CA2224668C - Method and apparatus for hybrid element casing packer for cased-hole applications - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for hybrid element casing packer for cased-hole applications Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2224668C CA2224668C CA002224668A CA2224668A CA2224668C CA 2224668 C CA2224668 C CA 2224668C CA 002224668 A CA002224668 A CA 002224668A CA 2224668 A CA2224668 A CA 2224668A CA 2224668 C CA2224668 C CA 2224668C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- inflatable
- ribs
- packer
- sealing
- resilient element
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/12—Packers; Plugs
- E21B33/127—Packers; Plugs with inflatable sleeve
- E21B33/1277—Packers; Plugs with inflatable sleeve characterised by the construction or fixation of the sleeve
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/12—Packers; Plugs
- E21B33/129—Packers; Plugs with mechanical slips for hooking into the casing
- E21B33/1295—Packers; Plugs with mechanical slips for hooking into the casing actuated by fluid pressure
Abstract
The present invention is directed to a new and improved wellbore packing device for use in isolating zones within a subterranean wellbore and to methods for applying the packing device in a cased-hole application. The present invention is directed to a new and improved inflatable or external casing packer (ECP) for use in cased wellbores. A hybrid inflatable packing element design in an ECP is presented, having in a single-unit, anchoring and sealing sections for application in cased wellbores using a phase change inflation medium such as cement or epoxy ar the like.
The present invention overcomes limitations of existing prior art ECP's since these prior art ECP's are not capable of providing both sealing and anchoring packing elements in a single unitized design in size and access restricted wellbores.
The inflatable elements comprise a sealing section that uses a noncontinuously reinforced elastomeric element with anti-extrusion ribs at its ends. When filled with the inflation medium, a frictional, radial force sealingly engages the elastomeric element with casing wall. An anchoring section is also provided that uses a continuously ribbed elastomeric bladder element. The steel ribs on the surface of the elastomeric element engage in metal-to-metal contact with the casing wall as the inflation medium exerts a Frictional, radial force. Any trapped. wellbore fluid between the sections escapes via the pathway between the ribs. A method for use of the hybrid ECP is also disclosed. More specifically, a method for use of the hybrid inflatable packer is a cased hole environment with a phase change inflation media is presented.
The present invention overcomes limitations of existing prior art ECP's since these prior art ECP's are not capable of providing both sealing and anchoring packing elements in a single unitized design in size and access restricted wellbores.
The inflatable elements comprise a sealing section that uses a noncontinuously reinforced elastomeric element with anti-extrusion ribs at its ends. When filled with the inflation medium, a frictional, radial force sealingly engages the elastomeric element with casing wall. An anchoring section is also provided that uses a continuously ribbed elastomeric bladder element. The steel ribs on the surface of the elastomeric element engage in metal-to-metal contact with the casing wall as the inflation medium exerts a Frictional, radial force. Any trapped. wellbore fluid between the sections escapes via the pathway between the ribs. A method for use of the hybrid ECP is also disclosed. More specifically, a method for use of the hybrid inflatable packer is a cased hole environment with a phase change inflation media is presented.
Description
METHOD AND APPARATUS FoR HYSRrD PLP1~NT
CASING PACKER p'oR CASED-R~~,1~J ApI~LICATIONS
The field of this invention relates generally to an inflatable packer for use in wellbores, ~d specifically to an inflatable packer which has a hybrid elastomeric element design providing sealing capability and anchoring support ~or use in cased-hole applications. More particularly, but not by rway of limitation, this invention relates to an inflatable packer where the sealing element acts independently o~ the anchoring element.
BACKGR 1N'ri pF THF INVE,NTi(?N
The production for oil and gas reserves has take. the industry to remote sites includiJOg inland and offshore locations. In addition, hydrocarbon production in xemote locations has become the 'norm." For example, production in deviated and mufti-l~al wellbores is nova very common. As a result, new and unique problems, particularly, in the completion phases have arisen. historically, the cost for developing and maintaining hydrocarbon production has been very high in remote locations. And as production continues in these remote areas, costs have also escalated bocause of the unique problems encountered iw producing oil and gas in difficult-to-reach locations andlor producing hydrocarbon through numerous zones. As a result production technigues in these remote areas require creative solutions to unique problems not encountered in conventional wellbores.
Aa one skilled in the industry znay understand, hydrocarbon production rates directly affect the profitability of a wellbore. r?uring the productive life of khese wvells, the well must be maintained so that hydrocarbon pz~oduotion and retrieval is performed in the most e~cient manner and at a maximum capacity. Well operators desire maacimum recovery from productive zones, and ~u ordex to maximize produc..
tion, propar testing, completion and cantsol of the well is required.
rn wellbore constivction, four factors are a part d~ every wellbore design phase: (1) the completion z:aethod most suitable ~~r a particular well, (Z) the fluid flow paths needed, (3) the completion system chosen to bz~ing the fluids to the wellhead, and (4) the completion cost versus the production potential. The completion method chosen is an important element, and this invention relates to proper zone isolation and 1,0 the most elective and efficient means to do so. More particularly, it concerns zone isolation in cased wellbores. As one in the industry might expect today, mufti-lateral wellbores require cased wellbores for efficient drainage through multiple zones andlor reservoirs. In addition, many operations conventionally performed at the surface are now performed downhole. As a z~esult, cased-hole operations have become a necessity for many wellbore coxnpletions.
Thus, di~'erent tools are needed for each of two methods of completion: {1) open-hole completion and (Z) cased ox perforated completions. rn an open-hole ox a barefoot wellbore completion, a relatively large internal diameter is encountered and the open bolt shape is invariably skewed. The open-hole is irregular {not pezfeetly ZO cylindrical) once the hale is drilled in the earthen formation. ~'horefore, the ~xtemal casing packer became an ideally suited tool to isolate zones during production or cementing opGxations because of its large inflation and sealing capacity. In such completion methods, tb~e external casing packex is part of the casing string and forms a seal and an anclwr against the open-hole wall when an elastomeric elemont in the inflatable tool is inflated. The anchor in the open.-hole is formed whey the packer's elastomeric element is inflated and contours to the shape of the open-hole, preventing axial movement in the weklbore. The exceptional expansion and sealing capabilities of the ~cible elastomeric elements allow these tools to handle conditions that would be impossible for conventional packing tools. 'When inflated, the packing element conforms to virtually any irregularity in open-.hole completed wellbores.
While no packring element can tolerate all conditions, the iz~atabke packing elements have been found to be very tolerant for open-hole completions.
4n the other hand, is cased-hole wellbores, a difl"erent set of criteria and problems for completing and workover o~ a wellbore are encountered. Ozte recent problem that has been encountered is to isolate a particular zone that is located below completion equipment akeady located in the wellbore. Such zones are normally very di~cult to isolate since only limited access or thmugh-pass in existing wellbore equipment is available to the zone below. Conventionally, such completion equipment bas provided a relatively narrow access to a section located below.
In such wellbores there is, therefore, a need for zone isolation packers that may be installed below any existing equipment. It is clear that conventional packer equipment may not be used in such wellbores since much of it comprises larger di~neter equipment.
Such equipment, therefore, cannot pass through the restricted available access.
In addition, conventional thru-tubing and production inj ection. packer tech nologies are also inadequate in these applications since they do not and cannot provide sufif dent scaling capability in larger diameter casing sizes when using an inflation medium that operates under a phase change condition. Examples of a phase change medium include cement or epoxy. Phase cl~ge of an inflation medium occurs after the inflation medium sets. An inflation medium sets whoa it retains a permanent pb~ase. For example, a phase change occurs when cement or epoxy hardens. However, subsequent to such hardening, another phase change occurs such that the cement ax epoxy shrinks slightly.
Tn these restricted access wellbores, conventional production injection packers and thra tubing technology using phase change inflation media cannot be inflated to reach the outer diameter (OD) of the cased wellbore (the wall) to effectively seal a zone for reasons that will be discussed hereinafter. Thus, a new zone isolation tool is greatly nxd~ to isolate certain zones in the cased wellbore.
One concept is to use conventional external casing packer technology, now usod in larger diameter open hole completions, to anchor and seal (isolate) a particular none, especially since they have a relatively small "pass-through" dr3 and thus are capable of passing through the restzicted access of existing equipment.
Examples of these conventional packer technology include "production injection packers"
and "thru tubing packers." However, even with improving elastomer technology, these conventional packets have proven to be relatively ineffective in applications requiring inflation in a cased wellbore with a phase change medium.
CASING PACKER p'oR CASED-R~~,1~J ApI~LICATIONS
The field of this invention relates generally to an inflatable packer for use in wellbores, ~d specifically to an inflatable packer which has a hybrid elastomeric element design providing sealing capability and anchoring support ~or use in cased-hole applications. More particularly, but not by rway of limitation, this invention relates to an inflatable packer where the sealing element acts independently o~ the anchoring element.
BACKGR 1N'ri pF THF INVE,NTi(?N
The production for oil and gas reserves has take. the industry to remote sites includiJOg inland and offshore locations. In addition, hydrocarbon production in xemote locations has become the 'norm." For example, production in deviated and mufti-l~al wellbores is nova very common. As a result, new and unique problems, particularly, in the completion phases have arisen. historically, the cost for developing and maintaining hydrocarbon production has been very high in remote locations. And as production continues in these remote areas, costs have also escalated bocause of the unique problems encountered iw producing oil and gas in difficult-to-reach locations andlor producing hydrocarbon through numerous zones. As a result production technigues in these remote areas require creative solutions to unique problems not encountered in conventional wellbores.
Aa one skilled in the industry znay understand, hydrocarbon production rates directly affect the profitability of a wellbore. r?uring the productive life of khese wvells, the well must be maintained so that hydrocarbon pz~oduotion and retrieval is performed in the most e~cient manner and at a maximum capacity. Well operators desire maacimum recovery from productive zones, and ~u ordex to maximize produc..
tion, propar testing, completion and cantsol of the well is required.
rn wellbore constivction, four factors are a part d~ every wellbore design phase: (1) the completion z:aethod most suitable ~~r a particular well, (Z) the fluid flow paths needed, (3) the completion system chosen to bz~ing the fluids to the wellhead, and (4) the completion cost versus the production potential. The completion method chosen is an important element, and this invention relates to proper zone isolation and 1,0 the most elective and efficient means to do so. More particularly, it concerns zone isolation in cased wellbores. As one in the industry might expect today, mufti-lateral wellbores require cased wellbores for efficient drainage through multiple zones andlor reservoirs. In addition, many operations conventionally performed at the surface are now performed downhole. As a z~esult, cased-hole operations have become a necessity for many wellbore coxnpletions.
Thus, di~'erent tools are needed for each of two methods of completion: {1) open-hole completion and (Z) cased ox perforated completions. rn an open-hole ox a barefoot wellbore completion, a relatively large internal diameter is encountered and the open bolt shape is invariably skewed. The open-hole is irregular {not pezfeetly ZO cylindrical) once the hale is drilled in the earthen formation. ~'horefore, the ~xtemal casing packer became an ideally suited tool to isolate zones during production or cementing opGxations because of its large inflation and sealing capacity. In such completion methods, tb~e external casing packex is part of the casing string and forms a seal and an anclwr against the open-hole wall when an elastomeric elemont in the inflatable tool is inflated. The anchor in the open.-hole is formed whey the packer's elastomeric element is inflated and contours to the shape of the open-hole, preventing axial movement in the weklbore. The exceptional expansion and sealing capabilities of the ~cible elastomeric elements allow these tools to handle conditions that would be impossible for conventional packing tools. 'When inflated, the packing element conforms to virtually any irregularity in open-.hole completed wellbores.
While no packring element can tolerate all conditions, the iz~atabke packing elements have been found to be very tolerant for open-hole completions.
4n the other hand, is cased-hole wellbores, a difl"erent set of criteria and problems for completing and workover o~ a wellbore are encountered. Ozte recent problem that has been encountered is to isolate a particular zone that is located below completion equipment akeady located in the wellbore. Such zones are normally very di~cult to isolate since only limited access or thmugh-pass in existing wellbore equipment is available to the zone below. Conventionally, such completion equipment bas provided a relatively narrow access to a section located below.
In such wellbores there is, therefore, a need for zone isolation packers that may be installed below any existing equipment. It is clear that conventional packer equipment may not be used in such wellbores since much of it comprises larger di~neter equipment.
Such equipment, therefore, cannot pass through the restricted available access.
In addition, conventional thru-tubing and production inj ection. packer tech nologies are also inadequate in these applications since they do not and cannot provide sufif dent scaling capability in larger diameter casing sizes when using an inflation medium that operates under a phase change condition. Examples of a phase change medium include cement or epoxy. Phase cl~ge of an inflation medium occurs after the inflation medium sets. An inflation medium sets whoa it retains a permanent pb~ase. For example, a phase change occurs when cement or epoxy hardens. However, subsequent to such hardening, another phase change occurs such that the cement ax epoxy shrinks slightly.
Tn these restricted access wellbores, conventional production injection packers and thra tubing technology using phase change inflation media cannot be inflated to reach the outer diameter (OD) of the cased wellbore (the wall) to effectively seal a zone for reasons that will be discussed hereinafter. Thus, a new zone isolation tool is greatly nxd~ to isolate certain zones in the cased wellbore.
One concept is to use conventional external casing packer technology, now usod in larger diameter open hole completions, to anchor and seal (isolate) a particular none, especially since they have a relatively small "pass-through" dr3 and thus are capable of passing through the restzicted access of existing equipment.
Examples of these conventional packer technology include "production injection packers"
and "thru tubing packers." However, even with improving elastomer technology, these conventional packets have proven to be relatively ineffective in applications requiring inflation in a cased wellbore with a phase change medium.
In order to understand why this is so, it is first necessary to review the desig~a of these (infl,atable) packers. inflatable packers have long utilized a design incorpo-rating the use of various elastomeric elements in combination with metal slats or ribs as inflatable elements. Such inflatable tools comprise an elastomeriG sleeve element mountod in surrounding relationship to a tubular body portion. To protect the elastomeric sleeve eleme~at, a plurality of resilient slats or ribs are peripherally bonded to the clastomeac sleeve element. The medial portion of the elastomeric sleeve is furrba surrounded, and may be bonded, by an outer annular elastomeric sleeve element or "cover" o~ substantial thickness. These prior art external casing packers thus use a "full cover" design. Upper and lower assemblies securely and sealingly couple the ends of the packing element sleeves to the central tubular body. A
pressurized. phase change inflation medium is communicated to the tubular body and then through radial passages thereon to the interior of the elastomeric sleeve element to inflate the packing elements, providing a sealing radial engagement With the wdibore wall. .
A conventional external casing packer (with or without a phase change medium) xs ineffective in cased-v~ellborc applications because the contour of the casing is sufficiently cylindrical, thus preventing a p~raper anchoring relationship between the external casing packea and the casing wall. One reason a proper anchor does not result is because the coe~cient of friction between the elastomeric element and the steel casing in a wetted media environment is very low. Thus, the differential pressure in the wellbore between locations above and below the packer forces its movement.
In addition, the conventional external, casing packer is designed to provide only anti-extrusion benefits. For example, the ribs are located only on the secured 3b cods (securing assemblies) of the elastomeric element and thus provide only limited anchoring benefits. As such, the elastomeric element has a tendency to "roll over" or overlap the secured end when a sufficient axial force is applied to the nibs.
Qn the other hand, if a modification is made and the elastomeric elemeat is fully ribbed, another disadvantage arises. In the latter case, a full length rib elastomeric element, in combination with the elastomeric element, is a much larger OD packer.
Therefore, a new design requires a thitm~er cover to overcome the limited access available through existing downhole equipment.
However, when a thinner cover is introduced in the new design, another signif ieant problem arises when a phase change inflation medium is used to inflate the inflatable packer in the cased wcllbore. This new problem arises when the inflation medium changes phases (cures and contracts) and there is a resulting loss of radial force available against the casing wall, It is understood by one skilled in the art that a relatively thicker elastomcric element normally makes up this differential in radial force. However, when a thinner element is used, the loss in radial force may not be compe~ated or "made up." Thus, the amount of compensation an elastomeric element can 'fake-up" is a function of its thickness. Stated differently, the energy storage capacity of the elastomeric element available for sealing engagement is a fimetion of its thickness. Thus, as a relatively thicker elastomeric element is used, a relatively larger energy storage potential exists. This larger stored energy potential is available to act against the cased-wellbore wall in sealing engagement, compensating for any shrinkage in the inflation medium. In a cased wellbore, therefore, a relatively thick elastomerie element is required to obtain proper sealing capability.
Thus, there is a need for a new Zone isolation tool that overcomes all of these limitations.
Various prior art external casing packer devices have existed, but none pmvide a solution for isolating a zone belovc~ existing equipment that has rest~cted access in a cased wellbore enviro~ent. k'or example, Molly, et. al., discloses in U.S.1'ater~t No.
pressurized. phase change inflation medium is communicated to the tubular body and then through radial passages thereon to the interior of the elastomeric sleeve element to inflate the packing elements, providing a sealing radial engagement With the wdibore wall. .
A conventional external casing packer (with or without a phase change medium) xs ineffective in cased-v~ellborc applications because the contour of the casing is sufficiently cylindrical, thus preventing a p~raper anchoring relationship between the external casing packea and the casing wall. One reason a proper anchor does not result is because the coe~cient of friction between the elastomeric element and the steel casing in a wetted media environment is very low. Thus, the differential pressure in the wellbore between locations above and below the packer forces its movement.
In addition, the conventional external, casing packer is designed to provide only anti-extrusion benefits. For example, the ribs are located only on the secured 3b cods (securing assemblies) of the elastomeric element and thus provide only limited anchoring benefits. As such, the elastomeric element has a tendency to "roll over" or overlap the secured end when a sufficient axial force is applied to the nibs.
Qn the other hand, if a modification is made and the elastomeric elemeat is fully ribbed, another disadvantage arises. In the latter case, a full length rib elastomeric element, in combination with the elastomeric element, is a much larger OD packer.
Therefore, a new design requires a thitm~er cover to overcome the limited access available through existing downhole equipment.
However, when a thinner cover is introduced in the new design, another signif ieant problem arises when a phase change inflation medium is used to inflate the inflatable packer in the cased wcllbore. This new problem arises when the inflation medium changes phases (cures and contracts) and there is a resulting loss of radial force available against the casing wall, It is understood by one skilled in the art that a relatively thicker elastomcric element normally makes up this differential in radial force. However, when a thinner element is used, the loss in radial force may not be compe~ated or "made up." Thus, the amount of compensation an elastomeric element can 'fake-up" is a function of its thickness. Stated differently, the energy storage capacity of the elastomeric element available for sealing engagement is a fimetion of its thickness. Thus, as a relatively thicker elastomeric element is used, a relatively larger energy storage potential exists. This larger stored energy potential is available to act against the cased-wellbore wall in sealing engagement, compensating for any shrinkage in the inflation medium. In a cased wellbore, therefore, a relatively thick elastomerie element is required to obtain proper sealing capability.
Thus, there is a need for a new Zone isolation tool that overcomes all of these limitations.
Various prior art external casing packer devices have existed, but none pmvide a solution for isolating a zone belovc~ existing equipment that has rest~cted access in a cased wellbore enviro~ent. k'or example, Molly, et. al., discloses in U.S.1'ater~t No.
5,143,154 an inflatable packing element for an inflatable paol~er having a specific ri'b coupling design to the tubular mandrel.
Another teaching is that by Molly in 'Cr.S. Patent No. 5,101,908 for an inflat able packing device and a method for sealing. The device discloses upper and lor~vex elastomeric elements surrounding a tubular mandrel. Again, however, this teaching is not directed to the problems encountered herein.
Another teaching is that of Halbardier in U.S. Patent No. 4,869,325, disclosing a method and apparatus for setting, upsetting, and retrieving a packer yr a bridge plug from a subterranean well which may be passed though a small diameter tubing. I~owever, again, such a teaching is nut directed to the specific problems encountered h,crein.
Therefore, there is a need for a method and apparatrxs for an inflatable tool that provides a solution for isolating zones through restricted access rompledan equipment in a cased wellbares that provide both a seal and anchoring features.
S 1MMARY )F THh LNVENTION
The present invention is directed to a new and improved wellbore packing device for use in isolating zones within a subteiraneatx wellbore and to methods for applying the packing device in a cased-hole application. The present invention is directed to a new and improved inflatable or external casing packer {ECP) for use in cased wellbores. A hybzid inflatable packing element design in an ECP is presented, having in a single-unit, anchoring and sealing sections for application in cased wellbores using a phase change inflation medium such as cement ox epoxy or the like.
The present invention overcomes limitations of existing prior art ECP's since these prior art ECP's are not capable of providing both sealing and anchoring packing elements in a single unitized design in size and access restricted wellbores.
The inflatable elements comprise a sealing section that uses a rloncontinuously reinforced elastomeric element with anti-extrusion ribs at its ends_ When filled with the inlla~ion medium, a friction l,, radial force sealingly engages the elastomeric element with casiurg wall. An anchoring section is also provided that uses a contuauously n'bbed elastomtric bladder element. The steel ribs on the surface of the elastomeric ekeznent engage in metal-to-metal contact rwith the casing wall as the inflation medium exerts a frictional, radial force. Any trapped wellbare fluid between the sections escapes via the pathway between the ribs. A method for use of the hybrid ECP is also disclosed. More specifically, a method for use of the hybrid infkatable packer m a cased-hole environment with a phase change inflation media is presented.
Another teaching is that by Molly in 'Cr.S. Patent No. 5,101,908 for an inflat able packing device and a method for sealing. The device discloses upper and lor~vex elastomeric elements surrounding a tubular mandrel. Again, however, this teaching is not directed to the problems encountered herein.
Another teaching is that of Halbardier in U.S. Patent No. 4,869,325, disclosing a method and apparatus for setting, upsetting, and retrieving a packer yr a bridge plug from a subterranean well which may be passed though a small diameter tubing. I~owever, again, such a teaching is nut directed to the specific problems encountered h,crein.
Therefore, there is a need for a method and apparatrxs for an inflatable tool that provides a solution for isolating zones through restricted access rompledan equipment in a cased wellbares that provide both a seal and anchoring features.
S 1MMARY )F THh LNVENTION
The present invention is directed to a new and improved wellbore packing device for use in isolating zones within a subteiraneatx wellbore and to methods for applying the packing device in a cased-hole application. The present invention is directed to a new and improved inflatable or external casing packer {ECP) for use in cased wellbores. A hybzid inflatable packing element design in an ECP is presented, having in a single-unit, anchoring and sealing sections for application in cased wellbores using a phase change inflation medium such as cement ox epoxy or the like.
The present invention overcomes limitations of existing prior art ECP's since these prior art ECP's are not capable of providing both sealing and anchoring packing elements in a single unitized design in size and access restricted wellbores.
The inflatable elements comprise a sealing section that uses a rloncontinuously reinforced elastomeric element with anti-extrusion ribs at its ends_ When filled with the inlla~ion medium, a friction l,, radial force sealingly engages the elastomeric element with casiurg wall. An anchoring section is also provided that uses a contuauously n'bbed elastomtric bladder element. The steel ribs on the surface of the elastomeric ekeznent engage in metal-to-metal contact rwith the casing wall as the inflation medium exerts a frictional, radial force. Any trapped wellbare fluid between the sections escapes via the pathway between the ribs. A method for use of the hybrid ECP is also disclosed. More specifically, a method for use of the hybrid infkatable packer m a cased-hole environment with a phase change inflation media is presented.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention there is provided a downhole inflatable packer for sealing against a cased or uncased wellbore wall, comprising:
a body;
a sealing section coupled to the body and being inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to the body and being inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body, said sealing section being spaced apart from said at least one anchor section.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of sealing a cased borehole, comprising the steps of:
providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and 1 S inflating both inflatable elements.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a downhole inflatable packer for sealing against a cased wellbore wall, comprising:
a body;
a sealing section coupled to said body and being inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to said body and being inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body, wherein:
said sealing section is nonoverlapping with said at least one anchor section;
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element which is nonoverlapping with said first resilient element; and said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a downhole inflatable packer for sealing against a cased wellbore wall, comprising:
6a a body;
a sealing section coupled to said body and inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to said body and inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body wherein:
said sealing section is spaced apart from said at least one anchor section;
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element;
said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element;
and said first resilient element comprises ribs which are located adjacent to at least one of opposed ends of said first resilient element, said ribs being discontinuous over the length of said first resilient element.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of sealing a cased borehole, comprising the steps of providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate nonoverlapping inflatable element for anchoring;
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of sealing a cased borehole, comprising the steps of:
providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements, wherein said method further comprises the steps of:
using an inflating material to inflate said inflatable that shrinks when it sets;
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring;
using said greater thickness for compensating for said shrinkage;
6b reinforcing said inflatable element for anchoring with ribs extending at least over a majority of the length thereof;
exposing said ribs on said inflatable element for anchoring so said ribs contact the cased borehole; and providing ribs on said inflatable element for sealing which extend from at least one end thereof, said ribs extending from said one end and terminating short of the midpoint of said inflatable element for sealing.
6c ~~ ~' D TaTION OF THE D AWIN ,~
Figure lA is a cross-sectional and perspective combination view of the prior art exttemal casing packer, showing a continuous ribbed style inflatable element.
Figure 1$ is a cross-sectional and perspective combination view of the prior art rxt~l casing packer, showing a noncontinuous style anllatable elerzxez~t_ 14 Figure 2 is a crass-sectional view of a hybrid external casing packer of the preferred embodiment, showing a sealing inflatable element section and an anchoring inflatable element section as it would appear in the run-in mode of operation.
Figure 3 is a cross-sectional view of a hybrid external casing packer of the preferred embodimtrxt, showing a sealing inflatable element section and an anchoring inflatable element section as it would appear in the inflation mode of operation.
D .~i~D,ESGRTPT10N f,~,F,~ PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention is best described and understood with reference to the context in which it is used and the prior art designs of external casing packers (see Figures lA & 1$).
Thcu tubing workover and completion technologies have significant advantages, particularly since they provide isolation in restricted access zones.
However, some operating and design limitations exist in sv~h technologies. For example, thin tubing technologies arc sized smaller and therefore are limited in larger diameter wellbore applications. In cased wellbores, significant pressure differentials exist within the wellbore when flowing wellbore fluids are present and, thus, unintendod displacement of settable or inflatable tools occurs. Flow in either direction usually eziats is a wellbore when a producing zone is in hydraulic commumicatio~u, with a consuming zone and such inter-zone "cross-flow" may exist in a wellbore, irrespective of whether flow is directed to the surface_ Inflatable wellbore tools are operable in a number of modes, such as the "run-in" mode of operation, an "expansion or inflation" mode of operation, and a "setting"
mode of operation. The an:Qatable tool is maintained in a run in condition during entxy of the tool into the wellbore in a reduced radial dimension so that the tool may pass through restri~d access areas. Once the inflatable tool is passed beyond the restricted access area, and placed in a desired area, inflation pressure is applied to the tool with an inflation medium so as to urge xt into a radially outward direction in an inflated condition. Such radial expansion, at least in part, obstructs the flow of wellbore fluid within the cased wellbore.
The obstruction created by the inflatable tool frequently creates a pressure diff~tial across the in~tatable tool. Most commonly, this occurs when the inflatable tool is set above a producing zone. Wellbore fluids, such as oil, gas and water, will continue flowing in the wellbore due to a pressure differential between the formation and the wellbore, as well as pressure differential between zones. Thus, wellbore fluid ~low may urge the inflatable tool to move, rotate, twist andlor slide, especially in a wetted e~ronment of a cased wellbore. The unintended, and often harmful, displacement of the inflatable tool o$en occurs because currently available prior azt thru-tubing technologies do not provide adequate anchoring means. Such anchoring means are traditionally found in tools having "gripping teeth," as those found in the more conventional metal-to-ztxetal packer devices. Thus, for example, coiled tubing-suspended inflatable tools do not provide sufficient anchoring means to prevenr displacement and are not often used in such applications. obviously, the mechanical packers are simply not appropriate for restricted access applications.
Additionally, if a pressure differential is developed across the inflatable tool, the pressure differential away act to disconnect the inflatable foal from the suspension tool or means. 'thus, for example, in a wireline-suspended tool, a large pressure diffenndal could snap the wellbore tool loose from the wireline cable.
Alternatively, a higb,-pxessure-stnsitive or tension-sensitive disconnect device used in connection with coif tubing ox groduction string operations znay easily actuate and disconnect the packer device from the coil tubing or production string.
With respect to prior art designs, such as open-hole inflatable packer devices, a continuous n'bbed style external casing packer (ECl'} zd is shown in Figure lA
and a noncontinuous ribbed styled ECP is shown in Figure 1B. The continuous ribbed style EG'P 20 provides a long dynamic hydromechanical seal using an elastomeric element 14 combined with continuous stainless steel ribs 16 to protect the inflatable elements x2,14 from the tremendous multidimensional strains existing in nonuniform wellbores. The steel ribs 16 are utilized to provide strength, flexibility and long-term reliability against tear of the irmer elastomeric element 12. These inflatable elements 12,14 are mounted on the mandrel or inflatable tool 10 by securing assemblies 18 on each end. This ECP 20 is particularly useful for short- or long-length seal applications requiring positive seals in high differential, irregular, or elliptical open-hole wellbores. The continuous ribbed ECP uses various inflation media, including water, drilling fluids and/or cement.
'fhe noncontinuous ribbed Et:,P 30, on the other hazed, is used as a supple-mental packer to the continuous n'bbed ECP 20 during special applications requiring longer sealing elements and utilizing cement, nnud, fluid or epoxy as the inflation medium. It may include a valve collar 3$ that features an enlarged inflation flow capacity and a flow control that decreases the erosion of the valve seats 35, seals (not shown) and the inflation passageway 39. The ribs 31 are located only on the secured ends 36 of the elastomeric element and thus provide only limited anchoring benefits.
The ribs 3 Z, as previously stated, provide strength at the end sleeve area 36 and also where the ribs engage 33 the wcllbore wall 11. The nonreinforced center ar medial portion 32 creates a flexible expansion area which readily conforms to open-hole irregularities 12, pmviditag an adequate seal.
In an apen~hole wellbore completion as shown in Figure 1, a relati'~ely large diameter is encountered in the welIbore, and the open-hole wall l,1 is invariably skewed or irregular x2 (not perfectly cylindrical) since the hole is drilled in the earthen formation 13. Therefore, the conventional ECP 20,30, as described above, b~a~ne an ideally suited wellbore tool to isolate zones in such environments during production or workover operations because of the large inflation capacity of its inflatable elastrnmeric clement. In such open-hole operations, the ECP is part of the casing string and forms a "sealing" anchor against the open-hole, izregular wall 12.
The "sealing" anchor in the open-hole wellbore i.s formed when the packer's elastomeric element 14 is inflated and contours to the shape 12 of the open-hole, preventing axial movement in the wellbore. Axial movement is prevented because of multidimensional forces acting radially against the wellbore wall 11. In addition, these prior art ECP's use a "full cover" elastomeric element design. A full cover ~8n '~'r~ >be ~ length of the inner elastomeric element 12, 29 with an outer elastomeric element 14,32. In the alternative, the noncontinuous metal ribs 31 (Figure 113) are fabricated inside the elastomerie cover 32 and are coupled to the end sleeves 36 so as to provide reinforcement against extrusion when the element 32 is inflated.
'Thus, the exceptional expansion capability of the flexible elastomeric element allows for use of these $Cp tools in conditions that would be otherwise impossible for conventional (mechanical) packing tools.
~~ however, as pz~eviously mentxoz~ed, these prior art ECP's 20,30 are limited in application to open-hole operations. In cased-wellbore applications, these prior art ECP's 20,30 are inadequate because the contour 55 of the casing 54 is sufficiently cylindrical. The uaifo~rm cylindrical shape of the casing wall 54 prevents a proper or adequate anchoring relationship between a conventional ECP 20,30 and the casing wall 54.
one reason a proper anchoring relationship, in the conventional ECP's20, 30, does not result is because the coefficient of friction between the elastomeric element 14,32 and the steel casing 54 in a wetted media is very law. 'Thus, the differential pressure in the wellbore between locations above and below the packer results in movement or displacement of the packer and which normally results in great damage to the well, particularly in loss of production and the resulting economic damages.
.. In addition, the conventional, nroncontinu.ous ribbed style IyCP 30 is designed such that the ribs 31 are only located an the secured ends 36 of the elastorneric element 32 and thus provide only limited. anchoring and/or anti-extrusion benefits. As such, the elastomeric element 32 has a tendency to "roll over" or overlap over the secured end 36 near the end sleeves 33 when a su~cient axial force is applied to the n'bs 30. Qn the other hand, if a modification is made so that the elastomeric element 32 is fully n'bbed, another problem arises. A full length ribbed elastomeric ele~rent 14, as shown in Figure lA, becomes a much larger diameter inflatable element 14 and therefore r~uires a thinner elastomeric cover 14 so that the ECP 20 may pass through existing equipment (not shown), having only limited or restricted access to the zone beyond.
Howtver, when a thinner elastomeric cover 14 is used, a significant dis-advantage results in providing adequate sealing protection. It should be understood that the inflatable tool is being applied to cased wellbores, using a phase change medium to inflate the element. Thus, when the phase change inflation medium cures, there is a toss of radial force available against the casing wall as the irdlation medium changes its phase, i. ~, the inflation medium contracts or shrinks as it hardens, resulting in loss of available radial force or energy against the wellbore wall. It is eleax to one skilled in the art that the clastomeric element normally makes up the difference in rad~i,al force loss through the resiliency of a relatively thicker elastomeric cover, i.e., the relatively thick clastomeric cover stores a certain amount of radial force energy upon the expansion of the inflation medium and releases this stored energy to compensate for any phase changes in the inflation medium, such as shrinkage or contraction. The amount of energy storage available to compensate for shrinkage force Loss is clearly a function of the elastomer thickness. In a cased wellbore, therefore, a relatively thick elastoxneric cover is necessary to obtain proper sealing capability. This thicker cover design requirement, however, conflicts with having only lim~it~d access through the downhole equipment in cased wellbares. Thus, there is a need for a new zone isolation inflatable taol that overcomes all of these limitations.
ReferBng now to Figures 2 and 3, a new inflatable tool design is disclosed which overcomes many of the limitations discussed above. In the preferred embodi-ment, the new inflatable tool design uses a sectioned element design. to provide two of the most important requirements iun cased-wellbore applications when using phase change inflation media: (1) sealing ability, and (2) anchoring capability.
In the preferred embodiment, the sealing feature 40 is provided with a full cover elastomerie design 45 having a relatively large thickness 41 while the anchoring feature 42 is provided with an exposed full length or continuous ebbed design providing metal-to-metal contact 63 with the casing wall 54. The full cover elastomea~ic design 45 of the sealing element section 40 provides the necessary elastomezic thickness 41 to compensate for phase change losses in radial sealing force. On the other hand, the full length exposed rib element section 42 provides a metal-to-metal engagement 63 between the anchoring element 62 and the casing wall 54 so as to create sufficient anchoring force in the cased wellbore.
The two sections 40, 42 are separated by end sleeves 44 which couple each respective element 40, 42 to the tubular body 58 of the inflatable tool. The method for coupling each respective element 40, 42 is well-known in the art and is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,143,154. In addition, the features of the valve apparatus (not shown) for proper inflation of the elastomeric elements is well-known in the art. See, for example, U.S. Patent No. 4,708,208; U.S. Patent No. 4,805,699; and U.S.
Patent No. 4,832,120. The end sleeves 44 are mechanically coupled to the tubular body by conventional techniques such as threaded sleeves (not shown).
Refernng now to Figure 2, one embodiment of the invention, a hybrid inflatable tool, is shown in the run-in condition. The sealing section 40 comprises elastomeric element 48 supported by noncontinuous anti-extrusion ribs 46. The sealing section 40 is preferably placed in the direction away from the conveyance device (not shown), while the anchoring section 42 is placed near the conveyance device. However, this by no means is a limitation to the present invention.
Opposite ends 45 of the sealing element 48 are coupled 47 to the tubular member 58 with end sleeves 44. The anti-extrusion ribs 46 are mechanically coupled to the end sleeve 44 in accordance with conventional methods that are well-known in the art. The noncontinuous, nonreinforced rib design of the sealing element 40 provides the necessary thickness 41 to compensate for radial force loss from phase change in the inflation medium 56. Yet, the thickness 41 of the sealing element 48 provided overcomes any access and size restrictions of existing equipment already located downhole as will become more apparent hereinafter.
The inflatable tool element 48 in the sealing section 40 is not reinforced in the medial portion 49 of the elastomeric element 48 and as such does not have ribs extending end to end. Such a design clearly compensates for having a relatively large thickness 41 elastomeric element 48 because the ribs 46 are eliminated in the medial portion 49. The ribs 46 are only provided at the ends 45 where the sealing element 48 is connected to the tubular mandrel 58 to support the end load. The medial portion 49 is simply made of elastomer, and thus, a thicker 41 elastamer may be provided.
However, anchori~ag is not possible in cased wellbores under such circumstances. rn open hole, the anchoring results frozen the rough noncontinuous surface of the wehbore I0 while the casing has a smooth surface 55 and the result is that gripping dons not occur.
Anchoring is, howevar, provided by a separate but related section 42.
In the prefeaed embodiment, the anchoring element section 42 comprises an inner tube or bladder 52 that is inflated, the anchor ribs 62 and an elastomeric stiffener band 60 to uniformly space the ribs 46 along the periphery of the inner tube 52 may 15 be added. The ribs 62 are made of steel and are exposed sa as to engage in a metal-to-metal relationship ~3 with the wellbore casing 55. The ribs 6Z are mechanically coupled to a ring (not shown) and fitted inside the end sleeves 44. The exposed steel n'bs 62 may be nm in a bigh-pressure differential environment and yet still maintain metal-to-metal friction 63 for a strong anchoring relationship. In certava applications, 20 such as short-length packers, the bands b0 are not needed.
Thus, the hybrid design of the present invention presented herein discloses an inflatable tool overcoming traditional cased-wellbore limitations and restrictions and yet having an intYatable unitary element design providing sealing and anchoring provisions and which are in pressure comxxrunication relative to each other.
Thus the 25 combinued design has two elements 40,42 providing independent functions while inflating relative to each other. The anchoring element 42 only functions as an anchor while the sealing element 40 only functions as a seal.
In the preferred embodiment, the elastomer compounds 4$,52 included in the design for the cover includes materials that have good memory for returning to the 30 original size and developed for use in. sub-zero surface conditions to avoid impact damage to the element surface during on-site handling. The temperature range far the elastomeric elements raage from ambient to more than 500°F depending on the typo of elastomer used. It should be noted that the cuz~rent invention does not, however, depend on the type of elastomer used.
The temperature ranges disclosed herein only represent currently available elastomer technology.
Each of the sealing and anchoring elements 40, 42 can be inflated with a phase change inflation medium 56 such as cement, epoxy or other such media. Thus, with today's expanding cement technology, a certain amount of contraction or shrinkage occurs in the inflation medium 56 during the curing or phase change stage. The present invention overcomes this limitation even when using phase change inflation medium 56 susceptible to radial force losses such as cement which suffers contraction at cured stage.
Referring now to Figure 3, one of the embodiments, the present invention is shown as an expansion or inflation mode of operation and a set mode of operation. In the sealing element section 40, the inflatable elastomeric element is in full expansion, exerting a radial force against the casing wall 55. The radial force from a pressurized inflation medium 56 creates a sealing engagement 64 between the elastomeric element 48 and casing wall 55. As a result, wellbore fluids are prevented from having cross-flow, and the area above and below the inflatable tool are isolated from each other. The compressive force or frictional engagement 64 between the elastomeric element 48 and the casing wall 55 assures a fluid-tight seal.
The anti-extrusion ribs 46 in the sealing element section 40 provide protection against the elastomeric element 48 from rolling over as the element 48 is inflated under a relatively large pressure force. In addition, the ribs 46 provide protection against the elastomeric element 48 tearing and failing.
The anchoring element section 4Z of the preferred embodiment is also shown in an intlat~ position in Figure ~. The stxl or other suitable metal ribs d2 provide a strong anchor against rotation, axial movement, twisting action, or any other type of displacement. Such movement is prevented because a large xadial force acting on the ribs b2 from the inflation medium 56 pushes it into frictional engagement 63 with the casing wall 55. The exposed ribbed anchoring section 42 comprises a continuous rib element 62. Stated differently, the ribs run across the whole length of the elastomeric element and are coupled at the ends 47 to the end sleeves 4.4. The end sleeves 44 are, in turn, nxec~ha~cally coupled to the tubular mandxel 58 by conventional means well knowst in the art such as threaded sleeves (not shown herein). The inner tube or bladder 52 is fabricated under the ribs 62 which are similarly coupled to the end sleeves 44. Thre inner tube 52 acts as a containment member for the inflation medium 56. The end sleeve 44 not coupled to the sealing section operates in a sliding relationship relative to the tubular mandrel 58. rt should be understood that the elastomeric band 60, in the anchoring element section 42, is provided so tbat the ribs 62 are evenly spaced-apart, and it is not intended to provide sealing capacity. In fact, ~ band 60, even though engaged with the casing wall 54, need not provide a pressure seal since its main function is to create a pathway (between the ribs 52) for the escaping fluids in the annulus 65 between the inflatable tool and the casing wall 54. The stiffener rings 60 typically range in number from zero to ten, depending on the size of the packer.
It should be understood that the preferred embodiment of hybrid inflatable tool progressively inflates, first inflating the sealing section 40 and then the anchoring section 42, due to the differences nn the stiffness between the elements in each section.
'This provides an important advantage in that fluid will not be trapped between the two sections in the annulus 65 near the mechanical lint: 44 during the inflation operation. Fluid trapping is further prevented because the anchoring section 42, with its exposod n'bs 62, creates a pathway for any trapped fluid to escape through passageways between the ribs 62.
The elements 40,42 may be infl ted in a conventional manner. The inflating medium 56 is injected through a receiving port 50 which communicates with the inflatable elements 40,42. The inflation medium 56 should enter the port 50, preferably at the top end of the packer, and inflate the first component (preferably the sealing element 40) and then the inflating medium 56 bypasses the end sleeves 44 and progressively inflates the second component (preferably the anchoring element 42) o.f the tool, In the prefeacd embodiment, there are multiple parts or pathways 50 provided for inflating the elastomeric dements 40,42. The inflation fluid 56 enter these pox'ts 50 and simultaneously inflate the elements 40,42 relative to each other.
however, the inflatable sections 40,42 can function independently of each other.
They eau, however, be iaflatad under a single unitary operation. The inflation features of the present invention may further incorporate the conventional design of having the flow pathways approach the inflatable tool in a 'halve collar up"
inflation mode (not shown), t.e., the inflation medium pathvc~ay begins at the valve cellar from the conveyance side. In such an inflation mode design, the inflation ports are placed at the top of the inflatable tool, i.e., the valve collar is placed away from the free or floating and and near the coupled end or conveyance end. Thus, inflation will occur from the valve collar side. However, it should be noted that an unconventional design, of "valve collar down" works equally well, depending upon the wellbore condition9 and rcquir~ments.
The placement of anchor and sealing sections 42, 40 relative to the conveyance device may be made interchangeably, i. e. the sealing element 40 may be near or away from the conveyance device. The decision to place the sealing element near the conveyance device {on top) is dependent on many factors and wellbore requirements including the ease with the inflation may occur. It is preferable to place the anchor section 42 near the "floating" end. In the preferred. embodiment, the sealing elem~t 42 is placed near a mechanical "tie-in" or conveyance device (tubing string ou the top side or the like) because the floating end "draws" up as the anchonng element is inflated. 'thus, as inflation occurs, the axial length of the anchoring element 42 shortens to compensate for the radial inflation. Thus, the bottom end, including the anchoring clement and the bottom-most end sleeve 44, slides as the anchoring elancnt is inflated and drawn up and ultimately engages in an anchoring rclatio~ship 63.
In the case where the sealing section 40 is on the bottom, the anchoring section 42 draws "down" and engages 63 as it inflates providing compensation provisions are made so that the anchoring section may slide axially. In this case, the sealing element 40 inflates relatively ahead of the anchor element 42 and the draw down occurs during this period due to the stiffer anchoring element 42 (with the ribs 62) and thus inflating slower than the sealing element 40.
A number of inflatable tools in series may just as easily be inflated. For example, a Selective Inflation Packer System SCIPSO* (not shown) discloses complementary tools which cooperate with the present invention to run-in, activate or inflate and set the hybrid inflatable tool disclosed herein. The SCIPSO* tool is designed for horizontal or vertical wellbore applications requiring selective cement or epoxy inflation of inflatable tools. Noncontaminated cement is spotted for inflation purposes into the inflatable tool. The SCIPSO* tool allows selective inflation of and movement between staggered inflatable tools located in slotted liners, pre-drilled liners or screens without the loss of the inflation medium during repositioning. The SCIPSO* tool may be run-in together with the inflatable tool's or by itself on a second run after the casing or liner string has been run-in. In addition, all remaining unused cement may be reverse circulated. As elements are inflated, both the sealing and anchoring element sections expand to the casing wall progressively as a volume change of the cement occurs.
By using a sectioned element design of the preferred embodiment, i.e., the sealing and anchoring element sections, which are mechanically linked and in constant pressure communication, the present invention can achieve the benefits of both sealing and anchoring in a single-unit inflatable tool when used in a cased wellbore and a phase change inflation medium is used, and thus creating substantial savings for the operator.
The method by which the present invention is used in the cased wellbore does not depart substantially from existing and current methods. The inflatable tool of the present invention may be lowered into the cased wellbore using any number of conventional methods such as wireline, coiled tubing, production tubing, and the like.
The only limitation is that the inflatable tool be capable of accessing and bypassing *trade-mark 1'7 existing downhole equipment. Such a limitation is overcome by the present invention and is directed at overcoming this limitation. The present invention anticipates a relatively small OIL operation and therefore is capable of being lowered under such conditions to the appropriate location in the cased wellbore. Once correctly located, the inflatable tool may be inflated into a sealing and anchoring engagement with the casing wall. Such inflation is accomplished as previously discussed herein.
inflation media nnay vary, depending on the atxticipated vise, but it is contemplatEd under the present invention to be a phase changing fluid which is settable and may incur slight The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are il.tustrative and explanatory thereof, and various changes in the sire, shape and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrated construction, may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. from the spirit of the invention.
a~~sos ~a.»e r~~.na was ~~
a body;
a sealing section coupled to the body and being inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to the body and being inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body, said sealing section being spaced apart from said at least one anchor section.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of sealing a cased borehole, comprising the steps of:
providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and 1 S inflating both inflatable elements.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a downhole inflatable packer for sealing against a cased wellbore wall, comprising:
a body;
a sealing section coupled to said body and being inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to said body and being inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body, wherein:
said sealing section is nonoverlapping with said at least one anchor section;
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element which is nonoverlapping with said first resilient element; and said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a downhole inflatable packer for sealing against a cased wellbore wall, comprising:
6a a body;
a sealing section coupled to said body and inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to said body and inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body wherein:
said sealing section is spaced apart from said at least one anchor section;
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element;
said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element;
and said first resilient element comprises ribs which are located adjacent to at least one of opposed ends of said first resilient element, said ribs being discontinuous over the length of said first resilient element.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of sealing a cased borehole, comprising the steps of providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate nonoverlapping inflatable element for anchoring;
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of sealing a cased borehole, comprising the steps of:
providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements, wherein said method further comprises the steps of:
using an inflating material to inflate said inflatable that shrinks when it sets;
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring;
using said greater thickness for compensating for said shrinkage;
6b reinforcing said inflatable element for anchoring with ribs extending at least over a majority of the length thereof;
exposing said ribs on said inflatable element for anchoring so said ribs contact the cased borehole; and providing ribs on said inflatable element for sealing which extend from at least one end thereof, said ribs extending from said one end and terminating short of the midpoint of said inflatable element for sealing.
6c ~~ ~' D TaTION OF THE D AWIN ,~
Figure lA is a cross-sectional and perspective combination view of the prior art exttemal casing packer, showing a continuous ribbed style inflatable element.
Figure 1$ is a cross-sectional and perspective combination view of the prior art rxt~l casing packer, showing a noncontinuous style anllatable elerzxez~t_ 14 Figure 2 is a crass-sectional view of a hybrid external casing packer of the preferred embodiment, showing a sealing inflatable element section and an anchoring inflatable element section as it would appear in the run-in mode of operation.
Figure 3 is a cross-sectional view of a hybrid external casing packer of the preferred embodimtrxt, showing a sealing inflatable element section and an anchoring inflatable element section as it would appear in the inflation mode of operation.
D .~i~D,ESGRTPT10N f,~,F,~ PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention is best described and understood with reference to the context in which it is used and the prior art designs of external casing packers (see Figures lA & 1$).
Thcu tubing workover and completion technologies have significant advantages, particularly since they provide isolation in restricted access zones.
However, some operating and design limitations exist in sv~h technologies. For example, thin tubing technologies arc sized smaller and therefore are limited in larger diameter wellbore applications. In cased wellbores, significant pressure differentials exist within the wellbore when flowing wellbore fluids are present and, thus, unintendod displacement of settable or inflatable tools occurs. Flow in either direction usually eziats is a wellbore when a producing zone is in hydraulic commumicatio~u, with a consuming zone and such inter-zone "cross-flow" may exist in a wellbore, irrespective of whether flow is directed to the surface_ Inflatable wellbore tools are operable in a number of modes, such as the "run-in" mode of operation, an "expansion or inflation" mode of operation, and a "setting"
mode of operation. The an:Qatable tool is maintained in a run in condition during entxy of the tool into the wellbore in a reduced radial dimension so that the tool may pass through restri~d access areas. Once the inflatable tool is passed beyond the restricted access area, and placed in a desired area, inflation pressure is applied to the tool with an inflation medium so as to urge xt into a radially outward direction in an inflated condition. Such radial expansion, at least in part, obstructs the flow of wellbore fluid within the cased wellbore.
The obstruction created by the inflatable tool frequently creates a pressure diff~tial across the in~tatable tool. Most commonly, this occurs when the inflatable tool is set above a producing zone. Wellbore fluids, such as oil, gas and water, will continue flowing in the wellbore due to a pressure differential between the formation and the wellbore, as well as pressure differential between zones. Thus, wellbore fluid ~low may urge the inflatable tool to move, rotate, twist andlor slide, especially in a wetted e~ronment of a cased wellbore. The unintended, and often harmful, displacement of the inflatable tool o$en occurs because currently available prior azt thru-tubing technologies do not provide adequate anchoring means. Such anchoring means are traditionally found in tools having "gripping teeth," as those found in the more conventional metal-to-ztxetal packer devices. Thus, for example, coiled tubing-suspended inflatable tools do not provide sufficient anchoring means to prevenr displacement and are not often used in such applications. obviously, the mechanical packers are simply not appropriate for restricted access applications.
Additionally, if a pressure differential is developed across the inflatable tool, the pressure differential away act to disconnect the inflatable foal from the suspension tool or means. 'thus, for example, in a wireline-suspended tool, a large pressure diffenndal could snap the wellbore tool loose from the wireline cable.
Alternatively, a higb,-pxessure-stnsitive or tension-sensitive disconnect device used in connection with coif tubing ox groduction string operations znay easily actuate and disconnect the packer device from the coil tubing or production string.
With respect to prior art designs, such as open-hole inflatable packer devices, a continuous n'bbed style external casing packer (ECl'} zd is shown in Figure lA
and a noncontinuous ribbed styled ECP is shown in Figure 1B. The continuous ribbed style EG'P 20 provides a long dynamic hydromechanical seal using an elastomeric element 14 combined with continuous stainless steel ribs 16 to protect the inflatable elements x2,14 from the tremendous multidimensional strains existing in nonuniform wellbores. The steel ribs 16 are utilized to provide strength, flexibility and long-term reliability against tear of the irmer elastomeric element 12. These inflatable elements 12,14 are mounted on the mandrel or inflatable tool 10 by securing assemblies 18 on each end. This ECP 20 is particularly useful for short- or long-length seal applications requiring positive seals in high differential, irregular, or elliptical open-hole wellbores. The continuous ribbed ECP uses various inflation media, including water, drilling fluids and/or cement.
'fhe noncontinuous ribbed Et:,P 30, on the other hazed, is used as a supple-mental packer to the continuous n'bbed ECP 20 during special applications requiring longer sealing elements and utilizing cement, nnud, fluid or epoxy as the inflation medium. It may include a valve collar 3$ that features an enlarged inflation flow capacity and a flow control that decreases the erosion of the valve seats 35, seals (not shown) and the inflation passageway 39. The ribs 31 are located only on the secured ends 36 of the elastomeric element and thus provide only limited anchoring benefits.
The ribs 3 Z, as previously stated, provide strength at the end sleeve area 36 and also where the ribs engage 33 the wcllbore wall 11. The nonreinforced center ar medial portion 32 creates a flexible expansion area which readily conforms to open-hole irregularities 12, pmviditag an adequate seal.
In an apen~hole wellbore completion as shown in Figure 1, a relati'~ely large diameter is encountered in the welIbore, and the open-hole wall l,1 is invariably skewed or irregular x2 (not perfectly cylindrical) since the hole is drilled in the earthen formation 13. Therefore, the conventional ECP 20,30, as described above, b~a~ne an ideally suited wellbore tool to isolate zones in such environments during production or workover operations because of the large inflation capacity of its inflatable elastrnmeric clement. In such open-hole operations, the ECP is part of the casing string and forms a "sealing" anchor against the open-hole, izregular wall 12.
The "sealing" anchor in the open-hole wellbore i.s formed when the packer's elastomeric element 14 is inflated and contours to the shape 12 of the open-hole, preventing axial movement in the wellbore. Axial movement is prevented because of multidimensional forces acting radially against the wellbore wall 11. In addition, these prior art ECP's use a "full cover" elastomeric element design. A full cover ~8n '~'r~ >be ~ length of the inner elastomeric element 12, 29 with an outer elastomeric element 14,32. In the alternative, the noncontinuous metal ribs 31 (Figure 113) are fabricated inside the elastomerie cover 32 and are coupled to the end sleeves 36 so as to provide reinforcement against extrusion when the element 32 is inflated.
'Thus, the exceptional expansion capability of the flexible elastomeric element allows for use of these $Cp tools in conditions that would be otherwise impossible for conventional (mechanical) packing tools.
~~ however, as pz~eviously mentxoz~ed, these prior art ECP's 20,30 are limited in application to open-hole operations. In cased-wellbore applications, these prior art ECP's 20,30 are inadequate because the contour 55 of the casing 54 is sufficiently cylindrical. The uaifo~rm cylindrical shape of the casing wall 54 prevents a proper or adequate anchoring relationship between a conventional ECP 20,30 and the casing wall 54.
one reason a proper anchoring relationship, in the conventional ECP's20, 30, does not result is because the coefficient of friction between the elastomeric element 14,32 and the steel casing 54 in a wetted media is very law. 'Thus, the differential pressure in the wellbore between locations above and below the packer results in movement or displacement of the packer and which normally results in great damage to the well, particularly in loss of production and the resulting economic damages.
.. In addition, the conventional, nroncontinu.ous ribbed style IyCP 30 is designed such that the ribs 31 are only located an the secured ends 36 of the elastorneric element 32 and thus provide only limited. anchoring and/or anti-extrusion benefits. As such, the elastomeric element 32 has a tendency to "roll over" or overlap over the secured end 36 near the end sleeves 33 when a su~cient axial force is applied to the n'bs 30. Qn the other hand, if a modification is made so that the elastomeric element 32 is fully n'bbed, another problem arises. A full length ribbed elastomeric ele~rent 14, as shown in Figure lA, becomes a much larger diameter inflatable element 14 and therefore r~uires a thinner elastomeric cover 14 so that the ECP 20 may pass through existing equipment (not shown), having only limited or restricted access to the zone beyond.
Howtver, when a thinner elastomeric cover 14 is used, a significant dis-advantage results in providing adequate sealing protection. It should be understood that the inflatable tool is being applied to cased wellbores, using a phase change medium to inflate the element. Thus, when the phase change inflation medium cures, there is a toss of radial force available against the casing wall as the irdlation medium changes its phase, i. ~, the inflation medium contracts or shrinks as it hardens, resulting in loss of available radial force or energy against the wellbore wall. It is eleax to one skilled in the art that the clastomeric element normally makes up the difference in rad~i,al force loss through the resiliency of a relatively thicker elastomeric cover, i.e., the relatively thick clastomeric cover stores a certain amount of radial force energy upon the expansion of the inflation medium and releases this stored energy to compensate for any phase changes in the inflation medium, such as shrinkage or contraction. The amount of energy storage available to compensate for shrinkage force Loss is clearly a function of the elastomer thickness. In a cased wellbore, therefore, a relatively thick elastoxneric cover is necessary to obtain proper sealing capability. This thicker cover design requirement, however, conflicts with having only lim~it~d access through the downhole equipment in cased wellbares. Thus, there is a need for a new zone isolation inflatable taol that overcomes all of these limitations.
ReferBng now to Figures 2 and 3, a new inflatable tool design is disclosed which overcomes many of the limitations discussed above. In the preferred embodi-ment, the new inflatable tool design uses a sectioned element design. to provide two of the most important requirements iun cased-wellbore applications when using phase change inflation media: (1) sealing ability, and (2) anchoring capability.
In the preferred embodiment, the sealing feature 40 is provided with a full cover elastomerie design 45 having a relatively large thickness 41 while the anchoring feature 42 is provided with an exposed full length or continuous ebbed design providing metal-to-metal contact 63 with the casing wall 54. The full cover elastomea~ic design 45 of the sealing element section 40 provides the necessary elastomezic thickness 41 to compensate for phase change losses in radial sealing force. On the other hand, the full length exposed rib element section 42 provides a metal-to-metal engagement 63 between the anchoring element 62 and the casing wall 54 so as to create sufficient anchoring force in the cased wellbore.
The two sections 40, 42 are separated by end sleeves 44 which couple each respective element 40, 42 to the tubular body 58 of the inflatable tool. The method for coupling each respective element 40, 42 is well-known in the art and is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,143,154. In addition, the features of the valve apparatus (not shown) for proper inflation of the elastomeric elements is well-known in the art. See, for example, U.S. Patent No. 4,708,208; U.S. Patent No. 4,805,699; and U.S.
Patent No. 4,832,120. The end sleeves 44 are mechanically coupled to the tubular body by conventional techniques such as threaded sleeves (not shown).
Refernng now to Figure 2, one embodiment of the invention, a hybrid inflatable tool, is shown in the run-in condition. The sealing section 40 comprises elastomeric element 48 supported by noncontinuous anti-extrusion ribs 46. The sealing section 40 is preferably placed in the direction away from the conveyance device (not shown), while the anchoring section 42 is placed near the conveyance device. However, this by no means is a limitation to the present invention.
Opposite ends 45 of the sealing element 48 are coupled 47 to the tubular member 58 with end sleeves 44. The anti-extrusion ribs 46 are mechanically coupled to the end sleeve 44 in accordance with conventional methods that are well-known in the art. The noncontinuous, nonreinforced rib design of the sealing element 40 provides the necessary thickness 41 to compensate for radial force loss from phase change in the inflation medium 56. Yet, the thickness 41 of the sealing element 48 provided overcomes any access and size restrictions of existing equipment already located downhole as will become more apparent hereinafter.
The inflatable tool element 48 in the sealing section 40 is not reinforced in the medial portion 49 of the elastomeric element 48 and as such does not have ribs extending end to end. Such a design clearly compensates for having a relatively large thickness 41 elastomeric element 48 because the ribs 46 are eliminated in the medial portion 49. The ribs 46 are only provided at the ends 45 where the sealing element 48 is connected to the tubular mandrel 58 to support the end load. The medial portion 49 is simply made of elastomer, and thus, a thicker 41 elastamer may be provided.
However, anchori~ag is not possible in cased wellbores under such circumstances. rn open hole, the anchoring results frozen the rough noncontinuous surface of the wehbore I0 while the casing has a smooth surface 55 and the result is that gripping dons not occur.
Anchoring is, howevar, provided by a separate but related section 42.
In the prefeaed embodiment, the anchoring element section 42 comprises an inner tube or bladder 52 that is inflated, the anchor ribs 62 and an elastomeric stiffener band 60 to uniformly space the ribs 46 along the periphery of the inner tube 52 may 15 be added. The ribs 62 are made of steel and are exposed sa as to engage in a metal-to-metal relationship ~3 with the wellbore casing 55. The ribs 6Z are mechanically coupled to a ring (not shown) and fitted inside the end sleeves 44. The exposed steel n'bs 62 may be nm in a bigh-pressure differential environment and yet still maintain metal-to-metal friction 63 for a strong anchoring relationship. In certava applications, 20 such as short-length packers, the bands b0 are not needed.
Thus, the hybrid design of the present invention presented herein discloses an inflatable tool overcoming traditional cased-wellbore limitations and restrictions and yet having an intYatable unitary element design providing sealing and anchoring provisions and which are in pressure comxxrunication relative to each other.
Thus the 25 combinued design has two elements 40,42 providing independent functions while inflating relative to each other. The anchoring element 42 only functions as an anchor while the sealing element 40 only functions as a seal.
In the preferred embodiment, the elastomer compounds 4$,52 included in the design for the cover includes materials that have good memory for returning to the 30 original size and developed for use in. sub-zero surface conditions to avoid impact damage to the element surface during on-site handling. The temperature range far the elastomeric elements raage from ambient to more than 500°F depending on the typo of elastomer used. It should be noted that the cuz~rent invention does not, however, depend on the type of elastomer used.
The temperature ranges disclosed herein only represent currently available elastomer technology.
Each of the sealing and anchoring elements 40, 42 can be inflated with a phase change inflation medium 56 such as cement, epoxy or other such media. Thus, with today's expanding cement technology, a certain amount of contraction or shrinkage occurs in the inflation medium 56 during the curing or phase change stage. The present invention overcomes this limitation even when using phase change inflation medium 56 susceptible to radial force losses such as cement which suffers contraction at cured stage.
Referring now to Figure 3, one of the embodiments, the present invention is shown as an expansion or inflation mode of operation and a set mode of operation. In the sealing element section 40, the inflatable elastomeric element is in full expansion, exerting a radial force against the casing wall 55. The radial force from a pressurized inflation medium 56 creates a sealing engagement 64 between the elastomeric element 48 and casing wall 55. As a result, wellbore fluids are prevented from having cross-flow, and the area above and below the inflatable tool are isolated from each other. The compressive force or frictional engagement 64 between the elastomeric element 48 and the casing wall 55 assures a fluid-tight seal.
The anti-extrusion ribs 46 in the sealing element section 40 provide protection against the elastomeric element 48 from rolling over as the element 48 is inflated under a relatively large pressure force. In addition, the ribs 46 provide protection against the elastomeric element 48 tearing and failing.
The anchoring element section 4Z of the preferred embodiment is also shown in an intlat~ position in Figure ~. The stxl or other suitable metal ribs d2 provide a strong anchor against rotation, axial movement, twisting action, or any other type of displacement. Such movement is prevented because a large xadial force acting on the ribs b2 from the inflation medium 56 pushes it into frictional engagement 63 with the casing wall 55. The exposed ribbed anchoring section 42 comprises a continuous rib element 62. Stated differently, the ribs run across the whole length of the elastomeric element and are coupled at the ends 47 to the end sleeves 4.4. The end sleeves 44 are, in turn, nxec~ha~cally coupled to the tubular mandxel 58 by conventional means well knowst in the art such as threaded sleeves (not shown herein). The inner tube or bladder 52 is fabricated under the ribs 62 which are similarly coupled to the end sleeves 44. Thre inner tube 52 acts as a containment member for the inflation medium 56. The end sleeve 44 not coupled to the sealing section operates in a sliding relationship relative to the tubular mandrel 58. rt should be understood that the elastomeric band 60, in the anchoring element section 42, is provided so tbat the ribs 62 are evenly spaced-apart, and it is not intended to provide sealing capacity. In fact, ~ band 60, even though engaged with the casing wall 54, need not provide a pressure seal since its main function is to create a pathway (between the ribs 52) for the escaping fluids in the annulus 65 between the inflatable tool and the casing wall 54. The stiffener rings 60 typically range in number from zero to ten, depending on the size of the packer.
It should be understood that the preferred embodiment of hybrid inflatable tool progressively inflates, first inflating the sealing section 40 and then the anchoring section 42, due to the differences nn the stiffness between the elements in each section.
'This provides an important advantage in that fluid will not be trapped between the two sections in the annulus 65 near the mechanical lint: 44 during the inflation operation. Fluid trapping is further prevented because the anchoring section 42, with its exposod n'bs 62, creates a pathway for any trapped fluid to escape through passageways between the ribs 62.
The elements 40,42 may be infl ted in a conventional manner. The inflating medium 56 is injected through a receiving port 50 which communicates with the inflatable elements 40,42. The inflation medium 56 should enter the port 50, preferably at the top end of the packer, and inflate the first component (preferably the sealing element 40) and then the inflating medium 56 bypasses the end sleeves 44 and progressively inflates the second component (preferably the anchoring element 42) o.f the tool, In the prefeacd embodiment, there are multiple parts or pathways 50 provided for inflating the elastomeric dements 40,42. The inflation fluid 56 enter these pox'ts 50 and simultaneously inflate the elements 40,42 relative to each other.
however, the inflatable sections 40,42 can function independently of each other.
They eau, however, be iaflatad under a single unitary operation. The inflation features of the present invention may further incorporate the conventional design of having the flow pathways approach the inflatable tool in a 'halve collar up"
inflation mode (not shown), t.e., the inflation medium pathvc~ay begins at the valve cellar from the conveyance side. In such an inflation mode design, the inflation ports are placed at the top of the inflatable tool, i.e., the valve collar is placed away from the free or floating and and near the coupled end or conveyance end. Thus, inflation will occur from the valve collar side. However, it should be noted that an unconventional design, of "valve collar down" works equally well, depending upon the wellbore condition9 and rcquir~ments.
The placement of anchor and sealing sections 42, 40 relative to the conveyance device may be made interchangeably, i. e. the sealing element 40 may be near or away from the conveyance device. The decision to place the sealing element near the conveyance device {on top) is dependent on many factors and wellbore requirements including the ease with the inflation may occur. It is preferable to place the anchor section 42 near the "floating" end. In the preferred. embodiment, the sealing elem~t 42 is placed near a mechanical "tie-in" or conveyance device (tubing string ou the top side or the like) because the floating end "draws" up as the anchonng element is inflated. 'thus, as inflation occurs, the axial length of the anchoring element 42 shortens to compensate for the radial inflation. Thus, the bottom end, including the anchoring clement and the bottom-most end sleeve 44, slides as the anchoring elancnt is inflated and drawn up and ultimately engages in an anchoring rclatio~ship 63.
In the case where the sealing section 40 is on the bottom, the anchoring section 42 draws "down" and engages 63 as it inflates providing compensation provisions are made so that the anchoring section may slide axially. In this case, the sealing element 40 inflates relatively ahead of the anchor element 42 and the draw down occurs during this period due to the stiffer anchoring element 42 (with the ribs 62) and thus inflating slower than the sealing element 40.
A number of inflatable tools in series may just as easily be inflated. For example, a Selective Inflation Packer System SCIPSO* (not shown) discloses complementary tools which cooperate with the present invention to run-in, activate or inflate and set the hybrid inflatable tool disclosed herein. The SCIPSO* tool is designed for horizontal or vertical wellbore applications requiring selective cement or epoxy inflation of inflatable tools. Noncontaminated cement is spotted for inflation purposes into the inflatable tool. The SCIPSO* tool allows selective inflation of and movement between staggered inflatable tools located in slotted liners, pre-drilled liners or screens without the loss of the inflation medium during repositioning. The SCIPSO* tool may be run-in together with the inflatable tool's or by itself on a second run after the casing or liner string has been run-in. In addition, all remaining unused cement may be reverse circulated. As elements are inflated, both the sealing and anchoring element sections expand to the casing wall progressively as a volume change of the cement occurs.
By using a sectioned element design of the preferred embodiment, i.e., the sealing and anchoring element sections, which are mechanically linked and in constant pressure communication, the present invention can achieve the benefits of both sealing and anchoring in a single-unit inflatable tool when used in a cased wellbore and a phase change inflation medium is used, and thus creating substantial savings for the operator.
The method by which the present invention is used in the cased wellbore does not depart substantially from existing and current methods. The inflatable tool of the present invention may be lowered into the cased wellbore using any number of conventional methods such as wireline, coiled tubing, production tubing, and the like.
The only limitation is that the inflatable tool be capable of accessing and bypassing *trade-mark 1'7 existing downhole equipment. Such a limitation is overcome by the present invention and is directed at overcoming this limitation. The present invention anticipates a relatively small OIL operation and therefore is capable of being lowered under such conditions to the appropriate location in the cased wellbore. Once correctly located, the inflatable tool may be inflated into a sealing and anchoring engagement with the casing wall. Such inflation is accomplished as previously discussed herein.
inflation media nnay vary, depending on the atxticipated vise, but it is contemplatEd under the present invention to be a phase changing fluid which is settable and may incur slight The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are il.tustrative and explanatory thereof, and various changes in the sire, shape and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrated construction, may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. from the spirit of the invention.
a~~sos ~a.»e r~~.na was ~~
Claims (39)
1. A downhole inflatable packer for sealing against a cased or uncased wellbore wall, comprising:
a body;
a sealing section coupled to the body and being inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to the body and being inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body, said sealing section being spaced apart from said at least one anchor section.
a body;
a sealing section coupled to the body and being inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to the body and being inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body, said sealing section being spaced apart from said at least one anchor section.
2. The packer of claim 1, wherein:
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element; and said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element.
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element; and said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element.
3. The packer of claim 2, wherein said first resilient element comprises ribs which are located adjacent to at least one of opposed ends thereof, said ribs being discontinuous over the length of said first resilient element.
4. The packer of claim 3, wherein said second resilient element comprises continuous ribs extending over a majority of the length of said second resilient element.
5. The packer of claim 4, wherein said second resilient element further comprises at least one band mounted over said ribs.
6. The packer of claim 5, wherein said first and second resilient elements when inflated define a cavity between said body and the wall, with said ribs allowing fluid in said cavity to pass by.
7. The packer of claim 6, wherein said first resilient element is operably inflated before said second resilient element.
8. The packer of claim 2, wherein said first resilient element is of sufficient thickness to retain sealing contact with the wall if an inflation medium experiences shrinkage as it sets.
9. The packer of claim 3, wherein said first resilient element comprises an outer surface which contacts the wall and said ribs are disposed beneath said outer surface to inhibit said ribs from contacting the wall in said set position.
10. The packer of claim 4, wherein said ribs in said second resilient element extend from end to end thereof and are exposed for contact with the wall in said set position.
11. The packer of claim 4, further comprising:
a sleeve on said body between said first and second resilient elements; and said ribs on said first and second resilient elements connected adjacent opposite ends of said sleeve.
a sleeve on said body between said first and second resilient elements; and said ribs on said first and second resilient elements connected adjacent opposite ends of said sleeve.
12. The packer of claim 11, wherein said sleeve is movable with respect to said body.
13. The packer of claim 12, wherein said body comprises at least one port to facilitate inflation of said first and second resilient elements.
14. The packer of claim 13, wherein:
said body has an upper and lower end, with said upper end comprising a connection to a conveying device to run said body into the wellbore; and said first resilient element is located closest to said upper end.
said body has an upper and lower end, with said upper end comprising a connection to a conveying device to run said body into the wellbore; and said first resilient element is located closest to said upper end.
15. A method of sealing a cased borehole, comprising the steps of providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements.
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements.
16. The method of claim 15, further comprising the step of using an inflating material to inflate said inflatable elements that shrinks when it sets.
17. The method of claim 16, further comprising the steps o~
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring; and using said greater thickness for compensating for said shrinkage.
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring; and using said greater thickness for compensating for said shrinkage.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising the steps of reinforcing said inflatable element for anchoring with ribs extending at least over a majority of the length thereof; and exposing said ribs on said inflatable element for anchoring so said ribs contact the cased borehole.
19. The method of claim 18, further comprising the step of providing ribs on said inflatable element for sealing which extend from at least one end thereof, said ribs extending from said one end and terminating short of the midpoint of said inflatable element for sealing.
20. The method of claim 19, further comprising the step of embedding said ribs on said inflatable element for sealing while extending said ribs from each end thereof to leave a large ribless central section.
21. A downhole inflatable packer for sealing against a cased wellbore wall, comprising:
a body;
a sealing section coupled to said body and being inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to said body and being inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body, wherein:
said sealing section is nonoverlapping with said at least one anchor section;
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element which is nonoverlapping with said first resilient element; and said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element.
a body;
a sealing section coupled to said body and being inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to said body and being inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body, wherein:
said sealing section is nonoverlapping with said at least one anchor section;
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element which is nonoverlapping with said first resilient element; and said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element.
22. The packer of claim 21, wherein said first resilient element is of sufficient thickness to retain sealing contact with the wall if an inflation medium used to inflate said first resilient element experiences shrinkage as it sets.
23. A downhole inflatable packer for sealing against a cased wellbore wall, comprising:
a body;
a sealing section coupled to said body and inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to said body and inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body wherein:
said sealing section is spaced apart from said at least one anchor section;
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element;
said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element;
and said first resilient element comprises ribs which are located adjacent to at least one of opposed ends of said first resilient element, said ribs being discontinuous over the length of said first resilient element.
a body;
a sealing section coupled to said body and inflatably operable between a run-in position and a set position where it sealingly contacts the wall; and at least one anchor section coupled to said body and inflatably operable between a run-in and a set position where it contacts the wall to support said body wherein:
said sealing section is spaced apart from said at least one anchor section;
said sealing section comprises a first resilient element;
said at least one anchor section comprises a second resilient element;
said first resilient element is thicker than said second resilient element;
and said first resilient element comprises ribs which are located adjacent to at least one of opposed ends of said first resilient element, said ribs being discontinuous over the length of said first resilient element.
24. The packer of claim 23, wherein said second resilient element comprises continuous ribs extending over a majority of the length of said second resilient element.
25. The packer of claim 24, wherein said second resilient element further comprises at least one band mounted over said ribs.
26. The packer of claim 5, wherein said first and second resilient elements when inflated define a cavity between said body and the wall, with said ribs allowing fluid in said cavity to pass by.
27. The packer of claim 26, wherein said first resilient element is operably inflated before said second resilient element.
28. The packer of claim 23, wherein said first resilient element comprises an outer surface which contacts the wall and said ribs are disposed beneath said outer surface to inhibit said ribs from contacting the wall in said set position.
29. The packer of claim 24, wherein said ribs in said second resilient element extend from end to end thereof and are exposed for contact with the wall in said set position.
30. The packer of claim 24, further comprising:
a sleeve on said body between said first and second resilient elements; and said ribs on said first and second resilient elements connected adjacent opposite ends of said sleeve.
a sleeve on said body between said first and second resilient elements; and said ribs on said first and second resilient elements connected adjacent opposite ends of said sleeve.
31. The packer of claim 30, wherein said sleeve is movable with respect to said body.
32. The packer of claim 31, wherein said body comprises at least one port to facilitate inflation of said first and second resilient elements.
33. The packer of claim 32, wherein said body has an upper and lower end, with said upper end comprising a connection to a conveying device to run said body into the wellbore and wherein said first resilient element is located closest to said upper end.
34. A method of sealing a cased borehole, comprising the steps o~
providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate nonoverlapping inflatable element for anchoring;
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements.
providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate nonoverlapping inflatable element for anchoring;
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements.
35. The method of claim 34, further comprising the step of using an inflating material to inflate said inflatable elements that shrinks when it sets.
36. The method of claim 35, further comprising the step of using said greater thickness for compensating for said shrinkage.
37. The method of claim 16, further comprising the steps of:
reinforcing said inflatable element for anchoring with ribs extending at least over a majority of the length thereof; and exposing said ribs on said inflatable element for anchoring so said ribs contact the cased borehole.
reinforcing said inflatable element for anchoring with ribs extending at least over a majority of the length thereof; and exposing said ribs on said inflatable element for anchoring so said ribs contact the cased borehole.
38. A method of sealing a cased borehole, comprising the steps of:
providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements, wherein said method further comprises the steps of:
using an inflating material to inflate said inflatable that shrinks when it sets;
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring;
using said greater thickness for compensating for said shrinkage;
reinforcing said inflatable element for anchoring with ribs extending at least over a majority of the length thereof;
exposing said ribs on said inflatable element for anchoring so said ribs contact the cased borehole; and providing ribs on said inflatable element for sealing which extend from at least one end thereof, said ribs extending from said one end and terminating short of the midpoint of said inflatable element for sealing.
providing on a body an inflatable packer with a discrete inflatable element for sealing and a separate inflatable element for anchoring;
running in said body into position; and inflating both inflatable elements, wherein said method further comprises the steps of:
using an inflating material to inflate said inflatable that shrinks when it sets;
providing a greater thickness on said inflatable element for sealing as compared to said inflatable element for anchoring;
using said greater thickness for compensating for said shrinkage;
reinforcing said inflatable element for anchoring with ribs extending at least over a majority of the length thereof;
exposing said ribs on said inflatable element for anchoring so said ribs contact the cased borehole; and providing ribs on said inflatable element for sealing which extend from at least one end thereof, said ribs extending from said one end and terminating short of the midpoint of said inflatable element for sealing.
39. The method of claim 38, further comprising the step of embedding said ribs on said inflatable element for sealing while extending said ribs from each end thereof to leave a large ribless central section.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3272896P | 1996-12-14 | 1996-12-14 | |
| US60/032,728 | 1996-12-14 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2224668A1 CA2224668A1 (en) | 1998-06-14 |
| CA2224668C true CA2224668C (en) | 2004-09-21 |
Family
ID=21866500
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002224668A Expired - Lifetime CA2224668C (en) | 1996-12-14 | 1997-12-12 | Method and apparatus for hybrid element casing packer for cased-hole applications |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| AU (1) | AU733346B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2224668C (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2320734B (en) |
| NO (1) | NO313563B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (58)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6209636B1 (en) * | 1993-09-10 | 2001-04-03 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Wellbore primary barrier and related systems |
| GB9714651D0 (en) | 1997-07-12 | 1997-09-17 | Petroline Wellsystems Ltd | Downhole tubing |
| AU766437B2 (en) | 1998-12-22 | 2003-10-16 | Weatherford/Lamb Inc. | Downhole sealing for production tubing |
| WO2000037766A2 (en) | 1998-12-22 | 2000-06-29 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Procedures and equipment for profiling and jointing of pipes |
| GB2355476B (en) * | 1999-10-19 | 2003-08-27 | Gemini Well Technology Ltd | Elastomeric packing element |
| US6752215B2 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2004-06-22 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method and apparatus for expanding and separating tubulars in a wellbore |
| US8746028B2 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2014-06-10 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Tubing expansion |
| US6598678B1 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2003-07-29 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for separating and joining tubulars in a wellbore |
| US6698517B2 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2004-03-02 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Apparatus, methods, and applications for expanding tubulars in a wellbore |
| US6695063B2 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2004-02-24 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Expansion assembly for a tubular expander tool, and method of tubular expansion |
| US6325148B1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2001-12-04 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Tools and methods for use with expandable tubulars |
| US6578630B2 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2003-06-17 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for expanding tubulars in a wellbore |
| US7373990B2 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2008-05-20 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method and apparatus for expanding and separating tubulars in a wellbore |
| DE60132936T2 (en) | 2000-05-05 | 2009-02-26 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc., Houston | Apparatus and method for producing a lateral bore |
| GB2364079B (en) | 2000-06-28 | 2004-11-17 | Renovus Ltd | Drill bits |
| GB0023032D0 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2000-11-01 | Weatherford Lamb | Downhole apparatus |
| US6845820B1 (en) | 2000-10-19 | 2005-01-25 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Completion apparatus and methods for use in hydrocarbon wells |
| GB0026063D0 (en) | 2000-10-25 | 2000-12-13 | Weatherford Lamb | Downhole tubing |
| US7090025B2 (en) | 2000-10-25 | 2006-08-15 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for reforming and expanding tubulars in a wellbore |
| US7121351B2 (en) | 2000-10-25 | 2006-10-17 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Apparatus and method for completing a wellbore |
| GB0028041D0 (en) | 2000-11-17 | 2001-01-03 | Weatherford Lamb | Expander |
| CA2432637C (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2007-05-29 | E2Tech Limited | Method and apparatus for repair operations downhole |
| US6662876B2 (en) | 2001-03-27 | 2003-12-16 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method and apparatus for downhole tubular expansion |
| US6510896B2 (en) | 2001-05-04 | 2003-01-28 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for utilizing expandable sand screen in wellbores |
| GB0114872D0 (en) | 2001-06-19 | 2001-08-08 | Weatherford Lamb | Tubing expansion |
| US6550539B2 (en) | 2001-06-20 | 2003-04-22 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Tie back and method for use with expandable tubulars |
| US6612481B2 (en) | 2001-07-30 | 2003-09-02 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Wellscreen |
| US6655459B2 (en) | 2001-07-30 | 2003-12-02 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Completion apparatus and methods for use in wellbores |
| GB0119977D0 (en) | 2001-08-16 | 2001-10-10 | E2 Tech Ltd | Apparatus and method |
| US6591905B2 (en) | 2001-08-23 | 2003-07-15 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Orienting whipstock seat, and method for seating a whipstock |
| US6752216B2 (en) | 2001-08-23 | 2004-06-22 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Expandable packer, and method for seating an expandable packer |
| US6688395B2 (en) | 2001-11-02 | 2004-02-10 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Expandable tubular having improved polished bore receptacle protection |
| US7156179B2 (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2007-01-02 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Expandable tubulars |
| US6585053B2 (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2003-07-01 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method for creating a polished bore receptacle |
| US6688399B2 (en) | 2001-09-10 | 2004-02-10 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Expandable hanger and packer |
| US6691789B2 (en) | 2001-09-10 | 2004-02-17 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Expandable hanger and packer |
| US6932161B2 (en) | 2001-09-26 | 2005-08-23 | Weatherford/Lams, Inc. | Profiled encapsulation for use with instrumented expandable tubular completions |
| US6877553B2 (en) | 2001-09-26 | 2005-04-12 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Profiled recess for instrumented expandable components |
| US6629567B2 (en) | 2001-12-07 | 2003-10-07 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method and apparatus for expanding and separating tubulars in a wellbore |
| GB0130849D0 (en) | 2001-12-22 | 2002-02-06 | Weatherford Lamb | Bore liner |
| US6722441B2 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2004-04-20 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Threaded apparatus for selectively translating rotary expander tool downhole |
| WO2003062593A1 (en) * | 2002-01-16 | 2003-07-31 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Inflatable packing element |
| US6668930B2 (en) | 2002-03-26 | 2003-12-30 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method for installing an expandable coiled tubing patch |
| US6742598B2 (en) | 2002-05-29 | 2004-06-01 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method of expanding a sand screen |
| US7730965B2 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2010-06-08 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Retractable joint and cementing shoe for use in completing a wellbore |
| US6820687B2 (en) | 2002-09-03 | 2004-11-23 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Auto reversing expanding roller system |
| GB0220933D0 (en) | 2002-09-10 | 2002-10-23 | Weatherford Lamb | Tubing expansion tool |
| US7182141B2 (en) | 2002-10-08 | 2007-02-27 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Expander tool for downhole use |
| US6938698B2 (en) * | 2002-11-18 | 2005-09-06 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Shear activated inflation fluid system for inflatable packers |
| USRE42877E1 (en) | 2003-02-07 | 2011-11-01 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for wellbore construction and completion |
| GB0315997D0 (en) | 2003-07-09 | 2003-08-13 | Weatherford Lamb | Expanding tubing |
| NO324007B1 (en) * | 2004-11-01 | 2007-07-30 | Hpi As | Method and apparatus for fluid displacement |
| CA2538196C (en) | 2005-02-28 | 2011-10-11 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Deep water drilling with casing |
| CA2555563C (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2009-03-31 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for creation of down hole annular barrier |
| US7503396B2 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2009-03-17 | Weatherford/Lamb | Method and apparatus for expanding tubulars in a wellbore |
| EP2312119A1 (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2011-04-20 | Welltec A/S | An annular barrier |
| WO2012045355A1 (en) * | 2010-10-07 | 2012-04-12 | Welltec A/S | An annular barrier |
| US10018011B2 (en) | 2012-10-16 | 2018-07-10 | Maersk Olie Og Gas A/S | Sealing apparatus and method |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5143154A (en) * | 1990-03-13 | 1992-09-01 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Inflatable packing element |
| US5101908A (en) * | 1990-08-23 | 1992-04-07 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Inflatable packing device and method of sealing |
-
1997
- 1997-12-12 CA CA002224668A patent/CA2224668C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-12-15 AU AU48347/97A patent/AU733346B2/en not_active Expired
- 1997-12-15 GB GB9726421A patent/GB2320734B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-12-15 NO NO19975894A patent/NO313563B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| NO313563B1 (en) | 2002-10-21 |
| GB2320734B (en) | 2001-03-07 |
| AU733346B2 (en) | 2001-05-10 |
| NO975894D0 (en) | 1997-12-15 |
| GB2320734A (en) | 1998-07-01 |
| CA2224668A1 (en) | 1998-06-14 |
| NO975894L (en) | 1998-06-15 |
| AU4834797A (en) | 1998-06-18 |
| GB9726421D0 (en) | 1998-02-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2224668C (en) | Method and apparatus for hybrid element casing packer for cased-hole applications | |
| US6009951A (en) | Method and apparatus for hybrid element casing packer for cased-hole applications | |
| US5361836A (en) | Straddle inflatable packer system | |
| US6742598B2 (en) | Method of expanding a sand screen | |
| US7055597B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for downhole tubular expansion | |
| US7699115B2 (en) | Method for applying an annular seal to a tubular element | |
| EP1019613B1 (en) | Downhole packer | |
| US7779928B2 (en) | Non-metallic mandrel and element system | |
| CA2366139C (en) | Expandable packer isolation system | |
| CA2473522C (en) | Inflatable packing element | |
| US7543637B2 (en) | Methods for expanding tubular strings and isolating subterranean zones | |
| EP2959097B1 (en) | Method and system for directing control lines along a travel joint | |
| US5417289A (en) | Inflatable packer device including limited initial travel means and method | |
| US20040007829A1 (en) | Downhole seal assembly and method for use of same | |
| CA2119521A1 (en) | Sand screen completion | |
| EP2418348B1 (en) | Filler rings for swellable packers | |
| AU2003209251A1 (en) | Inflatable packing element | |
| WO1998009053A9 (en) | Method and apparatus for sealing a junction on a multilateral well | |
| WO1998009053A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for sealing a junction on a multilateral well | |
| US20070012437A1 (en) | Inflatable packer | |
| GB2316966A (en) | An inflatable packer | |
| US11384620B2 (en) | Bridge plug with multiple sealing elements | |
| EP1466072A1 (en) | Inflatable packing element |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20171212 |