CA2461148A1 - Adaptive sound scrambling system and method - Google Patents
Adaptive sound scrambling system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2461148A1 CA2461148A1 CA002461148A CA2461148A CA2461148A1 CA 2461148 A1 CA2461148 A1 CA 2461148A1 CA 002461148 A CA002461148 A CA 002461148A CA 2461148 A CA2461148 A CA 2461148A CA 2461148 A1 CA2461148 A1 CA 2461148A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- sound
- frequency
- signal
- noise
- spectrum
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 17
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 230000000873 masking effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000000638 solvent extraction Methods 0.000 claims 3
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04K—SECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
- H04K3/00—Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
- H04K3/80—Jamming or countermeasure characterized by its function
- H04K3/82—Jamming or countermeasure characterized by its function related to preventing surveillance, interception or detection
- H04K3/825—Jamming or countermeasure characterized by its function related to preventing surveillance, interception or detection by jamming
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/16—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/175—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
- G10K11/1752—Masking
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04K—SECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
- H04K3/00—Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
- H04K3/40—Jamming having variable characteristics
- H04K3/42—Jamming having variable characteristics characterized by the control of the jamming frequency or wavelength
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04K—SECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
- H04K3/00—Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
- H04K3/40—Jamming having variable characteristics
- H04K3/43—Jamming having variable characteristics characterized by the control of the jamming power, signal-to-noise ratio or geographic coverage area
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04K—SECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
- H04K3/00—Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
- H04K3/40—Jamming having variable characteristics
- H04K3/45—Jamming having variable characteristics characterized by including monitoring of the target or target signal, e.g. in reactive jammers or follower jammers for example by means of an alternation of jamming phases and monitoring phases, called "look-through mode"
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Speech or voice signal processing techniques to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/02—Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
- G10L21/0208—Noise filtering
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04K—SECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
- H04K2203/00—Jamming of communication; Countermeasures
- H04K2203/10—Jamming or countermeasure used for a particular application
- H04K2203/12—Jamming or countermeasure used for a particular application for acoustic communication
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Soundproofing, Sound Blocking, And Sound Damping (AREA)
Abstract
An adaptive sound masking and/or scrambling system and method portions undesired sound into time-blocks and estimates frequency spectrum and power level, and continuously generates white noise with a matching spectrum and power level to mask the undesired sound.
Description
ADAPTIVE SOUND SCRAMBLING S~'STEM AND METHOD
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention [0001] The present invention is directed to systems for masking andlar scrambling undesired sounds in general, and i.n particular to an adaptive noise generating system to mask interfering sounds emanating or leaking from other sources to mitigate their effects on the listeners. The invention is also directed to systems for scrambling the speech leaking from a given location so that unauthorized listeners do not understand its contents. In both cases the system tracks the amplitude range and the .frequency range of the undesired sound and adaptively generates another sound to achieve its objectives.
Prior Art of the Invention [0002] Generation of masking background noise in order to reduce the intelligibility of sounds leaked from adjacent areas or sources is generally known in the art.
The commonly known masking systems generate constant background noise, the spectrum of which is shaped in such a way as to mask the speech at Least to some extent.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention [0001] The present invention is directed to systems for masking andlar scrambling undesired sounds in general, and i.n particular to an adaptive noise generating system to mask interfering sounds emanating or leaking from other sources to mitigate their effects on the listeners. The invention is also directed to systems for scrambling the speech leaking from a given location so that unauthorized listeners do not understand its contents. In both cases the system tracks the amplitude range and the .frequency range of the undesired sound and adaptively generates another sound to achieve its objectives.
Prior Art of the Invention [0002] Generation of masking background noise in order to reduce the intelligibility of sounds leaked from adjacent areas or sources is generally known in the art.
The commonly known masking systems generate constant background noise, the spectrum of which is shaped in such a way as to mask the speech at Least to some extent.
[0003] There are some problems associated with such approach, such as:
- the amplitude range (o~ level] of the noise is constant and does not adapt to the room conditions;
- the frequency range for spectrum) of the noise is constant and does not adapt to the room conditions;
- the masking noise does not stop when the room is silent which makes it annoying to the listeners;
- the masking noise does not completely scramble the leaked speech unless its level is extremely high which could make it very annoying to the listeners;
and - existing noise masking systems are central. For example, in the case of an open plan office, exiting noise masking systems are installed in the ceiling of the office and not on each partition. Their parameters are adjusted based on an estimate of the room conditions and not the needs of each partition.
[i1~4] Other prior art deals with tracking the amplitude of the ambient background noise in order to adjust the volume of a device. In US Patent No. 4,553,25? to Mori et al. an automatic sound volume control to adjust the volume of a device based on the ambient noise environment. Their noise level detector {block 2j is used to adjust the gain of an external signal {SOj. The disclosure is directed to amplifying and reproducing this external sound signal in the presence of undesired ambient noise, and is not concerned with masking the external sound signal, nor does it address the frequency spectrum of the ambient noise.
[0005] Other prior art deals with tracking the frequency of a signal.
Published application US 20011028634 Al Huang et al. is concerned with voice transmission in packet networks. A method to replace voice packets that are lost in the network.
Their method is based on replacing the lost packets by noise that has spectral characteristics similar to the voice packets surrounding the lost packet. This way the speech quality remains good despite loss of a packet. The method is a packet concealment technique that maintains a good speech quality and intelligibility.
X0006] In US Patent Number 4,438,526 to Thomalla an automatic volume and frequency controlled sound masking system is disclosed, which comprises a microphone that senses the ambient noise and controls a random noise generator. A number of predefined frequency bands are defined and used in the sensing and generation processes.
The output signal does not change unless the change in the input signal has a predetermined duration of at least about 30 seconds.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[000'x] The present invention provides a system and method for continuously adapting to the undesired signal characteristics not limited by any predetermined frequency bands or duration of the undesired signal. The system is also intended to scramble the speech and significantly reduce its intelligibility. Furthermore, the novel system is a distributed one that can accommodate multiple users and adapts to the needs of each partition in a room independently.
[0008] The present invention endeavors to mitigate some of the prior art problems by providing a system and method in which:
~ The masking noise adapts, dynamically, to the characteristics of the leaked interfering sound by having an appropriate amplitude range and an appropriate frequency range;
~ The amplitude range of the masking sound is minimized while achieving the desired reduction in intelligibility and scrambling.
~ The frequency range of the masking noise is minimized while achieving the desired reduction in intelligibility and scrambling.
The amplitude range and/or frequency range of the masking noise is varied depending upon the specif c application and user needs. For example, the amplitude range is relatively small for masking app3ications and large for scrambling applications.
~ The system is a distributed system and not a centralized one. It adapts to the needs of each partition in the room independently.
_..,.. _.. _._ a-.~._ .,.ed~,~~,~,~~ ~ _ _ ~,.,,..~.~e.~. _ __.. _ _ _. __.
___ [0009] More particularly, the method of the present invention comprises the following steps:
{i) acquire the undesired. sound from a given location in the room using a microphone, amplifier, filter, samplelhold, and analog/digital converter; the sampling rate in our experiments was set at 16 k~lz. However, the sampling rate could vary depending upon the specific application, desired performance, and hardware configuration.
(ii) partition the acquired signal to form signal blocks (their size depends upon the specific application, in our experiment this value varied from 10 to 1024 cosec); The block size determines the frequency tracking performance.
{iii) estimate the undesired sound power of the signal in each block. (for example by adding the squares of the samples and dividing by the total number of samples in the block);
(iv) filter the values of the estimated undesired sound power calculated in step {iii) using a low pass-filter to obtain a smaoth running average of the undesired signal power. The cut-off frequency of the ~nlter determines the desired amplitude tracking performance; ~r high cut-off frequency results into aggressive scrambling that tray be annoying in some applications. Whereas a low cut-off frequency results in a smooth scrambling that .may be less effective but also less annoying to the listeners. In our experiment we used a cut-off frequency of a. t ~ Iz.
(v~ estimate the frequency spectrum of each time block resulting from step (ii);
this could be done for example by calculating the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of each block. The FFT coe~cients are indicative of the frequency spectrum of the time black;
(vi) calculate the maximum and minimum frequencies of the signal in each block based on the frequenc~r spectrum estimated in step (v);
(vii) generate a white noise signal and filtering it with a band-pass f lter.
The pass-band of the filter is in the rangeaf'to fma,~ which are related to the maximum and minimum frequencies calculated in step (vi). In our experiments f,~ and f"~ were set at half of the maximum and minimum frequencies calculated in step (vi) respectively. This relationship depends upon the desired compromise between the level of scrambling and the degree of annoyance to the listener. A
wider band leads to better scrambling but also more annoyance and vice versa.
The pass band of the alter is designed to whiten the undesired speech. It amplifies the noise in the frequency bands where the undesired sound is. low and attenuates it in the frequency bands where the undesired sound is high.
This process is implemented by calculating the FFT coet~cients ofthe desired filter from the FFT coefficient representing the undesired signal from step (v);
(viii) multiply the filtered noise generated by step (vii) by the smooth running average of the power of the undesired sound generated by step (iv);
(ix) feed the signal generated from step (viii) to an amplifier and loudspeaker to generate the masking andior scrambling noise.
(0010] The system t~ carry out the above method is preferably a stand-alone circuit board based on an energy efficient DSP processor and memory; and an analog interface chip (AIC). A suitable DSP is sold by Texas instruments as Part No. TMS320-C542 or Part No. TMS320-0671 l, and a suitable A1C by the same company is, for example, Part No.
TLC32040. Of course, other similarly suitable devices are available in the marketplace.
[I~011[ The preferred exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail in conjunction with the annexed drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a block diagram of the adaptive system for sound making according to the present invention;
Figure 2 is a block diagram of the noise-shaping filter shown in tig. 1; and Figure 3 depicts the preferred system requirements for the adaptive system shown in figure I.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[~12~ Referring to figure l of the drawings, the system of the present invention comprises a microphone IO located at the border of, or in, a region A from which an interfering sound is leaking into a region B (the masking region. The output signal from the microphone is applied to and partitioned into output signal blocks of, say, between 10 and 1024 cosec in acquisition circuit 1 l, the output of which is applied to energy and spectrum estimators 12 and l~, respectively. The estimated spectrum output is applied to a spectrum shaping generator 14 which generates shaping filter I S parameters.
The filter I S filters the output of a white noise generator 16 and applies the spectrally conditioned white noise to a scaling amplifier 17, which drive a masking Loudspeaker 18 located in the region of interval B. The scaling amplifiers 17 gain is controlled by a scaling factor generator i 9, which is driven by the energy estimator 12, said that the higher the estimated interfering sound energy from the region A, the larger is the gain of the scaling amplifier 17.
[0013] The spectrum shaping filter 15 is shown in figure 2. ~ieveral approaches could be used to design the filter. In this implementation a Finite Impulse Response filter was used. The filter 15 receives the input white noise x(t), processes it in (N+1) stages separated by N equal delays D, the outputs of which are multiplied by factors Cv to CN
then summed to yield the filter output signal y(t) that represents the spectrally shaped output noise. D represents a one sample delay; with a sampling rate of 16 kHz the delay D is 1/l6kHz = 0.0625 cosec. The signal y(t) is then applied to the scaling amplifier 17.
Thus, the output y{t) is a modified uersion of x(t) as follows:
k=N
y(t)= ~ C x(t-k) k=o k where t is the time-slot member within a block;
x(t) is the input white noise;
Co to CN are the filter coefficients;
N is the number of delay elements in the filter; and y(t) is the output signal.
[0014] The number of samples (t~x) within a block, assuming a block length of cosec and a sampling rate of 16 kHz (0.0625 cosec) simply is 256 = 4,096 samples 0.0625 [0015] The filter coefficients C~, to Ck are derived from the FFT coefficients of the undesired sound. They are generated by block 14 as follows:
- Block 13 estimates the spectrum of the undesired sound. A possible implementation is the use of windowing and FFT. Assuming a block size of 4,096 samples, a 256-points FFT, a Hamming window, and an overlap factor of 2. A Hamming window of size 256 generates 256 values from samples x(0) to x(255). A 256-points FFT
operation is performed. Its eoefticients represent an estimate of the frequency spectrum of the first 256 input data points. The Hamming widow then generates another 256 values from input samples x(12$) to x(383) and the same operation is repeated for the whole block. The average of the FFT coefficients represents an estimate of the spectrum of this given block of the undesired sound input.
- Based on this estimated spectrum, the desired frequency response of filter 1 S is determined. A possible implementation is described in steps (v), (vi), and (vii) of the proposed method summary of this invention.
The filter coefficients C~, to C~ are calculated using the conventional frequency domain based filter design technique for FIR filters as described in any standard undergraduate signal processing textbook, (e.g. page s 630-632 of John G.
l'roakis and Dimitris G. Nlanolakis, "Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications", Third edition, Prentice Hall, 1996, ISBN Q-I3-X73762-4, which is incorporated herein by referen.ce).
(0016 The sealing factor controlling the gain of the sealing amplifier I7 would conveniently by adjustable depending on the proximity of individuals) in the regionally to the Ioudspeaker(s) 18. However, the spectrum estimator l3 would simply cause the generation of filter parameter to match the interfering spectrum.
[0017) Figure 3 shows the preferred system performance requirements, with a noise-floor between 35 dB-A (A-weighted) and 40 dB-A. ltriost systems in an office environment would not require a masking noise level higher than 45 dB-A, but this is a designer discretion.
- the amplitude range (o~ level] of the noise is constant and does not adapt to the room conditions;
- the frequency range for spectrum) of the noise is constant and does not adapt to the room conditions;
- the masking noise does not stop when the room is silent which makes it annoying to the listeners;
- the masking noise does not completely scramble the leaked speech unless its level is extremely high which could make it very annoying to the listeners;
and - existing noise masking systems are central. For example, in the case of an open plan office, exiting noise masking systems are installed in the ceiling of the office and not on each partition. Their parameters are adjusted based on an estimate of the room conditions and not the needs of each partition.
[i1~4] Other prior art deals with tracking the amplitude of the ambient background noise in order to adjust the volume of a device. In US Patent No. 4,553,25? to Mori et al. an automatic sound volume control to adjust the volume of a device based on the ambient noise environment. Their noise level detector {block 2j is used to adjust the gain of an external signal {SOj. The disclosure is directed to amplifying and reproducing this external sound signal in the presence of undesired ambient noise, and is not concerned with masking the external sound signal, nor does it address the frequency spectrum of the ambient noise.
[0005] Other prior art deals with tracking the frequency of a signal.
Published application US 20011028634 Al Huang et al. is concerned with voice transmission in packet networks. A method to replace voice packets that are lost in the network.
Their method is based on replacing the lost packets by noise that has spectral characteristics similar to the voice packets surrounding the lost packet. This way the speech quality remains good despite loss of a packet. The method is a packet concealment technique that maintains a good speech quality and intelligibility.
X0006] In US Patent Number 4,438,526 to Thomalla an automatic volume and frequency controlled sound masking system is disclosed, which comprises a microphone that senses the ambient noise and controls a random noise generator. A number of predefined frequency bands are defined and used in the sensing and generation processes.
The output signal does not change unless the change in the input signal has a predetermined duration of at least about 30 seconds.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[000'x] The present invention provides a system and method for continuously adapting to the undesired signal characteristics not limited by any predetermined frequency bands or duration of the undesired signal. The system is also intended to scramble the speech and significantly reduce its intelligibility. Furthermore, the novel system is a distributed one that can accommodate multiple users and adapts to the needs of each partition in a room independently.
[0008] The present invention endeavors to mitigate some of the prior art problems by providing a system and method in which:
~ The masking noise adapts, dynamically, to the characteristics of the leaked interfering sound by having an appropriate amplitude range and an appropriate frequency range;
~ The amplitude range of the masking sound is minimized while achieving the desired reduction in intelligibility and scrambling.
~ The frequency range of the masking noise is minimized while achieving the desired reduction in intelligibility and scrambling.
The amplitude range and/or frequency range of the masking noise is varied depending upon the specif c application and user needs. For example, the amplitude range is relatively small for masking app3ications and large for scrambling applications.
~ The system is a distributed system and not a centralized one. It adapts to the needs of each partition in the room independently.
_..,.. _.. _._ a-.~._ .,.ed~,~~,~,~~ ~ _ _ ~,.,,..~.~e.~. _ __.. _ _ _. __.
___ [0009] More particularly, the method of the present invention comprises the following steps:
{i) acquire the undesired. sound from a given location in the room using a microphone, amplifier, filter, samplelhold, and analog/digital converter; the sampling rate in our experiments was set at 16 k~lz. However, the sampling rate could vary depending upon the specific application, desired performance, and hardware configuration.
(ii) partition the acquired signal to form signal blocks (their size depends upon the specific application, in our experiment this value varied from 10 to 1024 cosec); The block size determines the frequency tracking performance.
{iii) estimate the undesired sound power of the signal in each block. (for example by adding the squares of the samples and dividing by the total number of samples in the block);
(iv) filter the values of the estimated undesired sound power calculated in step {iii) using a low pass-filter to obtain a smaoth running average of the undesired signal power. The cut-off frequency of the ~nlter determines the desired amplitude tracking performance; ~r high cut-off frequency results into aggressive scrambling that tray be annoying in some applications. Whereas a low cut-off frequency results in a smooth scrambling that .may be less effective but also less annoying to the listeners. In our experiment we used a cut-off frequency of a. t ~ Iz.
(v~ estimate the frequency spectrum of each time block resulting from step (ii);
this could be done for example by calculating the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of each block. The FFT coe~cients are indicative of the frequency spectrum of the time black;
(vi) calculate the maximum and minimum frequencies of the signal in each block based on the frequenc~r spectrum estimated in step (v);
(vii) generate a white noise signal and filtering it with a band-pass f lter.
The pass-band of the filter is in the rangeaf'to fma,~ which are related to the maximum and minimum frequencies calculated in step (vi). In our experiments f,~ and f"~ were set at half of the maximum and minimum frequencies calculated in step (vi) respectively. This relationship depends upon the desired compromise between the level of scrambling and the degree of annoyance to the listener. A
wider band leads to better scrambling but also more annoyance and vice versa.
The pass band of the alter is designed to whiten the undesired speech. It amplifies the noise in the frequency bands where the undesired sound is. low and attenuates it in the frequency bands where the undesired sound is high.
This process is implemented by calculating the FFT coet~cients ofthe desired filter from the FFT coefficient representing the undesired signal from step (v);
(viii) multiply the filtered noise generated by step (vii) by the smooth running average of the power of the undesired sound generated by step (iv);
(ix) feed the signal generated from step (viii) to an amplifier and loudspeaker to generate the masking andior scrambling noise.
(0010] The system t~ carry out the above method is preferably a stand-alone circuit board based on an energy efficient DSP processor and memory; and an analog interface chip (AIC). A suitable DSP is sold by Texas instruments as Part No. TMS320-C542 or Part No. TMS320-0671 l, and a suitable A1C by the same company is, for example, Part No.
TLC32040. Of course, other similarly suitable devices are available in the marketplace.
[I~011[ The preferred exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail in conjunction with the annexed drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a block diagram of the adaptive system for sound making according to the present invention;
Figure 2 is a block diagram of the noise-shaping filter shown in tig. 1; and Figure 3 depicts the preferred system requirements for the adaptive system shown in figure I.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[~12~ Referring to figure l of the drawings, the system of the present invention comprises a microphone IO located at the border of, or in, a region A from which an interfering sound is leaking into a region B (the masking region. The output signal from the microphone is applied to and partitioned into output signal blocks of, say, between 10 and 1024 cosec in acquisition circuit 1 l, the output of which is applied to energy and spectrum estimators 12 and l~, respectively. The estimated spectrum output is applied to a spectrum shaping generator 14 which generates shaping filter I S parameters.
The filter I S filters the output of a white noise generator 16 and applies the spectrally conditioned white noise to a scaling amplifier 17, which drive a masking Loudspeaker 18 located in the region of interval B. The scaling amplifiers 17 gain is controlled by a scaling factor generator i 9, which is driven by the energy estimator 12, said that the higher the estimated interfering sound energy from the region A, the larger is the gain of the scaling amplifier 17.
[0013] The spectrum shaping filter 15 is shown in figure 2. ~ieveral approaches could be used to design the filter. In this implementation a Finite Impulse Response filter was used. The filter 15 receives the input white noise x(t), processes it in (N+1) stages separated by N equal delays D, the outputs of which are multiplied by factors Cv to CN
then summed to yield the filter output signal y(t) that represents the spectrally shaped output noise. D represents a one sample delay; with a sampling rate of 16 kHz the delay D is 1/l6kHz = 0.0625 cosec. The signal y(t) is then applied to the scaling amplifier 17.
Thus, the output y{t) is a modified uersion of x(t) as follows:
k=N
y(t)= ~ C x(t-k) k=o k where t is the time-slot member within a block;
x(t) is the input white noise;
Co to CN are the filter coefficients;
N is the number of delay elements in the filter; and y(t) is the output signal.
[0014] The number of samples (t~x) within a block, assuming a block length of cosec and a sampling rate of 16 kHz (0.0625 cosec) simply is 256 = 4,096 samples 0.0625 [0015] The filter coefficients C~, to Ck are derived from the FFT coefficients of the undesired sound. They are generated by block 14 as follows:
- Block 13 estimates the spectrum of the undesired sound. A possible implementation is the use of windowing and FFT. Assuming a block size of 4,096 samples, a 256-points FFT, a Hamming window, and an overlap factor of 2. A Hamming window of size 256 generates 256 values from samples x(0) to x(255). A 256-points FFT
operation is performed. Its eoefticients represent an estimate of the frequency spectrum of the first 256 input data points. The Hamming widow then generates another 256 values from input samples x(12$) to x(383) and the same operation is repeated for the whole block. The average of the FFT coefficients represents an estimate of the spectrum of this given block of the undesired sound input.
- Based on this estimated spectrum, the desired frequency response of filter 1 S is determined. A possible implementation is described in steps (v), (vi), and (vii) of the proposed method summary of this invention.
The filter coefficients C~, to C~ are calculated using the conventional frequency domain based filter design technique for FIR filters as described in any standard undergraduate signal processing textbook, (e.g. page s 630-632 of John G.
l'roakis and Dimitris G. Nlanolakis, "Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications", Third edition, Prentice Hall, 1996, ISBN Q-I3-X73762-4, which is incorporated herein by referen.ce).
(0016 The sealing factor controlling the gain of the sealing amplifier I7 would conveniently by adjustable depending on the proximity of individuals) in the regionally to the Ioudspeaker(s) 18. However, the spectrum estimator l3 would simply cause the generation of filter parameter to match the interfering spectrum.
[0017) Figure 3 shows the preferred system performance requirements, with a noise-floor between 35 dB-A (A-weighted) and 40 dB-A. ltriost systems in an office environment would not require a masking noise level higher than 45 dB-A, but this is a designer discretion.
Claims (3)
1. A method for adaptive sound masking or scrambling comprising the steps of:
(i) acquiring a signal representing undesired sound;
(ii) partitioning the acquired signal into blocks;
(iii) estimating the sound power in each time block resulting from step (ii);
(iv) filtering the values of the estimated sound power estimated in step (iii) using a low-pass-filter, whereby cut-off frequency of the filter determines the desired amplitude tracking performance;
(v) estimating the frequency spectrum of each time block resulting from step (ii);
(vi) determining maximum and minimum frequencies of the signal in each of said blocks based on the frequency spectrum estimated in step (v);
(vii) generating a white noise signal and filtering it with a band-pass filter, having an upper range of pass-band equal to the maximum frequency determined in step (vi) and having a lower range equal to the minimum frequency determined in step (vi);
(viii) filtering the signal resulting from (vii) to shape its spectrum in a predetermined manner; and (ix) adaptively varying the amplitude range and frequency range of the generated noise.
(i) acquiring a signal representing undesired sound;
(ii) partitioning the acquired signal into blocks;
(iii) estimating the sound power in each time block resulting from step (ii);
(iv) filtering the values of the estimated sound power estimated in step (iii) using a low-pass-filter, whereby cut-off frequency of the filter determines the desired amplitude tracking performance;
(v) estimating the frequency spectrum of each time block resulting from step (ii);
(vi) determining maximum and minimum frequencies of the signal in each of said blocks based on the frequency spectrum estimated in step (v);
(vii) generating a white noise signal and filtering it with a band-pass filter, having an upper range of pass-band equal to the maximum frequency determined in step (vi) and having a lower range equal to the minimum frequency determined in step (vi);
(viii) filtering the signal resulting from (vii) to shape its spectrum in a predetermined manner; and (ix) adaptively varying the amplitude range and frequency range of the generated noise.
2. A system for adaptive sound masking comprising:
(i) means for acquiring a signal representing undesired sound;
(ii) means for partitioning the acquired signal into blocks;
(iii) means for estimating sound power level in the time blocks;
(iv) means for estimating frequency spectrum in the time blocks;
(v) means for generating white noise with a shaped spectrum and at a power level matching levels estimated in steps (iii) and (iv); and (vi) means for adaptively adjusting the amplitude range and frequency range of this noise.
(i) means for acquiring a signal representing undesired sound;
(ii) means for partitioning the acquired signal into blocks;
(iii) means for estimating sound power level in the time blocks;
(iv) means for estimating frequency spectrum in the time blocks;
(v) means for generating white noise with a shaped spectrum and at a power level matching levels estimated in steps (iii) and (iv); and (vi) means for adaptively adjusting the amplitude range and frequency range of this noise.
3. A system for adaptive sound scrambling comprising:
(i) means for acquiring a signal representing undesired sound;
(ii) means for partitioning the acquired signal into blocks;
(iii) means for estimating sound power level in the time blocks;
(iv) means for estimating frequency spectrum in the time blocks;
(v) means for generating white noise with a shaped spectrum and at a power level matching levels estimated in steps (iii) and (iv); and (vi) means for adaptively adjusting the amplitude range and frequency range of this noise.
(i) means for acquiring a signal representing undesired sound;
(ii) means for partitioning the acquired signal into blocks;
(iii) means for estimating sound power level in the time blocks;
(iv) means for estimating frequency spectrum in the time blocks;
(v) means for generating white noise with a shaped spectrum and at a power level matching levels estimated in steps (iii) and (iv); and (vi) means for adaptively adjusting the amplitude range and frequency range of this noise.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002461148A CA2461148A1 (en) | 2004-01-27 | 2004-01-27 | Adaptive sound scrambling system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002461148A CA2461148A1 (en) | 2004-01-27 | 2004-01-27 | Adaptive sound scrambling system and method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2461148A1 true CA2461148A1 (en) | 2005-07-27 |
Family
ID=34812815
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002461148A Abandoned CA2461148A1 (en) | 2004-01-27 | 2004-01-27 | Adaptive sound scrambling system and method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2461148A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102014111365A1 (en) * | 2014-08-08 | 2016-02-11 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Method for reducing the intelligibility of speech signals and separating component for influencing the sound transmission |
-
2004
- 2004-01-27 CA CA002461148A patent/CA2461148A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102014111365A1 (en) * | 2014-08-08 | 2016-02-11 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Method for reducing the intelligibility of speech signals and separating component for influencing the sound transmission |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP0707763B1 (en) | Reduction of background noise for speech enhancement | |
| CA2361544C (en) | Adaptive dynamic range optimisation sound processor | |
| US8886525B2 (en) | System and method for adaptive intelligent noise suppression | |
| US7242783B1 (en) | Audio limiting circuit | |
| US9735746B2 (en) | Automatic loudness control | |
| US20050018862A1 (en) | Digital signal processing system and method for a telephony interface apparatus | |
| WO2007120453A1 (en) | Calculating and adjusting the perceived loudness and/or the perceived spectral balance of an audio signal | |
| KR20070068379A (en) | Calculating and adjusting the perceived loudness and/or the perceived spectral balance of an audio signal | |
| EP2693635A1 (en) | Automatic loudness control | |
| US20040146168A1 (en) | Adaptive sound scrambling system and method | |
| US20040125962A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for dynamic sound optimization | |
| JP5216125B2 (en) | Dynamic acoustic optimization method and apparatus | |
| EP2693636A1 (en) | Automatic loudness control | |
| US5825754A (en) | Filter and process for reducing noise in audio signals | |
| EP2693637A1 (en) | Automatic loudness control | |
| CA2461148A1 (en) | Adaptive sound scrambling system and method | |
| US11694708B2 (en) | Audio device and method of audio processing with improved talker discrimination | |
| Pandey et al. | Adaptive gain processing to improve feedback cancellation in digital hearing aids | |
| AU2022265744A1 (en) | Passive sub-audible room path learning with noise modeling | |
| TH30855A (en) | How to adjust the response to sound automatically For enhanced message listening ability | |
| TH30538B (en) | How to adjust the response to sound automatically For enhanced message listening ability |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Dead |