CA2464004C - Mass spectrometer - Google Patents
Mass spectrometer Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2464004C CA2464004C CA2464004A CA2464004A CA2464004C CA 2464004 C CA2464004 C CA 2464004C CA 2464004 A CA2464004 A CA 2464004A CA 2464004 A CA2464004 A CA 2464004A CA 2464004 C CA2464004 C CA 2464004C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- mass
- ion
- mass spectrometer
- charge ratio
- calculating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 229
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 48
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 36
- 239000012491 analyte Substances 0.000 claims description 33
- 238000001819 mass spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 25
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004252 FT/ICR mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003795 desorption Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000010265 fast atom bombardment Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004992 fast atom bombardment mass spectroscopy Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000009616 inductively coupled plasma Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005040 ion trap Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001698 laser desorption ionisation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000000816 matrix-assisted laser desorption--ionisation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims description 4
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 102100022704 Amyloid-beta precursor protein Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000035699 Distal ileal obstruction syndrome Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 102000002068 Glycopeptides Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 108010015899 Glycopeptides Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 102000003886 Glycoproteins Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 108090000288 Glycoproteins Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 101000823051 Homo sapiens Amyloid-beta precursor protein Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 102000006382 Ribonucleases Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 108010083644 Ribonucleases Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000008186 active pharmaceutical agent Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000001014 amino acid Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- DZHSAHHDTRWUTF-SIQRNXPUSA-N amyloid-beta polypeptide 42 Chemical compound C([C@@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)CC)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCSC)C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)NCC(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)CC)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(O)=O)[C@@H](C)CC)C(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCCN)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1N=CNC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1N=CNC=1)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1N=CNC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCNC(N)=N)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC(O)=O)C(C)C)C(C)C)C1=CC=CC=C1 DZHSAHHDTRWUTF-SIQRNXPUSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000000065 atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920001222 biopolymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000001720 carbohydrates Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000014633 carbohydrates Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000000451 chemical ionisation Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000014113 dietary fatty acids Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 229930195729 fatty acid Natural products 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000194 fatty acid Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000004665 fatty acids Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000007620 mathematical function Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920001184 polypeptide Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000003431 steroids Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 77
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 28
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 13
- RVZRBWKZFJCCIB-UHFFFAOYSA-N perfluorotributylamine Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)N(C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)F RVZRBWKZFJCCIB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010828 elution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000012925 reference material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Diethyl ether Chemical compound CCOCC RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000001793 charged compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005315 distribution function Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005670 electromagnetic radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012417 linear regression Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004164 analytical calibration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000013375 chromatographic separation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013467 fragmentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006062 fragmentation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000752 ionisation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013372 meat Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- VIKNJXKGJWUCNN-XGXHKTLJSA-N norethisterone Chemical compound O=C1CC[C@@H]2[C@H]3CC[C@](C)([C@](CC4)(O)C#C)[C@@H]4[C@@H]3CCC2=C1 VIKNJXKGJWUCNN-XGXHKTLJSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920001223 polyethylene glycol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004611 spectroscopical analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/0009—Calibration of the apparatus
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/02—Details
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/0027—Methods for using particle spectrometers
- H01J49/0036—Step by step routines describing the handling of the data generated during a measurement
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/26—Mass spectrometers or separator tubes
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
- Electron Tubes For Measurement (AREA)
Abstract
A mass spectrometer is disclosed wherein the experimentally determined mass to charge ratios of ions are reported together with an error band for each mass to charge ratio determination. The error band may, for example, reflect a 95% probability or confidence that the real, true, actual or accepted mass to charge ratio of the ion lies within the error band. By accurately determining the error band the possible candidate ions in a database can be accurately restricted whilst, also guarding against over restriction.
Description
MASS SPECTROMETER
The present invention relates to a mass spectrometer and a method of mass spectrometry.
Known mass spectrometers measure and report a value of mass to charge ratio for analyte ions in a sample.
The determined mass to charge ratio is taken to be representative of the sum of the masses of the individual atoms present in an analyte molecule plus or minus the rest mass of one or more electrons (depending upon the charge state and polarity of the molecule when measured). The unit of mass to charge is based upon one mass unit being 1/12 of the mass of the most abundant isotope of carbon (12C) and one unit of charge being equal to the charge of an electron.
Conventional mass spectrometers process mass spectral data and calculate the mass to charge ratio of detected ions. However, the accuracy of a mass to charge ratio measurement will be dependent upon the particular type of mass analyser used, the quantity of analyte sample and the conditions under which a particular sample is mass analysed.
Although some conventional mass spectrometers are able to measure the mass to charge ratio of an ion to a relatively high precision and accuracy, conventional mass spectrometers are not able to determine the accuracy of each individual mass to charge ratio measurement relating to an unknown sample.
However, without an estimate of the accuracy of a mass to charge ratio measurement it is uncertain what range of mass to charge ratio should be considered when using, for example, a database of atomic elements and their isotopes to determine possible elemental compositions which will have mass to charge ratios substantially similar to that of the analyte ion.
Similarly, it will also not be known what range of mass to charge ratio should be considered when searching a database of known molecules to find a match for an analyte ion. It will be appreciated that if a relatively wide mass to charge ratio window needs to be considered then the number of possible candidate ions dramatically increases.
It is therefore desired to provide an improved method of mass spectrometry and an improved mass spectrometer..
According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a mass spectrometer comprising:
. a mass analyser; and a processing system, the processing system being arranged to obtain mass spectral data, to determine a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in the mass spectral data and to calculate a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion, wherein the probability or confidence that the real, true, actual or accepted mass to charge ratio of a species of ion falls within its respective calculated error band is greater than or equal to x~.
According to different embodiments~of the present invention n may be 1, 2-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20, 20-25, 25-30, 30-35, 35-40, 40-45, 45-50, ~ 50, z 60, Z 70, z 80, z 90 or ~ 100.
According to less preferred embodiments x may be <I, 1-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20, 20-25, 25-30, 30-35, 35-40, 40-45, 45-50. According to more preferred embodiments x may be 50-55, 55-60, 60-65, 65-70, 70-75, 75-80, 80-85 x , or 85-90. According to particularly preferred embodiments x may be 90-91, 91-92, 92-93, 93-94, 94-95, 95-96, 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-99.5, 99.5-99.95, 99.95-99.99 or 99.99-100.
The mass spectrometer may further comprise means for reporting the mass to charge ratio of at least some of the n species of ion together with the respective calculated error band for each mass to charge ratio.
The mass spectral data preferably comprises data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected. The data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected is preferably converted into data relating to the mass to charge ratio of the ions. The data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected is preferably converted into data relating to the mass to charge ratio of the ions by using a calibration function.
As part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the systematic error in determining the mass to charge ratio of the ions.
The processing system preferably estimates, in use, the accuracy of a mathematical model used in mass calibration. According to an embodiment the error due to mass calibration may be estimated.
The error due to using one or more internal references or calibrants may be estimated. Preferably, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band,for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system monitors for changes in the time of detection of one or more internal references or calibrants.
T
The present invention relates to a mass spectrometer and a method of mass spectrometry.
Known mass spectrometers measure and report a value of mass to charge ratio for analyte ions in a sample.
The determined mass to charge ratio is taken to be representative of the sum of the masses of the individual atoms present in an analyte molecule plus or minus the rest mass of one or more electrons (depending upon the charge state and polarity of the molecule when measured). The unit of mass to charge is based upon one mass unit being 1/12 of the mass of the most abundant isotope of carbon (12C) and one unit of charge being equal to the charge of an electron.
Conventional mass spectrometers process mass spectral data and calculate the mass to charge ratio of detected ions. However, the accuracy of a mass to charge ratio measurement will be dependent upon the particular type of mass analyser used, the quantity of analyte sample and the conditions under which a particular sample is mass analysed.
Although some conventional mass spectrometers are able to measure the mass to charge ratio of an ion to a relatively high precision and accuracy, conventional mass spectrometers are not able to determine the accuracy of each individual mass to charge ratio measurement relating to an unknown sample.
However, without an estimate of the accuracy of a mass to charge ratio measurement it is uncertain what range of mass to charge ratio should be considered when using, for example, a database of atomic elements and their isotopes to determine possible elemental compositions which will have mass to charge ratios substantially similar to that of the analyte ion.
Similarly, it will also not be known what range of mass to charge ratio should be considered when searching a database of known molecules to find a match for an analyte ion. It will be appreciated that if a relatively wide mass to charge ratio window needs to be considered then the number of possible candidate ions dramatically increases.
It is therefore desired to provide an improved method of mass spectrometry and an improved mass spectrometer..
According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a mass spectrometer comprising:
. a mass analyser; and a processing system, the processing system being arranged to obtain mass spectral data, to determine a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in the mass spectral data and to calculate a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion, wherein the probability or confidence that the real, true, actual or accepted mass to charge ratio of a species of ion falls within its respective calculated error band is greater than or equal to x~.
According to different embodiments~of the present invention n may be 1, 2-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20, 20-25, 25-30, 30-35, 35-40, 40-45, 45-50, ~ 50, z 60, Z 70, z 80, z 90 or ~ 100.
According to less preferred embodiments x may be <I, 1-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20, 20-25, 25-30, 30-35, 35-40, 40-45, 45-50. According to more preferred embodiments x may be 50-55, 55-60, 60-65, 65-70, 70-75, 75-80, 80-85 x , or 85-90. According to particularly preferred embodiments x may be 90-91, 91-92, 92-93, 93-94, 94-95, 95-96, 96-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-99.5, 99.5-99.95, 99.95-99.99 or 99.99-100.
The mass spectrometer may further comprise means for reporting the mass to charge ratio of at least some of the n species of ion together with the respective calculated error band for each mass to charge ratio.
The mass spectral data preferably comprises data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected. The data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected is preferably converted into data relating to the mass to charge ratio of the ions. The data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected is preferably converted into data relating to the mass to charge ratio of the ions by using a calibration function.
As part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the systematic error in determining the mass to charge ratio of the ions.
The processing system preferably estimates, in use, the accuracy of a mathematical model used in mass calibration. According to an embodiment the error due to mass calibration may be estimated.
The error due to using one or more internal references or calibrants may be estimated. Preferably, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band,for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system monitors for changes in the time of detection of one or more internal references or calibrants.
T
According to an embodiment the stability or instability of the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration may be estimated. Preferably, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to drift of the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration. The effect of changes in the operating conditions of the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration may be estimated.
According to another embodiment the effect of user intervention subsequent to mass calibration is estimated. The effect of external influences on the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration may also be estimated. According to a yet further embodiment the effect of the stability or instability of a power supply of the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration is estimated. Preferably, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the effect of changes in temperature on the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
The effect of changes in interference subsequent to mass calibration may be estimated. The interference may be due to one or more internal reference or calibrant ions interfering with one or,more analyte ions. The interference may be due to one or more analyte ions interfering with one or more internal reference or calibrant ions. The interference may be due to one or more background or chemical noise ions interfering with one or more internal reference or calibrant ions.
According to another embodiment the effect of user intervention subsequent to mass calibration is estimated. The effect of external influences on the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration may also be estimated. According to a yet further embodiment the effect of the stability or instability of a power supply of the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration is estimated. Preferably, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the effect of changes in temperature on the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
The effect of changes in interference subsequent to mass calibration may be estimated. The interference may be due to one or more internal reference or calibrant ions interfering with one or,more analyte ions. The interference may be due to one or more analyte ions interfering with one or more internal reference or calibrant ions. The interference may be due to one or more background or chemical noise ions interfering with one or more internal reference or calibrant ions.
Alternatively/additionally, the interference may be due to one or more background or chemical noise ions interfering with one or more analyte ions.
As part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the time elapsed since the mass spectrometer was last calibrated. The processing system may also estimate, in use, the effect of thermal expansion of one or more components of the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
According to another embodiment the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to space charge repulsion effects within the mass spectrometer.
The error due to space charge repulsion effects may be determined at least in part by consideration of the observed intensity of one or more species of ions.
As part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the error recorded during mass calibration.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment the processing .system may estimate, in use, the statistical error or random error in determining the mass to charge ratio of the ions. In particular, the processing system may estimate, in use, the uncertainty or standard deviation of the time of detection of one or more species of ion. According to a less preferred embodiment, particularly using a Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance mass analyser the processing system may estimate, in use, the uncertainty or standard deviation of the frequency of detection of one or more species. of ion.
Preferably, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to ion detection statistics. The processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to insufficient sampling.
According to another embodiment, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to cflmputational errors. Preferably, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to rounding off errors.
The processing system may estimate, in use, the error in a report exception situation wherein one or more species of ion within the mass spectral data are sufficiently corrupted or suffering from interference that the calculated respective error band of the ions is not reported.
As part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to mass interference wherein background or interference ions having substantially similar mass to charge ratios to analyte ions affect the ability of resolving the analyte ions from the background or interference ions. The _ 7 error due to mass interference may be estimated by comparing the shape of an observed mass peak from the mass spectral data with the shape of a theoretical mass peak. The error due to mass interference may, for example, be estimated by comparing the deviation of the shape of an observed mass peak with either a Gaussian distribution, a cosine squared distribution, another mathematical function, or a profile derived from the shape of one or more mass peaks of one or more internal reference or calibrant ions.
According to another embodiment as part of .the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined'mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to saturation of a detector. According to another embodiment the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to signal amplification saturation. According to another embodiment the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to deadtime effects or missed counts of an ion counting detector.
As part of the process~of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to the response of an ion detector.
According to another embodiment the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to the response of an electron or photon multiplier.
The processing system preferably combines multiple estimates of different errors. The multiple estimates of different errors are preferably combined by adding the estimates in quadrature.
According to a preferred embodiment the mass spectrometer further comprises means arranged to search in use a database to look for one or more ions known to have mass to charge ratios within a range which is related to the determined mass to charge ratio of one or more ions and the respective calculated error band for the determined mass to charge ratio. The database may comprise details of biopolymers, proteins, peptides, polypeptides, oligionucleotides, oligionucleosides, amino acids, carbohydrates, sugars, lipids, fatty acids, vitamins, hormones, portions or fragments of DNA;
portions or fragments of cDNA, portions or fragments of RNA, portions or fragments of mRNA, portions or fragments of tRNA, polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, ribonucleases, enzymes, metabolites, polysaccharides, phosphorolated peptides, phosphorolated proteins, glycopeptides, glycoproteins or steroids.
Additionally/alternatively, the database may comprise details of the Electron Impact mass spectra of compounds. For example, the Wiley and/or NBS libraries may be searched.
.According to an embodiment the mass spectrometer further comprises means for calculating elemental compositions having mass to charge ratios within a calculated error band of the determined mass to charge ratio of one or more species of ion. The elemental compositions are preferably. calculated using the known masses or mass to charge ratios of atomic elements or groups of elements and/or their isotopes.
According to an embodiment the processing system is arranged, in use, to define one or more compounds of interest and to interrogate at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective r _ g _ calculated error bands of at least some of the different species of ion observed in the mass spectral data to see whether the one or more compounds of interest fall within the error band of at least some of the different species of ion.
According to an embodiment the processing system is arranged, in use, to define one or more mass to charge ratios of interest and to interrogate at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of at least some of the different species of ion observed in the mass spectral data to see whether the one or more mass to charge ratios of interest fall within the error band of at least some of the different species of ion.
According to an embodiment the processing system is arranged, in use, to define one or more compounds of interest and to interrogate at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of different species of ion observed from a plurality of mass spectra acquired over a period of time to see whether the one or more compounds of interest fall within the error band of at least some of the different species of ion observed from the plurality of mass spectra.
According to an embodiment the processing system is arranged, in use, to define one or more mass to charge ratios of interest and to interrogate at least some of the determined mass. to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of different species of ion observed from a plurality of mass spectra acquired over a period of time to see whether the one or more mass to charge ratios of interest fall within the error band of r at least some of the different species of ion observed from the plurality of mass spectra.
The mass spectrometer preferably further comprises an Electrospray ("ESI") ion source, an Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionisation ("APCI") ion source, an Atmospheric Pressure Photo Ionisation ("APPI") ion source, a Laser Desorption Ionisation ("LDI") ion source, an Inductively Coupled Plasma ("ICP") ion source, an Electron Impact ("EI) ion source, a Chemical Ionisation (".CI") ion source, a Field Ionisation ("FI") ion source, a Fast Atom Bombardment ("FAB") ion source, a Liquid Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry ("LSIMS") ion source, an Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation ("API") ion source, a Field Desorption ("FD") ion source,~a Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation ("MALDI") ion source or a Desorption/Ionisation on Silicon ("DIOS") ion source. The ion.source may be a continuous ion source or a pulsed ion source.
The mass spectrometer preferably comprises a Time of Flight mass analyser, a quadrupole mass analyser, a Penning or Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance ("FTICR") mass analyser, a 2D or linear quadrupole ion trap or a Paul or 3D quadrupole ion trap.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of mass spectrometry comprising: .
obtaining mass spectral data using a mass spectrometer;
determining a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in the mass spectral data; and calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion, wherein the probability or r _ 1 1 _ confidence that the real, true, actual or accepted mass to charge ratio of a species of ion falls within its respective calculated error band is greater than or equal to x~.
The preferred embodiment is particularly advantageous in that an understanding of the error in a mass to charge ratio measurement and the overall confidence in the mass to charge ratio assignment for an ion is particularly useful if the mass assignment is -to be used, for example, to infer information about the elemental composition of the ion.
The preferred embodiment relates to automatically estimating and optionally reporting the expected or estimated accuracy of individual mass to charge ratio measurements. This is not something which conventional mass spectrometers are capable of doing.
The preferred embodiment automatically provides an estimate of the accuracy to be expected for individual mass to charge ratio measurements of unknown samples.
This provides accurate limits of mass to charge ratio within which candidate elemental compositions may lie in, for example, a database of analyte ions. Estimating the accuracy of an assignment of mass to charge ratio to observed analyte ions also provides a measure of confidence in such elemental composition assignment s.
It provides both a means of restricting the range of possible elemental compositions which may need to be considered and also guards against over restriction thereby reducing the possibility of erroneous assignment of elemental composition. The preferred embodiment is also particularly advantageous when searching against mass to charge ratios in a library of known ions having known mass to charge ratios.
The precision of a mass to charge ratio measurement is dependent upon the scatter of measured values and the number of measurements. For a normal distribution of measurements the precision may be estimated from the standard deviation a of measurements about the mean and the number of measurements n. The accuracy of a particular mass to charge ratio measurement is the difference between the mean of the mass to charge ratio measurements and the .true, actual, real or accepted mass to charge ratio of the analyte ion. In general, the more accurate the measurement of mass to charge ratio the smaller the band of uncertainty and hence the more restricted the range of possible elemental compositions which have mass to charge ratios which fall within this band of uncertainty.
Conventional mass spectrometers and in particular Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance mass spectrometers, double focusing magnetic sector mass spectrometers, orthogonal and axial Time of Flight mass spectrometers and RF quadrupole mass filter mass spectrometers are capable of measuring the mass to charge ratio of an ion to within a few parts per million (ppm) of the true mass to charge ratio. Although such mass spectrometers are able to measure mass to charge ratio with a high degree of precision and accuracy; no estimate of the accuracy of individual mass to charge ratio measurements is possible.
Without an estimate of the accuracy of a mass to charge ratio measurement the value or worth of such a-mass to charge ratio measurement is unknown. An understanding of the possible error in a mass to charge ratio measurement and an estimate of the confidence or otherwise in the mass to charge ratio assignment for an individual ion is particularly beneficial if the mass to charge ratio assignment is to be used to infer information about the elemental composition of the ion.
The preferred embodiment allows the mass to charge ratio window used to calculate proposed elemental compositions to be automatically restricted.
The preferred estimation of mass to charge ratio accuracy may also be used to appropriately set a search window when trying to match the measured mass to charge ratio or mass of an analyte ion to details of ions or molecules held in a library of ions or molecules having known mass to charge ratios or masses.
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only,. and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Fig. 1 shows a theoretical mass spectral peak;
Fig. 2 shows the theoretical mass spectral peak in which the mass to charge ratio axis has been divided into discrete samples;
Fig. 3 shows an uncalibrated mass spectrum of a reference compound PFTBA;
Fig. 4 shows how residual errors after mass calibration may be quite high if the mass spectrometer is only calibrated using a relatively small amount of data:
Fig. 5 shows how the residual errors after mass calibration will be smaller but~not insignificant if the mass spectrometer is calibrated using a relatively large amount of data:
Fig. 6 shows a portion of a mass spectrum wherein a resolution of 10,000 is sufficient to resolve two different ions;
Fig. 7 shows a portion of a mass spectrum wherein two different ions can not be resolved;
Fig. 8 shows the residual errors and calculated 95~
confidence interval after calibration according to the preferred embodiment; and Fig. 9 shows a mass spectrum according to the preferred embodiment wherein the mass to charge ratio of individual ions together with the respective error in the determination of the mass to charge ratio of the ion is reported.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described. The preferred embodiment involves arriving at a representative value for the precision and accuracy of an individual mass to charge ratio measurement. In order to do this multiple sources of error are preferably estimated and at least some of these errors are then combined and reported along with each individual mass to charge ratio measurement.
Some of the sources of error involved with an individual mass to charge ratio measurement which are preferably estimated include statistical or random errors such as errors due to ion detection statistics, errors due to insufficient sampling frequency, computational errors (e.g, founding off errors) and errors recorded during mass calibration.
In some cases data may be sufficiently corrupted that no estimate of mass measurement error may be reliably calculated or reported. This situations include the effects of mass interferences, detector saturation and errors due to instability or drift of the mass spectrometer subsequent to calibration or in between calibrations.
Random error in the determination of the mass to charge ratio of an ion is often dominated by ion statistics. A mass spectral peak in a mass spectrum is the result of detecting a number of ions generated from an ion source. An example of a theoretical mass peak is shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 shows a theoretical mass peak which may be observed for ions having a mass to charge ratio of 300. The detected ions which are all the same species of ion will have a distribution of mass to charge ratios centred around a mean value and will fall within a defined mass envelope. The narrower the mass or peak envelope the more able a mass spectrometer is to distinguish between ions with very small differences in mass to charge ratio. The mass resolution R may be defined as:
R= M
where M is the mass to charge ratio of the mean of a mass or peak envelope and 8M is the width of the mass or peak envelope in mass units defined in a specific way e.g. at the Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM). The mean of this distribution is the estimation of the mass to charge ratio for the observed mass peak.
If the gain characteristics of the detection and amplification system are known, then the area of the mass spectral peak may be expressed in terms of the absolute number of ions within the mass or peak envelope..
In Fig. 2 the mass to charge ratio scale has been divided into a plurality of discrete samples. Each sample is described by an index number i and each index number i is associated with a value of mass to charge ratio Mi. For simplicity, it has been assumed that the y axis represents the absolute number of ions Ii measured at each particular value of mass to charge ratio Mi. It is also assumed that each ion detected gives rise to a signal of the same amplitude. The mean of this distribution M~,ean is given by:
Lrlr .Mi __ r M
where ~, I, = N
and N is the total number of ions detected. The mean represents the measured mass to charge ratio value of the peak.
The mass spectral peak shown in Fig. 2 may be considered as a probability distribution with a parent population variance V of ion arrivals which can be estimated from:
Y = ~~I~CM. -M,~)Z
The standard deviation aM around the mean for this parent population is given by:
~M ' From theoretical statistics, if the mass to charge ratio value is measured based upon a single recorded ion belonging to this distribution then the value Mi recorded for this ion will be the most likely estimate of the mean of the distribution. The estimated uncertainty in this single measurement is given by QM.
If the measurement is repeated for N single ions an average mean value can be produced. This average mean value will have an uncertainty or standard deviation a~
of a~
where a~ represents the standard deviation on the measurement of the center of a mass spectral peak with a parent population standard deviation of QM and containing N ions.
The expressions above can be related to any peak shape. However, the shape of a typical mass spectral peak may be approximated by a Gaussian distribution.
Assuming a Gaussian distribution and 8M defined at Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) then:
_ 8M
6"' 2.35 This allows the uncertainty in the centroid determination of the peak to be expressed in terms of 8M
and the number of ions recorded N. The expression below yields the uncertainty in the measurement in mass units:
5.5 ~ N
From integration of the Gaussian probability distribution function, approximately 95~ of measurements for a. given 8M and N will fall within +/- 2a~. This spread is referred to as the 95$ confidence limit.
The equations derived above describe the statistical limitations of peak centroid determination in a situation where every ion detected gives an identical response.
Typically mass spectrometers employ multiplier systems to amplify the signal from the individual ions to ensure detection. These multipliers include electron multipliers, photo multipliers and microchannel plates in a variety~of configurations and are often used in conjunction with electronic amplification devices. Due to the statistical characteristics of some of these devices, ions having the same_mass to charge ratio will have a response governed by a separate probability distribution function. When employing an analogue signal recording system (e. g. an Analogue to Digital Recorder ADC) this distribution leads to an increase in the uncertainty of the determination of the centre of a mass spectral peak. This increase may be calculated .if the distribution of ion response is well characterized and may then be incorporated into the estimation of error. When using an ion counting system (e. g. a Time to Digital Recorder TDC) this effect does not need to be considered.
In some cases there may be insufficient samples over a mass spectral peak to accurately determine its center. This error should ideally be minimized.
However, if it is significant then it should preferably be incorporated into any final quantification of overall.
error.
When measuring mass to less than 111000 of a mass unit (commonly referred to as milli dalton (mDa)) it is important that calculations are performed and presented with a suitable number of decimal places to avoid unnecessary rounding errors. For example, if an ion having a mass to charge ratio of 50 is mass measured and the result rounded to four decimal places then the possible error due to this rounding will be 50.0000 t 0.00005. Expressed in parts per million (ppm) this is 50 t 1 ppm.
Calibration involves introducing a reference compound or mixture of reference compounds which give rise to mass spectral peaks which have precisely known elemental compositions and hence which have precisely known mass to charge ratios. The experimentally measured mass to charge ratio value for each of the calibration peaks are then compared to the known reference mass to charge ratio values and a suitable calibration function or functions can then be applied to subsequent experimental data: The calibration function ensures-that an unknown sample is~correctly calibrated as far as is possible. The purpose of this calibration function is to adjust the measured mass to charge ratio value of reference ions to be as close as possible to the theoretical mass of the reference compound.
As long as statistical errors are low this procedure will compensate for any systematic errors which axe present. Systematic errors in mass .
measurement are biases in the measured value which remain the same no matter how many times the measurement is repeated. Any residual errors remaining after calibration may be treated as random errors.
Ideally, during calibration, sufficient signal should be acquired such that statistical error due to an insufficient number.of ions is negligible. This may not, however, always be possible.
From the statistical expressions developed above it is possible to assign a value of centroid standard deviation to each peak in the calibration. This may be used to apply appropriate weighting to each mass to charge ratio value when fitting a calibration function or functions to the calibration data. This information may be used to predict how errors due to statistics in the initial calibration will affect the uncertainty in the final analyte mass measurement. This is illustrated further with reference to Figs. 3-5.
Fig. 3 shows an un-calibrated fragment ion mass spectrum over the mass to charge ratio range 300-624 resulting from a reference compound Perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA) acquired using an Electron Impact ("EI") ion source operated in positive ion mode. The ions were analysed using an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser. PFTBA is a common reference material for Electron Impact mass .spectrometry studies. As a result of the ionisation process the molecular ion having a nominal mass to charge ratio of 671 was fragmented into a number of different fragment ions having different mass to charge ratios. The molecular ion is not therefore observed in the resulting fragmentation mass spectrum a portion of which is shown in Fig. 3.
With orthogonal. acceleration Time of Flight mass analysers the mass to charge ratio value is proportional to the square of the time of flight of ions in a drift or flight region of the mass analyser. By comparing the square root of the flight time of a reference ion to the known mass to charge ratio of the reference ion, a relationship between time of flight and mass to charge ratio can be established. This relationship may then be used to generate a calibration expression based on a third order polynomial expression using a weighted least squares method.
Fig. 4 shows the residual errors after generating such a calibration expression based upon a relatively small amount of data. . In Fig. 4 the x axis indicates the calculated mass to charge ratios of different fragment ions derived from PFTBA based upon their known empirical formula. The y axis represents the difference between the calibrated mass to charge ratio of the fragment ions and the known reference mass to charge ratio values after calibration had been applied. The axis is displayed in parts per million error (ppm). The vertical lines represent +/- 2a~ where a~ is the statistical uncertainty in the peak center determination in ppm. These error bars represent the calculated scatter which could be expected from the reported mass to charge ratio value from repetitive measurements of each calibration point within a 95~s confidence limit.
The error bars are inversely proportional to the square root of the intensity.
Fig. 5 shows a similar plot but obtained using a' much larger data set. The error bars are very small but they are nonetheless still present and the total error is now less than +/- lppm over the entire range. The deviation of the calibrated results from the calculated result reflects a remaining element of systematic error.
_ 22 _ This error may be further reduced by employing a higher order polynomial expression or an alternative curve fitting method.
The results shown in Fig. 4 and 5 were taken from the same experimental run. PFTBA was continuously infused into the ion source and mass spectra were acquired at a rate of one mass spectrum per second.
Data from multiple mass spectra were averaged prior to calibration. Fig. 4 shows the error for an average of 20s of data collection whereas Fig. 5 shows the error for an average of 30 minutes of data collection. The results shown in Fig. 5 therefore represent a data set which is approximately x90 that of the data set used in Fig. 4. The error bars, which are based on ion statistics alone are approximately x9.5 (square root of 90) times smaller in Fig. 5 than in Fig. 4:
Because of the variation in signal intensity it can be seen from Fig. 4 that the error due to statistics within the calibration varies for different mass regions. The errors in this case are dominated by the calculated statistical error on each data point.
In the specific example of calibrating a Time of Flight mass spectrometer~coefficients have been calculated of a third order polynomial of the form:
M,~.~,a = a + b ~ M,,~~;~ + c ~ ( M~~;~ )2 + d ~ ( M~,c;~ )3 where Mref(i) is. the calculated mass to charge ratio value of ref-erence peak i based on the known empirical formula and Mestti~ is the mass to charge ratio value of reference peak i recorded before calibration.
The method involves minimizing the sum of the squared difference between the estimated mass to charge ratio values Mestci~ and the calculated mass to charge ratio value of the reference material Mrefct~ weighted by the calculated statistical variance a~~;,~2 of each estimated measurement where i is an index denoting individual points in the calibration and N is the total number of points in the calibration. This sum is denoted by the symbol x2:
N M,~ef'(t) - f (Meat(t) ) ~~' °~M~) where:
f (M~,,~(,) ) = a + b ~ Mgt,) + c ~ ( M~(,) )2 + d ~ ( Mur(t) )3 The coefficients of the polynomial function are adjusted to give the lowest value of x2. The x2 value gives an overall estimation of the goodness of fit of the calibration expression and can be used to provide crude acceptance or rejection criteria for a given calibration.
ether goodness of fit tests may be performed on this type of data depending on the number of calibration points and the calibration approach followed. In principle other methods may be used for rejection or acceptance of calibration.
Using the method of least sguares fitting above, the variance in the calculated coefficients in the polynomial expression can be calculated along with the covariance. This information can be used to calculate 24 _ the variance and hence standard deviation,of a measurement of any mass to charge ratio within the mass to charge ratio range of this. calibration. This standard deviation may be combined with other statistical information to give an overall estimated error in a subsequent measurement.
Although the method of calibration described above uses a least squares nth order polynomial, other calibration schemes may be employed such as, for example, non-linear and linear regression and splines.
These may be more suited to particular types of data or mass analysers. In each case it is possible to extract information about the predicted error at particular mass to charge ratio values based on the statistics of the individual calibrant peaks.
There are many potential sources of systematic error involved with mass measurement. However, many of these biases are constant during an experiment and can be removed from the final result by careful characterization of the system. This characterization, or calibration, is essential to ensure that the subsequent measurement is as accurate as possible. If a systematic error is identified that cannot be quantified then no reliable estimate of overall accuracy can be presented.
Some sources of systematic error may not be constant during the course of a measurement or may not be accurately predicted and corrected for during calibration. An example of this is an unresolved mass interference.
Fig. 6 shows a mass spectrum wherein the statistical error is assumed to be negligible. Two mass peaks are shown corresponding to two different ion species. The two mass peaks are assumed to have a Gaussian distribution. The first mass peak PI has a mean mass to charge ratio value of M1. The second mass peak P2 has a mean mass to charge ratio value of M2.
The intensity of the second peak P2 is set to be half that of the first mass_peak P1. Both mass peaks P1,P2 have a width at half height SM of 0.05 mass units. The mass resolution is therefore 10,000 (FWHM definition).
In the particular example shown in Fig. 6 M1 is 500.0000 and M2 500.1500 i.e. the separation between M1 and M2 is 0.15 mass units. It is clear that a resolution of 10,000 is more than sufficient to separate the two different peaks P1,P2 and to enable accurate determination of the mean value of the peaks M1,M2.
Fig. 7 illustrates a scenario wherein the separation between the two different mass peaks P1,P2 has now been reduced from 0.15 mass units to only 0.05 mass units e.g. M1 is 500.0000 but M2 is now 500.0500.
It is apparent that the two mass peaks P1,P2 can not now be resolved from one another. The resultant single asymmetrical mass peak shown in bold has a mean mass to charge ratio value M= of 500.0167. The first mass peak P1 may be an analyte ion which is intended to be measured whereas the second mass peak P2 may be an unexpected unresolved background or interference ion.
Accordingly, the measurement of the mass to charge of the first (analyte) mass peak P1 has an error EM1 where:
E=M;-Ml In the particular example shown and described in relation to Fig. 7, the error E is 0.0167 da (33.4 ppm).
Mass interference effects causing systematic error can be recognized and in some cases approximately quantified by examination of the mass spectral peak shape compared to an idealized model of the expected peak shape at a particular mass to charge ratio value.
This ideal peak shape may be characterized from that of standard reference peaks prior to a mass measu-rement.
In some cases a Gaussian peak shape can be assumed. If the peak shape or width deviates beyond a pre-set criteria then the accuracy of the mass measurement of this mass to charge ratio value will be poor. The extent to which this effect can be accurately quantified will depend on the sophistication of the. peak detection algorithm employed.
Another source of systematic error can result when the signal intensity recorded exceeds the operational range of a signal amplification and/or a detection device. In certain mass analysers mass measurement accuracy can also be effected by space charge repulsion within the mass analyser itself. These effects can lead.
to shifts in the recorded mass to charge due to, for example, distortions in mass spectral peak shape a.s the intensity increases. The characteristics of the particular mass analyser and detection electronics utilized should ideally be characterized prior to measurement and the upper limit of the range at which an appropriate measurement of mass accuracy can be reported found.
An additional source of systematic error can result from a change in the conditions under which the mass spectrometer is operating relative to those conditions existing when the system was calibrated. If a system parameter has changed, resulting in the calibration becoming invalid, then the final mass measurement will be in error. This situation can occur, for instance, due to user intervention, the failure of a power supply, interference from an external source of electromagnetic radiation or due to mass drift caused by ambient temperature changes. The time period which has elapsed between calibration being performed or checked using a ' suitable reference compound and a mass measurement being reported are preferably monitored. The longer this time period becomes the less accuracy is preferably assigned to the final measurement. Although the error on the final measurement may not be readily,quantifiable it is .
important that effort is made to recognize this situation and reflect a general uncertainty in accuracy with any measurement presented.
To determine an overall figure of accuracy for an individual measurement, possible errors (described above) arising at each step in the mass measurement process may preferably be examined.
Errors recorded in the instrument calibration procedure have been described above. Calibrations are generally made some time before a mass measurement of an analyte is performed: Due to the susceptibility of power supplies to temperature drift and the thermal expansion of components and materials used in the construction on mass analysers it is necessary.to recognise and correct for this drift over time.
To ensure that any minor drift in the instrument is accounted for when making a mass measurement an internal reference compound may be introduced at the same time or within a short time geriod before or after a mass measurement is made. This not only allows the calibration expression to be adjusted for any small changes but also provides an internal check of the stability of the system. For example, in a Time of Flight mass spectrometer a single point lock mass correction may be made. A reference material is introduced and the measured mass to charge ratio of a single mass spectral peak from this reference material is preferably monitored during the experiment. The empirical formula and hence the calculated mass to charge ratio for the internal calibrant is known.
Changes in the overall gain of the calibration expression maybe made on a mass spectrum to mass spectrum basis. If more~than one internal reference peak is present then more complex changes to the overall calibration expression may be incorporated. including correction for any offset drift.
An error in the determination of the mass to charge ratio value of the internal reference will result in a error in the mass measurement of the analyte. All the sources of error previously described should preferably be estimated for the measurement of the internal reference mass to charge ratio.
In techniques where the secondary reference , material is introduced at exactly the same time as the analyte compound, mass interference from background peaks or from analyte peaks may occur. In chromatographic techniques the analyte compound intensity will change with time as a chromatographic peak elutes. The internal reference compound, however, will remain at essentially constant intensity. Based on the intensity and the resolution of the internal reference peak the expected short-term scatter in the measured mass to charge ratio value for this may be calculated. If the mass to charge ratio value of the internal reference peak changes by significantly more than the calculated short-term statistical scatter it is probable that a mass interference has occurred at the internal reference peak. This could be from mass interference due to the elution of the analyte compound or due to the elution of a contaminant compound unrelated to the analyte. Alternatively, the shift may be due to an instrument parameter change, failure of a power supply, or interference from an external source of electromagnetic radiation. If this shift is greater than the statistical scatter of the internal reference measurement, then the resultant error in the accuracy of the analyte peak may be estimated and indicated. Effort must be made to differentiate between long term drift corrected by an internal reference and short term instability causing systematic measurement errors. This mass shift may characteristically occur in a similar time-scale to the chromatographic peak elution width.
Preferably, all the sources of statistical and possible systematic error previously described should be estimated for the analyte peak measurement.
In addition, using chromatographic separation techniques several mass measurements of the analyte peak are preferably made during the chromatographic elution timescale. These are subsequently averaged and presented as a final reported mass to charge ratio. It is expected that -the individual measurements across the chromatographic peak will have a statistical variation based upon their individual intensities. If a set of mass measurements from a peak from an eluting compound has an exceptionally large spread of values (Q) compared to what is expected, then it may indicate the presence of interference from co-eluting or partially co-eluting compounds. In such situations no,reliable estimation of accuracy may be reported.
If all the calculated errors above are determined in common units, e.g. mass units or parts per million (ppm) in mass to charge ratio, then the individual errors may be added in quadrature to yield an overall estimate of the errors associated with a single mass measurement:
1 ~ QT = CT12 'f' x'22 -!- Q~Z ......... + O'n2 where al to an represent the standard deviations calculated for each contribution to statistical error and aT is the total calculated standard deviation on the measurement of the analyte ion mass to charge ratio.
value.
The estimated accuracy of mass to charge ratio measurement is preferably recorded and optionally presented with each mass to charge ratio measurement displayed or listed in a mass spectrum. The figure reported preferably represents a scatter in multiples of ~ aT about the mean value. Based upon a Gaussian distribution the confidence in the measurement presented may expressed for different multiples of t aT. The table below gives some common confidence limits derived from a Gaussian distribution.
Range Probability of Presented measurement falling within the range set t 0.5a~ 38.29%
t aT . 68.26%
t l.SaT 86.64 t2 aT 95.43%
t 2 . 5aT __ g~ ~ 7-6~.
t 3a~ 99.73 t3.5 aT 99.95$
A figure of t 2.5 aT representing a 98.76%
confidence level may, for example, be presented. This figure may appear as an annotation within a mass spectrum or mass spectrum list and/or may be incorporated into the output from elemental composition calculation results.
The accuracy of the measurement may also be indicated by automatically setting the number of decimal places for mass to charge ratio annotation that are presented to reflect the calculated confidence limit.
It is important not to indicate tao high a level of accuracy especially when restricting the minimum ppm window used for calculation of proposed possible elemental compositions. Situations in, which insufficient data is available to calculate a meaningful estimation of the overall error in mass measurement should be determined. In the preferred embodiment an estimation of calculated error will only preferably be displayed if an internal reference compound was present during the measurement or correction was made within an acceptable time frame.
The mass calibration used during the measurement should be valid. The criteria defining validity of the calibration should be determined for an individual mass spectrometer. These criteria include changes to critical instrument parameters which could affect calibration or if an unacceptable time has elapsed since the calibration was performed.
Fig. 8 and 9 illustrate the preferred method as applied to the exact mass measurement of a mixture of Polyethylene glycols ionised using Electospray ionisation (ESI). The resulting ions were analysed using an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass spectrometer. Fig. 8 shows the residual errors after calibration. The x axis represents the calculated mass to charge value of the calibrant peaks based upon their known empirical formula. The y axis represents the difference between the calibrated mass to charge values and the known reference mass to charge ratio values after calibration had been applied. The y axis is displayed in units of parts per million error fppm).
The vertical lines represent +/- 2a~ where Q~ is the statistical uncertainty in the peak center determination in ppm. The error bars represent the calculated scatter which could be expected from the reported mass to charge ratio from repetitive measurements of each calibration point within a 95~ confidence limit. The dotted lines' represent predicted 95$ confidence bounds for subsequent measurements within the mass to charge ratio range of the calibration. These bounds were calculated based on the variance and covariance calculated using a third order weighted least squares linear regression.
Fig. 9 shows a mass spectrum according to the preferred embodiment of the mixture after calibration using an expression derived from the calibration shown in Fig. 8. The ion having a mass to charge ratio of 745.41977 was used as singly point internal secondary reference correction and hence no error band is presented for this particular ion.
The predicted errors for each mass to charge ratio measurement were combined to provide an overall 95~
confidence range for each measurement. The mass to charge values displayed in the mass spectrum shown in Fig. 9 are annotated with the predicated 95~ confidence ranges and are also truncated to three decimal places to reflect the predicted precision of the measurements.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art. that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the accompanying claims.
As part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the time elapsed since the mass spectrometer was last calibrated. The processing system may also estimate, in use, the effect of thermal expansion of one or more components of the mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
According to another embodiment the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to space charge repulsion effects within the mass spectrometer.
The error due to space charge repulsion effects may be determined at least in part by consideration of the observed intensity of one or more species of ions.
As part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the error recorded during mass calibration.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment the processing .system may estimate, in use, the statistical error or random error in determining the mass to charge ratio of the ions. In particular, the processing system may estimate, in use, the uncertainty or standard deviation of the time of detection of one or more species of ion. According to a less preferred embodiment, particularly using a Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance mass analyser the processing system may estimate, in use, the uncertainty or standard deviation of the frequency of detection of one or more species. of ion.
Preferably, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to ion detection statistics. The processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to insufficient sampling.
According to another embodiment, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to cflmputational errors. Preferably, as part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to rounding off errors.
The processing system may estimate, in use, the error in a report exception situation wherein one or more species of ion within the mass spectral data are sufficiently corrupted or suffering from interference that the calculated respective error band of the ions is not reported.
As part of the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to mass interference wherein background or interference ions having substantially similar mass to charge ratios to analyte ions affect the ability of resolving the analyte ions from the background or interference ions. The _ 7 error due to mass interference may be estimated by comparing the shape of an observed mass peak from the mass spectral data with the shape of a theoretical mass peak. The error due to mass interference may, for example, be estimated by comparing the deviation of the shape of an observed mass peak with either a Gaussian distribution, a cosine squared distribution, another mathematical function, or a profile derived from the shape of one or more mass peaks of one or more internal reference or calibrant ions.
According to another embodiment as part of .the process of calculating a respective error band for the determined'mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to saturation of a detector. According to another embodiment the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to signal amplification saturation. According to another embodiment the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to deadtime effects or missed counts of an ion counting detector.
As part of the process~of calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion the processing system may estimate, in use, the error due to the response of an ion detector.
According to another embodiment the processing system estimates, in use, the error due to the response of an electron or photon multiplier.
The processing system preferably combines multiple estimates of different errors. The multiple estimates of different errors are preferably combined by adding the estimates in quadrature.
According to a preferred embodiment the mass spectrometer further comprises means arranged to search in use a database to look for one or more ions known to have mass to charge ratios within a range which is related to the determined mass to charge ratio of one or more ions and the respective calculated error band for the determined mass to charge ratio. The database may comprise details of biopolymers, proteins, peptides, polypeptides, oligionucleotides, oligionucleosides, amino acids, carbohydrates, sugars, lipids, fatty acids, vitamins, hormones, portions or fragments of DNA;
portions or fragments of cDNA, portions or fragments of RNA, portions or fragments of mRNA, portions or fragments of tRNA, polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, ribonucleases, enzymes, metabolites, polysaccharides, phosphorolated peptides, phosphorolated proteins, glycopeptides, glycoproteins or steroids.
Additionally/alternatively, the database may comprise details of the Electron Impact mass spectra of compounds. For example, the Wiley and/or NBS libraries may be searched.
.According to an embodiment the mass spectrometer further comprises means for calculating elemental compositions having mass to charge ratios within a calculated error band of the determined mass to charge ratio of one or more species of ion. The elemental compositions are preferably. calculated using the known masses or mass to charge ratios of atomic elements or groups of elements and/or their isotopes.
According to an embodiment the processing system is arranged, in use, to define one or more compounds of interest and to interrogate at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective r _ g _ calculated error bands of at least some of the different species of ion observed in the mass spectral data to see whether the one or more compounds of interest fall within the error band of at least some of the different species of ion.
According to an embodiment the processing system is arranged, in use, to define one or more mass to charge ratios of interest and to interrogate at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of at least some of the different species of ion observed in the mass spectral data to see whether the one or more mass to charge ratios of interest fall within the error band of at least some of the different species of ion.
According to an embodiment the processing system is arranged, in use, to define one or more compounds of interest and to interrogate at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of different species of ion observed from a plurality of mass spectra acquired over a period of time to see whether the one or more compounds of interest fall within the error band of at least some of the different species of ion observed from the plurality of mass spectra.
According to an embodiment the processing system is arranged, in use, to define one or more mass to charge ratios of interest and to interrogate at least some of the determined mass. to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of different species of ion observed from a plurality of mass spectra acquired over a period of time to see whether the one or more mass to charge ratios of interest fall within the error band of r at least some of the different species of ion observed from the plurality of mass spectra.
The mass spectrometer preferably further comprises an Electrospray ("ESI") ion source, an Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionisation ("APCI") ion source, an Atmospheric Pressure Photo Ionisation ("APPI") ion source, a Laser Desorption Ionisation ("LDI") ion source, an Inductively Coupled Plasma ("ICP") ion source, an Electron Impact ("EI) ion source, a Chemical Ionisation (".CI") ion source, a Field Ionisation ("FI") ion source, a Fast Atom Bombardment ("FAB") ion source, a Liquid Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry ("LSIMS") ion source, an Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation ("API") ion source, a Field Desorption ("FD") ion source,~a Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation ("MALDI") ion source or a Desorption/Ionisation on Silicon ("DIOS") ion source. The ion.source may be a continuous ion source or a pulsed ion source.
The mass spectrometer preferably comprises a Time of Flight mass analyser, a quadrupole mass analyser, a Penning or Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance ("FTICR") mass analyser, a 2D or linear quadrupole ion trap or a Paul or 3D quadrupole ion trap.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of mass spectrometry comprising: .
obtaining mass spectral data using a mass spectrometer;
determining a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in the mass spectral data; and calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of the n different species of ion, wherein the probability or r _ 1 1 _ confidence that the real, true, actual or accepted mass to charge ratio of a species of ion falls within its respective calculated error band is greater than or equal to x~.
The preferred embodiment is particularly advantageous in that an understanding of the error in a mass to charge ratio measurement and the overall confidence in the mass to charge ratio assignment for an ion is particularly useful if the mass assignment is -to be used, for example, to infer information about the elemental composition of the ion.
The preferred embodiment relates to automatically estimating and optionally reporting the expected or estimated accuracy of individual mass to charge ratio measurements. This is not something which conventional mass spectrometers are capable of doing.
The preferred embodiment automatically provides an estimate of the accuracy to be expected for individual mass to charge ratio measurements of unknown samples.
This provides accurate limits of mass to charge ratio within which candidate elemental compositions may lie in, for example, a database of analyte ions. Estimating the accuracy of an assignment of mass to charge ratio to observed analyte ions also provides a measure of confidence in such elemental composition assignment s.
It provides both a means of restricting the range of possible elemental compositions which may need to be considered and also guards against over restriction thereby reducing the possibility of erroneous assignment of elemental composition. The preferred embodiment is also particularly advantageous when searching against mass to charge ratios in a library of known ions having known mass to charge ratios.
The precision of a mass to charge ratio measurement is dependent upon the scatter of measured values and the number of measurements. For a normal distribution of measurements the precision may be estimated from the standard deviation a of measurements about the mean and the number of measurements n. The accuracy of a particular mass to charge ratio measurement is the difference between the mean of the mass to charge ratio measurements and the .true, actual, real or accepted mass to charge ratio of the analyte ion. In general, the more accurate the measurement of mass to charge ratio the smaller the band of uncertainty and hence the more restricted the range of possible elemental compositions which have mass to charge ratios which fall within this band of uncertainty.
Conventional mass spectrometers and in particular Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance mass spectrometers, double focusing magnetic sector mass spectrometers, orthogonal and axial Time of Flight mass spectrometers and RF quadrupole mass filter mass spectrometers are capable of measuring the mass to charge ratio of an ion to within a few parts per million (ppm) of the true mass to charge ratio. Although such mass spectrometers are able to measure mass to charge ratio with a high degree of precision and accuracy; no estimate of the accuracy of individual mass to charge ratio measurements is possible.
Without an estimate of the accuracy of a mass to charge ratio measurement the value or worth of such a-mass to charge ratio measurement is unknown. An understanding of the possible error in a mass to charge ratio measurement and an estimate of the confidence or otherwise in the mass to charge ratio assignment for an individual ion is particularly beneficial if the mass to charge ratio assignment is to be used to infer information about the elemental composition of the ion.
The preferred embodiment allows the mass to charge ratio window used to calculate proposed elemental compositions to be automatically restricted.
The preferred estimation of mass to charge ratio accuracy may also be used to appropriately set a search window when trying to match the measured mass to charge ratio or mass of an analyte ion to details of ions or molecules held in a library of ions or molecules having known mass to charge ratios or masses.
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only,. and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Fig. 1 shows a theoretical mass spectral peak;
Fig. 2 shows the theoretical mass spectral peak in which the mass to charge ratio axis has been divided into discrete samples;
Fig. 3 shows an uncalibrated mass spectrum of a reference compound PFTBA;
Fig. 4 shows how residual errors after mass calibration may be quite high if the mass spectrometer is only calibrated using a relatively small amount of data:
Fig. 5 shows how the residual errors after mass calibration will be smaller but~not insignificant if the mass spectrometer is calibrated using a relatively large amount of data:
Fig. 6 shows a portion of a mass spectrum wherein a resolution of 10,000 is sufficient to resolve two different ions;
Fig. 7 shows a portion of a mass spectrum wherein two different ions can not be resolved;
Fig. 8 shows the residual errors and calculated 95~
confidence interval after calibration according to the preferred embodiment; and Fig. 9 shows a mass spectrum according to the preferred embodiment wherein the mass to charge ratio of individual ions together with the respective error in the determination of the mass to charge ratio of the ion is reported.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described. The preferred embodiment involves arriving at a representative value for the precision and accuracy of an individual mass to charge ratio measurement. In order to do this multiple sources of error are preferably estimated and at least some of these errors are then combined and reported along with each individual mass to charge ratio measurement.
Some of the sources of error involved with an individual mass to charge ratio measurement which are preferably estimated include statistical or random errors such as errors due to ion detection statistics, errors due to insufficient sampling frequency, computational errors (e.g, founding off errors) and errors recorded during mass calibration.
In some cases data may be sufficiently corrupted that no estimate of mass measurement error may be reliably calculated or reported. This situations include the effects of mass interferences, detector saturation and errors due to instability or drift of the mass spectrometer subsequent to calibration or in between calibrations.
Random error in the determination of the mass to charge ratio of an ion is often dominated by ion statistics. A mass spectral peak in a mass spectrum is the result of detecting a number of ions generated from an ion source. An example of a theoretical mass peak is shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 shows a theoretical mass peak which may be observed for ions having a mass to charge ratio of 300. The detected ions which are all the same species of ion will have a distribution of mass to charge ratios centred around a mean value and will fall within a defined mass envelope. The narrower the mass or peak envelope the more able a mass spectrometer is to distinguish between ions with very small differences in mass to charge ratio. The mass resolution R may be defined as:
R= M
where M is the mass to charge ratio of the mean of a mass or peak envelope and 8M is the width of the mass or peak envelope in mass units defined in a specific way e.g. at the Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM). The mean of this distribution is the estimation of the mass to charge ratio for the observed mass peak.
If the gain characteristics of the detection and amplification system are known, then the area of the mass spectral peak may be expressed in terms of the absolute number of ions within the mass or peak envelope..
In Fig. 2 the mass to charge ratio scale has been divided into a plurality of discrete samples. Each sample is described by an index number i and each index number i is associated with a value of mass to charge ratio Mi. For simplicity, it has been assumed that the y axis represents the absolute number of ions Ii measured at each particular value of mass to charge ratio Mi. It is also assumed that each ion detected gives rise to a signal of the same amplitude. The mean of this distribution M~,ean is given by:
Lrlr .Mi __ r M
where ~, I, = N
and N is the total number of ions detected. The mean represents the measured mass to charge ratio value of the peak.
The mass spectral peak shown in Fig. 2 may be considered as a probability distribution with a parent population variance V of ion arrivals which can be estimated from:
Y = ~~I~CM. -M,~)Z
The standard deviation aM around the mean for this parent population is given by:
~M ' From theoretical statistics, if the mass to charge ratio value is measured based upon a single recorded ion belonging to this distribution then the value Mi recorded for this ion will be the most likely estimate of the mean of the distribution. The estimated uncertainty in this single measurement is given by QM.
If the measurement is repeated for N single ions an average mean value can be produced. This average mean value will have an uncertainty or standard deviation a~
of a~
where a~ represents the standard deviation on the measurement of the center of a mass spectral peak with a parent population standard deviation of QM and containing N ions.
The expressions above can be related to any peak shape. However, the shape of a typical mass spectral peak may be approximated by a Gaussian distribution.
Assuming a Gaussian distribution and 8M defined at Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) then:
_ 8M
6"' 2.35 This allows the uncertainty in the centroid determination of the peak to be expressed in terms of 8M
and the number of ions recorded N. The expression below yields the uncertainty in the measurement in mass units:
5.5 ~ N
From integration of the Gaussian probability distribution function, approximately 95~ of measurements for a. given 8M and N will fall within +/- 2a~. This spread is referred to as the 95$ confidence limit.
The equations derived above describe the statistical limitations of peak centroid determination in a situation where every ion detected gives an identical response.
Typically mass spectrometers employ multiplier systems to amplify the signal from the individual ions to ensure detection. These multipliers include electron multipliers, photo multipliers and microchannel plates in a variety~of configurations and are often used in conjunction with electronic amplification devices. Due to the statistical characteristics of some of these devices, ions having the same_mass to charge ratio will have a response governed by a separate probability distribution function. When employing an analogue signal recording system (e. g. an Analogue to Digital Recorder ADC) this distribution leads to an increase in the uncertainty of the determination of the centre of a mass spectral peak. This increase may be calculated .if the distribution of ion response is well characterized and may then be incorporated into the estimation of error. When using an ion counting system (e. g. a Time to Digital Recorder TDC) this effect does not need to be considered.
In some cases there may be insufficient samples over a mass spectral peak to accurately determine its center. This error should ideally be minimized.
However, if it is significant then it should preferably be incorporated into any final quantification of overall.
error.
When measuring mass to less than 111000 of a mass unit (commonly referred to as milli dalton (mDa)) it is important that calculations are performed and presented with a suitable number of decimal places to avoid unnecessary rounding errors. For example, if an ion having a mass to charge ratio of 50 is mass measured and the result rounded to four decimal places then the possible error due to this rounding will be 50.0000 t 0.00005. Expressed in parts per million (ppm) this is 50 t 1 ppm.
Calibration involves introducing a reference compound or mixture of reference compounds which give rise to mass spectral peaks which have precisely known elemental compositions and hence which have precisely known mass to charge ratios. The experimentally measured mass to charge ratio value for each of the calibration peaks are then compared to the known reference mass to charge ratio values and a suitable calibration function or functions can then be applied to subsequent experimental data: The calibration function ensures-that an unknown sample is~correctly calibrated as far as is possible. The purpose of this calibration function is to adjust the measured mass to charge ratio value of reference ions to be as close as possible to the theoretical mass of the reference compound.
As long as statistical errors are low this procedure will compensate for any systematic errors which axe present. Systematic errors in mass .
measurement are biases in the measured value which remain the same no matter how many times the measurement is repeated. Any residual errors remaining after calibration may be treated as random errors.
Ideally, during calibration, sufficient signal should be acquired such that statistical error due to an insufficient number.of ions is negligible. This may not, however, always be possible.
From the statistical expressions developed above it is possible to assign a value of centroid standard deviation to each peak in the calibration. This may be used to apply appropriate weighting to each mass to charge ratio value when fitting a calibration function or functions to the calibration data. This information may be used to predict how errors due to statistics in the initial calibration will affect the uncertainty in the final analyte mass measurement. This is illustrated further with reference to Figs. 3-5.
Fig. 3 shows an un-calibrated fragment ion mass spectrum over the mass to charge ratio range 300-624 resulting from a reference compound Perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA) acquired using an Electron Impact ("EI") ion source operated in positive ion mode. The ions were analysed using an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser. PFTBA is a common reference material for Electron Impact mass .spectrometry studies. As a result of the ionisation process the molecular ion having a nominal mass to charge ratio of 671 was fragmented into a number of different fragment ions having different mass to charge ratios. The molecular ion is not therefore observed in the resulting fragmentation mass spectrum a portion of which is shown in Fig. 3.
With orthogonal. acceleration Time of Flight mass analysers the mass to charge ratio value is proportional to the square of the time of flight of ions in a drift or flight region of the mass analyser. By comparing the square root of the flight time of a reference ion to the known mass to charge ratio of the reference ion, a relationship between time of flight and mass to charge ratio can be established. This relationship may then be used to generate a calibration expression based on a third order polynomial expression using a weighted least squares method.
Fig. 4 shows the residual errors after generating such a calibration expression based upon a relatively small amount of data. . In Fig. 4 the x axis indicates the calculated mass to charge ratios of different fragment ions derived from PFTBA based upon their known empirical formula. The y axis represents the difference between the calibrated mass to charge ratio of the fragment ions and the known reference mass to charge ratio values after calibration had been applied. The axis is displayed in parts per million error (ppm). The vertical lines represent +/- 2a~ where a~ is the statistical uncertainty in the peak center determination in ppm. These error bars represent the calculated scatter which could be expected from the reported mass to charge ratio value from repetitive measurements of each calibration point within a 95~s confidence limit.
The error bars are inversely proportional to the square root of the intensity.
Fig. 5 shows a similar plot but obtained using a' much larger data set. The error bars are very small but they are nonetheless still present and the total error is now less than +/- lppm over the entire range. The deviation of the calibrated results from the calculated result reflects a remaining element of systematic error.
_ 22 _ This error may be further reduced by employing a higher order polynomial expression or an alternative curve fitting method.
The results shown in Fig. 4 and 5 were taken from the same experimental run. PFTBA was continuously infused into the ion source and mass spectra were acquired at a rate of one mass spectrum per second.
Data from multiple mass spectra were averaged prior to calibration. Fig. 4 shows the error for an average of 20s of data collection whereas Fig. 5 shows the error for an average of 30 minutes of data collection. The results shown in Fig. 5 therefore represent a data set which is approximately x90 that of the data set used in Fig. 4. The error bars, which are based on ion statistics alone are approximately x9.5 (square root of 90) times smaller in Fig. 5 than in Fig. 4:
Because of the variation in signal intensity it can be seen from Fig. 4 that the error due to statistics within the calibration varies for different mass regions. The errors in this case are dominated by the calculated statistical error on each data point.
In the specific example of calibrating a Time of Flight mass spectrometer~coefficients have been calculated of a third order polynomial of the form:
M,~.~,a = a + b ~ M,,~~;~ + c ~ ( M~~;~ )2 + d ~ ( M~,c;~ )3 where Mref(i) is. the calculated mass to charge ratio value of ref-erence peak i based on the known empirical formula and Mestti~ is the mass to charge ratio value of reference peak i recorded before calibration.
The method involves minimizing the sum of the squared difference between the estimated mass to charge ratio values Mestci~ and the calculated mass to charge ratio value of the reference material Mrefct~ weighted by the calculated statistical variance a~~;,~2 of each estimated measurement where i is an index denoting individual points in the calibration and N is the total number of points in the calibration. This sum is denoted by the symbol x2:
N M,~ef'(t) - f (Meat(t) ) ~~' °~M~) where:
f (M~,,~(,) ) = a + b ~ Mgt,) + c ~ ( M~(,) )2 + d ~ ( Mur(t) )3 The coefficients of the polynomial function are adjusted to give the lowest value of x2. The x2 value gives an overall estimation of the goodness of fit of the calibration expression and can be used to provide crude acceptance or rejection criteria for a given calibration.
ether goodness of fit tests may be performed on this type of data depending on the number of calibration points and the calibration approach followed. In principle other methods may be used for rejection or acceptance of calibration.
Using the method of least sguares fitting above, the variance in the calculated coefficients in the polynomial expression can be calculated along with the covariance. This information can be used to calculate 24 _ the variance and hence standard deviation,of a measurement of any mass to charge ratio within the mass to charge ratio range of this. calibration. This standard deviation may be combined with other statistical information to give an overall estimated error in a subsequent measurement.
Although the method of calibration described above uses a least squares nth order polynomial, other calibration schemes may be employed such as, for example, non-linear and linear regression and splines.
These may be more suited to particular types of data or mass analysers. In each case it is possible to extract information about the predicted error at particular mass to charge ratio values based on the statistics of the individual calibrant peaks.
There are many potential sources of systematic error involved with mass measurement. However, many of these biases are constant during an experiment and can be removed from the final result by careful characterization of the system. This characterization, or calibration, is essential to ensure that the subsequent measurement is as accurate as possible. If a systematic error is identified that cannot be quantified then no reliable estimate of overall accuracy can be presented.
Some sources of systematic error may not be constant during the course of a measurement or may not be accurately predicted and corrected for during calibration. An example of this is an unresolved mass interference.
Fig. 6 shows a mass spectrum wherein the statistical error is assumed to be negligible. Two mass peaks are shown corresponding to two different ion species. The two mass peaks are assumed to have a Gaussian distribution. The first mass peak PI has a mean mass to charge ratio value of M1. The second mass peak P2 has a mean mass to charge ratio value of M2.
The intensity of the second peak P2 is set to be half that of the first mass_peak P1. Both mass peaks P1,P2 have a width at half height SM of 0.05 mass units. The mass resolution is therefore 10,000 (FWHM definition).
In the particular example shown in Fig. 6 M1 is 500.0000 and M2 500.1500 i.e. the separation between M1 and M2 is 0.15 mass units. It is clear that a resolution of 10,000 is more than sufficient to separate the two different peaks P1,P2 and to enable accurate determination of the mean value of the peaks M1,M2.
Fig. 7 illustrates a scenario wherein the separation between the two different mass peaks P1,P2 has now been reduced from 0.15 mass units to only 0.05 mass units e.g. M1 is 500.0000 but M2 is now 500.0500.
It is apparent that the two mass peaks P1,P2 can not now be resolved from one another. The resultant single asymmetrical mass peak shown in bold has a mean mass to charge ratio value M= of 500.0167. The first mass peak P1 may be an analyte ion which is intended to be measured whereas the second mass peak P2 may be an unexpected unresolved background or interference ion.
Accordingly, the measurement of the mass to charge of the first (analyte) mass peak P1 has an error EM1 where:
E=M;-Ml In the particular example shown and described in relation to Fig. 7, the error E is 0.0167 da (33.4 ppm).
Mass interference effects causing systematic error can be recognized and in some cases approximately quantified by examination of the mass spectral peak shape compared to an idealized model of the expected peak shape at a particular mass to charge ratio value.
This ideal peak shape may be characterized from that of standard reference peaks prior to a mass measu-rement.
In some cases a Gaussian peak shape can be assumed. If the peak shape or width deviates beyond a pre-set criteria then the accuracy of the mass measurement of this mass to charge ratio value will be poor. The extent to which this effect can be accurately quantified will depend on the sophistication of the. peak detection algorithm employed.
Another source of systematic error can result when the signal intensity recorded exceeds the operational range of a signal amplification and/or a detection device. In certain mass analysers mass measurement accuracy can also be effected by space charge repulsion within the mass analyser itself. These effects can lead.
to shifts in the recorded mass to charge due to, for example, distortions in mass spectral peak shape a.s the intensity increases. The characteristics of the particular mass analyser and detection electronics utilized should ideally be characterized prior to measurement and the upper limit of the range at which an appropriate measurement of mass accuracy can be reported found.
An additional source of systematic error can result from a change in the conditions under which the mass spectrometer is operating relative to those conditions existing when the system was calibrated. If a system parameter has changed, resulting in the calibration becoming invalid, then the final mass measurement will be in error. This situation can occur, for instance, due to user intervention, the failure of a power supply, interference from an external source of electromagnetic radiation or due to mass drift caused by ambient temperature changes. The time period which has elapsed between calibration being performed or checked using a ' suitable reference compound and a mass measurement being reported are preferably monitored. The longer this time period becomes the less accuracy is preferably assigned to the final measurement. Although the error on the final measurement may not be readily,quantifiable it is .
important that effort is made to recognize this situation and reflect a general uncertainty in accuracy with any measurement presented.
To determine an overall figure of accuracy for an individual measurement, possible errors (described above) arising at each step in the mass measurement process may preferably be examined.
Errors recorded in the instrument calibration procedure have been described above. Calibrations are generally made some time before a mass measurement of an analyte is performed: Due to the susceptibility of power supplies to temperature drift and the thermal expansion of components and materials used in the construction on mass analysers it is necessary.to recognise and correct for this drift over time.
To ensure that any minor drift in the instrument is accounted for when making a mass measurement an internal reference compound may be introduced at the same time or within a short time geriod before or after a mass measurement is made. This not only allows the calibration expression to be adjusted for any small changes but also provides an internal check of the stability of the system. For example, in a Time of Flight mass spectrometer a single point lock mass correction may be made. A reference material is introduced and the measured mass to charge ratio of a single mass spectral peak from this reference material is preferably monitored during the experiment. The empirical formula and hence the calculated mass to charge ratio for the internal calibrant is known.
Changes in the overall gain of the calibration expression maybe made on a mass spectrum to mass spectrum basis. If more~than one internal reference peak is present then more complex changes to the overall calibration expression may be incorporated. including correction for any offset drift.
An error in the determination of the mass to charge ratio value of the internal reference will result in a error in the mass measurement of the analyte. All the sources of error previously described should preferably be estimated for the measurement of the internal reference mass to charge ratio.
In techniques where the secondary reference , material is introduced at exactly the same time as the analyte compound, mass interference from background peaks or from analyte peaks may occur. In chromatographic techniques the analyte compound intensity will change with time as a chromatographic peak elutes. The internal reference compound, however, will remain at essentially constant intensity. Based on the intensity and the resolution of the internal reference peak the expected short-term scatter in the measured mass to charge ratio value for this may be calculated. If the mass to charge ratio value of the internal reference peak changes by significantly more than the calculated short-term statistical scatter it is probable that a mass interference has occurred at the internal reference peak. This could be from mass interference due to the elution of the analyte compound or due to the elution of a contaminant compound unrelated to the analyte. Alternatively, the shift may be due to an instrument parameter change, failure of a power supply, or interference from an external source of electromagnetic radiation. If this shift is greater than the statistical scatter of the internal reference measurement, then the resultant error in the accuracy of the analyte peak may be estimated and indicated. Effort must be made to differentiate between long term drift corrected by an internal reference and short term instability causing systematic measurement errors. This mass shift may characteristically occur in a similar time-scale to the chromatographic peak elution width.
Preferably, all the sources of statistical and possible systematic error previously described should be estimated for the analyte peak measurement.
In addition, using chromatographic separation techniques several mass measurements of the analyte peak are preferably made during the chromatographic elution timescale. These are subsequently averaged and presented as a final reported mass to charge ratio. It is expected that -the individual measurements across the chromatographic peak will have a statistical variation based upon their individual intensities. If a set of mass measurements from a peak from an eluting compound has an exceptionally large spread of values (Q) compared to what is expected, then it may indicate the presence of interference from co-eluting or partially co-eluting compounds. In such situations no,reliable estimation of accuracy may be reported.
If all the calculated errors above are determined in common units, e.g. mass units or parts per million (ppm) in mass to charge ratio, then the individual errors may be added in quadrature to yield an overall estimate of the errors associated with a single mass measurement:
1 ~ QT = CT12 'f' x'22 -!- Q~Z ......... + O'n2 where al to an represent the standard deviations calculated for each contribution to statistical error and aT is the total calculated standard deviation on the measurement of the analyte ion mass to charge ratio.
value.
The estimated accuracy of mass to charge ratio measurement is preferably recorded and optionally presented with each mass to charge ratio measurement displayed or listed in a mass spectrum. The figure reported preferably represents a scatter in multiples of ~ aT about the mean value. Based upon a Gaussian distribution the confidence in the measurement presented may expressed for different multiples of t aT. The table below gives some common confidence limits derived from a Gaussian distribution.
Range Probability of Presented measurement falling within the range set t 0.5a~ 38.29%
t aT . 68.26%
t l.SaT 86.64 t2 aT 95.43%
t 2 . 5aT __ g~ ~ 7-6~.
t 3a~ 99.73 t3.5 aT 99.95$
A figure of t 2.5 aT representing a 98.76%
confidence level may, for example, be presented. This figure may appear as an annotation within a mass spectrum or mass spectrum list and/or may be incorporated into the output from elemental composition calculation results.
The accuracy of the measurement may also be indicated by automatically setting the number of decimal places for mass to charge ratio annotation that are presented to reflect the calculated confidence limit.
It is important not to indicate tao high a level of accuracy especially when restricting the minimum ppm window used for calculation of proposed possible elemental compositions. Situations in, which insufficient data is available to calculate a meaningful estimation of the overall error in mass measurement should be determined. In the preferred embodiment an estimation of calculated error will only preferably be displayed if an internal reference compound was present during the measurement or correction was made within an acceptable time frame.
The mass calibration used during the measurement should be valid. The criteria defining validity of the calibration should be determined for an individual mass spectrometer. These criteria include changes to critical instrument parameters which could affect calibration or if an unacceptable time has elapsed since the calibration was performed.
Fig. 8 and 9 illustrate the preferred method as applied to the exact mass measurement of a mixture of Polyethylene glycols ionised using Electospray ionisation (ESI). The resulting ions were analysed using an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass spectrometer. Fig. 8 shows the residual errors after calibration. The x axis represents the calculated mass to charge value of the calibrant peaks based upon their known empirical formula. The y axis represents the difference between the calibrated mass to charge values and the known reference mass to charge ratio values after calibration had been applied. The y axis is displayed in units of parts per million error fppm).
The vertical lines represent +/- 2a~ where Q~ is the statistical uncertainty in the peak center determination in ppm. The error bars represent the calculated scatter which could be expected from the reported mass to charge ratio from repetitive measurements of each calibration point within a 95~ confidence limit. The dotted lines' represent predicted 95$ confidence bounds for subsequent measurements within the mass to charge ratio range of the calibration. These bounds were calculated based on the variance and covariance calculated using a third order weighted least squares linear regression.
Fig. 9 shows a mass spectrum according to the preferred embodiment of the mixture after calibration using an expression derived from the calibration shown in Fig. 8. The ion having a mass to charge ratio of 745.41977 was used as singly point internal secondary reference correction and hence no error band is presented for this particular ion.
The predicted errors for each mass to charge ratio measurement were combined to provide an overall 95~
confidence range for each measurement. The mass to charge values displayed in the mass spectrum shown in Fig. 9 are annotated with the predicated 95~ confidence ranges and are also truncated to three decimal places to reflect the predicted precision of the measurements.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art. that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the accompanying claims.
Claims (68)
1. A mass spectrometer comprising:
a mass analyser; and a processing system, said processing system being arranged to obtain mass spectral data, to determine a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data and to calculate a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion, wherein the probability or confidence that the real, true, actual or accepted mass to charge ratio of a species of ion falls within its respective calculated error band is greater than or equal x%, and wherein x >= 50%.
a mass analyser; and a processing system, said processing system being arranged to obtain mass spectral data, to determine a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data and to calculate a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion, wherein the probability or confidence that the real, true, actual or accepted mass to charge ratio of a species of ion falls within its respective calculated error band is greater than or equal x%, and wherein x >= 50%.
2. The mass spectrometer as claimed in claim 1 wherein said processing system reports the mass to charge ratio of at least some of said n species of ion together with the respective calculated error band for each mass to charge ratio.
3. The mass spectrometer as claimed in claims 1 or 2 wherein said mass spectral data comprises data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected.
4. The mass spectrometer as claimed in claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the mass spectrometer comprises an ion source selected from the group consisting of: (i) an Electrospray ("ESI") ion source; (ii) an Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionisation ("APCI") ion source; (iii) an Atmospheric Pressure Photo Ionisation ("APPI") ion source; (iv) a Laser Desorption Ionisation ("LDI") ion source; (v) an Inductively Coupled Plasma ("ICP") ion source; (vi) an Electron Impact ("EI) ion source;
(vii) a Chemical Ionisation ("CI") ion source; (viii) a Field Ionisation ("FI") ion source; (ix) a Fast Atom Bombardment ("FAB") ion source; (x) a Liquid Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry ("LSIMS") ion source; (xi) an Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation ("API") ion source; (xii) a Field Desorption ("FD") ion source;
(xiii) a Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation ("MALDI") ion source; and (xiv) a Desorption/Ionisation on Silicon ("DIOS") ion source.
(vii) a Chemical Ionisation ("CI") ion source; (viii) a Field Ionisation ("FI") ion source; (ix) a Fast Atom Bombardment ("FAB") ion source; (x) a Liquid Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry ("LSIMS") ion source; (xi) an Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation ("API") ion source; (xii) a Field Desorption ("FD") ion source;
(xiii) a Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation ("MALDI") ion source; and (xiv) a Desorption/Ionisation on Silicon ("DIOS") ion source.
5. The mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 4 wherein the mass spectrometer comprises a continuous ion source.
6. The mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 4 wherein the mass spectrometer comprises a pulsed ion source.
7. The mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 - 6 wherein the mass spectrometer comprises a mass analyser selected from the group consisting of: (i) a Time of Flight mass analyser; (ii) a quadrupole mass analyser; (iii) a Penning or Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance ("FTICR") mass analyser; (iv) a 2D or linear quadrupole ion trap; and (v) a Paul or 3D quadrupole ion trap.
8. The mass spectrometer as claimed in claim 1, wherein n falls within a range selected from the group consisting of: (i) 1; (ii) 2-5; (iii) 5-10; (iv) 10-15; (v) 15-20; (vi) 20-25;
(vii) 25-30; (viii) 30-35; (ix) 35-40; (x) 40-45; (xi) 45-50;
(xii) >= 50; (xiii) >= 60; (xiv) >= 70; (xv) >= 80;
(xvi) >= 90; and (xvii) >= 100.
(vii) 25-30; (viii) 30-35; (ix) 35-40; (x) 40-45; (xi) 45-50;
(xii) >= 50; (xiii) >= 60; (xiv) >= 70; (xv) >= 80;
(xvi) >= 90; and (xvii) >= 100.
9. The mass spectrometer as claimed in claim 1 or 8, wherein x falls within a range selected from the group consisting of: (i) 50-55; (ii) 55-60; (iii) 60-65; (iv) 65-70; (v) 70-75; (vi) 75-80; (vii) 80-85; and (viii) 85-90.
10. The mass spectrometer as claimed in claim 1 or 8, wherein x falls within a range selected from the group consisting of: (i) 90-91; (ii) 91-92; (iii) 92-93; (iv) 93-94; (v) 94-95; (vi) 95-96; (vii) 96-97; (viii) 97-98; (ix) 98-99; (x) 99-99.5; (xi) 99.5-99.95; (xii) 99.95-99.99; and (xiii) 99.99-100.
11. The mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein said mass spectral data comprises data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected.
12. Use of the mass spectrometer of claim 1 for mass spectrometry, said mass spectrometry including obtaining mass spectral data using said mass spectrometer, determining a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data, and calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion.
13. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11.
14. The use as claimed in claim 13, further comprising reporting the mass to charge ratio of at least some of said n species of ion together with the respective calculated error band for each mass to charge ratio.
15. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in claim 11, wherein said data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected is converted into data relating to the mass to charge ratio of said ions.
16. The use as claimed in claim 15, wherein said data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected is converted into data relating to the mass to charge ratio of said ions by using a calibration function.
17. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the systematic error in determining the mass to charge ratio of said ions.
18. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the accuracy of a mathematical model used in mass calibration.
19. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to mass calibration.
20. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to using one or more internal references or calibrants.
21. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises monitoring for changes in the time of detection of one or more internal references or calibrants.
22. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the stability or instability of said mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
23. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to drift of said mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
24. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the effect of changes in the operating conditions of said mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
25. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the effect of user intervention subsequent to mass calibration.
26. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the effect of external influences on said mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
27. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the effect of the stability or instability of a power supply of said mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
28. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the effect of changes in temperature on said mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
29. Use of the mass spectrometer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the effect of changes in interference subsequent to mass calibration.
30. The use as claimed in claim 29, wherein said interference is due to one or more internal reference or calibrant ions interfering with one or more analyte ions.
31. The use as claimed in claim 29, wherein said interference is due to one or more analyte ions interfering with one or more internal reference or calibrant ions.
32. The use as claimed in claim 29, wherein said interference is due to one or more background or chemical noise ions interfering with one or more internal reference or calibrant ions.
33. The use as claimed in claim 29, wherein said interference is due to one or more background or chemical noise ions interfering with one or more analyte ions.
34. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the time elapsed since said mass spectrometer was last calibrated.
35. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the effect of thermal expansion of one or more components of said mass spectrometer subsequent to mass calibration.
36. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to space charge repulsion effects within said mass spectrometer.
37. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the error due to space charge repulsion effects is determined at least in part by consideration of the observed intensity of one or more species of ions.
38. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error recorded during mass calibration.
39. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the statistical error or random error in determining the mass to charge ratio of said ions.
40. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the uncertainty or standard deviation of the time of detection of one or more species of ion.
41. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the uncertainty or standard deviation of the frequency of detection of one or more species of ion.
42. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to ion detection statistics.
43. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to insufficient sampling.
44. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to computational errors.
45. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to rounding off errors.
46. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error in a report exception situation wherein one or more species of ion within said mass spectral data are sufficiently corrupted or suffering from interference that the calculated respective error band of said ions is not reported.
47. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to mass interference wherein background or interference ions having substantially similar mass to charge ratios to analyte ions affect the ability of resolving the analyte ions from said background or interference ions.
48. The use of claim 47, wherein the error due to mass interference is estimated by comparing the shape of an observed mass peak from said mass spectral data with the shape of a theoretical mass peak.
49. The use of claim 47 or 48, wherein the error due to mass interference is estimated by comparing the deviation of the shape of an observed mass peak with either a Gaussian distribution, a cosine squared distribution, another mathematical function, or a profile derived from the shape of one or more mass peaks of one or more internal reference or calibrant ions.
50. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to saturation of a detector.
51. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to signal amplification saturation.
52. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to deadtime effects or missed counts of an ion counting detector.
53. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to the response of an ion detector.
54. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises estimating the error due to the response of an electron or photon multiplier.
55. Use of the mass spectrometer of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the step of calculating a respective error band comprises combining multiple estimates of different errors.
56. The use of claim 55, wherein said multiple estimates of different errors are added in quadrature.
57. Use of the mass spectrometer of claim 1 for mass spectrometry, said mass spectrometry including obtaining mass spectral data using said mass spectrometer, determining a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data, calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion, and searching a database to look for one or more ions known to have mass to charge ratios within a range which is related to the determined mass to charge ratio of one or more ions and the respective calculated error band for the determined mass to charge ratio.
58. The use as claimed in claim 57, wherein said database comprises details of biopolymers, proteins, peptides, polypeptides, oligionucleotides, oligionucleosides, amino acids, carbohydrates, sugars, lipids, fatty acids, vitamins, hormones, portions or fragments of DNA, portions or fragments of cDNA, portions or fragments of RNA, portions or fragments of mRNA, portions or fragments of tRNA, polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, ribonucleases, enzymes, metabolites, polysaccharides, phosphorolated peptides, phosphorolated proteins, glycopeptides, glycoproteins or steroids.
59. The use as claimed in claim 57, wherein said database comprises details of the Electron Impact mass spectra of compounds.
60. Use of the mass spectrometer of claim 1 for mass spectrometry, said mass spectrometry including obtaining mass spectral data using said mass spectrometer, determining a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data, calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion, and calculating elemental compositions having mass to charge ratios within a calculated error band of the determined mass to charge ratio of one or more species of ion.
61. The use as claimed in claim 60, wherein said elemental compositions are calculated using the known masses or mass to charge ratios of atomic elements or groups of elements and/or their isotopes.
62. Use of the mass spectrometer of claim 1 for mass spectrometry, said mass spectrometry including obtaining mass spectral data using said mass spectrometer, determining a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data, calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion, defining one or more compounds of interest; and interrogating at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of at least some of said different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data to see whether said one or more compounds of interest fall within the error band of at least some of said different species of ion.
63. Use of the mass spectrometer of claim 1 for mass spectrometry, said mass spectrometry including obtaining mass spectral data using said mass spectrometer, determining a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data, calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion, defining one or more mass to charge ratios of interest; and interrogating at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of at least some of said different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data to see whether said one or more mass to charge ratios of interest fall within the error band of at least some of said different species of ion.
64. Use of the mass spectrometer of claim 1 for mass spectrometry, said mass spectrometry including obtaining mass spectral data using said mass spectrometer, determining a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data, calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion, defining one or more compounds of interest; and interrogating at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of different species of ion observed from a plurality of mass spectra acquired over a period of time to see whether said one or more compounds of interest fall within the error band of at least some of said different species of ion observed from said plurality of mass spectra.
65. Use of the mass spectrometer of claim 1 for mass spectrometry, said mass spectrometry comprising obtaining mass spectral data using said mass spectrometer, determining a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data, calculating a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion, defining one or more mass to charge ratios of interest; and interrogating at least some of the determined mass to charge ratios and respective calculated error bands of different species of ion observed from a plurality of mass spectra acquired over a period of time to see whether said one or more mass to charge ratios of interest fall within the error band of at least some of said different species of ion observed from said plurality of mass spectra.
66. Use of the mass spectrometer of claim 1, for mass spectrometry, said mass spectrometer being a continuous or pulsed ion source mass spectrometer, said mass spectrometry including obtaining mass spectral data using said continuous or pulsed ion source mass spectrometer, utilizing the processing system of said mass spectrometer to determine a mass to charge ratio of n different species of ion observed in said mass spectral data, and further utilizing said processing system to calculate a respective error band for the determined mass to charge ratio of each of said n different species of ion, wherein the probability or confidence that the real, true, actual or accepted mass to charge ratio of a species of ion falls within its respective calculated error band is greater than or equal to x%, and wherein x >= 50%.
67. The use as claimed in claim 66 further including utilizing said processing system to report the mass to charge ratio of at least some of said n species of ion together with the respective calculated error band for each mass to charge ratio.
68. The use as claimed in claim 66 or 67 wherein said mass spectral data comprises data relating to the time that different species of ion were detected.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0308278.1 | 2003-04-10 | ||
GBGB0308278.1A GB0308278D0 (en) | 2003-04-10 | 2003-04-10 | Mass spectrometer |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2464004A1 CA2464004A1 (en) | 2004-10-10 |
CA2464004C true CA2464004C (en) | 2012-11-27 |
Family
ID=9956545
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2464004A Expired - Lifetime CA2464004C (en) | 2003-04-10 | 2004-04-08 | Mass spectrometer |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP4497455B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2464004C (en) |
DE (2) | DE102004017272A1 (en) |
GB (2) | GB0308278D0 (en) |
Families Citing this family (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2405991B (en) * | 2003-08-22 | 2005-08-31 | Micromass Ltd | Mass spectrometer |
US20050080578A1 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2005-04-14 | Klee Matthew S. | Mass spectrometry spectral correction |
US8078427B2 (en) * | 2006-08-21 | 2011-12-13 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Calibration curve fit method and apparatus |
JP4894929B2 (en) * | 2007-12-20 | 2012-03-14 | 株式会社島津製作所 | Mass spectrometer |
GB0909289D0 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2009-07-15 | Micromass Ltd | Method of processing mass spectral data |
WO2011154219A2 (en) | 2010-06-10 | 2011-12-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | A method computer program and system to analyze mass spectra |
DE112012000959B4 (en) * | 2011-02-23 | 2017-06-01 | Leco Corporation | Correction of the transit time drift in transit time mass spectrometers |
KR101390878B1 (en) * | 2013-07-16 | 2014-04-30 | 국방과학연구소 | A method of identification of spores-forming bacillus using in-situ maldi-tof mass spectrometer and analysis system |
WO2015040381A1 (en) | 2013-09-23 | 2015-03-26 | Micromass Uk Limited | Peak assessment for mass spectrometers |
GB201316876D0 (en) * | 2013-09-23 | 2013-11-06 | Micromass Ltd | Peak assessment for mass spectrometers |
EP3204961B1 (en) * | 2014-10-08 | 2024-08-21 | DH Technologies Development PTE. Ltd. | Grouping amplitudes of tof extractions to detect convolution due to resolution saturation |
CN106024571B (en) | 2015-03-25 | 2018-08-24 | 萨默费尼根有限公司 | system and method for mass calibration |
EP3443352A1 (en) * | 2016-04-14 | 2019-02-20 | Roche Diagnostics GmbH | Method for determining a concentration of a target analyte in a sample of bodily fluid |
US11640901B2 (en) * | 2018-09-05 | 2023-05-02 | Protein Metrics, Llc | Methods and apparatuses for deconvolution of mass spectrometry data |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS6120856A (en) * | 1984-07-09 | 1986-01-29 | Jeol Ltd | Cleavage peak display system for mass spectrum |
JPS62124456A (en) * | 1985-11-26 | 1987-06-05 | Jeol Ltd | Automatic calibration system for mass spectrometric analysis data |
JPH08212969A (en) * | 1995-02-08 | 1996-08-20 | Hitachi Ltd | Mass spectrometer date processing device |
JPH10132786A (en) * | 1996-10-30 | 1998-05-22 | Shimadzu Corp | Mass spectroscope |
GB9801565D0 (en) * | 1998-01-23 | 1998-03-25 | Micromass Ltd | Method and apparatus for the correction of mass errors in time-of-flight mass spectrometry |
DE69921900T2 (en) * | 1998-01-23 | 2005-03-17 | Micromass Uk Ltd. | AIR-TIME MASS SPECTROMETER AND DOUBLE-REINFORCING DETECTOR THEREFOR |
US6437325B1 (en) * | 1999-05-18 | 2002-08-20 | Advanced Research And Technology Institute, Inc. | System and method for calibrating time-of-flight mass spectra |
JP4106444B2 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2008-06-25 | 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 | Automatic biopolymer identification method |
-
2003
- 2003-04-10 GB GBGB0308278.1A patent/GB0308278D0/en not_active Ceased
-
2004
- 2004-04-06 GB GB0407830A patent/GB2401721B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-04-07 DE DE102004017272A patent/DE102004017272A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-04-07 DE DE202004005563U patent/DE202004005563U1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-04-08 CA CA2464004A patent/CA2464004C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-04-09 JP JP2004115164A patent/JP4497455B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB0308278D0 (en) | 2003-05-14 |
DE102004017272A1 (en) | 2004-11-18 |
GB0407830D0 (en) | 2004-05-12 |
DE202004005563U1 (en) | 2004-09-02 |
JP4497455B2 (en) | 2010-07-07 |
JP2004317509A (en) | 2004-11-11 |
CA2464004A1 (en) | 2004-10-10 |
GB2401721B (en) | 2006-02-15 |
GB2401721A (en) | 2004-11-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7202473B2 (en) | Mass spectrometer | |
EP2245450B1 (en) | Method of quantitation by mass spectrometry | |
CA2464004C (en) | Mass spectrometer | |
US8274043B2 (en) | Estimation of ion cyclotron resonance parameters in fourier transform mass spectrometry | |
US7499807B1 (en) | Methods for recalibration of mass spectrometry data | |
US9558922B2 (en) | Quantitative peptide analysis by mass spectrometry based on bell-function fitting for ion isotope distribution | |
CN114270473B (en) | Adaptive intrinsic locking mass correction | |
Arrebola-Liébanas et al. | HRMS: Fundamentals and basic concepts | |
EP2268384B1 (en) | Method of improving signal-to-noise for quantitation by mass spectrometry | |
US6498340B2 (en) | Method for calibrating mass spectrometers | |
JP2022519884A (en) | Self-calibration of high resolution mass spectrum | |
JP4950029B2 (en) | Mass spectrometer | |
US8515685B2 (en) | Method of mass spectrometry, a mass spectrometer, and probabilistic method of clustering data | |
Kaiser et al. | Improved mass accuracy for tandem mass spectrometry |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20240408 |