CA2262392C - Hydrocarbon conversion process - Google Patents

Hydrocarbon conversion process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2262392C
CA2262392C CA002262392A CA2262392A CA2262392C CA 2262392 C CA2262392 C CA 2262392C CA 002262392 A CA002262392 A CA 002262392A CA 2262392 A CA2262392 A CA 2262392A CA 2262392 C CA2262392 C CA 2262392C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
hydrotreating
bar
steam
zone
group
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CA002262392A
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
CA2262392A1 (en
Inventor
Carl W. Bradow
Dane C. Grenoble
Stanley N. Milam
Bruce H. Winquist
Brendan D. Murray
Richard Foley
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc
Original Assignee
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/848,438 external-priority patent/US6190533B1/en
Application filed by ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc filed Critical ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc
Publication of CA2262392A1 publication Critical patent/CA2262392A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA2262392C publication Critical patent/CA2262392C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

This invention provides an integrated process for converting a hydrocarbon feedstock having components boiling above about 100 .degree.C into steam cracked products, which process comprises passing said feedstock to a hydrotreating zone at a pressure in the range of from about 400 psig to about 1,250 psig to effect substantially complete decomposition of organic sulfur and/or nitrogen compounds, passing the product from said hydrotreating zone to a steam cracking zone, and recoverin g therefrom hydrogen and C1-C4 hydrocarbons, steam cracked naphtha, steam cracked gas oil and steam cracked tar therefrom, wherein the amount of steam cracked tar produced is reduced by at least about 15 percent, basis the starting hydrocarbon feedstock which has not bee n subjected to hydrotreating.

Description

~
' CA 02262392 2005-O1-10 r I~YDROCA.RBC~N CONVERSION PROCESS
g; e'! d o~~ the Invention This invention relates to a process -for upgrading hydrocarbon feedstocks for subsequent use in steam cracking. Yn particular, this invention describes a process for upgrading hydrocarbon feedstocks for use in steam cracking by the application of hydrotreating and concomitant partial hydrogenation of the unsaturated and/or aromatic species found therein, and the resultant yield increase of hydrogen, C1-Ca hydrocarbons,, steam cracked naphtha and steam cracked gas oil, and the concomitant decrease in the yield of steam cracked gas tar, upon 'steam cracking of the hydrotreated hydrocarbon feedstocks.
Backg~ o ~n of t 3,~wenti n Steam cranking is.a process widely known in the petrochemical art. The primary intent of the process is the production of C~-Ca hydrocarbons, particularly ethylene, propylene, and butadiene, by thermal cracking of hydrocarbon feedstocks in the presence of steam at elevated temperatures.
The steam cracking process in general has been well described in the publication entitled "Manufacturing Ethylene'' by S. B.
Zdonik et. al, Oil and Gas Journal Reprints 1966 - 19?0.
Typical liquid feedstocks for conventional steam crackers. are straight run (virgin? and hydrotreated straight run (virgin) feedstocks ranging from light naphthas to vacuum gas oils:
,3o Gaseous feedstocks such as ethane,.propane~and butane are also commonly processed in the steam cracker.
The selection of a feedstock for processing in the steam cracker is a function of several criteria includinga (i) ... :l availability of the feedstock, {ii) cost of the feedstock and (iii) the yield slate derived by steam cracking of that feedstock. Feedstock availability and cost are predominantly a function of global supply and demand issues. On the other hand, the yield slate derived by steam cracking of a given feedstock is a function of the chemical characteristics of that feedstock.
In general, the yield of high value C1-Cd hydrocarbons, particularly ethylene, propylene and butadiene, is greatest when the steam cracker feedstocks are gaseous feedstocks such as ethane, propane and butane. The yield of high value steam cracked naphtha and low value steam cracked gas oil (SCGO) and particularly low value steam cracked tar (SCT) upon steam cracking of a straight run (virgin) or hydrotreated strsight run (virgin) feedstocks increases as the boiling range of the feedstock increases. Thus, the steam cracking of liquid feedstocks such as naphthas, gas oils and vacuum gas oils generally results in a greater proportion of particularly low value steam cracked products, i.e., steam cracked tar. In addition, steam cracking facilities where naphthas and gas oils are processed require additional capital infrastructure in order to process the large volume of liquid co-products resulting from steam cracking of those feedstocks.
What is more, the yield of the least desirable products of steam cracking, steam cracked tar, is generally even higher when low quality hydrogen deficient cracked feedstocks such as thermally cracked naphtha, thermally cracked gas oil, catalytically cracked naphtha, catalytically cracked gas oil, coker naphthas and coker gas oil are processed. The significantly increased yield of the low value steam cracked tar product relative to production of high value C1-CQ hydrocarbon products obtained when processing the low quality hydrogen deficient cracked feedstocks is such that these feedstocks are rarely processed in steam crackers.
Catalytic hydrodesulfurization (sulfur removal), hydrodenitrification (nitrogen removal) and hydrogenation (olefins, diolefins and aromatics saturation) are well known in the petroleum refining art. Hydrodesulfurization, hydrodenitrification and partial hydrogenation have been applied to upgrading feedstocks for steam cracking as described by Zimmermann in U.S. Patent No. 4,619,757. This two stage approach employed base metal, bi-metallic catalysts on both non-acidic (alumina) and acidic (zeolite) supports.
Minderhoud et. al., U.S. Patent No. 4,960,505, described an approach for upgrading of kerosene and fuel oil feedstocks by first pre-treating the feedstock to effect hydrodesulfurization and hydrodenitrification to yield a liquid product with sulfur and nitrogen contaminants at levels of less than 1,000 and 50 ppm wt., respectively. Thereafter, the low impurity hydrocarbon stream was subjected to hydrogenation to yield a high cetane number fuel oil product.
Winquist et. al., U.S. Patent No. 5,391,291, described an approach for upgrading of kerosene, fuel oil, and vacuum gas oil feedstocks by first pre-treating the feedstock to effect hydrodesulfurization and hydrodenitrification, and thereafter hydrogenation of the resultant liquid hydrocarbon fraction to yield a high cetane number fuel oil product.
It has been found that the present invention which comprises hydrotreating followed by steam cracking results in significant yield improvements for hydrogen, C1-Cd hydrocarbons and steam cracked naphtha when applied to straight run (virgin) feedstocks; and results in high yields of hydrogen, C1-Cd hydrocarbons and steam cracked naphtha and reduced yields of steam cracked tar when applied to low quality, hydrogen deficient, cracked feedstocks such as thermally cracked naphtha, thermally cracked kerosene, thermally cracked gas oil, catalytically cracked naphtha, catalytically cracked kerosene, catalytically cracked gas oil, cokes naphthas, cokes kerosene, cokes gas oil, steam cracked naphthas and steam cracked gas oils. The ability of this process to treat low quality hydrogen deficient cracked feedstocks, such as steam cracked gas oil, permits these i:eretofore undesirable feedstocks to be _-cvcled to e:ctinction through the combined feedstock upgrading and steam cracking system.
It has further been found that ;~ydrogen, _ .,_ hydrocarbons and steam cracked naphtha can be produced in ~~igher quantities in a process in which the effluent from at least one hydrotreating zone containing at least two hydrotreating catalysts is passed to a steam cracking zone. The effluents from the steam cracking zone are then passed to one or :note 1C fractionating zones in which the effluents are separated i.~.to a fraction comprising hydrogen and C_-Ca hydrocarbons, _ steam ,.r3CkeC1 naphtha frdCtlOn, a Stedm Cracked gaS Oil IraCtion dnd 3 Steam crackea gar frdCtlOn. The prOCeSS Cfi the pr~?S2nt invention results in improved yields of the high value steam '~5 crac'.~ced products, i.e., C~:-C; hydrocarbons, particularly ethylene, propylene, and butadiene, and steam cracked naph~ha, particularly isoprene, cis-pentadiene, traps-pentadiene, cyclopentadiene, and benzene, and reduced yields of steam racked tar.
20 Summary cf the Invention ''his invention provides an integrated process for converting a hydrocarbon feedstock having components boiling above 100°C into steam cracked products comprisv~ng hydrogen, C_-C_ hydrocarbons, steam cracked naphtha (boilir:g from C= to 25 220°C) , steam cracked gas oil (boiling from 220°C to 275°C) and steam cracked tar (boiling above 275°C).
The process of the present invention therefore comprises: (i) passing the hydrocarbon feedstock through at least one hydrotreating zone wherein said feedstock is contacted 30 at an elevated temperature and at a pressure in the range of from about 400 psig (27 bar) to about 1,250 psig (85 bar) with a hydrogen source and at least two hydrotreating catalysts to effect substantially complete conversion of organic sulfur and/or nitrogen compounds contained therein to HAS and NH3, 35 respectively; (ii) passing the product from said hydrotreating zone to a product separation AMENDED SHEET
zone to remove gases and, if desired,. light hydrocarbon fractions; (iii) passing the product from said separation zone to a steam cracking zone and thereafter; (iv) passing the product from said steam cracking zone to one or more product separation zones to separate the product into a fraction comprising hydrogen and C1-C~ hydrocarbons, a steam cracked naphtha fraction, a steam cracked gas oil fraction and a steam cracked tar fraction, wherein the yields of ethylene and propylene and butadiene in the HZ and Ci-Cd hydrocarbons fraction are each increased by at least about 5 percent, relative to the yields obtained when the untreated hydrocarbon feedstock is subjected to said steam cracking and product separation, the yield of isoprene, cis-pentadiene, trans-pentadiene, cyclopentadiene and benzene in the steam cracked naphtha fraction are each increased by at least about l0 percent, relative to when the untreated hydrocarbon feedstock is subjected to said steam cracking and product separation, the yield of steam cracked gas oil is increased by at least about 20 percent, relative to when the untreated hydrocarbon feedstock is subjected to said steam cracking and product separation, and the yield of steam cracked tar is reduced by at least about 15 percent, relative to when the untreated hydrocarbon feedstock is subjected to said steam cracking and product separation.
Descr? nt? on of the Prc~ft~r~-pri ~bodi mPnt-,~
As used in this specification, the term "Cl-Cd hydrocarbons" refers to methane, ethane, ethylene, acetylene, propane, propylene, propadiene, methylacetylene, butane, isobutane, isobutylene, butene-1, cis-butene-2, trans-butene-2, butadiene, and C,-acetylenes. As used in this specification, the term "steam cracked naphtha" refers to products boiling between CS and 220°C, including isoprene, cis-pentadiene, trans-pentadiene, cyclopentadiene, methylcyclopentadiene, and benzene.
The hydrocarbon feedstock in the process of the present invention typically comprises a hydrocarbon fraction having a major proportion, i.e., greater than about 95 percent, of its components boiling above about 100°C, preferably above about 150°C or higher. Suitable feedstocks of this type include straight run (virgin) naphtha, cracked naphthas (e. g.
catalytically cracked, steam cracked, and coker naphthas and the like), straight run (virgin) kerosene, cracked kerosenes (e. g:
catalytically cracked, steam cracked, and coker kerosenes and the like), straight run (virgin) gas oils (e.g. atmospheric and vacuum gas oil and the like), cracked gas oils (e.g. coker and catalytically cracked light and heavy gas oils, steam cracked gas oils and the like) visbreaker oil, deasphalted oil, thermal cracker cycle oil, synthetic gas oils and coal liquids.
Normally the feedstock will have an extended boiling range, e.g., up to 650°C or higher, but may be of more limited ranges with certain feedstocks. In general, the feedstocks will have a boiling range between about 150°C and about 650°C.
In the hydrotreating zone, the hydrocarbon feedstock and a hydrogen source are contacted with at least two hydrotreating catalysts to effect substantially complete decomposition of organic sulfur and/or nitrogen compounds in the feedstock, i.e., organic sulfur levels below about 100 parts per million, preferably below about 50 parts per million, and more preferably below about 25 parts per million, and organic nitrogen levels below about 15 parts per million, preferably below about 5 parts per million, and more preferably below about 3 parts per million. The source of hydrogen will typically be hydrogen-containing mixtures of gases which normally contain about 70 volume percent to about 100 volume percent hydrogen.
In one embodiment, the hydrotreating zone contains two hydrotreating catalysts in a stacked bed or layered arrangement.
When a stacked bed catalyst configuration is utilized, the first hydrotreating catalyst typically comprises one or more Group VIB
and/or Group VIII (Periodic Table of the Elements) metal compounds supported on an amorphous carrier such as alumina, silica-alumina, silica, zirconia or titanic. Examples of such metals comprise nickel, cobalt, molybdenum and tungsten. The first hydrotreating catalyst is preferably an oxide and/or sulfide of a Group VIII metal, preferably cobalt or nickel, mixed'with an oxide and/or a sulfide of a Group VIB metal, preferably molybdenum or tungsten, supported on alumina or silica-alumina. The second hydrotreating catalyst typically comprises. one or more Group VIB and/or Group VIII metal components supported on an acidic porous support. From Group VIB, molybdenum, tungsten and mixtures thereof are preferred.
From Group VIII, cobalt, nickel and mixtures thereof are preferred. Preferably, both Group VIB and Group VIII metals are present. In~ a particularly preferred embodiment, the hydrotreating component of the second hydrotreating catalyst is nickel and/or cobalt combined with tungsten and/or molybdenum with nickel/tungsten or nickel/molybdenum being particularly preferred. With respect to the second hydrotreating catalyst, the Group VIB and Group VIII metals are supported on an acidic carrier, such as, for example, silica-alumina, or a large pore molecular sieve, i.e. zeolites such as zeolite Y, particularly, ultrastable zeolite Y (zeolite USY), or other dealuminated zeolite Y. Mixtures of the porous amorphous inorganic oxide carriers and the molecular sieves can also be used. Typically, both the first and second hydrotreating catalysts in the stacked bed arrangement are sulfided prior to use.
The hydrotreating zone is typically operated at temperatures in the range of from about 200°C to about 550°C, preferably from about 250°C to about 500°C, and more preferably from about 275°C to about 425°C. The pressure in the hydrotreating zone is generally in the range of from about 400 psig to about 1,250 psig, preferably from about 400 psig to about 1, 000 psig, and more preferably from about 400 psig to about 750 psig. Liquid hourly space velocities (LHSV) will typically be in the range of from about 0.1 to about 10, preferably from about 0.5 to about 5 volumes of liquid hydrocarbon per hour per volume of catalyst, and hydrogen to oil ratios will be in the range of from about 500 to about 10,000 _ 7 _ 9c80513 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of feed (SCr~/BBL) (about .089 to about 2.0 standard cubic meters per liter of feed (m'/~)), preferably from about 1,000 to about 5,000 SCF/BBL
(about 0.18 to about 1.00 m3/~), most preferably from about 2,000 to about 3,000 SCF/BBL (about .35 to about .53 m'/z).
These conditions are adjusted to achieve substantially complete desulfurizatien and denitrification, i.e., organic sulfur levels below about 100 parts per million, preferably below about 50 parts per million, and more preferably below about 25 parts per million, and organic nitrogen levels below about 15 parts per million, preferably below about 5 parts per million, and more preferably below about 3 parts per million.
Alternatively, the hydrotreating step may be carried out utilizing two or more hydrotreating zones. ccr example, in one embodiment, the hydrotreating step can be carried out i.~. t:ne manner described below in which two zones, a first hyarotreating zone and a second hydrotreating zone, are used.
In the first hydrotreating zone, the hydrocarbon feedstock and a hydrogen source are contacted with a first hydrotreating catalyst. The source of hydrogen will typically be hydrogen-containing mixtures of gases which normally contain about 70 volume percent to about 100 volume percent hydrogen.
The first hydrotreating catalyst will typically include cne or more Group VIB and/or Group VIII metal compounds on an amorphous carrier such as alumina, silica-alumina, silica, zirconia or titania. Examples of such metals comprise nickel, cobalt, molybdenum and tungsten. The first hydrotreating catalyst is preferably an oxide and/or sulfide of a Group VIII metal, preferably cobalt or nickel, mixed with an oxide and/or a sulfide of a Group VIB metal, preferably molybdenum or tungsten, supported on alumina or silica-alumina. The catalysts are preferably in sulfided form.
The first hydrotreating zone is generally operated at temperatures in the range of from about 200°C to about 550°C, preferably from about 250°C to about 500°C, and more preferably from about 275°C to about 425°C. The pressure in the first hydrotreating zone is generally in the range of from about 27 _g_ AMENDED SHEET

>o'c~C~?3 bar to about 85 bar, preferably from about 27 bar to about 58 bar, and more preferably from about 27 bar to about 51 bar.
Liquid hourly space velocities (LHSV) will typically be in the range of from about 0.2 to about 2, preferably from about 0.5 to about 1 volumes of liquid hydrocarbon per hour per volume of catalyst, and hydrogen to oil ratios will be in the range of from about 500 to about 10, 000 s tandard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of feed (SCF/BBL) (about .089 m'/P to about 2.0 m''/~), preferably from about 1,000 to about 5,000 SCF/BBL (about 0.18 to about 1.0 mv/P), most preferably from about 2,000 to about 3,000 SCF/BBL about .35 to about .53 m'/e). These conditions are adjusted to achieve the desired degree of desulfurization and denitrification. Typically, it is desirable in the first hydrotreating zone to reduce the organic sulfur level to below about 500 parts per million, preferably below about 200 parts per millicn, and the organic nitrogen level to below about 50 parts per million, preferably below about 25 parts per million.
The product from the first hydrotreating zone may then, optionally, be passed to a means whereby ammonia and hydrogen sulfide are removed from the hydrocarbon product by conventional means. The hydrocarbon product from the first hydrotreating zone is then sent to a second hydrotreating zone.
Optionally, the hydrocarbon product may also be passed to a fractionating zone prior to being sent to the second hydrotreating zone if removal of light hydrocarbon fractions is desired.
In the second hydrotreating zone, the product from the first hydrotreating zone and a hydrogen source, typically hydrogen, about 70 volume percent to about 100 volume percent, in admixture with other gases, are contacted with at least one second hydrotreating catalyst. The operating conditions normally used in the second hydrotreating reaction zone include a temperature in the range of from about 200°C to about 550°C, preferably from about 250°C to about 500°C, and more preferably, from about 275°C to about 425°C, a liquid hourly space velocity _g_ AMENDED SHEET

9620~'_ .. . , ..
(LHSV) of about 0.1 to about 10 volumes of liquid hydrocarbon per hour per volume of catalyst, preferably an LHSV of about 0.5 to about 5, and a total pressure within the range of about 27 bar to about 85 bar, preferably from about 27 bar to about 68 bar, and more preferably from about 27 bar to about 51 bar. The hydrogen circulation rate is generally in the range of from about 500 to about 10,000 standard cubic feet per barrel (SCF/BBL) (about .089 to about 2.0 m'/P), preferably from about 1,000 to 5,000 SCF/BBL (about 0.18 to about 1.0 m'/P), and more preferably from about 2,000 to 3,000 SCF/BBL (about .35 to about .53 m3/P). These conditions are adjusted to achieve substantially complete desulfurization and denitrification.
Typically, it is desirable that the hydrotreated product obtained from the hydrotreating zone or zones have an organic sulfur level below about 100 parts per million, preferably below about SO parts per milkon, and more preferably below about 25 parts per million, and an organic nitrogen level below about 15 parts per million, preferably below about 5 parts per million and more preferably below about 3 parts per million. It is understood that the severity of the operating conditions is decreased as the volume of the feedstock and/or the level of nitrogen and sulfur contaminants to the second hydrotreating zone is decreased. For example, if product gases, including HAS
and NH3 (ammonia), and, optionally, light hydrocarbon fractions are removed after the first hydrotreating zone, then the temperature in the second hydrotreating zone will be lower, or alternatively, the LHSV in the second hydrotreating zone will be higher.
The catalysts typically utilized in the second hydrotreating zone comprise an active metals component supported on an acidic porous support. The active metal component, "the hydrotreating component", of the second hydrotreating catalyst is selected from a Group VIB and/or a Group VIII metal component. From Group VIB, molybdenum, tungsten and mixtures thereof are preferred. From Group VIII, cobalt, nickel and mixtures thereof are preferred. Preferably, both Group VIB and Groin VIII metals are present. In a particularly preferred AMENDED SHEET

r embodiment,~the hydrotreating component is nickel and/or cobalt combined with tungsten and/or molybdenum with nickel/tungsten or niokel/molybdenum being particularly preferred. The components are typically present in the sulfide for:u:
The Group VIB and Group VI=I metals are supported on an acidic carrier. Two rain classes o~ ~carri.ers knawn in the . art are typically utilized: (aj silic:a-alumina, and (bj the large pore molecular s3.eves, i ~~e: zeolites such as 2eolite Y, Mordenite, Zeolite Beta and the like. Mixtures of the porous amorphous inorganic oxide carriers and the molecular sieves are also used. The term "silica--alumina" refers to non~Zeolit~.e aluminosilicates.
The most preferred support <:omprises a zeolite Y, preferably a dealuminuated zeolite Y such as an ultrastable zeolite Y (zeolite U~Yj. The~ultrastable zeolites used herein are well known to those. skilled in the art. They .are also exemplified in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,293,192 and 3,449,0?0. They are generally prepared from sodium zeolite Y by dealumination.
The zeohte is aomposited w3.th a binder selected from alumina, silica, silica-alumina and mixtures thereof.
Preferably the binder is alumina, preferably a gamma .alumina binder or a precursor thereto, such as an' alumina hydrogel, aluminum trihydroxide, aluminum oxyhydroxide or pseudoboehmite.
The Group V=H/Group VIIJC second hydrotreating catalysts are preferably sulfided prior to use in the ri~econd hydrotreating zone. Typically, the catalysts are sulf~.ded by heating the catalysts to elevated temperatures (e.g., 200~400°C) in the presence of hxdrogen and sulfur or a sulfur-containing material.
The product from the final hydrotreating zone. is then passed to a steam cracking, i.e.;w..pyrolysis, zone. Prior to being sent to the steam cracking zone, however, if desired, the hydrocarbon product from the final hydrotreating zone may be 95d0~~B

passed to a fractionating zone for removal of product gases, and light hydrocarbon fractions.
In the steam cracking zone, the product from the hydrotreating zone and steam are heated to cracking temperatures. The operating conditions of the steam cracking zone normally include a coil outlet temperature greater than about 700°C, in particular between about 700°C and 925°C, and preferably between abcut 750°C and about 900°C, with steam present at a steam to hydrocarbon weight ratio in the range of from about 0.1:1 to about 2.0:1. The coil outlet pressure _=
the steam cracking zone is typically in the range of from about 0 bar to about 5 bar, preferably in the range of from about 0 bar to about 4 bar. The residence time for the cracking reaction is typically in the range of from about 0.01 second to about 5 seconds and preferably in the range of from about C.';
second to about 1 second.
After the starting hydrocarbon feed has been subjected to a hydrotreating step and a steam cracking step, the effluent from the steam cracking step may be sent to one or more fractionating zones wherein the effluent is separated into a fraction comprising hydrogen and C;-C~ hydrocarbons, a steam cracked naphtha fraction boiling from C~ to about 220°C, a steam cracked gas oil fraction boiling in the range of from about 220°C to about 275°C and a steam cracked tar fraction boiling above about 275°C. The amount of the undesirable steam cracked product, i.e., steam cracked tar, obtained utilizing the process of the present invention is greatly reduced. The yield of steam cracked tar is reduced by at least about 15 percent, relative to that obtained when the untreated hydrocarbon feedstock is subjected to steam cracking and product separation.
The process according to the present invention may be carried out in any suitable equipment. The hydrotreating zone or zones in the present invention typically comprise one or more vertical reactors containing at least one catalyst bed and are equipped with a means of injecting a hydrogen source into the AMENrE:7 ~~ =-__ reactors. A fixed bed hydrotreating reactor system wherein the feedstock is passed over one or more stationary beds of catalyst in each zone is particularly preferred.
The ranges and limitations provided in the instant specification and claims are those which are believed to particularly point out and distinctly claim the instant invention. It is, however, understood that other ranges and limitations that perform substantially the same function in substantially the same manner to obtain the same or substantially the same result are intended to be within the scope of the instant invention as defined by the instant specification and claims.
The invention will now be described by the following examples which are illustrative and are not intended to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
rl_lLStrat,_'ye Embodimprt-Example 1 and Comparative Example 1-A below were each carried out using a 100% Heavy Atmospheric Gas Oil (HAGO) feedstock having the properties shown in Table 1 below. Example 1 illustrates the process of the present invention. Comparative Example 1-A illustrates HAGO which has not been subjected to hydrotreating prior to steam cracking.
Fxamp 1~
Example 1 describes the process of the present invention using a 100% Heavy Atmospheric Gas Oil (HAGO) feed having the properties shown in Table 1 below was hydrotreated using two hydrotreating catalysts in a stacked bed system as follows.
A commercial alumina supported nickel/molybdenum catalyst, available under the name of.KF-756 from Akzo Chemicals Inc., U.S.A., was used as the first hydrotreating catalyst (catalyst A) while a commercial zeolite nickel/tungsten catalyst, available under the name of Z-763 from Zeolyst International, was used as the second hydrotreating catalyst (catalyst B).

96~~~~13 Catalysts A and B catalysts were operated as a "stacked bed" wherein the HAGO and hydrogen contacted catalyst A
first and -hereafter catalyst B, with the volume ratio of the catalysts (A:B) being 1:1. The HAGO was hydrotreated at 360°C
(o75°F), 39.8 bar total unit pressure, an overall LHSV of 0.5 hr-1 and a hydrogen flow rate of 3,000 SCF/BBL )0.53 m3/P).
The hydrotreated product was then passed to the steam cracking zone where it was contacted with steam at a temperature of 745 to 7'o5°C, a pressure of 0.88 to 1.73 bar, and a steam to hydrocarbon weight ratio of 0.3:1 to 0.45:1. The residence time in the steam cracker was 0.4 to 0.o seconds. The steam cracked product was then sent to a fractionating zone to quantify total hydrogen (Hz) and C~,-C~ Pydrocarbons, steam cracked naphtha (SCN), steam cracked gas oil (SCGO), and steam cracked tar (SCT). The steam cracking results are presented in Table 3 below.
Comparative Example 1-A
A 100% Heavy Atmospheric Gas Oil (HAGO) feed was treated in the same manner as forth in Example 1 above, except that it was not subjected to hydrotreating prior to steam cracking. The steam cracking results are presented in Table 3 below.

;~~! '~C~.;F' ' ..

Properties of HAGO Feed (Comp. Ex. 1-A) and Hydrotreated HAGO (Ex. 1) HALO Hydrotreated Feed HAGO

(1-A) (Ex. 1) wt. % H 12.76 13.47 ppm wt. S 12,400 41 ppm iat . N 42 6 1 Density, G/cm3 0.8773 0.8242 @ 15C

Simulated Distillation, D-2887 (ASTM), C

5% 200 99 10% 238 124 30% 304 200 50% 341 261 70% 374 337 90% 421 389 95% 443 413 I3AG0 feed (Comparative Example 1-A) and hydrotreated HAGO (Example 1) were analyzed by GC-MS in order to determine the structural types of the hydrocarbons present. These results are shown in Table 2 below. The results clearly show that the process of the present invention (Example 1) is effective at reducing the aromatic content of hydrocarbon feed streams with a concomitant rise in the quantity of both paraffins/isoparaffins and naphthenes.
Molecular Structural Types Observed in HALO, HT-HAGO, Hydrotreated HAGO and Distilled Saturated HT-HAGO
3 0 Relative Abundance of Various Hydrotreated Molecular HAGO HAGO
Types, Vol. % (1-A) (Ex. 1) Paraffins/Isoparaffins 27.69 28.70 Naphthenes 38.87 41.29 3 5 Aromatics 33.46 30.00 Laboratory Steam Cracking Yields for Gaseous Products, Naphtha, Gae Oil, and Tar FIAGO Hydrotreated Product Yield, wt. % (1-A) 8AG0 Based on Feedstock (Ex. 1) Total H2 and C1-C, 48.73 52.66 Hydrocarbons Total Others, C5 and Greater 51.27 47.34 SCN, CS-220°C (430°F) 23.54 29.50 SCGO, 220-275°C(430-525°F) 4.83 6.06 SCT, 275°C (526°F) and Above 22.90 11.78 Total 100.0 100.0 Hydrogen 0.39 0.46 Methane 7.64 8.02 Ethane 4.03 3.91 Ethylene 14.39 16.54 Acetylene 0.06 0.07 Propane 0.72 0.62 2 0 Propylene 12.06 12.80 Propadiene & Methylacetylene 0.18 0.18 Butane & Isobutane 0.13 0.16 Isobutylene 1.88 2.16 Butene-1 2.21 2.72 2 5 Butadiene-1,3 3.32 3.74 Butene-2 (cis & trans) 1.25 1.27 C4 acetylenes 0.01 0.01 Selected Li uid Prod t q uc 0.89 1.08 s Isoprene 3 0 Pentadiene (cie & trans) 0.74 0.95 Cyclopentadiene 1.19 1.48 Methylcyclopentadiene 0.81 1.06 Benzene 3.35 3.88 As can be seen in Table 3 above, the yield of each of 35 the particularly valuable steam cracked mono- and diolefin products in the HZ and C1-Cd hydrocarbons fraction, i.e., ethylene, propylene, and butadiene, is increased by at least about 6.0 percent, the yield of each of the valuable steam 96305'~~

cracked diolefin and aromatic products in the steam cracked naphtha fraction, i.e., ~~soprene, cis-pentadiene, trans-pentadiene, cyclopentadiene, and benzene, is increased by at least about 15 percent, the yi eld of the steam cracked gas oil product is increased by about 25 percent and the yield of the low value steam cracked tar product is decreased by about 48 percent when the process of the present invention comprising hydrotreating and steam cracking (Example 1) is utilized relative to the yields obtained when the untreated hydrocarbon feed alone is subjected to steam cracking (Comparative Example 1-A) .
Illustrative Embcdiment 2 Example 2 and Comparative Example 2-A below were each carried out using a 100 Catalytically Cracked Naphtha (CCN) feedstock having the properties shown in Table 4 below. Example 2 illustrates the process of the present invention. Comparative Example 2-A is illustrative of CCN which has not been subjected to hydrotreating prior to steam cracking.
Example 2 Example 2 describes the process of the present invention using a 1000 Catalytically Cracked Naphtha (CCN) feed.
A commercial alumina supported nickel/molybdenum catalyst (1/20" trilobe), available under the name of C-411 from Criterion Catalyst Company, was used as the first hydrotreating catalyst (catalyst A) while a commercial prototype hydroprocessing catalyst (1/8" cylinder), available under the name of HC-10 from Linde AG was used as the second hydrotreating catalyst (catalyst B).
The catalysts A and B were operated in the hydrotreating zone as a "stacked bed" wherein the feedstock and hydrogen were contacted with catalyst A first and thereafter with catalyst B; the volume ratio of the catalysts (A:B) in the hydrotreating zone was 2:1. The feed stock was hydrotreated at 370°C (700°F) , 40.8 bar total unit pressure, an overall LHSV of 0.33 hr-1 and a hydrogen flow rate of 2,900 SCF/BBL (0.52 m3/P), -17 - !l n ~, ~~,,.,~, .: . _:r' 96305:H

Hydrotreating of the CCN feed consumed 860 SCF/BBL
(0.15 m3/~) of hydrogen. and resulted in the production of 0.9 percent by weight of light gases (methane, ethane, propane and butane) and 2.5 percent by weight of liquid hydrocarbon boiling between C; and 150°C ( 300°F) .
The hydrotreated CCN was then passed to the steam cracking zone when? it was contacted with steam at a temperature of 790 to 805°C, a pressure of between i . 22 to 1 . 39 bar, and a steam to hydrocarbon weight ratio of 0.3:1 to 0.45:1. The residence time in the steam cracker was 0.4 to 0.6 seconds. The steam cracked product was -hen sent to a fractionating zone to quantify total hydrogen (H_) and . -C,) hydrocarbons, steam cracked naphtha (SCN), steam cracked gas oil (SCGC), and steam cracked tar (SCT). The steam cracking results are presented in Table 6 below.
Comparative Example 2-A
A 100% Catalytically Cracked Naphtha (CCN) feed was treated in the same manner as set forth in Example 2 above, except that it was not subjected to hydrotreating prior to steam cracking. The steam cracking results are presented in Table 6 below.

AMENDED SiirET

Properties of CCN Feed (Com . Ex 2-A) and Hydrotreated CCN (Ex 2) CCN Hydrotreated Feed CCN
(2-A) (Ex 2) wt. % C 89.15 88.31 wt. % H 10.31 11.78 ppm wt. S
ppm wt. N 4,130 ~2 217 <1 Density, g/cm3 0.9071 0.8714 @15°C
Simulated Distillation, D-2887 (ASTM), °C

5%

10% 205 183 30% 212 204 50% 221 212 70% 230 223 90%

95% 242 244 CCN Feed (Comparative Example 2-A) and the hydrotreated CCN
(Example 2) were analyzed by GC-MS in order to determine the structural types 2 0 of the hydrocarbons present. These results are shown in Table 5 below. As can be seen in Table 5, the process of the present invention (Example 2) ie effective at reducing the aromatic content of hydrocarbon feed streams with a concomitant rise in the quantity of both paraffins/isoparaffins and naphthenes.

Molecular Structural Types Observed in CCN Feed (Comp. Ex.
2-A) and Hydrotreated CCN (Ex 2) Relative Abundance of Various CCN Hydrotreated Molecular Feed CCN
3 0 Types, Vol. % (2-A) (Ex 2) Paraffins/Isoparaffins 7:97 10.92 Naphthenes 5.19 26.79 Aromatics 86.83 62.27 Laboratory Stesm Cracking Yields for GaseousProducts Naphtha, Gas Oil, and Tar Product Yield wt. % CCN Hydrotreated Baeed on Feedetock Feed C~

(2-A) (Ex 2) Total Hz and C1-C, Hydrocarbons 27.67 33.32 Total Others CS and Greater 72.33 66.68 SCN, CS 220C (430F) 40.85 35.79 SCGO, 220-275C(430-525F) 7.75 12.00 SCT, 275C (526F) and Above 23.73 lg,8g Total 100.00 100.00 Selected GaseoLS ProdLCts Hydrogen 0.65 0.74 Methane 8.03 9.58 Ethane 1.91 2.66 Ethylene 9.09 10.81 Acetylene 0.08 0.09 Propane 0.07 0.07 Propylene 4.79 5.81 2 Propadiene & Methylacetylene 0,08 0.08 Butane & Isobutane 0.03 0.02 Isobutylene 0.87 0.91 Butene-1 0.25 0.27 Butadiene-1,3 1.28 1.53 2 Butene-2 (cis & trane) 0.32 0.43 C, acetylenes 0.00 0.00 Selected L? r ~i d ProdLCts , 0.00 0.35 Isoprene Pentadiene (cis & traps) 0.13 0.15 3 Cyclopentadiene 0.49 0.80 methylcyclopentadiene 0.10 0.00 Benzene 2.79 4.03 As can be seen in Table 6 above, the yield of each of the particularly valuable steam cracked mono- and diolefin 35 products in the HZ and C~-C4 hydrocarbons fraction, i.e., ethylene, propylene, and butadiene, is increased by at least about 18 percent, the yield of each of the valuable steam cracked diolefin and aromatic products in the steam cracked naphtha fraction, i.e., isoprene, cis-pentadiene, trans-40 pentadiene, cyclopentadiene, and benzene, is increased by at least about 15 percent, the yield of the steam cracked gas oil product is increased by about 54 percent and the yield of the low value steam cracked tar product is decreased by about 20 percent when the process of the present invention comprising hydrotreating and steam cracking (Example 2) is utilized relative to the yields obtained when the untreated hydrocarbon feed alone is subjected to steam cracking (Comparative Example 2-A) .

Claims (17)

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. An integrated process for converting a cracked or uncracked hydrocarbon feedstock having components boiling above about 100°C into steam cracked products, which process comprises:
a) passing said hydrocarbon feedstock in the presence of a hydrogen source and two hydrotreating catalysts at least one of said hydrotreating catalysts being supported on an acidic zeolite molecular sieve, through a hydrotreating zone at an elevated temperature and a pressure from about 27 bar and about 85 bar to effect substantially complete decomposition of organic sulfur and/or nitrogen compounds contained therein;
b) passing the product from said hydrotreating zone to a steam cracking zone wherein said product is contacted with steam at temperatures greater than about 700°C;
and c) recovering hydrogen and C1 -C4 hydrocarbons, steam cracked naphtha, steam cracked gas oil and steam cracked tar therefrom, wherein the amount of steam cracked tar produced is reduced by at least about 15 percent, based on the starting hydrocarbon feedstock which has not been subjected to hydrotreating.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said hydrocarbon feedstock has components boiling from about 150°C to about 650°C.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said hydrotreating zone in step a) contains a first hydrotreating catalyst comprising a component selected from the group consisting of Group VIB
metals, oxides and sulfides; Group VIII metals, oxides and sulfides; and mixtures thereof, supported on an amorphous carrier, and a second hydrotreating catalyst comprising a Group VIB component selected from the group consisting of tungsten, molybdenum and mixtures thereof, a Group VIII component selected from the group consisting of nickel, cobalt and mixtures thereof, and said acidic zeolite molecular sieve has a pore diameter greater than about six angstroms and is admixed with an inorganic oxide binder selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica, silica-alumina and mixtures thereof.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein said first hydrotreating catalyst and said second hydrotreating catalyst are arranged in said hydrotreating zone in a stacked bed configuration.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein said hydrotreating zone in step a) is operated at a temperature from about 200°C to about 550°C and a pressure from about 27 bar to about 68 bar.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein said hydrotreating zone in step a) is operated at a temperature from about 200°C to about 550°C and a pressure from about 27 bar to about 51 bar.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein said steam cracking zone in step b) is operated at a temperature greater than about 700°C and a coil outlet pressure from about 0 bar to about 5 bar.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein said steam cracking zone in step b) is operated at a temperature from about 700°C to about 925°C and a coil outlet pressure from about 0 bar to about 4 bar.
9. An integrated process for converting a cracked or uncracked hydrocarbon feedstock having components boiling above about 100°C into steam cracked products, which process comprises:
a) passing said hydrocarbon feedstock in the presence of a hydrogen source and a first hydrotreating catalyst through a first hydrotreating zone at an elevated temperature and a pressure from about 27 bar to about 85 bar to reduce the levels of organic sulfur and/or nitrogen compounds contained therein, b) passing the product from said first hydrotreating zone to a second hydrotreating zone wherein said product is contacted at a pressure of from about 27 bar to about 85 bar and a temperature from about 200°C to about 550°C with a hydrogen source and a second hydrotreating catalyst comprising one or more hydrogenating components selected from the group consisting of Group VIB metals, oxides, sulfides, Group VIII metals, oxides, sulfides and mixtures thereof supported on an acidic zeolite molecular sieve, to effect substantially complete decomposition of organic sulfur and/or nitrogen compounds contained in the product from the first hydrotreating zone, c) passing the product from said second hydrotreating zone to a steam cracking zone wherein said product is contacted with steam at temperatures greater than about 700°C, and d) recovering hydrogen and C1-C4 hydrocarbons, steam cracked naphtha, steam cracked gas oils and steam cracked tar therefrom, wherein the amount of steam cracked tar produced is reduced by at least about 15 percent, based on the starting hydrocarbon feedstock which has not been subjected to hydrotreating.
10. The process of claim 9 wherein said hydrocarbon feedstock has components boiling from about 150°C to about 650°C.
11. The process of claim 10 wherein said first hydrotreating catalyst in step a) comprises a component selected from the group consisting of Group VIB metals, oxides and sulfides;
Group VIII metals, oxides and sulfides; and mixtures thereof, supported on an amorphous carrier.
12. The process of claim 9 wherein said first hydrotreating zone in step a) is operated at a temperature from about 200°C to about 550°C and a pressure from about 27 bar to about 68 bar.
13. The process of claim 9 wherein said second hydrotreating catalyst in step b) comprises a Group VIB component selected from the group consisting of tungsten, molybdenum and mixtures thereof, a Group VIII component selected from the group consisting of nickel, cobalt and mixtures thereof, said molecular sieve has a pore diameter greater than about six angstroms and said molecular sieve is admixed with an inorganic oxide binder selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica, silica-alumina and mixtures thereof.
14. The process of claim 13 wherein the Group VIII
component is nickel, the Group VIB component is selected from the group consisting of molybdenum, tungsten and mixtures thereof, the molecular sieve is zeolite Y and the binder is alumina.
15. The process of claim 9 wherein said second hydrotreating zone in step b) is operated at a temperature from about 200°C to about 550°C and a pressure from about 27 bar to about 68 bar.
16. The process of claim 9 wherein said steam cracking zone in step c) is operated at a temperature greater than about 700°C and a coil outlet pressure ranging from about 0 bar to about 5 bar.
17. The process of claim 9 wherein said steam cracking zone in step c) is operated at a temperature from about 700°C to about 925°C and a coil outlet pressure from about 0 bar to about 4 bar.
CA002262392A 1996-08-15 1997-08-15 Hydrocarbon conversion process Expired - Fee Related CA2262392C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US2785996P 1996-08-15 1996-08-15
US60/027,859 1996-08-15
US3461296P 1996-12-31 1996-12-31
US60/034,612 1996-12-31
US08/848,438 1997-05-08
US08/848,438 US6190533B1 (en) 1996-08-15 1997-05-08 Integrated hydrotreating steam cracking process for the production of olefins
PCT/US1997/014437 WO1998006795A1 (en) 1996-08-15 1997-08-15 Hydrocarbon conversion process

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2262392A1 CA2262392A1 (en) 1998-02-19
CA2262392C true CA2262392C (en) 2006-04-04

Family

ID=36143398

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002262392A Expired - Fee Related CA2262392C (en) 1996-08-15 1997-08-15 Hydrocarbon conversion process

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CA (1) CA2262392C (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2262392A1 (en) 1998-02-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU717657B2 (en) Hydrocarbon conversion process
US6210561B1 (en) Steam cracking of hydrotreated and hydrogenated hydrocarbon feeds
EP0040018B1 (en) Catalytic hydroconversion of residual stocks
RU2149172C1 (en) Gasoline desulfurization process
EP0944693B1 (en) Process for increased olefin yields from heavy feedstocks
AU764350B2 (en) Integrated staged catalytic cracking and staged hydroprocessing process
US20010050244A1 (en) Process of desulphurizing gasoline comprising desulphurization of the heavy and intermediate fractions resulting from fractionation into at least three cuts
JPH05247474A (en) Process for upgrading hydrocarbon
KR20010012699A (en) Hydrocarbon upgrading process
US11268037B2 (en) Process and system for hydrodearylation and hydrogenation of aromatic complex bottoms
US10066173B2 (en) Method of processing cracked naphtha to make a low-sulfur naphtha product and ultra-low sulfur diesel
CN115103894B (en) Process and system for catalytic conversion of aromatics complex bottoms
WO2021162898A1 (en) Process and system for hydrogenation of aromatic complex bottoms
WO2021162897A1 (en) Process and system for hydrogenation, hydrocracking and catalytic conversion of aromatic complex bottoms
US4260474A (en) Thermal cracking of heavy fraction of hydrocarbon hydrogenate
CA2262392C (en) Hydrocarbon conversion process
US7341657B2 (en) Process for reducing sulfur and olefin contents in gasoline
US5045174A (en) Process for the production of heartcut distillate resin precursors
JP4385178B2 (en) Process for producing desulfurized gasoline from gasoline fractions containing converted gasoline
RU2796569C2 (en) Method of cracking in hydrogen environment for producing middle distillate from light hydrocarbon feed materials
RU2796541C2 (en) Method of cracking in hydrogen environment for producing middle distillate from light hydrocarbon feed materials
GB1563357A (en) Hydrogenation process
CN112166172A (en) Hydrocracking process for the production of middle distillates from light hydrocarbon feedstocks

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
MKLA Lapsed