CA2087178C - Blender with virtual baffle of particulate material - Google Patents
Blender with virtual baffle of particulate material Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2087178C CA2087178C CA002087178A CA2087178A CA2087178C CA 2087178 C CA2087178 C CA 2087178C CA 002087178 A CA002087178 A CA 002087178A CA 2087178 A CA2087178 A CA 2087178A CA 2087178 C CA2087178 C CA 2087178C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- blending
- particulate material
- blender
- baffle
- converging
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01F—MIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
- B01F25/00—Flow mixers; Mixers for falling materials, e.g. solid particles
- B01F25/80—Falling particle mixers, e.g. with repeated agitation along a vertical axis
- B01F25/82—Falling particle mixers, e.g. with repeated agitation along a vertical axis uniting flows of material taken from different parts of a receptacle or from a set of different receptacles
- B01F25/821—Falling particle mixers, e.g. with repeated agitation along a vertical axis uniting flows of material taken from different parts of a receptacle or from a set of different receptacles by means of conduits having inlet openings at different levels
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Accessories For Mixers (AREA)
- Processing And Handling Of Plastics And Other Materials For Molding In General (AREA)
Abstract
A blending apparatus, inexpensive in construction and requiring a minimum of recirculation, is today essential for economical and thorough blending of particulate material, for example, plastic pellets of virgin material and of pellets that have been reconstituted from recycled material. Construction of the blender is low in cost not only because the customary receiver, and its piping, conventionally installed below he blender are eliminated, but because the rigid baffle of the prior blender has been replaced by a virtual baffle (626) of particulate material, which forms a toroidal block within: he sonically walls (610) of the blender; the converging blended conduits (602) adjacent thereto; and the structural supporting matrix. The baffle of particulate material (626) serves: 1) as a termination surface for the conventional perforated blending conduits; and 2) retains a toroidal annular volume of particulate material in position between the upper outer surface of the baffle and the inside wall of the blender.
Description
13!3'7 D'7/~R'7'70 ~ .'t ! 3 t ,'~ Df'T/7TL'i~"7111~9~80~
BLENDER WITH VIRTUAL BAFFLE OF PARTICULATE MATERIAL
FIELD OF THE INlIENTION
This invention relates to blenders and more specifically to methods and apparatus for thoroughly blending particulate or granular materials, a portion of the unblended material forming a toroidal block, constituting a virtual baffle to the downward flow of any particulate material except that passing through the blending tubes themselves.
DEFINITIONS
baffle--(noun) a plate, wall, screen, or other device to deflect, check, or regulate Ilow.
virtual battle-°herein defined as a barrier, formed of particulate material, in combination with a supporting structural matrix, to the downward flow of particulate material, except through blending tubes which penetrate the barrier.
matrix--herein defined as blender walls, metallic plates and cones, blending conduits, all coacting wixh the particulate material to provide the virtual battle.
voussoir°-(diet.) one of the wedge-shaped pieties forming an arch or vault. Used herein to graphically describe the cross section of the virtual baffle, at some point on the toroid or segment.
bridging--the tendency of particulate solids, flowing downward through a channel with converging sides, to bridge across the channel, blocking the channel, causing all of the material flowing out of the blender to flaw through the blending tubes.
toroidal block--herein, a toroidal mass of particulate material, having a voussoir-like crossection, supported betwe~:n the outer wall of the blender and the downwsrdly ' E H~ET
aa»nro l, ororon :~f'1'17 16~7113'7~~7E1 20'7178 converging metal baffles of FIGs. 6 and 9. Also called a toroidal or annular "keystone joist.°' Prior to the advent of large scale use of polymers in such applications as continuous film or filament production, the needs of industry for precision blendinig of bwlk solids products were met with mechanical tumbler, ribbon or screw blenders. Capacities of these units ranged from less than one cubic meter to over 100 cubic meters.
As the demand for plastics grew, it became apparent that much larger blender volumes were necessary to allow continuous production lines in plastics users' plants to operate without frequent shutdowns caused either by (1) variations in physical properties or (2) additive content inherent in the producer's production processes. This Ied to a demand for tumble blenders in the range of 700 cubic meter capacity.
The high cost of large tumble blander installations prompted industry-wide efforts to develop a blending capability in storage silos to comply with the product uniformity requirements of the polymer industry. A number of designs resulted, some silo blenders having capacities in the 3000 cubic meter range.
Efficient silo blenders are available today in two broad categories:
A. Gravity Blenders These designs generally use either external or internal tubes having openings to allow solids in the bin to slow from the main silo body to a separate blend chamber below the silo. The tube openings in the main body of the silo are randomly located so that material drained into the blend chamber represents a typical composite of the material in the main silo body.
B. Internally Recirculated Blenders These units rely on an external source of air to pick up material in the lower part of the silo body by an orifice arrangement, and convey it to the upper part of the main silo. The material flowing vertically down through the silo is randomly sampled by the openings in the tubes and agitated by inverted cones, resulting in homogenization of the silo contents after a period of time.
SUSSTdTUTE SHEET
The performance of both Gravity Blenders and Internally Recirculated Blenders can be significantly improved by recirculation while the blender is being filled.
As storage bins or hoppers are filled with granular or particulate material, it often happens that an inhomogeneous distribution of material occurs. There may be several reasons for this result. In the first place, as material flows into a hopper, the material beneath the inlet nozzle piles up at the angle of repose of the materiel. In this case the larger particles often roll dawn the peak toward the sides of the hopper, leaving the finer particles in the central region. Inhomogeneity can also occur when the hopper is filled with different batches of the same material because of variations of composition ai individual batches.
When material is drawn off through an outlet at the bottom of the hopper, the material flows irorn the region directly above the nozzle. Thus the material will not be representative of the average characteristics of the material in the hopper.
Prior art attempts at a solution to this segregation problem typically included placing perforated blending tubes vertically within the hopper. Such tubes have openings spaced apart along their axes which allow material from all levels within the hopper to enter the tubes. The lower portion of the blending tubes communicate with the outlet nozzle so that a more nearly homogeneous mixture of the material issues iron the outlet of the hopper.
In spite of many efforts to completely blend the particulate materiel, it is usually necessary in prior art blenders to specially treat at least the final portion of the discharge to achieve acceptable results. For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,923,304, discloses that the first and last few pounds are not used, but instead are withdrawn and later remixed with fresh ingredients, and re-poured, with these fresh ingredients, back into the dispensing apparatus.
3a SUMMRRY OF THE INDENTION
Recording to the invention there is provided a gravity blender having a cylindrical upper portion operable to receive and store a mass of particulate material, and a lower portion defining a downwardly converging canical section sealed to the lower cylindrical edge of the upper portion, the lower and upper portions being centered on a single vertical axis. R plurality of blending conduits extended downwards from the upper portion and continue downwardly adjacent the converging conical section, converging downwardly towards the vertical axis of the blender apparatus, The blending conduits have open lower ends which terminate in a generally circular and horizontal pattern, the convergence of the blending conduits and the conical walls of the lower section creating and supporting in operation a virtual baffle of particulate material in combination.
The virtual baffle consists of uousaoir-like accumulations of particulate material in the converging channels between the blending conduits and between the conical walls and the blending conduits. The baffle of particulate material remains in position until the blending tubes have begun to release the final portions of the particulate material through the blending tubes to blend with the particulate material of the virtual baffle as bath pass into and through the lower portion of the bin, In combination with a conventional hopper and conventional blending tubes, two embodiments disclosed herein can effectively blend a batch of particulate material, including the final portion of the batch. In a third embodiment, the operation of the i'ull size blender is simulated, in an adjustable T»"'i /71~~7?!!1?.:'11791 .a» n~ »onnn . _. _. _ ._. . _ r.,. .....~ ,u.:....: .. ._ laboratory size model, enabling experimentation with various particulate densities, cosrpactabilities and annular gaps.
My invention does not r~u~ire _a separate blending chamber. It utilizes the tendency of particulate solids, flowing downward through a channel with converging sides, to bridge across the channel, blocking the channel, causing all of the material flowing out of the blender to flow through the blending tubes. Thus my invention assures that all of the material discharged from the blender represents a truly typical composite of the blender contents.
The three preferred embodiments disclosed in this specification rely upon the tendency of particulate solids, in flowing downward through a channel with converging sides, to bridge across the channel. Such bridging may occur in:
A. A toroidal block, having a voussoir-like crosssection, as shown in the blender of FIG. 6, and equivalent supporting structure for bridging by particulate materials, as shown in FIGrs. 2, 4, ?, 8 and 10.
B. A similar toroidal block in the apparatus iw FIG. 9, for confirming by empirical tests, the preliminary design proportions for a blender specifically contoured for the density, compactability, and other characteristics ~i the particulate material, or materials, to be blended;
C. A voussoir-like construction for the support of particulate material! as shown in the construction of FIGS.
7 and 11-13, in which the matrix of blending tubes, optional inverted cones, and conical walls of the vessel prsvide a matrix for the support of the virtual baffle of pe~rticulate material.
The "bridging principle" and the "virtual baff~de"
concept employed in the preferred embodiments are illustrated in the following drawings and explained in the specification.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAb'VINGS
FIG. 1 provides an elevational, sectional vi~v through the center line of a typical blender of the prior art;
~CI~S~'fTUT~ S~J~~'-r :yf'Y'l7 laai72113~:d'~93 avm,. ~n in onnn ~e,.i %...n ev....~-. ._ ;7 n\
f f. d % .f ~I )l . ,.
FIG. 2 provides an elevational, sectional view through the center line of one preferred embodiment of the gravity blender of the present invention;
FIG. 3 provides a schematic diagram of the hopper, piping and pumps, if required for extremely uniform blending within the gravity blender of the present invention;
FIG. 4 provides a sectional view from the vertical centerline through the exterior wall of the lower portion of the hopper of an alternate embodiment of tine present invention, including a detail of s blending tube snd a conduit for exhaust gases, or for structural purposes;
FIG. 5 is a section of the conduit of FIG. 4, illustrating the knifelike device for preventing accumulation of particulate matter on the top surface of the conduit;
FIG. 6 is a more detailed view of Embodiment A of the present invention, as combined with terminations of the conventional blending tubes;
FIG, 7 is a more detailed view oI alternate Embodiments A and C of the present invention as combined with two convex surfaces for better blending of virtually all of the material to be blended;
FiG. 8 provides an elevational, sectional view through the center line of a gravity blender of an alternate embodiment A of the present invention, in which one basic convex surface is combined with a cylindrical device, developed further in FIG. I2-I3, for further blending;
FIG. 9, Embodiment B, provides a vertical, sectional view through the center line of the test apparatus, which substantially duplicates the conditions within, and operations of blending of the present invention) FIG. 10, Embodiment A, provides a sectional view from the vertical centerline tl2rough the exterior wall of the lower portion of the hopper of an alternate embodiment of the present invention, including a detail of a blending tube, but without a venting conduit for exhaust gases FIB, 11, Embodiment C, provides a fragmented elevational hemicylindricai inside view, through a section in the plane including the vertical centerline of a blender, utilizing a 19~~'~°~~ ~°~ et-s~e-r ' -Df"T'!1 iCa9 /!5'>°itn62 arise nnisnn,~n . .-.., --.-., .--..-_...
!-.f :':/ 10)6.:1 20~~~-'~~
b virtual baffle of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes, and equipped with a small inverted cone. Two partial sectional details are provided]
FIG. 11A is a fragmentary section just inside~the wall 1112, showing the ends 1114 of the blending tubes 1110 within the toroidal block 1130 of particu late materials FIG. 11B shows various angles of cut off of the discharge ends 1114 of the blending tubes 11101 FIG. 12, Embodiment C, provides an elevational hemicylindrical inside view, through a section in the plane including the vertical centerline of a blender, utilizing a virtual baffle of particulate material, supported solely on a matrix of converging blending tubes, without an inverted Bone, but with a vertical tubular elementl Q nd FIG. 13, Embodiment C, provides a generally horizontal sectional view through the blender of FIG. 12, at approximately the level of the virtual baffle of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes and the vertical tubular element 1240.
DESCRIPTION OF THE THREE PREFERRED EIgBODI115ENTS OF THE
INVENTION
In praviding a more detailed discussion of the three preferred embodiment of the invention, reference will be first made to components of the blending apparatus from the prior art, insofar as they differ from, or combine with, the new invention for improved and more efficient performance at lower cost.
In FIG. 1 is shown a drawing fram Patent No. 3,268,215, issued to T.A. Burton for a Blending Apparatus on August 23, 1966. Illustrative of this prior art are tank or hopper 10, blending tubes 24, and separate receiver or collector r manifold 2ff.
FIG. 2 shows the similarities and the differences between the prior art of FIG. 1 and the present invention.
Similarities include a cylindrical housing 210 superimposed upon and sealed to a conical structure 211. Downcomer tubes 224 however, terminate in perforations 227 through the SU~~T~1'1 ITF ~~~w°r°
~~ fl~~~~~~o ? ~_i ~y ; ~ : v px-r~r msazn~~:cdr~~
inverted generally horizontal baffle 225, comprising part of the present invention. This means of termination is a significant improvement over the prior art shown in FIG. 1, in which tubes 24 pass entirely through the hopper 10 and terminate in receiver 28. In the annular area 226, between the converging walls of baffle 225 and structure 2.11, the accumulation of particulate matter forms a toroldal block to the passage of the particulate matter accumulating above the block.
The recirculating schemes of the prior art are shown in FIG. 3, diagrams 302 and 303.
My invention, as shown in its alternate embodiments.
deals with the problem in novel fashion. In FIG. 2,,and as more easily seen in FIG. 6, the blending tubes, of which tube 602 is an example, terminate in apertures 603. These apertures are formed in the convex surface 604. This means of termination is a significant departure from the prior art, as shown in FIG. 1, in which tubes 24 pass entirely through the hopper 10 and terminate in receiver 28.
Returning to FIG. 6, it should be noted that convex surface 604 is supported upon brackets 606, and is thus spaced away from the exterior cone 610 by an annular gap shown as 605. Now, if the surfaces 604, annular gaps 605, and apertures 603, are designed as will be shown in connection with the description of FIG. 9, the material to be blended will begin to sill the hopper 601, but will form a barrier at the annulus 605, past which barrier the particulate material will not descend, until blending tubes are evacuated.
As the blending operation being perfarmed on the batch, or mixture, draws to a close, the level of the material will fall below the seam line 60't, and then past a series of apertures 608. The discharge of material from the M ender will then Ilow preferentially from the blending tulaes 602, with essentially zero flow through the annulus 605 between the inverted cone and the vessel cone. Flow through this annulus 605 cannot occur until the supply of maternal coming from the blend tubes 602 is exhausted, FIG. 9 is a diagram of the Test Apparatus, il'~ustrating its similarity in construction to the blenders of the present invention. Material 901 is cross hatched for clarity. Material 902 is shown crosshatched at mother ~~ ~~~'~~ri «~ .~,°~~~'r .
angle. The inverted cone may be set in a position 911 and provides a smaller annular gap 903 than were it raised to a higher position, say 912.
Material 901 is first poured into the inverted cone, upright cone and standpipe at the start of test, filling volumes shown as underlined 1,2,3,4 and 5. Material 902 may be then put in to sill the remainder of the vessel and will fill to the annular surface 809, in "keystone fashion," as a toroidal block, or as a vousaofr a! particulate material.
Material 902 will not flow out of the vessel until the supply of Material 901 is exhausted. In order to make this principle work:
e. The flow of material from the center nozzle must be regulated b~ ual~e to a rate below that could cause voids to Corm in material 801.
b. Flow properties of material 801 and 902 should be similar.
The teat procedure, it properly performed, can provide valuable information on the dimensions 903, 809, and other critical factors in cull-size blender design.
FIG. 11 illustrates the use of an inverted battle through which the blending tubes 1110 do not penetrate, but which is positioned in such a manner that a voussoir of particulate material is formed between converging surfaces in close proximity to each other. In this blender, particulate material is entrapped within the matrix of conduits 1110 and small inverted cone 1113 mounted on brackets 1106 within the cone of the outer wall 1112, The density, particle shape, compactability, and a host of indeterminate factors will cooperate to establish a toroidal block of material 1130, thus creating a virtual baffle of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes 1110, a small inverted cone 1113, and lower section wall 1112. It must be understood that this drawing is purely illustrative of the inventive concept, and that other variations are within the scope of the following claims.
~n ~~ m ~~~a . '..' ~~' ~ f u~~~i'v~s~v . . .,. . _, ..._..., " ,,; ~n .s. o v ...
FIG. 12 illustrates the accumulation of particulate material 1230 in this blender, when entrapped within the matrix of conduits 1210, and within the cone of the outer wall 1212. This embodiment is not equipped with an inverted cone 1113, but has instead a vertical tubular element 1240.
A voussoir of particulate material 1230 will be formed, Creating a virtual baille, in the corm of a toroid~al block, between and among Lhe structural members, including the central tubular structure 1240. The diameter of the tube 1240 is drawn too large in comparison with the area 1233 provided Ior discharge of the particulate material, but the concept is adequately presented.
The density, particle shape, eompactability, and a host of indeterminate factors will cooperate to establish the position, volume, and mass of material 1230. These parameters will be those required to obtain a suitable toroidal block, utilizing a virtual baffle of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes 1210 and vertical tubular element 1240. It must be understood that this drawing is purely illustrative of the inventive concept, and that other variations are within the scope the following claims.
FIG. 13 provides a horizontal sectional view through the blender of FIG. 12, at approximately the level of the virtual baffle 1230 of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes 1210.
Further support is provided by the vertical tubular structure 1240.
CLARIFICATION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BAFFLES OF
THE THREE PREFERRED EItiBODII4iENTS OF THIS INVENTION
In the embodiments disclosed in FIGS. 11-13, the blender uses a number of blending tubes or channels which terminate at the same elevation adjacent to a small inverted cone 1113 as shown in FIG. 11, or without an inverted cone as shown in FIVs, 1l and 13.
Although as shown in FIG. 6, the converging blending conduits provide only limited support to the blocking accumulation of the particulate material, in FIG. 11 the ma,~or past of the mass of particulate material is supported by the converging matrix of conduits. In FIGs. 12 and 13, the entire mass of particulate material is supported by the converging matrix of blending conduits and the vertical tubular element 1240, ~t~I~S~ITUTE ~~EET
urn o~r»~~o ~'t°nrr W~~ra3x~~~a Thus a very useful blender can be constructed which can be installed in silos at a much lower cost than blenders that rely solely on separate blend chambers as shown in F1G.
1.
FIG. 11 illustrates an alternate embodiment and a more economical method of construction than that of FIG. 7, achieved by eliminating the large baffle 704, and the "hard"
terminations of the blending tubes in apertures in the sides of cone 704.
The matrix of converging downcoming blending tubes 1110 are mounted close to the conical wall 1112. Blending tubes 1110 do not terminate in apertures or hubs in the surface of cone 1113, but terminate in the approximate region delineated as 1114, which has a variable vertical range as shown by the two-headed arrow at 1123.
The base line of the lower end of cone 1113 may vary above or below a typical position 1114, as shown by bidirectional arrow 1123. If proper proportions are selected' such a grid of blending tubes converging toward plane 1114, in combination with the converging wall 1112 of the lower bin section 1101, can support a voussoir 1130 of particulate material, extending slightly downward or upward cram reference plane 1114.
It is thus possible to achieve the blocking effect of the impervious baffle 604 of FIG. 6 without the expense of physically connecting (measuring, cutting and welding) the blending tubes to apertures fn the surface of a large baffle, and in some cases the small baffle 1113 may not be needed. Please refer to FIG. 12.
In FIG. 11A, various terminations for the blending tubes may be employed. The intent of this disclosure is to illustrate the concept of a baffle primarily of particulate material, simpler to build and less costly in material. The specific terminations of blending.conduits, patterns of the matrix, and use or nonuse of small convex cones are all .
minor variations contemplated in the general use of this invention.
In FIG. 12 is shown an embodiment which does not use the small inverted baffle or cone 1113, a preferred construction suss~ru~r~ ~~~~~r ~n o~iyu~~o ~3"1'l3_I5~f211)Za~-j33 . .. . _, ,..y~.. .' f a ~ ; ~ _..~
Nil (73 1_I() being the structural tubing 1240. With some particulate materials, the conical wall 1112 in combination with the blending tube matrix 1110, may support the toroidal blocking mass of material 1120 without member 1240.
The section shown in FIG. 13 is typical of many usable designs. The intent of this disclosure is to illustrate the concept of a baffle primarily of particulate material, .
simpler to build and less costly in material. The specific terminations of blending conduits, patterns of the matrix, and use or nonuse of small convex cones are all minor variations contemplated in the general use of this invention.
S~SST~TUTE SHEET
,
BLENDER WITH VIRTUAL BAFFLE OF PARTICULATE MATERIAL
FIELD OF THE INlIENTION
This invention relates to blenders and more specifically to methods and apparatus for thoroughly blending particulate or granular materials, a portion of the unblended material forming a toroidal block, constituting a virtual baffle to the downward flow of any particulate material except that passing through the blending tubes themselves.
DEFINITIONS
baffle--(noun) a plate, wall, screen, or other device to deflect, check, or regulate Ilow.
virtual battle-°herein defined as a barrier, formed of particulate material, in combination with a supporting structural matrix, to the downward flow of particulate material, except through blending tubes which penetrate the barrier.
matrix--herein defined as blender walls, metallic plates and cones, blending conduits, all coacting wixh the particulate material to provide the virtual battle.
voussoir°-(diet.) one of the wedge-shaped pieties forming an arch or vault. Used herein to graphically describe the cross section of the virtual baffle, at some point on the toroid or segment.
bridging--the tendency of particulate solids, flowing downward through a channel with converging sides, to bridge across the channel, blocking the channel, causing all of the material flowing out of the blender to flaw through the blending tubes.
toroidal block--herein, a toroidal mass of particulate material, having a voussoir-like crossection, supported betwe~:n the outer wall of the blender and the downwsrdly ' E H~ET
aa»nro l, ororon :~f'1'17 16~7113'7~~7E1 20'7178 converging metal baffles of FIGs. 6 and 9. Also called a toroidal or annular "keystone joist.°' Prior to the advent of large scale use of polymers in such applications as continuous film or filament production, the needs of industry for precision blendinig of bwlk solids products were met with mechanical tumbler, ribbon or screw blenders. Capacities of these units ranged from less than one cubic meter to over 100 cubic meters.
As the demand for plastics grew, it became apparent that much larger blender volumes were necessary to allow continuous production lines in plastics users' plants to operate without frequent shutdowns caused either by (1) variations in physical properties or (2) additive content inherent in the producer's production processes. This Ied to a demand for tumble blenders in the range of 700 cubic meter capacity.
The high cost of large tumble blander installations prompted industry-wide efforts to develop a blending capability in storage silos to comply with the product uniformity requirements of the polymer industry. A number of designs resulted, some silo blenders having capacities in the 3000 cubic meter range.
Efficient silo blenders are available today in two broad categories:
A. Gravity Blenders These designs generally use either external or internal tubes having openings to allow solids in the bin to slow from the main silo body to a separate blend chamber below the silo. The tube openings in the main body of the silo are randomly located so that material drained into the blend chamber represents a typical composite of the material in the main silo body.
B. Internally Recirculated Blenders These units rely on an external source of air to pick up material in the lower part of the silo body by an orifice arrangement, and convey it to the upper part of the main silo. The material flowing vertically down through the silo is randomly sampled by the openings in the tubes and agitated by inverted cones, resulting in homogenization of the silo contents after a period of time.
SUSSTdTUTE SHEET
The performance of both Gravity Blenders and Internally Recirculated Blenders can be significantly improved by recirculation while the blender is being filled.
As storage bins or hoppers are filled with granular or particulate material, it often happens that an inhomogeneous distribution of material occurs. There may be several reasons for this result. In the first place, as material flows into a hopper, the material beneath the inlet nozzle piles up at the angle of repose of the materiel. In this case the larger particles often roll dawn the peak toward the sides of the hopper, leaving the finer particles in the central region. Inhomogeneity can also occur when the hopper is filled with different batches of the same material because of variations of composition ai individual batches.
When material is drawn off through an outlet at the bottom of the hopper, the material flows irorn the region directly above the nozzle. Thus the material will not be representative of the average characteristics of the material in the hopper.
Prior art attempts at a solution to this segregation problem typically included placing perforated blending tubes vertically within the hopper. Such tubes have openings spaced apart along their axes which allow material from all levels within the hopper to enter the tubes. The lower portion of the blending tubes communicate with the outlet nozzle so that a more nearly homogeneous mixture of the material issues iron the outlet of the hopper.
In spite of many efforts to completely blend the particulate materiel, it is usually necessary in prior art blenders to specially treat at least the final portion of the discharge to achieve acceptable results. For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,923,304, discloses that the first and last few pounds are not used, but instead are withdrawn and later remixed with fresh ingredients, and re-poured, with these fresh ingredients, back into the dispensing apparatus.
3a SUMMRRY OF THE INDENTION
Recording to the invention there is provided a gravity blender having a cylindrical upper portion operable to receive and store a mass of particulate material, and a lower portion defining a downwardly converging canical section sealed to the lower cylindrical edge of the upper portion, the lower and upper portions being centered on a single vertical axis. R plurality of blending conduits extended downwards from the upper portion and continue downwardly adjacent the converging conical section, converging downwardly towards the vertical axis of the blender apparatus, The blending conduits have open lower ends which terminate in a generally circular and horizontal pattern, the convergence of the blending conduits and the conical walls of the lower section creating and supporting in operation a virtual baffle of particulate material in combination.
The virtual baffle consists of uousaoir-like accumulations of particulate material in the converging channels between the blending conduits and between the conical walls and the blending conduits. The baffle of particulate material remains in position until the blending tubes have begun to release the final portions of the particulate material through the blending tubes to blend with the particulate material of the virtual baffle as bath pass into and through the lower portion of the bin, In combination with a conventional hopper and conventional blending tubes, two embodiments disclosed herein can effectively blend a batch of particulate material, including the final portion of the batch. In a third embodiment, the operation of the i'ull size blender is simulated, in an adjustable T»"'i /71~~7?!!1?.:'11791 .a» n~ »onnn . _. _. _ ._. . _ r.,. .....~ ,u.:....: .. ._ laboratory size model, enabling experimentation with various particulate densities, cosrpactabilities and annular gaps.
My invention does not r~u~ire _a separate blending chamber. It utilizes the tendency of particulate solids, flowing downward through a channel with converging sides, to bridge across the channel, blocking the channel, causing all of the material flowing out of the blender to flow through the blending tubes. Thus my invention assures that all of the material discharged from the blender represents a truly typical composite of the blender contents.
The three preferred embodiments disclosed in this specification rely upon the tendency of particulate solids, in flowing downward through a channel with converging sides, to bridge across the channel. Such bridging may occur in:
A. A toroidal block, having a voussoir-like crosssection, as shown in the blender of FIG. 6, and equivalent supporting structure for bridging by particulate materials, as shown in FIGrs. 2, 4, ?, 8 and 10.
B. A similar toroidal block in the apparatus iw FIG. 9, for confirming by empirical tests, the preliminary design proportions for a blender specifically contoured for the density, compactability, and other characteristics ~i the particulate material, or materials, to be blended;
C. A voussoir-like construction for the support of particulate material! as shown in the construction of FIGS.
7 and 11-13, in which the matrix of blending tubes, optional inverted cones, and conical walls of the vessel prsvide a matrix for the support of the virtual baffle of pe~rticulate material.
The "bridging principle" and the "virtual baff~de"
concept employed in the preferred embodiments are illustrated in the following drawings and explained in the specification.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAb'VINGS
FIG. 1 provides an elevational, sectional vi~v through the center line of a typical blender of the prior art;
~CI~S~'fTUT~ S~J~~'-r :yf'Y'l7 laai72113~:d'~93 avm,. ~n in onnn ~e,.i %...n ev....~-. ._ ;7 n\
f f. d % .f ~I )l . ,.
FIG. 2 provides an elevational, sectional view through the center line of one preferred embodiment of the gravity blender of the present invention;
FIG. 3 provides a schematic diagram of the hopper, piping and pumps, if required for extremely uniform blending within the gravity blender of the present invention;
FIG. 4 provides a sectional view from the vertical centerline through the exterior wall of the lower portion of the hopper of an alternate embodiment of tine present invention, including a detail of s blending tube snd a conduit for exhaust gases, or for structural purposes;
FIG. 5 is a section of the conduit of FIG. 4, illustrating the knifelike device for preventing accumulation of particulate matter on the top surface of the conduit;
FIG. 6 is a more detailed view of Embodiment A of the present invention, as combined with terminations of the conventional blending tubes;
FIG, 7 is a more detailed view oI alternate Embodiments A and C of the present invention as combined with two convex surfaces for better blending of virtually all of the material to be blended;
FiG. 8 provides an elevational, sectional view through the center line of a gravity blender of an alternate embodiment A of the present invention, in which one basic convex surface is combined with a cylindrical device, developed further in FIG. I2-I3, for further blending;
FIG. 9, Embodiment B, provides a vertical, sectional view through the center line of the test apparatus, which substantially duplicates the conditions within, and operations of blending of the present invention) FIG. 10, Embodiment A, provides a sectional view from the vertical centerline tl2rough the exterior wall of the lower portion of the hopper of an alternate embodiment of the present invention, including a detail of a blending tube, but without a venting conduit for exhaust gases FIB, 11, Embodiment C, provides a fragmented elevational hemicylindricai inside view, through a section in the plane including the vertical centerline of a blender, utilizing a 19~~'~°~~ ~°~ et-s~e-r ' -Df"T'!1 iCa9 /!5'>°itn62 arise nnisnn,~n . .-.., --.-., .--..-_...
!-.f :':/ 10)6.:1 20~~~-'~~
b virtual baffle of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes, and equipped with a small inverted cone. Two partial sectional details are provided]
FIG. 11A is a fragmentary section just inside~the wall 1112, showing the ends 1114 of the blending tubes 1110 within the toroidal block 1130 of particu late materials FIG. 11B shows various angles of cut off of the discharge ends 1114 of the blending tubes 11101 FIG. 12, Embodiment C, provides an elevational hemicylindrical inside view, through a section in the plane including the vertical centerline of a blender, utilizing a virtual baffle of particulate material, supported solely on a matrix of converging blending tubes, without an inverted Bone, but with a vertical tubular elementl Q nd FIG. 13, Embodiment C, provides a generally horizontal sectional view through the blender of FIG. 12, at approximately the level of the virtual baffle of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes and the vertical tubular element 1240.
DESCRIPTION OF THE THREE PREFERRED EIgBODI115ENTS OF THE
INVENTION
In praviding a more detailed discussion of the three preferred embodiment of the invention, reference will be first made to components of the blending apparatus from the prior art, insofar as they differ from, or combine with, the new invention for improved and more efficient performance at lower cost.
In FIG. 1 is shown a drawing fram Patent No. 3,268,215, issued to T.A. Burton for a Blending Apparatus on August 23, 1966. Illustrative of this prior art are tank or hopper 10, blending tubes 24, and separate receiver or collector r manifold 2ff.
FIG. 2 shows the similarities and the differences between the prior art of FIG. 1 and the present invention.
Similarities include a cylindrical housing 210 superimposed upon and sealed to a conical structure 211. Downcomer tubes 224 however, terminate in perforations 227 through the SU~~T~1'1 ITF ~~~w°r°
~~ fl~~~~~~o ? ~_i ~y ; ~ : v px-r~r msazn~~:cdr~~
inverted generally horizontal baffle 225, comprising part of the present invention. This means of termination is a significant improvement over the prior art shown in FIG. 1, in which tubes 24 pass entirely through the hopper 10 and terminate in receiver 28. In the annular area 226, between the converging walls of baffle 225 and structure 2.11, the accumulation of particulate matter forms a toroldal block to the passage of the particulate matter accumulating above the block.
The recirculating schemes of the prior art are shown in FIG. 3, diagrams 302 and 303.
My invention, as shown in its alternate embodiments.
deals with the problem in novel fashion. In FIG. 2,,and as more easily seen in FIG. 6, the blending tubes, of which tube 602 is an example, terminate in apertures 603. These apertures are formed in the convex surface 604. This means of termination is a significant departure from the prior art, as shown in FIG. 1, in which tubes 24 pass entirely through the hopper 10 and terminate in receiver 28.
Returning to FIG. 6, it should be noted that convex surface 604 is supported upon brackets 606, and is thus spaced away from the exterior cone 610 by an annular gap shown as 605. Now, if the surfaces 604, annular gaps 605, and apertures 603, are designed as will be shown in connection with the description of FIG. 9, the material to be blended will begin to sill the hopper 601, but will form a barrier at the annulus 605, past which barrier the particulate material will not descend, until blending tubes are evacuated.
As the blending operation being perfarmed on the batch, or mixture, draws to a close, the level of the material will fall below the seam line 60't, and then past a series of apertures 608. The discharge of material from the M ender will then Ilow preferentially from the blending tulaes 602, with essentially zero flow through the annulus 605 between the inverted cone and the vessel cone. Flow through this annulus 605 cannot occur until the supply of maternal coming from the blend tubes 602 is exhausted, FIG. 9 is a diagram of the Test Apparatus, il'~ustrating its similarity in construction to the blenders of the present invention. Material 901 is cross hatched for clarity. Material 902 is shown crosshatched at mother ~~ ~~~'~~ri «~ .~,°~~~'r .
angle. The inverted cone may be set in a position 911 and provides a smaller annular gap 903 than were it raised to a higher position, say 912.
Material 901 is first poured into the inverted cone, upright cone and standpipe at the start of test, filling volumes shown as underlined 1,2,3,4 and 5. Material 902 may be then put in to sill the remainder of the vessel and will fill to the annular surface 809, in "keystone fashion," as a toroidal block, or as a vousaofr a! particulate material.
Material 902 will not flow out of the vessel until the supply of Material 901 is exhausted. In order to make this principle work:
e. The flow of material from the center nozzle must be regulated b~ ual~e to a rate below that could cause voids to Corm in material 801.
b. Flow properties of material 801 and 902 should be similar.
The teat procedure, it properly performed, can provide valuable information on the dimensions 903, 809, and other critical factors in cull-size blender design.
FIG. 11 illustrates the use of an inverted battle through which the blending tubes 1110 do not penetrate, but which is positioned in such a manner that a voussoir of particulate material is formed between converging surfaces in close proximity to each other. In this blender, particulate material is entrapped within the matrix of conduits 1110 and small inverted cone 1113 mounted on brackets 1106 within the cone of the outer wall 1112, The density, particle shape, compactability, and a host of indeterminate factors will cooperate to establish a toroidal block of material 1130, thus creating a virtual baffle of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes 1110, a small inverted cone 1113, and lower section wall 1112. It must be understood that this drawing is purely illustrative of the inventive concept, and that other variations are within the scope of the following claims.
~n ~~ m ~~~a . '..' ~~' ~ f u~~~i'v~s~v . . .,. . _, ..._..., " ,,; ~n .s. o v ...
FIG. 12 illustrates the accumulation of particulate material 1230 in this blender, when entrapped within the matrix of conduits 1210, and within the cone of the outer wall 1212. This embodiment is not equipped with an inverted cone 1113, but has instead a vertical tubular element 1240.
A voussoir of particulate material 1230 will be formed, Creating a virtual baille, in the corm of a toroid~al block, between and among Lhe structural members, including the central tubular structure 1240. The diameter of the tube 1240 is drawn too large in comparison with the area 1233 provided Ior discharge of the particulate material, but the concept is adequately presented.
The density, particle shape, eompactability, and a host of indeterminate factors will cooperate to establish the position, volume, and mass of material 1230. These parameters will be those required to obtain a suitable toroidal block, utilizing a virtual baffle of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes 1210 and vertical tubular element 1240. It must be understood that this drawing is purely illustrative of the inventive concept, and that other variations are within the scope the following claims.
FIG. 13 provides a horizontal sectional view through the blender of FIG. 12, at approximately the level of the virtual baffle 1230 of particulate material, supported partially on a matrix of converging blending tubes 1210.
Further support is provided by the vertical tubular structure 1240.
CLARIFICATION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BAFFLES OF
THE THREE PREFERRED EItiBODII4iENTS OF THIS INVENTION
In the embodiments disclosed in FIGS. 11-13, the blender uses a number of blending tubes or channels which terminate at the same elevation adjacent to a small inverted cone 1113 as shown in FIG. 11, or without an inverted cone as shown in FIVs, 1l and 13.
Although as shown in FIG. 6, the converging blending conduits provide only limited support to the blocking accumulation of the particulate material, in FIG. 11 the ma,~or past of the mass of particulate material is supported by the converging matrix of conduits. In FIGs. 12 and 13, the entire mass of particulate material is supported by the converging matrix of blending conduits and the vertical tubular element 1240, ~t~I~S~ITUTE ~~EET
urn o~r»~~o ~'t°nrr W~~ra3x~~~a Thus a very useful blender can be constructed which can be installed in silos at a much lower cost than blenders that rely solely on separate blend chambers as shown in F1G.
1.
FIG. 11 illustrates an alternate embodiment and a more economical method of construction than that of FIG. 7, achieved by eliminating the large baffle 704, and the "hard"
terminations of the blending tubes in apertures in the sides of cone 704.
The matrix of converging downcoming blending tubes 1110 are mounted close to the conical wall 1112. Blending tubes 1110 do not terminate in apertures or hubs in the surface of cone 1113, but terminate in the approximate region delineated as 1114, which has a variable vertical range as shown by the two-headed arrow at 1123.
The base line of the lower end of cone 1113 may vary above or below a typical position 1114, as shown by bidirectional arrow 1123. If proper proportions are selected' such a grid of blending tubes converging toward plane 1114, in combination with the converging wall 1112 of the lower bin section 1101, can support a voussoir 1130 of particulate material, extending slightly downward or upward cram reference plane 1114.
It is thus possible to achieve the blocking effect of the impervious baffle 604 of FIG. 6 without the expense of physically connecting (measuring, cutting and welding) the blending tubes to apertures fn the surface of a large baffle, and in some cases the small baffle 1113 may not be needed. Please refer to FIG. 12.
In FIG. 11A, various terminations for the blending tubes may be employed. The intent of this disclosure is to illustrate the concept of a baffle primarily of particulate material, simpler to build and less costly in material. The specific terminations of blending.conduits, patterns of the matrix, and use or nonuse of small convex cones are all .
minor variations contemplated in the general use of this invention.
In FIG. 12 is shown an embodiment which does not use the small inverted baffle or cone 1113, a preferred construction suss~ru~r~ ~~~~~r ~n o~iyu~~o ~3"1'l3_I5~f211)Za~-j33 . .. . _, ,..y~.. .' f a ~ ; ~ _..~
Nil (73 1_I() being the structural tubing 1240. With some particulate materials, the conical wall 1112 in combination with the blending tube matrix 1110, may support the toroidal blocking mass of material 1120 without member 1240.
The section shown in FIG. 13 is typical of many usable designs. The intent of this disclosure is to illustrate the concept of a baffle primarily of particulate material, .
simpler to build and less costly in material. The specific terminations of blending conduits, patterns of the matrix, and use or nonuse of small convex cones are all minor variations contemplated in the general use of this invention.
S~SST~TUTE SHEET
,
Claims (3)
1. A gravity blender having a cylindrical upper portion operable to receive and store a mass of particulate material, and a lower portion defining a downwardly converging conical section sealed to the lower cylindrical edge of the upper portion, the lower and upper portions being centered in a single vertical axis, a plurality of blending conduits extending downwards from the upper portion, the blending conduits continuing downwardly adjacent said converging conical section and the blending conduits converging downwardly towards said vertical axis of said blender apparatus, wherein the blending conduits have lower open ends which terminate in a generally circular and horizontal pattern, said convergence of the blending conduits and said conical walls of the lower section creating and supporting in operation a virtual baffle of particulate material in combination, said virtual baffle consisting of voussoir-like accumulations of particulate material in said converging channels between the blending conduits and between the conical walls and the blending conduits, the baffle of particulate material remaining In position until the blending tubes have begun to release the final portions of the particulate material through the blending tubes to blend with the particulate material of the virtual baffle as both pass into and through the lower portion of the bin.
2. Gravity blender apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising an upwardly converging conical surface, having a maximal diameter substantially that of the diameter of the circular pattern of the lower open end of said conduits, the conical surface projecting upwards towards the circle of open conduit lower ends, said lower ends being spaced above a bottom of said conical surface, and in that the virtual baffle is formed solely by the particulate material supported upon a matrix of said converging blending conduits, said conical lower portion of the bin walls and said conical surface projecting upwards.
3. Gravity blender apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising within said lower portion a vertical tubular element centered axially therein, the virtual baffle being formed solely of said particulate material supported upon a matrix of said converging blending conduits, said conical lower portion of the bin and said tubular element.
Applications Claiming Priority (7)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US683,320 | 1976-05-05 | ||
| US07/683,320 US5123749A (en) | 1991-04-10 | 1991-04-10 | Blender for particulate materials |
| US82208292A | 1992-01-17 | 1992-01-17 | |
| US822,082 | 1992-01-17 | ||
| US07/858,704 US5411332A (en) | 1991-04-10 | 1992-03-27 | Blender with virtual baffle of particulate material |
| US858,704 | 1992-03-27 | ||
| PCT/US1992/002890 WO1992018229A1 (en) | 1991-04-10 | 1992-04-09 | Blender with virtual baffle of particulate material |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2087178A1 CA2087178A1 (en) | 1992-10-11 |
| CA2087178C true CA2087178C (en) | 2004-06-08 |
Family
ID=27418420
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002087178A Expired - Lifetime CA2087178C (en) | 1991-04-10 | 1992-04-09 | Blender with virtual baffle of particulate material |
Country Status (7)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0538445B1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU1887592A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2087178C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69222920T2 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2109356T3 (en) |
| HK (1) | HK1003826A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1992018229A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1998034737A1 (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 1998-08-13 | Industrial Research Limited | Method and apparatus for removing lumps or agglomerates from granular or powdered material |
Family Cites Families (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR955447A (en) * | 1950-01-14 | |||
| US2633027A (en) * | 1951-07-19 | 1953-03-31 | Western Electric Co | Method of testing flow characteristics of granular materials |
| US3221560A (en) * | 1963-02-21 | 1965-12-07 | Pillsbury Co | Flowability apparatus |
| US3376753A (en) * | 1963-11-26 | 1968-04-09 | Lewis Howe Company | Particulate flow meter apparatus |
| US3940997A (en) * | 1973-12-27 | 1976-03-02 | Xerox Corporation | Apparatus and method for measuring angle of repose |
| US4109827A (en) * | 1977-05-09 | 1978-08-29 | Allied Industries Inc. | Method of discharging particulate material from a hopper |
| US4353652A (en) * | 1980-04-16 | 1982-10-12 | Young Henry T | Apparatus for gravity blending or particulate solids |
| US4385840A (en) * | 1981-03-02 | 1983-05-31 | Gulf Oil Corporation | Mixing apparatus |
| DE3332226A1 (en) * | 1983-09-07 | 1985-03-21 | Heidelberger Zement Ag, 6900 Heidelberg | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EMPTYING VIBRATING-FREE A CONTAINER FILLED WITH BULK MATERIAL, IN PARTICULAR SILOS OR BUNKERS |
| DE3512538A1 (en) * | 1984-12-15 | 1986-06-19 | AVT Anlagen- und Verfahrenstechnik GmbH, 7981 Vogt | Device for mixing bulk solids |
| US4719809A (en) * | 1985-12-31 | 1988-01-19 | Jr Johanson, Inc. | Apparatus and test method for determining flow or no flow conditions of bulk solids |
| US4825602A (en) * | 1987-10-22 | 1989-05-02 | Yacoe J Craig | Polyhedral structures that approximate an ellipsoid |
-
1992
- 1992-04-09 AU AU18875/92A patent/AU1887592A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1992-04-09 CA CA002087178A patent/CA2087178C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1992-04-09 EP EP92910728A patent/EP0538445B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1992-04-09 WO PCT/US1992/002890 patent/WO1992018229A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1992-04-09 ES ES92910728T patent/ES2109356T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1992-04-09 DE DE69222920T patent/DE69222920T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1998
- 1998-04-09 HK HK98103011A patent/HK1003826A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| ES2109356T3 (en) | 1998-01-16 |
| DE69222920T2 (en) | 1998-04-09 |
| EP0538445A4 (en) | 1993-12-29 |
| DE69222920D1 (en) | 1997-12-04 |
| AU1887592A (en) | 1992-11-17 |
| HK1003826A1 (en) | 1998-11-06 |
| EP0538445A1 (en) | 1993-04-28 |
| EP0538445B1 (en) | 1997-10-29 |
| WO1992018229A1 (en) | 1992-10-29 |
| CA2087178A1 (en) | 1992-10-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP0019446B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for the blending of granular materials | |
| EA007679B1 (en) | Blending system | |
| US3351326A (en) | Process and apparatus for solids blending | |
| Shinohara et al. | Mechanism of size segregation of particles in filling a hopper | |
| US3317191A (en) | Method and apparatus for solids blending | |
| CA1294254C (en) | Apparatus for dispensing a blended composition of particulate ingredients | |
| US3106385A (en) | Method and apparatus for solids blending | |
| US3268215A (en) | Blending apparatus | |
| CA2087178C (en) | Blender with virtual baffle of particulate material | |
| US4128343A (en) | Apparatus for blending granular materials | |
| US5123749A (en) | Blender for particulate materials | |
| US4473300A (en) | Method and apparatus for blending solids or the like | |
| US3421739A (en) | Apparatus for gravity blending of solids | |
| US4248539A (en) | Material spreader | |
| US5411332A (en) | Blender with virtual baffle of particulate material | |
| US4384789A (en) | Blender | |
| JPS6247575B2 (en) | ||
| CN206793574U (en) | A kind of twin-bucket measures bituminous mixing plant | |
| CN107284886A (en) | Diversion conical tower, dry-mixed mortar tank and manufacturing method thereof | |
| US4385840A (en) | Mixing apparatus | |
| US3550913A (en) | Method and apparatus for mixing granulated material | |
| SU1368017A1 (en) | Apparatus for preparing mixtures | |
| CN210352948U (en) | Automatic device that adds of fermentation bacterial | |
| CN212586062U (en) | Dry-type material mixing division sampling equipment | |
| US3860129A (en) | Apparatus for homogenizing particulate material |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |