CA2292357A1 - Microphone array diffracting structure - Google Patents
Microphone array diffracting structure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2292357A1 CA2292357A1 CA 2292357 CA2292357A CA2292357A1 CA 2292357 A1 CA2292357 A1 CA 2292357A1 CA 2292357 CA2292357 CA 2292357 CA 2292357 A CA2292357 A CA 2292357A CA 2292357 A1 CA2292357 A1 CA 2292357A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- array
- cylinder
- outside surface
- microphone
- shallow
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R1/00—Details of transducers, loudspeakers or microphones
- H04R1/20—Arrangements for obtaining desired frequency or directional characteristics
- H04R1/32—Arrangements for obtaining desired frequency or directional characteristics for obtaining desired directional characteristic only
- H04R1/40—Arrangements for obtaining desired frequency or directional characteristics for obtaining desired directional characteristic only by combining a number of identical transducers
- H04R1/406—Arrangements for obtaining desired frequency or directional characteristics for obtaining desired directional characteristic only by combining a number of identical transducers microphones
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Otolaryngology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention increases the aperture size of a microphone array by introducing a diffracting structure into the interior of a microphone array. The diffracting structure within the array modifies both the amplitude and phase of the acoustic signal reaching the microphones. The diffracting structure increases acoustic shadowing along with the signal's travel time around the structure. The diffracting structure in the array effectively increases the aperture size of the array and thereby increases the directivity of the array. Constructing the surface of the diffracting structure such that surface waves can form over the surface further increases the travel time and modifies the amplitude of the acoustical signal thereby allowing a larger effective aperture for the array.
Description
MICROPHONE ARRAY DIFFRACTING STRUCTURE
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to microphone technology and specifically to microphone arrays which can achieve enhanced acoustic directionality by a combination of both physical and signal processing means.
Background of the Invention Microphone arrays are well known in the field of acoustics. By combining the outputs of several microphones in an array electronically, a directional sound pickup pattern can be achieved. This means that sound arriving from a small range of directions is emphasized while sound coming from other directions is attenuated. Such a capability is useful in areas such as telephony, teleconferencing, video conferencing, hearing aids, and the detection of sound sources outdoors. However, practical considerations mitigate against physically large arrays. It is therefore desirable to obtain as much acoustical directionality out of as small an array as possible.
Normally, reduced array size can be achieved by utilizing superdirective approaches in the combining of microphone signals rather than the more conventional delay and sum beamforming usually used in array signal processing. While superdirective approaches do work, the resulting array designs can be very sensitive to the effects of microphone self noise and errors in matching microphone amplitude and phase responses.
A few approaches have been attempted in the field to solve the above problem. Elko, in U.S. Patent 5,742,693 considers the improved directionality obtained by placing a first order microphone near a plane baffle, giving an effective second order system. Unfortunately, the system described is unwieldy. Elko notes that when choosing baffle dimensions, the largest possible baffle is most desirable. Also, to achieve a second order response, Elko notes that the baffle size should be in the order of at least one-half a wavelength of the desired signal. These requirements render Elko unsuitable for applications requiring physically small arrays.
Bartlett et al, in U.S. Patent 5,539,834 discloses achieving a second order effect from a first order microphone. Bartlett achieves a performance enhancement by using a reflected signal from a plane baffle.
However, Bartlett does not achieve the desired directivity required in some applications. While Bartlett would be useful as a microphone in a cellular telephone handset, it cannot be readily adapted for applications such as handsfree telephony or teleconferencing in which high directionality is desirable.
Another approach, taken by Kuhn in U.S. Patent 5,592,441, uses forty-two transducers on the vertices of a regular geodesic two frequency icosahedron. While Kuhn may produce the desired directionality, it is clear that Kuhn is quite complex and impractical for the uses 3o envisioned above.
Another patent, issued to Elko et al, U.S. Patent 4,802,227, addresses signal processing aspects of microphone arrays. Elko et al however, utilizes costly signal processing means to reduce noise. The signal processing capabilities required to keep adaptively calculating the required real-time analysis can be prohibitive.
A further patent, issued to Gorike, U.S. Patent 4,904,078 uses directional microphones in eyeglasses to assist persons with a hearing disability receiving aural signals. The directional microphones, however, do not to allow for a changing directionality as to the source of the sound.
The use of diffraction can effectively increase the aperture size and the directionality of a microphone array. Thus, diffractive effects and the proper design of diffractive surfaces can provide large aperture sizes and improved directivity with relatively small arrays.
When implemented using superdirective beamforming, the resulting array is less sensitive to microphone self noise and errors in matching microphone amplitude and 2o phase responses. A simple example of how a diffracting object can improve the directional performance of a system is provided by the human head and ears. The typical separation between the ears of a human is 15 cm.
Measurements of two-ear correlation functions in reverberant rooms show that the effective separation is more than double this, about 30 cm, which is the ear separation around a half-circumference of the head.
Academic papers have recently suggested that diffracting structures can be used with microphone 3o arrays. An oral paper by Kawahara and Fukudome, ("Superdirectivity design for a sphere-baffled microphone", J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130,2897, 1998), suggests that a sphere can be used to advantage in beamforming. A six-microphone configuration mounted on a sphere was discussed by Elko and Pong, ("A steerable and variable 1st order differential microphone array", Intl. Conf. On Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1997), noting that the presence of the sphere acted to increase the effective separation of the microphones.
However, these two publications only consider the case of a rigid intervening sphere.
l0 What is therefore required is a directional microphone array which is relatively inexpensive, small, and can be easily adapted for electro acoustic applications such as teleconferencing and hands free telephony.
summary of the Invention The present invention uses diffractive effects to increase the effective aperture size and the directionality of a microphone array along with a signal processing method which generates time delay weights, amplitude and phase delay adjustments for signals coming from different microphones in the array.
The present invention increases the aperture size of a microphone array by introducing a diffracting structure into the interior of a microphone array. The diffracting structure within the array modifies both the amplitude and phase of the acoustic signal reaching the microphones. The diffracting structure increases acoustic shadowing along with the signal's travel time around the structure. The diffracting structure in the array effectively increases the aperture size of the array and thereby increases the directivity of the array. Constructing the surface of the diffracting structure such that surface waves can form over the surface further increases the travel time and modifies the amplitude of the acoustical signal thereby allowing a larger effective aperture for the array.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a diffracting structure for use with a microphone array, the microphone array being comprised of a plurality of microphones defining a space generally enclosed by the array wherein a placement of the structure is chosen from the group comprising the structure is positioned substantially adjacent to the spaced and at least a portion of the structure is substantially within the spacer and wherein the structure has an outside surface.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a microphone array comprising a plurality of microphones constructed and arranged to generally enclose a space; a diffracting structure placed such that at least a portion of the structure is adjacent to the space wherein the diffracting structure has an outside surface.
A further embodiment of the invention provides a method of increasing an apparent aperture size of a microphone array, the method comprising; positioning a diffraction structure within a space defined by the microphone array to extend a travel time of sound signals to be received by microphones in the microphone array, generating different time delay weights, phases, 3o and amplitudes for signals from each microphone in the microphone array, applying said time delay weights to said sound signals received by each microphone in the microphone array wherein the diffraction structure has a shape, said time delay weights are determined by analyzing the shape of the diffraction structure and the travel time of the sound signals.
Another embodiment of the invention provides a microphone array for use on a generally flat surface comprising; a body having a convex top and an inverted truncated cone for a bottom, a plurality of cells located on a surface of the bottom for producing an l0 acoustic impedance and a plurality of microphones located adjacent to the bottom.
grief Description of the Drawing,,s A better understanding of the invention will be obtained by considering the detailed description below, with reference to the following drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a diagram of a circular microphone array detailing the variables used in the analysis below;
Figure 2 is a diagram of a tetrahedral microphone array;
Figure 3 illustrates a directional beam response for a circular array.
Figure 4 illustrates a circular microphone array with a spherical diffracting structure within the array;
Figure 5 illustrates a bi-circular microphone array with an oblate spheroid shaped diffracting structure inside the array;
Figure 6 illustrates the beamformer response for a circular array with a spherical diffracting structure (solid curve) and the response for a circular array without a diffracting structure (dashed curve);
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to microphone technology and specifically to microphone arrays which can achieve enhanced acoustic directionality by a combination of both physical and signal processing means.
Background of the Invention Microphone arrays are well known in the field of acoustics. By combining the outputs of several microphones in an array electronically, a directional sound pickup pattern can be achieved. This means that sound arriving from a small range of directions is emphasized while sound coming from other directions is attenuated. Such a capability is useful in areas such as telephony, teleconferencing, video conferencing, hearing aids, and the detection of sound sources outdoors. However, practical considerations mitigate against physically large arrays. It is therefore desirable to obtain as much acoustical directionality out of as small an array as possible.
Normally, reduced array size can be achieved by utilizing superdirective approaches in the combining of microphone signals rather than the more conventional delay and sum beamforming usually used in array signal processing. While superdirective approaches do work, the resulting array designs can be very sensitive to the effects of microphone self noise and errors in matching microphone amplitude and phase responses.
A few approaches have been attempted in the field to solve the above problem. Elko, in U.S. Patent 5,742,693 considers the improved directionality obtained by placing a first order microphone near a plane baffle, giving an effective second order system. Unfortunately, the system described is unwieldy. Elko notes that when choosing baffle dimensions, the largest possible baffle is most desirable. Also, to achieve a second order response, Elko notes that the baffle size should be in the order of at least one-half a wavelength of the desired signal. These requirements render Elko unsuitable for applications requiring physically small arrays.
Bartlett et al, in U.S. Patent 5,539,834 discloses achieving a second order effect from a first order microphone. Bartlett achieves a performance enhancement by using a reflected signal from a plane baffle.
However, Bartlett does not achieve the desired directivity required in some applications. While Bartlett would be useful as a microphone in a cellular telephone handset, it cannot be readily adapted for applications such as handsfree telephony or teleconferencing in which high directionality is desirable.
Another approach, taken by Kuhn in U.S. Patent 5,592,441, uses forty-two transducers on the vertices of a regular geodesic two frequency icosahedron. While Kuhn may produce the desired directionality, it is clear that Kuhn is quite complex and impractical for the uses 3o envisioned above.
Another patent, issued to Elko et al, U.S. Patent 4,802,227, addresses signal processing aspects of microphone arrays. Elko et al however, utilizes costly signal processing means to reduce noise. The signal processing capabilities required to keep adaptively calculating the required real-time analysis can be prohibitive.
A further patent, issued to Gorike, U.S. Patent 4,904,078 uses directional microphones in eyeglasses to assist persons with a hearing disability receiving aural signals. The directional microphones, however, do not to allow for a changing directionality as to the source of the sound.
The use of diffraction can effectively increase the aperture size and the directionality of a microphone array. Thus, diffractive effects and the proper design of diffractive surfaces can provide large aperture sizes and improved directivity with relatively small arrays.
When implemented using superdirective beamforming, the resulting array is less sensitive to microphone self noise and errors in matching microphone amplitude and 2o phase responses. A simple example of how a diffracting object can improve the directional performance of a system is provided by the human head and ears. The typical separation between the ears of a human is 15 cm.
Measurements of two-ear correlation functions in reverberant rooms show that the effective separation is more than double this, about 30 cm, which is the ear separation around a half-circumference of the head.
Academic papers have recently suggested that diffracting structures can be used with microphone 3o arrays. An oral paper by Kawahara and Fukudome, ("Superdirectivity design for a sphere-baffled microphone", J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130,2897, 1998), suggests that a sphere can be used to advantage in beamforming. A six-microphone configuration mounted on a sphere was discussed by Elko and Pong, ("A steerable and variable 1st order differential microphone array", Intl. Conf. On Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1997), noting that the presence of the sphere acted to increase the effective separation of the microphones.
However, these two publications only consider the case of a rigid intervening sphere.
l0 What is therefore required is a directional microphone array which is relatively inexpensive, small, and can be easily adapted for electro acoustic applications such as teleconferencing and hands free telephony.
summary of the Invention The present invention uses diffractive effects to increase the effective aperture size and the directionality of a microphone array along with a signal processing method which generates time delay weights, amplitude and phase delay adjustments for signals coming from different microphones in the array.
The present invention increases the aperture size of a microphone array by introducing a diffracting structure into the interior of a microphone array. The diffracting structure within the array modifies both the amplitude and phase of the acoustic signal reaching the microphones. The diffracting structure increases acoustic shadowing along with the signal's travel time around the structure. The diffracting structure in the array effectively increases the aperture size of the array and thereby increases the directivity of the array. Constructing the surface of the diffracting structure such that surface waves can form over the surface further increases the travel time and modifies the amplitude of the acoustical signal thereby allowing a larger effective aperture for the array.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a diffracting structure for use with a microphone array, the microphone array being comprised of a plurality of microphones defining a space generally enclosed by the array wherein a placement of the structure is chosen from the group comprising the structure is positioned substantially adjacent to the spaced and at least a portion of the structure is substantially within the spacer and wherein the structure has an outside surface.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a microphone array comprising a plurality of microphones constructed and arranged to generally enclose a space; a diffracting structure placed such that at least a portion of the structure is adjacent to the space wherein the diffracting structure has an outside surface.
A further embodiment of the invention provides a method of increasing an apparent aperture size of a microphone array, the method comprising; positioning a diffraction structure within a space defined by the microphone array to extend a travel time of sound signals to be received by microphones in the microphone array, generating different time delay weights, phases, 3o and amplitudes for signals from each microphone in the microphone array, applying said time delay weights to said sound signals received by each microphone in the microphone array wherein the diffraction structure has a shape, said time delay weights are determined by analyzing the shape of the diffraction structure and the travel time of the sound signals.
Another embodiment of the invention provides a microphone array for use on a generally flat surface comprising; a body having a convex top and an inverted truncated cone for a bottom, a plurality of cells located on a surface of the bottom for producing an l0 acoustic impedance and a plurality of microphones located adjacent to the bottom.
grief Description of the Drawing,,s A better understanding of the invention will be obtained by considering the detailed description below, with reference to the following drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a diagram of a circular microphone array detailing the variables used in the analysis below;
Figure 2 is a diagram of a tetrahedral microphone array;
Figure 3 illustrates a directional beam response for a circular array.
Figure 4 illustrates a circular microphone array with a spherical diffracting structure within the array;
Figure 5 illustrates a bi-circular microphone array with an oblate spheroid shaped diffracting structure inside the array;
Figure 6 illustrates the beamformer response for a circular array with a spherical diffracting structure (solid curve) and the response for a circular array without a diffracting structure (dashed curve);
Figures 7A to 24A illustrates top views of some possible diffracting structures and microphone arrays.
Figures 7B to 24B illustrate corresponding side view of the diffracting structures of Figures 7A to 24A.
Figure 25 is a plot comparing the directivity of a circular array having a diffracting structure within the array with the directivity of the same circular array without the diffracting structure.
Figure 26 illustrates the construction of a surface wave propagating surface for the diffracting structures.
Figure 27 plots the surface wave phase speed for a simple celled construction as pictured in Fig 17; and Figures 28-31 illustrate different configurations for coating the diffracting surface.
Figure 32 is a plot of the directional beam response for a hemispherical diffracting structure. The plots for a rigid and a soft diffracting structure are plotted on the same graph for ease of comparison.
Figure 33 is the diffracting structure used for Figure 32.
Figure 34 is a cross-sectional diagram of the cellular structure of the diffracting structure shown in Fig 33.
Figure 35 is a preferred embodiment of a microphone array utilizing the methods and concepts of the invention.
Figure 36 is a plot of the beamformer response obtained using the microphone array of Figure 35 both with and without a cellular structure and with optimization.
Figures 7B to 24B illustrate corresponding side view of the diffracting structures of Figures 7A to 24A.
Figure 25 is a plot comparing the directivity of a circular array having a diffracting structure within the array with the directivity of the same circular array without the diffracting structure.
Figure 26 illustrates the construction of a surface wave propagating surface for the diffracting structures.
Figure 27 plots the surface wave phase speed for a simple celled construction as pictured in Fig 17; and Figures 28-31 illustrate different configurations for coating the diffracting surface.
Figure 32 is a plot of the directional beam response for a hemispherical diffracting structure. The plots for a rigid and a soft diffracting structure are plotted on the same graph for ease of comparison.
Figure 33 is the diffracting structure used for Figure 32.
Figure 34 is a cross-sectional diagram of the cellular structure of the diffracting structure shown in Fig 33.
Figure 35 is a preferred embodiment of a microphone array utilizing the methods and concepts of the invention.
Figure 36 is a plot of the beamformer response obtained using the microphone array of Figure 35 both with and without a cellular structure and with optimization.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments To analyse the effect of introducing a diffracting structure in a microphone array, some background on array signal processing is required.
In a microphone array the separate signals from the separate microphones are weighted and summed to provide an output signal. This process is represented by the equation:
M
V °C ~ 1Nm jJm m=1 where V is the electrical output signal;
wm is the weight assigned to the particular microphone s M is the number of microphones and pm is the acoustic pressure signal from a microphone.
The weights are complex and contain both an amplitude weighting and an effective time delay zm, according to m = Iwm l e(+ra~rp where w is the angular sound frequency. An e~-i"t~ time dependence is being assumed. Both amplitude weights and time delays are, in general, frequency dependent.
Useful beampatterns can be obtained by using a uniform weighting scheme, setting ~wm~l and choosing the time delay im so that all microphone contirbutions are in phase when sound comes form a desired direction.
This approach is equivalent to delay-and-sum beamforming for an array in free space. When acoustical noise is present, improved beamforming performance can be obtained by applying optimization techniques, as discussed below.
The acoustic pressure signal pm from microphone m consists of both a signal component sm and a noise component nm where pm - Sm + Ylm An array is designed to enhance reception of the signal component while suppressing reception of the noise component. The array's ability to perform this task is described by a performance index known as array gain.
Array gain is defined as the ratio of the array output signal-to-noise ratio over that of an individual sensor. For a specific frequency w the array gain G(w) can be written using matrix notation as E{IWHSI2}l(E{ITYHNI z}) E{Wxs,sr~}y.z ~1) GCf ) - _ Qs l Q~ E{WHN. NXW} l a~n In this expression, W is the vector of sensor weights CA 02292357 1999-12-17 --.. "
W T = ~1'1'i (~)1t'z (~)...wM (CO)~~
S is the vector of signal components ~Sl ~~)S2 (~)~ .. SM (CV )~~
N is the vector of noise components NT = [y (~)n2 (~)... nM (w)~~
692 and 6"2 are the signal and noise powers observed at a selected reference sensor, respectively, and E{} is the expectation operator.
By defining the signal correlation matrix RSS(~) R~(~)=E{s.sH}~~.s I2) and the noise correlation matrix R"n(w) R,~(~)-E{N.NH ~~
the above expression for array gain becomes _ rr HRss (~)~ ( 4 ) WHRnn(~)~.
The array gain is thus described as the ratio of two quadratic forms (also known as a Rayleigh quotient).
It is well known in the art that such ratios can be maximized by proper selection of the weight vector W.
Such maximization is advantageous in microphone array sound pickup since it can provide for enhanced array performance for a given number and spacing of microphones simply by selecting the sensor weights W.
Provided that Rnn (c~) is non-singular, the value of is bounded by the minimum and maximum eigenvalues of the symmetric matrix Rnn 1 (c~) R5s (~) . The array gain is maximized by setting the weight vector W equal to the eigenvector corresponding to the maximum eigenvalue.
In the special case where Rs9 (c~) is a dyad, that is, it is defined by the outer product Rss (~) - SSH
then the weight vector WoPt that maximizes G(ca) is given simply by WoPt = R,~-' (c~)S.
It has been shown that the optimum weight solutions for several different optimization strategies can all be expressed as a scalar multiple of the basic solution Rnn-1 ( w ) S .
The maximum array gain G(w)oPt provided by the weights in (6) is ~J~CJ~opt - SHRnn ~~~'s. (7 ) Specific solutions for Wopt are determined by the exact values of the signal and noise correlation matrices, Rs9 (w) and R"n (w) Optimized beamformers have the potential to provide higher gain than available from delay-and-sum beamforming. Without further constraints, however, the resulting array can be very sensitive to the effects of microphone response tolerances and noise. In extreme cases, the optimum gain is impossible to realize using practical sensors.
A portion of the optimized gain can be realized, however, by modifying the optimization procedure. The design of an optimum beamformer then becomes a trade-off between the array's sensitivity to errors and the desired amount of gain over the spatial noise field. Two methods that provide robustness against errors are considered: gain maximization with a white-noise gain constraint and maximization of expected array gain.
Regarding gain maximization with a white-noise gain constraint, white noise gain is defined as the array gain against noise that is incoherent between sensors. The noise correlation matrix in this case reduces to an M x M identity matrix. Substituting this into the expression for array gain yields GW ~~~ _ WHR ~~~yy W IW
White noise gain quantifies the array's reduction of sensor and preamplifier noise. The higher the value of C",(c~), the more robust the beamformer. As an example, the white noise gain for an M-element delay-and-sum beamformer steered for plane waves is M. In this case, array processing reduces uncorrelated noise by a factor of M (improves the signal-to-noise ratio by a factor of M) .
A white noise gain constraint is imposed on the gain maximization procedure by adding a diagonal component to the noise correlation matrix. That is, replace Rr", (w) by R"n (c~) +xI. The strength of the constraint is controlled by the magnitude of x. Setting x to a large value implies that the dominant noise is uncorrelated from microphone to microphone. When uncorrelated noise is dominant, the optimum weights are those of a conventional delay-and-sum beamformer.
Setting K = 0 , of course, produces the unconstrained optimum array. Unfortunately, there is no simple relationship between the constraint parameter x and the constrained value of white noise gain. Designing an array for a prescribed value of C", (c~) requires an iterative procedure. The optimum weight vector is thus Wopt - ~R.rs ~~~ + ~~ 1 where it is assumed that R9s(c~) is given by Equation 5.
Of course, a suitable value of C~,, (c~) must be selected. This choice will depend on the exact level of sensor and preamplifier noise present. Lower sensor and preamplifier noise permits more white noise gain to be traded for array gain. As an example, the noise level (in equivalent sound pressure level) provided by modern electret microphones is of the order of 20-30 dBSL (that is, dB re: 20x10-6 Pa) whereas the acoustic background noise level of typical offices are in the vicinity of 30-45 dBSL. Since the uncorrelated sensor noise is about 10-15 dB lower than the acoustic background noise (due to the assumed noise field) it is possible to trade off some of the sensor SNR for increased rejection of environmental noise and reverberation.
To maximize the expected array gain, the following analysis applies. For an array in free space, the effects of many types of microphone errors can be accommodated by constraining white noise gain. Since the acoustic pressure observed at each microphone is essentially the same the levels of sensor noise and the effects of microphone tolerances are comparable between microphones. In the presence of a diffracting object, however, the pressure observed at a microphone on the side facing the sound source may be substantially higher than that observed in the acoustic shadow zone. This means that the relative importance of microphone noise varies substantially with the different microphone positions. Similarly, the effects of microphone gain and phase tolerances also vary widely with microphone location.
To obtain a practical design in the presence of amplitude and phase variations, an expression for the expected array gain must be obtained. The analysis of this problem is facilitated by assuming that the actual array weights described by the vector W vary in amplitude and phase about their nominal values Wo.
Assuming zero-mean, normally distributed fluctuations it is possible to evaluate the expected gain of the beamformer. The expression is a aP~~OH~as~~)~0)+I1 a ap +~,2"~WoHdtag(Rss~~))~0) a ap ~~oHR~~ ~~)~o ) + (1- a aP + Qm ~(Wo'~d~ag(Rnn ~~))~o ) where 6m2 is the variance of the magnitude fluctuations and ape is the variance of the phase fluctuations due to microphone tolerance.
Although this expression is more complicated than that shown in (4), it is still a ratio of two quadratic forms. Provided that the matrix A is non-singular, the value of the ratio is bounded by the minimum and maximum eigenvalues of the symmetric matrix where ~e ~P Rnn ~~~ + ( 1 a op ~ICTg(Rnn ~~~~~
and ~e ~P Rss ~~~ + 11 a aP + Q,2" ~C~lClg'~Rss ~~~~~
The expected gain E{G(w)} is maximized by setting the weight vector Wo equal to the eigenvector which corresponds to the maximum eigenvalue.
Notwithstanding the above optimization procedures, useful beampatterns can be obtained by using a uniform weighting scheme. This approach is equivalent to delay-and-sum beamforming for an array in free space.
In the following analyses, we will set the time delay Tm so that all microphone contributions are in phase when sound comes from a desired direction and simply adopt unit amplitude weights ~wm~-1. The output of a 3 dimension array is then given by Equation 10:
m V oc ~ p e~+r~") m rr~l (10) 'Two examples of such an array are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 shows a circular array 10 with a sound source 20 and a multiplicity of microphones 30.
Figure 2 shows a tetrahedral microphone array 40 with microphones 30 located at each vertex.
For the circular array 10, a source located at a position (ro, 80, ~o) (with ro= distance from the center of the array 6a= angle to the positive z-axis as shown in Figure 1 angle to the positive x-axis as shown in Figure 1 ) the pressures at each microphone 30 is given by Equation 11:
n C exp(ikrmo ) Ymo = ~ ~ ( 11 ) where C is a source strength parameter and the distances between source and microphones are rmo = [roe + a2 - 2roa sin9a cos(~m - r~o)]1~2 where a is the radius of the circle, ~m is the azimuthal position of microphone m. The array output is thus given by Equation 12:
m y GC ~ e~+imr") Pmo m=1 (12) Suppose it is desired to steer a beam to a look position (rl, 6j, ~1) , where 61 is the azimuth and ~1 is the elevation angle. The pressure pm that would be obtained at each microphone position if the source was at this look position are C 8Xp(Ikrml ) Pml - ~~,~
K'rml where rml = [rlz + az - 2rla sin BI cos(~m - ~l)wz To bring all the contributions into phase when the look position corresponds to the actual source position, the phase of the weights need to be set so that ~zm - ~ml The beamformer output is then given by Equation 13:
Y x ~ exp[ik(rmo - rml ) m=1 ~ma ~ 1 3 A sample response function is shown in Figure 3. A
5-element circular array of 8.5cm diameter located in free space has been assumed. The source is located at a range of 2m and at an angular positions of ~o = 0 and 60 = zz/2. For the look position, r1 = 2m, 61 = n/2 and the azimuth ~1 is varied. It should be noted that the directional beam response pictured in Figure 3 is for a frequency of 650 Hz and that uniform weights have been assumed.
The response function in Figure 3 can be improved upon by inserting a diffracting structure inside the array. An example of this is pictured in Figure 4.
Figure 4 illustrates a circular array with a spherical diffracting structure positioned within the array.
Figure 5 illustrates another configuration using a diffracting structure. Figure 5 shows a bi-circular array 50 with a diffracting structure 60 mostly contained within the space defined by the bi-circular array 50.
To determine the response function for an array such as that pictured in Figure 4, some of the assumptions made in calculating the response function shown in Figure 3 cannot be made. While the above equations assume that the pressure at each microphone was the free-field sound pressure due to a point source, such is not the case with an array having a diffracting structure. A diffracting structure should have a surface S that can be defined by an acoustic impedance function. Subject to the appropriate boundary conditions on the surface S of the diffracting structure 60, the acoustic wave equation will have to be solved to determine the sound pressure over the surface.
Diffraction and scattering effects can then be included in the beamforming analysis.
For such an analysis, a source at a position given by ro (ro, 60, ~o) is assumed. For this source, the boundary value problem is given by Equation 14:
~p+lczp=bar-ro) ( 14 ) outside the surface S of the diffracting structure 60 , subject to the impedance boundary condition is given by Equation 15:
do + ik~3p - 0 s ~ (15) where n is the outward unit normal and ~i is the normalized specific admittance. Asymptotically near the source, the pressure is given by Equation 16:
C exp[ikl r - ro P --~
klr-rol (16) Solutions for a few specific structures can be expressed analytically but generally well known numerical techniques are required. Regardless, knowing that a solution does exist, we can write down a solution symbolically as Per) = F'(r~ro), where F(r,ro) is a function describing the solution in two variables r and ro.
Evaluating the pressure pmo at each microphone position rm we have:
pma - F(rm ~ ro ) giving a uniform weight beamformer output (Equation 17) M
V x ~F(rm,ro) exP(IC~zm) .
m (17) The pressure at each microphone will vary significantly in both magnitude and phase because of diffraction.
Suppose that a beam is to be steered toward a look position rl= (rl, 61, ~1) . The microphone pressures that would be obtained if this look position corresponded to the actual source position would be Pml F(rm ~ rl ) '.
The time delays zm are then set according to Equation 18 wzm = -arg[F(rm,rl)~ ( 18 ) i where arg[Frm ,rl)) denotes the argument of the function F(rm ,r1).
As noted above, Figure 4 shows an example of the above. Figure 4 is a circular array 70 on the circumference of a rigid surface 80. The solution for the sound field about a rigid sphere due to a point source is known in the art. For a source with free-field sound field as given by Equation 16, the total sound field is given by Equation 19:
F(r,ro)=iC~(2n+1)Pn~COS~/l~ylnl~~~"')~Jn~ki<~ anhnl~(~<)~ (19) ~r-0 where ~r is the angle between vectors r and ro, Pn is the Legendre polynomial of order n, jn is the spherical Bessel function of the first kind and order n, h"~1~ is the spherical Hankel function of the first kind and order n, r~ = min ( r, ro ) , r, =max ( r, ro ) , and a~ =.1" ~~) ~ h"1~' ~1~), where the ' indicates differentiation with respect to the argument kr. To obtain F(r,rl), rl is used in place of ro in Equation 19. The solutions can be evaluated at each microphone position r = rm.
This solution is then used in the evaluation of the beamformer output V. For a ciruclar array 8.5cm in diameter with 5 equally spaced microphones in the X-Y
plane forming the array and on the circumference of an acoustically rigid sphere, the response function is shown in Figure 6.
For the response function shown in Figure 6, a 650Hz point source was located in the plane of the microphones with ro=2, Ao= n/2, and ~0=0. The look position has rl = 2m and A1 = n/2 fixed. The response V
as a function of azimuthal look angle ~1 is shown as the solid line in Figure 6. For comparison, the beamformer response obtained with no sphere has been calculated using Equation 13 and this result shown as the dashed line in Figure 6.
The inclusion of the diffracting sphere is seen to enhance the performance of the array by reducing the width of the central beam.
While the circular array was convenient for its mathematical tractability, many other shapes are possible for both the microphone array and the diffracting structure. Figures 7 to 24 illustrate these possible configurations.
The configurations pictured with a top view and a side view are as follows:
Microphone Diffracting Array Structure Figures 7A & B Circular hemisphere Figures 8A & B bi-circular hemisphere Figures 9A & B circular right circular cylinder Figures l0A & B circular raised right circular cylinder Figures 11A & B circular cylinder with a star shaped cross section Figures 12A & B square pyramid truncated square ramid Figures13A B square inverted &
truncated square pyramid with a generally square cross section Figures14A B circular right circular &
cylinder having an oblate spheroid at each end Figures15A B circular raised oblate &
spheroid Figure 16A B circular flat shallow &
solid cylinder raised from a surface Figure 17A B circular shallow solid &
cylinder haivng a convex top &
being raised from a surface Figure 18A B circular circular shape &
with a convex top and a truncated cone as its base Figure 19A B circular shallow cup &
shaped cross section raised from a surface Figure 20A B circular shallow solid &
cylinder with a flared bottom Figure 21A & B square circular shape with a convex top and a flared square base opening to the circular shape Figure 22A & B square truncated square pyramid Figure 23A & B hexagonal truncated hexagonal pyramid Figure 24A & B hexagonal shallow hexagonal solid cylinder raised from the surface by a hexagonal stand It should be noted that in the above described figures, the black dots denote the position of microphones in the array. Other shapes not listed above are also possible for the diffracting structure.
As can be seen from Figures 7 to 24, the placement of the microphone array can be anywhere as long as the diffracting structure, or at least a portion of it, is contained within the space defined by the array.
To determine the improvement in spatial response due to a diffracting structure, the directivity index D
is used. This index is the ratio of the array response in the signal direction to the array response averaged over all directions. This index is given by equation 20:
CA 02292357 1999-12-17 ~ ""-°
(20) Iy( o)lrolz D=lOlog~
4~ f f IV(r~)l r~IZ sin~~~
and is expressed in decibels. The numerator gives the beamformer response when the array is directed toward the source, at range ro; the denominator gives the average response over all directions. This expression is mathematically equivalent to that provided for array gain if a spherically isotropic noise model is used for ~,n (~) .
Using this expression for the conditions presented in Figure 6, a directivity of 2.3 dB is calculated for the circular array with a sphere present; without the sphere the directivity is 0.9 dB. At a frequency of 650 Hz, the inclusion of a diffracting sphere improves the directivity by l.4dB. The directivity for other frequencies has been calculated and presented in Figure 25. It is seen that improvements of at least 2 dB in directivity index are achieved in the 800-1600 Hz range.
Another consequence of an increase in directivity is the reduction in size that becomes possible for a practical device. Comparing the two curves in Figure 25, we see that with the sphere present, the array performs as well at 500Hz as the array without the sphere would perform at 800Hz, a ratio of 1.6; at higher frequencies,~this ratio is about 1.2. It is known that the performance of an array depends on the ratio of size to wavelength. Hence, the array with the sphere could be reduced in size by a factor of 1.4 and have approximately the same performance as the array with no sphere. This 30$ reduction in size would be very important to designers of products such as handsfree telephones or arrays for hearing aids where a smaller size is important. Moreover, once the size is reduced, the number of microphones could be reduced as well.
Additional performance enhancements can be obtained by appropriate treatment of the surface of the diffracting objects. The surfaces need not be acoustically-rigid as assumed in the above analysis.
There can be advantages in designing the exterior surfaces to have an effective acoustical surface impedance. Introducing some surface damping (especially frequency dependent damping) could be useful in shaping the frequency response of the beamformer. There are however, particular advantages in designing the surface impedance so that the air-coupled surface waves can propagate over the surface. These waves travel at a phase speed lower than the free-field sound speed.
Acoustic signals propagating around a diffracting object via these waves will have an increased travel time and thus lead to a larger effective aperture of an array.
The existence and properties of air-coupled surface waves are known in the art. A prototypical structure with a plurality of adjacent cells is shown in Figure 26. A sound wave propagating horizontally above this surface interacts with the air within the cells and has its propagation affected. This may be understood in terms of the effective acoustic surface impedance Z of the structure. Plane-wave-like solutions of the Helmholtz equation, p ~ e~~xer~.
for the sound pressure p, are sought subject to the boundary condition dp+iZ =o y p , y=o where x and y are coordinates shown in Figure 26, k= a/c is the wave number, a is the angular frequency, p is the air density, ( _ ~-1, and an exp (-ir~t) time dependence is assumed. Then, the terms a and p in the Helmholtz equation are given by k= 1_~~Z~a and ~3/k = -pclZ .
For a surface wave to exist, the impedance Z must have a spring-like reactance X, i.e., for Z=R+iX, X>0 is required. Moreover, for surface waves to be observed practically, we require R<X and 2<X/pc <6. The surface wave is characterized by an exponential decrease in amplitude with height above the surface.
If the lateral size of the cells is a sufficiently small fraction of a wavelength of sound, then sound propagation within the cells may be assumed to be one dimensional. For the simple cells of depth L shown in Figure 17, the effective surface impedance is Z =ipccotkL~
so surface waves are possible for frequencies less than the quarter-wave resonance.
To exploit the surface-wave effect, microphones may be mounted anywhere along the length of the cells.
At frequencies near cell resonance, however, the acoustic pressure observed at the cell openings and at other pressure nodal points will be very small. To use the microphone signals at these frequencies, the microphones should be located along the cell's length at paints away from pressure nodal points. This can be achieved for all frequencies if the microphones are located at the bottom of the cells since an acoustically rigid termination is always an antinodal point.
The phase speed of a propagating surface wave is cph = r.~ l Re{ a}
For the simple surface structure shown in Figure 26, using a cell depth of L=2.5 cm, we obtain the phase speed shown in Figure 27. The phase speed is the free-field sound speed at low frequencies but drops gradually to zero at about 3400 Hz. Above this frequency, the reactance is negative and no surface wave can propagate.
The reduced phase speed increases the travel time for acoustic signals to propagate around the structure and results in improved beamforming performance.
Figures 28-31 show a few alternatives that the surface of a diffracting structure can be treated to generate surface waves. For these, a hemispherical structure has been adopted for simplicity but, as suggested in Figures 9-24, many other structures are possible. In Figure 28, the entire surface supports the formation of surface waves. The introduction of the surface treatment to a diffracting structure need not be uniform over its surface and advantages in directionality may be achievable by restricting the application. In Figure 29, the surface wave treatment is restricted to a band about the lower circumference increased directivity would be anticipated for sources located closer to the horizontal plane through the hemisphere. Further reduction in scope, to provide increased directivity for a smaller range of source positions, is shown in Figure 30. The use of absorbing materials or treatment may also be useful. An absorbing patch on the top of the hemisphere, to reduce contributions from acoustic propagation over the top of the structure is shown in Figure 31.
The effect of such a surface treatment on the beam pattern of a 6-microphone delay-and-sum beamformer mounted on a hemisphere 90 8.5 cm in diameter is shown in Figure 32. The hemisphere 90 is shown in Figure 33 and is mounted on a reflecting plane 100 and the microphones 110 are equally spaced around the circumference of the hemisphere at the bottom of the cells 120. The cross sectional structure of the cells 120 are shown in Figure 34. The lOcm cells give a surface impedance, at the hemisphere surface, that is spring-like at 650 Hz. For the response patterns shown in Figure 32, a 650 Hz point source was located in the plane of the microphones 110 with ro= 2, A1= n/2, and ~o - 0. The look position has rl = 2m and 61= n/2 fixed.
The response V as a function of azimuthal look angle ~1 is shown as the solid line in Figure 32. The dashed line shows the response obtained for a rigid hemisphere with to microophones located on the outer surface at the base of the hemisphere.
The inclusion of the surface treatment is seen to enhance the array performance substantially. The width of the main beam at half height is reduced from ~ 147°
for the rigid sphere to ~90° for the soft sphere.
Furthermore, the directivity index at 650 Hz increases by 2.4dB.
The cellular surface described is one method for obtaining a desired acoustical impedance. This approach is attractive since it is completely passive and the impedance can be controlled by modifying the cell characteristics but there are practical limitations to the impedance that can be achieved.
Another method to provide a controlled acoustical impedance is the use of active sound control techniques.
By using a combination of acoustic actuator (e. g.
loudspeaker), acoustic sensor (e.g. microphone) and the appropriate control circuitry a wider variety of impedance functions can be implemented. (See for example US Patent number 5812686).
A design which encompasses the concepts disclosed above is depicted in Fig. 35. The design in Fig 35 is of a diffracting structure with a convex top 130 and an inverted truncated cone 140 as its base. The inverted truncated cone 140 has, at its narrow portion, a cellular structure 150 which serves as the means to introduce an acoustical impedance. As will be noted below, the microphones are located inside the cells.
The maximum diameter is 32 cm, the bottom diameter is 10 cm. This unit is designed to rest on a table top 160 which serves as a reflecting plane. The sloping sides of the truncated cone 140 make an angle of 38° with the table top. There are 3 rows of cells circling the speakerphone, each row containing 42 vertical cells. The 3 rows have a cell depth of 9.5 cm: these are the cells that were introduced to produce the appropriate acoustical surface impedance. To accommodate the cells, the top of the housing had to be 15 cm above the table top. Included in this height is 2.9 mm for an 0-ring 170 on the bottom. The separators between the cells are 2.5 mm thick. Six microphones were called for in this design, to be located in 6 equally-spaced cells of the bottom row, at the top, innermost position in the cells.
The o-ring 170 prevents sound waves from leaking via the underside, from one side of the cone 140 to the other.
The table top 160 acts as a reflecting surface from which sound waves are reflected to the cells. Also included in the design is a speaker placement 180 at the top of the convex top 130.
The array beamforming is based on, and makes use of, the diffraction of incoming sound by the physical shape of the housing. Computation of the sound fields about the housing, for various source positions and sound frequencies from 300 Hz to 4000Hz, was conveniently performed using a boundary element technique. Directivity indices achieved using delay-and-sum and optimized beamforming are shown in Figure 36 as a function of frequency. Results are shown for the housing with no cells (dashed line) as well as for the housing with three rows of cells open as described above (solid line). Also shown are results for the housing with cells and optimization (dash and dot lines). As seen in Figure 36, the use of cells to control the surface impedance has a beneficial effect on the directivity index. An increase in directivity index is observed between 550 Hz to l.6kHz with a boost of approximately 4 dB obtained in the range of 700Hz to 800Hz. The use of array-gain optimization, as described by equation 9, is shown in Figure 36 to further increase the directivity of the device by approximately 6 dB at 200 Hz.
The person understanding the above described invention may now conceive of alternative design, using the principles described herein. All such designs which fall within the scope of the claims appended hereto are considered to be part of the present invention.
In a microphone array the separate signals from the separate microphones are weighted and summed to provide an output signal. This process is represented by the equation:
M
V °C ~ 1Nm jJm m=1 where V is the electrical output signal;
wm is the weight assigned to the particular microphone s M is the number of microphones and pm is the acoustic pressure signal from a microphone.
The weights are complex and contain both an amplitude weighting and an effective time delay zm, according to m = Iwm l e(+ra~rp where w is the angular sound frequency. An e~-i"t~ time dependence is being assumed. Both amplitude weights and time delays are, in general, frequency dependent.
Useful beampatterns can be obtained by using a uniform weighting scheme, setting ~wm~l and choosing the time delay im so that all microphone contirbutions are in phase when sound comes form a desired direction.
This approach is equivalent to delay-and-sum beamforming for an array in free space. When acoustical noise is present, improved beamforming performance can be obtained by applying optimization techniques, as discussed below.
The acoustic pressure signal pm from microphone m consists of both a signal component sm and a noise component nm where pm - Sm + Ylm An array is designed to enhance reception of the signal component while suppressing reception of the noise component. The array's ability to perform this task is described by a performance index known as array gain.
Array gain is defined as the ratio of the array output signal-to-noise ratio over that of an individual sensor. For a specific frequency w the array gain G(w) can be written using matrix notation as E{IWHSI2}l(E{ITYHNI z}) E{Wxs,sr~}y.z ~1) GCf ) - _ Qs l Q~ E{WHN. NXW} l a~n In this expression, W is the vector of sensor weights CA 02292357 1999-12-17 --.. "
W T = ~1'1'i (~)1t'z (~)...wM (CO)~~
S is the vector of signal components ~Sl ~~)S2 (~)~ .. SM (CV )~~
N is the vector of noise components NT = [y (~)n2 (~)... nM (w)~~
692 and 6"2 are the signal and noise powers observed at a selected reference sensor, respectively, and E{} is the expectation operator.
By defining the signal correlation matrix RSS(~) R~(~)=E{s.sH}~~.s I2) and the noise correlation matrix R"n(w) R,~(~)-E{N.NH ~~
the above expression for array gain becomes _ rr HRss (~)~ ( 4 ) WHRnn(~)~.
The array gain is thus described as the ratio of two quadratic forms (also known as a Rayleigh quotient).
It is well known in the art that such ratios can be maximized by proper selection of the weight vector W.
Such maximization is advantageous in microphone array sound pickup since it can provide for enhanced array performance for a given number and spacing of microphones simply by selecting the sensor weights W.
Provided that Rnn (c~) is non-singular, the value of is bounded by the minimum and maximum eigenvalues of the symmetric matrix Rnn 1 (c~) R5s (~) . The array gain is maximized by setting the weight vector W equal to the eigenvector corresponding to the maximum eigenvalue.
In the special case where Rs9 (c~) is a dyad, that is, it is defined by the outer product Rss (~) - SSH
then the weight vector WoPt that maximizes G(ca) is given simply by WoPt = R,~-' (c~)S.
It has been shown that the optimum weight solutions for several different optimization strategies can all be expressed as a scalar multiple of the basic solution Rnn-1 ( w ) S .
The maximum array gain G(w)oPt provided by the weights in (6) is ~J~CJ~opt - SHRnn ~~~'s. (7 ) Specific solutions for Wopt are determined by the exact values of the signal and noise correlation matrices, Rs9 (w) and R"n (w) Optimized beamformers have the potential to provide higher gain than available from delay-and-sum beamforming. Without further constraints, however, the resulting array can be very sensitive to the effects of microphone response tolerances and noise. In extreme cases, the optimum gain is impossible to realize using practical sensors.
A portion of the optimized gain can be realized, however, by modifying the optimization procedure. The design of an optimum beamformer then becomes a trade-off between the array's sensitivity to errors and the desired amount of gain over the spatial noise field. Two methods that provide robustness against errors are considered: gain maximization with a white-noise gain constraint and maximization of expected array gain.
Regarding gain maximization with a white-noise gain constraint, white noise gain is defined as the array gain against noise that is incoherent between sensors. The noise correlation matrix in this case reduces to an M x M identity matrix. Substituting this into the expression for array gain yields GW ~~~ _ WHR ~~~yy W IW
White noise gain quantifies the array's reduction of sensor and preamplifier noise. The higher the value of C",(c~), the more robust the beamformer. As an example, the white noise gain for an M-element delay-and-sum beamformer steered for plane waves is M. In this case, array processing reduces uncorrelated noise by a factor of M (improves the signal-to-noise ratio by a factor of M) .
A white noise gain constraint is imposed on the gain maximization procedure by adding a diagonal component to the noise correlation matrix. That is, replace Rr", (w) by R"n (c~) +xI. The strength of the constraint is controlled by the magnitude of x. Setting x to a large value implies that the dominant noise is uncorrelated from microphone to microphone. When uncorrelated noise is dominant, the optimum weights are those of a conventional delay-and-sum beamformer.
Setting K = 0 , of course, produces the unconstrained optimum array. Unfortunately, there is no simple relationship between the constraint parameter x and the constrained value of white noise gain. Designing an array for a prescribed value of C", (c~) requires an iterative procedure. The optimum weight vector is thus Wopt - ~R.rs ~~~ + ~~ 1 where it is assumed that R9s(c~) is given by Equation 5.
Of course, a suitable value of C~,, (c~) must be selected. This choice will depend on the exact level of sensor and preamplifier noise present. Lower sensor and preamplifier noise permits more white noise gain to be traded for array gain. As an example, the noise level (in equivalent sound pressure level) provided by modern electret microphones is of the order of 20-30 dBSL (that is, dB re: 20x10-6 Pa) whereas the acoustic background noise level of typical offices are in the vicinity of 30-45 dBSL. Since the uncorrelated sensor noise is about 10-15 dB lower than the acoustic background noise (due to the assumed noise field) it is possible to trade off some of the sensor SNR for increased rejection of environmental noise and reverberation.
To maximize the expected array gain, the following analysis applies. For an array in free space, the effects of many types of microphone errors can be accommodated by constraining white noise gain. Since the acoustic pressure observed at each microphone is essentially the same the levels of sensor noise and the effects of microphone tolerances are comparable between microphones. In the presence of a diffracting object, however, the pressure observed at a microphone on the side facing the sound source may be substantially higher than that observed in the acoustic shadow zone. This means that the relative importance of microphone noise varies substantially with the different microphone positions. Similarly, the effects of microphone gain and phase tolerances also vary widely with microphone location.
To obtain a practical design in the presence of amplitude and phase variations, an expression for the expected array gain must be obtained. The analysis of this problem is facilitated by assuming that the actual array weights described by the vector W vary in amplitude and phase about their nominal values Wo.
Assuming zero-mean, normally distributed fluctuations it is possible to evaluate the expected gain of the beamformer. The expression is a aP~~OH~as~~)~0)+I1 a ap +~,2"~WoHdtag(Rss~~))~0) a ap ~~oHR~~ ~~)~o ) + (1- a aP + Qm ~(Wo'~d~ag(Rnn ~~))~o ) where 6m2 is the variance of the magnitude fluctuations and ape is the variance of the phase fluctuations due to microphone tolerance.
Although this expression is more complicated than that shown in (4), it is still a ratio of two quadratic forms. Provided that the matrix A is non-singular, the value of the ratio is bounded by the minimum and maximum eigenvalues of the symmetric matrix where ~e ~P Rnn ~~~ + ( 1 a op ~ICTg(Rnn ~~~~~
and ~e ~P Rss ~~~ + 11 a aP + Q,2" ~C~lClg'~Rss ~~~~~
The expected gain E{G(w)} is maximized by setting the weight vector Wo equal to the eigenvector which corresponds to the maximum eigenvalue.
Notwithstanding the above optimization procedures, useful beampatterns can be obtained by using a uniform weighting scheme. This approach is equivalent to delay-and-sum beamforming for an array in free space.
In the following analyses, we will set the time delay Tm so that all microphone contributions are in phase when sound comes from a desired direction and simply adopt unit amplitude weights ~wm~-1. The output of a 3 dimension array is then given by Equation 10:
m V oc ~ p e~+r~") m rr~l (10) 'Two examples of such an array are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 shows a circular array 10 with a sound source 20 and a multiplicity of microphones 30.
Figure 2 shows a tetrahedral microphone array 40 with microphones 30 located at each vertex.
For the circular array 10, a source located at a position (ro, 80, ~o) (with ro= distance from the center of the array 6a= angle to the positive z-axis as shown in Figure 1 angle to the positive x-axis as shown in Figure 1 ) the pressures at each microphone 30 is given by Equation 11:
n C exp(ikrmo ) Ymo = ~ ~ ( 11 ) where C is a source strength parameter and the distances between source and microphones are rmo = [roe + a2 - 2roa sin9a cos(~m - r~o)]1~2 where a is the radius of the circle, ~m is the azimuthal position of microphone m. The array output is thus given by Equation 12:
m y GC ~ e~+imr") Pmo m=1 (12) Suppose it is desired to steer a beam to a look position (rl, 6j, ~1) , where 61 is the azimuth and ~1 is the elevation angle. The pressure pm that would be obtained at each microphone position if the source was at this look position are C 8Xp(Ikrml ) Pml - ~~,~
K'rml where rml = [rlz + az - 2rla sin BI cos(~m - ~l)wz To bring all the contributions into phase when the look position corresponds to the actual source position, the phase of the weights need to be set so that ~zm - ~ml The beamformer output is then given by Equation 13:
Y x ~ exp[ik(rmo - rml ) m=1 ~ma ~ 1 3 A sample response function is shown in Figure 3. A
5-element circular array of 8.5cm diameter located in free space has been assumed. The source is located at a range of 2m and at an angular positions of ~o = 0 and 60 = zz/2. For the look position, r1 = 2m, 61 = n/2 and the azimuth ~1 is varied. It should be noted that the directional beam response pictured in Figure 3 is for a frequency of 650 Hz and that uniform weights have been assumed.
The response function in Figure 3 can be improved upon by inserting a diffracting structure inside the array. An example of this is pictured in Figure 4.
Figure 4 illustrates a circular array with a spherical diffracting structure positioned within the array.
Figure 5 illustrates another configuration using a diffracting structure. Figure 5 shows a bi-circular array 50 with a diffracting structure 60 mostly contained within the space defined by the bi-circular array 50.
To determine the response function for an array such as that pictured in Figure 4, some of the assumptions made in calculating the response function shown in Figure 3 cannot be made. While the above equations assume that the pressure at each microphone was the free-field sound pressure due to a point source, such is not the case with an array having a diffracting structure. A diffracting structure should have a surface S that can be defined by an acoustic impedance function. Subject to the appropriate boundary conditions on the surface S of the diffracting structure 60, the acoustic wave equation will have to be solved to determine the sound pressure over the surface.
Diffraction and scattering effects can then be included in the beamforming analysis.
For such an analysis, a source at a position given by ro (ro, 60, ~o) is assumed. For this source, the boundary value problem is given by Equation 14:
~p+lczp=bar-ro) ( 14 ) outside the surface S of the diffracting structure 60 , subject to the impedance boundary condition is given by Equation 15:
do + ik~3p - 0 s ~ (15) where n is the outward unit normal and ~i is the normalized specific admittance. Asymptotically near the source, the pressure is given by Equation 16:
C exp[ikl r - ro P --~
klr-rol (16) Solutions for a few specific structures can be expressed analytically but generally well known numerical techniques are required. Regardless, knowing that a solution does exist, we can write down a solution symbolically as Per) = F'(r~ro), where F(r,ro) is a function describing the solution in two variables r and ro.
Evaluating the pressure pmo at each microphone position rm we have:
pma - F(rm ~ ro ) giving a uniform weight beamformer output (Equation 17) M
V x ~F(rm,ro) exP(IC~zm) .
m (17) The pressure at each microphone will vary significantly in both magnitude and phase because of diffraction.
Suppose that a beam is to be steered toward a look position rl= (rl, 61, ~1) . The microphone pressures that would be obtained if this look position corresponded to the actual source position would be Pml F(rm ~ rl ) '.
The time delays zm are then set according to Equation 18 wzm = -arg[F(rm,rl)~ ( 18 ) i where arg[Frm ,rl)) denotes the argument of the function F(rm ,r1).
As noted above, Figure 4 shows an example of the above. Figure 4 is a circular array 70 on the circumference of a rigid surface 80. The solution for the sound field about a rigid sphere due to a point source is known in the art. For a source with free-field sound field as given by Equation 16, the total sound field is given by Equation 19:
F(r,ro)=iC~(2n+1)Pn~COS~/l~ylnl~~~"')~Jn~ki<~ anhnl~(~<)~ (19) ~r-0 where ~r is the angle between vectors r and ro, Pn is the Legendre polynomial of order n, jn is the spherical Bessel function of the first kind and order n, h"~1~ is the spherical Hankel function of the first kind and order n, r~ = min ( r, ro ) , r, =max ( r, ro ) , and a~ =.1" ~~) ~ h"1~' ~1~), where the ' indicates differentiation with respect to the argument kr. To obtain F(r,rl), rl is used in place of ro in Equation 19. The solutions can be evaluated at each microphone position r = rm.
This solution is then used in the evaluation of the beamformer output V. For a ciruclar array 8.5cm in diameter with 5 equally spaced microphones in the X-Y
plane forming the array and on the circumference of an acoustically rigid sphere, the response function is shown in Figure 6.
For the response function shown in Figure 6, a 650Hz point source was located in the plane of the microphones with ro=2, Ao= n/2, and ~0=0. The look position has rl = 2m and A1 = n/2 fixed. The response V
as a function of azimuthal look angle ~1 is shown as the solid line in Figure 6. For comparison, the beamformer response obtained with no sphere has been calculated using Equation 13 and this result shown as the dashed line in Figure 6.
The inclusion of the diffracting sphere is seen to enhance the performance of the array by reducing the width of the central beam.
While the circular array was convenient for its mathematical tractability, many other shapes are possible for both the microphone array and the diffracting structure. Figures 7 to 24 illustrate these possible configurations.
The configurations pictured with a top view and a side view are as follows:
Microphone Diffracting Array Structure Figures 7A & B Circular hemisphere Figures 8A & B bi-circular hemisphere Figures 9A & B circular right circular cylinder Figures l0A & B circular raised right circular cylinder Figures 11A & B circular cylinder with a star shaped cross section Figures 12A & B square pyramid truncated square ramid Figures13A B square inverted &
truncated square pyramid with a generally square cross section Figures14A B circular right circular &
cylinder having an oblate spheroid at each end Figures15A B circular raised oblate &
spheroid Figure 16A B circular flat shallow &
solid cylinder raised from a surface Figure 17A B circular shallow solid &
cylinder haivng a convex top &
being raised from a surface Figure 18A B circular circular shape &
with a convex top and a truncated cone as its base Figure 19A B circular shallow cup &
shaped cross section raised from a surface Figure 20A B circular shallow solid &
cylinder with a flared bottom Figure 21A & B square circular shape with a convex top and a flared square base opening to the circular shape Figure 22A & B square truncated square pyramid Figure 23A & B hexagonal truncated hexagonal pyramid Figure 24A & B hexagonal shallow hexagonal solid cylinder raised from the surface by a hexagonal stand It should be noted that in the above described figures, the black dots denote the position of microphones in the array. Other shapes not listed above are also possible for the diffracting structure.
As can be seen from Figures 7 to 24, the placement of the microphone array can be anywhere as long as the diffracting structure, or at least a portion of it, is contained within the space defined by the array.
To determine the improvement in spatial response due to a diffracting structure, the directivity index D
is used. This index is the ratio of the array response in the signal direction to the array response averaged over all directions. This index is given by equation 20:
CA 02292357 1999-12-17 ~ ""-°
(20) Iy( o)lrolz D=lOlog~
4~ f f IV(r~)l r~IZ sin~~~
and is expressed in decibels. The numerator gives the beamformer response when the array is directed toward the source, at range ro; the denominator gives the average response over all directions. This expression is mathematically equivalent to that provided for array gain if a spherically isotropic noise model is used for ~,n (~) .
Using this expression for the conditions presented in Figure 6, a directivity of 2.3 dB is calculated for the circular array with a sphere present; without the sphere the directivity is 0.9 dB. At a frequency of 650 Hz, the inclusion of a diffracting sphere improves the directivity by l.4dB. The directivity for other frequencies has been calculated and presented in Figure 25. It is seen that improvements of at least 2 dB in directivity index are achieved in the 800-1600 Hz range.
Another consequence of an increase in directivity is the reduction in size that becomes possible for a practical device. Comparing the two curves in Figure 25, we see that with the sphere present, the array performs as well at 500Hz as the array without the sphere would perform at 800Hz, a ratio of 1.6; at higher frequencies,~this ratio is about 1.2. It is known that the performance of an array depends on the ratio of size to wavelength. Hence, the array with the sphere could be reduced in size by a factor of 1.4 and have approximately the same performance as the array with no sphere. This 30$ reduction in size would be very important to designers of products such as handsfree telephones or arrays for hearing aids where a smaller size is important. Moreover, once the size is reduced, the number of microphones could be reduced as well.
Additional performance enhancements can be obtained by appropriate treatment of the surface of the diffracting objects. The surfaces need not be acoustically-rigid as assumed in the above analysis.
There can be advantages in designing the exterior surfaces to have an effective acoustical surface impedance. Introducing some surface damping (especially frequency dependent damping) could be useful in shaping the frequency response of the beamformer. There are however, particular advantages in designing the surface impedance so that the air-coupled surface waves can propagate over the surface. These waves travel at a phase speed lower than the free-field sound speed.
Acoustic signals propagating around a diffracting object via these waves will have an increased travel time and thus lead to a larger effective aperture of an array.
The existence and properties of air-coupled surface waves are known in the art. A prototypical structure with a plurality of adjacent cells is shown in Figure 26. A sound wave propagating horizontally above this surface interacts with the air within the cells and has its propagation affected. This may be understood in terms of the effective acoustic surface impedance Z of the structure. Plane-wave-like solutions of the Helmholtz equation, p ~ e~~xer~.
for the sound pressure p, are sought subject to the boundary condition dp+iZ =o y p , y=o where x and y are coordinates shown in Figure 26, k= a/c is the wave number, a is the angular frequency, p is the air density, ( _ ~-1, and an exp (-ir~t) time dependence is assumed. Then, the terms a and p in the Helmholtz equation are given by k= 1_~~Z~a and ~3/k = -pclZ .
For a surface wave to exist, the impedance Z must have a spring-like reactance X, i.e., for Z=R+iX, X>0 is required. Moreover, for surface waves to be observed practically, we require R<X and 2<X/pc <6. The surface wave is characterized by an exponential decrease in amplitude with height above the surface.
If the lateral size of the cells is a sufficiently small fraction of a wavelength of sound, then sound propagation within the cells may be assumed to be one dimensional. For the simple cells of depth L shown in Figure 17, the effective surface impedance is Z =ipccotkL~
so surface waves are possible for frequencies less than the quarter-wave resonance.
To exploit the surface-wave effect, microphones may be mounted anywhere along the length of the cells.
At frequencies near cell resonance, however, the acoustic pressure observed at the cell openings and at other pressure nodal points will be very small. To use the microphone signals at these frequencies, the microphones should be located along the cell's length at paints away from pressure nodal points. This can be achieved for all frequencies if the microphones are located at the bottom of the cells since an acoustically rigid termination is always an antinodal point.
The phase speed of a propagating surface wave is cph = r.~ l Re{ a}
For the simple surface structure shown in Figure 26, using a cell depth of L=2.5 cm, we obtain the phase speed shown in Figure 27. The phase speed is the free-field sound speed at low frequencies but drops gradually to zero at about 3400 Hz. Above this frequency, the reactance is negative and no surface wave can propagate.
The reduced phase speed increases the travel time for acoustic signals to propagate around the structure and results in improved beamforming performance.
Figures 28-31 show a few alternatives that the surface of a diffracting structure can be treated to generate surface waves. For these, a hemispherical structure has been adopted for simplicity but, as suggested in Figures 9-24, many other structures are possible. In Figure 28, the entire surface supports the formation of surface waves. The introduction of the surface treatment to a diffracting structure need not be uniform over its surface and advantages in directionality may be achievable by restricting the application. In Figure 29, the surface wave treatment is restricted to a band about the lower circumference increased directivity would be anticipated for sources located closer to the horizontal plane through the hemisphere. Further reduction in scope, to provide increased directivity for a smaller range of source positions, is shown in Figure 30. The use of absorbing materials or treatment may also be useful. An absorbing patch on the top of the hemisphere, to reduce contributions from acoustic propagation over the top of the structure is shown in Figure 31.
The effect of such a surface treatment on the beam pattern of a 6-microphone delay-and-sum beamformer mounted on a hemisphere 90 8.5 cm in diameter is shown in Figure 32. The hemisphere 90 is shown in Figure 33 and is mounted on a reflecting plane 100 and the microphones 110 are equally spaced around the circumference of the hemisphere at the bottom of the cells 120. The cross sectional structure of the cells 120 are shown in Figure 34. The lOcm cells give a surface impedance, at the hemisphere surface, that is spring-like at 650 Hz. For the response patterns shown in Figure 32, a 650 Hz point source was located in the plane of the microphones 110 with ro= 2, A1= n/2, and ~o - 0. The look position has rl = 2m and 61= n/2 fixed.
The response V as a function of azimuthal look angle ~1 is shown as the solid line in Figure 32. The dashed line shows the response obtained for a rigid hemisphere with to microophones located on the outer surface at the base of the hemisphere.
The inclusion of the surface treatment is seen to enhance the array performance substantially. The width of the main beam at half height is reduced from ~ 147°
for the rigid sphere to ~90° for the soft sphere.
Furthermore, the directivity index at 650 Hz increases by 2.4dB.
The cellular surface described is one method for obtaining a desired acoustical impedance. This approach is attractive since it is completely passive and the impedance can be controlled by modifying the cell characteristics but there are practical limitations to the impedance that can be achieved.
Another method to provide a controlled acoustical impedance is the use of active sound control techniques.
By using a combination of acoustic actuator (e. g.
loudspeaker), acoustic sensor (e.g. microphone) and the appropriate control circuitry a wider variety of impedance functions can be implemented. (See for example US Patent number 5812686).
A design which encompasses the concepts disclosed above is depicted in Fig. 35. The design in Fig 35 is of a diffracting structure with a convex top 130 and an inverted truncated cone 140 as its base. The inverted truncated cone 140 has, at its narrow portion, a cellular structure 150 which serves as the means to introduce an acoustical impedance. As will be noted below, the microphones are located inside the cells.
The maximum diameter is 32 cm, the bottom diameter is 10 cm. This unit is designed to rest on a table top 160 which serves as a reflecting plane. The sloping sides of the truncated cone 140 make an angle of 38° with the table top. There are 3 rows of cells circling the speakerphone, each row containing 42 vertical cells. The 3 rows have a cell depth of 9.5 cm: these are the cells that were introduced to produce the appropriate acoustical surface impedance. To accommodate the cells, the top of the housing had to be 15 cm above the table top. Included in this height is 2.9 mm for an 0-ring 170 on the bottom. The separators between the cells are 2.5 mm thick. Six microphones were called for in this design, to be located in 6 equally-spaced cells of the bottom row, at the top, innermost position in the cells.
The o-ring 170 prevents sound waves from leaking via the underside, from one side of the cone 140 to the other.
The table top 160 acts as a reflecting surface from which sound waves are reflected to the cells. Also included in the design is a speaker placement 180 at the top of the convex top 130.
The array beamforming is based on, and makes use of, the diffraction of incoming sound by the physical shape of the housing. Computation of the sound fields about the housing, for various source positions and sound frequencies from 300 Hz to 4000Hz, was conveniently performed using a boundary element technique. Directivity indices achieved using delay-and-sum and optimized beamforming are shown in Figure 36 as a function of frequency. Results are shown for the housing with no cells (dashed line) as well as for the housing with three rows of cells open as described above (solid line). Also shown are results for the housing with cells and optimization (dash and dot lines). As seen in Figure 36, the use of cells to control the surface impedance has a beneficial effect on the directivity index. An increase in directivity index is observed between 550 Hz to l.6kHz with a boost of approximately 4 dB obtained in the range of 700Hz to 800Hz. The use of array-gain optimization, as described by equation 9, is shown in Figure 36 to further increase the directivity of the device by approximately 6 dB at 200 Hz.
The person understanding the above described invention may now conceive of alternative design, using the principles described herein. All such designs which fall within the scope of the claims appended hereto are considered to be part of the present invention.
Claims (31)
1. A diffracting structure for use with a microphone array, the microphone array being comprised of a plurality of microphones defining a space generally enclosed by the array wherein a placement of the structure is chosen from the group comprising:
a) the structure is positioned substantially adjacent to the space;
b) at least a portion of the structure is substantially within the space; and wherein the structure has an outside surface.
a) the structure is positioned substantially adjacent to the space;
b) at least a portion of the structure is substantially within the space; and wherein the structure has an outside surface.
2. A structure as claimed in claim 1 wherein a first set of portions of the outside surface of the structure is constructed and arranged to allow air-coupled surface waves to propagate over the first set of portions.
3. A structure as claimed in claim 2 wherein a second set of portions of the outside surface of the structure is constructed and arranged to absorb and dampen sound.
4. A structure as claimed in claim 1 wherein the outside surface of the structure is constructed and arranged to allow air-coupled surface waves to propagate over the outside surface.
5. A structure as claimed in claim 2 wherein the first set of portions has a cell-like construction.
6. A structure as claimed in claim 4 wherein the outside surface of the structure has a cell-like construction.
7. A structure as claimed in claim 1 wherein the structure has a shape chosen from the group comprising:
a) hemisphere b) right circular cylinder c) a cylinder with a star shaped cross section d) a square truncated pyramid e) an inverted truncated pyramid with a generally square cross section f) a right circular cylinder coupled to a flattened oblate spheroid at each end of the cylinder g) an oblate spheroid h) a flat shallow solid cylinder i) a shallow solid cylinder with a convex top j) generally circular with a convex top k) shallow cup shaped cross section l) shallow solid cylinder m) generally circular with a convex top n) hexagonal truncated pyramid and o) shallow hexagonal solid cylinder
a) hemisphere b) right circular cylinder c) a cylinder with a star shaped cross section d) a square truncated pyramid e) an inverted truncated pyramid with a generally square cross section f) a right circular cylinder coupled to a flattened oblate spheroid at each end of the cylinder g) an oblate spheroid h) a flat shallow solid cylinder i) a shallow solid cylinder with a convex top j) generally circular with a convex top k) shallow cup shaped cross section l) shallow solid cylinder m) generally circular with a convex top n) hexagonal truncated pyramid and o) shallow hexagonal solid cylinder
8. A structure as claimed in claim 7 wherein the outside surface of the structure has a cell-like construction.
9. A structure as claimed in claim 7 wherein the structure is raised from a surface by a support having a shape chosen from the group comprising:
aa) circular right cylinder bb) square cylinder cc) flaring cylinder with a narrow portion adjacent to the surface dd) a square base attached to a flaring cylinder and ee) hexagonal cylinder
aa) circular right cylinder bb) square cylinder cc) flaring cylinder with a narrow portion adjacent to the surface dd) a square base attached to a flaring cylinder and ee) hexagonal cylinder
10. A structure as claimed in claim 9 wherein the outside surface of the structure has a cell-like construction.
11. A microphone array comprising:
a plurality of microphones constructed and arranged to generally enclose a space; and a diffracting structure placed such that at least a portion of the structure is adjacent to said space and wherein the diffracting structure has an outside surface.
a plurality of microphones constructed and arranged to generally enclose a space; and a diffracting structure placed such that at least a portion of the structure is adjacent to said space and wherein the diffracting structure has an outside surface.
12. An array as claimed in claim 11 wherein at least a portion of the structure is substantially within the space.
13. An array as claimed in claim 11 wherein a first set of portions of the outside surface of the structure is constructed and arranged to allow air-coupled surface waves to propagate over a first set of portions.
14. An array as claimed in claim 13 wherein a second set of portions of the outside surface of the structure is constructed and arranged to absorb and dampen sound.
15. An array as claimed in claim 11 wherein the outside surface of the structure is constructed and arranged to allow air-coupled surface waves to propagate over the outside surface.
16. An array as claimed in claim 13 wherein the first set of portions has a cell-like construction.
17. An array as claimed in claim 15 wherein the outside surface of the structure has a cell-like construction.
18. An array as claimed in claim 11 wherein a shape of the structure is chosen from the group comprising:
a) hemisphere b) right circular cylinder c) a cylinder with a star shaped cross section d) a square truncated pyramid e) an inverted truncated pyramid with a generally square cross section f) a right circular cylinder coupled to a flattened oblate spheroid at each end of the cylinder g) an oblate spheroid and h) a flat shallow solid cylinder i) a shallow solid cylinder with a convex top j) generally circular with a convex top k) shallow cup shaped cross section l) shallow solid cylinder m) generally circular with a convex top n) hexagonal truncated pyramid and o) shallow hexagonal solid cylinder and wherein the plurality of microphones is arranged in a configuration chosen from the group comprising:
a) generally circular b) generally bi-circular c) generally tetrahedral d) triangular e) bi-triangular.
a) hemisphere b) right circular cylinder c) a cylinder with a star shaped cross section d) a square truncated pyramid e) an inverted truncated pyramid with a generally square cross section f) a right circular cylinder coupled to a flattened oblate spheroid at each end of the cylinder g) an oblate spheroid and h) a flat shallow solid cylinder i) a shallow solid cylinder with a convex top j) generally circular with a convex top k) shallow cup shaped cross section l) shallow solid cylinder m) generally circular with a convex top n) hexagonal truncated pyramid and o) shallow hexagonal solid cylinder and wherein the plurality of microphones is arranged in a configuration chosen from the group comprising:
a) generally circular b) generally bi-circular c) generally tetrahedral d) triangular e) bi-triangular.
19. An array as claimed in claim 18 wherein the outside surface of the structure has a cell-like construction.
20. An array as claimed in claim 19 wherein the structure is raised from a surface by a support having a shape chosen from the group comprising:
aa) right circular cylinder bb) square cylinder cc) flaring cylinder with a narrow portion adjacent to the surface dd) a square base attached to a flaring cylinder and ee) hexagonal cylinder
aa) right circular cylinder bb) square cylinder cc) flaring cylinder with a narrow portion adjacent to the surface dd) a square base attached to a flaring cylinder and ee) hexagonal cylinder
21. An array as claimed in claim 20 wherein the outside surface of the structure has a cell-like construction and wherein the microphones are disposed within the cells.
22. A method of increasing an apparent aperture size of a microphone array, the method comprising:
a) positioning a diffraction structure within a space defined by the microphone array to extend a travel time of sound signals to be received by microphones in the microphone array;
b) generating different time delay weights, phases, and amplitudes for signals from each microphone in the microphone array;
c) applying said time delay weights to said sound signals received by each microphone in the microphone array wherein the diffraction structure has a shape;
said time delay weights are determined by analyzing the shape of the diffraction structure and the travel time of the sound signals.
a) positioning a diffraction structure within a space defined by the microphone array to extend a travel time of sound signals to be received by microphones in the microphone array;
b) generating different time delay weights, phases, and amplitudes for signals from each microphone in the microphone array;
c) applying said time delay weights to said sound signals received by each microphone in the microphone array wherein the diffraction structure has a shape;
said time delay weights are determined by analyzing the shape of the diffraction structure and the travel time of the sound signals.
23. A method as claimed in claim 16 wherein the shape of the structure is chosen from the group comprising:
a) hemisphere b) right circular cylinder c) a cylinder with a star shaped cross section d) a truncated square pyramid e) an upside down truncated square pyramid f) a right circular cylinder coupled to a flattened oblate spheroid at each end of the cylinder g) an oblate spheroid h) a flat shallow solid cylinder i) a shallow solid cylinder with a convex top j) generally circular with a convex top k) shallow cup shaped cross section l) shallow solid cylinder m) generally circular with a convex top n) hexagonal truncated pyramid and o) shallow hexagonal solid cylinder
a) hemisphere b) right circular cylinder c) a cylinder with a star shaped cross section d) a truncated square pyramid e) an upside down truncated square pyramid f) a right circular cylinder coupled to a flattened oblate spheroid at each end of the cylinder g) an oblate spheroid h) a flat shallow solid cylinder i) a shallow solid cylinder with a convex top j) generally circular with a convex top k) shallow cup shaped cross section l) shallow solid cylinder m) generally circular with a convex top n) hexagonal truncated pyramid and o) shallow hexagonal solid cylinder
24. A method as claimed in claim 22 further including constructing and arranging a first set of portions of an outside surface of the diffraction structure to allow air-coupled surface waves to propagate over the first set of portions.
25. A method as claimed in claim 24 further including constructing and arranging a second set of portions of the outside surface of the diffraction structure to absorb and dampen the sound signals.
26. A method as claimed in claim 22 further including constructing and arranging an outside surface of the diffraction structure to allow air-coupled surface waves to propagate over the outside surface.
27. A method as claimed in claim 24 further including constructing and arranging the first set of portions of the surface of the diffraction structure to have a cell-like construction.
28. A method as claimed in claim 26 further including constructing and arranging the outside surface of the diffraction structure to have a cell-like construction.
29. A microphone array for use on a generally flat surface comprising:
a body having a convex top and an inverted truncated cone for a bottom;
a plurality of cells located on a surface of the bottom for producing an acoustic impedance; and a plurality of microphones located adjacent to the bottom.
a body having a convex top and an inverted truncated cone for a bottom;
a plurality of cells located on a surface of the bottom for producing an acoustic impedance; and a plurality of microphones located adjacent to the bottom.
30. A microphone array as claimed in claim 29 wherein each of the plurality of microphones is placed inside a cell chosen from the plurality of cells.
31. A microphone array as claimed in claim 29 further including a speaker located substantially in a center of the convex top.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11295098P | 1998-12-18 | 1998-12-18 | |
| US60/112,950 | 1998-12-18 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2292357A1 true CA2292357A1 (en) | 2000-06-18 |
Family
ID=31886239
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2292357 Abandoned CA2292357A1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 1999-12-17 | Microphone array diffracting structure |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2292357A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1429581A2 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2004-06-16 | Mitel Knowledge Corporation | Method of broadband constant directivity beamforming for non linear and non axi-symmetric sensor arrays embedded in a obstacle |
| US7123735B2 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2006-10-17 | National Research Council Of Canada | Method and apparatus to increase acoustic separation |
| US7400736B2 (en) | 2002-12-16 | 2008-07-15 | Mitel Networks Corporation | Method for extending the frequency range of a beamformer without spatial aliasing |
-
1999
- 1999-12-17 CA CA 2292357 patent/CA2292357A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7123735B2 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2006-10-17 | National Research Council Of Canada | Method and apparatus to increase acoustic separation |
| EP1429581A2 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2004-06-16 | Mitel Knowledge Corporation | Method of broadband constant directivity beamforming for non linear and non axi-symmetric sensor arrays embedded in a obstacle |
| US7269263B2 (en) | 2002-12-12 | 2007-09-11 | Bny Trust Company Of Canada | Method of broadband constant directivity beamforming for non linear and non axi-symmetric sensor arrays embedded in an obstacle |
| EP1429581A3 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2009-04-01 | Mitel Networks Corporation | Method of broadband constant directivity beamforming for non linear and non axi-symmetric sensor arrays embedded in a obstacle |
| US7400736B2 (en) | 2002-12-16 | 2008-07-15 | Mitel Networks Corporation | Method for extending the frequency range of a beamformer without spatial aliasing |
| EP1432280A3 (en) * | 2002-12-16 | 2009-04-01 | Mitel Networks Corporation | Method for extending the frequency range of a beamformer without spatial aliasing |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US7068801B1 (en) | Microphone array diffracting structure | |
| US7840013B2 (en) | Microphone array with physical beamforming using omnidirectional microphones | |
| US9445198B2 (en) | Polyhedral audio system based on at least second-order eigenbeams | |
| US7269263B2 (en) | Method of broadband constant directivity beamforming for non linear and non axi-symmetric sensor arrays embedded in an obstacle | |
| US9961437B2 (en) | Dome shaped microphone array with circularly distributed microphones | |
| Soede et al. | Development of a directional hearing instrument based on array technology | |
| US8433075B2 (en) | Audio system based on at least second-order eigenbeams | |
| Kates | Superdirective arrays for hearing aids | |
| Ryan et al. | Array optimization applied in the near field of a microphone array | |
| EP2773131B1 (en) | Spherical microphone array | |
| JP2012523731A (en) | Ideal modal beamformer for sensor array | |
| Huang et al. | On the design of robust steerable frequency-invariant beampatterns with concentric circular microphone arrays | |
| Tager | Near field superdirectivity (NFSD) | |
| Kleiman et al. | Constant-beamwidth beamforming with nonuniform concentric ring arrays | |
| Niwa et al. | Optimal microphone array observation for clear recording of distant sound sources | |
| CA2292357A1 (en) | Microphone array diffracting structure | |
| CA2453076C (en) | Method for extending the frequency range of a beamformer without spatial aliasing | |
| Luo et al. | Constrained maximum directivity beamformers based on uniform linear acoustic vector sensor arrays | |
| Meyer | Microphone array for hearing aids taking into account the scattering of the head | |
| US11558690B2 (en) | Audio systems, devices, and methods | |
| Brammer et al. | Opportunities for active noise control in communication headsets | |
| Niwa et al. | Microphone array for increasing mutual information between sound sources and observation signals | |
| Woods et al. | Limitations of theoretical benefit from an adaptive directional system in reverberant environments | |
| Maj et al. | A comparison of different methods of noise reduction in hearing aids |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| FZDE | Dead |