CA2568537C - Method for quantitative and/or comparative measurement of mrna expression levels in small biological samples - Google Patents
Method for quantitative and/or comparative measurement of mrna expression levels in small biological samples Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2568537C CA2568537C CA2568537A CA2568537A CA2568537C CA 2568537 C CA2568537 C CA 2568537C CA 2568537 A CA2568537 A CA 2568537A CA 2568537 A CA2568537 A CA 2568537A CA 2568537 C CA2568537 C CA 2568537C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- sequence
- amplification
- dna
- cdna
- sample
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 title claims abstract description 39
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 11
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 title claims description 13
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 title description 26
- 239000012472 biological sample Substances 0.000 title description 3
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 140
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 133
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 114
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 100
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 67
- 238000010839 reverse transcription Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 56
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 claims description 179
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 claims description 61
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 claims description 28
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 claims description 7
- 108091034117 Oligonucleotide Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 108091081021 Sense strand Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000011880 melting curve analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000003752 polymerase chain reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 108020004635 Complementary DNA Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000007515 enzymatic degradation Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 108091033319 polynucleotide Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- 102000040430 polynucleotide Human genes 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002157 polynucleotide Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000013518 transcription Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 102000053602 DNA Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 108700028369 Alleles Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 108060002716 Exonuclease Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 108020004682 Single-Stranded DNA Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N [3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-hydroxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methyl [5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-3-yl] hydrogen phosphate Polymers Cc1cn(C2CC(OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)C(COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3CO)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)O2)c(=O)[nH]c1=O JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 102000013165 exonuclease Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000002866 fluorescence resonance energy transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000007062 hydrolysis Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000006460 hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000007834 ligase chain reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000006166 lysate Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012175 pyrosequencing Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 108700026220 vif Genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000415 inactivating effect Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 239000013615 primer Substances 0.000 description 101
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 53
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 32
- 102000000424 Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 Human genes 0.000 description 27
- 108010016165 Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 Proteins 0.000 description 27
- 230000000692 anti-sense effect Effects 0.000 description 24
- 102000018690 Trypsinogen Human genes 0.000 description 18
- 108010027252 Trypsinogen Proteins 0.000 description 18
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 14
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 14
- 108010007577 Exodeoxyribonuclease I Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 102100029075 Exonuclease 1 Human genes 0.000 description 13
- 102000001776 Matrix metalloproteinase-9 Human genes 0.000 description 13
- 108010015302 Matrix metalloproteinase-9 Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 102000004504 Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 13
- 108010042352 Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 102000003990 Urokinase-type plasminogen activator Human genes 0.000 description 13
- 108090000435 Urokinase-type plasminogen activator Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 8
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 108010014303 DNA-directed DNA polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 102000016928 DNA-directed DNA polymerase Human genes 0.000 description 6
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 6
- DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N β‐Mercaptoethanol Chemical compound OCCS DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- RGWHQCVHVJXOKC-SHYZEUOFSA-J dCTP(4-) Chemical compound O=C1N=C(N)C=CN1[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP([O-])(=O)OP([O-])(=O)OP([O-])([O-])=O)[C@@H](O)C1 RGWHQCVHVJXOKC-SHYZEUOFSA-J 0.000 description 5
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 102100034343 Integrase Human genes 0.000 description 4
- TWRXJAOTZQYOKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium chloride Chemical compound [Mg+2].[Cl-].[Cl-] TWRXJAOTZQYOKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 229920001213 Polysorbate 20 Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 108010092799 RNA-directed DNA polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 4
- HAAZLUGHYHWQIW-KVQBGUIXSA-N dGTP Chemical compound C1=NC=2C(=O)NC(N)=NC=2N1[C@H]1C[C@H](O)[C@@H](COP(O)(=O)OP(O)(=O)OP(O)(O)=O)O1 HAAZLUGHYHWQIW-KVQBGUIXSA-N 0.000 description 4
- NHVNXKFIZYSCEB-XLPZGREQSA-N dTTP Chemical compound O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(O)(=O)OP(O)(=O)OP(O)(O)=O)[C@@H](O)C1 NHVNXKFIZYSCEB-XLPZGREQSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000256 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000010486 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- SCVFZCLFOSHCOH-UHFFFAOYSA-M potassium acetate Chemical compound [K+].CC([O-])=O SCVFZCLFOSHCOH-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 239000011541 reaction mixture Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 4
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011543 agarose gel Substances 0.000 description 3
- SUYVUBYJARFZHO-RRKCRQDMSA-N dATP Chemical compound C1=NC=2C(N)=NC=NC=2N1[C@H]1C[C@H](O)[C@@H](COP(O)(=O)OP(O)(=O)OP(O)(O)=O)O1 SUYVUBYJARFZHO-RRKCRQDMSA-N 0.000 description 3
- SUYVUBYJARFZHO-UHFFFAOYSA-N dATP Natural products C1=NC=2C(N)=NC=NC=2N1C1CC(O)C(COP(O)(=O)OP(O)(=O)OP(O)(O)=O)O1 SUYVUBYJARFZHO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethidium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229960005542 ethidium bromide Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002779 inactivation Effects 0.000 description 3
- JZLLRGCJEXHGNF-UHFFFAOYSA-M potassium;2-aminoacetic acid;hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[K+].NCC(O)=O JZLLRGCJEXHGNF-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000036647 reaction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000007790 solid phase Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000004881 tumor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229930182816 L-glutamine Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 238000012408 PCR amplification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229930182555 Penicillin Natural products 0.000 description 2
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000011530 RNeasy Mini Kit Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108010090804 Streptavidin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000013504 Triton X-100 Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920004890 Triton X-100 Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012298 atmosphere Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010804 cDNA synthesis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000004748 cultured cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000001351 cycling effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004925 denaturation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000036425 denaturation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000010195 expression analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012091 fetal bovine serum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910001629 magnesium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000002493 microarray Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005497 microtitration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007857 nested PCR Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108700025694 p53 Genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000001575 pathological effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940049954 penicillin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000011056 potassium acetate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003757 reverse transcription PCR Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108020004418 ribosomal RNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000002311 subsequent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- PIEPQKCYPFFYMG-UHFFFAOYSA-N tris acetate Chemical compound CC(O)=O.OCC(N)(CO)CO PIEPQKCYPFFYMG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000011534 wash buffer Substances 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000002260 Alkaline Phosphatase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020004774 Alkaline Phosphatase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091093088 Amplicon Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100275473 Caenorhabditis elegans ctc-3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000000018 DNA microarray Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003155 DNA primer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000238557 Decapoda Species 0.000 description 1
- 108700039887 Essential Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010056740 Genital discharge Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 1
- PKVZBNCYEICAQP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Mecamylamine hydrochloride Chemical compound Cl.C1CC2C(C)(C)C(NC)(C)C1C2 PKVZBNCYEICAQP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000012980 RPMI-1640 medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010240 RT-PCR analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 101150063325 ab gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004411 aluminium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002981 blocking agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000010897 colon adenocarcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000029742 colonic neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002380 cytological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002405 diagnostic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006911 enzymatic reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000706 filtrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008241 heterogeneous mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- UEGPKNKPLBYCNK-UHFFFAOYSA-L magnesium acetate Chemical compound [Mg+2].CC([O-])=O.CC([O-])=O UEGPKNKPLBYCNK-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000011654 magnesium acetate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000011285 magnesium acetate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940069446 magnesium acetate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000003211 malignant effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001531 micro-dissection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012775 microarray technology Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013188 needle biopsy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001821 nucleic acid purification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004962 physiological condition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011895 specific detection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011277 treatment modality Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6844—Nucleic acid amplification reactions
- C12Q1/6851—Quantitative amplification
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides a method for quantitative and/or comparative assessment of the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts present in a cell or tissue sample. In the method reverse transcription of the mRNA contained in the sample is first carried out using sequence-modifying primers for one or several genes in the same reaction to obtain a pool of sequence-modified cDNA
molecules. After completion of the reverse transcription redundant sequence-modifying primers are removed or inactivated. This step is followed by a step of co-amplifying the sequence-modified cDNA templates with a reference DNA
template in individual gene-specific amplification reactions. By quantitatively measuring the amounts and determining the relative levels of the amplification products derived from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates, a gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratio is obtained in each of the individual amplification reactions. Finally, by combining the ratios obtained, a sample-specific profile can be generated, which reflects the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts originally present in the sample.
molecules. After completion of the reverse transcription redundant sequence-modifying primers are removed or inactivated. This step is followed by a step of co-amplifying the sequence-modified cDNA templates with a reference DNA
template in individual gene-specific amplification reactions. By quantitatively measuring the amounts and determining the relative levels of the amplification products derived from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates, a gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratio is obtained in each of the individual amplification reactions. Finally, by combining the ratios obtained, a sample-specific profile can be generated, which reflects the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts originally present in the sample.
Description
Method for quantitative and/or comparative measurement of mRNA expression lev-els in small biological samples Field of the Invention The present invention relates to the diagnosis of pathological and physiological conditions in humans and to the monitoring of treatment as well as follow-up of such conditions. The invention also relates to the characterization of cell- or tissue-specific changes in gene-expression patterns and pathways in various conditions. The described technique enables comparative and/or quantitative measurement of mRNA transcripts contained in small cell or tissue samples.
Background of the Invention The development of technologies related to biological sciences has led to a rapid increase in available genetic information. The completion of the sequencing of the human genome and the Human Genome Project's policy of instant data accessibility has created a funda-ment for studying gene-expression in physiological and pathological conditions. Tech-niques such as gene expression microarrays, differential display polymerase chain reaction (DD-PCR) and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) together with statistical clustering algorithms have provided tools for characterization of gene-expression patterns and pathways. This has led to the defining of new subcategories of known diseases, based on gene expression profiles, with different prognoses and poten-tially different responses to specific drugs and other treatment modalities.
DNA microarray technology has been the main contributor to the rapidly accumulating gene expression data. Using this technology, gene expression-based classifications have been developed for several malignant diseases. At present, gene expression microarray technology, however, has major technical shortcomings as a diagnostic method in a clinical laboratory as it is fairly insensitive and the quantitative precision is only moderate.
Gene expression analysis in a clinical setting is subjected to specific technical challenges due to the characteristics of the different types of clinical samples. Solid tissue samples such as histological paraffin-embedded or frozen tissue specimen usually contain a hetero-geneous mixture of different cell types. Measurement of gene expression in a specific cell or tissue type within the sample requires isolation of cells or islets of cells from micro-scopic sections, e.g. by microdissection, or scoring of the relative amounts of different cell types present in sections cut from the sample. In needle biopsies and cytological samples the amount of sampled cells is usually small and the exact amount of cells is unknown. In blood samples the proportion of target cells is in many cases small and enrichment of spe-cific cell types in the samples is required. Messenger RNA (mRNA) recovery from these types of samples is often limited, thus increasing the sensitivity requirements on the tech-niques used for gene expression analysis. In addition, sample-to-sample variations in mRNA degradation and recovery occur during sample preparation and storage as well as during nucleic acid purification. In order to obtain comparable results from tissue samples obtained in vivo, normalization for sample-to-sample variations in mRNA levels and integ-rity is required.
qRT-PCR has been widely used to validate results on gene expression levels that have been obtained using gene expression microarrays. The sensitivity of qRT-PCR is sufficient for quantitative measurement of gene expression in samples containing minimal amounts of cells or even single cells. Because of the logarithmic nature of the amplification of nucleic acids during PCR, this technique is sensitive to tube-to-tube variations due to small differ-ences in reaction efficiencies. To overcome this problem, RNA or DNA internal control templates can be added to the samples to monitor the reaction efficiencies in individual reactions. Sample-to-sample variations in mRNA levels and integrity is typically con-trolled by normalizing mRNA expression levels of specific genes of interest against the expression levels of housekeeping genes or the amount of total RNA or ribosomal RNA
(rRNA) in the sample, or by comparative quantification of mRNA from multiple genes in the same sample.
A method of modifying the size of the cDNA template during reverse transcription in order to discriminate it from genomic DNA has been described by Joo et al. (in Journal of Vi-rological Methods 100 (2002) pages 71-81, and in patent application KR2002089746 A).
In this technique a size-modifying-anchor primer is used in the reverse transcription reac-tion to insert a modified primer-binding site into the generated cDNA. This technique re-lies on the assumption that genomic DNA remains double-stranded when reverse transcrip-tion is performed under non-denaturing conditions, and thus cannot function as a template for reverse transcription. In the amplification step the cDNA and genomic DNA
templates from the same gene are amplified using one common upstream primer and separate down-stream primers. The generated cDNA- and genomic DNA-derived amplicons differ in length to allow separate detection and quantification. Generally, RT-PCR
techniques re-quire amplification of a sequence that traverses at least one exon-exon boundary in order to enable separation of the cDNA- and genomic DNA-derived amplification products.
The technique described by Joo et al. enables differentiation of cDNA from its corresponding genomic DNA within the boundaries of a single exon after RT-PCR amplification.
It also allows comparison of relative levels of gene-specific mRNA and DNA.
The present invention provides a method for quantitative and/or comparative assessment of the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts present in a cell or tissue sample.
In this method sequence-modified cDNA templates are competitively co-amplified with a reference DNA
template using the very same primers. This enables using genomic DNA contained in, or added to the sample, as a universal reference template to normalize for tube-to-tube varia-tions in amplification efficiencies between separate gene-specific amplification reactions.
By quantitatively measuring the amounts and determining the relative levels of the ampli-fication products derived from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA
templates, a gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratio is obtained in each individual amplification reaction.
By combining the cDNA over DNA ratios for each of the analyzed genes, a sample-specific gene-expression profile is generated, that reflects the relative amounts of mRNA
transcripts originally present in the sample.
In the present invention, sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates are co-amplified with the very same primers in the same reaction vessels. Thus, the relative levels of the cDNA and reference template derived amplification products remain constant even when amplification reactions are run to the plateau phase. This enables optimization of the sensitivity of the assay for samples containing only minimal amounts of mRNA
transcripts.
Summary of the Invention The present invention provides a method, in which reverse transcription is carried out us-ing sequence-modifying primers for one or several genes in the same reaction to obtain a pool of sequence-modified cDNA molecules. The cDNA molecules are modified at one or several nucleotide positions without altering the primer-binding sites used in subsequent amplification reactions. After completion of the reverse transcription reaction redundant sequence-modifying primers are removed or inactivated, i.e. prevented from participating in subsequent amplification reactions. Individual amplification reactions are carried out for each of the analyzed genes, so that in each of the reactions sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates are co-amplified in a competitive manner, using the same gene-specific primers. The reference DNA template comprises genomic DNA contained in the analyzed sample or added to the sample prior to amplification. It can also comprise syn-thetic or cloned DNA. The sequence modifications generated during reverse transcription are incorporated in the cDNA-derived amplification products and used for separate detec-tion and determination of the ratio of the cDNA and reference DNA template-derived am-plification products in each of the individual amplification reactions. The gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratios determined in the individual amplification reactions are combined to generate a sample-specific profile of said ratios that reflects the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts originally present in the sample.
Consequently, the primary object of the present invention is a method for quantitative and/or comparative assessment of the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts present in a cell or tissue sample, which method is characterized by the steps (a) to (e) as defined in the appended claim 1. The different ways for implementing the method of the invention are described below.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 Schematic drawing showing the functional segments of the sequence-modifying primers.
Figure 2 Schematic drawing of the principle of the present invention. The reference DNA
template can be included in the reverse transcription step as shown (top panel), or it can be added prior to the amplification step. In the detection step (bottom panel) a dual-labeled hybridi-zation probe is shown for illustrative purposes. The present invention is, however, not de-pendent on any specific detection technique, but any method enabling separate quantitative detection of the cDNA and reference DNA template-derived amplification products can be used.
Figure 3 5 Measuring range of the assay for quantifying the relative levels of cDNA and reference DNA templates. 10-fold dilutions of cDNA, reverse transcribed from 109 copies of trypsi-nogen-1 cRNA and 103 copies of cloned trypsinogen DNA (upper panels) or genomic DNA from 500 cells (lower panels) were co-amplified in nested PCR reactions.
The ampli-fication products of the sequence-modified cDNA and genomic DNA were detected and quantified by solid-phase minisequencing. The measuring range of the assay more than two orders of magnitude (shown in black in the panels on the right-hand side).
The theo-retical cDNA template copy number is based on the assumption that the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was 100%.
Figure 4 Capacity of the minisequencing assay to discriminate between templates differing at single nucleotide positions. The PCR products derived from trypsinogen-1 cDNA (top panel), cloned trypsinogen-1 DNA (middle panel) and genomic DNA from tumor cells (bottom panel) were minisequenced with four different 3H-labelled nucleotides (dCTP, dGTP, dATP, and dTTP).
Figure 5 Reproducibility of the assay in analyzing an expression profile of genes in cultured cells.
Expression profile of MMP-2, MMP-9, uPA, uPAR, and p53 genes in cultured COLO
cells as analyzed in five separate experiments during a two months period. The sum of the cDNA to genomic DNA ratios of the individual genes in the each separate experiment is adjusted to 100.
Figure 6 Reproducibility of the assay in analyzing an expression profile of genes in cultured cells.
Expression profile of MMP-2, MMP-9, uPA, uPAR, and p53 genes in cultured COLO
cells as analyzed in five separate experiments during a two months period. The results rep-resent the mean values 1 standard errors from the five separate experiments.
The sum of the cDNA to genomic DNA ratios of the individual genes in the each separate experiment is adjusted to 100.
Figure 7 Measuring range of the assay for quantifying the relative levels of cDNA and reference DNA templates. 10-fold dilutions of cDNA, reverse transcribed from 109 copies of trypsi-nogen-2 (upper panel) or matrix-metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) (lower panel) cRNA
and 20 ng human genomic DNA were co-amplified in a PCR reaction on a LightCycler instru-ment. The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA
tem-plates were quantified by melting curve analysis on a LightCycler instrument.
The measur-ing range of the assay was more than two orders of magnitude (shown in black in the pan-els on the right-hand side). The theoretical cDNA template copy number is based on the assumption that the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was 100%.
Detailed Description of the Invention Samples and reference templates The present invention provides a method for quantitative and/or comparative assessment of the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts present in a cell or tissue sample.
The sample comprises a cell or tissue lysate or homogenate. The reference DNA template comprises genomic DNA contained in the sample or isolated from a separate source, or cloned or synthesized DNA oligo- or polynucleotides. When genomic DNA contained in the sample is used as a reference DNA template, RNA and genomic DNA can be isolated from the sample prior to reverse transcription. When genomic DNA contained in the sample is not used as a reference DNA template, RNA is isolated from the sample prior to reverse tran-scription. The reference DNA template is present in or added to each of the samples prior to amplification. The reference DNA template can be present in the sample during reverse transcription provided that it is double stranded. When the reference DNA
template is other than genomic DNA contained in the sample, it is preferably added in equal amounts to each of the samples after reverse transcription but prior to amplification.
Background of the Invention The development of technologies related to biological sciences has led to a rapid increase in available genetic information. The completion of the sequencing of the human genome and the Human Genome Project's policy of instant data accessibility has created a funda-ment for studying gene-expression in physiological and pathological conditions. Tech-niques such as gene expression microarrays, differential display polymerase chain reaction (DD-PCR) and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) together with statistical clustering algorithms have provided tools for characterization of gene-expression patterns and pathways. This has led to the defining of new subcategories of known diseases, based on gene expression profiles, with different prognoses and poten-tially different responses to specific drugs and other treatment modalities.
DNA microarray technology has been the main contributor to the rapidly accumulating gene expression data. Using this technology, gene expression-based classifications have been developed for several malignant diseases. At present, gene expression microarray technology, however, has major technical shortcomings as a diagnostic method in a clinical laboratory as it is fairly insensitive and the quantitative precision is only moderate.
Gene expression analysis in a clinical setting is subjected to specific technical challenges due to the characteristics of the different types of clinical samples. Solid tissue samples such as histological paraffin-embedded or frozen tissue specimen usually contain a hetero-geneous mixture of different cell types. Measurement of gene expression in a specific cell or tissue type within the sample requires isolation of cells or islets of cells from micro-scopic sections, e.g. by microdissection, or scoring of the relative amounts of different cell types present in sections cut from the sample. In needle biopsies and cytological samples the amount of sampled cells is usually small and the exact amount of cells is unknown. In blood samples the proportion of target cells is in many cases small and enrichment of spe-cific cell types in the samples is required. Messenger RNA (mRNA) recovery from these types of samples is often limited, thus increasing the sensitivity requirements on the tech-niques used for gene expression analysis. In addition, sample-to-sample variations in mRNA degradation and recovery occur during sample preparation and storage as well as during nucleic acid purification. In order to obtain comparable results from tissue samples obtained in vivo, normalization for sample-to-sample variations in mRNA levels and integ-rity is required.
qRT-PCR has been widely used to validate results on gene expression levels that have been obtained using gene expression microarrays. The sensitivity of qRT-PCR is sufficient for quantitative measurement of gene expression in samples containing minimal amounts of cells or even single cells. Because of the logarithmic nature of the amplification of nucleic acids during PCR, this technique is sensitive to tube-to-tube variations due to small differ-ences in reaction efficiencies. To overcome this problem, RNA or DNA internal control templates can be added to the samples to monitor the reaction efficiencies in individual reactions. Sample-to-sample variations in mRNA levels and integrity is typically con-trolled by normalizing mRNA expression levels of specific genes of interest against the expression levels of housekeeping genes or the amount of total RNA or ribosomal RNA
(rRNA) in the sample, or by comparative quantification of mRNA from multiple genes in the same sample.
A method of modifying the size of the cDNA template during reverse transcription in order to discriminate it from genomic DNA has been described by Joo et al. (in Journal of Vi-rological Methods 100 (2002) pages 71-81, and in patent application KR2002089746 A).
In this technique a size-modifying-anchor primer is used in the reverse transcription reac-tion to insert a modified primer-binding site into the generated cDNA. This technique re-lies on the assumption that genomic DNA remains double-stranded when reverse transcrip-tion is performed under non-denaturing conditions, and thus cannot function as a template for reverse transcription. In the amplification step the cDNA and genomic DNA
templates from the same gene are amplified using one common upstream primer and separate down-stream primers. The generated cDNA- and genomic DNA-derived amplicons differ in length to allow separate detection and quantification. Generally, RT-PCR
techniques re-quire amplification of a sequence that traverses at least one exon-exon boundary in order to enable separation of the cDNA- and genomic DNA-derived amplification products.
The technique described by Joo et al. enables differentiation of cDNA from its corresponding genomic DNA within the boundaries of a single exon after RT-PCR amplification.
It also allows comparison of relative levels of gene-specific mRNA and DNA.
The present invention provides a method for quantitative and/or comparative assessment of the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts present in a cell or tissue sample.
In this method sequence-modified cDNA templates are competitively co-amplified with a reference DNA
template using the very same primers. This enables using genomic DNA contained in, or added to the sample, as a universal reference template to normalize for tube-to-tube varia-tions in amplification efficiencies between separate gene-specific amplification reactions.
By quantitatively measuring the amounts and determining the relative levels of the ampli-fication products derived from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA
templates, a gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratio is obtained in each individual amplification reaction.
By combining the cDNA over DNA ratios for each of the analyzed genes, a sample-specific gene-expression profile is generated, that reflects the relative amounts of mRNA
transcripts originally present in the sample.
In the present invention, sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates are co-amplified with the very same primers in the same reaction vessels. Thus, the relative levels of the cDNA and reference template derived amplification products remain constant even when amplification reactions are run to the plateau phase. This enables optimization of the sensitivity of the assay for samples containing only minimal amounts of mRNA
transcripts.
Summary of the Invention The present invention provides a method, in which reverse transcription is carried out us-ing sequence-modifying primers for one or several genes in the same reaction to obtain a pool of sequence-modified cDNA molecules. The cDNA molecules are modified at one or several nucleotide positions without altering the primer-binding sites used in subsequent amplification reactions. After completion of the reverse transcription reaction redundant sequence-modifying primers are removed or inactivated, i.e. prevented from participating in subsequent amplification reactions. Individual amplification reactions are carried out for each of the analyzed genes, so that in each of the reactions sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates are co-amplified in a competitive manner, using the same gene-specific primers. The reference DNA template comprises genomic DNA contained in the analyzed sample or added to the sample prior to amplification. It can also comprise syn-thetic or cloned DNA. The sequence modifications generated during reverse transcription are incorporated in the cDNA-derived amplification products and used for separate detec-tion and determination of the ratio of the cDNA and reference DNA template-derived am-plification products in each of the individual amplification reactions. The gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratios determined in the individual amplification reactions are combined to generate a sample-specific profile of said ratios that reflects the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts originally present in the sample.
Consequently, the primary object of the present invention is a method for quantitative and/or comparative assessment of the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts present in a cell or tissue sample, which method is characterized by the steps (a) to (e) as defined in the appended claim 1. The different ways for implementing the method of the invention are described below.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 Schematic drawing showing the functional segments of the sequence-modifying primers.
Figure 2 Schematic drawing of the principle of the present invention. The reference DNA
template can be included in the reverse transcription step as shown (top panel), or it can be added prior to the amplification step. In the detection step (bottom panel) a dual-labeled hybridi-zation probe is shown for illustrative purposes. The present invention is, however, not de-pendent on any specific detection technique, but any method enabling separate quantitative detection of the cDNA and reference DNA template-derived amplification products can be used.
Figure 3 5 Measuring range of the assay for quantifying the relative levels of cDNA and reference DNA templates. 10-fold dilutions of cDNA, reverse transcribed from 109 copies of trypsi-nogen-1 cRNA and 103 copies of cloned trypsinogen DNA (upper panels) or genomic DNA from 500 cells (lower panels) were co-amplified in nested PCR reactions.
The ampli-fication products of the sequence-modified cDNA and genomic DNA were detected and quantified by solid-phase minisequencing. The measuring range of the assay more than two orders of magnitude (shown in black in the panels on the right-hand side).
The theo-retical cDNA template copy number is based on the assumption that the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was 100%.
Figure 4 Capacity of the minisequencing assay to discriminate between templates differing at single nucleotide positions. The PCR products derived from trypsinogen-1 cDNA (top panel), cloned trypsinogen-1 DNA (middle panel) and genomic DNA from tumor cells (bottom panel) were minisequenced with four different 3H-labelled nucleotides (dCTP, dGTP, dATP, and dTTP).
Figure 5 Reproducibility of the assay in analyzing an expression profile of genes in cultured cells.
Expression profile of MMP-2, MMP-9, uPA, uPAR, and p53 genes in cultured COLO
cells as analyzed in five separate experiments during a two months period. The sum of the cDNA to genomic DNA ratios of the individual genes in the each separate experiment is adjusted to 100.
Figure 6 Reproducibility of the assay in analyzing an expression profile of genes in cultured cells.
Expression profile of MMP-2, MMP-9, uPA, uPAR, and p53 genes in cultured COLO
cells as analyzed in five separate experiments during a two months period. The results rep-resent the mean values 1 standard errors from the five separate experiments.
The sum of the cDNA to genomic DNA ratios of the individual genes in the each separate experiment is adjusted to 100.
Figure 7 Measuring range of the assay for quantifying the relative levels of cDNA and reference DNA templates. 10-fold dilutions of cDNA, reverse transcribed from 109 copies of trypsi-nogen-2 (upper panel) or matrix-metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) (lower panel) cRNA
and 20 ng human genomic DNA were co-amplified in a PCR reaction on a LightCycler instru-ment. The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA
tem-plates were quantified by melting curve analysis on a LightCycler instrument.
The measur-ing range of the assay was more than two orders of magnitude (shown in black in the pan-els on the right-hand side). The theoretical cDNA template copy number is based on the assumption that the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was 100%.
Detailed Description of the Invention Samples and reference templates The present invention provides a method for quantitative and/or comparative assessment of the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts present in a cell or tissue sample.
The sample comprises a cell or tissue lysate or homogenate. The reference DNA template comprises genomic DNA contained in the sample or isolated from a separate source, or cloned or synthesized DNA oligo- or polynucleotides. When genomic DNA contained in the sample is used as a reference DNA template, RNA and genomic DNA can be isolated from the sample prior to reverse transcription. When genomic DNA contained in the sample is not used as a reference DNA template, RNA is isolated from the sample prior to reverse tran-scription. The reference DNA template is present in or added to each of the samples prior to amplification. The reference DNA template can be present in the sample during reverse transcription provided that it is double stranded. When the reference DNA
template is other than genomic DNA contained in the sample, it is preferably added in equal amounts to each of the samples after reverse transcription but prior to amplification.
Modification of the cDNA sequence during reverse transcription Reverse transcription of the mRNA contained in the sample is carried out using sequence-modifying primers for one or several genes in the same reaction to obtain a pool of se-quence-modified cDNA molecules. When a reference DNA template is present in the reac-tion mixture during reverse transcription, the reverse transcription reaction is carried out under non-denaturing conditions where DNA contained in the sample remains mainly dou-ble-stranded and does not function as a template for cDNA synthesis.
The sequence-modifying primers (Figure 1) comprise three functional segments;
a 5'-terminal segment comprising a nucleotide sequence, which is complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of a specific gene, and con-tains the complementary nucleotide sequence of the binding sites for the downstream primers used in subsequent amplification reactions, a central segment consisting of a nu-cleotide sequence comprising one or multiple nucleotides, which are non-complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of said gene, and a 3'-terminal segment comprising a nucleotide sequence, which is complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of said gene.
The generated cDNA thus contains a sequence modification comprising one or multiple nucleotide substitutions, insertions or deletions as compared with the antisense strand of the corresponding genomic DNA nucleotide sequence. The nucleotide sequence modifica-tions are located in such a manner that they will be incorporated in the amplification prod-ucts but do not affect the nucleotide sequence of the primer-binding sites used in the sub-sequent amplification reactions. This enables co-amplification of the modified cDNA tem-plates with a reference DNA template comprising genomic DNA, using the very same primers.
Removal or inactivation of redundant primers after reverse transcription After completion of the reverse transcription, it is essential to prevent redundant sequence-modifying primers from functioning as primers in the subsequent gene-specific amplifica-tion reactions. Any intact sequence-modifying primers transferred from the reverse tran-scription step to the amplification reactions could prime the amplification of the reference DNA template, causing modification of the nucleotide sequence in part of the reference DNA template-derived amplification product. Such modifications would be identical to the sequence-modification generated in the cDNA transcript during reverse transcription, ren-dering part of the reference DNA template-derived amplification products identical and thus indistinguishable from the amplification product derived from the sequence-modified cDNA template. Thus, quantification of the relative amounts of cDNA- and DNA-derived amplification products would not reflect the true amounts of sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates present in the sample prior to amplification.
Redundant sequence-modifying primers can be removed or inactivated, i.e.
prevented from functioning as primers in subsequent gene-specific amplification reactions by, for instance, enzymatic degradation using single-stranded DNA-specific exonuclease. As a result, sin-gle-stranded oligonucleotide primers are degraded but double-stranded mRNA-cDNA hy-brids and reference DNA contained in the sample are left intact.
Alternatively, redundant sequence-modifying primers can be physically removed from the sample by filtration or other means prior to the amplification step.
Any sequence-modifying primers transferred from the reverse transcription reactions to the gene-specific amplification reactions can also be prevented from functioning as primers by hybridization to blocking oligonucleotides or other agents that bind specifically to the 3'-terminal and/or central functional segments of the sequence-modifying primers.
Co-amplification of the sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates Following reverse transcription and removal or inactivation of redundant sequence-modifying primers, aliquots of the reaction mixture are transferred to separate amplifica-tion reactions. Individual amplification reactions are carried out in physically separate ves-sels for each of the analyzed genes, so that in each of the reactions sequence-modified cDNA templates are co-amplified with the same reference DNA template, using gene-specific primers to generate measurable amounts of amplification products. The cDNA and reference DNA templates in an individual amplification reaction are co-amplified in a competitive manner, using the very same primers. Amplification can be performed in a single reaction or in two consecutive reactions using nested primers. The binding sites of the amplification primers are preferably located on the same exon in order to generate cDNA and DNA derived amplification products of equal or close-to-equal length.
The binding sites of the amplification primers are located in such a manner that the sequence modification generated in the cDNA template will be incorporated in the amplification product. Co-amplification of the sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA
templates in the same reaction and with the very same primers results in close-to-equal amplification efficiencies for the two templates, even when amplification reactions are run to the plateau phase. As a result, the relative levels of amplification products deriving from sequence-modified cDNA templates and reference DNA templates in an individual gene-specific amplification reaction reflect the relative amounts of said templates originally present in the amplification reaction prior to amplification. Amplification can be carried out using polymerase chain reaction, ligase chain reaction, transcription-mediated amplification or any other enzymatic reaction that enables amplification of two similar templates in the same reaction in a competitive manner so that the sequence-modifications generated in the cDNA templates during reverse transcription are incorporated in the cDNA-derived ampli-fication products.
Detection and quantitative measurement of the amplification products deriving from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates In the present invention a modification in the nucleotide sequence of the cDNA
molecules is generated during reverse transcription. These sequence modifications are incorporated in the cDNA-derived amplification products and used to distinguish the cDNA-derived am-plification products from the reference DNA template-derived amplification products pre-sent in the same amplification reaction.
Quantitative measurement of the amplification products can be carried out during amplifi-cation (real-time or kinetic detection) using sequence-specific dual-labeled hydrolysis probes, fluorescence resonance energy-transfer probes, Molecular Beacon probes or any other technology that allows separate quantitative detection of the cDNA and reference DNA template-derived amplification products. Quantitative measurement of the amplifica-tion products can also be carried out after completion of the amplification reaction (end-point detection) using Minisequencing (single nucleotide primer extension), cyclic minise-quencing, Pyrosequencing , allele-specific primer extension, melting curve analysis, se-quence-specific hybridization probes, mass spectrometry, or any other technology that al-lows separate quantitative detection of the cDNA and reference DNA template-derived amplification products.
Interpretation of results 5 Co-amplification of the sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates in the same reaction with the very same primers results in close-to-equal amplification efficiency for the two templates even when amplification reactions are run to the plateau phase. As a result, the relative levels of amplification products deriving from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates in an individual gene-specific amplification reaction 10 remain constant throughout amplification, and reflect the relative amounts of said tem-plates originally present in the sample prior to amplification. By quantitatively measuring the amounts and determining the relative levels of the amplification products derived from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates, a gene-specific cDNA over DNA
ratio is obtained in each of the individual amplification reactions. A sample-specific profile is generated by combining the gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratios determined for each of the analyzed genes in the individual amplification reactions. The cDNA over DNA ra-tios in the sample-specific profiles reflect the relative amounts of mRNA
transcripts origi-nally present in the sample and can be used for comparative analysis of variations in the mRNA levels of the analyzed genes between separate samples. If genomic DNA
contained in the sample is used as a reference DNA template, potential variations in the copy number of the analyzed genes in the genome of the cells in the sample need to be taken into con-sideration.
Definitions The term "sequence-modifying primer" means an oligonucleotide primer that is used in the reverse transcription reaction in order to generate a nucleotide sequence modification in the cDNA sequence as compared with the wild type nucleotide sequence of a specific target gene. Gene-specific sequence-modifying primers for several different genes can be used in the same reverse transcription reaction to generate a pool of sequence-modified cDNA
molecules.
The sequence-modifying primers (Figure 1) comprise three functional segments;
a 5'-terminal segment comprising a nucleotide sequence, which is complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of a specific gene, and con-tains the complementary nucleotide sequence of the binding sites for the downstream primers used in subsequent amplification reactions, a central segment consisting of a nu-cleotide sequence comprising one or multiple nucleotides, which are non-complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of said gene, and a 3'-terminal segment comprising a nucleotide sequence, which is complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of said gene.
The generated cDNA thus contains a sequence modification comprising one or multiple nucleotide substitutions, insertions or deletions as compared with the antisense strand of the corresponding genomic DNA nucleotide sequence. The nucleotide sequence modifica-tions are located in such a manner that they will be incorporated in the amplification prod-ucts but do not affect the nucleotide sequence of the primer-binding sites used in the sub-sequent amplification reactions. This enables co-amplification of the modified cDNA tem-plates with a reference DNA template comprising genomic DNA, using the very same primers.
Removal or inactivation of redundant primers after reverse transcription After completion of the reverse transcription, it is essential to prevent redundant sequence-modifying primers from functioning as primers in the subsequent gene-specific amplifica-tion reactions. Any intact sequence-modifying primers transferred from the reverse tran-scription step to the amplification reactions could prime the amplification of the reference DNA template, causing modification of the nucleotide sequence in part of the reference DNA template-derived amplification product. Such modifications would be identical to the sequence-modification generated in the cDNA transcript during reverse transcription, ren-dering part of the reference DNA template-derived amplification products identical and thus indistinguishable from the amplification product derived from the sequence-modified cDNA template. Thus, quantification of the relative amounts of cDNA- and DNA-derived amplification products would not reflect the true amounts of sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates present in the sample prior to amplification.
Redundant sequence-modifying primers can be removed or inactivated, i.e.
prevented from functioning as primers in subsequent gene-specific amplification reactions by, for instance, enzymatic degradation using single-stranded DNA-specific exonuclease. As a result, sin-gle-stranded oligonucleotide primers are degraded but double-stranded mRNA-cDNA hy-brids and reference DNA contained in the sample are left intact.
Alternatively, redundant sequence-modifying primers can be physically removed from the sample by filtration or other means prior to the amplification step.
Any sequence-modifying primers transferred from the reverse transcription reactions to the gene-specific amplification reactions can also be prevented from functioning as primers by hybridization to blocking oligonucleotides or other agents that bind specifically to the 3'-terminal and/or central functional segments of the sequence-modifying primers.
Co-amplification of the sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates Following reverse transcription and removal or inactivation of redundant sequence-modifying primers, aliquots of the reaction mixture are transferred to separate amplifica-tion reactions. Individual amplification reactions are carried out in physically separate ves-sels for each of the analyzed genes, so that in each of the reactions sequence-modified cDNA templates are co-amplified with the same reference DNA template, using gene-specific primers to generate measurable amounts of amplification products. The cDNA and reference DNA templates in an individual amplification reaction are co-amplified in a competitive manner, using the very same primers. Amplification can be performed in a single reaction or in two consecutive reactions using nested primers. The binding sites of the amplification primers are preferably located on the same exon in order to generate cDNA and DNA derived amplification products of equal or close-to-equal length.
The binding sites of the amplification primers are located in such a manner that the sequence modification generated in the cDNA template will be incorporated in the amplification product. Co-amplification of the sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA
templates in the same reaction and with the very same primers results in close-to-equal amplification efficiencies for the two templates, even when amplification reactions are run to the plateau phase. As a result, the relative levels of amplification products deriving from sequence-modified cDNA templates and reference DNA templates in an individual gene-specific amplification reaction reflect the relative amounts of said templates originally present in the amplification reaction prior to amplification. Amplification can be carried out using polymerase chain reaction, ligase chain reaction, transcription-mediated amplification or any other enzymatic reaction that enables amplification of two similar templates in the same reaction in a competitive manner so that the sequence-modifications generated in the cDNA templates during reverse transcription are incorporated in the cDNA-derived ampli-fication products.
Detection and quantitative measurement of the amplification products deriving from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates In the present invention a modification in the nucleotide sequence of the cDNA
molecules is generated during reverse transcription. These sequence modifications are incorporated in the cDNA-derived amplification products and used to distinguish the cDNA-derived am-plification products from the reference DNA template-derived amplification products pre-sent in the same amplification reaction.
Quantitative measurement of the amplification products can be carried out during amplifi-cation (real-time or kinetic detection) using sequence-specific dual-labeled hydrolysis probes, fluorescence resonance energy-transfer probes, Molecular Beacon probes or any other technology that allows separate quantitative detection of the cDNA and reference DNA template-derived amplification products. Quantitative measurement of the amplifica-tion products can also be carried out after completion of the amplification reaction (end-point detection) using Minisequencing (single nucleotide primer extension), cyclic minise-quencing, Pyrosequencing , allele-specific primer extension, melting curve analysis, se-quence-specific hybridization probes, mass spectrometry, or any other technology that al-lows separate quantitative detection of the cDNA and reference DNA template-derived amplification products.
Interpretation of results 5 Co-amplification of the sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates in the same reaction with the very same primers results in close-to-equal amplification efficiency for the two templates even when amplification reactions are run to the plateau phase. As a result, the relative levels of amplification products deriving from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates in an individual gene-specific amplification reaction 10 remain constant throughout amplification, and reflect the relative amounts of said tem-plates originally present in the sample prior to amplification. By quantitatively measuring the amounts and determining the relative levels of the amplification products derived from sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates, a gene-specific cDNA over DNA
ratio is obtained in each of the individual amplification reactions. A sample-specific profile is generated by combining the gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratios determined for each of the analyzed genes in the individual amplification reactions. The cDNA over DNA ra-tios in the sample-specific profiles reflect the relative amounts of mRNA
transcripts origi-nally present in the sample and can be used for comparative analysis of variations in the mRNA levels of the analyzed genes between separate samples. If genomic DNA
contained in the sample is used as a reference DNA template, potential variations in the copy number of the analyzed genes in the genome of the cells in the sample need to be taken into con-sideration.
Definitions The term "sequence-modifying primer" means an oligonucleotide primer that is used in the reverse transcription reaction in order to generate a nucleotide sequence modification in the cDNA sequence as compared with the wild type nucleotide sequence of a specific target gene. Gene-specific sequence-modifying primers for several different genes can be used in the same reverse transcription reaction to generate a pool of sequence-modified cDNA
molecules.
The term "co-amplification" means simultaneous amplification of two or multiple cDNA
and/or DNA templates with differing nucleotide sequences within the generated amplifica-tion products. A prerequisite for co-amplification as the term is used in this patent applica-tion is that templates have identical nucleotide sequences at the primer-binding sites used in the amplification reaction and that amplification of the said templates is carried out in a competitive manner with the same primers and other reagents, in the same reaction vessel.
The term "reference DNA template" means a DNA template that is included in each ampli-fication reaction and serves to normalize for tube-to-tube variations in amplification effi-ciency. Reference DNA templates comprise genomic DNA contained in or added to the sample, or a pool of gene-specific templates such as cloned or synthesized DNA
oligo- or polynucleotides for each of the analyzed genes. The sequence-modified cDNA and refer-ence DNA templates in an individual amplification reaction are co-amplified in a competi-tive manner, using the same primers. Gene-specific synthetic or cloned reference DNA
templates can be concatenated by ligation or other means to form a single polynucleotide that functions as a universal reference DNA template for several genes.
The term "removal or inactivation of redundant sequence-modifying primers"
means for the purposes of this invention any action taken to prevent redundant sequence-modifying primers from functioning as primers in the gene-specific amplification reactions subse-quent to the reverse transcription reaction. Such actions may be, for instance, enzymatic degradation of the primers, physical separation of the primers from the sample, or hybridi-zation of the primers to any appropriate blocking agent.
The present invention is described in more detail in the following examples, which are presented for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered to limit the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art can easily apply the principles of the invention for different applications.
and/or DNA templates with differing nucleotide sequences within the generated amplifica-tion products. A prerequisite for co-amplification as the term is used in this patent applica-tion is that templates have identical nucleotide sequences at the primer-binding sites used in the amplification reaction and that amplification of the said templates is carried out in a competitive manner with the same primers and other reagents, in the same reaction vessel.
The term "reference DNA template" means a DNA template that is included in each ampli-fication reaction and serves to normalize for tube-to-tube variations in amplification effi-ciency. Reference DNA templates comprise genomic DNA contained in or added to the sample, or a pool of gene-specific templates such as cloned or synthesized DNA
oligo- or polynucleotides for each of the analyzed genes. The sequence-modified cDNA and refer-ence DNA templates in an individual amplification reaction are co-amplified in a competi-tive manner, using the same primers. Gene-specific synthetic or cloned reference DNA
templates can be concatenated by ligation or other means to form a single polynucleotide that functions as a universal reference DNA template for several genes.
The term "removal or inactivation of redundant sequence-modifying primers"
means for the purposes of this invention any action taken to prevent redundant sequence-modifying primers from functioning as primers in the gene-specific amplification reactions subse-quent to the reverse transcription reaction. Such actions may be, for instance, enzymatic degradation of the primers, physical separation of the primers from the sample, or hybridi-zation of the primers to any appropriate blocking agent.
The present invention is described in more detail in the following examples, which are presented for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered to limit the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art can easily apply the principles of the invention for different applications.
Example 1 Experimental design and proving the principle The experiment was conducted in order to define the measuring range of the assay over a range of cDNA/DNA ratios. In this experiment the principle of the present invention was proven by analyzing a dilution series of sequence-modified cDNA reverse-transcribed from the cRNA of a single gene in relation to the reference DNA template which was A) a fixed amount of cloned DNA copies from the same gene or B) genomic DNA.
Preparative steps Trypsinogen-1 DNA clone containing bases 46-714 of trypsinogen-1 cDNA sequence was generated from pancreatic cDNA (Clontech) by PCR. The sequence of the DNA
clone was checked by sequencing from both ends on an ABI Prism 310 genetic analyzer, (Applied Biosystems) using the ABI Prism dye terminator cycle sequencing core kit and AmpliTaq DNA polymerase. Trypsinogen-1 cRNA was generated by in vitro transcription using trypsinogen-1 DNA clone as a template (Epicentre Technologies), and purified by RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Tumor cells were grown at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere with 5%
CO2. The cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine and 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 gg/ml streptomycin. Genomic DNA from these cells was extracted by RNA/DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen).
The analytical procedure Reverse transcription Reverse transcription was performed using ThermoScript Rnase H- Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions in a 20- l reaction volume in cDNA synthesis buffer (50 mM Tris acetate, pH 8.4; 75 mM potassium acetate; 40 mM
magnesium acetate), 5 mM DTT, 1 mM dNTP, 20 pmol of sequence-modifying antisense primer to create a single nucleotide C to G substitution in the generated cDNA
(5'-CAC
ATA GTT GTA GAC CTT GGT GTA GAC TCG AGG C), 7.5 U of ThermoScript RT, and 5x109 copies of trypsinogen-1 cRNA. The reaction mixture was incubated at 65 C for 50 min and at 85 C for 5 min.
Preparative steps Trypsinogen-1 DNA clone containing bases 46-714 of trypsinogen-1 cDNA sequence was generated from pancreatic cDNA (Clontech) by PCR. The sequence of the DNA
clone was checked by sequencing from both ends on an ABI Prism 310 genetic analyzer, (Applied Biosystems) using the ABI Prism dye terminator cycle sequencing core kit and AmpliTaq DNA polymerase. Trypsinogen-1 cRNA was generated by in vitro transcription using trypsinogen-1 DNA clone as a template (Epicentre Technologies), and purified by RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Tumor cells were grown at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere with 5%
CO2. The cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine and 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 gg/ml streptomycin. Genomic DNA from these cells was extracted by RNA/DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen).
The analytical procedure Reverse transcription Reverse transcription was performed using ThermoScript Rnase H- Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions in a 20- l reaction volume in cDNA synthesis buffer (50 mM Tris acetate, pH 8.4; 75 mM potassium acetate; 40 mM
magnesium acetate), 5 mM DTT, 1 mM dNTP, 20 pmol of sequence-modifying antisense primer to create a single nucleotide C to G substitution in the generated cDNA
(5'-CAC
ATA GTT GTA GAC CTT GGT GTA GAC TCG AGG C), 7.5 U of ThermoScript RT, and 5x109 copies of trypsinogen-1 cRNA. The reaction mixture was incubated at 65 C for 50 min and at 85 C for 5 min.
Exonuclease I treatment Following reverse transcription, the unbound sequence-modifying reverse transcription primers were cleaved by exonuclease I (New England Biolabs) in a 25- l reaction volume in 1 x restriction buffer (67 mM Glycine-KOH, 6.7 mM MgC12, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, pH 9.5) and with 20 U of exonuclease I at 37 C for 60 min and at 80 C
for 20 min. The exonuclease I treated cDNA was serially diluted 10-fold prior to amplifi-cation.
Nested polymerase chain reaction 5 gl of each of the dilutions of the reverse transcription product were amplified with A) 103 copies of trypsinogen-1 DNA clone and B) genomic DNA from 500 tumor cells in a 45- l reaction volume in 1 x PCR buffer (10 mM tris-HCI, pH 8.8, 1.5 mM MgC12, 50 mM
KCI, 0.1% Triton X-100; Finnzymes), containing 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 20 pmol of the sense primer (5'-TGA TTC TGG TGG CCC TGT-3') and the antisense primer (CAC ATA GTT
GTA GAC CTT GGT G), and 2 U of Dynazyme II DNA polymerase (Finnzymes) by first denaturing the templates for 5 min at 95 C and then amplifying them for 35 cycles at 95 C for 1 min and at 55 C for 1 min. Then, 3 gl of the first amplification product was fur-ther amplified in a 75- l reaction volume using 7.6 pmol of the biotinylated nested sense primer (BIO-5'-CTG GTG GCC CTG TGG TCT-3') and 76 pmol of the nested antisense primer (5'-AGA CCT TGG TGT AGA CTC-3') with the same PCR program as the first PCR. Three controls containing 103 copies of trypsinogen-1 DNA clone, genomic DNA
from 500 cells, and sequence modified cDNA reverse transcribed from 109 copies of trypsinogen-1 cRNA, respectively, were included in the experiment. A 15- l aliquot of the PCR product was separated in 1.5 % agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide in order to exclude non-specific amplification.
Quantitative detection by minisequencing The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and reference DNA
templates were detected by a modification of a solid-phase minisequencing reaction using 3H-labeled nucleotides (Syvanen et al., Genomics (1990) 8:684-692; Ihalainen et al., Biotechniques (1994) 16:938-943; Suomalainen and Syvanen, Methods Mol. Biol. (1998) 86:121-131).
Following PCR amplification, 10 gl of the PCR product was captured on a streptavidin-coated scintillating microtitration plate wells (Perkin-Elmer Wallac) with 40 gl of buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 20 mM Na-phosphate pH 7.4 and 0.1% Tween-20) per well. The samples were incubated for 1 h at room temperature (RT) with gentle shaking after which the plate was washed four times with a buffer containing 40 mM Tris-HC1 (pH 8.8), 1 mM
EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) with an automatic microplate washer (Tecan 96 PW).
The bound PCR products were denatured with 100 gl of 50 mM NaOH for 5 min at RT.
The wells were then washed four times with the washing buffer.
The minisequencing reaction mixture, containing the detection step primer (5'-GTA GAC
CTT GGT GTA GAC TC-3') at 0.2 gM concentration, the appropriate 3H dNTPs (dCTP
for the amplification products deriving from the reference DNA templates and dGTP for the amplification product deriving from the sequence modified cDNA) (Amersham Biosci-ences) at 0.02 gM concentration and 0.5 U of Dynazyme DNA polymerase in 100 gl of 1 x PCR buffer were added to wells. The wells were incubated at 55 C for 15 min with gentle shaking. The wells were washed four times with the washing buffer and the incorporated radioactivity was measured in a beta counter MicroBeta (EG&G Wallac) and expressed as counts per minute (CPM). Amplification products deriving from the controls were minise-quenced with four different 3H dNTPs (dGTP, dCTP, dATP, and dTTP). The minisequenc-ing analysis for each sample was performed in two parallel reactions for each of the nu-cleotides.
Results To determine the measuring range of the assay, 10-fold dilutions of the cDNA
transcribed from 109 copies of trypsinogen-1 cRNA and the reference DNA template (103 copies of cloned trypsinogen-1 DNA or genomic DNA from 500 cells) were co-amplified. All nested PCR amplification reactions were run to the plateau phase. The measuring range of the assay was more than two orders of magnitude, ranging from a theoretical cDNA
to DNA
ratio of less than 1:1 (103 copies of cDNA and 103 copies of cloned DNA or genomic DNA
from 500 cells) to over 100:1 (105 copies of cDNA and 103 copies of cloned DNA
or ge-nomic DNA from 500 cells). The theoretical cDNA template copy number is based on the assumption that the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was 100%.
(Figure 3).
The minisequencing assay provided accurate discrimination of single nucleotide sequence differences in the separately amplified trypsinogen-1 cDNA, cloned trypsinogen-1 DNA, and genomic DNA products. The amplification product of trypsinogen-1 cDNA was de-tected with 3H-labelled dGTP while those of cloned trypsinogen-1 DNA and genomic DNA were detected with 3H-labelled dCTP. Mispriming of the minisequencing detection primers was excluded by minisequencing all the amplification products with 3H-labelled 5 dATP and dTTP. (Figure 4).
Example 2 Experimental design and proving the principle The experiment was conducted in order to test the reproducibility of the assay in analyzing 10 a gene expression profile in a cell line. In this experiment the expression profiles of five genes (matrix-metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), urokinase-type plasminogen activator recep-tor (uPAR) and p53) in COLO 205 human colon adenocarcinoma cells was analyzed by first conducting a multiplexed reverse transcription step of mRNA extracted from the 15 COLO 205 cells with sequence-modifying primers for each of the five genes.
This was followed by individual gene-specific amplification reactions, so that in each of the reac-tions sequence-modified cDNA and genomic DNA, which served as reference DNA
tem-plate, were co-amplified in a competitive manner, using the same gene-specific primers.
The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA
templates were detected and quantified by cyclic minisequencing (Jarvelainen et al., Hepatology (2001), 33:1148-1153). The gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratios determined in the indi-vidual amplification reactions were combined to generate a profile of said ratios that re-flected the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts originally present in the sample.
Preparative steps COLO 205 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA) were grown at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. The cells were maintained in medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine and 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 gg/ml streptomycin. For each of the experiments, the same mRNA sample extracted from COLO 205 using Oligotex Direct mRNA Kit (Qiagen) was used. Human genomic DNA was purchased from Roche Diagnostic (Mannheim, Ger-many).
for 20 min. The exonuclease I treated cDNA was serially diluted 10-fold prior to amplifi-cation.
Nested polymerase chain reaction 5 gl of each of the dilutions of the reverse transcription product were amplified with A) 103 copies of trypsinogen-1 DNA clone and B) genomic DNA from 500 tumor cells in a 45- l reaction volume in 1 x PCR buffer (10 mM tris-HCI, pH 8.8, 1.5 mM MgC12, 50 mM
KCI, 0.1% Triton X-100; Finnzymes), containing 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 20 pmol of the sense primer (5'-TGA TTC TGG TGG CCC TGT-3') and the antisense primer (CAC ATA GTT
GTA GAC CTT GGT G), and 2 U of Dynazyme II DNA polymerase (Finnzymes) by first denaturing the templates for 5 min at 95 C and then amplifying them for 35 cycles at 95 C for 1 min and at 55 C for 1 min. Then, 3 gl of the first amplification product was fur-ther amplified in a 75- l reaction volume using 7.6 pmol of the biotinylated nested sense primer (BIO-5'-CTG GTG GCC CTG TGG TCT-3') and 76 pmol of the nested antisense primer (5'-AGA CCT TGG TGT AGA CTC-3') with the same PCR program as the first PCR. Three controls containing 103 copies of trypsinogen-1 DNA clone, genomic DNA
from 500 cells, and sequence modified cDNA reverse transcribed from 109 copies of trypsinogen-1 cRNA, respectively, were included in the experiment. A 15- l aliquot of the PCR product was separated in 1.5 % agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide in order to exclude non-specific amplification.
Quantitative detection by minisequencing The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and reference DNA
templates were detected by a modification of a solid-phase minisequencing reaction using 3H-labeled nucleotides (Syvanen et al., Genomics (1990) 8:684-692; Ihalainen et al., Biotechniques (1994) 16:938-943; Suomalainen and Syvanen, Methods Mol. Biol. (1998) 86:121-131).
Following PCR amplification, 10 gl of the PCR product was captured on a streptavidin-coated scintillating microtitration plate wells (Perkin-Elmer Wallac) with 40 gl of buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 20 mM Na-phosphate pH 7.4 and 0.1% Tween-20) per well. The samples were incubated for 1 h at room temperature (RT) with gentle shaking after which the plate was washed four times with a buffer containing 40 mM Tris-HC1 (pH 8.8), 1 mM
EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) with an automatic microplate washer (Tecan 96 PW).
The bound PCR products were denatured with 100 gl of 50 mM NaOH for 5 min at RT.
The wells were then washed four times with the washing buffer.
The minisequencing reaction mixture, containing the detection step primer (5'-GTA GAC
CTT GGT GTA GAC TC-3') at 0.2 gM concentration, the appropriate 3H dNTPs (dCTP
for the amplification products deriving from the reference DNA templates and dGTP for the amplification product deriving from the sequence modified cDNA) (Amersham Biosci-ences) at 0.02 gM concentration and 0.5 U of Dynazyme DNA polymerase in 100 gl of 1 x PCR buffer were added to wells. The wells were incubated at 55 C for 15 min with gentle shaking. The wells were washed four times with the washing buffer and the incorporated radioactivity was measured in a beta counter MicroBeta (EG&G Wallac) and expressed as counts per minute (CPM). Amplification products deriving from the controls were minise-quenced with four different 3H dNTPs (dGTP, dCTP, dATP, and dTTP). The minisequenc-ing analysis for each sample was performed in two parallel reactions for each of the nu-cleotides.
Results To determine the measuring range of the assay, 10-fold dilutions of the cDNA
transcribed from 109 copies of trypsinogen-1 cRNA and the reference DNA template (103 copies of cloned trypsinogen-1 DNA or genomic DNA from 500 cells) were co-amplified. All nested PCR amplification reactions were run to the plateau phase. The measuring range of the assay was more than two orders of magnitude, ranging from a theoretical cDNA
to DNA
ratio of less than 1:1 (103 copies of cDNA and 103 copies of cloned DNA or genomic DNA
from 500 cells) to over 100:1 (105 copies of cDNA and 103 copies of cloned DNA
or ge-nomic DNA from 500 cells). The theoretical cDNA template copy number is based on the assumption that the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was 100%.
(Figure 3).
The minisequencing assay provided accurate discrimination of single nucleotide sequence differences in the separately amplified trypsinogen-1 cDNA, cloned trypsinogen-1 DNA, and genomic DNA products. The amplification product of trypsinogen-1 cDNA was de-tected with 3H-labelled dGTP while those of cloned trypsinogen-1 DNA and genomic DNA were detected with 3H-labelled dCTP. Mispriming of the minisequencing detection primers was excluded by minisequencing all the amplification products with 3H-labelled 5 dATP and dTTP. (Figure 4).
Example 2 Experimental design and proving the principle The experiment was conducted in order to test the reproducibility of the assay in analyzing 10 a gene expression profile in a cell line. In this experiment the expression profiles of five genes (matrix-metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), urokinase-type plasminogen activator recep-tor (uPAR) and p53) in COLO 205 human colon adenocarcinoma cells was analyzed by first conducting a multiplexed reverse transcription step of mRNA extracted from the 15 COLO 205 cells with sequence-modifying primers for each of the five genes.
This was followed by individual gene-specific amplification reactions, so that in each of the reac-tions sequence-modified cDNA and genomic DNA, which served as reference DNA
tem-plate, were co-amplified in a competitive manner, using the same gene-specific primers.
The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA
templates were detected and quantified by cyclic minisequencing (Jarvelainen et al., Hepatology (2001), 33:1148-1153). The gene-specific cDNA over DNA ratios determined in the indi-vidual amplification reactions were combined to generate a profile of said ratios that re-flected the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts originally present in the sample.
Preparative steps COLO 205 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA) were grown at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. The cells were maintained in medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine and 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 gg/ml streptomycin. For each of the experiments, the same mRNA sample extracted from COLO 205 using Oligotex Direct mRNA Kit (Qiagen) was used. Human genomic DNA was purchased from Roche Diagnostic (Mannheim, Ger-many).
The analytical procedure Reverse transcription Reverse transcription was performed using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitro-gen) according to the manufacturer's instructions by first combining in a 12-l reaction volume 2 pmol of each of the sequence-modifying antisense primers to create a single nu-cleotide A to G substitution (underlined) in the generated cDNA (5'-GGG AAT
GGT TGA
AGG GAG GGG CGG GGA G-3' (MMP-2), 5'-AAA GGT TAG AGA ATC CAA GTT
TGT TAG A-3' (MMP-9), 5'-ATT CAG TGT AAG GAG TGG TCC TCG CCC CA-3' (uPA), 5'-CAA CAC AAC AGC GGC AAC AAT ATT GAT AAT (uPAR), and 5'-AAG
GGT GGG GTG AAA ATG CGG ATG T-3' (p53)), 0.5 mM dNTP, and mRNA extracted from 105 COLO 205 cells and incubating at 65 C for 5 min. After this the RT
reaction was continued in a 20- l reaction volume in first-strand buffer (50 mM Tris acetate, pH
8.3; 75 mM potassium acetate; 3 mM magnesium chloride) containing 10 mM DTT
and 200 U of SuperScript RT at 42 C for 50 min after which the reaction was inactivated by heating at 70 C for 15 min.
Exonuclease I treatment Following reverse transcription, the unbound sequence-modifying reverse transcription primers were degraded by exonuclease I (New England Biolabs) in a 25- l reaction vol-ume in 1 x restriction buffer (67 mM Glycine-KOH, 6.7 mM MgC12, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, pH 9.5) and with 20 U of exonuclease I at 37 C for 60 min and at 80 C
for 20 min.
Polymerase chain reaction 2.5 gl of the reverse transcription product was co-amplified with 2 ng of human genomic DNA in separate gene-specific amplification reactions in a 25- l reaction volume in 1 x PCR buffer (10 mM tris-HCI, pH 8.8, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCI, 0.1% Triton X-100;
Finnzymes), containing 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 20 pmol of the sense primer (5'-CTG GAT
GGA GGA AAA CCA AG-3' (MMP-2), 5'-TGG GCC CTC TCT TCT CA-3' (MMP-9), 5'-TTG GCC AGT TAT CCC TTC-3' (uPA), 5'-GAA GAG AAA AGC TGG AGG AAG
G-3' (uPAR), or 5'-TGG AGC TGG AAG GGT CAA-3' (p53)), 20 pmol of the antisense primer (5'-GGG AAT GGT TGA AGG GAG-3' (MMP-2), 5'-AAA GGT TAG AGA
GGT TGA
AGG GAG GGG CGG GGA G-3' (MMP-2), 5'-AAA GGT TAG AGA ATC CAA GTT
TGT TAG A-3' (MMP-9), 5'-ATT CAG TGT AAG GAG TGG TCC TCG CCC CA-3' (uPA), 5'-CAA CAC AAC AGC GGC AAC AAT ATT GAT AAT (uPAR), and 5'-AAG
GGT GGG GTG AAA ATG CGG ATG T-3' (p53)), 0.5 mM dNTP, and mRNA extracted from 105 COLO 205 cells and incubating at 65 C for 5 min. After this the RT
reaction was continued in a 20- l reaction volume in first-strand buffer (50 mM Tris acetate, pH
8.3; 75 mM potassium acetate; 3 mM magnesium chloride) containing 10 mM DTT
and 200 U of SuperScript RT at 42 C for 50 min after which the reaction was inactivated by heating at 70 C for 15 min.
Exonuclease I treatment Following reverse transcription, the unbound sequence-modifying reverse transcription primers were degraded by exonuclease I (New England Biolabs) in a 25- l reaction vol-ume in 1 x restriction buffer (67 mM Glycine-KOH, 6.7 mM MgC12, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, pH 9.5) and with 20 U of exonuclease I at 37 C for 60 min and at 80 C
for 20 min.
Polymerase chain reaction 2.5 gl of the reverse transcription product was co-amplified with 2 ng of human genomic DNA in separate gene-specific amplification reactions in a 25- l reaction volume in 1 x PCR buffer (10 mM tris-HCI, pH 8.8, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCI, 0.1% Triton X-100;
Finnzymes), containing 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 20 pmol of the sense primer (5'-CTG GAT
GGA GGA AAA CCA AG-3' (MMP-2), 5'-TGG GCC CTC TCT TCT CA-3' (MMP-9), 5'-TTG GCC AGT TAT CCC TTC-3' (uPA), 5'-GAA GAG AAA AGC TGG AGG AAG
G-3' (uPAR), or 5'-TGG AGC TGG AAG GGT CAA-3' (p53)), 20 pmol of the antisense primer (5'-GGG AAT GGT TGA AGG GAG-3' (MMP-2), 5'-AAA GGT TAG AGA
ATC CAA GTT-3' (MMP-9), 5'-ATT CAG TGT AAG GAG TGG TC-3' (uPA), 5'-CAA
CAC AAC AGC GGC AAC AA-3' (uPAR), or 5'-AAG GGT GGG GTG AAA ATG-3' (p53)), and 2 U of Dynazyme II DNA polymerase (Finnzymes) by first denaturing the templates for 5 min at 95 C and then amplifying them for 35 cycles at 95 C
for 1 min and at 55 C for 1 min. Contamination of mRNA samples with cDNA was excluded by per-forming control reactions without reverse transcriptase for each of the samples. A 15- l aliquot of the PCR product was separated in 2 % agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide in order to exclude non-specific amplification.
Quantitative detection by cyclic minisequencing The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA
templates were detected by cyclic minisequencing described by Jarvelainen et al.
(Hepatology, 2001, 33:1148-1153), a modification of solid-phase minisequencing using 3H-labeled nucleotides (Syvanen et al., Genomics (1990), 8:684-692; Ihalainen et al., Biotechniques (1994), 16:938-943; Suomalainen and Syvanen, Methods Mol. Biol. (1998), 86:121-131) with mi-nor modifications. Following PCR amplification, the unreacted dNTPs and primers were removed by adding 1 U of shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Roche) and 5 U of exonuclease I
directly to the PCR reaction. The degradation of primers and dNTPs was performed at 37 C for 30 min, after which the enzymes were inactivated by incubation at 80 C for 15 min. The enzyme-treated PCR products were then filtered together with 220 gl of water using Microcon-96 YM filtrate assembly with YM-30 filter units (50 bp cut-off for double-stranded DNA) and then washed twice with 250 gl of water. Finally, the retentates were recovered by centrifuging and the volumes were adjusted to 50 l. Four aliquots, 5 gl each, of the filtered PCR products were transferred to 96-well PCR plates (Thermo-Fast 96, Ab-gene, Epsom, Surrey, England) containing reagents for the cyclic minisequencing reaction.
These wells contained 3 pmol of the biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer (5'Biotin-TTC CCG CTC AGC CCT CCC-3' (MMP-2), 5'Biotin-TTG TTT TTT GTT GGA GTG
TTT CTA A-3' (MMP-9), 5'Biotin-CCA ATC CTC ACT GGG TGG GG-3' (uPA), 5'Biotin-ATG GGA GAG CTC TTG TTA TTA T-3' (uPAR), or 5'Biotin-TTT TAC ATT
CTG CAA GCA CAT C-3' (p53)), 2 pmol of the 3H-labeled nucleotides, dCTP or dTTP, and 0.5 U of Dynazyme DNA polymerase in 15 gl of Dynazyme buffer.
CAC AAC AGC GGC AAC AA-3' (uPAR), or 5'-AAG GGT GGG GTG AAA ATG-3' (p53)), and 2 U of Dynazyme II DNA polymerase (Finnzymes) by first denaturing the templates for 5 min at 95 C and then amplifying them for 35 cycles at 95 C
for 1 min and at 55 C for 1 min. Contamination of mRNA samples with cDNA was excluded by per-forming control reactions without reverse transcriptase for each of the samples. A 15- l aliquot of the PCR product was separated in 2 % agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide in order to exclude non-specific amplification.
Quantitative detection by cyclic minisequencing The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA
templates were detected by cyclic minisequencing described by Jarvelainen et al.
(Hepatology, 2001, 33:1148-1153), a modification of solid-phase minisequencing using 3H-labeled nucleotides (Syvanen et al., Genomics (1990), 8:684-692; Ihalainen et al., Biotechniques (1994), 16:938-943; Suomalainen and Syvanen, Methods Mol. Biol. (1998), 86:121-131) with mi-nor modifications. Following PCR amplification, the unreacted dNTPs and primers were removed by adding 1 U of shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Roche) and 5 U of exonuclease I
directly to the PCR reaction. The degradation of primers and dNTPs was performed at 37 C for 30 min, after which the enzymes were inactivated by incubation at 80 C for 15 min. The enzyme-treated PCR products were then filtered together with 220 gl of water using Microcon-96 YM filtrate assembly with YM-30 filter units (50 bp cut-off for double-stranded DNA) and then washed twice with 250 gl of water. Finally, the retentates were recovered by centrifuging and the volumes were adjusted to 50 l. Four aliquots, 5 gl each, of the filtered PCR products were transferred to 96-well PCR plates (Thermo-Fast 96, Ab-gene, Epsom, Surrey, England) containing reagents for the cyclic minisequencing reaction.
These wells contained 3 pmol of the biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer (5'Biotin-TTC CCG CTC AGC CCT CCC-3' (MMP-2), 5'Biotin-TTG TTT TTT GTT GGA GTG
TTT CTA A-3' (MMP-9), 5'Biotin-CCA ATC CTC ACT GGG TGG GG-3' (uPA), 5'Biotin-ATG GGA GAG CTC TTG TTA TTA T-3' (uPAR), or 5'Biotin-TTT TAC ATT
CTG CAA GCA CAT C-3' (p53)), 2 pmol of the 3H-labeled nucleotides, dCTP or dTTP, and 0.5 U of Dynazyme DNA polymerase in 15 gl of Dynazyme buffer.
The plate was covered with the aluminium sealing tape (Adhesive PCR Foil Seal, Abgene), and the cyclic primer extension was performed by cycling at 96 C for 10 s and at 57 C for s, for 50 cycles. After cycling, the whole cyclic minisequencing reactions were trans-ferred to streptavidin-coated scintillating microtitration plate wells (Perkin-Elmer Wallac) 5 with 20 gl of buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 20 mM Na-phosphate pH 7.4 and 0.1 % Tween-20) per well. The samples were incubated for 1 h at room temperature (RT) with gentle shaking after which the plate was washed once with TENT buffer (40 mM Tris-HC1 (pH
8.8), 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 % Tween-20) with an automatic microplate washer (Tecan 96 PW), once with 50 mM NaOH for 5 min at RT, and once again with TENT buffer.
The 10 incorporated radioactivity was measured in a beta counter MicroBeta (EG&G
Wallac) and expressed as counts per minute (CPM). The minisequencing analysis for each sample was performed in two parallel reactions for each of the labeled nucleotides.
Results The assay is reproducible as shown in Figures 5 and 6. The mean values and standard er-rors were 13.5 and 2.4, respectively, for MMP-2, 1.7 and 0.8 for MMP-9, 8.5 and 0.7 for uPA, 31.2 and 2.5 for uPAR, and 48.1 and 2.9 for p53 (Figure 6).
Example 3 Experimental design and proving the principle The experiment was conducted in order to define the measuring range of the assay over a range of cDNA/DNA ratios. In this experiment the principle of the present invention was proven by analyzing a dilution series of sequence-modified cDNA reverse-transcribed from the cRNA of a single gene in relation to the reference DNA template which was 20 ng of human genomic DNA corresponding to about 104 copies of each gene. PCR
was per-formed on a LightCycler instrument (Roche Applied Science) and the amplification prod-ucts of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA templates were detected and quantified by melting curve analysis on the LightCycler instrument.
Preparative steps Full-length trypsinogen-2 and MMP-2 cDNA clones were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. The sequences of the cDNA clones were checked by sequencing from both ends on an ABI Prism 310 genetic analyzer, (Applied Biosystems) using the ABI
Prism dye terminator cycle sequencing core kit and AmpliTaq DNA polymerase.
Trypsi-nogen-2 and MMP-2 cRNAs were generated by in vitro transcription using trypsinogen-2 and MMP-2 cDNA clones as templates (Epicentre Technologies), and purified by RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen).
The analytical procedure Reverse transcription Reverse transcription was performed using DyNAmo Capillary SYBR Green 2-step qRT-PCR Kit (Finnzymes) according to the manufacturer's instructions using the sequence-modifying antisense primers to create five (trypsinogen-2) or six (MMP-2) nucleotide A to G or T to C substitutions (underlined) in the generated cDNA (5'-CCA CAC AGA
ACA
TGT TGC TGG CGG CCC TTC CA-3' (trypsinogen-2) and 5'-GAA GAG ACT CGG
TAG GGA CAC GCC GGG CGG AGT GA-3' (MMP-2)) using 5x109 copies of trypsino-gen-2 or MMP-2 cRNA as templates.
Exonuclease I treatment Following reverse transcription, the unbound sequence-modifying reverse transcription primers were degraded by exonuclease I (New England Biolabs) in a 25- l reaction vol-ume in 1 x restriction buffer (67 mM Glycine-KOH, 6.7 mM MgC12, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, pH 9.5) and with 20 U of exonuclease I at 37 C for 60 min and at 80 C
for 20 min. The exonuclease I treated cDNA was serially diluted 10-fold prior to amplifi-cation.
Polymerase chain reaction 2.5 gl of each of the dilutions of the exonuclease I treated reverse transcription products were amplified with 20 ng of human genomic DNA in gene-specific amplification reac-tions using DyNAmo Capillary SYBR Green 2-step qRT-PCR Kit (Finnzymes) according to the manufacturer's instructions using primers 5'-GCC AGG CTA AGT GTG AAG-3' (trypsinogen-2 sense), 5'-CCA CAC AGA ACA TGT TGC T-3' (trypsinogen-2 antisense), 5'-CTG GAT GGA GGA AAA CCA AG-3' (MMP-2 sense), 5'-GGG AAT GGT TGA
AGG GAG-3' (MMP-2 antisense) for 30 cycles. PCR was performed in a LightCycler in-strument (Roche Applied Science) for 30 cycles with denaturation at 95 C (15 s hold) and annealing at 57 C (1 min hold). The temperature transition rate was 20 C/s, and fluores-cence was acquired at the end of annealing. Contamination of cRNA samples with cDNA
was excluded by performing control reactions without reverse transcriptase for each of the 5 samples. A 15- l aliquot of the PCR product was separated in 2 % agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide in order to exclude non-specific amplification.
Melting curve acquisition and analysis The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA
templates 10 were detected and quantified by melting curve analysis on the LightCycler instrument im-mediately following amplification with an additional denaturation at 95 C with a 0 s hold, cooling at a rate of 20 C/s to 57 C, and a continuous melting curve acquisition during a 0.1 C/s ramp to 98 C. A derivative melting curve plot was obtained with the use of default settings of the LightCycler software.
Results By using the sequence-modifying primers to create five or six nucleotide A to G or T to C
substitutions in the generated cDNAs, we were able to detect and quantify the amplifica-tion products of the cDNAs and genomic DNA, differing in their melting temperatures by approximately 4 C, using melting curve analysis. To determine the measuring range of the assay, 10-fold dilutions of the cDNA transcribed from 109 copies of trypsinogen-2 cRNA
or MMP-2 cRNA were co-amplified with 20 ng of human genomic DNA. The measuring range of the assay for trypsinogen-2 was more than two orders of magnitude, ranging from a theoretical cDNA to DNA ratio of less than 10:1 (105 copies of cDNA and 20 ng of hu-man genomic DNA corresponding to about 104 copies of the gene) to over 1000:1 (107 cop-ies of cDNA and 20 ng of human genomic DNA corresponding to about 104 copies of the gene). The measuring range of the assay for MMP-2 was more than two orders of magni-tude, ranging from a theoretical cDNA to DNA ratio of less than 1:10 (103 copies of cDNA
and 20 ng of human genomic DNA corresponding to about 104 copies of the gene) to over 10:1 (105 copies of cDNA and 20 ng of human genomic DNA corresponding to about copies of the gene). The theoretical cDNA template copy number is based on the assump-tion that the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was 100%.
(Figure 7).
SEQUENCE LISTING
<110> Stenman, Jakob Paju, Annukka Rissanen, Oso Orpana, Arto <120> Method for quantitative and/or comparative measurement of mRNA
expression levels in small biological samples <130> 068483-383130 <140> PCT/F12005/050176 <141> 2005-05-25 <150> 20040723 <151> 2004-05-26 <160> 32 <170> Patentln version 3.1 <210> 1 <211> 34 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 1 cacatagttg tagaccttgg tgtagactcg aggc 34 <210> 2 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> sense primer <400> 2 tgattctggt ggccctgt 18 <210> 3 <211> 22 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> antisense primer <400> 3 cacatagttg tagaccttgg tg 22 <210> 4 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> nested sense primer <400> 4 ctggtggccc tgtggtct 18 <210> 5 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> nested antisense primer <400> 5 agaccttggt gtagactc 18 <210> 6 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> detection step primer <400> 6 gtagaccttg gtgtagactc 20 <210> 7 <211> 28 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 7 gggaatggtt gaagggaggg gcggggag 28 <210> 8 <211> 28 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-9 sequence modifying antisense primer <400> 8 aaaggttaga gaatccaagt ttgttaga 28 <210> 9 <211> 29 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPA sequence-mofifying antisense primer <400> 9 attcagtgta aggagtggtc ctcgcccca 29 <210> 10 <211> 30 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPAR sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 10 caacacaaca gcggcaacaa tattgataat 30 <210> 11 <211> 25 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> p53 sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 11 aagggtgggg tgaaaatgcg gatgt 25 <210> 12 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 sense primer <400> 12 ctggatggag gaaaaccaag 20 <210> 13 <211> 17 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-9 sense primer <400> 13 tgggccctct cttctca 17 <210> 14 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPA sense primer <400> 14 ttggccagtt atcccttc 18 <210> 15 <211> 22 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPAR sense primer <400> 15 gaagagaaaa gctggaggaa gg 22 <210> 16 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> p53 sense primer <400> 16 tggagctgga agggtcaa 18 <210> 17 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223>
<400> 17 gggaatggtt gaagggag 18 <210> 18 <211> 21 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-9 antisense primer <400> 18 aaaggttaga gaatccaagt t 21 <210> 19 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPA antisense primer <400> 19 attcagtgta aggagtggtc 20 <210> 20 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPAR antisense primer <400> 20 caacacaaca gcggcaacaa 20 <210> 21 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> p53 antisense primer <400> 21 aagggtgggg tgaaaatg 18 <210> 22 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 22 ttcccgctca gccctccc 18 <210> 23 <211> 25 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-9 biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 23 ttgttttttg ttggagtgtt tctaa 25 <210> 24 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPA biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 24 ccaatcctca ctgggtgggg 20 <210> 25 <211> 22 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPAR biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 25 atgggagagc tcttgttatt at 22 <210> 26 <211> 22 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> p53 biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 26 ttttacattc tgcaagcaca tc 22 <210> 27 <211> 32 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> trypsinogen-2 sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 27 ccacacagaa catgttgctg gcggcccttc ca 32 <210> 28 <211> 35 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 28 gaagagactc ggtagggaca cgccgggcgg agtga 35 <210> 29 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> trypsinogen-2 sense primer <400> 29 gccaggctaa gtgtgaag 18 <210> 30 <211> 19 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> trypsinogen-2-antisense primer <400> 30 ccacacagaa catgttgct 19 <210> 31 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 sense primer <400> 31 ctggatggag gaaaaccaag 20 <210> 32 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 antisense primer <400> 32 gggaatggtt gaagggag 18
8.8), 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 % Tween-20) with an automatic microplate washer (Tecan 96 PW), once with 50 mM NaOH for 5 min at RT, and once again with TENT buffer.
The 10 incorporated radioactivity was measured in a beta counter MicroBeta (EG&G
Wallac) and expressed as counts per minute (CPM). The minisequencing analysis for each sample was performed in two parallel reactions for each of the labeled nucleotides.
Results The assay is reproducible as shown in Figures 5 and 6. The mean values and standard er-rors were 13.5 and 2.4, respectively, for MMP-2, 1.7 and 0.8 for MMP-9, 8.5 and 0.7 for uPA, 31.2 and 2.5 for uPAR, and 48.1 and 2.9 for p53 (Figure 6).
Example 3 Experimental design and proving the principle The experiment was conducted in order to define the measuring range of the assay over a range of cDNA/DNA ratios. In this experiment the principle of the present invention was proven by analyzing a dilution series of sequence-modified cDNA reverse-transcribed from the cRNA of a single gene in relation to the reference DNA template which was 20 ng of human genomic DNA corresponding to about 104 copies of each gene. PCR
was per-formed on a LightCycler instrument (Roche Applied Science) and the amplification prod-ucts of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA templates were detected and quantified by melting curve analysis on the LightCycler instrument.
Preparative steps Full-length trypsinogen-2 and MMP-2 cDNA clones were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. The sequences of the cDNA clones were checked by sequencing from both ends on an ABI Prism 310 genetic analyzer, (Applied Biosystems) using the ABI
Prism dye terminator cycle sequencing core kit and AmpliTaq DNA polymerase.
Trypsi-nogen-2 and MMP-2 cRNAs were generated by in vitro transcription using trypsinogen-2 and MMP-2 cDNA clones as templates (Epicentre Technologies), and purified by RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen).
The analytical procedure Reverse transcription Reverse transcription was performed using DyNAmo Capillary SYBR Green 2-step qRT-PCR Kit (Finnzymes) according to the manufacturer's instructions using the sequence-modifying antisense primers to create five (trypsinogen-2) or six (MMP-2) nucleotide A to G or T to C substitutions (underlined) in the generated cDNA (5'-CCA CAC AGA
ACA
TGT TGC TGG CGG CCC TTC CA-3' (trypsinogen-2) and 5'-GAA GAG ACT CGG
TAG GGA CAC GCC GGG CGG AGT GA-3' (MMP-2)) using 5x109 copies of trypsino-gen-2 or MMP-2 cRNA as templates.
Exonuclease I treatment Following reverse transcription, the unbound sequence-modifying reverse transcription primers were degraded by exonuclease I (New England Biolabs) in a 25- l reaction vol-ume in 1 x restriction buffer (67 mM Glycine-KOH, 6.7 mM MgC12, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, pH 9.5) and with 20 U of exonuclease I at 37 C for 60 min and at 80 C
for 20 min. The exonuclease I treated cDNA was serially diluted 10-fold prior to amplifi-cation.
Polymerase chain reaction 2.5 gl of each of the dilutions of the exonuclease I treated reverse transcription products were amplified with 20 ng of human genomic DNA in gene-specific amplification reac-tions using DyNAmo Capillary SYBR Green 2-step qRT-PCR Kit (Finnzymes) according to the manufacturer's instructions using primers 5'-GCC AGG CTA AGT GTG AAG-3' (trypsinogen-2 sense), 5'-CCA CAC AGA ACA TGT TGC T-3' (trypsinogen-2 antisense), 5'-CTG GAT GGA GGA AAA CCA AG-3' (MMP-2 sense), 5'-GGG AAT GGT TGA
AGG GAG-3' (MMP-2 antisense) for 30 cycles. PCR was performed in a LightCycler in-strument (Roche Applied Science) for 30 cycles with denaturation at 95 C (15 s hold) and annealing at 57 C (1 min hold). The temperature transition rate was 20 C/s, and fluores-cence was acquired at the end of annealing. Contamination of cRNA samples with cDNA
was excluded by performing control reactions without reverse transcriptase for each of the 5 samples. A 15- l aliquot of the PCR product was separated in 2 % agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide in order to exclude non-specific amplification.
Melting curve acquisition and analysis The amplification products of the sequence modified cDNA and genomic DNA
templates 10 were detected and quantified by melting curve analysis on the LightCycler instrument im-mediately following amplification with an additional denaturation at 95 C with a 0 s hold, cooling at a rate of 20 C/s to 57 C, and a continuous melting curve acquisition during a 0.1 C/s ramp to 98 C. A derivative melting curve plot was obtained with the use of default settings of the LightCycler software.
Results By using the sequence-modifying primers to create five or six nucleotide A to G or T to C
substitutions in the generated cDNAs, we were able to detect and quantify the amplifica-tion products of the cDNAs and genomic DNA, differing in their melting temperatures by approximately 4 C, using melting curve analysis. To determine the measuring range of the assay, 10-fold dilutions of the cDNA transcribed from 109 copies of trypsinogen-2 cRNA
or MMP-2 cRNA were co-amplified with 20 ng of human genomic DNA. The measuring range of the assay for trypsinogen-2 was more than two orders of magnitude, ranging from a theoretical cDNA to DNA ratio of less than 10:1 (105 copies of cDNA and 20 ng of hu-man genomic DNA corresponding to about 104 copies of the gene) to over 1000:1 (107 cop-ies of cDNA and 20 ng of human genomic DNA corresponding to about 104 copies of the gene). The measuring range of the assay for MMP-2 was more than two orders of magni-tude, ranging from a theoretical cDNA to DNA ratio of less than 1:10 (103 copies of cDNA
and 20 ng of human genomic DNA corresponding to about 104 copies of the gene) to over 10:1 (105 copies of cDNA and 20 ng of human genomic DNA corresponding to about copies of the gene). The theoretical cDNA template copy number is based on the assump-tion that the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was 100%.
(Figure 7).
SEQUENCE LISTING
<110> Stenman, Jakob Paju, Annukka Rissanen, Oso Orpana, Arto <120> Method for quantitative and/or comparative measurement of mRNA
expression levels in small biological samples <130> 068483-383130 <140> PCT/F12005/050176 <141> 2005-05-25 <150> 20040723 <151> 2004-05-26 <160> 32 <170> Patentln version 3.1 <210> 1 <211> 34 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 1 cacatagttg tagaccttgg tgtagactcg aggc 34 <210> 2 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> sense primer <400> 2 tgattctggt ggccctgt 18 <210> 3 <211> 22 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> antisense primer <400> 3 cacatagttg tagaccttgg tg 22 <210> 4 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> nested sense primer <400> 4 ctggtggccc tgtggtct 18 <210> 5 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> nested antisense primer <400> 5 agaccttggt gtagactc 18 <210> 6 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> detection step primer <400> 6 gtagaccttg gtgtagactc 20 <210> 7 <211> 28 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 7 gggaatggtt gaagggaggg gcggggag 28 <210> 8 <211> 28 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-9 sequence modifying antisense primer <400> 8 aaaggttaga gaatccaagt ttgttaga 28 <210> 9 <211> 29 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPA sequence-mofifying antisense primer <400> 9 attcagtgta aggagtggtc ctcgcccca 29 <210> 10 <211> 30 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPAR sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 10 caacacaaca gcggcaacaa tattgataat 30 <210> 11 <211> 25 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> p53 sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 11 aagggtgggg tgaaaatgcg gatgt 25 <210> 12 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 sense primer <400> 12 ctggatggag gaaaaccaag 20 <210> 13 <211> 17 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-9 sense primer <400> 13 tgggccctct cttctca 17 <210> 14 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPA sense primer <400> 14 ttggccagtt atcccttc 18 <210> 15 <211> 22 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPAR sense primer <400> 15 gaagagaaaa gctggaggaa gg 22 <210> 16 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> p53 sense primer <400> 16 tggagctgga agggtcaa 18 <210> 17 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223>
<400> 17 gggaatggtt gaagggag 18 <210> 18 <211> 21 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-9 antisense primer <400> 18 aaaggttaga gaatccaagt t 21 <210> 19 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPA antisense primer <400> 19 attcagtgta aggagtggtc 20 <210> 20 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPAR antisense primer <400> 20 caacacaaca gcggcaacaa 20 <210> 21 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> p53 antisense primer <400> 21 aagggtgggg tgaaaatg 18 <210> 22 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 22 ttcccgctca gccctccc 18 <210> 23 <211> 25 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-9 biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 23 ttgttttttg ttggagtgtt tctaa 25 <210> 24 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPA biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 24 ccaatcctca ctgggtgggg 20 <210> 25 <211> 22 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> uPAR biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 25 atgggagagc tcttgttatt at 22 <210> 26 <211> 22 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> p53 biotinylated cyclic minisequencing primer <400> 26 ttttacattc tgcaagcaca tc 22 <210> 27 <211> 32 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> trypsinogen-2 sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 27 ccacacagaa catgttgctg gcggcccttc ca 32 <210> 28 <211> 35 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 sequence-modifying antisense primer <400> 28 gaagagactc ggtagggaca cgccgggcgg agtga 35 <210> 29 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> trypsinogen-2 sense primer <400> 29 gccaggctaa gtgtgaag 18 <210> 30 <211> 19 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> trypsinogen-2-antisense primer <400> 30 ccacacagaa catgttgct 19 <210> 31 <211> 20 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 sense primer <400> 31 ctggatggag gaaaaccaag 20 <210> 32 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> artificial sequence <220>
<223> MMP-2 antisense primer <400> 32 gggaatggtt gaagggag 18
Claims (19)
1. A method for quantitative and/or comparative assessment of the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts present in a cell or tissue sample, comprising:
(a) carrying out reverse transcription of the mRNA contained in the sample using sequence-modifying primers for several genes in the same reaction to obtain a pool of sequence-modified cDNA molecules, wherein the sequence-modifying primers are oligonucleotides comprising three functional segments:
(i) a 5'-terminal segment comprising a nucleotide sequence which is complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of a specific gene and contains the complementary nucleotide sequence of the binding sites for the downstream primers used in subsequent amplification reactions, (ii) a central segment consisting of a nucleotide sequence comprising one or multiple nucleotides which are non-complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of said gene, and (iii) a 3'-terminal segment comprising a nucleotide sequence which is complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of said gene;
(b) removing or inactivating redundant sequence-modifying primers after completion of the reverse transcription;
(c) carrying out individual amplification reactions for each of the analyzed genes so that, in each of the reactions, sequence-modified cDNA templates are co-amplified with a reference DNA template using gene-specific primers to generate measurable amounts of amplification products, wherein the cDNA and reference DNA templates in an individual amplification reaction are co-amplified in a competitive manner using the same primers;
(d) quantitatively measuring the amounts and determining the relative levels of the amplification products derived from the sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA
templates to obtain a gene-specific cDNA-over-DNA ratio in each of the individual amplification reactions; and (e) combining the gene-specific cDNA- over-DNA ratios determined in the individual amplification reactions to generate a sample-specific profile of said ratios that reflects the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts originally present in the sample.
(a) carrying out reverse transcription of the mRNA contained in the sample using sequence-modifying primers for several genes in the same reaction to obtain a pool of sequence-modified cDNA molecules, wherein the sequence-modifying primers are oligonucleotides comprising three functional segments:
(i) a 5'-terminal segment comprising a nucleotide sequence which is complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of a specific gene and contains the complementary nucleotide sequence of the binding sites for the downstream primers used in subsequent amplification reactions, (ii) a central segment consisting of a nucleotide sequence comprising one or multiple nucleotides which are non-complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of said gene, and (iii) a 3'-terminal segment comprising a nucleotide sequence which is complementary to the mRNA sequence as well as the sense strand DNA sequence of said gene;
(b) removing or inactivating redundant sequence-modifying primers after completion of the reverse transcription;
(c) carrying out individual amplification reactions for each of the analyzed genes so that, in each of the reactions, sequence-modified cDNA templates are co-amplified with a reference DNA template using gene-specific primers to generate measurable amounts of amplification products, wherein the cDNA and reference DNA templates in an individual amplification reaction are co-amplified in a competitive manner using the same primers;
(d) quantitatively measuring the amounts and determining the relative levels of the amplification products derived from the sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA
templates to obtain a gene-specific cDNA-over-DNA ratio in each of the individual amplification reactions; and (e) combining the gene-specific cDNA- over-DNA ratios determined in the individual amplification reactions to generate a sample-specific profile of said ratios that reflects the relative amounts of mRNA transcripts originally present in the sample.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sample comprises a cell or tissue lysate or homogenate.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein RNA or RNA and DNA is isolated from the sample prior to reverse transcription.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the reverse transcription reaction is carried out under conditions where DNA contained in the sample remains double-stranded.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein redundant sequence-modifying primers are removed or inactivated after completion of the reverse transcription by enzymatic degradation.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein said enzymatic degradation is carried out using single-stranded DNA-specific exonuclease.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the individual amplification reactions are carried out in physically separate reaction vessels.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the reference DNA template comprises genomic DNA contained in the sample or isolated from a separate source.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the reference DNA template comprises cloned or synthesized DNA oligo- or polynucleotides.
10. The method according to claim 1, further comprising modifying the nucleotide sequence of the cDNA molecules generated during reverse transcription and using these sequence modifications to distinguish the cDNA-derived amplification products from the reference DNA template-derived amplification products present in the same amplification reaction.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the quantitative measurement of the amplification products is carried out during amplification.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the quantitative measurement of the amplification products is carried out after completion of the amplification reaction.
13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the relative levels of amplification products deriving from the sequence-modified cDNA and reference DNA templates in an individual gene-specific amplification reaction reflect the relative amounts of said templates originally present in the amplification reaction prior to amplification.
14. The method according to claim 1, wherein polymerase chain reaction, ligase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification is used for amplification of the cDNA
and reference DNA templates.
and reference DNA templates.
15. The method according to claim 1 or 10, wherein melting curve analysis, primer extension at the site of differentiation, sequence specific hybridization probes, mass spectrometry, or assays based on direct or indirect fluorescence resonance energy transfer are used for quantitative measurement of the amplification products.
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the primer extension at the site of differentiation is minisequencing, cyclic minisequencing, Pyrosequencing®
, or allele-specific primer extension.
, or allele-specific primer extension.
17. The method according to claim 15, wherein the sequence specific hybridization probes are dual labeled hydrolysis probes or Molecular Beacon® probes.
18. A kit for comparative and/or quantitative measurement of mRNA transcripts contained in a cell or tissue sample, wherein the kit comprises sequence-modifying primers according to claim 1.
19. Use of a test kit in the method as defined in claim 1, wherein the test kit comprises sequence-modifying primers for several genes, a means for removing or inactivating redundant sequence-modifying primers after completion of the reverse transcription, and gene-specific primers suitable for co-amplification of the sequence-modified cDNA templates and reference DNA template in a competitive manner in individual amplification reactions for each of the analyzed genes.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FI20040723 | 2004-05-26 | ||
FI20040723A FI20040723A0 (en) | 2004-05-26 | 2004-05-26 | Method for a quantitative and / or relative measurement of mRNA expression levels in small biological samples |
PCT/FI2005/050176 WO2005116248A1 (en) | 2004-05-26 | 2005-05-25 | Method for quantitative and/or comparative measurement of mrna expression levels in small biological samples |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2568537A1 CA2568537A1 (en) | 2005-12-08 |
CA2568537C true CA2568537C (en) | 2013-04-02 |
Family
ID=32338424
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2568537A Expired - Fee Related CA2568537C (en) | 2004-05-26 | 2005-05-25 | Method for quantitative and/or comparative measurement of mrna expression levels in small biological samples |
Country Status (11)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7838228B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1749105B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5258289B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE457361T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2005248091B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2568537C (en) |
DE (1) | DE602005019285D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1749105T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2341013T3 (en) |
FI (1) | FI20040723A0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005116248A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11041216B2 (en) | 2007-10-01 | 2021-06-22 | Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc | Compositions and methods for detecting and quantifying nucleic acid sequences in blood samples |
US20140087964A1 (en) * | 2012-09-24 | 2014-03-27 | University Of Virginia Patent Foundation | Compositions and methods for detecting aberrant regulation, expression, and levels of hgh |
EP2749654A1 (en) * | 2012-12-28 | 2014-07-02 | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. | Method of analysis of composition of nucleic acid mixtures |
WO2017091809A1 (en) * | 2015-11-25 | 2017-06-01 | Longhorn Vaccines And Diagnostics, Llc | Compositions and methods for detecting and quantifying nucleic acid sequences in blood samples |
US11702702B2 (en) * | 2016-04-15 | 2023-07-18 | Predicine, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting genetic alterations |
CN111394455A (en) * | 2020-03-09 | 2020-07-10 | 皖南医学院 | Kit for detecting prostate cancer and preparation method thereof |
CN116606867B (en) * | 2023-04-28 | 2024-01-26 | 北京启辰生生物科技有限公司 | Preparation method and application for improving mRNA integrity of novel crown full-length S protein |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5674679A (en) * | 1991-09-27 | 1997-10-07 | Amersham Life Science, Inc. | DNA cycle sequencing |
US6258543B1 (en) * | 1996-05-02 | 2001-07-10 | Xtrana, Inc. | Quantitation of RNA transcripts using genomic DNA as the internal amplification competitor |
JPH1057064A (en) | 1996-08-16 | 1998-03-03 | Rikagaku Kenkyusho | Specific amplification of minor gene product |
WO1998035058A2 (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 1998-08-13 | Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Improved process for detection and quantification of nucleic acid molecules |
US20030235884A1 (en) | 1999-06-15 | 2003-12-25 | Cummings Richard D. | Polynucleotides encoding core 1 beta3-galactosyl transferase and methods of use thereof |
AU5830400A (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2001-01-22 | Arto Orpana | Diagnostic method for squamous cell carcinoma |
JP2001078768A (en) | 1999-09-16 | 2001-03-27 | Otsuka Pharmaceut Co Ltd | Assay of gene expression |
EP1257664A4 (en) * | 2000-01-28 | 2006-04-05 | Althea Technologies Inc | Methods for analysis of gene expression |
KR20020089746A (en) | 2001-05-24 | 2002-11-30 | 주식회사 커벡스 | A size-modifying-anchor primer, method for rt-pcr using the size-modifying-anchor primer and method for diagnosis using the same method |
US20040091857A1 (en) | 2001-07-20 | 2004-05-13 | Nallur Girish N. | Gene expression profiling |
US20030022175A1 (en) | 2001-07-26 | 2003-01-30 | Harn-Jing Terng | Diagnostic assay of genetic mutations by discriminating amplification and hybridization |
JP2004000039A (en) * | 2002-05-30 | 2004-01-08 | Inst Of Physical & Chemical Res | Method for detecting genetic polymorphism |
DE10224200C1 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2003-08-21 | Artus Ges Fuer Molekularbiolog | Replicating RNA, useful, after reverse transcription, for analysis on microarrays, comprises conversion to cDNA then reverse transcription of this to form antisense sequences |
JP2004113136A (en) * | 2002-09-26 | 2004-04-15 | Yamaguchi Technology Licensing Organization Ltd | Inspection method at molecular level for predicting onset risk of renal cell carcinoma by using snp of mmp-1 promoter relating with sensitivity of non-papillary renal cell carcinoma |
JP2004135509A (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2004-05-13 | Hitachi Ltd | Method for analyzing gene expression and probe kit for analyzing gene expression |
WO2005110596A2 (en) | 2004-05-10 | 2005-11-24 | Gorilla Genomics, Inc. | Methods of quantifying targets in multiple samples |
-
2004
- 2004-05-26 FI FI20040723A patent/FI20040723A0/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2005
- 2005-05-25 ES ES05744405T patent/ES2341013T3/en active Active
- 2005-05-25 AT AT05744405T patent/ATE457361T1/en active
- 2005-05-25 US US11/596,543 patent/US7838228B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-05-25 DK DK05744405.1T patent/DK1749105T3/en active
- 2005-05-25 WO PCT/FI2005/050176 patent/WO2005116248A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-05-25 AU AU2005248091A patent/AU2005248091B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-05-25 EP EP05744405A patent/EP1749105B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2005-05-25 CA CA2568537A patent/CA2568537C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-05-25 DE DE602005019285T patent/DE602005019285D1/en active Active
- 2005-05-25 JP JP2007513986A patent/JP5258289B2/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2005116248A1 (en) | 2005-12-08 |
FI20040723A0 (en) | 2004-05-26 |
ES2341013T3 (en) | 2010-06-14 |
CA2568537A1 (en) | 2005-12-08 |
JP2008500034A (en) | 2008-01-10 |
DE602005019285D1 (en) | 2010-03-25 |
AU2005248091B2 (en) | 2009-12-17 |
JP5258289B2 (en) | 2013-08-07 |
US7838228B2 (en) | 2010-11-23 |
EP1749105B1 (en) | 2010-02-10 |
AU2005248091A1 (en) | 2005-12-08 |
DK1749105T3 (en) | 2010-05-25 |
ATE457361T1 (en) | 2010-02-15 |
US20080286769A1 (en) | 2008-11-20 |
EP1749105A1 (en) | 2007-02-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2963687C (en) | Method for identification and relative quantification of nucleic acid sequence expression, splice variant, translocation, copy number, or methylation changes using combined nuclease, ligation, and polymerase reactions with carryover prevention | |
EP3673081B1 (en) | Accurate and massively parallel quantification of nucleic acid | |
EP2569453B1 (en) | Nucleic acid isolation methods | |
JP7391877B2 (en) | Biomarker panels and methods for detecting microsatellite instability in cancer | |
US20240301483A1 (en) | Dna mutation detection employing enrichment of mutant polynucleotide sequences and minimally invasive sampling | |
CA2568537C (en) | Method for quantitative and/or comparative measurement of mrna expression levels in small biological samples | |
WO2011142836A2 (en) | Assays for the detection of genotype, mutations, and/or aneuploidy | |
JP4989493B2 (en) | Method for detecting nucleic acid sequence by intramolecular probe | |
CN111349692B (en) | Method for performing polymerase chain reaction and related applications | |
Sun et al. | Recent advances and current issues in single-cell sequencing of tumors | |
Roh et al. | A simple PCR-based fluorometric system for detection of mutant fusion DNAs using a quencher-free fluorescent DNA probe and graphene oxide | |
US7445893B2 (en) | Sampling method for amplification reaction analysis | |
EP3565906B1 (en) | Quantifying dna sequences | |
JP2024010011A (en) | Methods and kits for determining efficiency of plasma separation from whole blood | |
WO2019106149A1 (en) | Pcr controls | |
WO2019226734A1 (en) | Target enrichment and sequencing of modified nucleic acid for human cancer detection | |
JP2023523477A (en) | Single-stranded nucleic acid for real-time detection of genetic mutation of a single target gene and detection method using the same | |
Singh et al. | Recent developments in PCR technology | |
AU2022327551B2 (en) | Advanced dumbbell PCR for isomiR detection | |
EP3458603A1 (en) | Penta e polymorphisms for human identification |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20150525 |
|
MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20150525 |