CA2540648C - System and method for correcting errors in depth for measurements made while drilling - Google Patents
System and method for correcting errors in depth for measurements made while drilling Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2540648C CA2540648C CA2540648A CA2540648A CA2540648C CA 2540648 C CA2540648 C CA 2540648C CA 2540648 A CA2540648 A CA 2540648A CA 2540648 A CA2540648 A CA 2540648A CA 2540648 C CA2540648 C CA 2540648C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- drillstring
- depth
- wellbore
- hookload
- corrections
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/04—Measuring depth or liquid level
Abstract
A method and system is disclosed for automatically correcting for depth errors in measurements taken from a drillstring during the drilling phase of the construction of a hydrocarbon wellbore. The correction is based on a stress profile which in turn is based on the states of the drilling rig, drill string description length spec, borehole description trajectory, friction factor and weight on bit.
Description
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CORRECTING ERRORS IN DEPTH FOR
MEASUREMENTS MADE WHILE DRILLING
FIELD OF THE INVENTION:
The present invention relates to the field of measurements made during the drilling phase of a hydrocarbon borehole. In particular, the invention relates to an automated method for correcting errors in depth for such measurements.
1.0 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION:
During the drilling phase of the construction of a hydrocarbon wellbore, the length of the drillstring in the borehole is used to estimate the measured depth (or along hole length) of a borehole, it is assumed that the pipe is inelastic and therefore does not stretch.
However, discrepancies in the length of the borehole estimated at surface during rig operations and the actual length of the borehole there may cause gaps or lost data, when the uncorrected depth is used with logs of data measured with sensors mounted on the drillstring, such as LWD and MWD logs.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION:
According to the invention,a method is provided for automatically correcting for depth errors in measurements taken from a drillstring comprising the steps of receiving data representing measurements taken in a hydrocarbon wellbore at a plurality of depths within the wellbore from at least one sensor located on the drillstring used to drill the wellbore, automatically calculating corrections for errors in the depths, and using the corrected depths to determine a depth of the measured data. The step of calculating corrections is based in part on estimates of stretch of the length of the drill string.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS:
Figure 1 shows a scheme for correcting depth for measurements made from a drillstring according to a preferred embodiment of the invention;
Figure 2 shows an example of data prior to correction according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; and Figure 3 shows data that has been corrected according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS:
The length of the drillstring in the borehole is used to estimate the measured depth (or along hole length) of a borehole. According to the invention, the depth is corrected. For real drill strings the assumption that the drillstring is inelastic is not valid. The length of the drillpipe is a function of several parameters including temperature, pressure, and stress. According to the invention, corrections are calculated based on at least the stress on the drillstring. In particular, a correction is calculated based on the un-deformed length of the drillstring and the stress due to the buoyant drillstring weight, weight on bit and frictional forces due to contact with the borehole acting along the length of the drillstring. Two of these parameters, friction factor and weight on bit vary depending on the rig operation and the drillers input at surface. According to the invention, a method is provided for correcting the measurement of depth at surface for these parameters. The corrected depth is then used to assign depths to data measured downhole.
Figure 1 shows a scheme for correcting depth for measurements made from a drillstring according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the following steps are undertaken for each time step:
1) The drillstring description, dimensions pipe weight per unit length are input, the pipe length as measured at surface is updated from real-time measurements.
2) The borehole trajectory, inclination and azimuth are input and updated from downhole measurements in real-time.
MEASUREMENTS MADE WHILE DRILLING
FIELD OF THE INVENTION:
The present invention relates to the field of measurements made during the drilling phase of a hydrocarbon borehole. In particular, the invention relates to an automated method for correcting errors in depth for such measurements.
1.0 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION:
During the drilling phase of the construction of a hydrocarbon wellbore, the length of the drillstring in the borehole is used to estimate the measured depth (or along hole length) of a borehole, it is assumed that the pipe is inelastic and therefore does not stretch.
However, discrepancies in the length of the borehole estimated at surface during rig operations and the actual length of the borehole there may cause gaps or lost data, when the uncorrected depth is used with logs of data measured with sensors mounted on the drillstring, such as LWD and MWD logs.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION:
According to the invention,a method is provided for automatically correcting for depth errors in measurements taken from a drillstring comprising the steps of receiving data representing measurements taken in a hydrocarbon wellbore at a plurality of depths within the wellbore from at least one sensor located on the drillstring used to drill the wellbore, automatically calculating corrections for errors in the depths, and using the corrected depths to determine a depth of the measured data. The step of calculating corrections is based in part on estimates of stretch of the length of the drill string.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS:
Figure 1 shows a scheme for correcting depth for measurements made from a drillstring according to a preferred embodiment of the invention;
Figure 2 shows an example of data prior to correction according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; and Figure 3 shows data that has been corrected according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS:
The length of the drillstring in the borehole is used to estimate the measured depth (or along hole length) of a borehole. According to the invention, the depth is corrected. For real drill strings the assumption that the drillstring is inelastic is not valid. The length of the drillpipe is a function of several parameters including temperature, pressure, and stress. According to the invention, corrections are calculated based on at least the stress on the drillstring. In particular, a correction is calculated based on the un-deformed length of the drillstring and the stress due to the buoyant drillstring weight, weight on bit and frictional forces due to contact with the borehole acting along the length of the drillstring. Two of these parameters, friction factor and weight on bit vary depending on the rig operation and the drillers input at surface. According to the invention, a method is provided for correcting the measurement of depth at surface for these parameters. The corrected depth is then used to assign depths to data measured downhole.
Figure 1 shows a scheme for correcting depth for measurements made from a drillstring according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the following steps are undertaken for each time step:
1) The drillstring description, dimensions pipe weight per unit length are input, the pipe length as measured at surface is updated from real-time measurements.
2) The borehole trajectory, inclination and azimuth are input and updated from downhole measurements in real-time.
3) The rig operation is computed preferably as described in US Patent No. 7,128,167 entitled "System and Method for Rig State Detection".
4) A model for computing the stress in the drillstring is selected.
5) A friction factor is selected for the given rig state.
6) Weight on bit is either estimated from the hookload and total hookload or from weight on bit measured downhole.
7) From these inputs the model is used to compute the hookload. If the hookload is within tolerances equal to the measured hookload the stress profile is accepted and used to compute the pipe stretch. If it is not then the friction factor or the weight on bit are varied until the hookload and the calculated hookloads match. The models used here and in step 4 above preferably known models such as DrillsafeTM.
8) Pipe stretch is then computed using the stress profile.
9) The stretch correction is applied to measured depth to give the corrected depth and time stamped.
10) Time stamped downhole data is the associated with the corrected surface measured depths with the same time stamp.
Figure 2 shows an example of data prior to correction according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. The first frame of Figure 2 shows a surface time versus depth plot, the first section is drilling without surface rotation.
As a result all of the friction force is opposing the motion of the drillstring along the hole. As a result whilst drilling the direction of the friction force is towards surface.
The driller then stops the drill, pulls the drillstring off the bottom and then runs back to the bottom rotating the drillstring. When rotating, the friction force opposes the direction of rotation and as a result the frictional force along the borehole falls to close to zero. This results in an increase in the tension in the pipe and therefore an increase in the pipe stretch. As a result the position of the bottom of the hole as measured from the surface appears shallower. In the second frame the resistivity data are shown plotted against the same time scale.
In the third frame the resistivity data are plotted against the apparent depth at which they were measured. It can be seen that there is a section of data in lighter grey that in terms of depths overlaps previously recorded data.
Conventionally, these data would be discarded. The darker line represents the data that would be kept. Thus, failure to compensate for errors in depth results not only in lost data but also the thickness of the formation section appearing thinner.
Figure 3 shows data that has been corrected according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. The stress profile and the pipe stretch have been calculated according to an appropriate model for the rig operation.
Note that in the first frame, the depth at which drilling resumes is very close to the depth at which it stopped. Secondly, the measured resisitivities are properly allocated to the measured depth. Thus, according this embodiment of the invention, there is no loss of data or gaps, (the remaining grey points are recorded off bottom).
While the invention has been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments described above, many equivalent modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art when given this disclosure. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention set forth above are considered to.be illustrative and not limiting. Various changes to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Figure 2 shows an example of data prior to correction according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. The first frame of Figure 2 shows a surface time versus depth plot, the first section is drilling without surface rotation.
As a result all of the friction force is opposing the motion of the drillstring along the hole. As a result whilst drilling the direction of the friction force is towards surface.
The driller then stops the drill, pulls the drillstring off the bottom and then runs back to the bottom rotating the drillstring. When rotating, the friction force opposes the direction of rotation and as a result the frictional force along the borehole falls to close to zero. This results in an increase in the tension in the pipe and therefore an increase in the pipe stretch. As a result the position of the bottom of the hole as measured from the surface appears shallower. In the second frame the resistivity data are shown plotted against the same time scale.
In the third frame the resistivity data are plotted against the apparent depth at which they were measured. It can be seen that there is a section of data in lighter grey that in terms of depths overlaps previously recorded data.
Conventionally, these data would be discarded. The darker line represents the data that would be kept. Thus, failure to compensate for errors in depth results not only in lost data but also the thickness of the formation section appearing thinner.
Figure 3 shows data that has been corrected according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. The stress profile and the pipe stretch have been calculated according to an appropriate model for the rig operation.
Note that in the first frame, the depth at which drilling resumes is very close to the depth at which it stopped. Secondly, the measured resisitivities are properly allocated to the measured depth. Thus, according this embodiment of the invention, there is no loss of data or gaps, (the remaining grey points are recorded off bottom).
While the invention has been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments described above, many equivalent modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art when given this disclosure. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention set forth above are considered to.be illustrative and not limiting. Various changes to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (8)
1. A method for automatically correcting for depth errors in measurements taken from a drillstring comprising the steps of:
receiving data representing measurements taken in a hydrocarbon wellbore at a plurality of depths within the wellbore from at least one sensor located on the drillstring used to drill the wellbore;
automatically calculating corrections for errors in the depths, wherein said step of calculating corrections is based in part on estimates of stretch of the length of the drillstring; and using the corrected depths to determine a depth of the measured data.
receiving data representing measurements taken in a hydrocarbon wellbore at a plurality of depths within the wellbore from at least one sensor located on the drillstring used to drill the wellbore;
automatically calculating corrections for errors in the depths, wherein said step of calculating corrections is based in part on estimates of stretch of the length of the drillstring; and using the corrected depths to determine a depth of the measured data.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the step of automatically calculating the corrections is based at least in part on the state of a drilling rig used to support the drillstring at the times when the measurements are taken.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising the step of measuring the length of portions of the drillstring prior to insertion into the wellbore.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein a time versus depth log is constructed using at least the measured length of portions of the drillstring.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the calculated corrections are applied to time versus depth log to generate a corrected time versus depth log, and wherein the corrected time versus depth log is combined with the data representing measurements taken in the wellbore such that a corrected depth can be attributed to said measurements.
6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said step of calculating corrections includes the step of computing a hookload.
7 7. A method according to claim 6, wherein said step of calculating corrections includes the step of computing a calculated hookload and varying the friction factor or the weight on bit until the hookload and the calculated hookload match.
8
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0322966A GB2396697A (en) | 2002-12-27 | 2003-10-01 | Depth correction of drillstring measurements |
GB0322966.3 | 2003-10-01 | ||
PCT/GB2004/004123 WO2005033473A1 (en) | 2003-10-01 | 2004-09-28 | System and method for correcting errors in depth for measurements made while drilling |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2540648A1 CA2540648A1 (en) | 2005-04-14 |
CA2540648C true CA2540648C (en) | 2012-10-30 |
Family
ID=34400954
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2540648A Expired - Fee Related CA2540648C (en) | 2003-10-01 | 2004-09-28 | System and method for correcting errors in depth for measurements made while drilling |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2540648C (en) |
NO (1) | NO20061563L (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005033473A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2009064732A1 (en) | 2007-11-12 | 2009-05-22 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | Wellbore depth computation |
US8121788B2 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2012-02-21 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and system to automatically correct LWD depth measurements |
US8600679B2 (en) * | 2008-02-27 | 2013-12-03 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | System and method to locate, monitor and quantify friction between a drillstring and a wellbore |
US8042624B2 (en) | 2008-04-17 | 2011-10-25 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | System and method for improved depth measurement correction |
US7823658B2 (en) | 2008-05-09 | 2010-11-02 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Analyzing resistivity images for determining downhole events and removing image artifacts |
US8362915B2 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2013-01-29 | Intelliserv, Llc | System and method for determining stretch or compression of a drill string |
US9593571B2 (en) * | 2013-05-30 | 2017-03-14 | Schlumberger Technology Coproration | Determining correct drill pipe length and formation depth using measurements from repeater subs of a wired drill pipe system |
GB201702825D0 (en) * | 2017-02-22 | 2017-04-05 | Ict Europe Ltd | A method for determining well depth |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2608208B1 (en) * | 1986-12-10 | 1989-04-07 | Sedco Forex Sa Services Techni | METHOD FOR MONITORING ROTARY WELL DRILLING OPERATIONS |
US4852052A (en) * | 1987-05-28 | 1989-07-25 | Teleco Oilfield Services Inc. | Kelly-to-riser position determining system with adjustment for uncompensated heave |
US4976143A (en) * | 1989-10-04 | 1990-12-11 | Anadrill, Inc. | System and method for monitoring drill bit depth |
US5511037A (en) * | 1993-10-22 | 1996-04-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Comprehensive method of processing measurement while drilling data from one or more sensors |
-
2004
- 2004-09-28 CA CA2540648A patent/CA2540648C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-09-28 WO PCT/GB2004/004123 patent/WO2005033473A1/en active Application Filing
-
2006
- 2006-04-06 NO NO20061563A patent/NO20061563L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2005033473A1 (en) | 2005-04-14 |
CA2540648A1 (en) | 2005-04-14 |
NO20061563L (en) | 2006-04-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8181510B2 (en) | System and method for correcting errors in depth for measurements made while drilling | |
US8121788B2 (en) | Method and system to automatically correct LWD depth measurements | |
US4760735A (en) | Method and apparatus for investigating drag and torque loss in the drilling process | |
US8902695B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for clock shift correction for measurement-while-drilling measurements | |
CA1312937C (en) | Method of controlling the direction of a drill bit in a borehole | |
US7556104B2 (en) | System and method for processing and transmitting information from measurements made while drilling | |
US7946357B2 (en) | Drill bit with a sensor for estimating rate of penetration and apparatus for using same | |
US8362915B2 (en) | System and method for determining stretch or compression of a drill string | |
CA2943052C (en) | Estimating casing wear using models incorporating bending stiffness | |
US20060180349A1 (en) | Time and depth correction of MWD and wireline measurements using correlation of surface and downhole measurements | |
US20160305231A1 (en) | System and Method for Drilling using Pore Pressure | |
GB2396697A (en) | Depth correction of drillstring measurements | |
CA2540648C (en) | System and method for correcting errors in depth for measurements made while drilling | |
US5010765A (en) | Method of monitoring core sampling during borehole drilling | |
US20200277823A1 (en) | Drilling apparatus and method for the determination of formation location | |
US7295926B2 (en) | Method for correlating well logs | |
GB2043747A (en) | Drilling boreholes | |
US11719087B2 (en) | Modeling friction along a wellbore | |
Bordakov et al. | A new methodology for effectively correcting LWD depth measurements | |
Denney | Dynamic Depth Correction To Reduce Depth Uncertainty and Improve MWD/LWD Log Quality |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20150928 |