CA2235762A1 - Integrated nucleic acid hybridization devices based upon active surface chemistry - Google Patents

Integrated nucleic acid hybridization devices based upon active surface chemistry Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2235762A1
CA2235762A1 CA002235762A CA2235762A CA2235762A1 CA 2235762 A1 CA2235762 A1 CA 2235762A1 CA 002235762 A CA002235762 A CA 002235762A CA 2235762 A CA2235762 A CA 2235762A CA 2235762 A1 CA2235762 A1 CA 2235762A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
hybridization
probe
oligonucleotide probe
target area
substrate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA002235762A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Arnab Mallik
Nobuko Akiyama
Du Xiao
Bonnie Iverson
Michael Hogan
Thomas Powdrill
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Baylor College of Medicine
Genometrix Inc
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of CA2235762A1 publication Critical patent/CA2235762A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07HSUGARS; DERIVATIVES THEREOF; NUCLEOSIDES; NUCLEOTIDES; NUCLEIC ACIDS
    • C07H21/00Compounds containing two or more mononucleotide units having separate phosphate or polyphosphate groups linked by saccharide radicals of nucleoside groups, e.g. nucleic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6834Enzymatic or biochemical coupling of nucleic acids to a solid phase

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)

Abstract

The hybrization device is comprised of an oligonucleotide probe and a solid substrate wherein the solid substrate has a support surface with a neutral or negative electrostatic field and a hybridization surface. As shown in the figure, the hybridization surface is accessible for linking the oligonucleotide probe to the solid substrate. The oligonucleotide probe is linked to the hybridization surface of the solid substrate at a distance of no more than 100 angstroms. Further, there is a method of using the hybridization device to detect single base changes in DNA or RNA target sequences.

Description

CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 Int~gr~t~d Nucloic Acid ~ybridisation DQvic~s B~s~d Upon Active ~urface ~hemistry This invention was made with government support. The government has certain rights in the invention.

Field of Invention The present invention relates to devices and methods for enhanced and selective b; n~; ng between DNA
or RNA and an oligonucleotide probe. More particularly, it relates to a device ~or use in nucleic acid diagnostic tests.

Ra~k.~. G~ of the Inven~ion The closest equivalent to the proposed invention is the use of DNA probes using modified backbones such as peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) to alter the ionic character of binding to targets. These have been investigated primarily as gene-based therapeutic agents and have not been used on substrate surfaces compatible with arrayed detection methodologies. In any case, the principle is completely different and is not readily compatible with large scale combinatorial approaches.
The current ~ -n~ for nucleic acid sequence analysis has spurred the rapid development of new technologies which will enable such information to be collected with increasing efficiency. In particular, the use of massively parallel, array-based hybridization detection devices are being investigated.
In this investigation modern concepts in microelectronic engineering, nanotechn~logy, optical physics and information processing are being combined CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 to develop devices which allow the collection and assimilation of large amounts of data in extremely short time frames. Ultimately, the employment of such devices may replace cumbersome mol~c~ r biological protocols which have traditionally been used for the generation of data for a variety o~ purposes, including but not limited to: 1) genome analysis, 2) mutation detection, 3) pathogen detection, 4) RNA analysis and 5) nucleotide sequence determination.
~he bioch~ ;cal basis for the ability to use a hybridization assay for any of the above mentioned reasons, either by modern or traditional methodologies, resides, of course, in the complementary nature of nucleic acids, originally elucidated by Watson and Crick in the early 1950s. Since then, the exploitation, ref; n~ -nt and further characterization of the specific hydrogen ho~; ng patterns of complementary nucleic acid strands has led to a huge volume of information, and has profoundly affected the paradigm of medicine and ~iology.
The ability to hybridize nucleic acids with adequate sen~itivity and selectivity is xL~nyly dependent on a n~l~hD~ of physical chemistry considerations and has ~een a subject of considerable attention. Of primary importance, is the electrostatic nature of nucleic acids and the need for bulk solution cations to screen the negative charges of the phosphate group~ on the bacXho~e, allowing hydrogen bonding to occur between the two negatively charged polyelectrolytes. Ele~LtGxLatics play a critical role in vivo also, being a primary detet ;nAnt in cellular ~unctions such as replication, recombination, transcription, chromatin structure, rACki ng and ligand bin-ling.

CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 Until recently, the bulk of hybridization analysis has been performed on nitrocellulose, nylon or other membranous type solid supports. The method of attachment of macromolecules to these types of support is at best semi-specific, involving non-covalent capture in microporous ch~nn~l c, It has recently been demonstrated that the covalent tethering of probe molecules to other types of solid supports may ~hAnC~
hybridization association binding constants by up to two orders of magnitude. For these reasons and for issues of compatibility with developing hybridization detection devices, covalent and other non-traditional means of surface immobilization of nucleic acids are h~C-__ ing more commonplace.
Although a great deal is known about the chemical interactions of polymers at solid interfaces, there is a paucity of information regarding the biophysical interactions of nucleic acids at such interfaces as c_ pA~ed with solution state physical data.
In the prior art, the parameters affecting the hybridization of nucleic acids has been traditionally characterized from solution state experiments or from experiments performed on membranous type supports in which target molecules are non-specifically absorbed or sequestered. Until the pre5ent invention, the active participation of a substrate material upon which probes are specifically tethered in the hybridization reaction has not been considered. Further, the present invention is useful in modern mol~c~ ~ te~hn i ques using large array-hA~e~ strategies. In these strategies, the probe molecules are covalently attached to a device-compatible substrate, often in a miniaturized format. Therefore, the exploitation of "smart" surfaces upon which to perform hybridization is CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 imminently useful in ~ zing the information output of modern detection devices.
The present invention provides a device and method to improve the specificity of nucleic acid hybridization on solid supports. ~his in turn leads to significant increases in the sensitivity and discrimination power of DNA and RNA based biosensors and related hybridization techni~ues.

8ummary of the Invention An object of the present invention is a hybridization device for detecting a target area in a DNA.
An additional object of the present invention is a hybridization device for detecting a target area in an RNA.
A further object in the present invention is 2 method for detecting a target area in a DNA or a RNA.
Thus, in accompl;ch;ng the foregoing objects, there is provided in accordance with one aspect of the present invention a hybridization device comprising an oligonucleotide probe, and a solid substrate, said ~olid substrate having a support surface with a neutral or negative electrostatic field and having a hybridization surface wherein said hybridization surface i~ accessible for 1 inkin~ said oligonucleotide probe to said solid ~ubstrate and wherein said oligonucleotide probe is linke~ to the hybridization ~urface of said solid substrate at a distance of no more than about 100 ar.y~L~ ~.

In one specific embodiment the oligonucleotide probe is linked to the hybridization surface by a CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 WO97/18226 PCT~Ss6/18212 covalent linkage or a slowly reversible, non-covalent linkage.

In one specific ~ ho~1ment the distance is no more - than about 50 angstroms. In the preferred embodiment the distance is about 20 angstroms.

In specific ~-ho~;ments the su~o~L surface has a negative electrostatic field. This can include the support surface having a layer of negatively charged protein film, or a composition which ~witches the charge of the electrostatic field in the range of Ph 5-8. Further, the support surface or hybridization surface can be composed of compositions where the electrostatic field is more cationic during hybridization and more anionic during washing.
Additionally, the support surface or hybridization surface can be c~ of compositions where the electrostatic field is cationic or neutral at Ph 5-6 and negatively charged at Ph 7-8.

In specific embodiments the hybridization surface is selected from the group consisting of streptavidin, imidazole derivative, carboxylic acid, histidine derivative, citrate and other ~ou~s with a Pk value near neutrality. Further, the hybridization surface can be an arginine derivative, salmine Al, a salmine Al-probe ch; ~~a linked to the support surface, an amino acid, an amino acid ester or a mixture of amino acids and/or amino acid esters.

In a specific embo~ t the hybridization surface i8 comprised of two or more different compounds.

In one embodiment the support surface is poly~Ly~ene; the hybridization surface is streptavidin;
the oligonucleotide probe has been modified to include biotin; and the oligonucleotide probe is linked to the hybridization surface by non-covalent interaction of the biotin with the streptavidin.

In specific embodiments the support surface i8 selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl, poly~Lylene, polypropylene and polyester; the hybridization surface is a carboxylic acid surface placed on the ~u~o~L surface; the oligonucleotide probe has been modified to include an amino group; and the modified probe is covalently linked to the hybridization surface.

In a specific embodiment the support surface is glass and the oligonucleotide probe and glass form a substrate surface-probe complex by linking the probe to the substrate surface by an epoxysilane linkage to a ter~inAl amine modification, and the substrate surface-probe complex forms an effective hybridization surface.

Another specific emho~ i ~ent includes a method for detecting single base difference in a target area of a strand of DNA or RNA comprising ;Y; ng a hybridization device with DNA or RNA Con~A; n i~g the target area to be detected; allowing sufficient time ~or the target area to hybridize to the hybridization device; altering the environment of the hybridization probe and DNA or RNA
target area to remove non-hybridized DNA or RNA; and detecting the DNA or RNA hybridized to the hybridization device.

CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 Other and further objects, features and advantages will be apparent from the following description of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, which are given for the purpose of disclosure, when taken in - 5 conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

Brief Des¢ription of the Drswings Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation showing modulation of duplex formation by surface physical Ch~ try.
Figures 2A, 2B and 2C are schematic representations of probe coupling methodologies.
Figure 3 shows the surface state ionic strength dep~n~nç~ of K-ras 12 mer duplexes.
Figures 4A and 4B demonstrate the Ph effects on the eleuL~ GD Latic nature of a prototypical "smart"
surface (streptavidin) as revealed by dissociation kinetics of hybridization at Ph 7.2 or Ph 5.2.
Figures 5A and 5B demonstrate the Ph and cation effects on dissociation kinetics.
Figure 6 is a schematic of a secondary structure assay.
Figures 7A and 7B show hybridization of a hairpin forming target at low ionic strength. Signal intensity given in Relative Light Units (RLUs) from a luminometer.
Figure 8 is a schematic of duplex formation in a protamine model.
Figures 9A and 9B show selectivity ~nhAnC~ment by Salmine A1 in Na' solutions (Fig. 9A) versus protamine solutions (Fig. 9B).
Figure 10 shows the results of hybridization on the surface with a 19 mer oligonucleotide.

CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 Figures llA and llB are schematic representations of an amino acid hybridization surface showing a plurality of amino acids.
Figures 12 to 17 are schematic representations of various hybridization surfaces on solid substrates.
The drawings are not nec~-cc~ily to scale.
Certain features of the invention may be exaggerated in scale or shown in C~h- ~tic form in the interest of clarity and conc;c~n~c~.

Detailed Des¢ription It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that various substitutions and modifications may be made to the invention disclosed herein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
The term "oligonucleotide probe" as used herein defines a molecule comprised of more than three deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides. The exact length will depend on ~any factors l~i ng to the ultimate function or use of the oligonucleotide probe, ~0 including temperature, source of the probe and use of the method. The oligonucleotide probe can occur naturally as in a purified restriction digest or be pro~-~ce~ synthetically. The oligonucleotide probe is capable of bin~i ng to DNA or RNA targets when placed under conditions which induce b;n~ing of the target to the DNA or RNA strand. In the device and methods of the present invention, the oligonucleotide probes are usually at least greater than 10 mer in length and range from 10-30 mer. Sensitivity and specificity of the oligonucleotide probes are determined by the probe length, uni~l~n~Cc of se~uence and localized environment. Probes which are too short, for example less than 10 mer, may show non-specific binding to a CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 wide variety of sequences in the DNA or RNA and thus are not very helpful.
It is known that probes which are substantially complementary to a strand of DNA or RNA will bind to - 5 that specific strand of DNA and RNA. Thus, in order for a probe to bind, the probe sequence need not reflect the exact complementary sequence of the DNA or RNA, however, the more closely it does reflect the exact sequence the better the b; n~; n~O This ability to bind without the exact sequences reflects the fact that the probe can bind the DNA or RNA where there is a "base mismatch". The term "base mismatch" refers to a change in the oligonuc}eotide such that when the probe lines up with the known sequence an abnormal bonding pair of nucleotides i8 formed. Normally ~l~nin~ ~G) and cytosine ~C) bind and A~; ne (A) and thymine (T) bind in the formation of double-stranded nucleic acids.
Thus, the stAn~A~d base pairing, A-T or G-C is not seen in base mismatch pairing. A variety of base mismatches can occur, for example G-G, C-C, A-A, T-T, A-G, A-C, T-G or T-C. This mispairing and the effects of localized enviLo ~nts on the efficiency of bi n~; n~ is used in the present invention to detect the mispairing. When there are base ~ -tches between a probe and DNA or RNA, the probe will bind preferentially to the strand that has the fewest base mismatches under the most stringent conditions. The method of the present invention provides a way to alter the conditions such that the combination with the fewest base mismatches will preferentially bind to the probe.

As used in the present invention a "solid su~strate" is the material which forms the solid support for the device or the hybridization reaction.

CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 It is composed of a substrate surface and a hybridization surface. The substrate surface can be selected from a variety of materials including polyvinyl, polysLylene, polypropylene, polyester, other plastics, glass, SiO2, other silanes, gold or platinum.
Each solid support will have a substrate surface and a hybridization surface. The hybridization surface can be selected from a variety of materials including those shown in Table 1 (Example 11) and other materials such as organic acids, inorganic acids, organic bases and inorganic bases. This can include amino acids, peptides and other short polymers. When amino acids are used, the preferred embodiment uses the methyl esters since they are commercially available and are not altered by the formation reactions.
~ he hybridization surface can also ~e an '~effective hybridization ~urface." For example, a probe can have a sufficient charge that when it is 1 ;nk~ to the solid substrate, it creates a localized positive, neutral or negative enviLc~ -nt at the surface of the solid substrate. This localized environment creates the hybridization surface. The support surface provides the positive, neutral or negative charge density nere~sary for the present 2~ invention.
The hybridization surface can be composed of a single compound or be compos~ of a combinatorial of a plurality of different compounds. One skilled in the art, using the teachings of the combinatorial method herein, will be readily able to determine, without undue experimentation, the compounds or plurality of compounds which are most efficient for a given probe to bind and/or distinguish DNA or RNA target sites. , CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 W097/18226 PCT~ss6/18212 The physical outcome of hybridization performed on a surface can include the hybridization surface itself as an integral part of the bi n~; ng reaction. This is illustrated in Figure 1. An important aspect of this illustration is the availability of free reactive ~,ou~s on the surface. These free reactive groups can be secondarily modified after the probe linkage to the hybridization surface. This secondary modification can be performed with an exLL~ -ly large repertoire of mon~ -~ic or oligomeric molecules using the same straightforward coupling chemistry used to link the probes. Examples of such molecules include all primary and modified amino acids, oligopeptides, polysaccharides, lipids and at least tens of tho~
of other small organic molecules. The hybridization surface can include either only one of these molecules on the surface or some combination of these molecules.
Thus, at least one molecule is used to alter the surface charge and water molecule binding (wetting) of~0 the hybridization surface.
one skilled in the art of course recognizes that the ability to evaluate such a large library of potentially beneficial surface modifications with regard to hybridization rate enhancement or specificity is highly dependent on the availability of high-throughput screening methodologies. One effective method for this high-throughput uses robotically placed probe arrays on the surface of microtiter plate wells.
Using this technology, each microtiter well of a s6-well plate contains a probe array representing a desired combination of matched and mismatched probes with regard to target specificity. Additionally, each well can contain some variant or surface modification or can be subjected to different bulk solution CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 components. Thus, one 96-well microtiter plate in which each well contains 16 probes will yield 16 x 96 l,536 individual hybridization data points.
one ~ ho~ i ~nt of the present invention is a hybridization device which exploits surface physical chemistry to ~nhAnce the selectivity and sensitivity of hybridization assays for detecting DNA or RNA
sequences. This hybridization device comprises a solid substrate and an oligonucleotide probe, wherein the solid substrate includes a hybridization surface having a neutral or negative charge density, said hybridization surface is accessible for linking to the oligonucleotide probe by a covalent linkage or a slowly reversible, non-covalent linkAge and wherein said oligonucleotide probe is linked to the hybridization surface at a distance of no more than about lOO
a~ oms.
one skilled in the art will rDcognize that this distance is not an exact measurement. The magnitude of the surface effect decreases progressively as the distance from the surface increases. When the distance i~ about lOO as~L}oms~ the surface effect begins to become negligible relative to the bulk solution effect.
The distance is selected to allow ~or physical or electrostatic interaction between the target DNA or RNA
and the support surface and hybridization surface. The distance effects the binding equilibrium. The physical or electrostatic interaction can include, for example, an interaction between the duplex and (i) surface electric field, or (ii) the local high cation concentration near the surface.
In specific embo~; ~nts, the probe is linked at a distance of no more than about 50 angstroms from the CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 WO97/18226 PCT~S9~/18212 hybridization surface and in a preferred embodiment the linkage is about 20 angstroms.
- In other specific embodiments, the support surface can be made negatively charged by layering a thin negatively charged protein film on the solid substrate.
In a specific ~ ho~iment, the solid substrate is polystyrene, the hybridization surface is streptavidin, and the oligonucleotide probe has been modified to include biotin and the modified probe is linked to the hybridization surface by a non-covalent interaction of the biotin with the streptavidin.
In another specific em~hodiment the solid substrate is polyvinyl, polystyrene, pol~ lene or polyester, the hybridization surface is a thin carboxylic acid surface placed on the solid substrate and the oligonucleotide probe has been modified to include an amine group and the modified probe is covalently link~
to the hybridization surface.
In another specific emho~; ~nt, the oligonucleotide probe is linked to a glass solid substrate by an epoxysilane linkage to a tel ; n~ 1 amine modification. This l;nked solid substrate/probe creates an effective hybridization surface because the probe is sufficiently negative to provide a negatively 2~ charged environment in the probe/solid substrate localized area.
In another specific ~- ho~; -nt, the hybridization surface has a composition which switches electrostatic charge in the range of Ph 5-8.
In a specific ho~; ment, the hybridization device has a hybridization surface where the electrostatic field is main~A;~e~ at a negative potential. This allows for field-;n~lce~ destabilization of mismatched b;n~i~g.

WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 In another embodiment the hybridization curface has a composition where the surface electrostatic field is more cationic during hybridization and serves as a nucleic acid attractor, but heco -~ more anionic during washing so as to create a field-induced destabilization of mismatch b;nA;ng during wAshing.
One embodiment of the present invention is the use of film chemistries to produce a hybridization surface which has switchable electrostatics, i.e., the surface is cationic or neutral at Ph 5-6 so as to attract nucleic acid targets to the surface during hybridization, but which h~c~.~ negatively charged at Ph 7-8 to confer a selective ele~ LL 0~ Latic interaction between target molecules and the surface during w~ ch i n~.
In one specific embodiment of the switchi n~
effect, the composition of the hybridization surface is selected from the group consisting of streptavidin, imidazole derivatives, carboxylic acids and other groups with Pk values near neutrality. This can include histi~in~ derivatives and citrate. It should also be noted that although an individual carboxylic acid or imidazole may not have a Pk near neutrality the Pk may be effectively, near neutral when various combinations of compounds are used. In another emhoAi~e~t the hybridization surface can be arginine derivat~ve. Further, the skilled artisiun will recogni~e that the hybridization surface could include amino acids, amino acid esters or a mixture of thereof.
A specific embodiment includes a hybridization surface comprised of a Salmine Al-probe ~hi -ra linked to the support surface.
Another specific ~hoAiment includes a hybridization surface comprising a Salmine Al and or CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 Salmine A1-probe chimera. This hybridization surface is selected to create high selective binding of target - to the surface in the absence of exogenous salt ions.
Another ~mho~iment includes a method for detecting ~ 5 single base dif~erence in a target area of a strand of DNA or RNA, comprising, mixing any of the hybridization devices of the present invention with ~NA or RNA
contA;ning the target area to be detected, allowing sufficient time for the probe on the hybridization device to hybridize to the target area of the DNA or RNA, altering the environment of the hybridized probe/DNA or RNA, and detecting the probe/DNA or RNA
r ~ ; ning after the alteration. Although a variety of methods are available for altering the environment, one common method is to wash the bound probe/DNA or RNA
with a solution having the specific characteristics to induce the change. For example, this could include Ph changes, ionic changes and other conditions.
Another embodiment is a method and device to obtain a precise hA-Ance of surface charge and/or charge swit~-hing during hybridization and wA~h;ng;
and/or surface water binding by using parallel combinatorial scr~nings of compounds for hybridization surfaces. In a specific e~ho~;ment, this includes the use of amino acid derivatives as hybridization surfaces.
In nucleic acid hybridization analyses involving oligonucleotide probes covalently tethered to a two ~ ional surface, the rate and specificity of Watson-Crick type duplex formation is affected by the surface itself (i.e., the localized environment). This effect may be exploited to accentuate the thermodynamic co~c~quences of subtle, single base target-probe mismatches in a variety of underlying substrate WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 materials. The present invention provides the ability to modulate this surface effect to ~nh~nce duplex formation.
Because molecular biology t~hn; ques are increasingly h~CQ-ing formatted into highly parallel, array-based systems using sophisticated microelectronic detection methodology to increase the speed and throughput of data acquisition, it has become increasingly important to be able to control the reaction. For the information ouL~I of any array-based hybridization strategy to heC-- ?
- ~n i n~ful, it is nec~cc~y to understand in explicit detail all parameters affecting the thermodynamic stability of probe-target duplexes. This includes the altered reactivity of complementary nucleic acids at or near a solid-liquid interphase transition. Only by ~k;n~ into account the above mentioned holln~Ary conditions will perfectly matched duplexes be feasibly distinguished from relatively stable yet mismatched target-probe pairings.
The present invention is a rational use of solid support materials and the chemical alterations of such materials such that the surface becomes an active participant in the hybridization process in a predictable and beneficial manner. This invention enco~r~ses the following:
1. The ion ~r~n~nc~ of duplex formation at the surface (i.e., localized environment) differs significantly from that in bulk solution and is selectively destabilizing for mismatched duplexes at low cation concentrations.
2. Indep~n~nt of general surface physical phenomena, the chemical nature of the surface may be e modified guite readily to provide surfaces differing in CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 the nature of their ele~LLo~Latic charge, hydrophobicity, density of probe molecules per unit area, tether length, and other characteristics.
Further, the surfaces may be chemically modified such that the physical manifestations are "tunable" by altering bulk solution parameters (e.g., Ph and bulk cation concentration).
3. The ability to chemically modify surfaces with desirable physical properties with regard to hybridization rate ~nh~nC~ment and specificity can be performed in a combinatorial fashion. one skilled in the art will understand from the description herein that this screening methodology allows for the detection of various hybridization surfaces in the shortest amount of time. In one specific example, the use of a variety of amino acids is tested by using the methyl esters of the amino acids. Since these methyl esters are c -~cially available, the favorable effects of these compounds is readily explored with the combinatorial methodology.
One of the advantages of the present invention is that there is a device and a method which can be used for hybridization of probes to target DNA or RNA at low bulk ion concentrations. This method is effective because the surface loading of cations on a solid support creates a hybridization surface that results in a high local cation density near the surface. This localized high cation density can be used to obviate target folding and side reactions. Thus, the present invention contemplates a device in which the support surface and hybridization surfaces interact to form a high local cation density for facilitating the b;~~in~
of a probe to a target DNA sequence.

CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 one specific advantage of the present invention is that the electrostatic field created on the surface of a solid substrate by the hybridization surface can be used to ~nhAn~ the selectivity of duplex binding due to the interaction between the mismatches in the target, the probe and the electrostatic ~ield of the surface.
Another benefit of the present invention is that a surface field i8 created which is switchable. This ability to switch the surface charge allows ~or a surface with a local ion electrostatic field which attracts the DNA or RNA during the hybridization stage yet can be altered such that local ion electrostatic field changes during the wA~h i ng phase and cannot selectively interact with mismatches providing preferential binding or ~i~A~cociation among the mismatched target se~7~n~C. In this proc~l~e, the target sequence which has the fewest iF~-tches with the probe will preferentially bind to the probe.
Another advantage of the present invention is that salmine Al and its derivatives either used alone or as part of a covalent probe complex will obviate the requirement for exogenous cations in a hybridization assay.
Another crucial aspect of the present invention is that by the use of combinatorial methods the device or the methods of the present invention can be fine-tuned.
The surface can become a cationic attractor during hybridization and a negatively charged discriminator during w~sh; ng . One aspect of the present invention is the method which employs a combinatorial surface chemistry using amino acid derivatives as the surface chemistry. It should be noted that the combinatorial surface chemistry which generates a plurality of CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 WO97/18226 PCT~S96118212 c~ ounds for the hybridization surface is especially attractive when using amino acid derivatives.
- In a specific embodiment, aminated poly~Ly.ene is coated as a thin layer of succinic acid on a solid substrate. By reaction with succinic anhydride a probe will be linked to this surface by amide bond formation between the amine modified probe and the carboxylated surface. Remaining (unused) carboxylates will be modified with the methyl ester of amino acids employing the same carboxylic acid coupling used to attach the probe. Modified amino acids will be added in pairs so to create surfaces with all possible mole ratios of surface chemistries (i.e., carbohydrate, amino acid l, amino acid 2, etc.). Because of their c -~cial availability, the O-methyl esters of the amino acids were chosen as an example to ~: onctrate this principle. The st~n~A~d amino acids can be varied to obtain the desired surface physical chemistries.
Various amino acids and their characteristics are well known to those skilled in the art. By the use of these methods of a variety of hybridization devices can be developed.
An additional embodiment includes a method of ~k; ng a library of hybridization devices. one method to generate the library of hybridization devices, involves using hybridization devices each having a substrate surface of glass and an oligonucleotide probe linked to the substrate surface by an epoxysilane linkage to a terminal amino modification to form a substrate surface-probe complex wherein said complex forms an effective hybridization surface. The method comprises the step of converting unreacted epoxysilane groups to the corresponding cationic, neutral or anionic derivative by treating said epoxysilane yL OU~

CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 wos7/18226 PCT~S96/18212 with a reaction compound selected from the group consisting of, an amino acid, an amino acid ester snd mixture thereof.

Another method to generate a library of hybridization devices involves using hybridization devices each having a substrate surface of glass and an oligonucleotide probe linked to the substrate ~urface by an epoxysilane l;nkAge to a terminal amino modification to form a substrate surface-probe complex wherein said complex forms an effective hybridization surface. In this method the unreacted epoxysilane groups are converted to the corresponding cationic, neutral or anionic derivative by treating said epoxysilane groups with a reaction compound consisting o~ an amino con~A; n i ng chemical compound.

A further method to generate a library of hybridization devices, includes using hybridization devices each having a substrate surface selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl, poly~Ly ene, polypropylene and polyester, a hybridization surface of carboxylic acid placed on the support surface, an oligonucleotide probe modified to include a compound selected from the group consisting of an amino acid, an amino acid ester and mixture thereof. The modified oligonucleotide probe is reacted with the carboxylic acid group to covalently link the probe to the hybridization surface.
A library of hybridization devices with multiple hybridization surfaces is generated in a glass bottom microtiter plate by treating each well separately with a reaction compound. Thus, each well can provide a different hybridization surface if it is treated with a CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 different reaction compound or mixture of reaction compounds.
-An additional embodiment includes a method to screen the activity of a library of hybridization devices, comprising the steps of mixing the library with DNA or RNA contA; n i n~ a target area to be detected; allowing sufficient time for the target area to hybridize to the library of hybridization device;
removing the non-hybridized DNA or RNA; and detecting the DNA or RNA hybridized to the hybridization surface.

Another embodiment includes a library of hybridization devices comprising a plurality of oligonucleotide probes; and a plurality of solid ~ubstrate, wherein each solid substrate has a ~u~olL
surface with a neutral or negative electrostatic field and a hybridization surface wherein each hybridization surface is accessible for linking one of the plurality of oligonucleotide probes to said solid substrate and wherein said oligonucleotide probe is linked to the hybridization surface of the solid substrate at a distance of no more than about 100 ang~L~ . One preferred embo~i ~nt of the library includes a microtiter plate where each well in the plate is a different hybridization device.
The following examples are offered by way of example, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any manner.

~mpl~ 1 Probe Coupling 8ubstrate ~h~ ; ~trie8 CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 Figure 2 illustrates covalent and non-covalent probe immobilization methodologies which were employed for surface hybridization modeling studies.
Figure 2A demonstrates the use of streptavidin coated microtiter plate wells. In this procedure a streptavidin monolayer hybridization surface was proAl~e~ by an aqueous deposition of a dilute solution of the protein to the polystyrene wells. Probes were modified by attaching biotin to the probes. The modified probes were then attached to the hybridization surface by the non-covalent biotin-streptavidin interaction.
Figure 2B demonstrates the use of aminated plastic surfaces. In this procedure the pOlysLyrene was ~ ;n~ted by gas-phase plasma amination. Surface amines were converted to the carboxylic acid by reaction with succinic anhydride. Amine ~i f ied probes were linked to the surface by amide formation, mediated by EDC and HSSI.
Figure 2C demonstrates the use of epoxysilanized SiO2 surfaces. In this procedure an epoxysilane monolayer was affixed to sio2 by vapor deposition. The probe was linked to the monolayer by secondary amine formation to amine-modified probe.
Ex~mpl~ 2 Ioni¢ ~tr~ngth ~ ~n~n~g of Dupl~x Formation Near a 8urface The ionic strength ~ep~n~e~c~ of DNA-DNA or RNA-DNA hybrids near any of the modified surfaces described in Example 1 is greatly reduced as compared to solution state thermodynamics. Both solution state counterion con~enc~tion theory and solution state experiments were performed. The results, as expected from known data, demonstrate that, in solution, the log CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 of the association constant (K~) varies linearly with the log of ionic strength overia large range. In - contrast, for duplexes formed near the surface, the ionic strength depen~ence is flat over a large range and then association constants descend in a mismatch specific ~nner at lower Mm Na~ concentrations. This can be seen in Figure 3.
Figure 3, represents several pos~ible matched and ;~ -tched probe-target pairings from the K-ras oncogene codons 12 and 13. From Figure 3 it is readily apparent that:
1. The cation dependence of duplex formation is very shallow over the higher Na' concentration range (approximately 1 M - 1~0 Mm) and then begins to lower the K,values for binding in a manner consistent with the severity of the mismatch in the range between 100 and 10 Mm Na'.
2. The rank order of mismatched base pairings is consistent with known thermodynamic stabilities (i.e., Perfect match > G-A type mismatch > other non-G type single base mismatches > double base mismatches). At the lowest ionic strength tested (approximately 10 Mm), the K, for the perfectly matched pair has not ~i ;ni~hed noticeably, and is 10 - 50 fold higher than any other surface bound duplex. This result of excellent specificity which is found in the present invention is quite surprising since the common accepted theory predicts that duplexes of this~length should become unstable and ~ ociate at these low Na' concentrations.
The effect seen in Figure 3 has been demonstrated with many other surface duplex pairings. For example, epoxysilane-coated glass or sioZ, carboxamide derivatives of aminated polystyrene, carho~A ;de CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 WO 97/18226 rCT/US96/18212 derivatives of aminated polypropylene, other carboxylic acid derivatives of plastic, haloacetic acid derivatives of aminated plastics, plastic coated with neutral or negatively charged polymers such as the modified agaroses, organic thiol coated platinum, gold or other metals, organic acid coated gold, platinum or other metals or streptavidin or neutravidin coated plastic, glass or metal. Although the exact ~?ch~n;~
is not ~nown, the following characteristics of the system are consistent with theoretical and experimental knowledge:
1. The surface itself, being inherently negatively charged or hec ;ng so after the coupling of negatively charged probe molecules, coordinates Na' ions such that the effective molar co~centration of cations near the surface is much greater than that in bulk solution. This phenomenon was previously unknown for nucleic acid surface hybridization.
2. Upon lowering the bulk solution cation concentration, the negative electric field manifest by the surface becomes revealed, as a loss of screening cations results in an electrostatic force ex~en~ng a distance consistent with known Debye-Huckel parameters.
At the lower ionic strengths where large effects are seen for the duplex pairings, the predicted field would extend to include the region con~A; n ing target-probe pairs. Thus the field itself would be ~i n~ an additional ele~Lr~Latic force repulsing mismatched duplexes, thereby leading to greater specificity as seen in Figure 1. This rh~n~ -non was previously unknown for nucleic acid surface hybridization.
3. As the observed equilibrium values are dependent on both forward and reverse rate constants, it may be that the mean resident time of bound targets CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 at the surface is greater than that in solution. As a matter of physical reality, this must almost certainly - be true in that the number of possible ~i -n~ions in which a target may diffuse without encountering another probe is limited to essentially one (up). In addition, the probe, being immobilized at the surface, is not free to diffuse to any appreciable extent. Thus, the equilibrium effects described above in l. and 2. are principally manifested through the resonance time (i.e., off rate~ of the surface bound target.
Example 3 Field Ef f ects Manifest Ne~r a "Tunable" 8urfaGe ~8trepta~i~in) To demonstrate the effects of underlying charge with respect to duplex formation near a surface boundary, streptavidin modified polyxL~ r ene was used to link an oligonucleotide probe to the hybridization surface of the solid substrate. The b;n~;ng of biotinylated oligonucleotide probe is very tight (Kd approx. lO-15M), and due to the paracrystalline nature of these surfaces, the probes may be precisely positioned at 50 ~I~Lr. intervals (the physical separation of biotin binding sites on the streptavidin). More importantly, the streptavidin protein has a Pk of about 5.5, thereby yielding an ionizable surface which can be -~ lAted by subtle changes in the Ph of the hybridization buffer solution.
Thus, at neutral Ph the surface will be negatively charged; as the Ph is lowered the charge on the streptavidin becomes more electroneutral to positive.
It should also be noted that there is no effect on duplex formation in the range of Ph 5 - 9 in solution.
The equilibrium values as a function of Ph and the dissociation kinetics were examined. The association WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 rates for a number of probe-target duplexes were measured and found to be very similar, as would be predicted for a diffusion-limited process.
Figures 4A, 4B, 5A and 5B illustrate the dramatic effect on the dissociation kinetics of matched and mismatched duplexes caused by changing the Ph from neutrality to close to the Pk value of streptavidin. In fact, there i~ no appreciable dissociation at all at the lower Ph at any ionic strength. In contrast, at neutral Ph, dissociation occurs in a mismatch specific manner and is sensitive to ionic strength conditions.
Remarkably, it was found that specific duplex formation can occur at the lower Ph on streptavidin in distilled water where the surface is neutral to cationic. One skilled in the art readily recognizes that this result i8 contrary to expectations, since normally under the above conditions of low salt in solution, duplex formation cannot occur.
ExamplQ 4 Hybridizatio~ on 8urfa¢e~ at Low Io~ic 8trength a8 a Means of NQgati~g the Ff f ect of Target ~ ~y 8tructure In addition to achieving greater than expected binding and selectivity at extremely low ionic buffer conditions, the effect of secondary structure of large target molecules (intramol~c~lA~ base pairing), which in itself is ionic strength dependent, i8 overcome by hybridization on modified surfaces at low bulk cation concentrations.
To address this possibility, a synthetic target which is ~elf-complementary on each end (forms a hairpin) was designed such that if the target folds upon itself, the probe binding site is obscured. This is shown schematically in Figure 6.

CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 W~97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 The results from this assay are shown in Figures 7A and 7B. As can be seen in Figure 7A, there is a two to three fold increase in binding of the target at ~ lower ionic strengths (O - 5 Mm Na+) than at the higher ionic strengths. In addition, the binding shows ordinary dissociation kinetics indicating that the signal obtained is not due to non-specific adsorption of targets. Figure 7B also indicates that there is excellent specificity even at equilibrium with regard to a mismatched probe. These data establish that surface effects can allow for target b;n~;n~ under conditions which minimize folding artifacts in solution.
Example 5 Hi8t ~ ~ ~ n9 Modification of th~ 8ur~ace Another class of modification is represented by the amino acid histidine. Histidine i6 interesting in that its Pk value is around 6.7. At Ph values of around 8, its side chain charge is neutral. However, at Ph 6.0 its side charge is a cation and assumes a formal positive charge. Therefore, if a negatively charged surface is modified with histidine or its methyl ester at a Ph lower than 6.5, the surface will ~c_ ~
positively charged, and become a general attractor for nucleic acid targets. If during washing the Ph is raised to Ph 8.0, the surface will h~c - ~ more negative and will electrostatically repel non-specifically bound targets. In this fashion, the surface acts as a hybridization rate ~nhAnc~ and a discrimination enhancer during washing. This is, as mentioned, only one example of a potential surface which has even further interesting properties in addition to those already mentioned above. It is a good example of a switchable electrostatic surface useful in the present invention.
~x~mple 6 Prot~mine B~ n~

Salmine Al was used to asse s the effect of protamine binding on the stability of matched vs mismatched base pairing.
The ability of ~~l~;n~ Al to enhance b;n~ing by measuring the association constant for formation of 13 bp test duplexes, at 25~C in the preC~nc~ of increasing concentration of the 31 aa peptide Salmine Al, or Na' for comparison. Bin~ing affinity for matched and mismatched duplexes was measured.
The base pairing selectivity afforded by Salmine Al in aqueous solution was measured. This was done by a competition method. Briefly, a biotin -~;fied nucleic acid probe is linked to the surface of a microtiter well, by biotin-streptavidin coupling. Up to 96 different probes can be linked concurrently in this way, employing a BioMek robot. The 96 well competition assay only consumes 1 nanomole of Salmine Al. Thus, not very much material is needed for multiple assay~. 50 uL of complementary target was added in solution at 5x10-1~M, which upon bin~;ng to the surface, was generated accurate surface binding data when detected by chemiluminescence (AP/T- iphos 530)-Solution state b; n~; ng equilibria were ob~i neA by adding probe to the target ~olution (without biotin), or a probe homologue with base sequence changes.
Duplex formation in solution consumes free target, thereby reducing the amount of target bound to the surface at equilibrium. By monitoring surface binding while performing a solution state probe titration, an CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 accurate binding isotherm was obtained, to yield the association constant for duplex formation.
- Large libraries of 9, ll, 13 and l9 bp duplex pairs were synthesized and analyzed in the above~ 5 microtiter ~ormat. For the Salmine Al analysis, a 13 bp assay set was employed. ~his set focused on the set of 32 duplex pairs described below. This set allowed the observation of the effect of Salmine Al on all mismatches, flanked by AT or GC base pairs.
13 BP TEXT DUPLEXE~:
5'--CTGGCG~-AA~A~C--3' AT ~ICH FLANK
3'-GACCGC~llYlAG-5' 5'-CTGG~ AA~ATC-3' GC ~ICH FLANK
3'-GACCYCCTTATAG-5' wherein X is A,T,G or C and Y is A,T,G or C.
In Figure 9A, the solution state association constants are displayed as a function of Na' ion concentration for 13 bp duplex formation. The perfectly matched (PM) 13 mer duplex displays approximately a 30-fold increase in association constant per lO-fold Na' ion concentrate in the range ~rom l.8 to 180 Mm, as expected from published theory.
Duplexes bearing a single CA or GA i~ -tch display affinities which are reduced by a factor of 50 relative to the perfect match, at all Na~
concentrations greater than 18 Mm (solid bars).
By comparison, in Fig. 9B, solution state duplex formation in the presence of Salmine Al saturates at approximately lOOO fold lower ion concentrate than for Na'. Over the range from 30 nanomolar to l Mm of added .~A 1 ;ne Al. The solution state association constant ~or mismatched duplex formation is at least lOOO-fold lower than for the perfectly matched 13 bp duplex. The selectivity is sufficiently high that mismatched duplex formation cannot be detected experimentally at Salmine A1 concentrations lower than 10 uM.
The result~ suggest that ~A 1~ ine A1 can drive high affinity double helix formation in solution at sub-micromolar concentration, and that in this range, the selectivity of duplex formation has ~een increased 20-50 fold relative to that seen when Na' ion is used to drive duplex formation.
Exa~ple 7 Effect of Amino A¢id 8~guance Change on ~rot~mi~e B l n~
The known members of the prot~ ine family, are described by the following consensus sequence:
.s~T~MT~E A1:
Pro-Arg-Arg-Arg-Arg-Ser-Ser-Ser-Arg-Pro-Val-Arg-Arg-Arg-Ag-Arg-Pro-Arg-Val-Ser-Arg-Arg-Arg-Arg-Arg-Gly-Gly-Art-Arg-Arg-Arg-COOH
CONSENSUS: [arg)n-bend]m-argn wherein n=3-5, m=3-5 and bend = 1-3 amino acid seguence capable of inducing a "kink" in the polypeptide backbone (pro, gly-gly, etc.) The 32 aa sequence of ~Alm;ne A1 easily falls into this consensus. One skilled in the art readily recognizes that the use of symmetrical derivatives of SalA1 is a design improvement. The symmetric derivatives can be synthesized blockwise much more inexr~ively than a unique 25-35 aa arginine-rich peptide of this kind.
Synthetic peptides are synthesized in small quantities, first varying the nature of the kink or bend in the molecule, then the span of the oligo-arginine domain.

First generation peptides:

CA 0223~762 Isss-0~-l3 WO97/18226 PCT~S96tl8212 [(arg)5-pro]5-arg5 23 aa rigid bend ~(arg)5-pro]4-arg5 29 aa rigid bend ~ [(arg)5-pro-gly~3-arg5 29 aa semi-rigid bend [(arg)5-pro-gly~4-arg5 33 aa semi-rigid bend t(arg)5-gly-gly]3-arg5 26 aa flexible bend t(arg)5-gly-gly]4-arg5 33 aa flexible bend Subsequent to identifying optimal bend above, the length of the oligo-arginine motif is varied:
~(arg)3-bend]3~arg3 t(arg)4-bend]3-arg4 t(arg)5-bend]3-arg5 ~xample 8 Ratlonal Design of AGtiV8 Sur~acQ Fil~8 When duplex formation is constrained to occur within lOO A of the solid support, solid phase nucleic acid hybridization will be affected by surface effects.
However, until the present invention, there was no published data which addressed the role of surface effects in nucleic acid hybridization, or how such surface effects might be exploited.
It is known that polystyrene can be coated with streptavidin. Streptavidin forms a paracrystalline monolayer, with sites for biotin binding positioned 50 a~ apart. Oligonucleotides are readily synthesized with a biotin group at the 3' terminus.
Streptavidin coated poly~Ly r ene was used as a prototype for the study of orderly surface films, to which probes can be affixed with spatial precision for the purpose of quantitative nucleic acid hybridization analysis.
Solution state nucleic acid targets were synthesized with digoxigenin (D) at the 3' teL ;nll~, so that duplex formation with probe oligomers on the streptavidin fil~
~u~Ol~ were monitored ~y anti-digoxigenin-AP

chemilumincsc~nce. A 96 well microliter format was employed, assayed with an EGG robotic luminometer.

PM 5'--TGACTGGCGr-AATA~CTGT-3'B probe D3'-ACTGACCGCCTTATAGACA-5' target CA S'---TGACTGGCG~-A~CTGT--3'B probe D3'-ACTGACCGCCT~A~-ACA-5' target GA 5'--TGACTGGCG~-AA~-~TCTGT-3'B probe D3~-ACTGACcGcCT~AG~-5~ target GT 5'--TGACTGGCG~-AA~-A~CTGT-3'B probe D3'-ACTGACCG~ AGACA-5' target B = BIOTIN and D = DIGOXIGENIN

Figure 10 displays the chemiluminescent signal due to bound target ~in relative luminescence units) vs the ~5 Na+ ion concentration used during hybridization and w~h;~g. Samples were hybridized for 12 hours at 25~C
and Ph 1.2, which was sufficient to reach binding equilibrium. Target conc~ntration was held constant at 5x10-1~M (strands). Probe density is fixed at 4x10-1~
molecules per mm2, which constitutes saturation of t~e available biotin binding sites (roughly 1 probe per 50 angstroms on center).
With a target with a perfectly matched 19 mer duplex (top curve), little or no Na' ion dep~n~enc~ was seen over the range from 20 Mm to 200 Mm and above. This e~fect is not due to saturation of available probe sites on the surface (less than 1% of probes are bound to target in this assay) and has been seen for all duplexes in the 10-20 bp range.
Further, none of the signal obtained in these experiments can be ascribed to trivial e~fects such as surface absorption, since targets with double mismatches do not yield b; n~ ing signals above back~oul.d.

CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 Therefore, the data suggest that the ionic strength ~p~n~ence of duplex formation on the orderly streptavidin coated surface is quite different than that of double helix formation in solution.
Upon reducing bulk Na~ c~nrentrate to 10 Mm, an abrupt 3 fold diminishment of target binding is detected (Fig. 10), indicative of a physical discontinuity in the binding proces~ in the 10-20 Mm range. Since ~L.epLavidin is negatively charged at Ph 7.2, the paracrystalline streptavidin surface film must produce a negative surface potential. St~A~d ~ouye-Debye theory predicts that this surface potential should decay exponentially, with a l/e length near to 30 angstroms at 10 Mm. Since that length is near to the separation between the surface film and the bound duplex, the Na' ion ~;~continuity detected below 20 Mm is a direct result of the interaction between the surface field and the bound double helix.
The lower curves of Figure 10 correspond to b; n~; ~g data for targets which yield a single CA, &A or GT
mismatch in the 19 mer duplex. The single mismatches cannot be detected in such 19 mer duplex above 100 Mm of Na+ ion, the stA~A~d Na' range for hybridization analysis of duplexes of this size at 25~C.
However, upon reducing the Na' ion ~o~entration below the point of ~;scQntinuity at 20 Mm, single base mismatches can now be detected in a 19 mer duplex, giving rise to a clear 5-fold signal differential. This mismatch discrimination is maximized below 20 Mm Na', for duplexeA in the 9-19 mer range.

~xampl~ 9 ~Ll~I,~vidin B;n~in~J

WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 At low ion concentration, interaction with the ~ur~ace electrostatic field is an explicit source of target binding selectivity. This was further demonstrated using streptavidin which has a PK of about 5.5 Since double helix stability has little Ph dependence in solution between Ph 5-8, target b;n~ing was measured at Ph 5.2, where the streptavidin film is nearly neutral and at Ph 7.2, where the surface potential due to streptavidin is large and negative. The kinetics of target dissociation were monitored by employing the 12 bp test duplex and the highly quantitative chemiluminec~nc~
assay .
In this kinetics experiment, target b;n~;ng was allowed to reach equilibrium during the "hybridization"
phase o~ the assay at 50 Mm Na', ph 7.2. ~issociation kinetics were monitored with vigorous rotary ;~i ng over 180 min during the "washing" phase by changing the buffer to 5 Mm Na' at time zero, at either Ph 7.2 (Fig. 4A), or Ph 5.0 tFig. 4B).
Target controls which yield a doubly mismatched duplex do not yield measurable signals in this kinetic assay, therefore all signals in this kinetic assay are due to oligonucleotide-oligonucleotide binding.
In these kinetics, the zero time intercept aorresponds to the outcome of the binding equilibrium obtA;ne~ at 50 Mn Na' Ph 7.2. As would be inferred from the l9 mer data (Fig~. lOA and lOB), the CA, but not the GA mismatch was ~;~c~nable from the perfect match at this "high salt" equilibrium condition. At neutral Ph (7.2) (Fig. 4A), substantial ~i~sociation kinetics, with rates which are roughly proportional to the equilibrium value detected at time zero (~A>R~>~M) were observed.
From a practical point of view, the data show that the selectivity of duplex formation increases steadily CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 with time, the ratio of matched vs mismatched target after a 180 min "wash" being lO fold greater than at equilibrium.
More flln~A~ntally, the data suggest that at 5 Mm Na' ion concentration and Ph 7.2, the mean residence time of the duplex upon the surface has h~c - dependant upon single base pair mismatches.
In principle, this kinetic distinction could be due to interaction within the double helix, or to the interaction of the helix with the surface field. In order to separate these two possibilities, we have repeated the kinetics experiment, keeping Na' ion fixed at 5 Mm, but lowering the Ph of the wash solution to 5.2.
Here, the streptavidin surface should h~c- ~ nearly uncharged, but the internal stability of the duplex should remain unaffected.
Figure 4B shows that surface neutralization has an enormous effect on duplex dissociation rate. The rates have h~ too slow to measure for both matched and ; ~tched duplexes upon the neutralized streptavidin surface. The kinetic data therefore indicate that it is the electrostatic interaction with the surface, and not internal duplex electrostatics which dominate the kinetics of short duplex formation at Ph 7 upon streptavidin coated polystyrene.
Thus, the electrostatic field near the solid support plays an active role in defining the affinity and selectivity of double helix formation in hybridization.
The skilled artisan will readily recognize that the streptavidin model is not unique in this regard.
The skilled artisan will readily recognize that a variety of compositions are useful as hybridization surfaces. Examples of some useful compositions are shown in Table l and Figures 12-17.

WO 97/18226 PCTAU$96/18212 EX ~ pl~ lO

R~t~ Design of Aativ~ 8urf~ce Films In addition to strep~avidin, chemically simpler surfaces were prepared which display ~imilarly useful physical featur~. A 20 mil polypropylene was plasma aminated to 0.5x~0~~mo~e/cm2. This is a durable, high quality substrate, which is available commercially in large quantities.
Several surface ~h-ri~tries listed in Table 1 were tested. All are consi~tent with high effici~ncy attachment of amine-modified oligonucleotide probes.

Table 1. Activation of Amines Ion Fig.
No. Nsme & Ph No. ~escription l. Streptavidin Anjr~nir~ 12 The bond fc ~r~n coated ~urface Ph 7 . 0 b _ ~ ~n biotLn and MtreptavidLn Ln very rapid snd once formed, L~
unaffected by mo~t extremQs of Ph, organLc aolvent~ and dQt~rgent~.
2. SuccLnic An~r~n~ 13 SuccLnic anhydride LB a anhydrLde Ph 7.0 good acylatLng agent, and = ly u~ed to immo~iliz~ bLopolymer~
onto a ~urface through an amide bond.
3. Cyanogen b,~ ~rl~ Neutral 14 Cy~oy~n bromLde L~ a Ph 7.0 ver~atLle reagent ha~
been wLdely u~ed in actLvatLon of ~olLd matrLce~ con~ n ~ n ~ n~
hyd~yl and amLno groups. It react~ wLth then~ ~urfaces quLckly to form a reactLve group whLch L~ ~u~ceptLble to nucleop~;lic attack by an amino group and result~
Ln a gu~ni~inr~ lLnkage.

Ion Fig.
No. Name & Ph No. Description 4. ~-Haloacid~ N~utral, 15 ~_u~ ~i~ are very zwittQrion r~activc and arQ c - ly Ph 7.0 u~d alkylating agents.
The rQactivity of the haloacids is a function of th~ halo~en in the order of DBr~Cl.
Alkylation of amines with haloacids is one way of c~..v~LLing aminss to their co~,~n~A;n~
carboxylLc acids. a-Haloacids such as ioAnA~etic acid or b ~ ~c~tic acid alkylate~ nucleophilQs, such as an umino group, to give c~L,n~ ing acid derivativ~. a,~-TJn~At~ated acids such as acrylic acid and b . --~rylic acid aro known to r~act with primary amines to give CO ~l~G~ i n~ high~r homologuQs.
5. Ethyl~ne oxide ~t;~ni~ 16 C~.. ~ ion of an amine Ph 7.0 group to an l~l,v~r can be achieved with ethylQne oxide. Oxiran~ will be c~.~v~ LQd to alcohols then can be co..~_~Led to good leaving group.
6. ~pi ~hl orohydrin C~ 17 ~tchl ~ohydrLn activate~
Ph 7.0 matrices with nucleophile~ ~uch as amino or hyl v~yl to an ~p~Yi~ derivativQ. This ep~i~ derivative reacts with nucleoph~lic amino group.
These surface chemistries are employed as a 1; nk~
to the oligonucleotide and as a vehicle to alter the surface properties of the plastic substrate. At 5xlO~~M/cm2, the primary ~;n~C on the plastic surface are positioned approximately 7A apart. Upon coupling to the a~.opriate linker, a nearly uniform surface film results. Probe coupling is regulated so that only 1% of these linkages are consumed, the r~ ~i n; nq 99~ being unaltered in their chemical properties.
With this procedure, three classes of surface film can be obtained: cationic, neutral zwitterionic and anionic at Ph 7. The nominal Pk of the groups described in the accompanying table is far from neutrality.
However, in preli ; n~y results the apparent Pk of such densely-packed surface films may deviate greatly from that of the linker in isolation, pr~ ~ly due to the fact that, at 7A separation, charged groups are constrained to be within a Debye length, especially at low bulk ionic strength.
This Pk shift is studied by measuring the effect of bulk Ph change on the affinity and kinetics of target binding to those surfaces in the range from Ph 5-8. This effect is of importance in terms of basic hybridization technology.
~sx~mpl~ 11 A~ino Acid Co~binatorial Approach In Example 10, Table 1 showed the activation o~
amines on the solid substrate. Any of the chemistries 2-6 can be used for creating an amino acid combinatorial surface. As shown in Figures llA and llB, a plurality of amino acids can be attached to the surface. In the ~igures Rn m can be any two different amino acids attached to the surface. Thus, the surface can have several surface ch~ ;~tries. There is a probe, a first amino acid, a second amino acid an lln~o~;fied car~oxylic acid (Case 2 in Table }~ or unmodified linker chemistry ~Case 2-6 in Table 1).

-CA 0223~762 1998-0~-13 ~campl-~ 12 DevelopmQnt of an Oligonucleotide-Peptide Chimera Salmine A1 has no primary ~;nes and a single carboxylate group at its C-terminus. Therefore, it can be linked, uniquely, by stAn~Ard aqueous carboximide chemistry to a te~ inAl group synthesized onto an oligonucleotide: Pro-SAL-Al-CONH-OLIGO.
Chimera of this sort are purified by Sephadex G100 chromatography in 6 M GuHCl. The identity of the final ~0 complex is confirmed by ESMS. The ability of such ~h i ~ra to form SAL-Al probe target complexes is ~ both in solution, by the competition method, and on solid supports. For solid phase bi n~; ng analysis, the conjugate is linked to the surface by ~-n~ of biotin coupling, using probes which bear biotin at the 3' tel ;nll~, and a primary amine at the 5 ' ter ; ~ for covalent coupling to the prot~ ; ne.
Such conjugates form selective double helix-prot~mi~e triple helices in the ~h~ence of other cations.
From the results shown in the above Examples, it is apparent that modified "smart" surfaces may be used to considerable advantage with regard to the selectivity of duplex formation as well as by negating the effect of target s~on~Ary structure in solution.
These results have been ob~;ned on substrate materials which are compatible with developing microelectronic detection devices (i.e., optically pure and sturdy).
Some examples of these substrate surfaces include quartz, Si02, polystyrene, polypropyle~e and polyester.
The streptavidin Ph "tunable" surface was representative of only one of many possible chemical modifications which can be made using existing repertoires of surface chemistries. The present invention has shown that there are developed WO97/18226 PCT~S96/18212 methodologies to chemically modify a variety of surfaces in a combinatorial fashion, as well as ins~r~ -ntation to insure high throughput for scre~n; ng. One skilled in the art readily recognizes that there are a variety of beneficial modifications.
One skilled in the art recognizes that the present invention provides new and novel benefit~ including providing teAchings to modify the surface to enhance hybridization selectivity, sensitivity and discrimination power. Surface physical ch~i~try can be modified to play a significant role in duplex formation at surfaces, particularly with regard to ionic strength ~ep~n~ence. ~he participation of the surface in the bi n~; ng reaction is exploitable by the use of active chemical modifications. Finally, using the teachings of the present invention additional -~ifications can be rapidly searched by using combinatorial means.

Claims (28)

What we Claim is:
1. A hybridization device comprising:
an oligonucleotide probe; and a solid substrate, said solid substrate having a support surface with a neutral or negative electrostatic field and having a hybridization surface wherein said hybridization surface is accessible for linking said oligonucleotide probe to said solid substrate and wherein said oligonucleotide probe is linked to the hybridization surface of said solid substrate at a distance of no more than about 100 angstroms.
2. The hybridization device of Claim 1, where the oligonucleotide probe is linked to the hybridization surface by a covalent linkage or a slowly reversible, non-covalent linkage.
3. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the distance is no more than about 50 angstroms.
4. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the distance is about 20 angstroms.
5. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the support surface has a negative electrostatic field.
6. The hybridization device of Claim 5, wherein the support surface has a layer of negatively charged protein film.
7. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein:
the support surface is polystyrene;
the hybridization surface is streptavidin;
the oligonucleotide probe has been modified to include biotin; and wherein the oligonucleotide probe is linked to the hybridization surface by non-covalent interaction of the biotin with the streptavidin.
8. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein:
the support surface is selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl, polystyrene, polypropylene and polyester;
the hybridization surface is a carboxylic acid surface placed on the support surface;
the oligonucleotide probe has been modified to include an amino group; and wherein said modified probe is covalently linked to the hybridization surface.
9. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the substrate surface is glass and the oligonucleotide probe and glass form a substrate surface-probe complex by linking the probe to the substrate surface by an epoxysilane linkage to a terminal amine modification, and wherein said substrate surface-probe complex forms an effective hybridization surface.
10. The device of Claim 1, wherein the hybridization surface is comprised of a composition which switches the charge of the electrostatic field in the range of Ph 5-8.
11. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the electrostatic field is maintained or a negative potential.
12. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the electrostatic field is more cationic during hybridization and more anionic during washing.
13. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the electrostatic field is cationic or neutral at Ph 5-6 and negatively charged at Ph 7-8.
14. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the hybridization surface is selected from the group consisting of streptavidin, imidazole derivative, carboxylic acid, histidine derivative, citrate and other groups with a Pk value near neutrality.
15. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the hybridization surface is an arginine derivative.
16. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the hybridization surface is salmine A1.
17. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the hybridization surface is a salmine A1-probe chimera linked to the support surface.
18. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the hybridization surface is an amino acid, an amino acid ester or mixture thereof.
19. The hybridization device of Claim 1, wherein the hybridization surface is comprised of two or more different compounds linked covalently to the substrate surface.
20. A method for detecting single base difference in a target area of a strand of DNA comprising:
mixing a hybridization device with DNA
containing the target area to be detected;
allowing sufficient time for the target area to hybridize to the hybridization device;
altering the environment of the hybridization probe and DNA target area to remove non-hybridized DNA; and detecting the DNA hybridized to the hybridization device.
21. A method for detecting single base difference in a target area of a strand of RNA comprising:
mixing a hybridization device with RNA
containing the target area to be detected;
allowing sufficient time for the target area to hybridize to the hybridization device;
altering the environment of the hybridization probe and RNA target area to remove non-hybridized RNA; and detecting the RNA hybridized to the hybridization device.
22. A method to generate a library of hybridization devices, wherein each hybridization device in the library has a substrate surface of glass and an oligonucleotide probe linked to the substrate surface by an epoxysilane linkage to a terminal amino modification to form a substrate surface-probe complex wherein said complex forms an effective hybridization surface comprising the step of converting unreacted epoxysilane groups to the corresponding cationic, neutral or anionic derivative by treating said epoxysilane groups with a reaction compound selected from the group consisting of, an amino acid an amino acid ester and a mixture thereof.
23. The method of Claim 22, wherein multiple hybridization surfaces are generated in a glass bottom microtiter plate by treating each well separately with a reaction compound.
24. A method to generate a library of hybridization devices, wherein each of said hybridization devices has a substrate surface of glass and an oligonucleotide probe linked to the substrate surface by an epoxysilane linkage to a terminal amino modification to form a substrate surface-probe complex wherein said complex forms an effective hybridization surface comprising the step of converting unreacted epoxysilane groups to the corresponding cationic, neutral or anionic deviation by treating said epoxysilane groups with an amino containing chemical compound.
25. A method to generate a library of hybridization devices, wherein each of said hybridization devices has a substrate surface selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl, polystyrene, polypropylene and polyester, a hybridization surface of carboxylic acid placed on the support surface, an oligonucleotide probe modified to include a compound selected from the group consisting of an amino acid, an amino acid ester and a mixture thereof, comprising the step of reacting the carboxylic acid group with the modified oligonucleotide probe to covalently link the probe to the hybridization surface.
26. A method to screen the activity of a library of hybridization devices, comprising the steps of:
mixing the library with DNA containing a target area to be detected;
allowing sufficient time for the target area to hybridize to the library of hybridization device;
removing the non-hybridized DNA; and detecting the DNA hybridized to the hybridization surface.
27. A method to screen the activity of a library of hybridization devices, comprising the steps of:
mixing the library with RNA containing a target area to be detected;
allowing sufficient time for the target area to hybridize to the library of hybridization device;
removing the non-hybridized RNA; and detecting the RNA hybridized to the hybridization surface.
28. A library of hybridization devices comprising:
a plurality of oligonucleotide probes; and a plurality of solid substrates, wherein each solid substrate has a support surface with a neutral or negative electrostatic field and a hybridization surface wherein each hybridization surface is accessible for linking one of the plurality of oligonucleotide probes to said solid substrate and wherein said oligonucleotide probe is linked to the hybridization surface of the solid substrate at a distance of no more than about 100 angstroms.
CA002235762A 1995-11-14 1996-11-14 Integrated nucleic acid hybridization devices based upon active surface chemistry Abandoned CA2235762A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US669695P 1995-11-14 1995-11-14
US60/006,696 1995-11-14

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2235762A1 true CA2235762A1 (en) 1997-05-22

Family

ID=21722141

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002235762A Abandoned CA2235762A1 (en) 1995-11-14 1996-11-14 Integrated nucleic acid hybridization devices based upon active surface chemistry

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0910570A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2001508281A (en)
AU (1) AU7612296A (en)
CA (1) CA2235762A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1997018226A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7173011B2 (en) 2000-11-20 2007-02-06 University Of Southern California Radiation therapy methods
AU3659199A (en) * 1998-04-20 1999-11-08 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for reducing non-specific binding to a nucleic acid probe array
AU3150400A (en) * 1999-01-25 2000-08-07 Biochip Technologies Gmbh Immobilization of molecules on surfaces via polymer brushes
WO2001014585A1 (en) * 1999-08-24 2001-03-01 Europäisches Laboratorium für Molekularbiologie (EMBL) Immobilising and marking biopolymers
FR2802550B1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2004-03-05 Centre Nat Rech Scient BIOCUCES, PREPARATION AND USES
CA2399189A1 (en) 2000-02-22 2001-08-30 Genospectra, Inc. Microarray fabrication techniques and apparatus
US6594432B2 (en) 2000-02-22 2003-07-15 Genospectra, Inc. Microarray fabrication techniques and apparatus
AU2000269393A1 (en) * 2000-03-09 2001-09-17 Genometrix Genomix, Inc. Integrated nucleic acid hybridization devices
JP4312595B2 (en) * 2001-07-11 2009-08-12 ベイラー カレッジ オブ メディシン Method and apparatus based on a novel form of nucleic acid duplex on a surface
US6984485B2 (en) 2002-04-23 2006-01-10 Beckman Coulter, Inc. Polymer-coated substrates for immobilization of biomolecules and cells
US20030198967A1 (en) * 2002-04-23 2003-10-23 Matson Robert S. Multi-functional microarrays and methods

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5599667A (en) * 1987-03-02 1997-02-04 Gen-Probe Incorporated Polycationic supports and nucleic acid purification separation and hybridization
WO1990001564A1 (en) * 1988-08-09 1990-02-22 Microprobe Corporation Methods for multiple target analyses through nucleic acid hybridization
US5237016A (en) * 1989-01-05 1993-08-17 Siska Diagnostics, Inc. End-attachment of oligonucleotides to polyacrylamide solid supports for capture and detection of nucleic acids
CA1337639C (en) * 1989-08-01 1995-11-28 Joseph Eugene Celebuski Dna probe assay using neutrally charged probe strands
DE69032425T2 (en) * 1990-05-11 1998-11-26 Microprobe Corp., Bothell, Wash. Immersion test strips for nucleic acid hybridization assays and methods for covalently immobilizing oligonucleotides
GB9208921D0 (en) * 1992-04-24 1992-06-10 Isis Innovation Electrochemical treatment of surfaces
AU5532196A (en) * 1995-04-03 1996-10-23 New York University Methods for measuring physical characteristics of nucleic ac ids by microscopic imaging

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0910570A4 (en) 2002-01-16
WO1997018226A1 (en) 1997-05-22
JP2001508281A (en) 2001-06-26
EP0910570A1 (en) 1999-04-28
AU7612296A (en) 1997-06-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6245518B1 (en) Polynucleotide arrays and methods of making and using the same
EP0677057B1 (en) Biopolymer synthesis utilizing surface activated, organic polymers
US7608396B2 (en) Systems, tools and methods of assaying biological materials using spatially-addressable arrays
EP1370690B1 (en) Arrays and methods of use
US6110676A (en) Methods for suppressing the binding of detectable probes to non-target sequences in hybridization assays
US6013789A (en) Covalent attachment of biomolecules to derivatized polypropylene supports
US6268210B1 (en) Sandwich arrays of biological compounds
Brandt et al. PNA microarrays for hybridisation of unlabelled DNA samples
US20030077609A1 (en) Modified oligonucleotides and uses thereof
US7183050B2 (en) Gradient resolved information platform
EP0405913B1 (en) Hydrophobic nucleic acid probe
EP1556506A1 (en) Molecular arrays and single molecule detection
O'Donnell-Maloney et al. The development of microfabricated arrays for DNA sequencing and analysis
US20050181384A1 (en) Selectivity of nucleic acid diagnostic and microarray technologies by control of interfacial nucleic acid film chemistry
CA2235762A1 (en) Integrated nucleic acid hybridization devices based upon active surface chemistry
AU742599B2 (en) Multiple functionalities within an array element and uses thereof
US20100035248A1 (en) Surface-based nucleic acid assays employing morpholinos
EP0721458B1 (en) Biopolymer synthesis utilizing surface activated, organic polymers
WO2001066687A1 (en) Integrated nucleic acid hybridization devices
EP0815259B1 (en) Modulation of the binding properties of nucleic acid binding partners
WO2001036585A1 (en) Sequence tag microarray and method for detection of multiple proteins through dna methods
CA2363510A1 (en) Selectivity of nucleic acid diagnostic and micorarray technologies by control of interfacial nucleic acid film chemistry

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
FZDE Dead