CA2348682A1 - Log construction - Google Patents

Abstract

A log construction has a pair of logs, each being formed with two upright boundary surfaces, each boundary surface of one log being complementary to the corresponding upright boundary surface of the other log when arranged in a corner formation therewith, each of the logs having a pair of cavities, each of the cavities extending along and open to an entire vertical dimension of a respective boundary surface, so that, in the corner formation, the opposing cavities in each mating pair of boundary surfaces form a passage, and a resilient material sufficiently located in each of the passages to form a barrier to weather across the boundary surfaces.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to log construction.

2. DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
Despite the advances in modern building construction techniques, the traditional log construction nonetheless remains popular, due to its aesthetic traditional appearance.
Modern log buildings are commonly made in a prefabricated fashion at a factory site, and then delivered to the destination.
The most dominant disadvantage to log construction is that the log walls tend to be drafty, particularly due to long term shrinkage and settling, which exposes gaps between the log joints. As the shrinkage occurs, the log construction tends to lose some structural integrity due to loosening joints. Advances in packing materials have made significant advances in reducing air infiltration through the log wall, but problems still remain.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved log construction techniques.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Briefly stated, the present invention involves a log construction comprising a pair of logs, each being formed with two upright boundary surfaces, each boundary surface of one log being complementary to the corresponding upright boundary surface of the other log when arranged in a corner formation therewith, each of the logs having a pair of cavities, each of the cavities extending along and open to an entire vertical dimension of a respective boundary surface, so that, in the corner formation, the opposing cavities in each mating pair of boundary surfaces form a passage, and a resilient material sufficiently located in each of the passages to form a barrier to weather across the boundary surfaces.
Preferably, the corner formation is a dove tail configuration, although other configurations are also contemplated such as rectangular notched corners.
Preferably, each of the boundary surfaces terminate partway through the log and the cavities are formed by cut outs extending the full thickness of each of the logs.
Desirably, the resilient material is in the form of a blank which, in one embodiment, is positioned to extend the full length of the boundary surface and partway into the cut out.
The blank and the passages are preferably of generally circular cross section, although other cross sectional shapes are also contemplated. The blank may be an open cell or closed cell plastics material, such as polyethylene, neoprene, or polypropylene material.
In another of its aspects, the present invention provides a log construction comprising:
a pair of logs, each having an end region with a surface portion thereon, wherein the surface portions are arranged to engage one another at a boundary there between, the boundary having a length, at least one barrier extending across the boundary and along the length thereof to couple the end regions together, the barrier having a pair of projections, each of the logs further comprising a passage open to and adjacent the boundary for receiving a corresponding one of the projections, each of the projections having a pair of outer surfaces and the passage having a pair of inner surfaces, the outer and inner surfaces being further arranged to generate residual compressive forces toward the boundary as a result of shrinkage between the barrier and the end regions.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of forming a log construction comprising the steps of:
providing a pair of logs, each with an end region having a surface portion thereon, arranging the surface portions are arranged to engage one another at a boundary there between, the boundary having a length, providing at least one barrier to extending across the boundary and along the length thereof to couple the end regions together, the barrier having a pair of projections, forming in each of the logs a passage open to and adjacent the boundary for receiving a corresponding one of the projections, forming on each of the projections a pair of outer surfaces and in the passage a pair of inner surfaces, arranging the outer and inner surfaces to generate residual compressive forces toward the boundary as a result of shrinkage between the barrier and the end regions.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Several preferred embodiments ofthe present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the appended drawings in which:

Figure 1 is a perspective assembly view of a log construction;
Figure 2 is a fragmentary plan view of the log construction of figure 1;
Figure 3 is a magnified fragmentary perspective assembly view of one portion of the log construction of figure 1;
Figure 4 is a magnified fragmentary plan view of a portion of the log construction of figure 1;
Figure 4a and 4b are magnified fragmentary plan views of other log constructions;
Figure 5 is a magnified fragmentary schematic plan view of the log construction of figure 4;
Figure 6 is a magnified fragmentary schematic plan view of another log construction;
Figure 7 is a fragmentary assembly view of still another log construction;
Figure 8 is a fragmentary perspective view of yet another log construction;
Figure 9 is a fragmentary plan view of yet another log construction;
Figure 10 is a sectional view taken on line 10-10 of figure 9;
Figure 11 is a fragmentary assembly side view of yet another log construction;
Figure 12 is a fragmentary sectional view taken on line 12-12 of figure 11;

Figure 13 is a sectional view of yet another log construction;
Figure 14 is a fragmentary plan view of the log construction of figure 13;
Figure 15 is a schematic representation of alternative portions of the log construction shown in figure 13;
Figure 16 is a fragmentary perspective view of the log construction of figure 13; and Figure 17 is a fragmentary perspective view of still another log construction.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring to the figures, there is provided a log construction 10 comprising a pair of logs 12, 14, each log having an end region 12a, 14a formed to engage one another, for example by a rectangular joint. The logs have adjacent first surface portions 12b, 14b and adjacent second surface portions 12c, 14c, each with a length'W' between an outer surface 12d, 14d and an intermediate surface 12e, 14e. As seen in figure 2, the surface portions are, when assembled, separated by a boundary 15, and are preferably upright and planar. In this case, the boundary is shown to involve a large gap for illustrative purposes only.
The end regions further comprise first barrier receiving passages 12f, 14f adjacent the first surface portions and second barrier receiving passages 12g, 14g which are open to and adjacent the second surface portions and the boundary in their assembled condition.
A rigid barrier, in the form of a key 16, is provided to engage each pair of aligned passages 12f, 14f and 12g, 14g, to interrupt the boundary between the adjacent surface portions along substantially the entire length thereof, thereby to couple the end regions together.

Preferably, the key has a tensile strength, shear strength and a stiffness to inhibit bending and stretching relative to the central axis shown at'A'. Once assembled, the key also has the capacity to inhibit displacement of one surface portion relative to its adjacent surface portion, thereby inhibiting relative movement of the logs, that is to inhibit displacement of one surface portion relative to another transverse to the boundary. The degree to which the key will inhibit such relative movement depends on the fit between the key and the aligned passages.
Each of the key receiving passages includes a bearing surface 12h, 14h, to establish a loaded condition with the barrier. In this manner, each of the bearing surfaces of one passage, has a corresponding opposed bearing surface in the other barrier receiving passage.
This can be seen in figure 4 wherein the bearing surfaces 12h in log 12 are aligned with the opposed passages 14h in log 14.
The outer surfaces of the projections and the corresponding inner surfaces of the passages are complementary and are further arranged to generate residual compressive forces toward the boundary as a result of shrinkage between the barrier and the end regions, thereby to establish this compressive loading. Further, the keys and their corresponding passages may be configured to establish tensile loading on the key and consequently compressive loading on the bearing surfaces in order to have the effect of drawing the logs together, that is to minimize the spacing between the surface portions at the boundary 15.
Therefore, the tensile strength and stiffness should be sufficient to withstand these forces.
The key 16 has a pair of aligned webs 16a, 16b, each shaped to fit snugly within a corresponding one of the barrier receiving passages (though a loose fitting is shown for illustrative purposes). The webs 16a, 16b are also joined by a central portion 16c to extend across the boundary 15. Each of the projections includes a pair of bearing surface portions 16d, 16e for engaging a corresponding bearing surface in the barrier receiving passage.

Preferably, the projections are symmetrically arranged along the common central axis 'A'. The outer surfaces of each of the projections diverge from the boundary relative to the axis. More preferably, the projections are triangular in cross section, for example 'wedge shaped'. In another embodiment, as shown in figure 4a, the central portion has parallel opposing side faces 17a and the outer corners are rounded as shown at 17b, 17c. In still another embodiment, the projection has circular divergent outer surfaces 19a, 19b as shown in figure 4b. The log construction can also utilize a number of known log joinery techniques, such as a dove tail joint as shown in figure 7, which also makes use of a central portion with parallel opposing side faces as shown at 21.
A particular feature of the log construction is that the barrier and the logs may be formed from materials with different "coefficients of shrinkage", a term which is intended to refer to the degree to which a particular material shrinks over a predetermined period of time and may be expressed by some ratio of the 'pre-shrink' length and the 'post-shrunk' length of a unit sample of the material. For example, green softwood such as pine or spruce should shrink to a greater extent (and therefore have a correspondingly higher coefficient of shrinkage) than a green hardwood, and to a much greater extent than a substantially cured hardwood, as one might obtain after an appropriate period of kiln or air drying, for example.
Preferably, the barrier and the logs are both formed from wood materials, while the barrier is formed from material with a lower shrinkage coefficient than the material of the logs. Still more preferably, the barrier is formed from hardwood materials and the logs are formed from softwood materials. More particularly, the barrier is formed from a single piece of substantially cured hardwood and the softwood material is green.
Conveniently, the barrier and the passages are dimensioned so that the barrier can be installed in place by slidably engaging the barrier with the passages during assembly.

Surprisingly, the compressive forces arising between the barrier and its associated end region from the natural effects of shrinkage may be directed to draw the end regions so coupled into tighter engagement without the need for additional locking or wedging hardware. As can be seen in figure 5, the green softwood of the end region tends to shrink over time, thereby making the passage smaller in cross sectional area shown by the chain dotted lines, that is it has a relatively high coefficient of shrinkage.
Because the barrier itself, in this particular example, is made from a substantially cured hardwood, it should not shrink to any measurable degree and therefore has a significantly smaller coefficient of shrinkage.
The barrier, as a result, will become more tightly engaged within the passage as it reduces in size, thereby causing, in effect, a squeezing action on the barrier.
A particular aspect here is the arrangement of the inner and outer surfaces which, though symmetrical relative to the common central axis'A', the surfaces are not symmetrical about a central transverse axis shown'B', as might otherwise occur if the cross section of the projection were, for example symmetrically circular or ellipsoid in cross section, as shown in figure 6. In other words, the compressive forces exerted on a circular projection by its con esponding passage on one side of the transverse axis, would balance themselves off with the forces on the opposite side of the transverse axis, resulting in substantially no residual forces emerging therefrom.
In the case of the embodiment of figure S, the compressive forces F~ on one side of the transverse axis do not balance those on the other side and in fact they reinforce one another and this resulting residual force is directed toward the boundary and has the effect of drawing both end regions inwardly toward one another at the boundary. This residual force is generated between the surfaces which are arranged in a divergent manner away from the opening to the boundary, and in the case of the triangular cross section, have no corresponding convergent surfaces that would otherwise balance to create a substantially zero residual force relative to the common central axis. Thus, the outer surfaces are asymmetrically arranged relative to the transverse axis. The residual forces therefore are caused by the compressive forces F~ generated at the intersection of the inner and outer surfaces and more particularly to the component thereof in the direction of the common central axis, as shown at F~ and F~. In other words, the force F,~ tends to force the end region toward the boundary while the force FRK tends to force the key away from the boundary, the net effect being biasing of the end regions together to minimize the spacing there between at the boundary and to form a snug connection there between. In order to provide these compressive forces, the angle of the inner surface of the passages may be at an angle 8 ranging from 45 to 85 degrees and more preferably about 80 degrees.
It will be understood, that the surfaces may come in any number of different configurations, provided that they arranged in a similar manner as above.
The joining technique shown herein above is particularly useful because it is simple to install and requires no additional tightening manoeuvres with additional wedging devices.
Rather, the present technique makes use of the natural compressive forces caused by the natural shrinkage of the materials. The same technique can be used to form butt joints and corner joints in the same log construction thereby reducing the number of parts necessary for a particular construction.
The length of the keys depends on the length'W', which of course will depend on the thickness of the logs and the profile of the particular joint pattern used, the intention being that the key extends the entire length'W'. By extending the entire length, the key can provide an effective barrier against the infiltration of air through the log wall as would otherwise occur through the boundary as shown by the arrows in figure 3.
However, the entire length may also be spanned by more than one single barrier. The single barrier may be replaced with, for example, three keys, all with a collective length equaling that of the single key as shown at 21a, b, c in figure 7.

The log construction may be formed in the following manner. First, the logs 12, 14 are cut to length and their end regions are shaped so as to engage in a complementary fashion as shown above. The barrier receiving passages 12f, 14f, 12g, 14g are formed so that they extend from the outer surface 12d, 14d to the intermediate surface 12e, 14e.
The keys are then formed with a cross section which is complementary to that of the aligned passages.
The keys may be slightly undersized in the direction of the axis 'A' in order to immediately establish a loaded condition with the bearing surfaces. With the logs in their position with the passages aligned, the keys may then be pressed in place with appropriate caulking compounds placed therein as necessary. The joint may then be left to the forces of nature to bring about the shrinkage of the materials to establish the residual forces as described.
The cross sections used herein have the additional benefit of increasing the engaged surface area of the inner and outer surfaces, both to increase the area which is available for caulking materials, if desired, or to otherwise increase the distance that infiltrating air would need to travel to circumvent the barrier so formed.
The key may, if desired, by dimensioned to extend beyond a single joint. For example, the keys may extend beyond two or more joints as shown in the log construction 30 shown in figure 8. In this case, there are provided two sets of logs 32, 34, with each set having a number of aligned end regions 32a, 34a, with each log element from set 32 formed to engage a pair of adjacent logs in set 34. There is provided a series of first surface portions as shown at 32b, and a series of second surface portions as shown at 32c.
In this case, each log is also provided with barrier receiving passages 33a, 33b, each of which extends the full thickness of the log so that, when assembled as shown in figure 8, the passages 33a, 33b align together to form a substantially continuous elongate passage extending the full length ofthe so-formed log'wall'. This is shown in the case ofthe passages 33a by the dashed lines at "33A".
A pair of keys 36, 38 engage the elongate passage 33a, 33b, thereby to interrupt the boundary between the adjacent surface portions and to inhibit relative movement between the log elements of each set of logs in the construction.
The keys used herein may be formed from a number of materials. Hardwood materials such as maple and oak are readily available and provide a natural counterpart to the soft woods normally used for the logs themselves.
However, other materials such as plastics are also envisioned. In this case, the materials may be preformed into the keys as shown above or alternatively be arranged to be forced in a liquid or other deformable consistency, into the aligned passages.
This technique has the advantage that the key forming material can fill the voids in the aligned passage, while accommodating minor misalignments between the logs. Furthermore, the passages can be finished in such a manner to allow the key forming material to partially or fully extend beyond the passages themselves and fill the spacing the between the adjacent surface portions. The key forming material, in this case, may be a thermoset material such as those defined as epoxies or thermoplastics such as polyethylene or polypropylene. The characteristics of the formed key may also be modified by adjusting the make up of the material, for example by adding a reinforcing fibre and the like.
Referring to figure 9, there is provided another log construction SO with a pair of logs 52, 54 having complementary end regions 52a, 54a. In this case, the complementary end regions are simply a flat end face to form a butt joint having a transverse boundary 56. A
barrier in the form of a key 58 is arranged in a like fashion to that shown above to interrupt the boundary along substantially the entire transverse dimension thereof, in this case, the height as shown in figure 10.

Referring to figures 11 and 12, there is provided still another log construction 70 with a pair of logs 72, 74 having complementary end regions 72a, 74a. In this case, the complementary end regions are simply a flat end face to form a butt joint having a transverse boundary 76. One end face has a projection 74b and the other end face has a complementary S recess 72b. A pair of fastening assemblies 78 are provided to engage each of the end regions on opposite sides thereof. Each of the fastening assemblies includes a pair of cylindrical plugs 80 mounted on a base plate 82, each plug adapted to receive a fastener such as a spike 84, by way of a small elongate passage or the like. A pair of passages extend through each of the end regions 72a, 74a and are dimensioned so as to receive a corresponding pair of plugs as shown.
The spikes are dimensioned to that they can be driven through the upper plug and project into the lower plug thereby to hold the fastening assemblies in place.
The plugs are firmly mounted on the plate so that the plate can absorb the loading exerted thereon should 1 S the butt end joint. If desired, the plugs may be dimensioned to extend fully into the passages and abut one another as shown in dashed lines in figure 12.
Referring to figures 13 and 14, there is provided still another log construction 100, in the form of a butt joint, with a pair of upper logs 102, 104 and a lower log shown at 106 having end regions 102a, 104a, each being a flat end face to form a butt joint having a transverse boundary 110. Each log has an upper face 102b, 104b with a pair of tongues 102c, 104c which are collinear with one another when assembled into the butt joint as shown in figure 14. Each end face has a pair of recesses 102d, 104d, which are aligned with a corresponding tongue 102c, so that the recesses are also aligned when the butt joint is formed, again as shown in figure 14. Extending through each of the aligned pair of recesses is a spline shown at 112, which is preferably a hardwood material. The spline has a rectangular cross section but may be provided with other cross sections, such as those in earlier embodiments herein.

Referring to figure 13, each log has a pair of grooves, shown at 102e for log 102.
Each groove is shaped to be complementary with the tongue 106c of the lower log I 06. The tongue 106b is further provided with an edge region 106f which is oriented to the exterior of the wall being formed by the logs. The spline 112 has a lower surface 112a which is complementary with the shape of the groove 102e. The spline is also shaped to have an overlying portion 112b which overlies the outer edge region 106, for reasons to be described.
The spline 112 also has an upper edge region I 12c which terminates below the height of the tongue 102c and has a pair of beveled edges shown at 112d.
The central region of each log has a groove in its upper face and a tongue in its lower face, such as shown at 102g and 102h respectively for log 102. Again, the central grooves and tongues of logs 102, 104 are aligned when in the butt joint. AS shown in figure 12, a plate 116, preferably with width approximately equal to the width of the central grooves, is located therein and is provided as pair of passages 116a. Each passage 116a receives a screw 118 which extends into the respective log, through the gap between the respective upper log and the lower log 106 to be anchored therein, thereby drawing the upper and lower logs together. The groove 1028 is further provided with a recess 102h to receive the plate 116 so that its upper face is substantially flush with the inner surface of the groove.
A number of seals are provided at locations throughout the butt joint, namely a pair of seals between the tongues and grooves between the upper logs and the lower log 106 (as shown at 120a, 120b), a central lower seal between the central tongues of the upper logs and the central groove on the lower log 106 (as shown at 120c), a pair of spline seals positioned in the gap between the upper region of the spline and the tongue 102a (as shown at 120d, I 20e) and a seal positioned in the central groove and above the plate I 16.
In the case of the spline seal 120d, the lateral edges of the seal are squeezed over the beveled edges 112d of the spline.
To assemble the butt joint, the logs are assembled as shown with the splines inserted in their respective recesses and the seals positioned between the logs 102, 104 and the lower log 106, namely seals 120a, 120b and 120c. The plate 116 is then installed in its recess 102h and the screws 118 driven through in their corresponding passages 116a.
Finally, the seals 120d, 120e and 120f are installed.
When the log wall is completed, the overlying portions 112b of the splines assist the seals in providing an effective barrier against the infiltration of air through the log wall, that is between the tones and the grooves. Over time, the shrinkage of the logs will cause the tongue 102c to be reduced toward the level of the spline I 12. Thus, by providing the gap between the upper edge region of the spline and its associated tongue, the joint will become tighter over time, while the seals I 20d, 120e will accommodate the gap in the meantime and reduce infiltration.
If desired, the overlying portions may be placed on opposite outer edge regions as shown in version 'B' of figure 1 S. Alternatively, the overlying portions may be provided on both sides of each spline as shown in version'C' of figure 15.
In another embodiment, a corner joint is formed in a similar manner to that shown in figure 1, except that the key I 6 is not formed of hardwood materials but rather is formed from a foam material such as a closed cell polyurethane material, such as a preformed compressible blank of such material. In this embodiment, cross sectional shape of the passage receiving the key is not necessarily as that shown above but is simply selected to relatively tightly receive the foam material blank, by compressibly sliding the blank into the associated aligned passages. It is desirable that the blank be, in its natural state, bulkier than the passage in order to enhance its sealing qualities when inserted in the passage, as shown at 16', 16" in figure 1.
Referring to figure 17, still another log construction is shown at 130 having a pair of logs 132, 134, each of which is formed with two upright boundary surfaces 132a, 134a, 132b, 134b. Each boundary surface 132a, 134a is complementary to the corresponding upright boundary surface 134a, 134b when the logs are arranged in a corner formation therewith.
In this case, the upright boundary surfaces are complementary by being generally vertical in orientation. Log 132 has a pair of cavities 132c, 132d and log 134 has a corresponding pair of cavities 134c, 134d. Each of the cavities extend along and are open to an entire vertical dimension of a respective boundary surface, so that, in the corner formation, the opposing cavities in each mating pair of boundary surfaces form a passage, and a resilient material sufficiently located in each of the passages to form a barrier to weather across the boundary surfaces.
Each of the boundary surfaces 132a, and 134b can be considered inner boundary surfaces because they terminate partway through the log. In this case, the cavities 132c and I 34d are formed by cut outs 1328, 134g extending the full thickness of each of the logs. In this case, the cutouts are circular but can be of some other configuration.
Preferably, the corner formation is a dove tail configuration such as the type shown in figure 7, although other configurations are also contemplated such as rectangular corners, as shown in figure 17.
Desirably, the resilient material is in the form of a blank 136 which, in one embodiment, is positioned to extend the full length of the boundary surface and partway into the cut out. The blank and the passages are preferably of generally circular cross section, although other cross sectional shapes are also contemplated. The blank may be an open cell or closed cell plastics material, such as polyethylene, neoprene, or polypropylene material.
For example, the aquatic floatation product sold widely in Canada under the trade name NOODLE can be used as the blank, if desired, when cut to the desired length to extend the entire length of each of the passages.
The log construction of figure 17 can be assembled as follows. First, the logs are formed with their complementary end regions, that is to form a suitable corner joint. Then, the cavities are formed in each of the corresponding boundary surfaces, for example by boring a hole through the log, in the case of passages 132c and 134d, wherein the corresponding cavity emerges in the region of the boundary surface. The cavities 132d, 134c are also formed, in this case also extending through the entire length of the corresponding boundary surfaces. The so-formed resulting cavities are generally concave and of a generally semicircular shape in this particular example, though the cavities may be in some other curvilinear or angular shape as desired. Two blanks 136 are then formed for each corner as shown herein, that is for the intersection of two logs. Being slightly larger to enhance their sealing effect with the sides ofthe cavities, the blanks 136 are slightly compressed while being pressed into placed. A log wall can be similarly formed by adding logs to the corner as needed.

Claims (8)

1. A log construction comprising a pair of logs, each being formed with two upright boundary surfaces, each boundary surface of one log being complementary to the corresponding upright boundary surface of the other log when arranged in a corner formation therewith, each of said logs having a pair of cavities, each of said cavities extending along and open to an entire vertical dimension of a respective boundary surface, so that, in said corner formation, the opposing cavities in each mating pair of boundary surfaces form a passage, and a resilient material sufficiently located in each of said passages to form a barrier to weather across said boundary surfaces.

2. A log construction as defined in claim 1 wherein said corner formation is a dove tail configuration.

3. A log construction as defined in claim 1 wherein each of said boundary surfaces terminate partway through said log and said cavities are formed by cut outs extending the full thickness of each of said logs.

4. A log construction as defined in claim 3 wherein said resilient material is in the form of a blank.

5. A log construction as defined in claim 4 wherein said blank is positioned to extend the full length of said boundary surface and partway into said cut out.

6. A log construction as defined in claim 5 wherein said blank and said passages are of generally circular cross section.

7. A log construction as defined in claim 1 wherein said blank is an open cell or closed cell plastics material.

8. A log construction as defined in claim 7 wherein said plastics material is a polyethylene, neoprene, or polypropylene material.