CA2235680C - Improvements relating to antimicrobial cleaning compositions - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention provides a hygienic cleaning composition of pH < 6 or pH &g t; 8 which comprises: a) 0.01-30 wt.% on product of an ethoxylated nonionic surfactant, other than an alkyl phenol derivative, said surfactant having an HLB of 10-14 (this is typically an ethoxylated alcohol having a chain length of C8-C14 and 4-10 ethoxy groups p er molecule), and, b) 1-30 wt.% on product of a C1-C5 linear or branched alcohol (this is typically selected from the group comprising propan-2-ol, propanol, ethanol and mixtures thereof). It is believed that the use of 1-30 wt.% of a C1-C5 linear or branched alcohol as a biocida l activity improving additive for the selected nonionic surfactants greatly improves the biocidal properties of the compositions under the pH conditions specified. The specification also provides a method of cleaning and disinfecting a hard surface which comprises the step of treating said surface with a cleaning composition as claimed.

Description

:s CA 02235680 2001-04-20 a Technical Field The present invention relates to the use of a specified surfactant in combination with a specific alcohol to improve the activity of the hygiene ;__ agent and to a method of treating surfaces with the said composition.
1_5 Background to the Invention Hard-surface cleaning compositions generally comprise one or more surfactants, and, optionally, one or more hygiene agents and/or solvents.
Typically, the surfactants used in such cleaning compositions are selected-from anionic, nonionic, amphoteric and cationic surfactants. This large group of surfactants exhibit a broad range of properties. Nonionics are very commonly used due to their effectiveness on fatty soils and the ease with which their foaming can be controlled. The precise function of nonionic surfactants in cleaning compositions depends on the hydrophile/lipophile balance or 'HLB' of the surfactant chosen. In general terms, nonionic surfactants with a relatively low HLB values (%-°) are regarded as wetting agents and are used in combination with solvents where the solvent performs the cleaning function, such as in glass cleaners. Nonionic surfactants with relatively high HLB
values (13-15) are regarded as detergents and themselves remove so,~l from surfaces.
. r'' - p,~dtE«D~.~ ~; v~ ~

c3s9g cc) we (Amended 17 November 1997) Nonionic surfactants are reported as showing low biocidal activity, whereas certain anionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants show biocidal activity under specific conditions of, for example, pH and concentration. However, the biocidal activity of surfactants is, with a few notable exceptions, low and it is commonplace to add a separate hygiene agent to compositions.

Typical hygiene agents include strong acids, alkali's, phenolics and oxidants such as peracids and hypohalites.

These oxidants, of which a typical example is hypochlorite, are generally highly reactive species which exhibit this reactivity alone or in effective formulations in terms of one or more of, short shelf life, toxic, corrosive and irritant properties. In general, these reactive components are required at relatively high levels in formulations-.

Other less chemically reactive hygiene agents, such as 2,4,4'-trichloro-2'-hydroxy Biphenyl ether (available in the marketplace as =RGASAN [RTM]), are effective at relatively low concentrations but are more expensive than simpler species and may be specific as regards their spectrum of activity. Many organic acids, including benzoic, salicylic and sorbic are known as preservatives in cosmetics and some food products. but these preservatives generally show lower biocidal activity than the above-mentioned chemically reactive hygiene agents when used at the same level.

In hard surface cleaning it is often necessary to disinfect a surface. A 'disinfectant' can be understood to be a hygiene agent which shows a 100,000 fold or better reduction in the number of viable micro-organisms in a specified culture when used at a level of around 0.5 wt~.
This is generally known as a 'log 5 kill'. Many of the weaker hygiene agents do not achieve this level of ~'..',:.'' _i C3698 (C) WO -_~~, - _ - ..
(Amended 17 November 1997) bacterial kill, especially when present in formulations at relatively low levels.
Some surfactants have been found to potentiate the effects of certain hygiene agents. DE 3619375 (Henkel) discloses that alkyl polyglycoside (APG) surfactants show a synergy with alcohols and organic acids as regards hygiene. The examples of this reference disclose compositions which comprise APG and organic acids. These compositions are used at strongly acidic pH, generally below pH 3.
Alcohols, such as ethanol and isopropanol (IPA), are well-known components of cleaning compositions. Generally, these are present as solvents at low levels in compositions of near neutral pH. For example: GB 1076920 (1966) relates to glass cleaners which comprise ~0.25~ alkyl phenol polyoxyalkylene ether and 3.5-4~ ethanol; GB 1403919 (1972) relates to vehicle washing compositions which comprise 3-4%
nonionic surfactant (an EO/PO system is used in the examples) and 4~ isopropanol; US 4414128 (1981) relates to hard surface cleaners with 0.5-3~ Dobanol 91-8 (HLB 13.8 by calculation) and 1-2~ ethanol; GB 2103642 (1981) relates to a spectacle-glass cleaning composition which comprises 1~
ethoxylated nonionic surfactant and loo ethanol: the preferred pH of which is 6-8.
Often these systems are free of ethoxylated alcohol surfactants, e.g. GB 2167083 (1984) relates to a hard surface cleaner comprising 4~ IPA and GB 2173508 (1986) relates to hard surface cleaners which comprise 1~ of 3,5-dimethyl-1-hexyn-3-of and 0.450 primary alkyl sulphate as anionic surfactant with 2-4~ IPA.
It is also known to use solvents at higher levels in 'spot removers'. Typical examples of such formulations can be found in GB 0962436 (1961) which relates to a solvent-based ~N1END~~ J~'c''~

C3698 (C) WO' ~ , - ,.
(Amended 17 November 1997) spot remover of which the examples comprise 8-35~
alkoxylated components (which do not include ethoxylated alcohols) and 20-44% alcohols.
When alcohols are present at very high levels (i.e. ethanol at 70owt is used in 'surgical spirit') they are also known to have disinfectant properties. However, such high alcohol concentrations are seldom used outside of specialist applications, due to the extreme flammability of the compositions and the health risks associated with consumption.
i Thus, where alcohols are present at lower levels, as solvent, it is commonplace to add additional hygiene agents if antimicrobial action is desired. US 4420484-(Sterling Drug: 1981) relates to such an antimicrobial composition.
Compositions are disclosed which comprise --12o nonionic surfactants and 3% iso propyl alcohol. The compositions, which have a pH around 5.5, do not appear to contain alcohol ethoxylate, the surfactant being either betaine or amine oxide. The antimicrobial properties of these composition arise from the known antimicrobials, such are chlorhexidine, which are incorporated in the composition.
EP 0478445 (Peters: 1990) discloses a composition for the disinfection of surgical instruments. Examples of a preferred embodiment in the cited specification relate to compositions containing 7~ C13/8E0 ethoxy alcohol nonionic (the HLB is around 12.8 by calculation) and 12~
ethanol/isopropanol at a pH of 8.5. The compositions cited comprise 13~ of didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, which is a known biocide and is identified as such in the specification, while the nonionic and the alcohol are optional.
', ... . .
1'.t.~', ~~rw~-'~' .. .~ ;i'. v'...

C3698 (C) wG . ,.- . . - -(Amended 17 November 1997) - -~ -- 4a -Fp 0536820 (Colgate Palmolive: 1991) discloses an acidic composition (pH 2-4) which contains nonionic surfactants (HLB 7-10 and 11) and anti-microbial disinfectants. It is mentioned in the cited patent that minor amounts of isopropyl alcohol (up to 2~) can be added to improve the anti-microbial effects (page 5, line 48ff).
FP 0028038 (P&G: 1979) relates to compositions which contain nonionics of HLB 10-13 and the examples contain 11.5% nonionic(HLB 12) and 1-2~ ethanol. The compositions have a pH of 8-13. Germicides are mentioned as optional '- ingredients in the compositions disclosed.
There is a need to provide anti-microbial, preferably disinfecting, compositions which do not require the , _ presence of either expensive or reactive hygiene agents such as hypochlorite or peroxides, but which show a wide spectrum antibacterial effect and are formulated with relatively simple and available materials such as solvents.
It is also considered important that high levels of alcohols or other solvents should be avoided due to health and fire risks.
~rcs~H-.-'~~~~'r-' JYL~".rL'.~~.

i:

Brief Description of the Invention We have now determined that a marked synergy is exhibited between selected ethoxylated alcohol surfactants and S certain alcohols at alkaline pH's which lie outside of the normal 'physiological' range in bacteria. This synergy enables much lower levels of alcohols than had previously been employed to have a significant antimicrobial effect.
Accordingly the present invention provides for the use of 1-30owt of a C.-CS linear or branched alcohol as a biocidal activity improving additive in a cleaning composition of pH>8 which comprises 0.01-30owt on product of an ethoxylated nonionic surfactant other than an alkyl phenol derivative, with an HLB of 10-1.4.

.. r c .. , .. . ..
.. . r. ~ ' As discussed above, ethOxylated alcohol surfactants of HLB
10-14 are inhibitors of bacterial growth but are only weakly biocidal at typical formulation pH's. In the presence of the specified alcohols, and above the normal physiological pH range; a synergy is maintained and exploited to give a product which is both an effective cleaner and biocidal. Effective cleaning and biocidal activity are desirable in a cleaning composition for hygiene purposes as it is important to both to ensure a ~- high kill of bacteria and removal soil so as to retard reinfection and regrowth of bacterial populations. In the present invention, the important. features of effective microbial kill and improved soil. removal are both attained with a relatively simple and hence cost-effective formulation.
Without wishing to be limited by any theory of operation, it is believed that the presence of the both the selected alcohol and the selected class of surfactant in the membrane of bacteria results in the formation of 'pores' in the cytoplasmic membrane of the bacteria through which the contents of the cell may be exchanged with the ambient.
This has been confirmed by studies with the fluorophore Propidium iodide, which is not taken up by cells with intact membranes. It is believed that bacteria cannot recover from this leakage under the pH conditions specified and consequently rapid cell death occurs.
Detailed Description of the Invention In order that the invention may be further understood it will be described hereafter with reference to preferred features and materials.
PNtENp~~ SN~ET

' . . , ~ ' . ~.
Nonionics Nonionic, ethoxylated surfactants are present in the compositions of the invention. These surfactants are believed to engage in a synergistic interaction with both the alcohol, to improve cleaning and aid the removal of soil subsequently deposited and with the antimicrobial so as to improve the disinfecting qualities of the composition.
Suitable nonionic detergent active compounds can be broadly t_ described as compounds produced by the condensation of ethylene oxide groups, which are hydrophilic in nature, with an organic hydrophobic compound. The length of the hydrophilic or polyoxyethylene radical which is condensed with any particular hydrophobic group can be readily adjusted to yield a water-soluble compound having the desired degree of balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic elements (HLB).
Particular examples include the condensation product of aliphatic alcohols having from 8 to 22 carbon atoms in either straight or branched chain configuration with ~- ethylene oxide, such as a coconut oil ethylene oxide condensate having from 3 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of coconut alcohol.
The amount of nonionic detergent active to be employed in the composition of the invention will generally be from 0.1 to 30owt, preferably from 1 to 20owt, and most preferably from 3 to l0owt for non-concentrated products.
Concentrated products will genE=rally have 10-20owt nonionic surfactant present, whereas dilute products suitable for spraying will have 0.1-5owt nonionic surfactant present.
ANiEND~D SN~E~

. ' ~. _ :~
_ g _ Typically, the ethoxylated nonionic surfactant is an ethoxylated alcohol having a chain length of Cg-Cla and 4-10 ethoxy groups per molecule. It is however essential that the HLB of the nonionic should fall in the range 10-14.
HLB can be calculated as a function of the chain length of the molecule and its degree of ethoxylation. According to Griffin (W. C. Griffin J. Soc. Cosmetic Chemists [5, 249, 19540 the HLB of fatty alcohol ethylene oxide adducts is given as one fifth of the weight percent of oxyethylene content in the adduct.
It is believed that the critical micellar concentration (CMC) of the ethoxylated nonionic surfactants should be below 10-'-5 moles/litre, preferably in the range 10-3~5 to 10-5 moles/litre. Quite surprisingly, we have found that for alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactants acting under optimum conditions the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for these surfactants appears to be equal to the CMC.
IMBENTIN 91-3S OFA~ (TM, ex. Kolb AG) a C9_11 alcohol with, on average, five moles of ethoxylation had been found to be a suitable nonionic surfactant in compositions according to the invention. This material has a calculated HLB of 11.6 and is believed to have a CMC of 1.6x10-" moles/litre.
2S DOBANOL 91-8 (TM) a C~-Cil alcohol with on average 8 moles of ethoxylation has also bee.~. found to be a suitable material. This material has a ca1_culated HLB of 13.8 and is believed to have a CMC of 4.3}:10-' moles/litre.
Alcohols Preferably, the alcohol is selected from the group comprising propan-2-ol, propanol, ethanol and mixtures thereof.
.: ,' ._ Ft~fa~U~~~~ ~::~:.~.~

C3698 LC) WG ~ . ~ : ~ ~ - ._ < (Amended 17 November 1997) Preferred levels of alcohol are 1-25~wt on product. At these concentrations alcohols taken alone show little ' potential as disinfectants. Particularly preferred levels of alcohol range from 5-150.
Preferably, the weight ratio of the alkoxylated nonionic surfactant to the alcohol such that the alcohol is present in weight excess over the alkoxylated nonionic surfactant.
Preferably, the compositions of the invention further comprise a buffer to maintain the pH of the composition in the desired pH range upon dilution by a factor of 2-5; , The alkaline products according to the invention have a preferred pH of 8-11, more preferably 9.5-11. Below pH 9.5, compositions show reduced bacterial kill, whilst above pH
11, compositions are considered unacceptably hazardous for many uses. Sodium bicarbonate/carbonate buffers are suitable to maintain pH in the preferred range.
~ ~~4-~~ ~,..r~' W'V~' n .. , ~ ~.
C3698 (C) WO -_. - ,. .- _ . ;. _ _ , (Amended 17 November 1997) - ~-Minors and Optional Components The composition according to the invention can contain other minor, unessential ingredients which aid in their cleaning performance and maintain the physical and the chemical stability of the product.
For example, the composition can contain detergent builders. In general, the builder, when employed, preferably will form from 0.1 to 25~ by weight of the composition.
i _ Optionally, the composition can include one or more amphoteric surfactants, preferably betaines, or other surfactants such as amine-oxide and alkyl-amino-glycinates.
Betaines are preferred for reasons of cost, low toxicity (especially as compared to amine oxides) and wide availability.
Typically betaines in compositions according to the invention are the amido-alkyl betaines, particularly the amido-propyl betaines, preferably having an aliphatic alkyl radical of from 8 to 18 carbon atoms and preferably having a straight chain. These betaines are preferred as they are .:.
believed to comprise relatively low levels of nitrosamine precursors although other betaines, such as alkyl betaines.
can be used in the compositions of the invention.
Typical levels of amphoteric range from 0.01 to 8~, with levels of 1-5wt~, particularly around 2~ being preferred for normal compositions and up to four times the ~~4~~~i ~w ~iWr LSt L w-1~S

C3698 (C) WO - ' . .-. . . .
(Amended 17 November 1997) ~ ' concentration being present in so called, concentrated products. As with the nonionic surfactant, lower levels of around 0.05-1~ will be employed in sprayable products and higher levels of, typically, around 4gwt in concentrates.
Metal ion sequestrants, including ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetates, amino-poly-phosphonates (such as those in the DEQUESTp range) and phosphates and a wide variety of other poly-functional organic acids and salts, can also be employed. It is believed that the hygiene performance of _ the composition is improved by the presence of a metal ion sequesterant.
The solutions do not generally require additional hydrotropes to be added as the alcohols provide a , hydrotroping function. Suitable additional hydrotropes include, alkali metal toluene sulphonates, urea, alkali metal xylene and cumene sulphonates, polyglycols, >20E0 ethoxylated alcohols and glycols. Preferred amongst these hydrotropes are the sulphonates, particularly the cumene, xylene and toluene sulphonates. Typical levels of additional hydrotrope range from 0-5o for the sulphonates.
Hydrotropes are not always required for dilute, sprayable products, but may be required if lower EO or longer alkyl ethoxylates are used or the cloud point needs to be raised ~~->;~1~.:~ r-' ..
j ;;~;;...:.i _.

considerably. The cumene sulphonate is the most preferred hydrotrope.
Compositions according to the invention can also contain, in addition to the ingredients already mentioned, various other optional ingredients such as, further solvents, colourants, optical brighteners, soil suspending agents, detersive enzymes, compatible bleaching agents, gel-control agents, freeze-thaw stabilisers, further bactericides, 1_0 perfumes and opacifiers.
_. The most preferred formulations according to the present invention, excluding minors, comprise:
a) 0.1-20owt on product of an ethoxylated alcohol having a chain length of CQ-C,a, 4-10 ethoxy groups per molecule and HLB of 10-14, b) 1-30owt of an alcohol is selected from the group comprising propan-2-ol, propanol, ethanol and mixtures thereof, wherein the alcohol (b) is present in weight excess over the ethoxylated alcohol (a), and, c) at least one buffering agent to maintain the pH either in the range 9.5-11.
It is envisaged that such a composition would be packaged in a container adapted to deliver the composition in the form of a spray and accordingly a pre~erred method according to the present invention co~«prises the step of treating a surface with a composition as disclosed he=ein by means of a spray.
In order that the present invention can be further understood it will be illustrated herein after by reference I,, C ,. ' , to the following, non-limiting examples.
Examples The following examples are suspension tests against a range Of microbes at a range of pH's. T:he following bacterial strains were used in these suspension tests.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ATCC 15442 w Staphylococcus aureus: NCTC 6538 Escherichia coli: ATCC 11229 .,~;~._;, .

Example 1: aga vr~t L. coli .
Bacterial suspension was prepared as follows. Incubate bacterial culture (tryptone Soya broth) for 24 hours. Spin down (SO ml tubes, Mistral 1000 centrifuge, 4100rpm, 10 min). Resuspend pellets in peptone water (20m1) and mix using a vortex miner nor 15-;0 seconds. Adjust cell density with sterile peptone water to required inoculum s~~ze using ~ENO~~ SH~~ C

a calibrated densitometer. Cell suspension is stored at 20 °C (+/- 1°C> and used within 2 hours All tests were carried out using t:he microplate method for a 5 minute contact time at 20°C, in a 96 well (8x12) microplate with inoculation (30u1 of microbe suspension) of the formulations as listed in Table 1 (270u1), to give a total volume of 300u1. The inoculum was estimated to contain ca.l0g cfu/ml. Inoculations were performed simultaneously using a multi-pipette (mixing thoroughly by charging and discharging the pipette 4 times) and the ;_ reaction mixture left for a Smin contact time.
Alkaline formulations (pH 10.5) were buffered with a mixture of sodium carbonate (1.14 w/v percent decahydrate) and sodium hydrogen carbonate (0.08 w/v percent).
After reaction 30u1 of each reaction mixture was transferred into 270u1 of a quench solution using a multipipette and mixed as previously indicated. The composition of quench solution was as follows:
f.-Lecithin 0.30 Sodium thiosulphate 0.50 L-histidine 0.10 Tween 80 3.Oo pH 7 buffer(see below) lOml Distilled water to 1 litre (Prepare pH 7 buffer by dissolving 34gm potassium dihydrogen phosphate in SOOmI distilled water and sterilize (autoclave, 121°C, 15 min)) ~iMENDED S!~.tE ~

After 5mins(+/-lmin), 30u1 of the quenched product was serially diluted into 270u1 peptone solution using a multipipette, and mixed as previously indicated.
Total viable count was determined using the Miles-Misra spot plate method, plating out 10u7_ (in triplicate) onto tryptone Soya agar and incubating for 24 hours at 30°C.
Results were recorded as mean count: from 3 spots on agar, calculating Log Reduction for each formulation. as Log Reduction - log (initial count) - log (final count) Table 1: Synergy with Propan-2-of under Alkaline Conditions Dobanol 91-8 Propan-2-of pH Mean Log Standard (wlv percent)(wlv percent) (reduction) Deviation of E-coli 0.7 0 1 0.5 0.9 0.3 0 g.p 10.5 0.3 0.1 0.7 8.0 1 0.5 3.2 0.5 I
Y

,-Table 1 shows that under alkaline conditions a significant increase in the biocidal activity of the composition is achieved when both the alcohol and the alcohol ethoxylate are present.
EXample 2: further examples 35 Tables 2a and 2b b~~ ow s:no.,~ further exampl es, using t-.~o nonicni c m~rfactants and tr.ao microbes, for wrhich the results -,-sere obtai::ed using the method as described above in e~:ampl~. 1 . Tn each case that the mater ial ;.~as present , i;C ~TT.r~ ~ ~~W.
~~.,.~ i ~;' .

the formulations contained 10o iso-propyl alcohol, 0.70 non-ionic surfactant, and were prepared at pH 11.0 Table 2a: Synergy with Propan-2-of against S.au~'eus Nonionic Iso-propyl 7~og (reduction) surfactant alcohol against S. aureus 0 - ,--- 0 0 Imbentin 91-35 OFA 0 0.3 Dobanol 91-5 0 0.3 Dobanol 91-8 0 0.1 Imbentin 91-35 OFA 10 1.~

Dobanol 91-5 10 2.1 Dobanol 91-8 10 1.1 Table 2b: Synergy with Propan-2-of against E.COIi.
Nonionic Iso-propyl hog (reduction) surfactant alcohol _ 0 0 1.2 0 10 5.1 Imbentin 91-35 OFA 0 S.l Dobanol 91-5 0 Dobanol 91-8 0 4.8 Imbentin 91-35 OFA 10 >6 Dobanol 91-S 10 >6 Dobanol 91-8 10 >6 From tables 2a and 2b , it can be seen that, at pH 11, synergy was seen when both the nonionic and the alcohol were present.
e_ ~sl~~'~~ ~c~..
jjyt~a-

Claims (5)

1. The use of 1-30%wt of a C1-C5 linear or branched alcohol as a biocidal activity improving additive in a cleaning composition of pH>8 which comprises 0.01-30%wt on product of an ethoxylated nonionic surfactant other than an alkyl phenol derivative, said ethoxylated nonionic surfactant having a HLB value of 10-14.

2. Use as claimed in claim 1 wherein the ethoxylated nonionic surfactant is an ethoxylated alcohol having a chain length of C8-C14 and 4-10 ethoxy groups per molecule.

3. Use as claimed in claim 1 wherein the alcohol is present in weight excess over the ethoxylated nonionic surfactant.

4. Use as claimed in claim 1 wherein the alcohol is selected from the group comprising propan-2-ol, propanol, ethanol and mixtures thereof.

5. Use according to claim 1 in a composition which comprises:

a) 0.1-20%wt on product of an ethoxylated alcohol having a chain length of C8-C14, 4-10 ethoxy groups per molecule and HLB of 10-14, b) 1-30%wt of an alcohol is selected from the group comprising propan-2-ol, propanol, ethanol and mixtures thereof, wherein the alcohol (b) is present in weight excess over the ethoxylated alcohol (a), and, c) at least one buffering agent to maintain the pH
either in the range 9.5-11.