CA2236849A1 - Process for the manufacture of shaped articles from detergent compositions - Google Patents
Process for the manufacture of shaped articles from detergent compositions Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2236849A1 CA2236849A1 CA 2236849 CA2236849A CA2236849A1 CA 2236849 A1 CA2236849 A1 CA 2236849A1 CA 2236849 CA2236849 CA 2236849 CA 2236849 A CA2236849 A CA 2236849A CA 2236849 A1 CA2236849 A1 CA 2236849A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- coating
- process according
- mould
- detergent
- weight
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Landscapes
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
Abstract
A process for the manufacture of shaped articles of compacted detergent powder is disclosed. The shaped articles are manufactured by compacting a particulate composition in a mould consisting of a plurality of mould parts (10, 12, 20, 14) which are moveable relative to each other, at least one of the mould parts (12) having an elastomeric coating on a surface area (16) which contacts the composition, characterised in that the elastomeric coating has, over a majority of its area, a thickness which does not exceed 0.5 mm.
Description
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/~.0028 PCTAEP96/05167 PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF SHAPED ARTICLES FROM DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS
T~NTC~T FI~T~
The present invention relates to the manufacture of detergent compositions in the form of shaped articles of compacted detergent powder.
R~CKGRO~nN~ AN~ PRIOR ART
One known category of detergent product in the form of a shaped solid article is a non-soap detergent bar used ~or the handwashing of fabrics and sometimes also used for cleaning ~ixed sur~aces. Such bars are used by rubbing on the fabric or surface. A layer oi~ the bar wears awa~ (e.g. is transferred to the fabric or the wash liquor) but after use the remainder of the bar can be set aside and stored for use on a future occasion.
UK-A-2260989 discloses that such reusable bars can be manufactured by stamping a particulate composition to compact it into shaped solid form. This is done using a high compaction pressure so as to obtain a bar of low porosity which retains its integrity when in contact with water.
Typically the air within such bars will be less than 15~ of bar volume. Such bars generally are made with a size weighing 100g or more.
Another known category of detergent product in the form of a shaped solid article is a non-soap detergent tablet which is added to a washing machine at the start o~ the wash as an alternative to using a powdered or a liquid detergent composition. Such tablets are formulated for a solution-washing process with the intention that the soluble components of the tablet will dissolve rapidly and that the CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 tablet will break up completely in the wash water giving a wash li~uor whose composition is similar to that which would be given by the use of a detergent powder or li~uid.
Tablets have several advantages over powdered products: they do not require measuring and are thus easier to handle and dispense into the washload, and they are more compact, hence ~acilitating more economical storage.
Detergent tablets are described, ~or example, in GB 911204 (Unilever), US 3953350 (Kao), EP-A-522766 (Unilever); and have been sold commercially in Spain.
Detergent tablets are generally made by compressing or compacting a detergent powder, which includes non-soap detergent active and detergency builder. Tablets typically weigh 10 to 160g more especially 10 or 15 up to lOOg, and have a porosity such as to contain 15% or more o~ air, by volume.
Processes are also known for stamping toilet soap bars, ~or example as described in GB746,769. However, such toilet bars are typically stamped ~rom solid billets. There are signi~icant di~ferences between the handling and processing of such billets and powdered detergent compositions.
Eor example, it is desirable that the stamped articles have smooth surfaces. Extruded toilet soap bars have smooth sur~aces as a result o~ the extrusion process. However, a smooth ~inish cannot be guaranteed in compacted detergent powder bars.
Compaction o~ detergent powder to make shaped solid articles has been carried out using a press with steel dies or punches CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 which contact the powder and compact it into the shaped article.
When making tablets, with any kind of material not necessarily detergent, a problem which can arise is adhesion of the composition to the steel mould parts. Adhesion of material to mould parts is disadvantageous, because the accumulated material spoi~s the sur~ace finish of articles compacted in the mould. The traditional approaches to this problem have been to provide a low ~riction surface on the mould parts, e.g. a conventional non-stick coating of polytetrafluoroethylene, or else to apply a release agent, ~or example magnesium stearate.
GB-A-2276345 proposes an alternative approach, which is to use mould parts bearing an elastomeric coating. Thus this document discloses a process for the manufacture of articles, including tablets and bars of compacted de~ergent powder, using mould parts sur~aced with an elastomeric material of some thickness. The document explains that a suitable modulus o~ elasticity can be achieved with a surface coating o~ elastomer which is at least 0.5mm thick. A range of 0.5 to 7mm is disclosed. The thicknesses which are exemplified are about 4mm.
The application of these thick coatings is apt to be complex and may re~uire e~uipment which cannot easily be provided at the place where the mould parts are used.
Surprisingly, we have now ~ound that good release of shaped articles such as tablets and bars from mould parts can be achieved with thinner coatings. This has practical advantages, because thin coatings are easier to apply to mould parts and recoating may be carried out at the manufacturing facility where the mould parts are used.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 We have found that thin elastomer films on punch surfaces lead to bars with smooth surfaces whereas thicker elastomer coatings produce rougher surfaces. A smooth surface is valuable because of consumer fears that a rough surface will damage fabrics when used.
Smoothness may be measured by the procedure described in relation to the examples below.
Thus, for bars which are to be used for handwashing, a thin elastomer coating on mould parts has the advantage of low adhesion to the shaped article, combined with the advantage of a smooth surface. Neither steel nor a thick elastomer coating provides both of these advantages in combination.
There~ore, in a first aspect the present invention provides a process for the manufacture of shaped solid articles by compacting a particulate detergent composition in a mould having a plurality o~ mould parts which are movable relative to each other, at least one of the mould parts having an elastomeric coating on a surface area which contacts the composition characterised in that the elastomeric coating has, over a majority, i.e. more than half of its area, a thickness which does not exceed 0.5mm, i.e. 500 micrometres.
Preferably the coating does not exceed this thickness over 90% or more of its area.
Such coatings are preferably applied as a li~uid - either a solution or a melt, and allowed to solidify by evaporation of solvent, cross-linking or cooling, as appropriate.
In a second aspect this invention provides a process for the manufacture of shaped solid articles by compacting a particulate detergent composition in a mould having a CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 plurality of mould parts which are movable relative to each other, at least one o~ the mould parts having an elastomeric coating on a surface area which contacts the composition characterised by applying the coating as a liguid to at least one mould part and allowing or causing it to solidi~y on the mould part, at least part of the coating having a thickness not exceeding 0.5mm.
Preferably, the present invention comprises the step of delivering particulate detergent to a cavity, the cavity being at least partially de~ined by at least one o~ the mould parts. Preferably, the cavity is defined by a sleeve and at least one mould part, the said at least one mould part being pre~erably movable within the sleeve. Pre~erably, the other mould part is also movable into this sleeve.
Means such as air extraction channels may be provided as is known to the skilled person, to allow removal o~ air during compaction.
In many instances the invention will include periodically renewing the coating.
~IST OF DRAWINGS
This application includes the following drawings:-Fig. 1 is a vertical cross-section through a tablet press illustrating its general arrangement;
Figs. 2, 3 and 4 are similar cross-sections showing stages in the cycle o~ operations of the tablet press;
Fig. 5 is a diagrammatic view, partly in vertical cross-section, of experimental apparatus; and Fig. 6 is a graph o~ ~orce against time obtained with the apparatus of Fig. 5.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/OS167 D~TAIT.~n D~SCRIPTION AND ~BODI~TS
~he invention can be put into effect using a conventional stamping press. A suitable press will generally have a pair of mould parts which move relatively towards and away from each other to compact particulate material between them. They may move within a surrounding sleeve or similar structure.
A suitable arrangement, as illustrated in GB-A-2276345 is shown in Figs. 1 to 4 of the accompanying drawings. The apparatus is a tabletting press, whose structure incorporates a tubular sleeve 10 into which fit a lower punch 12 and an upper punch 14. The sleeve 10 de~ines a mould cavity 16 closed at its bottom by the lower punch 12. ~n use a particulate composition is supplied to this cavity by means of a filling shoe 18 which slides on the upper surface 20.
Initially the filling shoe advances to the position shown in Fig. 2 with the upper punch 14 raised. A particulate composition falls ~rom the filling shoe to ~ the cavity 16 above the lower punch 12.
Next as seen in Fig. 3 the filling shoe withdraws and the upper punch 14 is pressed down into the cavity 16 thus compacting the particulate composition in the cavity to ~orm a shaped article such as a tablet. Next, as shown in Fig. 4, the upper punch 14 is raised and the lower punch 12 is also raised until the tablet 22 lies at a level with the surface 20. After this the filling shoe 18 advances, pushing the tablet 22 away as it does so while the lower punch descends to the position shown in Fig. 2 for the cycle of operations to be repeated.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 In accordance with this invention, the upper punch 12 and the lower punch 14 each have a thin elastomeric coating over their faces which come into contact with the detergent composition.
The sleeve 10, which also forms part of the mould, is made o~
steel and is not coated with elastomer. The punches 12,14 and also tablets compacted in the mould make sliding contact with this sleeve.
The step of compacting the particles reduces the porosity of the composition. Porosity is conveniently expressed as the percentage of volume which is air. The compaction step can be adjusted to produce shaped solids with a range of porosities. For detergent bars to be used in handwashing, then put aside and later reused, a porosity of not over 15%
air by volume, better not greater than 12% is desirable. A
high pressure can reduce porosity to as low as 1% air by volume. So, the preferred porosity is l to 15% more pre~erably 3 to 10% air by volume.
The force applied to the powdered detergent depends upon the final porosity desired. For example, the force may be in the region 50-100 kN.
The air content of a shaped solid product can be calculated from the volume and weight of the product, provided the air-free density of the solid content is known. The latter can be meas~red by compressing a sample o~ the material under vacuum with a very high applied force, then measuring the weight and volume of the resulting solid.
Detergent tablets intended to break-up and dissolve~dis~ose in water are generally compacted with less applied pressure CA 02236849 l998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/OS167 so as to be more porous. A porosity of more than 15 or 20%
by volume is typical.
~T.~S ~ ~S ~n~ TH~IR APPLICATION TO ~OULD PARTS
Elastomers are polymers which are de~ormable, but return to approximately their initial ~i~ensions and shape upon release of the de~orming force. Generally they are polymers with long fle~ible chains, with some cross-linking between chains so as to form a cross-linked network structure.; The network structure restrains the movement of the macro-molecular chain molecules and as a result recovers rapidly after deformation.
The term "elastomeric" as used in defining this invention includes materials as defined in ISO (International Standard Organisation) 1982 as an 'lelastomer", or "rubber". Also included in the definition of "elastomeric" materials according to the invention are thermoplastic elastomers and copolymers and blends of elastomers, thermoplastic elastomers and rubbers.
At low temperature elastomers are hard and brittle. Then, with increasing temperature an elastomer goes through a rubbery phase after softening and retains its elasticity and elastic modulus until its decomposition temperature is reached. The material should of course be in its rubbery state at the operating temperature of the press.
Thermoplastic elastomers consist of amorphous and crystalline phases. The amorphous phase has a softening range below ambient temperature and thus acts as an elastic spring whilst the crystalline segments whose so~tening range is above ambient temperature, act as cross-linking sites.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/2~028 PCT~EP96/~5167 Preferably the elastomeric material according to the invention is selected from those classes described in American Society for Testing and Materials D1418 which include:-1. Unsaturated carbon chain elastomers (R Class) including natural rubbers. E.g. Standard Malaysian Rubber;
butadiene acrylonitrile copolymer, e.g. "Perbunan" ex Bayer.
T~NTC~T FI~T~
The present invention relates to the manufacture of detergent compositions in the form of shaped articles of compacted detergent powder.
R~CKGRO~nN~ AN~ PRIOR ART
One known category of detergent product in the form of a shaped solid article is a non-soap detergent bar used ~or the handwashing of fabrics and sometimes also used for cleaning ~ixed sur~aces. Such bars are used by rubbing on the fabric or surface. A layer oi~ the bar wears awa~ (e.g. is transferred to the fabric or the wash liquor) but after use the remainder of the bar can be set aside and stored for use on a future occasion.
UK-A-2260989 discloses that such reusable bars can be manufactured by stamping a particulate composition to compact it into shaped solid form. This is done using a high compaction pressure so as to obtain a bar of low porosity which retains its integrity when in contact with water.
Typically the air within such bars will be less than 15~ of bar volume. Such bars generally are made with a size weighing 100g or more.
Another known category of detergent product in the form of a shaped solid article is a non-soap detergent tablet which is added to a washing machine at the start o~ the wash as an alternative to using a powdered or a liquid detergent composition. Such tablets are formulated for a solution-washing process with the intention that the soluble components of the tablet will dissolve rapidly and that the CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 tablet will break up completely in the wash water giving a wash li~uor whose composition is similar to that which would be given by the use of a detergent powder or li~uid.
Tablets have several advantages over powdered products: they do not require measuring and are thus easier to handle and dispense into the washload, and they are more compact, hence ~acilitating more economical storage.
Detergent tablets are described, ~or example, in GB 911204 (Unilever), US 3953350 (Kao), EP-A-522766 (Unilever); and have been sold commercially in Spain.
Detergent tablets are generally made by compressing or compacting a detergent powder, which includes non-soap detergent active and detergency builder. Tablets typically weigh 10 to 160g more especially 10 or 15 up to lOOg, and have a porosity such as to contain 15% or more o~ air, by volume.
Processes are also known for stamping toilet soap bars, ~or example as described in GB746,769. However, such toilet bars are typically stamped ~rom solid billets. There are signi~icant di~ferences between the handling and processing of such billets and powdered detergent compositions.
Eor example, it is desirable that the stamped articles have smooth surfaces. Extruded toilet soap bars have smooth sur~aces as a result o~ the extrusion process. However, a smooth ~inish cannot be guaranteed in compacted detergent powder bars.
Compaction o~ detergent powder to make shaped solid articles has been carried out using a press with steel dies or punches CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 which contact the powder and compact it into the shaped article.
When making tablets, with any kind of material not necessarily detergent, a problem which can arise is adhesion of the composition to the steel mould parts. Adhesion of material to mould parts is disadvantageous, because the accumulated material spoi~s the sur~ace finish of articles compacted in the mould. The traditional approaches to this problem have been to provide a low ~riction surface on the mould parts, e.g. a conventional non-stick coating of polytetrafluoroethylene, or else to apply a release agent, ~or example magnesium stearate.
GB-A-2276345 proposes an alternative approach, which is to use mould parts bearing an elastomeric coating. Thus this document discloses a process for the manufacture of articles, including tablets and bars of compacted de~ergent powder, using mould parts sur~aced with an elastomeric material of some thickness. The document explains that a suitable modulus o~ elasticity can be achieved with a surface coating o~ elastomer which is at least 0.5mm thick. A range of 0.5 to 7mm is disclosed. The thicknesses which are exemplified are about 4mm.
The application of these thick coatings is apt to be complex and may re~uire e~uipment which cannot easily be provided at the place where the mould parts are used.
Surprisingly, we have now ~ound that good release of shaped articles such as tablets and bars from mould parts can be achieved with thinner coatings. This has practical advantages, because thin coatings are easier to apply to mould parts and recoating may be carried out at the manufacturing facility where the mould parts are used.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 We have found that thin elastomer films on punch surfaces lead to bars with smooth surfaces whereas thicker elastomer coatings produce rougher surfaces. A smooth surface is valuable because of consumer fears that a rough surface will damage fabrics when used.
Smoothness may be measured by the procedure described in relation to the examples below.
Thus, for bars which are to be used for handwashing, a thin elastomer coating on mould parts has the advantage of low adhesion to the shaped article, combined with the advantage of a smooth surface. Neither steel nor a thick elastomer coating provides both of these advantages in combination.
There~ore, in a first aspect the present invention provides a process for the manufacture of shaped solid articles by compacting a particulate detergent composition in a mould having a plurality o~ mould parts which are movable relative to each other, at least one of the mould parts having an elastomeric coating on a surface area which contacts the composition characterised in that the elastomeric coating has, over a majority, i.e. more than half of its area, a thickness which does not exceed 0.5mm, i.e. 500 micrometres.
Preferably the coating does not exceed this thickness over 90% or more of its area.
Such coatings are preferably applied as a li~uid - either a solution or a melt, and allowed to solidify by evaporation of solvent, cross-linking or cooling, as appropriate.
In a second aspect this invention provides a process for the manufacture of shaped solid articles by compacting a particulate detergent composition in a mould having a CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 plurality of mould parts which are movable relative to each other, at least one o~ the mould parts having an elastomeric coating on a surface area which contacts the composition characterised by applying the coating as a liguid to at least one mould part and allowing or causing it to solidi~y on the mould part, at least part of the coating having a thickness not exceeding 0.5mm.
Preferably, the present invention comprises the step of delivering particulate detergent to a cavity, the cavity being at least partially de~ined by at least one o~ the mould parts. Preferably, the cavity is defined by a sleeve and at least one mould part, the said at least one mould part being pre~erably movable within the sleeve. Pre~erably, the other mould part is also movable into this sleeve.
Means such as air extraction channels may be provided as is known to the skilled person, to allow removal o~ air during compaction.
In many instances the invention will include periodically renewing the coating.
~IST OF DRAWINGS
This application includes the following drawings:-Fig. 1 is a vertical cross-section through a tablet press illustrating its general arrangement;
Figs. 2, 3 and 4 are similar cross-sections showing stages in the cycle o~ operations of the tablet press;
Fig. 5 is a diagrammatic view, partly in vertical cross-section, of experimental apparatus; and Fig. 6 is a graph o~ ~orce against time obtained with the apparatus of Fig. 5.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/OS167 D~TAIT.~n D~SCRIPTION AND ~BODI~TS
~he invention can be put into effect using a conventional stamping press. A suitable press will generally have a pair of mould parts which move relatively towards and away from each other to compact particulate material between them. They may move within a surrounding sleeve or similar structure.
A suitable arrangement, as illustrated in GB-A-2276345 is shown in Figs. 1 to 4 of the accompanying drawings. The apparatus is a tabletting press, whose structure incorporates a tubular sleeve 10 into which fit a lower punch 12 and an upper punch 14. The sleeve 10 de~ines a mould cavity 16 closed at its bottom by the lower punch 12. ~n use a particulate composition is supplied to this cavity by means of a filling shoe 18 which slides on the upper surface 20.
Initially the filling shoe advances to the position shown in Fig. 2 with the upper punch 14 raised. A particulate composition falls ~rom the filling shoe to ~ the cavity 16 above the lower punch 12.
Next as seen in Fig. 3 the filling shoe withdraws and the upper punch 14 is pressed down into the cavity 16 thus compacting the particulate composition in the cavity to ~orm a shaped article such as a tablet. Next, as shown in Fig. 4, the upper punch 14 is raised and the lower punch 12 is also raised until the tablet 22 lies at a level with the surface 20. After this the filling shoe 18 advances, pushing the tablet 22 away as it does so while the lower punch descends to the position shown in Fig. 2 for the cycle of operations to be repeated.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 In accordance with this invention, the upper punch 12 and the lower punch 14 each have a thin elastomeric coating over their faces which come into contact with the detergent composition.
The sleeve 10, which also forms part of the mould, is made o~
steel and is not coated with elastomer. The punches 12,14 and also tablets compacted in the mould make sliding contact with this sleeve.
The step of compacting the particles reduces the porosity of the composition. Porosity is conveniently expressed as the percentage of volume which is air. The compaction step can be adjusted to produce shaped solids with a range of porosities. For detergent bars to be used in handwashing, then put aside and later reused, a porosity of not over 15%
air by volume, better not greater than 12% is desirable. A
high pressure can reduce porosity to as low as 1% air by volume. So, the preferred porosity is l to 15% more pre~erably 3 to 10% air by volume.
The force applied to the powdered detergent depends upon the final porosity desired. For example, the force may be in the region 50-100 kN.
The air content of a shaped solid product can be calculated from the volume and weight of the product, provided the air-free density of the solid content is known. The latter can be meas~red by compressing a sample o~ the material under vacuum with a very high applied force, then measuring the weight and volume of the resulting solid.
Detergent tablets intended to break-up and dissolve~dis~ose in water are generally compacted with less applied pressure CA 02236849 l998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/OS167 so as to be more porous. A porosity of more than 15 or 20%
by volume is typical.
~T.~S ~ ~S ~n~ TH~IR APPLICATION TO ~OULD PARTS
Elastomers are polymers which are de~ormable, but return to approximately their initial ~i~ensions and shape upon release of the de~orming force. Generally they are polymers with long fle~ible chains, with some cross-linking between chains so as to form a cross-linked network structure.; The network structure restrains the movement of the macro-molecular chain molecules and as a result recovers rapidly after deformation.
The term "elastomeric" as used in defining this invention includes materials as defined in ISO (International Standard Organisation) 1982 as an 'lelastomer", or "rubber". Also included in the definition of "elastomeric" materials according to the invention are thermoplastic elastomers and copolymers and blends of elastomers, thermoplastic elastomers and rubbers.
At low temperature elastomers are hard and brittle. Then, with increasing temperature an elastomer goes through a rubbery phase after softening and retains its elasticity and elastic modulus until its decomposition temperature is reached. The material should of course be in its rubbery state at the operating temperature of the press.
Thermoplastic elastomers consist of amorphous and crystalline phases. The amorphous phase has a softening range below ambient temperature and thus acts as an elastic spring whilst the crystalline segments whose so~tening range is above ambient temperature, act as cross-linking sites.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/2~028 PCT~EP96/~5167 Preferably the elastomeric material according to the invention is selected from those classes described in American Society for Testing and Materials D1418 which include:-1. Unsaturated carbon chain elastomers (R Class) including natural rubbers. E.g. Standard Malaysian Rubber;
butadiene acrylonitrile copolymer, e.g. "Perbunan" ex Bayer.
2. Saturated carbon chain elastomers (M Class) including ethylene-propylene types, e.g. "Nordel" ex DuPont and fluorine containing types, e.g. "Viton~' ex DuPont.
3. Substituted silicone elastomers (Q Class) including li~uid silicone rubbers, e.g. Silastic 9050/50 P (A+B) ex Dow Corning.
4. Elastomers containing carbon, nitrogen and oxygen in the polymer chain (U Class) including polyurethane, e.g.
polyurethane ex Belzona.
Suitable elastomeric coatings can be obtained from materials such as li~uid silicone rubbers such as Silastic 9050/50 P
A~B (ex Dow Corning) which after curing has a modulus of elasticity about 2-3 MPa; and polyurethane, for example Belzona PU2221, as hereinafter defined, which after curing has a modulus of elasticity of about 9MPa, and Belzona 2131 (MP Fluid Elastomer), a 2 part product based on a diphenylmethane 4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI) system with a phenylmercuric neodecanoate catalyst.
Additionally materials, for exam~le fillers, can be added to the elastomeric material to modify its mechanical and processing properties. The e~fects of filler addition CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 depends on the mechanical and chemical interaction between the elastomeric material and the filler.
Fillers can be used to modify the elastomeric material such that desirable properties, for example tear resistance, is achieved. Suitable fillers include carbon blacks; silicas;
silicatesi and organic fillers such a styrene or ~henolic resins.
Other optional additives include friction modifiers and antioxidants.
Materials suitable as elastomeric coatings in the present invention will preferably have a modulus of elasticity, in the range 0.1 to 50MPa, most preferably 1 to 35MPa.
The modulus of elasticity of an elastomeric coating may be measured by recording the force re~uired to indent the coating as a function of the indentation depth. Typically an indentor with a spherical tip may be employed and the slope, s, of the force as a function of the indentation depth to the power 3/2 is determined. The indentation depth is the movement of an indentor into the coating after it ~irst contacts the surface of the coating. In general, it is necessary to correct the measured indentation depth for the compliance of the measurement apparatus. That is, the actual indentation depth, d, is related to the measured apparent value d~ by the ~ollowing expression d = d'-(F.C) where F is the indentation force. The compliance C is determined by compressing the indentor against a rigid surface and recording the apparent displacement as a function of the applied ~orce which has a slope e~ual to C. The CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 modulus o~ elasticity E i~ calculated ~rom the ~ollowing expression E = 3.s ~ . (1 - b2) where s = F.d3/a, R is the radius of the spherical tip of the indentor and b is the Poisson's ratio of the coating which is egual to about 0.5 ~or elastomers.
Under certain conditions to be described herea~ter, the above indentation method may give ~alsely large values of the elastic modulus due to the influence o~ the rigid material onto which the coating is applied. In order to safely avoid this problem it is necessary to ensure that the contact radius of the indentor with the coating does not exceed about 1/10 o~ the thickness of the coating. The contact radius, a, is related to the indentation depth by the ~ollowing expression a = ~(dR) For coatings less than 200~m, it is recommended that a nano-indentor is used which is capable o~ measuring indentation forces at small indentation depths using indentors with tips having a small radius. An example o~ such e~uipment is the "NanoIndentor II" (Nano-instruments). For thicker (greater than 200~m) coatings, more conventional measurement e~uipment such as an Instron tester, (e.g. Model 5566) may be employed.
Mould parts, to which elastomeric coatings are applied in accordance with this invention, will generally be metallic, most usually steel. Other rigid materials such as ceramics may possibly be used.
CA 02236849 l998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCTJ~P96/05167 A mould surface may be subjected to pre-treatment prior to coating with the elastomeric material, to improve the bond strength between the surface and the coating. The aim of pre-treatment is to remove wea~ boundary layers, ~or example weak oxides on metals; optimise the degree of contact between surface and coating and/or alter the surface topography such that the bondable surface area is increased, and to protect the surface be~ore bonding to it. Suitable technigues can be classified as:-1. Mechanical Abrasion - techni~ues include wire brushing abrasion papers, blasting techni~ues such as water, grit, sand or glass bead blasting, polishing such as diamond polishing and spark erosion.
2. Chemical Treatment - including solvent cleaning, etching for example using acid, anodising, and use of a primer or adhesive bonding chemical ~or example a silane or silicone.
3. Energetic Sur~ace Pre-Treatment such as corona discharge.
An elastomeric coating can be applied to mould surfaces as a solution in organic solvent. The solvent is allowed to evaporate, leaving a coating of the elastomer on the mould surface.
The coating solution may be applied by spraying, or by brushing on as i~ it were paint.
A thermoplastic elastomeric material may be applied to a mould surface as a melt, and allowed to cool. Once again application may be by brushing or spraying onto the mould surface.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 When an elastomeric material requires cross-linking, this may be in situ on a mould surface by incorporating a cross-linking agent in the coating material before it is applied, but ~curing/'~ the material, so as to bring about the cross-linking, after application to the mould surface.
When coating becomes worn it can be removed by abrasion, by dissolution or some combination of the two. The mould part can then be recoated, and used again.
For example silicone coatings can be removed using a solution o~ potassium hydroxide in a mixture o~ ethanol and toluene.
Polyurethane coatings can be removed using organic solvent.
An elastomeric coating will preferably have a thickness of at least 5, more preferably at least 10 micrometres, over a majority, i.e. more than half, of the coating area.
Pre~erably the coating will have this minimum thickness over at least 90%, better substantially all, o~ the coating area.
Pre~erably also the coating thickness will not exceed 0.5mm, i.e. 500 ~icrometres, over at least 90%, better substantially all, of the coating area.
The coating thickness may lie in a range up to 400, 450 or even 490 micrometres. Preferred coating thicknesses are in a range up to 300 micrometres.
Various instruments are available to measure the thickness o~
sur~ace coatings. Typically a measuring instrument is applied to the coated surface and uses inductive or electromagnetic interaction with the underlying metallic substrate to measure the distance from that substrate and CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 hence the coating thickne~s. A supplier o~ such instruments is Elcometer Instruments Ltd., Manchester, England.
COMPOSTTIONS
The particulate composition which is compacted may be a mixture o~ particles of individual ingredients, or may comprise particles which themselves contain a mixture of ingredients. Such particle~ containing a mixture of ingredients may be produced by a granulation process and may be used alone or together with particles or single ingredients.
A detergent composition will normally con~ain detergent active and detergent builder. Other ingredients are optional, but usually there will be some other ingredients in addition to the detergent active and detergency builder.
The amount of detergent active in a bar or tablet is suita~ly ~rom 2 to 60wt9~ and is pre~erably ~rom 5 or 8wt96 up to 40 to 50wt%. Detergent-active material present may be anionic (soap or non-soap), cationic, zwitterionic, amphoteric, nonionic or any combination of these.
Anionic detergent-active compounds may be present in an amount of from 0.5 to 40 wt%, preferably from 2 or 4% to 30 or 40 wt%.
~ynthetic (i.e. non-soap) anionic surfactants are well known to those skilled in the art. Examples include alkylbenzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonates having an alkyl chain length of C8-cl5; olefin sulphonates; alkane sulphonates; dialkyl sulphosuccinates;
and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 Primary alkyl sulphate having the formula ROSO3- M~
in which R is an alkyl or alkenyl chain of 8 to 18 carbon atoms especially 10 to 14 carbon atoms and M+ is a solubilising cation, is commercially significant as an anionic detergent active. It is frequently the desired anionic detergent and may provide 75 to 10Qwt~ of any anionic non-soap detergent in the composition.
In some forms of this invention the amount of non-soap anionic detergent lies in a range from 0.5 to 15 wt~ of the composition.
It may also be desirable to include one of more soaps of fatty acids. These are preferably sodium soaps derived from naturally occurring fatty acids, for example, the fatty acids from coconut oil, beef tallow, sunflower or hardened rapeseed oil.
Suitable nonionic detergent compounds which may be used include in particular the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide ether alone or with propylene oxide.
Specific nonionic detergent compounds are alkyl (C822) phenol-ethylene oxide condensates, the condensation products of linear or branched aliphatic C8~0 primary or secondary alcohols with ethylene oxide, copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, and products made by condensation of ethylene oxide with the reaction products of propylene oxide and ethylene-diamine. Other so-called nonionic detergent CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/2~028 PCTAEP96/05167 compounds include long-chain amine oxides, tertiary phosphine oxides, and dialkyl sulphoxides.
Especially preferred are the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates, especially the C1215 primary and secondary alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 5 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
In certain forms of this invention the amount of nonionic detergent lies in a range from 2 to 40%, better 4 or 5 to 30% by weight of the composition.
Since the nonionic detergent compounds are generally liguids, these may be absorbed on a porous carrier.
Preferred carriers include zeolite, sodium perborate monohydrate and Burkeite (spray-dried sodium carbonate and sodium sulphate as disclosed in EP 221776 (Unilever).
Products of this invention also include detergency builder and this may be provided by water-soluble salts or by water-insoluble material.
Examples of water-soluble builders are sodium tripolyphosphate, pyrophosphate and orthophosphate; soluble carbonates, e.g. sodium carbonate; and organic builders containing up to six carbon atoms, e.g. sodium tartrate, sodium citrate, trisodium carboxymethyloxysuccinate.
In particular phosphate or polyphosphate detergency builder may provide at least 5% by weight, often at least 10% by weight of the overall composition.
Alkali metal (preferably sodium) aluminosilicates are water-insoluble builders. They may be incorporated in amounts of up to 60% by weight (anhydrous basis) of the composition, CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 and may be either crystalline or amorphous of mixtures thereof, having the general formula:
-0.8 - ~.5 Na2O.Al2O3. 0.8 - 6 SiO2 These materials contain some bound water and are required to have a calcium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 mg CaO/g. The preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1.5-3.5 SiO2 units (in the formula above).
Other builders may also be included in the detergent composition as necessary or desired. Water-soluble builders may be organic or inorganic. Inorganic builders that may be present include alkali metal (generally sodium~ carbonate;
while organic builders include polycarboxylate polymers, such as polyacrylates, acrylic/maleic copolymers, and acrylic phosphonates, monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono- di-and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates, dipicolinates, hydroxyethyliminodiacetates; and organic precipitant builders such as alkyl- and alkenylmalonates and succinates, and sulphonated fatty acid salts.
Especially preferred supplementary builders are polycarboxylate polymers, more especially polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers, suitably used in amounts of from 0.5 to 15 wt%, especially from 1 to 10 wt%; and monomeric polycarboxylates, more especially citric acid and its salts.
The total amount of detergency builder will generally lie in a range from 5 to 80wt~ of the composition. The amount may be at least 10 or 15wt% and may lie in a range up to 50 or 60wt%.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97~0028 PCTA~P96/05167 A reusable detergent bar which is to be used for handwashing will generally include from 10 to 70wt% of water-insoluble material.
~uch material may be talc, kaolin, calcite or bentonite, as a "filler" which although chemically inert can be significant in contributing to strength and other properties of a detergent bar.
A reusable bar will generally include from 10 to 70wt% of soluble salts. These may be soluble builders such as tripolyphosphate, and other soluble salts such as sodium silicate or sulphate.
Tablets for addition to a washing machine preferably include a binder material which is water-soluble and also serves as a disintegrant by disrupting the structure of the tablet when the tablet is immersed in water, as taught in our EP-A-522766.
Preferred is that at least some of the particles of the detergent composition are individually coated with the binder material. Then, when the composition is compacted, this coating serves as a binder distributed within the composition.
Use of a binder helps to hold the tablet together, thus enabling it to be made using a lower compaction pressure and making it inherently more likely to disintegrate well in the wash li~uor. I~ the binder is also a material that causes disruption when contacted with water, even better disintegration properties may be achieved.
It is preferred that the binder material should melt at a temperature of at least 35~C, better 40~C or above, which is CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP9~/05167 above ambient temperatures in many temperate countries. For use in hotter countries it will be preferable that the melting temperature is somewhat above 40~C, so as to be above the ambient temperature.
For convenience the melting temperature of the binder material should be below 80~C.
Preferred binder materials are synthetic organic polymers of appropriate melting temperature, especially polyethylene glycol. Polyethylene glycol of average molecular weight 1500 (PEG 1500) melts at 45~C and has proved suitable.
Polyethylene glycol of higher molecular weight, notably 4000 or 6000, can also be used.
Other possibilities are polyvinylpyrrolidone, and polyacrylates and water-soluble acrylate copolymers.
The binder may suitably be applied to the particles by spraying, e.g. as a solution or dispersion. The binder is preferably used in an amount within the range from 0.1 to 1~% by weight of the tablet composition, more preferably the amount is at least 1% or even at least 3% by weight of the tablets. Preferably the amount is not over 8% or even ~% by weight.
Detergent compositions which are compacted into shaped articles according to the invention may contain a bleach system. This preferably comprises one or more peroxy bleach compounds, for example, inorganic persalts or organic peroxyacids, which may be employed in conjunction with activators to improve bleaching action at low wash temperatures. If any peroxygen compound is present, the amount is likely to lie in a range from 10 to 25% by weight of the ~omposition.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 . 20 Preferred inorganic persalts are sodium perborate monohydrate and tetrahydrate, and sodium percarbonate, advantageously employed together with an activator. Bleach activators, also referred to as bleach precursors, have been widely disclosed in the art. Preferred examples include peracetic acid precursors, for example, tetraacetylethylene diamine ~TAED), now in widespread commercial use in conjunction with sodium perborate; and perbenzoic acid precursors.
Other ingredients may also be present in the overall composition. These include sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, colouring materials, enzymes, fluorescent brighteners, germicides, perfumes and bleaches. Sodium alkaline silicate may be included, although the amount of this or at least the amount added as an aqueous liquid, is preferably restricted so as to keep to a particulate mixture prior to compaction.
The starting particulate composition which is compacted in accordance with this invention may in principle have any bulk density. However, we have preferred to utilise powders of relatively high bulk density. Thus the starting particulate composition may suitably have a bulk density o~
at least 400 g/litre, pre~erably at least 500 g/litre, and advantageously at least 700 g/litre.
Granular detergent compositions of high bulk density prepared by granulation and densification in a high-speed mixer/granulator, as described and claimed in EP 340013A
(Unilever), EP 352135A tUnilever), and EP 425277A
(Unilever), or by the continuous granulation/densification processes described and claimed in EP 367339A (Unilever) and EP 390251A (Unilever), are inherently suitable for use in the present invention.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCTrEP96/05167 Most preferred are granular detergent compositions prepared by granulation and densification in the high-speed mixer/granulator (Fukae mixer), as described in the above-mentioned EP 340013A (Unilever) and EP 425277A (Unilever).
~PLE 1 In order to investigate the ef~ect of a range of coatings, detergent bars were made using an experimental apparatus as shown in Fig. 5 of the drawings.
The mould for the tablets consisted of a steel collar 32 over a bottom plate 34 which was made of steel. A movable punch 36 was driven downwardly into the collar 32 to compress material within the mould and thus form a bar.
The punch 36 was driven up and down using an Instron (Registered Trademark) Universal testing machine. The ram of this machine is indicated at 38.
A load cell ~0 was interposed between the ram 38 and the movable punch 36. This load cell was connected to data logging equipment 42.
For each experiment, 250g of a particulate detergent composition was placed inside the collar 32.
The Instron was then used to drive the punch 36 into the collar 32 at a predetermined rate of movement until it was applying a predetermined load (about 85kM) to the material within the collar. This was sufficient to compact the material into a reusable bar. The punch was then withdrawn by reversing the ram 38 of the Instron.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 Throughout this procedure, the force applied by the ram 38 to the punch 36 was measured by the load cell 4Q and recorded by the data logging e~uipment.
As the punch is withdrawn, the force exerted on it by the ram 38 becomes negative. The magnitude of this negative force indicates the extent of adhesion between the bar and the surface of the punch.
A graph of force against time, obtained with a steel punch, is shown at Fig. 6 as an illustration. The maximum (reference number 44, at 4.4 kN in this case) of the negative peak is the magnitude of adhesion.
Experiments were carried out using the following two particulate detergent compositions.
% bv weiaht Formulations A
Linear alkyl benzene sulphonate 22.0 18.0 Primary alkyl sulphate - 12.0 Sodium triphosphate 14.0 15.0 Sodium carbonate 2.0 5.4 Sodium sulphate 10.0 9.4 Calcite 16.55 28.4 Kaolin 16.55 Microfine silica 5.0 2.0 Sodium sulphate 7.5 Calcium hydroxide 1.0 Water 3.0 4.3 Minors 2.4 5.5 Total 100.0 100.0 CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/2~028 PCTAEP96/05167 Each of these compositions was prepared, in the form of a particulate mixture, by granulating the ingredients in a high speed mixer.
s Initially, the granulator was used to mix the solid ingredients, other than the alkylben~ene sulphonate.
The solids included additional sodium carbonate re~uired for a subsequent neutralisation reaction.
The agitator speed was reduced, and alkylbenzene sulphuric acid was added over a period of 1 to 2 minutes. A small ~uantity of water was added, amounting to 2 to 6wt% of the composition. Neutralisation took place and the mixture formed granules. A small ~uantity of flow aid (finely divided silica) was added which prevented the granules agglomerating together.
A number of punches were used as the movable upper punch 36.
These punches were:
uncoated steel punch, steel punch with coating of polytetrafluoroethylene steel punch with relatively thick (2mm) coating of natural rubber steel punches with coating of synthetic elastomer 2mm and 8mm thick steel punches with thinner silicone rubber coatings.
To prepare the thin silicone rubber coatings, the punches were first degreased with acetone, and treated with a primer (Dow Corning 3-6060) which comprises 95% methyl isobutyl ketone, 2% ethyl polysilicate, 1%
isopropoxybis(acetylacetonate) titanium and 2% dimethyl, 3s methylvinyl siloxane, acetoxy-terminated, and was diluted CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT/~C/05167 with hexane as re~uired to give a composition suitable for application by brushing.
The silicone rubber was li~uid silicone rubber Silastic 9050-50P Parts A and B, ex Dow Corning. In order to prepare the coating the two parts were mixed at room temperature.
The resulting mixture was then brushed onto the punch surface and cured at 200~C.
Each of these punches was used to make bars of each composition. Adhesion of the punches to the bars was determined from the output of the load cell. The results obtained are set out in the table below.
The smoothness of the surfaces of the bars was measured. A
white silicone rubber was cast on the surface, covering an area about 15mm in diameter, then peeled off after it had cured, so as to provide a white replica surface. A 4mm by 4mm area of the replica surface was scanned with a laser profilometer at 20um intervals. The accuracy of replica surfaces made in this way was checked by making and scanning more than one replica of the same surface area.
The profilometer was used to scan the 4mm by 4mm area as 201 lines, each containing 201 points. At each point the instrument determined the height of a spot 1.5um in diameter, with a resolution of about ~ m. For each line scanned, a centre line was established by linear regression, so that a cross-section on the line of scan would have egual areas above and below the centre line. This area divided by the line length is a value ra which represents the average of the distances between the individual points and the centre line. The average of these values ra for the 201 lines scanned is a value Ra denoting the roughness of the surface.
The values obtained are also given in the table below.
Formulation A Formulation B
(LAS) (LAS/PAS~
Punch surface Adhesion Roughness Adhesion Roughnes material (kN) Ra (~m) (kN) s Ra (~m) steel 4.7 11.3 4.3 4.7 ptfe NS 10.1 2.5 4.7 natural rubber NS 25.6 NS 17.1 2mm moulded NS 45.7 NS 28.2 elastomer 2mm moulded NS 28.9 NS 17.7 elastomer 8mm silicone rubber NS 11.6 NS 8.9 35~m silicone rubber NS 17.5 NS 14.4 130~m silicone rubber NS 22.2 NS 22.2 170,um silicone rubber NS 36.6 NS 41.3 300~m It is apparent from these results that adhesion of the bar composition to steel is much greater than the adhesion with any coated punch. Therefore the recorded adhesion values for the coated punches must be the adhesion to the coated surface of the mobile punch and not the (greater) adhesion to the steel bottom plate.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97~0028 PCT~EP96/05167 With natural rubber 2mm thick, and likewise with 2mm or 8mm synthetic elastomer, the adhesion was so small as to be indistinguishable from friction between the punch 36 and the collar 32. The value was therefore recorded as "NS"
meaning "not significant".
With varying thicknesses of silicone rubber, all less than 0.5mm, the values were again too small to distinguish from friction and recorded as not significant.
Thus, these thin rubber coatings were effective to prevent adhesion of the bar composition to the movable punch.
With the thinner coatings, the results show a surface smoothness which was better than that obtained with the thicker coatings of natural rubber or synthetic elastomer.
Visual inspection also reported that the surface finish of bars moulded with the 130 micrometre silicone rubber coating was better than that of bars moulded with the punches whose surfaces were coated with the much thicker 2mm and 8mm coatings.
As mentioned earlier, a smooth surface is perceived by the consumer as being better for the fabric which is being washed.
~PLE 2 A punch was coated with a silicone rubber coating, 30 micrometres thick, as in the previous Example.
The punch was used to make about 100 bars of each formulation. Measurements of adhesion were made, as in the previous Example, after making 27 and 100 bars of such W O 97noo28 PCT~EP96/05167 formulation. In all cases there was no significant adhesion.
..
The following composition was prepared:
Granulated Com~onents % bv weiaht coconut primary alkyl sulphate 1.4 coconut alcohol 3EO 7.6 coconut alcohol 6EO 4.8 zeolite A24 29.3 soap 2.9 SCMC 0.8 sodium carbonate 0.3 water 5.3 Postdosed Gom~onents PEG 1500 4.3 sodium percarbonate (borosilicate coated) 19.5 TAED granule 4.2 perfume 0.6 antifoam fluorescer and heavy metal sequestrant 4.0 sodium citrate 15.0 The materials listed as ~granulated components" were mixed in a Fukae (Trade Mark) FS-100 high speed mixer-granulator.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 WO 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 (Continuous granulation equipment could also be used, as could other machinery for granulating in batches.) The soap was prepared in situ by neutralisation of fatty acid with sodium hydroxide. The mixture was granulated and densified to give a powder of bulk density greater than 750 g/litre and a mean particle size of approximately 650~m.
The powder was sieved to remove fine particles smaller than 180~m and large particles exceeding 1700~m. The remaining solids were then mixed with the powder in a rotary mixer, after which the perfume was sprayed on, followed by the PEG.
The PEG was sprayed at about 80~C onto the powder which was at about 22-26~C (slightly above ambient because of frictional heating during granulation).
Detergent tablets were prepared by compaction of 50g ~uantities of the detergent powder formulation using apparatus as illustrated in Figs. 1 to 4. The tablets were of circular cross-section having a diameter of 4.5 cm and a thickness of approximately 2.5 to 3.1 cm depending on the density of the finished tablets.
Compaction of the detergent powder, to make tablets, was carried out using either plain steel top and bottom punches, or alternatively punches which had been coated, on their faces which contact the detergent composition. The coating was polyurethane elastomer, applied by spraying. The coating thickness was in a range from 200-300 micrometres.
With each set of punches, two levels of force were employed, so as to produce tablets of density approximately 1140 kg/mZ
and 1280 kg/m2.
With steel punches, 100 tablets were produced, after which the top punch was inspected. It was found to have 0.3 to W O 97/20028 PcT/~~ sl67 0.6g of powder firmly adhering to it, and producing indentations in the tablets surfaces.
With the coated punches, the top punch was again inspected after producing 100 tablets. It was found to have only about O.Olg of powder adhering to it. This was a light dusting which was easily removed. If a larger ~uantity of tablets was to be made, it would be possible to run the press for an extended period without needing fre~uent stops to clean the punches.
The speed of dissolution of the tablets was measured using tests as described in EP-A-466484. For tablets of the same density no difference could be detected between tablets made with coated and uncoated punches.
In a comparative experiment, a similar detergent composition was compacted in the same way, but with a self-adhesive polytetrafluoroethylene coating on the upper and lower punches. After producing batches of 100 tablets it was found that 0.1 to 0.6 g of detergent powder had become firmly adhered to the punch surfaces.
polyurethane ex Belzona.
Suitable elastomeric coatings can be obtained from materials such as li~uid silicone rubbers such as Silastic 9050/50 P
A~B (ex Dow Corning) which after curing has a modulus of elasticity about 2-3 MPa; and polyurethane, for example Belzona PU2221, as hereinafter defined, which after curing has a modulus of elasticity of about 9MPa, and Belzona 2131 (MP Fluid Elastomer), a 2 part product based on a diphenylmethane 4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI) system with a phenylmercuric neodecanoate catalyst.
Additionally materials, for exam~le fillers, can be added to the elastomeric material to modify its mechanical and processing properties. The e~fects of filler addition CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 depends on the mechanical and chemical interaction between the elastomeric material and the filler.
Fillers can be used to modify the elastomeric material such that desirable properties, for example tear resistance, is achieved. Suitable fillers include carbon blacks; silicas;
silicatesi and organic fillers such a styrene or ~henolic resins.
Other optional additives include friction modifiers and antioxidants.
Materials suitable as elastomeric coatings in the present invention will preferably have a modulus of elasticity, in the range 0.1 to 50MPa, most preferably 1 to 35MPa.
The modulus of elasticity of an elastomeric coating may be measured by recording the force re~uired to indent the coating as a function of the indentation depth. Typically an indentor with a spherical tip may be employed and the slope, s, of the force as a function of the indentation depth to the power 3/2 is determined. The indentation depth is the movement of an indentor into the coating after it ~irst contacts the surface of the coating. In general, it is necessary to correct the measured indentation depth for the compliance of the measurement apparatus. That is, the actual indentation depth, d, is related to the measured apparent value d~ by the ~ollowing expression d = d'-(F.C) where F is the indentation force. The compliance C is determined by compressing the indentor against a rigid surface and recording the apparent displacement as a function of the applied ~orce which has a slope e~ual to C. The CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 modulus o~ elasticity E i~ calculated ~rom the ~ollowing expression E = 3.s ~ . (1 - b2) where s = F.d3/a, R is the radius of the spherical tip of the indentor and b is the Poisson's ratio of the coating which is egual to about 0.5 ~or elastomers.
Under certain conditions to be described herea~ter, the above indentation method may give ~alsely large values of the elastic modulus due to the influence o~ the rigid material onto which the coating is applied. In order to safely avoid this problem it is necessary to ensure that the contact radius of the indentor with the coating does not exceed about 1/10 o~ the thickness of the coating. The contact radius, a, is related to the indentation depth by the ~ollowing expression a = ~(dR) For coatings less than 200~m, it is recommended that a nano-indentor is used which is capable o~ measuring indentation forces at small indentation depths using indentors with tips having a small radius. An example o~ such e~uipment is the "NanoIndentor II" (Nano-instruments). For thicker (greater than 200~m) coatings, more conventional measurement e~uipment such as an Instron tester, (e.g. Model 5566) may be employed.
Mould parts, to which elastomeric coatings are applied in accordance with this invention, will generally be metallic, most usually steel. Other rigid materials such as ceramics may possibly be used.
CA 02236849 l998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCTJ~P96/05167 A mould surface may be subjected to pre-treatment prior to coating with the elastomeric material, to improve the bond strength between the surface and the coating. The aim of pre-treatment is to remove wea~ boundary layers, ~or example weak oxides on metals; optimise the degree of contact between surface and coating and/or alter the surface topography such that the bondable surface area is increased, and to protect the surface be~ore bonding to it. Suitable technigues can be classified as:-1. Mechanical Abrasion - techni~ues include wire brushing abrasion papers, blasting techni~ues such as water, grit, sand or glass bead blasting, polishing such as diamond polishing and spark erosion.
2. Chemical Treatment - including solvent cleaning, etching for example using acid, anodising, and use of a primer or adhesive bonding chemical ~or example a silane or silicone.
3. Energetic Sur~ace Pre-Treatment such as corona discharge.
An elastomeric coating can be applied to mould surfaces as a solution in organic solvent. The solvent is allowed to evaporate, leaving a coating of the elastomer on the mould surface.
The coating solution may be applied by spraying, or by brushing on as i~ it were paint.
A thermoplastic elastomeric material may be applied to a mould surface as a melt, and allowed to cool. Once again application may be by brushing or spraying onto the mould surface.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 When an elastomeric material requires cross-linking, this may be in situ on a mould surface by incorporating a cross-linking agent in the coating material before it is applied, but ~curing/'~ the material, so as to bring about the cross-linking, after application to the mould surface.
When coating becomes worn it can be removed by abrasion, by dissolution or some combination of the two. The mould part can then be recoated, and used again.
For example silicone coatings can be removed using a solution o~ potassium hydroxide in a mixture o~ ethanol and toluene.
Polyurethane coatings can be removed using organic solvent.
An elastomeric coating will preferably have a thickness of at least 5, more preferably at least 10 micrometres, over a majority, i.e. more than half, of the coating area.
Pre~erably the coating will have this minimum thickness over at least 90%, better substantially all, o~ the coating area.
Pre~erably also the coating thickness will not exceed 0.5mm, i.e. 500 ~icrometres, over at least 90%, better substantially all, of the coating area.
The coating thickness may lie in a range up to 400, 450 or even 490 micrometres. Preferred coating thicknesses are in a range up to 300 micrometres.
Various instruments are available to measure the thickness o~
sur~ace coatings. Typically a measuring instrument is applied to the coated surface and uses inductive or electromagnetic interaction with the underlying metallic substrate to measure the distance from that substrate and CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 hence the coating thickne~s. A supplier o~ such instruments is Elcometer Instruments Ltd., Manchester, England.
COMPOSTTIONS
The particulate composition which is compacted may be a mixture o~ particles of individual ingredients, or may comprise particles which themselves contain a mixture of ingredients. Such particle~ containing a mixture of ingredients may be produced by a granulation process and may be used alone or together with particles or single ingredients.
A detergent composition will normally con~ain detergent active and detergent builder. Other ingredients are optional, but usually there will be some other ingredients in addition to the detergent active and detergency builder.
The amount of detergent active in a bar or tablet is suita~ly ~rom 2 to 60wt9~ and is pre~erably ~rom 5 or 8wt96 up to 40 to 50wt%. Detergent-active material present may be anionic (soap or non-soap), cationic, zwitterionic, amphoteric, nonionic or any combination of these.
Anionic detergent-active compounds may be present in an amount of from 0.5 to 40 wt%, preferably from 2 or 4% to 30 or 40 wt%.
~ynthetic (i.e. non-soap) anionic surfactants are well known to those skilled in the art. Examples include alkylbenzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonates having an alkyl chain length of C8-cl5; olefin sulphonates; alkane sulphonates; dialkyl sulphosuccinates;
and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 Primary alkyl sulphate having the formula ROSO3- M~
in which R is an alkyl or alkenyl chain of 8 to 18 carbon atoms especially 10 to 14 carbon atoms and M+ is a solubilising cation, is commercially significant as an anionic detergent active. It is frequently the desired anionic detergent and may provide 75 to 10Qwt~ of any anionic non-soap detergent in the composition.
In some forms of this invention the amount of non-soap anionic detergent lies in a range from 0.5 to 15 wt~ of the composition.
It may also be desirable to include one of more soaps of fatty acids. These are preferably sodium soaps derived from naturally occurring fatty acids, for example, the fatty acids from coconut oil, beef tallow, sunflower or hardened rapeseed oil.
Suitable nonionic detergent compounds which may be used include in particular the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide ether alone or with propylene oxide.
Specific nonionic detergent compounds are alkyl (C822) phenol-ethylene oxide condensates, the condensation products of linear or branched aliphatic C8~0 primary or secondary alcohols with ethylene oxide, copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, and products made by condensation of ethylene oxide with the reaction products of propylene oxide and ethylene-diamine. Other so-called nonionic detergent CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/2~028 PCTAEP96/05167 compounds include long-chain amine oxides, tertiary phosphine oxides, and dialkyl sulphoxides.
Especially preferred are the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates, especially the C1215 primary and secondary alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 5 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
In certain forms of this invention the amount of nonionic detergent lies in a range from 2 to 40%, better 4 or 5 to 30% by weight of the composition.
Since the nonionic detergent compounds are generally liguids, these may be absorbed on a porous carrier.
Preferred carriers include zeolite, sodium perborate monohydrate and Burkeite (spray-dried sodium carbonate and sodium sulphate as disclosed in EP 221776 (Unilever).
Products of this invention also include detergency builder and this may be provided by water-soluble salts or by water-insoluble material.
Examples of water-soluble builders are sodium tripolyphosphate, pyrophosphate and orthophosphate; soluble carbonates, e.g. sodium carbonate; and organic builders containing up to six carbon atoms, e.g. sodium tartrate, sodium citrate, trisodium carboxymethyloxysuccinate.
In particular phosphate or polyphosphate detergency builder may provide at least 5% by weight, often at least 10% by weight of the overall composition.
Alkali metal (preferably sodium) aluminosilicates are water-insoluble builders. They may be incorporated in amounts of up to 60% by weight (anhydrous basis) of the composition, CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 and may be either crystalline or amorphous of mixtures thereof, having the general formula:
-0.8 - ~.5 Na2O.Al2O3. 0.8 - 6 SiO2 These materials contain some bound water and are required to have a calcium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 mg CaO/g. The preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1.5-3.5 SiO2 units (in the formula above).
Other builders may also be included in the detergent composition as necessary or desired. Water-soluble builders may be organic or inorganic. Inorganic builders that may be present include alkali metal (generally sodium~ carbonate;
while organic builders include polycarboxylate polymers, such as polyacrylates, acrylic/maleic copolymers, and acrylic phosphonates, monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono- di-and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates, dipicolinates, hydroxyethyliminodiacetates; and organic precipitant builders such as alkyl- and alkenylmalonates and succinates, and sulphonated fatty acid salts.
Especially preferred supplementary builders are polycarboxylate polymers, more especially polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers, suitably used in amounts of from 0.5 to 15 wt%, especially from 1 to 10 wt%; and monomeric polycarboxylates, more especially citric acid and its salts.
The total amount of detergency builder will generally lie in a range from 5 to 80wt~ of the composition. The amount may be at least 10 or 15wt% and may lie in a range up to 50 or 60wt%.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97~0028 PCTA~P96/05167 A reusable detergent bar which is to be used for handwashing will generally include from 10 to 70wt% of water-insoluble material.
~uch material may be talc, kaolin, calcite or bentonite, as a "filler" which although chemically inert can be significant in contributing to strength and other properties of a detergent bar.
A reusable bar will generally include from 10 to 70wt% of soluble salts. These may be soluble builders such as tripolyphosphate, and other soluble salts such as sodium silicate or sulphate.
Tablets for addition to a washing machine preferably include a binder material which is water-soluble and also serves as a disintegrant by disrupting the structure of the tablet when the tablet is immersed in water, as taught in our EP-A-522766.
Preferred is that at least some of the particles of the detergent composition are individually coated with the binder material. Then, when the composition is compacted, this coating serves as a binder distributed within the composition.
Use of a binder helps to hold the tablet together, thus enabling it to be made using a lower compaction pressure and making it inherently more likely to disintegrate well in the wash li~uor. I~ the binder is also a material that causes disruption when contacted with water, even better disintegration properties may be achieved.
It is preferred that the binder material should melt at a temperature of at least 35~C, better 40~C or above, which is CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT~EP9~/05167 above ambient temperatures in many temperate countries. For use in hotter countries it will be preferable that the melting temperature is somewhat above 40~C, so as to be above the ambient temperature.
For convenience the melting temperature of the binder material should be below 80~C.
Preferred binder materials are synthetic organic polymers of appropriate melting temperature, especially polyethylene glycol. Polyethylene glycol of average molecular weight 1500 (PEG 1500) melts at 45~C and has proved suitable.
Polyethylene glycol of higher molecular weight, notably 4000 or 6000, can also be used.
Other possibilities are polyvinylpyrrolidone, and polyacrylates and water-soluble acrylate copolymers.
The binder may suitably be applied to the particles by spraying, e.g. as a solution or dispersion. The binder is preferably used in an amount within the range from 0.1 to 1~% by weight of the tablet composition, more preferably the amount is at least 1% or even at least 3% by weight of the tablets. Preferably the amount is not over 8% or even ~% by weight.
Detergent compositions which are compacted into shaped articles according to the invention may contain a bleach system. This preferably comprises one or more peroxy bleach compounds, for example, inorganic persalts or organic peroxyacids, which may be employed in conjunction with activators to improve bleaching action at low wash temperatures. If any peroxygen compound is present, the amount is likely to lie in a range from 10 to 25% by weight of the ~omposition.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 . 20 Preferred inorganic persalts are sodium perborate monohydrate and tetrahydrate, and sodium percarbonate, advantageously employed together with an activator. Bleach activators, also referred to as bleach precursors, have been widely disclosed in the art. Preferred examples include peracetic acid precursors, for example, tetraacetylethylene diamine ~TAED), now in widespread commercial use in conjunction with sodium perborate; and perbenzoic acid precursors.
Other ingredients may also be present in the overall composition. These include sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, colouring materials, enzymes, fluorescent brighteners, germicides, perfumes and bleaches. Sodium alkaline silicate may be included, although the amount of this or at least the amount added as an aqueous liquid, is preferably restricted so as to keep to a particulate mixture prior to compaction.
The starting particulate composition which is compacted in accordance with this invention may in principle have any bulk density. However, we have preferred to utilise powders of relatively high bulk density. Thus the starting particulate composition may suitably have a bulk density o~
at least 400 g/litre, pre~erably at least 500 g/litre, and advantageously at least 700 g/litre.
Granular detergent compositions of high bulk density prepared by granulation and densification in a high-speed mixer/granulator, as described and claimed in EP 340013A
(Unilever), EP 352135A tUnilever), and EP 425277A
(Unilever), or by the continuous granulation/densification processes described and claimed in EP 367339A (Unilever) and EP 390251A (Unilever), are inherently suitable for use in the present invention.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCTrEP96/05167 Most preferred are granular detergent compositions prepared by granulation and densification in the high-speed mixer/granulator (Fukae mixer), as described in the above-mentioned EP 340013A (Unilever) and EP 425277A (Unilever).
~PLE 1 In order to investigate the ef~ect of a range of coatings, detergent bars were made using an experimental apparatus as shown in Fig. 5 of the drawings.
The mould for the tablets consisted of a steel collar 32 over a bottom plate 34 which was made of steel. A movable punch 36 was driven downwardly into the collar 32 to compress material within the mould and thus form a bar.
The punch 36 was driven up and down using an Instron (Registered Trademark) Universal testing machine. The ram of this machine is indicated at 38.
A load cell ~0 was interposed between the ram 38 and the movable punch 36. This load cell was connected to data logging equipment 42.
For each experiment, 250g of a particulate detergent composition was placed inside the collar 32.
The Instron was then used to drive the punch 36 into the collar 32 at a predetermined rate of movement until it was applying a predetermined load (about 85kM) to the material within the collar. This was sufficient to compact the material into a reusable bar. The punch was then withdrawn by reversing the ram 38 of the Instron.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 Throughout this procedure, the force applied by the ram 38 to the punch 36 was measured by the load cell 4Q and recorded by the data logging e~uipment.
As the punch is withdrawn, the force exerted on it by the ram 38 becomes negative. The magnitude of this negative force indicates the extent of adhesion between the bar and the surface of the punch.
A graph of force against time, obtained with a steel punch, is shown at Fig. 6 as an illustration. The maximum (reference number 44, at 4.4 kN in this case) of the negative peak is the magnitude of adhesion.
Experiments were carried out using the following two particulate detergent compositions.
% bv weiaht Formulations A
Linear alkyl benzene sulphonate 22.0 18.0 Primary alkyl sulphate - 12.0 Sodium triphosphate 14.0 15.0 Sodium carbonate 2.0 5.4 Sodium sulphate 10.0 9.4 Calcite 16.55 28.4 Kaolin 16.55 Microfine silica 5.0 2.0 Sodium sulphate 7.5 Calcium hydroxide 1.0 Water 3.0 4.3 Minors 2.4 5.5 Total 100.0 100.0 CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/2~028 PCTAEP96/05167 Each of these compositions was prepared, in the form of a particulate mixture, by granulating the ingredients in a high speed mixer.
s Initially, the granulator was used to mix the solid ingredients, other than the alkylben~ene sulphonate.
The solids included additional sodium carbonate re~uired for a subsequent neutralisation reaction.
The agitator speed was reduced, and alkylbenzene sulphuric acid was added over a period of 1 to 2 minutes. A small ~uantity of water was added, amounting to 2 to 6wt% of the composition. Neutralisation took place and the mixture formed granules. A small ~uantity of flow aid (finely divided silica) was added which prevented the granules agglomerating together.
A number of punches were used as the movable upper punch 36.
These punches were:
uncoated steel punch, steel punch with coating of polytetrafluoroethylene steel punch with relatively thick (2mm) coating of natural rubber steel punches with coating of synthetic elastomer 2mm and 8mm thick steel punches with thinner silicone rubber coatings.
To prepare the thin silicone rubber coatings, the punches were first degreased with acetone, and treated with a primer (Dow Corning 3-6060) which comprises 95% methyl isobutyl ketone, 2% ethyl polysilicate, 1%
isopropoxybis(acetylacetonate) titanium and 2% dimethyl, 3s methylvinyl siloxane, acetoxy-terminated, and was diluted CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97/20028 PCT/~C/05167 with hexane as re~uired to give a composition suitable for application by brushing.
The silicone rubber was li~uid silicone rubber Silastic 9050-50P Parts A and B, ex Dow Corning. In order to prepare the coating the two parts were mixed at room temperature.
The resulting mixture was then brushed onto the punch surface and cured at 200~C.
Each of these punches was used to make bars of each composition. Adhesion of the punches to the bars was determined from the output of the load cell. The results obtained are set out in the table below.
The smoothness of the surfaces of the bars was measured. A
white silicone rubber was cast on the surface, covering an area about 15mm in diameter, then peeled off after it had cured, so as to provide a white replica surface. A 4mm by 4mm area of the replica surface was scanned with a laser profilometer at 20um intervals. The accuracy of replica surfaces made in this way was checked by making and scanning more than one replica of the same surface area.
The profilometer was used to scan the 4mm by 4mm area as 201 lines, each containing 201 points. At each point the instrument determined the height of a spot 1.5um in diameter, with a resolution of about ~ m. For each line scanned, a centre line was established by linear regression, so that a cross-section on the line of scan would have egual areas above and below the centre line. This area divided by the line length is a value ra which represents the average of the distances between the individual points and the centre line. The average of these values ra for the 201 lines scanned is a value Ra denoting the roughness of the surface.
The values obtained are also given in the table below.
Formulation A Formulation B
(LAS) (LAS/PAS~
Punch surface Adhesion Roughness Adhesion Roughnes material (kN) Ra (~m) (kN) s Ra (~m) steel 4.7 11.3 4.3 4.7 ptfe NS 10.1 2.5 4.7 natural rubber NS 25.6 NS 17.1 2mm moulded NS 45.7 NS 28.2 elastomer 2mm moulded NS 28.9 NS 17.7 elastomer 8mm silicone rubber NS 11.6 NS 8.9 35~m silicone rubber NS 17.5 NS 14.4 130~m silicone rubber NS 22.2 NS 22.2 170,um silicone rubber NS 36.6 NS 41.3 300~m It is apparent from these results that adhesion of the bar composition to steel is much greater than the adhesion with any coated punch. Therefore the recorded adhesion values for the coated punches must be the adhesion to the coated surface of the mobile punch and not the (greater) adhesion to the steel bottom plate.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 W O 97~0028 PCT~EP96/05167 With natural rubber 2mm thick, and likewise with 2mm or 8mm synthetic elastomer, the adhesion was so small as to be indistinguishable from friction between the punch 36 and the collar 32. The value was therefore recorded as "NS"
meaning "not significant".
With varying thicknesses of silicone rubber, all less than 0.5mm, the values were again too small to distinguish from friction and recorded as not significant.
Thus, these thin rubber coatings were effective to prevent adhesion of the bar composition to the movable punch.
With the thinner coatings, the results show a surface smoothness which was better than that obtained with the thicker coatings of natural rubber or synthetic elastomer.
Visual inspection also reported that the surface finish of bars moulded with the 130 micrometre silicone rubber coating was better than that of bars moulded with the punches whose surfaces were coated with the much thicker 2mm and 8mm coatings.
As mentioned earlier, a smooth surface is perceived by the consumer as being better for the fabric which is being washed.
~PLE 2 A punch was coated with a silicone rubber coating, 30 micrometres thick, as in the previous Example.
The punch was used to make about 100 bars of each formulation. Measurements of adhesion were made, as in the previous Example, after making 27 and 100 bars of such W O 97noo28 PCT~EP96/05167 formulation. In all cases there was no significant adhesion.
..
The following composition was prepared:
Granulated Com~onents % bv weiaht coconut primary alkyl sulphate 1.4 coconut alcohol 3EO 7.6 coconut alcohol 6EO 4.8 zeolite A24 29.3 soap 2.9 SCMC 0.8 sodium carbonate 0.3 water 5.3 Postdosed Gom~onents PEG 1500 4.3 sodium percarbonate (borosilicate coated) 19.5 TAED granule 4.2 perfume 0.6 antifoam fluorescer and heavy metal sequestrant 4.0 sodium citrate 15.0 The materials listed as ~granulated components" were mixed in a Fukae (Trade Mark) FS-100 high speed mixer-granulator.
CA 02236849 1998-0~-06 WO 97/20028 PCT~EP96/05167 (Continuous granulation equipment could also be used, as could other machinery for granulating in batches.) The soap was prepared in situ by neutralisation of fatty acid with sodium hydroxide. The mixture was granulated and densified to give a powder of bulk density greater than 750 g/litre and a mean particle size of approximately 650~m.
The powder was sieved to remove fine particles smaller than 180~m and large particles exceeding 1700~m. The remaining solids were then mixed with the powder in a rotary mixer, after which the perfume was sprayed on, followed by the PEG.
The PEG was sprayed at about 80~C onto the powder which was at about 22-26~C (slightly above ambient because of frictional heating during granulation).
Detergent tablets were prepared by compaction of 50g ~uantities of the detergent powder formulation using apparatus as illustrated in Figs. 1 to 4. The tablets were of circular cross-section having a diameter of 4.5 cm and a thickness of approximately 2.5 to 3.1 cm depending on the density of the finished tablets.
Compaction of the detergent powder, to make tablets, was carried out using either plain steel top and bottom punches, or alternatively punches which had been coated, on their faces which contact the detergent composition. The coating was polyurethane elastomer, applied by spraying. The coating thickness was in a range from 200-300 micrometres.
With each set of punches, two levels of force were employed, so as to produce tablets of density approximately 1140 kg/mZ
and 1280 kg/m2.
With steel punches, 100 tablets were produced, after which the top punch was inspected. It was found to have 0.3 to W O 97/20028 PcT/~~ sl67 0.6g of powder firmly adhering to it, and producing indentations in the tablets surfaces.
With the coated punches, the top punch was again inspected after producing 100 tablets. It was found to have only about O.Olg of powder adhering to it. This was a light dusting which was easily removed. If a larger ~uantity of tablets was to be made, it would be possible to run the press for an extended period without needing fre~uent stops to clean the punches.
The speed of dissolution of the tablets was measured using tests as described in EP-A-466484. For tablets of the same density no difference could be detected between tablets made with coated and uncoated punches.
In a comparative experiment, a similar detergent composition was compacted in the same way, but with a self-adhesive polytetrafluoroethylene coating on the upper and lower punches. After producing batches of 100 tablets it was found that 0.1 to 0.6 g of detergent powder had become firmly adhered to the punch surfaces.
Claims (15)
1. A process for the manufacture of shaped articles of compacted detergent powder by compacting a particulate composition in a mould consisting of a plurality of mould parts which are movable relative to each other, at least one of the mould parts having an elastomeric coating on a surface area which contacts the composition, characterised in that the elastomeric coating has a thickness of at least 5 micrometers and not exceeding 490 micrometres over more than half of the coating area.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the mould has a pair of mould parts which are movable towards and away from each other to compact the particulate composition, each of the two said mould parts having said elastomeric coating on a surface area which contacts the composition.
3. A process according to claim 2, wherein the mould includes a sleeve open at both ends, one of the pair of mould parts closes an end of the sleeve, and the other one of the pair of mould parts is movable into the sleeve from the other end to compact the material in the sleeve.
4. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein each said elastomeric coating has a thickness not exceeding 490 micrometres over at least 90%
of the coating area.
of the coating area.
5. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the coating thickness lies in a range from 5 to 400 micrometres.
6. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the coating thickness lies in a range from 10 to 300 micrometres.
7. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the elastomeric material has a modulus of elasticity in the range from 0.1 to 50 MPa.
8. A process according to claim 7, wherein each elastomeric coating is made of a material selected from the group consisting of unsaturated carbon chain elastomers, ethylene-propylene elastomers, silicone rubbers and polyurethanes.
9. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the particulate composition contains 5 to 60% by weight of non-soap detergent active, 10 to 70% by weight of water-soluble salts and 10 to 70% by weight of water-insoluble material.
10. A process according to claim 9, wherein the shaped articles contain less than 15% by volume of air.
11. A process according to any one of claim 1 to 8, wherein the particulate composition contains from 5 to 50% by weight of one or more detergent-active compounds, and from 15 to 60% by weight of aluminosilicate detergency builder.
12. A process according to claim 11, wherein the particulate composition contains from 1 to 8% by weight of a polymeric binder which is a water-soluble organic polymer.
13. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 8, 11 or 12, wherein the shaped articles contain more than 15% by volume of air.
14. A process according to any one of the preceding claims including a step of applying an elastomeric coating in liquid form to a mould part and allowing the coating to solidify on the mould part.
15. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, which includes a step of applying a fresh elastomer coating to a mould part after the mould part has been used to produce a plurality of articles, and then using the mould part to produce a further plurality of articles.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBGB9524537.9A GB9524537D0 (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1995-11-30 | Detergent compositions |
| GB9524537.9 | 1995-11-30 | ||
| PCT/EP1996/005167 WO1997020028A1 (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1996-11-20 | Process for the manufacture of shaped articles from detergent compositions |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2236849A1 true CA2236849A1 (en) | 1997-06-05 |
Family
ID=29403944
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2236849 Abandoned CA2236849A1 (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1996-11-20 | Process for the manufacture of shaped articles from detergent compositions |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2236849A1 (en) |
-
1996
- 1996-11-20 CA CA 2236849 patent/CA2236849A1/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP1382668B1 (en) | Detergent tablets | |
| CA2328791A1 (en) | Compression process for multiphase tablets | |
| EP0863980B1 (en) | Process for the manufacture of shaped articles from detergent compositions | |
| EP1511834B1 (en) | Detergent tablets | |
| GB2276345A (en) | Process for making shaped articles | |
| EP1375636B1 (en) | Detergent tablets | |
| US6066615A (en) | Detergent compositions | |
| EP0975734B1 (en) | Detergent compositions | |
| CA2236849A1 (en) | Process for the manufacture of shaped articles from detergent compositions | |
| EP0956332B2 (en) | Detergent compositions | |
| EP1054947B1 (en) | Tablet detergent compositions | |
| WO1998046719A1 (en) | Detergent compositions | |
| EP1491622B1 (en) | Detergent compositions | |
| EP1371721A1 (en) | Detergent tablets | |
| EP1676904B1 (en) | Detergent tablets | |
| EP1516916A1 (en) | Detergent compositions | |
| EP1496105B1 (en) | Detergent compositions | |
| CZ365899A3 (en) | Detergent agent | |
| CA2314035A1 (en) | Detergent tablets, especially for machine dishwashing |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| FZDE | Dead |