CA2421174A1 - Cloned cells, embryos, and avians and methods, of producing them - Google Patents
Cloned cells, embryos, and avians and methods, of producing them Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2421174A1 CA2421174A1 CA002421174A CA2421174A CA2421174A1 CA 2421174 A1 CA2421174 A1 CA 2421174A1 CA 002421174 A CA002421174 A CA 002421174A CA 2421174 A CA2421174 A CA 2421174A CA 2421174 A1 CA2421174 A1 CA 2421174A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- avian
- recipient cell
- cell
- recipient
- protein
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 241000271566 Aves Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 79
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 72
- 210000002257 embryonic structure Anatomy 0.000 title description 15
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 81
- 235000013601 eggs Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 66
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 230000009261 transgenic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 238000012800 visualization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 210000003855 cell nucleus Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 110
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 claims description 77
- 210000004940 nucleus Anatomy 0.000 claims description 46
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 claims description 45
- 210000001161 mammalian embryo Anatomy 0.000 claims description 34
- 238000002679 ablation Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 238000000340 multi-photon laser scanning microscopy Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 108700019146 Transgenes Proteins 0.000 claims description 24
- 210000003101 oviduct Anatomy 0.000 claims description 22
- 241000286209 Phasianidae Species 0.000 claims description 17
- 241000287828 Gallus gallus Species 0.000 claims description 14
- 235000013330 chicken meat Nutrition 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 102000003951 Erythropoietin Human genes 0.000 claims description 6
- 108090000394 Erythropoietin Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 102000004269 Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Human genes 0.000 claims description 6
- 108010017080 Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 102000004457 Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Human genes 0.000 claims description 6
- 108010017213 Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 229940105423 erythropoietin Drugs 0.000 claims description 6
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium;[2-butyl-5-chloro-3-[[4-[2-(1,2,4-triaza-3-azanidacyclopenta-1,4-dien-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl]methyl]imidazol-4-yl]methanol Chemical compound [K+].CCCCC1=NC(Cl)=C(CO)N1CC1=CC=C(C=2C(=CC=CC=2)C2=N[N-]N=N2)C=C1 OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 claims description 6
- 241000271567 Struthioniformes Species 0.000 claims description 5
- 102000014150 Interferons Human genes 0.000 claims description 4
- 108010050904 Interferons Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- 229940079322 interferon Drugs 0.000 claims description 4
- KIUKXJAPPMFGSW-DNGZLQJQSA-N (2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-[(2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3-Acetamido-2-[(2S,3S,4R,5R,6R)-6-[(2R,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3-acetamido-2,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-4-yl]oxy-2-carboxy-4,5-dihydroxyoxan-3-yl]oxy-5-hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-4-yl]oxy-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound CC(=O)N[C@H]1[C@H](O)O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O3)C(O)=O)O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)NC(C)=O)[C@@H](C(O)=O)O1 KIUKXJAPPMFGSW-DNGZLQJQSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000272517 Anseriformes Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 108090000935 Antithrombin III Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 101710081722 Antitrypsin Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 108090000317 Chymotrypsin Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102100022641 Coagulation factor IX Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000008186 Collagen Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010035532 Collagen Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010076282 Factor IX Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010054218 Factor VIII Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000001690 Factor VIII Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010014173 Factor X Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010049003 Fibrinogen Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000008946 Fibrinogen Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000018997 Growth Hormone Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010051696 Growth Hormone Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000002265 Human Growth Hormone Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010000521 Human Growth Hormone Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000854 Human Growth Hormone Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 101800004937 Protein C Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000017975 Protein C Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 101800001700 Saposin-D Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 108090000373 Tissue Plasminogen Activator Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003674 animal food additive Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001475 anti-trypsic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 229960005348 antithrombin iii Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000005018 casein Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229960002376 chymotrypsin Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920001436 collagen Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 229960005188 collagen Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 229940088598 enzyme Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 229960004222 factor ix Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 229960000301 factor viii Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 229940012426 factor x Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 229940012952 fibrinogen Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920002674 hyaluronan Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 229960003160 hyaluronic acid Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 229940125396 insulin Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 229960000856 protein c Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002753 trypsin inhibitor Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011824 nuclear material Substances 0.000 claims 4
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 102000004411 Antithrombin III Human genes 0.000 claims 2
- 102000004877 Insulin Human genes 0.000 claims 2
- 108010063045 Lactoferrin Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 102000010445 Lactoferrin Human genes 0.000 claims 2
- 102000003978 Tissue Plasminogen Activator Human genes 0.000 claims 2
- CSSYQJWUGATIHM-IKGCZBKSSA-N l-phenylalanyl-l-lysyl-l-cysteinyl-l-arginyl-l-arginyl-l-tryptophyl-l-glutaminyl-l-tryptophyl-l-arginyl-l-methionyl-l-lysyl-l-lysyl-l-leucylglycyl-l-alanyl-l-prolyl-l-seryl-l-isoleucyl-l-threonyl-l-cysteinyl-l-valyl-l-arginyl-l-arginyl-l-alanyl-l-phenylal Chemical compound C([C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCSC)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)CC)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(O)=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 CSSYQJWUGATIHM-IKGCZBKSSA-N 0.000 claims 2
- 235000021242 lactoferrin Nutrition 0.000 claims 2
- 229940078795 lactoferrin Drugs 0.000 claims 2
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 abstract description 82
- 108010000912 Egg Proteins Proteins 0.000 abstract description 57
- 102000002322 Egg Proteins Human genes 0.000 abstract description 57
- 210000004681 ovum Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 55
- 210000000287 oocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 17
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 16
- 230000007159 enucleation Effects 0.000 description 15
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 14
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 14
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 14
- 239000002775 capsule Substances 0.000 description 12
- 230000031864 metaphase Effects 0.000 description 10
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical group 0.000 description 10
- 210000002969 egg yolk Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 9
- 210000001082 somatic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 8
- 239000000975 dye Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 108091029865 Exogenous DNA Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000017448 oviposition Effects 0.000 description 7
- 108091033319 polynucleotide Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 102000040430 polynucleotide Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 239000002157 polynucleotide Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4',6-Diamino-2-phenylindol Chemical compound C1=CC(C(=N)N)=CC=C1C1=CC2=CC=C(C(N)=N)C=C2N1 FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 230000004720 fertilization Effects 0.000 description 6
- 244000144977 poultry Species 0.000 description 6
- 235000013594 poultry meat Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- XQMVBICWFFHDNN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 5-amino-4-chloro-2-phenylpyridazin-3-one;(2-ethoxy-3,3-dimethyl-2h-1-benzofuran-5-yl) methanesulfonate Chemical compound O=C1C(Cl)=C(N)C=NN1C1=CC=CC=C1.C1=C(OS(C)(=O)=O)C=C2C(C)(C)C(OCC)OC2=C1 XQMVBICWFFHDNN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 210000000349 chromosome Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 210000004602 germ cell Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 5
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 5
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 4
- 230000009418 agronomic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000001109 blastomere Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 210000004748 cultured cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000016087 ovulation Effects 0.000 description 4
- WEXRUCMBJFQVBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N pentobarbital Chemical compound CCCC(C)C1(CC)C(=O)NC(=O)NC1=O WEXRUCMBJFQVBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000001890 transfection Methods 0.000 description 4
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 102000003839 Human Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000144 Human Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 3
- 241001494479 Pecora Species 0.000 description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000022131 cell cycle Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000003278 egg shell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000004520 electroporation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001605 fetal effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012239 gene modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010353 genetic engineering Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005017 genetic modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 235000013617 genetically modified food Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000520 microinjection Methods 0.000 description 3
- -1 ovalbwnin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000002460 smooth muscle Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 2
- PRDFBSVERLRRMY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2'-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-5-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-2,5'-bibenzimidazole Chemical compound C1=CC(OCC)=CC=C1C1=NC2=CC=C(C=3NC4=CC(=CC=C4N=3)N3CCN(C)CC3)C=C2N1 PRDFBSVERLRRMY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- VIBDVOOELVZGDU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-(1h-indol-2-yl)benzene-1,3-dicarboximidamide Chemical compound NC(=N)C1=CC(C(=N)N)=CC=C1C1=CC2=CC=CC=C2N1 VIBDVOOELVZGDU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000272525 Anas platyrhynchos Species 0.000 description 2
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000283707 Capra Species 0.000 description 2
- LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethylene glycol Chemical compound OCCO LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000270322 Lepidosauria Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 description 2
- 108091092724 Noncoding DNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010064983 Ovomucin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000282887 Suidae Species 0.000 description 2
- IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-XLPZGREQSA-N Thymidine Chemical compound O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)C1 IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-XLPZGREQSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108091023040 Transcription factor Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000040945 Transcription factor Human genes 0.000 description 2
- ISAKRJDGNUQOIC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Uracil Chemical compound O=C1C=CNC(=O)N1 ISAKRJDGNUQOIC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013566 allergen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000000170 cell membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000003837 chick embryo Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- OPTASPLRGRRNAP-UHFFFAOYSA-N cytosine Chemical compound NC=1C=CNC(=O)N=1 OPTASPLRGRRNAP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035558 fertility Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012894 fetal calf serum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010363 gene targeting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000004907 gland Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- UYTPUPDQBNUYGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N guanine Chemical compound O=C1NC(N)=NC2=C1N=CN2 UYTPUPDQBNUYGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000012447 hatching Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002406 microsurgery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000001672 ovary Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229960001412 pentobarbital Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 235000020030 perry Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229920001184 polypeptide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000004994 reproductive system Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000001177 retroviral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000001562 sternum Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000001534 vitelline membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- CPKVUHPKYQGHMW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-ethenylpyrrolidin-2-one;molecular iodine Chemical compound II.C=CN1CCCC1=O CPKVUHPKYQGHMW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- GFFGJBXGBJISGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Adenine Chemical compound NC1=NC=NC2=C1N=CN2 GFFGJBXGBJISGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930024421 Adenine Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 102100022977 Antithrombin-III Human genes 0.000 description 1
- DWRXFEITVBNRMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Beta-D-1-Arabinofuranosylthymine Natural products O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1C1C(O)C(O)C(CO)O1 DWRXFEITVBNRMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108020004638 Circular DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108020004705 Codon Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010026206 Conalbumin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000702421 Dependoparvovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000010190 G1 phase Effects 0.000 description 1
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrochloric acid Chemical compound Cl VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010062767 Hypophysitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100023915 Insulin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000009151 Luteinizing Hormone Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010073521 Luteinizing Hormone Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000016943 Muramidase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010014251 Muramidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000711408 Murine respirovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010062010 N-Acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine Amidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091061960 Naked DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229930193140 Neomycin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 108091034117 Oligonucleotide Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000283903 Ovis aries Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108020004511 Recombinant DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007056 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010008281 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000220010 Rhode Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000700584 Simplexvirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000272534 Struthio camelus Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000006601 Thymidine Kinase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020004440 Thymidine kinase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100033571 Tissue-type plasminogen activator Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000631 Trypsin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004142 Trypsin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000251539 Vertebrata <Metazoa> Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000036142 Viral infection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000003187 abdominal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960000643 adenine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000003444 anaesthetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000844 anti-bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N beta-L-thymidine Natural products O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1C1OC(CO)C(O)C1 IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940064804 betadine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000002459 blastocyst Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001172 blastoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002298 blastodisc Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004556 brain Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000010370 cell cloning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007910 cell fusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002659 cell therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002808 connective tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000020247 cow milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940104302 cytosine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- BFMYDTVEBKDAKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L disodium;(2',7'-dibromo-3',6'-dioxido-3-oxospiro[2-benzofuran-1,9'-xanthene]-4'-yl)mercury;hydrate Chemical compound O.[Na+].[Na+].O1C(=O)C2=CC=CC=C2C21C1=CC(Br)=C([O-])C([Hg])=C1OC1=C2C=C(Br)C([O-])=C1 BFMYDTVEBKDAKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 238000010573 double replacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013345 egg yolk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000002308 embryonic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000003623 enhancer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003746 feather Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013350 formula milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 244000144980 herd Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000002744 homologous recombination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006801 homologous recombination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000005260 human cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 235000021244 human milk protein Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- WGCNASOHLSPBMP-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydroxyacetaldehyde Natural products OCC=O WGCNASOHLSPBMP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002779 inactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011813 knockout mouse model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 244000144972 livestock Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940040129 luteinizing hormone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229960000274 lysozyme Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000010335 lysozyme Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004325 lysozyme Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004080 milk Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000472 morula Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229960004927 neomycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000008935 nutritious Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002394 ovarian follicle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004303 peritoneum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002688 persistence Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003635 pituitary gland Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 210000001778 pluripotent stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008488 polyadenylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000004481 post-translational protein modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000136 postovulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011027 product recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000005000 reproductive tract Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008672 reprogramming Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004621 scanning probe microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000996 thick albumen Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229940104230 thymidine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000005030 transcription termination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010361 transduction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000026683 transduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014616 translation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002054 transplantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012588 trypsin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000701161 unidentified adenovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940035893 uracil Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000003462 vein Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000009385 viral infection Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013603 viral vector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000001325 yolk sac Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/85—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for animal cells
- C12N15/8509—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for animal cells for producing genetically modified animals, e.g. transgenic
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K67/00—Rearing or breeding animals, not otherwise provided for; New or modified breeds of animals
- A01K67/027—New or modified breeds of vertebrates
- A01K67/0273—Cloned vertebrates
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/005—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from viruses
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K2217/00—Genetically modified animals
- A01K2217/05—Animals comprising random inserted nucleic acids (transgenic)
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K2217/00—Genetically modified animals
- A01K2217/07—Animals genetically altered by homologous recombination
- A01K2217/075—Animals genetically altered by homologous recombination inducing loss of function, i.e. knock out
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K2227/00—Animals characterised by species
- A01K2227/30—Bird
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K2267/00—Animals characterised by purpose
- A01K2267/01—Animal expressing industrially exogenous proteins
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K2267/00—Animals characterised by purpose
- A01K2267/02—Animal zootechnically ameliorated
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2770/00—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA ssRNA viruses positive-sense
- C12N2770/00011—Details
- C12N2770/24011—Flaviviridae
- C12N2770/24211—Hepacivirus, e.g. hepatitis C virus, hepatitis G virus
- C12N2770/24222—New viral proteins or individual genes, new structural or functional aspects of known viral proteins or genes
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Virology (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
- Catching Or Destruction (AREA)
Abstract
Methods for producing cloned non-human animals by nuclear transfer and by combinations of nuclear transfer and ovum transfer, employing near-infrared visualization of the recipient cell nucleus are described herein. Transgenic , knock-out, and knock-in avians are provided. Method for producing eggs which contain exogenous proteins are encompassed by the present invention. Thus, t he instant invention satisfies the need for an effective route to the generatio n of cloned avians.
Description
CLONED CELLS, EMBRYOS, AND ANIMALS
AND METHODS OF PRODUCING THEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
a) Field of the Invention This invention relates generally to cloned cells, embryos and animals, and to methods of producing them via nuclear transfer and combinations of nuclear transfer and ovum transfer. Tn particular, this invention relates to the cloning of avians.
b) Description of Related Art A major aim of biotechnologists is to produce offspring from cell populations that can be maintained in culture and to obtain stable desirable phenotypes that transmit the required traits through the germ line. For nuclear transfer, the availability of cultured cell lines facilitates cell cycle synchronization of the donor nucleus and allows optimization i of cell cycle co-ordination in the reconstituted embryo. In order to obtain stable desirable phenotypes, nuclear transfer from cultured cell populations provides a promising alternative route to genetic modification. Until recently, genetic modification in farm animals was limited to pronuclear injection wherein the required gene is injected into the pronucleus of a zygote. Although pronuclear injection has been applied in several species including mice, rabbits, pigs, sheep, goats and cattle, there are a number of disadvantages with this technique. Integration of the gene does not always occur during the first cell cycle, resulting in the production of mosaic embryos. In addition, integration occurs at random within the genome, resulting in variable expression of the gene product. Thus, the production of an animal having the required phenotype capable of germ line transmission may require the generation of several transgenic lines, as well as extensive breeding of founder animals. In comparison, the.production of animals by nuclear transfer from cells that can be maintained in culture offers a number of advantages over pronuclear injection. In nuclear transfer, the cells to be used as nuclear donor cells may be sexed, optionally genetically modified, and selected in culture before their use. The resultant animal is produced from a single nucleus and mosaics can therefore be avoided. The genetic modification is easily transmitted to the offspring. In addition, all the cells in the animal are likely to contain the transgene and expression can be obtained in the tissues of interest.
The ability to produce live offspring by nuclear transfer from cultured somatic cells also provides a route for the precise genetic manipulation of animal species. Such modifications include the addition or "knock-in" of genes, and the removal or inactivation or "knock-out" of genes or their control sequences (Polejaeva et al., TI~eYiogenology, 53 1 :117-26 (2000)). Gene targeting techniques also promise the generation of transgenic animals in which specific genes coding for endogenous proteins have been replaced by human genes coding for exogenous human proteins. In 1993, 1~0 Yom and Bremmel suggested that genes coding for major proteins in cow's milk could be replaced by human cotmterparts. Cows modified in this fashion would produce milk containing human milk proteins, which may be more nutritious for human infants and more suitable for infant formula manufacture (Yom, H.C. and.Bremmel, R.D., Americaya .Iournal of Clinical Nut~itioh, 1993, 58 (Supplement) 3065).. Methods for producing exogenous proteins in the mills of pigs, sheep, goats and cows have been reported.
Wilinut and Campbell (GB 2 331 751 B) have reported the production of reconstituted animal embryos by transfernng the nucleus of a diploid donor cell into a suitable recipient cell. The donor cells are quiescent, i. e., not actively proliferating, and are characterized as being in the.GO or G1 phase. The recipient cells include oocytes at metaphase I or II, zygotes, and two-cell embryos, preferably enucleate.
Enucleation is accomplished by splitting, aspiration, 'or irradiation. In those mechanical techniques predicated upon visualization of the nucleus, the use of a'DNA-specific fluorochrome is .
required.
Nuclear transfer (NT) involves the transfer of the complete diploid genetic material (the DNA contained in a nucleus) from a donor cell into an enucleated recipient cell, such as a fertilized (zygote) or unfertilized (oocyte) cell. The technique involves several steps. The donor cells are first grown under special Conditions in culture, increasing the number of cells by several orders of magnitude. The nuclei of the donor cells are then transferred to oocytes or zygotes, resulting in a reconstructed embryo.
Activation (initiation of development) is usually artificially, most often chemically, induced. The embryos are then transplanted into female animals and allowed to develop to term. In some species (mice, cattle and sheep) the reconstructed embryos may be grown in culture until the blastocyst stage before transfer to a recipient.
The reconstruction of mammalian embryos by transfer of a blastomere nucleus to an enucleated oocyte or zygote has been reported to produce genetically identical individuals (Eyestone et al., J. Reprod. Fertil. Supp., 54:49-97 (1999)).
Although the number of offspring that can be produced from a single embryo is limited both by the number of blastomeres (embiyos at the 32-64 cell stage are the most widely used in farm animal species) and the efficiency of the nuclear transfer procedure, the ability to produce live offspring by nuclear transfer from cells that can be propagated and maintained in culture offers many advantages. This includes the production of identical offspring over an extended period (since cultured cells can be frozen and stored indefinitely) and the ability to genetically modify and to select populations of cells of specific genotypes or phenotypes before embryo reconstruction. This objective has been achieved with the production of lambs using nuclei from cultured cells established from erilbryonic, fetal and adult material.
Two types of recipient cells are commonly used for nuclear transfer: oocytes arrested at the metaphase of the second meiotic division (MIT) and pronuclear zygotes. W
mice, enucleated, two-cell stage blastomeres have been used as recipients. In farm species, development does not always occur when pronuclear zygotes are used, except when pronuclei are exchanged between zygotes, therefore, MII-arrested oocytes have often been the recipient of choice. Oocytes arrested at MII do not contain a nucleus but a metaphase plate, where'the chromosomes are arranged on the meiotic spindle.
The MIf.
chromosomes or metaphase plate are not easily visible under the light microscope in mammalian oocytes. However, visualization of the MII chromosomes or metaphase plate has been achieved with W light using DAPI (4', 6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole, hydrochloride) or Hoescht 33342 (bis-benzimide) staining. , After enucleation and introduction of the donor genetic material, the reconstructed embryo must be cultured to a stage at which it can be transferred to a recipient animal, generally the morula or blastocyte stage. This can be done iu vitro or ih vivo (Eyestone et al., supra). Double nuclear transfer has also been reported, in which an activated, previously transferred nucleus is removed from the host unfertilized egg and transferred a second time into an enucleated fertilized embryo. (Polejaeva et al., Nature, 407:505-9 (2000)). .
Although gene targeting techniques in combination with nuclear transfer hold tremendous promise with respect to nutritional and medical applications, current approaches suffer from several limitations, including long generation times between founder and production transgenic herds, and extensive husbandry and veterinary costs.
It is therefore desirable to employ a system where the use of cultured somatic cells for nuclear transfer is more efficiently employed. One system that holds great potential is the avian reproductive system.
The avian reproductive system, including that of the chicken, is well described.
The production of an egg begins with formation of the large yolk in the ovary of the hen.
The unfertilized oocyte or ovum is positioned on top of the yolk sac. Upon ovulation or release of the yolk from the ovary, it passes into the infundibultun of the oviduct where it is fertilized if sperm are present. It then moves into the magnum of the oviduct which is lined with tubular gland cells. These cells secrete the egg-white proteins, including ovalbwnin, lysozyme, ovomucoid, conalbumin and ovomucin, into the lumen of the magnum from which they axe deposited onto the avian embryo and yolk.
Attempts at nuclear transfer in avians have remained difficult to realize. One significant challenge is the inaccessibility of the eaxly avian egg. It is well lrnown in the art that all forms of genetic manipulation that require visualization of the avian early embryo have been hindered by the inability to properly visualize the target structures. In nuclear transfer, after enucleation, the genetic material from the donor cell (nuclear donor) must be intYOduced into the enucleated oocyte. In order to produce an enucleated recipient cytoplast, it is essential to visualize the metaphase II plate or pronuclei that reside about 25~.m beneath the egg's vitelline membrane within the germinal disk. Yet, the large size and optical density of the yollc have made visualization of the avian early embryo and its structures difficult to achieve.
The hen oviduct offers outstanding potential as a protein bioreactor because of high levels of protein production, proper folding and post-translation modification of the target protein, and ease of product recovery. As a result, efforts have been made to create transgenic chickens expressing exogenous proteins in the oviduct by means of microinjection of DNA (PCT Publication WO 97/47739). Bosselinan et al.
describe a method for introducing a replication-defective retroviral vector into a pluripotent stem cell of an unincubated chick embryo, and further describe chimeric chickens, whose cells express an exogenous vector nucleic acid sequence. However, the percentage of Gl 5 transgenic offspring (progeny from vector-positive male GO birds) was~low and varied between 1% and approximately 8% (U.S. Patent No. 5,162,215). Generally, DNA
injection into avian eggs has so far lead to poor and unstable transgene integration (Sang and Perry, Mol. Repr~od. Dev., 1:98-106 (1989); and Naito, et al., Mol.
Rep>~od. Dev., 37:167-71 (1994)). In addition, the use of viral vectors poses a number of limitations;
including limited transgene size and potential viral infection of the offspring. The production of transgenic chickens by means of DNA microinjection (supra) is both inefficient and time-consuming. In fact, a key limitation of using any animal as a bioreactor is the time required (approximately 10 months for chickens, 2-3 years for ungulates) to introduce the desired transgene~ into the animal's genome.
The hen also offers a unique system for efficient direct transgenesis of the magnum gland, but iutial attempts have yielded poor results. Plasmid DNAs carrying transgenes have been introduced directly into the magnum of mature hens by electroporation (Ochiai et al., Poultry Science, 77:299-302 (1998)). Due to the large size of the oviduct of mature hens, the transient persistence of the plasmid DNAs in the cells, and the inefficiency of organ electroporation, only very low levels of protein were detected in the oviduct tissue of sacrificed hens and no expressed protein was reported as being detected in the egg. Other attempts have involved the transfection of magnum cells with expression cassettes after excision of the cells from the bird~and preparation of an oviduct cell culture (Sanders et al., EfzdocYizzology, 116:398-405 (1985);
Sanders et al., Bioclzemistry, 27:6550-6557 (1988); Schweers et al., .Iou~fzal of Biological Chemistry, 265:7590-7595 (1990); Otten et al., MoleculaY Ehdoc~inology, 2:143-147 (1988);
and Schweers et al., Jouz~zzal ofBiological Chemistry, 266:10490-10497 (1991)).
Ovum transfer, the transfer of a donor ovum to the oviduct of a recipient hen, provides another means for genetic manipulation in avians. Tanaka et al.
produced chicks by izz vity~o fertilization (IVF) by returning the fertilized ovum into the oviduct of a recipient hen to complete the egg and shell formation. This experimental approach suggests a useful model for production of transgenic avians (Tanaka et al., .IouYnal of RepYOductioh and Fet~tility, 100:447-449 (1994)).
Another major challenge is the culture of the reconstructed egg. It is essential to hatch the reconstructed zygote following micromanipulation. One solution was proposed by Perry et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,011,780). Perry et al. use ex ovo culture to remove an embryo and yolk from a donor hen and incubate the embryo and yolk in a series of separate culture systems until hatch. Yet, this procedure is laborious and inefficient with low numbers of "test tube chickens" hatching.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved method for visualization of the nuclear structures in a recipient cell to facilitate the process of enucleation and subsequent nuclear transfer.
It is also an object of this invention to provide an improved method for ablation of the nucleus in a recipient cell to facilitate subsequent nuclear transfer.
It is a particular object of the instant invention to provide methods that overcome the technical hurdles relating to the cloning of avians, such as inaccessibility of the avian egg and difficulty of culturing the reconstructed zygote. A new and useful method for successful nuclear transfer in avians in order to produce cloned birds would satisfy a present need in the art. Avians cloned in this manner may be genetically modified. The resulting expression and deposition of exogenous proteins in eggs, suitable for commercial use, would provide immediate benefits to the public.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides cloned cells, cell lines, embryos, and animals and methods for their production by nuclear transfer, employing two-photon visualization, ablation or both. In one embodiment, nuclear transfer in conjmZCtion with ovum transfer 25~ is employed. Cloned and transgenic avians, including knock-outs and lcnock-ins, are also provided.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, two-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM) is used to visualize nuclear structures in a recipient cell.
Following visualization, the cell is enucleated, optionally with two-photon laser-mediated ablation, to provide a recipient cytoplast. Alternatively, the recipient cell may also be enucleated via cell splitting, aspiration of its nuclear structure(s)~, irradiation, or.
other enucleating procedure. Preferably, the recipient cell is removed from an animal, the nucleus visualized and ablated via two-photon laser-mediated ablation. The donor nucleus is then inserted into the recipient cell by cell fusion, microinj ection, or other renucleation procedure. The replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus yields a reconstructed zygote. The reconstructed zygote may be activated and allowed to develop to term in vivo or in vitro. Tiz a preferred embodiment of the invention, the animal is an avian including, but not limited to, chickens, duclcs, turkeys, quails, pheasants and ostriches.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of producing a cloned animal comprising nuclear transfer in combination with ovum transfer. TPLSM
and two-photon laser-mediated ablation is used to perform nuclear transfer wherein the donor nucleus may be of normal karyotype or genetically modified. Accordingly, the replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus results in a reconstructed zygote. The ovum may be cultured via ovum transfer, whereby the reconstructed zygote is transferred to a recipient animal, or cultured iN
vity~o and allowed to develop to term.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of producing a cloned avian comprising nuclear transfer in combination with ovum transfer. TPLSM and two-photon laser-mediated ablation is used to perform nuclear transfer wherein the donor nucleus may be of normal lcaryotype or genetically modified. Accordingly, the replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus results in a reconstructed zygote. The ovum may be cultured via ovum transfer, wherein the ovum containing the reconstructed zygote is transferred to a recipient avian or cultured i~ vitro.
Once transferred, the embryo develops inside the recipient hen and travels through the oviduct of the hen where it is encapsulated by natural egg white proteins and a natural egg shell. The egg which contains endogenous yolk and a reconstructed embryo, is laid and can then be incubated and hatched like a normal chick. The resulting chick may be genetically modified. In one embodiment, the genetically modified cloned avian carries a transgene in all or most of its cells. After maturation, the transgenic avian may lay eggs that contain one or more exogenous protein(s). The combination of nuclear transfer and ovum transfer allows for the preparation of a cloned avian. In an alternative embodiment, ex ovo culture may be used instead of ovum transfer to produce the cloned avian. In a preferred embodiment of the instant invention, the avian is a chicken, duck, quail, turlcey, pheasant or ostrich.
Another aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing a transgenic avian by (i) preparing a transgenic avian, carrying a gene encoding an exogenous protein, using nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization andlor ablation, and (ii) allowing the immature transgenic avian to grow to maturity, wherein the exogenous protein is secreted into the oviduct lumen of the mature avian and deposited into eggs laid by the avian. Preferably, the exogenous DNA comprises a stable transgene and the transgenic avians may be bred and propagated. The novel transgenic avians possess the ability to lay eggs that contain one or more desired, exogenous protein(s).
Yet, another aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing a knock-out or knock-in avian by (i) preparing a knock-out or knock-in avian according to nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization andlor ablation, and (ii) allowing the immature knock-out or knock-in egg-laying animal to grow to maturity. The knock-out avians are able to lay eggs that contain less than all endogenous proteins normally present in the egg. This allows for the elimination of potential undesired substances found in the egg (e.g., allergens) or suppression of a specific agronomic trait. The knock-in sequence may replace all or part of an endogenous gene of the animal by a functional homologous gene or gene segment of another animal.
Cloned non-human cells, cell lines, embryos, and animals, optionally genetically modified, are encompassed by the instant invention. Transgenic, knock-out, and knock-in animals are also provided. In one embodiment, reconstituted avian embryos, particularly chick embryos, prepared by transfernng the nucleus of a donor cell into a suitable recipient cell, are provided. The donor cell may be quiescent or non-quiescent.
Intact avian eggs containing proteins) exogenous to naturally occurnrig avian eggs are further provided by the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
a) Definitions and General Parameters The following definitions are set forth to illustrate and define the meaning and' scope of the various terms used to describe the invention herein.
The teen "TPLSM" refers to two-photon laser scanning microscopy. TPLSM
relies upon the phenomenon of two-photon excited fluorescence in which two photons collide simultaneously with a fluorescent molecule. Their combined energy is absorbed by the fluorophore inducing a fluorescent emission, which is detected by a photomultiplier and converted into a digital image. The major advantage of TPLSM lies in its ability to generate images of,living and optically dense structures for prolonged periods of time, while not affecting their viability. This is the case because TPLSM
utilizes biologically innocuous pulsed infrared light that is able to penetrate much deeper into scattering specimens. Hence this method provides the capability for producing noninvasive, three-dimensional, real-time images of the optically dense oocyte (e.g., avian egg).
In addition to. visualization, TPLSM may also be used for enucleation.
The terms "ovum" and "oocyte" are used interchangeably herein. Although only one ovum matures at a time, an aumal is born with a finite number of ova.
Ovulation, the shedding of an egg from the ovarian follicle, occurs when the brain's pituitary gland releases a luteinizing hormone, LH. Mature follicles form a stalk or pedicle of connective tissue aazd smooth muscle. Immediately after ovulation the follicle becomes a thin-walled sac, the post-ovulatory follicle. The mature ovum erupts from its sac and starts its journey through the oviduct. Eventually, the ovum enters the infundibulum where fertilization occurs. Fertilization must take place within 15 minutes of ovulation, before the ovum becomes covered by albumen. During fertilization, sperm (avians have polyspennic fertilization) penetrate the blastodisc, the small white spot on the top side of the yollc where the embryo will develop. When the sperm lodges within this germinal dislc, an embryo begins to form. It is now known as a "blastoderm" or "zygote".
A "donor cell" is used herein to describe the source of the nuclear structure that is transplanted to the recipient cytoplast. All cells of normal karyotype, including embryonic, fetal, and adult somatic cells, preferably in a quiescent state, may be nuclear donors. The use of non-quiescent cells as nuclear donors has been described as well by Cibelli, et al., Science, 280:1256-8 (1998).
A "recipient cell" is used herein to describe the enucleated recipient cell, preferably an enucleated metaphase I or II oocyte, or an enucleated preactivated oocyte.
Enucleation may be accomplished by splitting the cell into halves, aspirating the metaphase plate, pronucleus or pronuclei, or even by irradiation. In a preferred embodiment, enucleation is done through two-photon laser-mediated ablation.
Alternatively, TPLSM could be used to guide mechanical enucleation.
5 A "nucleic acid sequence" or "polynucleotide" includes, but is not limited to, eucaryotic mRNA, cDNA, genomic DNA, and synthetic DNA and RNA sequences, comprising the natural nucleotide bases adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymidine, and uracil. The teen also encompasses sequences having one or more modified nucleotide(s). The terms "polynucleotide", "oligonucleotide", and "nucleic acid 10 sequence" are used interchangeably herein and include, but are not limited to, coding sequences (polynucleotide(s) or nucleic acid sequences) which are transcribed and translated into polypeptide i~ vitYO or ih vivo when placed under the control of appropriate regulatory or control sequences); control sequences (e.g., translational start and stop codons, promoter sequences, ribosome binding sites, polyadenylation signals, transcription factor binding sites, transcription termination sequences, upstream and . . . , downstream regulatory domains, enhancers, silencers, and the like); and regulatory sequences (DNA sequences to which a transcription factors) binds and alters the activity of a gene's promoter either positively (induction) or negatively (repression)). No limitation as to length or to synthetic origin are suggested by the terms described herein.
The terms "endogenous nucleic acid sequence" and "endogenous DNA" are used interchangeably herein. The term "endogenous" as it relates to nucleic acid sequences such as coding sequences, control sequences, and regulatory sequences denotes sequences that are normally associated with a particular cell or tissue.
Hence, endogenous sequences are found in nature. Endogenous proteins are the expression products of endogenous DNA, such as endogenous coding sequences.
The terms "exogenous nucleic acid sequence" and "exogenous DNA" are used interchangeably herein. The term "exogenous" as it relates to nucleic acid sequences such as coding sequences, control sequences, and regulatory sequences denotes sequences that are "not" normally associated with a particular cell or tissue.
Thus, an "exogenous" region of a nucleic acid is an identifiable segment of nucleic acid within or attached to another nucleic acid molecule that is not found in association with the other molecule in nature. Exogenous DNA may be integrated into the genome of the donor cell or may exist independently of the genome of the donor cell. For example, exogenous DNA may not be integrated into the genome of the donor cell but exist as part of a non-integrated vector in the donor cell.
The term "transgene" refers to exogenous polynucleotide sequences) containing a desired coding sequence and control sequences in operable linkage, so that cells transformed with these sequences are capable of producing the encoded product.
In order to effect transformation, the transgene may optionally be included on a discrete vector;
however, the relevant polynucleotide rnay also be an integrative vector which has or can become integrated into the host chromosome. A "tra,nsgenic animal" is an animal that expresses one or more exogenous gene(s).
The term "knock-out animal" refers to an animal that completely lacks a specific gene that is normally present in its genome.
The term "lcnock-in animal" refers to an animal that carries a specific nucleic acid sequence such as a "lcnock-in sequence" in a predetermined coding or noncoding region, wherein the knock-in sequence is introduced through methods of recombination, such as homologous recombination. The recombination event comprises replacing all or part of a gene of the animal by a functional homologous gene or gene segment of another animal, where the respective knoclc-in sequence is placed in the genomic sequence.
"Vector" means a polynucleotide comprised of single strand, double strand, ,circular, or supercoiled DNA or RNA, preferably constructed so that a particular coding sequence is located in the vector with the appropriate regulatory sequences, the positioning and orientation of the coding sequence with respect to the control sequences being such that the coding sequence is transcribed under the "control" of the control sequences.
A "plasmid" is a small, circular DNA vector capable of independent replication within a bacterial or yeast host cell.
The terms "transformation", "transduction", and "transfection" all denote the introduction of a polynucleotide into a cell, such as an embryonic or somatic cell.
The term "exogenous protein" means a protein or polypeptide not naturally present in a particular tissue or cell, a protein that is the expression product of an exogenous gene, ari exogenous expression construct or a transgene, or a protein not naturally present in a given quantity in a particular tissue or cell.
The term "avian" means a bird of any known species or type. The term includes the various know strains of Gallus gallus, or chickens, (for example, White Leghorn, Brown Leghorn, Barred-Rock, Sussex, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Ausstralorp, Minorca, Amrox, California Gray, Italian Partidge-colored), as well as turkeys, pheasants, quails, duck, ostriches and other poultry commonly bred in commercial quantities.
b) Nuclear Transfer and TPLSM
The present invention provides methods for producing cloned animals by nuclear a transfer and by combinations of nuclear transfer and embryo transfer.
Nuclear transfer allows the cloning of animal species, wherein individual steps are common to the procedures of embryonic, fetal and adult cell cloning. These steps include, but are not limited to, preparation of a chromosome-free recipient cell called a cytoplast (which involves chromosome removal often referred to as enucleation); donor cell nucleus (nuclear donor) isolation and transfer to the cytoplast to produce a reconstructed embryo;
optional reconstructed embryo culture; and embryo transfer to a synchronized host animal.
A novel approach to nuclear transfer in animals, employing two-photon visualization, is described in the instant invention. In a preferred embodiment, the fertilized or unfertilized egg is removed from an animal and manipulated ih vitro, wherein the genetic material of the egg is visualized and removed and the ablated nucleus replaced with a donor nucleus. Optionally, the donor nucleus may be genetically modified. Two-photon laser. scanning microscopy (TPLSM) is used to visualize the nuclear structures. Following visualization, the nucleus in the recipient cell, such as a fertilized or unfertilized egg; is removed or ablated, optionally using TPLSM.
TPLSM is based on two-photon excited fluorescence in which two photons collide simultaneously with a fluorescent molecule. Their combined energy is absorbed by the fluorophore, inducing fluorescent emission, which is detected by a photomultiplier tube and converted into a digital image. See Squirrell et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 17:763-7 (1999);
and Piston et al., Trends Cell Biol., 9:66-9 (1999). TPLSM allows for the generation of images of living, optically dense structures for prolonged periods of time, while not affecting their viability. This is possible because TPLSM utilizes biologically innocuous pulsed near infrared light, usually at a wavelength of about 700 nm to about 1000 nrn, which is able to penetrate much deeper into scattering specimens. TPLS1VI may employ different lasers, such as a mode-locked laser, where the wavelength is fixed, or a tunable laser that can be tuned between about 700 rim and about 1000 nm., depending upon the range of emission of the dye used. For DAPI and Hoescht 33342 dyes, 720-770 rim. is preferred.
New fluorophores are being produced with different ranges of emission and the invention is not limited to the presently available dyes and their respective emission ranges.
Furthermore, lasers used in TPLSM can be grouped into femtosecond and picosecond lasers. These lasers are distinguished by their pulse duration.
Preferably, a femtosecond laser is used in the instant invention since it is particularly suitable for visualization without harming the specimen.
In a preferred embodiment, TPLSM realizes a method of producing noninvasive, I 5 three-dimensional, real-time images of the optically dense avian egg. The ability to visualize the metaphase plate or pronucleus in avian eggs during nuclear transfer has so far been hindered by the presence of the yoll~, which makes visualization of these nuclear structures impossible. But two-photon imaging with femtosecond lasers operating in the near infrared allows visualization of nuclear structures without damaging cellular constituents, despite the unfavorable optical properties.of the egg yolk.
Prior to visualization, specimens may be incubated or injected with DNA-specific dyes such as DAPI (4', 6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole hydrochloride) or Hoescht 33342 (bis-benzimide). Prior to incubation, the albumen capsule is removed and the ovum placed in a dish with the germinal disk facing the top. Any remnants of the albumen capsule are removed from the top of the germinal dislc. An aqueous solution, e.g., phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), is added to prevent drying of the ovum. A cloning cylinder is placed around the germinal disk and DAPI in PBS is added to the cylinder.
Alternatively, a DAPI-PBS solution.may be injected into the germinal disk by using a glass pipette, after which the dye moves into the nuclear structures. In the case of injecting the dye, removal of the albumen capsule is not necessary. However, injection of nuclei into the disk is facilitated in the absence of the capsule.
Following incubation or injection of DNA-specific dyes, images of the inside of the early avian embryo can be generated through the use of TPLSM. Visualization may be performed after about 10 to 15 minutes of incubation or about 10 minutes after injection. During visualization, the germinal disk is placed under the microscope objective and the pronuclear structures are searched within the central area of the disk using relatively low laser powers of about 3-6 milliwatts. Once the structures are found they may be ablated by using higher laser power or mechanically removed, guided by TPLSM.
Nuclear transfer also requires the destruction or enucleation of the pronucleus before a nuclear donor can be introduced into the oocyte. Iri order to enucleate the oocyte to produce a cytoplast donor, it is essential to visualize the pronucleus which resides about 25~.m beneath the ovum's vitelline membrane within the germinal disk.
Microsurgery has so far been a preferred method to accomplish pronuclear removal or enucleation. However, two-photon laser-mediated ablation of nuclear structures provides an alternative to microsurgery: Higher laser powers than those used for imaging are used for enucleation, with minimal collateral damage to the cell. As during visualization., the wavelength for ablation generally ranges from about 700 nm to 1000 mn, normally about 750 nm. TPLSM and two-photon laser-mediated ablation are more efficient than alternative methods because they are less operator dependent and less invasive, which results in higher viability of the recipient cell. Following visualization, pronuclear structures may be ablated~using higher laser powers of about 30 to about 70 milliwatts.
Enucleation is followed by renucleation, where a cultured somatic cell nucleus (nuclear donor) is injected into the enucleated recipient cytoplast.
Renucleation may be performed under a microscope on a micromanipulation unit comprising a microinjector and a micromanipulator. Following ablation, the nuclear donor is introduced into the germinal dislc though guided inj ection using episcopic illumination (i. e., light coming thxough the obj ective onto the sample). The reconstructed zygote may then be surgically transferred to the oviduct of a recipient hen to produce a hard shell egg.
Alternatively, the reconstructed embryo may be cultured for 24 hours and screened for development prior to surgical transfer. The egg can be further incubated to generate a cloned chick, optionally genetically modified. The cloned chick may carry a transgene in all or most of its cells. After maturation, the transgenic avian may lay eggs that contain one or more desired, exogenous protein(s). Alternatively, the resulting chick may be a knock-out animal capable of laying eggs that contain less than all endogenous proteins normally present in the egg. The cloned chick may also be a knock-in chick expressing an alternative phenotype or capable of laying eggs having an exogenous protein therein.
5 The reconstructed egg may also be cultured to term using the ex ovo method described by Perry et al. (supra). In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the animal is an avian including, but not limited to, chickens, ducks, turkeys, quails, pheasants and ostriches.
The replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus results in a reconstructed zygote. In a preferred embodiment, the cytoplasmic membrane 10 of the cell used as nuclear donor is disrupted to expose its nucleus to the ooplasm of the recipient cytoplast. The nuclear donor may be injected into the germinal disk, where it undergoes reprogramming and becomes the nucleus of the reconstructed one-cell embryo. Alternatively, a donor cell may be fused to the recipient cell using methods well known in the art, e.g., by means of fusion-promoting chemicals, such as polyethylene 15 glycol, inactivated viruses, such as Sendai virus, or electrical stimulation.
The methodologies of TPLSM and two-photon laser-mediated ablation described herein, can also be used for selective visualization and destruction of specific structures within germ and/or somatic cells including nuclear transfer in marnlnalian species and other vertebrate species. The slcilled artisan will be able to readily adapt the methods established for avians described herein to other types of aumals including, but not limited to, mammals, fish, reptile(s); amphibian(s), and insect(s).
c) Ovum Transfer Another aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing.a cloned animal comprising nuclear transfer in combination with ovum transfer.
Two-~ photon visualization and ablation may be used to perform nuclear transfer, as described above. Accordingly, the replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus results in a reconstructed zygote. In the preferred embodiment pronuclear stage eggs are used as recipient cytoplasts already activated by fertilization.
Alternatively, unactivated metaphase II eggs may serve as recipient cytoplast and activation induced after renucleation. The ovum may be cultured via ovum transfer, wherein the ovum containing the reconstructed zygote is transferred to a recipient hen.. The ovum is surgically transferred into the oviduct of the recipient hen shortly after oviposition. This is accomplished according to normal husbandry procedures (oviposition, incubation, and hatching; see Tanaka et al., supYa).
In an alternative embodiment, the ovum may be cultured to stage X prior to transfer into a recipient hen. More specifically, reconstructed stage I
embryos are cultured for 24-48 hours to stage X. This allows for developmental screening of the reconstructed embryo prior to surgical transfer. Stage I embryos are enclosed within a thick albumen capsule. In this novel procedure, the albumen capsule is removed, after which the nuclear donor is injected into the germinal disk. Subsequently, the capsule and germinal disk are recombined by placing the thick capsule in contact with the germinal disk on top of the yolk. Embryos develop to stage X at similar rates as those cultured with their capsules intact. At stage X, the embryo is transferred to the oviduct of a recipient hen.
. Once transferred, the embryo develops inside the recipient hen and travels through the oviduct of the hen where it is encapsulated by natural egg white proteins and a natural egg shell. The egg which contains endogenous yolk and an embryo from another hen, is laid and can then be incubated and hatched like a normal chick. The resulting chick may carry a transgene in all or most of its cells. Following maturation, the cloned avian may express a desired phenotype or may be able to lay eggs that contain ~ one or more desired, exogenous protein(s).
The combination of nuclear transfer and ovum transfer allows for the preparation of a cloned animal that is a complete organism, optionally genetically modified.
Genetically modified animals encompassed by the instant invention are transgenics, and knock-in and knock-out animals.
25. In an alternative embodiment, ex ovo culture may be used instead of ovum transfer to produce the cloned animal (see Perry et al., supra). In a preferred embodiment of the instant invention, the animal is an avian including, but not limited to, chickens, ducks, quails, turkeys, pheasants and ostriches. In another embodiment, the animal is a mammal, fish, reptile, amphibian, or insect.
d) Cloned-, Transgenic-, Knock-out-, and Knock-in Animals and Their Eggs The present invention provides for cloned egg-laying animals produced by nuclear transfer and by combinations of nuclear transfer and ovum transfer as described herein. A novel approach of nuclear transfer, employing two-photon visualization and ablation is used to produce the cloned animals. ~ In addition, the present invention encompasses cloned animals that are genetically modified including, but not limited to, transgenic, lrnock-out, and knock-in animals. The instant invention satisfies the need for a rapid route to the expression and deposition of exogenous proteins in eggs.
Eggs containing proteins) exogenous to an egg are also provided by the present invention.
Furthermore, the instant invention provides a novel method of producing cloned, transgenic animals through nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization and ablation, and ovum transfer. Transgenic animals may have their hereditary properties permanently modified by the introduction of recombinant DNA into their germ cells. The combination of zygote reconstruction followed by ovum transfer, as disclosed herein, promises a more efficient and flexible route to accomplish the cloning of animals and production of transgenics. One pertinent use of this technology is the modification of poultry and livestock genomes to improve agronomic traits. Candidate genes, whose introduction or deletion would enhance agronomic traits, can be targeted through use of the instant invention. Most importantly, the possibility of cloning avian species promises tremendous gains for the market place. The new technology disclosed herein may be used in selective poultry breeding, leading to enhanced traits in chickens and their.eggs.
Further, nuclear transfer techniques developed herein (e.g., laser-mediated selective ablation of nuclear structures of oocytes) also have a wide range of applications in fields such as mammalian transgenesis, genetics, cell therapies, and transplantation.
One aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing a transgenic animal, comprising the steps of (i) preparing the transgenc animal according to nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization and optionally, laser-mediated ablation, and ovum transfer which contains exogenous DNA in its cells, and (ii) allowing the immature transgenic animal to grow to maturity. In the case of an avian, an exogenous protein is secreted into the oviduct lumen of the mature animal and deposited into eggs laid by the animal. In a preferred embodiment of the instant invention, the exogenous DNA comprises a transgene and the resulting transgenic animals can be bred and propagated. Transgenic avians produced by the instant invention also possess the ability to lay eggs that contain one or more desired, exogenous protein(s).
Transgenes are introduced into the ovum of an animal through nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization and ablation, wherein the nuclear donor contains a desired exogenous DNA sequence in its genome. One of ordinary skill in the art will be able to readily adapt conventional methods to insert the desired transgene into the genome of the nuclear donor prior to inj ection of the nuclear donor into the recipient cytoplast, or prior to fusion of the nuclear donor cell with the recipient cell. For example, a vector that contains one or more transgene(s) may be delivered into the nuclear donor cell through the use of a delivery vehicle. The transgene is then transferred along with the nuclear donor into the recipient ovum. Following zygote reconstruction, the ovum is transferred into the reproductive tract of a recipient hen. In a preferred embodiment, the ovum is transferred into the infundibulum of the recipient hen. After reconstruction, the embryo containing the transgene develops inside the recipient hen and travels through the oviduct of the hen where it is encapsulated by natural egg white proteins and a natural egg shell.
The egg is Iaid and can be incubated and hatched to produce a transgenic chiclc. The resulting transgenic chick will carry one or more desired transgene(s) in its germ line.
Following maturation, the transgenic avian may lay eggs that contain one or more desired, exogenous proteins) which can be easily harvested.
In one embodiment of the instant invention, a nuclear donor cell is transfected with a vector construct that contains~a. transgene. Methods for transfection of somatic cell nuclei are well known in the art and include, by way of example, the use of retroviral vectors, retrotransposons, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, naked DNA, lipid-mediated transfection, electroporation and direct inj ection into the nucleus.
Such techniques, particularly as applied to avians, are disclosed in Bosselman (LJ.S. Patent No.. 5,162,215), Etches (PCT Publication No. W099/10505), Hodgson (IJ.S.
Patent No. 6,027,722), Hughes (CT.S. Patent No. 4,997,763), Ivarie (PCT Publication No. W099/19472), MacArthur (PCT Publication No. W097/47739), Perry (U.S.
Patent No. 5,011,780), Petitte (U.S. Patent Nos. 5,340,740 and 5,656,479), and Simkiss (PCT
Publication No. W090/11355), the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Another aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing a lcnock-out or knock-in animal,~comprising the steps of (i) preparing the knock-out or knock-in animal according to nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization and/or ablation, and (ii) allowing the immature knock-out or knoclc-in animal to grow to maturity.
In one embodiment of the instant invention, the knoclc-out animal has been manipulated such that an endogenous gene has been removed from the genome of the donor nucleus. This may be accomplished using described protocols for the production of knock-out mice, including the transformation of the nuclear donors with a targeting vector comprising genomic DNA containing the desired modification, flanked by positive (neomycin resistance gene for instance) and/or negative (herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase) or other applicable selectable marker genes, using a number of described strategies such as the so-called "hit and run'.' (Hasty, et al., Nature, 350:243-6 (1991); and Valancius and Smithies, Mol. Cell Biol., 11:1402-S (1991)), tag and exchange (Askew, et al., Mol. Cell Biol., 13:4115-24 (1993)) and double replacement (Stacey, et al., Mol. Cell Biol., 14:1009-16 (1994)).
The resulting lcnoclc-out animal can be bred and propagated. Animals produced in this fashion are suitable for research purposes mainly to study the effects of specific drugs on the breeding of poultry and certain agronomic traits. These knock-out animals also possess the ability to lay eggs that contain less than all endogenous proteins normally present in the egg, which allows for the elimination of potential undesired substances found in the egg (e.g., allergens).
In another embodiment of the instant invention, a knock-in animal has been manipulated such that it carries a specific nucleic acid sequence such as a "knock-in sequence" in a predetermined coding or noncoding region of its genome. The knock-in sequence may replace all or part of an endogenous gene of the animal by a functional homologous gene or gene segment of another animal. Knock-in animals can be prepared according to a variation of the standard knock-out method, comprising the introduction ' of a foreign gene into the targeting vector, in such a way that the introduced gene would be under the control of the regulatory elements that normally control the expression of the endogenous gene (Le Mouellic, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:4712-6 (1990);
and McCreath, et al., Nature, 405:1066-1069 (2000)).
Another embodiment of the invention provides a method of producing a protein 5 derived from cloned, genetically modified egg-laying animals as a result of embryo reconstruction followed by ovum transfer. This method comprises producing a hard-shell egg that contains exogenous protein and then isolating the exogenous protein from the egg. An intact avian egg containing protein exogenous to an avian egg is contemplated by the present invention. The transgenic animals of the instant invention 10 include avians that have a transgene encoding an exogenous protein in their oviducts, wherein the avians secrete into their eggs the protein expressed by the transgene. A
transgenic avian that makes a human protein (e.g., human interferon) will recognize this substance as its~own and will therefore not produce an immune response against it. This makes the egg-laying transgenic ideally suited for the production of large quantities of 15 human protein. In this respect, the avian egg provides an ideal container for the production of recombinant proteins because its interior is sterile and contains antibacterial compounds, and it is easily accessible. As a consequence, the purity of the protein products can be improved and their efficacy tested more efficiently.
Several proteins that may be produced in this fashion are contemplated by the present invention.
20 These proteins include, but are not limited to, human growth hormone, interferon, (3-casein, a-1 antitrypsin, antithrombin III, collagen, factor VIII, factor IX, factor X, fibrinogen, hyaluronic acid, insulin, lactofernn, protein C, erythropoietin (EPO), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), feed additive enzymes, somatotropin, and chymotrypsin.
e) Examples . The following specific Examples are intended to illustrate the invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims:
Example 1. Preparation of the Recipient Cytoplast Incubation Ova were isolated from euthanized hens between 2-4 hours after oviposition of the previous egg. Alternatively, eggs were isolated from hens whose oviducts have been fistulated, (Gilbert and Woodgush, .Ioufrnal of Reproduction ahd Fertility, 5:451-453 (1963); and Pancer, et al. B~ Poult Sci., 30:953-7 (1989)).
Prior to generating images of the ,avian early embryo, incubation of the DNA
specific dye was performed according to the following protocol: The albumen capsule was removed and the ovum placed in a dish with the germinal disk facing the top.
Remnants of the albumen capsule were removed from the top of the germinal disk.
Phosphate buffered saline was added to the dish to prevent drying of the ovum.
A
cloning cylinder was placed around the germinal disk and 1.O~g/ml of DAPI in PBS was added to the cylinder. Visualization was performed after approximately 15 minutes of incubation.
Ini ection Preparation of the egg was done as described for incubation. Following removal of the capsule, 10-50 nanoliters of a 0.1 ~g/ml solution of DAPI in PBS was injected into the germinal disk using a glass pipette. Visualization was performed approximately 15 minutes after inj ection. , .
Visualization Following incubation, images of the inside of the avian early embryo were generated through the use of TPLSM. The germinal disk was placed under the microscope objective, and the pronuclear structures were searched within the central area of the disk, to a depth of 60~,m using low laser power of 3-6 milliwatts at a wavelength of 750 nm. Once the structures were found they were subsequently ablated.
Nuclear Ablation and Enucleation Pronuclear structures were subj ected to laser-mediated ablation. In these experiments, an Olympus 20x/O.SNA (Numerical Aperture) water imrnersiori lens was used. The x and y planes to be ablated were defined with the two photon software, while the z plane (depth) was just under lOpm for this type of objective. Since the pronuclear structure was about 20 pm in diameter, the ablation comprised two steps (2 times 10~,m).
The focal point was lowered to visualize the remaining of the pronucleus, which was subsequently ablated. The laser power used to ablate the pronuclei was between 30 to 70 milliwatts at a wavelength of 750 nanometers. For the ablation experiments described above, the image was zoomed by a factor of 4 to 5, giving an area compression of 16-25 fold. Then the power was increased 10-12 fold for a total intensity increase of 160-300 fold compared to the visualization intensity of 3-6 milliwatts. The ablation intensity (power density) is the functional parameter, i.e., the power increase of 10-12 fold results in ablation power of 30-70 milliwatts, but the zoom factor compressed this power into an area 16-25x smaller giving a power density increase of 160-300 fold.
Example 2. Preparation of the Nuclear Donor,Cell Isolation of the Donor Nucleus Fibroblast cells in cultured were trypsinized (0.25% Trypsin and 1 ~,M EDTA, Gibco catalog #25200-056), centrifuged twice in PBS~containing 5% of Fetal Calf Serum and placed in a 60 mm plastic dish in PBS containing 5% of Fetal Calf Serum.
Using the microscope/micromanipulation uut described below, under transmission light, the nuclear donors were then isolated by repeated pipetting of the cells, which disrupted the cytoplasmic membrane and released the nucleus from inside the cell.
Example 3. Preparation of the, Reconstructed Zygote Ini ection A micromanipulation unit, comprising a IM-16 microinjector and a MM-188NE
micromanipulator, both from Nilcon/Marishige, were adapted to an upright Nikon Eclipse E800. This microscope was adapted to operate under both transmission and reflective light conditions. This unique configuration has allowed us to morphologically examine and prepare (isolate the nuclei, as described above) somatic cells in suspension and to load the injection pipette using dry or water immersion lenses under diascopic illmnination or transmitted light. This was followed by prompt localization and positioning of the germinal disk under the microscope and subsequent guided injection of the somatic cells, using dry and long distance lenses under fiber optic as well as episcopic illumination (light coming from the side and through the obj ectives onto the sample respectively).
Example 4. Ovum Transfer At the time of laying, recipient hens are anesthetized by wing vein injection with pentobarbital (0.7 ml of a 68 mg/ml solution). At this time, the infundibulum is receptive to receiving a donor ovum but has not yet ovulated. We have also established that pentobarbital is the anesthetic of choice. Feathers are removed from the abdominal area, and the area is scrubbed with betadine, and rinsed with 70% ethanol. The bird is placed in a supine position and a surgical drape is placed over the bird with the surgical area exposed. An incision is made beginning at the junction of the sternal rib to the breastbone and running parallel to the breastbone. The length of the incision is approximately two inches. After cutting through the smooth muscle layers and the peritoneum, the infundibulum is located. The infundibulum is externalized and opened using gloved hands and the donor ovum is gently applied to the open infundibulurn. The ovum is allowed to move into the infundibulum and into the anterior magnum by gravity feed. The internalized ovum is placed into the body cavity and the incision closed using interlocl~ing stitches both for the smooth muscle layer and the skin. The recipient hen is returned to her cage and allowed to recover with free access to both feed and water.
Recovery time for the bird to be up, moving and feeding is usually within 45 min. of the operation's end. Eggs laid by the recipient hens are collected the next day, set, and incubated in a Jamesway incubator. They will hatch 21 days later.
Alternatively, a hen whose oviduct is fistulated allows the collection of eggs for enucleation (Gilbert and Woodgush, Journal of Rep~oductioh ahd Fertility, 5:451-453 (1963); and Pancer, et al. Br Poult Sci., 30:953-7 (1989)) as mentioned previously, but also the transfer of the reconstructed embryo to a recipient hen for the production of a ~ hard shell egg (Wentworth, Poultry Scieyace, 39:782-784 (I960)). The first technique could be used to obtain ova for recipient cytoplasts and the latter to produce recipient hens to be used repeatedly for the transfer of reconstructed embryos. If they can be made to work, both, and especially the latter technique, should increase the output by reducing the time spent on collection and surgeries. .
All documents cited in the above specification are herein incorporated by reference. Various modifications and variations of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be 'understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in the art are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.
AND METHODS OF PRODUCING THEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
a) Field of the Invention This invention relates generally to cloned cells, embryos and animals, and to methods of producing them via nuclear transfer and combinations of nuclear transfer and ovum transfer. Tn particular, this invention relates to the cloning of avians.
b) Description of Related Art A major aim of biotechnologists is to produce offspring from cell populations that can be maintained in culture and to obtain stable desirable phenotypes that transmit the required traits through the germ line. For nuclear transfer, the availability of cultured cell lines facilitates cell cycle synchronization of the donor nucleus and allows optimization i of cell cycle co-ordination in the reconstituted embryo. In order to obtain stable desirable phenotypes, nuclear transfer from cultured cell populations provides a promising alternative route to genetic modification. Until recently, genetic modification in farm animals was limited to pronuclear injection wherein the required gene is injected into the pronucleus of a zygote. Although pronuclear injection has been applied in several species including mice, rabbits, pigs, sheep, goats and cattle, there are a number of disadvantages with this technique. Integration of the gene does not always occur during the first cell cycle, resulting in the production of mosaic embryos. In addition, integration occurs at random within the genome, resulting in variable expression of the gene product. Thus, the production of an animal having the required phenotype capable of germ line transmission may require the generation of several transgenic lines, as well as extensive breeding of founder animals. In comparison, the.production of animals by nuclear transfer from cells that can be maintained in culture offers a number of advantages over pronuclear injection. In nuclear transfer, the cells to be used as nuclear donor cells may be sexed, optionally genetically modified, and selected in culture before their use. The resultant animal is produced from a single nucleus and mosaics can therefore be avoided. The genetic modification is easily transmitted to the offspring. In addition, all the cells in the animal are likely to contain the transgene and expression can be obtained in the tissues of interest.
The ability to produce live offspring by nuclear transfer from cultured somatic cells also provides a route for the precise genetic manipulation of animal species. Such modifications include the addition or "knock-in" of genes, and the removal or inactivation or "knock-out" of genes or their control sequences (Polejaeva et al., TI~eYiogenology, 53 1 :117-26 (2000)). Gene targeting techniques also promise the generation of transgenic animals in which specific genes coding for endogenous proteins have been replaced by human genes coding for exogenous human proteins. In 1993, 1~0 Yom and Bremmel suggested that genes coding for major proteins in cow's milk could be replaced by human cotmterparts. Cows modified in this fashion would produce milk containing human milk proteins, which may be more nutritious for human infants and more suitable for infant formula manufacture (Yom, H.C. and.Bremmel, R.D., Americaya .Iournal of Clinical Nut~itioh, 1993, 58 (Supplement) 3065).. Methods for producing exogenous proteins in the mills of pigs, sheep, goats and cows have been reported.
Wilinut and Campbell (GB 2 331 751 B) have reported the production of reconstituted animal embryos by transfernng the nucleus of a diploid donor cell into a suitable recipient cell. The donor cells are quiescent, i. e., not actively proliferating, and are characterized as being in the.GO or G1 phase. The recipient cells include oocytes at metaphase I or II, zygotes, and two-cell embryos, preferably enucleate.
Enucleation is accomplished by splitting, aspiration, 'or irradiation. In those mechanical techniques predicated upon visualization of the nucleus, the use of a'DNA-specific fluorochrome is .
required.
Nuclear transfer (NT) involves the transfer of the complete diploid genetic material (the DNA contained in a nucleus) from a donor cell into an enucleated recipient cell, such as a fertilized (zygote) or unfertilized (oocyte) cell. The technique involves several steps. The donor cells are first grown under special Conditions in culture, increasing the number of cells by several orders of magnitude. The nuclei of the donor cells are then transferred to oocytes or zygotes, resulting in a reconstructed embryo.
Activation (initiation of development) is usually artificially, most often chemically, induced. The embryos are then transplanted into female animals and allowed to develop to term. In some species (mice, cattle and sheep) the reconstructed embryos may be grown in culture until the blastocyst stage before transfer to a recipient.
The reconstruction of mammalian embryos by transfer of a blastomere nucleus to an enucleated oocyte or zygote has been reported to produce genetically identical individuals (Eyestone et al., J. Reprod. Fertil. Supp., 54:49-97 (1999)).
Although the number of offspring that can be produced from a single embryo is limited both by the number of blastomeres (embiyos at the 32-64 cell stage are the most widely used in farm animal species) and the efficiency of the nuclear transfer procedure, the ability to produce live offspring by nuclear transfer from cells that can be propagated and maintained in culture offers many advantages. This includes the production of identical offspring over an extended period (since cultured cells can be frozen and stored indefinitely) and the ability to genetically modify and to select populations of cells of specific genotypes or phenotypes before embryo reconstruction. This objective has been achieved with the production of lambs using nuclei from cultured cells established from erilbryonic, fetal and adult material.
Two types of recipient cells are commonly used for nuclear transfer: oocytes arrested at the metaphase of the second meiotic division (MIT) and pronuclear zygotes. W
mice, enucleated, two-cell stage blastomeres have been used as recipients. In farm species, development does not always occur when pronuclear zygotes are used, except when pronuclei are exchanged between zygotes, therefore, MII-arrested oocytes have often been the recipient of choice. Oocytes arrested at MII do not contain a nucleus but a metaphase plate, where'the chromosomes are arranged on the meiotic spindle.
The MIf.
chromosomes or metaphase plate are not easily visible under the light microscope in mammalian oocytes. However, visualization of the MII chromosomes or metaphase plate has been achieved with W light using DAPI (4', 6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole, hydrochloride) or Hoescht 33342 (bis-benzimide) staining. , After enucleation and introduction of the donor genetic material, the reconstructed embryo must be cultured to a stage at which it can be transferred to a recipient animal, generally the morula or blastocyte stage. This can be done iu vitro or ih vivo (Eyestone et al., supra). Double nuclear transfer has also been reported, in which an activated, previously transferred nucleus is removed from the host unfertilized egg and transferred a second time into an enucleated fertilized embryo. (Polejaeva et al., Nature, 407:505-9 (2000)). .
Although gene targeting techniques in combination with nuclear transfer hold tremendous promise with respect to nutritional and medical applications, current approaches suffer from several limitations, including long generation times between founder and production transgenic herds, and extensive husbandry and veterinary costs.
It is therefore desirable to employ a system where the use of cultured somatic cells for nuclear transfer is more efficiently employed. One system that holds great potential is the avian reproductive system.
The avian reproductive system, including that of the chicken, is well described.
The production of an egg begins with formation of the large yolk in the ovary of the hen.
The unfertilized oocyte or ovum is positioned on top of the yolk sac. Upon ovulation or release of the yolk from the ovary, it passes into the infundibultun of the oviduct where it is fertilized if sperm are present. It then moves into the magnum of the oviduct which is lined with tubular gland cells. These cells secrete the egg-white proteins, including ovalbwnin, lysozyme, ovomucoid, conalbumin and ovomucin, into the lumen of the magnum from which they axe deposited onto the avian embryo and yolk.
Attempts at nuclear transfer in avians have remained difficult to realize. One significant challenge is the inaccessibility of the eaxly avian egg. It is well lrnown in the art that all forms of genetic manipulation that require visualization of the avian early embryo have been hindered by the inability to properly visualize the target structures. In nuclear transfer, after enucleation, the genetic material from the donor cell (nuclear donor) must be intYOduced into the enucleated oocyte. In order to produce an enucleated recipient cytoplast, it is essential to visualize the metaphase II plate or pronuclei that reside about 25~.m beneath the egg's vitelline membrane within the germinal disk. Yet, the large size and optical density of the yollc have made visualization of the avian early embryo and its structures difficult to achieve.
The hen oviduct offers outstanding potential as a protein bioreactor because of high levels of protein production, proper folding and post-translation modification of the target protein, and ease of product recovery. As a result, efforts have been made to create transgenic chickens expressing exogenous proteins in the oviduct by means of microinjection of DNA (PCT Publication WO 97/47739). Bosselinan et al.
describe a method for introducing a replication-defective retroviral vector into a pluripotent stem cell of an unincubated chick embryo, and further describe chimeric chickens, whose cells express an exogenous vector nucleic acid sequence. However, the percentage of Gl 5 transgenic offspring (progeny from vector-positive male GO birds) was~low and varied between 1% and approximately 8% (U.S. Patent No. 5,162,215). Generally, DNA
injection into avian eggs has so far lead to poor and unstable transgene integration (Sang and Perry, Mol. Repr~od. Dev., 1:98-106 (1989); and Naito, et al., Mol.
Rep>~od. Dev., 37:167-71 (1994)). In addition, the use of viral vectors poses a number of limitations;
including limited transgene size and potential viral infection of the offspring. The production of transgenic chickens by means of DNA microinjection (supra) is both inefficient and time-consuming. In fact, a key limitation of using any animal as a bioreactor is the time required (approximately 10 months for chickens, 2-3 years for ungulates) to introduce the desired transgene~ into the animal's genome.
The hen also offers a unique system for efficient direct transgenesis of the magnum gland, but iutial attempts have yielded poor results. Plasmid DNAs carrying transgenes have been introduced directly into the magnum of mature hens by electroporation (Ochiai et al., Poultry Science, 77:299-302 (1998)). Due to the large size of the oviduct of mature hens, the transient persistence of the plasmid DNAs in the cells, and the inefficiency of organ electroporation, only very low levels of protein were detected in the oviduct tissue of sacrificed hens and no expressed protein was reported as being detected in the egg. Other attempts have involved the transfection of magnum cells with expression cassettes after excision of the cells from the bird~and preparation of an oviduct cell culture (Sanders et al., EfzdocYizzology, 116:398-405 (1985);
Sanders et al., Bioclzemistry, 27:6550-6557 (1988); Schweers et al., .Iou~fzal of Biological Chemistry, 265:7590-7595 (1990); Otten et al., MoleculaY Ehdoc~inology, 2:143-147 (1988);
and Schweers et al., Jouz~zzal ofBiological Chemistry, 266:10490-10497 (1991)).
Ovum transfer, the transfer of a donor ovum to the oviduct of a recipient hen, provides another means for genetic manipulation in avians. Tanaka et al.
produced chicks by izz vity~o fertilization (IVF) by returning the fertilized ovum into the oviduct of a recipient hen to complete the egg and shell formation. This experimental approach suggests a useful model for production of transgenic avians (Tanaka et al., .IouYnal of RepYOductioh and Fet~tility, 100:447-449 (1994)).
Another major challenge is the culture of the reconstructed egg. It is essential to hatch the reconstructed zygote following micromanipulation. One solution was proposed by Perry et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,011,780). Perry et al. use ex ovo culture to remove an embryo and yolk from a donor hen and incubate the embryo and yolk in a series of separate culture systems until hatch. Yet, this procedure is laborious and inefficient with low numbers of "test tube chickens" hatching.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved method for visualization of the nuclear structures in a recipient cell to facilitate the process of enucleation and subsequent nuclear transfer.
It is also an object of this invention to provide an improved method for ablation of the nucleus in a recipient cell to facilitate subsequent nuclear transfer.
It is a particular object of the instant invention to provide methods that overcome the technical hurdles relating to the cloning of avians, such as inaccessibility of the avian egg and difficulty of culturing the reconstructed zygote. A new and useful method for successful nuclear transfer in avians in order to produce cloned birds would satisfy a present need in the art. Avians cloned in this manner may be genetically modified. The resulting expression and deposition of exogenous proteins in eggs, suitable for commercial use, would provide immediate benefits to the public.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides cloned cells, cell lines, embryos, and animals and methods for their production by nuclear transfer, employing two-photon visualization, ablation or both. In one embodiment, nuclear transfer in conjmZCtion with ovum transfer 25~ is employed. Cloned and transgenic avians, including knock-outs and lcnock-ins, are also provided.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, two-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM) is used to visualize nuclear structures in a recipient cell.
Following visualization, the cell is enucleated, optionally with two-photon laser-mediated ablation, to provide a recipient cytoplast. Alternatively, the recipient cell may also be enucleated via cell splitting, aspiration of its nuclear structure(s)~, irradiation, or.
other enucleating procedure. Preferably, the recipient cell is removed from an animal, the nucleus visualized and ablated via two-photon laser-mediated ablation. The donor nucleus is then inserted into the recipient cell by cell fusion, microinj ection, or other renucleation procedure. The replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus yields a reconstructed zygote. The reconstructed zygote may be activated and allowed to develop to term in vivo or in vitro. Tiz a preferred embodiment of the invention, the animal is an avian including, but not limited to, chickens, duclcs, turkeys, quails, pheasants and ostriches.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of producing a cloned animal comprising nuclear transfer in combination with ovum transfer. TPLSM
and two-photon laser-mediated ablation is used to perform nuclear transfer wherein the donor nucleus may be of normal karyotype or genetically modified. Accordingly, the replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus results in a reconstructed zygote. The ovum may be cultured via ovum transfer, whereby the reconstructed zygote is transferred to a recipient animal, or cultured iN
vity~o and allowed to develop to term.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of producing a cloned avian comprising nuclear transfer in combination with ovum transfer. TPLSM and two-photon laser-mediated ablation is used to perform nuclear transfer wherein the donor nucleus may be of normal lcaryotype or genetically modified. Accordingly, the replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus results in a reconstructed zygote. The ovum may be cultured via ovum transfer, wherein the ovum containing the reconstructed zygote is transferred to a recipient avian or cultured i~ vitro.
Once transferred, the embryo develops inside the recipient hen and travels through the oviduct of the hen where it is encapsulated by natural egg white proteins and a natural egg shell. The egg which contains endogenous yolk and a reconstructed embryo, is laid and can then be incubated and hatched like a normal chick. The resulting chick may be genetically modified. In one embodiment, the genetically modified cloned avian carries a transgene in all or most of its cells. After maturation, the transgenic avian may lay eggs that contain one or more exogenous protein(s). The combination of nuclear transfer and ovum transfer allows for the preparation of a cloned avian. In an alternative embodiment, ex ovo culture may be used instead of ovum transfer to produce the cloned avian. In a preferred embodiment of the instant invention, the avian is a chicken, duck, quail, turlcey, pheasant or ostrich.
Another aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing a transgenic avian by (i) preparing a transgenic avian, carrying a gene encoding an exogenous protein, using nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization andlor ablation, and (ii) allowing the immature transgenic avian to grow to maturity, wherein the exogenous protein is secreted into the oviduct lumen of the mature avian and deposited into eggs laid by the avian. Preferably, the exogenous DNA comprises a stable transgene and the transgenic avians may be bred and propagated. The novel transgenic avians possess the ability to lay eggs that contain one or more desired, exogenous protein(s).
Yet, another aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing a knock-out or knock-in avian by (i) preparing a knock-out or knock-in avian according to nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization andlor ablation, and (ii) allowing the immature knock-out or knock-in egg-laying animal to grow to maturity. The knock-out avians are able to lay eggs that contain less than all endogenous proteins normally present in the egg. This allows for the elimination of potential undesired substances found in the egg (e.g., allergens) or suppression of a specific agronomic trait. The knock-in sequence may replace all or part of an endogenous gene of the animal by a functional homologous gene or gene segment of another animal.
Cloned non-human cells, cell lines, embryos, and animals, optionally genetically modified, are encompassed by the instant invention. Transgenic, knock-out, and knock-in animals are also provided. In one embodiment, reconstituted avian embryos, particularly chick embryos, prepared by transfernng the nucleus of a donor cell into a suitable recipient cell, are provided. The donor cell may be quiescent or non-quiescent.
Intact avian eggs containing proteins) exogenous to naturally occurnrig avian eggs are further provided by the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
a) Definitions and General Parameters The following definitions are set forth to illustrate and define the meaning and' scope of the various terms used to describe the invention herein.
The teen "TPLSM" refers to two-photon laser scanning microscopy. TPLSM
relies upon the phenomenon of two-photon excited fluorescence in which two photons collide simultaneously with a fluorescent molecule. Their combined energy is absorbed by the fluorophore inducing a fluorescent emission, which is detected by a photomultiplier and converted into a digital image. The major advantage of TPLSM lies in its ability to generate images of,living and optically dense structures for prolonged periods of time, while not affecting their viability. This is the case because TPLSM
utilizes biologically innocuous pulsed infrared light that is able to penetrate much deeper into scattering specimens. Hence this method provides the capability for producing noninvasive, three-dimensional, real-time images of the optically dense oocyte (e.g., avian egg).
In addition to. visualization, TPLSM may also be used for enucleation.
The terms "ovum" and "oocyte" are used interchangeably herein. Although only one ovum matures at a time, an aumal is born with a finite number of ova.
Ovulation, the shedding of an egg from the ovarian follicle, occurs when the brain's pituitary gland releases a luteinizing hormone, LH. Mature follicles form a stalk or pedicle of connective tissue aazd smooth muscle. Immediately after ovulation the follicle becomes a thin-walled sac, the post-ovulatory follicle. The mature ovum erupts from its sac and starts its journey through the oviduct. Eventually, the ovum enters the infundibulum where fertilization occurs. Fertilization must take place within 15 minutes of ovulation, before the ovum becomes covered by albumen. During fertilization, sperm (avians have polyspennic fertilization) penetrate the blastodisc, the small white spot on the top side of the yollc where the embryo will develop. When the sperm lodges within this germinal dislc, an embryo begins to form. It is now known as a "blastoderm" or "zygote".
A "donor cell" is used herein to describe the source of the nuclear structure that is transplanted to the recipient cytoplast. All cells of normal karyotype, including embryonic, fetal, and adult somatic cells, preferably in a quiescent state, may be nuclear donors. The use of non-quiescent cells as nuclear donors has been described as well by Cibelli, et al., Science, 280:1256-8 (1998).
A "recipient cell" is used herein to describe the enucleated recipient cell, preferably an enucleated metaphase I or II oocyte, or an enucleated preactivated oocyte.
Enucleation may be accomplished by splitting the cell into halves, aspirating the metaphase plate, pronucleus or pronuclei, or even by irradiation. In a preferred embodiment, enucleation is done through two-photon laser-mediated ablation.
Alternatively, TPLSM could be used to guide mechanical enucleation.
5 A "nucleic acid sequence" or "polynucleotide" includes, but is not limited to, eucaryotic mRNA, cDNA, genomic DNA, and synthetic DNA and RNA sequences, comprising the natural nucleotide bases adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymidine, and uracil. The teen also encompasses sequences having one or more modified nucleotide(s). The terms "polynucleotide", "oligonucleotide", and "nucleic acid 10 sequence" are used interchangeably herein and include, but are not limited to, coding sequences (polynucleotide(s) or nucleic acid sequences) which are transcribed and translated into polypeptide i~ vitYO or ih vivo when placed under the control of appropriate regulatory or control sequences); control sequences (e.g., translational start and stop codons, promoter sequences, ribosome binding sites, polyadenylation signals, transcription factor binding sites, transcription termination sequences, upstream and . . . , downstream regulatory domains, enhancers, silencers, and the like); and regulatory sequences (DNA sequences to which a transcription factors) binds and alters the activity of a gene's promoter either positively (induction) or negatively (repression)). No limitation as to length or to synthetic origin are suggested by the terms described herein.
The terms "endogenous nucleic acid sequence" and "endogenous DNA" are used interchangeably herein. The term "endogenous" as it relates to nucleic acid sequences such as coding sequences, control sequences, and regulatory sequences denotes sequences that are normally associated with a particular cell or tissue.
Hence, endogenous sequences are found in nature. Endogenous proteins are the expression products of endogenous DNA, such as endogenous coding sequences.
The terms "exogenous nucleic acid sequence" and "exogenous DNA" are used interchangeably herein. The term "exogenous" as it relates to nucleic acid sequences such as coding sequences, control sequences, and regulatory sequences denotes sequences that are "not" normally associated with a particular cell or tissue.
Thus, an "exogenous" region of a nucleic acid is an identifiable segment of nucleic acid within or attached to another nucleic acid molecule that is not found in association with the other molecule in nature. Exogenous DNA may be integrated into the genome of the donor cell or may exist independently of the genome of the donor cell. For example, exogenous DNA may not be integrated into the genome of the donor cell but exist as part of a non-integrated vector in the donor cell.
The term "transgene" refers to exogenous polynucleotide sequences) containing a desired coding sequence and control sequences in operable linkage, so that cells transformed with these sequences are capable of producing the encoded product.
In order to effect transformation, the transgene may optionally be included on a discrete vector;
however, the relevant polynucleotide rnay also be an integrative vector which has or can become integrated into the host chromosome. A "tra,nsgenic animal" is an animal that expresses one or more exogenous gene(s).
The term "knock-out animal" refers to an animal that completely lacks a specific gene that is normally present in its genome.
The term "lcnock-in animal" refers to an animal that carries a specific nucleic acid sequence such as a "lcnock-in sequence" in a predetermined coding or noncoding region, wherein the knock-in sequence is introduced through methods of recombination, such as homologous recombination. The recombination event comprises replacing all or part of a gene of the animal by a functional homologous gene or gene segment of another animal, where the respective knoclc-in sequence is placed in the genomic sequence.
"Vector" means a polynucleotide comprised of single strand, double strand, ,circular, or supercoiled DNA or RNA, preferably constructed so that a particular coding sequence is located in the vector with the appropriate regulatory sequences, the positioning and orientation of the coding sequence with respect to the control sequences being such that the coding sequence is transcribed under the "control" of the control sequences.
A "plasmid" is a small, circular DNA vector capable of independent replication within a bacterial or yeast host cell.
The terms "transformation", "transduction", and "transfection" all denote the introduction of a polynucleotide into a cell, such as an embryonic or somatic cell.
The term "exogenous protein" means a protein or polypeptide not naturally present in a particular tissue or cell, a protein that is the expression product of an exogenous gene, ari exogenous expression construct or a transgene, or a protein not naturally present in a given quantity in a particular tissue or cell.
The term "avian" means a bird of any known species or type. The term includes the various know strains of Gallus gallus, or chickens, (for example, White Leghorn, Brown Leghorn, Barred-Rock, Sussex, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Ausstralorp, Minorca, Amrox, California Gray, Italian Partidge-colored), as well as turkeys, pheasants, quails, duck, ostriches and other poultry commonly bred in commercial quantities.
b) Nuclear Transfer and TPLSM
The present invention provides methods for producing cloned animals by nuclear a transfer and by combinations of nuclear transfer and embryo transfer.
Nuclear transfer allows the cloning of animal species, wherein individual steps are common to the procedures of embryonic, fetal and adult cell cloning. These steps include, but are not limited to, preparation of a chromosome-free recipient cell called a cytoplast (which involves chromosome removal often referred to as enucleation); donor cell nucleus (nuclear donor) isolation and transfer to the cytoplast to produce a reconstructed embryo;
optional reconstructed embryo culture; and embryo transfer to a synchronized host animal.
A novel approach to nuclear transfer in animals, employing two-photon visualization, is described in the instant invention. In a preferred embodiment, the fertilized or unfertilized egg is removed from an animal and manipulated ih vitro, wherein the genetic material of the egg is visualized and removed and the ablated nucleus replaced with a donor nucleus. Optionally, the donor nucleus may be genetically modified. Two-photon laser. scanning microscopy (TPLSM) is used to visualize the nuclear structures. Following visualization, the nucleus in the recipient cell, such as a fertilized or unfertilized egg; is removed or ablated, optionally using TPLSM.
TPLSM is based on two-photon excited fluorescence in which two photons collide simultaneously with a fluorescent molecule. Their combined energy is absorbed by the fluorophore, inducing fluorescent emission, which is detected by a photomultiplier tube and converted into a digital image. See Squirrell et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 17:763-7 (1999);
and Piston et al., Trends Cell Biol., 9:66-9 (1999). TPLSM allows for the generation of images of living, optically dense structures for prolonged periods of time, while not affecting their viability. This is possible because TPLSM utilizes biologically innocuous pulsed near infrared light, usually at a wavelength of about 700 nm to about 1000 nrn, which is able to penetrate much deeper into scattering specimens. TPLS1VI may employ different lasers, such as a mode-locked laser, where the wavelength is fixed, or a tunable laser that can be tuned between about 700 rim and about 1000 nm., depending upon the range of emission of the dye used. For DAPI and Hoescht 33342 dyes, 720-770 rim. is preferred.
New fluorophores are being produced with different ranges of emission and the invention is not limited to the presently available dyes and their respective emission ranges.
Furthermore, lasers used in TPLSM can be grouped into femtosecond and picosecond lasers. These lasers are distinguished by their pulse duration.
Preferably, a femtosecond laser is used in the instant invention since it is particularly suitable for visualization without harming the specimen.
In a preferred embodiment, TPLSM realizes a method of producing noninvasive, I 5 three-dimensional, real-time images of the optically dense avian egg. The ability to visualize the metaphase plate or pronucleus in avian eggs during nuclear transfer has so far been hindered by the presence of the yoll~, which makes visualization of these nuclear structures impossible. But two-photon imaging with femtosecond lasers operating in the near infrared allows visualization of nuclear structures without damaging cellular constituents, despite the unfavorable optical properties.of the egg yolk.
Prior to visualization, specimens may be incubated or injected with DNA-specific dyes such as DAPI (4', 6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole hydrochloride) or Hoescht 33342 (bis-benzimide). Prior to incubation, the albumen capsule is removed and the ovum placed in a dish with the germinal disk facing the top. Any remnants of the albumen capsule are removed from the top of the germinal dislc. An aqueous solution, e.g., phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), is added to prevent drying of the ovum. A cloning cylinder is placed around the germinal disk and DAPI in PBS is added to the cylinder.
Alternatively, a DAPI-PBS solution.may be injected into the germinal disk by using a glass pipette, after which the dye moves into the nuclear structures. In the case of injecting the dye, removal of the albumen capsule is not necessary. However, injection of nuclei into the disk is facilitated in the absence of the capsule.
Following incubation or injection of DNA-specific dyes, images of the inside of the early avian embryo can be generated through the use of TPLSM. Visualization may be performed after about 10 to 15 minutes of incubation or about 10 minutes after injection. During visualization, the germinal disk is placed under the microscope objective and the pronuclear structures are searched within the central area of the disk using relatively low laser powers of about 3-6 milliwatts. Once the structures are found they may be ablated by using higher laser power or mechanically removed, guided by TPLSM.
Nuclear transfer also requires the destruction or enucleation of the pronucleus before a nuclear donor can be introduced into the oocyte. Iri order to enucleate the oocyte to produce a cytoplast donor, it is essential to visualize the pronucleus which resides about 25~.m beneath the ovum's vitelline membrane within the germinal disk.
Microsurgery has so far been a preferred method to accomplish pronuclear removal or enucleation. However, two-photon laser-mediated ablation of nuclear structures provides an alternative to microsurgery: Higher laser powers than those used for imaging are used for enucleation, with minimal collateral damage to the cell. As during visualization., the wavelength for ablation generally ranges from about 700 nm to 1000 mn, normally about 750 nm. TPLSM and two-photon laser-mediated ablation are more efficient than alternative methods because they are less operator dependent and less invasive, which results in higher viability of the recipient cell. Following visualization, pronuclear structures may be ablated~using higher laser powers of about 30 to about 70 milliwatts.
Enucleation is followed by renucleation, where a cultured somatic cell nucleus (nuclear donor) is injected into the enucleated recipient cytoplast.
Renucleation may be performed under a microscope on a micromanipulation unit comprising a microinjector and a micromanipulator. Following ablation, the nuclear donor is introduced into the germinal dislc though guided inj ection using episcopic illumination (i. e., light coming thxough the obj ective onto the sample). The reconstructed zygote may then be surgically transferred to the oviduct of a recipient hen to produce a hard shell egg.
Alternatively, the reconstructed embryo may be cultured for 24 hours and screened for development prior to surgical transfer. The egg can be further incubated to generate a cloned chick, optionally genetically modified. The cloned chick may carry a transgene in all or most of its cells. After maturation, the transgenic avian may lay eggs that contain one or more desired, exogenous protein(s). Alternatively, the resulting chick may be a knock-out animal capable of laying eggs that contain less than all endogenous proteins normally present in the egg. The cloned chick may also be a knock-in chick expressing an alternative phenotype or capable of laying eggs having an exogenous protein therein.
5 The reconstructed egg may also be cultured to term using the ex ovo method described by Perry et al. (supra). In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the animal is an avian including, but not limited to, chickens, ducks, turkeys, quails, pheasants and ostriches.
The replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus results in a reconstructed zygote. In a preferred embodiment, the cytoplasmic membrane 10 of the cell used as nuclear donor is disrupted to expose its nucleus to the ooplasm of the recipient cytoplast. The nuclear donor may be injected into the germinal disk, where it undergoes reprogramming and becomes the nucleus of the reconstructed one-cell embryo. Alternatively, a donor cell may be fused to the recipient cell using methods well known in the art, e.g., by means of fusion-promoting chemicals, such as polyethylene 15 glycol, inactivated viruses, such as Sendai virus, or electrical stimulation.
The methodologies of TPLSM and two-photon laser-mediated ablation described herein, can also be used for selective visualization and destruction of specific structures within germ and/or somatic cells including nuclear transfer in marnlnalian species and other vertebrate species. The slcilled artisan will be able to readily adapt the methods established for avians described herein to other types of aumals including, but not limited to, mammals, fish, reptile(s); amphibian(s), and insect(s).
c) Ovum Transfer Another aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing.a cloned animal comprising nuclear transfer in combination with ovum transfer.
Two-~ photon visualization and ablation may be used to perform nuclear transfer, as described above. Accordingly, the replacement of the recipient cell's nucleus with the donor cell's nucleus results in a reconstructed zygote. In the preferred embodiment pronuclear stage eggs are used as recipient cytoplasts already activated by fertilization.
Alternatively, unactivated metaphase II eggs may serve as recipient cytoplast and activation induced after renucleation. The ovum may be cultured via ovum transfer, wherein the ovum containing the reconstructed zygote is transferred to a recipient hen.. The ovum is surgically transferred into the oviduct of the recipient hen shortly after oviposition. This is accomplished according to normal husbandry procedures (oviposition, incubation, and hatching; see Tanaka et al., supYa).
In an alternative embodiment, the ovum may be cultured to stage X prior to transfer into a recipient hen. More specifically, reconstructed stage I
embryos are cultured for 24-48 hours to stage X. This allows for developmental screening of the reconstructed embryo prior to surgical transfer. Stage I embryos are enclosed within a thick albumen capsule. In this novel procedure, the albumen capsule is removed, after which the nuclear donor is injected into the germinal disk. Subsequently, the capsule and germinal disk are recombined by placing the thick capsule in contact with the germinal disk on top of the yolk. Embryos develop to stage X at similar rates as those cultured with their capsules intact. At stage X, the embryo is transferred to the oviduct of a recipient hen.
. Once transferred, the embryo develops inside the recipient hen and travels through the oviduct of the hen where it is encapsulated by natural egg white proteins and a natural egg shell. The egg which contains endogenous yolk and an embryo from another hen, is laid and can then be incubated and hatched like a normal chick. The resulting chick may carry a transgene in all or most of its cells. Following maturation, the cloned avian may express a desired phenotype or may be able to lay eggs that contain ~ one or more desired, exogenous protein(s).
The combination of nuclear transfer and ovum transfer allows for the preparation of a cloned animal that is a complete organism, optionally genetically modified.
Genetically modified animals encompassed by the instant invention are transgenics, and knock-in and knock-out animals.
25. In an alternative embodiment, ex ovo culture may be used instead of ovum transfer to produce the cloned animal (see Perry et al., supra). In a preferred embodiment of the instant invention, the animal is an avian including, but not limited to, chickens, ducks, quails, turkeys, pheasants and ostriches. In another embodiment, the animal is a mammal, fish, reptile, amphibian, or insect.
d) Cloned-, Transgenic-, Knock-out-, and Knock-in Animals and Their Eggs The present invention provides for cloned egg-laying animals produced by nuclear transfer and by combinations of nuclear transfer and ovum transfer as described herein. A novel approach of nuclear transfer, employing two-photon visualization and ablation is used to produce the cloned animals. ~ In addition, the present invention encompasses cloned animals that are genetically modified including, but not limited to, transgenic, lrnock-out, and knock-in animals. The instant invention satisfies the need for a rapid route to the expression and deposition of exogenous proteins in eggs.
Eggs containing proteins) exogenous to an egg are also provided by the present invention.
Furthermore, the instant invention provides a novel method of producing cloned, transgenic animals through nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization and ablation, and ovum transfer. Transgenic animals may have their hereditary properties permanently modified by the introduction of recombinant DNA into their germ cells. The combination of zygote reconstruction followed by ovum transfer, as disclosed herein, promises a more efficient and flexible route to accomplish the cloning of animals and production of transgenics. One pertinent use of this technology is the modification of poultry and livestock genomes to improve agronomic traits. Candidate genes, whose introduction or deletion would enhance agronomic traits, can be targeted through use of the instant invention. Most importantly, the possibility of cloning avian species promises tremendous gains for the market place. The new technology disclosed herein may be used in selective poultry breeding, leading to enhanced traits in chickens and their.eggs.
Further, nuclear transfer techniques developed herein (e.g., laser-mediated selective ablation of nuclear structures of oocytes) also have a wide range of applications in fields such as mammalian transgenesis, genetics, cell therapies, and transplantation.
One aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing a transgenic animal, comprising the steps of (i) preparing the transgenc animal according to nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization and optionally, laser-mediated ablation, and ovum transfer which contains exogenous DNA in its cells, and (ii) allowing the immature transgenic animal to grow to maturity. In the case of an avian, an exogenous protein is secreted into the oviduct lumen of the mature animal and deposited into eggs laid by the animal. In a preferred embodiment of the instant invention, the exogenous DNA comprises a transgene and the resulting transgenic animals can be bred and propagated. Transgenic avians produced by the instant invention also possess the ability to lay eggs that contain one or more desired, exogenous protein(s).
Transgenes are introduced into the ovum of an animal through nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization and ablation, wherein the nuclear donor contains a desired exogenous DNA sequence in its genome. One of ordinary skill in the art will be able to readily adapt conventional methods to insert the desired transgene into the genome of the nuclear donor prior to inj ection of the nuclear donor into the recipient cytoplast, or prior to fusion of the nuclear donor cell with the recipient cell. For example, a vector that contains one or more transgene(s) may be delivered into the nuclear donor cell through the use of a delivery vehicle. The transgene is then transferred along with the nuclear donor into the recipient ovum. Following zygote reconstruction, the ovum is transferred into the reproductive tract of a recipient hen. In a preferred embodiment, the ovum is transferred into the infundibulum of the recipient hen. After reconstruction, the embryo containing the transgene develops inside the recipient hen and travels through the oviduct of the hen where it is encapsulated by natural egg white proteins and a natural egg shell.
The egg is Iaid and can be incubated and hatched to produce a transgenic chiclc. The resulting transgenic chick will carry one or more desired transgene(s) in its germ line.
Following maturation, the transgenic avian may lay eggs that contain one or more desired, exogenous proteins) which can be easily harvested.
In one embodiment of the instant invention, a nuclear donor cell is transfected with a vector construct that contains~a. transgene. Methods for transfection of somatic cell nuclei are well known in the art and include, by way of example, the use of retroviral vectors, retrotransposons, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, naked DNA, lipid-mediated transfection, electroporation and direct inj ection into the nucleus.
Such techniques, particularly as applied to avians, are disclosed in Bosselman (LJ.S. Patent No.. 5,162,215), Etches (PCT Publication No. W099/10505), Hodgson (IJ.S.
Patent No. 6,027,722), Hughes (CT.S. Patent No. 4,997,763), Ivarie (PCT Publication No. W099/19472), MacArthur (PCT Publication No. W097/47739), Perry (U.S.
Patent No. 5,011,780), Petitte (U.S. Patent Nos. 5,340,740 and 5,656,479), and Simkiss (PCT
Publication No. W090/11355), the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Another aspect of the present invention provides for a method of producing a lcnock-out or knock-in animal,~comprising the steps of (i) preparing the knock-out or knock-in animal according to nuclear transfer via two-photon visualization and/or ablation, and (ii) allowing the immature knock-out or knoclc-in animal to grow to maturity.
In one embodiment of the instant invention, the knoclc-out animal has been manipulated such that an endogenous gene has been removed from the genome of the donor nucleus. This may be accomplished using described protocols for the production of knock-out mice, including the transformation of the nuclear donors with a targeting vector comprising genomic DNA containing the desired modification, flanked by positive (neomycin resistance gene for instance) and/or negative (herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase) or other applicable selectable marker genes, using a number of described strategies such as the so-called "hit and run'.' (Hasty, et al., Nature, 350:243-6 (1991); and Valancius and Smithies, Mol. Cell Biol., 11:1402-S (1991)), tag and exchange (Askew, et al., Mol. Cell Biol., 13:4115-24 (1993)) and double replacement (Stacey, et al., Mol. Cell Biol., 14:1009-16 (1994)).
The resulting lcnoclc-out animal can be bred and propagated. Animals produced in this fashion are suitable for research purposes mainly to study the effects of specific drugs on the breeding of poultry and certain agronomic traits. These knock-out animals also possess the ability to lay eggs that contain less than all endogenous proteins normally present in the egg, which allows for the elimination of potential undesired substances found in the egg (e.g., allergens).
In another embodiment of the instant invention, a knock-in animal has been manipulated such that it carries a specific nucleic acid sequence such as a "knock-in sequence" in a predetermined coding or noncoding region of its genome. The knock-in sequence may replace all or part of an endogenous gene of the animal by a functional homologous gene or gene segment of another animal. Knock-in animals can be prepared according to a variation of the standard knock-out method, comprising the introduction ' of a foreign gene into the targeting vector, in such a way that the introduced gene would be under the control of the regulatory elements that normally control the expression of the endogenous gene (Le Mouellic, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:4712-6 (1990);
and McCreath, et al., Nature, 405:1066-1069 (2000)).
Another embodiment of the invention provides a method of producing a protein 5 derived from cloned, genetically modified egg-laying animals as a result of embryo reconstruction followed by ovum transfer. This method comprises producing a hard-shell egg that contains exogenous protein and then isolating the exogenous protein from the egg. An intact avian egg containing protein exogenous to an avian egg is contemplated by the present invention. The transgenic animals of the instant invention 10 include avians that have a transgene encoding an exogenous protein in their oviducts, wherein the avians secrete into their eggs the protein expressed by the transgene. A
transgenic avian that makes a human protein (e.g., human interferon) will recognize this substance as its~own and will therefore not produce an immune response against it. This makes the egg-laying transgenic ideally suited for the production of large quantities of 15 human protein. In this respect, the avian egg provides an ideal container for the production of recombinant proteins because its interior is sterile and contains antibacterial compounds, and it is easily accessible. As a consequence, the purity of the protein products can be improved and their efficacy tested more efficiently.
Several proteins that may be produced in this fashion are contemplated by the present invention.
20 These proteins include, but are not limited to, human growth hormone, interferon, (3-casein, a-1 antitrypsin, antithrombin III, collagen, factor VIII, factor IX, factor X, fibrinogen, hyaluronic acid, insulin, lactofernn, protein C, erythropoietin (EPO), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), feed additive enzymes, somatotropin, and chymotrypsin.
e) Examples . The following specific Examples are intended to illustrate the invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims:
Example 1. Preparation of the Recipient Cytoplast Incubation Ova were isolated from euthanized hens between 2-4 hours after oviposition of the previous egg. Alternatively, eggs were isolated from hens whose oviducts have been fistulated, (Gilbert and Woodgush, .Ioufrnal of Reproduction ahd Fertility, 5:451-453 (1963); and Pancer, et al. B~ Poult Sci., 30:953-7 (1989)).
Prior to generating images of the ,avian early embryo, incubation of the DNA
specific dye was performed according to the following protocol: The albumen capsule was removed and the ovum placed in a dish with the germinal disk facing the top.
Remnants of the albumen capsule were removed from the top of the germinal disk.
Phosphate buffered saline was added to the dish to prevent drying of the ovum.
A
cloning cylinder was placed around the germinal disk and 1.O~g/ml of DAPI in PBS was added to the cylinder. Visualization was performed after approximately 15 minutes of incubation.
Ini ection Preparation of the egg was done as described for incubation. Following removal of the capsule, 10-50 nanoliters of a 0.1 ~g/ml solution of DAPI in PBS was injected into the germinal disk using a glass pipette. Visualization was performed approximately 15 minutes after inj ection. , .
Visualization Following incubation, images of the inside of the avian early embryo were generated through the use of TPLSM. The germinal disk was placed under the microscope objective, and the pronuclear structures were searched within the central area of the disk, to a depth of 60~,m using low laser power of 3-6 milliwatts at a wavelength of 750 nm. Once the structures were found they were subsequently ablated.
Nuclear Ablation and Enucleation Pronuclear structures were subj ected to laser-mediated ablation. In these experiments, an Olympus 20x/O.SNA (Numerical Aperture) water imrnersiori lens was used. The x and y planes to be ablated were defined with the two photon software, while the z plane (depth) was just under lOpm for this type of objective. Since the pronuclear structure was about 20 pm in diameter, the ablation comprised two steps (2 times 10~,m).
The focal point was lowered to visualize the remaining of the pronucleus, which was subsequently ablated. The laser power used to ablate the pronuclei was between 30 to 70 milliwatts at a wavelength of 750 nanometers. For the ablation experiments described above, the image was zoomed by a factor of 4 to 5, giving an area compression of 16-25 fold. Then the power was increased 10-12 fold for a total intensity increase of 160-300 fold compared to the visualization intensity of 3-6 milliwatts. The ablation intensity (power density) is the functional parameter, i.e., the power increase of 10-12 fold results in ablation power of 30-70 milliwatts, but the zoom factor compressed this power into an area 16-25x smaller giving a power density increase of 160-300 fold.
Example 2. Preparation of the Nuclear Donor,Cell Isolation of the Donor Nucleus Fibroblast cells in cultured were trypsinized (0.25% Trypsin and 1 ~,M EDTA, Gibco catalog #25200-056), centrifuged twice in PBS~containing 5% of Fetal Calf Serum and placed in a 60 mm plastic dish in PBS containing 5% of Fetal Calf Serum.
Using the microscope/micromanipulation uut described below, under transmission light, the nuclear donors were then isolated by repeated pipetting of the cells, which disrupted the cytoplasmic membrane and released the nucleus from inside the cell.
Example 3. Preparation of the, Reconstructed Zygote Ini ection A micromanipulation unit, comprising a IM-16 microinjector and a MM-188NE
micromanipulator, both from Nilcon/Marishige, were adapted to an upright Nikon Eclipse E800. This microscope was adapted to operate under both transmission and reflective light conditions. This unique configuration has allowed us to morphologically examine and prepare (isolate the nuclei, as described above) somatic cells in suspension and to load the injection pipette using dry or water immersion lenses under diascopic illmnination or transmitted light. This was followed by prompt localization and positioning of the germinal disk under the microscope and subsequent guided injection of the somatic cells, using dry and long distance lenses under fiber optic as well as episcopic illumination (light coming from the side and through the obj ectives onto the sample respectively).
Example 4. Ovum Transfer At the time of laying, recipient hens are anesthetized by wing vein injection with pentobarbital (0.7 ml of a 68 mg/ml solution). At this time, the infundibulum is receptive to receiving a donor ovum but has not yet ovulated. We have also established that pentobarbital is the anesthetic of choice. Feathers are removed from the abdominal area, and the area is scrubbed with betadine, and rinsed with 70% ethanol. The bird is placed in a supine position and a surgical drape is placed over the bird with the surgical area exposed. An incision is made beginning at the junction of the sternal rib to the breastbone and running parallel to the breastbone. The length of the incision is approximately two inches. After cutting through the smooth muscle layers and the peritoneum, the infundibulum is located. The infundibulum is externalized and opened using gloved hands and the donor ovum is gently applied to the open infundibulurn. The ovum is allowed to move into the infundibulum and into the anterior magnum by gravity feed. The internalized ovum is placed into the body cavity and the incision closed using interlocl~ing stitches both for the smooth muscle layer and the skin. The recipient hen is returned to her cage and allowed to recover with free access to both feed and water.
Recovery time for the bird to be up, moving and feeding is usually within 45 min. of the operation's end. Eggs laid by the recipient hens are collected the next day, set, and incubated in a Jamesway incubator. They will hatch 21 days later.
Alternatively, a hen whose oviduct is fistulated allows the collection of eggs for enucleation (Gilbert and Woodgush, Journal of Rep~oductioh ahd Fertility, 5:451-453 (1963); and Pancer, et al. Br Poult Sci., 30:953-7 (1989)) as mentioned previously, but also the transfer of the reconstructed embryo to a recipient hen for the production of a ~ hard shell egg (Wentworth, Poultry Scieyace, 39:782-784 (I960)). The first technique could be used to obtain ova for recipient cytoplasts and the latter to produce recipient hens to be used repeatedly for the transfer of reconstructed embryos. If they can be made to work, both, and especially the latter technique, should increase the output by reducing the time spent on collection and surgeries. .
All documents cited in the above specification are herein incorporated by reference. Various modifications and variations of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be 'understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in the art are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.
Claims (27)
1. A method of producing a cloned non-human animal comprising the steps of:
(i) providing a recipient cell;
(ii) visualizing the nuclear material of the recipient cell using light in the near-infrared region;
(iii) enucleating the recipient cell;
(iv) introducing a donor nucleus into the recipient cell to produce a reconstructed zygote;
(v) activating the reconstructed zygote; and (vi) allowing the reconstructed zygote to develop to term.
(i) providing a recipient cell;
(ii) visualizing the nuclear material of the recipient cell using light in the near-infrared region;
(iii) enucleating the recipient cell;
(iv) introducing a donor nucleus into the recipient cell to produce a reconstructed zygote;
(v) activating the reconstructed zygote; and (vi) allowing the reconstructed zygote to develop to term.
2. The method of claim 1 in which the nuclear material of the recipient cell is visualized with near-infrared light using two photon laser scanning microscopy.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the light has a wavelength from about 700 nm to about 1000 nm.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the recipient cell is enucleated through the use of laser-mediated ablation.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the visualization and ablation are conducted using two photon laser scanning microscopy.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the donor nucleus is genetically modified.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the reconstructed zygote is transferred to a recipient oviduct.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the culturing comprises ex ovo culture.
9. The method of claim 7 wherein the recipient cell and the donor nucleus are of the same species.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the animal is an avian.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the cloned avian is selected from the group consisting of chickens, ducks, turkeys, quails, ostriches and pheasants.
12. A cloned avian animal produced by the method of claim 10.
13. The cloned avian animal of claim 12 which is genetically modified.
14. A method of producing a cloned non-human animal comprising the steps of:
(i) providing a recipient cell;
(ii) visualizing the nuclear material of the recipient cell using light in the near-infrared region;
(iii) enucleating the recipient cell using light in the near-infrared region;
(vi) introducing a donor nucleus into the recipient cell to produce a reconstructed zygote;
(vii) activating the reconstructed zygote; and (vi) allowing the reconstructed zygote to develop to term.
(i) providing a recipient cell;
(ii) visualizing the nuclear material of the recipient cell using light in the near-infrared region;
(iii) enucleating the recipient cell using light in the near-infrared region;
(vi) introducing a donor nucleus into the recipient cell to produce a reconstructed zygote;
(vii) activating the reconstructed zygote; and (vi) allowing the reconstructed zygote to develop to term.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the light has a wavelength that ranges from about 700 nm to about 1000 nm.
16. The method of claim 14, wherein the recipient cell nucleus is visualized using two photon laser scanning microscopy
17. The method of claim 14, wherein the recipient cell nucleus is enucleated using two photon laser scanning microscopy
18. The method of claim 14, wherein the recipient cell is visualized and enucleated using two photon laser scanning microscopy.
19. A method of producing a transgenic avian, comprising the steps of:
(i) providing an avian recipient cell;
(ii) visualizing the nuclear material of the recipient cell using light in the near-infrared region;
(iii) enucleating the recipient cell;
(viii) introducing a transgenic avian donor nucleus into the recipient cell to produce a reconstructed avian zygote;
(ix) activating the reconstructed zygote; and (vi) allowing the reconstructed zygote to develop to term.
(i) providing an avian recipient cell;
(ii) visualizing the nuclear material of the recipient cell using light in the near-infrared region;
(iii) enucleating the recipient cell;
(viii) introducing a transgenic avian donor nucleus into the recipient cell to produce a reconstructed avian zygote;
(ix) activating the reconstructed zygote; and (vi) allowing the reconstructed zygote to develop to term.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the transgene codes for a protein selected from the group consisting of human growth hormone, interferon, .beta.-casein, .alpha.-1 antitrypsin, antithrombin III, collagen, factor VIII, factor IX, factor X, fibrinogen, hyaluronic acid, insulin, lactoferrin, protein C, erythropoietin (EPO), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), feed additive enzymes, somatotropin, and chymotrypsin.
21. A method for producing a protein, comprising:
(i) producing a transgenic avian according to the method of claim 20 wherein the transgene encodes an exogenous protein, said protein deposited in the white of the developing eggs of said avian; and (ii) harvesting hard shell eggs; and (iii) isolating the exogenous protein from said eggs.
(i) producing a transgenic avian according to the method of claim 20 wherein the transgene encodes an exogenous protein, said protein deposited in the white of the developing eggs of said avian; and (ii) harvesting hard shell eggs; and (iii) isolating the exogenous protein from said eggs.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein the exogenous protein is selected from the group consisting of human growth hormone, interferon, .beta.-casein, .alpha.-1 antitrypsin, antithrombin III, collagen, factor VIII, factor IX, factor X, fibrinogen, hyaluronic acid, insulin, lactoferrin, protein C, erythropoietin (EPO), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), feed additive enzymes, somatotropin, and chymotrypsin.
23. An intact hard-shell egg containng protein exogenous to the egg.
24. A method of claim 19 wherein the avian is a knock-out or knock-in avian.
25. An intact hard-shell egg containing less then the normal complement of endogenous proteins found in the egg.
26. A reconstituted avian embryo prepared by transferring the nucleus of a donor cell into a suitable recipient cell.
27. An embryo of claim 26 in which the donor cell is quiescent.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/654,293 US7049480B1 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2000-09-01 | Methods of enucleating an avian oocyte or zygote using two-photon laser scanning microscopy |
US09/654,293 | 2000-09-01 | ||
PCT/US2001/026723 WO2002020752A2 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2001-08-27 | Cloned cells, embryos, and avians and methods, of producing them |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2421174A1 true CA2421174A1 (en) | 2002-03-14 |
Family
ID=24624242
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002421174A Abandoned CA2421174A1 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2001-08-27 | Cloned cells, embryos, and avians and methods, of producing them |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7049480B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1313849B8 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2004522416A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE329019T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2001288434A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2421174A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE60120425D1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002020752A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7049480B1 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2006-05-23 | Avigenics, Inc. | Methods of enucleating an avian oocyte or zygote using two-photon laser scanning microscopy |
US7541512B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2009-06-02 | Synageva Biopharma Corp. | Avians containing a lysozyme promoter transgene |
US7550650B2 (en) | 2001-09-18 | 2009-06-23 | Synageva Biopharma Corp. | Production of a transgenic avian by cytoplasmic injection |
WO2003025146A2 (en) | 2001-09-18 | 2003-03-27 | Avigenics, Inc. | Production of a transgenic avian by cytoplasmic injection |
KR100891487B1 (en) | 2007-11-01 | 2009-04-01 | 한국과학기술원 | Enucleation system of oocyte or ovum which based on microfluid mechanics |
EP2925122A1 (en) * | 2012-11-28 | 2015-10-07 | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Cloned non-human animals free of selective markers |
EP2943777B1 (en) | 2013-01-08 | 2018-01-03 | The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc. | Metabolic imaging methods for assessment of oocytes and embryos |
WO2015161045A1 (en) * | 2014-04-16 | 2015-10-22 | President And Fellows Of Harvard College | Non-linear imaging systems and methods for assisted reproductive technologies |
WO2017157950A1 (en) | 2016-03-15 | 2017-09-21 | Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität | Light inducible antisense oligonucleotides for in vivo application |
CN110628617B (en) * | 2019-09-23 | 2023-07-07 | 李赞东 | Visual culture system, culture method and application of egg animal embryo |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020160970A1 (en) * | 1996-04-10 | 2002-10-31 | Gyula Hadlaczky | Artificial chromosomes, uses thereof and methods for preparing artificial chromosomes |
DE69837337T2 (en) * | 1997-08-22 | 2008-02-21 | University Of Guelph, Guelph | PREPARATION OF PROTEINS IN EGGS |
DK1023442T3 (en) * | 1997-10-16 | 2011-03-14 | Univ Georgia | Transgenetic birds and protein production |
AU5690799A (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2000-03-14 | Avigenics, Inc. | Direct oviduct transgenesis |
KR100760367B1 (en) * | 2000-02-15 | 2007-10-04 | 오보 바이오사이언시즈 인코포레이티드 | In ovo activation of an avian egg in the shell |
US7049480B1 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2006-05-23 | Avigenics, Inc. | Methods of enucleating an avian oocyte or zygote using two-photon laser scanning microscopy |
-
2000
- 2000-09-01 US US09/654,293 patent/US7049480B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2001
- 2001-08-27 CA CA002421174A patent/CA2421174A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-08-27 JP JP2002525759A patent/JP2004522416A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2001-08-27 AT AT01968166T patent/ATE329019T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-08-27 WO PCT/US2001/026723 patent/WO2002020752A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-08-27 AU AU2001288434A patent/AU2001288434A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-08-27 DE DE60120425T patent/DE60120425D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-08-27 EP EP01968166A patent/EP1313849B8/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2006
- 2006-03-29 US US11/392,176 patent/US20060166260A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2001288434A1 (en) | 2002-03-22 |
ATE329019T1 (en) | 2006-06-15 |
WO2002020752A2 (en) | 2002-03-14 |
DE60120425D1 (en) | 2006-07-20 |
WO2002020752A3 (en) | 2003-02-13 |
JP2004522416A (en) | 2004-07-29 |
US20060166260A1 (en) | 2006-07-27 |
EP1313849A2 (en) | 2003-05-28 |
EP1313849B1 (en) | 2006-06-07 |
US7049480B1 (en) | 2006-05-23 |
EP1313849B8 (en) | 2007-03-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Mozdziak et al. | Status of transgenic chicken models for developmental biology | |
EP1365643B1 (en) | Microinjection assembly and methods for microinjecting and reimplanting avian eggs | |
US7145057B2 (en) | Chimeric bird from embryonic stem cells | |
Kurome et al. | Nuclear transfer and transgenesis in the pig | |
US5523222A (en) | Polyelectrolyte DNA conjugation and genetic transformation of an animal | |
US20060166260A1 (en) | Visualization of avian eggs | |
CHRENEK et al. | Transgenic farm animal production and application | |
AU673990B2 (en) | Repopulation of testicular seminiferous tubules with foreign cells | |
Popova et al. | Production of transgenic models in hypertension | |
JP4376901B2 (en) | Method for producing avian chimera using spermatogonia and avian chimera | |
Niemann et al. | Production of biopharmaceuticals in transgenic animals | |
Singhal et al. | Transgenic animals: production and application | |
John Clark | Generation of transgenic livestock by pronuclear injection | |
Petitte | The avian germline and strategies for the production of transgenic chickens | |
Bősze et al. | Methods to create transgenic and genome-edited rabbits. | |
Proudman et al. | The quest for transgenic poultry: birds are not mice with feathers | |
Rabbits | 15 Methods to Create Transgenic | |
AU2002250015B2 (en) | Microinjection Assembly and Methods for Producing Transgenic Avians | |
Saeed et al. | Transgenesis in Transgenic Animals and Its Applications | |
Roychoudhury et al. | The oviduct of transgenic birds as a source of therapeutic proteins | |
Daniel et al. | THE USE OF TRANSGENIC ANIMALS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH; THE PROS AND CONS | |
Khillan | Transgenic animals as bioreactors for expression of recombinant proteins | |
Mahdi et al. | Overview on the efforts to generate transgenic chicken | |
Mahdi et al. | An overview of the basics of generate transgenic hen „bioreactors” | |
Kimmell | Development of Methodology for the Production of Transgenic Birds |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FZDE | Discontinued |