CA2582059A1 - A method for producing a non-segregating waste stream - Google Patents
A method for producing a non-segregating waste stream Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2582059A1 CA2582059A1 CA 2582059 CA2582059A CA2582059A1 CA 2582059 A1 CA2582059 A1 CA 2582059A1 CA 2582059 CA2582059 CA 2582059 CA 2582059 A CA2582059 A CA 2582059A CA 2582059 A1 CA2582059 A1 CA 2582059A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- waste stream
- tailings
- apparent viscosity
- modified
- segregating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 57
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 7
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 34
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 29
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000010426 asphalt Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000013043 chemical agent Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000440 bentonite Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910000278 bentonite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- SVPXDRXYRYOSEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N bentoquatam Chemical compound O.O=[Si]=O.O=[Al]O[Al]=O SVPXDRXYRYOSEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010440 gypsum Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052602 gypsum Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 26
- 238000010977 unit operation Methods 0.000 description 24
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 22
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 15
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 14
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 12
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000005204 segregation Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000007385 chemical modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002562 thickening agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000004614 Process Aid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000084 colloidal system Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- -1 Ca2+ Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000006057 Non-nutritive feed additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052925 anhydrite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 125000000129 anionic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000008346 aqueous phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012267 brine Substances 0.000 description 1
- OSGAYBCDTDRGGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium sulfate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O OSGAYBCDTDRGGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 125000002091 cationic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011362 coarse particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007596 consolidation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011038 discontinuous diafiltration by volume reduction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010419 fine particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008394 flocculating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000265 homogenisation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910010272 inorganic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011147 inorganic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910003480 inorganic solid Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001728 nano-filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004064 recycling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001223 reverse osmosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- HPALAKNZSZLMCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium;chloride;hydrate Chemical compound O.[Na+].[Cl-] HPALAKNZSZLMCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21D—SHAFTS; TUNNELS; GALLERIES; LARGE UNDERGROUND CHAMBERS
- E21D9/00—Tunnels or galleries, with or without linings; Methods or apparatus for making thereof; Layout of tunnels or galleries
- E21D9/12—Devices for removing or hauling away excavated material or spoil; Working or loading platforms
- E21D9/13—Devices for removing or hauling away excavated material or spoil; Working or loading platforms using hydraulic or pneumatic conveying means
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G7/00—Distillation of hydrocarbon oils
- C10G7/04—Dewatering
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F11/00—Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor
- C02F11/008—Sludge treatment by fixation or solidification
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)
Abstract
A non-segregating waste stream, including tailings obtained from mining, and a method for production of the non--segregating waste stream is provided.
Description
A METHOD FOR PRODUCING A NON-SEGREGATING WASTE STREAM
The present invention relates to a method and system for producing a non-segregating waste stream.
BACKGROUND
Mining operations suffer from significant waste disposal difficulties. One such difficulty is differential settling of the produced waste stream.
In many current open-pit mining operations, for example, waste streams are disposed of by pipelining the waste stream slurry to an external tailings confinement facility, which is essentially a man-made pond enclosed with a dyke system that contains the waste material. Poor settling characteristics of fine inorganic solids create an uppermost solids layer that consists of material that has limited bearing capacity. There is a desire to reclaim mined surfaces, but the low bearing capacity of the top layer of the tailings ponds presents a technical barrier for achieving this.
One example of where this problem is presented is in oil sands mining operations, such as those found in Alberta, Canada. In order to separate valuable bitumen from a surrounding inorganic matrix, large amounts of water and process aids are currently added to mined ore. After separating the bitumen, a large volume of waste slurry remains, which comprises water, sand, dissolved organic and inorganic material, and fine, poorly settling, solids. Once disposed in the tailings confinement, the fine, poorly settling solids do not settle with the other, coarser solids creating a low bearing capacity top layer that is unsuitable for land reclamation.
It has been recognized that one means of generating an in-pit deposit of a waste slurry that is suitable for land reclamation is to generate a waste slurry that does not show differential settling rates between the coarser and finer solids. Several attempts have been made to prevent differential settling. To date, these attempts have shown little success. In the oil sands industry, these attempts have focused on increasing the yield stress of the tailings, but this has failed to generate tailings resistant to differential settling effects under process conditions.
SUMMARY
According to one broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided a substantially non-segregating waste stream.
According to another broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for producing a substantially non-segregating waste stream comprising: (a) determining the apparent viscosity of the waste stream; and (b) modifying the waste stream to increase the apparent viscosity to at least a threshold level over which the waste stream becomes substantially non-segregating.
According to another broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for recovering water from a waste disposal site comprising: (a) determining the apparent viscosity of a waste stream comprising water and solids; (b) modifying the waste stream to increase the apparent viscosity to at least a threshold level over which the waste stream becomes substantially non-segregating; (c) depositing the modified waste stream at the waste disposal site; (d) allowing sufficient time to permit settling of the solids from the water in the modified waste stream; and (e) recovering the water.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a tailings pond exhibiting differential settling.
Figure 2 is a schematic representation of differential settling.
Figure 3 is a schematic representation of non-differential settling.
Figure 4 is a plant layout for generating substantially non-segregating tailings according to one embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 5 is a chart illustrating the effect of apparent viscosity on settling.
Figure 6 shows rheograms of a number of different fluids having different rheological properties.
Figure 7 is the accompanying apparent viscosity profiles for the fluids of Figure 6.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
A schematic representation of a mine tailings stream produced under current operating conditions is shown in Figure 1. Upon introduction of the mine tailings stream, a poorly settling fine solids layer (100) forms on a settled coarse solids layer (110) in a tailings pond (120), surrounded by a dyke (130). The poorly settling fine solids layer (100) is a result of differential settling, which may be better understood from Figures 2 and 3.
The present invention relates to a method and system for producing a non-segregating waste stream.
BACKGROUND
Mining operations suffer from significant waste disposal difficulties. One such difficulty is differential settling of the produced waste stream.
In many current open-pit mining operations, for example, waste streams are disposed of by pipelining the waste stream slurry to an external tailings confinement facility, which is essentially a man-made pond enclosed with a dyke system that contains the waste material. Poor settling characteristics of fine inorganic solids create an uppermost solids layer that consists of material that has limited bearing capacity. There is a desire to reclaim mined surfaces, but the low bearing capacity of the top layer of the tailings ponds presents a technical barrier for achieving this.
One example of where this problem is presented is in oil sands mining operations, such as those found in Alberta, Canada. In order to separate valuable bitumen from a surrounding inorganic matrix, large amounts of water and process aids are currently added to mined ore. After separating the bitumen, a large volume of waste slurry remains, which comprises water, sand, dissolved organic and inorganic material, and fine, poorly settling, solids. Once disposed in the tailings confinement, the fine, poorly settling solids do not settle with the other, coarser solids creating a low bearing capacity top layer that is unsuitable for land reclamation.
It has been recognized that one means of generating an in-pit deposit of a waste slurry that is suitable for land reclamation is to generate a waste slurry that does not show differential settling rates between the coarser and finer solids. Several attempts have been made to prevent differential settling. To date, these attempts have shown little success. In the oil sands industry, these attempts have focused on increasing the yield stress of the tailings, but this has failed to generate tailings resistant to differential settling effects under process conditions.
SUMMARY
According to one broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided a substantially non-segregating waste stream.
According to another broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for producing a substantially non-segregating waste stream comprising: (a) determining the apparent viscosity of the waste stream; and (b) modifying the waste stream to increase the apparent viscosity to at least a threshold level over which the waste stream becomes substantially non-segregating.
According to another broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for recovering water from a waste disposal site comprising: (a) determining the apparent viscosity of a waste stream comprising water and solids; (b) modifying the waste stream to increase the apparent viscosity to at least a threshold level over which the waste stream becomes substantially non-segregating; (c) depositing the modified waste stream at the waste disposal site; (d) allowing sufficient time to permit settling of the solids from the water in the modified waste stream; and (e) recovering the water.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a tailings pond exhibiting differential settling.
Figure 2 is a schematic representation of differential settling.
Figure 3 is a schematic representation of non-differential settling.
Figure 4 is a plant layout for generating substantially non-segregating tailings according to one embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 5 is a chart illustrating the effect of apparent viscosity on settling.
Figure 6 shows rheograms of a number of different fluids having different rheological properties.
Figure 7 is the accompanying apparent viscosity profiles for the fluids of Figure 6.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
A schematic representation of a mine tailings stream produced under current operating conditions is shown in Figure 1. Upon introduction of the mine tailings stream, a poorly settling fine solids layer (100) forms on a settled coarse solids layer (110) in a tailings pond (120), surrounded by a dyke (130). The poorly settling fine solids layer (100) is a result of differential settling, which may be better understood from Figures 2 and 3.
When an homogeneous combined solids slurry is introduced into a containment unit, a heavier fraction will settle to the bottom of the containment unit due to gravitational effects. This is shown in Figure 2. In a typical oil sands operation, the heavier fraction is rich in sand, with the upper fraction comprising a mixture of fines suspended in water. The fine slurry upper layer of the tailings pond will have insufficient bearing capacity to be suited for land reclamation purposes.
ASTM provides a definition for "fines" as particles having a diameter of 74 m or less. In practice, fines are primarily composed of silica and clay. "Coarse"
solids have particles with a larger diameter than the fines (e.g., above 75 m). In practice, these particles are primarily sand.
If differential settling were not to occur, the homogeneous slurry would settle under its own weight in a homogeneous fashion. This is shown in Figure 3. In time, a water layer will form over the settled layer, which water can be recycled into, for example, the oil sands mining operation process, reducing the amount of water that must be drawn from external water sources. The consolidated slurry forms a soil layer that will have sufficient bearing capacity to allow for land reclamation.
There have been a number of different approaches taken in an attempt to obtain non-segregating tailings.
According to one theory, it has been suggested that the yield strength of the tailings mix be increased in order to minimize particle settling. On a fundamental level, the terminal settling velocity of a particle is determined by force equilibrium on the particle. Referring to standard textbooks on fluid mechanics (see, for example, Bird, R., W.E. Steward and E.N. Lightfoot, "Transport Phenomena", 1960, John Wiley & Sons), the terminal settling velocity for a single particle in a Newtonian fluid is given by Formula 1.0:
V - gOPdz s 1grI
Formula 1.0 where:
g is the gravitational acceleration constant [m/sZ];
Ap is the difference between particle and fluid density [kg/m3];
d is the particle diameter [m]; and ri is the fluid viscosity [Pa=s].
In Formula 1.0, the density difference for a tailings recipe comprising silica particles and water is typically about 1500 kg/m3. From the functional form of the equation, it is therefore obvious that the settling velocity can only become zero if the fluid viscosity is infinitely high. This suggests that there will always be differential settling (and therefore segregation) when particles settle in a Newtonian fluid.
It is possible to generate tailings mixes that exhibit non-Newtonian behaviour. Unlike with Newtonian fluids, it is theoretically possible to obtain non-segregating tailings with a non-Newtonian fluid. In order to keep a particle suspended in a non-Newtonian fluid (i.e., have zero settling velocity), the fluid must have sufficient strength to counteract the buoyancy force acting on the particle. In rheological terms, this means that the fluid must exhibit yield strength characteristics (see, for example, Hunter, R.J., "Introduction to modern colloid science", Oxford University Press, 1993; and Hiemenz, P.C., "Principles of colloid and surface chemistry", Marcel Dekker, 1997). Physically, the fluid's yield strength required for keeping a particle suspended is given by Formula 2.0:
tio = a0pgd Formula 2.0 where:
tio is the yield strength in Pa;
a is an empirically determined constant with a numerical value between 0.048 and 0.2; and p, d and g are as defined for Formula 1Ø
Applying numbers typical to oil-sands tailings reveals that a yield strength of approximately 0.33 Pa should suffice for generating non-segregating oil sands tailings. But, laboratory testing has revealed that oil sands tailings samples with yield strength higher than 0.33 Pa still show differential settling under simulated process conditions.
Another approach taken in an attempt to obtain a non-segregating tailings has focused on increasing the fines content of the tailings. It has been suggested that if the tested tailings mix is higher in fines content such that a weight ratio of Fines/(Fines+Water) is higher than a certain threshold value, then the tailings should be non-segregating. (See, for example, Fine Tailings Fundamentals Consortium, 1995. "Vol. III, Volume reduction of CHWE fine tailings utilizing non-segregating tailings", in "Advances in oil sands tailings research", Alberta Department of Energy, Oil Sands Research Division.) The present inventors have determined that while the presence of a yield strength of 0.33 Pa may be a factor in generating non-segregating oil sands tailings, this alone is insufficient. It is believed that varying the yield strength alone is insufficient, because this property describes the slurry under stagnant conditions, and not under process conditions. Increasing the Fines/(Fines+Water) ratio has also not resulted in a substantially non-segregating tailings. The present inventors have determined that modifying the apparent viscosity of a tailings product will reduce the undesired effects of differential settling and assist in producing non-segregating tailings.
Any fluid (Newtonian or non-Newtonian) will show resistance against deformation, e.g. shear. The amount of stress that has to be applied at a certain deformation (or shear) rate depends on the rheological properties of the fluid. For Newtonian fluids, the ratio between shear stress and shear rate is constant (e.g., doubling the shear rate doubles the amount of stress required). This constant ratio is referred to as the fluid viscosity. For non-Newtonian fluids, the ratio between shear stress and shear rate is generally not constant, but is dependent on the shear rate.
For non-Newtonian fluids, an analogous property to viscosity, i.e. the apparent viscosity, can be defined as the ratio between shear stress and shear (i.e., deformation) rate. Apparent viscosity can be measured in a number of ways, as will be known to the person skilled in the art.
It has been observed that the total amount of segregation to be expected is a function of the deformation rate to which the tailings recipe is exposed and the time the tailings mix is exposed to this deformation rate. As described above, the deformation rate is directly related to the apparent viscosity of the mixture.
Tailings slurries are exposed to deformation under process conditions (e.g., during mixing, pipeline transport, in-pit placement). To offset this, the apparent viscosity of the slurry is made sufficiently high during processing so that a substantially non-segregating tailings is obtained.
In practice, this means determining a threshold apparent viscosity above which the tailings become substantially non-segregating. The threshold apparent viscosity can be determined experimentally by observing at what apparent viscosity value the tailings mix becomes substantially non-segregating.
"Substantially non-segregating" as used throughout this application is intended to encompass waste streams that show limited differential settling between coarse and fine particles, which will facilitate generating a sufficient bearing capacity in situ to meet a desired purpose, including, without limitation, land reclamation activities.
It will be readily appreciated that when the waste stream is first introduced into a containment area, it is not immediately suited for land reclamation purposes. A
sufficient consolidation time will have to pass before the material reaches a desired strength.
There are a number of variables that affect the apparent viscosity, including, without limitation, the composition of the tailings mix, the degree of dewatering of the tailings slurry, additives that can modify solution chemistry, and flow devices used during processing.
Increasing the apparent viscosity to a threshold level can therefore be achieved in a number of ways. For example, modifications can be made to mechanical and chemical variables during processing, as well as mechanical factors that may act on the slurry during deposition into a tailings pond. The modifications include, without limitation:
increasing the degree of dewatering of the waste slurry; a regime of conditioning treatments in the process line-up;
and limiting the deformation rate on the slurry during the final stages of deposition.
Apparent viscosity is raised when the water content of a tailings slurry is lowered. There are a number of different dewatering processes that can be used to lower water content, which will be known to the person skilled in the art. Common dewatering options for fine solids include, without limitation, mechanical thickeners and centrifuges.
For coarse tailings, hydrocylones and vibrating screen technology are commonly adopted.
Chemical modification during processing may also be used to increase apparent viscosity. For instance, an apparent viscosity enhancing chemical agent could be added.
Apparent viscosity is raised in oil sands tailings slurries, for example, when the electric double layer around clay material in the slurry is contracted. To achieve this divalent or trivalent cations (e.g., Ca2+, A13+) may be added to the tailings stream. Gypsum (CaSO4), for example, can be used as a source of Ca2+. Other means of chemical modification include, modifying the pH of the tailings stream and/or adding active clays (e.g. Bentonite) to the tailings product. Other suitable chemical modifications will be apparent to the skilled person, or can be determined through routine testing. The appropriate amount of additives can be determined through routine testing.
Mechanical parameters at deposition into a tailings pond may also affect apparent viscosity. For instance, apparent viscosity is adversely affected if the deformation rate applied to the tailings product is too high. For example, a common way of introducing tailings material in the deposition cell is through 'beaching'. In this method, tailings run down the containment wall into the containment. During this process, the deformation to which the material is exposed results in the coarse fraction segregating almost immediately. When the tailings product is introduced in a more controlled way (e.g., by means of feed-wells, diffusers), deformation can be limited and segregation inhibited.
Any of these modifications can be made alone or in combination to minimize deformation conditions in order to meet a defined threshold apparent viscosity suitable for the intended purpose.
A plant layout for generating a substantially non-segregating waste stream is exemplified in Figure 4. This plant layout is described by reference to a tailings obtained from a typical oil sands mining operation.
In Figure 4, a waste stream (400) from an oil sands processing facility is fed into a size classification unit operation (405). The waste stream (400) may be a combination of one or more waste streams, and may comprise one or more of, without limitation, bitumen extraction tailings, Tailings Solvent Recovery Unit (TSRU) tailings, and Mature Fine Tailings (MFT) from a conventional external tailings facility. The size classification unit operation (405) separates the stream into a fines rich stream (410) and a coarse rich stream (420). The size classification unit operation (405) typically consists of (but is not limited to) an appropriate combination of hydrocyclones, gravity separators and equivalents thereof.
Stream (410) is fed into a fine tailings conditioning unit operation (415). In conditioning unit operation (415), one or more tailings process aids (430) may be added to the fines rich stream (410). Processing aids may comprise (but are not limited to) one or more anionic and/or cationic flocculants, as well as dilution water. The conditioned fine tailings stream (440) is fed to a fine tailings dewatering unit operation (425). This unit operation (425) may comprise a combination of mechanical thickeners and/or centrifuges or equivalent unit operations.
The unit operation (425) achieves a degree of dewatering of the conditioned fine tailings stream (440) for generating a fine paste having a sufficient apparent viscosity to produce a substantially non-segregating tailings product. Unit operation (425) produces an overflow stream (450) that is lean in particles and an underflow stream (460) that is rich in particles. Stream (450) may be fed to water treatment unit operation (435), which separates the stream into an internal recycle stream (470) and a product stream (480).
Unit operation (435) is aimed at removing sufficient ionic material from the aqueous phase to make the water acceptable for recycling into the oil sands processing plant as stream (480). Unit operation (435) will typically comprise a final solids removal step and a combination of Reverse-Osmosis/Nanofiltration or equivalent. Stream (450) may be treated in whole or in part, and unit operation (435) may comprise a means for bypassing a part of stream (435) directly to stream (480). Stream (470) is comprised of a concentrated 'brine' that can be used as dilution water for unit operation (405).
The coarse rich stream (420) may not be of high enough solids content for producing a substantially non-segregating tailings product. Stream (420) may therefore be further treated in a coarse tailings dewatering unit operation (445). This unit operation (445) may comprise vibrating screen technology, for example, or an equivalent thereof. A water stream (490) from this unit operation may contain fine material that is recycled into the size classification unit (405). Unit operation (445) dewaters the coarse material to sufficiently low water content for substantially non-segregating tailings production. A
dewatered coarse materials stream (500) is obtained from unit operation (445). Both the dewatered fines stream (460) and the dewatered coarse stream (500) are fed at correct proportions to product mixing unit operation (455). After the streams are homogenized sufficiently in unit operation (455), the homogenized material stream obtained (510) is fed to deposition unit operation (465), which pumps out and distributes stream (520) in-pit (not shown). Unit operation (465) may comprise equipment equivalent to feed-wells in commercially available mechanical thickeners.
Example 1 In Figure 5, laboratory data on a combined coarse-fine tailings mix is presented. Physical characteristics of the tailings mix are:
Remoulded yield strengthl: 2 Pa.
Unmoulded yield strength2: > 10 Pa.
Fines/(Fines+Water): 38 wt%
Solids content: 75.5 wt%
1"Remoulded yield strength" is the residual yield strength after thorough homogenisation.
2"Unmoulded yield strength" is the yield strength if the tailings mix is left undisturbed.
The yield strength of the sample is higher than 0.33 Pa, and should therefore be non-segregating according to Formula 2Ø Also, the tested tailings mix is higher in total solids content and a ratio of Fines/(Fines+Water) than the segregation boundary as defined in "Advances in Oil Sands Tailings Research" (see above). This also suggests that the tailings should be non-segregating.
The tailings recipe was tested by monitoring the degree of sand drop-out over time under simulated process conditions. For this purpose, laboratory equipment that monitors sand fraction in a slurry as a function of time was used. Process conditions are mimicked by applying shear rates representative of pipeline transport and deposition to the sample while measuring the change in sand fraction in the sample. A decreasing sand fraction in the sample indicates that the sand has settled past the detection point, which means that sand has segregated from the slurry mix. The lines shown in Figure 5 show the amount of sand present at a certain height in the test cell. For the condition indicated as "low apparent viscosity" (typically around 100 mPa s), it can be seen that after around 6000 seconds, the sand content starts decreasing. The solids content continues to decrease over time. When the same sample was tested under higher apparent viscosity conditions, as shown by lines labelled "intermediate apparent viscosity" and "high apparent viscosity" (typically around 500 mPa s), both the time at which segregation commences and the extent to which segregation occurs decreases. The apparent viscosity was changed by altering the shear rate applied to the sample.
Prior teachings suggest that this tailings recipe should be non-segregating, but segregation is observed under process conditions. However, it is observed in this example that increasing apparent viscosity reduces the degree of segregation, and that the onset of segregation can be delayed.
Example 2 The rheological behaviour of two tailings mixes is shown in Figure 6. Figure 6 shows the stress-deformation rate behaviour of a Newtonian fluid (600), an oil sands tailings slurry having a low yield stress (610) of about 0.4 Pa, and an oil sands tailings slurry having a high yield stress (620) of greater than 3 Pa. The Newtonian fluid (600) has a viscosity that is 10 times the viscosity of water. The Newtonian fluid (600) was not actually measured, but is a theoretical construct included for reference purposes only.
In Figure 7 the data plotted in Figure 6 is converted into apparent viscosity values. The horizontal line (700) illustrates an approximate threshold value for the apparent viscosity over which segregation was observed to be negligible. The reference Newtonian fluid from Figure 6 is plotted as line (710). The low yield strength fluid is plotted as line (720) and also fails to exceed the threshold value for deformation rates over about 10 s-1: for deformation rates below 10 s-1, the material acts as non-segregating, while for values over 10 s-1 the material segregates. Finally, the higher yield strength fluid is plotted as line (730). The constraint on deformation rate is alleviated: the material stays non-segregating throughout the deformation rate regime shown.
In this example, it is observed that a material with a yield stress of 0.33 Pa will segregate under process conditions when the apparent viscosity is not carefully controlled.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it is readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings of this invention that certain changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the appended claims. By way of example, specific reference to tailings from a mining operation as the waste stream has been made, but the invention is not intended to be so limited. The method of the invention may be extended to any suitable manufacturing waste stream, including one comprising organic matter.
It must be noted that as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms of "a", "and"
"the" include plural reference unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
Unless defined otherwise all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill and the art to which this invention belongs.
ASTM provides a definition for "fines" as particles having a diameter of 74 m or less. In practice, fines are primarily composed of silica and clay. "Coarse"
solids have particles with a larger diameter than the fines (e.g., above 75 m). In practice, these particles are primarily sand.
If differential settling were not to occur, the homogeneous slurry would settle under its own weight in a homogeneous fashion. This is shown in Figure 3. In time, a water layer will form over the settled layer, which water can be recycled into, for example, the oil sands mining operation process, reducing the amount of water that must be drawn from external water sources. The consolidated slurry forms a soil layer that will have sufficient bearing capacity to allow for land reclamation.
There have been a number of different approaches taken in an attempt to obtain non-segregating tailings.
According to one theory, it has been suggested that the yield strength of the tailings mix be increased in order to minimize particle settling. On a fundamental level, the terminal settling velocity of a particle is determined by force equilibrium on the particle. Referring to standard textbooks on fluid mechanics (see, for example, Bird, R., W.E. Steward and E.N. Lightfoot, "Transport Phenomena", 1960, John Wiley & Sons), the terminal settling velocity for a single particle in a Newtonian fluid is given by Formula 1.0:
V - gOPdz s 1grI
Formula 1.0 where:
g is the gravitational acceleration constant [m/sZ];
Ap is the difference between particle and fluid density [kg/m3];
d is the particle diameter [m]; and ri is the fluid viscosity [Pa=s].
In Formula 1.0, the density difference for a tailings recipe comprising silica particles and water is typically about 1500 kg/m3. From the functional form of the equation, it is therefore obvious that the settling velocity can only become zero if the fluid viscosity is infinitely high. This suggests that there will always be differential settling (and therefore segregation) when particles settle in a Newtonian fluid.
It is possible to generate tailings mixes that exhibit non-Newtonian behaviour. Unlike with Newtonian fluids, it is theoretically possible to obtain non-segregating tailings with a non-Newtonian fluid. In order to keep a particle suspended in a non-Newtonian fluid (i.e., have zero settling velocity), the fluid must have sufficient strength to counteract the buoyancy force acting on the particle. In rheological terms, this means that the fluid must exhibit yield strength characteristics (see, for example, Hunter, R.J., "Introduction to modern colloid science", Oxford University Press, 1993; and Hiemenz, P.C., "Principles of colloid and surface chemistry", Marcel Dekker, 1997). Physically, the fluid's yield strength required for keeping a particle suspended is given by Formula 2.0:
tio = a0pgd Formula 2.0 where:
tio is the yield strength in Pa;
a is an empirically determined constant with a numerical value between 0.048 and 0.2; and p, d and g are as defined for Formula 1Ø
Applying numbers typical to oil-sands tailings reveals that a yield strength of approximately 0.33 Pa should suffice for generating non-segregating oil sands tailings. But, laboratory testing has revealed that oil sands tailings samples with yield strength higher than 0.33 Pa still show differential settling under simulated process conditions.
Another approach taken in an attempt to obtain a non-segregating tailings has focused on increasing the fines content of the tailings. It has been suggested that if the tested tailings mix is higher in fines content such that a weight ratio of Fines/(Fines+Water) is higher than a certain threshold value, then the tailings should be non-segregating. (See, for example, Fine Tailings Fundamentals Consortium, 1995. "Vol. III, Volume reduction of CHWE fine tailings utilizing non-segregating tailings", in "Advances in oil sands tailings research", Alberta Department of Energy, Oil Sands Research Division.) The present inventors have determined that while the presence of a yield strength of 0.33 Pa may be a factor in generating non-segregating oil sands tailings, this alone is insufficient. It is believed that varying the yield strength alone is insufficient, because this property describes the slurry under stagnant conditions, and not under process conditions. Increasing the Fines/(Fines+Water) ratio has also not resulted in a substantially non-segregating tailings. The present inventors have determined that modifying the apparent viscosity of a tailings product will reduce the undesired effects of differential settling and assist in producing non-segregating tailings.
Any fluid (Newtonian or non-Newtonian) will show resistance against deformation, e.g. shear. The amount of stress that has to be applied at a certain deformation (or shear) rate depends on the rheological properties of the fluid. For Newtonian fluids, the ratio between shear stress and shear rate is constant (e.g., doubling the shear rate doubles the amount of stress required). This constant ratio is referred to as the fluid viscosity. For non-Newtonian fluids, the ratio between shear stress and shear rate is generally not constant, but is dependent on the shear rate.
For non-Newtonian fluids, an analogous property to viscosity, i.e. the apparent viscosity, can be defined as the ratio between shear stress and shear (i.e., deformation) rate. Apparent viscosity can be measured in a number of ways, as will be known to the person skilled in the art.
It has been observed that the total amount of segregation to be expected is a function of the deformation rate to which the tailings recipe is exposed and the time the tailings mix is exposed to this deformation rate. As described above, the deformation rate is directly related to the apparent viscosity of the mixture.
Tailings slurries are exposed to deformation under process conditions (e.g., during mixing, pipeline transport, in-pit placement). To offset this, the apparent viscosity of the slurry is made sufficiently high during processing so that a substantially non-segregating tailings is obtained.
In practice, this means determining a threshold apparent viscosity above which the tailings become substantially non-segregating. The threshold apparent viscosity can be determined experimentally by observing at what apparent viscosity value the tailings mix becomes substantially non-segregating.
"Substantially non-segregating" as used throughout this application is intended to encompass waste streams that show limited differential settling between coarse and fine particles, which will facilitate generating a sufficient bearing capacity in situ to meet a desired purpose, including, without limitation, land reclamation activities.
It will be readily appreciated that when the waste stream is first introduced into a containment area, it is not immediately suited for land reclamation purposes. A
sufficient consolidation time will have to pass before the material reaches a desired strength.
There are a number of variables that affect the apparent viscosity, including, without limitation, the composition of the tailings mix, the degree of dewatering of the tailings slurry, additives that can modify solution chemistry, and flow devices used during processing.
Increasing the apparent viscosity to a threshold level can therefore be achieved in a number of ways. For example, modifications can be made to mechanical and chemical variables during processing, as well as mechanical factors that may act on the slurry during deposition into a tailings pond. The modifications include, without limitation:
increasing the degree of dewatering of the waste slurry; a regime of conditioning treatments in the process line-up;
and limiting the deformation rate on the slurry during the final stages of deposition.
Apparent viscosity is raised when the water content of a tailings slurry is lowered. There are a number of different dewatering processes that can be used to lower water content, which will be known to the person skilled in the art. Common dewatering options for fine solids include, without limitation, mechanical thickeners and centrifuges.
For coarse tailings, hydrocylones and vibrating screen technology are commonly adopted.
Chemical modification during processing may also be used to increase apparent viscosity. For instance, an apparent viscosity enhancing chemical agent could be added.
Apparent viscosity is raised in oil sands tailings slurries, for example, when the electric double layer around clay material in the slurry is contracted. To achieve this divalent or trivalent cations (e.g., Ca2+, A13+) may be added to the tailings stream. Gypsum (CaSO4), for example, can be used as a source of Ca2+. Other means of chemical modification include, modifying the pH of the tailings stream and/or adding active clays (e.g. Bentonite) to the tailings product. Other suitable chemical modifications will be apparent to the skilled person, or can be determined through routine testing. The appropriate amount of additives can be determined through routine testing.
Mechanical parameters at deposition into a tailings pond may also affect apparent viscosity. For instance, apparent viscosity is adversely affected if the deformation rate applied to the tailings product is too high. For example, a common way of introducing tailings material in the deposition cell is through 'beaching'. In this method, tailings run down the containment wall into the containment. During this process, the deformation to which the material is exposed results in the coarse fraction segregating almost immediately. When the tailings product is introduced in a more controlled way (e.g., by means of feed-wells, diffusers), deformation can be limited and segregation inhibited.
Any of these modifications can be made alone or in combination to minimize deformation conditions in order to meet a defined threshold apparent viscosity suitable for the intended purpose.
A plant layout for generating a substantially non-segregating waste stream is exemplified in Figure 4. This plant layout is described by reference to a tailings obtained from a typical oil sands mining operation.
In Figure 4, a waste stream (400) from an oil sands processing facility is fed into a size classification unit operation (405). The waste stream (400) may be a combination of one or more waste streams, and may comprise one or more of, without limitation, bitumen extraction tailings, Tailings Solvent Recovery Unit (TSRU) tailings, and Mature Fine Tailings (MFT) from a conventional external tailings facility. The size classification unit operation (405) separates the stream into a fines rich stream (410) and a coarse rich stream (420). The size classification unit operation (405) typically consists of (but is not limited to) an appropriate combination of hydrocyclones, gravity separators and equivalents thereof.
Stream (410) is fed into a fine tailings conditioning unit operation (415). In conditioning unit operation (415), one or more tailings process aids (430) may be added to the fines rich stream (410). Processing aids may comprise (but are not limited to) one or more anionic and/or cationic flocculants, as well as dilution water. The conditioned fine tailings stream (440) is fed to a fine tailings dewatering unit operation (425). This unit operation (425) may comprise a combination of mechanical thickeners and/or centrifuges or equivalent unit operations.
The unit operation (425) achieves a degree of dewatering of the conditioned fine tailings stream (440) for generating a fine paste having a sufficient apparent viscosity to produce a substantially non-segregating tailings product. Unit operation (425) produces an overflow stream (450) that is lean in particles and an underflow stream (460) that is rich in particles. Stream (450) may be fed to water treatment unit operation (435), which separates the stream into an internal recycle stream (470) and a product stream (480).
Unit operation (435) is aimed at removing sufficient ionic material from the aqueous phase to make the water acceptable for recycling into the oil sands processing plant as stream (480). Unit operation (435) will typically comprise a final solids removal step and a combination of Reverse-Osmosis/Nanofiltration or equivalent. Stream (450) may be treated in whole or in part, and unit operation (435) may comprise a means for bypassing a part of stream (435) directly to stream (480). Stream (470) is comprised of a concentrated 'brine' that can be used as dilution water for unit operation (405).
The coarse rich stream (420) may not be of high enough solids content for producing a substantially non-segregating tailings product. Stream (420) may therefore be further treated in a coarse tailings dewatering unit operation (445). This unit operation (445) may comprise vibrating screen technology, for example, or an equivalent thereof. A water stream (490) from this unit operation may contain fine material that is recycled into the size classification unit (405). Unit operation (445) dewaters the coarse material to sufficiently low water content for substantially non-segregating tailings production. A
dewatered coarse materials stream (500) is obtained from unit operation (445). Both the dewatered fines stream (460) and the dewatered coarse stream (500) are fed at correct proportions to product mixing unit operation (455). After the streams are homogenized sufficiently in unit operation (455), the homogenized material stream obtained (510) is fed to deposition unit operation (465), which pumps out and distributes stream (520) in-pit (not shown). Unit operation (465) may comprise equipment equivalent to feed-wells in commercially available mechanical thickeners.
Example 1 In Figure 5, laboratory data on a combined coarse-fine tailings mix is presented. Physical characteristics of the tailings mix are:
Remoulded yield strengthl: 2 Pa.
Unmoulded yield strength2: > 10 Pa.
Fines/(Fines+Water): 38 wt%
Solids content: 75.5 wt%
1"Remoulded yield strength" is the residual yield strength after thorough homogenisation.
2"Unmoulded yield strength" is the yield strength if the tailings mix is left undisturbed.
The yield strength of the sample is higher than 0.33 Pa, and should therefore be non-segregating according to Formula 2Ø Also, the tested tailings mix is higher in total solids content and a ratio of Fines/(Fines+Water) than the segregation boundary as defined in "Advances in Oil Sands Tailings Research" (see above). This also suggests that the tailings should be non-segregating.
The tailings recipe was tested by monitoring the degree of sand drop-out over time under simulated process conditions. For this purpose, laboratory equipment that monitors sand fraction in a slurry as a function of time was used. Process conditions are mimicked by applying shear rates representative of pipeline transport and deposition to the sample while measuring the change in sand fraction in the sample. A decreasing sand fraction in the sample indicates that the sand has settled past the detection point, which means that sand has segregated from the slurry mix. The lines shown in Figure 5 show the amount of sand present at a certain height in the test cell. For the condition indicated as "low apparent viscosity" (typically around 100 mPa s), it can be seen that after around 6000 seconds, the sand content starts decreasing. The solids content continues to decrease over time. When the same sample was tested under higher apparent viscosity conditions, as shown by lines labelled "intermediate apparent viscosity" and "high apparent viscosity" (typically around 500 mPa s), both the time at which segregation commences and the extent to which segregation occurs decreases. The apparent viscosity was changed by altering the shear rate applied to the sample.
Prior teachings suggest that this tailings recipe should be non-segregating, but segregation is observed under process conditions. However, it is observed in this example that increasing apparent viscosity reduces the degree of segregation, and that the onset of segregation can be delayed.
Example 2 The rheological behaviour of two tailings mixes is shown in Figure 6. Figure 6 shows the stress-deformation rate behaviour of a Newtonian fluid (600), an oil sands tailings slurry having a low yield stress (610) of about 0.4 Pa, and an oil sands tailings slurry having a high yield stress (620) of greater than 3 Pa. The Newtonian fluid (600) has a viscosity that is 10 times the viscosity of water. The Newtonian fluid (600) was not actually measured, but is a theoretical construct included for reference purposes only.
In Figure 7 the data plotted in Figure 6 is converted into apparent viscosity values. The horizontal line (700) illustrates an approximate threshold value for the apparent viscosity over which segregation was observed to be negligible. The reference Newtonian fluid from Figure 6 is plotted as line (710). The low yield strength fluid is plotted as line (720) and also fails to exceed the threshold value for deformation rates over about 10 s-1: for deformation rates below 10 s-1, the material acts as non-segregating, while for values over 10 s-1 the material segregates. Finally, the higher yield strength fluid is plotted as line (730). The constraint on deformation rate is alleviated: the material stays non-segregating throughout the deformation rate regime shown.
In this example, it is observed that a material with a yield stress of 0.33 Pa will segregate under process conditions when the apparent viscosity is not carefully controlled.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it is readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings of this invention that certain changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the appended claims. By way of example, specific reference to tailings from a mining operation as the waste stream has been made, but the invention is not intended to be so limited. The method of the invention may be extended to any suitable manufacturing waste stream, including one comprising organic matter.
It must be noted that as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms of "a", "and"
"the" include plural reference unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
Unless defined otherwise all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill and the art to which this invention belongs.
Claims (19)
1. A method for producing a substantially non-segregating waste stream comprising:
(a) determining the apparent viscosity of the waste stream; and (b) modifying the waste stream to increase the apparent viscosity to at least a threshold level over which the waste stream becomes substantially non-segregating.
(a) determining the apparent viscosity of the waste stream; and (b) modifying the waste stream to increase the apparent viscosity to at least a threshold level over which the waste stream becomes substantially non-segregating.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the waste stream is tailings obtained from a mining operation.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the tailings is obtained from an oil sands mining operation.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the tailings comprise tailings from bitumen extraction, tailings from a tailings solvent recovery unit, or mature fine tailings, or a combination thereof.
5. The method according to claim 1, 2, 3 or 4, wherein the apparent viscosity is increased to at least a threshold level sufficient to permit land reclamation following disposal of the waste stream.
6. The method according to claim 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the waste stream is modified by dewatering, addition of an apparent viscosity enhancing chemical agent, pH
modification, addition of active clays, or minimizing mechanical deformation forces acting on the waste stream, or a combination thereof.
modification, addition of active clays, or minimizing mechanical deformation forces acting on the waste stream, or a combination thereof.
7. The method according to claim 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the waste stream is modified by dewatering.
8. The method according to claim 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the waste stream is modified by addition of an apparent viscosity enhancing chemical agent.
9. The method according to claim 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the waste stream is modified by addition of a divalent or trivalent cation.
10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the cation is Ca2+ or Al3+.
11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the Ca2+
is added as gypsum.
is added as gypsum.
12. The method according to claim 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the waste stream is modified by modifying the pH.
13. The method according to claim 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the waste stream is modified by adding an active clay.
14. The method according to claim 13, wherein bentonite is added.
15. The method according to claim 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the waste stream is modified by minimizing mechanical deformation forces acting on the tailings composition during disposal.
16. A substantially non-segregating waste stream obtained from the method of claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or 15.
17. A method for recovering water from a waste disposal site comprising:
(a) determining the apparent viscosity of a waste stream comprising water and solids;
(b) modifying the waste stream to increase the apparent viscosity to at least a threshold level over which the waste stream becomes substantially non-segregating;
(c) depositing the modified waste stream at the waste disposal site;
(d) allowing sufficient time to permit settling of the solids from the water in the modified waste stream; and (e) recovering the water.
(a) determining the apparent viscosity of a waste stream comprising water and solids;
(b) modifying the waste stream to increase the apparent viscosity to at least a threshold level over which the waste stream becomes substantially non-segregating;
(c) depositing the modified waste stream at the waste disposal site;
(d) allowing sufficient time to permit settling of the solids from the water in the modified waste stream; and (e) recovering the water.
18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the waste stream is tailings obtained from a mining operation.
19. The method according to claim 18, wherein the tailings is obtained from an oil sands mining operation.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2582059 CA2582059A1 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2007-03-16 | A method for producing a non-segregating waste stream |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2582059 CA2582059A1 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2007-03-16 | A method for producing a non-segregating waste stream |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2582059A1 true CA2582059A1 (en) | 2008-09-16 |
Family
ID=39764596
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2582059 Withdrawn CA2582059A1 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2007-03-16 | A method for producing a non-segregating waste stream |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2582059A1 (en) |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2009052018A1 (en) * | 2007-10-15 | 2009-04-23 | Nalco Company | Purification of oil sands pond water |
US9068776B2 (en) | 2009-10-30 | 2015-06-30 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Depositing and farming methods for drying oil sand mature fine tailings |
US9207019B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2015-12-08 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Heat recovery for bitumen froth treatment plant integration with sealed closed-loop cooling circuit |
US9404686B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2016-08-02 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Process for dying oil sand mature fine tailings |
US9546323B2 (en) | 2011-01-27 | 2017-01-17 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process for integration of paraffinic froth treatment hub and a bitumen ore mining and extraction facility |
US9587177B2 (en) | 2011-05-04 | 2017-03-07 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Enhanced turndown process for a bitumen froth treatment operation |
US9587176B2 (en) | 2011-02-25 | 2017-03-07 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process for treating high paraffin diluted bitumen |
US9676684B2 (en) | 2011-03-01 | 2017-06-13 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process and unit for solvent recovery from solvent diluted tailings derived from bitumen froth treatment |
US9791170B2 (en) | 2011-03-22 | 2017-10-17 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process for direct steam injection heating of oil sands slurry streams such as bitumen froth |
US9909070B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2018-03-06 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Process for flocculating and dewatering oil sand mature fine tailings |
US10041005B2 (en) | 2011-03-04 | 2018-08-07 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process and system for solvent addition to bitumen froth |
US10226717B2 (en) | 2011-04-28 | 2019-03-12 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Method of recovering solvent from tailings by flashing under choked flow conditions |
US11261383B2 (en) | 2011-05-18 | 2022-03-01 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Enhanced temperature control of bitumen froth treatment process |
-
2007
- 2007-03-16 CA CA 2582059 patent/CA2582059A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8597515B2 (en) | 2007-10-15 | 2013-12-03 | Nalco Company | Purification of oil sands pond water |
WO2009052018A1 (en) * | 2007-10-15 | 2009-04-23 | Nalco Company | Purification of oil sands pond water |
US9909070B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2018-03-06 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Process for flocculating and dewatering oil sand mature fine tailings |
US10590347B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2020-03-17 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Process for flocculating and dewatering oil sand mature fine tailings |
US9404686B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2016-08-02 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Process for dying oil sand mature fine tailings |
US9068776B2 (en) | 2009-10-30 | 2015-06-30 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Depositing and farming methods for drying oil sand mature fine tailings |
US9546323B2 (en) | 2011-01-27 | 2017-01-17 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process for integration of paraffinic froth treatment hub and a bitumen ore mining and extraction facility |
US10125325B2 (en) | 2011-02-25 | 2018-11-13 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process for treating high paraffin diluted bitumen |
US9587176B2 (en) | 2011-02-25 | 2017-03-07 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process for treating high paraffin diluted bitumen |
US9676684B2 (en) | 2011-03-01 | 2017-06-13 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process and unit for solvent recovery from solvent diluted tailings derived from bitumen froth treatment |
US10041005B2 (en) | 2011-03-04 | 2018-08-07 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process and system for solvent addition to bitumen froth |
US10988695B2 (en) | 2011-03-04 | 2021-04-27 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process and system for solvent addition to bitumen froth |
US9791170B2 (en) | 2011-03-22 | 2017-10-17 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Process for direct steam injection heating of oil sands slurry streams such as bitumen froth |
US9207019B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2015-12-08 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Heat recovery for bitumen froth treatment plant integration with sealed closed-loop cooling circuit |
US10226717B2 (en) | 2011-04-28 | 2019-03-12 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Method of recovering solvent from tailings by flashing under choked flow conditions |
US9587177B2 (en) | 2011-05-04 | 2017-03-07 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Enhanced turndown process for a bitumen froth treatment operation |
US11261383B2 (en) | 2011-05-18 | 2022-03-01 | Fort Hills Energy L.P. | Enhanced temperature control of bitumen froth treatment process |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2582059A1 (en) | A method for producing a non-segregating waste stream | |
CA2123076C (en) | Oil sand extraction process | |
US8771502B2 (en) | Closed loop solvent extraction process for oil sands | |
CA2588043C (en) | Method for separating a bitumen froth into maltenes and asphaltenes enriched fractions | |
CA2667933C (en) | Method for dispersing and aggregating components of mineral slurries | |
CA2606312C (en) | System and method for treating tailings | |
US8158000B2 (en) | System and method of separating hydrocarbons | |
TW201229224A (en) | Tailings stream treatment processes | |
ITMI20100215A1 (en) | PROCEDURE FOR RECOVERY OF OILS FROM A SOLID MATRIX | |
CA2753811C (en) | Method of processing tailings from solvent-based hydrocarbon extraction | |
CA2888236C (en) | Method for preparing a trafficable tailings deposit | |
US3931006A (en) | Method of reducing sludge accumulation from tar sands hot water process | |
US20120018383A1 (en) | Method for dispersing and aggregating components of mineral slurries | |
US9550944B2 (en) | Process for the recovery of bitumen from an oil sand | |
US3953318A (en) | Method of reducing sludge accumulation from tar sands hot water process | |
US10160914B2 (en) | Process and system for above ground extraction of crude oil | |
US11268032B2 (en) | Process and system for the above ground extraction of crude oil from oil bearing materials | |
KR101698575B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for purify soil polluted crude | |
Schramm et al. | Froth flotation of oil sand bitumen | |
EP2546003B1 (en) | Method and device for separating roadsurface - asphalt or oilsand mixtures | |
US12043799B2 (en) | Process for extracting crude oil from diatomaceous earth | |
WO2014134726A1 (en) | Method for treatment of oil and sand cuttings | |
CA2363932A1 (en) | Management of segregating industrial tailings by using thickeners producing segregated thickened tailings | |
MIKULA et al. | Role of clays in controlling tailings behaviour in oil sands processing | |
CA1036524A (en) | Treatment of tailings from tar sands |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
AZWI | Withdrawn application |