CA2598782C - Snowplow with pivoting sideblades - Google Patents

Abstract

The left and right sideblades are hinged to the mainblade about vertical axes, and can pivot each through 180°. The sideblades are rotated by means of left and right hydraulic rotary actuators. The actuator includes a piston formed with helical splines, which drive a rotor sleeve of the actuator to rotate in a single-plane-circle when the piston is driven axially. The journal bearings in the rotary actuator are supplemented by bearings provided in a coaxial lower hinge, which are of much greater journal capacity than the bearings in the rotary actuators. The lower hinge protects the hydraulic rotary actuator from shocks due to the sideblade impacting against a kerb. A wheel-protection link blocks the sideblade from contacting the wheel of the vehicle.

Description

Title: SNOWPLOW WITH PIVOTING 5IAEHLAoES

(001] This invention relates to the provision of hinged sideblades on snowplows, and to the manner zn which sideblades are mounted and actuated for pivoting. Often, it is desired that the sideblades can be rotated through 180 degrees, from full forward to full back, and to any angle therebetween. It is a].mo desired that the left and right sideblades can be rotated independently.

[0021 Traditionally, such sideblAdes have been actuated by conventional linear hydraulic rams and associated levers. However, it is difficult to provide a full 180 degrees of arcuate travel by means of linear rams and levers. Some designers have resorted to double ram/lever arrangemento, which are expensive and intricate, [003] Instead of an arrangement of rams and levers, in the designs as depicted herein a rotary actuator is employed for the purpose of rotating the sideblade. A rotary actuator is a standard proprietary item; in the typical hydraulic version, a rotary actuator contains a hydraulic ram, which drives a piston having helical aplines. A
complementarily-qrooved rotor sleeve fits withira the piston, whereby the sleeve rotates when the ram is pressurised. The machine component to be rotated is bolted to the rotor sleeve.

[004] Rotary aotuators are sold for use in hydraulic equipment.
Typically, the rotary actuator includes a housing or casing that is bolted to the fixed frame of the equipment. The component to be rotated rotates with the rotor Bleeve about an axis defined by bearings housed inside the aatuator unit, the axis of the bearings being (usually) the same as the operational axis of the ram.

[0051 A rotary actuator -- as that expression is used herein --should be contrasted with a motor. A motor is capable of spinning continuously at so many revolutions per minute, whereas a rotary actuator is capable only of a limited arcuate movement about its rotary axis. The rotor sleeve of a rotary actuator (to which the component to be rotated is attached) cannot move beyond that arc, i.e cannot spin conta.nuous ly .

[006) A conventional rotary actuator hps it$ own bearings, inside the h.ousing of the actuator. In the conventional applications of the rotary actuator, it has been traditional to use the bearings already provided in the rotary actuator as the only bearings needed to support

2 the rotary component. This is fine, if the loading on the rotating component is more or less a pure torque, without heavy jouxnal loading.
Thus, the use of rotary actuators, though not confined to pure-torque, or almost pure-torque, applications (in which the journal or radial loading is small), have been used therein. on the other hand, the bearings inside the aotuator housing are (or could be) robust enough, and design applications in which the bearings are called upon to support substantial journal loading are not unknown.

[007] Typically, in a snowplow sideblade application, the sideblade rotates about a vertical axis. The expression "vertical axis" should be understood as including cases where the rotary axis is actually at a measurable angle relative to the vertioal, but where the rotary axis has a predominating vertical component.

[008] The sideblade, like any anowplow blade, is inevitably subjected to occasional very large abusive impacts. These can occur when the sideblade strikes a kerb, or a manhole-cover, etc. These impacts do indeed transmit heavy journal loading into the (vertical) sideblade bearings.

[009] It is recognised that such violent abusive loads occur often enough that, if a hydraulic rotary actuator were subject.ed to the brunt af the violence, the length of the service life of the rotary actuator might not be satisfactory. It was an aim, in the deaigns as depicted herein, to isolate and protect the rotary actuator from the violent impacts that are inflicted upon the sideblade.

[0010] By way of further explanation, examples will now be described with referenCe to the accompanying drawings, in whiche Fig 1 is a (diagrammatic) plan view of a truck pushing a snowplow assembly, with sideblades.
Fig 2 is a pictorxal view of the rear of the mainblade of a snowplow, illustrating how sideblades are attached thereto.
Fig 3 is a view of the hinge area between the mainblade of Fig 2 and the sideblade, when the sideblade is in line with the mainblade, viewed from the rear of the snowplow.
Fig 4 is a sectional view of part of the hinge area shown in Fig 3.
Fig 5.is a cross-section of a rotary actuator.
Fig 6 is a diagrammatic p[an view of a snowplow assembly which incorporates a safety feature.
Fig 6a is a close-up of a portion of Fig.6.

3 Fig.7 is the same view as Fig.6, but shows the components of the assembly In a position of possible danger.
Fig 8 is a detailed plctorlal view of the snowplow assembly of Fig.6.

[0011] The apparatuses shown in the accompanying drawings and described herein are examples. The scope of the patent protection sought is defined by the accompanying claims, and not necessarily by specific features of the examples.

[0012] As shown in Fig 1, a truck 23 is pushing a snowplow unit 25 forwards, in the direction of the arrow. A mainblade 29 is angled so that snow is being defleated off to the right side. As usual, the truck driver actuates hydraulic rams 26 to set the deflection angle of the main blade.

[0013] Sometimes, it is desired to increase the effective width of a snowplow, especially rightwards, and a right sideblade 27 is shown extending from the mainblade 29, in order to increase the width or reach of the snowplow, in that direction.

[0014] Sometittles, also, it can be a problem that some snow might spill off to the left of the mainblade 29. To inhibit this, in Fig 1 a left sideblade 30 has been extended forwards. Both sideblades 27,30 are pivoted or hinged at the respective left and right ends of the mainblade 29. The hinging structure permits the sideblades to have a full one-eighty degrees range of arcuate movement relative to the mainblade, from perpendicular leading the mainblade to perpendicular trailing the mainbiade.

[0015] Other orientations of the left and right sideblades can be required in other circumetances, and the sidablades 27,30 are rotatable each through 180R, as indicated by the arcuate arrows, relative to the mainblade 29. The orientations of the left and right sideblades are controllable by the driver, using appropriate hydraulic flow control valves (not shown). The valves control flow to the ports of right and left rotary actuators, which are described below.

(0016] AS shown in Fig 2, the mainblade 29, as a unit, includes an underblade 29U. An underblade is conventionally included in a snowplow, in oase it should strike a road-object such as a manhole cover, a kerb, an embedded lane-indicator, etc. The underblade 29U is hinged, being mounted for pivoting movement about an axis 29A running

4 left-right (i.e widthwise) across the mainblade 29, whereby the top edge of the underblade 29U is hinged to the bottom edge of the curved blade 29B. The underblade 29U is held in its normal working position relative to the blade 29B by means of heavy springs. When an impact happens, the springs allow the underblade 29U to pivot rearwards, thus protecting the mainblade 29 from the full violence of the impact. As mentioned, the provision of a hinged, sprung, underbiade is conventional. The sidebladea 27,30 also have hinged, sprung, underblades 27U,30U (described later), corresponding to the main underblade 29U.

[0017] The right sideblade 27 can be considered to be at least partially protected by its hinged, sprung, underblade, against violent impacts due to road-objects striking that underblade. However, the left sideblade 30 is not protected, or not so well-protected, by ita hinged, sprung, underblade 30V, because an impaot would strike end-on against the leading edge of that left unde=rblade. It is impacts like that that can cause the bearings in a rotary actuator to deteriorate, if those impacts were felt by the actuator.

[0018] The violent impact is felt mainly by the bottom regions of the sideblade hinge atructure. In the designs depicted herein, the vertical axis 32 about which the sideblade pivots is defined by two spaced bearings, i.e an upper hinge bearing 43 and a low r hinge bearing 45. The lower hinge bearing 45 ia the subject of Fig 4. The upper hinge bearing 43 is the bearing inside the rotary actuator 47, the subject of Fig 5.

[0019] The lower hinge bearing 45 includes a main hinge leaf 45M, attached to the main blade 29B, and a side hinge leaf 45s, attached to the left side blade 308. A hinge-pin 49 connects the two hinge leaves.
[0020] The main leaf 45M of the lower hinge 45 includes a main bracket 50. The main bracket 50 ia welded to an endplate 52 of the mainblade 29. The bracket 50 is also welded to a bol$ter 54, which runs the width of the mainbiade (and on which are mounted the bearings that define the pivot axis 29A). The main bracket 50 carries upper and lower cylindrical tubes 56,57, into which have been pressed cylindrical bearing-rings 58,59. The bearing-rings are a running fit over the hinge-pin 49.

[0021] The side leaf 455 of the lower hinge includes a side bracket 60. The side bracket 60 is welded to the blade 30B of the left S

sideblade 30. The side bracket 60 is also welded to a reinforcing strut 63 of the blade 30B. The side bracket 60 carries upper and lower cylindrical tubes 64,65, into which have been pressed cylindrical bearing-ringe 67,68. Again, these bearing-rings are a running fit over the hinge-pin 49. The bearing rings 58,59,67,68 are of suitable bearing material, preferably a metal such as a bronze-based bearing metal, although a plastic material such as (filled) PTFE may be considered.

[0022] Collars 70 are clamped to the hinge-pin 49, and serve to locate the hinge-pin 49 in a vertical sense in the lower hinge 45.
[0023] The function of the main bracket 50 is to ensure that the bearing-rings 58,59 are functionally unitary with the main blade 29B.
The designer should see to it that the cylindrical tubes 56,57 are supported solidly and rigidly with respect to the blade 29B, and ehould provide such brackets, struts, reinforcements, etc, as are zequired to ensure that this is so. The extent to which the tubes and the blade should be solid and rigid with respect to each other is such that the tubes and blade remain mutually solid and rigid, even when subjected to the largest abunive forces that the snowplow as a whole is designed to encounter. The same applies to the solidity and rigidity with which the cylindrical tubes 64,65 are supported with respect to the side blade 29B, [0024] The main bracket 50 carries two spaced tubes 56,57, and the side bracket 60 carries two apaced tubes 64,65. These four tubes are arranged geometrically so as to intercalate, one above another, as shown. This arrangement gives the best support for the pin 49, and for the lower hinge 45 as a whole. The bending stresses on the pin would be higher if only one tube per leaf were provided, or if one leaf had two tubes and the other leaf had only one. The higher the bending stresses on the hinge-pin, the thicker the hinge-pin would have to be, and the more robust the supporting tubes and brackets would hava to be.
More than two cylindrical tubes per leaf of the hinge would be incrementally better still, from the stress standpoint, but the increment would be amall.

[0025] The upper hinge bearing 43 comprises the bearings inside the rotary actuator 47. The presence of the lower hinge 45 is a preferred feature of the designs as depicted herein, in that the presence of the highly-robust lower hinge 45 means that the bearings inside the rotary actuator 47 are protected from the violent impacts and abusive loads that the snowplow will inevitably encounter.

[0026J it is also preferred that the rotary actuator 47 be provided as the upper hinge, not the lower hinge. If the rotary actuator were to form the lower hinge, the bearings in the rotary actuator would not be isolated and protected nearly so effectively from the violent impacts against the bottom regions of the sideblade.

[0027] The hQusing of the rotary actuator is bolted to the endplate 52 0f the mainblade 29, using the prepared bolt-holes 72 as shown in Fig 2. The designer should arrange for appropriate struts, gussets, and other reinforcing provisions, as required. In Fig.2, it can be seen that the major stiffening and reinforcing Btructures are provided in respect of the lower hinge 45, rather than in respeet of the rotary actuator / upper hinge 43; again, this is in keeping with the fact that it is the lower hinge 45 that suffers the brunt of the violent impacts.
[0028] In Fig.3, a top strip 74 of the sideblade 27 is bolted, at 76, to the rotor sleeve 78 of the rotary actuator 47. A bottom strip 80 is part of the structure of the sideblade 27, and ig clamped also to the rotor sleeve 78. A longbolt 83 passes lengthwise through the hollow interior of the rotor sleeve 78, clamping the bottom strip 80 also to the rotoz sleeve 78.

[0029] The structure and operation of the rotary aCtuator 47 will now be described with reference to Fig 5. A rotary actuator is a proprietary item, and designs other than the example now described may be employed. It is preferred that the actuator be of a design in which the rotor sleeve 78, to whiGh the item to be rotated is bolted, should swivel in a single-plane circle, the plane of the circle being perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the actuator. This prQferenoe is followed in the design as shown In Fig.5. It would not be preferred if the actuator were of a design in which the rotor sleeve follows e.g a helical path.

[0030] The actuator includes a hydraulic piston 85, which reciprocates in a cylinder 87. On the left of Fig 5, the piston is shown in its uppermost position, and is shown on the right in its lowermost position. Ports 89,90 (Fig 3) transfor hydraulic fluid into and out of the cylinder 87, above and below the piston 85. Attached to the piston 85 is a skirt 92. The skirt. 92 is formed with internal 94 and external 96 helical splines. The helical splines may be regarded equala,y as a multi-start screw thread, having a steep helical lead angle. When the piston 85 moves downwards, the engagement of the male splines 96 with the corresponding female splznes 98 in the actuator housing 100 causes the piston to rotate. Thus, the piSton 85, with its skirt 92, undergoes a helical movement, i.e undergoes rotation with a simultaneous axial movement.

[0031] The internal female splines 94 on the skirt 92 engage the male splines 103 on the rotor sleeve 78. The internal and external splines 94,96 are of opposite hand, whereby the sleeve 78 rotates through an overall angle of arc that is determined by the sum of the respective helical lead anglee of the two splines. The rotor sleeve 78 cannot move axially with respect to the housing 100, being confined between thrust bearings 105,106. The rotor sleeve 78 is guided for rotation in the housing 100 in journal bearings 108,109. Thus, the structure of the hydraulic rotary actuator 47 is such that the sleeve 78 rotates in a single-plane circle when relatively prassurised hydraulic fluid is applied to one of the ports 89,90, [0032] As shown in Fig 4, the bearing rings 58,59,67,68 are arranged to perform thrust duties, in addition to their journal duties.
However, this requires careful vertical alignment of the rings in relation to the rotary actuator -- which also includes thrust bearings -- and the designer might prefer to arrange the bearing rings no that they cannot touch each other in the thrust sense, whereby all the thrust loading falls on the bearings 105,106 in the hydraulic rotary actuator 47. (The abusive impaCt shocks that a snowplow blade encounters generally have only a small thrust component.) [0033] The extent of the arcuate travel of the rotor sleeve 78 is determined by the geometry of the actuator. In the particular example, the axial lenqth of travel of the piston 85, and the lead angles of the two helical splines, is such that the rotor sleeve is designed to undergo a maximum arcuate travel of 1802, as the piston is driven from top to bottom of its available travel within the cylinder 87.

[0034] It will be understood that the bearings 105,106,108,109 in the rotary actuator are not intended or designed to cope with violent abusive loadings. The bearings can be plain, as shown, and of nylon, bronze, etc, as required. The bearings 105,106,108,109 are designed to cope with the axial and radial loads that are applied to the bearings as a result of the torque that is generated in the sleeve due to the applied hydraulic pressure. Of course, the prudent designer of the actuator provides a margin of tolerance, by which the bearing capacity is sufficient to provide a long service life, but it is recognised that the kind and size of the bearings normally encvuntered in a hydraulic rotary actuator, by themselves, fall well short of the robustness needed to support a hinging eideblade of a anowplow.

[0035) The radially-projected bearing area of the journal bearings 108,109 in the rotary actuator Ji.e in the upper hinge 43) may be compared with the radially-projected bearing area of the bearing rings 67,68 in the lower hinge 45. It is appar8nt, from the difference in size, that the load capacity of the lower hinge is an order of magnitude greater than the load capacity of the bearings 108,109 in the actuator. It might be possible for a rotary actuator to be designed in which the load capacity of the journal bearings was the equal of the load capacity of the lower hinge 45; however, it can easily be seen how such an increased load capacity would enta,iJ, some very radical changes to the structure (and to the cost) of the rotary actuator. Providing a lower hinge 45 of hugely increased load capacity, as compared with the actuator, means that the standard conventional rotary actuators can be used in the snowplow blade application as described herein, without modification and without damage.

[0036] Because of the new arrangement as described herein, only the lower hinge 45 suffers the effects of the impacts on the snowplow sideblade. The relatively puny bearings 108,109 in the rotary actuator 47 are substantially protected from impacts by the provision of the relatively huge bearings in the lower hinge 45. It is a simple matter to design the bearings of the lower hinge to be robust enough to take the heavy impacts. Thus it is recognised that, in the snowplow application, it would be much less preferred to provide just the rotary actuator as the sole hinge bearing, with no supplementary hinge bearing.

[0037] It will be recognised from the drawings that pXOviding the hinge bearings with the high degree of robustness as described is achieved without resorting to hydraulic rams and linkages. The rotary actuator has a neat, compact form, and is much less likely to be damaged, in the abusive snowplow environment, than an equivalent rams-and-linkage type of rotation-producing mechanism. Also, the rotary actuator being fixed to the mainblade, the hydraulic hose and lines to the rotary actuator do not move, relative to the mainblade, during operation -- which means that flexible hoses -- which are expensive and vulnerable to damage -- can be reduced or even eliminated.

[0036] The proprietary rotary aotuatoz, though an expensive item in itself, actually can work out oheaper, in overall money terms, than the equivalent linear ram(s) and associated linkage. Also, the rotary actuator is small and neat -- being hugely different, in that respect, from the ram-and-linkage equivalent.

[0039] As shown, preferably the snowplow includes both left and right sidebladea, of which both can pivot through 1801. However, the rotary actuator can be used in the manner deacribed herein in a snowplow that has only one s,iideblade.

[0040] The paracular rotary actuators shown in Fig 1 have a range of 780 . As far as the rotary actuators 47 are concemed, the sideblades can lie at 90 to the mainblade, either forwards or rearwards, or anywhere between, as shown in Fig 1.

10041] It s recognised that the following dangerous condition might arise. If the mainblade 29 is pivoted clockwise relative to the frame, and the sideblade 27 is pivoted clockwise relative to the mainblade 29, possibly the sideblade 27 might strike the wheel or tire of the vehicle. That is to say: If the two pivoting movements were allowed to go, together, to their full clockwise limits, the right sidebiade would strike the right wheel. (The same condition might arise In respect of the left side wheel, but that is less likely, in practice.) [00421 In Fig 6, the mainblade 29 Is In the flat or straight-ahead position, and it can be seen that the sideblades 27,30 can now be allowed their full range of pivoting movement, without any danger of their striking the wheels. But in Fig 7, the combination of the two pivoting movements has almost reached the danger condition, whereby further clockwise pivoting might be dangerous.

[0043] To alleviate this possible danger, a wheel-protection link 120 has been incorporated into the design. The function of the wheel-protection link 120 is to block any further movement of the sidebiade 27 towards the wheel 121. Similarly, the left side wheel-protection link 134 protects the left wheel from being contacted by the left side-blade 30.

[0044] The wheel-protection link 120 incorporates a sliding lost-motlon connection 122, in which a rod 123 slides In a sleeve 125 of the link. The end 129 of the rod forms an abutment, and the deep end 130 of the sleeve forms a stop. If the abutment 129 were to strike the stop 130, further movement of the sidebtade 27 in the clockwise direction would then be blocked.

[0045] In Fig.7, the abutment 129 has almost reached the stop 130. If the operator were now to attempt to move either the mainblade or the sideblade further, in the clockwise direction, the abutment would bottom out - thus blocking that further movement.

[0048] It will be understood that further clockwise movement of the mainblade 29, from the condition shown in Fig.7, is permitted; but if such further ciockwise pivoting of the mainblade were to take place, the bottoming out of the wheel-protection link 120 would not just block the sideblade 27, but would cause the sideblade 27 then actually to rotate counter-clockwise relative to the mainblade 29, so as not to approach any closer to the wheel.

[0047] Fig.8 shows a more detailed view of the mainblade 29, now lying straight (i.e parallel to the width of the vehicle), and the right side-blade 27 lies angled backwards (towards the vehicle) at 90 to the main-blade. The apparatus in Fig.8 includes the left-side wheel-protection link 134, and the right-side wheel-protection link 120.

[0048] The mainblade 29 pivots relative to the vehicle on its main pivot, at 136, located on the frame 132, which Is solidly attached to the vehicle. The wheel-protection link 120 Is pivoted, at link-frame pivot 138, to the frame. The link-frame pivot 138 is located a distance D to the rear of the mainblade-frame pivot 136. The other end of the wheel-protection link is pivoted, at 140, to an arm 141, which is solid with the side-blade 27.

[0049] The effect of this configuration is that, as the maln-blade 29 angles clockwise, the wheel-protection link 120, as a whole, follows that clockwise movement. As a result of the spacing D of the two pivots 136,138, the link-sideblade pivot 140 moves to the right, relative to the mainblade, as the main-blade rotates clockwise about the mainblade-frame pivot 136.
[0050] As described, the angle of the side-blade 27 relative to the main-blade 29 is controlled by the hydraulic rotary actuator 47. Incorporated into the hydraulic circuit associated with the actuator 47 is a pressure-sensing cross-over valve. This (conventional) valve has the ability to allow fluid to pass from the upper chamber 145 of the actuator 47 into the lower chamber 147, or vice versa, when the pressure between the two chambers exceeds a pre-determined maximum. If the side-blade 27 should start to approach too closely to the wheel 121, and the lost-motion connection 122 bottoms out, the force transmitted through the wheel-protection link 120 to the side-blade 27 does give rise to such a pressure differential between the two chambers. Therefore, the side-blade 27 can and does rotate away from the wheel 121.
[0051] The pressure-sensing crossover-valve +s providad In any case, in the system, to allow the sideblade 27 to break back from the mainbiade 29 without incurring damage -if the sidebiade 27 should strike a kerb, for example.

[0052] It might, of course, be possible to trust the driver of the vehicle to control the angles of the mainblade 29 and of the sideblade 27 so carefully and competently that the sideblade 27 never would touch the wheel 121 _ On the other hand, without the wheel-protection link 120, it would always be possible for the driver to touch the side-blade against the wheel accidentally, perhaps due to the driver momentarily not paying attention, or lacking the proper skill, etc.
The presence of the wheel-protection links 120,134 makes it impossible for the driver to move the blades to a position where touching the wheel might arise.

[0053] The wheel-protection link 120, when bottomed out, forms a solid rod, between the link-frame pivot 138 and the link-sideblade pivot 140, when the blades 29,27 are in, or are approaching, the danger position. In order to allow free rotation of the side-blade 27 at other orientations of the blades, when the danger of touching the wheels is not present, the wheel-protection link 120 has to be capable of being elongated. The lost motion connection 122 provides this facility. The link 120 can be elongated by the rod 123 sliding out of the sleeve 125. In the Fig.8 unit, a peg 148 (Fig.BA) that is solid with the rod 123 runs in a slot 149 formed in the sleeve 125. When the wheef-protectian fink 120 needs to elongate, the peg 148 of the rod 123 can slide in the slot 149 of the sleeve 125.

[0054] If the designer designs the wheel-protection link to be suitable for a particular size and configuration of snowplow, It Is likely that the wheel-protection link will protect the wheels of every type of vehicle upon which that size and type of snowplow can be used_ However, the wheel-protection link could be made adjustable, In the hands of the operator, to meet special situations. Thus, in the adjustable version, the peg 147 could be made to be adjustable as to its position along the length of the rod 123.

[0055] The wheel-protection link, as shown, might, in some cases, be drff'icult to accommodate in what is a premium space, between the mainbiade and the vehicle;
and of course there is the expense of the Ifnk itself. Alternatively, blocking the sideblade from approaching too closely to the tire can be done by other means. For example, sensors may be included, which signal the extensions of the mainblade rams 26, and the positions of the rotary actuators 47. From these signals, a simple sum of the angles indicates the approach of the danger condition, This Indication can be used to trigger a hydraulic blocking valve, which prevents further movement of the rotary actuator in the direction of increasing danger.

(0056] The designer must of course see to It that the point at which the sideblade is blocked from moving closer towards the wheel is appropriate to the situation_ This may be done geometrically, by laying out in a drawing, or by calculating, the positions of the pivots and the distances between them, such that the movements thereof block the sidebtade appropriately.
[0057] Preferably, the geometrical layout should include the feature that the link-frame pivot 138 Iles closer to the vehicle than does the mainblade pivot 136, and that the link-sideblade pivot 140 Iles closer to the vehicle than does the sideblade pivot axis 32.

Reference wumerals 23 truck 25 snowplow unit 27 right sideblade ( unit ) 27U underblade foX . .
29 mainblade (unit) 29U underblade of 29 29B blade of 29 29A pivoting axis of 29t7 (horizontal) 30 left sideblade 32 hinge axie of 30 43 upper hinge bearing 45 lower hinge beering 45H main hinge leaf 45S side hinge leaf 47 rotary actuator 49 hinge pin 50 main braoket of main leaf 45M
52 endplate of mainbla.de 54 bolster at foot of mainblade 56 upper cylindrical tube of main leaf 57 lower cylindrical tube of main leaf 58 upper bearing ring in 56 59 lower bearing ring in 57 60 side bracket of side leaf 45S
63 reinforcing strut in sideblade 27 64 upper cylindrical tube of side leaf 65 lower cylindrical tube of side leaf 67 upper bearing ring in 64 68 lower bearing ring in 65 70 collars 72 bolt-holes in endplate 52 for 47 74 top strip of sideblade 76 ring of bolts to 78 rotor sleeve 80 bottom strip 83 longbolt 85 piston 87 cylinder 89 upper hydr port 90 lower hydr port 92 skirt 94 internal splines on skirt 96 external splines on skirt 98 female splines in 100 actuator housing 103 male epl.znes on rotor sleeve 78 105 upper thrust bearing 106 lower thzust bearing 108 upper journal bearing 109 lower journal bearing 120 wheel-protection link 121 link 122 sliding lost-motlon connection 123 rod 125 sleeve 129 end of rod = abutment 130 deep end of sleeve = stop 132 flxed frame of snowplow unit 134 wheel-protection link (left side) 136 maioblade pivot 138 link-frame pivot 140 link-sideblade pivot 141 arm of slideblade 145 upper chamber of rotary actuator 147 lower chamber of rotary actuator 148 peg 149 slot

Claims (5)

Claims
1. Claim 1. Snow-plow assembly for a vehicle, wherein:
   [2] the assembly includes a mainblade and a sideblade;
   [3] the assembly includes a frame, which is structurally suitable for being attached solidly to the vehicle;
   [4] the mainblade is pivoted to the frame, at a mainblade/frame pivot;;
   [5] the assembly includes an operable mainblade control, which is so structured as to enable an operator to forcefully direct the mainblade to pivot about the mainblade/frame pivot, relative to the frame, and thus to change a mainblade-angle at which the mainblade lies with respect to the frame;
   [6] the sideblade is pivoted to the mainblade at a mainblade/sideblade pivot, located at or near one end of the mainblade;
   [7] the assembly includes an operable sideblade control, which is so structured as to enable an operator to forcefully direct the sideblade to pivot about the mainblade/sideblade pivot, relative to the mainblade, and thus to change a sideblade-angle at which the sideblade lies with respect to the mainblade;
   [8] the assembly includes a wheel-protecting blocker;
   [9] the blocker includes a means for sensing the sum of the mainblade-angle and the sideblade-angle;
   [10] the blocker is so structured as to be effective, responsive to sensing that the sum of those angles has exceeded a pre-determined value, to automatically block further pivoting of the sideblade, at least in the direction that would increase the sum of those angles.
2. Claim 2. As in claim 1, wherein:
   [2] the wheel-protecting blocker takes the form of a wheel-protection link;
   [3] the wheel-protection link is pivotally connected at or near one end to the frame at a link/frame pivot, which is spaced a distance D to the rear of the mainblade-pivot;
   [4] the wheel-protection link is pivotally connected at or near its other end to a link/sideblade pivot, which is spaced to the rear of the mainblade/sideblade pivot axis;
   
   [5] the configuration of the pivots is such that, when the frame is attached to the front of the vehicle, the link/frame pivot lies closer to the vehicle than does the mainblade-pivot, and the link/sideblade pivot lies closer to the vehicle than does the mainblade/sideblade pivot.
3. Claim 3. As in claim 2, wherein the configuration of the pivots is such that, when the frame is attached to the front of the vehicle, the link/frame pivot lies closer to the vehicle than does the mainblade/frame pivot, and the link/sideblade pivot lies closer to the vehicle than does the mainblade/sideblade pivot.
4. Claim 4. As in claim 1, wherein:
   [2] the mainblade-angle is defined as being zero degrees when the mainblade lies parallel to the width of a vehicle to which the frame is attached;
   [3] the sideblade-angle is defined as being zero degrees when the sideblade is in line with the mainblade.
5. Claim 5. As in claim 1, wherein:
   [2] the assembly includes a mainblade and a sideblade;
   [3] the assembly includes a pivot-hinge, located at or near one end of the mainblade, whereby the sideblade is constrained for pivoting movement relative to the mainblade; and [4] the pivot-hinge includes a hydraulic rotary actuator.