

7. As well we could use the space under each level's tray to grow mushrooms, or germinate the next crop of corn, or shred and pelletize, or logs or particle board, bag, spin/weave...

Smaller Scale Gravity Chain Machine Version 3 The main difference in this invention is that the chain, instead of being made from Teflon, we use spun, woven nano fibres that can be stronger than steel with possibility mixture of nano particles in plastic, and give the chain teeth (for spinning the wheels that generate electricity like a windmill).

Since the chain material is so light we don't need as high a structure (for cumulative effects theory to work).

The cumulative effects theory says that the higher the structure the more total net differing weight (accumulating into force more down on one side than the other), this differing force must overcome, friction and inertia.

If we use nano material for the chain, the chain is far lighter, and therefore less friction and inertia (probably more flexible - then Teflon and stronger - than steel, so even less material is needed) to hold back the entire system from working.

This could allow for micro GCM (Smaller Scale).

We could also make the reservoir/tank structural cage out of a mix of riano particles or spray on fibres, mixed with plastic We could also make the reservoir/tank structural cage out of a mix of nano particles or spray on fibres, mixed with plastic or other mixable substances that make strong/durable yet light cage. (GP).

The skin of the reservoir/tank could be made of nano textiles (eg. that are water proof, fabrics, or diver's suit except thinner and lighter).

We could also make the skin out of mylar or air bag material.

In addition to reflective mirror surrounding a solar panelled boiler and boiling salt water that spins a propeller under pressure and creates fresh water at the other end:

1. We could put magnifying glasses in between the sun the reflective mirrors and the solar panel boiler.
2. In fact all solar panels could (15%, they plagiarize, while they handicapped me and I can't plagiarize off their ideas) have moving magnifying or moving solar panels to capture maximum sun exposure throughout the day.

We could build comprehensive energy farms...
1. solar cells roof 2. direction of flow of rainwater 3. drain for slanted roof to pour and collect rainwater to reservoir below 4. New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention; Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs; Overbalanced Endless Chain Motor - the walls are covered with reflective material to reflect light to outer surrounding level of crops 5. slanted panels (shine light on to crops from centre out) that catch light from reflective (mirrors) below on the surrounding ground floor (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy) 6. One level/floor of surrounding crops.
7. windmills on to of each Overbalanced Endless Chain Machine 8. Ground level, or some higher up (eg. crisscross cheap towers) to reflect sunlight to the slanted panels that then re-reflect light back down to the crops at each level/floor below (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy).

We are planning to use possibly a layer of Kevlar straps, Teflon straps, cordura nylon, ballistic nylon, leather for the wheel surface (and chain)(possibly steel threads - especially on the wheels), as well as stamp a crisscross pattern on the exposed surfaces meet.

We are also looking at chinks of titanium possibly linked together by tightly and greased spun Keviar chords to make up the chain, where the wheels have spokes that poke into the open spaces where the chain, end of the hole catches and spins the wheel.

We are also looking at keeping chain taut (eg. possibly a layer of Kevlar straps, Teflon straps, cordura nylon, ballistic nylon, leather). The tight surfaces between the chain and the wheel contact points, uses friction to drag the wheel in the vector direction of the chain. We could also use knots.

We might even make the wheel out of rubber (An).

Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel) design will make the intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the most (peak) of cumulative effects theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of unbalanced weight such as closer stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we could also stack each level of tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg. carbon graphite), and tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and bottom of the system.
We have developed a modular Gravity Chain Machine blocks (that expand to fit a plot of land while maximize the amount of energy produced in that plot's size of space), windmills are situated on top of walls surrounding the Gravity Chain Machines and at the solid sides of the collective.

DRAWING 1.

1. Fulcrum 2. Inner weight 3. Direction of the lever.

DRAWING 2. Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel) design will make the intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the most (peak) of cumulative effects theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of unbalanced weight such as closer stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we could also stack each level of tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg.
carbon graphite), and tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and bottom of the system 1. Wheels who protrudes and spins generating energy 2. Direction of the water from higher (inner) to lower (outer) tanks/reservoirs via levers/necks (rectangular) - on the left side 3. Direction of the spin of the system 4. Direction of the water from the higher (outer) to higher (inner) tanks/reservoirs via levers/necks (rectangular) - on the right side 5. The chain (reacting/moving/spinning) fulcrum 6. Maximum efficiency sideways size and shape 7. Maximum efficiency front size and shape 8. Least vertical gap between reservoir/tanks DRAWING 3. Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel) design will make the intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the most (peak) of cumulative effects theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of unbalanced weight such as closer stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we could also stack each level of tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg.
carbon graphite), and tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and bottom of the system 1. Wheels who protrudes and spins generating energy 2. Direction of the water from higher (inner) to lower (outer) tanks/reservoirs via levers/necks (rounded) - on the left side 3. Direction of the spin of the system 4. Direction of the water from the higher (outer) to higher (inner) tanks/reservoirs via levers/necks (rounded) - on the right side 5. The chain (reacting/moving/spinning) fulcrum 6. Funnel between the tanks/reservoirs where connected to levers/necks 7. Maximum efficiency sideways size and shape 8. Maximum efficiency front size and shape 9. Least vertical gap between reservoir/tanks DRAWING 3.5.

1. Reservoir/tanks spinning over top.
2. Space/gap between vertical reservoir/tanks.
3. Outer reservoir/tank.
4. Lever/tube.
5. Inner reservoir/tanks.
6. Wheel that spun to generate electricity.
7. Direction of spin.

DRAWING 4. - Top Wheel 1. Ball bearings 2. Neck of wheel 3. Neck attached to much larger anchor on each side - less likely to break 4. Rods the reinforce the neck and extra sideways length wise between neck and the larger anchors on each side, and rods circular intervals in diameter (not shown in DRAWING to keep DRAWING form getting to complex).
5. Chain (Teflon/nanofibers/duct tape particularly the mesh...) that hang off the neck of the Top Wheel.

DRAWING 5 - Top Wheel 1. Rollers 2. Neck of wheel 3. Neck attached to much larger anchor on each side - less likely to break 4. Rods the reinforce the neck and extra sideways length wise between neck and the larger anchors on each side, and rods circular intervals in diameter (not shown in DRAWING to keep DRAWING form getting to complex).
5. Rod guards the side to make the chain movement looser and smoother and aligned straight.
6. Chain (Teflon/nanofibers/duct tape particularly the mesh...) that hang off the neck of the Top Wheel.

DRAWING 6.

1. Stopper 2. hole that travels through the entire weight centred with surrounding steel or ball bearings (rollers) in ring.
3. weight 4. bar to guide weight from side to side (could also be square bar) DRAWING 7.

1. Stopper 2. 2 holes for the bars shafts to pass through/that travels through the entire weight centred with surrounding steel or ball bearings (rollers) in ring.
3. weight 4. bar to guide weight from side to side (could also be square bar) DRAWING 8.

^ Rails on each side of the weight, travelling along by ball bearings or rollers. (C) DRAWING 9. (Top Wheel) 1. rollers - ball bearings 2. hooks to side support 3. chain 4. thick center to carry weight the entire chain and weights system.
DRAWING 10. (Top Wheel) 1. rollers - ball bearings 2. hooks to side support 3. chain 4. thick and broader spread of center to carry weight the entire chain and weights system.

DRAWING 11. (Top Wheel) 1. rollers - ball bearings 2. protrusions that stick into supporting side walls at intervals like multiple hooks.
3. chain 4. thick center DRWAING 12. (Top Wheel) 1. rollers - ball bearings 2. very thick side protrusion 3. vertical embedded supporting rods 4. chain 5. center very thick to carry weight to entire weights of the system.
6. horizontal rods that strengthen the ability of the center to carry entire weights of the system DRAWING 13. April 6t', 2007 - 1.

1. The wheel that is like one big solid cylinder (possibly reinforced/embedded with very strong circular and attached sideways as well.
2. Ball bearings 3. Tanks/Reservoirs (shifting weights) 4. Wheels that spin to generate electricity 5. Chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) 6. Casing on each side that fit in between the ball bearings and the chain (teflon/nano fibers...) and guarded by rims DRAWING 14. April 6th, 2007 - 2. - Top wheel is larger for the purpose of strength for holding more weight.

1. The wheel that is like one big solid cylinder (possibly reinforced/embedded with very strong circular and attached sideways as well.

2. Ball Bearings 3. Tanks/Reservoirs (shifting weights) 4. Chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) 5. Wheels that spin to generate electricity 6. Casing on each side that fit in between the ball bearings and the chain (teflon/nano fibers... ) and guarded by rims DRAWING 15. April 6th, 2007 - 3. Vertical Tunnel 1. Tanks/Reservoirs (shifting weights) 2. Stoppers encased in a large chunk of concrete 3. The solid centre (of wheel) cylinder that protrudes into the wall each level therefore acting as support for the weight of the machine 4. The vertical tunnel walls, which could also to be sprayed with concrete and reinforced with cage (strong material eg. rebar) DRAWING 16.

1. Blades horizontal on roof of building.
2. Building.

DRAWING 17.

1. Blades situated vertically.
2. Building.

DRAWING 18.

1. Multiple blades above each other vertically.
2. Building.

DRAWING 19 - Combination(s).
1. Top blades on roof.
2. Building.
3. Muitiple blades lined up vertically up the buildings wall.
DRAWING 20.

1. Top blades on Roof.
2. Rotating Ring that allows the possible multi number of blades to spin to catch the wind direction.
3. Lower Ring.
4. Building.
DRAWING 21.

1. Regular windmill's neck.
2. Blades near top of neck.
3. Building.

DRAWING 22.

1. Out stretched wind funnel.
2. Windmill Blades that placed on two sides (on both sides of the vertical funnel) if in close proximity, we could get more yield out the same amount of space or the blades could be placed on the outside of the funnel walls also on the narrow end on the funnel walls.
3. The lower funnel walls are attached to a circular base. The base spins to catch the maximum amount of wind into the oppening of the funnel. Below the base stands the building.

DRAWING 23.

1. At the centre are Gravity Chain Machines.
2. Windmills stacked vertically or on each side or on horizontally top of the support walls of the Gravity Chain Machine.
3. On the side walls are possibly multiply stacked on each far end of the total length ends of the Gravity Chain Machine side by side condensed blue print design.
4. Pyramid/greenhouse, where each level has perhaps 10 trays (of corn) that rotate.
Each level further away from the Gravity Chain Machine centre extend out of the shade of the levels of trays above it and therefore each level extends further out sideways to capture maximum sunlight for the rotating trays of that level.
This sideways pyramid structure keeps extending out and down until level by level until the trays reach ground level. The trays and the Gravity Chain Machine reservoir/tanks are enclosed in the same structure, where heating sharing (best use of energy for heating) in winter may be needed.
5. Probably extending in between the green houses are the stands that carry windmills' whose blades may tower above the level/step of the pyramid/greenhouse beneath it.
6. Structurally strong yet transparent or translucent material to hold up the pyramid/greenhouses (if even necessary), since each pyramid/greenhouses' rotating trays component is really not that high.
As well we could use the space under each level's tray to grow mushrooms, or germinate the next crop of corn, or shred and pelletize, or logs or particle board, bag, spin/weave...

DRAWING 24.

1. solar cells roof 2. direction of flow of rainwater 3. drain for slanted roof to pour and collect rainwater to reservoir below 4. New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention; Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs; Overbalanced Endless Chain Motor - the walls are covered with reflective material to reflect light to outer surrounding level of crops 5. slanted panels (shine light on to crops from centre out) that catch light from reflective (mirrors) below on the surrounding ground floor (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy) 6. One level/floor of surrounding crops.

7. windmills on to of each Overbalanced Endless Chain Machine 8. Ground level, or some higher up (eg. crisscross cheap towers) to reflect sunlight to the slanted panels that then re-reflect light back down to the crops at each level/floor below (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy).

DRAWING 25.

9. solar panels 10. windmill blades outside walls 11. windmill blades in the cross diagonal position between Gravity Chain Machines 12. top wheel of Gravity Chain Machine 13. reservoir/tank 14. windmill facing the sides (aligned) to the moving tanks Bascially each unit (block) of Gravity Chain Machine is surrounded by windmills, by placing the unit/blocks together (on any of all sides) to squeeze the most out of the usage of the land and the modular design makes it flexible to fit odd land shapes.

Pertaining to DRAWING 3.5 - Compressed version so you can get more net forces (more yield) for the same height (you won't have to stack it up as high to get the same yield) - and furthermore once you reach the maximum buildable height you could increase yield compressing (plus it may save building costs) that according to the cumulative effects theory, the more additional amount of extra by way of weight (water) switching to extremity of each side of the lever(s) means a net force of one side being heavier than the other side. The system of chains and the levers (weights) connected to the chains must be flexible enough at the top and bottom to allow spinning around the top end of the Top and Bottom wheel.
Furthermore we are experimenting with shrinking the wheel making a shorter (some may say it creates a steeper change in drag but there should be an equal and opposite pull on the other side of the wheel - nullifying each other out - even some ) and less space to cover (given that the top wheel is strong enough (reinforced) which would not make sense to try to spin, therefore we would use rollers/ball bearings) my hypothesis is to maximize the size of the reservoirs/tanks (sticking/jutting out and width) and optimize usage of vertical space;
while minimizing the resistance to the flow/spin of the system from handling the top and bottom part of the system.

Claims (8)

1. DISCLOSURE: This Invention generates electricity by harnessing what I call the Cumulative Effects Theory.

2. The Invention Comprises of:

2.i) PRIMARY NOVELTY: Our invention increases height over width by shrinking the proportionate size (eg. diameter) of the wheels, we do this by stacking the wheels high up. The outcome is that the height is where the (increases in totalling net forces) of the cumulative effects theory is derived this net force is increased with a higher/taller design and results in the wheels being proportionatedly - relatively smaller. We note that most of the inertia, drag, friction, and bounciness (also dead weight - no net weight pushing down on one side of the chain over the other) occurs on the top and bottom wheels.
2.ii) We will dissect this invention from the inside out, like peeling an onion from the inside out.
2.iii) The Invention is compromised of a top wheel which is solid - with ball bearings or rollers for the chain (teflon/nanofibers... ) and water tanks (eg the wheel can be made of tungsten carbide reinforced by cage shaped to and embedded into the wheel, which may also have casing and guards or we may use other very strong mate(al since the top wheel will have hold up the weight of all the tanks all together).
2.iv) There will be hundreds light weight wheels (eg. spokes) at the stacked up the vertical centre of the invention. The closest invention to ours, explicitly says their invention is comprised of 2 wheels (see below).

2.v) Next outer layer is the chain it has grooves/spokes/teeth interact with and spins wheels, the chain might be made of Teflon ... strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.

2.vi) Next layer out are the tanks/reservoirs levers that are slanted at an angle.

3. HOW THEY INTERACT:

3.i) In order to for the invention to make the Cumulative Effects Theory work, the invention will need 100's if not 1000's of unbalanced weights. There are several ways to hold the invention erect (possibly as tall as a building) is to stick a solid pole, almost as thick in diameter as the top wheel's diameter allowing clearance for the inner tanks/reservoirs to pass above. Or use an anchor (see Drawings top wheel

4,5,8,9,10, 11, 12) - very thick (tungsten carbide) top wheel.

In de 19919022 A1 they explicitly state that their invention consists 2 wheels furthermore both their figures show 14 weights on each figure.

This is very different from Our invention, where the Cumulative Effects Theory tells us to increase the number of net weights (cumulative overbalanced levels up) on each side, this invention needs 100's to 1000's weights/levers high (to accumulate the total of net/overbalanced; forces of levered mass on each side downwards).

We will possibly use ball bearings/rollers on top of the top wheel (which will be almost entirely be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel and/or platinum and/or carbon steel, eg. chisel material and/or tungsten carbide...) rods and also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano particles, tubes, wires and/or nano fibers). By using rollers - ball bearings we avoid using needing to turn the large and heavy top wheel (and the inertia and friction of spinning such a wheel).

The ball bearings/rollers maybe encased in -Option 1.- shell (-Option 2.- the chain (Teflon...) may glide directly over the ball bearings/rollers some of the ball bearings may not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon to become misaligned).
In -Option 1.- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is sandwiched between the ball bearings/rollers and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) would spin over.

We may place guards/rims (rollers can be positioned below the chain (Teflon/nano fibers..) and on both sides - rollers are probably more smooth than ball bearings, where the path of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers) is straight, and the rollers on the side are least friction alternative to guide the chain (teflon/nano fibers) and to on the side to prevent the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) from slipping off. We also many wheels made of light weight material whose grooves/spokes/teeth are caught and spun by the chain (Teflon... strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.

The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of the entire structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia clumsiness -although the downside to different sized wheels is the extra cost to customized sizes.
Regarding DRAWING 2:

The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings/rollers next to the surface, the difference is that it umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense concentration of weight is not focused on a small location.

The downside is that more surface contact between the mechanisms (eg. surface -more ball bearings/rollers or larger ones and more horizontal spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes against and takes away from the movement of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... )) of the top wheel and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) taking away from the unbalanced force since an umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) to move more across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative Effects Theory says that the unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertically stacked up high;
imbalance of tanks/reservoirs each couplet (each horizontal pair on each side of the chain/fulcrum) being heavier on one side, lighter on the other.

We plan to use strong/very thin/lightest weight of material for the skin of the tanks/reservoirs such as the material used to make air bags or thin Teflon...

We could also make the (many wheels and very high up - tall as a building) shifting weights move by rollers/ball bearings on a guide that is at a horizontal angle from side to side on each side of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) with the weights made of carbon steel or iron.
3.ii) The 100's to 1000's of light weight wheels vertically stacked up the middle of the invention. Each wheels whose sides' grooves/spokes/teeth are spun by the movement of the chain (Teflon/nanofibers...). The purpose of the inbetween wheels are two fold. One. Each or some of the wheels have a rod in its centre that protrudes out and as it spins it generates electricity. Two. The many wheels are needed to keep the shape of the chain and tanks/reservoirs from twisting (since the invention will be the height of a building).

3.iii) The chain (Teflon/nanofiber...) must be made of strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material. It will have holes or grooves that catch the teeth or the other way around to spin the wheels which generate electricity. We are looking at reinforcing the chain with duct tape like material - such as the mesh spread equally, possibly sandwiched by Teflon - or some flexible material to cover the mesh to smoothen out the surface - reduce friction.

3.iv) There is a tank/reservoir (or shifting weights see DRAWING 6,7 and 8).
On each end of a lever (eg. see saw). The longer the lever the more magnified the shift in weight position of one side's force downwards to the other side. Consider a see saw or a old doctor's weight scale, the further outwards towards the extreme length of the lever the weight is shifted the more force downwards the scale (see saw) will be tipped.

The second function of the lever is to be thick and hollow enough to let water drain from inner tank/reservoir to outer tank/reservoir.

The lever must be shaped and positioned to easily drain the higher tank/reservoir until empty, and therefore its hole must be connected to the bottom of the higher tank/reservoir.
The lever is positioned at an angle (we are experimenting with various angles) where the outside tank/reservoir is lower than the inner tank/reservoir on one (say the left) side of the chain then as the chain spins this particular lever/outer and inner tank under discussion spins underneath and to the other side.

The angle of the lever naturally becomes upside down. - Firstly, The outer tank/reservoir is (or square solid tightly vertically stacked weights with rods or rails -levers; as guides and rollers - ball bearings to allow passage) situated lower than its matching inner tank/reservoir so naturally the lever drains the water from the higher upper inner tank/reservoir to the lower outer tank/reservoir.

- Secondly, look at the chain as a responsive fulcrum, meaning it will move around the wheels as more down force is added on one side of the chain relative to the other.

The water weight in the outer tank/reservoir, being further out (ie. the shifting of weight on the doctor's scale or see saw that becomes magnified as the weight is shifted further and further out to the far end of the fulcrum) and thus will have more downwards force -Thirdly, relative to its counterpart on the other side of the chain, where the outer tank/reservoir becomes (the opposite in terms of relative positioning to the other side of the chain) higher (switches in relative height - just enough to drain all the water) than the inner tank/reservoir. Thus the water drains from the outer tank/reservoir to the inner tank/reservoir on the right side.

Based on the LAWS OF LEVERAGE - force downwards is lighter when the weight shifts closer to the fulcrum (chain) and is magnified on the other side where the weight is on the far end of the lever; further away from the fulcrum (chain) (see Drawing 1.).

3.v) Each set of weights (eg. take the example of the see saw again, the person's weight on each side of the fulcrum, where they are equal in mass, but the weight of one person over the other is magnifed by the fact the person; say the left side is seated further away from the fulcrum while the person on the right side is seated closer (or even right next to the fulcrum) this imbalance in leverage causes the left side to sink and the right side to sink.

4.) The weakness in the system is the transition in the top and the bottom, where the weights wreak havoc on the invention. Here is where weights shift/transition from side to side, and are exert inertia, drag, can cause friction and bounciness. The weights interfere with the free flow of the chain that is critical to the success of the system. Fortunately we have the Cumulative Effects Theory, which was discovered by Gerard Voon.

4.i) The cumulative effects theory says that for each set of weights horizontally (think of a see saw) there is a net gain downwards. By adding up all the net gains the total becomes larger and larger the more sets of weights you stack each set on top of the other.
4.ii) By making the machine very tall (technically the taller you make it the more total net gains increase) and making the wheels very small (or at least using smooth ball bearings/rollers) the total net gains will become greater and greater than the inertia, drag, friction and bounciness.

5.) Not knowing or understanding The Cumulative Effects Theory is where de goes wrong, they have only two wheels and 14 weights/levers - even if they build their invention as high as a building, both their figures in their drawings are in the same number of relative parts proportions which we are convinced is inoperable. We believe that their 14 weights are all so small they can't overcome the inertia (the propensity for the wheels which are so large to slow down and rest... stop), not to mention friction and drag of such large wheels relative to so few and small weights.

Furthermore for de 19919022, without wheels in the middle the chains may twist, losing its shape and getting caught and even breaking, especially at the height of a building.

We have enclosed a Drawing of de 19919022 model, you must realize the huge size of the wheels relative to the weights in width if their model were built to the height of building.

Our invention increases height over width by shrinking the relative size of the wheels, we do this by stacking the wheels high up. The outcome is that the height is where the (increases in totalling net forces) of the cumulative effects theory is derived is increased with a the higher/taller the versus the slimmer (smaller wheels) the structure. We note that most of the inertia, drag, friction, and bounciness (also dead weight - no net weight pushing down on one side of the chain over the other) occurs on the top and bottom wheels.

I believe with the top wheel (see 3i) ) that we have designed is the only solution to holding the invention erect, the invention is weighted down by 100's to 1000's of weighted water tanks the invention is as high as a building.

Furthermore:
Firstly, 19919022 A1 have round weights and their weights are not closely stacked (they use round weights we use squareish shaped weights) for maximum use of space -density.
Secondly, 19919022 A1's weights are not large enough for the space/amount of chain they occupy, their dispersal, along the chain - density Thirdly, 19919022 A1 don't have long enough lever length for the amount of chain space (dispersal) allocated each lever - density.

Fourthly, 19919022 fail to come up with a solution to hold (errect) up the invention especially if it is as tall as a building.

Fifth, 19919022 A1's 14 weights (such small weights and levers) scaled to a building tall to two proportional - to their drawings -(adds up to two) very large (and huge inertia) wheels we don't think would accumulate enough total net gain down wards force.

The wheels are too large and the 14 weights and levers are neither heavy enough nor long enough to overcome the huge wheels' friction and inertia.

I believe de 19919022 A1 is inoperable while Our Invention provides the novel solution that will work. Note the internet website: LIST TITLE: PATENTS FOR UNWORKABLE
DEVICES
that de 19919022 cannot work. Further evidence that it does not work is that 6 years have past and they have not produced anything. However for Our Invention most of our people believe that the crucial novelties in our design makes working sense.

We will possibly use ball bearings on top of the top wheel (which will be almost entirely be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel and/or platinum) rods and also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano particles, tubes, or spun nano wires and/or nano fibers) or other very strong/probably lightweight/material - that can be cast or moulded. The ball bearings maybe encased in -Option 1.- shell (-Option 2.- if the chain (Teflon...) were to glide directly over the ball bearings some of the ball bearings may not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon to become misaligned). In -Option 1.- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is sandwiched between the ball bearings and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) would spin over. We may place guards/rims on the side to prevent the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) from slipping off. We also many wheels made of light weight material whose grooves/spokes are caught and spun by the chain (Teflon...strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.

The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of the entire structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia clumsiness.
Regarding DRAWING April 6th, 2007 - 2.:
The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings next to the surface, the difference is that it umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense concentration of weight is not focused on a small location. The downside is that more surface contact between the mechanisms (eg. surface - more ball bearings/or larger ones and more horizontal spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes against and takes away from the movement of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... )) of the top wheel and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) taking away from the unbalanced force since an umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) to move more across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative Effects Theory says that the unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertical imbalance.
We could also dig a very deep vertical tunnel (100 to 1,000 floors deep) and lengthen the solid centre cylinders (core) of the wheels (some or probably not the wheels) (the outside of the wheel can be ball bearings (encased on each side?). The solid centre cylinder (core) can be reinforced with very strong forwards and backwards and sideways rods, and stuck into the sides of the tunnel walls with a big strong stopper plugged deep into the wall using concrete and very strong (eg, rebar) cage, and especially encased in a large chunk of concrete at the end of the centre cylinder anchored by the big strong stopper. We are not quite sure of the implications of gravity on the machine underground, since the walls have sideways gravity mass. Or we could combine a vertical tunnel down until the water table and rising hundreds of stories above ground.
Whereby the tunnel could support the wheels' solid centre cylinder (core)s, while the above ground could be supported by Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.

In this invention the chain will be made of spun/woven nano fibres. These chain is much lighter so the top wheel (fairly large with rollers/ball bearings and guard/rails that must carry the weight of the entire system can be smaller; thus the wheels in-between are also smaller, leading to an allowable height relative to width of the system.

Since nano fibres are stronger than steel, we could hang more weights/reservoirs/tanks vertically (optimizing size of weights/reservoirs/tanks relative to level lengths relative to number high - Cumulative Effects Theory).

Nano fibres are flexible enough to wrap around the rollers on the top wheel, yet strong enough to hold up a lot of weights/reservoirs/tanks. The Cumulative Effect Theory isolates the forces as primarily the height and number of weights/reservoirs/tanks on one side is offset by (a levered - weight on the outside end of lever - magnified) a heavier cumulative/sum the total of each weight on one side heavier than the other side.

The reason this model works where similar wheels have failed; is because firstly our width is small while our height is huge - this allows our invention to generate more movement forces in one direction that overcome's the weight's friction and inertia when they are at the top and bottom of the system - consider that on a wheel, the number of weights on the sides and on the top and bottom. The movement force's success is dependent on the huge number of weights/reservoirs/tanks stacked high up versus the few that are situated on the top and bottom (interfering with movement).

Additionally, Chain design updates are being applied for patents for all Gravity Chain Machines, and PCT/CA2005/000145, and Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention.

We will have a large wheel at the top (too carry all the weights below), it will have a pathway of rollers/ball bearings that are in size aligned to place the teeth of the chain in perfect unionson like a chainsaw, the reason for the teeth on the chain is to turn the wheels (which have counter teeth) below. In the alternative we could make the chain taut or weave/spin the nano fibers into sequences of knots that catch the wheels below's teeth. We could also make the chain have tiny wavy hills and valleys shape (intervals of nodules rather than teeth), avoiding the most friction with the top wheel (and its rollers and/or ball bearings) while catching the teeth of the wheels we need to spin below to generate the electricity.

A more complex design is to put longer teeth on the chain, and a micro hinge in-between.
The top wheel will have a protruding mechanism that folds the hinge (eg. by pokes into it, causing an unhooking) just before the chain's teeth reaches/approaches the top wheels rollers/ball bearings, thus avoiding friction. Then as the chain's teeth leaves the rollers/ball bearings, the Top Wheel mechanism such as a protruding poking mechanism unfolds/rearms the chain's teeth for catching and spinning the electricity generating wheels below.
Or we could have guards/rails all the way from top to bottom to keep the chain's teeth facing inside - the down side with this design is that the teeth of the chain the a not properly aligned my scrape against the guards/rail, unless we made it wide enough.

We could also have guards/rails that funnel in the chain just before each wheel to align the teeth of the chain to point inwards.

Another design is to design the chain widely and divide its width into center segment or segment on both sides surrounding the centre. Either the centre will have teeth in which case both surrounding sides will have no teeth or both sides will have teeth, in which case the centre will have no teeth (in this case the top wheel could be surrounded by larger roller with inner rollers adding to overcome friction inside the large roller; with rims/guards/rails or standing up rollers to keep the movement of the chain smooth and straight) -the inner rollers surround the non moving neck of the Top Wheel; it must strong enough to carry the total weight of the entire system. The Top Wheel will have rollers to match the area of the chain that has the no teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding sides while the lower wheels will have teeth aligned to match area of chain that has teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding sides of width of chain.

ADDITION: New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention;
Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs We are looking covering the entire Gravity Chain Machine of whatever versions with solar panels.

We are looking at developing Building windmills.

1. Our first design is to put the rotary blades (hereinafter referred to as blades) on the roof (with the blades horizontal) (see Drawing 1.).

2. Our second design is to put the blades on the side of the building (vertically) possible on all four sides (see Drawing 2.).

We prefer the first design because it allows clearance between buildings and the wind needed to may be blocked by other buildings in the second choice (in the case of vertical blades connected to the side of the building). There is usually more wind on the top of the buildings.

Even if there currently was clearance, in the future a developer may build a new building the blocks the wind needed for the blades.

We could also put windmill blades on our Gravity Chain Machine.

If the building is tall enough we could even line up the vertical blades one above the other (see Drawing 3.).

Additionally we could do a combination 1) roof, 2) on side, 3) on all four sides, 4) multiple vertical blades up along each side of the building (see Drawing 4.).

We could also add rings (at multiple levels) to allow the blades to catch the wind, the way normal windmills spin to catch the wind (see Drawing 5.) (Ch 2%).

As well we could put elongated neck with blades near the top, like a regular windmill, except under the circular disc base of the windmill(s) is a building.

1. We also have a design to vertical walls that funnel wind either inwards (in which case blades could be positioned on both sides of the funnel walls and wind would be channeled into the funnel. We could also stack the blades vertically.
2. The other design is to have the same funnel but position the blades on the narrow end of the funnel on the outside.
3. There is a base at the bottom that is circular or disc shaped that spins to channel the wind in the case of 1.) the wind goes inside the entrance of the funnel and in the case of 2.) the wind is divided by a sharp narrow divider (possibly vertical triangular shape - other end of the funnel.

We could place these designs on top of buildings.

We could also build windmills with multiples blades stacked vertically, and one horizontally on top and blades on each side of the stand.

We could also build a mixed use Energy focusing on the most productive/efficient use of the land - our buildings have zero effluent unlike oil/gas/nuclear never mind coal:

1. At the centre are Gravity Chain Machines.
2. Windmills stacked vertically or on each side or on horizontally top of the support walls of the Gravity Chain Machine.

3. On the side walls are possibly multiply stacked on each far end of the total length ends of the Gravity Chain Machine side by side condensed blue print design.
4. Pyramid/greenhouse, where each level has perhaps 10 trays (of corn) that rotate.
Each level further away from the Gravity Chain Machine centre extend out of the shade of the levels of trays above it and therefore each level extends further out sideways to capture maximum sunlight for the rotating trays of that level.
This sideways pyramid structure keeps extending out and down until level by level until the trays reach ground level. The trays and the Gravity Chain Machine reservoir/tanks are enclosed in the same structure, where heating sharing (best use of energy for heating) in winter may be needed.
5. Probably extending in between the green houses are the stands that carry windmills' whose blades may tower above the level/step of the pyramid/greenhouse beneath it.

6. Structurally strong yet transparent or translucent material to hold up the pyramid/greenhouses (if even necessary), since each pyramid/greenhouses' rotating trays component is really not that high.

7. As well we could use the space under each level's tray to grow mushrooms, or germinate the next crop of corn, or shred and pelletize, or logs or particle board, bag, spin/weave...

Smaller Scale Gravity Chain Machine Version 3 The main difference in this invention is that the chain, instead of being made from Teflon, we use spun, woven nano fibres that can be stronger than steel with possibility mixture of nano particles in plastic, and give the chain teeth (for spinning the wheels that generate electricity like a windmill).

Since the chain material is so light we don't need as high a structure (for cumulative effects theory to work).

The cumulative effects theory says that the higher the structure the more total net differing weight (accumulating into force more down on one side than the other), this differing force must overcome, friction and inertia.

If we use nano material for the chain, the chain is far lighter, and therefore less friction and inertia (probably more flexible - then Teflon and stronger - than steel, so even less material is needed) to hold back the entire system from working.

This could allow for micro GCM (Smaller Scale).

We could also make the reservoir/tank structural cage out of a mix of nano particles or spray on fibres, mixed with plastic We could also make the reservoir/tank structural cage out of a mix of nano particles or spray on fibres, mixed with plastic or other mixable substances that make strong/durable yet light cage. (GP).

The skin of the reservoir/tank could be made of nano textiles (eg. that are water proof, fabrics, or diver's suit except thinner and lighter).

We could also make the skin out of mylar or air bag material.
In addition to reflective mirror surrounding a solar panelled boiler and boiling salt water that spins a propeller under pressure and creates fresh water at the other end:

1. We could put magnifying glasses in between the sun the reflective mirrors and the solar panel boiler.
2. In fact all solar panels could (15%, they plagiarize, while they handicapped me and I
can't plagiarize off their ideas) have moving magnifying or moving solar panels to capture maximum sun exposure throughout the day.

We could build comprehensive energy farms...
1. solar cells roof 2. direction of flow of rainwater 3. drain for slanted roof to pour and collect rainwater to reservoir below 4. New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention; Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs; Overbalanced Endless Chain Motor - the walls are covered with reflective material to reflect light to outer surrounding level of crops 5. slanted panels (shine light on to crops from centre out) that catch light from reflective (mirrors) below on the surrounding ground floor (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy) 6. One level/floor of surrounding crops.
7. windmills on to of each Overbalanced Endless Chain Machine

8. Ground level, or some higher up (eg. crisscross cheap towers) to reflect sunlight to the slanted panels that then re-reflect light back down to the crops at each level/floor below (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy) We are planning to use possibly a layer of Kevlar straps, Teflon straps, cordura nylon, ballistic nylon, leather for the wheel surface (and chain)(possibly steel threads - especially on the wheels), as well as stamp a crisscross pattern on the exposed surfaces meet.

We are also looking at chinks of titanium possibly linked together by tightly and greased spun Kevlar chords to make up the chain, where the wheels have spokes that poke into the open spaces where the chain, end of the hole catches and spins the wheel.

We are also looking at keeping chain taut (eg. possibly a layer of Kevlar straps, Teflon straps, cordura nylon, ballistic nylon, leather). The tight surfaces between the chain and the wheel contact points, uses friction to drag the wheel in the vector direction of the chain. We could also use knots.

We might even make the wheel out of rubber (An).

Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel) design will make the intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out as well as maximizing (peak efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the most (peak) of cumulative effects theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of unbalanced weight such as closer stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we could also stack each level of tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg. carbon graphite), and tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and bottom of the system.

We have developed a modular Gravity Chain Machine blocks (that expand to fit a plot of land while maximize the amount of energy produced in that plot's size of space), windmills are situated on top of walls surrounding the Gravity Chain Machines and at the solid sides of the collective.

Bascially each unit (block) of Gravity Chain Machine is surrounded by windmills, by placing the unit/blocks together (on any of all sides) to squeeze the most out of the usage of the land and the modular design makes it flexible to fit odd land shapes.

Pertaining to DRAWING 3.5 - Compressed version so you can get more net forces (more yield) for the same height (you won't have to stack it up as high to get the same yield) - and furthermore once you reach the maximum buildable height you could increase yield compressing (plus it may save building costs) that according to the cumulative effects theory, the more additional amount of extra by way of weight (water) switching to extremity of each side of the lever(s) means a net force of one side being heavier than the other side. The system of chains and the levers (weights) connected to the chains must be flexible enough at the top and bottom to allow spinning around the top end of the Top and Bottom wheel.
Furthermore we are experimenting with shrinking the wheel making a shorter (some may say it creates a steeper change in drag but there should be an equal and opposite pull on the other side of the wheel - nullifying each other out - even some ) and less space to cover (given that the top wheel is strong enough (reinforced) which would not make sense to try to spin, therefore we would use rollers/ball bearings) my hypothesis is to maximize the size of the reservoirs/tanks (sticking/jutting out and width) and optimize usage of vertical space;
while minimizing the resistance to the flow/spin of the system from handling the top and bottom part of the system.