CA2318669A1 - Method for identifying the geographical location of an ip address on the internet - Google Patents
Method for identifying the geographical location of an ip address on the internet Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2318669A1 CA2318669A1 CA002318669A CA2318669A CA2318669A1 CA 2318669 A1 CA2318669 A1 CA 2318669A1 CA 002318669 A CA002318669 A CA 002318669A CA 2318669 A CA2318669 A CA 2318669A CA 2318669 A1 CA2318669 A1 CA 2318669A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- address
- country
- internet
- information
- database
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/30—Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
- H04L69/32—Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
- H04L69/322—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
- H04L69/329—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L61/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L61/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
- H04L61/45—Network directories; Name-to-address mapping
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/51—Discovery or management thereof, e.g. service location protocol [SLP] or web services
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/52—Network services specially adapted for the location of the user terminal
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
A method and system for the identification of the geographical location of an IP address on the Internet is described herein.
The method and system include traversing the entire top-level address space and collect all the allocations, which we save in an intermediate format; looking up the registration information of each allocation and store that information in an intermediate format; processing said registration information to determine country of origin: - Country Name, Country Code if used, City names; - Heuristic Address indicators - ZIP codes, ZIP+4, Canadian Postal code format, UK Postcodes, Telephone number cross reference, area codes, etc... we score each entry and if the score is high enough, then it is accepted; otherwise the offending entries are manually inspected; and associating the corresponding network with the country.
The method and system include traversing the entire top-level address space and collect all the allocations, which we save in an intermediate format; looking up the registration information of each allocation and store that information in an intermediate format; processing said registration information to determine country of origin: - Country Name, Country Code if used, City names; - Heuristic Address indicators - ZIP codes, ZIP+4, Canadian Postal code format, UK Postcodes, Telephone number cross reference, area codes, etc... we score each entry and if the score is high enough, then it is accepted; otherwise the offending entries are manually inspected; and associating the corresponding network with the country.
Description
TITLE OF THE INVENTION
Method for identifying the geographical location of an IP
address on the Internet.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the Internet. More specifically, the present invention is concerned with a method for identifying the geographical location of an IP address on the Internet.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Current efforts to determine the geographical location of a computer on the Internet are based upon reverse domain name system ("DNS") lookups. The IN-ADDR DNS lookup will return the unique forward DNS name from the Internet name servers. The forward DNS name is used to do a "whois" lookup in the DNS registration database.
The "whois" lookup will provide a text record of the official address of the owner of the particular DNS name. The text record has few formal fields but is relatively easily parsed to provide the country name of the registering organization. This assumes that country data is included in the returned text. Incomplete address information is common in the whois DNS tables.
Method for identifying the geographical location of an IP
address on the Internet.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the Internet. More specifically, the present invention is concerned with a method for identifying the geographical location of an IP address on the Internet.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Current efforts to determine the geographical location of a computer on the Internet are based upon reverse domain name system ("DNS") lookups. The IN-ADDR DNS lookup will return the unique forward DNS name from the Internet name servers. The forward DNS name is used to do a "whois" lookup in the DNS registration database.
The "whois" lookup will provide a text record of the official address of the owner of the particular DNS name. The text record has few formal fields but is relatively easily parsed to provide the country name of the registering organization. This assumes that country data is included in the returned text. Incomplete address information is common in the whois DNS tables.
This type of lookup has many problems including the speed of the lookup, its scaleability, and its accuracy. Up until last year all Internet name registrations were handled by a single organization (Internet Solutions, currently owned by Verisign Inc). When the APRA
mandate on administration of the Internet expired, DNS registrations were opened up to many more companies. Currently there are almost 40 different companies capable of DNS registrations.
With the proliferation of competing DNS registrars there is no consistency among registrars with respect to "whois" lookups. Each registry company may or may not provide registration data available by "whois" lookup.
In an interactive environment like web sites or streaming video on the Internet there is considerable time lost to the several lookups required to determine the geographical location of an incoming transaction request.
To resolve the location of any IP (Internet Protocol) address requires at least two external queries to the Internet. One reverse lookup and then a "whois". This quickly becomes a problem when a web site has to handle many requests.
mandate on administration of the Internet expired, DNS registrations were opened up to many more companies. Currently there are almost 40 different companies capable of DNS registrations.
With the proliferation of competing DNS registrars there is no consistency among registrars with respect to "whois" lookups. Each registry company may or may not provide registration data available by "whois" lookup.
In an interactive environment like web sites or streaming video on the Internet there is considerable time lost to the several lookups required to determine the geographical location of an incoming transaction request.
To resolve the location of any IP (Internet Protocol) address requires at least two external queries to the Internet. One reverse lookup and then a "whois". This quickly becomes a problem when a web site has to handle many requests.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is therefore to provide an improved method for identifying of the geographical location of an IP
address on the Internet.
Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reading of the following non restrictive description of preferred embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention was developed specifically to build a database to identify the geographical location of an IP address on the Internet. This is done by determining the smallest network the IP address is part of and returning the country of origin of that network. The present invention is designed to be better and faster to map IP address to country of origin then any other method currently available.
The present invention offers a significant advantage in providing a database where only one call is required and no parsing of data to return a country of origin.
The present approach to the problem is based on recognition that all IP addresses are part of networks. Historically, IP
space has been handled out in Class A, B or C allocations. Due to the inefficiencies of the class system and the significant growth of the Internet, space is now allocated on a classless system.
When an organization, such as an ASP connects to the Internet they make an application to their ISP (Internet Service Provider) for IP space. If an organization needs 150 IP address's, the upstream ISP
will likely allocate a Class C (255 IP's). In the classless world they will receive a /24 delegation.
When the IP space is allocated from the ISP to the ASP
the ISP will file a SWIP. The SWIP is a electronic form that the ISP sends to ARIN (American Registry of Internet Numbers), RIPE (Reseau IP
europeen) or APNIC to perform the official administrative transfer of IP
space from one organization to another.
Since IP space is a "limited" resource with about 4 billion possible addresses, an agency called ICANN was put in charge of the IP
space. With 4 billion addresses to manage, ICANN delegates IP allocation responsibility to 3 Regional Internet Registries (RIR) ARIN, RIPE NIC and APNIC.
ARIN (www.arin.net) handles North America delegations and is the lead agency. ARIN also handles most of all the unknown of unusual allocations. European and African applications are mostly handled by RIPE (www.ripe.net), and Asian registrations by APNIC
(www.apnic.net).
The total address space available was allocated along Class A boundaries that can be found at http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/ipv4-address-space 5 The present invention includes a database of information built from the information sources described above. This database can be queried in several ways including http requests and a custom unix daemon. The database provides much quicker access to geographical information in a extremely quick and easily integrated fashion. The preferred response to a database inquiry is a ISO 3166 2 letter country codes.
The system of the present invention comprises three distinct parts. There is a "suck" engine that is used to populate the database. There is the database itself with information on all the subnets of interest. Finally there is the API (Application Program Interface) mechanism that is used by applications to query the system.
The "suck" engine of the present invention is the primary method used to populate the database.
The database population starts with a basic division of the all the Class A address space allocations into responsible RR's and others. For example the IANA (Internet Assigned Number Authority) assignments tell us that the 206 Class A has ARIN as the responsible registry. All 206 inquiries will be directed to ARIN instead of RIPE or APNIC.
An object of the present invention is therefore to provide an improved method for identifying of the geographical location of an IP
address on the Internet.
Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reading of the following non restrictive description of preferred embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention was developed specifically to build a database to identify the geographical location of an IP address on the Internet. This is done by determining the smallest network the IP address is part of and returning the country of origin of that network. The present invention is designed to be better and faster to map IP address to country of origin then any other method currently available.
The present invention offers a significant advantage in providing a database where only one call is required and no parsing of data to return a country of origin.
The present approach to the problem is based on recognition that all IP addresses are part of networks. Historically, IP
space has been handled out in Class A, B or C allocations. Due to the inefficiencies of the class system and the significant growth of the Internet, space is now allocated on a classless system.
When an organization, such as an ASP connects to the Internet they make an application to their ISP (Internet Service Provider) for IP space. If an organization needs 150 IP address's, the upstream ISP
will likely allocate a Class C (255 IP's). In the classless world they will receive a /24 delegation.
When the IP space is allocated from the ISP to the ASP
the ISP will file a SWIP. The SWIP is a electronic form that the ISP sends to ARIN (American Registry of Internet Numbers), RIPE (Reseau IP
europeen) or APNIC to perform the official administrative transfer of IP
space from one organization to another.
Since IP space is a "limited" resource with about 4 billion possible addresses, an agency called ICANN was put in charge of the IP
space. With 4 billion addresses to manage, ICANN delegates IP allocation responsibility to 3 Regional Internet Registries (RIR) ARIN, RIPE NIC and APNIC.
ARIN (www.arin.net) handles North America delegations and is the lead agency. ARIN also handles most of all the unknown of unusual allocations. European and African applications are mostly handled by RIPE (www.ripe.net), and Asian registrations by APNIC
(www.apnic.net).
The total address space available was allocated along Class A boundaries that can be found at http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/ipv4-address-space 5 The present invention includes a database of information built from the information sources described above. This database can be queried in several ways including http requests and a custom unix daemon. The database provides much quicker access to geographical information in a extremely quick and easily integrated fashion. The preferred response to a database inquiry is a ISO 3166 2 letter country codes.
The system of the present invention comprises three distinct parts. There is a "suck" engine that is used to populate the database. There is the database itself with information on all the subnets of interest. Finally there is the API (Application Program Interface) mechanism that is used by applications to query the system.
The "suck" engine of the present invention is the primary method used to populate the database.
The database population starts with a basic division of the all the Class A address space allocations into responsible RR's and others. For example the IANA (Internet Assigned Number Authority) assignments tell us that the 206 Class A has ARIN as the responsible registry. All 206 inquiries will be directed to ARIN instead of RIPE or APNIC.
It is not unusual for there to be some cross over between the registries. For example, an inquiry of RIPE might produce the same or different information than AKIN on the same inquiry. When there is a difference of information the IANA Class A allocation provides the indication of he correct RR.
If IANA points to ARIN and the data does not exist in the ARIN registry, the system of the present invention will perform a lookup in RIPE and APNIC.
The database population exploits a feature of the ARIN
database lookup that allows us to view the first 250 sub-network allocations that comprise any network. The allows us to determine and populate the database with networks that cross the traditional Class boundaries. For example, we can determine and map a Class C space of 255 IP's that does not start at .0 and end at .255. This also has the added benefit of speeding up the querying of the ARIN database tables greatly.
We can determine all of an organizations contiguous IP space in one lookup rather that several smaller lookups.
The present invention keeps track of all network ownership through the use of Internic handles. The Internic handle to organization address is maintained as a separate database. This allows for much faster query of the information. Only when a network ownership changes to an unknown organization does the system of the present invention requires another lookup to the ARIN database.
If IANA points to ARIN and the data does not exist in the ARIN registry, the system of the present invention will perform a lookup in RIPE and APNIC.
The database population exploits a feature of the ARIN
database lookup that allows us to view the first 250 sub-network allocations that comprise any network. The allows us to determine and populate the database with networks that cross the traditional Class boundaries. For example, we can determine and map a Class C space of 255 IP's that does not start at .0 and end at .255. This also has the added benefit of speeding up the querying of the ARIN database tables greatly.
We can determine all of an organizations contiguous IP space in one lookup rather that several smaller lookups.
The present invention keeps track of all network ownership through the use of Internic handles. The Internic handle to organization address is maintained as a separate database. This allows for much faster query of the information. Only when a network ownership changes to an unknown organization does the system of the present invention requires another lookup to the ARIN database.
The present invention also supports the use of exclusion lists. With the proliferation of anonymous proxy services we have a list of IP's and DNS names that are completely blocked because the DNS data is incomplete or misleading. A client of these proxy services, for example, would not be identified as a resident of any country because the client is identified as a client of a service established to protect privacy.
The exclusion information also applies to large Class A
and Class B corporate allocations that were made in the early years of the Internet. Some large companies were given complete a complete Class A for use in their corporate networks. There large corporate networks can easily span the entire organization including all of their physical locations around the world. The present invention blocks there addresses and does not make try to integrate this IP space into the database as any information is misleading and will often reflect the address and country of origin of the corporate headquarters.
The present invention also uses a the forward DNS
name to determine geographic data if it exists. For example, country domains as opposed to the more generic TLD like .com, .net and .org. An IP address with a reverse DNS name that identifies a country code like .ca for Canada is a good indicator of country of origin when it exists.
There is also a DNS RR record for geographic location based on latitude and longitude coordinates. Such data is only present in a small number of DNS entries. However when such data exists it can be taken as the most authoritative information available. It is relatively easy to use some basic tools to map longitude and latitude information to a physical country.
When the system of the present invention is specifically used in a web page and the API call to the database is made by the client themselves or information is passed to the system in the API call, the language of the browser provides some basic country information. For example a client with browser language set to Russian and coming from an IP address otherwise identified as Spanish would be suspect.
The present invention uses a "traceroute" feature to verify the location of IP address after they have been used. The total address space of the Internet is sufficiently large that a complete trace of routing information cannot be performed in reasonable time.
Traceroute data provides the most comprehensive and accurate indication of the physical location of a computer. After an IP
address is looked up in the system of the present invention by a client, the system adds the IP address into a queue of address space to researched with a traceroute.
While there is a total of 4 billion IP's available on the Internet the actual number of IP address used by web surfers and other client type computers is relatively small. Exact numbers are unknown and impossible to determine with any accuracy.
When the traceroute function is run on an IP address, the traceroute provides a complete list of routers involved in routing traffic to the end user IP. The system of the present invention uses this by starting with the first router between the IP address of interest and the Internet and doing a database lookup on that IP address. The system then does a lookup on the IP address of the router before and so on.
What we end up with is a chain of country codes. If the country codes are flipping around then the data in the database is highly suspect and the offending IP and network is marked for manual analysis.
Routers before the IP address in question that are part of the same network have no weight to the determination of the country of origin If the first router from a network outside that of the IP in question is also from the same country then it is extremely likely that the database determination is valid.
After considerable effort we have discovered that to try to apply techniques to map the Internet to boundaries smaller than a country level the data available from the Internet IP registrations is simply not reliable.
Although the present invention has been described hereinabove by way of preferred embodiments thereof, it can be modified, without departing from the spirit and nature of the subject invention as defined in the appended claims.
The exclusion information also applies to large Class A
and Class B corporate allocations that were made in the early years of the Internet. Some large companies were given complete a complete Class A for use in their corporate networks. There large corporate networks can easily span the entire organization including all of their physical locations around the world. The present invention blocks there addresses and does not make try to integrate this IP space into the database as any information is misleading and will often reflect the address and country of origin of the corporate headquarters.
The present invention also uses a the forward DNS
name to determine geographic data if it exists. For example, country domains as opposed to the more generic TLD like .com, .net and .org. An IP address with a reverse DNS name that identifies a country code like .ca for Canada is a good indicator of country of origin when it exists.
There is also a DNS RR record for geographic location based on latitude and longitude coordinates. Such data is only present in a small number of DNS entries. However when such data exists it can be taken as the most authoritative information available. It is relatively easy to use some basic tools to map longitude and latitude information to a physical country.
When the system of the present invention is specifically used in a web page and the API call to the database is made by the client themselves or information is passed to the system in the API call, the language of the browser provides some basic country information. For example a client with browser language set to Russian and coming from an IP address otherwise identified as Spanish would be suspect.
The present invention uses a "traceroute" feature to verify the location of IP address after they have been used. The total address space of the Internet is sufficiently large that a complete trace of routing information cannot be performed in reasonable time.
Traceroute data provides the most comprehensive and accurate indication of the physical location of a computer. After an IP
address is looked up in the system of the present invention by a client, the system adds the IP address into a queue of address space to researched with a traceroute.
While there is a total of 4 billion IP's available on the Internet the actual number of IP address used by web surfers and other client type computers is relatively small. Exact numbers are unknown and impossible to determine with any accuracy.
When the traceroute function is run on an IP address, the traceroute provides a complete list of routers involved in routing traffic to the end user IP. The system of the present invention uses this by starting with the first router between the IP address of interest and the Internet and doing a database lookup on that IP address. The system then does a lookup on the IP address of the router before and so on.
What we end up with is a chain of country codes. If the country codes are flipping around then the data in the database is highly suspect and the offending IP and network is marked for manual analysis.
Routers before the IP address in question that are part of the same network have no weight to the determination of the country of origin If the first router from a network outside that of the IP in question is also from the same country then it is extremely likely that the database determination is valid.
After considerable effort we have discovered that to try to apply techniques to map the Internet to boundaries smaller than a country level the data available from the Internet IP registrations is simply not reliable.
Although the present invention has been described hereinabove by way of preferred embodiments thereof, it can be modified, without departing from the spirit and nature of the subject invention as defined in the appended claims.
Claims (7)
1. A method for the identification of the geographical location of an IP address on the Internet as described herein.
2. A method for the identification of the geographical location of an IP address on the Internet, said method comprising:
traversing the entire top-level address space and collect all the allocations, which we save in an intermediate format;
looking up the registration information of each allocation and store that information in an intermediate format;
processing said registration information to determine country of origin:
- Country Name, Country Code if used, City names, - Heuristic Address indicators - ZIP codes, ZIP+4, Canadian Postal code format, UK Postcodes, Telephone number cross reference, area codes, etc... we score each entry and if the score is high enough, then it is accepted; otherwise the offending entries are manually inspected; and associating the corresponding network with the country.
traversing the entire top-level address space and collect all the allocations, which we save in an intermediate format;
looking up the registration information of each allocation and store that information in an intermediate format;
processing said registration information to determine country of origin:
- Country Name, Country Code if used, City names, - Heuristic Address indicators - ZIP codes, ZIP+4, Canadian Postal code format, UK Postcodes, Telephone number cross reference, area codes, etc... we score each entry and if the score is high enough, then it is accepted; otherwise the offending entries are manually inspected; and associating the corresponding network with the country.
3. A method for storing a global IP/Country information in such a way as to make updating rapid, and accesses reliable:
- since getting a list of all allocations is relatively quick (claim 2), we can do this frequently, and check the results against our list of allocations; Added/Deleted/Changed registrations can be updated as per the steps above.
- since getting a list of all allocations is relatively quick (claim 2), we can do this frequently, and check the results against our list of allocations; Added/Deleted/Changed registrations can be updated as per the steps above.
4. A method as recited in claim 2, wherein the exclusion of anonymised allocations is possible by the maintenance of an exclusion list of networks which are supra-national (i.e. Ford/HP/etc), and networks which provide 'privacy' and 'anonymization' services; these are considered 'pirate' entries, and XX is returned as the country code.
5. A method as recited in claim 2, wherein the compression of the database allows adjacent networks to be grouped together provided they are all in the same country; in other words, if we determine that the class B address 204.101 is allocated only to Canadians, we don't need to store the thousands of suballocations; this results in a greatly compressed database and is likewise orders of magnitude faster to search.
6. A method as recited in claim 2, suited for making this information available for use by others; comprising:
- a connection to an internet daemon is made, the IP
address is passed to the program and a 2 character country code is returned; and - a local copy of the database is available which may be queried directly.
- a connection to an internet daemon is made, the IP
address is passed to the program and a 2 character country code is returned; and - a local copy of the database is available which may be queried directly.
7. A system for the identification of the geographical location of an IP address on the Internet as described herein.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA002318669A CA2318669A1 (en) | 2000-09-11 | 2000-09-11 | Method for identifying the geographical location of an ip address on the internet |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA002318669A CA2318669A1 (en) | 2000-09-11 | 2000-09-11 | Method for identifying the geographical location of an ip address on the internet |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2318669A1 true CA2318669A1 (en) | 2002-03-11 |
Family
ID=4167106
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002318669A Abandoned CA2318669A1 (en) | 2000-09-11 | 2000-09-11 | Method for identifying the geographical location of an ip address on the internet |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2318669A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2408114A (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2005-05-18 | Whereonearth Ltd | Determining a geographical location from IP address information |
US7752210B2 (en) | 2003-11-13 | 2010-07-06 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method of determining geographical location from IP address information |
CN103327133A (en) * | 2013-05-31 | 2013-09-25 | 青岛海信传媒网络技术有限公司 | Method and device for updating geographic position information |
CN113360586A (en) * | 2021-06-03 | 2021-09-07 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Address aggregation degree query method, device and equipment and computer readable storage medium |
-
2000
- 2000-09-11 CA CA002318669A patent/CA2318669A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2408114A (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2005-05-18 | Whereonearth Ltd | Determining a geographical location from IP address information |
US7752210B2 (en) | 2003-11-13 | 2010-07-06 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method of determining geographical location from IP address information |
CN103327133A (en) * | 2013-05-31 | 2013-09-25 | 青岛海信传媒网络技术有限公司 | Method and device for updating geographic position information |
CN103327133B (en) * | 2013-05-31 | 2016-04-27 | 青岛海信传媒网络技术有限公司 | A kind of geographical location information update method and device |
CN113360586A (en) * | 2021-06-03 | 2021-09-07 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Address aggregation degree query method, device and equipment and computer readable storage medium |
CN113360586B (en) * | 2021-06-03 | 2024-05-03 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Address aggregation degree query method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7752210B2 (en) | Method of determining geographical location from IP address information | |
US7769826B2 (en) | Systems and methods of providing DNS services using separate answer and referral caches | |
US8090796B2 (en) | Position identification method and system | |
JP7045104B2 (en) | How to process data, devices and computer programs, and zone files for hierarchical Domain Name System | |
AU2010263076B2 (en) | Characterizing unregistered domain names | |
US6745248B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for analyzing domain name registrations | |
US20060218303A1 (en) | Creation of a database storing domain names and business operational areas | |
US20040220903A1 (en) | Method and system to correlate trademark data to internet domain name data | |
AU2013206327B2 (en) | Systems and methods for automatically providing whois service to top level domains | |
CA2565077A1 (en) | System and methods for domain name acquisition and management | |
Halvorson et al. | The BIZ top-level domain: ten years later | |
CA2318669A1 (en) | Method for identifying the geographical location of an ip address on the internet | |
KR100342107B1 (en) | Methods for deciding Internet address groups distinguished by assigned organizations or locations and for resolving the geographical information for each address group, which are intended to set up Internet address supplementary system and its applications | |
US20020073209A1 (en) | Method for redirecting a network communication | |
US8117439B2 (en) | Issuing secure certificate using domain zone control validation | |
US9183368B2 (en) | Validating control of domain zone | |
EP1784947A1 (en) | Systems and methods of registering and utilizing domain names | |
KR100464583B1 (en) | System for mapping keyword name to url and method thereof | |
WO2019207771A1 (en) | System for user attribute estimation based on ip address | |
KR20050099943A (en) | System for accessing web page and method thereof | |
KR100464582B1 (en) | System for acc esing web page using native language key-word names and method thereof | |
Ichise et al. | Design and implementation of NS record history database for detecting DNS-based botnet communication | |
KR100732975B1 (en) | System for accessing web page and method thereof | |
WO2001029710A2 (en) | Derivative domain names | |
GB2408114A (en) | Determining a geographical location from IP address information |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FZDE | Discontinued |