CA2444925C - Process for making coated paper or paperboard - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention refers to a method of producing a coated paper or paperboard, but excluding photographic papers, comprising the steps of: (a) forming a free flowing curtain comprising at least one layer, whereby the composition forming at least one layer of the free flowing curtain has a high shear viscosity of at least 50 mPa.cndot.s, and (b) contacting the curtain with a continuous web substrate of basepaper and paperboard.

Description

A

PROCESS FOR MAKING COATED PAPER. OR PAPERBOARD
The present invention relates to a method of producing coated paper or paperboard. In addition, the present invention relates to a method of applying coating compositions having a high viscosity under conditions of high shear to substrates.
In the manufacture of printing paper pigmented coating compositions, which have a considerably higher solids content and viscosity than photographic solutions or emulsions, typically are applied, for example, by blade type, bar (rod) type or reverse-roll (film) type 1 o coating methods at high line speeds of above 1000 m/min. Any or all of these methods are commonly employed to sequentially apply pigmented coatings to a moving paper or paperboard surface.
However, each of these application methods inherently has its own set of problems that can result in an inferior coated surface quality. In the case of the blade type coating method, the lodgment of particles under the blade can result in streaks in the coating layer, which lowers the quality of the coated paper or paperboard. In addition, the high pressure that must be applied to the blade to achieve the desired coating weight places a very high stress on the substrate and can result in breakage of the substrate web, rf;sulting in lowered production 2o efficiency. Moreover, since the pigmented coatings are highly abrasive, the blade must be replaced regularly in order to maintain the evenness of the .coated surface.
Also, the distribution of the coating on the surface of the paper or paperboard substrate is affected by the surface irregularities of the substrate. An uneven distrifution of coating across the paper or paperboard surface can result in a dappled or mottled surface appearance that can lead to an inferior printing result.
The bar (rod) type coating method is limited as to the solids content and viscosity of the pigmented coating color that is to be applied. Pigmented coatings applied by the bar type coating method are typically lower in solids content and viscosity than pigmented coating 3o colors applied by the blade type method: Accordingly, for the bar type coating method it is not possible to freely change the amount of coating that can be applied to the surface of the paper or paperboard substrate. Undesirable reductions in the quality of the surface of the coated paper or paperboard can result when the parameters of coating solids content, viscosity and coatweight are imbalanced. Moreover, abrasion of the bar by the pigmented coatings requires that the bar be replaced at regular intervals in order to maintain the evenness of the coated surface.
The roll type (film) coating method is a particularly complex process of applying pigmented coatings to paper and paperboard in that there is a narrow range of operating conditions related to substrate surface characteristics, substrate porosity, coating solids content, and coating viscosity that must be observed for each operating speed and each desired 1o coatweight to be achieved. An imbalance between these variables can lead to an uneven film-split pattern on the surface of the coated paper, which can lead to ar_ inferior pxxnti~g result, or the expulsion of small droplets of coating as the sheet exits the coating nip. These droplets, if re-deposited on the sheet surface, can lead to an inferior printing result.
Moreover, the maximum amount of coating that can be applied to a paper or paperboard ~5 surface in one pass using the roll type coating method is typically less than that which can be applied in one pass by the blade or bar type coating methods. This coating weight limitation is especially pronounced at high coating speeds.
A common feature of all these methods is that the amount of coating liquid applied to a 2o paper web, which generally has an irregular surface with hills and valleys, is different depending on whether it is applied to a hill or a valley. Therefore, coating thickness, and thus ink reception properties, will vary across the surface of the coated paper resulting in irregularities in the printed image. Despite their drawbacks, these coating methods are still the dominant processes in the paper industry due to their economics, especially since very 25 high line speeds can be achieved.
All of the aforementioned coating methods have in common that coating compositions having a very high viscosity under conditions of high shear and/or shear-thickening behavior cannot be applied to substrates because such coating compositions lead to 3o unacceptable coating defects such as streaks in the coating layer or failure to meet target coatweights. Moreover, such coating compositions generally exhibit poor water-holding properties coupled with a low immobilization solids content. Coatings with poor water-ns holding properties generally cannot be coated with the aforementioned coating methods without lowering the coating solids andlor adding water-holding agents. In addition for drying efficiency it is desirable to coat at high coating solids content close to the immobilization solids content. This means that coatings with low immobilization solids and poor water-holding properties are particularly challenging to coat using the aforementioned coating processes.
On the other hand, there is the trend in the paper industry to use engineered pigments that are generally pigments having narrow particle size distributions or morphologies such as to high aspect ratios, acicular shapes, or other irregular shapes as well as internal porosity such as found in calcined clay. Engineered pigments hereafter referred to as co-structured pigments, have also been developed. The term "co-structured pigment" should be interpreted in the sense that such pigment is modified by, for example, agglomerating specific particles to other specific particles; one example of these is calcium carbonate particles agglomerated onto talc particles, such a combination being thought to improve specific paper properties such as opacity, gloss and printing properties.
Moreover, such pigments lead to improved mechanical properties of the paper.
When engineered pigments are added to a coating composition at a level of greater then 20 2o weight percent the composition typically has a high viscosity under conditions of high shear and/or shear-thickening behavior. This is due to the inability of the pigments to pack into efficient compact structures under conditions of high shear rate Similar volumetric packing effects at conditions of high shear rate also occur with conventional coating formulations as the solids content approaches the immobilization point. This phenomenon makes it difficult or even impossible to coat such a coating composition on paper or paperboard using the aforementioned coating techniques. Generally speaking, as the viscosity at shear rates greater than 100,000 s-' gets higher than 50 mPa~s, runnability issues become problematic.
Coatings with a viscosity above 75 mPa~s axe usually considered difficult to run and coatings with viscosity above 100 mPa~s are very difficult to run.
In addition, coatings with shear-thickening behavior are nearly impossible to run on the aforementioned equipment. Shear-thickening behavior is the phenomenon of an increasing ,° 627~,.R
viscosity as the shear rate is increased. The shear rate for the onset of shear thickening behavior can vary widely as well as the degree of increase in viscosity with increasing shear. Both aspects of the shear-thickening behavior are important and both aspects are very dependent on the solids content of the coating. For purposes of this invention a shear-thickening coating formulation is defined as one whose viscosity increases by at least 20 percent over an order of magnitude (factor of 10) change. in shear rate for shear gates in excess of 1000 s 1.
For some coatings the onset and degree of shear-thickening behavior is an abrupt transition l0 and represents a severe form of shear-thickening (dilatant) behavior. For the purposes of this invention this behavior will be called Shear Blocking Behavior, and is defined by a coating whose viscosity increases by at least 100 percent in less than an order magnitude increase in shear rate as measured using the Parallel Plate Viscosity Test.
The shear rate for the onset of shear-blocking behavior can vary widely and is very dependent on the solids content of the coating as well as the factors and particle size distribution of the coating pigments.
Curtain coating is a relatively new coating technique. ElP-A 517 223 and Japanese patent applications JP-94-89437, JP-93-311931, JP-93-177816, JP-93-131718, JP-92-298683, JP-92-51933, JP-91-298229, JP-90-217327, and JP-8-3101 1l0 disclose the use of curtain coating methods to apply one or more pigmented coating layers to a moving paper surface.
More specifically, the prior art relates to:
(i) The curtain coating method being used to apply a single layer of pigmented coating to a basepaper substrate to produce a single-layer-pigmented coating on paper.
(ii) The curtain coating method being used to apply a single priming layer of pigmented coating to a basepaper substrate prior to the application of a single layer of pigmented topcoat applied by a blade type coating process. Thus a 3o multilayer-pigmented coating of paper was achieved by sequential applications of pigmented coating:
(iii) The curtain coating method being used to apply a single topcoating layer of pigmented coating to a basepaper substrate that has previously been primed with >= 62'?~.8 a single layer of pigmented precoat that was applied by a blade or a metering roll type coating process. Thus a multilayer-pigmented paper coating was achieved by sequential applications of pigmented coating.
(iv) The curtain coating method being used to apply two single layers of specialized pigmented coating to a basepaper substrate such that the single layers were applied in consecutive processes. Thus a multilayer-pigmented coating of paper was achieved by sequential applications of pigmented coating.
The use of a curtain coating method to apply a single layer of pigmented coating to the l0 surface of a moving web of paper, as disclosed in the prior art discussed above, is stated to offer the opportunity to produce a superior quality coated paper surface compared to that produced by conventional means. However, the sequential application of single layers of pigmented coating using curtain coating techniques is constrained by the dynamics of the curtain coating process. Specifically, lightweight coating applications can only be made at 15 coating speeds below those currently employed by conventional coating processes because at high coating speeds the curtain becomes unstable, and this results in an inferior coated surface. Unfortunately, the application of consecutive single layers of pigmented coatings to paper or paperboard at successive coating stations, whether by any of the above coating methods, remains a capital-intensive process due to the number of coating stations required, 20 the amount of ancillary hardware required, for example, drive units, dryers, etc., and the space that is required to house the machinery.
Coated papers and paperboards that have received a coating that contains an additive designed to impart functional properties, such as barner properties, printability properties, 25 adhesive properties, release properties; and optical properties such as color, brightness, opacity, gloss, etc., are described as functional products and their coatings may be referred to as functional coatings. The coating components that impart these properties may also be referred to as functional additives. Functional products include paper types such as self adhesive papers, stamp papers, wallpapers, silicone release papers, food packaging, grease-30 proof papers, moisture resistant papers, and saturated tape backing papers.

y~ 627 The curtain coating method for the simultaneous coating of multiple layers is well known and is described in U.S. Patents 3,508,947 and 3,632,374 for applying photographic compositions to paper and plastic web. However, photographic solutions or emulsions have a low viscosity and a law solids content, and are applied at low coating speeds.
In addition to photographic applications, the simultaneous application of multiple coatings by curtain coating methods is known from the art of making pressure sensitive copying paper. For example, U.S. Patent 4,230,743 discloses in one embodiment the simultaneous application of a base coating comprising microcapsules as a main component and a second to layer comprising a color developer as a main component onto a travelling web. However, it is .reported that the resulting paper has the same characteristics as the paper made by sequential application of the layers. Moreover, the coating composition containing the color developer is described as having a viscosity between 10 and 20 cps at 22°C.
~s JP-A-10-328613 discloses the simultaneous application of two coating layers onto a paper web by curtain coating to make an inkJet paper. The coating compositions applied according to the teaching of that reference are aqueous solutions with an extremely low solids content of 8 percent by weight. Furthermore a thickener is added in order td obtain non-Newtonian behavior of the coating solutions. The examples in JP-A-10-328613 reveal 2o that acceptable coating quality is only achieved at line speeds below 400m/min. The low operation speed of the coating process is not suitable for an economic production of printing paper, especially commodity printing paper.
The aforementioned documents do not disclose that a coating composition having a high 25 viscosity under conditions of high shear can be applied to a substrate using curtain coating technology. Nor do the aforementioned documents disclose that a coating composition having shear-thickening behavior can be applied to a substrate using curtain coating technology.
3o The technical problem underlying the present invention is the provision of a method of producing a coated paper or paperboard, whereby a coating composition having a high viscosity under conditions of high shear is applied to said paper or paperboard.

a ~' 62Z~ 8 The technical problem is solved by a method of producing a coated paper or paperboard, but excluding photographic papers, comprising the steps of (a) forming a free flowing curtain comprising at least one layer, whereby the composition forming at least one layer of the free flowing curtain has, at a shear rate of 500,000 s'1, a high shear viscosity of at least 50 mPa~s as measured using the Capillary High-shear Viscosity test described hereinbelow, and (b) contacting the curtain with a continuous web substrate of basepaper and paperboard.
In another embodiment of the present invention the problem of the invention is solved by a method of producing a coated paper or paperboard comprising the steps of: (a) forming a free flowing curtain comprising at least one layer, whereby a composition forming at least one layer of the free flowing curtain has, at a temperature of 25°C, a Shear-Thickening Index of at least 1.2 and (b) contacting the curtain with a continuous web substrate of basepaper and paperboard.
The Shear-Thickening Index is determined by the ratio of the viscosity at 30,000 s'1 to the viscosity at 3000 s 1. The viscosity values are measured using the Parallel Plate Viscosity Test as specified hereinbelow. If the viscosity at 30,000 s 1 is greater than the viscosity at 3,000 s 1 then the Shear-Thickening Index will have a value greater than one indicating shear-thickening behavior.
Unexpectedly, it is possible to successfully apply the curtain of step a) to a substrate when at least one layer comprises a composition having a Shear-Thickening Index of at least 1.2.
Preferably, the Shear-Thickening Index is at least I.3, more preferably at least 1.4 and most preferably at least 1.5.
In another embodiment of the present invention the problem of the invention is solved by a method of producing a coated paper or paperboard comprising the steps of (a) forming a free flowing curtain comprising at least one layer, whereby a composition forming at least one layer of the free flowing curtain exhibits, at a temperature of 25°C, a Shear-Blocking Behavior and (b) contacting the curtain with a continuous web substrate of basepaper and paperboard.

a d 62'8 The presence of Shear-Blocking Behavior is determined by observing an increase in viscosity of greater than 100 percent in less than a factor of 10 increase in shear rate, where the viscosity values are measured using the Parallel Plate Viscosity Test as specified hereinbelow In a preferred embodiment, the free flowing curtain of step (a) is a multilayer free flowing curtain. The free flowing curtain can prefer ably be applied according to the present invention by using a curtain coating unit with a slide nozzle arrangement for delivering multiple liquid layers to form a continuous, rrmltilayer curtain.
Alternatively, an extrusion type supplying head, such as a slot die or nozzle having several adjacent extrusion nozzles, can be employed in the practice of the present invention.
to It is preferred that at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) has, at a temperature of 25°C and at a shear rate of 500,000 s 1, a high-shear viscosity of at least 75 mPa~s, preferably at least 100 mPa~s, and most preferably at least 125 mPa~s.
In a preferred embodiment; the coated paper or paperbo~~rd is not a pressure sensitive copying paper. As used herein, the term "paper" also encompasses paperboard, unless such a construction is clearly not intended as will be clear from the context in which this term is used. The term "excluding photographic papers" should be interpreted in the sense that none of the layers of the curtain used in the practice of the present invention comprise silver compounds. The term "excluding pressure sensitive copying paper" should be interpreted in the sense that the layers of the curtain used in the practice of the present invention do not contain a combination of a microencapsulated color former and a color developer in a single layer or in different layers.
The multilayer free flowing curtain of the invention has a bottom or interface layer, a top layer and optionally one or more internal layers. The free falling curtain may include further layers in addition to the at least one layer having the specific Theological properties according to the teaching of the present: Conventional coating formulations;
referred to in the industry as coating colors, can be employed in the curtain. Each layer can comprise a liquid, emulsion, suspension, dispersion, solution, or combination thereof.
The coating curtain of the present invention includes at least one, desirably at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, or at least six layers or more. The layers of the curtain can include one or more coating layers, one or more functional layeas, and/or one or more printing layers.
At Ieast one layer of the free flowing curtain of the invention preferably cc~nmprises at least one pigment. Examples of suitable pigmems include~clay, kaolin, calcined clay, ov-structured pigments, talc, calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide; satin white, synthetic polymer pigments, zinc oxide, barium sulfate, gypsum,, silica, synthetic magadiite, alumina trihydrate, mica, and diatomaceous earth. The pigment can be naturally oc:cuiring, .
synthetic, or engineered. When used in coating compositions, such pigments exlu'bit o improved paper properties such as batter opacity, improved gloss and/or better printing .
properties. Mixtures of pigments can be employed. The pigment can have various shapes, including blocky, dendritic, platy, acicular, globular, and the like, as known in the art. One advantage of the present invention is the surprising ability to employ any shape of pigment;
including acicular pigments, which are difficult to employ with a blade coating process.
is Unexpectedly, ~ineered pigments, whew formulated in a coating composition having at a shear rate of 500,000 s' a high shear vi$eosity of at least SO mPa~s caa.readily be applied to substrates using the method of the present invention.
2o The morphology and structure of some pigments, such as co-structured pigments, is destroyed at a high shear rate and, thus, the properties of such pigments are detrimentally affected. Unexpectedly, with the method of the present invention it is possible to apply to a substrate a composition comprising at least one pigmemt, the morphology and structure of which is destroyed at a shear gate of less than 500,000 s'I, as s component of at least one 25 layer of the free flowing curtain. . In a pretarted ernbodi~aatnt, the shear rate ax which the morphology and structure of said pigmentR are detrimentally affected 3R less than .100,000 s ', more preferably 50,000 s ~ and most preferably at Ieast 10,000 s'1.
In a further embodiment, at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (e) comprises 3o at least one pigment having an aspect ratio of at least 1.5:1. Preferably, such pigments have an aspect ratio that is at least 5:1, more preferably at least 10:1, even more preferably at least 15:1, and most preferably at least 20:1. hr a further preferred embodiment, the aspect ratio of said pigment is at least 30:1, more preferably at least 40:1 and most preferably at least 60:1.
Preferably, at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of the invention comprises a binder.
The binder can be any binder customary to a person skilled in the art.
Examples of binders include styrene-butadiene latex, styrene-acrylate latex, styrene-butadiene-acrylonitrile latex, styrene-acylate-acrylonitrile latex, styrene-butadiene-acrylate-acrylonitrile latex, styrene-maleic anhydride latex, styrene-acrylate-malefic anhydride latex, polysaccharides, proteins, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, and cellulose derivatives. A
wide variety of binders are commercially available.
The curtain of the invention can include one or more functional layers. The purpose of a functional layer is to impart a desired functionality to the coated paper.
Functional layers can be selected to provide, for example, printability, barrier properties, such as moisture barrier, aroma barner, water and/or water vapor barner, solvent barrier, oil barrier, grease barrier and oxygen barrier properties, sheet stiffness, fold crack resistance, paper sizing properties, release properties, adhesive properties, and optical properties, such as, color, brightness, opacity, gloss, etc. Functional coatings that are very tacky in character would not normally be coated by conventional consecutive coating processes because of the tendency of the tacky coating material to adhere the substrate to guiding rolls or other coating equipment. The simultaneous multilayer method, on the other hand, allows such functional coatings to be placed underneath a topcoat that shields the functional coating from contact with coating machinery.
The solids content of a functional layer can vary widely depending on the desired function.
A functional layer of the present invention preferably has a solids content of up to 75 percent by weight based on the total weight of the functional layer, and a viscosity of up to 3,000 cps (Brookfield, spindle 5, 100 rpm, 25°C), more preferably 50 to 2,000 cps.
Preferably, the coatweight of a functional layer is from 0.1 to 10 g/m2, more preferably 0.5 to 3 g/mz. In certain situations, such as, for example, when a dye layer is employed, the coatweight of the functional layer can be less than 0.1 g/rn2.

627,8 The functional layer of the present invention can contain one or more materials such as, for example: a polymer of ethylene acrylic acid; a polyethylene; other polyolefins; a polyurethane; an epoxy resin; a polyester; an adhesive such as a styrene butadiene latex, a styrene acrylate latex, a carboxylated latex, a starch, a protein, or the like; a sizing agent such as a starch, a styrene-acrylic copolymer, a styrene-malefic anhydride, a polyvinyl alcohol, a polyvinyl acetate, a carboxymetliyl cellulose or the like; a barner such as ethylene vinyl alcohol, silicone, or a wax or the like. The functional layer can include, but is not limited to include, a pigment or binder as previously described for each coating layer.
For the purposes of the present invention, in a multilayer curtain the layer most distant from the substrate paper is referred to as the top layer. In a preferred embodiment, the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises a top layer ensuring printability since this layer typically is the layer that will be printed upon. It is possible that the coated paper of the present invention could also be further coated using conventional means, such as rod, blade, roll, bar, or air knife coating techniques, and the like. The top layer can be a coating layer or a functional layer; including a gloss layer. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the top layer is very thin, having a coatweight of, for example from 0.5 to 3 g/m2. This advantageously allows the use of less expensive materials vender the top layer, while still producing a paper having good printing properties. In on.e embodiment, the top layer is free of mineral pigment.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the top layer comprises a glossing formulation. The novel combination of glossing formulation and simultaneous multilayer curtain coating combines the advantages of curtain coating with good gloss.
The glossing formulations useful in the present invention comprise gloss additives, such as synthetic polymer pigments, including hollow polymer pigments, produced by polymerization of, for example, styrene; aerylonitrile and/or acrylic monomers. The synthetic polymer pigments suitably have a glass transition temperature of 40 -200°C, more preferably 50 - 130°C, and a particle size of 0.02 -10 Vim, more preferably 0.05 - 2 ~.m. The glossing formulations contain 5 - 100 weight percent, based on solids, of gloss additive, more preferably 60 -100 weight percent. Another type of glossing formulation a CA 02444925 2003-10-15 x~ 6278 comprises gloss varnishes, such as tly~sP b~,;au c~:~ epoxyacrylates, polyester, polyesteracrylates, polyurethanes, polyetheracrylates, oleoresins, nitrocellulose, polyamide, vinyl copolymers and various forms of polyacrylates.
When the curtain has at least 3 layers, then it has at least one internal layer. The viscosity of the internal layers) is not critical; provided a stable curtain can be maintained. When more than one internal layer is present, combinations of functional and coating layers can be employed. For example, the internal layers can comprise a combination of identical or different functional layers, a combination of identical or different coating layers, or a l0 combination of coating and functional layers.
The interface layer is the layer that comes in contact with the substrate to be coated. One important function of the interface layer is to promote wetting of the substrate. The interface layer can have more than one function. For example, in addition to wetting, it may provide coverage of the substrate, and improved functional performance such as adhesion, sizing, stiffness or a combination of functions. In the case of a multilayer curtain of the invention, the interface layer is preferably a relatively thin layer. The coatweight of the interface layer suitably is from 0.1 to 5 g/m2, preferably from 1 to 3 g/m2.
The solids content of the interface layer suitably is from 0.1 to 65 percent, based on the weight of the 2o interface layer in the curtain. In one embodiment, the interface layer is-relatively low in solids, preferably having a solids content of from 0.1 to 40 percent.
The solids content of the curtain of step a) can range from 10 to 80 weight percent, preferably 20 to 75 weight percent, based on the total weight of the curtain.
Furthermore, it is preferred that the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a solids content of at least 30 weight percent, preferably of at least 40 weight percent, more preferably of at least 50 weight percent, even more preferably at least 55 weight percent, and most preferably of at least 60 weight percent.
3o According to a preferred embodiment, the solids content of at least one of the layers forming the composite free falling curtain is higher than 60 weight percent based on the total weight of the coating layer. In a further embodiment of the present invention, at least Y a 6273 ~
one layer of the free flowing curtain of step.(a) has a solids content of at least.30 weight percent, preferably of at least 40 weight percent, and most preferably of at least 50 weight percent.
Contrary to the art of photographic papers or pressure sensitive copying papers, the method of the present invention can be practiced with curtain layers having a viscosity in a wide range and a high solids content even at high coating speeds.
The process of the present invention advantageously makes it possible to vary the l0 composition and relative thickness of the layers in a multilayer composite structure. The composition of the multiple layers can be identical or different depending on the grade of paper being produced. For example, a thin layer next to the basepaper designed for adhesion, with a thick internal layer designed to provide sheet bulk, and a very thin top layer designed for optimum printing can be combined in a multilayer curtain to provide a composite structure. In another embodiment, an internal layer designed specifically for enhanced hiding can be employed. Other embodiments of variable coatweight layers in a multilayer composite include a thin layer of less than 2 g/m2 as at least one of the top, internal or bottom layers of the composite coating. Using the process of the invention, the substrate paper can be coated on one or both sides.
In a preferred embodiment at least one layer of the free-flowing curtain of step a) suitably can comprise additives customary to a person skilled in the art, such as, for example, at least one surfactant, at least one dispersant, at least orie lubricant, at least one water-retention agent, at least one erosslinking agent, at least one optical whitening agent, at least one pigment, dye or colorant, at least one thickening agent, at least one defoamer, at least one antifoaming agent, at least one biocide and/or at least one soluble dye or colorant, or the like. Polyethylene oxide is an example of a preferred additive, and can be employed in any layer. In a preferred embodiment, polyethylene oxide is employed as a thickening agent, preferably at least in the interface layer. Advantageously, the polyethylene oxide has a weight average molecular weight of at least 50,000, preferably at least 100,000, more preferably at least 500,000, and most preferably at least X00,000. Preferably, the amount of a CA 02444925 2003-10-15 ~ 4 ~a 62738 polyethylene oxide employed is sufficient to prevent cratering, and is preferably less than 2 weight percent, based on the weight of solids in the layer in which it is employed.
In a further embodiment, at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a dry s coatweight of less than 10 g/m2, preferably of less than 8 g/m2, most preferably of less than 6 g/m2.
In one embodiment of the invention, the continuous web substrate of step (b) is neither precoated nor precalendared. In another embodiment, the web substrate is not precoated.
to In a further embodiment, the web substrate is not precalendared.
Preferably, the continuous web substrate of step (b) has a web velocity of at least 300 m/min, even more preferably of . at least 400 m/min, and most preferably of at least 500 rn/min. In a further embodiment the continuous web substrate has a velocity of at least 800 m/min and preferably of at least 1000 m/min.
is The continuous web substrate suitably has a grammage, or basis weight, of from 20 to 350 g/m2.
Figure 1 is an explanatory cross-sectional view of a preferred curtain coating unit 1 with a 2o slide nozzle arrangement 2 for delivering multiple streams 3 of curtain layer to form a continuous, multilayer curtain 4. When a dynamic equilibrium state is reached, the flow amount of the curtain layers flowing into the slide nozzle arrangement 2 is completely balanced with the flow amount flowing out of the slide nozzle arrangement. The free falling multilayer curtain 4 comes into contact with web 5, which is running continuously, 25 and thus the web 5 is coated with multiple layers of the t.°espective curtain layers. The running direction of the web 5 is changed immediately before the coating area by means of a roller 6 to minimize the effect of air flow accompanying the fast moving web 5.
The present invention is illustrated by the following examples. All parts and percentages 3o are by weight unless otherwise indicated.

n CA 02444925 2003-10-15 Examples:
Formulations 'The following materials were us~l in the coating liquids:
~ Carbonate(A): dispersion of calcium carbonate with, particle size of 90 percent < 2 ~.m in water (HYDROCARB 90 ME available from Pluess-Stauffer), 77 percent solids.
~ Carbonate (B): dispersion of calcium carbonate with particle size of 60 percent < 2 ~,m in water (HYDROCARB 60 ME available from Pluess-Stauffer), 77 percent solids.
~ Carbonate (C): dispersion in water of engineered calcium carbonate with narrowed particle size distribution and a particle size of 75 percent < 2 pm (COVERCARB

available from Pluess-Stauffer), 72 percent solids.
~ Carbonate (D): calcium carbonate with a particle size of 36 percent < 2 wm (MILLICARB OG available from Pluess-Stauffer), available as a powder.
~ Clay (A): dispersion of calcined clay in water (ANS~ILEX 93, fine particle calcined kaolin, with particle size distribution of 86 - 90 percent below of 2 microns, average particle size = 0.8 micron, 50 percent solids, available form Engelhard Corporation, Iselin NJ.
~ Clay (B): dispersion of high aspect ratio clay in water (KSZ 81 available from AKW -Kick, Hirschau Germany), 59.8 percent solids, aspect ratio 55-60:1.
~ Clay (C): dispersion of No. 1 high brightness kaolin. clay with particle size of 98 percent < 2 ~,rn in water (HYDRAGLOSS 90 available from J.M Huber Corp., Have de Grace, Maryland, USA), 71 percent solids.
~ Latex: carboxylated styrene-butadiene latex (DL 966 available from The Dow Chemical Company), 50 percent solids in water.
~ PVOH: solution of 15 percent of low molecular weight synthetic polyvinyl alcohol (MOWIOL 6/98 available from Clariant AG, Basel, Switzerland).
~ Thickener (A): anionic water-in-oil emulsion of an acrylamide-acrylic acid copolymer (STEROCOL BL available from BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany), 37 percent solids.
~ Thickener (B): a 900,000 molecular weight non-ionic high molecular weight water-3o soluble polyethylene oxide) polymer (POLYOX WSR-1105 available from The Dow Chemical Company), prepared as a 4 percent solids ;solution.

a CA 02444925 2003-10-15 °~ 6278 ~ Surfactant: aqueous solution of sodium di-alkylsulphosuccinate (AEROSOL OT
available from Cyanamid, Wayne, New Jersey, USA.), 75 percent solids.
~ Whitener: fluorescent whitening agent derived from diamino-stilbenedisulfonic acid (TINOPAL ABP/Z, available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc., Basel, Switzerland).
The pH of the pigmented coatings formulations was adjusted to by adding NaOH
solution (10 percent). Water was added as needed to adjust the solids content of the formulations.
Coating Procedure 1o The formulations detailed below were coated onto paper according to the following procedure A multilayer slide die type curtain coater manufactured by Trolley Schweizer Engineering (TSE, Murgenthal, Switzerland) was used. The curtain coating apparatus was equipped with edge guides lubricated with a trickle of water and with a vacuum suction device to remove this edge lubrication water at the bottom of the edge guide just above the . , 15 coated paper edge. In addition, the curtain coater was equipped with a vacuum suction device to remove interface surface air from the paper substrate upstream from the curtain impingement zone. The height of the curtain was 300mm. Coating formulations were deaerated prior to use to remove air bubbles. The coatweight achieved in each coating experiment was calculated from the known volumetric flow rate of the pump delivering the 2o coating to the curtain coating head, the speed at which the continuous web of paper was moving under the curtain coating head, the density and percent solids of the curtain; and the width of the curtain.
The comparative blade coating experiments were carried out using a conventional blade 25 coater. The blade pressure is controlled by adjusting thE; head angle up to a maximum of 24 degrees.
Test Methods 3o Brookfield Viscosity The viscosity is measured using a Brookfield RVT viscometer (available from Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc., Stoughton, Massachusetts, USA). For viscosity determination, 600 ml of a sample are poured into a 1000 ml beaker arid the viscosity is measured at 25°C at a spindle speed of 100 rpm.
Parallel Plate Viscositv Test The viscosity is measure using a Physics UDS 200 Viscometer (available from Paar Physics). The sample is tested at 25°C using a 50 mm diameter parallel plate geometry with a measurement gap of 0.03 mm. The shear rate is camped from 10 s 1 to 100,000 s 1 over a period of 2 minutes using logarithmic steps in shear rate with 10 steps/decade of shear rate. The viscosity at 3000 s'1 and 30,000 s 1 is determined by interpolation of the measured values. The Shear-Thickening Index is calculated by dividing the viscosity value at 30,000 s 1 by the viscosity value at 3000 s r. A Shear=Thickening Index value greater than one is indicative of shear-thickening behavior. If the viscosity versus shear rate flow curve exhibits a sudden sharp increase in viscosity (greater than 100 percent viscosity increase in less than a factor of 10 increase in shear rate), then the coating is deemed to have Shear-Blocking Behavior.
Capillar~Hi~h-Shear Viscosity The high shear viscosity is measured using an ACAV II Capillary Viscometer (available from ACA Systems in Finland). Approximately 1000 cc of sample is placed in the measuring cylinder and the measurement temperature is 25°C. A glass capillary having a diameter of 0.5 mm and a length of 50 mm is used for the measurements. The use of a capillary with a Length/Diameter ratio of 100 minimizes the impact of end effects on the measurement. The sample viscosity is measured from 100,000 s-1 to 1,500,000 s-1 using 12 logarithmic steps in shear rate. If the maximum testing pressure (300 bar) is reached before the 1,500,000 -1 shear rate; then the test is terminated. The viscosity is calculated from the measured pressure versus flow rate curve. The ACAV II software corrects the data for kinetic energy. The viscosity at 500;000 s-1 is then determined by interpolation of the experimental data.
Water Retention Water retention of a coating color is measured with an AA-GWR gravimetric water retention meter (available from OY Gradek Ab, Kauinianen, Finland). The test cell is placed on top of a non hydroscopic polycarbonate filter with 0.8 micron pore size (Nucleopore brand, available from Sterico AG, Dietikon, Switzerland) that is placed on top of a pre-weighed absorbing paper (Whatman Chromatographic paper 17 CHR, available from VMR International AG, Dietikon, Switzerland). The assembly is placed onto the backing table and tightened. Then, 10 ml of coating color is poured in the test cell, which is immediately closed with the plug. The timer is started. After 15 seconds, the cell is pressurized at 1 bar. Upon completion of 90 seconds, the pressure is removed and the plug cell removed. After an additional 15 seconds, the absorbing paper is separated from the filter membrane. The amount of absorbed liquid is determined by weighing the absorbing ~o paper with a balance accurate to 0.0001g. The amount of absorbed liquid per square meter is calculated using an average of 3 measurements.
Immobilization Solids Content A Coesfeld Minimum Film Forming Temperature device (available from Coesfeld, Dortmund, Germany) is used. Over a 50cm long glass plate put on a metal plate;
a temperature gradient is' reached by heating one end to 50"C and keeping the other end at 10°C. A coating color layer l4cm wide and 0.4 mm wet thickness is put over the plate using a drawdown bar. The solids of the coating color is measured prior to application to the plate and is defined as the Coating Application Solids for the purposes of this invention. A drying front progresses from the hot end toward the cold one.
After about 15 minutes, samples of coating color are taken at the drying front with a spatula. The solids content of the samples are measured. An average of 6 measurements is taken as the Immobilization Solids Content.
Coatweight The'coatweight achieved in each paper coating experiment is calculated from the known volumetric flow rate of the pump delivering the coating to the curtain coating head, the speed at which the continuous web of paper is moving under the curtain coating head, the density and percent solids of the curtain, and the width of the curtain.

Degree of Craterin~
The degree of cratering is determined by visual observation of burn out samples. A (50/50) water/isopropyl alcohol solution with 10 percent NH4CI is used. Paper coated on only one side is immersed for 30 sec in the solution; paper coated on both sides is immersed for 60 18a < CA 02444925 2003-10-15 62'',.3 8 sec. After removing the excess of solution with a blotting paper the samples are air dried overnight. Burn out is done in an oven at 225°C for 3.5 min. Craters are counted within a 3 x 3-cm section of the burn out samples with the help of magnifying glasses (magnification x10). Very small uncoated spots, with perfect circular shape are not taken as craters; they are assumed to be pitting given by micro bubbles in the coating from air entrainment. Also not taken in account are elliptical uncoated areas oriented with the long axis in the machine direction (the direction in which the paper is moving) given by larger bubbles present in the coating formulation that are not removed by deaeration.
l0 Coating_Density The density of a curtain layer is determined by weighing a 100-millilitre sample of the coating in a pyknometer.
Pa ep r Roughness The roughness of the coated paper surface is measured with a Parker PrintSurf roughness tester. A sample sheet of coated paper is clamped between a cork-melir~ex platen and a measuring head at a clamping pressure of 1,000 kPa. Compressed air is supplied to the instrument at 400 kPa and the leakage of air between the measuring head and the coated paper surface is measured. A higher number indicates a higher degree of roughness of the 2o coated paper surface.
Bri tness Brightness is measured on a Zeiss Elrepho 2000. Brightness is measured according to ISO
standard 2469 on a pile of sheets. The result is given as 8457.
O acit Opacity is measured on a Zeiss Ekepho 2000. Opacity is measured on a single sheet backed by black standard (RD) and on a pile of sheets (R~). The result is given as Ro/R~ x 100 percent.

m CA 02444925 2003-10-15 Particle Size The median Stokes equivalent spherical particle size and particle size distribution are measured using an X-Ray sedigraph instrument (SediGraph 5100 Particle Size Analysis System available from Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). Raw material manufacturers s supplied particle size and particle size distribution numbers for raw materials employed in the Examples.
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio is measured using an electron microscope image analysis method described in "Aspect Ratios of Pigment Particles Determined by Different," Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, Vol. 15, No: 3/2000, pp. 221-230.
Example 1 The above ingredients were mixed in the amounts given in Table 1 to demonstrate the use i5 of the high aspect ratio clay.
Table 1 _ Slot 1 Slot 2 ~

_ 100 _ Carbonate(A) C1a B 100 Latex 13 13 PVOH 1 3.5 Surfactant 0.4 0.2 Whitener 1 H 8:5 8.6 Solids ( ercent) 60.1 55.7 Densit cm' 1.51 1.43 Brookfield Viscosi mPas 120 755 Viscosit at 3,000 s mPa~s 29.9 114 Viscosi at 30,000 s ' mPa~s 13.5 150 Viscosit at 500,000 s mPa~s 13.6 57.9 Shear-Thickenin Index 0:45 1.32 The viscosity at 500,000 s~i for the coating in Slot 2 exceeds the range observed to be 2o problematic for running on blade coaters (greater than 50 mPa~s) and the shear thickening index is greater than 1.2.

. CA 02444925 2003-10-15 ~ - 62738 The trial speeds and coatweights for each layer for Example 1 are given in Table 2. The basepaper was a wood-containing paper with a surface roughness of 4.3 microns.
Table 2 Slot l Slot 2 Speed coatweightg/m2(coatweightg/m2( [m/min] ) ) 1000 2 - _ _ A pigmented layer (slot 1 ) was placed next to the paper. A second layer was added simultaneously using slot 2. This layer contained the high aspect ratio clay.
The multilayer coating was successfully applied at all conditions in Table 2 without runnability problems.
to Example 2 The above ingredients were mixed in the amounts given in Table 3 to demonstrate the use of the calcined clay.
Table 3 Slot Slot 2 Carbonate A) 100 Cla 100 Latex A 13 13 PVOH 1 3.5 Surfactant 0.4 0.2 Whitener 1 H 8.5 8.6 Solids ercent _ 47.9 60.1 Densi ( in~ _ 1.36 1.51 Brookfield Viscosit mPas 120 470 Viscosit at 3,000 s-' mPa~s 29.9 30.7 Viscosi at 30,000 s ' mPa-s 13.5 47.6 Viscosit at 500,000 s- mPas 13.6 105.2 Shear-Thickenin Index 0.45 ~55 The viscosity at 500,000 s 1 for the coating in Slot 2 exceeds the range observed to be very ~2'~38 problematic for running on blade coaters (greater than 100 mPa~s) and the shear thickening index is greater than 1.5.
Trial speed and coatweights for each layer of Example 2 are given in Table 4.
The s basepaper was a wood-containing paper with a surface roughness of 4.3 microns.
Table 4 Speed Slot 1 coatweight Slot 2 coatweight [m/min] m2( ) G/m2(dry) A pigmented layer (slot 1 ) was placed next to the paper. A second layer was added 1o simultaneously using slot 2, and this layer contained the calcined clay.
The multilayer coating was successfully applied at all conditions in Table 4 without runnability problems.
The coated paper sample from the first test condition in Table 4 had significantly improved opacity (92.6 versus 90.4) and significantly improved brightness (80.4 versus 73.7) when compared to a single 8g/m2 laboratory blade-coated sample in which Clay (C) was 15 substituted for Clay (A) in the formulation for Slot 2 given in Table 3.
Example 3 The method of Example 1 was repeated using a thickener in place of some of the polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH) in the top layer (Slot 2). The thickener employed in the comparative 2o experiments was chosen for its compatibility for high-speed blade coating as well as for its ability to provide crater-free curtain coating at high coating speeds. In addition, the amount of PVOH in the bottom layer (Slot 1 ) was increased to 2 parts and the whitener was removed from the top layer {Slot 2). The coating ingredients were mixed in the amounts given in Table 5.

62?3 8 Table 5 __ _ Slot Slot 2 ~~ 1 Carbonate A 100 -Cla B
Latex -.

PVOH 2 1.0 Thickener A 0.2 Surfactant 0.4 0.2 H 8.5 8.6 Solids ercent 60.3 55.8 Derrsit cm 1.51 1.43 ABO Water Retention m NM* 76 Brookfield Viscosit mPas 350 740 Viscosit at 3,000 s mPa~s NM 153 Viscosity at 30,000 s mPa~s] NM 214 Viscosity at 500,000 s 1 mPa~s NM 96 Shear-Thickenin Index NM 1.39 (*NM = Not Measured) The viscosity at 500,000 s 1 for the coating in Slot 2 exceeds the range observed to be difficult for running on blade waters (greater than 75 mPa~s) and the Shear Thickening Index is greater than 1.2.
The coatweights for each layer were 1.5 glm2(dry) for Slot 1 and 6.5 glm2(dry) for Slot 2.
The 8 g/m2(dry} total coatweight multilayer coating was applied at 1250 mlmin and 1500 m/min. The basepaper was a 35 g/m2 wood-containing paper with a surface roughness of 4.8 microns. The orating applied at 1250 m/min gave a crater-free orating, while the coating applied at 1500 m/min gave an almost crater free coating with no other runnability problems. This demonstrates that coatings with high aspect ratio pigments and high high-shear viscosity can be easily applied with a curtain coater at high coating speeds using the process of the invention.
Comparative Experiment A
An attempt was made to apply the coating with the high .aspect ratio pigment (Slot 2 of 2o Example 3) onto the same basepaper as Example 3 using a jet applicator blade water. With the jet applicator it was impossible to properly apply the coating at 1250 m/min, as the coating was deflected from the paper web when it hit the web.

C2'~3 8 Comparative Experiment B
The method of Comparative Example A was repeated except that the coating mixture shown in Table 6 was used. This coating composition represents the blend of the pigment compositions for the two coatings (Slots 1 and 2) used in Example 3. The PVOH, surfactant, and thickener levels were kept the same as for the top layer (Slot 2) in Example 3.
Table 6 Carbonate A 19 Clay (B) - 81 Latex 13 pVOH -- 1.0 Thickener (A 0.2 Surfactant 0.2 H 8.6 Solids ercent 59.2 Densit cm' 1.46 ABO Water Retention m' 74 Brookfield Viscosi mPas 1690 Viscosit at 3,000 s mPa-s 215 Viscosit at 30,000 s mPas 294 Viscosi at 500,000 s mPa-s 110 Shear-Thickenin Index 1.37 to A coating of 8.3 g/m2(dry) total coatweight was applied at 1250 m/min using the jet applicator blade coater onto the same basepaper used in Example 3. The metering blade was a 0.4-mm thick blade with a 45-degree bevel operating with a blade load (head angle) of 12.1 degrees. The blade exhibited an extreme amount of wet bleeding (30g of coating bleeds for 2 minutes of running time). In addition, the paper had numerous areas of skip coating, that is uncoated areas. When the blade bevel was changed to 40 degrees, then the blade ran clean but the blade load was very high (at the maximum head angle of 24 degrees the coatweight was 8.3 g/m2). These blade conditions would lead to frequent web breaks and rapid blade wear, thus causing unacceptably high levels of downtime in a production facility.
At 1500 m/min using the 0.4-mm thick blade with a 45-degree bevel the runnability problems were even more severe. The blade pressure (head angle) needed to reach 8.0 ~ CA 02444925 2003-10-15 g/m2(dry) total coatweight was 22.7 degrees. There was very pronounced bleeding (37.5 g of coating bleeding out after 2 minute run) and the degree of skip coating was unacceptable.
Example 4 s The method of Example 2 was repeated using a thickener in place of some of the polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH) in the top layer (Slot 2). The thickener was chosen for its compatibility for high-speed blade coating in the comparative experiments as well as for its ability to provide crater-free curtain coating at high coating speeds. In addition, the amount of PVOH in the bottom layer (Slot 1) was increased to 2 parts and the whitener was removed from the top layer (Slot 2). The coating ingredients were mixed in the amounts given in Table ?.
Table 7 Slot 1 Slot 2 Carbonate A 100 _ Cla 100 A
--_ 13 13 Latex -PVOH 2 2.0 Thickener A 0.2 Surfactant 0.4 0.2 H 8.5 8.6 Solids ercent 60.3 48.8 Densit cm' 1.51 1.38 Brookfield Viscosi [mPas 350 410 Viscosit at 3,000 s- mPas NM* 595 Viscosity at 30,000 s~l [mPas] NM Too high to _ measure Viscosit at 500,000 s mPas NM 137 Shear-Thickenin Index NM not calculable Shear Blockin Behavior NM ~ Yes (*NM = Not Measured) The viscosity at 500,000 s 1 for the coating in Slot 2 exceeds the range observed to be very difficult for running on blade waters (greater than 100 mPa~s) and in addition the coating exhibits Shear Blocking Behavior.
2o The coating speed was 1500 m/min and watweights for each layer were 1.5 g/m2(dry) for Slot l and 6.5 g/m2(dry) for Slot 2. The basepaper was a 35 g/m2 wood-containing paper m CA 02444925 2003-10-15 ° f2~°38 with a surface roughness of 4.8 microns. The rnultilayer coating with 8 g/m2(dry) total coatweight was applied at 1500 m/min and gave a nearly crater-free coating with no other runnability issues. T his demonstrates that coatings with Shear-Blocking Behavior can be easily applied using a curtain coater.
s Comparative Experiment C
The coating with the calcined clay pigment (Slot 2 of Example 4) was applied onto the same basepaper as Example 4 using a jet applicator blade coater equipped with a 0.4-mm thick 45 degree angle blade operating. At 1500 m/min the blade load (head angle) needed to achieve l0 8.4 g/m2(dry) was 21.4 degrees and the blade ran clean. This demonstrates that this ca.lcined clay pigment requires relatively high blade loads.
Comparative Experiment D
The method of Comparative Example C was repeated except that the coating mixture shown is in Table 8 was used. This coating composition represents the blend of the pigment compositions for the two coatings (Slots 1 and 2) used in Example 4. The PVOH, surfactant, and thickener levels were kept the same as for the top layer in Example 4. At 1500 m/min the blade load (head angle) needed to achieve 8.0 g/m2(dry) was 22.4 degrees and the blade ran clean.
Table 8 Carbonate(A 19 Cla (A) 81 Latex 13 PVO~I 2.0 Thickener A 0.2 Surfactant 0.2 H 8.6 Solids ercent 51.7 Densit ( cm ) 1.41 Brookfield Viscosit Units] 420 Viscosit at 3,000 s ' [mPa~s 523 Viscosity at 30,000 s-1 [mPa~s] Too high to measure Viscosit at 500,040 s mPa~s 124 Shear-Thickening Index Not calculable Shear Blockin Behavior Yes ~ ~ 62;38 ~m Example 5 The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that the formulations of Table 9 were employed. This example demonstrates the use of an engineered calcium carbonate pigment with a narrow particle size distribution compared to conventional ground calcium carbonate.
The coating formulation was prepared at high solids with low thickener content that gives a coating with low water retention and low immobilization solids.
Table 9 Slot 1 Slot 2 arbonate(A) --_ 100 C

_ 100 _ Carbonate C

Latex 13 11 PVOH 1.0 0.5 -Thickener A _ _ O.17 Surfactant 0.4 0.2 H 8.5 8.6 Solids ercent) 60.0 67.2 Densit cm 1.51 1.38 Water Retention m NM* 133 Immobilization Solids ercent NM 82.3 Brookfield Viscosit mPas 240 1160 Viscosi at 3,000 s mPa-s NM 162 Viscosit at 30,000 s mPa-s NM 141 Viscosit at 500,000 s ' mPa~s NM 127 Shear-Thickenin Index NM 0.87 (*NM = Not Measured) The viscosity at 500,000 s'i for the coating color in Slot 2 exceeds the range observed to be very difficult for running on blade coaters (greater than 100 mPa~s).
The coatweights for each layer were 1.5 g/m2(dry) for Slot 1 and 6.5 g/m2(dry) for Slot 2.
The multilayer coating with total 8 g/m2(dry) coatweight was applied at a speed of 1250 m/min onto a 35 g/m2 wood-containing paper with a surface roughness of 4.8 microns. The coating was crater free and was applied with no other runnability problems:
This demonstrates the ease of using curtain coating to apply coatings that have a high rate of dewatering and quick immobilization of the coating.

~2 r38 Example 6 The method of Example 5 was repeatd exvept that the coating for Slot 1 was replaced with , the same coating used in Slot 2 diluted down to 58.3 percent solids: This results in a multilayer curtain having the same overall composition differing only in the solids content between the two layers. 'The applied coating showed no cratering or other runnability defects.
Comparative Experiment E
An attempt was made to apply the coating with the engineered carbonate coating (Slot 2 of to Example 5) onto the same basepaper as Example 5 using a jet applicator blade coater. At the maximum blade pressure (head angle) of 24 degrees the coatweight was 11 glm2 (dry).
The coating was diluted to 65.5 percent solids and had a Brookfield viscosity of 890 mPa~s, a viscosity at 500,000 s l of 107 mPa~s and a water retention value of 137.
The coatweight at the maximum blade pressure (head angle = 24 degrees) was 9.3 g/m2(dry). The coating was further diluted to 64.3 percent solids and had a Brookfield viscosity of 730 mPa~s, a viscosity at 500,000 s l of 88 mPa~s and a Water Retention value of 146. A
coatweight of 8.3 g/m2(dry) could be reached for this coating, but there was no stable value for the blade pressure. The blade pressure (head angle) had to be increased continuously up to the maximum value in order to attempt to maintain the coatweight, at which time the coating 2o exceeded the target coatweight of 8 g/m2(dry). In additian, dry coating deposits accumulated on the blade tip (3.3 g after 3.75 min. running time). These dry "beards" were quite large and would eventually cause streaks on the coated paper surface.
The poor runnability of this coating is attributed to the rapid rate of dewatering, and to immobilization of the coating under the blade.
Example 7 The above ingredients were mixed in the amounts given i.n Table 10 to demonstrate the use of Carbonate D, a coarse carbonate pigment. This carbonate pigment had 2 weight percent of the particles with a diameter greater than 12 ~,m. Suclr, a pigment cannot be coated with a 3o blade coater without severe streaking because of the large particles, whose diameters approach that of the wet coating thickness:

> CA 02444925 2003-10-15 ~2~38 Table 10 Slot 1 Slot Slot 3 Carbonate(A) 25 30 Carbonate D J~

C1a C 75 Latex 13 10 11 PVOH 1.0 0.8 0.8 Thickener 0.2 0.15 0.07 Surfactant 0.4 0.2 H 9.3 8.6 8:6 Solids ercent 60.1 70.0 62.3 Densit cm 1_.50_ 1.67 1.54 Brookfield Viscosit mPas 980 210 1120 Thickener (B) was added to the coatings to help prevent cratering. The trial speeds and coatweights for each layer fox Example 7 are given in Table 11. The basepaper was a 75 g/m2 wood-free paper with a surface roughness of 8.5 macrons.
Table 11 Slot 1 Slot 2 coatweightSlot coatweight Speed coatweight g/m2(dry) g/m2(dry) [m/min] ma ~, ) 1200 1.5 5.5 3 1200 2.5 12.5 5 The coatings were crater free and had no other runnability issues. The 10 g/m2 (dry) total 1o coatweight coating had an uncalendered surface roughness of 5.52 wm and a calendered surface roughness of 2.1 hum. The 20 glm2 (dry) total coatweight coating had an uncalendered surface roughness of 3.95 um and a calendered surface roughness of 1.3 ~,m.
This demonstrates that the multilayer coating using a coarse pigment within the main coating layer can be easily applied with a curtain coater and can achieve a surface smoothness comparable to papers coated with much finer pigments.

Claims (35)

1. A method of producing a coated paper or paperboard, comprising the steps of:

(a) forming a free flowing curtain comprising at least one layer, whereby a composition forming at least one layer of the free flowing curtain has a Shear-Thickening Index, defined as the ratio of the viscosity at 30,000 s-1 to the viscosity at 3,000 s-1 at 25°C, of at least 1.2, and (b) contacting the curtain with a continuous web substrate of basepaper and paperboard, wherein the composition has at least 30% solids.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the free flowing curtain of step (a) is a multilayer free flowing curtain.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises a top layer ensuring printability.

4. A method according to claim 2 or 3, wherein the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises at least 3 layers.

5. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises at least one pigment.

6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the pigment is selected from the group consisting of clay, kaolin, calcined clay, co-structured pigments, talc, calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide, satin white, synthetic polymer pigment, zinc oxide, barium sulfate, gypsum, silica, alumina trihydrate, mica, synthetic magadiite, and diatomaceous earth.

7. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises at least one pigment having an aspect ratio of at least 1.5:1.

8. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises a binder.

9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the binder is selected from the group consisting of styrene-butadiene latex, styrene-acrylate latex, styrene-butadiene-acrylonitrile latex, styrene-acrylate-acrylonitrile latex, styrene-butadiene-acrylate-acrylonitrile latex, styrene-maleic anhydride latex, styrene-acrylate-maleic anhydride latex, polysaccharides, proteins, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, cellulose derivatives and mixtures thereof.

10. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a solids content of at least 30 weight percent.

11. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a solids content of at least 40 weight percent.

12. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a solids content of at last 50 weight percent.

13. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a solids content of at least 40 weight percent.

14. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a solids content of at least 45 weight percent.

15. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a solids content of at least 50 weight percent.

16. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises at least one optical brightening agent.

17. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 16, wherein at least one layer of the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises at least one surfactant.

18. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises at least 4 layers.

19. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises at least 5 layers.

20. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein the free flowing curtain of step (a) comprises at least 6 layers.

21. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 20, wherein at least one of the layers of the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a coatweight when dried of less than 10 g/m2.

22. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 20, wherein at least one of the layers of the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a coatweight when dried of less than 8 g/m2.

23. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 20, wherein at least one of the layers of the free flowing curtain of step (a) has a coatweight when dried of less than 6 g/m2.

24. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 23, wherein the continuous web substrate of step (b) is neither precoated nor precalendared.

25. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 24, wherein the continuous web substrate of step (b) has a web velocity of at least 300 m/min.

26. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 24, wherein the continuous web substrate of step (b) has a web velocity of at least 400 m/min.

27. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 24, wherein the continuous web substrate of step (b) has a web velocity of at least 500 m/min.

28. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 27, wherein the continuous web substrate of step (b) has a grammage of from 20 to 350 g/m2.

29. A method of producing a coated paper or paperboard, comprising the steps of:

(a) forming a free flowing curtain comprising at least one layer, whereby a composition forming at least one layer of the free flowing curtain has a Shear-Blocking Behavior, and (b) contacting the curtain with a continuous web substrate of basepaper and paperboard, wherein the composition has at least 30% solids.

30. The method of any one of claims 1 to 29, wherein the continuous web substrate has a velocity of at least 800 m/min.

31. The method of any one of claims 1 to 29, wherein the continuous web substrate has a velocity of at least 1000 m/min.

32. The method of any one of claims 1 to 31, wherein the curtain is formed with a slot die.

33. The method of any one of claims 1 to 32, wherein the curtain is formed with a slide die.

34. The method of any one of claims 1 to 33, wherein at least one layer of the curtain comprises polyethylene oxide.

35. The method of any one of claims 1 to 34, wherein the curtain comprises polyethylene oxide in an interface layer.