CA2115153A1 - Dewatering slurries - Google Patents

Dewatering slurries

Info

Publication number
CA2115153A1
CA2115153A1 CA002115153A CA2115153A CA2115153A1 CA 2115153 A1 CA2115153 A1 CA 2115153A1 CA 002115153 A CA002115153 A CA 002115153A CA 2115153 A CA2115153 A CA 2115153A CA 2115153 A1 CA2115153 A1 CA 2115153A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
coal
dewatering
slurry
aid
flocculant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA002115153A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Mark E. Keeney
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of CA2115153A1 publication Critical patent/CA2115153A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/52Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
    • C02F1/54Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using organic material
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D37/00Processes of filtration
    • B01D37/03Processes of filtration using flocculating agents

Abstract

The specification describes a method of dewatering mineral slurries especially slurries of a fine coal. The method involves adding an anionic flocculant to the slurry and subsequently adding a dewatering aid to the slurry at or just prior to the formation of a filter cake during a filtration step. The specification also discloses that overloading with an anionic flocculant can be avoided if a dewatering aid is used in combination with the flocculant.

Description

2 PCr/~U92~00437 D}æWAAT13RING SI~RIISS

Thia inYen~io~ relate~ to im~ro~ed dewatering method~ a~d agents for u~e in ~acuum filtration o~eration~ in ~ineral S and coal ~xoce~ing. The in~ention i gener~lly a~licable to the dewatering of 31urrie~ including tho3e encou~tered in the ~ro~e~sing of mineral~ ~uch as alu~ina, a~ well a~
coal, but i~ i of partieular intere~t in the dewatering of fine coal and aecording~y will be de~cribed in detail with particular reference to the latter a~plication.

sack~round of_the In~en~ion vacuum filtration i~ co~monly used in indu~trial. ~roce~e~
~o remove water from ~lurrie~. Vacuum disc and drum 1~ filter~ are widely u~ed, a3 well a~ ~acuum belt filter ~he e~ficiency of ~uch ~roce ~e~ de~e~ds i~ lar~e ~art upon the ~h~ical ~ro~ertie~ of the ~lurrie~ ~o be dewa~ered, a~d exten~i~a ~udie ha~e been carried out with a ~iew to modifyi~g tho~e~-~hy~ic~l ~ro~ertie~ in order to o~timi~e the effieieney of the dewatering ~roee~. The ~ro~ertie~
may be affeeted, for ex~mple, by chemical mea~ ~ueh aQ
` the u~e of ehemieal ~ddi~ve~, or by ~hy~ieal mean~ ~uch a~
the meehanieal treat~ent of the ~lurrie~ and/or the filter eake which i~ formed i~ the ~aeuum ~iltration ~roee~. A~
the~e ~roce~se~ are earried out on a very lar~Q ~eale, eeono~ie eonsi~eration~ are al~o important ~nd what may a~ear to be ~all impro~ement~ ean re~ult in ~ub~tantial eo~t ~a~

39 Coal proce~ing, ~articul~rly the treatment of metallur~eal eoal, u~ually ineorporate~ wa~hi~g ~tep~ as ~art of the benefieiatio~ ~eh~me.

211~153 The coal-cleaning ~roce~s ~roduce~ coal wlth a broad range of ~article Qize~. Coar~e coal (ie., >600 micron) a~d f~ne coal are treated differently to dewater e~fecti~ely.
Water i~ u~ually re~o~ed from ~oar~e coal by ~creen drainage or centrifugation and from fine coal (ie., flotation concentrate~ or refuse) by centri~ugation or ~acuum filtration. In ~ome ca~e~, thermal drying of fi~e coal i employed as a nece~ary ~te~ to achie~e target moi~ure~. Depending u~on the mining o~eration, the type of coal treated and normal ~wîng~ in proce~ o~eration in the ~lant, the moi~ture le~elz in the cleaned coal can ~ary quite widely. Typical moisture le~el~ in coar~e coal range fro~ 2-12%, while fine coal moi~tures can range from 1~-30%.
. Coal ~rocesQing ~lants often ha~e considerable trouble meeting target moi~ture le~el~ in the ~roduc~ coal they - . ~ell. A~ a re~ult of naw mining met~od~ employed in long-. wall operation~, the proportion of fine coal reporting to the washing & ~reparation pl~nt~ ha~ increa~ed ~ignific~ntly.~.Fine coal iR much more di$ficult and co~tly ~o dewatar than coar~e coal. Ona method often employed by coal ~re~ ~lants to achieve moisture ~ecification~ i~ to blend high-moi~ture fine coal with low-moi~ture coar~ coal i~ ~ro~ortio~ necè~ary to ~u~t meet tar~et moi~ture.
While, in many ca~es, it would be much more co~t effactive for a coal ~re~ ~lant;to ~imply di~card the fine~ ana mine more coar~e coal, for rea~on~ of re~ource management/utili~ation/con~ervat~on it i~ moxe ~rudent to treat ~e f~no~.

Vacuum f~ltrat~on i~ the mo~t commonly u~ed mea~ of mechanical treatment to dewater fine coal. Fine coal, in ~lurry form, reports to the filtration o~eration where the WO 93~03B12 P~/AU92/00437 211~153 watex iR removed . Yacuum diE~c and drum f ilter~ are ~che prir~ci~al tyl?e uQed by the coal industry to f ilter f ine coal, althou~h increasinç~ intere~t i~3 beins~ ~hown in ~acuum belt filter~. To a~ 3t in the efficient ol?eration o~
5 VlCUllm filters, reageslts are often added to the f~ed ~lurr~r -It i~ known to u~e anionic and cationic f locculaxlts in the~racuum ~iltrat~on o~ fine coal. The~e reage~t~ are 10 necez~ary to "thicken" the ~3lur:ry a~ it i~ $ed to the ~vacuum filter to en~ure the l?ro~er fomlation of a filter cake. It i~ thou~ht that the reage~ts functios~ by binding the ~rery f isle coal particle~ to larger coal part:icle~ in a ty~?ical flocculation ~?roc~, thu~ ~roducin~ a ~ore uniform :LS and increa~ed ~?article ~iz~ diRtribution ~or better f ilter cake l?ermeabiliky. Thi~ re~ult~ in 1~ "blinding" of tb~e f ilter cloth and f il~cer cake by the ~ery f i~e coal ~ar~icl~ .

Both anionie floeeulant~ (u~ually high molecular weight aeryl ~ ide/aerylate eo-~olymer~) and eationie floeeulants (u~ually low ~olecular weight ~olyamines) are u~ed, indi~idually or in combination, to Go~trol filter eake formation. These reagents are alway~ added to the ~lurry ~eeding th~ ~aeuum filter~ (ie., slurry ~re-tr~atme~t) in a . maDner ty~ieal of floeeulant addition in the mineral~
i~du~try.

There has al~o been eonsiderable interest by the eoal industry in the use of ~urfaetants, in eombination with floe~ulaGt2, to eDhaQce the dewateri~g of fine eoal.
Althou~h mA~y ~tudie~ ha~e been eonducted and e~orted, there are widely ~arying rQsults/conclusio~. Some studie~
ha~e ~hown that surfactants do not ~i~nificantly affect WO93/03812 PCT/~U92/00437 211Sl53 4 reQidual cake moisture, while other~ Qhow they do. Other tudieR conclude that surfactant~ can be ef ective for certain type3 o~ ~oal but ~o~ for other~.

S One o~ the mo~t ~ignific~nt reas ~ for the Yariatio~ in the performance of dewatering aids for fine coal i the ~ariable c~emi~try o~ coal it~elf. ~nlike all other mineral~, coal i an organic ~aterial. C~al~ ~ary widely in bul~urface compo~ition, de~endin~ upon a multi~licity of factorY ~uch a~ location of the depo~it, ranX and mi~eral (i~orga~ic~ matter, deyree of weatheri~l~, internal truc~ure/porosity, et~. Therefore, depending upon the s~ecific coal ~reated, dewaterin~ aid ~erfor~ance can be expec~e~ to ~ary widely ~i~ce both the ad~orption ta surface chemieal ~ro~erty) and absorption (a bulk chemical ~roperty) eharaeteri~tie~ of eoal~ with re~pect to drainage aid int~raction w~ll ~ary widely.

~. . .
The ~eci~i~ation of ~uro~ean Paten~ Ap~lieation Publieation No. 460811 in the name of nniehema Chemie BV
de~eribe~ the ~ddition of anionic f loecula~t~ or eationic eoagula~t~ to a eoal ~lurry prior to ~ltration in the pre~e~ee of a dewa~ering aid. However, the ~eeifieation state~ that the preferred point for addition of the dewateri~g aid i~ from a po~ition within the filter eake forming zone. W~ have now found that when an a~ionie floeeulant i~ u~ed, the be~t ~oint for addition of the dawatering aid i8 at or ju~t ~rior to the formation of the ~ilter eake during the f~ltration ~te~.
Sy~mary of the inve~tio~

Aeeordi~ to the ~re~ent in~ention the-e i~ pro~ided a ~ethod of dewatering an aqueou~ coal or mineral ~lurry 3~12 PCT~AU92/00437 com~ri~ing addi~ a flocculant to the ~lurry, ~ub~equently add~g a dewa~ering aid, and filteri~g the ~lurry by mean~
of ~acuum filtra~ion to obtai~ a f ilter aake a~d a fil~rate, characteri3ed in that the dewatering aid i~
added at ju~t ~rior to formakio~ of the ilter cake during - the filtration ~e~

Preferably, the dewateri~g aid i~ a salt ~uch a3 a ~odium ~alt o~ a ~atty acid i~cluding fatty a~ids deri~ed from . tall oil. The fatty acid may ha~e from B to 20 carbon atoms. However, ~odium olea~e i~ ~articularly ~referred~
The d~waterin~ aid may also be a pota~sium or ~mmonium salt of a fatty acid.

The dewaterinQ aid may al~o com~riae either a ~alt of a gul~honic acid ~uch a~ dodecyl be~zene ~ul~ho~ic a~id, an ethoxylated alcohol or a~ un~apo~i~ied fatty acid.

. The ~loeculau~ may be a~ded to the coal ~lurry ~rior to the filtration ~te~ in a.ratio in the ra~ge from-10 to 100 and ~ref~rably 20 to 50 ~m~ ~er tonna of ~i~eral:or coal co~tained in the ~lurry. On the other hand the dewatering aid may be added to the ~lurry in a ratio in the range from . .02 to 1.5 and preferably D.5 to 1.5 ~g ~er tonne of mineral or coal~

- In a.further a~ect of th~ i~ention we ha~e found that the ex~en~e cationic flocculant~ ~re~ently u~ed may be . re~laced by ~ery much smaller amount~ of anionic ~locculant~, without ~uffering the drawbac~ formerly a~Roc~ate~ with the u~e of ~aid anionic flocculant8, whereby a ~ery large ~a~ing in co~t i~ achie~ed.

In ye~ another a~ect of the inven~ion, a two-~tage ~roce~
i3 ~rovided in~ol~ing u~e of anionic flocculant~ in ~lace of cationic ~locculant~, in combination with a~lication of t~e dewatering aid at a particular ~ta~e of t~e ~roce3~, to 5 pro~ide a greatly impro~ed and ~uch more co~t-effective proce~s ~or dewatering ~lurrie~ than ha~ hitherto been con.idered fea~ible.

Detailed description of the invention An ex~erimental rig wa~ e~tabli~hed enabling accurate ~imulation of actual plant o~erations at the Bellambi Coal Com~any Pty ~td, South Bulli, New South Wale~, ~ustralia.
~he ~erformance of the laboratory f ilter rig wa~ correlated wi~h the ~er~or~ance of a Delkor ~acuum ~elt .ilter at Bel. la~bi . Current ~ractice in~.rol~e~ addition of a cationic ~locculant to the feed of the Delkor filt~r~ in order to control the for~ation of the ~ilter cake c~n the f ilter belt. T~i~ reagent addition re~re~ent~ a ~igni icant 20 o~erational cost but u~e of ~he cationic f locculant ha~
b~en con~idered nec~ary for adequate proce~ control and ~- s~erfcrmaslce of the Delkor filter~.

It wa~ nece~ary to accurately a~ess the performance of the ca~ionic floc¢ulant on filter cake for~atio~ ~rior to under~akin~ draina~e aid testwork. The amount of the cationic flocqulant ~eeded to achie~e cake formation ~n the teRt-rig comparable to that i~ the plant had to be de~ermined and the effect of the cationic flocculant on drainage aid ~erformance had to be a~certained.

~115153 Brief Summary~of the Dra~ing~

Figure 1 i5 a graph of filter cake moi~ture content ~r~us cationic flocculan~ do~age at a fixed dryins time and a~plied ~acuum. Fi~ure 2 i~ a gra~h of filter cake fo~m time a~d a~arent a~pliad ~acuum again~t c tio~i~
floccula~t do~a~e rate, Fi~ure 3 i~ a ~raph o~ filter cake moi~ture conte~t and fo~m ti~e ~er~u~ a~lied ~acuum at a ~ixed do~age rate of cationic flocculant, Figure 4 i~ a gra~h of fil~er cake moiR~ure content versu~ do~3age rate of dewa~ering aid where the dewa~ering aid i~ added at dif~erent location~ in the filtra~ion ste~, Fi~ure 5 ia a gra~h of filter cake form ~ime ~eraus a~ionic flocculant do~age rate for two types o~ anio~ locculant, Figure 6 i~ a gra~h of filter ca~e moi~ture content ~er~u~ anionic ~loccula~t do~a~ rate for two type~ of anionic flocculant, Figure 7 i~ a gra~h of f ilter eake moi~ture conte~t ~er~u~
:- do~age rate of dewaterin~ aid ~howing th~ offeet of incorporating t~e dewateri~g aid at ~ariou~ loeations in 20 - the filtration ~te~, Fi~ur~ 8 iQ a graph of filter cake moi~ture co~tent Yer~u~ d~watering aid do~age rate for bo~h an anio~ic floeeulated filter eake and a eationie floeeula~ed fllter eake; and Figure 9 i~ a ~ra~h of ~ilter ea~e moi~ture eontent ~er~us a~ionie floceulant do~age ra~e wit~ aQd without the add;tion of a dewatering aid.

Fi~ure 1 ~hows t~e time re ired to aehie~e f~lter eake for~ation and the a~arent ~aeuum of the ~y~tem (at 80 kPa a~lied ~aeuum) a~ a fun~tion of eoagula~t addition. To mateh the f~lter-~ake formation t~me (5-60 sec) and a~are~ ~aeuum eondition~ (70 kPa) of the Delkor #2 filter, a~ equi~alent do~age of 250 g/toDne of ~he eationie floeeulant wa~ required ~ an addition to the teRt-rig lurry.

WO~3/03812 PCT/AU92~00437 211~1~3 Figure 2 ~how~ the re~idual filter cake moi~ture~ achie~ed in the lab tes~ rig a~ a function of cationic flocculant addition. ~e of the cationi~ floccula~t at the do~a~e rate determined above (for ~ro~er form time/a~parent vacuum) resultQ in a re~idual moi~ure le~el of 22-23%.
This re~ult i~ identical to the re3idual moisture le~el~ of ~ample~ of ~ine-coal taken ~rom the Delkor #2 filter, confirmi~g the ability of ~he te~t rig to accurately ~imulate B llambi ~la~t o~eration~. ~xces~i~e ~atio~ic flocculant addition wa~ found to ha~e no detrimental effect ¦ on filter cake moiRture.

Fi~ure 3 show~ the ~ariation in ~ilter-cake moigture and formation ti~ a~ a ~unction of the a~plied ~acuum (at a fixed do~age of cationic floccula~t). ~he~e te~t~ were conducted to te~t the ~e~Riti~ity of the te t rig to en~ure that-change~ in re~idual mo~ture during the ~raluation of the draiDage aids were due to chemical parameter~ and not to mi~or:ch~nges ~n ~acuum which ;ne~itably occur during teRt work (i.e., due to ~light ~ari~tion~ in ~ampling or te~t ~rocedure). A~ ~een, form ti~e i~ ~irtually i~de~endent of a~plied ~acuum (as expected) while moi~ture ~aris~ only ~lightly o~er the ~ariation~ in a~plied ~acuum expected.

Te~ts o~ the~Bellambi ~y~tem indicate that a ~articular drainage aid, namely ~odium oleate, had the mo~t ~ig~ificant ~otential to ach~e~e the cr~teria for technical ~ucces~ e~tablished prior to u~dertaking the ex~erimental woxk.

In attem~ting to o~timî~e the ~erformance of ~odium oleate, con~iderable effort wa~ ~pent to examine the most effecti~e 211~1~3 . ~

method of ~eagent addition to th~ ~acu~m-belt filter.
CGnsideration wa~ gi~en to a ~ari~ty o~ rea~ent-additio~
technique~. Fir~tly, there iQ often a detrimental effect on cost-per~orma~ce of adding drainaye aid~ to the ~ilter feed or to t~e ~u~ernatant liquor too early in the filter cake formation Rtage as a re~ult o~ dilution of the reagent in the slurry. Howe~er, a lo~ in reagent ~erformance due to reagent dilution mu~t be wei~hed again~t the ~roblem~ of (1) in~uffi~ient ~enetration of reagent-treated liquor into the filter cake, ~2) a raduction in filt~r-~ake dry-time and (3) the need to recycle filtrate if the drainage aid reagent i~ a~plied as a wash after ~ilter cake formation occur~.

~igure 4 ~how~ that at the preferred dose rate 0.S0 kg/tonne the mo~t effecti~e methods of reagent a~plication are to en~ure that the reagent is a~lied to th~ ~elkor filter ~from a trou~h or ~pray ~y~tem) at or close to the ~oint of formation of the filter cake. ~oisture reduction of a~roximately 3 to 5% (22-23~ to 18-19%3 can be expected if the reagent i~ ~ro~erly ap~lied.

~here is, howe~er, a ~e~re detrimental con~equence of a~lying the drainage aid to the Delkor ~ilter~ too early in the filter cake formation ~tage. This i~ due to a ~reci~itation reactio~ between the cationic flocculant and specific ~omponeuts of ths drainage ~id.~ Thi~ ~roblem i~
~een clearly from the re~ults pre~e~ted in ~i~ure 4. When ths draina~e aia iB added to the cationic-treated slurry, prior to the slurry rQ~or~ing to the filter belt, a dramatic increa~e ~n cake moisture is ob~erved. Thi~
~roblem i~ reduced if the reagent is added to the ~u~erDatant liquor after the ~lurry i~ on the belt.

21151~3 Anionic Flocculant Addition ~nfortunately, due to ~wings in Bellambi ~roces~
o~ration~, ~articularly a~ more fine~ rea h the filter due to long-wall mining, i~ is extremely difficult ~o control the Delkor filter3 to en~ure that the filter cake form zone remain~ at the same ~oint during f il~ration, even with flocculant addition. In an ef~ort to o~ercome a potential ~roce ~ control problem re~ulting f rom t~e need to a~ly reagent at a critical ~oint in the proce~ o~eration, a method was ~ought to elimi~ate the u~e of the cationic floccul~nt in order to achieve rapid filter cake formation.

Te~twork wa~ conducted on ~am~les of fine-coal taken from the plant ~rior to being treated with the cationic reagent, u~i~q both of the liquid anionic floccula~t8 (i.e., acrylat~/acrylamide co~olymer~) currently u~ed by Bellambi in other ~roce~ o~eration~. The re~ults, gi~en in Figure . . 5,.~ho~that b~ re~laci~g the catio~ic flocculant with an I . anionic flocculant the filter cake formation t~me can be 1 20 dramatically reduced (~rom 60 ~QC to 20 sec) u~ing 1~B~
; than one-tenth of the amount of r~agent (15 g/t a~ion~c flocculant ~ 250 g~t ~ationic flocculant). As the C08t ~er weight unit is idQntical, the sa~ing is ~ubstantial.

T~ere iB, how~er, the ~ote~tial to o~erdo~e the fine-coal ~lurry with an anionic flocculant. Thi~ ~ay result in ~rocess ~rQblems not encountered w~th th~ use of the cationic flocculant. As shown ~n t~e cake moi~ture ~ :
reagent do~age data gi~en in Figure~ 6 ~nd 9, o~erdo~ing the snionic flocculant csn re~ult in an increa~ in the filter cake moisture~. Howe~er, this ~roblem is not unique to Bellambi. Mo~t unit operation~ in~ol~ing floccula~t sddition, e~pecially thickaner~, have similar problem~ if too much flocculant is added to a mineral 211~153 . ~
- ' 11 ~lurry. Fort~nately, with pro~er control of the do~ing o the flocculant to the ~lurry, ~hi~ potential ~roblem can be ~irtually eliminated.

Sodium oleate/Anlonic Flocculant_Performa~e - In addition to ~o~ible ~roce~ ~a~ings by ~hanging from the cationic flocculant to an anionic flo~culaat to control filte~ cake for~ation, we ha~e found ~hat there are significant benefit~ to the ~erformance of ~odium oleate and the control of filter o~eration3.

Fir~tly, here is no danger of a ~etri~ental interaction of the reagent with the anionic flocculant. ~nlike ~he cata~trophic result ~how~ in Fig~re 4, addition of dewatering aid ~o ~nionic flocculated ~lurry ~roduces no dramatic increa~e in ilter cake moi~ture (a~ ~hown in Figure 7). Howe~er, compa~ison of the ~oi~ture ~ reagent - do~age ~rofile~ in Figure 7 clearly i~dicates that the - reagent i~ be~t a~lied a~ a concentrated ~olution at or ~u~t ~rior to cak~ formation.

Secondly, a~ ~hown in Figure 8, at 0.5 k~/tonne do~age : rate, there i~ a demon~trable impro~ment in the performance of the reagent (i.e., 1.0-2.0 ~ impro~ement in moi~ture reduction ca~ability) u~i~g it in con~unction with an a~ionic flocculant rather:than with a cationic floccula~t. Furth~rmore, the ~otential ~roblem of o~er flocculation of the fi~e-coal ~lurry i~ eliminated with a combination reagent/flocculant ~ro~r~mme. ~ab te~t~
indicatQ that, when u~ing ~odium ol~ate as a draiDage aid, exce~ anionic floccula~t addition ha little effect on r~idual f~lter cake moi~ture le~el~.

It will be a~parent that a number o~ ~roce~s benefit~ are achieved by ~he in~ention.

Fir~ly, if the dewateri~g aid i~ 2~1ied to the filter cake ~ia a ~ray at or jus~ ~rior to ~ake formation, thi~
I re~ults in a re~uction in the a~ount of draina~e aid ¦ required to eff~c~ a 3 to 4% dro~ in re~idual moi~ture in I the fine coal filter cake.

; 10 Secondly, the a~plication of the drainage aid reagen~ to the ~a~uum filter a~ a ~ilter-cake ~ray at or around the ¦ point o~ cakQ 40rmation on the filter belt/di~c enable~ an anionic floc¢ula~t to be ~ub~tituted for a cationic floccula~t for .ilt~r fee~ thicke~in~. Thi~ tw~-~tage ap~roach to ~ine-coal dawaterin~ hae been fourld to co~ple~ely eliminate ~robl~ a~Qciated with ~roce~
control if a~ anionic flocculan~ i~ u~ed to ~hicken the filter ~eed ~lurry. ~he reaqe~t ~ray ha~ been ound to an~ure that il~er cake ~ermeabili~y durin~ the dewaterinq ~ha~e of ~iltration (~.e., once air ba~in~ ~enetration o~
the filter cake) i~ ma~ntained re~ardle~ of ~ny ~l~ght - o~erdo~in~ of the an~onic floccula~t due to ~roce~ ~wing~.
Thi~ permit~ an anionic f loccula~t to be aub~tituted for a cationic flocculant with enormou~ ~rocQ~s za~ing~.
Figure 9 ~how~ the impact on f iDal ~roduct cake moi~ture u~ an anionic ~locculant ~retreatment ~te~ ~r~or to filtration w~th and without thQ aid o~ the a~ ed reagent.
H~g~ ~roduct cake moi~ture~ are encountered where the ~locculated pretreatment i~ too high and the corres~onding curve ~how~ the ri~ in moi~ture after thi~ phenomenon occurs (i.~., around 20 g/T flocculant do~e).

21151~3 ~owe~er, i~ a dual floccula~t/reagent ~y~t~m, the ~roblem#
e~coun~ered with flo~culant overdo~ins a~e corre~ted by way of a ~y~ergism with the raage~t addition.

- The e~d re~ult is a lower cake moi#tu~e with a far more C05t effec~i~e ~retreat~ent ~te~.

s~
Although th~ experimenta work de~cribed abo~e wa~ carried out in co~nection with the de~elo~me~t of fatty acid deri~ati~es and particularly ~odium oleate a~ dewatering aia~, it i~ a~arent that the conce~t of a~lyi~g a ~olutio~ of the dewateri~g aid at or about th~ ~oi~t of for~ation of the filter cake i~ ~ombi~atio~ with u~e of a lo~cul~nt i~ no~el ~er ~e and ge~erally a~licable u~
con~entio~al dewateri~g aid~. ~he present in~ention there ore ~x~and~ to thi~ concept a~ a~plied to the ,~.
dewaterin~ of slurrie~ U8i~ dewatering aids other than 2Q fatty acid ~erivati~e~.

~licatio~ of thA abo~e identifiea concept enable~
~ub~titutio~ of a~ionic floccula~t, hitherto believed to be i~practical, for the much more expe~i~e ca~ionic ~loccula~t hit~erto employed i~ ~he dewatering of Rlurrie~, ~articularly i~ the dewa~erin~ of ~i~e coal. A~ detailed abo~e, this i~.o~ co~iderable economic ~ignificance.

It will be clearly under~tood th~t tha in~ention i~ it8 ~enoral a~ect~ iR ~ot lim~tea to the particular deta~lR
~et out i~ the experimental work di~clo~ed above.

Claims (13)

14
1. A method of dewatering an aqueous, coal or mineral slurry comprising adding an anionic flocculant to the slurry, subsequently adding a dewatering aid and filtering the slurry by means of vacuum filtration to obtain a filter cake and a filtrate characterized in that the dewatering aid is added at or just prior to formation of the filter cake during filtration.
2. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering aid comprises a salt of a fatty acid having from 8 to 20 carbon atoms.
3. A method according to Claim 2 wherein the salt is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium and ammonium salts.
4. A method according to Claim 2 wherein the fatty acid is oleic acid.
5. A method according to Claim 2 wherein the fatty acid is a tall oil fatty acid.
6. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the anionic flocculant is added to the slurry at a rate in the range from 10 to 100 grams/tonne of coal or mineral.
7. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the anionic flocculant added to the slurry at a rate in the range from 20 to 50 grams/tonne of coal or mineral.
8. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering aid is added at a rate in the range from 0.02 to 1.5 kg/tonne of coal or mineral.
9. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering aid is added at a rate in the range from 0.5 to 1.5 kg/tonne of coal or mineral.
10. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering aid comprises a salt of a sulphonic acid.
11. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering aid comprises a fatty acid having from 8 to 20 carbon atoms.
12. A method according to claim 1 wherein the dewatering aid comprises an ethoxylated alcohol.
13. A method of dewatering an aqueous mineral or coal slurry comprising adding an anionic flocculant to the slurry, subsequently adding a dewatering aid and filtering the slurry by means of vacuum filtration to obtain a filter cake and a filtrate characterized in that the dewatering aid is a salt of a fatty acid having from 8 to 20 carbon atoms.
CA002115153A 1991-08-20 1992-08-19 Dewatering slurries Abandoned CA2115153A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPK7855 1991-08-20
AUPK785591 1991-08-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2115153A1 true CA2115153A1 (en) 1993-03-04

Family

ID=3775635

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002115153A Abandoned CA2115153A1 (en) 1991-08-20 1992-08-19 Dewatering slurries

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0601023A4 (en)
JP (1) JPH06509975A (en)
CA (1) CA2115153A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1993003812A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA926247B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9068776B2 (en) 2009-10-30 2015-06-30 Suncor Energy Inc. Depositing and farming methods for drying oil sand mature fine tailings
US9404686B2 (en) 2009-09-15 2016-08-02 Suncor Energy Inc. Process for dying oil sand mature fine tailings
US9909070B2 (en) 2009-09-15 2018-03-06 Suncor Energy Inc. Process for flocculating and dewatering oil sand mature fine tailings

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11459257B1 (en) * 2017-05-12 2022-10-04 Eco Environmental, LLC Method of treating a liquid with nanobubbles

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4132630A (en) * 1978-04-03 1979-01-02 Gulf Research & Development Company Method for separating solids from coal liquids
US4290897A (en) * 1980-05-27 1981-09-22 Dow Corning Corporation Dewatering fine coal slurries using two types of organopolysiloxanes
CA1156535A (en) * 1980-10-29 1983-11-08 Dieter Frank Hydroxylbenzyl amines as dewatering agents
IN172903B (en) * 1990-05-08 1994-01-01 Lever Hindustan Ltd

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9404686B2 (en) 2009-09-15 2016-08-02 Suncor Energy Inc. Process for dying oil sand mature fine tailings
US9909070B2 (en) 2009-09-15 2018-03-06 Suncor Energy Inc. Process for flocculating and dewatering oil sand mature fine tailings
US10590347B2 (en) 2009-09-15 2020-03-17 Suncor Energy Inc. Process for flocculating and dewatering oil sand mature fine tailings
US9068776B2 (en) 2009-10-30 2015-06-30 Suncor Energy Inc. Depositing and farming methods for drying oil sand mature fine tailings

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0601023A1 (en) 1994-06-15
JPH06509975A (en) 1994-11-10
WO1993003812A1 (en) 1993-03-04
ZA926247B (en) 1993-04-22
EP0601023A4 (en) 1994-09-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1336020C (en) Clarification process
ITRM980439A1 (en) PROCEDURE FOR SEPARATING AND REGENERATING EXHAUSTED ABRASIVE BASED ON GLYCOL AND SILICON CARBIDE FOR THE PURPOSE OF THEIR RE-USE
CA2097372A1 (en) Process for recovery of metallic mercury from contaminated mercury-containing soil
DK1546268T3 (en) Process for grinding inorganic particulate material
KR870007084A (en) Acid treatment method for improving filtration of clay
SE456254B (en) SET TO CLEAN GROUNDLUT IN SULPHATE MASFACTURER'S CHEMICALS RECOVERY
AU707514B2 (en) Biopolymer use as a sand filter aid
CA2115153A1 (en) Dewatering slurries
EA199800618A1 (en) A METHOD FOR INCREASING THE ACTIVITY OF CONTAINING ZEOLITE SOLID SUBSTANCES IN THE FORM OF PARTICLES
US5089142A (en) Methods for dewatering coal and mineral concentrates
JP4595099B2 (en) Method and system for cleaning contaminated soil
CN110449118A (en) A kind of method of modified gangue removal Uranium in Waste Water
AU597773B2 (en) Methylated starch compositions and their use as flocculating agents for bauxite residues
CA1092363A (en) Filtration dewatering of iron ore concentrates
CA1324845C (en) Process for improving the sedimentation and filtering properties of waste waters containing clay minerals
JP7184622B2 (en) Method for recovering gypsum dihydrate from waste gypsum board
JPH11244628A (en) Filtration
RU95102021A (en) Method of clarification of mine inflow water and slime dewatering
CN110117051A (en) A kind of magnetic powder high speed separating device for biological magnetic sedimentation
KR100582801B1 (en) Refining method of high purified sodium sulfate from wasted sodium sulfate arising from electric precipitator
US5893463A (en) Recovering precious metals and small precious stones from clay suspensions
CN220611701U (en) Shield soil treatment system
Pearse et al. Application of Special Chemicals(Flocculants and Dewatering Aids) for Red Mud Separation and Hydrate Filtration
SU1708489A1 (en) Method of hydraulic regeneration of foundry sand
KR950018687A (en) How to remove impurities from plating solution

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FZDE Dead