CA2574834C - Combining audio signals using auditory scene analysis - Google Patents
Combining audio signals using auditory scene analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2574834C CA2574834C CA2574834A CA2574834A CA2574834C CA 2574834 C CA2574834 C CA 2574834C CA 2574834 A CA2574834 A CA 2574834A CA 2574834 A CA2574834 A CA 2574834A CA 2574834 C CA2574834 C CA 2574834C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- channel
- channels
- delta
- alpha
- beta
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S3/00—Systems employing more than two channels, e.g. quadraphonic
- H04S3/02—Systems employing more than two channels, e.g. quadraphonic of the matrix type, i.e. in which input signals are combined algebraically, e.g. after having been phase shifted with respect to each other
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R3/00—Circuits for transducers, loudspeakers or microphones
- H04R3/02—Circuits for transducers, loudspeakers or microphones for preventing acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B1/00—Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
- H04B1/06—Receivers
- H04B1/16—Circuits
- H04B1/20—Circuits for coupling gramophone pick-up, recorder output, or microphone to receiver
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S3/00—Systems employing more than two channels, e.g. quadraphonic
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S2420/00—Techniques used stereophonic systems covered by H04S but not provided for in its groups
- H04S2420/03—Application of parametric coding in stereophonic audio systems
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Otolaryngology (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Algebra (AREA)
- Stereophonic System (AREA)
- Electrophonic Musical Instruments (AREA)
- Complex Calculations (AREA)
- Holo Graphy (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
- Measurement Of Current Or Voltage (AREA)
- Measurement And Recording Of Electrical Phenomena And Electrical Characteristics Of The Living Body (AREA)
- Measuring Pulse, Heart Rate, Blood Pressure Or Blood Flow (AREA)
Abstract
A process for combining audio channels combines the audio channels to produce a combined audio channel and dynamically applies one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to the channels, to the combined channel, or to both the channels and the combined channel. One or more of the adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in one or more of the channels and/or the combined channel. Applications include the presentation of multichannel audio in cinemas and vehicles. Not only methods, but also corresponding computer program implementations and apparatus implementations are included.
Description
Description Combining Audio Signals Using Auditory Scene Analysis Technical Field The present invention is related to changing the number of channels in a multichannel audio signal in which some of the audio channels are combined. Applications include the presentation of multichannel audio in cinemas and vehicles. The invention includes not only methods but also corresponding computer program implementations and apparatus implementations.
Background Art In the last few decades, there has been an ever-increasing rise in the production, distribution and presentation of multichannel audio material.
This rise has been driven significantly by the film industry in which 5.1 channel playback systems are almost ubiquitous and, more recently, by the music industry which is beginning to produce 5.1 multichannel music.
Typically, such audio material is presented through a playback system that has the same number of channels as the material. For example, a 5.1 channel film soundtrack may be presented in a 5.1 channel cinema or through a 5.1 channel home theater audio system. However, there is an increasing desire to play multichannel material over systems or in environments that do not have the same number of presentation channels as the number of channels in the audio material ¨ for example, the playback of 5.1 channel material in a vehicle that has only two or four playback channels, or the playback of greater than 5.1 channel movie soundtracks in a cinema that is only equipped with a 5.1 channel system. In such situations, there is a need to combine or "downmix" some or all of the channels of the multichannel signal for presentation.
Background Art In the last few decades, there has been an ever-increasing rise in the production, distribution and presentation of multichannel audio material.
This rise has been driven significantly by the film industry in which 5.1 channel playback systems are almost ubiquitous and, more recently, by the music industry which is beginning to produce 5.1 multichannel music.
Typically, such audio material is presented through a playback system that has the same number of channels as the material. For example, a 5.1 channel film soundtrack may be presented in a 5.1 channel cinema or through a 5.1 channel home theater audio system. However, there is an increasing desire to play multichannel material over systems or in environments that do not have the same number of presentation channels as the number of channels in the audio material ¨ for example, the playback of 5.1 channel material in a vehicle that has only two or four playback channels, or the playback of greater than 5.1 channel movie soundtracks in a cinema that is only equipped with a 5.1 channel system. In such situations, there is a need to combine or "downmix" some or all of the channels of the multichannel signal for presentation.
The combining of channels may produce audible artifacts. For example, some frequency components may cancel while other frequency components reinforce or become louder. Most commonly, this is a result of the existence of similar or correlated audio signal components in two or more of the channels that are being combined.
It is an object of this invention to minimize or suppress artifacts that occur as a result of combining channels. Other objects will be appreciated as this document is read and understood.
It should be noted that the combining of channels may be required for other purposes, not just for a reduction in the number of channels. For example, there may be a need to create an additional playback channel that is some combination of two or more of the original channels in the multichannel signal. This may be characterized as a type of "upmixing" in that the result is more than the original number of channels. Thus, whether in the context of "downmixing" or "upmixing," the combining of channels to create an additional channel may lead to audible artifacts.
Common techniques for minimizing mixing or channel-combining artifacts involve applying, for example, one or more of time, phase, and amplitude (or power) adjustments to the channels to be combined, to the resulting combined channel, or to both. Audio signals are inherently dynamic ¨ that is, their characteristics change over time. Therefore, such adjustments to audio signals are typically calculated and applied in a dynamic manner. While removing some artifacts resulting from combining, such dynamic processing may introduce other artifacts. To minimize such dynamic processing artifacts, the present invention employs Auditory Scene Analysis so that, in general, dynamic processing adjustments are maintained substantially constant during auditory scenes or events and changes in such adjustments are permitted only at or near auditory scene or event boundaries.
= 73221-103 Auditory Scene Analysis The division of sounds into units perceived as separate is sometimes referred to as "auditory event analysis" or "auditory scene analysis"
("ASA"). An extensive discussion of auditory scene analysis is set forth by Albert S. Bregman in his book Auditory Scene Analysis - The Perceptual Organization of Sound, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991, Fourth printing, 2001, Second MIT Press paperback edition.
Techniques for identifying auditory events (including event boundaries) in accordance with aspects of Auditory Scene Analysis are set forth in U.S. Patent Application S.N. 10/478,538 of Brett G. Crockett, filed November 20, 2003, entitled "Segmenting Audio Signals into Auditory Events," attorneys' docket DOL098US, which is the U.S. National application resulting from International Application PCT/US02/05999, filed February 2, 2002, designating the United States, published as WO
02/097792 on December 5, 2002. Certain applications of the auditory event identification techniques of said Crockett applications are set forth in U.S.
Patent application S.N. 10/478,397 of Brett G. Crockett and Michael J.
Smithers, filed November 20, 2003, entitled "Comparing Audio Using Characterizations Based on Auditory Events," attorneys' docket DOL092US, which is a U.S. National application resulting from International Application PCT/US02/05329, filed February 22, 2002, designating the United States, published as WO 02/097790 on December 5, 2002, and U.S. Patent application S.N. 10/478,398 of Brett G. Crockett and Michael J. Smithers, filed November 20, 2003, entitled "Method for Time Aligning Audio Signals Using Characterizations Based on Auditory Events,"
published July 29, 2004 as US 2004/0148159 Al, attorneys' docket DOL09201US, which is a U.S. National application resulting from International Application PCT/US02/05806, filed February 25, 2002, designating the United States, published as WO 02/097791 on December 5, 2002.
Although techniques described in said Crockett and Crockett/Smithers applications are particularly useful in connection with aspects of the present invention, other techniques for identifying auditory events and event boundaries may be employed in aspects of the present invention.
Disclosure of the Invention According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a process for combining audio channels, comprising combining the audio channels to produce a combined audio channel, and dynamically applying one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to the channels, to the combined channel, or to both the channels and the combined channel, wherein one or more of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in one or more of the channels and/or the combined channel so that the adjustments remain substantially constant during auditory events and are allowed According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a process for downmixing three input audio channels a, 13, and 6 to two output audio channels a" and 6", wherein the three input audio channels represent, in order, consecutive spatial directions a, 13, and 6, and the two output channels a" and 6" represent the non-consecutive spatial directions a and 8, comprising extracting common signal components from the channels: channel a', a modification of channel a representing the direction a, channel a' 4a comprising the signal components of channel a from which signal components common to input channels a and 6 have been substantially removed, channel 6', a modification of channel 8 representing the direction 8, channel 6' comprising the signal components of channel 8 from which signal components common to input channels a and 8 have been substantially removed, and channel [3',a new channel representing the direction 13, channel 13' comprising the signal components common to input channels a and 8, combining intermediate channel a', intermediate channel p', and input channel 13 to produce output channel a", combining intermediate channel 8', intermediate channel IT, and input channel 13 to produce output channel 8", and dynamically applying one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to at least one of: a) one or more of the intermediate channels a', ry, and 8' and the input channel 0, and b) one or both of the combined output channels a"
and 8", wherein one or more of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in at least one of: i) one or more channels of the input channels, ii) the intermediate channels, and iii) the combined output channels, an audio segment in a channel between consecutive boundaries constituting an auditory event, and wherein each auditory event boundary is identified in response to a change in spectral content with respect to time in a channel exceeding a threshold such that a set of auditory event boundaries is obtained for the channel.
According to an aspect of the invention, a process for combining audio channels, comprises combining the audio channels to produce a combined audio channel, and dynamically applying one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to the channels, to the combined channel, or to both the channels and the combined channel, wherein one or more of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in one or more of the channels and/or the combined channel. The adjustments may be controlled so as to remain substantially constant during auditory events and to permit changes at or near auditory event boundaries.
Some embodiments of the invention may improve the sound quality of combined audio signals. This may be achieved, for example, by performing, variously, time, phase and/or amplitude (or power) correction to the audio signals, and by controlling such 4b corrections at least in part with a measure of auditory scene analysis information. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, adjustments applied to the audio signals generally may be held relatively constant during an auditory event and allowed to change at or near boundaries or transitions between auditory events. Of course, such adjustments need not occur as frequently as every boundary. The control of such adjustments may be accomplished on a channel-by-channel basis in response to auditory event information in each channel. Alternatively, some or all of such adjustments may be accomplished in response to auditory event information that has been combined over all channels or fewer than all channels.
It is an object of this invention to minimize or suppress artifacts that occur as a result of combining channels. Other objects will be appreciated as this document is read and understood.
It should be noted that the combining of channels may be required for other purposes, not just for a reduction in the number of channels. For example, there may be a need to create an additional playback channel that is some combination of two or more of the original channels in the multichannel signal. This may be characterized as a type of "upmixing" in that the result is more than the original number of channels. Thus, whether in the context of "downmixing" or "upmixing," the combining of channels to create an additional channel may lead to audible artifacts.
Common techniques for minimizing mixing or channel-combining artifacts involve applying, for example, one or more of time, phase, and amplitude (or power) adjustments to the channels to be combined, to the resulting combined channel, or to both. Audio signals are inherently dynamic ¨ that is, their characteristics change over time. Therefore, such adjustments to audio signals are typically calculated and applied in a dynamic manner. While removing some artifacts resulting from combining, such dynamic processing may introduce other artifacts. To minimize such dynamic processing artifacts, the present invention employs Auditory Scene Analysis so that, in general, dynamic processing adjustments are maintained substantially constant during auditory scenes or events and changes in such adjustments are permitted only at or near auditory scene or event boundaries.
= 73221-103 Auditory Scene Analysis The division of sounds into units perceived as separate is sometimes referred to as "auditory event analysis" or "auditory scene analysis"
("ASA"). An extensive discussion of auditory scene analysis is set forth by Albert S. Bregman in his book Auditory Scene Analysis - The Perceptual Organization of Sound, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991, Fourth printing, 2001, Second MIT Press paperback edition.
Techniques for identifying auditory events (including event boundaries) in accordance with aspects of Auditory Scene Analysis are set forth in U.S. Patent Application S.N. 10/478,538 of Brett G. Crockett, filed November 20, 2003, entitled "Segmenting Audio Signals into Auditory Events," attorneys' docket DOL098US, which is the U.S. National application resulting from International Application PCT/US02/05999, filed February 2, 2002, designating the United States, published as WO
02/097792 on December 5, 2002. Certain applications of the auditory event identification techniques of said Crockett applications are set forth in U.S.
Patent application S.N. 10/478,397 of Brett G. Crockett and Michael J.
Smithers, filed November 20, 2003, entitled "Comparing Audio Using Characterizations Based on Auditory Events," attorneys' docket DOL092US, which is a U.S. National application resulting from International Application PCT/US02/05329, filed February 22, 2002, designating the United States, published as WO 02/097790 on December 5, 2002, and U.S. Patent application S.N. 10/478,398 of Brett G. Crockett and Michael J. Smithers, filed November 20, 2003, entitled "Method for Time Aligning Audio Signals Using Characterizations Based on Auditory Events,"
published July 29, 2004 as US 2004/0148159 Al, attorneys' docket DOL09201US, which is a U.S. National application resulting from International Application PCT/US02/05806, filed February 25, 2002, designating the United States, published as WO 02/097791 on December 5, 2002.
Although techniques described in said Crockett and Crockett/Smithers applications are particularly useful in connection with aspects of the present invention, other techniques for identifying auditory events and event boundaries may be employed in aspects of the present invention.
Disclosure of the Invention According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a process for combining audio channels, comprising combining the audio channels to produce a combined audio channel, and dynamically applying one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to the channels, to the combined channel, or to both the channels and the combined channel, wherein one or more of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in one or more of the channels and/or the combined channel so that the adjustments remain substantially constant during auditory events and are allowed According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a process for downmixing three input audio channels a, 13, and 6 to two output audio channels a" and 6", wherein the three input audio channels represent, in order, consecutive spatial directions a, 13, and 6, and the two output channels a" and 6" represent the non-consecutive spatial directions a and 8, comprising extracting common signal components from the channels: channel a', a modification of channel a representing the direction a, channel a' 4a comprising the signal components of channel a from which signal components common to input channels a and 6 have been substantially removed, channel 6', a modification of channel 8 representing the direction 8, channel 6' comprising the signal components of channel 8 from which signal components common to input channels a and 8 have been substantially removed, and channel [3',a new channel representing the direction 13, channel 13' comprising the signal components common to input channels a and 8, combining intermediate channel a', intermediate channel p', and input channel 13 to produce output channel a", combining intermediate channel 8', intermediate channel IT, and input channel 13 to produce output channel 8", and dynamically applying one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to at least one of: a) one or more of the intermediate channels a', ry, and 8' and the input channel 0, and b) one or both of the combined output channels a"
and 8", wherein one or more of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in at least one of: i) one or more channels of the input channels, ii) the intermediate channels, and iii) the combined output channels, an audio segment in a channel between consecutive boundaries constituting an auditory event, and wherein each auditory event boundary is identified in response to a change in spectral content with respect to time in a channel exceeding a threshold such that a set of auditory event boundaries is obtained for the channel.
According to an aspect of the invention, a process for combining audio channels, comprises combining the audio channels to produce a combined audio channel, and dynamically applying one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to the channels, to the combined channel, or to both the channels and the combined channel, wherein one or more of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in one or more of the channels and/or the combined channel. The adjustments may be controlled so as to remain substantially constant during auditory events and to permit changes at or near auditory event boundaries.
Some embodiments of the invention may improve the sound quality of combined audio signals. This may be achieved, for example, by performing, variously, time, phase and/or amplitude (or power) correction to the audio signals, and by controlling such 4b corrections at least in part with a measure of auditory scene analysis information. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, adjustments applied to the audio signals generally may be held relatively constant during an auditory event and allowed to change at or near boundaries or transitions between auditory events. Of course, such adjustments need not occur as frequently as every boundary. The control of such adjustments may be accomplished on a channel-by-channel basis in response to auditory event information in each channel. Alternatively, some or all of such adjustments may be accomplished in response to auditory event information that has been combined over all channels or fewer than all channels.
5 Other aspects of the present invention include apparatus or devices for performing the above-described processes and other processes described in the present application along with computer program implementations of such processes. Yet further aspects of the invention may be appreciated as this document is read and understood.
Description of the Drawings FIG. us a functional schematic block diagram of a generalized embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a functional schematic block diagram of an audio signal process or processing method embodying aspects of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a functional schematic block diagram showing the Time and Phase Correction 202 of FIG. 2 in more detail.
FIG. 4 is a functional schematic block diagram showing the Mix Channels 206 of FIG. 2 in more detail.
FIG. 5a is an idealized response showing the magnitude spectrum of a white noise signal. FIG. 5b is an idealized response showing the magnitude spectrum resulting from the simple combining of a first channel consisting of white noise with a second signal that is the same white noise signal but delayed in time by approximately a fraction of a millisecond. In both FIG.
5a and 5b, the horizontal axis is frequency in Hz and the vertical axis is a relative level in decibels (dB).
FIG. 6 is a functional schematic block diagram of a three channel to two channel downmix according to aspects of the invention.
Description of the Drawings FIG. us a functional schematic block diagram of a generalized embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a functional schematic block diagram of an audio signal process or processing method embodying aspects of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a functional schematic block diagram showing the Time and Phase Correction 202 of FIG. 2 in more detail.
FIG. 4 is a functional schematic block diagram showing the Mix Channels 206 of FIG. 2 in more detail.
FIG. 5a is an idealized response showing the magnitude spectrum of a white noise signal. FIG. 5b is an idealized response showing the magnitude spectrum resulting from the simple combining of a first channel consisting of white noise with a second signal that is the same white noise signal but delayed in time by approximately a fraction of a millisecond. In both FIG.
5a and 5b, the horizontal axis is frequency in Hz and the vertical axis is a relative level in decibels (dB).
FIG. 6 is a functional schematic block diagram of a three channel to two channel downmix according to aspects of the invention.
FIGS. 7a and 7b are idealized representations showing the spatial locations of two sets of audio channels in a room, such as a cinema auditorium. FIG. 7a shows the approximate spatial locations of the "content" channels of a multichannel audio signal, while FIG. 7b shows the approximate spatial locations of "playback" in a cinema equipped to play five-channel audio material.
FIG. 7c is a functional schematic block diagram of a ten channel to five channel downmix according to aspects of the invention Modes For Carrying Out The Invention A generalized embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG.
1, wherein an audio channel combiner or combining process 100 is shown.
A plurality of audio input channels, P input channels, 101-1 through 101-P
are applied to a channel combiner or combining function ("Combine Channels") 102 and to an auditory scene analyzer or analysis function ("Auditory Scene Analysis") 103. There may be two or more input channels to be combined. Channels 1 through P may constitute some or all of a set of input channels. Combine Channels 102 combines the channels applied to it.
Although such combination may be, for example, a linear, additive combining, the combination technique is not critical to the present invention.
In addition to combining the channels applied to it, Combine Channels 102 also dynamically applies one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to the channels to be combined, to the resulting combined channel, or to both the channels to be combined and the resulting combined channel. Such adjustments may be made for the purpose of improving the quality of the channel combining by reducing mixing or channel-combining artifacts. The particular adjustment techniques are not critical to the present invention. Examples of suitable techniques for combining and adjusting are set forth in United States Provisional Patent Application S.N. 60/549,368 of Mark Franklin Davis, filed March 1, 2004, entitled "Low Bit Rate Audio Encoding and Decoding in Which Multiple Channels Are Represented by a Monophonic Channel and Auxiliary Information," attorneys', docket DOL11501, United States Provisional Application S.N. 60/579,974 of Mark Franklin Davis, et at, filed June 14, 2004, entitled "Low Bit Rate Audio Encoding and Decoding in which Multiple Channels are Represented by a Monophonic Channel and Auxiliary Information," attorneys' docket DOL11502, and United States Provisional Application S.N. 60/588,256, of = Mark Franklin Davis, et al filed July 14, 2004, entitled Low Bit Rate Audio Encoding and Decoding in which Multiple Channels are Represented by a Monophonic Channel and Auxiliary Information," attorneys' docket D0L11503. Auditory Scene Analysis 103 derives auditory scene information in accordance, for example, with techniques described in one or more of the above-identified applications by or some other suitable auditory scene analyzer or analysis process. Such information 104, which should include at least the location of boundaries between auditory events, is applied to Combine Channels 102. One or more ' of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in one or more of the channels to be combined and/or the resulting combined channel.
FIG. 2 shows an example of an audio signal processor or processing method 200 embodying aspects of the present invention. Signals 101-1 through 101-P from a plurality of audio channels 1 through P that are to be combined are applied to a time and/or phase correction device or process ("Time & Phase Correction") 202 and to an auditory scene analysis device or process ("Auditory Scene Analysis") 103, as described in connection with FIG. 1. Channels 1 through P may constitute some or all of a set of input channels. Auditory Scene Analysis 103 derives auditory scene information 104 and applies it to the Time & Phase Correction 202, which applies time and/or phase correction individually to each of the channels to be combined, as is described below in connection with FIG. 3. The corrected channels 205-1 through 205-P are then applied to a channel mixing device or process ("Mix Channels") 206 that combines the channels to create a single output channel 207. Optionally, Mix Channels 206 may also be controlled by the Auditory Scene Analysis information 104, as is described further below.
An audio signal processor or processing method embodying aspects of the present invention as in the examples of FIGS. 1 and 2 may also combine various ones of channels 1 through P to produce more than one output channel.
Auditory Scene Analysis 103 (FIGS. 1 and 2) Auditory scene analysis research has shown that the ear uses several different auditory cues to identify the beginning and end of a perceived auditory event. As taught in the above-identified applications, one of the most powerful cues is a change in the spectral content of the audio signal.
For each input channel, Auditory Scene Analysis 103 performs spectral analysis on the audio of each channel 1 through P at defined time intervals to create a sequence of frequency representations of the signal. In the manner described in said above-identified applications, successive representations may be compared in order to find a change in spectral content greater than a threshold. Finding such a change indicates an auditory event boundary between that pair of successive frequency representations, denoting approximately the end of one auditory event and the start of another. The locations of the auditory event boundaries for each input channel are output as components of the Auditory Scene Analysis information 104. Although this may be accomplished in the manner described in said above-identified applications, auditory events and their boundaries may be detected by other suitable techniques.
Auditory events are perceived units of sound with characteristics that remain substantially constant throughout the event. If time, phase and/or amplitude (or power) adjustments, such as may be used in embodiments of the present invention, vary significantly within an auditory event, effects of such adjustments may become audible, constituting undesirable artifacts. By keeping adjustments constant throughout an event and only changing the adjustments sufficiently close to event boundaries, the similarity of an auditory event is not broken up and the changes are likely to be hidden among more noticeable changes in the audio content that inherently signify the event boundary.
Ideally, in accordance with aspects of the present invention, channel combining or "downmixing" parameters should be allowed to change only at auditory event boundaries, so that no dynamic changes occur within an event. However, practical systems for detecting auditory events typically operate in the digital domain in which blocks of digital audio samples in the time-domain are transformed into the frequency domain such that the time resolution of the auditory event boundaries have a fairly coarse time resolution, which resolution is related to the block length of the digital audio samples. If that resolution is chosen (with a trade-off between block length and frequency resolution) to yield useful approximations to the actual event boundaries, that is to say, if the resolution yields approximate boundaries that are close enough so that the errors are not perceptible to a listener, then for the purposes of dynamic downmixing in accordance with the present invention, it is adequate to use not the actual boundaries, which are unknown, but rather the approximations provided by block boundaries.
Thus, in accordance with an example in the above-identified applications of Crockett, event boundaries may be deteimined to within half a block length, or about 5.8 milliseconds for the example of a 512 sample block length in a system employing a 44.1 kHz sampling rate.
In a practical implementation of aspects of the present invention, each 5 input channel is a discrete time-domain audio signal. This discrete signal may be partitioned into overlapping blocks of approximately 10.6 milliseconds, in which the overlap is approximately 5.3 milliseconds. For an audio sample rate of 48 kHz, this is equivalent to 512 sample blocks of which 256 samples overlaps with the previous block. Each block may be 10 windowed using, for example, a Hanning window and transformed into the frequency domain using, for example, a Discrete Fourier Transform (implemented as a Fast Fourier Transfonn for speed). The power, in units of decibels (dB), is calculated for each spectral value and then the spectrum is normalized to the largest dB spectral value. Non-overlapping or partially overlapping blocks may be used to reduce the cost of computation. Also, other window functions may be used, however the Hanning window has been found to be well suited to this application.
As described in the above-cited applications of Crockett, the normalized frequency spectrum for a current block may be compared to the normalized spectrum from the next previous block to obtain a measure of their difference. Specifically, a single difference measure may be calculated by summing the absolute value of the difference in the dB spectral values of the current and next previous spectrums.
Such difference measure may then be compared to a threshold. If the difference measure is greater than the threshold, an event boundary is indicated between the current and previous block, otherwise no event boundary is indicated between the current and previous block. A suitable value for this threshold has been found to be 2500 (in units of dB). Thus, event boundaries may be determined within an accuracy of about half a block.
This threshold approach could be applied to frequency subbands in which each subband has a distinct difference measure. However, in the context of the present invention, a single measure based on full bandwidth audio is sufficient in view of the perceived human ability to focus on one event at any moment in time.
The auditory event boundary information for each channel 1 through P is output as a component of the Auditory Scene Analysis information 104.
Time & Phase Correction 202 (FIG. 2) Time and Phase Correction 202 looks for high correlation and time or phase differences between pairs of the input channels. FIG. 3 shows the Time and Phase Correction 202 in more detail. As explained below, one channel of each pair is a reference channel. One suitable correlation detection technique is described below. Other suitable correlation detection techniques may be employed. When a high correlation exists between a non-reference channel and a reference channel, the device or process attempts to reduce phase or time differences between the pair of channels by modifying the phase or time characteristics of the non-reference channel, thus reducing or eliminating audible channel-combining artifacts that would otherwise result from the combining of that pair of channels. Some of such artifacts may be described by way of an example. FIG. 5a shows the magnitude spectrum of a white noise signal. FIG. 5b shows the magnitude spectrum resulting from the simple combining of a first channel consisting of white noise with a second signal that is the same white noise signal but delayed in time by approximately 0.21 milliseconds. A combination of the undelayed and delayed versions of the white noise signal has cancellations and spectral shaping, commonly called comb filtering, and audibly sounds very different to the white noise of each input signal.
FIG. 3 sho*s a suitable device or method 300 for removing phase or time delays. Signals 101-1 through 101-P from each input audio channel are applied to a delay calculating device or process ("Cale Delays") 301 that outputs a delay-indicating signal 302 for each channel. The auditory event boundary information 104, which may have a component for each channel 1 through P, is used by a device or process that includes a temporary memory device or process ("Hold") 303 to conditionally update delay signals 304-1 through 304-P that are used, respectively, by delay devices or functions ("Delay") 305-1 through 305-P for each channel to produce output channels 306-1 through 306-P.
Cale Delays 301 (FIG. 3) Cale Delays 301 measures the relative delay between pairs of the input channels. A preferred method is, first, to select a reference channel from among the input channels. This reference may be fixed or it may vary over time. Allowing the reference channel to vary, overcomes the problem, for example, of a silent reference channel. If the reference channel varies, it may be determined, for example, by the channel loudness (e.g., loudest is the reference). As mentioned above, the input audio signals for each input channel may be divided into overlapping blocks of approximately 10.6 milliseconds in length, overlapping by approximately 5.3 milliseconds. For an audio sample rate of 48 kHz, this is equivalent to 512 sample blocks of which 256 samples overlaps with the previous block.
The delay between each non-reference channel and the reference channel may be calculated using any suitable cross-correlation method. For example, let S, (length N1) be a block of samples from the reference channel and S2 (length N2) a block of samples from one of the non-reference channels. First calculate the cross-correlation array R1,2.
R12(1) = 1(n).S2(n -1) 1 = 0, 1,+2,.... (1) , The cross-correlation may be performed using standard FFT based techniques to reduce execution time. Since both si and S2 are finite in length, the non-zero component of R1,2 has a length of N + N2 ¨1. The lag /
corresponding to the maximum element in R1,2 represents the delay of S2 relative to Si .
1 peak = 1 for MAX (2) (2) This lag or delay has the same sample units as the arrays Si and S .
The cross-correlation result for the current block is time smoothed with the cross-correlation result from the previous block using a first order infinite impulse response filter to create the smoothed cross-correlation Q12.
The following equation shows the filter computation where in denotes the current block and in-1 denotes the previous block.
Q1,2 (1,in). a x R1,2(1) + ¨ a)x Q1,2(1, in -1) 1 = 0, 1, 2,.... (3) A useful value for a has been found to be 0.1. As for the cross-correlation R12, the lag / corresponding to the maximum element in Q1,2 represents the delay of s2 relative to Si . The lag or delay for each non-reference channel is output as a signal component of signal 302. A value of zero may also output as a component of signal 302, representing the delay of the reference channel.
The range of delay that can be measured is proportional to the audio signal block size. That is, the larger the block size, the larger the range of Hold 303 (FIG. 3) When an event boundary is indicated via ASA information 104 for a channel, Hold 303 copies the delay value for that channel from 302 to the corresponding output channel delay signal 304. When no event boundary is Delay 305-1 through 305-P (FIG. 3) Since the delay signal 304 can be either positive or negative, each of When any of the input delay signals 304-1 through 304-P change value, it may be necessary either to remove or replicate samples. Preferably, this is performed in a manner that does not cause audible artifacts. Such Alternatively, a more complex method may measure and correct for time or phase differences in individual frequency bands or groups of frequency bands. In such a more complex method, both Cale Delays 301 and Delays 305-1 through 305-P may operate in the frequency domain, in 5 which case Delays 305-1 through 305-P perform phase adjustments to bands or subbands, rather than delays in the time domain. In that case, signals 306-1 through 306-P are already in the frequency domain, negating the need for a subsequent Filterbank 401 (FIG. 4, as described below).
Some of the devices or processes such as Cale Delays 301 and 10 Auditory Scene Analysis 103 may look ahead in the audio channels to provide more accurate estimates of event boundaries and time or phase corrections to be applied to within events.[
Mix Channels 206 (FIG. 2) Details of the Mix Channels 206 of FIG. 2 are shown as device or 15 process 400 in FIG. 4, which shows how the input channels may be combined, with power correction, to create a downmixed output channel. In addition to mixing or combining the channels, this device or process may correct for residual frequency cancellations that were not completely corrected by Time & Phase Correction 203 in FIG. 2. It also functions to maintain power conservation. In other words, Mix Channels 206 seeks to ensure that the power of the output downmix signal 414 (FIG. 4) is substantially the same as the sum of the power of the time or phase adjusted input channels 205-1 through 205-P. Furthermore, it may seek to ensure that the power in each frequency band of the downmixed signal is substantially the sum of the power of the corresponding frequency bands of the individual time or phase adjusted input channels. The process achieves this by comparing the band power from the downmixed channel to the band powers from the input channels and subsequently calculating a gain correction value for each band. Because changes in gain adjustments across both time and frequency may lead to audible artifacts, the gains preferably are both time and frequency smoothed before being applied to downmixed signal. This device or process represents one possible way of combining channels. Other suitable devices or processes may be employed. The particular combining device or process is not critical to the invention.
Filterbank ("FB") 401-1 through 401-P (FIG. 4) The input audio signals for each input channel are time-domain signals and may have been divided into overlapping blocks of approximately 10.6 milliseconds in length, overlapping by approximately 5.3 milliseconds, as mentioned above. For an audio sample rate of 48 kHz, this is equivalent to 512 sample blocks of which 256 samples overlaps with the previous block.
The sample blocks may be windowed and converted to the frequency domain by Filterbanks 401-1 through 401-P (one filterbank for each input signal). Although any one of various window types may be used, a Hanning window has been found to be suitable. Although any one of various time-domain to frequency-domain converters or conversion processes may be used, a suitable converter or conversion method may use a Discrete Fourier Transform (implemented as a Fast Fourier Transform for speed). The output of each filterbank is a respective array 402-1 through 402-P of complex spectral values ¨ one value for each frequency band (or bin).
Band ("BND") Power 403-1 through 403-P (FIG. 4) For each channel, a band power calculator or calculating process ("BND Power") 403-1 through 403-P, respectively, computes and calculates the power of the complex spectral values 402-1 through 402-P, and outputs them as respective power spectra 404-1 through 404-P. Power spectrum values from each channel are summed in an additive combiner or combining function 415 to create a new combined power spectrum 405. Corresponding complex spectral values 402-1 through 402-P from each channel are also summed in an additive combiner or combining function 416 to create a downmix complex spectrum 406. The power of downmix complex spectrum 406 is computed in another power calculator or calculating process ("BND ' Power") 403 and output as the downmix power spectrum 407.
Band ("BND") Gain 408 (FIG. 4) A band gain calculator or calculating process (Band Gain 408) divides the power spectrum 405 by the downmix power spectrum 407 to create an array of power gains or power ratios, one for each spectral value. If a downmix power spectral value is zero (causing the power gain to be infinite), then the corresponding power gain is set to "1." The square root of the power gains is then calculated to create an array of amplitude gains 409.
Limit, Time & Frequency Smooth 410 (FIG. 4) A limiter and smoother or limiting and smoothing function (Limit, Time & Frequency Smooth) 410 performs appropriate gain limiting and time/frequency smoothing. The spectral amplitude gains discussed just above may have a wide range. Best results may be obtained if the gains are kept within a limited range. For example, if any gain is greater an upper threshold, it is set equal to the upper threshold. Likewise, for example, if any gain is less than a lower threshold, it is set equal to the lower threshold.
Useful thresholds are 0.5 and 2.0 (equivalent to 6 dB).
The spectral gains may then be temporally smoothed using a first-order infinite impulse response (IIR) filter. The following equation shows the filter computation where b denotes spectral band index, B denotes the total number of bands, n denotes the current block, n-1 denotes the previous block, G denotes the unsmoothed gains and Gs denotes the temporally smooth gains.
FIG. 7c is a functional schematic block diagram of a ten channel to five channel downmix according to aspects of the invention Modes For Carrying Out The Invention A generalized embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG.
1, wherein an audio channel combiner or combining process 100 is shown.
A plurality of audio input channels, P input channels, 101-1 through 101-P
are applied to a channel combiner or combining function ("Combine Channels") 102 and to an auditory scene analyzer or analysis function ("Auditory Scene Analysis") 103. There may be two or more input channels to be combined. Channels 1 through P may constitute some or all of a set of input channels. Combine Channels 102 combines the channels applied to it.
Although such combination may be, for example, a linear, additive combining, the combination technique is not critical to the present invention.
In addition to combining the channels applied to it, Combine Channels 102 also dynamically applies one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to the channels to be combined, to the resulting combined channel, or to both the channels to be combined and the resulting combined channel. Such adjustments may be made for the purpose of improving the quality of the channel combining by reducing mixing or channel-combining artifacts. The particular adjustment techniques are not critical to the present invention. Examples of suitable techniques for combining and adjusting are set forth in United States Provisional Patent Application S.N. 60/549,368 of Mark Franklin Davis, filed March 1, 2004, entitled "Low Bit Rate Audio Encoding and Decoding in Which Multiple Channels Are Represented by a Monophonic Channel and Auxiliary Information," attorneys', docket DOL11501, United States Provisional Application S.N. 60/579,974 of Mark Franklin Davis, et at, filed June 14, 2004, entitled "Low Bit Rate Audio Encoding and Decoding in which Multiple Channels are Represented by a Monophonic Channel and Auxiliary Information," attorneys' docket DOL11502, and United States Provisional Application S.N. 60/588,256, of = Mark Franklin Davis, et al filed July 14, 2004, entitled Low Bit Rate Audio Encoding and Decoding in which Multiple Channels are Represented by a Monophonic Channel and Auxiliary Information," attorneys' docket D0L11503. Auditory Scene Analysis 103 derives auditory scene information in accordance, for example, with techniques described in one or more of the above-identified applications by or some other suitable auditory scene analyzer or analysis process. Such information 104, which should include at least the location of boundaries between auditory events, is applied to Combine Channels 102. One or more ' of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in one or more of the channels to be combined and/or the resulting combined channel.
FIG. 2 shows an example of an audio signal processor or processing method 200 embodying aspects of the present invention. Signals 101-1 through 101-P from a plurality of audio channels 1 through P that are to be combined are applied to a time and/or phase correction device or process ("Time & Phase Correction") 202 and to an auditory scene analysis device or process ("Auditory Scene Analysis") 103, as described in connection with FIG. 1. Channels 1 through P may constitute some or all of a set of input channels. Auditory Scene Analysis 103 derives auditory scene information 104 and applies it to the Time & Phase Correction 202, which applies time and/or phase correction individually to each of the channels to be combined, as is described below in connection with FIG. 3. The corrected channels 205-1 through 205-P are then applied to a channel mixing device or process ("Mix Channels") 206 that combines the channels to create a single output channel 207. Optionally, Mix Channels 206 may also be controlled by the Auditory Scene Analysis information 104, as is described further below.
An audio signal processor or processing method embodying aspects of the present invention as in the examples of FIGS. 1 and 2 may also combine various ones of channels 1 through P to produce more than one output channel.
Auditory Scene Analysis 103 (FIGS. 1 and 2) Auditory scene analysis research has shown that the ear uses several different auditory cues to identify the beginning and end of a perceived auditory event. As taught in the above-identified applications, one of the most powerful cues is a change in the spectral content of the audio signal.
For each input channel, Auditory Scene Analysis 103 performs spectral analysis on the audio of each channel 1 through P at defined time intervals to create a sequence of frequency representations of the signal. In the manner described in said above-identified applications, successive representations may be compared in order to find a change in spectral content greater than a threshold. Finding such a change indicates an auditory event boundary between that pair of successive frequency representations, denoting approximately the end of one auditory event and the start of another. The locations of the auditory event boundaries for each input channel are output as components of the Auditory Scene Analysis information 104. Although this may be accomplished in the manner described in said above-identified applications, auditory events and their boundaries may be detected by other suitable techniques.
Auditory events are perceived units of sound with characteristics that remain substantially constant throughout the event. If time, phase and/or amplitude (or power) adjustments, such as may be used in embodiments of the present invention, vary significantly within an auditory event, effects of such adjustments may become audible, constituting undesirable artifacts. By keeping adjustments constant throughout an event and only changing the adjustments sufficiently close to event boundaries, the similarity of an auditory event is not broken up and the changes are likely to be hidden among more noticeable changes in the audio content that inherently signify the event boundary.
Ideally, in accordance with aspects of the present invention, channel combining or "downmixing" parameters should be allowed to change only at auditory event boundaries, so that no dynamic changes occur within an event. However, practical systems for detecting auditory events typically operate in the digital domain in which blocks of digital audio samples in the time-domain are transformed into the frequency domain such that the time resolution of the auditory event boundaries have a fairly coarse time resolution, which resolution is related to the block length of the digital audio samples. If that resolution is chosen (with a trade-off between block length and frequency resolution) to yield useful approximations to the actual event boundaries, that is to say, if the resolution yields approximate boundaries that are close enough so that the errors are not perceptible to a listener, then for the purposes of dynamic downmixing in accordance with the present invention, it is adequate to use not the actual boundaries, which are unknown, but rather the approximations provided by block boundaries.
Thus, in accordance with an example in the above-identified applications of Crockett, event boundaries may be deteimined to within half a block length, or about 5.8 milliseconds for the example of a 512 sample block length in a system employing a 44.1 kHz sampling rate.
In a practical implementation of aspects of the present invention, each 5 input channel is a discrete time-domain audio signal. This discrete signal may be partitioned into overlapping blocks of approximately 10.6 milliseconds, in which the overlap is approximately 5.3 milliseconds. For an audio sample rate of 48 kHz, this is equivalent to 512 sample blocks of which 256 samples overlaps with the previous block. Each block may be 10 windowed using, for example, a Hanning window and transformed into the frequency domain using, for example, a Discrete Fourier Transform (implemented as a Fast Fourier Transfonn for speed). The power, in units of decibels (dB), is calculated for each spectral value and then the spectrum is normalized to the largest dB spectral value. Non-overlapping or partially overlapping blocks may be used to reduce the cost of computation. Also, other window functions may be used, however the Hanning window has been found to be well suited to this application.
As described in the above-cited applications of Crockett, the normalized frequency spectrum for a current block may be compared to the normalized spectrum from the next previous block to obtain a measure of their difference. Specifically, a single difference measure may be calculated by summing the absolute value of the difference in the dB spectral values of the current and next previous spectrums.
Such difference measure may then be compared to a threshold. If the difference measure is greater than the threshold, an event boundary is indicated between the current and previous block, otherwise no event boundary is indicated between the current and previous block. A suitable value for this threshold has been found to be 2500 (in units of dB). Thus, event boundaries may be determined within an accuracy of about half a block.
This threshold approach could be applied to frequency subbands in which each subband has a distinct difference measure. However, in the context of the present invention, a single measure based on full bandwidth audio is sufficient in view of the perceived human ability to focus on one event at any moment in time.
The auditory event boundary information for each channel 1 through P is output as a component of the Auditory Scene Analysis information 104.
Time & Phase Correction 202 (FIG. 2) Time and Phase Correction 202 looks for high correlation and time or phase differences between pairs of the input channels. FIG. 3 shows the Time and Phase Correction 202 in more detail. As explained below, one channel of each pair is a reference channel. One suitable correlation detection technique is described below. Other suitable correlation detection techniques may be employed. When a high correlation exists between a non-reference channel and a reference channel, the device or process attempts to reduce phase or time differences between the pair of channels by modifying the phase or time characteristics of the non-reference channel, thus reducing or eliminating audible channel-combining artifacts that would otherwise result from the combining of that pair of channels. Some of such artifacts may be described by way of an example. FIG. 5a shows the magnitude spectrum of a white noise signal. FIG. 5b shows the magnitude spectrum resulting from the simple combining of a first channel consisting of white noise with a second signal that is the same white noise signal but delayed in time by approximately 0.21 milliseconds. A combination of the undelayed and delayed versions of the white noise signal has cancellations and spectral shaping, commonly called comb filtering, and audibly sounds very different to the white noise of each input signal.
FIG. 3 sho*s a suitable device or method 300 for removing phase or time delays. Signals 101-1 through 101-P from each input audio channel are applied to a delay calculating device or process ("Cale Delays") 301 that outputs a delay-indicating signal 302 for each channel. The auditory event boundary information 104, which may have a component for each channel 1 through P, is used by a device or process that includes a temporary memory device or process ("Hold") 303 to conditionally update delay signals 304-1 through 304-P that are used, respectively, by delay devices or functions ("Delay") 305-1 through 305-P for each channel to produce output channels 306-1 through 306-P.
Cale Delays 301 (FIG. 3) Cale Delays 301 measures the relative delay between pairs of the input channels. A preferred method is, first, to select a reference channel from among the input channels. This reference may be fixed or it may vary over time. Allowing the reference channel to vary, overcomes the problem, for example, of a silent reference channel. If the reference channel varies, it may be determined, for example, by the channel loudness (e.g., loudest is the reference). As mentioned above, the input audio signals for each input channel may be divided into overlapping blocks of approximately 10.6 milliseconds in length, overlapping by approximately 5.3 milliseconds. For an audio sample rate of 48 kHz, this is equivalent to 512 sample blocks of which 256 samples overlaps with the previous block.
The delay between each non-reference channel and the reference channel may be calculated using any suitable cross-correlation method. For example, let S, (length N1) be a block of samples from the reference channel and S2 (length N2) a block of samples from one of the non-reference channels. First calculate the cross-correlation array R1,2.
R12(1) = 1(n).S2(n -1) 1 = 0, 1,+2,.... (1) , The cross-correlation may be performed using standard FFT based techniques to reduce execution time. Since both si and S2 are finite in length, the non-zero component of R1,2 has a length of N + N2 ¨1. The lag /
corresponding to the maximum element in R1,2 represents the delay of S2 relative to Si .
1 peak = 1 for MAX (2) (2) This lag or delay has the same sample units as the arrays Si and S .
The cross-correlation result for the current block is time smoothed with the cross-correlation result from the previous block using a first order infinite impulse response filter to create the smoothed cross-correlation Q12.
The following equation shows the filter computation where in denotes the current block and in-1 denotes the previous block.
Q1,2 (1,in). a x R1,2(1) + ¨ a)x Q1,2(1, in -1) 1 = 0, 1, 2,.... (3) A useful value for a has been found to be 0.1. As for the cross-correlation R12, the lag / corresponding to the maximum element in Q1,2 represents the delay of s2 relative to Si . The lag or delay for each non-reference channel is output as a signal component of signal 302. A value of zero may also output as a component of signal 302, representing the delay of the reference channel.
The range of delay that can be measured is proportional to the audio signal block size. That is, the larger the block size, the larger the range of Hold 303 (FIG. 3) When an event boundary is indicated via ASA information 104 for a channel, Hold 303 copies the delay value for that channel from 302 to the corresponding output channel delay signal 304. When no event boundary is Delay 305-1 through 305-P (FIG. 3) Since the delay signal 304 can be either positive or negative, each of When any of the input delay signals 304-1 through 304-P change value, it may be necessary either to remove or replicate samples. Preferably, this is performed in a manner that does not cause audible artifacts. Such Alternatively, a more complex method may measure and correct for time or phase differences in individual frequency bands or groups of frequency bands. In such a more complex method, both Cale Delays 301 and Delays 305-1 through 305-P may operate in the frequency domain, in 5 which case Delays 305-1 through 305-P perform phase adjustments to bands or subbands, rather than delays in the time domain. In that case, signals 306-1 through 306-P are already in the frequency domain, negating the need for a subsequent Filterbank 401 (FIG. 4, as described below).
Some of the devices or processes such as Cale Delays 301 and 10 Auditory Scene Analysis 103 may look ahead in the audio channels to provide more accurate estimates of event boundaries and time or phase corrections to be applied to within events.[
Mix Channels 206 (FIG. 2) Details of the Mix Channels 206 of FIG. 2 are shown as device or 15 process 400 in FIG. 4, which shows how the input channels may be combined, with power correction, to create a downmixed output channel. In addition to mixing or combining the channels, this device or process may correct for residual frequency cancellations that were not completely corrected by Time & Phase Correction 203 in FIG. 2. It also functions to maintain power conservation. In other words, Mix Channels 206 seeks to ensure that the power of the output downmix signal 414 (FIG. 4) is substantially the same as the sum of the power of the time or phase adjusted input channels 205-1 through 205-P. Furthermore, it may seek to ensure that the power in each frequency band of the downmixed signal is substantially the sum of the power of the corresponding frequency bands of the individual time or phase adjusted input channels. The process achieves this by comparing the band power from the downmixed channel to the band powers from the input channels and subsequently calculating a gain correction value for each band. Because changes in gain adjustments across both time and frequency may lead to audible artifacts, the gains preferably are both time and frequency smoothed before being applied to downmixed signal. This device or process represents one possible way of combining channels. Other suitable devices or processes may be employed. The particular combining device or process is not critical to the invention.
Filterbank ("FB") 401-1 through 401-P (FIG. 4) The input audio signals for each input channel are time-domain signals and may have been divided into overlapping blocks of approximately 10.6 milliseconds in length, overlapping by approximately 5.3 milliseconds, as mentioned above. For an audio sample rate of 48 kHz, this is equivalent to 512 sample blocks of which 256 samples overlaps with the previous block.
The sample blocks may be windowed and converted to the frequency domain by Filterbanks 401-1 through 401-P (one filterbank for each input signal). Although any one of various window types may be used, a Hanning window has been found to be suitable. Although any one of various time-domain to frequency-domain converters or conversion processes may be used, a suitable converter or conversion method may use a Discrete Fourier Transform (implemented as a Fast Fourier Transform for speed). The output of each filterbank is a respective array 402-1 through 402-P of complex spectral values ¨ one value for each frequency band (or bin).
Band ("BND") Power 403-1 through 403-P (FIG. 4) For each channel, a band power calculator or calculating process ("BND Power") 403-1 through 403-P, respectively, computes and calculates the power of the complex spectral values 402-1 through 402-P, and outputs them as respective power spectra 404-1 through 404-P. Power spectrum values from each channel are summed in an additive combiner or combining function 415 to create a new combined power spectrum 405. Corresponding complex spectral values 402-1 through 402-P from each channel are also summed in an additive combiner or combining function 416 to create a downmix complex spectrum 406. The power of downmix complex spectrum 406 is computed in another power calculator or calculating process ("BND ' Power") 403 and output as the downmix power spectrum 407.
Band ("BND") Gain 408 (FIG. 4) A band gain calculator or calculating process (Band Gain 408) divides the power spectrum 405 by the downmix power spectrum 407 to create an array of power gains or power ratios, one for each spectral value. If a downmix power spectral value is zero (causing the power gain to be infinite), then the corresponding power gain is set to "1." The square root of the power gains is then calculated to create an array of amplitude gains 409.
Limit, Time & Frequency Smooth 410 (FIG. 4) A limiter and smoother or limiting and smoothing function (Limit, Time & Frequency Smooth) 410 performs appropriate gain limiting and time/frequency smoothing. The spectral amplitude gains discussed just above may have a wide range. Best results may be obtained if the gains are kept within a limited range. For example, if any gain is greater an upper threshold, it is set equal to the upper threshold. Likewise, for example, if any gain is less than a lower threshold, it is set equal to the lower threshold.
Useful thresholds are 0.5 and 2.0 (equivalent to 6 dB).
The spectral gains may then be temporally smoothed using a first-order infinite impulse response (IIR) filter. The following equation shows the filter computation where b denotes spectral band index, B denotes the total number of bands, n denotes the current block, n-1 denotes the previous block, G denotes the unsmoothed gains and Gs denotes the temporally smooth gains.
G s (b n) = x G (b) + (1 5 (b))x G s (b n 1) b = 0 , . . , B ¨ 1 (4) A useful value for 8(b) has been found to be 0.5 except for bands below approximately 200 Hz. Below this frequency, (b) tends toward a final value of 0 at band or DC. If the smoothed gains Gs are initialized to 1.0, the value at DC stays equal to 1Ø That is, DC will never be gain adjusted and the gain of bands below 200 Hz will vary more slowly than bands in the rest of the spectrum. This may be useful in preventing audible modulations at lower frequencies. This is because at frequencies lower than 200 Hz, the wavelength of such frequencies approaches or exceeds the block size used by the filterbank, leading to inaccuracies in the filterbanks' ability to accurately discriminate these frequencies. This is a common and well-known phenomenon.
The temporally-smoothed gains are further smoothed across frequency to prevent large changes in gain between adjacent bands. In the preferred implementation, the band gains are smoothed using a sliding five band (or approximately 470 Hz) average. That is, each bin is updated to be the average of itself and two adjacent bands both above and below in frequency.
At the upper and lower edge of the spectrum, the edge values (bands 0 and N-1) are used repeatedly so that a five band average can still be performed.
The smoothed band gains are output as signal 411 and multiplied by the downmix complex spectral values in a multiplier or multiplying function 419 to create the corrected downmix complex spectrum 412. Optionally, the output signal 411 may be applied to the multiplier or multiplying function 419 via a temporary memory device or process ("Hold") 417 under control of the ASA information 104. Hold 417 operates in the same manner as Hold 303 of FIG. 3. For example, the gains could be held relatively constant during an event and only changed at event boundaries. In this way, possibly audible and dramatic gain changes during an event may be prevented.
Inverse Filterbank (Inv FB) 413 (FIG. 4) The downmix spectrum 412 from multiplier or multiplying function 419 is passed through an inverse filterbank or filterbank function ("INV
FB") 413 to create blocks of output time samples. This filterbank is the inverse of the input filterbank 401. Adjacent blocks are overlapped with and added to previous blocks, as is well known, to create an output time-domain signal 414.
The arrangements described do not preclude the common practice of separating the window, at the forward filterbank 401, into two windows (one used at the forward and one used at the inverse filterbank) whose multiplication is such that unity signal is maintained through the system.
Downmixing Applications One application of downmixing according to aspects of the present invention is the playback of 5.1 channel content in a motor vehicle. Motor vehicles may reproduce only four channels of 5.1 channel content, corresponding approximately to the Left, Right, Left Surround and Right Surround channels of such a system. Each channel is directed to one or more loudspeakers located in positions deemed suitable for reproduction of directional information associated with the particular channel. However motor vehicles usually do not have a center loudspeaker position for reproduction of the Center channel in such a 5.1 playback system. To accommodate this situation, it is known to attenuate the Center channel signal (by 3 dB or 6 dB for example) and to combine it with each of the Left and Right channel signals to provide a phantom center channel. However, such simple combining leads to artifacts previously described.
Instead of applying such a simple combining, channel combining or downmixing according to aspects of the present invention may be applied.
For example, the arrangement of FIG. 1 or the arrangement of FIG. .2 may be applied twice, once for combining the Left and Center signals, and once for The inverse may also be applicable. That is, time or phase adjust only the Center channel, again ensuring that the phantom Center Channel image remains stable.
Another application of the downmixing according to aspects of the present invention is in the playback of multichannel audio in a cinema.
Standards under development for the next generation of digital cinema systems require the delivery of up to, and soon to be more than, 16 channels of audio. The majority of installed cinema systems only provide 5.1 playback or "presentation" channels (as is well known, the "0.1" represents the low frequency "effects" channel). Therefore, until the playback systems are upgraded, at significant expense, there is the need to downmix content Therefore, if P channels are to be downmixed to Q channels (where P
> Q) then downmixing according to aspects of the present invention (e.g., as in the exemplary embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 2) may be applied to obtain Alternatives Time or phase adjustment, as described herein, serves to minimize the complete or partial cancellation of frequencies during downmixing.
somewhere between the physical locations of the loudspeakers receiving those output channels. The problem arises when these two or more input channels, with substantially equivalent content, are independently phase adjusted prior to being combined with other channels to create the output channels. The independent phase adjustment can lead to both incorrect phantom image location, and/or indeterminate image location, both of which may be audibly perceived as unnatural.
It is possible to devise a system that looks for input channels having substantially similar content and attempts to time or phase adjust such channels in the same or similar way such that their phantom image location is not altered. However, such a system becomes very complex, especially as the number of input channels becomes substantially larger than the number of output channels. In systems where substantially similar content frequently occurs in more than one input channel, it may be simpler to dispense with phase adjustment, and perform only power correction.
This adjustment problem can be explained further in the automobile application described previously in which the Center channel signal is combined with each of the Left and Right channels for playback through the Left and Right loudspeakers, respectively. In 5.1 channel material, the Left and Right input channels often contain a plurality of signals (e.g., instruments, vocals, dialog and/or effects), some of which are different and some of which are the same. When the Center channel is mixed with each of the Left and Right channels, the Center channel is denoted as the reference channel and is not time or phase adjusted. The Left channel is time or phase adjusted so as to produce minimal phase cancellation when combined with the Center channel, and similarly the Right channel is time or phase adjusted so as to produce minimal phase cancellation when combined with the Center channel. Because the Left and Right channels are time or phase adjusted independently, signals that are common to the Left and Right channels may no longer have a phantom image between the physical locations of the Left and Right loudspeakers. Furthermore, the phantom image may not be localized to any one direction but may be spread throughout the listening space ¨ an unnatural and undesirable effect.
A solution to the adjustment problem is to extract signals that are common to more than one input channel from such input channels and place them in new and separate input channels. Although this increases the overall number of input channels P to be downmixed, it reduces spurious and undesirable phantom image distortion in the output downmixed channels.
An automotive example device or process 600 is shown in FIG. 6 for the case of three channels being downmixed to two. Signals common to the Left and Right input channels are extracted from the Left and Right channels into another new channel using any suitable channel multiplier or multiplication process ("Decorrelate Channels") 601 such as an active matrix decoder or other type of channel multiplier that extracts common signal components.
Such a device may be characterized as a type of decorrelator or decon-elation function. One suitable active matrix decoder, known as Dolby Surround Pro Logic II, is described in U.S. Patent Application S.N. 09/532,711 of James 90 W. Fosgate, filed March 22, 2000, entitled "Method for deriving at least three audio signals from two input audio signals", attorneys' docket D0L07201 and U.S. Patent Application S.N. 10/362,786 of James W.
Fosgate, et al, filed February 25, 2003, entitled "Method for apparatus for audio matrix decoding," published as US 2004/0125960 Al on July 1, 2004, attorneys' docket DOL07203US, Which is the U.S. national application resulting from International Application PCT/US01/27006., filed August 30, 2001, designating the United States, published as WO 02/19768 on =
March 7, 2002. Another type of suitable channel multiplier and decorrelator that may be employed is described in U.S. Patent Application S,N. 10/467,213 of Mark Franklin Davis, filed 08/05/2003, entitled "Audio Channel Translation," published as US 2004/0062401 Al on April 1, 2004, attorneys' docket DOL088US, which is the U.S. national application resulting from International Application PCT/US02/03619, filed February 7, 2002, designating the United States, published as WO
02/063925 on August 7, 2003, and International Application PCT/US03/24570, filed 08/06/2003, designating the United States, attorneys' docket DOL08801PCT published as WO 2004/019656 on 03/04/2004. Another suitable channel multiplication/decorrelation technique is described in "Intelligent Audio Source Separation using Independent Component Analysis," by Mitianoudis and Davies, Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper 5529, Presented at the 112th Convention, May 10-13, 2002, Munich, Germany.
The result is *four channels, the new channel CD, the original Center channel C and the modified Left and Right channels, LD and R.
The device or process 602, based on the an-angement of FIG. 2, but here with two output channels, combines the four channels to create Left and Right playback channels Lp and R. The modified channels LD and RD are each mixed to only one playback channel; Lp and Rp respectively. Because they do not substantially contain any correlated content, the modified channels LD and RD, from which their common component CD has been extracted, can be time or phase adjusted without affecting any phantom center images present in the input .channels L and R. To perform the time and/or phase adjustment, one of the channels such as channel CD is denoted as the reference channel. The other channels LD, RD and C are then time and/or phase adjusted relative to the reference channel. Alternatively since the LD and RD channels are unlikely to be correlated with the C channel, and since they are decorrelated from the CD channel by means of process 601, 5 they may be passed to mix channels without any time or phase adjustment.
Both original channel C and the derived center channel CD may be mixed with each of the intermediate channels LD and RD, respectively, in the Mix Channels portion of device or process 602 to produce the playback channels Lp and R. Although an equal proportion of C and CD has been found to 10 produce satisfactory results, the exact proportion is not critical and may be other than equal. Consequently, any time and phase adjustment applied to CD and C will appear in both playback channels, thus maintaining the direction of phantom center images. Some attenuation (for example 3 dB) may be required on each of the center channels since these channels are 15 reproduced through two speakers, and not one. Also the amount of each of the center channels C and CD that is mixed into the output channels could be controlled by the listener. For example the listener may desire all of the original center channel C but some attenuation on the derived center channel CD.
The temporally-smoothed gains are further smoothed across frequency to prevent large changes in gain between adjacent bands. In the preferred implementation, the band gains are smoothed using a sliding five band (or approximately 470 Hz) average. That is, each bin is updated to be the average of itself and two adjacent bands both above and below in frequency.
At the upper and lower edge of the spectrum, the edge values (bands 0 and N-1) are used repeatedly so that a five band average can still be performed.
The smoothed band gains are output as signal 411 and multiplied by the downmix complex spectral values in a multiplier or multiplying function 419 to create the corrected downmix complex spectrum 412. Optionally, the output signal 411 may be applied to the multiplier or multiplying function 419 via a temporary memory device or process ("Hold") 417 under control of the ASA information 104. Hold 417 operates in the same manner as Hold 303 of FIG. 3. For example, the gains could be held relatively constant during an event and only changed at event boundaries. In this way, possibly audible and dramatic gain changes during an event may be prevented.
Inverse Filterbank (Inv FB) 413 (FIG. 4) The downmix spectrum 412 from multiplier or multiplying function 419 is passed through an inverse filterbank or filterbank function ("INV
FB") 413 to create blocks of output time samples. This filterbank is the inverse of the input filterbank 401. Adjacent blocks are overlapped with and added to previous blocks, as is well known, to create an output time-domain signal 414.
The arrangements described do not preclude the common practice of separating the window, at the forward filterbank 401, into two windows (one used at the forward and one used at the inverse filterbank) whose multiplication is such that unity signal is maintained through the system.
Downmixing Applications One application of downmixing according to aspects of the present invention is the playback of 5.1 channel content in a motor vehicle. Motor vehicles may reproduce only four channels of 5.1 channel content, corresponding approximately to the Left, Right, Left Surround and Right Surround channels of such a system. Each channel is directed to one or more loudspeakers located in positions deemed suitable for reproduction of directional information associated with the particular channel. However motor vehicles usually do not have a center loudspeaker position for reproduction of the Center channel in such a 5.1 playback system. To accommodate this situation, it is known to attenuate the Center channel signal (by 3 dB or 6 dB for example) and to combine it with each of the Left and Right channel signals to provide a phantom center channel. However, such simple combining leads to artifacts previously described.
Instead of applying such a simple combining, channel combining or downmixing according to aspects of the present invention may be applied.
For example, the arrangement of FIG. 1 or the arrangement of FIG. .2 may be applied twice, once for combining the Left and Center signals, and once for The inverse may also be applicable. That is, time or phase adjust only the Center channel, again ensuring that the phantom Center Channel image remains stable.
Another application of the downmixing according to aspects of the present invention is in the playback of multichannel audio in a cinema.
Standards under development for the next generation of digital cinema systems require the delivery of up to, and soon to be more than, 16 channels of audio. The majority of installed cinema systems only provide 5.1 playback or "presentation" channels (as is well known, the "0.1" represents the low frequency "effects" channel). Therefore, until the playback systems are upgraded, at significant expense, there is the need to downmix content Therefore, if P channels are to be downmixed to Q channels (where P
> Q) then downmixing according to aspects of the present invention (e.g., as in the exemplary embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 2) may be applied to obtain Alternatives Time or phase adjustment, as described herein, serves to minimize the complete or partial cancellation of frequencies during downmixing.
somewhere between the physical locations of the loudspeakers receiving those output channels. The problem arises when these two or more input channels, with substantially equivalent content, are independently phase adjusted prior to being combined with other channels to create the output channels. The independent phase adjustment can lead to both incorrect phantom image location, and/or indeterminate image location, both of which may be audibly perceived as unnatural.
It is possible to devise a system that looks for input channels having substantially similar content and attempts to time or phase adjust such channels in the same or similar way such that their phantom image location is not altered. However, such a system becomes very complex, especially as the number of input channels becomes substantially larger than the number of output channels. In systems where substantially similar content frequently occurs in more than one input channel, it may be simpler to dispense with phase adjustment, and perform only power correction.
This adjustment problem can be explained further in the automobile application described previously in which the Center channel signal is combined with each of the Left and Right channels for playback through the Left and Right loudspeakers, respectively. In 5.1 channel material, the Left and Right input channels often contain a plurality of signals (e.g., instruments, vocals, dialog and/or effects), some of which are different and some of which are the same. When the Center channel is mixed with each of the Left and Right channels, the Center channel is denoted as the reference channel and is not time or phase adjusted. The Left channel is time or phase adjusted so as to produce minimal phase cancellation when combined with the Center channel, and similarly the Right channel is time or phase adjusted so as to produce minimal phase cancellation when combined with the Center channel. Because the Left and Right channels are time or phase adjusted independently, signals that are common to the Left and Right channels may no longer have a phantom image between the physical locations of the Left and Right loudspeakers. Furthermore, the phantom image may not be localized to any one direction but may be spread throughout the listening space ¨ an unnatural and undesirable effect.
A solution to the adjustment problem is to extract signals that are common to more than one input channel from such input channels and place them in new and separate input channels. Although this increases the overall number of input channels P to be downmixed, it reduces spurious and undesirable phantom image distortion in the output downmixed channels.
An automotive example device or process 600 is shown in FIG. 6 for the case of three channels being downmixed to two. Signals common to the Left and Right input channels are extracted from the Left and Right channels into another new channel using any suitable channel multiplier or multiplication process ("Decorrelate Channels") 601 such as an active matrix decoder or other type of channel multiplier that extracts common signal components.
Such a device may be characterized as a type of decorrelator or decon-elation function. One suitable active matrix decoder, known as Dolby Surround Pro Logic II, is described in U.S. Patent Application S.N. 09/532,711 of James 90 W. Fosgate, filed March 22, 2000, entitled "Method for deriving at least three audio signals from two input audio signals", attorneys' docket D0L07201 and U.S. Patent Application S.N. 10/362,786 of James W.
Fosgate, et al, filed February 25, 2003, entitled "Method for apparatus for audio matrix decoding," published as US 2004/0125960 Al on July 1, 2004, attorneys' docket DOL07203US, Which is the U.S. national application resulting from International Application PCT/US01/27006., filed August 30, 2001, designating the United States, published as WO 02/19768 on =
March 7, 2002. Another type of suitable channel multiplier and decorrelator that may be employed is described in U.S. Patent Application S,N. 10/467,213 of Mark Franklin Davis, filed 08/05/2003, entitled "Audio Channel Translation," published as US 2004/0062401 Al on April 1, 2004, attorneys' docket DOL088US, which is the U.S. national application resulting from International Application PCT/US02/03619, filed February 7, 2002, designating the United States, published as WO
02/063925 on August 7, 2003, and International Application PCT/US03/24570, filed 08/06/2003, designating the United States, attorneys' docket DOL08801PCT published as WO 2004/019656 on 03/04/2004. Another suitable channel multiplication/decorrelation technique is described in "Intelligent Audio Source Separation using Independent Component Analysis," by Mitianoudis and Davies, Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper 5529, Presented at the 112th Convention, May 10-13, 2002, Munich, Germany.
The result is *four channels, the new channel CD, the original Center channel C and the modified Left and Right channels, LD and R.
The device or process 602, based on the an-angement of FIG. 2, but here with two output channels, combines the four channels to create Left and Right playback channels Lp and R. The modified channels LD and RD are each mixed to only one playback channel; Lp and Rp respectively. Because they do not substantially contain any correlated content, the modified channels LD and RD, from which their common component CD has been extracted, can be time or phase adjusted without affecting any phantom center images present in the input .channels L and R. To perform the time and/or phase adjustment, one of the channels such as channel CD is denoted as the reference channel. The other channels LD, RD and C are then time and/or phase adjusted relative to the reference channel. Alternatively since the LD and RD channels are unlikely to be correlated with the C channel, and since they are decorrelated from the CD channel by means of process 601, 5 they may be passed to mix channels without any time or phase adjustment.
Both original channel C and the derived center channel CD may be mixed with each of the intermediate channels LD and RD, respectively, in the Mix Channels portion of device or process 602 to produce the playback channels Lp and R. Although an equal proportion of C and CD has been found to 10 produce satisfactory results, the exact proportion is not critical and may be other than equal. Consequently, any time and phase adjustment applied to CD and C will appear in both playback channels, thus maintaining the direction of phantom center images. Some attenuation (for example 3 dB) may be required on each of the center channels since these channels are 15 reproduced through two speakers, and not one. Also the amount of each of the center channels C and CD that is mixed into the output channels could be controlled by the listener. For example the listener may desire all of the original center channel C but some attenuation on the derived center channel CD.
20 The solution may also be explained by way of an example in cinema audio. FIGS. 7a and 7b show the room or spatial locations of two sets of audio channels. FIG. 7a shows the approximate spatial locations of the channels as presented in the multichannel audio signal, otherwise denoted as "content channels". FIG. 7b shows the approximate locations of channels, 25 denoted as "playback channels," that can be reproduced in a cinema that is equipped to play five channel audio material. Some of the content channels have corresponding playback channel locations; namely, the L, C. R, Rs and Ls channels. Other content channels do not have corresponding playback channel locations and therefore must be mixed into one or more of the playback channels. A typical approach is to combine such content channels into the nearest two playback channels.
As previously mentioned, simple additive combining may lead to audible artifacts. As also mentioned, combining as described in connection with FIGS. 1 and 2 may also lead to phantom imaging artifacts when channels that have substantially common content are phase or time adjusted differently. A solution includes extracting signals that are common to more than one input channel from such input channels and place them in new and separate channels.
FIG. 7c shows a device or process 700 for the case in which five additional channels Qi to Q5 are created by extracting information common to some combinations of the input or content channels using device or process ("Decorrelate Channels") 701. Device or process 701 may employ a suitable channel multiplication/decorrelation technique such as described above for use in the "Decorrelate Channels" device or function 601. The actual number and spatial location of these additional intermediate channels may vary according to variations in the audio signals contained in the content channels. The device or process 702, based on the arrangement of FIG.2, but here with five output channels, combines the intermediate channels from Decorrelate Channels 701 to create the five playback channels.
For time and phase correction, one of the intelmediate channels such as the C channel, may be denoted as the reference channel and all other intermediate channels be time and phase adjusted relative to this reference.
Alternatively, it may be beneficial to denote more than one of the channels as reference channels and thus perform time or phase corrections in smaller groups of channels than the total number of intermediate channels. For example if channel Qi represents common signals extracted out of content channels L and C, and if Qi and Lc are being combined with intermediate channels L and C to create the playback channels L and C, channel Lc may be denoted as the reference channel. Intermediate channels L, C and Qi are then time or phase adjusted relative to the reference intermediate channel Lc.
Each smaller group of intermediate channels is time or phase adjusted in succession until all intermediate channels have been considered by the time and phase correction process.
In creating the playback channels, device or process 702 may assume a priori knowledge of the spatial locations of the content channels.
Information regarding the number and spatial location of the additional intermediate channels may be assumed or may be passed to the device or process 702 from the decorrelating device or process 701 via path 703. This enables process or device 702 to combine the additional intermediate channels into, for example, the nearest two playback channels so that phantom image direction of these additional channels is maintained.
Implementation The invention may be implemented in hardware or software, or a combination of both (e.g., programmable logic arrays). Unless otherwise specified, the algorithms included as part of the invention are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. In particular, various general-purpose machines may be used with programs written in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may be more convenient to construct more specialized apparatus (e.g., integrated circuits) to perform the required method steps. Thus, the invention may be implemented in one or more computer programs executing on one or more programmable computer systems each comprising at least one processor, at least one data storage system (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage =
elements), at least one input device or port, and at least one output device or port. Program code is applied to input data to perform the functions described herein and generate output information. The output information is applied to one or more output devices, in known fashion.
Each such program may be implemented in any desired computer language (including machine, assembly, or high level procedural, logical, or object oriented programming languages) to communicate with a computer system. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language.
Each such computer program is preferably stored on or downloaded to a storage media or device (e.g., solid state memory or media, or magnetic or optical media) readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer, for configuring and operating the computer when the storage media or device is read by the computer system to perform the procedures described herein. The inventive system may also be considered to be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where the storage medium so configured causes a computer system to operate in a specific and predefined manner to perform the functions described herein.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described.
Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, some of the steps described above may be order independent, and thus can be performed in an order different from that described. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
As previously mentioned, simple additive combining may lead to audible artifacts. As also mentioned, combining as described in connection with FIGS. 1 and 2 may also lead to phantom imaging artifacts when channels that have substantially common content are phase or time adjusted differently. A solution includes extracting signals that are common to more than one input channel from such input channels and place them in new and separate channels.
FIG. 7c shows a device or process 700 for the case in which five additional channels Qi to Q5 are created by extracting information common to some combinations of the input or content channels using device or process ("Decorrelate Channels") 701. Device or process 701 may employ a suitable channel multiplication/decorrelation technique such as described above for use in the "Decorrelate Channels" device or function 601. The actual number and spatial location of these additional intermediate channels may vary according to variations in the audio signals contained in the content channels. The device or process 702, based on the arrangement of FIG.2, but here with five output channels, combines the intermediate channels from Decorrelate Channels 701 to create the five playback channels.
For time and phase correction, one of the intelmediate channels such as the C channel, may be denoted as the reference channel and all other intermediate channels be time and phase adjusted relative to this reference.
Alternatively, it may be beneficial to denote more than one of the channels as reference channels and thus perform time or phase corrections in smaller groups of channels than the total number of intermediate channels. For example if channel Qi represents common signals extracted out of content channels L and C, and if Qi and Lc are being combined with intermediate channels L and C to create the playback channels L and C, channel Lc may be denoted as the reference channel. Intermediate channels L, C and Qi are then time or phase adjusted relative to the reference intermediate channel Lc.
Each smaller group of intermediate channels is time or phase adjusted in succession until all intermediate channels have been considered by the time and phase correction process.
In creating the playback channels, device or process 702 may assume a priori knowledge of the spatial locations of the content channels.
Information regarding the number and spatial location of the additional intermediate channels may be assumed or may be passed to the device or process 702 from the decorrelating device or process 701 via path 703. This enables process or device 702 to combine the additional intermediate channels into, for example, the nearest two playback channels so that phantom image direction of these additional channels is maintained.
Implementation The invention may be implemented in hardware or software, or a combination of both (e.g., programmable logic arrays). Unless otherwise specified, the algorithms included as part of the invention are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. In particular, various general-purpose machines may be used with programs written in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may be more convenient to construct more specialized apparatus (e.g., integrated circuits) to perform the required method steps. Thus, the invention may be implemented in one or more computer programs executing on one or more programmable computer systems each comprising at least one processor, at least one data storage system (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage =
elements), at least one input device or port, and at least one output device or port. Program code is applied to input data to perform the functions described herein and generate output information. The output information is applied to one or more output devices, in known fashion.
Each such program may be implemented in any desired computer language (including machine, assembly, or high level procedural, logical, or object oriented programming languages) to communicate with a computer system. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language.
Each such computer program is preferably stored on or downloaded to a storage media or device (e.g., solid state memory or media, or magnetic or optical media) readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer, for configuring and operating the computer when the storage media or device is read by the computer system to perform the procedures described herein. The inventive system may also be considered to be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where the storage medium so configured causes a computer system to operate in a specific and predefined manner to perform the functions described herein.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described.
Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, some of the steps described above may be order independent, and thus can be performed in an order different from that described. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Claims (8)
1. A
process for downmixing three input audio channels .alpha., .beta., and .delta.
to two output audio channels .alpha." and .delta.", wherein the three input audio channels represent, in order, consecutive spatial directions .alpha., .beta., and .delta., and the two output channels .alpha." and .delta." represent the non-consecutive spatial directions .alpha. and .delta., comprising extracting common signal components from the two input audio channels representing directions .alpha. and .delta. to produce three intermediate channels:
channel .alpha.', a modification of channel a representing the direction .alpha., channel .alpha.' comprising the signal components of channel a from which signal components common to input channels .alpha. and .delta. have been substantially removed, channel .delta.', a modification of channel .delta. representing the direction .delta., channel .delta.' comprising the signal components of channel .delta. from which signal components common to input channels a and .delta. have been substantially removed, and channel .beta.', a new channel representing the direction .beta., channel .beta.' comprising the signal components common to input channels .alpha. and .delta., combining intermediate channel .alpha.', intermediate channel .beta.', and input channel .beta. to produce output channel .alpha.", combining intermediate channel .delta.', intermediate channel .beta.', and input channel .beta. to produce output channel .delta.", and dynamically applying one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to at least one of:
a) one or more of the intermediate channels .beta.', .beta.', and .delta.' and the input channel .beta., and b) one or both of the combined output channels .alpha." and .beta.", wherein one or more of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in at least one of: i) one or more channels of the input channels, ii) the intermediate channels, and iii) the combined output channels, an audio segment in a channel between consecutive boundaries constituting an auditory event, and wherein each auditory event boundary is identified in response to a change in spectral content with respect to time in a channel exceeding a threshold such that a set of auditory event boundaries is obtained for the channel.
process for downmixing three input audio channels .alpha., .beta., and .delta.
to two output audio channels .alpha." and .delta.", wherein the three input audio channels represent, in order, consecutive spatial directions .alpha., .beta., and .delta., and the two output channels .alpha." and .delta." represent the non-consecutive spatial directions .alpha. and .delta., comprising extracting common signal components from the two input audio channels representing directions .alpha. and .delta. to produce three intermediate channels:
channel .alpha.', a modification of channel a representing the direction .alpha., channel .alpha.' comprising the signal components of channel a from which signal components common to input channels .alpha. and .delta. have been substantially removed, channel .delta.', a modification of channel .delta. representing the direction .delta., channel .delta.' comprising the signal components of channel .delta. from which signal components common to input channels a and .delta. have been substantially removed, and channel .beta.', a new channel representing the direction .beta., channel .beta.' comprising the signal components common to input channels .alpha. and .delta., combining intermediate channel .alpha.', intermediate channel .beta.', and input channel .beta. to produce output channel .alpha.", combining intermediate channel .delta.', intermediate channel .beta.', and input channel .beta. to produce output channel .delta.", and dynamically applying one or more of time, phase, and amplitude or power adjustments to at least one of:
a) one or more of the intermediate channels .beta.', .beta.', and .delta.' and the input channel .beta., and b) one or both of the combined output channels .alpha." and .beta.", wherein one or more of said adjustments are controlled at least in part by a measure of auditory events in at least one of: i) one or more channels of the input channels, ii) the intermediate channels, and iii) the combined output channels, an audio segment in a channel between consecutive boundaries constituting an auditory event, and wherein each auditory event boundary is identified in response to a change in spectral content with respect to time in a channel exceeding a threshold such that a set of auditory event boundaries is obtained for the channel.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the consecutive spatial directions a, 13, and 8 are one of the sets of directions:
left, center, and right, left, left center, and center, center, right center, and right, right, right middle, and right surround, right surround, center back, and left surround, and left surround, left middle, and left.
left, center, and right, left, left center, and center, center, right center, and right, right, right middle, and right surround, right surround, center back, and left surround, and left surround, left middle, and left.
3. A process according to any one of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein said adjustments are controlled so as to remain substantially constant during auditory events and to permit changes at or near auditory event boundaries.
4. A process according to claim 3 wherein identifying auditory event boundaries in a channel includes dividing the audio signal into time blocks, converting the data in each block to the frequency domain, and comparing the normalized frequency spectrum for a current block to the normalized frequency spectrum from the immediately preceding block.
5. A process according to claim 4 wherein a single difference measure is calculated by summing the absolute value of the difference in logarithmically-expressed corresponding spectral values of the current and immediately preceding block spectrums and comparing the single difference measure to a threshold.
6. A process according to claim 5 wherein an auditory event boundary is identified when the summed magnitudes exceed said threshold.
7. Apparatus adapted to perform the methods of any one of claims 1 through 6.
8. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon computer-executable instructions for a computer program for causing a computer to perform the methods of any one of claims 1 through 6.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/911,404 | 2004-08-03 | ||
US10/911,404 US7508947B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2004-08-03 | Method for combining audio signals using auditory scene analysis |
PCT/US2005/024630 WO2006019719A1 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2005-07-13 | Combining audio signals using auditory scene analysis |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2574834A1 CA2574834A1 (en) | 2006-02-23 |
CA2574834C true CA2574834C (en) | 2013-07-09 |
Family
ID=35115846
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2574834A Active CA2574834C (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2005-07-13 | Combining audio signals using auditory scene analysis |
Country Status (19)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7508947B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1787495B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4740242B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101161703B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101002505B (en) |
AT (1) | ATE470322T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2005275257B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0514059B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2574834C (en) |
DE (1) | DE602005021648D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1787495T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2346070T3 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1101053A1 (en) |
IL (1) | IL180712A (en) |
MX (1) | MX2007001262A (en) |
MY (1) | MY139731A (en) |
PL (1) | PL1787495T3 (en) |
TW (1) | TWI374435B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006019719A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (53)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7711123B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2010-05-04 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Segmenting audio signals into auditory events |
US7610205B2 (en) | 2002-02-12 | 2009-10-27 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | High quality time-scaling and pitch-scaling of audio signals |
ATE527654T1 (en) | 2004-03-01 | 2011-10-15 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | MULTI-CHANNEL AUDIO CODING |
SE0400998D0 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2004-04-16 | Cooding Technologies Sweden Ab | Method for representing multi-channel audio signals |
KR101283525B1 (en) * | 2004-07-14 | 2013-07-15 | 돌비 인터네셔널 에이비 | Audio channel conversion |
US7508947B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2009-03-24 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Method for combining audio signals using auditory scene analysis |
CA2581810C (en) | 2004-10-26 | 2013-12-17 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Calculating and adjusting the perceived loudness and/or the perceived spectral balance of an audio signal |
KR101251426B1 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2013-04-05 | 돌비 레버러토리즈 라이쎈싱 코오포레이션 | Apparatus and method for encoding audio signals with decoding instructions |
AU2006266655B2 (en) * | 2005-06-30 | 2009-08-20 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Apparatus for encoding and decoding audio signal and method thereof |
US8082157B2 (en) * | 2005-06-30 | 2011-12-20 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Apparatus for encoding and decoding audio signal and method thereof |
TWI396188B (en) * | 2005-08-02 | 2013-05-11 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | Controlling spatial audio coding parameters as a function of auditory events |
CN101278598B (en) * | 2005-10-07 | 2011-05-25 | 松下电器产业株式会社 | Acoustic signal processing device and acoustic signal processing method |
TWI489886B (en) * | 2006-04-03 | 2015-06-21 | Lg Electronics Inc | A method of decoding for an audio signal and apparatus thereof |
TWI517562B (en) | 2006-04-04 | 2016-01-11 | 杜比實驗室特許公司 | Method, apparatus, and computer program for scaling the overall perceived loudness of a multichannel audio signal by a desired amount |
ATE448638T1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2009-11-15 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | AUDIO SIGNAL DECORRELATOR |
CA2648237C (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2013-02-05 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Audio gain control using specific-loudness-based auditory event detection |
WO2008039038A1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Apparatus and method for coding and decoding multi-object audio signal with various channel |
RU2413357C2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2011-02-27 | Долби Лэборетериз Лайсенсинг Корпорейшн | Processing dynamic properties of audio using retuning |
JP2008262021A (en) * | 2007-04-12 | 2008-10-30 | Hiromi Murakami | Phase switching device in electric musical instrument |
DE102007018032B4 (en) * | 2007-04-17 | 2010-11-11 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Generation of decorrelated signals |
JP5021809B2 (en) * | 2007-06-08 | 2012-09-12 | ドルビー ラボラトリーズ ライセンシング コーポレイション | Hybrid derivation of surround sound audio channels by controllably combining ambience signal components and matrix decoded signal components |
CN101790758B (en) | 2007-07-13 | 2013-01-09 | 杜比实验室特许公司 | Audio processing using auditory scene analysis and spectral skewness |
JP4471028B2 (en) * | 2007-09-03 | 2010-06-02 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program |
WO2009086174A1 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2009-07-09 | Srs Labs, Inc. | System for adjusting perceived loudness of audio signals |
JP5195652B2 (en) * | 2008-06-11 | 2013-05-08 | ソニー株式会社 | Signal processing apparatus, signal processing method, and program |
US8233629B2 (en) * | 2008-09-04 | 2012-07-31 | Dts, Inc. | Interaural time delay restoration system and method |
DE102008056704B4 (en) * | 2008-11-11 | 2010-11-04 | Institut für Rundfunktechnik GmbH | Method for generating a backwards compatible sound format |
JP5163545B2 (en) * | 2009-03-05 | 2013-03-13 | 富士通株式会社 | Audio decoding apparatus and audio decoding method |
CN101533641B (en) | 2009-04-20 | 2011-07-20 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method for correcting channel delay parameters of multichannel signals and device |
CN102307323B (en) * | 2009-04-20 | 2013-12-18 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method for modifying sound channel delay parameter of multi-channel signal |
WO2010126709A1 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2010-11-04 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Low complexity auditory event boundary detection |
WO2010148244A1 (en) | 2009-06-19 | 2010-12-23 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | User-specific features for an upgradeable media kernel and engine |
US8538042B2 (en) * | 2009-08-11 | 2013-09-17 | Dts Llc | System for increasing perceived loudness of speakers |
EP2503618B1 (en) * | 2011-03-23 | 2014-01-01 | Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | Composite material, light-emitting element, light-emitting device, electronic device, and lighting device |
US8804984B2 (en) * | 2011-04-18 | 2014-08-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Spectral shaping for audio mixing |
US9312829B2 (en) | 2012-04-12 | 2016-04-12 | Dts Llc | System for adjusting loudness of audio signals in real time |
EP2898510B1 (en) | 2012-09-19 | 2016-07-13 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Method, system and computer program for adaptive control of gain applied to an audio signal |
CA2893729C (en) | 2012-12-04 | 2019-03-12 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Audio providing apparatus and audio providing method |
EP2974253B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2019-05-08 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Normalization of soundfield orientations based on auditory scene analysis |
EP2811758B1 (en) | 2013-06-06 | 2016-11-02 | Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH | Audio signal mixing |
US10547960B2 (en) | 2014-09-01 | 2020-01-28 | Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation | Audio processing apparatus |
EP3257270B1 (en) * | 2015-03-27 | 2019-02-06 | Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Angewand | Apparatus and method for processing stereo signals for reproduction in cars to achieve individual three-dimensional sound by frontal loudspeakers |
US10045145B2 (en) * | 2015-12-18 | 2018-08-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Temporal offset estimation |
US10210871B2 (en) * | 2016-03-18 | 2019-02-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Audio processing for temporally mismatched signals |
CN110741435B (en) | 2017-06-27 | 2021-04-27 | 杜比国际公司 | Method, system, and medium for audio signal processing |
CN107682529B (en) * | 2017-09-07 | 2019-11-26 | 维沃移动通信有限公司 | A kind of acoustic signal processing method and mobile terminal |
EP3669556B1 (en) | 2017-10-16 | 2022-06-08 | Sony Europe B.V. | Audio processing |
US10462599B2 (en) * | 2018-03-21 | 2019-10-29 | Sonos, Inc. | Systems and methods of adjusting bass levels of multi-channel audio signals |
CN108495234B (en) * | 2018-04-19 | 2020-01-07 | 北京微播视界科技有限公司 | Multi-channel audio processing method, apparatus and computer-readable storage medium |
CN108597527B (en) * | 2018-04-19 | 2020-01-24 | 北京微播视界科技有限公司 | Multi-channel audio processing method, device, computer-readable storage medium and terminal |
CN112437957B (en) | 2018-07-27 | 2024-09-27 | 杜比实验室特许公司 | Forced gap insertion for full listening |
DE102018127071B3 (en) * | 2018-10-30 | 2020-01-09 | Harman Becker Automotive Systems Gmbh | Audio signal processing with acoustic echo cancellation |
EP3949368B1 (en) | 2019-04-03 | 2023-11-01 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Scalable voice scene media server |
Family Cites Families (61)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US586228A (en) * | 1897-07-13 | Mounting prism-lights | ||
JPS526601B2 (en) * | 1972-03-27 | 1977-02-23 | ||
JPS4935003A (en) * | 1972-08-03 | 1974-04-01 | ||
JPS5510654B2 (en) * | 1974-05-15 | 1980-03-18 | ||
US4624009A (en) * | 1980-05-02 | 1986-11-18 | Figgie International, Inc. | Signal pattern encoder and classifier |
US4464784A (en) * | 1981-04-30 | 1984-08-07 | Eventide Clockworks, Inc. | Pitch changer with glitch minimizer |
US5040081A (en) * | 1986-09-23 | 1991-08-13 | Mccutchen David | Audiovisual synchronization signal generator using audio signature comparison |
US5055939A (en) | 1987-12-15 | 1991-10-08 | Karamon John J | Method system & apparatus for synchronizing an auxiliary sound source containing multiple language channels with motion picture film video tape or other picture source containing a sound track |
US5235646A (en) * | 1990-06-15 | 1993-08-10 | Wilde Martin D | Method and apparatus for creating de-correlated audio output signals and audio recordings made thereby |
AU8053691A (en) | 1990-06-15 | 1992-01-07 | Auris Corp. | Method for eliminating the precedence effect in stereophonic sound systems and recording made with said method |
CA2085887A1 (en) | 1990-06-21 | 1991-12-22 | Kentyn Reynolds | Method and apparatus for wave analysis and event recognition |
SG49883A1 (en) * | 1991-01-08 | 1998-06-15 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | Encoder/decoder for multidimensional sound fields |
US5175769A (en) | 1991-07-23 | 1992-12-29 | Rolm Systems | Method for time-scale modification of signals |
DE69423922T2 (en) * | 1993-01-27 | 2000-10-05 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Sound signal processing arrangement for deriving a central channel signal and audio-visual reproduction system with such a processing arrangement |
US5956674A (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 1999-09-21 | Digital Theater Systems, Inc. | Multi-channel predictive subband audio coder using psychoacoustic adaptive bit allocation in frequency, time and over the multiple channels |
US6430533B1 (en) * | 1996-05-03 | 2002-08-06 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Audio decoder core MPEG-1/MPEG-2/AC-3 functional algorithm partitioning and implementation |
JPH1074097A (en) | 1996-07-26 | 1998-03-17 | Ind Technol Res Inst | Parameter changing method and device for audio signal |
US6049766A (en) | 1996-11-07 | 2000-04-11 | Creative Technology Ltd. | Time-domain time/pitch scaling of speech or audio signals with transient handling |
US5862228A (en) * | 1997-02-21 | 1999-01-19 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Audio matrix encoding |
US6211919B1 (en) * | 1997-03-28 | 2001-04-03 | Tektronix, Inc. | Transparent embedment of data in a video signal |
US6330672B1 (en) | 1997-12-03 | 2001-12-11 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for watermarking digital bitstreams |
GB2340351B (en) | 1998-07-29 | 2004-06-09 | British Broadcasting Corp | Data transmission |
US6266644B1 (en) | 1998-09-26 | 2001-07-24 | Liquid Audio, Inc. | Audio encoding apparatus and methods |
SE9903552D0 (en) | 1999-01-27 | 1999-10-01 | Lars Liljeryd | Efficient spectral envelope coding using dynamic scalefactor grouping and time / frequency switching |
US6760448B1 (en) * | 1999-02-05 | 2004-07-06 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Compatible matrix-encoded surround-sound channels in a discrete digital sound format |
FR2802329B1 (en) * | 1999-12-08 | 2003-03-28 | France Telecom | PROCESS FOR PROCESSING AT LEAST ONE AUDIO CODE BINARY FLOW ORGANIZED IN THE FORM OF FRAMES |
KR100898879B1 (en) | 2000-08-16 | 2009-05-25 | 돌비 레버러토리즈 라이쎈싱 코오포레이션 | Modulating One or More Parameter of An Audio or Video Perceptual Coding System in Response to Supplemental Information |
CA2420671C (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2011-12-13 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Method for apparatus for audio matrix decoding |
EP1410686B1 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2008-03-26 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Audio channel translation |
WO2004019656A2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2004-03-04 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Audio channel spatial translation |
US7461002B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2008-12-02 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Method for time aligning audio signals using characterizations based on auditory events |
US7711123B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2010-05-04 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Segmenting audio signals into auditory events |
EP1377967B1 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2013-04-10 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | High quality time-scaling and pitch-scaling of audio signals |
US7610205B2 (en) * | 2002-02-12 | 2009-10-27 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | High quality time-scaling and pitch-scaling of audio signals |
US7283954B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2007-10-16 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Comparing audio using characterizations based on auditory events |
MXPA03010237A (en) | 2001-05-10 | 2004-03-16 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | Improving transient performance of low bit rate audio coding systems by reducing pre-noise. |
JP4272050B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-06-03 | ドルビー・ラボラトリーズ・ライセンシング・コーポレーション | Audio comparison using characterization based on auditory events |
MXPA03010750A (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2004-07-01 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | High quality time-scaling and pitch-scaling of audio signals. |
TW569551B (en) * | 2001-09-25 | 2004-01-01 | Roger Wallace Dressler | Method and apparatus for multichannel logic matrix decoding |
JP4427937B2 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2010-03-10 | オンキヨー株式会社 | Acoustic signal processing circuit and acoustic reproduction device |
US20040037421A1 (en) | 2001-12-17 | 2004-02-26 | Truman Michael Mead | Parital encryption of assembled bitstreams |
CN1705980A (en) | 2002-02-18 | 2005-12-07 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | Parametric audio coding |
DE60326782D1 (en) | 2002-04-22 | 2009-04-30 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Decoding device with decorrelation unit |
EP2879299B1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2017-07-26 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | Multi-channel downmixing device |
CN1672464B (en) * | 2002-08-07 | 2010-07-28 | 杜比实验室特许公司 | Audio channel spatial translation |
DE10236694A1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-26 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Equipment for scalable coding and decoding of spectral values of signal containing audio and/or video information by splitting signal binary spectral values into two partial scaling layers |
US7454331B2 (en) | 2002-08-30 | 2008-11-18 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Controlling loudness of speech in signals that contain speech and other types of audio material |
US7676047B2 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2010-03-09 | Bose Corporation | Electroacoustical transducing with low frequency augmenting devices |
MXPA05008317A (en) | 2003-02-06 | 2005-11-04 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | Continuous backup audio. |
SG185134A1 (en) | 2003-05-28 | 2012-11-29 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | Method, apparatus and computer program for calculating and adjusting the perceived loudness of an audio signal |
US7398207B2 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2008-07-08 | Time Warner Interactive Video Group, Inc. | Methods and systems for determining audio loudness levels in programming |
US7394903B2 (en) * | 2004-01-20 | 2008-07-01 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. | Apparatus and method for constructing a multi-channel output signal or for generating a downmix signal |
ATE527654T1 (en) | 2004-03-01 | 2011-10-15 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | MULTI-CHANNEL AUDIO CODING |
US7617109B2 (en) | 2004-07-01 | 2009-11-10 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Method for correcting metadata affecting the playback loudness and dynamic range of audio information |
FR2872910B1 (en) | 2004-07-07 | 2006-10-13 | Nanoraptor Sa | OPTICAL COMPONENT FOR OBSERVING A NANOMETRIC SAMPLE, SYSTEM COMPRISING SUCH A COMPONENT, ANALYSIS METHOD USING THE SAME, AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF |
US7508947B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2009-03-24 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Method for combining audio signals using auditory scene analysis |
TW200638335A (en) | 2005-04-13 | 2006-11-01 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | Audio metadata verification |
TWI397903B (en) | 2005-04-13 | 2013-06-01 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | Economical loudness measurement of coded audio |
KR101251426B1 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2013-04-05 | 돌비 레버러토리즈 라이쎈싱 코오포레이션 | Apparatus and method for encoding audio signals with decoding instructions |
TWI396188B (en) | 2005-08-02 | 2013-05-11 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | Controlling spatial audio coding parameters as a function of auditory events |
CA2648237C (en) | 2006-04-27 | 2013-02-05 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Audio gain control using specific-loudness-based auditory event detection |
-
2004
- 2004-08-03 US US10/911,404 patent/US7508947B2/en active Active
-
2005
- 2005-07-13 ES ES05770949T patent/ES2346070T3/en active Active
- 2005-07-13 AU AU2005275257A patent/AU2005275257B2/en active Active
- 2005-07-13 PL PL05770949T patent/PL1787495T3/en unknown
- 2005-07-13 DK DK05770949.5T patent/DK1787495T3/en active
- 2005-07-13 CA CA2574834A patent/CA2574834C/en active Active
- 2005-07-13 CN CN2005800261496A patent/CN101002505B/en active Active
- 2005-07-13 EP EP05770949A patent/EP1787495B1/en active Active
- 2005-07-13 JP JP2007524817A patent/JP4740242B2/en active Active
- 2005-07-13 BR BRPI0514059-5A patent/BRPI0514059B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-07-13 KR KR1020077002358A patent/KR101161703B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-07-13 DE DE602005021648T patent/DE602005021648D1/en active Active
- 2005-07-13 AT AT05770949T patent/ATE470322T1/en active
- 2005-07-13 MX MX2007001262A patent/MX2007001262A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-07-13 WO PCT/US2005/024630 patent/WO2006019719A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-07-15 TW TW094124108A patent/TWI374435B/en active
- 2005-08-02 MY MYPI20053586A patent/MY139731A/en unknown
-
2007
- 2007-01-15 IL IL180712A patent/IL180712A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2007-06-07 HK HK07106095.4A patent/HK1101053A1/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4740242B2 (en) | 2011-08-03 |
PL1787495T3 (en) | 2010-10-29 |
TW200608352A (en) | 2006-03-01 |
MY139731A (en) | 2009-10-30 |
BRPI0514059A (en) | 2008-05-27 |
HK1101053A1 (en) | 2007-10-05 |
IL180712A0 (en) | 2007-06-03 |
ES2346070T3 (en) | 2010-10-08 |
ATE470322T1 (en) | 2010-06-15 |
KR101161703B1 (en) | 2012-07-03 |
IL180712A (en) | 2012-02-29 |
EP1787495A1 (en) | 2007-05-23 |
CA2574834A1 (en) | 2006-02-23 |
DK1787495T3 (en) | 2010-09-06 |
AU2005275257A1 (en) | 2006-02-23 |
US20060029239A1 (en) | 2006-02-09 |
TWI374435B (en) | 2012-10-11 |
EP1787495B1 (en) | 2010-06-02 |
MX2007001262A (en) | 2007-04-18 |
WO2006019719A1 (en) | 2006-02-23 |
CN101002505B (en) | 2011-08-10 |
KR20070049146A (en) | 2007-05-10 |
BRPI0514059B1 (en) | 2019-11-12 |
AU2005275257B2 (en) | 2011-02-03 |
US7508947B2 (en) | 2009-03-24 |
CN101002505A (en) | 2007-07-18 |
JP2008509600A (en) | 2008-03-27 |
DE602005021648D1 (en) | 2010-07-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2574834C (en) | Combining audio signals using auditory scene analysis | |
US11395085B2 (en) | Audio channel spatial translation | |
KR100635022B1 (en) | Multi-channel downmixing device | |
EP2614659B1 (en) | Upmixing method and system for multichannel audio reproduction | |
KR20160141765A (en) | Method and apparatus for rendering acoustic signal, and computer-readable recording medium | |
JP2011501486A (en) | Apparatus and method for generating a multi-channel signal including speech signal processing | |
US11115768B2 (en) | Binaural dialogue enhancement | |
US11388539B2 (en) | Method and device for audio signal processing for binaural virtualization | |
EP2984857A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for center signal scaling and stereophonic enhancement based on a signal-to-downmix ratio |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |