CA2113686A1 - Liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth - Google Patents

Liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth

Info

Publication number
CA2113686A1
CA2113686A1 CA002113686A CA2113686A CA2113686A1 CA 2113686 A1 CA2113686 A1 CA 2113686A1 CA 002113686 A CA002113686 A CA 002113686A CA 2113686 A CA2113686 A CA 2113686A CA 2113686 A1 CA2113686 A1 CA 2113686A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
weight
vitality
teeth
liquefied gas
gas formulation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA002113686A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Hans-Matthias Deger
Claudia Schutz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hoechst AG
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of CA2113686A1 publication Critical patent/CA2113686A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K49/00Preparations for testing in vivo
    • A61K49/0004Screening or testing of compounds for diagnosis of disorders, assessment of conditions, e.g. renal clearance, gastric emptying, testing for diabetes, allergy, rheuma, pancreas functions
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P1/00Drugs for disorders of the alimentary tract or the digestive system
    • A61P1/02Stomatological preparations, e.g. drugs for caries, aphtae, periodontitis

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Rheumatology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Endocrinology (AREA)
  • Diabetes (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Medicinal Preparation (AREA)
  • Cosmetics (AREA)
  • Acyclic And Carbocyclic Compounds In Medicinal Compositions (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)

Abstract

Abstract Liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth The invention relates to a liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth, which comprises at least 50% by weight of 2-hydroheptafluoropropane liquefied under pressure and not more than 50% by weight of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane liquefied under pressure, the use thereof and a method for testing the vitality of teeth.

Description

`~ 2113~8~
-``` HOECHST AKTIENGESELLSCXAFT HOE 93/F 018 Dr. MA/we Liquefied gas formulation for te~ting the vitality o~
teeth, The matter of the vitality of teeth i8 of decisive importance in the context o recording dental finding~
and planning dental treatment. The most requent causes o toothache are carious deect~, hyperemias o the pulp (marrow organ of the tooth), pulpitis or gangrene. Since the treatment o the dierent diseases varie~, pulp diagnostics (testing o vitali~y) is o decisive import-ance. In the case of deep-seated caries, it is important to retain the vitality wi~ich still exists (for example by direct or i~direct capping). In the case of crowning, it is important to determine devitalized teeth, since devitalized side teeth have an excessive risk of fracture and devitalized front teeth should be provided with a core construction of metal before crowning. Difficulties also oten occur with arowned teeth. Since diagnosis by X-ray is made dificult here, testing of vitality is of great importance.

The pulp regenerates dentine as a reaction to external influences and ~timuli and thus maintains the vitality of the pulp tissue.

The vitality of dental pulp i~ equated with the intact metaboli~m of cells and the ability to regenerate dent-ine. Direct evaluation of thie function ia not po~oible,i.e. vitality can be checked only indirectly.

In practice, the vitality of pulp is evaluated by check-ing ~ensitivity. An establi~hed clinical method i~ the U~8 o~ thermal stimuli. In this proc0dure, these ~timuli are given to the tooth ~urface and lead, via a ehift in the dentine Sluid, to excitation of the 0en~itive nerve3 o~ the pulp and thers~ore to a pain ~ensation.

Pulp ~enaltivity i~ chiefly t~ted with low temperature stimuli. Thie te~t is reliable, ~ince tha ~tlmulus ,, , ,,,"~ " ~ ~, ' ~.. ' ~ ~ '; ': ' '~' " ~ . ' .
, , ",",,, ", ,,,,", ,,"" ;,~,;,,, ~ ~ ~ ' ,.. , :., ,"
,,. ,~ ,",",,, :, -,, ~ "~
, ~,," ," , , ", ",, ~ ,, " ,', : "

_, 2 21~3~
threshold for low temperature stimuli in pulp tissue is low. On the other hand, in most case~ the pulp tissue i~
relatively insensitive to (brief) cooling, 80 that there is no fear of permanent tissue damage.

The use o~ R12 (dichlorodi~luoromethane) is outst~ndingly suitable and has been tried and tested for years for thi3 test.

To test the vitality of a tooth, this i8 brought into contact with a $oam pellet or cotton wool swab which has been sprayed beforehand with R12 liquefied under pres-eure. AB a re~ult of the drop in temperature on the tooth surface, the temperature in the region of the pulp falls, which means that the stimulus threshold for low tempera-ture stimuli is exceeded. However, like all completely halogenated chlorofluorocarbons (CFC~), R12 has a high resistance to biotic and abiotic degradation. CFCs are not destroyed in the lower atmosphere and therefore rise to the stratosphere. It is assumed that they are then cleaved by W radi~tion and contribute to the degradation of the ozone molecules via free radicale.

It has now been ~ound that R227 (1,1,1,2,3,3,3-hepta-fluoropropane, 2-hydroheptafluoropropane), by itself or as a mixture with up to 50% by weight of R134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane) ia a suitable eubetitute or R12. R227 and R134a ar~ both non-combustible. ~inca the~e compounds contain hydrogen in the molecule, ~n contra~t to com-pletely halogenated chloro~luorocarbons, their life in the atmo~phere and therefore their contribution to the indirect greenhoune e~ect i~ signi~icantly reduced.
Since they are chlorine-free, they do not contribute toward ozone degradation. ~hi~ mean~ that the in~luence on the atmo~phere is minimized.

~he preeent invention relate~ to a liguefied gae ~ormula-tion ~or te~ting the ~itality o~ t~eth, which ~ompri~es 2-hydroh~pta~luoropropane (R227) lique~ied under "~ ',",i ''~, ' j ,~'","', , ~ '~"" ;

~ ,, r~
~/ ", ~ , '" , ,~

2~ i3g~
~ - 3 -.~, . .
pre~sure.

The usual epray can~ of aluminum are de~igned for a test pressure of 18 bar. For safety reason~, however, they ~hould be filled only with products having a vapor pressure at 50C of not more than 12 bar, i.e. 2/3 of the test pressure.
R227 has a vapor pressure of only 9.22 bar at 50C. On the other hand, the corresponding pressure of R134a is already 12.77 bar. R134a therefore can be u~ed only as a mixture with at least 50% by weight of R227 as a "pres-sure reducer". The ~apor pre~ure of a mixture of 50% by weight of R134a and 50% by weight of R227 i~ 10.8 bar at 50C, i.e. even if the spray cans are filled under an atmo~pheric pres~ure of 1 bar, the total preseure in the cans is only 11.8 bar, i.e. iB still of an admiesible value.

~he invention therefore furthermore relate~ to a lique-~ied ga~ formulation for testing the vitality of teeth, which comprises at lea~t 50% by weight of 2-hydrohepta-fluoropropane (R227) liguefied under pre~sure and notmore than 50% by weight of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (R134a) liquefied under pressure. The liquefied gaB
formulation preferably comprises 50 - 99% by weight of R227, the remainder e~eentially being R134a. In particu-lar, the liguefisd gas formulation compri~es 50 - 95% by weight of R227, above all 50 - 90% by weight of R227, the remainder in each case essentially being R134a.

Com~aratiYe ~tudie~ ~how that R12, when applied to a measurement probe (thermocouple) wrapped in cotton wool, lower~ the temperaturo to -36C, i.e. about 10C below the boiling point of R12, within 20 - 25 eeconde. Sur-prisingly, it has now been found that R227 lowers the temperature to only about -16C, i.e. down to about the boiling point of R227, within 15 second0. A mixture of 50% by weight each of R227 and R134a reaches a temp~ratur~ of -26.5C, which al80 only corresponds to ~"" ,,~ "", ,~. ,,,~.'~","" ,,", '",~ ,' :' ~ ;' ~ ' ''' '',', ,~, ~",, ~ "~,"",,",,~" ,:,~

~ ~ 4 ~ 2~3~8~
.
approximately the boiling point of this mixture, within 15 seconds. Considerably less icing on the mea~urement probe therefore occurs both with pure R227 and with its mixture with R134a than when R12 is employed.
Thes2 studies sugge~t that R227 and mixtures thareof with not mora than 50~ by weight o R134a will cau~e a lower-ing of the tamperature on the tooth surface (when applied via a cotton wool swab or foam pellet or sprayed directly onto the tooth) which is ~uff~cient to exceed the pain limit of a vital tooth.
R227 and it~ mixtures mentioned with R134a therefore allow gentler but ~ust as effective testing of the vitality of teeth in comparison with the R12 employed to date for this purpose. Damage to the enamel and the surrounding ti~sue is prevented or minimized by the higher temperature, in comparison with R12, as are the effects following accidental spraying onto the mucou~
membrane.

With R227 and it~ mixtures with R134a, the doctor can adjust to the individual pain limit of the patient by starting with pure R227 and elowly increasing the content of R134a and therefore slowly lower$ng the temperature on the tooth. The higher the R134a content, the lower the temperature generated on the tooth. In other word~, a considerably gentler diagno~i~ can be parformed than with R12.
The vitality can also be t0~ted by direct spraying onto I the tooth u~ing pure R227 or R227 containing ~mall I amount~ of R134a. However, it i~ preferable to u~e an application aid (for example a cotton wool ~wab or foam pellst), as $8 the case with mixture~ with higher con-tents of R134a.

Overall, R227 and it~ mixtures with R134a have the following advantage~ over R12: They are chlorine-Eree and therefore do not contribute toward ozone degradation.
Their vapor pressure i~ 80 low that it i~ not nece~sary to f$11 the ~pray can~ under v~cuum. Beaause the '', ~ 5 - 21~3~
temperature generated by them on the tooth i~ not ~o low, they are gentler to UBe. By suitable choice of the R134a content, te~ting of vitality can be adapted to the individual pain limit of the patient.
Mixtures with increas~ng contents of R134a can he em-ployed here, starting at 1-5~ by weight, then 5-10~ by weight, then 10-20% by weight, then 20-30~ by weight, then 30-40~ by weight and then 40-50% by weight of R134a, the remainder in each case being essentially R227.

10 The following example~ illustrate the invention. `

Comparison Example --A thermocouple wae connected to a digital temperature ~ ;
display apparatus. The thermocouple was wrapped in a cotton wool pellet (3 cm high and 4-5 cm thick). A --15 pressurized ga~ can filled with R12 was fixed on a stand. ~--The diatance between the spray head and the thermocouple was 10 cm; the thermocouple was ad~u~ted centrally in the cotton wool pellet. R12 was sprayed o~to the cotton wool pellet at room temperature for about 5 seconds. Within 20 20 - 25 second~, counted from the ~tart of spraying, the - -~
temperature dropped to -36C. Severe icing occurred on the cotton wool pellet. --Example 1 ~he procedure was ae in the Compari~on Example, except that inetead of R12, R227 wa~ now ~prayed onto the cotton wool pellet. Within 15 ~econd~, counted from the ~tart of spraying, the temperature dropp0d to -16C, only ~light icing occurring on the cotton wool pellet.

~xampls 2 Th~ procedure wa~ a~ in the Compari~on ~xample, except that inetead of R12, a mixture of 50% by weight o~ R227 and 50% by weight o~ R134a wa~ now ~pray~d onto tha cotton wool pellet. Within 15 ~econd~, counting from the ~tart o~ ~praying, the tempoxature dropped to -26.5C, only moderat~ icing o¢curring on the cotton wool pellet.

, y~, j- ,,,, "~, ,, ~, , , , ~; , :, :

-- - 6 - 21~3~8~
Example 3 The procedure wa~ a~ in the Comparison Example, except that instead of R12, a mixture of 90% by weight of R227 and 10% by weight of R134a was now sprayed onto the cotton wool pellet. Within 15 seconds, counting from the start of spraying, the temperature dropped to -20C, only slight icing occurring on the cotton wool pellet.

~ ~", ,~

Claims (14)

1. A liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth, which comprises 2-hydroheptafluoropropane liquefied under pressure.
2. A liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth, which comprises at least 50% by weight of 2-hydroheptafluoropropane liquefied under pressure and not more than 50% by weight of 1,1,1,2-tetra-fluoroethane liquefied under pressure.
3. A liquefied gas formulation as claimed in claim 2, which comprises 50 - 99 % by weight of 2-hydrohepta-fluoropropane, the remainder essentially being 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
4. A liquefied gas formulation as claimed in claim 2, which comprises 50 - 95% by weight of 2-hydrohepta-fluoropropane, the remainder essentially being 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
5. A liquefied gas formulation as claimed in claim 2, which comprises 50 - 90% by weight of 2-hydrohepta-fluoropropane, the remainder essentially being 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
6. A liquefied gas formulation as claimed in claim 2, which comprises 50 - 70% by weight of 2-hydrohepta-fluoropropane, the remainder essentially being 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
7. The use of 2-hydroheptafluoropropane for the prepar-ation of a liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth.
8. The use of a mixture of 2-hydroheptafluoropropane and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, which comprises at least 50% by weight of 2-hydroheptafluoropropane, for the preparation of a liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth.
9. The use of a mixture as claimed in claim 8, which comprises 50 - 99% by weight of 2-hydroheptafluoro-propane, the remainder essentially being 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
10. The use of a mixture as claimed in claim 8, which comprises 50 - 95% by weight of 2-hydroheptafluoro-propane, the remainder essentially being 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
11. The use of a mixture as claimed in claim 8, which comprises 50 - 90% by weight of 2-hydroheptafluoro-propane, the remainder essentially being 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
12. The use of a mixture as claimed in claim 8, which comprises 50 - 70% by weight of 2-hydroheptafluoro-propane, the remainder essentially being 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
13. A method for testing the vitality of teeth, which comprises bringing the tooth to be tested into contact with a liquefied gas formulation as claimed in one of claims 1 to 6.
14. A method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the lique-fied gas formulation is sprayed onto a cotton wool swab or foam pellet and this is brought into contact with the tooth to be tested.
CA002113686A 1993-01-19 1994-01-18 Liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth Abandoned CA2113686A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DEP4301205.1 1993-01-19
DE4301205 1993-01-19

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2113686A1 true CA2113686A1 (en) 1994-07-20

Family

ID=6478429

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002113686A Abandoned CA2113686A1 (en) 1993-01-19 1994-01-18 Liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0607822B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH06298669A (en)
AT (1) ATE144151T1 (en)
CA (1) CA2113686A1 (en)
DE (1) DE59400836D1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9522701D0 (en) 1995-11-07 1996-01-10 Star Refrigeration Centrifugal compression refrigerant composition

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IL97065A (en) * 1990-02-02 1994-01-25 Fisons Plc Aerosol propellant compositions
CA2079776A1 (en) * 1990-04-25 1991-10-26 Donald B. Bivens Halocarbon blends
US5182040A (en) * 1991-03-28 1993-01-26 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Azeotropic and azeotrope-like compositions of 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane
SG42375A1 (en) * 1991-12-31 2001-04-17 Solvay Medicinal aerosol formulation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0607822B1 (en) 1996-10-16
ATE144151T1 (en) 1996-11-15
JPH06298669A (en) 1994-10-25
EP0607822A1 (en) 1994-07-27
DE59400836D1 (en) 1996-11-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Hirano et al. Does suppression of bone turnover impair mechanical properties by allowing microdamage accumulation?
Maragakis et al. Chemomechanical caries removal: a comprehensive review of the literature
Huang et al. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin
Tarbet et al. Clinical evaluation of a new treatment for dentinal hypersensitivity
Miserendino et al. Thermal effects of continuous wave CO2 laser exposure on human teeth: an in vitro study
Cohen et al. Human pulpal response to bleaching procedures on vital teeth
Cooley et al. Effect of carbamide peroxide on composite resins.
Klassen et al. Naratriptan is effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine. Results of a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study
Uemura et al. Effectiveness of eucalyptol and d-limonene as gutta-percha solvents
Barengolts et al. Effects of progesterone on postovariectomy bone loss in aged rats
Paris et al. Penetration depths of an infiltrant into proximal caries lesions in primary molars after different application times in vitro
US4204978A (en) Tooth crack detector
DE10066408B4 (en) Use of fine-grained powders for supragingival powder blasting
Bailón-Sánchez et al. Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth
JPH11500722A (en) Process for the preparation of a formulation for bleaching teeth or for treating skin complaints and mucosal disorders
Vlacic et al. Laser‐activated fluoride treatment of enamel as prevention against erosion
Dionysopoulos et al. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations
Frankenberger et al. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: in vitro investigations
Jones Effect of the type carrier used on the results of dichlorodifluoromethane application to teeth
LIU et al. The combined effectiveness of the semiconductor laser with Duraphat in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity
CA2113686A1 (en) Liquefied gas formulation for testing the vitality of teeth
EP1372593B1 (en) Formulations for the remineralization of teeth
Carr et al. Clinical evaluation and comparison of 2 topical anesthetics for pain caused by needle sticks and scaling and root planing
CA2284557C (en) Dental composition material
Gupta Occupational diseases of teeth

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FZDE Discontinued