CA2329140A1 - Means and methods for monitoring non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor antiretroviral therapy - Google Patents

Abstract

This invention relates to antiviral drug susceptibility and resistance tests to be used in identifying effective drug regimens for the treatment of human immunodificiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrom e (AIDS) and further relates to the means and methods of monitoring the clinic al progression of HIV infection and its response to antiretroviral therapy, particularly non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy using phenotypic susceptibility assays or genotypic assays.

Description

MEANS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING NON-NUCLEOSIDE REVERSE
TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY
This application is a continuation-in-.part of U.S. Serial No. 09/085,148, filed May 26, 1998 and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/124,090, filed March 12, 1999, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference into this application.
Throughout this application, various references are referred to within parenthesis. Disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this application to more fully describe the state of the art to which this .invention pertains.
Technical Field This invention relates to antiretroviral drug susceptibility and resistance tests to be used in identifying effective drug regimens for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immunodef iciency syndrome (AIDS). The invention further relates to the means and methods of monitoring the clinical progression of HIV infection and its response to antiretroviral therapy using phenotypic or genotypic susceptibility assays. The invention also relates to novel vectors, host cells and compositions for carrying out phenotypic susceptibility tests. The invention further relates to the use of various genotypic methodologies to identify patients whose infection has become resistant to a particular antiretroviral drug regimen. This invention also relates to the screening of candidate antiretroviral drugs for their capacity to inhibit viruses, selected viral sequences and/or viral proteins. More particularly, this invention relates to the determination of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance using phenotypic susceptibility tests and/or genotypic tests.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Background of the Invention HIV infection is characterized by high rates of viral turnover throughout the disease process, eventually leading to CD4 depletion and disease progression. Wei X, Ghosh SP;, Taylor ME, et al. (1995) Nature 343, 117-122 and Ho DD, Naumann AU, Perelson AS, et al. (1995) Nature 373, 123-12E~.
The aim of antiretroviral therapy is to achieve substantial and prolonged suppression of viral replication. Achieving sustained viral control is likely to involve the use of sequential therapies, generally each therapy comprising combinations of three or more antiretroviral drugs. Choice of initial and subsequent therapy should, therefore, be made on a rational basis, with knowledge of resistance and cross-resistance patterns being vital to guiding those decisions. The primary rationale of combination therapy relates to synergistic or add~.tive activity to achieve greater inhibition of viral replication. The tolerability of drug regimens will remain critical, however, as therapy will need to be maintained over many years.
In an untreated patient, some 101°new viral particles are produced per day. Coupled with the failure of HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) to correct transcription errors by exonucleolytic proofreading, this high level of viral turnover results in 10' to 105 mutations per day at each position in the HIV genome. The result is the rapid establishment of extensive genotypic variation. While soc~e template positions or base pair substitutions may be more , error prone (Mansky LM, Temin HM (1995) J Virol 69, 5087-5094) (Schinazi RF, Lloyd RM, Ramanathan CS, et al. (1994) Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38, 268-274), mathematical modeling suggests that, at every possible single point, mutation may occur up to 10,000 times per day in infected individuals.
For antiretroviral drug resistance to occur, the target enzyme must be modified while preserving its function in the presence of the inhibitor. Point mutations leading to SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) an amino acid substitution may result in change in shape, size or charge of the active site, substrate binding site or surrounding regions of the enzyme. Mutants resistant to antiretroviral agents have been detected at. low levels before the initiation of therapy. (Mohri H, Singh MK, Ching WTW, et al. (1993) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90, 25-29) (Najera I, Richman DD, Olivares I, et al. (1994) AIDS R~.~s Hum Retroviruses 10, 1479-1488) (Najera I, Holguin A, Quinones-Mateu E, et al. (1995) J Virol 69, 23-31).
However, these mutant strains represent only a small proportion of the total viral load and may have a replication or competitive disadvantage compared with wild-type virus. (Coffin JM (1995) Science 267, 483-489). The selective pressure of antiretroviral therapy provides these drug-resistant mutants with a competitive advantage and thus they come to represent t:he dominant quasispecies (Frost SDW, McLean AR (1994) ATDS 8, 323-332) (Kellam P, Boucher CAB, Tijnagal JMGH (1994) J Gen Virol 75, 341-351) ultimately leading to drug resistance and virologic failure in the patient.
Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are a chemically diverse group of compounds which are potent inhibitors of HIV-1 RT ~:n vitro. These compounds include pyridinone derivatives, bis(heteroaryl)piperazines (BHAPs) such as delavirdine and atevirdine, the dipyridodiazepinone nevirapine, the thymine derivative groups TSAO and HEPT, an a-anilino phenylacetamides (a-APA) compound loviride, and the qu_inoxaline-class inhibitors such as (HBY-097), the benzodiazE:pin-one and -thione (TIBO) compounds and the pyridinone derivatives (L-697,661). For overviews see (DeClercq E. (1996) Rev Med Virol 6, 97-117) (Emini EA (1996) Antiviral Drug Resistance, ed. DD Richman, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. High-level resistance to individual compounds appears too develop rapidly, often within a few weeks of initiating monotherapy, frequently involving only single-point mutations and in many cases SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) leading to considerable cross-resistance to other NNRTIs.
Most mutations reported occur in the codon groups 100-lOF3 and 181-190 which encode for the two (~-sheets adjacent to the catalytic site of the RT enzyme (Kohlstaedt LA, Wang J, Friedman JM, et al. (1992) Science 256, 1783-90) The NNRT:L
binding pocket, as it has been described, is a hydrophobic non-substrate binding region of: RT where these agents directly interact with RT. They inhibit activity by interfering with mobility of the 'thumb' subdomain, o:r disrupting the orientation of conserved aspartic acid side chains essential for catalytic activity (D'Aquilla RT.
(1994) Clin Lab Med 14, 393-423) (Arnold E., Ding J., Hughes SH, et al. (1995) Curr Op~in Struct Biol 5, 27-38).
Mutations conferring reduced susceptibility to nevirapine have been described at codons 98, 100, 103, 106, 108, 181, 188 and 190 (Richman DD, Havlir D, Corbeil J. (1994) J
Virol 68, 1660-1666). The most frequently selected variant during nevirapine monotherapy is a Tyrlsl Cys (Y181C) mutation which results in a 100-fold reduction in sensitivity to this agent, with reduced susceptibility to the pyridinone derivatives L-696,:229 and L-697,661 (Arnold, Ibid). TSAO also has limited activity in the presence of the 181 mutation, but maintains activity in the presence of mutations at codons 100 and 103 and in vitro selects for a unique mutation, GLU'38 Lys (E138K), in the region where it most closely interacts with RT (Richman, DD, Ibid) (Richman DD, Shih C-K, Lowy I, et al.(1991) Proc Nail Acad Sci USA
88, 11241-11245).
Resistance to loviride when used as monotherapy develops .in most patients by week 24. It has been mapped to a range of codons 100-110; 181-190), most commonly codon 103 (Staszewski S, Miller V, Kober A, et al. (1996) Antiviral Ther 1, 42-50. During combination therapy using loviride with zidovudine or zidovudine plus lamivudine, variants at codons 98 and 103 were the most frequent mutations defected SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) at 24 weeks (Staszewski S, Miller V, Rehmet S, et al.
(1996) AIDS 10, Fl-7) .
Although the 101, 103 and 181 mutations also confer cross-5 resistance to BHAPs, (Balzarini J, Karlsson A, Perez-Perez M-J, et al. (1992) Virology I92, 246-253) the characteristic P236L substitution selected for by these agents in vitro appears to sensitize RT to some other NNRTIs, reducing the IC50 for nevirapine, for example, '7-to 10-fold, without influencing sensitivity to nucleoside analogues (Staszewski S., Ibid). This mutation at codon 236 has not been observed in clinical isolates during atevirdine therapy, although other resistance-conferring mutations at codons 103 and 181 have been reported during monotherapy as well as at codons 101, 188, 233 and 2:38 during combination therapy with zidovudine.
While HBY-097 may initially select for a mutation at codons 190 in vitro, further passage consistently selects for mutations at RT codon 74 and 75, with some mutant viruses showing decreased sensitivity to didanosine and stavudine, but not zidovudine (Kleim J-P, Rosner M, Winkler I, et al.
(1995) J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 10 Suppl 3, 2).
Mutation at codon 181 has bean reported to antagonize zidovudine resistance due to the typical 41 and 215 codon mutations, (Zhang D, Caliendo AM, Eron JJ, et al. (1994) Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38, 282-287) suggesting that combination therapy with some NNRTIs and zidovudine may be feasible. Although an HIV mutant with triple resistance to zidovudine, didanosine and nevirapine has been described in vitro, (Larder BA, Kellam P, Kemp SD (1993) Nature 365, 451-453) treatment with this triple combination does provide superior immunological and virological responses to treatment with zidovudine plus didanosine alone over a 48 week period in patients with CD4 cell counts <350/mm3.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Combination therapy with zidovudine and the pyridinone derivative L-697,661 prevents the appearance of the codon 181 mutation typically selected during monotherapy with this NNRTI, delaying the appearance of high-level resistance to this compound. Changes in susceptibility to zidovudine were not examined in this study. (Staszewski S, Massari FE, Kober A, et al. (1995) J Infect Dis 171, 1159-1165). Concomitant or alternating zidovudine therapy does not delay the appearance of resistance during nevirapine therapy; (Richman DD, Ibid) (Nunberg JH, Schleif WA, Boots EJ, et al. (1990) J Viro1 65, 4887-4892) (DeJong MD, Loewenthl M, Boucher CAB, et al. (1994) J Infect Dis 169, 1346-1350) (Cheeseman SH, Havlir D, McLaughlin MM, e:t al. (1995) J Acquir Tmmune Defic Syndr 8, 141-151) however, the 181 mutant is not being observed during combination, the most common change being at codon 190 (Richman DL), Ibid). This suggests that the codon 181 mutation which is antagonistic to zidovudine resistance in vitro is not compatible, or not preferred in vivo, selection favoring other mutations which allow for reduced susceptibility to this NNRTI concomitant with zidovudine resistance.
The rapid development of reduced susceptibility to the NNRTIs suggests limited utility of these agents, particularly as monotherapies, and has led to the modification of these molecules in an attempt to delay tine appearance of drug-resistant virus. A 'second generation' NNRTI, the pyridinone derivative L-702,019, demonstrated only a 3-fold change in ICso between wild-type and codon 181 mutant HIV-1, and required multiple mutations to engender high-level resistance (Goldman ME, O'Brien JA, Buffing TL, et al. (1993) Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37, 947-949).
It is an object of this invention to provide a drug susceptibility and resistance test capable of showing whether a viral population in a patient is resistant to a given prescribed drug. Another object of this invention is to provide a test that will enable the physician to SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) substitute one or more drugs in a therapeutic regimen for a patient that has become resistant to a given drug or drugs after a course of therapy. Yet another object of this invention is to provide a test that will enable selection of an effective drug regimen for the treatment of HIV infections and/or AIDS. Yet another object of this invention is to provide the means for identifying the drugs to which a patient has become resistant, in particular identifying resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Still another object of this invention is to provide a test and methods for evaluating the biological effectiveness of candidate drug compounds which act on specific viruses, viral genes and/or viral proteins particularly with respect to viral drug resistance associated with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. It is also an object of this invention to provide the means and compositions for evaluating HIV
antiretroviral drug resistance and susceptibility. This and other objects of this invention will be apparent from the specification as a whole.
_Summary of the Invention The present invention relates to methods of monitoring, using phenotypic and genotypic methods, the clinical progression of human immunodeficiency virus infection and its response to antiviral therapy. The invention is also based, in part, on the discovery that, genetic changes in HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) which confer resistance to antiretroviral therapy may be rapidly determined directly from patient plasma HIV RNA using phenotypic or genotypic methods. The methods utilize polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assays. Alternatively, methods evaluating viral nucleic acid of viral protein in the absence of an amplification step could utilize the teaching of this invention to monitor and/or modify antiretroviral therapy.
This invention is based in part on the discovery o:f a mutation at codon 225 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 103 of HIV reverse transcriptase in SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (efavirenz) treated patients) in which the presence of the mutations correlate with an increase in delavi.rdine susceptibility and little or no change in nevirapine susceptibility. The mutations were found in plasma ~iIV RNA after a period of time following initiation of therapy. The development of the mutant at colon 225 in addition to the mutation at colon 103 in HIV RT was found t:o be an indicator of the development of resistance and ultimately of immunological decline. This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at colon 236 of RT was discovered to occur in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) treated patients in which the presence of the mutation correlates with decreased susceptibility to delavirdine and no reduction in nevirapine susceptibility. The development of the colon 190 and 103 and/or 101 mutations in HIV RT was found to be an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic susceptibility/resistance which has been associated with virologic failure and subsequent immunological decline. This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at colon 190 either alone or i.n combination with a mutation at colon 190 either alone or i.n combination with a mutation at colon 103 and/or 101 of HI:V
reverse transcriptase in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (efavirenz) treated patients) i.n which the presence of the mutations correlate with an increase in delavirdine susceptibility and a decrease in nevirapine susceptibility. The: mutations were found in plasma HIV RNA after a period of time following initiation of NNRTI therapy. The development of the colon 236 and lU3 and/or 181 mutations in HIV RT was found to be an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic susr_eptibility/resistance which has been associated with virologic failure and subsequent. immunological decline.
This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at colon 230 either alone or in combination with a mutation at ccdon 181 of HIV' reverse transcriptase in SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nevirapine) treated patients) in which the presence of the mutations correlate with a significant dec:rease in both delavirdine and nevirapine susceptibility. The mutations were found i.n plasma HIV RNA after a period of time following initiation of NNRTI theraphy. The development of the codon 230 and 181 mutations in HIV RT were found to be an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic susceptibility/resistance which has been associated with virologic failure and subsequent immunological decline.
This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at codon 181 of HIV reverse transcriptase in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nevirapinE:) treated patients) in which the presence of the mutation correlates with a moderate decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a significant decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and no change in efavirenz susceptibility.
The mutation was found in plasma HIV RNA after a period of time following initiation o:f NNRTI therapy. T:he development of the codon 181 mutation .in HIV RT was found to be an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic susceptibiltiy/resi.stance which has been associated with virologic failure and subsequent immunological decline. This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at codon 188 of HIV reverse transcriptase in non-nucleoside reverse transcripta.se inhibitor (efavirenz) treated patients) in which the presence of the mutation correlates with a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility. The mutation was found in plasma HIV RNA after a period o:f time following initiation of NNRTI therapy. The development of the codon 7_88 mutation in HIV RT was found to be an indicator of t:he development of alterations in phenotypic susceptibility/resistance which has been associated with viologic failure and subsequent immunological decline.
This invention is based in part on the discovery lof a mutation at codon 188 of HIV reverse transcriptase in SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) patients) with no previously reported exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in which the presence of the mutations correlate with a moderate decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a substatial 5 decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a maderate decrese in efavirenz susceptibility. The mutation was found in plasma HIV RNA after a period of time following initiation of anti-retroviral th~°_rapy. The development of the codon 138 and 188 mutations in HIV RT was found to be 10 an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic susceptibility/resistance which has been associated with virologic failure and subsequent immunological decline. This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at codon 98 of HIV reverse transcriptase in patients) wir_h no previously reported exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibtors in which the presence of the mutation correlates with slight decrease in delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz susceptibility. The mutation was found in plasma HIV RNA
after a period of time following initiation of ant:i-retroviral therapy. The devE:lopment of the codon 98 mutation in HIV RT was found t:o be an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic susceptibility/resistance which has been associated with virologic failure and subsequenr_ immunological decline.
This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at codon 98 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 190 of HIV reverse transcriptase, in patients) whose anti-retroviral treatment was unknown in which the presence of the mutations correlate with an increase in delavirdine susceptibility and substantial decrease in both nevirapine and efavirenz susceptibilti.y.
The mutations were found in plasma HIV RNA. The development of the mutant at codon 98 in addition to t: he mutation at codon 190 in HI'J RT was found to be an indicator of the development of resistance and ultimately of immunological decline. This invention is based in part SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) on the discovery cf a mutation at codon 181 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 98 of HIV reverse transcriptase in non-nucleoside reverse transcr:iptase inhibitor (delavirdine) treated patients) in which the presence of the mutations correlate with an significant decresase in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibwlity. The mutations were found in plasma HIV RNA sfter a period of time following initiation of therapy. The development of the mutant at codon 98 in addition to the mutation at codon 181 in HIV RT
was found to be an indicator of the development of resistance and ultimately of immunological decline. This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at codon 101 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 190, for example 190s of HIV reverse transcriptase in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (efavirenz) treated patients) in which the presence of the mutations correlate with no change in delavirdine susceptibiltiy and a substantial decrease in both nevirapine and efavirenz susceptibiltiy. The mutations were found in plasma HIV RNA after a period of time following initiation of therapy. The development of the mutant at codon 101 in addition to the mutation at codon 190, for example 190s in HIV RT was found to be an indicator of the development of resistance and ultimately of immuological decline. This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at codon 108 of HIV reverse transcriptase in patients) with no previously reported exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in which the presence of the mutation correlates with no change in delavirdine susceptibility and a slight decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and no change in efavirenz susceptibility. The mutation was found in plasma HIV RNA
after a period of time following initiation of anti-retroviral therapy. The development of the codon 1.08 mutation in HIV RT was found to be an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) susceptibility/resistance which has been associated with.
virologic failure and subsequent immunological decline.
This invention is based in part. on the discovery of a miutation at codon 101 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 103 and/or 190 of HIV reverse transcriptase in patients with no previously reported exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in which the presence of the mutatins correlate with changes in delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz susceptibility. Specifically, the: presence of mutations a't 101 and 190, for example 190A, correlates with no change in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a significant decrease i.:n efavirenz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 103 and 190 correlates with a moderate decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibiltiy and a significant decresase in efavirenz susceptibility. The mutations were found in plasma HIV RNA
after a period of time following initiation of anti-retroviral therapy. The development of the codon 101 and 103 and/or 190 mutations in HIV RT was found to be an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic susceptibiltiy/resistance which has been associated with virologic failure and subsequent immunological decline.
This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at codon 106 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 189 and/or :181 and 227 of HIV reverse transcriptase in non-nucleoside reverse transcripta:~e inhibitor (nevirapine) treated patients) in which the presence of the mutations correlate with changes :in delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz susceptibility.
Specifically, the presence of mutations at 106 and 181 correlates with a significant decrease in delavirdi:ne susceptibility, a substantial decresase in neviradine susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 106 and 189 correlates with a slight decrease in delavirdine SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) susceptibility, a moderate ciecresase in nevirapine susceptibitlity and no change in efavirenz susceptibility.
The presence of mutations at 106 and 227 correlates with a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a substantial decresase in nevirapine susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 181 and 227 correlates with an increase in delavirdine susceptibility, a significant decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and an incease in efavirenz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 106 and 1E31 and 227 correlates with a moderate decrease in delavirdine susceptibility , a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. The mutations were found in plasma HIV R~1A
after a period of time following initiation of NNR'TI
therapy. The development of the codon 106 and 189 and/or 181 and 227 mutations in HI~~ RT was found to be an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic susceptibility/resistance which. has been associated with virologic failure and subsequent immuological decline.
This invention is based in part on the discovery of a mutation at codon 103 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 100 and/or 188 of HIV reverse transcriptase in non-nucleo=;ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor ~nevirapine) treated patients) in which t:he presence of the mutations correlate with changes in delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz susceptibility.
Specifically, the presence of mutations at 103 and 188 correlates with a substantial decrease in delavird:ine susceptibility, a substantial decrease in nevirap:ine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efaviranz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 100 and 103 correlates with a substantial decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a moderate decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 103 and 100 and 188 correlates with a substantial decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a substantial decrease in SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) nevirapine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. The mutations were found in plasma HIV RNA after a period of time following initiation of NNRTI therapy. The developemnt of the codon 103 and 100 and/or 188 mutations in HIV RT was found to be an indicator of the development of alterations in phenotypic susceptibility/resistance which has been associated with virologic failure and subsequent immunological decline.
In a further embodiment of the invention, PCR based assay:, including phenotypic and genoty~>ic assays, may be used t:o detect mutations at codon 225 in combination with mutations at other codons including 103 of HIV RT which correlate with a specific pattern of resistance to antiretroviral therapies and subsequent immunologic decline. In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used i=o detect mutations at codon 236 either alone or in combination with mutations at other codons including 103 and/or 181 of HIV RT which correlate with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline. In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect mutations at codon 190 (G190S) either alone or in combination with mutation at codon 101 (K101E) of HIV RT
which correlates with resistancE: to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline.
In still another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect mutations at codon 190 (G190A) either alone or in combination with mutation at codon 103 (K103N) of FiIV
RT which correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect mutations at codon 230 either alone or in SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) combination with mutation at codon 181 of HIV RT which correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline.
5 In yet another embodiment of t:he invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect a mutation at codon 181 of HIV RT which correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and. genotypic assays, may be used to detect a mutation at codon 188 of HIV RT which correlates with resistance to antiretYoviral therapy anal immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect mutations at codon 138 either alone or in combination with mutation at codon 188 of HIV RT which correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect a mutation at codon 98 of HIV RT which correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect mutations at codon 98 either alone or in combination with mutation at codon 190 of HIV RT which correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immuolgoic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/bIb58 PC'T/US99/11629 used to detect mutations at colon 181 either alone or i.n combination with mutation at c~odon 98 of HIV RT whic:h correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect mutations at colon 1.01 either alone or in combination with mutation at colon 190, for example 190s of HIV RT which correlates with resistance to antiretrovir<~1 therapy and immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect a mutation at colon 108 of HIV RT which correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect mutations at colon 101 either alone or in combination with mutations at colon 103 and/or 190 of HIV
RT which correlates with re:~istance to antiretoviral therapy and immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect mutations at colon 106 either alone or in combination with mutations at colon 189 and/or 181 and 227 of HIV RT which correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic decline.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, PCR based assays, including phenotypic and genotypic assays, may be used to detect mutations at colon 188 either alone or in combination with mutation at colon 100 and /ar 103 of HIV
RT which correlates with resistance to antiretroviral therapy and immunologic declaine. Once mutations at colon SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) 225 and 103 have been detected in a patient undergoing NNRTI antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the°_ therapeutic regimen must be con:~idered. Similarly, once mutations at colon 236 and/or 103 and/or 181 have been detected i.n a patient undergoing certain NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered. Similarly, once mutations at colon 190 and/or 103 and/or 101 have been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered.
Similarly, once mutations at colon 230 and/or 181 have been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered. Similarly, once a mutation a.t colon _181 has been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered. Similarly, once a mutation at colon 188 has been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered.
Similarly, once mutations at colon 138 and/or 188 have been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered. Similarly, once a mutation at colon 98 has been detected in a .patient undergoing certain NNRTI antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered. Similarly, once mutations at colon 98 and/or 190 have been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered.
Similarly, once mutations at colon 181 and/or 98 have been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therpeutic regimen must be considered. Similarly, once mutations at colon 101 and/or 190, for example 1905, have been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered. Similarly, once a mutation at colon 108 has SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) been detected in a patient underfoing certain NNRT:I
antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeuti~~
regimen must be considered. Similarly, once mutations at codon 101 and/or 103 and/or 190, for example 190A, have been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered. Similarly, once mutations at codon 106 and/or 189 and/or 181 and/or 227 have been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy, an alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered. Similarly, once mutations at codon 188 and/or 100 and/or 103 have been detected in a patient undergoing certain NNRTI antiretroviral therapy, a.n alteration in the therapeutic regimen must be considered.
The timing at which a modification of the therapeutic regimen should be made, following the assessment of the antiretroviral therapy using PCR based assays, may depend on several factors including the patient's viral load, CD4 count, and prior treatment history.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a method for assessing the effectiveness of a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase antiretroviral drug comprising: (a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment and an indicator gene into a host cell; (b) culturing the host cell from step (a); (c) measuring expression of the indicator gene in a target host cell wherein expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment; and (d) comparing the expression of the indicator gene from step (c) with the expression of the indicator gene measured when steps (a) (c) are carried out in the absence of the NNRTI anti-HIV
drug, wherein a test concentration of the NNRTI, anti-HIV
drug is presented at steps (a) - (c) ; at steps (b) - (c) ;
or at step (c) .
This invention also provides a method for assessing the effectiveness of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCTlUS99111629 antiretroviral therapy in a patient comprising: (a) developing a standard curve of drug susceptibility for an NNRTI anti-HIV drug; (b) determining NNRTI anti-HIV drug susceptibility in the patient using the susceptibility test described above; and (c) comparing the NNRTI anti-HIV drug susceptibility in step (b) with the standard curve determined in step (a), wherein a decrease in NNRTI anti-HIV susceptibility indicates development of anti-HIV drug resistance in the patient.
This invention also provides a method for evaluating the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising: (a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment and an indicator gene into a host cell; (b) culturing the host cell from step (a); (c) measuring expression of the indicator gene in a target host cell wherein expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment; and (d) comparing the expression of the indicate>r gene from step (c) with the expression of the indicator gene measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate anti-viral drug compound, wherein a test concentration of the <:andidate anti-viral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c);
or at step (c) .
The expression of the indicator gene in the resistance test vector in the target cell is ultimately dependent upon the action of the patient-derived segment sequences. The indicator gene may be functional. or non-functional.
In another aspect this invention is directed to antiretroviral drug susceptibility and resistance tests for HIV/AIDS. Particular resistance test vectors of the invention for use in the HIV/AIDS antiretroviral drug susceptibility and resistance test are identified.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) In yet another aspect this invention provides for the identification and assessment of the biological effectiveness of potential therapeutic antiretroviral compounds for the treatment of HIV and/or AIDS. In another 5 aspect, the invention is directed to a novel resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment further comprising one or more mutations on the RT gene and an indicator gene.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Brief Description of the Drawincts Fig. 1 Resistance Test Vector. A diagrammatic representation of the resistance test vector comprising a patient derived segment and an indicator gene.
Fig. 2 Two Cell Assay. Schematic Representation of the Assay. A
resistance test vector is generated by cloning the patient derived segment into an indicator gene viral vector. The resistance test vector is then co-transfected with an expression vector that produces amphotropic murine leukemia virus (MLV) envelope protein or other viral or cellular proteins which enable infection. Pseudotyped viral particles are produced containing the protease (PR) and the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene products encoded by the patient-derived sequences. The particles are then harvested and used to infect fresh cells. Using defective PR and RT sequences it was shown that luciferase activity is dependent on functional PR and RT. PR inhibitors are added to the cells following transfection and are thus present during particle maturation. RT inhibitors, on the other hand, are added to the cells at the time of or prior to viral particle infection. ThE: assay is performed in t:he absence of drug and in the presence of drug over a wide range of concentrations. The amount of luciferase is determined and the percentage (4) inhibition is calculated at the different drug concentrations tested.
Fig. 3 Examples of phenotypic drug susceptibility profiles. Data are analyzed by plotting th.e percent inhibition of luciferase activity vs. logy concentration (uM). This plot is used to calculate the drug concentration that is reauired to inhibit virus replication by 50% (ICSO) or by 950 (IC95). Shifts in the ~~nhibition curves towards higher drug concentrations are interpreted as evidence of drug resistance. Three typical curves for a nucleoside reverse SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) transcriptase inhibitor (AZT), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (delavirdine), and a protease inhibitor (ritonavir) are shown. A reduction in drug susceptibility (resistance) is reflected in a shift in the drug susceptibility curve toward higher drug concentrations (to the right) as compared to a baseline (pre-treatment) sample or a drug susceptible virus control, such as PNL4-3 or HXB-2, when a baseline sample is not available.
Fig. 4 Phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance profile:
patient 487. A PCR-based phenotypic susceptibility assay was carried out giving the phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance profile showing increased resistance to both delavirdine and nevirapine. This is an example of the first pattern of NNRTI susceptibility/resistance.
Evaluation of this virus from plasma showed HIV reverse transcriptase having mutations at codons 184 (M184V) associated with 3TC resistance and at 103 (K103N) associated with both delavirdine and nevirapine resistance.
Fig. 5 Phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance profile of site directed reverse transcriptase mutants. A PCR-based phenotypic susceptibility assay was carried out giving t:he phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance profile for site directed mutants having mutations at codons 103 a:nd 181 (K103N; Y181C) demonstrating resistance to both delavirdine and nevirapine. The double mutant demonstrates the additive effect of both mutations resulting in a further increase in resistance.
Fig. 6 Phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance profile:
Patient 268. A PCR-based phenotypic susceptibility assay was carried out giving the phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance profile showing the evaluation of virus from plasma with HIV reverse transcriptase having phenotypic SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) W O 99/61658 PCT/US99/1 ~ 629 resistance to delavirdine but not nevirapine. This is an example of the second pattern of NNRT:L
susceptibility/resistance. This f>atient virus is resistant to all of the protease inhibitors tested and also has significant resistance to AZT and 3TC and shows slight shifts in susceptibility to ddC, ddI, and d4T. Evaluation of this virus from plasma using a PCR and sequencing based genotypic assay showed HIV reverse transcriptase having mutations at codons 103 and 236 (K103N; P236L). The P236L
mutation was previously reported to cause delavirdine resistance and nevirapine hypersensitivity (Dueweke TJ et al. (1993) Proc Natl Acad Sci 90,. 4713-4717). However, in this patient sample, while there was delavirdine resistance nevirapine susceptibility was the same as wild type.
Fig. 7 Phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance profile of site-directed reverse transcriptase mutant (P236L). A PCR-based phenotypic susceptibility assay was carried out giving the phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance profile showing the susceptibility to delavirdine and nevirapine of the P236L site-directed mutagenesis mutant.
This result is identical to that observed in the patient virus sample shown in Figure 6. The next two panels show the K103N site-directed mutagenesis mutant and the two panels below show the double mutant K103N + P236L. The P236L mutation is additive to the K103N causing severe resistance to delavirdine while having no effect on nevirapine resistance due to K103N. The right side of the figure shows a similar result when the P236L mutation is added to the Y181->C mutation.
Fig. SA
Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility and Resistance Profile:
Patients 302. This is one example of the third pattern of NNRTI susceptibility/resistance. Phenotypic analysis of the patient virus demonstrated reduced susceptibility to both delavirdine and nevirapine. This pattern is SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) characterized by a larger reduction of nevirapin.e susceptibility compared to the reduction of delavirdine susceptibility. Genotypic analysis of the patient virus demonstrated the presence of the RT mutations K103N
associated with nevirapine and <ielavirdine resistance arLd P225H.
Fig. 8B
Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility and Resistance Profile:
Patients 780. This is a second example of the third pattern of NNRTI susceptibility/resistance. Phenotypic analysis of the patient virus demonstrated reduced susceptibility to both delavirdine and nevirapine. This pattern is characterized by a larger reduction of nevirapine susceptibility compared to the reduction of delavirdine susceptibility. C~enotypic analysis of t;he patient virus demonstrated the presence of the RT mutations K103N associated with nevirapine and delavirdine resistance and P225H.
Fig. 8C
Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility and Resistance Profile:
Individual Virus Clones of Patient 302. Genotypic analysis of individual virus clones from patient 302 revealed viruses containing the K103N mutation without the P225H
mutation (K103N, I135M, R211K) and viruses containing the K103N mutation with the P225H mutation (K103N, P225H:).
Phenotypic characterization of these virus clones indicates that the P225H mutation reduces the amount delavirdine resistance associated with the K103N mutation (compare bottom panels), but does not alter the amount of nevirapine resistance associated with the K103N mutation (compare t:op panels) .
Fig. 8D
Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility and Resistance Profile: Site Directed Reverse Transcriptase Mutants. Phenotypic characterization of a virus cont:ainirig the site directed RT
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) mutation P225H indicates that this mutation increases susceptibility to delavirdine, but not nevirapine (compare top panels). Phenotypic characterization of a virus containing the site directed RT mutations P225H plus KO1~N
5 or P225HV plus Y181C indicate that the P225H mutation decreases the amount of delavirdine resistance associated with either K103N or Y181C, but does not decrease the amount of nevirapine resistance associated with K103N or Y181C. to delavirdine, but not nevirapine (compare 10 corresponding middle and bottom panels).
Fig_ 9A
Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility and Resistance Profile:
Patients 644. This is one example of the fourth pattern of 15 NNRTI susceptibility and resistance. Phenotypic analysis of the patient virus demonstrated by a large reduction in susceptibility to nevirapine,, but not delavirdine.
Genotypic analysis of the patient virus demonstrated the presence of the RT mutations G190S, as well as the K101E
20 mutation associated with reductions in susceptibility to atevirdine, DMP266, L-697,661 and UC-10,38,57 (Schinazi, Mellors, Larder resistance table).
Fig. 9B
25 Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility and Resistance Profile: Site Directed Reverse Transcriptase Mutants. Phenotypic characterizations of viruses containing either site directed RT mutations G190A, oz' G190S indicate that these mutations greatly reduce susceptibility to nevirapine, and slightly increase susceptibility to delavirdine (compare top panels).
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99!61658 PCT/US99/11629 Detailed Description of the Invention The present invention relates to methods of monitoring the clinical progression of HIV infection in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy, particularly non-nucleoside reverse' transcriptase inhibitor antiretroviral therapy.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides for <~
method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretrovira:l therapy of a patient comprising (s_) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at one or more positions in the RT. The mutations) correlate positively with alterations in phenotypic susceptibility/resistance.
In a specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at codon 225 and 103. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assays, that mutations at codon 225 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 103 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with an increase in delavirdine -susceptibility, little or no chance in nevirapine susceptibility and little or no change in efavirenz susceptibility.
In another specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNR'rI
antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (:i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whEaher the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at codon(s) 236 and 103 and/or 181. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assay, that mutations at codon 236 either alone or in combination with SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCI'/US99I11629 a mutation at codon 103 and/or 181 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with a decrease in delavirdine susceptibility (increased resistance) and no change in nevirapine susceptibility. The 236 mutation alone or on a Y181C background has no effect on efavirenz susceptibility but restores a significant portion of the loss of susceptibility caused by a 103N mutation.
In another specific embodiment, t:he invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i.) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at codon(s) 230 and/or 181. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assay, that mutations at codon 230 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 181 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with a significant decrease in delavirdine susceptibility (increased resistance), significant decrease in nevirapine susceptibility.
In another specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNR'rI
antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at codon 181. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assay, that a mutation at codon 181 of HIV
reverse transcriptase is correlated with a moderate decrease in delavirdine susceptibility (increased resistance), significant decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and no change in efavirenz susceptibility.
In another specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient, and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at colon 188. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assay, that a mutation at colon 188 of HIV
reverse transcriptase are correla~ed with a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility ;increased resistance), a substantial decrease in nevira~>ine susceptibility and a significant decrease in efavirenz susceptibility.
In other specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding H:IV RT having a mutation a t codon(s) 138 and/or 188. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assay, that mutations at colon 138 either alone or in combination with a mutation at colon 188 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with a moderate decrease in delavirdine susceptibility (increased resistance), a ;substantial decrease :in nevirapine susceptibility and a moderate decrease in efavirenz susceptibility.
In another specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at codon(s) 98. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assays, that mutations at colon 98 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility (increase resistance), a slight decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCT/LJS99/1 x629 In another specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNRTI:
antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological samplf=_ from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at.
codon(s) 98 and/or 190. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assay, that mutations at codon 98 either alone or in combination. with a mutation at codon 190 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with an increase in delavirdine susceptibility (decreased resistance), a substantial decrease in nevirapin~=
susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In other specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNRTI antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nuc:Leic acid encoding HIV RT
having a mutation at codon(s) 181 and/or 98. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assay, that mutations at codon 181 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 98 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with. a significant decrease in delavirdine susceptibility (increased resistance), a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In another specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNRTI antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient ; and (ii) determining whether the biological samplE: comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at codon(s) 101 and/or 190, for example 1905. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assay, that mutations at codon 101 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 190 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with no change in delavirdine susceptibility (wild-type), a SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In another specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the Effectiveness of NNRT7:
5 antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HTV RT having a mutation at codon(s) 108. This invention established, using a 10 phenotypic susceptibility assay, that a mutation at codon 108 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with a no change in delavirdine susceptibility (wild-type), a slight decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and no change i:n efavirenz susceptibility. In anc>ther specific embodiment, 15 the invention provides fox a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNRTI antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nuc:Leic acid encoding HIV RT
20 having a mutation at codon(s) 101 and 103 and/or 190. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility assay, that mutations at codon 101, either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 103 and/or 190 of HIV
reverse transcriptase are correlated with a either no 25 change (101 and 190) or a moderate decrease (103 and 190, for example 190A) in delavirdine susceptibility (increasE:d resistance), a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a significant decrease in efavirenz susceptibility.
In another specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNR'rI
antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (:i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV- infected patient; and (ii) determining wheaher the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT having a mutation at codon(s) 106 and/or 189 and/or 181 and/or 227. This invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibility SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) assay, that mutations at codon 106 either alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 189 and/or 181 and/or 227 of HIV reverse transcriptase are correlated with changes in delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz susceptibility. Specifically, the: presence of mutations at.
106 and 181 correlates with a significant decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 106 and 189 correlates with a slight. decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a moderate decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and no change in efavirenz susceptibility.
The presence of mutations at 106 and 227 correlates with a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 181 and 227 correlates with an increase in delavirdine susceptibility, a significant decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and <~n increase in efavirenz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 106 and 181 and 227 correlates with a moderate decrease in delavirdin.e susceptibility, a substantial decrease in nevirapin.e susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirer.~z susceptibility. In another ;specific embodiment, the invention provides for a method of evaluating the effectiveness of NNRTI antiretroviral therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (ii) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV RT
having a mutation at codon(s) 188 and 100 and/or 103. Th_Ls invention established, using a phenotypic susceptibilit=y assay, that mutations at codon 188 either alone or :in combination with a mutation at codon 100 and/or 103 of HIV
reverse transcriptase are correlated changes in delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz susceptibility.
Specifically, the presence of mutations at 103 and 188 correlates with a substantial decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a substantial decrease in nevirapine SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) susceptibility and a substatntial decrease in efaviren:~
susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 100 and 103 correlates with a substantial decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a moderate decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. The presence of mutations at 103 and 100 and 188 correlates with a substantial decrease in delavirdine susceptibility, a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a. substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. Under the foregoing circumstances, the phenotypic susceptibility/resi~~tance profile and genotypic profile cf the HIV virus infecting the patient has been altered reflecting some change in the response to the antiretroviral agent. In the case on NNRTI
antiretroviral therapy, the HIV virus infecting the patient may be resistant to one or more but not another of th.e NNRTIs as described herein. It therefore may be desirable after detecting the mutation, to either increase the dosage of the antiretroviral agent, change to another antiretroviral agent, or add one or more additional antiretroviral agents to the pati.ent's therapeutic regimen.
For example, if the patient was being treated with efavirenz (DMP-266) when the 225 mutation arose, the patient's therapeutic regimen may desirably be altered by either (i) changing to a different NNRTI antiretroviral agent, such as delavirdin a or nevirapine and stopping efavirenz treat; or (ii) increasing the dosage of efavirenz; or (iii) adding another antiretroviral agent to the patient's therapeutic regimen. The effectiveness of the modification in therapy may be evaluated by monitoring viral burden such as by HIV RNA copy number. A decrease in HIV RNA copy number correlates positively with the effectiveness of a treatment regiment.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) The phrase "correlates positively," as used herein, indicates that a particular result renders a particular conclusion more likely than other conclusions.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (:i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the biological sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HIV
sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises that RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR producers comprising wild type or mutant 225 and lU3 codons; and (iv) determining, via the I5 products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 225 or 103 or both. Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNR.TI
therapy of a patient comprising (I) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected pat=lent; (ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the F;NA
to cDNA and amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises the RT gene; (ii_i) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR producers comprising the wild type or mutations at codons I03 and/or 181 and 236; and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 236 and :'_03 and/or 181.
Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing 'the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (I) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA tc cDNA and amplifying HIV sequences SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC1'/US99/11629 using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises that RT gene: (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or mutations at codon 101 and 190 (G190S); and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 190 (G190S) and 101.
Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: P, method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises the RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or mutations at codon 103 and 190 (G190A) and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 190 (G190A) and 103. Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising li) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HTV sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises the RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild ~ype or mutations at codon 230 and 181, and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 230 and 181.
Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a_patient comprising (i) SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCTILJS99/1:1629 collecting a plasma sample from. an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that 5 comprises the RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or mutation at 181; and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at colon 181.
Yet another preferred, non-limit_Lng specific embodiment, of 10 the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a plasma sample frorn an HIV-infected patier.;t;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA anc~ amplifying HIV sequences 15 using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises the RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primE:rs that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or mutation at colon 188; and (iv) determining, via t=he products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at 20 colon 188. Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a plasma sample from an H:IV-infected patient; (ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in 25 the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HIV sequences using H",IV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises the R'.' gene; (iii) performing PCR
using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or mutations at colon 138 and 188; and (iv) 30 determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at colon 138 and 188.
Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the 35 effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a.patient comprising (i) SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) collecting a plasma sample frorn an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-enccding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result= in a PCR product that comprises the RT gene; (iii) p~°rforming PR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild t:.ype or mutation at codon 98 and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 98.
Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing t=he effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA anal amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises the RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or mutations at codon 98 and 190; and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 190 and 98. Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A
method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (i) col.lecti.ng a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient; (ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA
in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises the R'r gene; (iii) performing PCR
using primers that result in fCR products comprising the wild type or mutations at codon 98 and 181; and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 98 and 181.
Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a_patient comprising (i) SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCTlUS99/11629 collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA _and amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that.
comprises the RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or mutations at codon 101 and 190; and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 190, for example 1905 and 101.
Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy e~f a patient comprising (i) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA anti amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result= in a PCR product that comprises the RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or a mutation at codon 108; and (iv) determining, via t:he products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 108. Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a plasma sample from an H:LV-infected patient; (ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises the R7.' gene; (iii) performing PCR
using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or a mutation at codon 101 and 103 and 190 and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codorv 101 and 103 and 190, for example 190A.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HIV sequencf:s using HIV primers that result in a PCR product. tha t comprises that RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or mutations at codon 106 and and 189 arid 181 and 227 and (iw) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 106 and 189 and 181 and 227.
Yet another preferred, non-limiting specific embodiment, of the invention is as follows: A method of assessing the effectiveness of NNRTI therapy of a patient comprising (i) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient;
(ii) amplifying the HIV-encoding RNA in the plasma sample by converting the RNA to cDNA and amplifying HIV sequences using HIV primers that result in a PCR product that comprises the RT gene; (iii) performing PCR using primers that result in PCR products comprising the wild type or mutations at codon 188 and 100 and 103 and (iv) determining, via the products of PCR, the presence or absence of a mutation at codon 188 and 100 and 103. The presence of t:he mutation at codon 225 and 103 of HIV RT indicates that t:he effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy may require alteration, since as shown by this invention mutation at codon 103 reduces susceptibility which susceptibility can in part be restored by mutation at codon 225. Using the methods of this invention change in the NNRTI therapy would be indicated. Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at codon 236 and 103 and/or 181 of the HIV RT
indicates that the effectivE:ness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished. Similarly, SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at colon 190 (G190A) and 103 (K103N) of the HIV RT indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished. Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at colon 190 (G190S) and 101 (K101E) of t:he HIV RT indicate that the effecriveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished. Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at colon 230 and 181 of the HIV RT indicat:es that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI
therapy has been diminished. Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the a mutation at colon 181 of the HIV RT indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished. Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at colon 188 of the HIV RT indicates that the effectiveness of the current of prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished. Similar:Ly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at colon 138 and 188 of the HIV RT indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NN:RTI
therapy has been diminished. Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at colon 98 of the HIV RT indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished. Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at colon 98 and 190 of the HIV RT indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished.
Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at colon 181 and 98 of the HIV' RT
indicates that the effectivE=_ness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished. Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at colon 101 and 190, for example 190S, of the HIV RT indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCT/US99/1'1629 Similarly, using the means and methods of this invention the presence of a mutation at codon 1.08 of the HIV RT indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI
therapy has been diminished. Sim:Llarly, using the means and 5 methods of this invention the presence of the mutation at 101 and 103 and 190, for example 190A, of the HIV RT
indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished. Similarly, using the means and methods cf t:his invention the presence 10 of the mutation at codon 106 and 189 and 181 and 22'1 of the HIV RT indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished. Similarly, using the means and methods of the invention the presence of the mutation at codon 188 and 100 and 103 of the HIV RT
15 indicates that the effectiveness of the current or prospective NNRTI therapy has been diminished.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows. a method of evaluating the 20 effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic. acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 236 and 103 25 and/or 181. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the three mutations correlates positively with delavirdine resistance. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the three mutations correlates positively 30 with nevirapine resistance. In another embodiment, the mutated codon 236 of HIV RT a_ncodes leucine (L). In a further embodiment, the reverse transcriptase has a mutation at codon 103, a mutation at codon 181 or a combination thereof in addition to the mutation at codon 236 o.f HIV RT.
35 In a still further embodiment, the mutated codon 103 encodes an asparagine (N) and the mutated codon at 181 encodes a cysteine (C) .
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is a follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infectE=_d patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 225 a:nd 103. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at codons 225 alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 103 of HIV
RT cause an increase in delavirdine susceptibility while having no effect ors nevirapine susceptibility. In yet another embodiment, the mutated codon 225 codes for a histidine, codon 230 codes for a :Luecine and codon 181 codes for a cysteine.
This invention provides a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether t:he biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 181. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay it was observed that t=he presence of mutations at codor:. 18 i correlates positively with a moderate decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a significant decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and no change in efavirenz susceptibility. In an embodiment, the mutated codon 181 for a isol.euci.ne.
This invention provides a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 188. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay it was observed that SUBSTITUTE SHEET {RULE 26) the presence of mutations at codor-i 188 correlates positively with a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and significant decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In an embodiment, the mutated codon x_88 codes for a cysteine, histidine, or leucine.
This invention provides a method of assessing tire effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether t:he biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 190. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay it was observed that the presence of mutations at codon 190 correlates positively with a slight increase in delavirdine susceptibility and a large decrease in nevirapine susceptibility. In an embodiment, the mutated codon 190 codes for an alanine or a serine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological samp~'~e from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 230 and 181. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at codons 230 alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 181 of HIV
RT causes a significant decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a significant decrease in nevirapine susceptibility.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (}y determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 138 and 188. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at codons 138 alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 188 of H:IV
RT causes a moderate decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in newirapine susceptibility a.nd a moderate decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In yet another embodiment, the mutated codon 138 codes for a alanine and codon 188 codes for a leucine.
This invention provides a method of assessing t:he effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether t:he biological sample comprises z:ucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 98. Using the phenotypic susceptibility asp>ay it was observed that ~~he presence of mutations at codon 98 correlates positively with a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a slight decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In an embodiment, the mutated codon 98 codes for glycine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV--infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and ;b) determining whether the SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 98 and 190.
Using tote phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at codons 98 alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 190 of HIV RT causes an increase in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In yet another embodiment, the mutated codon 190 codes for a serine and codon 98 for a glycine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral_ therapy of HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 181 and 98.
Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at codons 181 alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 98 of HIV RT cause~~ a significant decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In yet another embodiment, the mutated codon 98 codes for a glycine and codon 181 codes for a cysteine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of v he invention is as follows: a method of assessing 'the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding EiIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 101 and 190, for example 190S. Using tl-.e phenotypic susceptibility SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at codons 101 alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 190 of HIV RT causes no change in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decease in nevirapine susceptibility and 5 a substantial decrease in efavire.nz susceptibility. In y~st another embodiment, the mutated codon 190 codes for a serine and codon 101 codes for a glutamine acid.
This invention provides a method of assessing t:he 10 effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (r~) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic. acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 108. Using 15 the phenotypic susceptibility assay it was observed that the presence of mutations at codon 108 correlates positively with no change in delavirdine susceptibility and a slight decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and no change in efavirenz susceptibility . In an embodiment, the mutated 20 codon 108 codes for a isoleucine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected 25 patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b} determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding EiIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 101 and 190, for example °y90A. Using the phenotypic susceptibility 30 assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at codons 101 alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 190 of HIV RT causes no change in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decease in nevirapine susceptibility and a significant decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In yet SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) another embodiment, the mutated codon 190 codes for a glycine and codon 101 codes for a glutamine acid.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a ;nethod of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding H:IV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 103 and 190. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it w;ss observed that the presence of the mutations at codons 103 alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 190 of HIV
RT causes a moderate decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a significant decrease in efavirenz susceptibility . In yet another embodiment, the mutated codon 190 codes for a alanine and codon 103 codes for a asparagine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological samp~~e from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 106 and 181. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at colons 106 alone or in combination with a mutation at colon 181 of H:IV
RT causes a significant decease in delvaridine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in nevirapi.ne susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavire~nz susceptibility . In yet another embodiment, the mutated colon 106 codes for a alanine and colon 181 codes for a cysteine.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether t:he biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 106 and 189. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at colons 7_06 alone or in combination with a mutation at colon 189 of HIV
RT causes a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a moderate decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and no change in efavirenz susceptibility. In yet another embodiment, the mutated colon 189 codes for a leucine and a colon 106 codes for a alanine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of 'the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and ib) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 106 and 227. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at colons 106 alone or in combination with a mutation at colon 227 of HIV
RT causes a slight decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in nE:virapine susceptibi.iity and a slight decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In yet another embodiment, the mutated colon 227 codes for a leucine and colon 106 codes for a alanine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological cample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 181 and 227. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at codons 181 alone or in combination with a mutation at codon 227 of HIV-RT causes an increase in delavirdine susceptibility and an significant decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and and an increase in efavirenz susceptibility.
In yet another embodiment, the mutated codon 227 codes f:or a leucine and codon 181 nodes fcr cysteine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of t:he invention is as follows: a method of assessing t:he effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-.infect:ed patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether t:he biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 106 and :L81 and 227. Using the phenotypic :susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of t:he mutations at codons 106 alone or in combination with a mutation.at codon 181 and 227 of HIV RT causes a moderate decrease in delavird.ine susceptibility and a slight: decrease in efavir~~nz susceptibility.
In yet another embodiment, the mutated codon 106 codes for a alanine, codon 181 codes for a cysteine and codon 227 codes for a leucine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding H=LV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 103 and S 188. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at colons 103 alone or in combination with a mutation at colon 188 of H:IV
RT causes a substantial decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibility. In yet another embodiment, the mutated colon 188 codes for a leucine and colon 103 codes for a asparagine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing t:he effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising: (a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 100 and 103. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at colons 100 alone or in combination with a mutation at colon 103 of HIV
RT causes a substantial decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a moderate decrease in nevirapine susceptibility and a substantial decrease in efavirenz susceptibility.
In yet another embodiment, the mutated colon 100 codes for a isoleucine, colon 103 codes for a asparagine.
Another preferred, non-limiting, specific embodiment of the invention is as follows: a method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) patient comprising: (a) collectirng a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b;~ determining whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV
reverse transcriptase having a mu~ation-at colon 100 and 103 5 and 188. Using the phenotypic susceptibility assay, it was observed that the presence of the mutations at colons 100 alone or in combination with a mutation at colon 103 and 188 of HIV RT causes a substantial decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a moderatE: decrease in nevirapine 10 susceptibility and a substant~.al decrease in efavirenz susceptibility.
In yet another embodiment, the mutated colon 100 codes for a isoleucine, colon 103 codes for a asparagine and colon 1.88 15 codes for a leucine.
This invention also provides the means and methods to use the resistance test vector comprising an HIV gene further comprising an NNRTI mutation for drug screening. More 20 particularly, the invention describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having mutations at colons 225 and 10:3 for drug screening. ~~he invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transc:riptase having mutations at 25 colons 236 and 103 and/or 181. The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having mutations at: colons 190 (G190A) and 103 (K103N). The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having 30 mutations at colons 190 (G190S) and 101 (K101E).
The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having mutations at colons 230 and 181.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 181.
The invention also describes the resistance test vecvor comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 188.
The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having mutations at codons 138 and 188.
The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at 98.
The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having mutations at codons 98 and 190.
The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having muta~ions at codons 181 and 98.
The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having mutatio n; at codons 101 and 190, for example 1905.
The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 108.
The invention also describes the resistance test veca or comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having mutations at codons 101 and 103 and/or 190, for example 190A.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transcriptase having mutations at codons 106 and 189 and/or 181 and/or 227.
The invention also describes the resistance test vector comprising the HIV reverse transc:riptase having mutations at codons 188 and 100 and/or 103.
The invention further relates to novel vectors, host cells and compositions for isolation and identification of the non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutant and using such vectors, host cells and compositions to carry out anti-viral drug screening. This invention also relates to the screening of candidate drugs for their capacity to inhibit said mutant.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) EXAMPLE 1: Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility and Resistance Test Using Resistance Test Vectors Phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance tests a.re carried out using the means and methods described in PCT
International Application No. PCT/US9'7/01609, filed January 29, 1997 which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In these experiments patient-derived segments) corresponding to the HIV protease and reverse transcriptase coding regions were either patient-derived segments amplified by the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method (RT-PCR) using viral RNA isolated from vir al particles present in the serum of HIV-infected individuals or were mutants of wild type HIV-1 made by site direct=ed mutagenesis of a parental clones of resistance test veci~or DNA. Isolation of viral RNA was performed using standard procedures (e. g. RNAgents Total RNA Isolation SystE=_m, Promega, Madison WI or RNAzol, Tel-Test, Friendswood, T;~).
The RT-PCR protocol was divided into two steps. A
retroviral reverse transcriptase [e. g. Moloney MuLV reverse transcriptase (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchbu.rg, NJ), or avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase, (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN)] was used to copy viral RNA into cDNA. The cDNA was then amplified using a thermostablE: DNA polymerase [e.g. Taq (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ), Tth (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ), frimeZyme (isolated from Thermus brockianus, Biometra, Gottingen, Germany)] or a combination of thermostable polymerases as described for the performance of "long PCR" (Barnes, W.M., (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA 91, 2216-2220) [e. g.
Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Taq + Pwo), (Boehringer Mannheim. Indianapolis, IN) OR GeneAmp XL PCR kit (Tth +
Vent), (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ)]..
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) The primers, Apal primer (PDSApa) and AgeI primer i;PDSAge) used to amplify the "test" patient-derived segments contained sequences resulting in Apal and Agel recognition sites being introduced into the ~' and 3' termini of the PCR
product, respectively as described in PCT International Application No. PCT/US97/01609, filed January 29, 1997.
Resistance test vectors incorporating the "test" patient-derived segments were constru~~ted as described in I?CT
International Application No. PCT/US97/01609, filed January 29, 1997 using an amplified DNA product of 1.5 kB prepa:red by RT-PCR using viral RNA as a tE~mplate and oligonucleotides PDSApa (1) and PDSAge (2) as primers, followed by digestion with ApaI and AgeI or the isoschizimer PINAI. To ensure that the plasmid DNA corresponding to the resultant resistance test vector comprise~~ a representative sample of the HIV viral quasi-species present in the serum of a given patient, many (>100) independent E., coli transformants obtained in the construction of a given resistance test vector were pooled and used for the preparation of plasmid DNA.
A packaging expression vector encoding an amphotrophic NIuLV
4070A env gene product enables production in a resistance test vector host cell of resistance test vector viral particles which can efficientl~r infect human target ce7_ls.
Resistance test vectors encoding all HIV genes with the exception of env were used to transfect a packaging host cell (once transfected the host cell is referred to as a resistance test vector host cell.). The packaging expression vector which encodes the amphotrophic MuLV 4070A env gene product is used with the resi:>tance test vector to enable production in the resistance test vector host cell of infectious pseudotyped resistance test vector viral particles.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC~'/US99111629 Resistance tests performed with resistance test vectors were carried out using packaging hcst and target host cells consisting of the human embryonic kidney cell line 293 (Cell Culture Facility, UC San Francisco, SF, CA) or the Jurk.at 5 leukemic T-cell line (Arthur Weiss, UC San Francisco, ~~F, CA) .
Resistance tests were carried out with resistance test vectors using two host cell types. Resistance test vector 10 viral particles were produced by a first host cell (the resistance test vector host cell) that was prepared by transfecting a packaging host cell with the resistance test vector and the packaging expres~;ion vector. The resistance test vector viral particles were then used to .infect: a 15 second host cell (the target host cell) in which the expression of the indicator gene is measured.
The resistance test vectors containing a functional luciferase gene cassette were constructed and host cells 20 were transfected with the resistance test vector DNA. The resistant test vectors contained patient-derived reverse transcriptase and protease sequences that were either susceptible or resistant to the antiretroviral agents, such as nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-25 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. The resistance test vector viral particles produced by transfecting the resistance test vector DNA into host cells, either in the presence or absence of protease inhibitors, were used to infect target host cells grown.
30 either in the absence of NRTI or NNRTI or in the presence of:
increasing concentrations of the drug. The amount: of:
luciferase activity produced :~n infected target host cells in the presence of drug was compared to the amount of luciferase produced in infected target host cells in the 35 absence of drug. Drug resistance was_measured as the amount SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99!61658 PCT/US99/11629 of drug required to inhibit by 50o the luciferase activity detected in the absence of drug (inhibitory concentration 500, IC50). The IC50 values were determined by plotting percent drug inhibition vs. log,;, drug concentration.
Host cells were seeded in 10-cm-diameter dishes and were transfected several days after plating with resistance tE:st vector plasmid DNA and the envelope expression vector.
Transfections were performed using a calcium-phosphate precipitation procedure. The cell culture media containing the DNA precipitate was replaced with fresh medium, from one to 24 hours, after transfect:ion. Cell culture media containing resistance test vector viral particles was harvested one to four days after transfection and was pa w ed through a 0.45-mm filter befcre being stored at -80°C. I~IV
capsid protein (p24) levels in the harvested cell cult ure media were determined by an EIA method as described by the manufacturer (SIAC; Frederick, MD). Before infection, target cells (293 and 293/T) were plated in cell culture media. Control infections were performed using cell culture media from mock transfections (no DNA) or transfections containing the resistance test vector plasmid DNA without the envelope expression plasmid. pne to three or more days after infection the media was removed and cell lysis buffer (Promega) was added to each well. Cell lysates were assayed for luciferase activity (Fig.3). The 'inhibitory effect of the drug was determined using the following equation:
o luciferase inhibition = 1 - (RLUluc [drug) - RLUluc) x 100 where RLUluc (drug] is the relative light unit of lucifei:ase activity in infected cells in the presence of drug and RLUluc is the Relative Light Unit of luciferase activit~,r in infected cells in the absence of drug. IC50 values were obtained from the sigmoidal curves that were generated :Eram the data by plotting the percent inhibition of lucife:rase SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) activity vs. the 1og10 drug concentration. The drug inhibition curves are shown in (Fig.3).
EXAMPLE 2: Correlating Phenotypic Susceptibility And Genotypic Analysis Phenotypic susceptibility analysis of patient HIV samples Resistance test vectors are constructed as described in example 1. Resistance test vectors, or clones derived from the resistance test vector pools, are tested in a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs.
This panel of anti-retroviral drugs may comprise members of the classes known as nucleoside-analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and protease inhibitors (PRIs). ~'he panel of drugs can be expanded as new drugs or new drug targets become available. An C50 is determined for each resistance test vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drugs tested is examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility.
A patient sample can be further examined for genotypic changes correlated with the pattern of susceptibility observed.
Genotypic analysis of patient HIV samples Resistance test vector DNAs, either pools or clones, are analyzed by any of the genotyping methods described in Example 2. In one embodiment of: the invention, patient HIV
sample sequences are determined using viral RNA
purification, RT/PCR and ABI chain terminator automated sequencing. The sequence that is determined is compared to control sequences present in the database or is compared to a sample from the patient prior to initiation of therapy, if available. The genotype is examined for sequences that are SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) different from the control or pre-treatment sequence and correlated to the observed phenc.-~type.
Phenotypic susceptibility analysis of site directed mutants Genotypic changes that are observed to correlate with changes in phenotypic patterns of drug susceptibility are evaluated by construction of resistance test vectors containing the specific mutation on a defined, wild-type (drug susceptible) genetic background. Mutations may be incorporated alone and/or in combination with other known drug resistance mutations that are thought to modulate the susceptibility of HIV to a certain drug or class of drugs.
Mutations are introduced into the resistance test vector through any of the widely known methods for site-directed mutagenesis. In one embodiment of this invention the mega-primer PCR method for site-directed mutagenesis is used. A
resistance test vector containing the specific mutation. or group of mutations is then t=ested using the phenotypic susceptibility assay described above and the susceptibi7_ity profile is compared to that of a genetically defined wild type (drug susceptible) resistance test vector which lacks the specific mutations. Observed changes in the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the antiretroviral drugs tested is attributed to the specific mutations introduced into the resistance test vector.

Correlating Phenotypic Susceptibility And Genotypic Analysis: P225H
Phenotypic analysis of Patient 97-302 A resistance test vector was constructed as described in example 1 from a patient sample: designated as 97-302. 'This patient had been treated with d4T, indinavir and DMP-266 for a period of approximately 10 months. Isolation of viral RNA
and RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) that comprised viral sequences coding for all of PR and as 1 - 313 of RT. The patient derived segment was inserted into a indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistance test vector designated RTV-302. RTV-302 was tested using a phenotypic susceptibility assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of the classes known as NRTIs (AZT, 3fC, d4T, ddI and ddC), NNRTIs (delavirdine -and nevirapine), and PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for each drug tested. Susceptibility of the patient virus to each drug was examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for patient sample RTV-302 in which there was significant decrease in nevirapine susceptibility (incre:ased resistance) and modest decrease in delavirdine susceptibility (See Figure 8A).
Patient sample 97-302 was examined further for genotypic changes associated with the observed pattern of susceptibility.
Determination of genotype of patient 97-302 RTV-302 DNA was analyzed by AB:L chain terminator automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (HIV
Sequence Database Los Alamos, NM). The nucleotide sequence was examined for sequences that are different prom the control sequence. RT mutations were noted at positions K103N, I135M, T200A, and P225H. K103N is associated with resistance to the NNRTIs and has been shown using the phenotypic susceptibility assay to be associated with reduced susceptibility to both delavirdine and nevirapine to an equal extent. The mutations at I135M and T200A are known polymorphisms of the wild-type (drug-sensitive) variants of HIV. The mutation, P225H, was characterized SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99161658 PC'T/US99/11629 using site directed mutagenesis and phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the changes at amino acid 225 with changes in NNRTI phenotypic susceptibility.
5 Site directed mutagenesis Resistance test vectors were constructed containing the P225H mutation alone arid in combination with other known drug resistance mutations (K103N, Y181C) known to modulate the HIV susceptibility to NNRTIs. Mutations were int:roduc:ed 10 into the resistance test vector using the mega-primer fCR
method for site-directed mutagenesis. (Sakar G and Somrnar SS (1994) Biotechniques 8(4), 404-407). A resistance test vector containing the P225H mutation (P225H-RTV) was tested using the phenotypic susceptibility assay described above 15 and the results were compared to that of a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 225. The pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTI, delavirdine in the P225H-RTV was altered as compared to wild type. In the context of an otherwise wild 20 type background (i.e. P225H mutation alone) the P225H-,ATV
was more susceptible to delavirdine than the wild type control RTV. No significant change in nevirapine susceptibility was observed in the P225H-RTV. The P225H
mutation was also introduced into a RTV containing 25 additional mutations at K103N, 5.'181C or both (K103NtY181C).
In all cases, RTVs were more susceptible to inhibition by delavirdine if the P225H mutation was present as compared. to the corresponding RTV lacking the P225H mutation (Fig. 8D).
In all cases the P225H mutation did riot significantly change 30 nevirapine susceptibility (Fig. 8D).
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) EXAMPhE 4 Correlating Phenotypic Susceptibility And Genotyp:ic Analysis: P236Z
Phenotypic analysis of HIV patient 97-268 A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 97-268. This patient had been treated with AZT and 3TC (NRTIs), indinavir and saquinavir (PRIs) and delavirdine (an NNRTI) for periods varying from 1 month to 2 years. Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequences coding for all of PR
and amino acids 1 - 313 of RT. 'rhe patient derived segment was inserted into a indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistance test vector designated RTV-268. RTV-268 was then tested using the phenotypic susceptibility assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of t:he classes known as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI and ddC) , NNR'.CIs (delavirdine and nevirapine), and PRIs (indinav:Lr, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir). An IC50 w as determined for each drug tested. Susceptibility of 'the patient virus to each drug was examined and compared to the susceptibility of a reference virus. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for the patient sample RTV-268 in which the virus sample was observed to be resistant to delavirdine with no resistance to delavirdine.
The sample was examined further for genotypic changes associated with the pattern of susceptibility.
Genotype of HIV patient 97-268 RTV-268 DNA was analyzed by ABC chain terminator automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of wild type Glade B HIV-1. The nucleotide sequence was evaluated f-or sequences different SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC'C/US99/11629 from the control sequence. R':' mutations were noted at positions M41L, D67N, M184V, T200A, E203D, L210W, T215'~, K219Q, and P236L compared to the control sequence. The mutations at T200A and E203D are known polymorphisms in wild-type (drug-sensitive) variants of HIV. Mutations at positions M41L, D67N, L210W, T215Y, and~K219Q are associated with AZT resistance. The mutation at M184V is associated with 3TC resistance. The mutation at P236L is associated with resistance to delavirdine and increased susceptibility to nevirapine (Dueweke et al., Ibid.). In contrast to previous reports, the RTV-268 ~cample showed no change in nevirapine susceptibility. The mutation, P236L, was characterized using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate changes at amino acid 236 with changes in phenotypic susceptibility.
Site directed mutagenesis Resistance test vectors were constructed containing the P236L mutation alone and in ccmbination with other known drug resistance mutations (K103Cd, Y181C) that are known to modulate the susceptibility of fiIV-1 to NNRTIs. Mutations were introduced into the resistance test vector using the mega-primer PCR method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sa1<;ar and Sommar, Ibid.). A resistance test vector containing t:he P236L mutation (P236L-RTV) was tested using the phenotypic susceptibility assay and the results were compared to that of a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 236. P236L-RTV exhibited changes in NNRTI phenotypic susceptibility. In the context of an otherwise wild type background (i.e. P236L mutation alone) the P236L-RTV is less susceptible to delavirdine than a wild type reference RTV. In contrast to Dueweke et al. no significant change in nevirapine susceptibility was observed for P236L-RTV. The P236L mutation was also introduced into a RTV containing mutations at K103N, Y181C or both SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC'r/US99/11629 (K103N+Y181C). In all cases, the RTV's were less susceptible (more resistant) to deiavirdine if the P236L
mutation was present as compared to the corresponding RTV
lacking the P236L mutation. In all cases the P236L mutation did not significantly alter nev~.rapine susceptibility.
Example 5 Correlating Phenotypic Susceptibility And Genotypic Analysis: G190S
Phenotypic analysis of HIV patient 97-644 A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 97-644. T his patient had been treated with d4T (NRTI), indinavir (PRI) and efavirenz (NNRTI) for a period varying from 5 to 17 months. Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequences coding for all of PR and amino acids 1 - 313 of RT. The patient derived segment was inserted into a indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistance test vector designated RTV-644. RTV-644 was then tested using the phenotypic susceptibility assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel. of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of the classes known as NRTTs (A2T, 3TC, d4T, ddI and ddC), NNRTIs (delavirdine a.nd nevirapine), and PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavi.r, and saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for each drug tested. Susceptibility of the patient virus to each drug was examined and compared to the susceptibility of a reference virus. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for the patient sample RTV-644 in which t:he virus sample was observed to be resistant to nevirap=.ne with little or no resistance t.o delavirdine. The sample was examined further for genotypic changes associated with the pattern of susceptibility.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC'T/US99/11629 Genotype of HIV patient 97-644 RTV-644 DNA was analyzed by ABI chain terminator automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of wild type Glade B HIV-1. The S nucleotide sequence was evaluated for sequences different from the control sequence. R'w' mutations were noted at positions K101E and G190S compared to the control sequence. The mutations at T200A and E203D are known polymorphisms in wild-type (drug-sensitive) variants of HIV. The mutation at K101E is associated with resistance to some but not all NNRTIs. The mutation, G190A but not specifically G190S is associ<.~ted with nevirapine a:nd loviride resistance. The mutations G190S and G190A were characterized using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate changes at amino acid 190 with changes in phenotypic susceptibility.
Site directed mutagenesis Resistance test vectors were constructed containing the G190S and G190A mutations. Mutations were introduced into the resistance test vector using the mega-primer PCR method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.).
Resistance test vectors containing the G190S or G190A
mutations (G190S-RTV, or G190A-~RTV) were tested using the phenotypic susceptibility assay and the results were compared to that of a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 6190. G190S-RTV and G190A-RTV exhibited change~> in NNRTI phenotypic susceptibility. In the context: of an otherwise wild type background these RTVs were markedly less susceptible to nevirapine and slightly more susceptible to delavirdine than a wild type reference RTV.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCT!US99/11629 Example 6 Predicting Response to Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors by Characterization of Amino Acid Changes in HI'il-1 Reverse Transcriptase 5 Phenotypic and genotypic correlation of mutations at amino acid 236 of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase In one embodiment of this invention, changes in the amino acid at position 236 of the reverse transcriptase protein of HIV-1 is evaluated using the following method comprising:
10 (i) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-1 infected subject; (ii) evaluating whether the biolagical sample contains nucleic acid encoding t-fIV-1 reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 236. The presence of a mutation at codon 236 (P236L) is correlated with a reduction in 15 delavirdine susceptibility and little or no change in nevirapine susceptibility.
The biological sample comprises whole blood, blood components including peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMC:), 20 serum, plasma (prepared using various anticoagulants such as EDTA, acid citrate-dextrose, ~neparin), tissue biopsies, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), or other cell, tissue or body fluids, In another embodiment., the HIV-1 nucleic acid (genomic RNA) or reverse transcriptase protein can be 25 isolated directly from the b_Lological sample or after purification of virus particles from the biological sampJ_e.
Evaluating whether the amino acid at position 236 of t=he HIV-1 reverse transcriptase is mutated, can be perforrned using various methods, such as direct characterization of 30 the viral nucleic acid encoding reverse transcriptase or direct characterization of the reverse transcriptase protein itself. Defining the amino acid at position 236 of reverse transcriptase can be performed by direct characterization of the reverse transcriptase protein by conventional cr novel 35 amino acid sequencing methodoloqies,-epitope recognition by SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCTlUS99/11629 antibodies or other specific binding proteins or compounds.
Alternatively, the amino acid at position 236 of the HIV--1 reverse transcriptase protein can be defined by characterizing amplified copies of HIV-1 nucleic acid encoding the reverse transcriptase protein. Amplification of the HIV-1 nucleic acid can be performed using a varie!:.y of methodologies including reverse transcription-polymeraae chain reaction (RT-PCR), NASBA, SDA, RCR, or 3SR as would be known to the ordinarily skilled artisan. Evaluating whethE=_r the nucleic acid encoding HIV r~=verse transcriptasE= has a mutation at codon 236 can be pE:rformed by direct nucleic acid sequencing using various primer extension-chain termination (Sanger, ABI/PE and Visible Genetics) or chain cleavage (Maxam and Gilbert) methodologies or more recently developed sequencing methods such as matrix assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) or mass spectrometry {Sequenom, Gene Trace Systems). Alternatively, the nucleic acid sequence encoding amino acid position 236 can be evaluated using a variety of probe hybridization methodologies, such as genechip hybridization sequencing (Affymetrix), line probe assay (LiPA; Murexj, and differential hybridization (Chiron).
In a preferred embodiment of th:~.s invention, evaluation of whether amino acid position 236 of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase was wild type or mutant was carried out using a phenotypic susceptibility assay using resistance test vector DNA prepared from the biological sample. Tn one embodiment, plasma sample was collected, viral RNA was purified and an RT-PCR methodology was used to amplify a patient derived segment encoding the HIV-1 protease a.nd reverse transcriptase regions. The amplified patient derived segments were then incorporated, via DNA l igation and bacterial transformation, into an indicator gene viral vector thereby generating a resistance test vector.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC~'/US99111629 Resistance test vector DNA was isolated from the bacterial culture and the phenotypic susceptibility assay was carried out as described in Example 1. The results of the phenotypic susceptibility assay with a patient sample having a P236L mutation. The nucleic acid (DNA) sequence of the patient derived HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptaae regions from patient samp~'~e 268 was determined using a fluorescence detection chain termination cycle sequencing methodology (ABI/PE). The method was used to determine a consensus nucleic acid sequence representing the combination of sequences of the mixture of HIV-1 variants existing in the subject sample (representing the quasispecies), and to determine the nucleic acid sequences of individual variants.
Phenotypic susceptibility profiles of patient samples and site directed mutants showed that delavirdine and nevirapine susceptibility correlated with t:he absence of RT mutations at positions 103, 181 or 236 of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
Phenotypic susceptibility profiles of patient samples and site directed mutants showed a significant reduction in delavirdine susceptibility (increased resistance) and little or no reduction in nevirapine su~~ceptibility correlated with a mutation in the nucleic acid sequence encoding the amino acid leucine (L) at position 236 of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and the absence of mutations at positions 103 and 181.
Phenotypic susceptibility profiles of patient samples and site directed mutants showed no additional reduction in delavirdine or nevirapine susceptibility (increa:~ed resistance) with the amino acid p roline at position 236 when the RT mutations at positions 103, 181 or 103 and 181 wE:re present (K103N, Y181C, or K103N ~- Y181C). However, phenotypic susceptibility profiles of patient samples and site directed mutants showed an additional reduction in SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) delavirdine susceptibility (.increased resistance) and litt=Le or no additional reduction in nevirapine susceptibility wit=h the amino acid leucine (L) at position 236 in addition 1~0 the RT mutations associated wits NNRTI resistance (K103N, Y181C, or K103N + Y181C).
Phenotypic and genotypic correlation of mutations at amino acid 225 of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Phenotypic susceptibility profi~.es of patient samples and site directed mutants showed no change in susceptibility t o delavirdine or nevirapine when t=he amino acid proline (:P) was present at position 225 of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in the absence of RT mutations associated with NNR'TI
resistance (K103N, Y181C). However, phenotypic susceptibility profiles of patient samples and site directed mutants showed an increase in del~avirdine susceptibility a:nd little or no change nevirapine susceptibility when the amino acid histidine (H) was present: at position 225 in the absence of RT mutations (K103N, Y181C) associated with NNRTI
resistance.
Phenotypic susceptibility profiles of patient samples and site directed mutants showed no additional reduction in delavirdine susceptibility or nevirapine susceptibility when the amino acid proline (P) at position 225 was present in addition to the RT mutations associated with NNRTI
resistance (K103N, Y181C, or K103N + Y181C). In contrast phenotypic susceptibility profiles of patient samples and site directed mutants showed an increase in delavirdine susceptibility and little or no change in nevirapine susceptibility when the amino acid histidine (H) was present at position 225 in the presence of RT mutations associated with NNRTI resistance (K103N, Y1.81C, ~r K103N + Y18~_C).
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Phenotypic and genotypic correlation of mutations at amino acid 190 of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Phenotypic susceptibility profiles of patient samples and site directed mutants showed no change in susceptibility to delavirdine or nevirapine when the amino acid glycine (G) at position 190 was present in the absence of RT mutatio;~s associated with NNRTI resistance (K103N, Y181C). Phenotypic susceptibility profiles of site directed mutants showed an increase in delavirdine susceptibility and a decrease in nevirapine susceptibility when the amino acid alanlne ~.y~
was present at position 190 in the absence of RT mutatio:ns associated with NNRTI resistance. Phenotypic susceptibility profiles of patient samples and site directed mutants showed an increase in delavirdine susceptibility and a decrease in nevirapine susceptibility when the amino acid serine (S) was present at position 190 in the absence of RT mutations associated with NNRTI resistance.

Using Resistance Test Vectors and Site Directed Mutants To Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated With NNR.TI
Drug Susceptibility And Resistance in HIV: Y181I
Preparation os resistant test. vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient 98-964 HIV samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 98-964. This patient had been previously treated with ddI, d4T, AZT, 3T'C, ddC, (NRTIs), saquinavir and nelfinavir (PRIs) and nevirapine (an NNRTI) and HU. Isolation of viral RNA a,nd RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequence coding 'for all of PR and as 1- .'.13 of RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistance test vector designated RTV-964. RTV-964 was then tested in a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of t:he SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCTlUS99/11629 classes known as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI and ddC), NNRT:Ls (delavirdine and nevirapine), and PRIs (indinavi:r, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir) . An IC50 was determined for the resistance test vector pool for each drag 5 tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drugs tested was examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-964 in. which there was a moderate decrease (10 fold) in delavirdine susceptibility 10 and a significiant decrease (750-fold) in nevi.rapine susceptibility.
Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples RTV-964 DNA was analyzed by ABI chain terminator automated I5 sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (HIV
Sequence Database Los Alamos, NM). The genotype was examined for sequences that are different from the control sequence. Mutations were noted at positions M41L, K43E, 20 D67N, K70R, L74I, V75S, Y181I, R211T, T215Y, D218E, a.nd K219Q compared to the control sequence. M41L, D67N, K70R, L74I, V75S, T215Y, and K219Q are associated with NR:TI
resistance. A mutation at R211T is a known polymorphism in the sequence among different wild-type (drug-sensitive) 25 variants of HIV. Y181I had previously been shown to be associated with high level resistance to nevirapine. We examined the mutation, Y181I, using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the observed changes in genotype w~_th 30 phenotype.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to anl~i-retroviral drugs in HIV
35 The Y181I mutation was introduced into the resistance test vector using the mega-primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid). A resistance test vector containing the Y181I mutation (Y181I -RTV) was then SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and the results were compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 181. We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to t=he NNRTIs, delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz, in the Y181I-RTV. On a wild type background (i.e. Y181I mutation alone) the Y181I-RTV
displayed a moderate loss of susceptibility (20-fold) t:o delavirdine and a significant loss of susceptibility (740-fold) to nevirapine compared to a wild type control RTV.
The Y181I- RTV showed wild-type susceptibility (1.4-fold) t:o efavirenz.

Using Resistance Test Vectors And Site Directed Mutants '.~o Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated With NNR'.CI
Drug Susceptibility And Resistance in HIV: Y188 Preparation of resistant test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient 97-300 HIV samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 97-300 , Th:is patient had been previously treated with d4T and 3'TC
(NRTIs), indinavir (a PRI) and efavirenz (an NNRTI).
Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that ~~omprised viral sequences coding for all of PR and as 1 - 313 of RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistance test vector designated RTV-300. RTV-300 was then tested in a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of the classe~~ known as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI and ddC), NNRTIs (delavirdine, efavirenz and nevirapine), and PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for the resistance test vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drug tested was examined a.nd SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC'T/US99/11629 compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern c>f susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-300 in which there was moderate decrease (25-fold) i_n delavirdine sisceptibility and a substantial decrea~~e (greater than 800-fold) in nevirapine susceptibility.
Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples RTV-300 DNA analyzed by ABI chain terminator automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1_ (H:CV
Sequence Database Los Alamos, NH). The genotype was examined for sequence that are different from the control sequence. Mutations were noted a~ positions K32N, M184V and Y188L compared to the control ~~equence. The mutation at M184V is associated with 3TC resistance. Y188L h<~d previously been shown to be associated with high level resistance to efavirenz. Other mutations at position Y188 (i.e Y188C and Y188H) have been reported to have been selected for by treatment with several NNRTIs (E-ePseU, E-EPS, HEPT, Nevirapine, BHAP, U-8720E, TIBO 882913, Loviride). We examined the mutation, Y188L, using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the observed changes in genotype with phenotype.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs in HIV
The Y188L mutation was introduced into the resistance test vector using the mega-primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.): A resistance test vector containing the Y188L mutation (Y188L-RTV) was then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and t:he results were compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 188. We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTIs, delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz, in the Y188L-RTV. On a wild type SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC'f/US99/11629 background (i.e. Y188L mutation alone) the Y188L-R'TV
displayed a slight loss of susceptibility (9-fold) to delavirdine and substantial loss of susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapine and a significant loss of susceptibility (109-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. The approximate 100-fold loss of susceptibility to efavirenz way; not as high as had been previously reported.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in pnenotypic susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs in HIV
The Y188C mutation was introduced into the resistance test vector using the mega-primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.). A resistance test vector containing the Y188C mutation (Y188C-RTV) was then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and t:he results were compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 188. We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTIs., delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz, in the Y188C-RTV. On a wild t;rpe background (i.e. Y188C mutation alone) the Y188C-RTV
displayed a slight loss of :susceptibility (3-fold) to delavirdine and a moderate loss of susceptibility (30-fo:Ld) to nevirapine and efavirenz (20-fold) compared to a wild type control RTV.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs in HIV
The Y188H mutation was introduced into the resistance test vector using the mega-primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.).. A resistance test vector containing the Y188H mutation (Y188H-RTV) was then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and the results were compared to those- determined ~~sing a SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCT/US99/11.629 genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 18B. We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to tt~e NNRTIs, delavirdine and nevirapine, in the Y188H-RTV. On a wild type background (i.e. Y188H mutation alone) the Y188H-RTV displayed a moderate loss of susceptibility (3.5-fold) to nevirapine compared to a wild type control RTV. The phenotypic susceptibility of Y188H to efavirenz was not determined.
EXAMPhE 10 Using Resistance Test Vectors And Site Directed Mutants To Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated With NNRTI
Drug Susceptibility And Resistance in HIV: E138 and Y188 Preparation of resistant test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient 97-249 HIV samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 97-209. This patient had been previously treated with AZT, ddI, d4T and 3TC (NRTIs), indinavir (a PRIs) and adefovir. Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequences coding for all of PR
and as 1 - 313 of RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate resistance test vector designated RTV-209. RTV-209 was then tested in a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retrovi:ral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of the classes known as NRTIs (A.ZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI and ddC), NNRTIs (delavirdine, efavirenz and nevirapine), and P:RIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir). An I~~50 was determined for the resistance test vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drugs tested was examined and compared to known patterns of SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRT=~s was observed for patient RTV-209 in which there was a moderate decrease (75-fold) in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease (greater than 800-fold) :in 5 nevirapine susceptibility.
Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples RTV-209 DNA was analyzed by ABI chain terminator automat~sd sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the 10 consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (HIV
Sequence Database Los Alamos, NM). The genotype w,as examined for sequences that are different from the control sequence. Mutations were noted at positions A62V, S68G, V76I, F77L, F116Y, E138A, Q151M, M184V, Y188L and E291D
15 compared to the control sequence. The mutations at A62V, V75I, F77L, F116Y, Q151M and M184V are associated with NRTI
resistance. A mutation at E138k; had previously been shown to be associated with resistance to several NNRTIs and a mutation at Y188L had previously been shown to be associated 20 wiht a decrease in susceptibility to efavirenz. We examined the mutations Y188L and E1:38A using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenot~rpic susceptibility testing to correlate the observed changes in genotype with phenotype.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to .confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs in HIV
The E138A mutation alone and in combination with Y188L was introduced into resistance test vectors using the mega primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.). Resistance test vectors containing i~he E138A mutation (E138A-RTV) or the E138 mutation along with the Y1881 mutation (E138A-Y188L-RTV) were then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and the results wE=re SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at positions 188 and 138. We determined the pattern of phenotyp:Lc susceptibility to the NNRTIs, df=_lavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz, in the E138A-RTV, Y188L-RTV and E138-Y188L-RTV.
On a wild type background (i.a. E138A mutation alone) the E138A-RTV displayed wild-type susceptibility to delavirdine (1.6-fold), nevirapine (1.3-fold) and efavirenz (1.4-fold).
The Y188L-RTV displayed a slight loss of susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapine and a significant loss of susceptibility (110-fold) to efavirenz. The E138A-Y188L-RTV displayed a moderate loss of susceptibility (75-fold) to delavirdine and efavirenz (88-fold) and a substantial loss of susceptibility to nevirapin~~ (greater than 800-fold) compared to a wild type control- RTV. The combination of mutations resulted in an increased effect on delavirdine susceptibility compared tc the effect observed for each mutation alone.
EXAMPhE 11 Using Resistance Test Vectors And SiteDirected Mutants To Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated With NNRTI
Drug Susceptibility And Resistance in HIV: A98 Preparation of resistant test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient 98-675 HIV samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 98-675. This patient had been previously treated with ddI, AZT, and 3TC
(NRTIs), and saquinavir and nelfv~navir (PRIs). Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequences coding for all of PR
and as 1 - 313 of RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistance test vector designated RTV-675. RTV-675 was then tested in a SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCT/US99/11.629 phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of the classes known as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI
and ddC), NNRTIs (delavirdine, E_~favirenz and nevirapine), and PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir).
An IC50 was determined for the resistance test vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drugs tested was examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility t.o the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-675 in which wilcl-type susceptibility (2.1-fold) was observed for delavirdine and a slight decrease (6-fold) in nevirapine susceptibility was observed.
Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples RTV-675 DNA was analyzed by ABI chain terminator automatE:d sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (H=fV
Sequence Database Los Alamos, NM). The genotype was examined for sequences that are different from the control sequence. Mutations were noted at positions M41L, S48t, L74V, A98G, M184V and T215Y are associated with NR'rI
resistance. A mutation at A98G had previously been shown v o be associated with resistance to :nevirapine. We examined t)ze mutation A98G using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the observed changes in genotype with phenotype.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs in HIV
The A98G mutation into the resistance test vector ussng the mega-primer method for site-directed-mutagenesis (Sakar and SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Sommar, Ibid.). A resistance test vector containing the A98G mutation (A98G-RTV) was then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and the results were compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 98.
We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTIs, delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz, in t:he A98G-RTV. On a wild type background (i.e. A98G matati_on alone) the A98G RTV displ<~yed a slight lass of susceptibility to delavirdine (3-fold), nevirpine (8-fold) and efavirenz (3-fold) compared to a wild type control RfV.
Example 12 Using Resistance Test Vectors and Site Directed Mutants to Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated with NNRTI Drug Susceptibility and Resistance in HIV: A98 and 6190 Preparation of resistant test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient B HIV samples.
A resistant test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated B. The anti-retroviral treatment this patient received is unknown.
Isolation of viral RNA and RTi'PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequences coding for all of PR and as 1-313 of RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistant test vector designated RTV-B. Individual clones of the RTV-B pool were selected and then tested in. a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs camprised members of the classes known as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI
and ddC), NNRTIs (delavirdine and nevirapine), and PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavi_r, and saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for the resistance test vector clone for each SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) drug tested. The pattern of sup>ceptibility to all of the drugs tested was examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-B clone 1 in which there was an increase in susceptibility (0.55-fold) to delaviridine, a substantial loss of susceptibility (640-fold) to nevirapine and significant loss of susceptibility (250-fold) to efavirenz.
Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples RTV-B clone 1 DNA was analyzed by ABI chain terminator automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (HIV
Sequence Database Los Alamos, NM). The genotype was examined for sequences that are different from the control sequence. Mutations were noted at positions M41L, A98~~, M184V, L210W, 8211?, T215Y, E297P, and G190S compared to the control sequence. M41L, M184V, L210W and T215Y are associated with NRTI resistance. A mutation at A98G had previously been shown to be associated with resistance to nevirapine. A mutation at pos_Ltion G190A had previously been shown to be associated witru changes in susceptibility to nevirapine. Other changes at position 190 (i.e. E, Q, and T) have also been reported. We examined the mutations A98G and G190S, using site directed mutagenesis and i_n vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the observed changes in genotype with phenotype.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to anti-viral drugs in HIV
The A98 and G190S mutations were introduced alone or in 5 combination into the resistance test vector using the mega primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid. ) . Resistance test 'sectors containing the A98G
mutation (A98G-RTV), the G190S mutation (G190S-RTV) and boi~h mutations (A98G-G190S-RTV) were then tested using the 10 phenotypic assay described earlier and the results were compared to those determined u~;ing a genetically definE~d resistance test vector that was wild type at position 98 and 190. We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTIs, delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz, in t)~e 15 three vectors. On a wild type background (i.e. A9BG
mutation alone) the A98G-RTV displayed a slight Loss of susceptibility to delavirdine (3--fold), nevirapine (8-fold) and efavirenz (3-fold) compared to a wild type control RTV.
On a wild type background (i.e. G190S mutation alone) the 20 G190S-RTV displayed increased susceptibility (0.5-fold) to delavirdine, a moderate loss of :susceptibility (75-fold) to nevirapine and a slight loss of susceptibility (8-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. The A98G-G190S-RTV displayed increased susceptibility (0.8-fold) to 25 delavirdine, but a substantial loss of susceptibility to both nevirapine (greater than 800-fold) and efavirenz (greater than 250-fold) compared to a wild type control RfV.
Although only a slight loss of susceptibility to efavire:nz was observed for the individual mutations, the combination 30 of A98G and G190S resulted ._n a substantial loss of susceptibility to efavirenz. Likewise, this combination of mutation resulted in a greater loss of susceptibility to nevirapine than the sum of the t:wo mutations alone.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) EXAMPhE 13 Using Resistance Test Vectors and Site Directed Mutants Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated With NNRTI
Drug Susceptibility And Resistance in HIV: Y181 and A98 Preparation of resistant test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient 98-1057 samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 98-1057. This patient had been previously treated with ddI, d4T, AZT, anal 3TC (NRTIs), saquinavir and indinavir (PRIs) and delavirdir,,e (an NNRTI). Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used t.o generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequences coding for all of PR and as 1-313 RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate resistance test vector designated RTV-1057. RTV-1057 was then tested in a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral -drugs. This panel of anti-retrovira:L drugs comprised members of the classes known as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI, and ddC), NNRTIs (delavirdine, efavirenz and nevirapine) and PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for the resistance test vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drugs tested was examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for patient RT'J-1057 in which there was a moderate decrease in delavirdine (35-fold) susceptibility and a significant decrease (610-fold) in nevirapine susceptibility.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCf/US99/1 x629 Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples RTV-1057 DNA was analyzed by ABI chain terminator automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (HIV
Sequence Database, Los Alamos, NM). The genotype was examined for sequences that are different from the control sequence. Mutations were noted at positions T39A, M41L, A62V, D67E, T69SST, A98G, I135T, Y181C, T200I and T21'.~Y
compared to the control sequence M41L, A62V, D67E, T69SST, and T215Y are associated with NRT:I resistance. Mutations at positions I135T and T200I are known polymorphisms in the sequence among different wild-type (drug-sensitive) variants of HIV. Y181C and A98G have been previously shown to be associated with resistance to certain NNRTIs. We examined the mutations Y181C and A98G using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the observed changes in genotype with phenotype.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to anti retroviral drugs in HIV
The Y181C and A98G mutations were introduced alone and in combination into resistance test vectors using the mega-primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.). Resistance test vectors containing the Y181C mutation (Y181C-RTV) and the A98G mutation (A98G-RfV) and both mutations (Y181C-A98G-RTV) were then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and the results were compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 1.81 and 98. We determined the pattern of phenoty~>ic susceptibility to the NNRTIs, dc:lavirdine, neviraphine and efavirenz, in the three vectors. On a wild type background (i.e. Y181C mutation alone) the f181C-RTV displayed moderate loss of susceptibility (35-~old)_ to delavirdine, a significant loss of susceptibility (161-fold) to nevirapine SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) and a slight loss of susceptibility (3-fold) to efaviren.z compared to a wild type control R'fV. The A98G-RTV displayed a slight loss of susceptibility to delavirdine (3-fold), nevirapine (8-fold) and efavirenz (3-fold) compared to a wild type control RTV. The Y181C-A98G-RTV displayed significant loss of suscep~ibility (240-fold) t:o delavirdine, a substantial loss of susceptibility (greate:r than 800-fold) to nevirapine and a slight loss of susceptibility (7-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. THese data indicated that the comination of the two mutations, Y181C and A98G, resulted in a greater loss of susceptibility to both delavirdine and nevirapine than the sum of effects observed fer these two mutations individually.

Using Resistant Test Vectors and Site Directed Mutants t.o Correlate Genotypes and Phenotypes Associated with NNR'.rI
Drug Susceptibility and Resistance in HIV: K101 and 6190 Preparation of resistant test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patients 98-644 and 98-1060 HIV samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 98-644. This patient had been previously treated with d4T (an NNRTI), indinavir (a PRI and efavirenz (an NNRTI). A second resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 98-1060. This patient had been previously treated with d4T (an NNRTI).
indinavir (a PRI) and efavirnez (an NNRTI) . Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequences coding for all of PR
and as 1-313 of RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generates resistance test vectors designated RTV-644 and RTV-1060. RTV-644 and RTV-1060 were then tested in a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) comprised members of the classes ltnown as NNRTIs (AZT, 3TC', d4T, ddI, and ddC), NNRTIs (cielavi.rdine and nevirapine), and PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for the resistance test vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptiblity to all of the drugs tested was examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-644 in which there was a very slight (2.5-fold) decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a significant (600-fold) decrease in nevirapine susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility too the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-644 in which there was a very slight (2.5-fold) decrease in delavirdine susceptibility and a signigicant (600-fold) decrease :in nevirapine susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility too the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-1060 in which wild-type susceptibility (1.5-fold) to delavirdine was observed.
A significant decrease in efavi.renz susceptibility (900-fold) and a substantial decrease ~o nevirapine (greater than S00-fold) susceptibility was observed for RTV-1060.
Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples RTV-644 and RTV-1060 DNA were analyzed by ABI chain terminator automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (HIV Sequence Database Los Alamos, NM). The genotype was examined for sequences that are different from the control sequence. Mutations were noted at positions K101E and G190S
for RTV-644 compared to the control sequence and mutations were noted at positions K101E, G190S, T200A and T215Y for RTV-1060 compared to the control sequence. The sequence at position T215 was a mixture of wild-type and mutation. A
mutation at position K101E had been previously shown to be associated with resistance to several NNRTIs including high level resistance to delavi.rdine. A mutation at position G190A had previously been shown to be associated with changes in susceptibility to nevirapine. Other changes at position 190 (i.e. E, Q and T) have also been reported. We SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) examined the mutations K101E and c~190S, using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the observed changes in genotype with phenotype.

Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility t:o antiretroviral drugs in HIV
The K101E and Gl9oS mutations were introduced alone and in 10 combination into resistance test vectors using the mega primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.). Resistance te:~t vectors containing the K101E mutation (K101E-RTV), the G190S mutation (G190S-RTV) were then tested using the phenotypic assay described 15 earlier and the results were compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at positions 101 and 190. We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTI:~, delavirdine, nevirapine and efavirenz, in all three vectors.
20 On a wild type background ( i . a . K101E mutation alone ) tlZe K101E-RTV displayed a slight loss of susceptibility (5-fold) to delavirdine and efavirenz (5-fold) and a moderate loss of susceptibility (12-fold) to nevirapine compared to a wild type control RTV. The K101E-G190S-RTV displayed increased 25 susceptibility to delavirdine (0.5-fold), a moderate loss of susceptibility to nevirapine (75-fold) and a slight loss of susceptibility (7.6-fold) r_o efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. The K101E-G190S-RTV displayed wild-type susceptibility (l.4-fold) to del.avirdine and a substantial 30 loss of susceptibility to both nevirapine (greater than 800-fold) and efavirenz (greater than 250-fold) compared to a wild type control RTV.
In this example, the combination of mutations, G190S a.nd 35 K101E, displayed a novel phenotypic pattern. The combination resulted in the reversal of the effect on delavirdine susceptibility observed for the G190S mutation SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC'1'/US99/11629 alone and a greater than additive effect on t)ze susceptibility for both nevirapine and efavirenz.

Using Resistance Test Vectors And Site Directed Mutants 'To Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated With NNRTI
Drug susceptibility And Resistance in HIV: V108I
Preparation of resistant test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient 98-652 HIV samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 98-652. This patient had no previous anti-retroviral treatment.
Isolation of viral RNA and RT/F?CR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral. sequences coding for all of PR and as 1 - 313 or RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistance test vector designated RTV-652. RTV-652 was then tested in a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of hte classes known. as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI and ddC), NNRTIs (delav:irdine and nevirapine), a,nd PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for the resistance test vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drugs tested was examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to t:he NNRTIs was observed for patient: RTV-652 in which increase susceptibility (0.97-fold) to delavirdine was observed and a slight decrease (5-fold) in nevirapine susceptibility was observed.
Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples RTV-652 DNA was analyzed by ABI chain terminator automal~ed sequecing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (13IV
Sequence Database Los Alamos, NM1. The genotype was SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) examined for sequences that are diffrent from the control sequence. Mutations were noted at positions M41L, V108I,, I135T, L210W, R211K and T215D compared to the contro.L
sequence. M41L, L210W and T215D are associated with NRT:I
resistance. Mutations at positions I135T and R211K are known polymorphisms in the sequence among different wild-type (drug-sensitive) variants of HIV. V108I is known to b~~
associated with resistance to several NNRTIs. We examined the mutation V108I using site directed mutagenesis and i:n vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the observed changes in genotype with phenotype.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs in HIV
The V108I mutation was introduced into the resistance test vector using the mega-primer method for site directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.). A resistance test vector containing the V108I mutation (V108I-RTV) was then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and th.e results were compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at position 108. We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTIs, delaviridine, nevirapine and efavirenz, in the V108I -RTV. On a wild ty~>e background (i.e. V108I mutation alone) the V108I -RTV
displayed wild-type susceptibility (1.3-fold) t:o delaviridine and efavirenz (1.7-i=old) and a slight loss of susceptibility (3-fold) to nevir_apine compared to a type control RTV.

Using Resistance Test Vectors And Site Directed Mutants 'ro Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated With NNR'rI
Drug Susceptibility And Resistance in HIV: K103 and K101 and SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Preparation of resistant test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient 98-955 HIV samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described i.n Example 1 from a patient sample designated 98-955. This patient had been previously treated with nelfinavir (a PRI).
Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequence's coding for all of PR and as 1 - 313 of RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistance test vectors designated RTV-955. RTV-955 was then tested in a phenotypic assay tc> determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to a panel of anti-retroviral -drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of the classes known as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI and ddC), NNRTIs (delaviridine, efavirenz and nevirapine), and PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for the resistance test vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drugs tested was examined a:nd compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-955 in which there was a slight decrease (4-fold) in delaviridine susceptibility and a significant decrease (530-fold) in nevirapine susceptibility.
Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples RTC-955 DNA was analyzed by ABI chain terminator automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of wild type Glade B HIV-1 (HIV Sequence Database Los Alamos, NM). The genotype was examined for sequences that are different from the control sequence.
Mutations were noted at positions K20R, V35I, A62V, D67N, T69D, V75I, F77L, K101E, K103N, Y115F, F116Y, Q151M, I167V, Y181C, M184V, G190A, I202V, R211K, F214L, T215V, and K27.9Q
compared to the control sequence. Mutations at positions K101E, K103N, Y181C, G190A, and F214 L were mixtures of wild-type and the mutation. A62V, D67N, T69D, V75I, F7'7L, Y115F, F116Y, Q151M, M184V, T215V and K219Q are associated SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) with NRTI resistance. Mutations at. V35I, R211K and F214L are known polymorphism in the sequence among different wild-type (drug sensitive) variants of HIV. a mutation at position K101E had been previously shown to be associated with resistance to the NNRTIs. A mutation at Y181I had previous7_y been shown to be associated with high level resistance t:o nevirapine. a mutation at K103N had previously been shown too be associated with resistance to the three NNRTIs, delaviridine and nevirapine and efavirenz. We examined the mutations K101E, J103N and G1.90A using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the observed changes in genotype with phenotype.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to anti-retroviral drugs in HIV
The K101E, K103N and G190A mutations were introduced alone and in combination into resistance test vectors using the mega-primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.). Resistance test vectors containing the K101E
mutation (K101E-RTV), the K103N mutation (K0103N-RTV), the 6190 mutation (g190A-RTV and two mutations (KlOlE-G190A-RTV) and (K103N-G190A-RTV) were then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and the results were compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at positions 101, 103 and 190. We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTIs, delaviridine, nevirapine, and efavirenz, in all 5 vectors. On a wild type background (i.e. K101E mutation alone) the K101E-RTV displayed a slight loss (5-fold) os susceptibility to delavirdine and efavirenz (5-fold) anc~ a moderate loss of susceptibility (12-fold) to nevirapine (55-fold) and efavirenz(30-fold) compared to a wild type control RTV. On a wild type background (i.e. G190A mutation alone) the G190A -RTV displayed increased susceptibility (8-fo:Ld) efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. The K10:LE-G190A-RTV displayed wild-type susceptibility (2-fold) to SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) delavirdine, substantial loss of: susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapine and a significant loss of susceptibility (120-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. The K103N-6190-RTV displayed a moderate 5 loss of susceptibility (40-fold) to delavirdine, substantial loss of susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapin.e and a significant loss of susceptibility (215-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type. control RTV. Th.e introduction of a second mutation to a vector containing th.e 10 G190A resulted in the reversal of the effect on delavirdin.e susceptibility observed for the G190A mutation alone. The 6190-a mutation displayed an increased susceptibility t.o delviridine. However, the addition of either K10E or K103N
to the G190A mutation resulted in a slight loss of 15 susceptibility to delavirdine. Furthermore, the combination of G190A and K101E resulted in a greater than additive effect on the loss of susceptibility to nevirapine arid efavirenz. Lastly, these data indicated that the combination of the two mutations G190A and K103N resulted in a greater 20 loss of susceptibility to both nevirapine and efavirenz than the sum of effects observed for these two mutations individually.

25 Using Test Vectors And Site Directed Mutants To Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated With NNRTI Drug Susceptibility An Resistance in HIV: V106 and V189 and V1l31 and F227 30 Preparation of resistant test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient 98-1033 and 98-757 HIV samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient samples designated 98-1033. This patient had been previously treated with AZT, d$T, 3TC a:nd 35 ddI (NRTI), saquinavir, indinavir and nelfinavir (PRIs and nevirapine (an NNRTI). a second resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a sample obtained from the same patient at a different time point and SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCT/US99/1~1629 designated 98-757. This patient had received an additional 8 weeks of treatment with nevirapine San NNRTI) d4T (a.n NRTI), and saquinavir and relfin.avir (PRIs). Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used to generate a patient derived segment that comprised viral sequences coding for all of PR
and as 1 - 313 of RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate resistance test vectors designated RTV-1033 and RTV-757. RTV-1033 and RTV-757 were then tested in a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility t:o a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. This panel of anti-retroviral drugs comprised members of the classes known as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI and ddC), NNRTIs (delavirdine and nevirapine), and PRIs (indi.navir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for the resistance test vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drugs tested was examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-1033 in which there was a moderate decrease (30-fold) in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease (greater than 800-fold) in nevirapine susceptibility and a significant decrease (200-fold) i.n efavirenz susceptibility.
A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for patient RTV-757 in which there was a slight decrease ( 10-fold) in delavirdine susceptibility and a substantial decrease (greater than 800-fold) in nevirapine susceptibility.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Determination of Genotype of Patient HIV Samples R.TV-1033 and RTV-757 DNA were analyzed by ABI chain terminator automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (HIV Sequence Database Los Alamos, NM). The genotype was examined for sequences that are different from the control sequence. Mutations were noted at positions V35I, D67N, T69D, K70R, V106A, V189L, T200A, I202T, R211K, T215F, D218E, K219Q, H221Y, F227L, L228H and 8289 for RTV'-1033 compared to the control sequence. Mutations were noted at positions V35I, D67N, T69D, K70R, V106A, V108I, L109V, Y108C, V189L, T200A, I202T, R21.1K, T215F, D218E, K219Q, H221Y, L228H, L283I and R284K for RTV-757 compared to the control sequence. The sequences at positions V106A, V108I
and L109V were a mixture of wild--type and mutation. D67D1, T69D, K70R, T215F and K219Q are associated with NRTI
resistance. Mutations at V35I, 'r200A, R211K and R284K ai:e known polymorphisms in the sequence among different wild-type (drug-sensitive) variants of HIV. A mutation at V106A
had previously been shown to be associated with increase resistance to nevirapine. A mutation at V189I had previously been shown to be associated with NNRTI resistance but a mutation to L at this posit_Lon had not been previou sly reported to be associated with NNRTI resistance. A mutation at V108I had previously been sruown to be associated wi~~h increased resistance to both delavirdine and nevirapine. A
mutation at Y181C had also previously been shown to be associated with increased resistance to both delavirdine a:nd nevirapine. We examined the mutations V106A, V189L, V181C
and F227L using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing tc correlate the observed changes in genotype with phenotype.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PC'~/US99/1'1629 Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic susceptibility to anti-retroviral drugs in HIV
The mutations V106A, V189L, V181C an F227L were introduced alone and in combination into resistance test vectors using the mega-primer method for site-cirected mutagenesis (Saka r and Sommar, Ibid.). Resistance test vectors containing t he V106A mutation (V106A-RTV), the V189L mutation (V189L-RTV), the V181C mutation (V181C-RTV) and F227L mutation lF2271 RTV) and two mutations (V106A-Y1.81C-RTV) and (V106A-V189L-RTV) and (V106A-F227-RTV) and (V181C-F227-RTV) and three mutations, (V106A-Y181C-F227L-RTV) were then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and the results were compared to those determined using a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at positions 106, 189, 181 and 227. We determine:i the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTIs, delavirdine, nevirapine a.nd efavirenz, in all nine vectors. On a wild type background (i.e. V106A mutation alone) the V106A-RTV displayed a slight loss (5-fold) of susceptibility to delavirdine and a moderate loss of susceptibility (60-fold) to nevirapine and wild-type susceptibility (1.7-fo:Ld) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. On a wild type background (i..e.
V189L mutation alone) the V189-RTV displayed wild type susceptibility to delavirdine (1.8-fold), nevirapine (1.3-fold) and efavirenz (1.3-fold) compared to a wild type control RTV. On a wild type background (i.e. V181C mutation alone) the Y181C-RTV displayed a significant loss of susceptibility (100-fold) to delavirdine and a substantial loss of susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapine and a slight loss of susceptibility (4-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. On a wild type background (i.e. F227L mutation alone) the F227L-RTV
displayed increased susceptibility (0.03-fold) to delavirdine and efavirenz (0.48-fold) and a slight loss of SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) susceptibility (3-fold) to nevirapine compared to a wi7_d type control RTV. The V106A-Y181C-RTV displayed a significant loss of susceptibility (100-fold) t:o delavirdine, a substantial loss of susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapine and slight loss of susceptibility (4-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. The V106A-V189L-RTV displayed a slight loss o f susceptibility (3-fold) to delavirdine, a moderate loss of susceptibility (50-fold) to nevirapine and wild-type susceptibility (1-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. The V106A-F227-RTV displayed a slight loss of susceptibility (3-fold) to delavirdine, a substantial loss of susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapine and a slight loss of susceptibility (8-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. The Y181C-F227L-RTV
displayed increased susceptibility (0.89-fold) to delavirdine and efavirenz (0.99-fold) and a significant loss of susceptibility (285-fold) to nevirapine compared to a wild type control RTV. The V106A-Y181C-F227L-RTV displayed a moderate loss (50-fold) of su~~ceptibility to delavirdine and a substantial loss of susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapine and a slight loss of susceptibility (12-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control P,TV.

Using Resistance Test Vectors And Site Directed Mutants To Correlate Genotypes And Phenotypes Associated With NNRTI
Drug Susceptibility And Resistance In HIV: Y188 and L100 and Preparation of resistance test vectors and phenotypic analysis of patient 98-1058 HIV samples A resistance test vector was constructed as described in Example 1 from a patient sample designated 98-1058. Tlzis patient had been previously treated with ddI, d4T, AZT, 3'TC, SUBSTITUTE SHEET {RULE 26) WO 99161658 PCTIUS99/1:1629 ddC and abacavir (NRTIs), indinavir and amprenavir (PRI~~) and nevirapine (an NNRTI). Isolation of viral RNA and RT/PCR was used to generate a pat=ient derived segment that comprised viral sequences coding for all of RP and as 1 -5 313 of RT. The PDS was inserted into an indicator gene viral vector to generate a resistance test vector designated RTV-1058. Individual clones of RTV-1058 were selected and were then tested in a phenotypic assay to determine accurately and quantitatively the level of susceptibility to 10 a panel of anti-retroviral drugs. The panel of ant:i-retroviral drugs comprised members of the classes known as NRTIs (AZT, 3TC, d4T, ddI and ddC), NNRTIs (delavirdine a:zd nevirapine), an PRIs (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, a:nd saquinavir). An IC50 was determined for the resistance test 15 vector pool for each drug tested. The pattern of susceptibility to all of the drugs tested was examined and compared to known patterns of susceptibility. A pattern of susceptibility to the NNRTIs was observed for clones 4, 5 and 10 from patient RTV-1058. Clone 4 displayed a 20 significant loss of susceptibility (85-fold) for delavirdine and a substantial loss of susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) for nevirapine. Clone 5 displayed a substantial loss of susceptibility (250-fold) to delavirdine and a significant loss of susceptibility (120-fold) to nevirapine.
25 Clone 10 displayed a substantial loss of susceptibility (greater than 250-fold) to del~avirdiwe and (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapine.
Determination of genotype of patient HIV samples 30 RTV-1058 DNA was analyzed by ABI chain terminator automai~ed sequencing. The nucleotide sequence was compared to the consensus sequence of a wild type Glade B HIV-1 (13IV
sequence Database Los Almos, NM). The genotype was examined for sequences that are different from the control sequen~~e.
35 Mutations were noted at positions M41L, A62V, D6~N, T69SST, SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) L74V, L100I, K103N, V118I, I135T, T200S, L210W, R211K arid T215Y compared to the control seqvaence. L74V and L100I were mixtures of wild-type and mutation. Clone 4 contained mutations at positions K103N and Y188L. Clone 5 contained mutations at positions L100I and K103N. Clone 10 contained mutations at positions L100I, K103N and Y188L. M41L, A62V, D67N, T69SST, L79V, L210W and T215Y are associated with NRTI
resistance. Mutations at positions I135T, T200S and R211T
are known polymorphisms in the sequence among different wild-type (drug-sensitive) variants of HIV. A mutation at L100I had previously been shown to be associated with resistance to delavirdine and nevirapine. A mutation at K103N had previously been shown to be associated with resistance to delavirdine, nevvArapine and efavirenz. We examined the mutations, Y188L, '~100I and K103N, using site directed mutagenesis and in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing to correlate the observe=_d changes in genotype with phenotype.
Site directed mutagenesis is used to confirm the role of specific mutations in phenotypic suspectibility to anti-restroviral drugs in HIV
The mutations Y188L, L100I and K103N were introduced alone and in combinationn into resistance test vectors using 'the mega-primer method for site-directed mutagenesis (Sakar and Sommar, Ibid.). Resistance test vectors containing the Y188L mutation (Y188L-RTV), the L100I mutation (L100I-RTV), the K103N mutation (K103N-RTV), the two mutations (K103N-Y188L-RTV) and (L100I-K103N-RT'J), and, the three mutations (L100I-K103N-Y188L-RTV) were then tested using the phenotypic assay described earlier and the results were compared to those determined !sing a genetically defined resistance test vector that was wild type at positions 188, 100, and 103. We determined the pattern of phenotypic susceptibility to the NNRTIs, delay-irdine, nevlrapine and SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 99/61658 PCT/US99/1k629 efavirenz, in all 6 vectors. On a wild type background (i.e. Y188L mutation alone) the Y1.88L-RTV displayed a slight loss of susceptibility (9-fold) to delavirdine, a substantial loss of susceptibility (greater than 800-fold) to nevirapine and a moderate loss of susceptibility (110-fold) to efavirenz compared to a wild type control RTV. On a wild type background (i.e. L100I mutation alone) the L100I-RTV displayed a moderate loss of susceptibility (30-fold)to delavirdine and efavirenz (10-fold) and a slight displayed moderate loss of susceptibility (10-fold) and a slight loss of susceptibility (3-fold) to nevirapi:ne compared to a wild type control RTV. On a wild type background (i.e. K103M mutation alone) the K103N-RTV
displayed moderate loss of to delavirdine susceptibility (50-fold), nevirapine (55-fold;. and efavirenz (30-fold) compared to a wild type control RTV. The K103N-Y188L-RTV
displayed substantial loss of susceptibility to delavirdine (greater than 250-fold), nevirap:ine (greater than 800-fold) and efavirenz (greater that 25()-fold). compared to a wild control RTV. The L100I-K103N-RTV displayed substantial loss of susceptibility (greater that 250-fold) to delavirdine and efavirenz (greater that 250-fo=.d) and a moderate loss of susceptibility (70-fold) to nev~irapine compared to a wild type control RTV. The L100I-K103N-Y188L-RTV displayed substantial loss of susceptibility to delavirdine (great=er than 250-fold), nevirapine (greater than 800-fold), and efavirenz (greater than 250-fold) compared to a wild type control RTV. Novel combinations resulted in unpredeicted resistance patterns than were different from those patterns observed for the each mutation alone.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)

Claims (72)

What is claimed is:

1. A method of assessing the effectiveness of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising:
(a) collecting a plasma sample from the HIV-infected patient; and (b) evaluating whether the plasma sample contains nucleic acid encoding HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 236;
in which the presence of the mutation correlates with decreased susceptibility to delavirdine and little or no change in nevirapine susceptibility.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the mutation at colon 236 codes for a leucine.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein reverse transcriptase has an additional mutations) at colon 103, colon 181 or a combination thereof.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the mutation at colon 103 encodes an asparagine (N) and the mutation at colon 181 encodes a cysteine C).

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the HIV-infected patient is being treated with an antiretroviral agent.

6. A method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising:
(a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) evaluating whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 225;
in which the presence of the mutation correlates with an increase in delavirdine susceptibility and little or no change in nevirapine susceptibility.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the mutated codon 225 encodes a histidine (H).

8. The method of claim 6, wherein the HIV-infected patient is being treated with an antiretroviral agent.

9. The method of claim 6, wherein the reverse transcriptase has an additional mutation(s) at codon 103, 181 or a combination thereof.

10. A method of assessing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected patient comprising:
(a) collecting a biological sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) evaluating whether the biological sample comprises nucleic acid encoding HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 190;
in which the presence of the mutation correlates with an increase in delavirdine susceptibility and a decrease in nevirapine susceptibility.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the mutation at codon 190 encodes an alanine or a serine.

12. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:

(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment further comprising a mutation at codon 236 and a mutation at codon 103 and/or 181 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring the indicator in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the measurement of the indicator. from step (c) with the measurement of the indicator measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound;
wherein a test concentration of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

13. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment further comprising a mutation at codon 225 and a mutation at codon 103 and an indicator into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring the indicator in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the measurement of the indicates from step (c) with the measurement of the indicator measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound;
wherein a test concentration of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c) ; or at step (c)

14. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:

(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment which encodes the reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 236 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring expression of the indicator gene in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the expression of the indicator gene from step (c) with the expression of the indicator gene measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate anti-viral drug compound, wherein a test concentration of the candidate anti-viral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

15. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment which encodes the reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 225, and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring expression of the indicator gene in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the expression of the indicator gene from step (c) with the expression of the indicator gene measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate anti-viral drug compound, wherein a test concentration of the candidate anti-viral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

16. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment which encodes the reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 190, and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring expression of the indicator gene in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the expression of the indicator gene from step (c) with the expression of the indicator gene measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate anti-viral drug compound, wherein a test concentration of the candidate anti-viral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

17. A resistance test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 190 and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

18. A resistance test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 225 and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

19. A resistance test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 236 and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

20. A resistance test vector of claim 17, wherein the patient-derived segment having a mutation at cotton 190 further comprises a mutation at colon 103.

21. A resistance test vector of claim 18, wherein the patient-derived segment having a mutation at colon 225 further comprises a mutation at colon 103.

22. The resistance test vector of claim 17, wherein the patient-derived segment having a mutation at colon 236 farther comprises a mutation at colon 103 and/or 181.

23. A method of assessing the effectiveness of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected comprising:

(a) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) evaluating whether the plasma sample contains nucleic acid encoding HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 230;
in which the presence of the mutation correlates with decreased susceptibility to delavirdine and nevirapine.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the mutation at colon 230 codes for a leucine (L).

25. The method of claim 23, wherein reverse transcriptase has an additional mutation(s) at colon 181 or a combination thereof.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein the mutation at colon 281 encodes a cysteine (C).

27. The method of claim 23, wherein the HIV-infected patient is being treated with an antiretroviral agent.

28. A method of assessing the effectiveness of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected comprising:
(a) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) evaluating whether the plasma sample contains nucleic acid encoding HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at colon 181;
in which the presence of the mutation correlates with decreased susceptibility to delavirdine and nevirapine and little or no change in efavirenz susceptibility.

29. The method of claim 28, wherein the mutation at colon 181 codes for a cysteine (c).

30. The method of claim 28, wherein reverse transcriptase has an additional mutation(s) at codon 98, codon 106, codon 227 or a combination thereof.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein the mutation at codon 98 encodes a glycine (G), the mutation at codon 106 encodes an alanine (A) and the mutation at codon 227 encodes a leucine (L)

32. The method of claim 28, wherein the HIV-infected patient is being treated with an antiretroviral agent.

33. A method of assessing the effectiveness of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected comprising:
(a) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) evaluating whether the plasma sample contains nucleic acid encoding HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 188;
in which the presence of the mutation correlates with decreased susceptibility to delavirdine and nevirapine and efavirenz.

34. The method of claim 33, wherein the mutation at codon 188 codes for a leucine (L), cysteine (C) or histidine (H).

35. The method of claim 33, wherein reverse transcriptase has an additional mutation(s) at codon 138, codon 103, codon 100 or a combination thereof.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein the mutation at codon 138 encodes an alanine (A), the mutation at codon 103 encodes an asparagine (N) and the mutation at codon 100 encodes an isoleucine (I).

37. The method of claim 33, wherein the HIV-infected patient is being treated with an antiretroviral agent.

38. A method of assessing the effectiveness of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected comprising:
(a) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) evaluating whether the plasma sample contains nucleic acid encoding HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 190;
in which the presence of the mutation correlates with increased susceptibility to delavirdine and decreased susceptibility to nevirapine and efavirenz.

39. The method of claim 38, wherein the mutation at codon 190 codes for an alanine (A) or a serine (S).

40. The method of claim 38, wherein reverse transcriptase has an additional mutation(s) at codon 98, codon 101 or codon 103 or a combination thereof.

41. The method of claim 40, wherein the mutation at codon 98 encodes a glycine (G), 101 encodes a glutamic acid (E) and 103 encodes an asparagine (N).

42. The method of claim 38, wherein the HIV-infected patient is being treated with an antiretroviral agent.

43. A method of assessing the effectiveness of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected comprising:
(a) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) evaluating whether the plasma sample contains nucleic acid encoding HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 106;
in which the presence of the mutation correlates with decreased susceptibility to delavirdine and nevirapine and little or no change in efavirenz susceptibility.

44. The method of claim 43, wherein the mutation at codon 106 encodes an alanine (A).

45, The method of claim 43, wherein reverse transcriptase has an additional mutation(s) at codon 227 and codon 189 or a combination thereof.

46. The method of claim 45, wherein the mutation at codon 227 encodes a leucine (L) and 189 encodes a leucine (L).

47. The method of claim 43, wherein the HIV-infected patient is being treated with an antiretroviral agent.

48. A method of assessing the effectiveness of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase antiretroviral therapy of an HIV-infected comprising:
(a) collecting a plasma sample from an HIV-infected patient; and (b) evaluating whether the plasma sample contains nucleic acid encoding HIV reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 103;

in which the presence of the mutation correlates with decreased susceptibility to delavirdine and nevirapine and efavirenz.

49. The method of claim 48, wherein the mutation at codon 103 codes for asparagine (N).

50. The method of claim 48, wherein reverse transcriptase has an additional mutation(s) at codon 100 or a combination thereof.

51. The method of claim 50, wherein the mutation at codon 100 encodes an isoleucine (I).

52. The method of claim 48, wherein the HIV-infected patient is being treated with an antiretroviral agent.

53. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of candidate HIV antiretroviral. drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment further comprising a mutation at codon 230 and a mutation at codon 181 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring the indicator in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the measurement of the indicator from step (c) with the measurement of the indicator measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound;
wherein a test concentration of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

54. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment further comprising a mutation at codon 181 and a mutation at codon 98 and/or 106 and/or 227 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell form step (a);
(c) measuring the indicator in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the measurement of the indicator from step (c) with the measurement of the indicator measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound;
wherein a test concentration of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

55. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment further comprising a mutation at codon 188 and a mutation at codon 138 and/or 103 and/or 100 arid an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring the indicator: in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the measurement of the indicator from step (c) with the measurement of the indicator measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound;

wherein a test concentration of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound is present at. steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c) or at step (c).

56. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment further comprising a mutation at colon 190 and a mutation at colon 98 and/or 101 and/or 103 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring the indicator in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the measurement of the indicator form step (c) with the measurement of the indicator measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound;
wherein a test concentration of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

57. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment further comprising a mutation at colon 106 and a mutation at colon 227 and/or 189 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring the indicator in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the measurement of the indicator from step (c) with the measurement of the indicator measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound;
wherein a test concentration of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

58. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:

(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment further comprising a mutation at codon 103 and a mutation at codon 100 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring the indicator in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the measurement of the indicator from step (c) with the measurement of the indicator measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound;
wherein a test concentration of the candidate antiretroviral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

59. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment which encodes the reverie transcriptase having a mutation at codon 230 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring expression of the indicator gene in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the expression of the indicator gene from step (c) with the expression of the indicator gene measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate anti-viral drug compound, wherein a test concentration of the candidate anti-viral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

60. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment which encodes the reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 227 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring expression of the indicator gene in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the expression of the indicator gene from step (c) with the expression of the indicator gene measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate anti-viral drug compound, wherein a test concentration of the candidate anti-viral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) -(c); or at step (c).

61. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment which encodes the reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 188 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring expression of the indicator gene in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the expression of the indicator gene from step (c) with the expression of the indicator gene measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate anti-viral drug compound, wherein a test concentration of the candidate anti-viral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

62. A method for assessing the biological effectiveness of a candidate HIV antiretroviral drug compound comprising:
(a) introducing a resistance test vector comprising a patient-derived segment which encodes the reversetranscriptase having a mutation at codon 189 and an indicator gene into a host cell;
(b) culturing the host cell from step (a);
(c) measuring expression of the indicator gene in a target host cell; and (d) comparing the expression of the indicator gene from step (c) with the expression of the indicator gene measured when steps (a) - (c) are carried out in the absence of the candidate anti-viral drug compound, wherein a test concentration of the candidate anti-viral drug compound is present at steps (a) - (c); at steps (b) - (c); or at step (c).

63. A resistant test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 230 and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

64. A resistance test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 227 and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

65. A resistance test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 188 and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

66. A resistance test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutation at codon 189 and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

67. A resistance test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutations at codon 181, codon 98, codon 106 and codon 227 or a combination thereof and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

68. A resistance test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutations at codon 106, codon 227, and codon 189 or a combination thereof and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

69. A resistance test vector comprising an HIV
patient-derived segment further comprising reverse transcriptase having a mutations at codon 103 and codon 101 and an indicator gene, wherein the expression of the indicator gene is dependent upon the patient derived segment.

70. The resistance test vector of claim 17, wherein the patient-derived segment having a mutation at colon 190 further comprises mutations at codon 98 and codon 101 or a combination thereof.

71. The resistance test vector of claim 63, wherein the patient-derived segment having a mutation at codon 230 further comprises a mutation at codon 181.

72. The resistance test vector of claim 65, wherein the patient-derived segment having a mutation at codon 188 further comprises mutations at codon 138, codon 103 and codon 190 or a combination thereof.