CA2549469A1 - Process for preparing mechanical pulp - Google Patents
Process for preparing mechanical pulp Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2549469A1 CA2549469A1 CA002549469A CA2549469A CA2549469A1 CA 2549469 A1 CA2549469 A1 CA 2549469A1 CA 002549469 A CA002549469 A CA 002549469A CA 2549469 A CA2549469 A CA 2549469A CA 2549469 A1 CA2549469 A1 CA 2549469A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- chips
- enzyme
- enzyme preparation
- treatment
- pulp
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 229920001131 Pulp (paper) Polymers 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims description 30
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 104
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 104
- 108010059892 Cellulase Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 81
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 76
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 62
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 58
- 108010008885 Cellulose 1,4-beta-Cellobiosidase Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 48
- 238000005265 energy consumption Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 claims description 31
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 claims description 31
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 claims description 27
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 claims description 25
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 24
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 17
- 241000223259 Trichoderma Species 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000004537 pulping Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 241000228212 Aspergillus Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000222385 Phanerochaete Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000193830 Bacillus <bacterium> Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000223198 Humicola Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000228143 Penicillium Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000187747 Streptomyces Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 229940070376 protein Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 claims 4
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 229940088598 enzyme Drugs 0.000 description 93
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 45
- 229940106157 cellulase Drugs 0.000 description 30
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 24
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 18
- 241000499912 Trichoderma reesei Species 0.000 description 10
- 229940079919 digestives enzyme preparation Drugs 0.000 description 10
- 108010084185 Cellulases Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 102000005575 Cellulases Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 229920005610 lignin Polymers 0.000 description 9
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 8
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 8
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 7
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 7
- 101710126559 Endoglucanase EG-II Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 108010029541 Laccase Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 241000218657 Picea Species 0.000 description 6
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 6
- 101710121765 Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 150000001720 carbohydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 5
- 235000014633 carbohydrates Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000010411 cooking Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 5
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 5
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007062 hydrolysis Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000006460 hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 108091005804 Peptidases Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102100037486 Reverse transcriptase/ribonuclease H Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000051 modifying effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 3
- 230000003313 weakening effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 2
- 102100032487 Beta-mannosidase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 229920002488 Hemicellulose Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 108090001060 Lipase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004882 Lipase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 239000004367 Lipase Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004365 Protease Substances 0.000 description 2
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000014680 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 108010055059 beta-Mannosidase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010091371 endoglucanase 1 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000012239 gene modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005017 genetic modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000013617 genetically modified food Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 108010002430 hemicellulase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 235000019421 lipase Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003265 pulping liquor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 244000144725 Amygdalus communis Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000228245 Aspergillus niger Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000014469 Bacillus subtilis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000003932 Betula Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000219429 Betula Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000146399 Ceriporiopsis Species 0.000 description 1
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-CUHNMECISA-N D-Cellobiose Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](CO)OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-CUHNMECISA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108090000371 Esterases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000146398 Gelatoporia subvermispora Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920001503 Glucan Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 108010060309 Glucuronidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000053187 Glucuronidase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101001091385 Homo sapiens Kallikrein-6 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001480714 Humicola insolens Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100034866 Kallikrein-6 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000221871 Ophiostoma Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001507673 Penicillium digitatum Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000228129 Penicillium janthinellum Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000222393 Phanerochaete chrysosporium Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000222395 Phlebia Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000218641 Pinaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005205 Pinus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000218602 Pinus <genus> Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000011613 Pinus brutia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000008566 Pinus taeda Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000218679 Pinus taeda Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010059820 Polygalacturonase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000219000 Populus Species 0.000 description 1
- 101710148718 Protein Smg Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000218998 Salicaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000958211 Streptomyces flavogriseus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000187134 Streptomyces olivochromogenes Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000222354 Trametes Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000003425 Tyrosinase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108060008724 Tyrosinase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920002522 Wood fibre Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002730 additional effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010009 beating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101150052795 cbh-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150114858 cbh2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001461 cytolytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 101150003727 egl2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010091384 endoglucanase 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010093305 exopolygalacturonase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002538 fungal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000003869 genetically modified organism Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003450 growing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011121 hardwood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002573 hemicellulolytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005470 impregnation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009776 industrial production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005342 ion exchange Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002366 lipolytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010297 mechanical methods and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005226 mechanical processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012261 overproduction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000496 pancreas Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000011020 pilot scale process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003755 preservative agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- NQLVQOSNDJXLKG-UHFFFAOYSA-N prosulfocarb Chemical compound CCCN(CCC)C(=O)SCC1=CC=CC=C1 NQLVQOSNDJXLKG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002797 proteolythic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940081969 saccharomyces cerevisiae Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011122 softwood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013619 trace mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011573 trace mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241001148471 unidentified anaerobic bacterium Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21B—FIBROUS RAW MATERIALS OR THEIR MECHANICAL TREATMENT
- D21B1/00—Fibrous raw materials or their mechanical treatment
- D21B1/02—Pretreatment of the raw materials by chemical or physical means
- D21B1/021—Pretreatment of the raw materials by chemical or physical means by chemical means
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Paper (AREA)
- Seasonings (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for the pre-treatment of chips, which can be used to reduce the specific energy consumption of mechanical pulp and to improve the technical properties of the fibres. In the treatment, chips in a liquid phase are brought into contact with an enzyme preparation containing cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase
Description
Process for preparing mechanical pulp The present invention relates to a process in accordance with the preamble of Claim 1 for preparing mechanical pulp. The invention also relates to a process for decreas-ing the energy consumption of mechanical pulping processes based on refining chips, according to the preamble of Claim 17.
Chemical and mechanical pulps possess different chemical and fibre-technical prop-erties and thus their use in different paper grades can be chosen according to these properties. Many paper grades contain both types of pulps in different proportions according to the desired properties of the final products. Mechanical pulp is used, when necessary, to improve or to increase the stiffness, bulkiness or optical proper-ties of the product.
In paper manufacture, the wood material must first be defibred. Mechanical pulp is mainly manufactured by means of grinding and refining methods, in which the raw wood material is subjected to periodical pressure impulses. Due to friction heat, the structure of the wood is softened and its structure loosened, finally leading to the separation of the fibres from one another (Virkola, 1983). However, only a small part of the energy brought into the system is used for separating the fibres;
the ma jor part being converted into heat. Therefore, the total energy economy of the defi bration is very poor.
Several methods for improving the energy economy of mechanical pulping are sug-gested in prior art. Some of these are based on the pre-treatment of chips by, e.g., water or acid (FI Patent Specifications Nos. 74493 and 87371). Methods are also known, which comprise treating the raw material with enzymes to reduce the con-sumption of pulping energy. Thus, the Finnish Patent Application No. 895676 de-scribes an experiment in which once-refined pulp was treated with a xylanase en-zyme preparation. It is stated in the application that this enzymatic treatment would, to some .extent, decrease the energy consumption of pulping. In the said prior art publication, the possibility of using cellulases is also mentioned but no examples of these are given nor are their effects shown. As far as isolated enzymes are con-cerned, in addition to hemicellulases, the interest has been focused on lignin modi-fying enzymes, such as laccase enzyme (Jokinen and Savolainen, 1991). A treat-ment using the laccase enzyme did not, however, have an effect on the energy con-sumption (Jokinen and Savolainen, 1991).
The Patent Specification EP 0429 422 suggests the use of laccase treatments in me-chanical pulping between the first and the second refining treatments. This specifi-cation states that the laccase treatment decreases the energy consumption of the re fining process. The Patent Specification WO 93/23606, in turn, suggests a treatment with phenol oxidase enzymes after the last refining or grinding treatments.
The said treatment had no effect on the energy consumption of the refining treatment but it S has been said to have an influence on the strength of paper or board.
As the energy in defibration is mainly absorbed by the amorphous part of the paper furnish only, i.e., hemicellulose and lignin, an increase in the amorphousness of the raw material improves the energy economy of the defibration. The Patent Specifica-tions WO 94/20666 and WO 94/20667 suggest that the amorphousness of the raw material be increased in connection with mechanical pulping by treating the raw material with a suitable enzyme that reacts with the crystalline, insoluble cellulose of the raw material. The Patent Specification WO 94/20666 suggests that the raw material be treated with an enzyme preparation, the main cellulase activity of which consists of cellobiohydrolase activity. The Patent Specification WO 94/20667 sug-gests that an enzyme preparation be used for the same purpose, containing cellobio-hydrolase activity and mannanase activity. The examples of the said specifications deal with rough wood, such as the long-fibre fraction of fractioned TMP spruce pulp, once-refined TMP spruce pulps (with freeness values of CSF 450 - 550) or TMP pulps refined to different freeness levels (30 - 300). If a synergistically acting cellulase enzyme product, i.e., cellulase, was used in connection with the manufac-ture of mechanical pulp, containing both cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase, the treatment resulted in the hydrolysis of the insoluble cellulose and, thus, in the weakening of the strength properties of the pulp.
The Patent Specification US 6,267,841 describes a manufacturing method of thermo-mechanical pulp, wherein the pulp is treated with enzyme between the first and the second refining processes. It also suggests the treatment of chips with en-zymes before the first refining. The specification cites enzymes, such as pectinase, xylanase, laccase, cellulase or the mixtures thereof. The specification gives no nu-merical values of any energy savings obtained.
In addition to the afore-mentioned isolated enzymes, the application of growing white rot fungi in the manufacture of mechanical pulp has also been studied.
Car-ried out before defibration, such a treatment with a white rot fungus has been found to decrease the specific energy consumption and to improve the strength properties of these pulps (Setliff et al., 1990, Leatham et al., 1990 and Akhtar et al., 1992).
The drawbacks of these treatments with the white rot fungus are, however, the long treatment times needed (mostly weeks); the decreased yield (85 to 95 %), the diffi-culty to control the process and the impaired optical properties.
Chemical and mechanical pulps possess different chemical and fibre-technical prop-erties and thus their use in different paper grades can be chosen according to these properties. Many paper grades contain both types of pulps in different proportions according to the desired properties of the final products. Mechanical pulp is used, when necessary, to improve or to increase the stiffness, bulkiness or optical proper-ties of the product.
In paper manufacture, the wood material must first be defibred. Mechanical pulp is mainly manufactured by means of grinding and refining methods, in which the raw wood material is subjected to periodical pressure impulses. Due to friction heat, the structure of the wood is softened and its structure loosened, finally leading to the separation of the fibres from one another (Virkola, 1983). However, only a small part of the energy brought into the system is used for separating the fibres;
the ma jor part being converted into heat. Therefore, the total energy economy of the defi bration is very poor.
Several methods for improving the energy economy of mechanical pulping are sug-gested in prior art. Some of these are based on the pre-treatment of chips by, e.g., water or acid (FI Patent Specifications Nos. 74493 and 87371). Methods are also known, which comprise treating the raw material with enzymes to reduce the con-sumption of pulping energy. Thus, the Finnish Patent Application No. 895676 de-scribes an experiment in which once-refined pulp was treated with a xylanase en-zyme preparation. It is stated in the application that this enzymatic treatment would, to some .extent, decrease the energy consumption of pulping. In the said prior art publication, the possibility of using cellulases is also mentioned but no examples of these are given nor are their effects shown. As far as isolated enzymes are con-cerned, in addition to hemicellulases, the interest has been focused on lignin modi-fying enzymes, such as laccase enzyme (Jokinen and Savolainen, 1991). A treat-ment using the laccase enzyme did not, however, have an effect on the energy con-sumption (Jokinen and Savolainen, 1991).
The Patent Specification EP 0429 422 suggests the use of laccase treatments in me-chanical pulping between the first and the second refining treatments. This specifi-cation states that the laccase treatment decreases the energy consumption of the re fining process. The Patent Specification WO 93/23606, in turn, suggests a treatment with phenol oxidase enzymes after the last refining or grinding treatments.
The said treatment had no effect on the energy consumption of the refining treatment but it S has been said to have an influence on the strength of paper or board.
As the energy in defibration is mainly absorbed by the amorphous part of the paper furnish only, i.e., hemicellulose and lignin, an increase in the amorphousness of the raw material improves the energy economy of the defibration. The Patent Specifica-tions WO 94/20666 and WO 94/20667 suggest that the amorphousness of the raw material be increased in connection with mechanical pulping by treating the raw material with a suitable enzyme that reacts with the crystalline, insoluble cellulose of the raw material. The Patent Specification WO 94/20666 suggests that the raw material be treated with an enzyme preparation, the main cellulase activity of which consists of cellobiohydrolase activity. The Patent Specification WO 94/20667 sug-gests that an enzyme preparation be used for the same purpose, containing cellobio-hydrolase activity and mannanase activity. The examples of the said specifications deal with rough wood, such as the long-fibre fraction of fractioned TMP spruce pulp, once-refined TMP spruce pulps (with freeness values of CSF 450 - 550) or TMP pulps refined to different freeness levels (30 - 300). If a synergistically acting cellulase enzyme product, i.e., cellulase, was used in connection with the manufac-ture of mechanical pulp, containing both cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase, the treatment resulted in the hydrolysis of the insoluble cellulose and, thus, in the weakening of the strength properties of the pulp.
The Patent Specification US 6,267,841 describes a manufacturing method of thermo-mechanical pulp, wherein the pulp is treated with enzyme between the first and the second refining processes. It also suggests the treatment of chips with en-zymes before the first refining. The specification cites enzymes, such as pectinase, xylanase, laccase, cellulase or the mixtures thereof. The specification gives no nu-merical values of any energy savings obtained.
In addition to the afore-mentioned isolated enzymes, the application of growing white rot fungi in the manufacture of mechanical pulp has also been studied.
Car-ried out before defibration, such a treatment with a white rot fungus has been found to decrease the specific energy consumption and to improve the strength properties of these pulps (Setliff et al., 1990, Leatham et al., 1990 and Akhtar et al., 1992).
The drawbacks of these treatments with the white rot fungus are, however, the long treatment times needed (mostly weeks); the decreased yield (85 to 95 %), the diffi-culty to control the process and the impaired optical properties.
Generally, the different enzymatic treatments according to prior art have been ap-plied to raw wood material, which has been defibred to a certain extent already dur-ing the manufacturing process. According to a general view, the enzymatic treat-ment is not as effective when applied to chips directly, because it is difficult to make the enzyme preparation to be effectively absorbed into the fibres of a raw ma terial that is in the form of chips. In a native form of chips, the surface area of the raw wood material is not sufficient for an effective enzymatic treatment to take place. Another reason is that a major part of the capillaries of the wood are too small to receive any enzyme molecules (Grethlein, H.E. Biotechnology, February 1985, pp. 155 to 160).
According to prior art, the pulping liquor is made to penetrate the chips used in pulp cooking by treating the chips with pressure shocks in the presence of the pulping liquor. In the Vilamo method, for example, the chips are treated in the presence of the cooking liquor by varying the pressure from a pressure of 4.5 kp/cm2 and a treatment time of 10 - 16s to a pressure of 2 kp/cm2 and a treatment time of 5 - 6s, the treatment being repeated 6 - 8 times at 1-minute intervals /Rydholm, 1965).
The Patent Specification WO 95/09267 suggests treating the chips, which are used in pulp cooking, with a chemical solution by subjecting the chips to a vacuum and making the chemical solution penetrate the wood fibres by means of a pressure shock. According to the application, the chemical solution can be cooking liquor that contains, for example, catalysts and enzymes. The object of the invention is, thus, to be able to decrease the amount of lignin in order to diminish the need of decreasing the residue lignin at the final stage of cooking. However, the application does not describe in detail, whether or not the enzymes penetrate the wood cells successfully and whether or not the enzymes have any effect on the decrease of the amount of lignin.
The US Patent 5,374,555 suggests the removal of lignin from the lignocellulose material by means of a protease enzyme. To enhance the enzymatic treatment, the patent suggests a mechanical treatment of chips, for example, in a screw clamp. The patent specification reminds that cellulase can be used as a pre-treatment enzyme for the chips or the pulp, but it does not suggest carrying out a treatment with cellu-lase in connection with the mechanical processes. The purpose of the patent is not to save energy but to remove lignin, and there are no observations relating to energy economy. While the application suggests a protease treatment of the wood material, which is used both in the manufacture of mechanical pulp and in that of chemical pulp, the main issue is the removal of lignin as a pre-treatment in the manufacture of chemical pulp.
According to prior art, the pulping liquor is made to penetrate the chips used in pulp cooking by treating the chips with pressure shocks in the presence of the pulping liquor. In the Vilamo method, for example, the chips are treated in the presence of the cooking liquor by varying the pressure from a pressure of 4.5 kp/cm2 and a treatment time of 10 - 16s to a pressure of 2 kp/cm2 and a treatment time of 5 - 6s, the treatment being repeated 6 - 8 times at 1-minute intervals /Rydholm, 1965).
The Patent Specification WO 95/09267 suggests treating the chips, which are used in pulp cooking, with a chemical solution by subjecting the chips to a vacuum and making the chemical solution penetrate the wood fibres by means of a pressure shock. According to the application, the chemical solution can be cooking liquor that contains, for example, catalysts and enzymes. The object of the invention is, thus, to be able to decrease the amount of lignin in order to diminish the need of decreasing the residue lignin at the final stage of cooking. However, the application does not describe in detail, whether or not the enzymes penetrate the wood cells successfully and whether or not the enzymes have any effect on the decrease of the amount of lignin.
The US Patent 5,374,555 suggests the removal of lignin from the lignocellulose material by means of a protease enzyme. To enhance the enzymatic treatment, the patent suggests a mechanical treatment of chips, for example, in a screw clamp. The patent specification reminds that cellulase can be used as a pre-treatment enzyme for the chips or the pulp, but it does not suggest carrying out a treatment with cellu-lase in connection with the mechanical processes. The purpose of the patent is not to save energy but to remove lignin, and there are no observations relating to energy economy. While the application suggests a protease treatment of the wood material, which is used both in the manufacture of mechanical pulp and in that of chemical pulp, the main issue is the removal of lignin as a pre-treatment in the manufacture of chemical pulp.
The Patent Specification WO 97/40194 suggests changing the structure or the com-position of the wood by adding to the compressed chips fungal or bacterial cultures or products, such as enzymes obtained from them, by means of pressure. The pur-pose of the compression is to make cracks and fractures in the wood. When the chips are released from the compression, microbes of their products, while the chips expand, are absorbed by the structures of the wood partially by the virtue of under pressure, partially by the capillary action. The application suggests, among others, fungi from the genera Ceriposiophsis, Phanerochaete and Ophiostoma. Regarding enzymes, lipolytic, proteolytic, linginolytic, cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic en-zymes are mentioned. The patent specification describes the absorption of the en-zyme preparation Clariant Cartazyme HST"' (xylanase) into the compressed chips after releasing the pressure. Liquid was removed after the treatment, and mechanical pulp was prepared from the chips. In that case, the amount of energy consumed was 7.5% less than in the case of chips that were treated with a buffer only. In another test, the enzyme preparations Clariant Cartazyme NSTM (xylanase) and Sigma por-cine pancreas Lipase L-3126 were treated. In that case, the amount of energy con-sumed was 12.5% less than when treated with a buffer only. The specification men-tions no preservation of the optical properties of the pulp. According to the specifi-cation, the highest energy savings were made by combining enzyme preparations originating in different sources, of which the amount of a lipase of a mammalian origin, in particular, was considerable. The amount of the other enzymes used was also fairly high, which makes one suspect that the energy savings achieved were not particularly cost-effective.
Eriksson and Heitman (1998) describe tests, wherein pieces of wood (with a size of 1 x1 x 1.5 inches) were treated with a cellulase enzyme mixture, after which the pieces were ground and the energy consumed by the grinding was studied. The ab-sorption of the enzyme mixture into the pieces of wood was facilitated by subject-ing the pieces to a vacuum. The treatment was not observed to have any effect on the consumption of the grinding energy.
One problem with the manufacturing methods of mechanical pulp according to prior art is their great energy consumption. While attempts have been made to improve the beating degree and the energy economy with the aid of enzymatic treatments, hardly any energy savings have been made and, often, they have resulted in the weakening of the strength properties of the pulp (cellulase treatment) or in the dark-ening of the pulp and an impairment in the optical properties (laccase treatment).
Furthermore, it has not always been possible to make the enzyme solution effec-tively act on the wood. In some cases, the preparation of the enzyme composition used in the tests may have included time-consuming stages and/or been otherwise uneconomic.
The purpose of the present invention is to remove at least some disadvantages of prior art and to provide an improved method for the manufacture of mechanical 5 pulp. To be more precise, the object of the invention is to provide a pre-treatment method of chips to be used before preparing the mechanical pulp.
In connection with the present invention, it has surprisingly been observed that chips can be pre-treated with an enzyme preparation that has synergistically acting enzyme activities. In that case, the enzyme preparation does not need to contain any certain isolated enzyme activity only, but an enzyme preparation containing differ-ent enzyme activities can be used directly as the enzyme preparation.
The treatment according to the method can be applied to the chips directly. As the enzymatic treatment takes place at an early stage of the pulping process, savings in the refining energy are then as high as possible.
According to the method of the present invention, the chips are pre-treated with an enzyme that is capable of degrading the structural parts of the wood, after which mechanical pulp is manufactured from the chips by refining. It is preferable to carry out the enzymatic treatment by compressing the chips and by bringing the com-pressed chips in a liquid phase into contact with the enzyme composition to absorb the enzyme composition into the chips. The enzyme composition preferably con-tains both cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase. It is particularly preferable for the composition to contain an effective amount of both cellobiohydrolase and endoglu-canase. Enzyme preparations containing cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase in a ratio of 20:1 - 1:20, indicated as the weight ratio of the proteins, are preferable.
According to some preferable embodiments of the invention, the amount of en-doglucanase compared with that of cellobiohydrolase is higher than what is natu-rally produced by the industrial production strains of cellulase, such as Tricho-derma, in their growth media.
To be more precise, the method according to the invention is mainly characterized in that which is presented in the characterizing part of Claim 1.
The method according to the invention is also characterized in that which is pre-sented in the characterizing part of Claim 17.
The invention provides several considerable advantages. When using the methods according to the preferable embodiments of the invention, considerably lower amounts of energy are consumed than in the methods according to prior art. The energy saving can be as much as 20% compared with a method, wherein the chips are not treated with the enzyme preparation.
When treating the chips by the methods according to the preferable embodiments of the invention, the strength of the pulp was not weakened; on the contrary, it im-proved to some extent. The optical properties also remained good. Thus, when treat-ing the chips with the methods according to the preferred embodiments of the in-vention, it was possible to improve the quality of the pulp.
According to prior art, treating the raw material by means of a non-optimized cellu-lase enzyme product resulted in the hydrolysis of the insoluble cellulase and, thus, in the weakening of the strength properties of the pulp. In connection with the pre-sent invention, it was surprisingly observed that the enzyme preparation containing cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase did not necessarily result in a loss of the pulp strength.
According to the preferred embodiments of the invention, the enzyme preparation is produced in a host organism, which excretes the enzyme preparation out of the cell, whereby the enzyme preparation does not need to be isolated from the cell. It is also especially advantageous to use a genetically modified organism as the production host, producing the desired enzyme preparation directly in the growth medium.
This provides the considerable advantage that the used enzyme activity does not need to be isolated from the host organism or its growth medium but, for example, the growth medium of the host organism can be directly used.
In the following, the invention is described with the aid of a detailed description and some examples, the purpose of which, however, is not to limit the scope of the in-vention.
The enzymes that participate in the modification and degradation of cellulose are commonly called "cellulases". These enzymes include endo-(3-glucanases, cellobio hydrolases and ~i-glucosidase. Countless organisms, such as various wood rotting fungi, moulds and anaerobic bacteria are able to produce some or all of these en zymes. Depending on the type of organism and cultivation conditions, these en zymes are produced extracellularly in various ratios and amounts.
The term "enzyme preparation" used in this application refers to any product that contains at least one enzyme or a structural part of the enzyme. Accordingly, the enzyme preparation can be, for example, a growth medium containing the en-zyme(s), an isolated enzyme or a mixture of two or more enzymes. "Cellulase"
or "cellulase enzyme preparation", in turn, refers to an enzyme preparation containing at least one of the above-mentioned cellulase enzymes. The "enzyme composition"
Eriksson and Heitman (1998) describe tests, wherein pieces of wood (with a size of 1 x1 x 1.5 inches) were treated with a cellulase enzyme mixture, after which the pieces were ground and the energy consumed by the grinding was studied. The ab-sorption of the enzyme mixture into the pieces of wood was facilitated by subject-ing the pieces to a vacuum. The treatment was not observed to have any effect on the consumption of the grinding energy.
One problem with the manufacturing methods of mechanical pulp according to prior art is their great energy consumption. While attempts have been made to improve the beating degree and the energy economy with the aid of enzymatic treatments, hardly any energy savings have been made and, often, they have resulted in the weakening of the strength properties of the pulp (cellulase treatment) or in the dark-ening of the pulp and an impairment in the optical properties (laccase treatment).
Furthermore, it has not always been possible to make the enzyme solution effec-tively act on the wood. In some cases, the preparation of the enzyme composition used in the tests may have included time-consuming stages and/or been otherwise uneconomic.
The purpose of the present invention is to remove at least some disadvantages of prior art and to provide an improved method for the manufacture of mechanical 5 pulp. To be more precise, the object of the invention is to provide a pre-treatment method of chips to be used before preparing the mechanical pulp.
In connection with the present invention, it has surprisingly been observed that chips can be pre-treated with an enzyme preparation that has synergistically acting enzyme activities. In that case, the enzyme preparation does not need to contain any certain isolated enzyme activity only, but an enzyme preparation containing differ-ent enzyme activities can be used directly as the enzyme preparation.
The treatment according to the method can be applied to the chips directly. As the enzymatic treatment takes place at an early stage of the pulping process, savings in the refining energy are then as high as possible.
According to the method of the present invention, the chips are pre-treated with an enzyme that is capable of degrading the structural parts of the wood, after which mechanical pulp is manufactured from the chips by refining. It is preferable to carry out the enzymatic treatment by compressing the chips and by bringing the com-pressed chips in a liquid phase into contact with the enzyme composition to absorb the enzyme composition into the chips. The enzyme composition preferably con-tains both cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase. It is particularly preferable for the composition to contain an effective amount of both cellobiohydrolase and endoglu-canase. Enzyme preparations containing cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase in a ratio of 20:1 - 1:20, indicated as the weight ratio of the proteins, are preferable.
According to some preferable embodiments of the invention, the amount of en-doglucanase compared with that of cellobiohydrolase is higher than what is natu-rally produced by the industrial production strains of cellulase, such as Tricho-derma, in their growth media.
To be more precise, the method according to the invention is mainly characterized in that which is presented in the characterizing part of Claim 1.
The method according to the invention is also characterized in that which is pre-sented in the characterizing part of Claim 17.
The invention provides several considerable advantages. When using the methods according to the preferable embodiments of the invention, considerably lower amounts of energy are consumed than in the methods according to prior art. The energy saving can be as much as 20% compared with a method, wherein the chips are not treated with the enzyme preparation.
When treating the chips by the methods according to the preferable embodiments of the invention, the strength of the pulp was not weakened; on the contrary, it im-proved to some extent. The optical properties also remained good. Thus, when treat-ing the chips with the methods according to the preferred embodiments of the in-vention, it was possible to improve the quality of the pulp.
According to prior art, treating the raw material by means of a non-optimized cellu-lase enzyme product resulted in the hydrolysis of the insoluble cellulase and, thus, in the weakening of the strength properties of the pulp. In connection with the pre-sent invention, it was surprisingly observed that the enzyme preparation containing cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase did not necessarily result in a loss of the pulp strength.
According to the preferred embodiments of the invention, the enzyme preparation is produced in a host organism, which excretes the enzyme preparation out of the cell, whereby the enzyme preparation does not need to be isolated from the cell. It is also especially advantageous to use a genetically modified organism as the production host, producing the desired enzyme preparation directly in the growth medium.
This provides the considerable advantage that the used enzyme activity does not need to be isolated from the host organism or its growth medium but, for example, the growth medium of the host organism can be directly used.
In the following, the invention is described with the aid of a detailed description and some examples, the purpose of which, however, is not to limit the scope of the in-vention.
The enzymes that participate in the modification and degradation of cellulose are commonly called "cellulases". These enzymes include endo-(3-glucanases, cellobio hydrolases and ~i-glucosidase. Countless organisms, such as various wood rotting fungi, moulds and anaerobic bacteria are able to produce some or all of these en zymes. Depending on the type of organism and cultivation conditions, these en zymes are produced extracellularly in various ratios and amounts.
The term "enzyme preparation" used in this application refers to any product that contains at least one enzyme or a structural part of the enzyme. Accordingly, the enzyme preparation can be, for example, a growth medium containing the en-zyme(s), an isolated enzyme or a mixture of two or more enzymes. "Cellulase"
or "cellulase enzyme preparation", in turn, refers to an enzyme preparation containing at least one of the above-mentioned cellulase enzymes. The "enzyme composition"
in this application means the same as the enzyme preparation. In addition to the en-zymes, the enzyme preparation or the enzyme composition may also contain, for example, buffers, stabilizers, preservatives or other necessary additives.
The "cellobiohydrolase activity" in this application refers to an activity that is capa-S ble of modifying the crystalline parts of the cellulose. The cellobiohydrolase I and II
activities refer to the main activities of the cellobiohydrolase produced by Tricho-derma or to the corresponding activities produced by some other organism. The en-doglucanase activity in this application refers to an activity capable of modifying the amorphous parts of the cellulose. The endoglucanase I and the endoglucanase (I
activities refer to the main activities of the endoglucanase produced by Trichoderma or to the corresponding activities produced by another organism.
An enzyme preparation containing "an effective amount" of cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase refers to an enzyme preparation, in which the effect of each enzyme on the chips can be measured as a reduction in the energy consumption of the refin-ing. The effective amount of cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase provides a de-crease of at least 3%, preferably at least 5%, more preferably at least 8%, most pref erably at least 10% in the energy consumption of the refining.
When so desired, the methods according to the invention can be combined with treatments carried out with other enzymes, such as hemicellulases (e.g., xylanases, glucuronidases and mannanases) or esterases. In addition to these enzymes, addi tional enzyme preparations containing (3-glucosidase activity can be used in the pre-sent processes, because this kind of (3-glucosidase activity prevents the end product inhibition caused by cellobiose.
Cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase enzyme preparations are produced by grow ing suitable micro-organism strains, known to produce cellulase. The strains are preferably production strains that are used industrially. The growth medium used can be, for example, a simple cellulosic substrate (1% Solka floc), which the neces sary trace elements have been added to (Mandels and Weber, 1969). The production strains can be bacteria, fungi or moulds. As examples, the micro-organisms belong ing to the following families can be mentioned:
Trichoderma (e.g. T. reesei), Aspergillus (e.g. A. niger), Phanerochaete (e.g.
P.
chrysosporium; Covert et al., 1992), Penicillium (e.g. P. janthinellum, P.
digi-tatum), Streptomyces (e.g. S. olivochromogenes, S. flavogriseus), Humicola (e.g. H.
insolens), and Bacillus (e.g. B. subtilis, B. circulars, Ito et al., 1989).
Other white rot fungi can also be used, strains belonging to families, such as Phlebia, Ceri-poriopsis and Trametes.
The "cellobiohydrolase activity" in this application refers to an activity that is capa-S ble of modifying the crystalline parts of the cellulose. The cellobiohydrolase I and II
activities refer to the main activities of the cellobiohydrolase produced by Tricho-derma or to the corresponding activities produced by some other organism. The en-doglucanase activity in this application refers to an activity capable of modifying the amorphous parts of the cellulose. The endoglucanase I and the endoglucanase (I
activities refer to the main activities of the endoglucanase produced by Trichoderma or to the corresponding activities produced by another organism.
An enzyme preparation containing "an effective amount" of cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase refers to an enzyme preparation, in which the effect of each enzyme on the chips can be measured as a reduction in the energy consumption of the refin-ing. The effective amount of cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase provides a de-crease of at least 3%, preferably at least 5%, more preferably at least 8%, most pref erably at least 10% in the energy consumption of the refining.
When so desired, the methods according to the invention can be combined with treatments carried out with other enzymes, such as hemicellulases (e.g., xylanases, glucuronidases and mannanases) or esterases. In addition to these enzymes, addi tional enzyme preparations containing (3-glucosidase activity can be used in the pre-sent processes, because this kind of (3-glucosidase activity prevents the end product inhibition caused by cellobiose.
Cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase enzyme preparations are produced by grow ing suitable micro-organism strains, known to produce cellulase. The strains are preferably production strains that are used industrially. The growth medium used can be, for example, a simple cellulosic substrate (1% Solka floc), which the neces sary trace elements have been added to (Mandels and Weber, 1969). The production strains can be bacteria, fungi or moulds. As examples, the micro-organisms belong ing to the following families can be mentioned:
Trichoderma (e.g. T. reesei), Aspergillus (e.g. A. niger), Phanerochaete (e.g.
P.
chrysosporium; Covert et al., 1992), Penicillium (e.g. P. janthinellum, P.
digi-tatum), Streptomyces (e.g. S. olivochromogenes, S. flavogriseus), Humicola (e.g. H.
insolens), and Bacillus (e.g. B. subtilis, B. circulars, Ito et al., 1989).
Other white rot fungi can also be used, strains belonging to families, such as Phlebia, Ceri-poriopsis and Trametes.
It is also possible to produce cellobiohydrolases, endoglucanases or their structural parts by means of strains, which have been genetically improved to produce specifi-cally these proteins, or by other genetically modified production strains, to which genes coding for these proteins have been transferred. When the genes of the de-sired protein have been cloned (Teeri et al., 1983), it is possible to produce the pro-tein or its part in a desired host organism. The desired host may be the Trichoderma mould (EP 244 234, Mitsuishi et al., 1990), yeast (Penttila et al., 1988), some other mould, from families such as Aspergillus (van den Hondel et al., 1992), a bacterium or any other micro-organism, whose genetics are sufficiently well-known.
According to the preferred embodiments of the invention, the desired cellobiohy-drolase and endoglucanase are produced by means of the mould strain Trichoderma, preferably the strain T. reesei.
The said strain is a generally used production organism and its cellulases are fairly well known. T. reesei synthesizes two cellobiohydrolases, which are later referred to as CBH I and CBH II, several endoglucanases, of which EGI and EGII are the main activities, and at least two ~-glucosidases (Chen et al, 1992). The biochemical properties of these enzymes on pure cellulosic substrates have been extensively de-scribed. Endoglucanases are typically active on soluble and amorphous substrates (CMC, HEC, ~i-glucan), whereas the cellobiohydrolases are able to hydrolyze crys-talline cellulose. The cellobiohydrolases act clearly synergistically on crystalline cellulose, but their hydrolysis mechanisms are supposed to be different from each other. The present knowledge of the hydrolysis mechanisms of cellulases is based on results obtained on pure cellulase preparations, and may not be valid in cases, where the substrate also contains other components, such as lignin or hemicellulose.
The cellulases of T. reesei (cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases) do not essen-tially differ from each other with respect to their optimal external conditions, such as pH or temperature. Instead, they differ from each other with respect to their abil-ity to hydrolyze and modify cellulose in the raw wood material.
As far as their activities are concerned, the cellobiohydrolases I and II also differ to some extent from each other, and so do the endoglucanases I and II. In the preferred embodiments of this invention, however, it seems that the ratio of the cellobiohy-drolases to the endoglucanases is more important than the interrelation between the various cellobiohydrolases or the various endoglucanases.
Trichoderma reesei naturally produces various cellulase components in its growth medium, the amount and the interrelation of them depending on the production strain and the external conditions used. For the wild type of Trichoderma reesei, the following relative amounts of the main cellulases have been proposed: CBH I
60%, CBH II 20%, EG I 10% and EG II 10% (Stahlberg, 1991 ). In that case, the ratio of the cellobiohydrolases to the endoglucanases is about 4:1.
In this invention, it was observed that the preferred enzyme mixtures for the method according to the invention included those containing both cellobiohydrolase en-zymes and endoglucanase enzymes. While not wanting to commit ourselves to any theories, it very strongly seems that the method according to the invention needs both cellobiohydrolase enzymes and endoglucanase enzymes, because the endoglu-canase is capable of preparing, in the chips, objects that the cellobiohydrolase is able to act on. As neither activity alone is able to provide the desired effect, the cel-lobiohydrolases and the endoglucanases must work in synergy. According to the preferred embodiments of the invention, the ratio of the cellobiohydrolases to the endoglucanases, indicated as the weight ratio of the proteins, is preferably 20:1 -1:20, more preferably 9:1 - 1:9, more preferably 5:1 - 1:5, and more preferably 3:1 - 1:3, most preferably 2:1 - 1:2, and even more preferably about 1:1.
Accordingly, the most preferable cellulase compositions are those, wherein the weight ratio of the cellobiohydrolases and the endoglucanases is close to 1:1. However, an energy sav ing effect can even be provided by a weight ratio deviating from this, if the en doglucanase used has a very strong activity so that even a small amount is sufficient to provide the desired effect.
The preferred embodiments of the invention also include an enzyme preparation, wherein the portion of endoglucanases in the preparation is 2 - 60% by weight.
Even more preferred is a preparation, wherein the portion of endoglucanases in the preparation is 20 - 55% by weight and the most preferred is one, wherein the por-tion of endoglucanases is 45 - 50% by weight. Such an amount of endoglucanases can be reached by increasing the amount of either EGI or EGII, or both, in the preparation. If the amount of EGI is increased exclusively, the amount of EGI
in the preparation should reach a level of 15 - 45% by weight. This is also true, if only the amount of EGII is increased.
US Patent No. 5,874,293, for example, describes an enzyme preparation that is pro-duced by the strain Trichoderma (ALKO 3529) that overproduces EGII. The ratio of CBH:EG in the growth medium produced by the strain is estimated to be 1 -1.4:1. It would be advantageous to use the growth medium produced by such a strain, for example, in the present invention. The publication Karhunen et al.
(1993) describes a Trichoderma host that is modified to overproduce the EGI enzyme.
The growth medium of this host could also be used in the present invention.
Generally, preferable enzyme mixtures according to the preferred embodiments of this inven-tion include those, wherein the amount of endoglucanase is higher than what the cellulase-producing micro-organisms, such as 7richoderma, especially T.
reesei, would naturally produce in their growth media.
The modified cellulase preparation herein refers to a preparation, wherein the ratio 5 of CBH and EG components has been changed by methods that are well-known to average experts. Such methods include, e.g., the genetic modification of a host or ganism so that the host organism produces a novel cellulase compound in its growth medium. Other viable methods of manufacturing modified cellulase preparations include the fractioning of a cellulase-containing growth medium or combining dif 10 ferent cellulase mixtures.
The host organism can be modified genetically to produce the desired cellobiohy-drolases and endoglucanases in a desired proportion. For example, the genetic modification of the strains of the family Trichoderma can be carried out by the methods described in the patent EP 244234 or in the publication Suominen et al., 1993. Preferable enzyme preparations to be used in the embodiments of this inven-tion include those, wherein the mould T. reesei is modified to overproduce EG
I
and/or EG II enzymes. The overproduction host may also have been modified so as to produce less of some cellobiohydrolase activities, especially the CBH I or CBH
II activities, if any, or to produce less endoglucanases, if any, especially the EG I
and/or EG II activities. However, it should be noticed that in the enzyme prepara-tions according to the preferred embodiments of the invention, there should be cel-lobiohydrolase activities; therefore, adding endoglucanase activities to the enzyme preparations is more advantageous than decreasing cellobiohydrolase activities or removing the endoglucanases.
Corresponding enzyme preparations can also be manufactured by purifying suitable cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase enzymes and combining the same in advanta-geous proportions, or by adding to an enzyme preparation, which is produced by a non-modified host, the desired enzyme activities, for example, the EGI and EGII
activities.
The strains, which are capable of overproducing EGI and EGII enzymes, can be constructed, for example, by transferring genes coding for these enzymes (egll Penttila et al. 1986 and egl2 Saloheimo et al. 1988) to a selected Trichoderma host as several copies or to replace some genes of Trichoderma, such as the cbhl and cbh2 genes that code for cellobiohydrolases, as described in the publication Suomi-nen et al. (1993). The said genes can be expressed under a strong cbhl promoter, as described in the publication Paloheimo et al. (1993).
According to the preferred embodiments of the invention, the desired cellobiohy-drolase and endoglucanase are produced by means of the mould strain Trichoderma, preferably the strain T. reesei.
The said strain is a generally used production organism and its cellulases are fairly well known. T. reesei synthesizes two cellobiohydrolases, which are later referred to as CBH I and CBH II, several endoglucanases, of which EGI and EGII are the main activities, and at least two ~-glucosidases (Chen et al, 1992). The biochemical properties of these enzymes on pure cellulosic substrates have been extensively de-scribed. Endoglucanases are typically active on soluble and amorphous substrates (CMC, HEC, ~i-glucan), whereas the cellobiohydrolases are able to hydrolyze crys-talline cellulose. The cellobiohydrolases act clearly synergistically on crystalline cellulose, but their hydrolysis mechanisms are supposed to be different from each other. The present knowledge of the hydrolysis mechanisms of cellulases is based on results obtained on pure cellulase preparations, and may not be valid in cases, where the substrate also contains other components, such as lignin or hemicellulose.
The cellulases of T. reesei (cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases) do not essen-tially differ from each other with respect to their optimal external conditions, such as pH or temperature. Instead, they differ from each other with respect to their abil-ity to hydrolyze and modify cellulose in the raw wood material.
As far as their activities are concerned, the cellobiohydrolases I and II also differ to some extent from each other, and so do the endoglucanases I and II. In the preferred embodiments of this invention, however, it seems that the ratio of the cellobiohy-drolases to the endoglucanases is more important than the interrelation between the various cellobiohydrolases or the various endoglucanases.
Trichoderma reesei naturally produces various cellulase components in its growth medium, the amount and the interrelation of them depending on the production strain and the external conditions used. For the wild type of Trichoderma reesei, the following relative amounts of the main cellulases have been proposed: CBH I
60%, CBH II 20%, EG I 10% and EG II 10% (Stahlberg, 1991 ). In that case, the ratio of the cellobiohydrolases to the endoglucanases is about 4:1.
In this invention, it was observed that the preferred enzyme mixtures for the method according to the invention included those containing both cellobiohydrolase en-zymes and endoglucanase enzymes. While not wanting to commit ourselves to any theories, it very strongly seems that the method according to the invention needs both cellobiohydrolase enzymes and endoglucanase enzymes, because the endoglu-canase is capable of preparing, in the chips, objects that the cellobiohydrolase is able to act on. As neither activity alone is able to provide the desired effect, the cel-lobiohydrolases and the endoglucanases must work in synergy. According to the preferred embodiments of the invention, the ratio of the cellobiohydrolases to the endoglucanases, indicated as the weight ratio of the proteins, is preferably 20:1 -1:20, more preferably 9:1 - 1:9, more preferably 5:1 - 1:5, and more preferably 3:1 - 1:3, most preferably 2:1 - 1:2, and even more preferably about 1:1.
Accordingly, the most preferable cellulase compositions are those, wherein the weight ratio of the cellobiohydrolases and the endoglucanases is close to 1:1. However, an energy sav ing effect can even be provided by a weight ratio deviating from this, if the en doglucanase used has a very strong activity so that even a small amount is sufficient to provide the desired effect.
The preferred embodiments of the invention also include an enzyme preparation, wherein the portion of endoglucanases in the preparation is 2 - 60% by weight.
Even more preferred is a preparation, wherein the portion of endoglucanases in the preparation is 20 - 55% by weight and the most preferred is one, wherein the por-tion of endoglucanases is 45 - 50% by weight. Such an amount of endoglucanases can be reached by increasing the amount of either EGI or EGII, or both, in the preparation. If the amount of EGI is increased exclusively, the amount of EGI
in the preparation should reach a level of 15 - 45% by weight. This is also true, if only the amount of EGII is increased.
US Patent No. 5,874,293, for example, describes an enzyme preparation that is pro-duced by the strain Trichoderma (ALKO 3529) that overproduces EGII. The ratio of CBH:EG in the growth medium produced by the strain is estimated to be 1 -1.4:1. It would be advantageous to use the growth medium produced by such a strain, for example, in the present invention. The publication Karhunen et al.
(1993) describes a Trichoderma host that is modified to overproduce the EGI enzyme.
The growth medium of this host could also be used in the present invention.
Generally, preferable enzyme mixtures according to the preferred embodiments of this inven-tion include those, wherein the amount of endoglucanase is higher than what the cellulase-producing micro-organisms, such as 7richoderma, especially T.
reesei, would naturally produce in their growth media.
The modified cellulase preparation herein refers to a preparation, wherein the ratio 5 of CBH and EG components has been changed by methods that are well-known to average experts. Such methods include, e.g., the genetic modification of a host or ganism so that the host organism produces a novel cellulase compound in its growth medium. Other viable methods of manufacturing modified cellulase preparations include the fractioning of a cellulase-containing growth medium or combining dif 10 ferent cellulase mixtures.
The host organism can be modified genetically to produce the desired cellobiohy-drolases and endoglucanases in a desired proportion. For example, the genetic modification of the strains of the family Trichoderma can be carried out by the methods described in the patent EP 244234 or in the publication Suominen et al., 1993. Preferable enzyme preparations to be used in the embodiments of this inven-tion include those, wherein the mould T. reesei is modified to overproduce EG
I
and/or EG II enzymes. The overproduction host may also have been modified so as to produce less of some cellobiohydrolase activities, especially the CBH I or CBH
II activities, if any, or to produce less endoglucanases, if any, especially the EG I
and/or EG II activities. However, it should be noticed that in the enzyme prepara-tions according to the preferred embodiments of the invention, there should be cel-lobiohydrolase activities; therefore, adding endoglucanase activities to the enzyme preparations is more advantageous than decreasing cellobiohydrolase activities or removing the endoglucanases.
Corresponding enzyme preparations can also be manufactured by purifying suitable cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase enzymes and combining the same in advanta-geous proportions, or by adding to an enzyme preparation, which is produced by a non-modified host, the desired enzyme activities, for example, the EGI and EGII
activities.
The strains, which are capable of overproducing EGI and EGII enzymes, can be constructed, for example, by transferring genes coding for these enzymes (egll Penttila et al. 1986 and egl2 Saloheimo et al. 1988) to a selected Trichoderma host as several copies or to replace some genes of Trichoderma, such as the cbhl and cbh2 genes that code for cellobiohydrolases, as described in the publication Suomi-nen et al. (1993). The said genes can be expressed under a strong cbhl promoter, as described in the publication Paloheimo et al. (1993).
When manufacturing genetically modified hosts, the T. reesei strain QM6a, for ex-ample, can be used as a host, especially the strains QM9414 and Rut C - 30, which are developed from the same for the production of cellulase, or strains developed from them, which produce less protease.
According to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the enzyme preparation is manufactured by means of a host organism, which is modified to pro-duce cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases in a desired proportion in its growth medium. Alternatively, endoglucanase I and/or II enzymes are added to a growth medium, which is produced by a non-modified host organism that naturally pro-duces cellulases in its growth medium, the enzymes having either been produced by a micro-organism that is modified to overproduce these enzymes, or isolated and possibly purified from the growth medium. In the manufacture of the enzyme prepa-ration, the above-mentioned methods can also be combined. The cellobiohydrolase and the endoglucanase can be separated from the growth medium of the production host by means of several known methods. In these methods of separation, typically, various purifying techniques are combined, such as precipitation, ion exchange chromatographic and affinity chromatographic as well as gel chromatographic methods.
The enzyme preparations can be manufactured by means of the mould Trichoderma or some other production host. Genes that code for cellobiohydrolase and endoglu canase can originate in Trichoderma or some other host that produces the preferable cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase activities; and the said activities in the en zyme preparation can be from the same or a different origin.
The treatment according to the present invention is applied to chips. The raw wood material is chipped in a normal manner so that the chip length is about 15 -25 mm.
Before the treatment, the chips can be graded by removing oversize and too thick chips and fines.
In the method according to the invention, the chip material is typically compressed by at least 10%, generally 10 - 30% of its original bulk volume. The chips are com presses in a ratio of 1:2 - 1:10. A ratio of compression of at least 1:4 is preferably used. The compression treatment is preferably carried out by a method, wherein the chips are compressed without a considerable circular motion, because the object is not to crush the pieces of chips but make microscopic cracks in the raw wood mate-rial. In terms of technicality, the compression can be implemented by various means, e.g., in a screw clamp or by a hydraulic press. In the compression treatment, the impregnated chips are treated for a sufficient time in conditions favourable for the activity of the enzyme, after which the chips are processed in a normal manner before refining, including pre-heating with steam before feeding them into the re-fi ner.
The method according to the invention is not limited to a certain raw wood material but can generally be applied to both softwood and hardwood, such as the species of the Pinaceae order (e.g., the Picea and Pinus families), the species of the Salica-ceae order (e.g., the Populus family) and the species in the Betula family.
The compressed chips are brought into contact with the enzyme preparation in a liquid phase. This is best carried out so that the chips are compressed in an enzyme solution. The proportion of the liquid and the chips is preferably selected so that the liquid is able to effectively act on the chips. Thus, the proportion of liquid to the chips can be 10:1 - 2:1, and it is preferably 6 - 8:1. The compression pressure can be 10 - 20 MPa, and it is preferably 12 - 15 MPa. The duration of the compres-sion/absorption stage should be at least I min; the duration is preferably 5 -min and generally 10 - 30 min. After releasing the compression, the chips are al-lowed to return to their original volume under the enzyme solution, whereby the enzyme solution is impregnated into the chips.
At the compression/absorption stage, the pH and the temperature of the enzyme so-lution should be suitable for the functioning of the enzyme preparation. For the cel-lobiohydrolases and the endoglucanases, the pH should preferably be within a range of pH 3 - 10, preferably pH 4 - 8, and the temperature should be 20 -55°C, pref erably 30 - 45°C. In order for the enzyme to act on the chips before refining, the chips are treated for a sufficiently long time in the conditions mentioned above. The treatment time greatly varies depending on the properties (size, thickness) of the chips, sort of wood, compression treatment, enzyme preparation, operational condi-dons etc., and a suitable treatment time must be specified for each case separately.
In terms of costs, as short a time as possible is advantageous but in terms of process technology, there are no obstacles for a treatment of several hours.
Typically, the treatment time can be within a range of 1 - 24h, preferably 1 - 12h.
The amount of enzyme preparation used in the invention in the treatment of chips is selected so that the amount of free sugars released in the solution is preferably about 0.1 - 1.0% of the original dry matter. A suitable dosage, determined as total protein, is 0.1 - 7mg of protein per g of chips, preferably 3 - 6mg of protein per g of chips (as dry matter).
In the present invention, mechanical pulp is manufactured by refining chips that are treated with an enzyme to obtain a drainability value, which is preferably at least 100m1 CSF, more preferably 40 - 80m1 CSF. Surprisingly, it was observed that the method according to the invention yielded energy savings of 13%, preferably 15%
and most preferably as much as 20%.
It seems that the enzymatic treatment according to the present invention is advanta-geous, when combined with the manufacture of mechanical pulp by the refining method, in particular, and when refining the pulp into drainability of 100 CSF
or lower.
The invention provides considerable advantages. Accordingly, it can be used to considerably reduce the specific energy consumption of refining; in accordance with the preferred embodiments of the invention, as much as 20% lower energy consumption can be achieved than with untreated source materials, as the examples below indicate. By means of a suitable enzyme preparation, the properties of the mass can also be improved. Using the solutions according to the preferred embodi-ments of the invention, a high yield is obtained in the manufacture of mechanical pulp by refining, the quality of the pulp is good, the strengths are maintained, the optical properties are good, and the method is easy to connect to the present proc-esses.
The invention can be applied to all manufacturing methods of mechanical pulp, such as the manufacture of thermo-mechanical pulp (TMP) and refined mechanical pulp (RMP).
In the following, the invention is described in detail with the aid of a few examples of application.
Example 1 Enzymatic treatment of chips Enzymatic treatments with a cellulase mixture were carried out on sorted spruce sapwood chips (0 7mm), using an enzyme dosage of 6.3mg of protein per g of chips (as dry matter), ~KLn~Kra~a commercial enzyme preparation produced by the Tricho-derma strain, wherein the weight proportions of CBH:EG were defined as 1:1. To enhance the enzymatic treatment, a compression treatment was exerted on the chips using a PREX hydraulic press. In the hydraulic compression, a chip lot (200g) was compressed in the enzyme solution into a volume that was about 20% smaller than the original, using a compression load of 48t (14 Mpa). The ratio of liquid to wood was 11:4 and the duration of the compression/absorption stage was lOmin. After releasing the compression, the chips were allowed to return to their original volume under the enzyme solution, whereby the enzyme solution was impregnated into the chips. As a reference, an otherwise similar treatment was used, but without the en-zyme. In the compression treatment, neither visual nor microscopic changes were perceived in the chips. After the compression treatment, the chips (+ the compres-sion solution) were transferred into a rotary air oven for further processing.
The treatment was carried out in atmospheric pressure and at a temperature of 45°C. The amount of carbohydrates released in the treatment solution, as reducing sugars, was defined after 6 and 22 h. The result obtained was compared with a treatment, wherein the compression treatment of chips was omitted. The results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. The amount of carbohydrates released in the solution (after 6 and 22h) from spruce sapwood chips in the enzymatic treatment. The amount of dissolved carbohydrates is calculated as per cent of the original dry matter.
Treatment Dissolved carbohydrates, %, dry matter 6h 22h Compression treatment 0.71 1.06 No compression treatment 0.04 0.26 1 S On the basis of the results, it was stated that the impregnation of the enzyme pro-vided by means of the compression treatment considerably enhanced the release of soluble carbohydrates from the chips compared with a case, wherein no compres-sion treatment was carried out.
Example 2 Effect of the enzymatic treatment on the beatability of chips The effects of the combined compression/absorption and enzymatic treatments on the beatability of the chips were examined by means of a blade refiner. The equip-ment used in the tests contained the actual refiner and an accurate energy measuring system connected thereto. The refiner chamber of the blade refiner consisted of a cylinder provided with counter blades (20 in number) and a rotary rotor having four wing-like blades. Several refining operations (125g dry matter per refining) were carried out for each specific energy consumption curve (SEC) by varying the refin-ing time (3 - l2min) and, thus, also the energy level of the refining. The total en-ergy consumption of the refining was obtained from a watt-hour meter by means of a cumulative pulse counter. The energy consumption value obtained per amount of defibred chips was corrected by a zero load.
According to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the enzyme preparation is manufactured by means of a host organism, which is modified to pro-duce cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases in a desired proportion in its growth medium. Alternatively, endoglucanase I and/or II enzymes are added to a growth medium, which is produced by a non-modified host organism that naturally pro-duces cellulases in its growth medium, the enzymes having either been produced by a micro-organism that is modified to overproduce these enzymes, or isolated and possibly purified from the growth medium. In the manufacture of the enzyme prepa-ration, the above-mentioned methods can also be combined. The cellobiohydrolase and the endoglucanase can be separated from the growth medium of the production host by means of several known methods. In these methods of separation, typically, various purifying techniques are combined, such as precipitation, ion exchange chromatographic and affinity chromatographic as well as gel chromatographic methods.
The enzyme preparations can be manufactured by means of the mould Trichoderma or some other production host. Genes that code for cellobiohydrolase and endoglu canase can originate in Trichoderma or some other host that produces the preferable cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase activities; and the said activities in the en zyme preparation can be from the same or a different origin.
The treatment according to the present invention is applied to chips. The raw wood material is chipped in a normal manner so that the chip length is about 15 -25 mm.
Before the treatment, the chips can be graded by removing oversize and too thick chips and fines.
In the method according to the invention, the chip material is typically compressed by at least 10%, generally 10 - 30% of its original bulk volume. The chips are com presses in a ratio of 1:2 - 1:10. A ratio of compression of at least 1:4 is preferably used. The compression treatment is preferably carried out by a method, wherein the chips are compressed without a considerable circular motion, because the object is not to crush the pieces of chips but make microscopic cracks in the raw wood mate-rial. In terms of technicality, the compression can be implemented by various means, e.g., in a screw clamp or by a hydraulic press. In the compression treatment, the impregnated chips are treated for a sufficient time in conditions favourable for the activity of the enzyme, after which the chips are processed in a normal manner before refining, including pre-heating with steam before feeding them into the re-fi ner.
The method according to the invention is not limited to a certain raw wood material but can generally be applied to both softwood and hardwood, such as the species of the Pinaceae order (e.g., the Picea and Pinus families), the species of the Salica-ceae order (e.g., the Populus family) and the species in the Betula family.
The compressed chips are brought into contact with the enzyme preparation in a liquid phase. This is best carried out so that the chips are compressed in an enzyme solution. The proportion of the liquid and the chips is preferably selected so that the liquid is able to effectively act on the chips. Thus, the proportion of liquid to the chips can be 10:1 - 2:1, and it is preferably 6 - 8:1. The compression pressure can be 10 - 20 MPa, and it is preferably 12 - 15 MPa. The duration of the compres-sion/absorption stage should be at least I min; the duration is preferably 5 -min and generally 10 - 30 min. After releasing the compression, the chips are al-lowed to return to their original volume under the enzyme solution, whereby the enzyme solution is impregnated into the chips.
At the compression/absorption stage, the pH and the temperature of the enzyme so-lution should be suitable for the functioning of the enzyme preparation. For the cel-lobiohydrolases and the endoglucanases, the pH should preferably be within a range of pH 3 - 10, preferably pH 4 - 8, and the temperature should be 20 -55°C, pref erably 30 - 45°C. In order for the enzyme to act on the chips before refining, the chips are treated for a sufficiently long time in the conditions mentioned above. The treatment time greatly varies depending on the properties (size, thickness) of the chips, sort of wood, compression treatment, enzyme preparation, operational condi-dons etc., and a suitable treatment time must be specified for each case separately.
In terms of costs, as short a time as possible is advantageous but in terms of process technology, there are no obstacles for a treatment of several hours.
Typically, the treatment time can be within a range of 1 - 24h, preferably 1 - 12h.
The amount of enzyme preparation used in the invention in the treatment of chips is selected so that the amount of free sugars released in the solution is preferably about 0.1 - 1.0% of the original dry matter. A suitable dosage, determined as total protein, is 0.1 - 7mg of protein per g of chips, preferably 3 - 6mg of protein per g of chips (as dry matter).
In the present invention, mechanical pulp is manufactured by refining chips that are treated with an enzyme to obtain a drainability value, which is preferably at least 100m1 CSF, more preferably 40 - 80m1 CSF. Surprisingly, it was observed that the method according to the invention yielded energy savings of 13%, preferably 15%
and most preferably as much as 20%.
It seems that the enzymatic treatment according to the present invention is advanta-geous, when combined with the manufacture of mechanical pulp by the refining method, in particular, and when refining the pulp into drainability of 100 CSF
or lower.
The invention provides considerable advantages. Accordingly, it can be used to considerably reduce the specific energy consumption of refining; in accordance with the preferred embodiments of the invention, as much as 20% lower energy consumption can be achieved than with untreated source materials, as the examples below indicate. By means of a suitable enzyme preparation, the properties of the mass can also be improved. Using the solutions according to the preferred embodi-ments of the invention, a high yield is obtained in the manufacture of mechanical pulp by refining, the quality of the pulp is good, the strengths are maintained, the optical properties are good, and the method is easy to connect to the present proc-esses.
The invention can be applied to all manufacturing methods of mechanical pulp, such as the manufacture of thermo-mechanical pulp (TMP) and refined mechanical pulp (RMP).
In the following, the invention is described in detail with the aid of a few examples of application.
Example 1 Enzymatic treatment of chips Enzymatic treatments with a cellulase mixture were carried out on sorted spruce sapwood chips (0 7mm), using an enzyme dosage of 6.3mg of protein per g of chips (as dry matter), ~KLn~Kra~a commercial enzyme preparation produced by the Tricho-derma strain, wherein the weight proportions of CBH:EG were defined as 1:1. To enhance the enzymatic treatment, a compression treatment was exerted on the chips using a PREX hydraulic press. In the hydraulic compression, a chip lot (200g) was compressed in the enzyme solution into a volume that was about 20% smaller than the original, using a compression load of 48t (14 Mpa). The ratio of liquid to wood was 11:4 and the duration of the compression/absorption stage was lOmin. After releasing the compression, the chips were allowed to return to their original volume under the enzyme solution, whereby the enzyme solution was impregnated into the chips. As a reference, an otherwise similar treatment was used, but without the en-zyme. In the compression treatment, neither visual nor microscopic changes were perceived in the chips. After the compression treatment, the chips (+ the compres-sion solution) were transferred into a rotary air oven for further processing.
The treatment was carried out in atmospheric pressure and at a temperature of 45°C. The amount of carbohydrates released in the treatment solution, as reducing sugars, was defined after 6 and 22 h. The result obtained was compared with a treatment, wherein the compression treatment of chips was omitted. The results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. The amount of carbohydrates released in the solution (after 6 and 22h) from spruce sapwood chips in the enzymatic treatment. The amount of dissolved carbohydrates is calculated as per cent of the original dry matter.
Treatment Dissolved carbohydrates, %, dry matter 6h 22h Compression treatment 0.71 1.06 No compression treatment 0.04 0.26 1 S On the basis of the results, it was stated that the impregnation of the enzyme pro-vided by means of the compression treatment considerably enhanced the release of soluble carbohydrates from the chips compared with a case, wherein no compres-sion treatment was carried out.
Example 2 Effect of the enzymatic treatment on the beatability of chips The effects of the combined compression/absorption and enzymatic treatments on the beatability of the chips were examined by means of a blade refiner. The equip-ment used in the tests contained the actual refiner and an accurate energy measuring system connected thereto. The refiner chamber of the blade refiner consisted of a cylinder provided with counter blades (20 in number) and a rotary rotor having four wing-like blades. Several refining operations (125g dry matter per refining) were carried out for each specific energy consumption curve (SEC) by varying the refin-ing time (3 - l2min) and, thus, also the energy level of the refining. The total en-ergy consumption of the refining was obtained from a watt-hour meter by means of a cumulative pulse counter. The energy consumption value obtained per amount of defibred chips was corrected by a zero load.
The defibration times for the treated spruce sapwood chips were 3 - l2min. The treatments were carried out as described in Example 3 (45°C, 22h). The compres-sion/absorption treatments were carried out using a treated cellulase mixture, as in Example l, CBH l, and an EG-rich enzyme preparation. The dosages for the treated 5 mixture were 0.63 and 6.3 of protein per g of chips (as dry matter). The dosage for CBH 1 and the EG-rich enzymes was S.Omg of protein per g of chips (dry matter).
Reference refining operations were carried out on untreated chips and chips that were treated otherwise similarly to the others but without the enzyme (a buffer treatment). After refining, the pulp was removed from the refiner, filtered, homoge-10 nized and its dry content was defined, on the basis of which the SEC value could be calculated (kWh/kg).
The results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Treatment CFS, ml SEC, kWh/kg Buffer treatment 1 OOmI 4.78 (pH5) Cellulase mixture, " 4.15 0.63 mg/g Cellulase mixture, " 3.79 6.3 mg/g CBH I, protein Smg/g" 4.94 EG-rich, protein " 4.14 Smglg 15 According to the results, it could be stated that the pre-treatment of chips with the treated cellulase mixture considerably enhanced the beatability, compared with the other cellulase preparations (CBH I and the EG-rich): depending on the enzyme dosage used, energy savings of 10 - 20% were achieved with the cellulase mixture compared with the corresponding buffer treatment.
Example 3 Effect of the enzymatic treatment on the sheet properties of the pulp The chips were impregnated and treated with a cellulase mixture (a dosage contain-ing 0.63mg of protein per g of chips (dry matter), 45°C, 22h), as described in Ex-ample 1. After this, the chips were refined by the blade refiner in accordance with Example 2. Laboratory sheets were prepared from the refined pulps and tested in accordance with SCAN methods. The sheet properties are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
TreatmentSEC, CSF, Density,TensileTear Scott Opacity,Brightness, kWh/kg ml kg/m' index,index, Bond, N m/g mN mz/g J/m2 Reference4.61 115 361 38.5 8.24 112 94.5 54.4 Cellulase4.19 108 375 39.9 7.84 139 93.5 56.0 According to the results, the cellulase treatment, which was applied to the chips, improved the strength properties of the pulp; the tensile strength and the z-strength (Scott Bond) in particular. Also the optical properties were well-preserved.
References M. Akhtar, M. Attridge, G. Myers, T.K. Kirk & R. Blanchette. Biomechanical pulp ing of loblolly pine with different strains of the white-rot fungus Ceriporiopsis sub vermispora. TAPPI J. 75 (1992), 105-109.
Chen H., Hayn M. & Esterbauer H. Purification and characterization of two ex-tracellular ~i-glucosidases from Trichoderma reesei. Biochim. Biophys. Acta ( 1992), 54-60.
Covert, S., Vanden Wymelenberg, A. & Cullen, D., Structure, organisation and transcription of a cellobiohydrolase gene cluster from Phanerochaete chrysospo-rium, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58 (1992), 2168-2175.
Eriksson, L.A. & Heitman, J.A. Jr. Enzyme treatment of wood chips for mechanical pulping and the resulting effects on wood and fiberultrasructure. 7 th Int.
Conf. Bio technol. Pulp Pap. Ind., 1998, Volume B, B25-B28.
D.A. Goring. Thermal Softening of Lignin, Hemicellulose and Cellulose. Pulp And Paper Magazine of Canada 64 (1963) 12, T517-27.
Grethlein, H.E. Biotechnology, February 1985, pp.155 - 160.
Ito, S., Shikata, S., Ozaki, K., Kawai, S., Okamoto, K., moue, S., Takei, A., Ohta, Y. & Satoh, T., Alkaline cellulase for laudry detergents: production by Bacillus sp.
KSM-635 and enzymatic properties, Agril. Biol. Chem. 53 (1989), 1275-1281.
K. Jokinen & M. Savolainen. Puun mekaanisen massan kasittely lakkaasilla. PSC
Communications 18. Espoo 1991.
Reference refining operations were carried out on untreated chips and chips that were treated otherwise similarly to the others but without the enzyme (a buffer treatment). After refining, the pulp was removed from the refiner, filtered, homoge-10 nized and its dry content was defined, on the basis of which the SEC value could be calculated (kWh/kg).
The results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Treatment CFS, ml SEC, kWh/kg Buffer treatment 1 OOmI 4.78 (pH5) Cellulase mixture, " 4.15 0.63 mg/g Cellulase mixture, " 3.79 6.3 mg/g CBH I, protein Smg/g" 4.94 EG-rich, protein " 4.14 Smglg 15 According to the results, it could be stated that the pre-treatment of chips with the treated cellulase mixture considerably enhanced the beatability, compared with the other cellulase preparations (CBH I and the EG-rich): depending on the enzyme dosage used, energy savings of 10 - 20% were achieved with the cellulase mixture compared with the corresponding buffer treatment.
Example 3 Effect of the enzymatic treatment on the sheet properties of the pulp The chips were impregnated and treated with a cellulase mixture (a dosage contain-ing 0.63mg of protein per g of chips (dry matter), 45°C, 22h), as described in Ex-ample 1. After this, the chips were refined by the blade refiner in accordance with Example 2. Laboratory sheets were prepared from the refined pulps and tested in accordance with SCAN methods. The sheet properties are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
TreatmentSEC, CSF, Density,TensileTear Scott Opacity,Brightness, kWh/kg ml kg/m' index,index, Bond, N m/g mN mz/g J/m2 Reference4.61 115 361 38.5 8.24 112 94.5 54.4 Cellulase4.19 108 375 39.9 7.84 139 93.5 56.0 According to the results, the cellulase treatment, which was applied to the chips, improved the strength properties of the pulp; the tensile strength and the z-strength (Scott Bond) in particular. Also the optical properties were well-preserved.
References M. Akhtar, M. Attridge, G. Myers, T.K. Kirk & R. Blanchette. Biomechanical pulp ing of loblolly pine with different strains of the white-rot fungus Ceriporiopsis sub vermispora. TAPPI J. 75 (1992), 105-109.
Chen H., Hayn M. & Esterbauer H. Purification and characterization of two ex-tracellular ~i-glucosidases from Trichoderma reesei. Biochim. Biophys. Acta ( 1992), 54-60.
Covert, S., Vanden Wymelenberg, A. & Cullen, D., Structure, organisation and transcription of a cellobiohydrolase gene cluster from Phanerochaete chrysospo-rium, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58 (1992), 2168-2175.
Eriksson, L.A. & Heitman, J.A. Jr. Enzyme treatment of wood chips for mechanical pulping and the resulting effects on wood and fiberultrasructure. 7 th Int.
Conf. Bio technol. Pulp Pap. Ind., 1998, Volume B, B25-B28.
D.A. Goring. Thermal Softening of Lignin, Hemicellulose and Cellulose. Pulp And Paper Magazine of Canada 64 (1963) 12, T517-27.
Grethlein, H.E. Biotechnology, February 1985, pp.155 - 160.
Ito, S., Shikata, S., Ozaki, K., Kawai, S., Okamoto, K., moue, S., Takei, A., Ohta, Y. & Satoh, T., Alkaline cellulase for laudry detergents: production by Bacillus sp.
KSM-635 and enzymatic properties, Agril. Biol. Chem. 53 (1989), 1275-1281.
K. Jokinen & M. Savolainen. Puun mekaanisen massan kasittely lakkaasilla. PSC
Communications 18. Espoo 1991.
Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227 ( 1970), 680-685.
G. Leatham, G. Myers & T. Wegner. Biomechanical pulping of aspen chips: energy savings resulting from different fungal treatments. TAPPI J. 73 ( 1990), 197-200.
Mitsuishi, Y., Nitisinprasert, S., Saloheimo, M., Biese, I., Reinikainen, T., Clayssens, M., Keranen, S., Knowles, J. & Teeri, T. Site-directed mutagenesis of the putative catalysic residues of Trichoderma.
Paloheimo, M., Miettinen-Oinonen, A., Torkkeli, T., Nevalainen, H. and Suominen, P. Enzyme production by Trichoderma reesei using the cbh I promoter.
Proceedings of the second TRICEL symposium on Trichoderma reesei cellulases and other hy-drolases, Espoo, Finland, 1993, ed. by P. Suominen & T. Reinikainen, Foundation for Biotechnical and Industrial Fermentation Research & (1993):229-238.
Penttila, M., Antre, L., Lehtovaara, P., Bailey, M., Teeri, T. & Knowles, J.
Effecient secretion of two fungal cellobiohydrolases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene (1988) 103-112.
J-C Pommier, J-L Fuentes & G. Goma. Using enzymes to improve the process and the product quality in the recycled paper industry. Part 1: the basic laboratory work.
TAPPI J. 72 (1989) 6, 187-191.
J-C Pommier, G. Goma, J-L Fuentes, C. Rousser, O. Jokinen, Using enzymes to improve the process and the product quality in the recycled paper industry.
Part 2:
Industrial applications. TAPPI J. 73 (1990) 12, 197-202.
Rydholm, S. Pulping Processes, Interschience Publishers, London, 1965.
E. Setliff, R. Marton, G. Granzow & K. Eriksson. Biochemical pulping with white-rot fungi. TAPPI J. 73 ( 1990), 141-147.
Stahlberg, J. Functional organization of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei.
PhD
Thesis. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dis-sertations from the Faculty of Science, No. 344, Uppsala, 1991.
Suominen, P. et al., 1993. High frequency one-step gene replacement in Tricho-derma reesei. II Effects of deletions of individual cellulase genes. Mol. Gen.
Genet.
241:523-530.
Teeri, T., Salowori, I. & Knowles, J., The molecular cloning of the major cellobio-hydrolase gene from Trichoderma reesei Bio/Technolgy 1 (1983), 696-699.
Tomme, P., McCrae, S., Wood, T. & Claeyssens, M. Chromatographic separation of cellulolytic enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 160 (1988), 187-193.
G. Leatham, G. Myers & T. Wegner. Biomechanical pulping of aspen chips: energy savings resulting from different fungal treatments. TAPPI J. 73 ( 1990), 197-200.
Mitsuishi, Y., Nitisinprasert, S., Saloheimo, M., Biese, I., Reinikainen, T., Clayssens, M., Keranen, S., Knowles, J. & Teeri, T. Site-directed mutagenesis of the putative catalysic residues of Trichoderma.
Paloheimo, M., Miettinen-Oinonen, A., Torkkeli, T., Nevalainen, H. and Suominen, P. Enzyme production by Trichoderma reesei using the cbh I promoter.
Proceedings of the second TRICEL symposium on Trichoderma reesei cellulases and other hy-drolases, Espoo, Finland, 1993, ed. by P. Suominen & T. Reinikainen, Foundation for Biotechnical and Industrial Fermentation Research & (1993):229-238.
Penttila, M., Antre, L., Lehtovaara, P., Bailey, M., Teeri, T. & Knowles, J.
Effecient secretion of two fungal cellobiohydrolases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene (1988) 103-112.
J-C Pommier, J-L Fuentes & G. Goma. Using enzymes to improve the process and the product quality in the recycled paper industry. Part 1: the basic laboratory work.
TAPPI J. 72 (1989) 6, 187-191.
J-C Pommier, G. Goma, J-L Fuentes, C. Rousser, O. Jokinen, Using enzymes to improve the process and the product quality in the recycled paper industry.
Part 2:
Industrial applications. TAPPI J. 73 (1990) 12, 197-202.
Rydholm, S. Pulping Processes, Interschience Publishers, London, 1965.
E. Setliff, R. Marton, G. Granzow & K. Eriksson. Biochemical pulping with white-rot fungi. TAPPI J. 73 ( 1990), 141-147.
Stahlberg, J. Functional organization of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei.
PhD
Thesis. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dis-sertations from the Faculty of Science, No. 344, Uppsala, 1991.
Suominen, P. et al., 1993. High frequency one-step gene replacement in Tricho-derma reesei. II Effects of deletions of individual cellulase genes. Mol. Gen.
Genet.
241:523-530.
Teeri, T., Salowori, I. & Knowles, J., The molecular cloning of the major cellobio-hydrolase gene from Trichoderma reesei Bio/Technolgy 1 (1983), 696-699.
Tomme, P., McCrae, S., Wood, T. & Claeyssens, M. Chromatographic separation of cellulolytic enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 160 (1988), 187-193.
van den Hondel, C., Punt, P. & van Gorcom, R. Production of extracellular proteins by the filamentous fungus Aspergillus. Antonio van Leeuwenhoek 61 ( 1992), 153-160.
van Tilbeurgh, H. Bhikhabhai, R. Pettersson, L. and Claeyessens M. (1984) Separa lion of endo- and exo-type cellulases using a new affinity method. FEBS Lett.
169, 215-218.
Virkola, Nils-Erik (Ed.) Puumassan valmistus. Suomen Paperi-insinoorien yhdistys.
Turku 1983.
Zurbriggen, B.Z., Bailey, M.J., Penttila, M.E., Poutanen, K. and Linko M.
(1990) Pilot scale production of a heterologous Trichoderma reesei cellulase in Saccharo myces cerevisiae. J. Biotechnol. 13, 267-278.
van Tilbeurgh, H. Bhikhabhai, R. Pettersson, L. and Claeyessens M. (1984) Separa lion of endo- and exo-type cellulases using a new affinity method. FEBS Lett.
169, 215-218.
Virkola, Nils-Erik (Ed.) Puumassan valmistus. Suomen Paperi-insinoorien yhdistys.
Turku 1983.
Zurbriggen, B.Z., Bailey, M.J., Penttila, M.E., Poutanen, K. and Linko M.
(1990) Pilot scale production of a heterologous Trichoderma reesei cellulase in Saccharo myces cerevisiae. J. Biotechnol. 13, 267-278.
Claims (18)
1. A process for preparing mechanical pulp, comprising - chipping the raw wood material, - pre-treating the chips with an enzyme that is capable of disintegrating the struc-tural parts of the wood, after which - mechanical pulp is prepared from the chips by refining, characterized in that - the enzymatic treatment is carried out by compressing the chips and bringing the compressed chips in a liquid phase into contact with an enzyme preparation contain-ing an effective amount of both cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase.
2. A method according to Claim 1, characterized in that an enzyme preparation is used, containing cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases in a weight ratio of the pro-teins of 20:1 - 1:20, preferably in a weight ratio of 9:1 - 1:9.
3. A method according to Claim 1 or 2, characterized in that an enzyme prepara-tion is used, containing cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases in a weight ratio of the proteins of 5:1 - 1:5, preferably in a weight ratio of 3:1 - 1:3.
4. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that an en-zyme preparation is used, containing 2 - 60% by weight, preferably 20 - 55% by weight of endoglucanases.
5. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the enzyme preparation is produced by any production strain that is used industrially.
6. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the enzyme preparation is produced by a strain belonging to a family that is selected from the following group: Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Humicola, Phan-erochaete, Streptomyces, and Bacillus.
7. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the enzyme preparation is used in an amount of 0.1 - 7mg of protein per g of chips, preferably 3 - 6mg of protein per g of chips (dry matter).
8. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the pulp is refined to obtain a drainability of at least 100ml CSF, preferably at least about 80ml CSF.
9. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the chips are compressed by at least 10%.
10. A method according to Claim 9, characterized in that the chips are compressed using a compression ratio of 1:2 - 1:10.
11. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the average chip size of the chips that are subjected to the compression treatment is about 15 - 25 mm.
12. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the compression treatment is carried out in a screw clamp or a hydraulic press.
13. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the enzyme preparation is allowed to act on the chips for at least 1 minute, preferably about 5 - 100 min before the refiner mechanical pulp is prepared.
14. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the chips are steamed before the compression treatment.
15. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the mechanical pulp is prepared by the TMP or the RMP method.
16. The use of the method according to any of the preceding claims for preparing mechanical pulp that is used for paper pulp.
17. A method of reducing the energy consumption of mechanical pulping processes that are based on the refinement of chips, characterized in that, before refining, the chips are treated with an enzyme preparation, which contains cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase enzymes in a ratio of 20:1 - 1:20 and which is absorbed into the chips by a mechanical compression of the chips and by bringing the compressed chips into contact with the enzyme preparation in a liquid phase.
18. A method according to Claim 17, characterized in that the chips are refined to obtain a drainability level of < 100ml CSF, preferably < 80ml CSF.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FI20031818 | 2003-12-11 | ||
FI20031818A FI20031818A (en) | 2003-12-11 | 2003-12-11 | Manufacture of mechanical pulp |
PCT/FI2004/000759 WO2005056915A1 (en) | 2003-12-11 | 2004-12-13 | Process for preparing mechanical pulp |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2549469A1 true CA2549469A1 (en) | 2005-06-23 |
Family
ID=29763513
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002549469A Abandoned CA2549469A1 (en) | 2003-12-11 | 2004-12-13 | Process for preparing mechanical pulp |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20070151683A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1699974B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE437993T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2549469A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602004022332D1 (en) |
FI (1) | FI20031818A (en) |
NO (1) | NO20063206L (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005056915A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7682811B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2010-03-23 | University Of Massachusetts | Systems and methods for producing biofuels and related materials |
WO2009124321A1 (en) * | 2008-04-04 | 2009-10-08 | University Of Massachusetts | Methods and compositions for improving the production of fuels in microorganisms |
WO2009152362A2 (en) * | 2008-06-11 | 2009-12-17 | University Of Massachusetts | Methods and compositions for regulating sporulation |
US20100028966A1 (en) * | 2008-07-28 | 2010-02-04 | Jeffrey Blanchard | Methods and Compositions for Improving The production Of Products In Microorganisms |
US7943363B2 (en) * | 2008-07-28 | 2011-05-17 | University Of Massachusetts | Methods and compositions for improving the production of products in microorganisms |
US20100086981A1 (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2010-04-08 | Qteros, Inc. | Compositions and methods for improved saccharification of biomass |
SE0950534A1 (en) * | 2009-07-07 | 2010-10-12 | Stora Enso Oyj | Method for producing microfibrillar cellulose |
DE102009057208A1 (en) | 2009-11-27 | 2011-06-01 | Technische Universität Dresden | Process for the production of lignocellulosic paper pulps and papers, cartons and boards derived therefrom |
DE102009057206B3 (en) | 2009-11-27 | 2011-09-01 | Technische Universität Dresden | Lignocellulosic fiber material, natural fiber reinforced plastic and method of manufacture |
US20110183382A1 (en) * | 2009-12-15 | 2011-07-28 | Qteros, Inc. | Methods and compositions for producing chemical products from c. phytofermentans |
FI122169B (en) * | 2010-01-29 | 2011-09-30 | Mzymes Oy | Treatment of wood chips for the production of hot pulp |
GB2478791A (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2011-09-21 | Qteros Inc | Ethanol production by genetically-modified bacteria |
RU2603957C2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2016-12-10 | Стора Энсо Ойй | Process for treating cellulose and cellulose treated according to process |
EP2853635B1 (en) * | 2012-05-21 | 2018-09-12 | Oji Holdings Corporation | Method for producing fine fiber, fine fiber, non-woven fabric, and fine fibrous cellulose |
US9145640B2 (en) * | 2013-01-31 | 2015-09-29 | University Of New Brunswick | Enzymatic treatment of wood chips |
US9127401B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2015-09-08 | University Of New Brunswick | Wood pulp treatment |
FI126698B (en) | 2013-12-18 | 2017-04-13 | Teknologian Tutkimuskeskus Vtt Oy | A process for making fibrillated cellulosic material |
EP3530743A1 (en) | 2018-02-21 | 2019-08-28 | Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd | Method of production |
CN118633720A (en) | 2018-08-15 | 2024-09-13 | 剑桥糖质科学有限公司 | Novel compositions, uses thereof and methods of forming the same |
WO2021032647A1 (en) | 2019-08-16 | 2021-02-25 | Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd | Methods of treating biomass to produce oligosaccharides and related compositions |
CN115279208A (en) | 2019-12-12 | 2022-11-01 | 剑桥糖质科学有限公司 | Low-sugar multi-phase food |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FI92414B (en) * | 1989-11-27 | 1994-07-29 | Enso Gutzeit Oy | Process for mass production |
CA2082185C (en) * | 1991-11-26 | 2004-01-20 | Alexander R. Pokora | Protease catalyzed treatments of lignocellulose materials |
FI92500C (en) * | 1993-03-03 | 1994-11-25 | Valtion Teknillinen | Process for producing mechanical pulp |
WO1997040194A1 (en) * | 1996-04-25 | 1997-10-30 | Union Camp Corporation | Improved method for biological pretreatment of wood chips |
SE525872C2 (en) * | 2002-09-06 | 2005-05-17 | Stora Enso Ab | Method of producing mechanical pulp with reduced energy consumption |
-
2003
- 2003-12-11 FI FI20031818A patent/FI20031818A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2004
- 2004-12-13 DE DE602004022332T patent/DE602004022332D1/en active Active
- 2004-12-13 EP EP04805154A patent/EP1699974B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2004-12-13 US US10/582,525 patent/US20070151683A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2004-12-13 AT AT04805154T patent/ATE437993T1/en active
- 2004-12-13 WO PCT/FI2004/000759 patent/WO2005056915A1/en active Application Filing
- 2004-12-13 CA CA002549469A patent/CA2549469A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2006
- 2006-07-10 NO NO20063206A patent/NO20063206L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE602004022332D1 (en) | 2009-09-10 |
US20070151683A1 (en) | 2007-07-05 |
EP1699974A1 (en) | 2006-09-13 |
EP1699974B1 (en) | 2009-07-29 |
NO20063206L (en) | 2006-07-10 |
WO2005056915A1 (en) | 2005-06-23 |
FI20031818A0 (en) | 2003-12-11 |
ATE437993T1 (en) | 2009-08-15 |
FI20031818A (en) | 2005-06-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1699974B1 (en) | Process for preparing mechanical pulp | |
CA2157512C (en) | Process and enzyme preparation for preparing mechanical pulp | |
Chandra et al. | Substrate pretreatment: the key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics? | |
AU2009308624B2 (en) | Sugar production process and ethanol production process | |
US9145640B2 (en) | Enzymatic treatment of wood chips | |
JP4682982B2 (en) | Production of fiber components from lignocellulosic materials and their utilization | |
US6402887B1 (en) | Biopulping industrial wood waste | |
CN1681992A (en) | Method of producing mechanical pulp and the mechanical pulp thus produced | |
US20190003120A1 (en) | Method for saving energy in paper production | |
Dorado et al. | Nitrogen-removal with protease as a method to improve the selective delignification of hemp stemwood by the white-rot fungus Bjerkandera sp. strain BOS55 | |
Dekker et al. | Pretreatment of hardwood (Eucalyptus regnans) sawdust by autohydrolysis explosion and its saccharification by trichodermal cellulases | |
WO2017102542A1 (en) | Method for producing mechanical pulp from a biomass comprising lignocellulosic material | |
Hart et al. | Selective enzyme impregnation of chips to reduce specific refining energy in alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping | |
WO1997040194A1 (en) | Improved method for biological pretreatment of wood chips | |
WO2017108431A1 (en) | Method for producing mechanical pulp from a biomass comprising lignocellulosic material | |
Eriksson | Swedish developments in biotechnology based on lignocellulosic materials | |
CN117344561A (en) | Method for preparing high-whiteness high-strength needle-leaf machine pulp | |
ADESINA | CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME HYDROLYTIC ENZYMES AND BIOPULPING POTENTIAL OF FUNGAL ISOLATES FROM SELECTED WOOD SAMPLES IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA | |
VIIKARI | J. BUCHERT, T. OKSANEN, J. PERE, M. SIIKA-AHO, A. SUURNÄKKI and | |
CA2804661A1 (en) | Enzymatic treatment of wood chips |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Discontinued |
Effective date: 20121029 |