CA2098800C - Electrode assemblies - Google Patents
Electrode assemblies Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2098800C CA2098800C CA002098800A CA2098800A CA2098800C CA 2098800 C CA2098800 C CA 2098800C CA 002098800 A CA002098800 A CA 002098800A CA 2098800 A CA2098800 A CA 2098800A CA 2098800 C CA2098800 C CA 2098800C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- electrode
- precious metal
- platinum
- component
- catalyst
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 title description 5
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 title description 5
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Chemical compound [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 126
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 239000010970 precious metal Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 239000002322 conducting polymer Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 229920001940 conductive polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 229920001600 hydrophobic polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 229920000554 ionomer Polymers 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 229920001343 polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000004810 polytetrafluoroethylene Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000005518 polymer electrolyte Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- -1 platinum group metals Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- UQSQSQZYBQSBJZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluorosulfonic acid Chemical compound OS(F)(=O)=O UQSQSQZYBQSBJZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 abstract description 20
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 abstract description 12
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 31
- KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isopropanol Chemical compound CC(C)O KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 18
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 16
- 239000000376 reactant Substances 0.000 description 15
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 14
- 229920000557 Nafion® Polymers 0.000 description 13
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 12
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 12
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 12
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 11
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 10
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 8
- 229940058401 polytetrafluoroethylene Drugs 0.000 description 8
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 229960004592 isopropanol Drugs 0.000 description 6
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 5
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000006229 carbon black Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000019241 carbon black Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000001117 sulphuric acid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000011149 sulphuric acid Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000010411 electrocatalyst Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000036647 reaction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphoric acid Chemical compound OP(O)(O)=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000003575 carbonaceous material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004570 mortar (masonry) Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920005597 polymer membrane Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000007650 screen-printing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 1
- MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dioxygen Chemical compound O=O MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920006358 Fluon Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 101100060915 Haemophilus influenzae (strain ATCC 51907 / DSM 11121 / KW20 / Rd) comF gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- CBENFWSGALASAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ozone Chemical compound [O-][O+]=O CBENFWSGALASAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000010757 Reduction Activity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 241000872198 Serjania polyphylla Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005275 alloying Methods 0.000 description 1
- HSFWRNGVRCDJHI-UHFFFAOYSA-N alpha-acetylene Natural products C#C HSFWRNGVRCDJHI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000147 aluminium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002484 cyclic voltammetry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003411 electrode reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004070 electrodeposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005868 electrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- HQQADJVZYDDRJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethene;prop-1-ene Chemical group C=C.CC=C HQQADJVZYDDRJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000002534 ethynyl group Chemical group [H]C#C* 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007731 hot pressing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000005470 impregnation Methods 0.000 description 1
- NDDAHWYSQHTHNT-UHFFFAOYSA-N indapamide Chemical compound CC1CC2=CC=CC=C2N1NC(=O)C1=CC=C(Cl)C(S(N)(=O)=O)=C1 NDDAHWYSQHTHNT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000976 ink Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011244 liquid electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000012299 nitrogen atmosphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000510 noble metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007747 plating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920005596 polymer binder Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000002491 polymer binding agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012078 proton-conducting electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011369 resultant mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007784 solid electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010023 transfer printing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000080 wetting agent Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/10—Fuel cells with solid electrolytes
- H01M8/1004—Fuel cells with solid electrolytes characterised by membrane-electrode assemblies [MEA]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M4/00—Electrodes
- H01M4/86—Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
- H01M4/88—Processes of manufacture
- H01M4/8825—Methods for deposition of the catalytic active composition
- H01M4/8828—Coating with slurry or ink
- H01M4/8835—Screen printing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M4/00—Electrodes
- H01M4/86—Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
- H01M4/88—Processes of manufacture
- H01M4/8825—Methods for deposition of the catalytic active composition
- H01M4/8828—Coating with slurry or ink
- H01M4/8839—Painting
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M4/00—Electrodes
- H01M4/86—Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
- H01M4/88—Processes of manufacture
- H01M4/8825—Methods for deposition of the catalytic active composition
- H01M4/8846—Impregnation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M4/00—Electrodes
- H01M4/86—Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
- H01M4/88—Processes of manufacture
- H01M4/8878—Treatment steps after deposition of the catalytic active composition or after shaping of the electrode being free-standing body
- H01M4/8882—Heat treatment, e.g. drying, baking
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M4/00—Electrodes
- H01M4/86—Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
- H01M4/88—Processes of manufacture
- H01M4/8878—Treatment steps after deposition of the catalytic active composition or after shaping of the electrode being free-standing body
- H01M4/8892—Impregnation or coating of the catalyst layer, e.g. by an ionomer
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/30—Hydrogen technology
- Y02E60/50—Fuel cells
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P70/00—Climate change mitigation technologies in the production process for final industrial or consumer products
- Y02P70/50—Manufacturing or production processes characterised by the final manufactured product
Landscapes
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Sustainable Energy (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Inert Electrodes (AREA)
- Catalysts (AREA)
- Crystals, And After-Treatments Of Crystals (AREA)
- Electrodes Of Semiconductors (AREA)
- Superconductors And Manufacturing Methods Therefor (AREA)
- Control Of Motors That Do Not Use Commutators (AREA)
- Battery Electrode And Active Subsutance (AREA)
- Thermistors And Varistors (AREA)
- Electrical Discharge Machining, Electrochemical Machining, And Combined Machining (AREA)
- Electrodes For Compound Or Non-Metal Manufacture (AREA)
Abstract
A porous electrode suitable for use in a membrane electrode assembly for solid polymer fuel cells comprises a highly dispersed precious metal catalyst an particulate carbon impregnated with proton conducting polymer, and, a further component comprising hydrophobic polymer and a dispersion of particulate carbon, the loading of precious metal being 0.01-1.0mg/cm2 of geometric electrode area. Said electrode demonstrates high effective platinum surface area and power density output when fabricated into a membrane electrode assembly.
Description
zdsssoo ELECTRODE ASSEMBLIES
This invention relates to electrode assemblies, and more particularly to electrode assemblies for use with fuel cells having solid polymer electrolytes.
Fuel cells in which the electrolyte is a solid polymer are known as solid polymer fuel cells, SPFCs, or proton exchange membrane fuel cells, PEMFCs. The solid proton-conducting polymer membrane electrolytes, commonly based ~on perfluorosulphonic acid materials, have to be maintained 2oss~oo in a hydrated form during operation to prevent loss of ionic conduction through the elecarolyte. This limits the operating temperature of the SPFC
typically to between 80"C and 120°C, depending on the operating pressure.
Therefore, both the anode reaction, at which the fuel, which may be hydrogen, a hydrocarbon or an oxygen-containing fuel such as methanol, is oxidised, and the cathode reaction, at which oxygen is reduced, require catalysts to proceed at useful rates. Precious metals, and in particular platinum, have been found to be the most efficient and stable catalysts for all fuel cells which operate at below 300°C, regardless of whether the electrolyte is acidic or alkaline in nature, although they are particularly useful in acid electrolyte fuel cells such as the SPFC.
:l0 The phosphoric acid fuel cell (PAFC) is the type of acid electrolyte fuel cell closest to commercialisation, and will find applications in the mufti-megawatt utility power generation market and also in combined heat and power systems in the 50 to several hundred kilowatt range. The SPFC however, can provide much higher power density output than the 1.5 PAFC, and can operate efficiently at much lower temperatures. Because of this it is envisal;ed that the SPFC might find use in applications such as small scale residential power generation and in vehicular power generation.
In particular, regulations have been passed in areas of the United States which may restrict the use of combustion engines in the future. SPFC
~;0 demonstration units are being built for evaluation in these applications.
In the liquid ~e ectro yte ~ PAFC system the latinum P
electrocatalyst is, providc;d as very small particles (20-50~ diameter), of high surface area, which are distributed on, and supported by, larger conducting carbon particles to provide a desired catalytic loading. Electrodes are formed from the catalysed carbon particles and, for the fuel cell reactions to proceed efficiently, these: electrodes are designed to optimise contact between the reactant gas, the electrolyte, and the precious metal electrocatalyst. The electrode has to be porous, and is often known as a gas diffusion (or gas porous) electrode, to allow the reactant gas to enter the electrode from the LO back and electrolyte to penetrate through from the front. Efficient gas diffusion electrodes, using platinum loadings of around 0.3-O.Smg/cm2 of geometrical elecoode area, have been developed for fuel cells such as the PAFC, which use a liquid acid electrolyte. The electrolyte can penetrate that portion of the porous stnacture of the catalyst carbon support which contains the majority of the platinum catalyst, and in practice above 90% of the catalyst is effectively utilised to perform the fuel cell reactions.
In .any fuel cell, the rates of the electrode reactions depend on a number of factors, but the most important is the total effective surface area of the catalyst present <~t the interface between the reactant gas and the electrolyte.
In the SPF'C the electrodes are bonded to the solid polymer electrolyte, which is in the form of a thin membrane, to form a single integral unit, known as the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). It has been found that the supported catalyst gas diffusion electrodes, as developed for the PAFC, are in general unsuitable for use with SPFCs as only very low current densities are usually attainable. This is because very little of the platinum catalyst surface is present at the three-phase interface, where the membrane electrolyte is in direct contact with platinum catalyst surface and an adjacent gas pore. This occurs most readily at the front surface of the electrode where contact: with the membrane occurs. Very little of the thickness of the electrode is used because the electrolyte does not penetrate into the thickness of the electrode. State of the art solid polymer fuel cell :l0 stacks therefore utilise electrodes containing unsupported platinum black with relatively high noble metal loadings, typically 4mg/cm2 per electrode, in order to maximise the level of platinum contact at the front face of the electrode.
This represents <~ catalyst loading about ten times higher than the catalyst loading used on the cart>on-supported catalysed gas diffusion electrodes. It 1.5 is believed that the amount of platinum surface utilised in these SPFC
electrodes is around 3Ho of the total available platinum surface area on the electrode. Despite the low platinum utilisation, the performance of the state of the art SPFC'.s is high compared to the PAFC. Current densities of SOOmA/cm2 at 0.72V, with H~/air as reactants, at a temperature of 80°C and ~;0 a pressure of Satm, have been reported, whereas the PAFC usually operates at only 200-300rnA/cm2. However, the platinum requirement of these state of the art SPFC electrodes is close to 20g/kW. For reasons of cost it is widely accepted that the platinum requirement needs to be reduced to levels of around O.Sg/kW and below for the SPFC to become a viable system for 2 5 applications such as transportation. Furthermore, the operating current density -S-209~~00 needs to be increased to around 2A/cm2, whilst maintaining the voltage at around 0.7V, to achieve higher power outputs.
The low utilisation of the high platinum loading electrodes, and hence the 1-ugh materials cost, coupled with the fact that the power densities, although amongst the highest of any fuel cell, are still too low for the applications that are envisaged, have been the major problems associated with the production of viable membrane electrode assemblies for the SPFC.
Significant increases in the effective surface area of the catalyst utilised in these electrodes will enable both performance increases and cost reductions to be attained. It should also be noted that increases in power density output can further reduce the capital cost per unit of power generated out of all proportion to thf~, value of the catalyst per se. With the SPFC, other materials, in particular the solid polymer membrane, are also of very high cost, and improvements in cell performance will reduce the quantity of these materials required per unit of power output.
Mary workers in the field have attempted to produce viable membrane electrode assemblies for the SPFC.
21) For example, USP 4,876,115 discloses an SPFC having electrodes which ;ire modified versions of gas diffusion electrodes developed for the PAFC. These are formed by coating a solution of a proton conductive material over a gas diffusion electrode containing platinum 2:i loadings of around O.Smg,/cm2 of geometrical electrode area. The preferred 20~~~~~J
SPFC membrane is a pe:rfluorocarbon copolymer marketed by E I duPont, under the trade mark NAFION. Similar performance is reported for such a carbon-supported platinum electrode compared to an unsupported state of the art platinum black elecarode containing more than ten times as much platinum. The similar effective platinum surface area at the interface, at these much lower platinum loa.dings, is due to a combination of greater utilisation of the platinum catalyst and also to the higher intrinsic surface area of the carbon supported catalysts (typically 100m2/g Pt can be achieved) compared to the unsupported platinum black (typically around 30m2/g Pt). Srinivasan et al ("High Energy Efficiency and High Power Density Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells - Electrode Kinetics and Mass Transport", in Space Electrochemical Research Technology NASA Conference Publication 3125, April 9-10, 1991) have estimated that the platinum utilisation in the carbon supported electrodes is still only 10%. Under similar operating conditions to 1:5 the state of the <~rt high platinum loading system, it is estimated that the platinum requirement in these electrodes is 2.Sg/kW. There is still a need for significant improvement:> in effective surface area of the platinum electrocatalyst both to improve performance and further reduce platinum requirements.
USP 5,084,144 discloses similar hydrogen oxidation and oxygen duction perfornnance from an electrode containing O.OSmgPt/cm2, in comparison with a conventional PAFC electrode containing O.SmgPt/cm2 which has been brush-coated with NAFION. These results are attributed to 2'i a higher utilisation of the platinum.
20'U8800 The procc~.ss by which the electrodes are produced involves fabricating a g;as diffusion electrode from uncatalysed high surface area carbon black, followed by impregnation of a solution of solubilised NAFION
polymer. The platinum catalyst is then applied in a subsequent stage via electrodeposition of platinum onto the preformed electrode from a platinum plating bath solution.
Even though the platinum utilisation appears to be high, the total effective surface area, and hence performance, remains similar to that of the conventional electrode because the Pt loading, of only O.OSmgPt/cm2, is very low. The process disclosed would not appear to be capable of giving sufficiently high platinum surface areas at the necessarily higher platinum loadings and may thus have practical limitations. In addition, the process itself may not readily lend itself to larger-scale commercial production.
V~~ilson and Gottesfeld, in J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol 139, No 2, 1992, L28-30, disclose high utilisation of platinum in electrodes in which very thin films ~of catalyst layers are cast directly onto membrane electrolytes from inks comprising the carbon supported platinum catalyst and solubilised NAFION. Altlhough high Pt utilisations are again reported the technique appears to be limited to ultra-low platinum loadings not exceeding 0.12mgPt/cm2, due to problems of achieving gas permeation to the active catalyst sites with thicker catalyst layers. Indeed it can be seen that at loadings greater than 0.12mgPt/cm2 no further increase in current is obtained, _g_ 20~~~00 because active catalyst covered by a NAFION film greater than 4~m thick is not utilised.
U;~P 4,87'7,694 discloses a gas diffusion electrode comprising an electrode matrix including a hydrophobic layer containing hydrophobic polymer, and a hydrophilic ingredient of particulate carbon bound by hydrophilic, halogenated polymer binder. It is stated that such electrodes may find use in applications such as for solid polymer electrolyte application and related fuel cell applications. However, the catalyst loadings employed l0 are of the same order as in the high loading state of the art solid polymer fuel cell stacks.
For the SPFC to become a commercially viable system for the applications that are envisaged it is still necessary to develop higher performance, lower cost electrode structures in which useful platinum loadings can be applied to give increased effective platinum surface area at the interface and in which the rate of reactant gas supply is sufficiently high to enable practically useful current densities and hence cell power densities, to be attained.
An object of the present invention is to provide a high performance, lower cost rnembrane electrode assembly for solid polymer fuel cells, in which the porous electrodes have a relatively low platinum loading and improved platinum utilisation, and therefore higher effective platinum 2:5 surface area, while demonstrating, by maintaining adequate rates of reactant ~0~~~00 gas transport, higher performance over prior art SPFC electrodes at practically useful current densities under practical operating conditions of temperature, pressure and ~;as flow rates.
Accordingly, this invention provides a porous electrode suitable for use in a solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell comprising a first component comprising highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate carbon impregnated v~rith proton conducting polymer, and a second component which component is a gas supplying component, comprising hydrophobic polymer with particulate carbon, characterised in that said highly dispersed precious metal catalyst is present in a precious metal loading of 0.01-l.Omg;/cm2 of geometric ele<;trode area.
This invention further provides a membrane electrode assembly containing an electrode of the present invention.
Yet further this invention provides a process for the production of an electrode suitable for use in a solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell, comprising:
i) the preparation of a first component containing highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate carbon impregnated with proton conducting polymer;
ii) the preparation of a second component which component is a gas supplying; component, comprising adding hydrophobic polymer to a 2~~'saoo dispersion of particulate: carbon and firing, and the combination of said second component with said first component; and iii) fabrication into an electrode, characterised in that said highly dispersed precious metal catalyst is present in a precious metal loading of 0.01-l.Omg/cm2 of geometric electrode area.
The electrode of the present invention may form either the anode or the cathode. Such electrode may find use in other applications, such as in liquid electrolyte fuel cells or in other applications of solid :l0 polymer electrolyte technology such as water electrolysis, electrochemical ozone generation., or organic electrosynthesis processes.
The first and second components together form what is known as the active layer.
l~ 5 The first and second components serve different functions in the active layer. The first, or IONOMER component allows intimate contact between catalyst particles and the polymer membrane to be used in the fuel cell, necessary to maximise catalyst utilisation and therefore the current density obtainable at any given electrode potential. Said ionomer component comF~rises highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate .arbon impregnated with proton conducting polymer, such as the perfluoro-sulfonate ionome:r produced by E I duPont de Nemours under the trademark NAFION. Any suitable precious metal catalyst may be used, for example :?5 comprising one or more platinum group metals or alloys thereof, such as 20~'5~00 platinum or an alloy thereof. Preferably the alloying components are selected from the Transition Meta elements of the Periodic Table. The active metal part of the catalyst may typically represent 10-SO% by weight of the carbon-supported catalyst.
Gaseous reactant must be supplied to the ionomer component at a rate sufficient to minimise losses in current density at a given electrode potential. (Such losses ~~re usually referred to as mass transport limitations.) Diffusion of gaseous reactant through the electrode is aided by the second, 1.0 or GAS SUPPLYING component, which contains particulate carbon impregnated with a hydrophobic polymer such as polytetrafluoro-ethylene (PTFE) or ethylene-propylene copolymer (FEP) or other hydrophobic polymer.
Conveniently, the ionomer component may be prepared by first wetting the highly dispersed catalyst with the minimum quantity of demineralised water and then adding a measured quantity of iso-propyl alcohol (IPA)/dernineralised water blend (90:10) with stirring. Other wetting agents may be substituted for the water/IPA mix. When the catalyst is well dispersed in the liquid medium, a measured quantity of, typically Swt%
2:0 NAFION solution may be added with stirring. The resultant mixture may be evaporated to close to dryness, conveniently at a temperature of less than 70°C with stirring to minimise the undesired production of thick clumps of NAFION material, and aid the formation of the desired thin, continuous NAFION film throughout the porous carbon black structure. Final drying 2.5 may be performed for example at 60°C for 24 hours followed by 4 hours at 70°C in a vac:uum oven or by any other suitable means. The resultant coarse powder may be: then vigorously milled to give a fine powder.
Samples with polymer contents of between 5 and 60wt% based upon dry material have been prepared. It is envisaged that this spans the useful range.
The loading of the precious metal catalyst is crucial to the power density output obtained. Optimum performance is essential to the commercial viability of the electrode, and is attained at precious metal loadings of 0.01-l.Omg/cm2 of geometric electrode area. Preferably the loading of precious metal is 0.05-l.Omg/cm2 and especially 0.05-0.Smg/cm2.
The gas supplying component may be prepared by dispersing particulate carbon in hot (80°C to 90°C) demineralised water and blending using a high slhear mixer. A measured quantity of hydrophobic polymer emulsion may be added to the dispersion and the mixture allowed to cool with gentle stirring until. a carbon/PTFE floc settles to leave a clear colourless supernatant liquid layer. The floc may be filtered, for example through a buchner funnel, and the resultant solids dried. After drying, which may conveniently be in a vacuum oven, the rubbery material obtained may be broken down into smaller particles and fired. Firing may be carried out at a temperature of, for example, at least 280°C, for example between 300-400°C but especially 320-360°C. Firing may conveniently be carried out in a nitrogen atmosphere. To complete the preparation of the gas supplying component, the resultant solids may be cooled with liquid nitrogen during subsequent milling to produce a fine powder. It is envisaged that samples 20~~~00 with polymer contents oiE between 10 and 60wt% based upon dry material may be useful, but the preferred polymer content is between 20 and 40wt%.
It its envisaged that mixing the ionomer and gas supplying component in ratios of bcaween 100:0 and 50:50 respectively may be useful.
To prepare the elf:ctrode, the components may be dry blended, milled together using a suitable solvent or dispersed together in a suitable liquid medium.
The technique employed will very much depend upon the method employed to lay down the components onto a substrate as a uniform layer to form the 1~0 required electrode. Application techniques considered relevant are those practised in the art, and include direct filtration, filter transfer, screen printing, K-bar technique and spraying. Suitable substrates include carbon paper, carbon cloth, and metal mesh. Said substrates may optionally have a backing layer of a hydrophobic carbon material. This can comprise either a high 1.'S surface area, porous, particulate conductive carbon material, for example, furnace carbon blacks, or acetylene blacks, or the carbon may be mixed with a suitable hydrophobic polymer such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or ethylene-propylene: copolymer (FEP). This can be applied to the substrate by any of the methods indicated above, and heat treated at an appropriate 2(1 temperature to provide the correct hydrophobic properties, prior to application of the active layer.
It may also be desirable to complete the preparation of the electrode by the a~pplicatio~n of a thin layer of a solubilised form of a proton-25 conducting polymer to the; front face of the electrode structure.
20'3800 The elecd-odes of the invention may be formed into the complete membrane electrode assembly by bonding of a thin film of the conducting polymer elecarolyte between the front faces of two electrodes, using processes of heat .and pressure, as is commonly practised in the art.
The invention will now be described by Example, which is regarded to be illustrative; and not limiting. The terms "utilisation", "activity"
and "performanc:e" refer to those properties measured according to the methods contained in the; following paragraphs.
"Utilisation" refers to the proportion of the total active catalyst surface area contained in the electrode structure which is in direct contact with the proton-conducting electrolyte material, and hence is capable of participating in the fuel cell reactions of oxygen reduction and hydrogen oxidation. The method used is based on that described by S Gilman, J
Electroanal Checn, 7, 1964, 382. The method involves the use of cyclic voltammetry to deposit and strip off a monolayer coverage of hydrogen on the active catalyst surface, in contact with the ionomer component, at potentials close to hydrogen evolution. A threx-compartment glass electrochemical cell is used and 1 mol/dm3 sulphuric acid, at 25°C, is used as the electrolyte to provide a source of protons to the test electrode samples.
7 ,e charge associated with hydrogen adsorption is measured and using the relationship lcm2F't = 210pC (C = Coulomb), the electrochemical surface area of the platinum catalyst in contact with the ionomer, in terms of m2/g total 2.'i Pt in the electrode is determined. Additionally, if the total surface area of 2oogsoo the Pt cataly~ct on the electrode is known, then the utilisation can be determined by the ratio of the Pt area in contact with the ionomer component to the total Pt surface area on the electrode.
1(n terms of increased power density and reduced costs for an SPFC it is, however, a high Pt area in contact with ionomer component which is important. This may be expressed in terms of cm2Pt per cm2 electrode area, which rnay be measured by, again, using the relationship lcmz Pt = 210pC.
'''Activity" is a measure of the oxygen reduction ability per unit weight of the catalyst material present in the electrode structure, and is also often referred to as "mass activity". Measurements of over-voltage at various current densitic;s are made in an electrochemical half-cell using 1 mol/dm3 sulphuric acid electrolyte at 60°C, with oxygen and air as the reactants at atmospheric prcasure. The current flow through the test electrode, at a series of IR (Interna Resistance) free potentials versus a dynamic hydrogen electrode (DHF;), is measured, and the mass activity, expressed in terms of milliamps per milligram of the total precious metal material present in the electrode is plotted against the electrode potential. As the protons from the sulphuric acid only interact with platinum in contact with the solid ionomer component, the: mass activity measurements should be strictly dependent on the utilisation.
209880-0~6 _ "Performa.nce" is a measure of the cell voltage obtained at a particular current densil;y in a complete single cell operating under defined conditions. A single cell unit comprises an anode, a cathode and the electrolyte, together commonly referred to as the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) in the SPFC, together with provisions to provide access for the reactant hydrogen and oxygen gases to reach the anode and cathode respectively. Typically, the reactant gases, which are humidified to prevent the solid electrolyte mennbrane film from drying out during the measurements, are fed to the cell at pressures from atmospheric to 5 atmospheres pressure and the cell is rnaintainE:d at temperatures of between 50°C and 120°C. The current density taken :from the cell is adjusted by applying a variable electrical load in controlled increments and the resulting cell voltage is measured when steady. Herein, the electrodes of the invention are evaluated as the cathode, and a standard anode, fabricated at a loading of l.OmgPtkm2, was used to mirumise and provide constant anode voltage losses.
Initial results have been obtained with two component electrodes of the invention prepared by filter transfer and screen printing which demonstrate a 1?t utilisation of 30% of an electrode with a loading of 0.54mgPt/cm2 (ie, in to ms of Pt utilised, 0.152mgPt/cm2). The platinum catalyst has a total surface area of 108m2/g Pt, and thus the total effective platinum surface; area (ie, the surface area at the three-phase interface) is equivalent to 169cm2PtJc;m2 electrode area. This is much improved over the current state of the art. Further half-cell studies in sulphuric acid have indicated that thc: increased level of utilised Pt is active for oxygen reduction, 20~98.8Q.~_ as demonstrated by ;a proportionate increase in current density generated by the high Pt utilisation electrode of the invention.
Furthermore, the performance data in the more realistic single cell test have also confirmed the improvement achieved with the electrodes of the invention compared with the state of the art.
In particular, at high current aensiLies, where proniems associated with mass transport, specifically the diffusion of reactant gases at sufficient rates to the active catalyst sites, become more apparent, the electrodes also appear to function with improved performance: compared with state of the art materials.
IONOI~t C'~~$~
Particulai~e carbon sold under the trademark ViTLCAN
XC72R, available from Cabot Corp, Hillerica, Mass, USA, was catalysed according to canventional method as described in EP
0512713 A1, Comparative Example A with Pt to a loading of 20wt%.
The catalyst ( 2 . 25g ) was wetted with distilled water ( 5 . 5cm' ) and IPA/distilled water blend ( 94cm' of a 90 :10 blend) was added with stirring. After 5 minutes 5wt% NAFION solution was added ( 15. 0g) and the mixture evaporated to close to dryness at 70°C with continued stirring. The aolids were dried at 60°C for 24 hours then finally in the vacuum oven at 70°C to constant weight. The resultant powder wa~~ vigorously milled to give a fine crystalline powder.
.._ ~ 0 9_~1~ Q
GAS SUPPLYING COMPONENT
Shawinigan acetylene black, a carbon available from Chevron Chemicals, Houston, Texas, USA, (1g) was dispersed in hot (80 to 90°C) demineralised wager (100c:m3) and blended for 10 minutes using a high shear Silverson mixer. At 60°C, PTFE emulsion, available as a 60% solids suspension, Fluon GP1, from ICI Chemicals, Cheshire, UK, was added (0.72g of 60wt% emulsion to give 30wt% PTFE in the dry sample) and the mixture stirred gently whilst cooling occurred. After 15 minutes the resultant carbon/PTFE floc was filtered in a buchner funnel and the solids dried for 4 11) hours at 60°C in the vacuum oven. The mixture was then broken down using a mortar and pestle and fired at 350°C for 16 minutes under nitrogen.
A fine powder was obtained by cooling the resultant solids in liquid nitrogen and grinding in a mortar and pestle whilst the sample was still cold.
1 'i ELECTRODE PREPARATION
The ionomer component (0.230g) and the gas supplying component (0.153g) were blended for an hour in a mixture of IPA/demineralised water (40cm' of IPA and 60cm3 of demineralised water) using a high shear' mixer. The resultant dispersion was filtered directly onto 2(I a carbon cloth upon which a previously prepared carbon black layer had been deposited. The carbon cloth was fixed in a filter dam base (8 x 8cm) on top of a fine nickel mesh and wetted with IPA. The dispersion of the active layer components were poured into the dam base and the liquid drained with a suction pump. The resultant electrode was dried in the vacuum oven at 25 60°C for one hour.
The preparation of the electrode was completed by applying a coating of Swt% NAFIO:N solution, using a fine brush, onto the front surface of the active layer to give ca 0.6mg NAFION/cm2 electrode dry weight. The electrode was placed on a hotplate at 60°C during the application and was then dried at 70°C for 2 hours in the vacuum oven to remove any remaining traces of solvent., The electrode active layer contains a 60:40 ratio of ionomer to gas supplying; component. The total surface area of the catalyst is 108m2/gPt and the Pt loading in the electrode is 0.54mgPt/cm2 of geometric electrode area. This electrode was used for Pt utilisation and half-cell activity measurements.
A cathode was prepared from the ionomer component (0.171 g) and gas supplying component (0.114g), as described in Example 1, to give a 60:40 weight ratio of the components and a total electrode platinum loading of 0.40mg;/cm2.
2~D
MEA FABRICATION
Using this cathode an MEA was fabricated. The anode comprised a 20wt% Pt catalyst supported on Vulcan XC72R carbon, at a loading of l.OmgPt/cm2, which was brush-coated with the soluble form of 2:5 NAFION polymer to a loading of ca 0.6mgNafion/cm2 of the electrode dry weight. The proton-conducting polymer membrane was an experimental membrane produced by the Dow Chemical Company, Freeport, Texas, USA, and referred to as XUS-13204.10. The MEA was formed by hot pressing the front face of tha anode and cathode to each side of the membrane at a temperature of 170°C and a pressure of 100psi, for 90 seconds, as commonly practised in the art. The membrane was cleaned prior to forming the MEA
as commonly practised in the art. The MEA was evaluated in the single cell to determine the performance characteristics.
An electrode was prepared according to the method described in USP 4,876,115, in which the soluble NAFION polymer was applied to the front face of a prefon:~med PAFC-type gas diffusion electrode, made with 1.5 a 20wt% PtJXC72R catalyst with a surface area of 100m2/gPt. The electrode was fabricated with a platinum loading of O.SOmgPt/cm2.
A cathode; was prepared as described in Comparative Example l, but with a F't loading of 0.40mgPt/cm2. From this cathode an MEA was fabricated as described in Example 2.
2098~0~
RESULTS
Utilisation Results obtained (by the method contained hereinabove) with the two component electrode of the invention demonstrated a platinum S utilisation of 30%. This is equivalent to an effective platinum surface area of 169cmZPt/cmZ electrode area. The comparative example was measured in our tests only to show 10% Pt utilisation, which is in close agreement with figures reported. in the: prior art. At the loading of O.SmgPt/cm2 this corresponds to an effective platinum surface area of 48cm2Pt/cmz electrode.
Acaivity O~;ygen readuction activity was measured in a half cell according to the method hereinabove. As shown in Figure 1 the mass activity per mg Pt on the electrode, for the electrode of this invention was significantly higher iL S than for the electrode prepared by the method of USP 4,876,115. For example, at 850mV vs 1DHE, with air as the reactant, the mass activity is increased from 0.86mA,/mgPt to 5.79mA/mgPt with the two component electrode. With oxygen as reactant the corresponding increase is from 3.65mA/mgPt to 23.76m~A/mgPt. As can be seen the electrode structure that 2;0 is the subject of this invention gives not only improved Pt utilisation, but enhanced oxygen reduction activity. This higher activity reflects the increase in the effective 1't surface area in contact with ionomer from 48cm2Pt/cm2 electrode area, in the electrode of USP 4,876,115, to 169cm2Ptkm2 electrode area for the two component electrode.
The single cell performance of the two component electrode structure was superior to the performance of the state of the art electrode at all current densities, with both hydrogen/oxygen and hydrogen/air reactants, as shown in Figure 2. For example, at a current density of 0.3A/cm2, on hydrogen/oxygen, the two component electrode exhibited a cell voltage of 0.739 volts, an increase of 95mV on the performance of 0.644 volts obtained with the state of the art electrode. This reflects the higher effective platinum surface area of tl~e two component electrode structure of the invention.
l.0 From the slope of the linear region of the cell voltage versus current density plots, in Figure 2, it is evident that under the cell conditions there are insignificant mass transport losses with pure oxygen as the oxidant.
The slopes of the: linear regions of 0.19S2cm2 for the two component MEA
and 0.17S2cm2 for the state of the art MEA are close to the slopes expected from the activation and resistive losses in the single cell. With air as the oxidant, however, there are mass transport losses, as shown by the slopes of 0.38S2cm2 and 0.:?6S~2cm2 for the state of the art and two component MEAs respectively. The: lower slope for the MEA of the invention is indicative of improved rates of mass transport in the electrode structure compared with the 2~0 state of the art. This highlights the useful function of the gas supplying component, in providing more efficient gas transport to the active catalyst tes.
2:5
This invention relates to electrode assemblies, and more particularly to electrode assemblies for use with fuel cells having solid polymer electrolytes.
Fuel cells in which the electrolyte is a solid polymer are known as solid polymer fuel cells, SPFCs, or proton exchange membrane fuel cells, PEMFCs. The solid proton-conducting polymer membrane electrolytes, commonly based ~on perfluorosulphonic acid materials, have to be maintained 2oss~oo in a hydrated form during operation to prevent loss of ionic conduction through the elecarolyte. This limits the operating temperature of the SPFC
typically to between 80"C and 120°C, depending on the operating pressure.
Therefore, both the anode reaction, at which the fuel, which may be hydrogen, a hydrocarbon or an oxygen-containing fuel such as methanol, is oxidised, and the cathode reaction, at which oxygen is reduced, require catalysts to proceed at useful rates. Precious metals, and in particular platinum, have been found to be the most efficient and stable catalysts for all fuel cells which operate at below 300°C, regardless of whether the electrolyte is acidic or alkaline in nature, although they are particularly useful in acid electrolyte fuel cells such as the SPFC.
:l0 The phosphoric acid fuel cell (PAFC) is the type of acid electrolyte fuel cell closest to commercialisation, and will find applications in the mufti-megawatt utility power generation market and also in combined heat and power systems in the 50 to several hundred kilowatt range. The SPFC however, can provide much higher power density output than the 1.5 PAFC, and can operate efficiently at much lower temperatures. Because of this it is envisal;ed that the SPFC might find use in applications such as small scale residential power generation and in vehicular power generation.
In particular, regulations have been passed in areas of the United States which may restrict the use of combustion engines in the future. SPFC
~;0 demonstration units are being built for evaluation in these applications.
In the liquid ~e ectro yte ~ PAFC system the latinum P
electrocatalyst is, providc;d as very small particles (20-50~ diameter), of high surface area, which are distributed on, and supported by, larger conducting carbon particles to provide a desired catalytic loading. Electrodes are formed from the catalysed carbon particles and, for the fuel cell reactions to proceed efficiently, these: electrodes are designed to optimise contact between the reactant gas, the electrolyte, and the precious metal electrocatalyst. The electrode has to be porous, and is often known as a gas diffusion (or gas porous) electrode, to allow the reactant gas to enter the electrode from the LO back and electrolyte to penetrate through from the front. Efficient gas diffusion electrodes, using platinum loadings of around 0.3-O.Smg/cm2 of geometrical elecoode area, have been developed for fuel cells such as the PAFC, which use a liquid acid electrolyte. The electrolyte can penetrate that portion of the porous stnacture of the catalyst carbon support which contains the majority of the platinum catalyst, and in practice above 90% of the catalyst is effectively utilised to perform the fuel cell reactions.
In .any fuel cell, the rates of the electrode reactions depend on a number of factors, but the most important is the total effective surface area of the catalyst present <~t the interface between the reactant gas and the electrolyte.
In the SPF'C the electrodes are bonded to the solid polymer electrolyte, which is in the form of a thin membrane, to form a single integral unit, known as the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). It has been found that the supported catalyst gas diffusion electrodes, as developed for the PAFC, are in general unsuitable for use with SPFCs as only very low current densities are usually attainable. This is because very little of the platinum catalyst surface is present at the three-phase interface, where the membrane electrolyte is in direct contact with platinum catalyst surface and an adjacent gas pore. This occurs most readily at the front surface of the electrode where contact: with the membrane occurs. Very little of the thickness of the electrode is used because the electrolyte does not penetrate into the thickness of the electrode. State of the art solid polymer fuel cell :l0 stacks therefore utilise electrodes containing unsupported platinum black with relatively high noble metal loadings, typically 4mg/cm2 per electrode, in order to maximise the level of platinum contact at the front face of the electrode.
This represents <~ catalyst loading about ten times higher than the catalyst loading used on the cart>on-supported catalysed gas diffusion electrodes. It 1.5 is believed that the amount of platinum surface utilised in these SPFC
electrodes is around 3Ho of the total available platinum surface area on the electrode. Despite the low platinum utilisation, the performance of the state of the art SPFC'.s is high compared to the PAFC. Current densities of SOOmA/cm2 at 0.72V, with H~/air as reactants, at a temperature of 80°C and ~;0 a pressure of Satm, have been reported, whereas the PAFC usually operates at only 200-300rnA/cm2. However, the platinum requirement of these state of the art SPFC electrodes is close to 20g/kW. For reasons of cost it is widely accepted that the platinum requirement needs to be reduced to levels of around O.Sg/kW and below for the SPFC to become a viable system for 2 5 applications such as transportation. Furthermore, the operating current density -S-209~~00 needs to be increased to around 2A/cm2, whilst maintaining the voltage at around 0.7V, to achieve higher power outputs.
The low utilisation of the high platinum loading electrodes, and hence the 1-ugh materials cost, coupled with the fact that the power densities, although amongst the highest of any fuel cell, are still too low for the applications that are envisaged, have been the major problems associated with the production of viable membrane electrode assemblies for the SPFC.
Significant increases in the effective surface area of the catalyst utilised in these electrodes will enable both performance increases and cost reductions to be attained. It should also be noted that increases in power density output can further reduce the capital cost per unit of power generated out of all proportion to thf~, value of the catalyst per se. With the SPFC, other materials, in particular the solid polymer membrane, are also of very high cost, and improvements in cell performance will reduce the quantity of these materials required per unit of power output.
Mary workers in the field have attempted to produce viable membrane electrode assemblies for the SPFC.
21) For example, USP 4,876,115 discloses an SPFC having electrodes which ;ire modified versions of gas diffusion electrodes developed for the PAFC. These are formed by coating a solution of a proton conductive material over a gas diffusion electrode containing platinum 2:i loadings of around O.Smg,/cm2 of geometrical electrode area. The preferred 20~~~~~J
SPFC membrane is a pe:rfluorocarbon copolymer marketed by E I duPont, under the trade mark NAFION. Similar performance is reported for such a carbon-supported platinum electrode compared to an unsupported state of the art platinum black elecarode containing more than ten times as much platinum. The similar effective platinum surface area at the interface, at these much lower platinum loa.dings, is due to a combination of greater utilisation of the platinum catalyst and also to the higher intrinsic surface area of the carbon supported catalysts (typically 100m2/g Pt can be achieved) compared to the unsupported platinum black (typically around 30m2/g Pt). Srinivasan et al ("High Energy Efficiency and High Power Density Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells - Electrode Kinetics and Mass Transport", in Space Electrochemical Research Technology NASA Conference Publication 3125, April 9-10, 1991) have estimated that the platinum utilisation in the carbon supported electrodes is still only 10%. Under similar operating conditions to 1:5 the state of the <~rt high platinum loading system, it is estimated that the platinum requirement in these electrodes is 2.Sg/kW. There is still a need for significant improvement:> in effective surface area of the platinum electrocatalyst both to improve performance and further reduce platinum requirements.
USP 5,084,144 discloses similar hydrogen oxidation and oxygen duction perfornnance from an electrode containing O.OSmgPt/cm2, in comparison with a conventional PAFC electrode containing O.SmgPt/cm2 which has been brush-coated with NAFION. These results are attributed to 2'i a higher utilisation of the platinum.
20'U8800 The procc~.ss by which the electrodes are produced involves fabricating a g;as diffusion electrode from uncatalysed high surface area carbon black, followed by impregnation of a solution of solubilised NAFION
polymer. The platinum catalyst is then applied in a subsequent stage via electrodeposition of platinum onto the preformed electrode from a platinum plating bath solution.
Even though the platinum utilisation appears to be high, the total effective surface area, and hence performance, remains similar to that of the conventional electrode because the Pt loading, of only O.OSmgPt/cm2, is very low. The process disclosed would not appear to be capable of giving sufficiently high platinum surface areas at the necessarily higher platinum loadings and may thus have practical limitations. In addition, the process itself may not readily lend itself to larger-scale commercial production.
V~~ilson and Gottesfeld, in J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol 139, No 2, 1992, L28-30, disclose high utilisation of platinum in electrodes in which very thin films ~of catalyst layers are cast directly onto membrane electrolytes from inks comprising the carbon supported platinum catalyst and solubilised NAFION. Altlhough high Pt utilisations are again reported the technique appears to be limited to ultra-low platinum loadings not exceeding 0.12mgPt/cm2, due to problems of achieving gas permeation to the active catalyst sites with thicker catalyst layers. Indeed it can be seen that at loadings greater than 0.12mgPt/cm2 no further increase in current is obtained, _g_ 20~~~00 because active catalyst covered by a NAFION film greater than 4~m thick is not utilised.
U;~P 4,87'7,694 discloses a gas diffusion electrode comprising an electrode matrix including a hydrophobic layer containing hydrophobic polymer, and a hydrophilic ingredient of particulate carbon bound by hydrophilic, halogenated polymer binder. It is stated that such electrodes may find use in applications such as for solid polymer electrolyte application and related fuel cell applications. However, the catalyst loadings employed l0 are of the same order as in the high loading state of the art solid polymer fuel cell stacks.
For the SPFC to become a commercially viable system for the applications that are envisaged it is still necessary to develop higher performance, lower cost electrode structures in which useful platinum loadings can be applied to give increased effective platinum surface area at the interface and in which the rate of reactant gas supply is sufficiently high to enable practically useful current densities and hence cell power densities, to be attained.
An object of the present invention is to provide a high performance, lower cost rnembrane electrode assembly for solid polymer fuel cells, in which the porous electrodes have a relatively low platinum loading and improved platinum utilisation, and therefore higher effective platinum 2:5 surface area, while demonstrating, by maintaining adequate rates of reactant ~0~~~00 gas transport, higher performance over prior art SPFC electrodes at practically useful current densities under practical operating conditions of temperature, pressure and ~;as flow rates.
Accordingly, this invention provides a porous electrode suitable for use in a solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell comprising a first component comprising highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate carbon impregnated v~rith proton conducting polymer, and a second component which component is a gas supplying component, comprising hydrophobic polymer with particulate carbon, characterised in that said highly dispersed precious metal catalyst is present in a precious metal loading of 0.01-l.Omg;/cm2 of geometric ele<;trode area.
This invention further provides a membrane electrode assembly containing an electrode of the present invention.
Yet further this invention provides a process for the production of an electrode suitable for use in a solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell, comprising:
i) the preparation of a first component containing highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate carbon impregnated with proton conducting polymer;
ii) the preparation of a second component which component is a gas supplying; component, comprising adding hydrophobic polymer to a 2~~'saoo dispersion of particulate: carbon and firing, and the combination of said second component with said first component; and iii) fabrication into an electrode, characterised in that said highly dispersed precious metal catalyst is present in a precious metal loading of 0.01-l.Omg/cm2 of geometric electrode area.
The electrode of the present invention may form either the anode or the cathode. Such electrode may find use in other applications, such as in liquid electrolyte fuel cells or in other applications of solid :l0 polymer electrolyte technology such as water electrolysis, electrochemical ozone generation., or organic electrosynthesis processes.
The first and second components together form what is known as the active layer.
l~ 5 The first and second components serve different functions in the active layer. The first, or IONOMER component allows intimate contact between catalyst particles and the polymer membrane to be used in the fuel cell, necessary to maximise catalyst utilisation and therefore the current density obtainable at any given electrode potential. Said ionomer component comF~rises highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate .arbon impregnated with proton conducting polymer, such as the perfluoro-sulfonate ionome:r produced by E I duPont de Nemours under the trademark NAFION. Any suitable precious metal catalyst may be used, for example :?5 comprising one or more platinum group metals or alloys thereof, such as 20~'5~00 platinum or an alloy thereof. Preferably the alloying components are selected from the Transition Meta elements of the Periodic Table. The active metal part of the catalyst may typically represent 10-SO% by weight of the carbon-supported catalyst.
Gaseous reactant must be supplied to the ionomer component at a rate sufficient to minimise losses in current density at a given electrode potential. (Such losses ~~re usually referred to as mass transport limitations.) Diffusion of gaseous reactant through the electrode is aided by the second, 1.0 or GAS SUPPLYING component, which contains particulate carbon impregnated with a hydrophobic polymer such as polytetrafluoro-ethylene (PTFE) or ethylene-propylene copolymer (FEP) or other hydrophobic polymer.
Conveniently, the ionomer component may be prepared by first wetting the highly dispersed catalyst with the minimum quantity of demineralised water and then adding a measured quantity of iso-propyl alcohol (IPA)/dernineralised water blend (90:10) with stirring. Other wetting agents may be substituted for the water/IPA mix. When the catalyst is well dispersed in the liquid medium, a measured quantity of, typically Swt%
2:0 NAFION solution may be added with stirring. The resultant mixture may be evaporated to close to dryness, conveniently at a temperature of less than 70°C with stirring to minimise the undesired production of thick clumps of NAFION material, and aid the formation of the desired thin, continuous NAFION film throughout the porous carbon black structure. Final drying 2.5 may be performed for example at 60°C for 24 hours followed by 4 hours at 70°C in a vac:uum oven or by any other suitable means. The resultant coarse powder may be: then vigorously milled to give a fine powder.
Samples with polymer contents of between 5 and 60wt% based upon dry material have been prepared. It is envisaged that this spans the useful range.
The loading of the precious metal catalyst is crucial to the power density output obtained. Optimum performance is essential to the commercial viability of the electrode, and is attained at precious metal loadings of 0.01-l.Omg/cm2 of geometric electrode area. Preferably the loading of precious metal is 0.05-l.Omg/cm2 and especially 0.05-0.Smg/cm2.
The gas supplying component may be prepared by dispersing particulate carbon in hot (80°C to 90°C) demineralised water and blending using a high slhear mixer. A measured quantity of hydrophobic polymer emulsion may be added to the dispersion and the mixture allowed to cool with gentle stirring until. a carbon/PTFE floc settles to leave a clear colourless supernatant liquid layer. The floc may be filtered, for example through a buchner funnel, and the resultant solids dried. After drying, which may conveniently be in a vacuum oven, the rubbery material obtained may be broken down into smaller particles and fired. Firing may be carried out at a temperature of, for example, at least 280°C, for example between 300-400°C but especially 320-360°C. Firing may conveniently be carried out in a nitrogen atmosphere. To complete the preparation of the gas supplying component, the resultant solids may be cooled with liquid nitrogen during subsequent milling to produce a fine powder. It is envisaged that samples 20~~~00 with polymer contents oiE between 10 and 60wt% based upon dry material may be useful, but the preferred polymer content is between 20 and 40wt%.
It its envisaged that mixing the ionomer and gas supplying component in ratios of bcaween 100:0 and 50:50 respectively may be useful.
To prepare the elf:ctrode, the components may be dry blended, milled together using a suitable solvent or dispersed together in a suitable liquid medium.
The technique employed will very much depend upon the method employed to lay down the components onto a substrate as a uniform layer to form the 1~0 required electrode. Application techniques considered relevant are those practised in the art, and include direct filtration, filter transfer, screen printing, K-bar technique and spraying. Suitable substrates include carbon paper, carbon cloth, and metal mesh. Said substrates may optionally have a backing layer of a hydrophobic carbon material. This can comprise either a high 1.'S surface area, porous, particulate conductive carbon material, for example, furnace carbon blacks, or acetylene blacks, or the carbon may be mixed with a suitable hydrophobic polymer such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or ethylene-propylene: copolymer (FEP). This can be applied to the substrate by any of the methods indicated above, and heat treated at an appropriate 2(1 temperature to provide the correct hydrophobic properties, prior to application of the active layer.
It may also be desirable to complete the preparation of the electrode by the a~pplicatio~n of a thin layer of a solubilised form of a proton-25 conducting polymer to the; front face of the electrode structure.
20'3800 The elecd-odes of the invention may be formed into the complete membrane electrode assembly by bonding of a thin film of the conducting polymer elecarolyte between the front faces of two electrodes, using processes of heat .and pressure, as is commonly practised in the art.
The invention will now be described by Example, which is regarded to be illustrative; and not limiting. The terms "utilisation", "activity"
and "performanc:e" refer to those properties measured according to the methods contained in the; following paragraphs.
"Utilisation" refers to the proportion of the total active catalyst surface area contained in the electrode structure which is in direct contact with the proton-conducting electrolyte material, and hence is capable of participating in the fuel cell reactions of oxygen reduction and hydrogen oxidation. The method used is based on that described by S Gilman, J
Electroanal Checn, 7, 1964, 382. The method involves the use of cyclic voltammetry to deposit and strip off a monolayer coverage of hydrogen on the active catalyst surface, in contact with the ionomer component, at potentials close to hydrogen evolution. A threx-compartment glass electrochemical cell is used and 1 mol/dm3 sulphuric acid, at 25°C, is used as the electrolyte to provide a source of protons to the test electrode samples.
7 ,e charge associated with hydrogen adsorption is measured and using the relationship lcm2F't = 210pC (C = Coulomb), the electrochemical surface area of the platinum catalyst in contact with the ionomer, in terms of m2/g total 2.'i Pt in the electrode is determined. Additionally, if the total surface area of 2oogsoo the Pt cataly~ct on the electrode is known, then the utilisation can be determined by the ratio of the Pt area in contact with the ionomer component to the total Pt surface area on the electrode.
1(n terms of increased power density and reduced costs for an SPFC it is, however, a high Pt area in contact with ionomer component which is important. This may be expressed in terms of cm2Pt per cm2 electrode area, which rnay be measured by, again, using the relationship lcmz Pt = 210pC.
'''Activity" is a measure of the oxygen reduction ability per unit weight of the catalyst material present in the electrode structure, and is also often referred to as "mass activity". Measurements of over-voltage at various current densitic;s are made in an electrochemical half-cell using 1 mol/dm3 sulphuric acid electrolyte at 60°C, with oxygen and air as the reactants at atmospheric prcasure. The current flow through the test electrode, at a series of IR (Interna Resistance) free potentials versus a dynamic hydrogen electrode (DHF;), is measured, and the mass activity, expressed in terms of milliamps per milligram of the total precious metal material present in the electrode is plotted against the electrode potential. As the protons from the sulphuric acid only interact with platinum in contact with the solid ionomer component, the: mass activity measurements should be strictly dependent on the utilisation.
209880-0~6 _ "Performa.nce" is a measure of the cell voltage obtained at a particular current densil;y in a complete single cell operating under defined conditions. A single cell unit comprises an anode, a cathode and the electrolyte, together commonly referred to as the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) in the SPFC, together with provisions to provide access for the reactant hydrogen and oxygen gases to reach the anode and cathode respectively. Typically, the reactant gases, which are humidified to prevent the solid electrolyte mennbrane film from drying out during the measurements, are fed to the cell at pressures from atmospheric to 5 atmospheres pressure and the cell is rnaintainE:d at temperatures of between 50°C and 120°C. The current density taken :from the cell is adjusted by applying a variable electrical load in controlled increments and the resulting cell voltage is measured when steady. Herein, the electrodes of the invention are evaluated as the cathode, and a standard anode, fabricated at a loading of l.OmgPtkm2, was used to mirumise and provide constant anode voltage losses.
Initial results have been obtained with two component electrodes of the invention prepared by filter transfer and screen printing which demonstrate a 1?t utilisation of 30% of an electrode with a loading of 0.54mgPt/cm2 (ie, in to ms of Pt utilised, 0.152mgPt/cm2). The platinum catalyst has a total surface area of 108m2/g Pt, and thus the total effective platinum surface; area (ie, the surface area at the three-phase interface) is equivalent to 169cm2PtJc;m2 electrode area. This is much improved over the current state of the art. Further half-cell studies in sulphuric acid have indicated that thc: increased level of utilised Pt is active for oxygen reduction, 20~98.8Q.~_ as demonstrated by ;a proportionate increase in current density generated by the high Pt utilisation electrode of the invention.
Furthermore, the performance data in the more realistic single cell test have also confirmed the improvement achieved with the electrodes of the invention compared with the state of the art.
In particular, at high current aensiLies, where proniems associated with mass transport, specifically the diffusion of reactant gases at sufficient rates to the active catalyst sites, become more apparent, the electrodes also appear to function with improved performance: compared with state of the art materials.
IONOI~t C'~~$~
Particulai~e carbon sold under the trademark ViTLCAN
XC72R, available from Cabot Corp, Hillerica, Mass, USA, was catalysed according to canventional method as described in EP
0512713 A1, Comparative Example A with Pt to a loading of 20wt%.
The catalyst ( 2 . 25g ) was wetted with distilled water ( 5 . 5cm' ) and IPA/distilled water blend ( 94cm' of a 90 :10 blend) was added with stirring. After 5 minutes 5wt% NAFION solution was added ( 15. 0g) and the mixture evaporated to close to dryness at 70°C with continued stirring. The aolids were dried at 60°C for 24 hours then finally in the vacuum oven at 70°C to constant weight. The resultant powder wa~~ vigorously milled to give a fine crystalline powder.
.._ ~ 0 9_~1~ Q
GAS SUPPLYING COMPONENT
Shawinigan acetylene black, a carbon available from Chevron Chemicals, Houston, Texas, USA, (1g) was dispersed in hot (80 to 90°C) demineralised wager (100c:m3) and blended for 10 minutes using a high shear Silverson mixer. At 60°C, PTFE emulsion, available as a 60% solids suspension, Fluon GP1, from ICI Chemicals, Cheshire, UK, was added (0.72g of 60wt% emulsion to give 30wt% PTFE in the dry sample) and the mixture stirred gently whilst cooling occurred. After 15 minutes the resultant carbon/PTFE floc was filtered in a buchner funnel and the solids dried for 4 11) hours at 60°C in the vacuum oven. The mixture was then broken down using a mortar and pestle and fired at 350°C for 16 minutes under nitrogen.
A fine powder was obtained by cooling the resultant solids in liquid nitrogen and grinding in a mortar and pestle whilst the sample was still cold.
1 'i ELECTRODE PREPARATION
The ionomer component (0.230g) and the gas supplying component (0.153g) were blended for an hour in a mixture of IPA/demineralised water (40cm' of IPA and 60cm3 of demineralised water) using a high shear' mixer. The resultant dispersion was filtered directly onto 2(I a carbon cloth upon which a previously prepared carbon black layer had been deposited. The carbon cloth was fixed in a filter dam base (8 x 8cm) on top of a fine nickel mesh and wetted with IPA. The dispersion of the active layer components were poured into the dam base and the liquid drained with a suction pump. The resultant electrode was dried in the vacuum oven at 25 60°C for one hour.
The preparation of the electrode was completed by applying a coating of Swt% NAFIO:N solution, using a fine brush, onto the front surface of the active layer to give ca 0.6mg NAFION/cm2 electrode dry weight. The electrode was placed on a hotplate at 60°C during the application and was then dried at 70°C for 2 hours in the vacuum oven to remove any remaining traces of solvent., The electrode active layer contains a 60:40 ratio of ionomer to gas supplying; component. The total surface area of the catalyst is 108m2/gPt and the Pt loading in the electrode is 0.54mgPt/cm2 of geometric electrode area. This electrode was used for Pt utilisation and half-cell activity measurements.
A cathode was prepared from the ionomer component (0.171 g) and gas supplying component (0.114g), as described in Example 1, to give a 60:40 weight ratio of the components and a total electrode platinum loading of 0.40mg;/cm2.
2~D
MEA FABRICATION
Using this cathode an MEA was fabricated. The anode comprised a 20wt% Pt catalyst supported on Vulcan XC72R carbon, at a loading of l.OmgPt/cm2, which was brush-coated with the soluble form of 2:5 NAFION polymer to a loading of ca 0.6mgNafion/cm2 of the electrode dry weight. The proton-conducting polymer membrane was an experimental membrane produced by the Dow Chemical Company, Freeport, Texas, USA, and referred to as XUS-13204.10. The MEA was formed by hot pressing the front face of tha anode and cathode to each side of the membrane at a temperature of 170°C and a pressure of 100psi, for 90 seconds, as commonly practised in the art. The membrane was cleaned prior to forming the MEA
as commonly practised in the art. The MEA was evaluated in the single cell to determine the performance characteristics.
An electrode was prepared according to the method described in USP 4,876,115, in which the soluble NAFION polymer was applied to the front face of a prefon:~med PAFC-type gas diffusion electrode, made with 1.5 a 20wt% PtJXC72R catalyst with a surface area of 100m2/gPt. The electrode was fabricated with a platinum loading of O.SOmgPt/cm2.
A cathode; was prepared as described in Comparative Example l, but with a F't loading of 0.40mgPt/cm2. From this cathode an MEA was fabricated as described in Example 2.
2098~0~
RESULTS
Utilisation Results obtained (by the method contained hereinabove) with the two component electrode of the invention demonstrated a platinum S utilisation of 30%. This is equivalent to an effective platinum surface area of 169cmZPt/cmZ electrode area. The comparative example was measured in our tests only to show 10% Pt utilisation, which is in close agreement with figures reported. in the: prior art. At the loading of O.SmgPt/cm2 this corresponds to an effective platinum surface area of 48cm2Pt/cmz electrode.
Acaivity O~;ygen readuction activity was measured in a half cell according to the method hereinabove. As shown in Figure 1 the mass activity per mg Pt on the electrode, for the electrode of this invention was significantly higher iL S than for the electrode prepared by the method of USP 4,876,115. For example, at 850mV vs 1DHE, with air as the reactant, the mass activity is increased from 0.86mA,/mgPt to 5.79mA/mgPt with the two component electrode. With oxygen as reactant the corresponding increase is from 3.65mA/mgPt to 23.76m~A/mgPt. As can be seen the electrode structure that 2;0 is the subject of this invention gives not only improved Pt utilisation, but enhanced oxygen reduction activity. This higher activity reflects the increase in the effective 1't surface area in contact with ionomer from 48cm2Pt/cm2 electrode area, in the electrode of USP 4,876,115, to 169cm2Ptkm2 electrode area for the two component electrode.
The single cell performance of the two component electrode structure was superior to the performance of the state of the art electrode at all current densities, with both hydrogen/oxygen and hydrogen/air reactants, as shown in Figure 2. For example, at a current density of 0.3A/cm2, on hydrogen/oxygen, the two component electrode exhibited a cell voltage of 0.739 volts, an increase of 95mV on the performance of 0.644 volts obtained with the state of the art electrode. This reflects the higher effective platinum surface area of tl~e two component electrode structure of the invention.
l.0 From the slope of the linear region of the cell voltage versus current density plots, in Figure 2, it is evident that under the cell conditions there are insignificant mass transport losses with pure oxygen as the oxidant.
The slopes of the: linear regions of 0.19S2cm2 for the two component MEA
and 0.17S2cm2 for the state of the art MEA are close to the slopes expected from the activation and resistive losses in the single cell. With air as the oxidant, however, there are mass transport losses, as shown by the slopes of 0.38S2cm2 and 0.:?6S~2cm2 for the state of the art and two component MEAs respectively. The: lower slope for the MEA of the invention is indicative of improved rates of mass transport in the electrode structure compared with the 2~0 state of the art. This highlights the useful function of the gas supplying component, in providing more efficient gas transport to the active catalyst tes.
2:5
Claims (6)
1. A process for the production of an electrode suitable for use in a solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell, comprising:
i) the preparation of a first component containing highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate carbon impregnated with proton conducting polymer, wherein the highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate carbon is first wetted with water;
ii) the preparation of a second component comprising adding hydrophobic polymer to a dispersion of particulate carbon and firing at a temperature of at least 280°C;
iii) the combination of said second component with said first component;
and iv) fabrication into an electrode;
characterised in that said highly dispersed precious metal catalyst is present at a precious metal loading of 0.01-1.0mg/cm2 of geometric electrode area.
i) the preparation of a first component containing highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate carbon impregnated with proton conducting polymer, wherein the highly dispersed precious metal catalyst on particulate carbon is first wetted with water;
ii) the preparation of a second component comprising adding hydrophobic polymer to a dispersion of particulate carbon and firing at a temperature of at least 280°C;
iii) the combination of said second component with said first component;
and iv) fabrication into an electrode;
characterised in that said highly dispersed precious metal catalyst is present at a precious metal loading of 0.01-1.0mg/cm2 of geometric electrode area.
2. A process according to claim 1, characterised in that the highly dispersed precious metal catalyst comprises one or more platinum group metals or alloys thereof.
3. A process according to claim 2, wherein the highly dispersed precious metal catalyst comprises platinum or an alloy thereof.
4. A process according to claim 1, wherein the proton conducting polymer of the first component comprises a perfluorosulphonate ionomer.
5. A process according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic polymer of the second component comprises polytetrafluoroethylene or ethylenepropylene copolymer.
6. A process according to claim 1, wherein the highly dispersed precious metal catalyst is present at a precious metal loading of 0.05-0.5mg/cm2 of geometric electrode area.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB92/13124.2 | 1992-06-20 | ||
| GB929213124A GB9213124D0 (en) | 1992-06-20 | 1992-06-20 | High performance electrode |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2098800A1 CA2098800A1 (en) | 1993-12-21 |
| CA2098800C true CA2098800C (en) | 2004-01-13 |
Family
ID=10717443
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002098800A Expired - Fee Related CA2098800C (en) | 1992-06-20 | 1993-06-18 | Electrode assemblies |
Country Status (10)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5501915A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0577291B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3211997B2 (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE164705T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU664620B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2098800C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69317700T2 (en) |
| DK (1) | DK0577291T3 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2114005T3 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB9213124D0 (en) |
Families Citing this family (79)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3422377B2 (en) * | 1993-08-06 | 2003-06-30 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Method for manufacturing polymer electrolyte fuel cell and polymer electrolyte fuel cell obtained by the method |
| WO1995015016A1 (en) * | 1993-11-29 | 1995-06-01 | International Fuel Cells Corporation | Cell/membrane and electrode assembly for electrochemical cells |
| JP3712768B2 (en) * | 1995-01-26 | 2005-11-02 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Production method of polymer electrolyte fuel cell |
| GB9504713D0 (en) * | 1995-03-09 | 1995-04-26 | Johnson Matthey Plc | Improved electrocatalytic material |
| US6312845B1 (en) | 1995-10-06 | 2001-11-06 | The Dow Chemical Company | Macroporous flow field assembly |
| ATE245852T1 (en) * | 1995-10-06 | 2003-08-15 | Dow Global Technologies Inc | LIQUID DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURES FOR MEMBRANE ELECTRODE ARRANGEMENTS OF FUEL CELLS |
| US5702755A (en) * | 1995-11-06 | 1997-12-30 | The Dow Chemical Company | Process for preparing a membrane/electrode assembly |
| DE19544323A1 (en) * | 1995-11-28 | 1997-06-05 | Magnet Motor Gmbh | Gas diffusion electrode for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells |
| US6183898B1 (en) | 1995-11-28 | 2001-02-06 | Hoescht Research & Technology Deutschland Gmbh & Co. Kg | Gas diffusion electrode for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells |
| US5672439A (en) * | 1995-12-18 | 1997-09-30 | Ballard Power Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reducing reactant crossover in an electrochemical fuel cell |
| US5882810A (en) * | 1996-03-08 | 1999-03-16 | The Dow Chemicalcompany | Active layer for membrane electrode assembly |
| US6103393A (en) * | 1998-02-24 | 2000-08-15 | Superior Micropowders Llc | Metal-carbon composite powders, methods for producing powders and devices fabricated from same |
| US6660680B1 (en) | 1997-02-24 | 2003-12-09 | Superior Micropowders, Llc | Electrocatalyst powders, methods for producing powders and devices fabricated from same |
| US6780350B1 (en) | 1997-02-24 | 2004-08-24 | Superior Micropowders Llc | Metal-carbon composite powders, methods for producing powders and devices fabricated from same |
| US6338809B1 (en) * | 1997-02-24 | 2002-01-15 | Superior Micropowders Llc | Aerosol method and apparatus, particulate products, and electronic devices made therefrom |
| JP3773325B2 (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2006-05-10 | ジャパンゴアテックス株式会社 | Gas diffusion layer material for polymer electrolyte fuel cell and its joined body |
| US5910378A (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 1999-06-08 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Membrane electrode assemblies |
| JP3929146B2 (en) * | 1997-11-07 | 2007-06-13 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Polymer electrolyte fuel cell system |
| US7066976B2 (en) * | 1998-02-24 | 2006-06-27 | Cabot Corporation | Method for the production of electrocatalyst powders |
| US6967183B2 (en) * | 1998-08-27 | 2005-11-22 | Cabot Corporation | Electrocatalyst powders, methods for producing powders and devices fabricated from same |
| US20030006517A1 (en) * | 1998-02-24 | 2003-01-09 | Kodas Toivo T. | Methods for the production of patterned and unpatterned metal-carbon features |
| US6753108B1 (en) | 1998-02-24 | 2004-06-22 | Superior Micropowders, Llc | Energy devices and methods for the fabrication of energy devices |
| US6074773A (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2000-06-13 | Ballard Power Systems Inc. | Impregnation of microporous electrocatalyst particles for improving performance in an electrochemical fuel cell |
| US6548202B2 (en) | 1998-03-06 | 2003-04-15 | Ballard Power System, Inc. | Carbon-supported catalysts for fuel cells |
| DE19812592B4 (en) * | 1998-03-23 | 2004-05-13 | Umicore Ag & Co.Kg | Membrane electrode unit for polymer electrolyte fuel cells, process for their production and ink |
| DE69900256T2 (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2002-06-27 | N.E. Chemcat Corp., Tokio/Tokyo | Supported Pt-Ru electrocatalyst, as well as the electrode containing it, MEA and solid electrolyte fuel cell |
| US7255954B2 (en) * | 1998-08-27 | 2007-08-14 | Cabot Corporation | Energy devices |
| US7098163B2 (en) * | 1998-08-27 | 2006-08-29 | Cabot Corporation | Method of producing membrane electrode assemblies for use in proton exchange membrane and direct methanol fuel cells |
| CN1134556C (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2004-01-14 | 古屋长一 | Gas diffusion electrode material, process for producing same, and process for producing gas diffusion electrode |
| FR2788630B1 (en) * | 1999-01-14 | 2001-08-03 | Sorapec | STRUCTURE FOR ACTIVE LAYER OF POLYMER SOLID ELECTROLYTE FUEL CELL ELECTRODES |
| US6403245B1 (en) * | 1999-05-21 | 2002-06-11 | Microcoating Technologies, Inc. | Materials and processes for providing fuel cells and active membranes |
| AU6984500A (en) | 1999-09-09 | 2001-04-10 | Danish Power Systems Aps | Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells |
| WO2001022514A1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2001-03-29 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Polymer electrolytic fuel cell and method for producing the same |
| US6780533B2 (en) | 1999-12-17 | 2004-08-24 | Utc Fuel Cells, Llc | Fuel cell having interdigitated flow channels and water transport plates |
| BR0016442A (en) * | 1999-12-17 | 2002-10-01 | Int Fuel Cells Llc | Fuel cell power station, and its operation process. |
| JP2001216991A (en) | 2000-02-02 | 2001-08-10 | Toyota Motor Corp | Fuel cell performance evaluation device and its evaluation method, specific surface area evaluation device for fuel cell electrode catalyst and its evaluation method, and fuel cell electrode catalyst and its manufacturing method |
| US6602630B1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2003-08-05 | The Electrosynthesis Company, Inc. | Membrane electrode assemblies for electrochemical cells |
| US7507687B2 (en) * | 2000-03-22 | 2009-03-24 | Cabot Corporation | Electrocatalyst powders, methods for producing powder and devices fabricated from same |
| ATE478913T1 (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2010-09-15 | Stanford Res Inst Int | POLYMER MEMBRANE COMPOSITION |
| FR2810794A1 (en) * | 2000-06-26 | 2001-12-28 | Sorapec | ASSOCIATION OF ELECTRODES AND MEMBRANE COMPRISING PROTONIC CONDUCTORS |
| DE10037072A1 (en) * | 2000-07-29 | 2002-02-14 | Omg Ag & Co Kg | Membrane electrode unit for polymer electrolyte fuel cells and process for their production |
| WO2002045196A2 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2002-06-06 | Mti Microfuel Cells, Inc. | Fuel cell membrane and system with integrated gas separation |
| US7541308B2 (en) * | 2001-04-11 | 2009-06-02 | Cabot Corporation | Fuel cells and other products containing modified carbon products |
| US7316855B2 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2008-01-08 | Polyfuel, Inc. | Fuel cell assembly for portable electronic device and interface, control, and regulator circuit for fuel cell powered electronic device |
| WO2002099916A2 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2002-12-12 | Polyfuel, Inc | Fuel cell assembly for portable electronic device and interface, control, and regulator circuit for fuel cell powered electronic device |
| US6921593B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2005-07-26 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Fuel additives for fuel cell |
| US6465041B1 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2002-10-15 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method of making gas diffusion layers for electrochemical cells |
| KR100436712B1 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2004-06-22 | 삼성에스디아이 주식회사 | Cathode electrode, method for manufacturing the same, and lithium battery containing the same |
| GB0200253D0 (en) * | 2002-01-08 | 2002-02-20 | Johnson Matthey Plc | Improved material for electrode manufacture |
| US6730424B1 (en) | 2002-03-14 | 2004-05-04 | H Power Corporation | Electrochemical method to improve the performance of H2/air PEM fuel cells and direct methanol fuel cells |
| DE10211177A1 (en) * | 2002-03-14 | 2003-10-02 | Daimler Chrysler Ag | Membrane-electrode assembly |
| JP2003317729A (en) * | 2002-04-26 | 2003-11-07 | Ube Ind Ltd | Fuel cell electrode using porous graphite film, membrane-electrode assembly, and fuel cell |
| GB0212636D0 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2002-07-10 | Johnson Matthey Plc | Electrode |
| CA2508123A1 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2004-06-17 | Polyfuel, Inc. | Fuel cell cartridge for portable electronic device |
| JP4266624B2 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2009-05-20 | 三洋電機株式会社 | Fuel cell electrode and fuel cell |
| AU2003300048A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2004-07-29 | Northern Illinois University | Metal-coated carbon surfaces for use in fuel cells |
| US20060269826A1 (en) * | 2003-03-03 | 2006-11-30 | Eugenii Katz | Novel electrode with switchable and tunable power output and fuel cell using such electrode |
| US7396611B2 (en) * | 2003-12-15 | 2008-07-08 | Plug Power Inc. | Fuel cell catalyst layer |
| US7291419B2 (en) | 2004-01-22 | 2007-11-06 | General Motors Corporation | Durable membrane electrode assembly catalyst coated diffusion media with no lamination to membrane |
| US20050233203A1 (en) * | 2004-03-15 | 2005-10-20 | Hampden-Smith Mark J | Modified carbon products, their use in fluid/gas diffusion layers and similar devices and methods relating to the same |
| KR100953545B1 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2010-04-21 | 삼성에스디아이 주식회사 | Supported catalyst and its manufacturing method |
| DE102004035309A1 (en) * | 2004-07-21 | 2006-02-16 | Pemeas Gmbh | Membrane electrode units and fuel cells with increased service life |
| WO2006046656A1 (en) * | 2004-10-28 | 2006-05-04 | Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation | Spherical carbon particles and aggregate thereof |
| JP2006164790A (en) * | 2004-12-08 | 2006-06-22 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Apparatus for forming catalyst layer for fuel cell and method for forming catalyst layer for fuel cell |
| US20060237034A1 (en) * | 2005-04-20 | 2006-10-26 | Lawrence Shore | Process for recycling components of a PEM fuel cell membrane electrode assembly |
| WO2006138282A2 (en) * | 2005-06-13 | 2006-12-28 | Enerage, Inc. | Supported metal electrocatalyst materials and the method for forming the same |
| US20070160899A1 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2007-07-12 | Cabot Corporation | Alloy catalyst compositions and processes for making and using same |
| JP5223127B2 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2013-06-26 | 国立大学法人山梨大学 | Manufacturing method of gas diffusion electrode |
| US8124261B2 (en) * | 2006-06-20 | 2012-02-28 | Basf Corporation | Process for recycling components of a PEM fuel cell membrane electrode assembly |
| US20090215615A1 (en) * | 2006-07-11 | 2009-08-27 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method of forming supported nanoparticle catalysts |
| CN100527494C (en) * | 2006-09-15 | 2009-08-12 | 新源动力股份有限公司 | PTFE/C Composite Powder for Low Temperature Fuel Cell Electrode and Its Application |
| WO2008138396A1 (en) * | 2007-05-15 | 2008-11-20 | Acta S.P.A. | Vapor fed direct hydrocarbon alkaline fuel cells |
| EP2250693A4 (en) * | 2008-02-08 | 2011-09-07 | Univ Monash | ELECTRODE FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS |
| US8206569B2 (en) * | 2009-02-04 | 2012-06-26 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Porous three dimensional copper, tin, copper-tin, copper-tin-cobalt, and copper-tin-cobalt-titanium electrodes for batteries and ultra capacitors |
| US20100203391A1 (en) * | 2009-02-09 | 2010-08-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Mesoporous carbon material for energy storage |
| DE102010029966A1 (en) * | 2009-06-10 | 2010-12-16 | Wieland Kg | Improved electrocatalyst, fuel cell cathode and fuel cell |
| US20140356761A1 (en) | 2011-08-11 | 2014-12-04 | Amalyst Limited | Catalysts |
| GB201121898D0 (en) | 2011-12-20 | 2012-02-01 | Ucl Business Plc | Fuel cell |
| NL2034462B1 (en) * | 2023-03-29 | 2024-10-04 | Sotoodeh Beheer B V | Conductive catalytic particle and method of producing conductive catalytic particles |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR2404312A1 (en) * | 1977-09-27 | 1979-04-20 | Anvar | Gas electrode for fuel cell - has a current-conducting element with a catalytic layer and a gas-permeable but electrolyte-impermeable layer |
| EP0241432B1 (en) * | 1986-03-07 | 1993-08-11 | Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K. | Gas permeable electrode |
| US4816431A (en) * | 1986-04-03 | 1989-03-28 | Nagakazu Furuya | Process for preparing materials for reaction layer of gas permeable electrode |
| US4876115A (en) * | 1987-01-30 | 1989-10-24 | United States Department Of Energy | Electrode assembly for use in a solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell |
| EP0374145A1 (en) * | 1987-03-02 | 1990-06-27 | Westinghouse Electric Corporation | Ionomeric polymers with ionomer membrane in pressure tolerant gas diffusion electrodes |
| US4877694A (en) * | 1987-05-18 | 1989-10-31 | Eltech Systems Corporation | Gas diffusion electrode |
| US4804592A (en) * | 1987-10-16 | 1989-02-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Composite electrode for use in electrochemical cells |
| US5084144A (en) * | 1990-07-31 | 1992-01-28 | Physical Sciences Inc. | High utilization supported catalytic metal-containing gas-diffusion electrode, process for making it, and cells utilizing it |
| JPH04162365A (en) * | 1990-10-25 | 1992-06-05 | Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo Kk | Method for preparing electrode of fuel cell |
-
1992
- 1992-06-20 GB GB929213124A patent/GB9213124D0/en active Pending
-
1993
- 1993-06-16 EP EP93304687A patent/EP0577291B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1993-06-16 DE DE69317700T patent/DE69317700T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1993-06-16 ES ES93304687T patent/ES2114005T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1993-06-16 DK DK93304687T patent/DK0577291T3/en active
- 1993-06-16 AT AT93304687T patent/ATE164705T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1993-06-18 CA CA002098800A patent/CA2098800C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1993-06-18 JP JP14756693A patent/JP3211997B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1993-06-18 AU AU41372/93A patent/AU664620B2/en not_active Ceased
-
1995
- 1995-04-26 US US08/429,460 patent/US5501915A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE69317700T2 (en) | 1998-08-20 |
| EP0577291B1 (en) | 1998-04-01 |
| JPH0652862A (en) | 1994-02-25 |
| GB9213124D0 (en) | 1992-08-05 |
| ATE164705T1 (en) | 1998-04-15 |
| ES2114005T3 (en) | 1998-05-16 |
| AU4137293A (en) | 1993-12-23 |
| AU664620B2 (en) | 1995-11-23 |
| DK0577291T3 (en) | 1999-02-01 |
| US5501915A (en) | 1996-03-26 |
| JP3211997B2 (en) | 2001-09-25 |
| CA2098800A1 (en) | 1993-12-21 |
| EP0577291A1 (en) | 1994-01-05 |
| DE69317700D1 (en) | 1998-05-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2098800C (en) | Electrode assemblies | |
| CA2136133C (en) | Improved manufacture of electrodes | |
| US5716437A (en) | Materials for use in electrode manufacture | |
| US5523177A (en) | Membrane-electrode assembly for a direct methanol fuel cell | |
| US6344291B1 (en) | Solid polymer electrolyte-catalyst composite electrode, electrode for fuel cell, and process for producing these electrodes | |
| EP1169743B1 (en) | Gas difffusion substrates | |
| US20040110052A1 (en) | Conducting polymer-grafted carbon material for fuel cell applications | |
| US20040110051A1 (en) | Sulfonated conducting polymer-grafted carbon material for fuel cell applications | |
| US5314760A (en) | Electrochemical cell electrode | |
| US20040258979A1 (en) | Method of making a membrane electrode assembly for electrochemical fuel cells | |
| US7459103B2 (en) | Conducting polymer-grafted carbon material for fuel cell applications | |
| JPH11167926A (en) | Fuel cell electrode with CO tolerance | |
| US20070184332A1 (en) | Ruthenium-rhodium alloy electrode catalyst and fuel cell comprising the same | |
| US20040144961A1 (en) | Metallized conducting polymer-grafted carbon material and method for making | |
| KR20110037294A (en) | Electrode catalyst for fuel cell, manufacturing method thereof and fuel cell using same | |
| CA2627604A1 (en) | Membrane electrode assemblies for dmfc having catalyst concentration gradient | |
| WO2004107359A1 (en) | Metallized conducting polymer-grafted carbon material and method for making | |
| KR20040042195A (en) | Polyelectrolyte nanocomposite membrane and the preparation method thereof and the fuel cell using the prepared polyelectrolyte nanocomposite membrane | |
| JPH0896813A (en) | Electrodes for polymer solid electrolyte type electrochemical cells | |
| Taguchi et al. | Oxygen Reduction Activity of Thermally Decomposed Tetraphenylporphyrin as Cathode Catalyst of DMFC | |
| Shan | Polymer-supported catalysts for oxygen reduction and methanol oxidation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |