CA2091696A1 - Stationary turbine blade having diaphragm construction - Google Patents

Stationary turbine blade having diaphragm construction

Info

Publication number
CA2091696A1
CA2091696A1 CA 2091696 CA2091696A CA2091696A1 CA 2091696 A1 CA2091696 A1 CA 2091696A1 CA 2091696 CA2091696 CA 2091696 CA 2091696 A CA2091696 A CA 2091696A CA 2091696 A1 CA2091696 A1 CA 2091696A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
blade
airfoil
angle
steam
turbine
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA 2091696
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jurek Ferleger
Shun Chen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CBS Corp
Original Assignee
Westinghouse Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US07/851,711 external-priority patent/US5221181A/en
Application filed by Westinghouse Electric Corp filed Critical Westinghouse Electric Corp
Publication of CA2091696A1 publication Critical patent/CA2091696A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

56,937 ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A steam turbine blade has inner and outer rings which are integrally formed with an airfoil. A plurality of such blades are joined by welding the inner and outer rings to form an annular nozzle assembly. The diaphragm structure of the inventive blades offers improved performance over blades of similar length in that performance is improved due to smoother transition between the airfoil and the inner and outer rings as compared to conventional segmental assemblies in which a forged airfoil is welded to inner and outer rings. Furthermore, the present invention allows a thinner trailing edge and reduced manufacturing tolerances than is found in prior art segmental assemblies having forged airfoils with thick trailing edges and relatively large tolerance requirements. The particular design of the inventive blade also controls steam separation by control of the rate of change of convergence and turning angle. Steam velocity increases substantially continuously over the major extent of the suction surface of the blade to avoid flow separation.

Description

2~6~

56, 937 INPROVED ~;TATIONARY l~JRBINE BLAD~3 HAVING DIAPHRAGM CO~ISTRUCTIOM
This application is a continuation in-part of co-pending application S.N. 07/603,332 filed October 24, 1990 and co-pending application 5.N. 07/624,367 filed December 6, 1990, both assigned to the assignee of the present application.
BACKGROVND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention pertains to steam turbines for utility power application and, more particularly, to a stationary blade for use in a low pressure steam turbine.
Steam turbine rotor and stationary blades are arranged in a plurality of rows or stages. The rotor blades of a given row are identical to each other and mounted in a mounting groove provided in the turbine rotor. Stationary blades, on the other hand, are mounted on a cylinder or blade ring which surrounds the rotor.
Turbine rotor blades typically share the same basic components. Each has a root receivable in the mounting groove of the rotor, a platform which overlies the outer surface of the rotor at the upper terminus of the rootr and an airfoil which extends outwardly from the platform.
Stationary blades also have airfoils, except that the airfoils of the stationary blades extend downwardly towards the rotor. The airfoils include a leading edge, a ; trailing edge, a concave surface, and a convex surface. In ~lB9~
2 56,937 most turbines, the airfoil shape common to a particular row of blades generally differs from the airfoil shape in other rows within a particular turbine. In general, no two turbines of different designs share airfoils of the same shape. The structural differences in airfoil shape result in significant variations in aerodynamic characteristics, stress patterns, operating temperature, and natural frequency of the blade. These variations, in turn, determine the expected life of the turbine blade under the operating conditions (turbine inlet temperature, pressure ratio, and rotational speed), which are generally determined prior to airfoil shape development.
Development of a turbine for a new commercial power generation steam turbine may require several years to complete. When designing rotor blades for a new steam turbine, a profile developer is given a certain flow field with which to work. The flvw field determines the inlet angles (for steam passing between adjacent blades of a row), gauging, and the force applied on each blade, among other ; 20 things. "Gauging" is the ratio of throat to pitch; "throat"
is the straight line distance between the trailing edge of one blade and the suction surface of an adjacent blade, and ~pitch" is the distance in the tangential direction between the trailing edges of the adjacent blades, each measurement being determined at a specific radial distance from the turbine axis.
These flow field parameters are dependent on a number of factors, including the length of the blades of a particular row. The length of the blades is established early in the design states of the steam turbine and is essentially a function of the overall power output of the steam turbine and the power output for that particular stage.
When working with the flow field of a particular turbine, it is important to consider the interaction of adjacent rows of blades. The preceding row affects the following row by potentially creating a mass flow rate near the base which cannot pass through the following row. Thus, 3 2 ~ 56,937 it is important to design a blade with proper flow distribution up and down the blade length.
The pressure distribution along the concave and convex surfaces of the blade can result in secondary flow which results in blading inefficiency. These secondary flow losses result from differences in steam pressure between the suction and the pressure surfaces of the blades near the end walls.
Regardless of the shape of the airfoil as dictated by the flow field parameters, the blade designer must also consider the cost of manufacturing the optimum blade shape.
Flow field parameters may dictate a profile which cannot be produced economically, and inversely the optimum blade shape may otherwise be economically impractical. Thus, the optimum blade shape should also take into account manufacturability.
SUMMARY OF T~E INVENTION
In the present invention, a steam turbine blade has inner and outer rings which are integrally formed with ~0 an airfoil. A plurality of such blades are joined by welding the inner and outer rings to form an annular nozzle assembly. The diaphragm structure of the inventive blades offers improved performance over blades of similar length in that performance is improved due to smoother transition between the airfoil and the inner and outer rings as compared to conventional segmental assemblies in which a forged airfoil is welded to inner and outer rings.
Furthermore, the present invention allows a thinner trailing edge and reduced manufacturing tolerances than is found in prior art segmental assemblies having forged airfoils with thick trailing edges and relatively large tolerance requirements. The particular design of the inventive blade also controls steam separation by control of the rate of change of convergence and turning angle. Steam velocity increases substantially continuously over the major extent of the suction surface of the blade to avoid flow separation.
4 2~91~9~ 56,937 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a ~ectional view of two adjacent blades illustrating typical blade features;
FIG. 2 is a vertical sectional view o~ a portion of a steam turbine incorporating a row of blades a~cording to the present invention;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of a portion of the turbine of FIG. 2 illustrating a blade of the present invention;
10FIG. 4 is a graph of cross-sectional area as a function of radius for the blade of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a graph of minimum moment of inertia (I_MIN) as a function of radius for the blade of the present invention;
15FIGS. 6A-6E are an overlay of cross-sections of the blade of the present invention; and FIG. 7 is a graph of steam velocity at the suction surface and pressure surface of the blade of the present invention.

Referring to Fig. 1, two adjacent blades of a row are illustrated in sectional views to demonstrate some of the features of a typical blade. The two blades are referred to by the numerals 10 and 12. The blades have convex, suction-side surfaces 14 and ~6, concave pressure-side surfaces 18 and 20, leading edges 22 and 24, and trailing edges 26 and 28.
The throat is indicated in Fig. 1 by the letter "O", which is the shortest straight line distance between the trailing edge of blade 10 and the suction-side surface of blade 12. The pitch is indicated by the letter "S", which represents the straight line distance between the trailing edges of the two adjacent blades.
The width of the blade is indicated by the distance Wml while the blade inlet flow angle is al, and the outlet flow angle is a2.
"B~' is the leading edge included metal angle, and the letter "s" refers to the stagger angle.

~ 9 ~ 56, g37 Referring to YIG. 2, a low pressure fossil fuel steam tuxbine 30 includes a rotor 32 carrying several rows or stages of rotary blades 34. An inner cylinder 36 carries plural rows of stationary blades, including a last row of stationary blades 38, next to last row of stationary blades 40 and a second from last row of stationary blades 42. Each row of blades has a row designation. Blade 38 is in row 7C, while the last row of rotary blades is designated 7R. The immediately upstream stationary blade 40 is in blade row 6C
and the next stationary blade 42 is in blade row 5C. The present invention is particularly intended for use in row 5C.
As shown in ~IG. 3, the blade 42 includes an airfoil portion 44, an outer ring 46 for connecting the blade to the inner cylinder 36, and an inner ring 48 connected to an "inner diameter'l distal end of the airfoil portion 44. The "outer diameter~ end of the airfoil portion 4~ is formed integrally with the outer ring 46 in a diaphragm structure process. In a diaphragm structure, the airfoil, outer ring and inner ring are machinéd from an integral casting. Normally, a blade used in the 5C row, typically about 8.65 inches (219.71 MM), would be formed as a segmental assembly in which the inner and outer rings are welded to a separately formed airfoil. The diaphragm structure offers improved performance due to smoother airfoil to ring transitions, a thinner trailing edge on the airfoil and reduced manufacturing tolerances. A diaphragm asseMbly or nozzle assembly is formed by welding the inner and outer rings to adjacent rings to create an annular ar~ay of blades. The inner ring 48 is spaced from rotor 32 by a clearance gap. Seals 50 are positioned in the clearance gap to limit steam leakage under the stationary blades.
The inner ring 48 and airfoil 44 have been constructed to tune the fundamental mode of the entire assembly between the multiples of turbine running speed, i.e., with respect to harmonic excitation frequencies, thus minimizing the risk of high cycle fatigue and failure.
Specifically, the blade mass/stiffness is distributed in the 6 2~9~ ~9~3 56,937 radial direction to produce the characteristics shown in FIGS. 4 and 5. The fundamental harmonic frequency is then fine-tuned by optimiæing the inner ring shape, i.e., by adjusting mass and stiffness.
In order to reduce the opportunity for high-cycle fatigue failure, the diaphragm blade structure is preferably analyzed by assuming full steam loading of th~ blade acting as in phase excitation. Such analysis can be done using a Goodman diagram technique normally reserved for rotating la blade analysis. The vibratory stresses obtained from this analysis are then compared to empirically derived allowable stresses. If necessary, the blade structure can then be re-tuned and the analysis and comparison repeated until acceptable results are obtained. This technique has only been used for a blade of this type. Historically, diaphragm structures have only been tested for frequency response.
When the blades of the present invention are assem~led in~o a blade row 5C, the efficiency of the blade row or stage is optimized by minimizing the steam flow incidence angle and secondary flow loss. The optimum inlet angle and ganging distributing are obtained using a qu~si-three dimensional flow field analysis. The unique shape of the airfoil 44 influences the flow conditions leaving rotating blade row 5R and the performance of the last two stages of the low pressure turbine 30. The inlet angles of blade row 5C are influenced by the condition of the steam leaving rotating blade row 4R.
FIGS. 6A-6E show the general shape of the inventive blade 42 and the convergent configuration of the steam passage between blade 42 and an adjacent blade indicated by pressure side profile line 43. The section of FIG. 6A is taken adjacent the radially inner end of the blade 42 (the tip end) and the section of FIG. 6E is taken adjacent the radially outer end (the ~ase end) of blade 42.
Table 1 lists the important characteristics of each of the sections of FIGS. 6A-6E in corresponding sequence. It will ~e noted that certain characteristics such as stagger angle, exit opening angle and principal coordinate (alpha) angle 9 ~
7 56,937 remain substantially constant over the extent of the airfoil 44. 5tagger angle is the angle formed between a horizontal line and a line tangent to leading and trailing edge circles in a cross-sectional view. The principal coordinate angle is the angle between a horizontal line and a minimum second moment of area axis. One measurement not listed in Table 1 is the nominal thickness o the blade trailing edge 44A.
For the inventive blade, this thickne~s can be reduced to about 80 mils for significantly reducing wake mixing loss and improving turbine performance. In referring to Table 1, it is noted that suction surface turning is the change in the slope of the suction surface from a throat point (the point where the minimum pa~sage chord intersects the suction surface) to the exit of the airfoil. Inlet metal angle is the angle between the vertical direction and a bisecting line formed between the two tangen~ lines to the suction and pressure surfaces, respectively, at the leading edge tangency points. The inlet included angle is the angle between these two tangent lines. The exit opening is the shortest distance between adjacent airfoils at the steam passage exit.
RADIVS (IN) 26.63 28.25 29.70 32.00 35.26 1. WIDTH (IN) 1.71 1.77 1.81 1.89 1.99 2. CHORD (IN) 2.88 3.03 3.16 3.36 3.66 3. PITCH/WIDTH 1.15 1.20 1.23 1.27 1.33 4. PITCH/CHORD 0.69 0.70 0.70 0.71 0.72 5. STAGGER ANGLE52.85 53.66 54.31 55.23 56.39 (DEG~
6. MAXINUM THICKNESS 0.45 0.44 0.47 0.51 0.56 7. MAX THICKNESS/ 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 CHORD
8. TURNING ANGLE 80.31 79.42 74.53 65.38 52.88 9. EXIT OPENING (IN) 0.56 0.61 0.66 0.73 0.85 10. EXIT OPENING 24.36 23.43 24.84 25.59 25.34 ANGLE
11. INLET NETAL 82.57 82.57 87.33 96.27 109.72 ANGLE
12. INLET INCL. 54.98 49.19 60.85 61.05 59. 42 ANGLE
13. GAUGING 0. 2855 .2932 .2991 .3091 .3238 14. SUCTION SURFACE 9. 92 8.11 9.47 10.66 11.08 T~RNING
15. AREA ( IN**2) 0.74 0.75 0.83 0.95 1.12 16. ALPHA (DEG)54.24 55.50 55.56 56.6057.33 17. I MIN (IN**4) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 20~169~
8 56,937 18. I MAX ~IN**4) 0.32 0.36 0.42 0.55 0.73 FIG. 7 illustrates another important characteristic of the present invention. As shown in FIG.
7, the velocity ratio of steam flow over the suction surface (convex surface) of blade airfoil 44 increases continuously over nearly the full width of the airfoil. This acceleration characteristic maintains the steam in contact with or closely spaced to the blade surface. Thus, ~his characteristic is achieved by the decreasing rate of convergence of the area between adjacent blades form leading to trailing edge and by controlling the rate of change of the turning angle. Turning angle is the amount of angular turning from inlet to exit of the blade.
The blade 42 provides improved performance and efficiency in fossil fueled steam turbines. It utilizes manufacturing and tuning techniques which are not believed previously applied to stationary blades of this dimension.

'

Claims (18)

1. A stationary blade for a steam turbine, the blade having an airfoil with a radially outer end and a radially inner end when installed in an operative position in a steam turbine, the radially inner end terminating in an integrally formed inner ring portion and the radially outer end terminating in an integrally formed outer ring portion, the blade airfoil having the following characteristics:
RADIUS (IN) 26.63 28.25 29.70 32.00 35.26 1. WIDTH (IN) 1.71 1.77 1.81 1.89 1.99
2. CHORD (IN) 2.88 3.03 3.16 3.36 3.66
3. PITCH/WIDTH 1.16 1.20 1.23 1.27 1.33
4. PITCH/CHORD 0.69 0.70 0.70 0.71 0.72
5. STAGGER ANGLE 52.85 53.66 54.31 55.23 56.39 (DEG)
6. MAXIMUM THICKNESS 0.45 0.44 0.47 0.51 0.56
7. MAX THICKNESS/ 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 CHORD
8. TURNING ANGLE 80.31 79.42 74.53 65.38 52.88
9. EXIT OPENING (IN) 0.56 0.61 0.66 0.73 0.85
10. EXIT OPENING 24.36 23.43 24.84 25.59 25.34 ANGLE
11. INLET METAL 82.57 82.57 87.33 96.27 109.72 ANGLE
12. INLET INCL. 54.98 49.19 60.85 61.05 59.42 ANGLE
13. GAUGING 0.2855 .2932 .2991 .3091 .3238
14. SUCTION SURFACE 9.92 8.11 9.47 10.66 11.08 TURNING
15. AREA (IN**2) 0.74 0.75 0.83 0.95 1.12
16. ALPHA (DEG) 54.24 55.50 55.56 56.60 57.33
17. I MIN (IN**4) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
18. I MAX (IN**4) 0.32 0.36 0.42 0.55 0.73 2. A diaphragm type stationary blade for a steam turbine, the blade having an airfoil, an integral radially inner ring, and an integral radially outer ring, the airfoil having a cross-sectional configuration defining a convex suction surface and an at least generally concave pressure surface, the flow velocity of steam over the suction and pressure surfaces having a characteristic substantially as shown in FIG. 5 at a generally mean diameter of the airfoil.

56,937 3. The blade of claim 2 wherein the blade exhibits a minimal steam flow incidence angle, the airfoil having a cross-sectional configuration substantially as shown in FIGS. 4A-4E.
4. A method for optimizing reliability of a diaphragm type stationary blade for a steam turbine, the blade having an airfoil, an integral inner ring, and an integral outer ring, the method comprising the steps of:
tuning the blade with respect to harmonic excitation by distribution of the blade mass in a radial direction such that minimum mass exists adjacent the inner ring and optimizing the mass of the inner ring;
analyzing blade vibratory characteristics after tuning by assuming resonance and using computer simulation of full steam loading acting as in-phase excitation; and repeating the steps of tuning and re-tuning until the analyzed blade characteristics correspond to allowable vibratory stresses.
5. A turbine blade for use in a steam turbine and avoiding flow separation along a suction surface, the blade having a concave suction surface over substantially a width of the blade such that steam flow over the suction surface continuously increases in velocity to near a trailing edge of the blade.
6. The turbine blade of claim 5 wherein the alpha angle is substantially constant from base end to tip end of the blade.
7. The turbine blade of claim 6 wherein the stagger angle is substantially constant from base end to tip end of the blade.
8. The turbine blade of claim 5 wherein the rate of convergence of area between adjacent blades decreases from leading to trailing edge of the blade.
9. The turbine blade of claim 5 wherein the inlet included angle is greater than ninety degrees.
10. The turbine blade of claim 5 wherein the inlet metal angle increases from about 82 degrees at a tip end of the blade to about 109 degrees at a base end of the 11 56,937 blade.
11. The turbine blade of claim 5 wherein the pitch/chord ratio is substantially constant from tip end to base end of the blade.
12. The turbine blade of claim 5 wherein the maximum thickness/chord ratio is substantially constant from tip end to base end of the blade.
CA 2091696 1992-03-16 1993-03-15 Stationary turbine blade having diaphragm construction Abandoned CA2091696A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/851,711 US5221181A (en) 1990-10-24 1992-03-16 Stationary turbine blade having diaphragm construction
US851,711 1992-03-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2091696A1 true CA2091696A1 (en) 1993-09-17

Family

ID=25311463

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA 2091696 Abandoned CA2091696A1 (en) 1992-03-16 1993-03-15 Stationary turbine blade having diaphragm construction

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0610609A (en)
CA (1) CA2091696A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5196601A (en) * 1975-02-20 1976-08-25 Heibaninsatsubanno kahitsueki

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0610609A (en) 1994-01-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5221181A (en) Stationary turbine blade having diaphragm construction
US5277549A (en) Controlled reaction L-2R steam turbine blade
US5192190A (en) Envelope forged stationary blade for L-2C row
EP1559871B1 (en) Rotor blade for a turbomachine
US6033185A (en) Stress relieved dovetail
US5211703A (en) Stationary blade design for L-OC row
EP0654585B1 (en) Turbine blade geometry
EP1559869B1 (en) Rotor blade for a turbomachine
US5160242A (en) Freestanding mixed tuned steam turbine blade
JP3896169B2 (en) Turbine blade
US7217096B2 (en) Fillet energized turbine stage
US6338609B1 (en) Convex compressor casing
US5524341A (en) Method of making a row of mix-tuned turbomachine blades
US7001152B2 (en) Shrouded turbine blades with locally increased contact faces
US6004101A (en) Reinforced aluminum fan blade
US7134842B2 (en) Scalloped surface turbine stage
JP3578769B2 (en) Flow orientation assembly for the compression region of rotating machinery
US5525038A (en) Rotor airfoils to control tip leakage flows
EP1152122B1 (en) Turbomachinery blade array
US5035578A (en) Blading for reaction turbine blade row
US7134838B2 (en) Rotor blade for a rotary machine
EP1559870B1 (en) Shrouded rotor blade for a turbomachine
CA2091696A1 (en) Stationary turbine blade having diaphragm construction
US11053804B2 (en) Shroud interlock
KR100227049B1 (en) Stationary blade of steam turbine

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FZDE Dead