CA2100996A1 - Silage inoculant - Google Patents

Silage inoculant

Info

Publication number
CA2100996A1
CA2100996A1 CA002100996A CA2100996A CA2100996A1 CA 2100996 A1 CA2100996 A1 CA 2100996A1 CA 002100996 A CA002100996 A CA 002100996A CA 2100996 A CA2100996 A CA 2100996A CA 2100996 A1 CA2100996 A1 CA 2100996A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
clostridium
silage
inhibiting factor
bacteria
grass
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA002100996A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Bart Ten Brink
Sierk F. Spoelstra
Hans K. Van Dasler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Duphar International Research BV
Original Assignee
Duphar International Research BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Duphar International Research BV filed Critical Duphar International Research BV
Publication of CA2100996A1 publication Critical patent/CA2100996A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The present invention is concerned with a method for the production of silage bymicrobial conversion of silage crop during an aerobic phase and a subsequent anaerobic phase, wherein the anaerobic phase takes place in the presence of lactic acid bacteria, preferably Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria which produce a Clostridium-inhibiting factor, in particular a proteinaceous Clostridium-inhibiting factor.
The invention is also concerned with novel Lactobacillus plantarum species whichproduce a Clostridium-inhibiting factor, in particular a proteinaceous Clostridium-inhibiting factor.

Description

210~996 DIR 0510 Bl SILAGE INOCULANT

The present invention is concerned with a method for the production of silage bymicrobial conversion of silage crop during a first aerobic and a subsequent anaerobic phase.
The quality of silage is subject to wide variation. Fluctuations in weather conditions are generally considered to be the main factor causing such variations. Improvement of the quality of silage is often attained by addition of bacterial inoculants and other silage additives. However, these additions turn out to have a minor impact on silage quality under moderate or bad conditions.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a silage additive which results in silage of good quality under various weather conditions.

When silage crop is cut off from the air, a number of microbial processes take place.
During a first aerobic phase the obligate and facultative aerobic bacteria remain active. These bacteria convert hexose and oxygen into carbon dioxide and water. As soon as the oxygen is depleted the obligate aerobic bacteria lose their activity.
As long as the pH stays above 5 the entero bacteria and the yeast convert hexoseinto fatty acids, ethanol and carbon dioxide. However, the lactic acid bacteria present will produce lactic acid which will gradually decrease the pH value below 4.

At pH4 and below bacterial activity will cease, and hence the silage will remain well preserved.
However, in many cases the pH lowering occurs too slowly. Many causes may underly this phenomenon. If the weather prevents fast drying of the silage crop the respiration of the plants will continue for too long. The sugars present will then be digested and too little substrate will remain for sufficient bacterial activity. Hence the pH lowering will be insufficient. Under these conditions of a slow pH lowering clostridia (i.e. Clostridium tyrobutyricum) start to convert part of the available substrate into butyric acid. Furthermore, these bacteria are able to convert the lactic acid previously produced into butyric acid. By this process two molecules of lactic ~100996 2 DIR 0510 Bl acid are converted into one molecule of the weaker butyric acid, thereby leading to a rise of the pH. At this higher pH also the proteolytic clostridia remain active. These proteolytic clostridia convert protein into ammonia, which also contributes to a pH
rise.

As a result, the quality of the silage in terms of nutritional value will be much lower ~less dry material, less proteins).

Furthermore, the occurence of clostridia in silage will cause the presence of Clostridium spores in raw milk from cows fed with this silage. This Clostridium contamination will have a negative influence on the quality of milk products, inparticular on the quality of cheese.

It has been found now that the nutritional value of silage produced under unfavorable weather conditions can be improved by inoculation of the silage crop with lactic acid bacteria which are able to produce a Clostridium-inhibiting factor.

Advantageously, use can be made of Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria which are able to produce a high molecular weight Clostridium-inhibiting factor, more in particular a proteinaceous factor.

In general, such a factor is characterized in that its Clostridium-inhibiting activity can be abolished by trypsine and by heat treatment. The factor is unable to pass a ultrafiltration membrane having a cut-off value of 30 kD.
Examples of lactobacilli useful according to the present invention are the Lactobacillus plantarum strains G147 and F123, samples of which have been deposited at the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures at Baarn, the Netherlands under the deposit numbers CBS 343.92 and CBS 342.92, respectively.
Suitable silage crops are grass, clover and alfalfa. These crops are stored in such a way that exposure to air is prevented, for instance in a silo or under plastic. When introduction of air is prevented, fermentation will occur. In order to enhance the rate of fermentation or to direct the type of fermentation, silage additives can be aded.
Examples of silage additives are: sugars, enzymes, acids, salts and inoculants.

Silage inoculants for use according to the present invention are Lactobacillus 3 DIR 0510 Bl plantarum cells with Clostridium-inhibiting activity, formulated as a dry or concentrated liquid product. This product is generally suspended in water and sprayed over the crops before and during ensiling. The culture can be applied in 104 - 1 o8 colony forming units (cfu's) per gram of crop, preferably 1 o6 cfu's/g of crop.

Example 1 Procagation of Lactobacilius Lactobacilli were isolated by plating appropriate dilutions of starting material on MRS
agar plates. The composition of the RMS medium is given in Table 1 ~De Man, J.C.Rogers, M. and Sharpe, M.E. (1960) J. Appl. Bac.eriology 23, 130-135).

Table 1 ¦ Component Amount Peptone 10.0 g/l "Lab-lemco" powder 8.0 g/l Yeast extract 4.0 9/l Glucose 20.0 g/l Tween 80 1.0 ml/l K2HP04 2.0 g/l Sodium acetate.3H20 5.0 g/l Tri-ammonium citrate 2.0 g/l Magnesium sulphate.7H20 0.2 9/l ¦Manganese sulphate.4H20 0.05 g/l After 48 hours incubation under anaerobic conditions at 30 C, isolated colonieswere selected. The selected colonies were propagated in MRS broth supplemented with glucose (2% w/v~ and calcium carbonate (6% w/v) for 48 hours at 30 C underanaerobic conditions.

Characterization of Clostridium-inhibitin~ factor The Clostridium-inhibiting factors produced by the Lactobaccilus strains G 147 and F 123 were further characterized with regard to heat stability, trypsin sensitivity and molecular dimensions.
4 DIR 0510 Bl Heat stability Cell free supernatants of the respective Lactobacillus strains were incubated during a certain period at a certain temperature, and the remaining inhibiting activity was determined.

Table 2 _ Treatment Inhibition zone (in mm) against Clos ridium controle 14 14 5 min 75 C 14 14 10 min 75 C 14 14 15 min 75C 14 14 5 min 100C 10 13 10 min 100 C 8 12 15 min 100 C 6 11 5 min 121 C 8 The results ~summarized in Table 2~ show that the inhibitors investigated are resistent to pasteurization. However, they are inactivated by cooking and by sterilization .
The inhibitor produced by strain F123 seems to be slightly more heat-sensitive than the one produced by strain G147.
Trypsin sensitivity Trypsin (1 mg) was added to 1 ml each of the cell free supernatant of strains F123 and G147.
Subsequently, at pH 8, the supernatants were incubated during 1 hour at 37C.
Thereafter the pH was lowered to 5.8 and the remaining clostridium inhibiting activity was determined.
In all of the cases tested the inhibiting activity had completely disappeared.

Molecular dirnensions Cell free supernatants of strains F123 and G147 were subjected to ultrafiltration in : . ~ . ., . ,~, : :
~, , - . ~ .
, .:-: .~,, ~ : .

. . .

210~996 5 DIR 0510 Bl a Centricon 30 filtersystem ~Amicon). The two compartments of this filter systemwere separated by a filter with a cut-off of 30 kD.
Portions of 5 ml of each of the supernatants were transferred to the upper compartment of the filter system, and the system was subjected to a centrifugal force (10000 9) during 10 minutes and the inhibiting activities of the contents of both compartments lpermeate llower compartment); retentate (upper compartment)]
were tested. The results are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 __ Material Inhibiting zone (in mm) against Clostridiurn sporogenes caused by strain:

Starting material 14 14 permeate (<%0 kD) 6 6 15retentate (~ 30 kD) 19 18 Example 2 Acidification of arass The grass was mowed and pre-dried at the field until the dry mass content was 30%. Subsequently the grass was cut up into pieces of about 2 cm.
The shredded grass was inoculated with 0, 105, 1o6 colony-forming units/gram of grass (cfu/g) of strain G147. Inoculation was carried out by spraying the bacteria suspension onto the grass (25 ml suspension/kg of grass) using a plant spray during mixing of the grass in a concrete mixer. For each treatment eight 11 bottles were filled with 400 9 of grass each, and these bottles were stored at room temperature.
During the experiments for each treatment two bottles were opened at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours of incubation time.
An aqueous extract (30 9 of grass + 270 9 of demineralized water, 5 minutes in Stomacher) was made from each bottle, and the pH was measured.
Results:
During the experiment the rate of acidification of the silage inoculated with strain -, . : :-:
.
6 DIR 0510 Bl G147 exceeded that of the control, and it was dependent on the inoculation level(Figure 1).

Example 3 Anti-clostridium activitv in grass silaae Just like in Example 2 grass cut up into pieces of about 2 cm was used. Care wastaken to use nitrate-free grass, in order to prevent clostridia-inhibition by nitrate-degradation.

In experiments 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 the grass was inoculated with lactobacillus cells in an amount of 105 and 1o8 cfu/g of grass.
As a control demineralized water was used. For each treatment three 1 l bottles with a septum (Experiments 3.1 and 3.2) or without a septum (Experiment 3.3) were filled with 400 9 of grass/bottle.

The respective lactobacillus suspensions were sprayed onto the grass (25 ml of suspension/kg of grass). In experiments 3.2 and 3.3, apart from the Lactobacillus, soil extract was sprayed on to the grass (25 ml of extractlkg of grass) to increase the starting amount of clostridium spores. The soil extract was produced by mixing 1 kg of pasture soil and 780 ml of demineralized water In experiment 3.4 the grass was inoculated with lactobacillus suspension at 108 cfu/g. As a control demineralized water was used. For each treatment 3.5 kg of grass was filled into a 10 1 laboratory silo. The respective lactobacillus strains were applied to the grass using a plant spray (25 mllkg) and the grass was mixed using a concrete mixer. In order to increase the number of clostridium spores a soil suspension (1 kg of pasture soil + 750 ml of demineralized water) was applied (25 mllkg of grass). The dry mass content of the grass was decreased by adding 100 ml demineralized waterlkg.

During Experiments 3.1 and 3.2 the weight loss and the hydrogen concentrations of the silages were measured periodically.
For each treatment in Experiment 3.1 one bottle was removed after 21 days and its 2100~9~
7 DIR 0510 Bl content was frozen.
For each treatment in Experiment 3.2 the contents of two bottles were removed after 26 days and frozen.
The numbers of clostridium spores and the contents of ethanol, volatile fatty acids, lactic acid and ammonia from these frozen samples were determined.

During Experiment 3.3 the contents of two bottles were removed after 6 weeks andthe number of clostridium spores, and contents of ethanol, volatile fatty acids, lactic acid and ammonia were determined in these samples.
During Experiment 3.4 the hydrogen concentrations of each silo were determined periodically, and a sample of the silage was removed for determination of the pH, of the concentrations of ethanol, volatile fatty acids, lactic acid and ammonia, and of the numbers of lactic acid bacteria, yeasts, enterobacteria and clostridium spores.
Results ExDeriment 3.1. The results of this experiment after incubation of the grass during 21 days are summarized in Table 4. Herein RCM rneans the number of clostridium spores (log cfu/g) according to the RCM plate method; HAC means acetic acid content (mmol/kg), HB means butyric acid content (mmol/kg) and HL means lactic acid content (mmol/kg). Little differences were shown between the controls and the inoculated silages, all silages were well preserved (low pH) and contained only a low amount of clostridium spores ( < 102 cfu/g) Table 4 L~rain-cfulg RCM HAC HB HL _ Controle < 2.00 39.7 1.2 174 4.03 I G147-10 <2.00 34.0 0.0 122 3 88 [3~ <2.00 3-1.2 0.0 255 3 85 L F 123-10 c 2.00 35.1 0.0 245 3.88 ¦ F123-10 < 2.00 33.3 0.0 237 3.90 Results ExDeriment 3.2. After 6 days of incubation a minor increase of both hydrogen production and weight loss in the control silages as compared to the inoculated silages was found. The results summarized in Table 5 (data after 26 days of incubation) lend support to the hypothesis that this increase was due to clostridium activity.

- . : : , - ~ . .

- .: - - - : : .' :: :: ~ :

2i~0996 8 DIR 0510 Bl Abbreviations in Table 5 have the same meaning as in Table 4; MPN means the number of clostridium spores (log cfu/g) according to the Most Probable Number (MPN~ tube method.

Table 5 ..
Strain-cfu/g Spores RCM MPNHAC HB HL pH
¦ Control 6.12 5.97 8.1 64.4 134 4.69 l 6.08 5.88 5.6 62.0 131 4.70 G147-105 3.39 4.38 23.7 2.5243 3.72 4.61 4.97 21.7 3.4248 3.72 G 147- 1 o6 3.20 3.63 19.5 û.9 239 3.65 ~ 2.48 3.8520.3 0.0 2413.65 I F123-105 2.88 5.18 24.6 1.1242 3.73 3.00 4.97 23.2 1.2248 3.71 F123-10 3.13 4.15 20.8 1.0242 3.64 l 4.76 4.88 24.0 0.0234 3.67 Results ExDeriment 3.3. The observations made in Experiment 3.2 were confirmed in this experiment after 42 days of incubation: the control silages showed higher pH
and butyric acid levels, more weight loss and much higher numbers of clostridiurn spores than the inoculated silages (Table 6; WL means weight loss (g/kg)). 5 Table 6 Strain-cfu/g RCM HACHB HL_ pH WL ¦¦
Control 5.35 33.5 86.0 175 5.36 25.3 _5 22 29.1 84.8 236 5.39 25.8 G 147-10 2.30 21.0 1.6 219 3.70 3.47 <2.00 26.1 1.4 288 3.69 3.96 ll G147-10~ < 2.00 21.8 3.2 286 3.68 4.01 ¦¦
2.70 21.5 1.8 289 3.68 3.70 F123-10 < 2.00 24.1 1.6 284 3.68 4.68 3.00 12.7 1.7 276 3.71 3.99 F123-10~ 2.90 16.2 < 1.0 280 . 3.67 5.23 3.23 22.7 < 1.0 275 3.67 4.69 Results ExDeriment 3.4. It is shown in Figure 2 t~at the pH of the two inoculated silages dropped to about 3.8 within 5 days (pH 4.1 was found in the controls).
The onset of a subsequent pH rise occurred much later in the inoculated silages (41 days) then in the control silages (21 days).

Claims (11)

1. Method for the production of silage by microbial conversion of silage crop during an aerobic phase and a subsequent anaerobic phase, characterized in that the anaerobic phase takes place in the presence of lactic acid bacteria which produce a Clostridium inhibiting factor.
2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the anaerobic phase takes place in the presence of lactic acid bacteria which produce a protenaceous Clostridium inhibiting factor.
3. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the anaerobic phase takes place in the presence of Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria which produce a Clostridium inhibiting factor.
4. Method according to claim 3, characterized in that the anaerobic phase takes place in the presence of Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria which produce a protenaceous Clostridium inhibiting factor.
5. Use of lactic acid bacteria producing a Clostridium-inhibiting factor in the production of silage.
6. Use of lactic acid bacteria producing a proteinaceous Clostridium-inhibiting factor in the production of silage.
7 . Use of Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria producing a Clostridium-inhibiting factor in the production of silage.
8. Use of Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria producing a proteinaceous Clostridium-inhibiting factor in the production of silage.
9. Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria which are able to produce a Clostridium-inhibiting factor.
10. Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria which are able to produce a proteinaceous Clostridium-inhibiting factor.
11. Silage inoculant containing Lactobacillus bacteria according to claim 9-10.
CA002100996A 1992-07-24 1993-07-21 Silage inoculant Abandoned CA2100996A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP92202272 1992-07-24
EP92202272.8 1992-07-24

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2100996A1 true CA2100996A1 (en) 1994-01-25

Family

ID=8210803

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002100996A Abandoned CA2100996A1 (en) 1992-07-24 1993-07-21 Silage inoculant

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH06253747A (en)
CA (1) CA2100996A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EE05746B1 (en) * 2013-07-30 2015-05-15 OÜ Tervisliku Piima Biotehnoloogiate Arenduskeskus Microorganism Lactobacillus plantarum TAK 59 NCIMB42150 and use thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH06253747A (en) 1994-09-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5378458A (en) Lactobacillus casei ssp. rhamosus, bacterial preparations comprising said strain, and use of said strain and preparations for the controlling of yeast and moulds
US4956177A (en) Method for inhibiting fungi
EP0880323B1 (en) Microorganisms and their use in treating animal feed and silage
US4981705A (en) Bacterial treatment to preserve silage
US20080138461A1 (en) Lactobacillus buchneri strain LN1297 and its use to improve aerobic stability of silage
Huot et al. Tween 80 effect on bacteriocin synthesis by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris J46
Merry et al. Use of freshly cultured lactic acid bacteria as silage inoculants
US20080138463A1 (en) Lactobacillus buchneri strain LN5689 and its use to improve aerobic stability of silage
US20080138462A1 (en) Lactobacillus buchneri strain LN5665 and its use to improve aerobic stability of silage
CN101735964A (en) Microbial inoculum for preparing feed and application thereof
US20090028993A1 (en) Lactobacillus buchneri strain LN1326 and its use to improve aerobic stability of silage
Östling et al. Influences of enterobacteria on the fermentation and aerobic stability of grass silages
Fitzsimons et al. Assessment of Pediococcus acidilactici as a potential silage inoculant
US20090028991A1 (en) Lactobacillus buchneri strain LN1284 and its use to improve aerobic stability of silage
CA1214412A (en) Silage production from fermentable forages
US4999301A (en) Culture and preservation of microorganisms within a concentrated medium
Kearney et al. Meat fermentations with immobilized lactic acid bacteria
Cselovszky et al. Production of formate, acetate, and succinate by anaerobic fermentation of Lactobacillus pentosus in the presence of citrate
US6905716B2 (en) Propionic acid based preservative agent for animal and vegetable products
EP0580236A2 (en) Silage inoculant
Winters et al. Degradation of fructans by epiphytic and inoculant lactic acid bacteria during ensilage of grass
CA2100996A1 (en) Silage inoculant
Alli et al. Effects of additives on lactic acid production and water soluble carbohydrates in chopped corn and alfalfa
Shockey et al. Effect of salt on fermentation of alfalfa. 2. Treatment with sodium chloride, clostridium butyricum, and lactic acid bacteria
JP2904428B2 (en) Method for producing silage and additive for silage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FZDE Dead