CA2234966A1 - Improved blade edge - Google Patents
Improved blade edge Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2234966A1 CA2234966A1 CA 2234966 CA2234966A CA2234966A1 CA 2234966 A1 CA2234966 A1 CA 2234966A1 CA 2234966 CA2234966 CA 2234966 CA 2234966 A CA2234966 A CA 2234966A CA 2234966 A1 CA2234966 A1 CA 2234966A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- razor blade
- coating
- blade according
- cutting edge
- polymer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26B—HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B26B21/00—Razors of the open or knife type; Safety razors or other shaving implements of the planing type; Hair-trimming devices involving a razor-blade; Equipment therefor
- B26B21/54—Razor-blades
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26B—HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B26B21/00—Razors of the open or knife type; Safety razors or other shaving implements of the planing type; Hair-trimming devices involving a razor-blade; Equipment therefor
- B26B21/54—Razor-blades
- B26B21/58—Razor-blades characterised by the material
- B26B21/60—Razor-blades characterised by the material by the coating material
Abstract
A blade edge with increased durability and a reduced cut force and a method for manufacturing the same. The blade edge is thickened by depositing a coating or grinding.
A thin film having a low coefficient of friction, such as amorphous diamond, is then applied to the edge. An additional layer of a lubricious polymer may then be applied. The resulting blade edge has a significantly reduced cut force over existing razor blades and also has greatly increased durability.
A thin film having a low coefficient of friction, such as amorphous diamond, is then applied to the edge. An additional layer of a lubricious polymer may then be applied. The resulting blade edge has a significantly reduced cut force over existing razor blades and also has greatly increased durability.
Description
IMPROVED BLADE EDGE
Background of the Invention I . Field of the Invention This invention relates to the forming and coating of blade edges to modify the cutting performance of the blade edge.
Background of the Invention I . Field of the Invention This invention relates to the forming and coating of blade edges to modify the cutting performance of the blade edge.
2. Description of Related Art Razor blade m~nllf~ctllrers have over the years attempted various means of improving shave performance. The primary goal of the m~nllf~Gtl,rers has been toimprove shave pe,~ lance and comfort by redllcing the required cut force and increasing the life of the blade edge. Generally, efforts at improving shave pc. îol ...~-ce and reducing cut force have focused on providing edges with thinner, and lI.eG.elically sharper, edge profiles than prevailing blades. Since the thinner edges are weaker than their thicker counterparts, there have been efforts to simult~neously increase the ~ nglh of the edge.
With regard to cut force, one means of reduçing cut force is to modify the geometry of the razor blade edge. It has been found that reducing the width of the blade edge for some ~i~t~nce back from the tip will improve shave pcl~llllance by cut force reduction.
However, reduction in the edge width also weakens the edge and leads to more rapid deterioration due to mecll~nical deformation during cutting.
A typical razor blade edge has a wedge shape with a pr~,fc"ed inrh~ded angle of appro~i".~lely 20 degrees. This wedge may be further characterized by its tip radius, which is the radius of curvature of the I ~Itim~te cutting tip, and the thickness of the edge for a ~ t~nce back from the ultim~te tip. Typically, the tip radius is specified as being less than 500 A. The edge thickness is a function of ~ Ance from the ultim~te edge. For example T2 and T 10 may be defined as the width of the edge 2 microns and 10 microns back from the ultimate edge respectively. Typical razor blades have T2 values in the range of from 0.85 ~ and T10 values in the range of 3.3-4.0 ,u. Standard mechanicalgrinding and honing operations give the edge a bit of a convex shape which has been described as a '~gothic arch" shape. Most razor blades have a thin layer of chromium on the cutting edge to increase the blade's corrosion resistance and to provide a good base for the application of a lubricating polymer such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
PTFE has an extremely low coefficient of friction and its use has become virtually universal in the razor blade industry. PTFE (an example of which is sold by duPont under the name KRYTOX 1000) is deposited on the blade edge as a fine powder which is heated above the melt point so that it flows and bonds to the blade edge. The lubricating polymer reduces the force required for the edge to cut through hair. Standard felt cutting tests demonstrate the large reduction in cut force for a PTFE coated edge compared to an uncoated chromium edge.
While the addition of a polymer to the blade edge reduces the cut force, a closelook at the ultimate edge of the blade reveals that the ultimate tip is not fully covered by PTFE. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs show that the molten polymer has a tendency to pull back slightly from the edge. Con~eq~lently, polymer coated razor blades contain an uncoated region e~ctending up to a few microns back from the tip of the blade. Therefore, the ~ltim~te tip and cutting point does not benefit from the lubricating effect of the PTFE. It is an object of this invention to improve the lubrication of this small but critical area. It is a further object of this invention to improve the ~llengl}1 of the ultimate tip of the razor blade.
Various means to streng~hçn the edge, from using harder substrates for blades tothe use of hard coatingc to ~Llen~,lhen the edge, have been proposed. An ~,~al.,ple of a substrate that is inhe~el.lly stronger than the prese~llly used grade of stainless steel is described in U.S. patent 5,121,660 issued to Kramer. Kramer discloses a blade made of a polycrystalline ceramic material which is significantly harder than steel. However, this material is difficult to process and has not yet found commercial application for ra~or blades.
Hard coatings have been described numerous times as a means of increasing edge strength. For example, U.S. patent 4,933,058 issued to Bache~ et. al. describes the use of ion bombardment during hard coating deposition to achieve a prescribed tip shape. This tip is narrower than standard blades, but retains its strength due to the presence of a thick hard coating on the tip. U.S. patent 5,295,305, issued to Hahn~ et. al. discloses the use of a diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating over various adhesion interlayers. The DLC coating is said to provide strength and high quality shaving performance. U.S. patents 5,142,785, issued to Grewal and 5,232,568, issued to Parent. et. al. both describe the use of DLC
coatings over a molybdenum adhesion layer. Other patents have similarly disclosed a variety of ceramic coatings applied to strengthen the blade edge.
The modification of edge shape to provide a suitable substrate for hard coatings is disclosed in U.S. patent 5,032,243, issued to Bache. et. al. This patent discloses a method for modifying edge shape through ion beam bo~"bard.nenl. The ion beam removes material from both sides of the &cet thus red~lc.ing its width. The ion beam method is proposed due to the difficulty in obtaining such blade profiles using ~..ech~l-ical grinding means. However, the ion beam method has its own difficulties and such an arrangement remains to be commercialized.
A somewhat di~I~renl means of increasing blade life is disclosed in U. S. patent5,488,774, issued to Janowski. This patent discloses the use of a diamond or DLCcoating to reduce shaving degradation due to possible loss of the lubricating polymer during shaving. It is claimed that the PTFE is gradually removed from the edge and that the presence of a low friction coating will ll~;n.lll;~.Ç the effect of the PTFE removal.
As can be seen, extensive effort has gone into producing thinner and stronger blade edges that ",;ni",i7e cut force while providing normal or extended life. Most ofthese methods employ sophisticated means of shaping the blade edge followed by a thickcoating of a hard material to strengthen the edge. These methods are difficult to implement and it would be advantageous to produce a blade that has the benefits of a thinner blade edge, i.e. Iow cut force, but without the attendant strength and production difficulties.
Consequently, it is an object of the present invention to describe such a razor blade and a means for production that avoids much of the difficulty associated with prior designs. Such a blade would advantageously have enhanced strength and durability and exhibit reduced cut forces compared to standard razor blades.
Summary of the Invention The present invention is directed to a blade edge with improved shave pel rOI .llance and a method of m~m~facturing such blades. To achieve the desired result the tipthickness, tip radius and cut force are increased, either by application of a first, non-polymeric coating or by some other means, and then the blade is coated with a second non-polymeric adherent coating having a very low coefficient of friction. Suitable materials for the second coating include the class of carbon films which include diamond, amorphous diamond, and diarnond like carbon (DLC). Another material with a suitably low coefficient of friction is Molybdenum disulfide. The thickness of the coating need only be such that a continuous film, typically less than 500 ~, is forrned over the blade edge up to and incllJding the ultimate tip. The aspect ratio of this film is approximately 1:1, there is no need for the high aspect ratios claimed in previous disclosures. The blade is then coated with a lubricating polyrner, such as PTFE, as is standard practice in the industry. The resulting blades cut with a signicantly lower cut force than comparable blades without the low coefficient of friction film. The blade pe~ Çol Ills as if the edge were sharper and thinner while ret~ining the original edge geometry. Because the edge is of at least standard thickness it retains the ha~dness and durability of a regular edge A preferred embodiment of the invention emphasizes edge durability. In this casethe edge is made thicker than usuaJ via coating or grinding. Normally the thickening would have the effect of increasing the cut force and compromising shave performance.
However, the addition of the coating of this invention reduces the cut force to a nominal level thus restoring shave comfort. Such coated blades last significantly longer and provide better shave performance than their uncoated counterparts by virtue of their thicker and stronger edge.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure I is a chart illustrating the indent depths of blade edges having di~e-encoatings. A smaller indent signifies a stronger edge.
Figure 2 is a chart illustrating the effect of the coating of this invention on average cut force for 20 cuts.
Detailed Description of the ~lefel led Embodiments Rerelence will now be made in detail to the presently plefe-,ed embor~im~nts ofthe invention.
The blade edge of the present invention comprises a razor blade having an increased tip thir~ness and tip radius, a reduced cutting force and a longer usable life. In order to provide these desireable pl ope. lies, a substrate is provided in which the portion which is to be the cutting edge is prepared with a profile either nominal to or thicker than that of prevailing blades, res.llting in increased tip thicl~nçss. tip radius, cut force and coefficient of friction. The increased thickness may be achieved in various manners, but a preferred method for achieving this shape is by appropriately grinding or stropping the edge. A further preferred method of producing this shape is by depositing an inner coating of suitable thickness onto the edge of the blade. This coating may consist of of virtually any compatible material inclucling oxides, carbides, nitrides, borides, metals and any combinations thereof, preferred materials include ceramics, chromium, chromium/platinum, and chrome nitride The primary criteria for this coating are that it adhere to the steel substrate and that the coating of this invention adheres to it. In the p, ~ ,ed embodiment a coating of up to 1500 angstroms of chromium is applied to the edge of a ground blade The actual thickness of the coating may vary depending on a number of variables, inclu~in~ the starting edge shape, and a thicker or thinner coating may be used as desired. The result of the initial thickening step is a blade edge which has increased tip thickness, increased ~le~ h, increascd tip radius, is less sharp than before and exhibits a correspondingly higher cut force For eAal",.,lc, such a thickened blade edge would be less desireable for cutting hair in that it would tend to "pull" the hair and thus prove uncomfortable during wet shaving Once a suitable blade edge is obtained, the edge is coated with an outer coating of a thin film of a non-polymeric material which has a very low coefficient of friction. The outer coating may be deposited by ion beam sputtering, m~gnetron sputtering, laser beam ablation, vacuum arc deposition, or any other suitable process. The thickness of this non-polymeric coating is preferably less than about 1500 an~ o-l,s and an aspect ratio (tip thickness/flank thickness) of about 1:1 is plefel~bly obtained. In an especially p~efe~ ~ed embodiment, the thickness of the non-polymeric coating is in the range of from 100 - 1000 angstroms A prel~,.ed value for the low coeffiriçnt of friction is less than about 0 3 and preferably less than 0 2 Pl~ftllc;d materials having such a low coefficient for the thin film coating are amorphous diamond, diamond-like carbon (DLC), molybdenum dislllfide~ or any other similar material. The prefellcd thin film coating material is amorphous diamond.
Amorphous diamond comprises a nonhydrog~nqted version of DLC with at least 40% sp3 carbon bonding, a hardness of at least 45 gigaracc~l~ and a modulus of at least 400 gigapascals. In contrast, standard DLC has a hardness of only about 30 gigapascals. The resultant blade edge has a further increased tip radius and tip thickness over the blade edge having no coating or the inner coating alone, and has a cut force which is significantly lower than that of the blade edge having the first coating alone. In an especially prefel I ~d embodiment, the blade edge may be further coated with a lubricious polymer to fi~rther reduce the cut force. Because this coating has been shown to pull back from the edge the presence of the hard, thin film of low coefficient of friction causes the blade to show a significant reduction in cut force over blades having only chromium or other conventional materials on the edge. This superiority of cut force is evident even over sharper blades using conventional coatings. In an especially p,~fe-~ed embodiment, the blade edge is first coated with a thin film having a low coefficient of friction, such as amorphous diamond, and then with a lubricious polymer such as low molecular weight PTFE or KRYTOX
1000 to provide a shave exhibiting minim~l cut force. The resulting razor blade is especially advantageous for use with a wet shave razor, and one or more of such blades may be employed in a razor. The blades may be employed in a wet shave razor which is either disposable, i.e. the entire razor is discarded after a certain amount of usage, or pe""anenl which requires disposal and repl~ce~ 1 of only the razor cartridge, but not the handle, after a certain number of uses.
A variety of methods are available for depositing the coating of this invention.One method uses pulsed laser deposition to generate a plume of vaporized carbon ions from a solid carbon source. These ions can be directed to the edge of a blade where they will condense as a hard solid film with a suitable low coefficient of friction. Another method is the use of sputtering, either RF or DC, to provide a vapor of carbon atoms which similarly condense onto the blades fo~ g carbon films. Typically, the sputtered films are not as hard as coatings prepared by other means but they may be used due to their low coefficient of friction. CVD methods can be utili7çd, using a gaseous hydrocarbon gas as the source, but these must be done under conditions where the blades do not exceed 350 C for periods oftime as this will soften the blade steel. A plefe.led method of depositing the carbon films is by the cathodic arc method. Such a method is described fully in patent 5,458,754, assigned to Multi Arc Inc. in New Jersey and the disclosure of that patent is incorporated herein by reference. In this method carbon ions are produced with the arc vaporization of a solid graphite target. The patented method described pro-duces amorphous diamond films with a very low coefficient of friction.
As illustrated in Figure 1, the blade edge which is coated with chromium has significantly increased strength over the uncoated blade edge. Specifically, an unused, standard blade edge will be indented to a depth of approximately 650 nanometers by a 4 gram load applied normal to the blade edge. Coating with 300 A of chromium increases the edge strength as shown by a reduction in indent depth to about 610 nm, while 600 angstroms of chromium coating further reduces the indents to about 595 nm. A 600angstrom chromium coating in combination with an amorphous diamond coating of 200-300 angstroms significantly reduces the indent range to apploxillldlely 540 nm, thus illustrating that the blade of the present invention is significantly stronger than a standard blade.
Figure 2 illustrates the cut force of a standard blade, a less sharp blade made according to this invention, and a similar less sharp blade including the amorphous diamond coating. All blades are coated per standard process with PTFE. The standard blade edge exhibits a cut force of 2.64 Ib. The less sharp blade exhibits an average cut force of 2.96 Ib. The addition of 250 angstroms of amorphous diamond to the less sharp blade results in a cut force of 2.46 Ib, a significant reduction over the uncoated blade.
Consequently, blades made according to this invention are exceedin~ly durable and will continue to exhibit advantages over conventional blades for hundreds of cuts.
While there have been described what are p,escnlly believed to be the p,~;rel,cdembodiments of the present invention, those skilled in the art will realize that various ch~nges and modifications may be made to the invention without d~pa, ling from the spirit of the invention, and it is intended to claim all such ch~nges and modifications as fall within the scope of the invention.
With regard to cut force, one means of reduçing cut force is to modify the geometry of the razor blade edge. It has been found that reducing the width of the blade edge for some ~i~t~nce back from the tip will improve shave pcl~llllance by cut force reduction.
However, reduction in the edge width also weakens the edge and leads to more rapid deterioration due to mecll~nical deformation during cutting.
A typical razor blade edge has a wedge shape with a pr~,fc"ed inrh~ded angle of appro~i".~lely 20 degrees. This wedge may be further characterized by its tip radius, which is the radius of curvature of the I ~Itim~te cutting tip, and the thickness of the edge for a ~ t~nce back from the ultim~te tip. Typically, the tip radius is specified as being less than 500 A. The edge thickness is a function of ~ Ance from the ultim~te edge. For example T2 and T 10 may be defined as the width of the edge 2 microns and 10 microns back from the ultimate edge respectively. Typical razor blades have T2 values in the range of from 0.85 ~ and T10 values in the range of 3.3-4.0 ,u. Standard mechanicalgrinding and honing operations give the edge a bit of a convex shape which has been described as a '~gothic arch" shape. Most razor blades have a thin layer of chromium on the cutting edge to increase the blade's corrosion resistance and to provide a good base for the application of a lubricating polymer such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
PTFE has an extremely low coefficient of friction and its use has become virtually universal in the razor blade industry. PTFE (an example of which is sold by duPont under the name KRYTOX 1000) is deposited on the blade edge as a fine powder which is heated above the melt point so that it flows and bonds to the blade edge. The lubricating polymer reduces the force required for the edge to cut through hair. Standard felt cutting tests demonstrate the large reduction in cut force for a PTFE coated edge compared to an uncoated chromium edge.
While the addition of a polymer to the blade edge reduces the cut force, a closelook at the ultimate edge of the blade reveals that the ultimate tip is not fully covered by PTFE. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs show that the molten polymer has a tendency to pull back slightly from the edge. Con~eq~lently, polymer coated razor blades contain an uncoated region e~ctending up to a few microns back from the tip of the blade. Therefore, the ~ltim~te tip and cutting point does not benefit from the lubricating effect of the PTFE. It is an object of this invention to improve the lubrication of this small but critical area. It is a further object of this invention to improve the ~llengl}1 of the ultimate tip of the razor blade.
Various means to streng~hçn the edge, from using harder substrates for blades tothe use of hard coatingc to ~Llen~,lhen the edge, have been proposed. An ~,~al.,ple of a substrate that is inhe~el.lly stronger than the prese~llly used grade of stainless steel is described in U.S. patent 5,121,660 issued to Kramer. Kramer discloses a blade made of a polycrystalline ceramic material which is significantly harder than steel. However, this material is difficult to process and has not yet found commercial application for ra~or blades.
Hard coatings have been described numerous times as a means of increasing edge strength. For example, U.S. patent 4,933,058 issued to Bache~ et. al. describes the use of ion bombardment during hard coating deposition to achieve a prescribed tip shape. This tip is narrower than standard blades, but retains its strength due to the presence of a thick hard coating on the tip. U.S. patent 5,295,305, issued to Hahn~ et. al. discloses the use of a diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating over various adhesion interlayers. The DLC coating is said to provide strength and high quality shaving performance. U.S. patents 5,142,785, issued to Grewal and 5,232,568, issued to Parent. et. al. both describe the use of DLC
coatings over a molybdenum adhesion layer. Other patents have similarly disclosed a variety of ceramic coatings applied to strengthen the blade edge.
The modification of edge shape to provide a suitable substrate for hard coatings is disclosed in U.S. patent 5,032,243, issued to Bache. et. al. This patent discloses a method for modifying edge shape through ion beam bo~"bard.nenl. The ion beam removes material from both sides of the &cet thus red~lc.ing its width. The ion beam method is proposed due to the difficulty in obtaining such blade profiles using ~..ech~l-ical grinding means. However, the ion beam method has its own difficulties and such an arrangement remains to be commercialized.
A somewhat di~I~renl means of increasing blade life is disclosed in U. S. patent5,488,774, issued to Janowski. This patent discloses the use of a diamond or DLCcoating to reduce shaving degradation due to possible loss of the lubricating polymer during shaving. It is claimed that the PTFE is gradually removed from the edge and that the presence of a low friction coating will ll~;n.lll;~.Ç the effect of the PTFE removal.
As can be seen, extensive effort has gone into producing thinner and stronger blade edges that ",;ni",i7e cut force while providing normal or extended life. Most ofthese methods employ sophisticated means of shaping the blade edge followed by a thickcoating of a hard material to strengthen the edge. These methods are difficult to implement and it would be advantageous to produce a blade that has the benefits of a thinner blade edge, i.e. Iow cut force, but without the attendant strength and production difficulties.
Consequently, it is an object of the present invention to describe such a razor blade and a means for production that avoids much of the difficulty associated with prior designs. Such a blade would advantageously have enhanced strength and durability and exhibit reduced cut forces compared to standard razor blades.
Summary of the Invention The present invention is directed to a blade edge with improved shave pel rOI .llance and a method of m~m~facturing such blades. To achieve the desired result the tipthickness, tip radius and cut force are increased, either by application of a first, non-polymeric coating or by some other means, and then the blade is coated with a second non-polymeric adherent coating having a very low coefficient of friction. Suitable materials for the second coating include the class of carbon films which include diamond, amorphous diamond, and diarnond like carbon (DLC). Another material with a suitably low coefficient of friction is Molybdenum disulfide. The thickness of the coating need only be such that a continuous film, typically less than 500 ~, is forrned over the blade edge up to and incllJding the ultimate tip. The aspect ratio of this film is approximately 1:1, there is no need for the high aspect ratios claimed in previous disclosures. The blade is then coated with a lubricating polyrner, such as PTFE, as is standard practice in the industry. The resulting blades cut with a signicantly lower cut force than comparable blades without the low coefficient of friction film. The blade pe~ Çol Ills as if the edge were sharper and thinner while ret~ining the original edge geometry. Because the edge is of at least standard thickness it retains the ha~dness and durability of a regular edge A preferred embodiment of the invention emphasizes edge durability. In this casethe edge is made thicker than usuaJ via coating or grinding. Normally the thickening would have the effect of increasing the cut force and compromising shave performance.
However, the addition of the coating of this invention reduces the cut force to a nominal level thus restoring shave comfort. Such coated blades last significantly longer and provide better shave performance than their uncoated counterparts by virtue of their thicker and stronger edge.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure I is a chart illustrating the indent depths of blade edges having di~e-encoatings. A smaller indent signifies a stronger edge.
Figure 2 is a chart illustrating the effect of the coating of this invention on average cut force for 20 cuts.
Detailed Description of the ~lefel led Embodiments Rerelence will now be made in detail to the presently plefe-,ed embor~im~nts ofthe invention.
The blade edge of the present invention comprises a razor blade having an increased tip thir~ness and tip radius, a reduced cutting force and a longer usable life. In order to provide these desireable pl ope. lies, a substrate is provided in which the portion which is to be the cutting edge is prepared with a profile either nominal to or thicker than that of prevailing blades, res.llting in increased tip thicl~nçss. tip radius, cut force and coefficient of friction. The increased thickness may be achieved in various manners, but a preferred method for achieving this shape is by appropriately grinding or stropping the edge. A further preferred method of producing this shape is by depositing an inner coating of suitable thickness onto the edge of the blade. This coating may consist of of virtually any compatible material inclucling oxides, carbides, nitrides, borides, metals and any combinations thereof, preferred materials include ceramics, chromium, chromium/platinum, and chrome nitride The primary criteria for this coating are that it adhere to the steel substrate and that the coating of this invention adheres to it. In the p, ~ ,ed embodiment a coating of up to 1500 angstroms of chromium is applied to the edge of a ground blade The actual thickness of the coating may vary depending on a number of variables, inclu~in~ the starting edge shape, and a thicker or thinner coating may be used as desired. The result of the initial thickening step is a blade edge which has increased tip thickness, increased ~le~ h, increascd tip radius, is less sharp than before and exhibits a correspondingly higher cut force For eAal",.,lc, such a thickened blade edge would be less desireable for cutting hair in that it would tend to "pull" the hair and thus prove uncomfortable during wet shaving Once a suitable blade edge is obtained, the edge is coated with an outer coating of a thin film of a non-polymeric material which has a very low coefficient of friction. The outer coating may be deposited by ion beam sputtering, m~gnetron sputtering, laser beam ablation, vacuum arc deposition, or any other suitable process. The thickness of this non-polymeric coating is preferably less than about 1500 an~ o-l,s and an aspect ratio (tip thickness/flank thickness) of about 1:1 is plefel~bly obtained. In an especially p~efe~ ~ed embodiment, the thickness of the non-polymeric coating is in the range of from 100 - 1000 angstroms A prel~,.ed value for the low coeffiriçnt of friction is less than about 0 3 and preferably less than 0 2 Pl~ftllc;d materials having such a low coefficient for the thin film coating are amorphous diamond, diamond-like carbon (DLC), molybdenum dislllfide~ or any other similar material. The prefellcd thin film coating material is amorphous diamond.
Amorphous diamond comprises a nonhydrog~nqted version of DLC with at least 40% sp3 carbon bonding, a hardness of at least 45 gigaracc~l~ and a modulus of at least 400 gigapascals. In contrast, standard DLC has a hardness of only about 30 gigapascals. The resultant blade edge has a further increased tip radius and tip thickness over the blade edge having no coating or the inner coating alone, and has a cut force which is significantly lower than that of the blade edge having the first coating alone. In an especially prefel I ~d embodiment, the blade edge may be further coated with a lubricious polymer to fi~rther reduce the cut force. Because this coating has been shown to pull back from the edge the presence of the hard, thin film of low coefficient of friction causes the blade to show a significant reduction in cut force over blades having only chromium or other conventional materials on the edge. This superiority of cut force is evident even over sharper blades using conventional coatings. In an especially p,~fe-~ed embodiment, the blade edge is first coated with a thin film having a low coefficient of friction, such as amorphous diamond, and then with a lubricious polymer such as low molecular weight PTFE or KRYTOX
1000 to provide a shave exhibiting minim~l cut force. The resulting razor blade is especially advantageous for use with a wet shave razor, and one or more of such blades may be employed in a razor. The blades may be employed in a wet shave razor which is either disposable, i.e. the entire razor is discarded after a certain amount of usage, or pe""anenl which requires disposal and repl~ce~ 1 of only the razor cartridge, but not the handle, after a certain number of uses.
A variety of methods are available for depositing the coating of this invention.One method uses pulsed laser deposition to generate a plume of vaporized carbon ions from a solid carbon source. These ions can be directed to the edge of a blade where they will condense as a hard solid film with a suitable low coefficient of friction. Another method is the use of sputtering, either RF or DC, to provide a vapor of carbon atoms which similarly condense onto the blades fo~ g carbon films. Typically, the sputtered films are not as hard as coatings prepared by other means but they may be used due to their low coefficient of friction. CVD methods can be utili7çd, using a gaseous hydrocarbon gas as the source, but these must be done under conditions where the blades do not exceed 350 C for periods oftime as this will soften the blade steel. A plefe.led method of depositing the carbon films is by the cathodic arc method. Such a method is described fully in patent 5,458,754, assigned to Multi Arc Inc. in New Jersey and the disclosure of that patent is incorporated herein by reference. In this method carbon ions are produced with the arc vaporization of a solid graphite target. The patented method described pro-duces amorphous diamond films with a very low coefficient of friction.
As illustrated in Figure 1, the blade edge which is coated with chromium has significantly increased strength over the uncoated blade edge. Specifically, an unused, standard blade edge will be indented to a depth of approximately 650 nanometers by a 4 gram load applied normal to the blade edge. Coating with 300 A of chromium increases the edge strength as shown by a reduction in indent depth to about 610 nm, while 600 angstroms of chromium coating further reduces the indents to about 595 nm. A 600angstrom chromium coating in combination with an amorphous diamond coating of 200-300 angstroms significantly reduces the indent range to apploxillldlely 540 nm, thus illustrating that the blade of the present invention is significantly stronger than a standard blade.
Figure 2 illustrates the cut force of a standard blade, a less sharp blade made according to this invention, and a similar less sharp blade including the amorphous diamond coating. All blades are coated per standard process with PTFE. The standard blade edge exhibits a cut force of 2.64 Ib. The less sharp blade exhibits an average cut force of 2.96 Ib. The addition of 250 angstroms of amorphous diamond to the less sharp blade results in a cut force of 2.46 Ib, a significant reduction over the uncoated blade.
Consequently, blades made according to this invention are exceedin~ly durable and will continue to exhibit advantages over conventional blades for hundreds of cuts.
While there have been described what are p,escnlly believed to be the p,~;rel,cdembodiments of the present invention, those skilled in the art will realize that various ch~nges and modifications may be made to the invention without d~pa, ling from the spirit of the invention, and it is intended to claim all such ch~nges and modifications as fall within the scope of the invention.
Claims (28)
1. A razor blade comprising a substrate having a cutting edge which has a first tip radius and first tip thickness and an initial cut force, coated with a non-polymer inner coating of a first material sufficient to increase the initial cut force and provide a second, increased tip radius, a second, increased tip thickness and increase the strength of the cutting edge; and a non-polymer outer coating of a second material having a low coefficient of friction, wherein the second coating provides a third tip radius which is greater than the second tip radius, a third tip thickness which is greater than the second tip thickness and a cut force which is less than the initial cut force, and wherein the first and second materials are different from each other.
2. A razor blade according to claim 1, wherein the first material is selected from the group consisting of oxides, carbides, nitrides, borides, metals, chromium, ceramics, chromium/platinum, chrome nitride and combinations of this group.
3. A razor blade according to claim 2, wherein the first material is chromium.
4. A razor blade according to claim 2, wherein the inner coating is up to 1500 angstroms thick.
5. A razor blade according to claim 1, wherein the second material comprises a non-polymer material sufficient to reduce the coefficient of friction of the substrate.
6. A razor blade according to claim 5, wherein the second material has a coefficient of friction of less than about 0.3.
7 A razor blade according to claim 6, wherein the second material is selected from the group consisting of amorphous diamond, DLC (diamondlike carbon), and molybdenum disulfide.
8. A razor blade according to claim 7, wherein the second material is amorphous diamond.
9. A razor blade according to claim 8, wherein the amorphous diamond coating is in the range of about 100 to about 1000 angstroms thick.
10. A razor blade according to claim 9 further comprising a third coating consisting of a lubricious polymer.
11. A razor blade according to claim 10, wherein the lubricious polymer is polytetraflouroethylene or KRYTOX.
12. A razor blade according to claim 9, wherein the aspect ratio is about 1:1.
13. A wet shave razor comprising at least one blade according to claim 1.
14. A razor blade comprising a substrate having a cutting edge that has been increased in width and tip radius sufficient to increase the cutting force and a non-polymer coating sufficient to further increase the tip width and tip radius and to reduce the cut force of the cutting edge.
15. A razor blade according to claim 14, wherein the cutting edge is increased in tip radius and width via grinding or stropping.
16. A razor blade according to claim 14, wherein the coating comprises a non-polymer material having a coefficient of friction of less than about 0.3.
17. A razor blade according to claim 16, wherein the coating is selected from the group consisting of amorphous diamond, diamondlike carbon, and molybdenum disulfide.
18. A razor blade according to claim 17, wherein the coating is amorphous diamond.
19. A razor blade according to claim 18, wherein the amorphous diamond coating is in the range of about 100 to 1000 angstroms thick.
20. A razor blade according to claim 19 further comprising a second coating consisting of a lubricious polymer.
21. A razor blade according to claim 20, wherein the coating is polytetraflouroethylene or KRYTOX.
22. A razor blade according to claim 19, wherein the aspect ratio of the amorphous diamond coating is about 1:1.
23. A wet shave razor comprising at least on blade according to claim 14.
24. A method for manufacturing a razor blade having a cutting edge, comprising the steps of:
a) providing a substrate;
b) coating the cutting edge of the razor blade with a first, non-polymer coatingwhich is sufficient to increase the tip thickness, tip radius and cut force of the cutting edge, and c) coating the cutting edge of the razor blade with a second, non-polymer coating which is sufficient to increase the tip radius and tip thickness of the cutting edge and to reduce the coefficient of friction of the cutting edge.
a) providing a substrate;
b) coating the cutting edge of the razor blade with a first, non-polymer coatingwhich is sufficient to increase the tip thickness, tip radius and cut force of the cutting edge, and c) coating the cutting edge of the razor blade with a second, non-polymer coating which is sufficient to increase the tip radius and tip thickness of the cutting edge and to reduce the coefficient of friction of the cutting edge.
25. A method for manufacturing a razor blade according to claim 24, comprising the additional step of coating the cutting edge of the razor blade with a lubricious polymer.
26. A method for manufacturing a razor blade having a cutting edge, comprising the steps of:
a) providing a substrate:
b) thickening the cutting edge of the razor blade sufficiently so as to increase the cut force of the blade;
c) coating the cutting edge of the razor blade with a non-polymer coating having a low coefficient of friction sufficient to increase the tip thickness and tip radius of the cutting edge and to reduce the cut force of the edge.
a) providing a substrate:
b) thickening the cutting edge of the razor blade sufficiently so as to increase the cut force of the blade;
c) coating the cutting edge of the razor blade with a non-polymer coating having a low coefficient of friction sufficient to increase the tip thickness and tip radius of the cutting edge and to reduce the cut force of the edge.
27. A method for manufacturing a razor blade according to claim 26, wherein the thickening step is performed via grinding or stropping.
28. A method for manufacturing a razor blade according to claim 27, comprising the additional step of coating the cutting edge of the razor blade with a lubricious polymer.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US87244397A | 1997-06-10 | 1997-06-10 | |
| US08/872,443 | 1997-06-10 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2234966A1 true CA2234966A1 (en) | 1998-12-10 |
Family
ID=25359586
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2234966 Abandoned CA2234966A1 (en) | 1997-06-10 | 1998-04-17 | Improved blade edge |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0884142A1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH119857A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU738778B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2234966A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7527628B2 (en) | 1991-05-30 | 2009-05-05 | Synvasive Technology, Inc. | Surgical saw blade having at least one pair of opposed teeth shaped as right triangles |
| US6684513B1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2004-02-03 | The Gillette Company | Razor blade technology |
| JP4741056B2 (en) * | 2000-06-05 | 2011-08-03 | 株式会社貝印刃物開発センター | Blade member and method of manufacturing the blade edge |
| CA2353705A1 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2002-01-28 | Warner-Lambert Company | Multiple micro-blade hair removal devices and methods for manufacturing |
| US20040167544A1 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2004-08-26 | Eveready Battery Company, Inc. | Progressive hair removal surface |
| JP5184886B2 (en) | 2004-09-08 | 2013-04-17 | ビック・バイオレクス・エス・エー | Method of depositing a predetermined layer on a razor blade tip and razor blade |
| US20060277767A1 (en) * | 2005-06-14 | 2006-12-14 | Shuwei Sun | Razor blades |
| MX348741B (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2017-06-22 | The Gillette Company * | Razor blade coating. |
| US20130014395A1 (en) * | 2011-07-14 | 2013-01-17 | Ashok Bakul Patel | Razor blades having a large tip radius |
| US20130014396A1 (en) * | 2011-07-14 | 2013-01-17 | Kenneth James Skrobis | Razor blades having a wide facet angle |
| US9808944B2 (en) * | 2014-06-17 | 2017-11-07 | The Gillette Company Llc | Methods of manufacturing silicon blades for shaving razors |
| KR102265892B1 (en) | 2014-12-22 | 2021-06-17 | 빅-비올렉스 에스아 | Razor blade |
| EP3616800B1 (en) * | 2018-08-31 | 2022-11-09 | BIC Violex Single Member S.A. | Thinning of razor blade coatings |
| JP2023518359A (en) * | 2020-04-16 | 2023-05-01 | ザ ジレット カンパニー リミテッド ライアビリティ カンパニー | coating for razor blades |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE3372189D1 (en) * | 1982-11-19 | 1987-07-30 | Gillette Co | Razor blades |
| DE3403196A1 (en) * | 1984-01-31 | 1985-08-01 | Reinhard Dr. 7101 Flein Dahlberg | Extremely sharp points and cutting edges |
| US4933058A (en) | 1986-01-23 | 1990-06-12 | The Gillette Company | Formation of hard coatings on cutting edges |
| GB8821944D0 (en) | 1988-09-19 | 1988-10-19 | Gillette Co | Method & apparatus for forming surface of workpiece |
| US5488774A (en) | 1990-01-24 | 1996-02-06 | Janowski; Leonard J. | Cutting edges |
| US5121660A (en) | 1990-03-19 | 1992-06-16 | The Gillette Company | Razor blade technology |
| CA2065581C (en) | 1991-04-22 | 2002-03-12 | Andal Corp. | Plasma enhancement apparatus and method for physical vapor deposition |
| US5142785A (en) * | 1991-04-26 | 1992-09-01 | The Gillette Company | Razor technology |
| US5232568A (en) | 1991-06-24 | 1993-08-03 | The Gillette Company | Razor technology |
| US5295305B1 (en) | 1992-02-13 | 1996-08-13 | Gillette Co | Razor blade technology |
| CN1064294C (en) * | 1994-04-25 | 2001-04-11 | 吉莱特公司 | Amorphous diamond coating of blades |
-
1998
- 1998-04-17 CA CA 2234966 patent/CA2234966A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-05-01 AU AU63757/98A patent/AU738778B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1998-06-09 EP EP98304533A patent/EP0884142A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1998-06-10 JP JP16218598A patent/JPH119857A/en active Pending
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH119857A (en) | 1999-01-19 |
| AU738778B2 (en) | 2001-09-27 |
| AU6375798A (en) | 1998-12-17 |
| EP0884142A1 (en) | 1998-12-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP5312552B2 (en) | Razor blade | |
| CA2234966A1 (en) | Improved blade edge | |
| US6866894B2 (en) | Razor blade technology | |
| US5295305A (en) | Razor blade technology | |
| US5048191A (en) | Razor blade technology | |
| US5142785A (en) | Razor technology | |
| EP1899121B1 (en) | Razor blades | |
| US5669144A (en) | Razor blade technology | |
| CA2403346C (en) | Scalpel blade having high sharpness and toughness | |
| KR890004786B1 (en) | Disordered coating | |
| AU666659B2 (en) | Improvements in or relating to razor blades | |
| US20050246904A1 (en) | Cutting member having a superlattice coating | |
| MXPA02005832A (en) | Razor blade technology |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| FZDE | Dead |