CA2561078C - Testing method for ball mills - Google Patents
Testing method for ball mills Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2561078C CA2561078C CA2561078A CA2561078A CA2561078C CA 2561078 C CA2561078 C CA 2561078C CA 2561078 A CA2561078 A CA 2561078A CA 2561078 A CA2561078 A CA 2561078A CA 2561078 C CA2561078 C CA 2561078C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- grinding
- ore
- test
- ball mill
- testing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C17/00—Disintegrating by tumbling mills, i.e. mills having a container charged with the material to be disintegrated with or without special disintegrating members such as pebbles or balls
- B02C17/10—Disintegrating by tumbling mills, i.e. mills having a container charged with the material to be disintegrated with or without special disintegrating members such as pebbles or balls with one or a few disintegrating members arranged in the container
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C17/00—Disintegrating by tumbling mills, i.e. mills having a container charged with the material to be disintegrated with or without special disintegrating members such as pebbles or balls
- B02C17/18—Details
- B02C17/1805—Monitoring devices for tumbling mills
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/40—Investigating hardness or rebound hardness
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/0001—Type of application of the stress
- G01N2203/0005—Repeated or cyclic
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/0058—Kind of property studied
- G01N2203/0076—Hardness, compressibility or resistance to crushing
- G01N2203/0087—Resistance to crushing
Abstract
The invention relates to a testing method for designing a semiautogenous or an autogenous grinding circuit with at least one ball mill for grinding ore. In the method the ore is tested in two separate testing steps using the same testing sample of ore.
Description
°1 TESTING METHOD FOR BALL MILLS
This invention relates to a testing method for designing a semiautogenous or an autogenous grinding circuit with at least one ball mill.
The feed to autogenous and semiautogenous mills is an important variable in the performance of a grinding circuit. The feed can be essentially influenced by the grinding circuit and, in some cases, by the mining operations itself.
Autogenous mills use the feed material as the grinding media. The larger the particle the more energy can be imparted, and therefore the more impact breakage likely. In semiautogenous milling, steel grinding media is added to the mill. The size of the grinding media has an essential impact on the rate of breakage, for instance with a ball of 125 mm equivalent in mass to a rock of approximately 180 mm. Therefore, the feed required for semiautogenous mills does not have to be as coarse as that for autogenous mills.
In order to determine the energy and thus power required for grinding in autogenous or semiautogenous mills there are developed different kinds of tests. One test is called Bond ball mill test, which results a parameter providing a standard net power requirement for grinding. The test is conducted on ore stage-crushed to minus 6 mesh, i.e. the ore is crushed so that all ore is going through a screen having quadratic apertures of 3.35 millimeter (6 mesh) and further ground to minus 100 mesh, going through a screen having quadratic apertures of 0.149 millimeter. The test requires 5 to 10 kg of minus 2.362 millimeter (8 mesh) ore. The Bond ball mill test enables basic grinding power requirement to be determined, from the feed 80 % passing size to circuit 80 passing size. The Bond ball mill test is designed to predict power in wet ball mill grinding circuit operating at a 250 % circulating load. However, moving away from this condition reduces the accuracy of the test. Further, the Bond ball mill test does not predict the behavior of large rocks in a grinding circuit where the mode of breakage is impact dominated. The test has been further developed to include other type of tests to provide information to make the projection for
This invention relates to a testing method for designing a semiautogenous or an autogenous grinding circuit with at least one ball mill.
The feed to autogenous and semiautogenous mills is an important variable in the performance of a grinding circuit. The feed can be essentially influenced by the grinding circuit and, in some cases, by the mining operations itself.
Autogenous mills use the feed material as the grinding media. The larger the particle the more energy can be imparted, and therefore the more impact breakage likely. In semiautogenous milling, steel grinding media is added to the mill. The size of the grinding media has an essential impact on the rate of breakage, for instance with a ball of 125 mm equivalent in mass to a rock of approximately 180 mm. Therefore, the feed required for semiautogenous mills does not have to be as coarse as that for autogenous mills.
In order to determine the energy and thus power required for grinding in autogenous or semiautogenous mills there are developed different kinds of tests. One test is called Bond ball mill test, which results a parameter providing a standard net power requirement for grinding. The test is conducted on ore stage-crushed to minus 6 mesh, i.e. the ore is crushed so that all ore is going through a screen having quadratic apertures of 3.35 millimeter (6 mesh) and further ground to minus 100 mesh, going through a screen having quadratic apertures of 0.149 millimeter. The test requires 5 to 10 kg of minus 2.362 millimeter (8 mesh) ore. The Bond ball mill test enables basic grinding power requirement to be determined, from the feed 80 % passing size to circuit 80 passing size. The Bond ball mill test is designed to predict power in wet ball mill grinding circuit operating at a 250 % circulating load. However, moving away from this condition reduces the accuracy of the test. Further, the Bond ball mill test does not predict the behavior of large rocks in a grinding circuit where the mode of breakage is impact dominated. The test has been further developed to include other type of tests to provide information to make the projection for
2 coarse grinding, namely autogenous or semiautogenous grinding. The other tests are for instance Bond Impact test and JK impact test. Characteristic to these tests are testing large number of single pieces of the tested material.
The samples are prepared separately from the Bond ball mill test and thus the representativeness of the two samples is questioned as well as the sample size for testing will be increased.
It is also developed a test, the Starkey test, to predict semiautogenous mill specific power requirements using only minus 12.7 millimeter (0,5 mesh) material. The Starkey test uses a small 300 mm in diameter and 100 mm long laboratory scale mill with a small ball charge of 25 mm balls to grind the test sample of 2 kg. The objective is to establish the grinding time required to grind the ore to 80 % passing 1.7 millimeter (10 mesh), the closing screen size. The Starkey test demonstrates a strong correlation between the grinding time for ores and their corresponding semiautogenous mill specific power draw. The Starkey test is an attractive alternative to tests requiring large sample size.
The object of the present invention is to eliminate some drawbacks of the prior art and to achieve an improved testing method for designing a semiautogenous or an autogenous grinding circuit with at least one ball mill. The essential features of the invention are enlisted in the appended claims.
In accordance with the invention, the testing method for designing a semiautogenous or an autogenous grinding circuit with at least one ball mill contains two separate testing steps using the same sample for determining the energy requirements for a semiautogenous mill using balls as grinding media.
The testing steps are arranged so that the first step for the testing method is a semiautogenous test, which is followed by a ball mill test. Due to the fact the test is carried out in two steps, one can make accurate estimation for capacity and energy requirement for the two products in respective process steps, thus optimize the energy distribution between the comminution stages. The first testing step is conventionally optimized for testing product size or transfer size
The samples are prepared separately from the Bond ball mill test and thus the representativeness of the two samples is questioned as well as the sample size for testing will be increased.
It is also developed a test, the Starkey test, to predict semiautogenous mill specific power requirements using only minus 12.7 millimeter (0,5 mesh) material. The Starkey test uses a small 300 mm in diameter and 100 mm long laboratory scale mill with a small ball charge of 25 mm balls to grind the test sample of 2 kg. The objective is to establish the grinding time required to grind the ore to 80 % passing 1.7 millimeter (10 mesh), the closing screen size. The Starkey test demonstrates a strong correlation between the grinding time for ores and their corresponding semiautogenous mill specific power draw. The Starkey test is an attractive alternative to tests requiring large sample size.
The object of the present invention is to eliminate some drawbacks of the prior art and to achieve an improved testing method for designing a semiautogenous or an autogenous grinding circuit with at least one ball mill. The essential features of the invention are enlisted in the appended claims.
In accordance with the invention, the testing method for designing a semiautogenous or an autogenous grinding circuit with at least one ball mill contains two separate testing steps using the same sample for determining the energy requirements for a semiautogenous mill using balls as grinding media.
The testing steps are arranged so that the first step for the testing method is a semiautogenous test, which is followed by a ball mill test. Due to the fact the test is carried out in two steps, one can make accurate estimation for capacity and energy requirement for the two products in respective process steps, thus optimize the energy distribution between the comminution stages. The first testing step is conventionally optimized for testing product size or transfer size
3 to a subsequent grinding step ranging between 0.500 and 3.500 millimeter measured as the 80 % passing point. In the second test the grinding process is extended to finer size range to make an accurate projection for the typical final grinding circuit product ranging between 0.045 and 0.150 millimeter measured as the 80 % passing point. In the first testing step the resultant time and the ore specific gravity are used to calculate the required grinding energy, and the second testing step is used to determine the required ball mill energy to reach the predetermined grind size.
The sample for the testing method of the invention is advantageously between 2 to 10 kg, preferably 6 to 9 kg by weight of the ore to be tested. The ore sample is precrushed to the particle size of minus 1.25 inches (32 mm) and/or 80 % of the particles passing a screen having mesh of 0.75 inches (19 mm).
The first step of the testing method, the semiautogenous test is carried out in a conveniently selected ball mill having a diameter of 490 millimeter and a length of 163 millimeter. The ball mill is advantageously in a range of 1:0.33 to 1:2 in diameter length ratio. The diameter length ratio is dependent on the required application type of energy transfer required to carry out the comminution process. The ore sample is ground in batch mode at the presence of steel balls.
The steel ball size is selected so that 55% of the balls is equal or larger than 2 inches and 45% of the balls is equal or larger than 1,5 inches in diameter.
The steel weight is 16 kg. The grinding is continued until the entire ore weight is reduced to 80 % passing a screen of having quadratic apertures of 1.68 millimeter (12 mesh). The resultant grinding time, grinding media, the ore specific gravity and revolutions of the ball mill are used to calculate required grinding energy advantageously in units of kilowatts per ton of ore, i.e.
kW/t.
The energy calculation (SAG Energy) is done using the following equation (1 ):
SAG Energy (kWh/t) = C x Actual Revs x (Bulk SG / Weight (g)) (1 ),
The sample for the testing method of the invention is advantageously between 2 to 10 kg, preferably 6 to 9 kg by weight of the ore to be tested. The ore sample is precrushed to the particle size of minus 1.25 inches (32 mm) and/or 80 % of the particles passing a screen having mesh of 0.75 inches (19 mm).
The first step of the testing method, the semiautogenous test is carried out in a conveniently selected ball mill having a diameter of 490 millimeter and a length of 163 millimeter. The ball mill is advantageously in a range of 1:0.33 to 1:2 in diameter length ratio. The diameter length ratio is dependent on the required application type of energy transfer required to carry out the comminution process. The ore sample is ground in batch mode at the presence of steel balls.
The steel ball size is selected so that 55% of the balls is equal or larger than 2 inches and 45% of the balls is equal or larger than 1,5 inches in diameter.
The steel weight is 16 kg. The grinding is continued until the entire ore weight is reduced to 80 % passing a screen of having quadratic apertures of 1.68 millimeter (12 mesh). The resultant grinding time, grinding media, the ore specific gravity and revolutions of the ball mill are used to calculate required grinding energy advantageously in units of kilowatts per ton of ore, i.e.
kW/t.
The energy calculation (SAG Energy) is done using the following equation (1 ):
SAG Energy (kWh/t) = C x Actual Revs x (Bulk SG / Weight (g)) (1 ),
4 wherein C is a constant defined by the mill dimension and speed having a value 17.66 for the given test arrangement, Actual Revs is the amount of revolutions in the ball mill, Bulk SG is the specific weight of the sample to be treated and Weight is the mass of the sample to be treated.
In the second step of the testing method, the test is based on the Bond ball mill.
The product from the first step is then used for determination of the required ball mill energy for the secondary grinding stage to reach the target grinding size. The empirical formula to calculate Bond Mill Work Index (BWi) is presented in the equation (2) BWi = 44,5 (2)~
0,23 0,82 Gbh Uso Fso wherein U1 is the passing size in micrometer of the test sieve, Gbn is the ball mill grindability and U$o and F$o are passing values in a mount of 80 % in the sieve analysis for the product (U8o) and feed(F8o) in micrometer.
Based on the results of the first and second testing steps a circuit of ball mills were sized and designed so that the resulted grinding energy was divided in ball mills so that the dimensions of each mill are reasonable for effective grinding of the ore tested.
Using the testing method of the invention for the same sample through both the testing steps the required sample size for one type of ore is limited and the same sample allows more testing for the same amount of investment. Also the result of two tests gives more accurate information of the tested ore.
Further, the same sample is advantageous because the sample preparation for the second testing step is eliminated and the true feeding conditions are passed to the Bond ball mill testing. In the method of the invention, the fines generation in the first testing step is taken into account as the product from the first test is used for the second test without artificially manipulating the sample and the size distribution. This improves the accuracy of the test and reduces sample preparation stages.
In the second step of the testing method, the test is based on the Bond ball mill.
The product from the first step is then used for determination of the required ball mill energy for the secondary grinding stage to reach the target grinding size. The empirical formula to calculate Bond Mill Work Index (BWi) is presented in the equation (2) BWi = 44,5 (2)~
0,23 0,82 Gbh Uso Fso wherein U1 is the passing size in micrometer of the test sieve, Gbn is the ball mill grindability and U$o and F$o are passing values in a mount of 80 % in the sieve analysis for the product (U8o) and feed(F8o) in micrometer.
Based on the results of the first and second testing steps a circuit of ball mills were sized and designed so that the resulted grinding energy was divided in ball mills so that the dimensions of each mill are reasonable for effective grinding of the ore tested.
Using the testing method of the invention for the same sample through both the testing steps the required sample size for one type of ore is limited and the same sample allows more testing for the same amount of investment. Also the result of two tests gives more accurate information of the tested ore.
Further, the same sample is advantageous because the sample preparation for the second testing step is eliminated and the true feeding conditions are passed to the Bond ball mill testing. In the method of the invention, the fines generation in the first testing step is taken into account as the product from the first test is used for the second test without artificially manipulating the sample and the size distribution. This improves the accuracy of the test and reduces sample preparation stages.
5 Example The ore having a density of 3.03 kg/cm3 was ground in the ball mill for the semiautogenous test. The grinding time was 1880 revolutions for a sample of 8065 g. Using the equation 1 the required grinding energy was calculated for a value of 12.5 kW/t ore. The ground ore from the semiautogenous test was then used for the Bond ball mill test. Using the results of the test the equation 2 gives for the ball mill energy a value of 15.0 kW/t ore.
Claims
1. A testing method for designing a semi-autogenous or an autogenous grinding circuit having at least one ball mill for grinding ore, the method comprising:
measuring an amount of time for grinding a predetermined mass of ore to a first predetermined size, in a first, semi-autogenous step;
calculating a required grinding energy based on the measured time for grinding in the first step, mass of ore, mill characteristics and a measured specific gravity;
grinding in a ball mill, in a second step, the ore from the first step to a second predetermined size; and calculating, using the Bond Mill Work Index, a required ball mill energy for the second step required to obtain a desired final grind size.
measuring an amount of time for grinding a predetermined mass of ore to a first predetermined size, in a first, semi-autogenous step;
calculating a required grinding energy based on the measured time for grinding in the first step, mass of ore, mill characteristics and a measured specific gravity;
grinding in a ball mill, in a second step, the ore from the first step to a second predetermined size; and calculating, using the Bond Mill Work Index, a required ball mill energy for the second step required to obtain a desired final grind size.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/820,373 US7197952B2 (en) | 2004-04-08 | 2004-04-08 | Testing method for ball mills |
| US10/820,373 | 2004-04-08 | ||
| PCT/FI2005/000136 WO2005097327A1 (en) | 2004-04-08 | 2005-03-07 | Testing method for ball mills |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2561078A1 CA2561078A1 (en) | 2005-10-20 |
| CA2561078C true CA2561078C (en) | 2011-08-09 |
Family
ID=35059171
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2561078A Active CA2561078C (en) | 2004-04-08 | 2005-03-07 | Testing method for ball mills |
Country Status (13)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US7197952B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1737575B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN100460073C (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE487541T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2005230244B2 (en) |
| BR (1) | BRPI0509355B1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2561078C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE602005024675D1 (en) |
| DK (1) | DK1737575T3 (en) |
| EA (1) | EA009158B1 (en) |
| MX (1) | MXPA06011491A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2005097327A1 (en) |
| ZA (1) | ZA200608347B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL2011002292A1 (en) * | 2011-09-15 | 2012-01-20 | Sgs Lakefield Res Chile S A 50% Solis Blau Ivan Luino 50% | Method and system for dynamic measurement of rock hardness that allows to obtain the parameter of kwh / ton equivalent to that obtained in the industrial process of grinding or crushing of ore, comprises an impact mill, a self-calibrating scale, a feeding medium, an electric servo and a computer connected to the balance and the servo. |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB404608A (en) | 1931-04-08 | 1934-01-08 | Babcock & Wilcox Ltd | Process of and apparatus for measuring reduction in size of solids |
| US3791218A (en) * | 1972-01-05 | 1974-02-12 | D & P Minerals Inc | Apparatus for removing samples of particulate materials from an endless belt conveyor |
| US3865718A (en) * | 1972-12-07 | 1975-02-11 | Dow Chemical Co | Frothers for the flotation of sulfidic ores |
| US3940997A (en) * | 1973-12-27 | 1976-03-02 | Xerox Corporation | Apparatus and method for measuring angle of repose |
| US5211920A (en) * | 1989-03-20 | 1993-05-18 | Betz Laboratories, Inc. | Agglomerating agents for clay containing ores |
| US5289728A (en) * | 1990-11-08 | 1994-03-01 | Jr Johanson, Inc. | Flow-no-flow tester |
| CN1055507C (en) * | 1997-02-27 | 2000-08-16 | 河北电力设备厂 | High ductility high chromium abrasion-resistant ball for ball grinder and its manufacturing method |
| US6089079A (en) * | 1997-05-27 | 2000-07-18 | Noranda Inc. | Moisture sensor for ore concentrates and other perticulate materials |
| CA2388251C (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2007-09-11 | John Starkey | Ball mill |
-
2004
- 2004-04-08 US US10/820,373 patent/US7197952B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2005
- 2005-03-07 MX MXPA06011491A patent/MXPA06011491A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-03-07 WO PCT/FI2005/000136 patent/WO2005097327A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-03-07 AT AT05717263T patent/ATE487541T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-03-07 CN CNB2005800098189A patent/CN100460073C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-03-07 BR BRPI0509355A patent/BRPI0509355B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-03-07 AU AU2005230244A patent/AU2005230244B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-03-07 DE DE602005024675T patent/DE602005024675D1/en active Active
- 2005-03-07 EA EA200601573A patent/EA009158B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-03-07 CA CA2561078A patent/CA2561078C/en active Active
- 2005-03-07 DK DK05717263.7T patent/DK1737575T3/en active
- 2005-03-07 EP EP05717263A patent/EP1737575B1/en not_active Not-in-force
-
2006
- 2006-10-06 ZA ZA200608347A patent/ZA200608347B/en unknown
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU2005230244B2 (en) | 2010-08-12 |
| EP1737575B1 (en) | 2010-11-10 |
| AU2005230244A1 (en) | 2005-10-20 |
| CN100460073C (en) | 2009-02-11 |
| EA009158B1 (en) | 2007-10-26 |
| ZA200608347B (en) | 2008-06-25 |
| DE602005024675D1 (en) | 2010-12-23 |
| MXPA06011491A (en) | 2007-04-13 |
| DK1737575T3 (en) | 2010-12-06 |
| US20050223798A1 (en) | 2005-10-13 |
| US7197952B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 |
| CN1938096A (en) | 2007-03-28 |
| EP1737575A1 (en) | 2007-01-03 |
| BRPI0509355B1 (en) | 2018-10-30 |
| BRPI0509355A (en) | 2007-09-11 |
| CA2561078A1 (en) | 2005-10-20 |
| ATE487541T1 (en) | 2010-11-15 |
| EA200601573A1 (en) | 2007-04-27 |
| WO2005097327A1 (en) | 2005-10-20 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Toprak et al. | The influences and selection of grinding chemicals in cement grinding circuits | |
| Todorovic et al. | A quick method for Bond work index approximate value determination | |
| EA014375B1 (en) | A method of predicting breakage properties of a particulate material when subjected to impact | |
| Vardhan et al. | Investigation of iron ores based on the bond grindability test | |
| Genc et al. | Single particle impact breakage characterization of materials by drop weight testing | |
| Mucsi | Fast test method for the determination of the grindability of fine materials | |
| CA2561078C (en) | Testing method for ball mills | |
| Davaanyam et al. | Using piston press tests for determining optimal energy input for an HPGR operation | |
| Aras et al. | Correlations of bond and breakage parameters of some ores with the corresponding point load index | |
| Mariano et al. | The effect of breakage energies on the mineral liberation properties of ores | |
| Taşdemir et al. | A comparative study on PSD models for chromite ores comminuted by different devices | |
| Tosun et al. | Development of a model estimating energy consumption values of primary and secondary crushers | |
| Chandramohan et al. | Reliability of some ore characterization tests | |
| Shahgholi et al. | Application of perfect mixing model for simulation of vertical roller mills | |
| Tripathy et al. | Performance optimization of an industrial ball mill for chromite processing | |
| Gawenda et al. | An assessment of influence of selected characteristics of feed on the results of ball mill grinding process course for polish copper ores | |
| Magdalinović | Abbreviated test for quick determination of Bond’s Work index | |
| Ergun et al. | Modelling and simulation of grinding circuit in Madneuli copper concentrator | |
| Rowland | Bond’s method for selection of ball mills | |
| McIvor | The GMSG guideline for determining the bond efficiency of industrial grinding circuits | |
| Siddall et al. | Process design and implementation techniques for secondary crushing to increase milling capacity | |
| Ciobanu et al. | Variation of energy consumption and specific surface blaine resulting from simulation of clinker grinding in a cement mill. | |
| Oji et al. | Ddetermination of bond work index of Bagega gold mineral deposit of Zamfara State, Nigeria | |
| Hosseinzadeh et al. | Determination of Breakage Distribution Function of Fine Chromite Ores with Bed Breakage Method | |
| Tong et al. | An Energy-T 75 Size Reduction Model for Ball Mills |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request |