CA2069854A1 - Powdered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes - Google Patents
Powdered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymesInfo
- Publication number
- CA2069854A1 CA2069854A1 CA 2069854 CA2069854A CA2069854A1 CA 2069854 A1 CA2069854 A1 CA 2069854A1 CA 2069854 CA2069854 CA 2069854 CA 2069854 A CA2069854 A CA 2069854A CA 2069854 A1 CA2069854 A1 CA 2069854A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- dishwashing composition
- enzyme
- weight
- percent
- composition according
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Landscapes
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A phosphate-free powdered dishwashing composition containing a mixture of protease enzyme and anamylase enzymes have been found to be very useful in the cleaning of dishware.
The compositions contain nonionic surfactants and a alkali metal silicate and a bleaching agent.
A phosphate-free powdered dishwashing composition containing a mixture of protease enzyme and anamylase enzymes have been found to be very useful in the cleaning of dishware.
The compositions contain nonionic surfactants and a alkali metal silicate and a bleaching agent.
Description
2~98~4 POWDERED AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
CONTAINING ENZYMES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
` It has been found to be very useful to have enzymes in dishwashing detergent compositions because enzymes are very effective in removing food soils from the surface of glasses, dishes, pots, pans and eating utensils. The enzymes attack these materials while other components of the detergent will effect other aspects of the cleaning action. However, in order for the enzymes to be highly effective, the composition must be chemically stable, and it must maintain an effective activity at the operating temperature of the automatic dishwasher. Chemical stability, such as to bleach agents, is the property whereby the detergent composition containing enzymes does not undergo any significant degradation during storage. Activity i9 the property of maintaining enzyme activity during usage. From the time that a detergent is packaged until it i5 used by the customer, it must remain stable. Furthermore, during customer usage of the dishwashiny detergent, it must retain its activity. Unless the enzymes in the detergent are maintained in a minimum e~posure to moisture or water, the enzymes will suffer a degradation during storage which will result in a product that will have a decreased activity. When enzymes are a part of the detergent composition, it has been found that the initial water content ~0~98~4 of the components of the composition should be as low a level as possible, and this low water content must be maintained during storage, since water will deactivate the enzymes. This deactivation will cause a decrease in the initial activity of ~he detergent composition.
After the detergent container is opened, the detergent will be exposed to the environment which contains moisture.
During each instance that the detergent is exposed to the environment it could possibly absorb some moisture. This absorption occurs by components of the detergent composition absorbing moisture, when in contact with the atmosphere. This effect is increased as the container is emptied, since there will be a greater volume of air in contact with the detergent, and thus more available moisture to be absorbed by the detergent composition. This will usually accelerate the decrease in the activity of the detergent composition. The most efficient way to keep a high activity i9 to start with an initial high activity of enzyme and to use components in the dishwashing composition which do not interact with the enzyme or which have a low water affinity which will minimize any losses in activity as the detergent is being stored or used.
Powdered detergent compositions which contain enzymes can be made more stable and to have a high activity, if the initial free water content of the detergent composition is less than 10 percent by weight, more preferably less than 9 percent by weight and most preferably less than 8 percent by weight. Furthermore, the pH of a 1.0 wt~ aqueous solution of the powdered detergent composition should be less than ahout 2~6985~
11.5 more preferably less than 11.0, and most preferably less than 10.5. This low alkalinity of the dishwashing detergent should maintaln the stability of the detergent composition which contains a mixture of enzymes, thereby providing a higher initial activity of the mixture of the enzymes and the maintenance of this initial high activity.
A major concern in the use of automatic dishwashing compositions is the formulation of phosphate-free compositions which are safe to the environment while maintaining superior cleaning performance and dish care. The present invention teaches the preparation and use of powdered automatic dishwashing compositions which are phosphate-free and have superior cleaning performance and dish care.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention is directed to producing powdered phosphate-free enzyme-containing automatic dishwa3hing detergent compositions that have an increased chemical stability and essentially high at wash operating temperatures of 40C to 65C, wherein the composition also can be used as a laundry pre-soaking agent. This is accomplished by controlling the alkalinity of the detergent composition and using a unique mixture of enzymes. An alkali metal silicate is used in the powdered dishwashing detergent compositions.
The preferred builder system of the instant compositions comprises a mixture of sodium carbonate and/or sodium citrate and a low molecular weight polyacrylic polymer.
It is to be understood that the term powder in this invention includes within its definition tablets, soluble capsules and soluble sachet. It is also possible to use the instant compositions as a laundry presoaking powder.
Conventional powdered automatic dishwashing compositions usually contain a low foaming surface-active agent, a chlorine ~leach, alkaline builder materials, and usually minor ingredients and additives. The incorporation of chlorine bleach requires special processing and storage precautions to protect composition components which are subject to deterioration upon direct contact with the active chlorine.
The stability of the chlorine bleach is also critical and raises additional processing and storage difficulties. In addition, it is known that automatic dishwasher detergent compositions may tarnish silverware and damage metal trim on china as a result of the presence of a chlorine-containing bleach therein. Accordingly, there is a standing desire to formulate detergent compositions for use in automatic dishwashing operations which are free of active chlorine and which are capable of providing overall hard surface cleaning and appearance benefits comparable to or better than active chlorine-containing detergent compositions. This reformulation i8 particularly delicate in the context of automatic dishwashing operations, since during those operations, the active chlorine prevents the formation and/or deposition of troublesome protein and protein-grease complexes on the hard dish surfaces and no surfactant system currently ~nown is capable of adequately performing that function.
Various attempts have been made to formulate bleach-free low foaming detergent compositions for automatic dishwashing 2~S~8J
machines, containing particular low foaming nonionics, builders, filler materials and enzymes. US Patent 3,472,783 to Smille recognized that degradation of the enzyme can occur, when an enzyme is added to a highly alkaline automatic dishwashing detergent.
French Patent No. 2,102,851 to Colgate-Palmolive, pertains to rinsing and washing compositions for use in automatic dishwashers. The compositions disclosed have a pH of 6 to 7 and contain an amylolytic and, if desired, a proteolytic enzyme, which have been prepared in a special manner from animal pancreas and which exhibit a desirable activity at a pH
in the range of 6 to 7. German Patent No. 2,038,103 to Henkel & Co. relates to aqueous liquid or pasty cleaning compositions containing phosphate salts, enzymes and an enzyme stabilizing compound. US Patent No. 3,79g,879 to Francke et al, teaches a detergent composition for cleaning dishes, with a pH of from 7 to 9 containing an amylolytic enzyme, and in addition, optionally a proteolytic enzyme.
US Patent 4,101,457, to Place et al., teaches the use of a proteolytic enzyme having a maximum activity at a pH of 12 in an automatic dishwashing detergent.
US Patent 4,162,987, to Maguire et al., teaches a granular or liquid automatic dishwashing detergent which uses a proteolytic enzyme having a maximum activity at a pH of 12 as well as an amylolytic enzyme having a maximum activity at a pH
of 8.
US Patent No 3,827,938, to Aunstrup et al., discloses specific proteolytic enzymes which exhibit high enzymatic 2 0 ~
actlvities in highly alkaline systems. Similar disclosures are found in British Patent Specificatlon ~To. 1,361,386, to Novo Terapeutisk Laboratorium A/S. British Patent Specification No. 1,296,839, to Novo Terapeutisk La~oratorium A/s, discloses specific amylolytic enzymes which exhibit a high degree of enzymatic activity in alkaline systems.
Thus, while the prior art clearly recognizes the disadvantages of using aggressive chlorine bleaches in automatic dishwashing operations and also suggests bleach-free compositions made by leaving out the bleach component, said art disclosures are silent about how to formulate an effective bleach-free powdered automatic dishwashing compositions capable of providing superior performance during conventional use.
US Patent Nos. 3,821,118 and 3,840,480; 4,568,476, 4,501,681 and 4,692,260 teach the use of enzymes in automatic dishwashing detergents, as well as Belgian Patent 895,459;
French Patents 2,544,393 and 1,600,256; European Patents 256,679; 266,904; 271,155; 139,329; and 135,226; and Great Britain Patent 2,186,884.
The aforementioned prior art fails to provide a powdered automatic dishwashing detergent which is phosphate-free and contains a mixture of enzymes for the simultaneous degradation of both proteins and starches, wherein the combination of enzymes have a maximum activity at a pH of less than 11 to 12 as measured b~ Anson method and the powdered automatic dishwashing detergent has optimized cleaning performance in a temperature range of 4~C to 65~C.
2 ~ 6 ~ ~ 5 L~l It is an object of this inventlon to incorporate an enzyme mixture in a phosphate-free, powdered automatic dishwasher detergent composition for use in automatic dishwashing operations capable of providing at least equal or better performance to conventional automatic dishwashing compositions at operating temperatures of 40C to 65C.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present invention relates to a powdered automatic dishwashing detergent compositions which comprise a nonionic surfactant, alkali metal silicate, a phosphate-free builder system, a peroxygen compound with activator as a bleaching agent and a mixture of an amylase enzyme and a protease enzyme, wherein the powdered automatic dishwashing detergent composition has a pH of less than 11.5 in the washing liquor at a concentration of 10 grams per liter of water and the powdered dishwashing detergent composition exhibits high cleaning efficiency for both proteins and starches at a wash temperature of 40C to 65C.
The nonionic surfactants that can be used in the present powdered automatic dishwasher detergent compositions are well known. A wide variety of these surfactants can be used.
The nonionic synthetic organic detergents are generally described as ethoxylated propoxylated fatty alcohols which are low-foaming surfactants and are possibly capped, characterized by the presence of an organic hydrophobic group and an organic hydrophilic group and are typically produced by the condensation of an organic aliphatic or alkyl aromatic hydrophobic compound with ethylene oxide and/or propyleneoxide 2 ~ ~ r~ 8 5 l~
(hydrophilic in nature). Practically any hydrophobic compound having a carboxy, hydroxy, amido or amino group with a free hydrogen attached to the oxygen or the nitrogen can be condensed with ethylene oxide or propylene oxide or with the polyhydration product thereof, polyethylene glycol, to form a nonionic detergent. The length of the hvdrophilic or polyoxy ethylene chain can be readily adjusted to achieve the desired balance between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups.
fflical suitable nonionic surfactants are those disclosed in US Patent Nos. 4,316,812 and 3,630,929.
Preferably, the nonionic detergents that are used are the low-foaming polyalkoxylated lipophiles wherein the desired hydrophile-lipophile balance is obtained from addition of an hydrophilic poly-lower alkoxy group to a lipophilic moiety. A
preferred class of the nonionic detergent employed is the poly-lower alkoxylated higher alkanol whexein the alkanol is of 9 to 18 carbon atoms and wherein the number of moles of lower alkylene oxide (of 2 or 3 carbon atoms) is from 3 to 15.
Of such materials it is preferred to employ those wherein the higher alkanol is a high fatty alcohol of 9 to 11 or 12 to 15 carbon atoms and which contain from 5 to 15 or 5 to 16 lower alkoxy groups per mole. Pxeferably, the lower alkoxy i5 ethoxy but in some instances, it may be desirably mixed with propoxy, the latter, if present, usually being major (more than 50~) portion. Exemplary of such compounds are those wherein the alkanol is of 12 to 15 carbon atoms and which contain about 7 ethylene oxide groups per mole.
20~8~4 Useful nonionics are represented by the low foam Plurafac series from BASF Chemical Conpany which are the reaction product of a higher llnear alcohol and a mixture of ethylene and propylene oxides, containing a mixed chain of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, terminated by a hydroxyl group.
Examples include Product A(a C~3-CIs fatty alcohol condensed with 6 moles ethylene oxide and 3 moles propylene oxide).
Product B (a C~3-C~s fatty alcohol condensed with 7 mole propylene oxide and 4 mole ethylene oxide), and Product C (a 0 C~3- C15 fatty alcohol condensed with 5 moles propylene oxide and 10 moles ethylene oxide). Particularly good surfactants are Plurafac LF132 and LF 231 which are capped nonionic surfactants. ~nother liquid nonionic surfactant that can be used is sold under the tradename Lutensol SC 9713.
Synperonic nonionic surfactant from ICI such as Synperonic LF/D25 are especially preferred nonionic surfactants that can be used in the powdered automatic dishwasher detergent compositions of the instant invention.
Other useful surfactants are Neodol 25-7 and Neodol 23-6.5, which products are made by Shell Chemical Company, Inc.
The former is a condensation product of a mixture of higher fatty alcohols averaging about 12 to 13 carbon atoms and the number of ethylene oxide groups present averages 6.5. The higher alcohols are primary alkanols. Other examples of such detergents include Tergitol 15-S-7 and Tergitol 15-S-9 (registered trademarks), both of which are linear secondary alcohol ethoxylates made by Union Carbide Corp. The former is mixed ethoxylation product of 11 to 15 carbon atoms linear 20~8~
secondary alkanol with seven moles of ethylene oxide and the latter is a similar product but with nine moles of ethylene oxide being reacted.
Also useful in the present compositions as a component of ~he nonionic detergent are higher molecular weight nonionics, such as Neodol 45-11, which are similar ethylene oxide condensation products of higher fatty alcohols, with the higher fatty alcohol being of 14 to 15 carbon atoms and the number of ethylene oxide groups per mole being about 11. Such products are also made by Shell Chemical Company.
In the preferred poly-lower alkoxylated higher alkanols, to obtain the best balance of hydrophilic and lipophilic moieties the number of lower alkoxies will usually be from 40 to 100~ of the number of carbon atoms in the higher alcohol, preferably 40 to 60~ thereof and the nonionic detergent will preferably contain at least 50~ of such preferred poly-lower alkoxy higher alkanol.
The alkylpolysaccharides are surfactants which are also u~eful alone or in conjunction with the aforementioned surfactants and have those having a hydrophobic group containing from 8 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably from 10 to 16 carbon atoms, most preferably from 12 to 14 carbon atoms, and polysaccharide hydrophilic group containing from 1.5 to about 10, preferably from about 1.5 to 4, and most preferably from 1.6 to 2.7 saccharide units (e.g., galactoside, glucoside, fructoside, glucosyl, fructosyl, and/or galactosyl units). ~ixtures of saccharide moieties may be used in the alkyl polysaccharide surfactants. The number x indicates the 2 0 ~
number of saccharide units in a particular alkylpolysaccharide surfactant. For a particular alkylpolysaccharide molecule x can only assume integral values. In any physical sample can be characterized by the average value o~ x and this average value can assume non-integral values. In this specification ; the values of x are to be understood to be average values.
The hydrophobic group (R) can be attached at the 2-, 3-, or 4-positions rather than at the l-position, (thus giving e.g. a glucosyl or galactosyl as opposed to a glucoside or galactoside). However, attachment through the l-position, i.e., glucosides, galactosides, fructosides, etc., is preferred. In the preferred product the additional saccharide units are predominately attached to the previous saccharide unit's 2-position. Attachment through the 3-, 4-, and 6-positions can also occur. Optionally and less desirably there can be a polyalkoxide chain joining the hydrophobic moiety (R) and the polysaccharide chain. the preferred alkoxide moiety i9 ethoxide.
Typical hydrophobic groups include alkyl groups, either saturated or unsaturated, branched or unbranched containing from about 8 to about 20, preferably from 10 to 16 carbon atoms. Preferably, the alkyl group is a straight chain saturated alkyl group. The alkyl group can contain up to 3 hydroxy groups and/or the polyalkoxide chain can contain up to 30, preferably less than 10, most preferably 0, alkoxide moieties.
Suitable alkyl polysaccharides are decyl, dodecyl, tetradecyl, pentadecyl, hexadecyl, and octadecyl, di-, tri-, 20~85~
tetra-, penta-, and hexaglucosides, galactosides, lactosides, fructosides, fructosyls, lactosyls, glucosyls and/or galactosyls and mixtures thereof.
The alkyl monosaccharides are relatively less soluble in water than the higher alkylpolysaccharides. When used in admixture with alkylpolysaccharides, the alkyl monosaccharides are solubilized to some extent. The use of alkyl monosaccharides in admixture with alkylpolysaccharides is a preferred mode of carrying out the invention. Suitable mixtures include coconut alkyl, di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentaglucosides and tallow alkyl tetra-, penta-, and hexaglucosides.
The preferred alkyl polysaccharides are alkyl polyglucosides having the formula:
R2O(CnH2nO)r(Z)~
wherein Z is derived from glucose, R i~ a hydrophobic group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkylphenyl, hydroxyalkylphenyl, and mixtures thereof in which said alkyl groups contain from 10 to 18, preferably from 12 to 14 carbon atoms; n is 2 or 3 preferably 2, r is from 0 to about 10, preferable 0; and x is from 1.5 to 8, preferably from 1.5 to ~, most preferably from 1.6 to 2.7. To prepare these compounds a long chain alcohol (R2OH) can be reacted with glucose, in the presence of an acid catalyst to form the desired glucoside. Alternatively the alkylpolyglucosides can be prepared by a two step procedure in which a short chain alcohol (R~OH) an be reacted with glucose, in the presence of an acid catalyst to form the desired glucoside. Alternatively 2~8~4 the alkylpolyglucosides can be prepared by a two step procedure in which a short chain alcohol (C~6) is reacted with glucose or a polyglucoside (x=2 to 4) to yield a short chain alkyl glucoside (x=1 to 4) which can in turn be reacted with a ~onger chain alcohol (R2OH) to displace the short chain alcohol and obtain the desired alkylpolyglucoside. If this two step procedure is used, the shcrt chain alkylglucoside content of the final alkylpolyglucoside material should be less ~han 50~, preferably less than 10~, more preferably less than 5~, most preferably 0% of the alkylpolyglucoside.
The amount of unreacted alcohol (the free fatty alcohol content) in the desired alkylpolysaccharide surfactant is preferably less than about 2~, more preferably less than 0.5%
by weight of the total of the alkylpolysaccharide. For some uses it is desirable to have the alkyl monosaccharide content less than 10~.
The used herein, "alkyl polysaccharide surfactant" i9 intended to represent both the preferred glucose and galactose derived surfactants and the less preferred alkyl polysaccharide surfactants. Throughout this specification, "alkyl polyglucoside" is used to include alkyl- polyglycosides because the stereo chemistry of the saccharide moiety is changed during the preparation reaction.
An especially preferred APG glycoside surfactant is APG
625 glycoside manufactured by the Henkel Corporation of Ambler, PA. APG 625 i9 a nonionic alkyl polyglycoside characterized by the formula:
CnH2n+lO(C6H~O5)~H
2~3~
wherein n=10(2~); n=12(65%); n=14(21-28~); n=16(4-8~) and - n=18(0.5~) and x(degree of polymerization) = 1.6. APG 625 has: a pH o~ 6-8(10~ of APG 625 in distilled water); a specific gravity at 25C of 1.1 grams/ml; a density at 25C of ~.1 kgs/gallons; a calculated HLB of 12.1 and a Brookfield viscosity at 35C, 21 spindle, 5-10 RPM of 3,000 to 7,000 cps.
Mixtures of two or more of the liquid nonionic surfactants can be used and in some cases advantages can be obtained by the use of such mixtures.
The liquid nonaqueous nonionic surfactant is absorbed on a builder system which comprises a mixture of phosphate-free particles which is a builder salt and a low molecular weight polyacrylate type polymer such as a polyacrylate organic and/or inorganic detergent builders. A preferred solid builder 15 salt is an alkali carbonate such as sodium carbonate or an alkali metal citrate such as sodium citrate or a mixture of sodium carbonate and sodium citrate. When a mixture of sodium carbonate and sodium citrate is used, a weight ratio of sodium citrate to sodium carbonate is 9:1 to 1:9, more preferably 3:1 20 to 1:3.
Other builder salts which can be mixed with the sodium carbonate and/or sodium citrate are gluconates phosphonates and nitriloacetic acid salts. In conjunction with the builder salts are optionally used low molecular weight polyacrylates 25 having a molecular weight of 1,000 to 100,000, more preferably 2,000 to 80,000. A preferred low molecular weight polyacrylate is Sokalan~CP45 manufactured by BASF and having a molecular weight of 70,000. Another preferred low molecular 20S~
;
weight polyacrylate is Acrysol~nLMW45ND manufactured by Rohrn and Haas and having a molecular welght of 4,500. Norasol~WL2 comprises 26~ BMW45ND sprayed on 74% soda ash.
Sokalan~CP45 is a copolymer of an acrylic acid and an acid anhydride. Such a material should have a water absorption at 38C and 78 percent relative humidity of less than 40 percent and preferably less than 30 percent. The builder is commercially available under the tradename of Sokalan~CP45.
This is a partially neutralized copolymer of metacrylic acid and maleic anhydride sodium salt. Sokalan~CP45 is classified as a suspending and anti-deposition agent. This suspending agent has a low hygroscopicity. Another builder salt is Sokalan~CP5 having a molecular weight of 70lO00. An objective is to u~e suspending and anti-redeposition agents that have a low hygroscopicity. Copolymerized polyacids have this property, and particularly when partially neutralized.
Acusol~640ND provicled by Rohm Haas is another useful suspending and anti-redepositing agent.
Another cla~s of builders useful herein are the aluminosilicates, both oE the crystalline and arnorphous type.
Various crystalline zeolites (i.e. alumino-silicates) are described in British Patent No. 1,504,168l U.S. Patent No.
4l409l136 and Canadian Patent Nos. 1l072l835 and 1l087l477.
An example of amorphous zeolites useful herein can be found in Belgium Patent No. 835,351. The zeolites generally have the formula (M20) ~ (Al203) y (si2) ~ Wl~20 2~8~
wherein x is 1, y is from 0.8 to 1.2 and preferably 1, z is from 1.5 to ~.5 or higher and preferably 2 to 3 and w is from 0 to 9, preferably 2.5 to 6 and M is preferably sodium. A
typical zeolite is type A or similar structure, with type 4A
particularly preferred. The preferred aluminosilicates have calcium ion exchange capacities of about 200 milliequivalents per gram or greater, e.g. 400 meq/g.
The alkali metal silicates are useful anti-corrosion agents which function to make the composition anti-corrosive to eating utensils and to automatic dishwashing machine parts.
Sodium silicates of Na20/SiO2 ratios of from 1:1 to 1:3.4, more preferably 1:1 to 1:2.8. Potassium silicates of the same ratios can also be used. The preferred silicates are sodium disilicate (anhydrous), sodium disilicate (hydrated) and sodium metasilicate and mixtures thereof, wherein the preferred silicate is hydrated disilicate.
Essentially, any compatible anti-foaming agent can be used. Preferred anti-foaming agents are silicone anti-foaming agents. These are alkylated polysiloxanes and include polydimethyl siloxanes, polydiethyl siloxanes, polydibutyl siloxanes, phenyl methyl siloxanes, dimethyl silinated silica, trimethysilanated silica and triethylsilanated silica. A
suitable anti-foaming agent is Silicone TP-201 from Union Carbide. Other suitable anti-foaming agents are Silicone DB700 used at 0.2 to 1.0 percent by weight, sodium stearate used at a concentration level of 0.5 to 1.0 weight percent, and LPKN 158 (phosphoric ester) sold by Hoechst used at a concentration level of 0 to 1.5 weight percent, more 2~8~
preferably 0.1 ~o 1.0 weight percen~. The perfumes that can be used include lemon perfume and other natural scents.
Essentially, any opacifier that is compatible with the remaining components of the detergent formulation can be used.
A useful and preferred opacifier is titanium dioxide at a concentration level of 0 to 1.0 weight percent.
A key aspect is to keep the free water (non-chemically bonded water) in the detergent composition at a minimum.
Absorbed and adsorbed water are two types of free water, and comprise the usual free water found in a detergent composition. Free water will have the affect of deactivating the enzymes.
The detergent composition of the present invention includes a peroxygen bleaching agent at a concentration level of about 0 to about 20 weight percent, more preferably 0.5 to 17 weight percent and most preferably at 1.0 to 14 weight percent. The oxygen bleaching agents that can be used are alkali metal perborate, percarbonate, perphthalic acid, perphosphates, and potassium monopersulfate. A preferred compound is sodium perborate monohydrate. The peroxygen bleaching compound is preferably used in admixture with an activator at a concentration level of 1-5 wt. percent.
Suitable activator~ are those disclosed in U.S. Patent No.
4,264,466 or in column 1 of U.S. Patent No. 4,430,244.
Polyacetylated compounds are preferred activators. Suitable preferred activators are tetraacetyl ethylene diamine ("TAED"), pentaacetyl glucose and ethylidenebenzoate acetate.
2Q6~854 The activator usually i~teracts with the peroxygen compound to form a peroxyacid bleaching agent in the wash water.
The detergent formulation also contains a mixture of a proteolytic enzyme and an amylotytic enzyme and, optionally, a lipolytic enzyme that serve to attack and remove organic residues on glasses, plates, pots, pans and eating utensils.
Proteolytic enzymes attack protein residues, lipolytic enzymes fat residues and amylolytic enzymes starches. Proteolytic enzymes include the protease enzymes subtilism, bromelin, papain, trypsin and pepsin. Amylolytic enzymes include amylase enzymes. Lipolytic enzymes include the lipase enzymes. The preferred amylase enzyme is available under the name Maxamyl, derived from Bacillus licheniformis and is available from Gist-brocades of the Netherlands available in the form of a prill having an activity of about 6,000 TAU/g.
One of the preferred protease enzyme is available under the name Maxacal derived from Bacillus alcalophilus, and is supplied by Gist-brocades, of the Netherlands in a prill form (activity of about 329KADU/g.). Preferred enzyme activates per wash are Maxacal-300-700 KADU per wash and Maxamyl-2,000 to 4,000 TAU per wash.
Another preferred protease enzyme is available under the name Maxatase derived from a novel Bacillus strain designated "PB92" wherein a culture of the Bacillus i3 deposited with the ~aboratory for Microbiology of the Technical University of Del~t and has a number OR-60, and is supplied by from Gist-Brocades, of the Netherlands in a prill 2~8~
form (activity o~ about 40,000 DU/g.). Preferred enzyme activates per wash are Maxatase 250-600 KDU per wash.
The alkali silicate, which is a corrosion inhibitor, wherein sodium disilicate is preferred, will be present in an amount of about 0 to 30 percent by weight, more preferably about 3 to about 30 percent by weight and most preferably about 4 to about 28 percent by weight.
` The opacifier will be present in an amount of about 0 to about 1.0 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.1 to about 7 percent by weight and most preferably about 0.4 percent by weight.
The enzymes will be present in an arnount in a prill form as supplied by Gist-Brocades at a concentration of about 0.8 to 22.0 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.9 to 20.0 percent by weight, and most preferably about 1.0 to about 18.0 percent by weight. The protease enzyme prills in the automatic dishwashing composition will comprise about 0.5 to about 15.00 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.7 to about 13.0 weight percent and most preferably about 0.8 to about 11.0 percent by weight. The amylase enzyme prills will comprise about 0.3 to about 8.0 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.4 percent to about 7.0 weight percent and most preferably about 0.5 to about 6.0 weight percent. The lipase enzyme will comprise about 0.00 to about 8.0 percent by weight of the detergent composition. A typical lipase enzyme is Lipolase 100 T from Novo Corporation. The lipase enzymes are especially beneficial in reducing srease residues and related filming problems on glasses and dishware. Another 2~8~
useful lipase enzyme i9 Amano PS lipase provided by Amano International Enzyme Co., Inc.
Other components such as perfumes will comprise about 0.1 to about 5.0 percent by weight of the detergent composition.
One method o~ producing the powder detergent formulation having a bulk density of about 0.8 is to spray dry by any conventional means the nonionic surfactant and defoamer onto the perborate bleach compound and the builder salt. This spray dry materials can be used immediately, but it is preferred to age it for 24 hours. The spray dried materials are dry blended in any suitable conventional blender such as a tumble blender at about room temperature with the other ingredients of the composition until a homogenous blend is obtained.
The weight ratio of the proteolytic enzyme to the amylolytic enzyme in prill form the powdered automatic dishwasher detergent compositions is 6:1 to 1:1, and more preferably 4.5:1 to 1.1:1.
The detergent composition can have a fairly wi.de ranging composition. The surfactant can comprise 0 to 15 percent by weight of the composition, more preferably 0.1 to 15 percent by weight, and most preferably about 1 to 12 percent by weight. The anti-foaming agent will be present in an amount of about 0 to about 1.5 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.1 to about 1.2 percent by weight and most preferably about 0.1 to about 1 percent by weight. The builder system, which is preferably sodium carbonate and/or sodium citrate, is present in an amount of 2 to 40 percent by weight, more 206~8~4 preferably 4 to 40 percent by weight and most preferably 5 to 30 percent by weight. The builder system also preferably contains the low molecular weight polyacrylate type polymer at a concentration level of about 0 to 20 weight percent, more preferably 1.0 to 17 weight percent and most preferably a to 17 weight percent. The composition also includes the peroxygen bleaching agent at a concentration of about 0 to 20 wt. percent and the activator at a concentration of about 1 to 5 wt. percent.
The alkali silicate, which is a corrosion inhibitor, wherein sodium disilicate is preferred, will be present in an amount of 0 to 40 percent by weight, more preferably 3 to 40 percent by weight and most preferably 4 to 40 percent by weight.
The opacifier will be present in an amount of 0 to 1.0 percent by weight, more preferably 0.1 to 0.7 percent by weight and most preferably about 0.4 percent by weight.
The enzymes will be present in an amount in a prill form as supplied by Gist-Brocades at a concentration of 0.8 to 22.0 percent by weight, more preferably 0.9 to 20.0 percent by weight, and most preferably 1.0 to 18.0 percent by weight.
The protease enzyme prills in the automatic dishwashing composition will comprise 0.5 to 15.00 percent by weight, more preferably 0.7 to 13.0 weight percent and most preferably 0.8 to 11.0 percent by weight. The amylase enzyme prills will comprise 0.3 to 8.0 percent by weight, more preferably 0.4 percent to 7.0 weight percent and most preferably 0.5 to 6.0 welght percent. The lipase enzyme prills will comprise 0.00 2~98.5~
to ~.0 percent by weight of the detergent composition. A
;; typical lipase enzy~e is Lipolase 100T from Novo Corporation.
The lipase enzymes are especially beneficial in reducing grease residues and related filming problems on glasses and dishware. Another useful lipase en~yme is Amano PS lipase provided by Amano International Enzyme Co., Inc.
Other components such as perfumes will comprise 0.1 to 5.0 percent by weight of the detergent composition.
One method of producing the powder detergent formulation having a bulk density of 0.8 is to spray dry by any conventional means the nonionic surfactant and defoamer onto the perborate bleach compound and the builder salt. This spray dry materials can be used immediately, but it is preferred to age it for 24 hours. The spray dried materials are dry blended in any suitable conventional blender such as a tumble blender at about room temperature with the other ingredients of the composition until a homogenous blend is obtained.
The instant compositions also can be produced as low density powders according to the procedure as set forth in U.S. Patent 4,931,203, wherein these powders have a bulk density less than the bulk density of the bulk density of the standard powders which have a bulk density of about 0.8 kg/liter.
The concentrated powdered nonionic automatic dishwashing detergent compositions of the present invention disperses readily in the water in the dishwashing machine. The presently used home dishwashing machines have a measured 2~3~
capacity for 80 cc or 90 grams of detergent. In normal use, for example, for a full load of dirty dishes 60 grams of powdered detergent are normally used.
In accordance with the present invention only about 19 cc or about 15 grams of the concentrated powdered detergent composition is needed. The normal operation of an automatic dlshwashing machine can involve the following steps or cycles:
washing, rinse cycles with cold water and rin~e cycles with hot water. The entire wash and rinse cycles require about 60 minutes. The temperature of the wash water is 40C to 65C
and the temperature of the rinse water is 55C to 65C. The wash and rinse cycle~ use 4 to 7.5 liters of water for the wash cycle and 4 to 7.5 liters of water for the hot rinse cycle.
The highly concentrated powdered automatic dishwashing detergent compositions exhibit excellent cleaning properties and because of the high concentration of the detergent in the composition, the detergent is not totally consumed during the wash cycle or totally eliminated during the rinse cycle such that there is a sufficient amount of detergent remaining during the rinse cycle to substantially improve the rinsing.
The washed and dried dishes are free of undesirable traces, deposits or film due to the use of hot water in the rinse cycle.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Example~1 2 ~ 6 ~
The concentrated powdered nonionic ~urfactant detergent composition was formulated from the following ingredients in the amounts specified according to the previously defined and described dry blending process.
20~8~
H _ ~ ~ ~ -- = 'I
~ ~a 1~ ~h~ ~
I ~ I al ~ l l ~D l l o --o _ ~ ~ _~ l l , _~ __ __~
a _ ~ 9 ~ , ~ a a 2 a ~c a 9 ~ a q ~ a a ~-In o u~ o u, 2~8~
.. _ -- Ln Ln I
Ln o . . o I
Ln l ~ ~ ~D ~ O O ~ l l l o o 1 n Ln o I
Ln l ~ ~ ~I l o o ~ l l I
._ I
Ln Ln I
o o ~ . o I
Ln l ~ ~1 ~ ~ o o ~1 l l I
O N _ Ln Ln O
~1 ~ l l o ~ ~1 a~ l I ~`I
_..... ... ..... .... __ _ ~ I
o d~ Ln ~n o I
o ~ ,~ l l I
o ~r _ n Ln o _ ~
l l ,1 ~ l l o ~ ,~ l l I
. _ ---I
oi l o ~r Ln Ln o ' l o - rl, ' .__ l o ~, o l ~
l l ~ ~ l l o ~ ~ l l I
- -- ~ - - -o Ln Ln o o ~ ,i l l I
~_ _ __ __~ ~ _ ___ ~1 O ~ rd -I
X O O\o ~ ~ ~ al td Cq ~ I
L) ~) L) O h ~ L) O ~ ~I h a) 01 O :~ O O o t:n ~ ';S! ~ v h O h h ~ 11~ ~;
~ k O Q, O ~ ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ a O o O Ln ~ O
C~ X C~ X ~ t~l a) 1~ - h ~ ~1 rl o ~ ~ ~1 ~h ~ ::~ O E~
P3 ~ (n ~ rd ~ ~ O Ln r~ O O -rJ a) ~¢ rl ~ :~4 O a) o ~ r~ O
p~ ~ Ln ~ cn ~ 3 m v~ u~ ~ ~ E~ cn ~ u~ ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_ --......... ~=_ _ .__ _ _ ._ = _ Ln o Ln o Ln ~ ~ (~1 r`'3 2~g54 Example II
Formulas (~-I) of Example 1 were tested in a European style Philips 664 Dishwasher working at 55C with a charge of 15.0 grams per wash of the Formulas (A-I) and 3 ml./per wash of commercial Galaxy rinse aid sold by Colgate-Palmolive Co.
; The load of items placed in the dishwasher consisted of 6 plates soiled with 3.0 grams of a mixture of 12.0 grams of porridge oats with 188 grams of water and 3 plates soiled with 0.4 grams of calcium chloride denaturated egg yolk and three plates soiled with 5 grams of a microwave oven baked mixture of 177 grams of egg yolk with 50 grams of margarine and 3 CUp9 soiled with tea after overglaze removal wherein all the plates and cups were dried prior to being placed in the dishwasher.
The pH of the washing bath and the formulation were measured.
The hardness of the rin~e water was 38 (C~C03) ppm. Each formulation was evaluated for spotting and filming. The results were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 with the higher number being the better result.
2~8~
TABLE II
. _ _. - ' TEST CLEANING PERFORMANCE EVA~UATIONS (AT 55C) ~ ~_ __ __ _ __~ __ r---r--SOIL A B C D E ¦ F G H I
REMOVAL
_ _ .._ ~ .. _ __ . ..-= . ---I OATMEAL 7 7.5 8.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 _ MICROEGGS 5 7.5 9 5 7.5 9 8.8 8.2 9.0 CALCIUM 2 9 9.5 2 9.3 9 9.7 9.7 10 l 11 l FILMING 7.6 7.5 7.3 7.6 7.5 SPOTTING 6.0 7.5 6.3 8.2 7.5 _ __ GLASS 8.3 9.2 8.7 DAYLIGHT
. ._ .
BUILD-UP
STRAINER
_ _ _ i GREASY
BUILD-UP
_ 11 SPOTTING 8.5 7.2 8.2 ll l FILMING 7.7 7.5 7.3 . .__ 11 GLASS 8.5 8.5 9.8 DAYLIGHT
. . _ ll GREASY 9.0 9.0 9.0 BUILD-UP
STRAINER
=
The above described examples of illustrative compositions of the invention were evaluated for performance according to the following laboratory test methods.
All cleaning performance were carried out under European washing conditions in automatic dishwashers with a built-in heater and water softening ion-exchange resin, at a temperature range of about 50C to about 65C with 3ml of a rinse aid (Galaxy Rinse Aid) used in the later stages of the cycle (automatically dispersed by a built-in closing device 2~6~
during the last rinse cycle). Fifteen ~rams of the illustrative compositions were used as a simple dose per wash.
In the so-called soil cleaning test, 3 cups and 2 sets of plates were identically soiled with food (tea stain, oatmeal soil, hardened egg soil and microwave oven-cooked egg soil).
The cup staining was obtained by using 3 cups previously filled with a 5~ fluorhydric acid solution during 15 minutes in order to remove the protection. The cups were washed and dried just before staining. The tea stain was prepared by adding 90 ml boiling water to one 2g dose of LIPTON yellow label tea and leaving the system at test for 20 minutes.
After emptying, the cups were then allowed to dry for 12 hours.
Oatmeal soil was prepared by boiling 24 grams of Quaker oats in 400 ml of tap water for ten minutes and then homogenized with a high shearing device (Ultrawax). Three grams of this mixture was spread as thin film onto 7.5 inch china plates. The plates were aged for 2 hours at 80C, and then stored overnight at room temperature. Hardened egg 90il was prepared by mixing egg yolk with an equal amount of 2.5N
calcium chloride solution. 0.4 grams of this mixture was applied as a thin crosswise film to the usable surface of 7.5 inch china plates. Microwave-egg 90il was prepared by mixing hot egg yolk and cooked margarine with a homogenizer (Ultraturax device). Five grams of this mixture were spread as thin film onto 7.5 inch china plates, and the soiled plates were baked afterwards for one minute in a microwave oven. The two type of egg soils were stored overnight at room ~ ~ ~7~8 temperature. Six plates of oatmeal, 3 cups soiled with tea, and three plates of each egg were used per wash, together with six clean glasses. The twelve soiled plates, the three soiled cups, and the six glasses were always placed in the same positions in the dishwasher at each run. In each test four different compositions were assessed using a series of four dishwashers.
A11 washed plates were scored each run by determining the percent area cleaned (percentage of soil removal) with the aid of a reference scale of gradually cleaned plates. Average percentages of soil removal for each type of soil after four runs were converted in a 0 to lQ scale, 0 being for no soil removal and 10 for perfect cleaning. Glasses were rated in a viewing box for filming and spotting and under natural lighting for evaluation. They were rated according to a scale ranging from 0 (bad performance) to 10 (perfectly clean glasses) with the aid of reference glasses.
In the multisoil cleaning test different dishware/soil combinations were used. The dishwasher load included each run six plates of oatmeal, three cup~ soiled with tea, one dish of white sauce, one dish of rice, four glasses soiled with tomato juice, four glasses soiled with cocoa, and four soiled with milk. Pieces of cutlery (forks, knives and spoons, six each) were also included and soiled with porridge soil, rice and rice with cheese soils.
Same Latin Square procedure was used as for soil cleaning test. Percentages of soil removal on all the dishware and glasses were converted in 0 to 10 scale, 0 being for no soil 20~8~4 removal and 10 for perfect cleaning. Glasses were also scored for ~ilming, spotting redeposition of soils and global evaluation according to a 0 (bad performance) to 10 (very good performance) scale with the aid of reference glasses. A
different scale was used to distinguish the data from soil removal performance. Results tabulated were average of four runs.
In the greasy residue build-up test, the dishwasher load included six clean plates in the lower basket and six clean glasses in the upper basket. The soil load was consisting of 100 grams of a greasy soil mixture prepared by mixing mustard (42 weight ~) white vinegar (33 wt. %), corn oil (15 wt. ~), and lard (10 wt. ~) altogether.
In each test, four different compositions were assessed according to a Rubin Square procedure by using a series of four dishwashers during at the same time. 50 grams of greasy soil mixture were poured each run in the wash bath together with fifteen grams of the detergent composition used as a single dose per wash. After each run, the upper basket containing the six glasses, the cutlery basket with the plastic tiles as well as the dishwasher filter elements were moved from one dishwasher to the following one, before conducting the next run. Such a procedure was used to assess the performance of compositions on glasses and on plastic dishware surfaces under conditions of repeated washer in the presence of said greasy soil mixture.
After each cycle, glasses were scored in a viewing box for filming and spotting and under natural lighting for 966d 2 ~ 4 aspect according to the same O (bad performance) to 10 (perfectly clean glasses) scale as for the so-called soil cleaning test with the aid of reference glasses.
The same procedure was repeated three times using the same set of glasses so as to calculate average performance results for each composition after 4 cycles. The dishwashers filter parts were also inspected after each cycle to evidence greasy deposit build up differences between compositions.
Example 3 The concentrated powdered nonionic surfactant detergent composition was formulated from the following ingredients in the amounts specified according to the pre~iously defined and described dry blending process.
2 ~1 ~ e~ 8 ~i ~
TABLE III
~ . ~
: ¦RAW MATERIALS FORMULA CO~POSITIONS (IN
I PARTSJ
I A IB C D E F G
/ , Anhydrous 23 23 23 23 ¦Sodium IMetasilicate I
Sodium 23 23 23 Disilicate (at 122~ water) _ _ ....
Nonionic 8.0 16.0 coated Maxcal at 330 KADU/g Nonionic 6.9 6.9 11 coated Maxamyl at 5800 TAU/g cNoatediC 10.9 10.9 7 Maxatase at 440 KDU/g _ ....... _ _ PEG coated Maxacal at 350 KADU/g _ ._ .
206~8~
PEG coated .
Maxamyl at 5900 TAU/g .. _ .. _ PEG coated Maxapem CX30 ~at 600 KADU/g at 60~ water from BASE' SODA ASH 34.2 34.2 34.2 34.2 34.2 29.2 29 ._ .. __ Sodium Citrate Dihydrated TAED
SILICONE DB100 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 SYNPERONIC 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 PERBRATE
MONOHYDRATED
I
LIPOLASE 100T _ = _ = ~ =
205~5~
.
RAW MATERIALS FORMULA COMPOSITIONS (IN
PARTS) _ ~ r--~ ~--_~ __ H I J K L M N
:~ __ _ .
Anhydrous Sodium ¦Metasilicate ¦Sodium 23 23 23 23 23 26.1 25.1 ¦
¦Disilicate (at l22% water) I I
¦Nonionic coated ¦Maxcal at 330 KADU/g Nonionic coated 5 5 3 3 3 5 5 Maxamyl at 5 a o o TAU/g Nonionic coated 13 13 15 15 15 13 13 Maxatase at 440 KDU/g _ PEG coated Maxcal at 350 KADU/g PEG coated TAU/g .. _ _ __ ._ PEG coated Maxapen CX 30 at 600 KADU/g _ _ ~
at 60~ water from BASF
_ _ __ l SODA ASH 29 26 20.2 252.7 31 26 26 _ ._ .__ SODIUM CITRATE
DIHYDRATED
__ _ ... ... __ SILICONE DB100 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 SYNPERONIC 4.5 4.5 2.5 7.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 MONOHYDRATED
_ CAUSTIC SODA 5 5 5 5 5 1 9 1.9 . _ 2Q~9~
¦¦ LIPOLASE 100T
. ( NOVO ) __ . . _ .
' 2~3~
Example IV
Formulas (A-N) of Example II1 were tested in a European style Philips 664 Dishwasher working at 55C with a charge of 15.0 grams per wash of the Formulas (A-N) and 3 ml./per wash of commercial Galaxy rinse aid sold by Colgate-Palmolive Co.
The load of items placed in the dishwasher consisted of 6 plates soiled with 3.0 grams of a mixture of 12.0 grams of porridge oats with 188 grams of water and 3 plates soiled with 0.4 grams of calcium chloride denaturated egg yolk and three plates soiled with 5 grams of a microwave oven baked mixture of 177 grams of egg yolk with 50 grams of margarine and 3 cups soiled with tea after overglaze removal wherein all the plates and cups were dried prior to being placed in the dishwasher.
The pH of the washing bath and the formulation were measured.
The hardness of the rinse water was 38 (C2C03) ppm. Each formulation was evaluated for spotting and filming. The results were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 with the higher number being the better result.
2~$~54 ~ TABBE IV
I
~EST CLEANING PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS (AT 55~) 1 r~
SOIL REMOVAL A ¦B C D E ¦F G
_ _ _ _= _ :1 : OATMEAL 7 7.5 8.5 10 10 10 10 MICROEGGS 5 7.5 9 5 7.0 7.4 7.2 CALCIUM EGGS 2 9 9.5 2 8.8 9.1 fl.9 _ FILMING 7.5 7.6 7.8 GLASS
DAYLIGHT
I
TEA STAIN
_ . __ .. __ 11 GREASY
BUILD-UP ON
STRAINER
. .. -- _ ._ 'I
GREASY
BUILD-UP
SPOTTING
FILMING _ _ _ DAYLIGHT
GREASY
BUILD-UP ON
STRAINER
.
2 ~ 5 ~
TABLE IV (Cont.) __ ,___ ¦TEST CLEANING PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS (AT
¦SOIL REMOVAL H II I J IK IL M IN
~ _= . _ ,. _ ~OATMEAL 10 10 10 101 10 10 10 MICROEGGS 7.5 7 7.8 7.8 1 7.8 6.2 6.8 CALCIUM EGGS 10 10 10 10 lo 10 9.8 .
FILMING 7.8 7.7 6.7 7.8 1 6.5 7.4 8.2 SPOTTING 7.7 7.8 6.3 8.2 7.3 7.8 9.0 GLASS DAYLIGHT - 8.8 9.7 ¦
ON STRAINER
_ . _ ._ - =
GREASY BUILD-UP
SPOTTING I I 7.1 8.3 FILMING_ ~ 7.4 1 7.7 GLASS DAYLIGHT 8.1 9.3 i GREASY BUILD-UP 8.0 1.3 ON STRAINER
_ . _ ._ _. _ The above described examples of illustrative compositions of the invention were evaluated for performance according to the following laboratory test methods.
All cleaning performance were carried out under European washing conditions in automatic dishwashers with a built-in heater and water softening ion-exchange resin, at a temperature range of about 50C to about 65C with 3ml of a rinse aid (Galaxy Rinse Aid) used in the later stages of the cycle (automatically dispersed by a built-in closing device during the last rinse cycle). Fifteen grams of the illustrative compositions were used as a simple dose per wash.
20~854 In the so-called soil cleaning test, 3 cups and 2 sets of plates were identically soiled with food (tea stain, oatmeal soil, hardened egg soil and microwave oven-cooked egg soil).
The cup staining was obtained by using 3 cups previously filled with a 5~ fluorhydric acid solution during 15 minutes in order to remove the protection. The cups were washed and dried just before staining. The tea stain was prepared by adding 90 ml boiling water to one 2g dose of LIPTON yellow label tea and leaving the system at test for 20 minutes.
After emptying, the cups were then allowed to dry for 12 hours.
Oatmeal soil was prepared by boiling 24 grams of Quaker oats in 400 ml of tap water for ten minutes and then homogenized with a high shearing device (Ultrawax). Three grams of this mixture was spread as thin film onto 7.5 inch china plates. The plates were aged for 2 hours at 80C, and then stored overnight at room temperature. Hardened egg soil was prepared by mixing egg yolk with an equal amount of 2.5N
calcium chloride solution. 0.4 grams of this mixture was applied as a thin crosswise film to the usable surface of 7.5 inch china plates. Microwave-egg 90il was prepared by mixing hot egg yolk and cooked margarine with a homogenizer (Ultraturax device). Five grams of this mixture were spread as thin film onto 7.5 inch china plates, and the soiled plates were baked afterwards for one minute in a microwave oven. The two type of egg soils were stored overnight at room temperature. Six plates of oatmeal, 3 cups soiled with tea, and three plates of each egg were used per wash, together with 20~8~
six clean glasses. The twelve soiled plates, the three soiled cups, and the six glasses were always placed in the same positions in the dishwasher at each run. In each test four different compositions were assessed using a series of four ~ishwashers.
All washed plates were scored each run by determining the percent area cleaned (percentage of soil removal) with the aid of a reference scale of gradually cleaned plates. Average percentages of soil removal for each type of soil after four runs were converted in a 0 to 10 scale, 0 heing for no soil removal and 10 for perfect cleaning. Glasses were rated in a viewing box for filming and spotting and under natural lighting for evaluation. They were rated according ~o a scale ranging from 0 (bad performance) to 10 (perfectly clean glasses) with the aid of reference glasses.
In the multisoil cleaning test different dishware/soil combinations were used. The dishwasher load included each run six plates of oatmeal, three cups soiled with tea, one dish of white sauce, one dish of rice, four glasses soiled with tomato juice, four glasses soiled with cocoa, and four soiled with milk. Pieces of cutlery (forks, knives and spoons, 9iX each) were also included and soiled with porridge soil, rice and rice with cheese soils.
Same Latin Square procedure was used as for soil cleaning test. Percentages of soil removal on all the dishware and glasses were converted in 0 to 10 scale, 0 being for no soil removal and 10 for perfect cleaning. Glasses were also scored for filming, spotting redeposition of soils and global ~9~
evaluation according to a o (bad performance) to 10 (very good performance) scale with the aid of reference glasses. A
different scale was used to distinguish the data from soil removal performance. Results tabulated were average of four runs.
In the greasy residue build-up test, the dishwasher load included six clean plates in the lower basket and six clean glasses in the upper basket. The soil load was consisting or 100 grams of a greasy soil mixture prepared by mixing mustard (42 weight ~) white ~inegar (33 wt. ~), corn oil (15 wt. ~), and lard (10 wt. ~) altogether.
In each test, four different compositions were assessed according to a Rubin Square procedure by using a series of four dishwashers during at the same time. 50 grams of yreasy soil mixture were poured each run in the wash bath together with fifteen grams of the detergent composition used as a single dose per wash. After each run, the upper basket containing the six glasses, the cutlery basket with the plastic tiles as well as the dishwasher filter elements were moved from one dishwasher to the following one, before conducting the next run. Such a procedure was used to assess the performance of compositions on glasses and on plastic dishware surfaces under conditions of repeated washer in the presence of said greasy soil mixture.
After each cycle, glasses were scored in a viewing box for filming and spotting and under natural lighting for 966d aspect according to the same O (bad performance) to 10 20S~8~4 (perfectly clean glasses) scale as for the so-called soil cleaning test wlth the aid of reference glasses.
The same procedure was repeated three times using the same set of glasses so as to calculate average performance results for each composition after 4 cycles. The dishwashers filter parts were also inspected after each cycle to evidence greasy deposit build up differences between compositions.
CONTAINING ENZYMES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
` It has been found to be very useful to have enzymes in dishwashing detergent compositions because enzymes are very effective in removing food soils from the surface of glasses, dishes, pots, pans and eating utensils. The enzymes attack these materials while other components of the detergent will effect other aspects of the cleaning action. However, in order for the enzymes to be highly effective, the composition must be chemically stable, and it must maintain an effective activity at the operating temperature of the automatic dishwasher. Chemical stability, such as to bleach agents, is the property whereby the detergent composition containing enzymes does not undergo any significant degradation during storage. Activity i9 the property of maintaining enzyme activity during usage. From the time that a detergent is packaged until it i5 used by the customer, it must remain stable. Furthermore, during customer usage of the dishwashiny detergent, it must retain its activity. Unless the enzymes in the detergent are maintained in a minimum e~posure to moisture or water, the enzymes will suffer a degradation during storage which will result in a product that will have a decreased activity. When enzymes are a part of the detergent composition, it has been found that the initial water content ~0~98~4 of the components of the composition should be as low a level as possible, and this low water content must be maintained during storage, since water will deactivate the enzymes. This deactivation will cause a decrease in the initial activity of ~he detergent composition.
After the detergent container is opened, the detergent will be exposed to the environment which contains moisture.
During each instance that the detergent is exposed to the environment it could possibly absorb some moisture. This absorption occurs by components of the detergent composition absorbing moisture, when in contact with the atmosphere. This effect is increased as the container is emptied, since there will be a greater volume of air in contact with the detergent, and thus more available moisture to be absorbed by the detergent composition. This will usually accelerate the decrease in the activity of the detergent composition. The most efficient way to keep a high activity i9 to start with an initial high activity of enzyme and to use components in the dishwashing composition which do not interact with the enzyme or which have a low water affinity which will minimize any losses in activity as the detergent is being stored or used.
Powdered detergent compositions which contain enzymes can be made more stable and to have a high activity, if the initial free water content of the detergent composition is less than 10 percent by weight, more preferably less than 9 percent by weight and most preferably less than 8 percent by weight. Furthermore, the pH of a 1.0 wt~ aqueous solution of the powdered detergent composition should be less than ahout 2~6985~
11.5 more preferably less than 11.0, and most preferably less than 10.5. This low alkalinity of the dishwashing detergent should maintaln the stability of the detergent composition which contains a mixture of enzymes, thereby providing a higher initial activity of the mixture of the enzymes and the maintenance of this initial high activity.
A major concern in the use of automatic dishwashing compositions is the formulation of phosphate-free compositions which are safe to the environment while maintaining superior cleaning performance and dish care. The present invention teaches the preparation and use of powdered automatic dishwashing compositions which are phosphate-free and have superior cleaning performance and dish care.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention is directed to producing powdered phosphate-free enzyme-containing automatic dishwa3hing detergent compositions that have an increased chemical stability and essentially high at wash operating temperatures of 40C to 65C, wherein the composition also can be used as a laundry pre-soaking agent. This is accomplished by controlling the alkalinity of the detergent composition and using a unique mixture of enzymes. An alkali metal silicate is used in the powdered dishwashing detergent compositions.
The preferred builder system of the instant compositions comprises a mixture of sodium carbonate and/or sodium citrate and a low molecular weight polyacrylic polymer.
It is to be understood that the term powder in this invention includes within its definition tablets, soluble capsules and soluble sachet. It is also possible to use the instant compositions as a laundry presoaking powder.
Conventional powdered automatic dishwashing compositions usually contain a low foaming surface-active agent, a chlorine ~leach, alkaline builder materials, and usually minor ingredients and additives. The incorporation of chlorine bleach requires special processing and storage precautions to protect composition components which are subject to deterioration upon direct contact with the active chlorine.
The stability of the chlorine bleach is also critical and raises additional processing and storage difficulties. In addition, it is known that automatic dishwasher detergent compositions may tarnish silverware and damage metal trim on china as a result of the presence of a chlorine-containing bleach therein. Accordingly, there is a standing desire to formulate detergent compositions for use in automatic dishwashing operations which are free of active chlorine and which are capable of providing overall hard surface cleaning and appearance benefits comparable to or better than active chlorine-containing detergent compositions. This reformulation i8 particularly delicate in the context of automatic dishwashing operations, since during those operations, the active chlorine prevents the formation and/or deposition of troublesome protein and protein-grease complexes on the hard dish surfaces and no surfactant system currently ~nown is capable of adequately performing that function.
Various attempts have been made to formulate bleach-free low foaming detergent compositions for automatic dishwashing 2~S~8J
machines, containing particular low foaming nonionics, builders, filler materials and enzymes. US Patent 3,472,783 to Smille recognized that degradation of the enzyme can occur, when an enzyme is added to a highly alkaline automatic dishwashing detergent.
French Patent No. 2,102,851 to Colgate-Palmolive, pertains to rinsing and washing compositions for use in automatic dishwashers. The compositions disclosed have a pH of 6 to 7 and contain an amylolytic and, if desired, a proteolytic enzyme, which have been prepared in a special manner from animal pancreas and which exhibit a desirable activity at a pH
in the range of 6 to 7. German Patent No. 2,038,103 to Henkel & Co. relates to aqueous liquid or pasty cleaning compositions containing phosphate salts, enzymes and an enzyme stabilizing compound. US Patent No. 3,79g,879 to Francke et al, teaches a detergent composition for cleaning dishes, with a pH of from 7 to 9 containing an amylolytic enzyme, and in addition, optionally a proteolytic enzyme.
US Patent 4,101,457, to Place et al., teaches the use of a proteolytic enzyme having a maximum activity at a pH of 12 in an automatic dishwashing detergent.
US Patent 4,162,987, to Maguire et al., teaches a granular or liquid automatic dishwashing detergent which uses a proteolytic enzyme having a maximum activity at a pH of 12 as well as an amylolytic enzyme having a maximum activity at a pH
of 8.
US Patent No 3,827,938, to Aunstrup et al., discloses specific proteolytic enzymes which exhibit high enzymatic 2 0 ~
actlvities in highly alkaline systems. Similar disclosures are found in British Patent Specificatlon ~To. 1,361,386, to Novo Terapeutisk Laboratorium A/S. British Patent Specification No. 1,296,839, to Novo Terapeutisk La~oratorium A/s, discloses specific amylolytic enzymes which exhibit a high degree of enzymatic activity in alkaline systems.
Thus, while the prior art clearly recognizes the disadvantages of using aggressive chlorine bleaches in automatic dishwashing operations and also suggests bleach-free compositions made by leaving out the bleach component, said art disclosures are silent about how to formulate an effective bleach-free powdered automatic dishwashing compositions capable of providing superior performance during conventional use.
US Patent Nos. 3,821,118 and 3,840,480; 4,568,476, 4,501,681 and 4,692,260 teach the use of enzymes in automatic dishwashing detergents, as well as Belgian Patent 895,459;
French Patents 2,544,393 and 1,600,256; European Patents 256,679; 266,904; 271,155; 139,329; and 135,226; and Great Britain Patent 2,186,884.
The aforementioned prior art fails to provide a powdered automatic dishwashing detergent which is phosphate-free and contains a mixture of enzymes for the simultaneous degradation of both proteins and starches, wherein the combination of enzymes have a maximum activity at a pH of less than 11 to 12 as measured b~ Anson method and the powdered automatic dishwashing detergent has optimized cleaning performance in a temperature range of 4~C to 65~C.
2 ~ 6 ~ ~ 5 L~l It is an object of this inventlon to incorporate an enzyme mixture in a phosphate-free, powdered automatic dishwasher detergent composition for use in automatic dishwashing operations capable of providing at least equal or better performance to conventional automatic dishwashing compositions at operating temperatures of 40C to 65C.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present invention relates to a powdered automatic dishwashing detergent compositions which comprise a nonionic surfactant, alkali metal silicate, a phosphate-free builder system, a peroxygen compound with activator as a bleaching agent and a mixture of an amylase enzyme and a protease enzyme, wherein the powdered automatic dishwashing detergent composition has a pH of less than 11.5 in the washing liquor at a concentration of 10 grams per liter of water and the powdered dishwashing detergent composition exhibits high cleaning efficiency for both proteins and starches at a wash temperature of 40C to 65C.
The nonionic surfactants that can be used in the present powdered automatic dishwasher detergent compositions are well known. A wide variety of these surfactants can be used.
The nonionic synthetic organic detergents are generally described as ethoxylated propoxylated fatty alcohols which are low-foaming surfactants and are possibly capped, characterized by the presence of an organic hydrophobic group and an organic hydrophilic group and are typically produced by the condensation of an organic aliphatic or alkyl aromatic hydrophobic compound with ethylene oxide and/or propyleneoxide 2 ~ ~ r~ 8 5 l~
(hydrophilic in nature). Practically any hydrophobic compound having a carboxy, hydroxy, amido or amino group with a free hydrogen attached to the oxygen or the nitrogen can be condensed with ethylene oxide or propylene oxide or with the polyhydration product thereof, polyethylene glycol, to form a nonionic detergent. The length of the hvdrophilic or polyoxy ethylene chain can be readily adjusted to achieve the desired balance between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups.
fflical suitable nonionic surfactants are those disclosed in US Patent Nos. 4,316,812 and 3,630,929.
Preferably, the nonionic detergents that are used are the low-foaming polyalkoxylated lipophiles wherein the desired hydrophile-lipophile balance is obtained from addition of an hydrophilic poly-lower alkoxy group to a lipophilic moiety. A
preferred class of the nonionic detergent employed is the poly-lower alkoxylated higher alkanol whexein the alkanol is of 9 to 18 carbon atoms and wherein the number of moles of lower alkylene oxide (of 2 or 3 carbon atoms) is from 3 to 15.
Of such materials it is preferred to employ those wherein the higher alkanol is a high fatty alcohol of 9 to 11 or 12 to 15 carbon atoms and which contain from 5 to 15 or 5 to 16 lower alkoxy groups per mole. Pxeferably, the lower alkoxy i5 ethoxy but in some instances, it may be desirably mixed with propoxy, the latter, if present, usually being major (more than 50~) portion. Exemplary of such compounds are those wherein the alkanol is of 12 to 15 carbon atoms and which contain about 7 ethylene oxide groups per mole.
20~8~4 Useful nonionics are represented by the low foam Plurafac series from BASF Chemical Conpany which are the reaction product of a higher llnear alcohol and a mixture of ethylene and propylene oxides, containing a mixed chain of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, terminated by a hydroxyl group.
Examples include Product A(a C~3-CIs fatty alcohol condensed with 6 moles ethylene oxide and 3 moles propylene oxide).
Product B (a C~3-C~s fatty alcohol condensed with 7 mole propylene oxide and 4 mole ethylene oxide), and Product C (a 0 C~3- C15 fatty alcohol condensed with 5 moles propylene oxide and 10 moles ethylene oxide). Particularly good surfactants are Plurafac LF132 and LF 231 which are capped nonionic surfactants. ~nother liquid nonionic surfactant that can be used is sold under the tradename Lutensol SC 9713.
Synperonic nonionic surfactant from ICI such as Synperonic LF/D25 are especially preferred nonionic surfactants that can be used in the powdered automatic dishwasher detergent compositions of the instant invention.
Other useful surfactants are Neodol 25-7 and Neodol 23-6.5, which products are made by Shell Chemical Company, Inc.
The former is a condensation product of a mixture of higher fatty alcohols averaging about 12 to 13 carbon atoms and the number of ethylene oxide groups present averages 6.5. The higher alcohols are primary alkanols. Other examples of such detergents include Tergitol 15-S-7 and Tergitol 15-S-9 (registered trademarks), both of which are linear secondary alcohol ethoxylates made by Union Carbide Corp. The former is mixed ethoxylation product of 11 to 15 carbon atoms linear 20~8~
secondary alkanol with seven moles of ethylene oxide and the latter is a similar product but with nine moles of ethylene oxide being reacted.
Also useful in the present compositions as a component of ~he nonionic detergent are higher molecular weight nonionics, such as Neodol 45-11, which are similar ethylene oxide condensation products of higher fatty alcohols, with the higher fatty alcohol being of 14 to 15 carbon atoms and the number of ethylene oxide groups per mole being about 11. Such products are also made by Shell Chemical Company.
In the preferred poly-lower alkoxylated higher alkanols, to obtain the best balance of hydrophilic and lipophilic moieties the number of lower alkoxies will usually be from 40 to 100~ of the number of carbon atoms in the higher alcohol, preferably 40 to 60~ thereof and the nonionic detergent will preferably contain at least 50~ of such preferred poly-lower alkoxy higher alkanol.
The alkylpolysaccharides are surfactants which are also u~eful alone or in conjunction with the aforementioned surfactants and have those having a hydrophobic group containing from 8 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably from 10 to 16 carbon atoms, most preferably from 12 to 14 carbon atoms, and polysaccharide hydrophilic group containing from 1.5 to about 10, preferably from about 1.5 to 4, and most preferably from 1.6 to 2.7 saccharide units (e.g., galactoside, glucoside, fructoside, glucosyl, fructosyl, and/or galactosyl units). ~ixtures of saccharide moieties may be used in the alkyl polysaccharide surfactants. The number x indicates the 2 0 ~
number of saccharide units in a particular alkylpolysaccharide surfactant. For a particular alkylpolysaccharide molecule x can only assume integral values. In any physical sample can be characterized by the average value o~ x and this average value can assume non-integral values. In this specification ; the values of x are to be understood to be average values.
The hydrophobic group (R) can be attached at the 2-, 3-, or 4-positions rather than at the l-position, (thus giving e.g. a glucosyl or galactosyl as opposed to a glucoside or galactoside). However, attachment through the l-position, i.e., glucosides, galactosides, fructosides, etc., is preferred. In the preferred product the additional saccharide units are predominately attached to the previous saccharide unit's 2-position. Attachment through the 3-, 4-, and 6-positions can also occur. Optionally and less desirably there can be a polyalkoxide chain joining the hydrophobic moiety (R) and the polysaccharide chain. the preferred alkoxide moiety i9 ethoxide.
Typical hydrophobic groups include alkyl groups, either saturated or unsaturated, branched or unbranched containing from about 8 to about 20, preferably from 10 to 16 carbon atoms. Preferably, the alkyl group is a straight chain saturated alkyl group. The alkyl group can contain up to 3 hydroxy groups and/or the polyalkoxide chain can contain up to 30, preferably less than 10, most preferably 0, alkoxide moieties.
Suitable alkyl polysaccharides are decyl, dodecyl, tetradecyl, pentadecyl, hexadecyl, and octadecyl, di-, tri-, 20~85~
tetra-, penta-, and hexaglucosides, galactosides, lactosides, fructosides, fructosyls, lactosyls, glucosyls and/or galactosyls and mixtures thereof.
The alkyl monosaccharides are relatively less soluble in water than the higher alkylpolysaccharides. When used in admixture with alkylpolysaccharides, the alkyl monosaccharides are solubilized to some extent. The use of alkyl monosaccharides in admixture with alkylpolysaccharides is a preferred mode of carrying out the invention. Suitable mixtures include coconut alkyl, di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentaglucosides and tallow alkyl tetra-, penta-, and hexaglucosides.
The preferred alkyl polysaccharides are alkyl polyglucosides having the formula:
R2O(CnH2nO)r(Z)~
wherein Z is derived from glucose, R i~ a hydrophobic group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkylphenyl, hydroxyalkylphenyl, and mixtures thereof in which said alkyl groups contain from 10 to 18, preferably from 12 to 14 carbon atoms; n is 2 or 3 preferably 2, r is from 0 to about 10, preferable 0; and x is from 1.5 to 8, preferably from 1.5 to ~, most preferably from 1.6 to 2.7. To prepare these compounds a long chain alcohol (R2OH) can be reacted with glucose, in the presence of an acid catalyst to form the desired glucoside. Alternatively the alkylpolyglucosides can be prepared by a two step procedure in which a short chain alcohol (R~OH) an be reacted with glucose, in the presence of an acid catalyst to form the desired glucoside. Alternatively 2~8~4 the alkylpolyglucosides can be prepared by a two step procedure in which a short chain alcohol (C~6) is reacted with glucose or a polyglucoside (x=2 to 4) to yield a short chain alkyl glucoside (x=1 to 4) which can in turn be reacted with a ~onger chain alcohol (R2OH) to displace the short chain alcohol and obtain the desired alkylpolyglucoside. If this two step procedure is used, the shcrt chain alkylglucoside content of the final alkylpolyglucoside material should be less ~han 50~, preferably less than 10~, more preferably less than 5~, most preferably 0% of the alkylpolyglucoside.
The amount of unreacted alcohol (the free fatty alcohol content) in the desired alkylpolysaccharide surfactant is preferably less than about 2~, more preferably less than 0.5%
by weight of the total of the alkylpolysaccharide. For some uses it is desirable to have the alkyl monosaccharide content less than 10~.
The used herein, "alkyl polysaccharide surfactant" i9 intended to represent both the preferred glucose and galactose derived surfactants and the less preferred alkyl polysaccharide surfactants. Throughout this specification, "alkyl polyglucoside" is used to include alkyl- polyglycosides because the stereo chemistry of the saccharide moiety is changed during the preparation reaction.
An especially preferred APG glycoside surfactant is APG
625 glycoside manufactured by the Henkel Corporation of Ambler, PA. APG 625 i9 a nonionic alkyl polyglycoside characterized by the formula:
CnH2n+lO(C6H~O5)~H
2~3~
wherein n=10(2~); n=12(65%); n=14(21-28~); n=16(4-8~) and - n=18(0.5~) and x(degree of polymerization) = 1.6. APG 625 has: a pH o~ 6-8(10~ of APG 625 in distilled water); a specific gravity at 25C of 1.1 grams/ml; a density at 25C of ~.1 kgs/gallons; a calculated HLB of 12.1 and a Brookfield viscosity at 35C, 21 spindle, 5-10 RPM of 3,000 to 7,000 cps.
Mixtures of two or more of the liquid nonionic surfactants can be used and in some cases advantages can be obtained by the use of such mixtures.
The liquid nonaqueous nonionic surfactant is absorbed on a builder system which comprises a mixture of phosphate-free particles which is a builder salt and a low molecular weight polyacrylate type polymer such as a polyacrylate organic and/or inorganic detergent builders. A preferred solid builder 15 salt is an alkali carbonate such as sodium carbonate or an alkali metal citrate such as sodium citrate or a mixture of sodium carbonate and sodium citrate. When a mixture of sodium carbonate and sodium citrate is used, a weight ratio of sodium citrate to sodium carbonate is 9:1 to 1:9, more preferably 3:1 20 to 1:3.
Other builder salts which can be mixed with the sodium carbonate and/or sodium citrate are gluconates phosphonates and nitriloacetic acid salts. In conjunction with the builder salts are optionally used low molecular weight polyacrylates 25 having a molecular weight of 1,000 to 100,000, more preferably 2,000 to 80,000. A preferred low molecular weight polyacrylate is Sokalan~CP45 manufactured by BASF and having a molecular weight of 70,000. Another preferred low molecular 20S~
;
weight polyacrylate is Acrysol~nLMW45ND manufactured by Rohrn and Haas and having a molecular welght of 4,500. Norasol~WL2 comprises 26~ BMW45ND sprayed on 74% soda ash.
Sokalan~CP45 is a copolymer of an acrylic acid and an acid anhydride. Such a material should have a water absorption at 38C and 78 percent relative humidity of less than 40 percent and preferably less than 30 percent. The builder is commercially available under the tradename of Sokalan~CP45.
This is a partially neutralized copolymer of metacrylic acid and maleic anhydride sodium salt. Sokalan~CP45 is classified as a suspending and anti-deposition agent. This suspending agent has a low hygroscopicity. Another builder salt is Sokalan~CP5 having a molecular weight of 70lO00. An objective is to u~e suspending and anti-redeposition agents that have a low hygroscopicity. Copolymerized polyacids have this property, and particularly when partially neutralized.
Acusol~640ND provicled by Rohm Haas is another useful suspending and anti-redepositing agent.
Another cla~s of builders useful herein are the aluminosilicates, both oE the crystalline and arnorphous type.
Various crystalline zeolites (i.e. alumino-silicates) are described in British Patent No. 1,504,168l U.S. Patent No.
4l409l136 and Canadian Patent Nos. 1l072l835 and 1l087l477.
An example of amorphous zeolites useful herein can be found in Belgium Patent No. 835,351. The zeolites generally have the formula (M20) ~ (Al203) y (si2) ~ Wl~20 2~8~
wherein x is 1, y is from 0.8 to 1.2 and preferably 1, z is from 1.5 to ~.5 or higher and preferably 2 to 3 and w is from 0 to 9, preferably 2.5 to 6 and M is preferably sodium. A
typical zeolite is type A or similar structure, with type 4A
particularly preferred. The preferred aluminosilicates have calcium ion exchange capacities of about 200 milliequivalents per gram or greater, e.g. 400 meq/g.
The alkali metal silicates are useful anti-corrosion agents which function to make the composition anti-corrosive to eating utensils and to automatic dishwashing machine parts.
Sodium silicates of Na20/SiO2 ratios of from 1:1 to 1:3.4, more preferably 1:1 to 1:2.8. Potassium silicates of the same ratios can also be used. The preferred silicates are sodium disilicate (anhydrous), sodium disilicate (hydrated) and sodium metasilicate and mixtures thereof, wherein the preferred silicate is hydrated disilicate.
Essentially, any compatible anti-foaming agent can be used. Preferred anti-foaming agents are silicone anti-foaming agents. These are alkylated polysiloxanes and include polydimethyl siloxanes, polydiethyl siloxanes, polydibutyl siloxanes, phenyl methyl siloxanes, dimethyl silinated silica, trimethysilanated silica and triethylsilanated silica. A
suitable anti-foaming agent is Silicone TP-201 from Union Carbide. Other suitable anti-foaming agents are Silicone DB700 used at 0.2 to 1.0 percent by weight, sodium stearate used at a concentration level of 0.5 to 1.0 weight percent, and LPKN 158 (phosphoric ester) sold by Hoechst used at a concentration level of 0 to 1.5 weight percent, more 2~8~
preferably 0.1 ~o 1.0 weight percen~. The perfumes that can be used include lemon perfume and other natural scents.
Essentially, any opacifier that is compatible with the remaining components of the detergent formulation can be used.
A useful and preferred opacifier is titanium dioxide at a concentration level of 0 to 1.0 weight percent.
A key aspect is to keep the free water (non-chemically bonded water) in the detergent composition at a minimum.
Absorbed and adsorbed water are two types of free water, and comprise the usual free water found in a detergent composition. Free water will have the affect of deactivating the enzymes.
The detergent composition of the present invention includes a peroxygen bleaching agent at a concentration level of about 0 to about 20 weight percent, more preferably 0.5 to 17 weight percent and most preferably at 1.0 to 14 weight percent. The oxygen bleaching agents that can be used are alkali metal perborate, percarbonate, perphthalic acid, perphosphates, and potassium monopersulfate. A preferred compound is sodium perborate monohydrate. The peroxygen bleaching compound is preferably used in admixture with an activator at a concentration level of 1-5 wt. percent.
Suitable activator~ are those disclosed in U.S. Patent No.
4,264,466 or in column 1 of U.S. Patent No. 4,430,244.
Polyacetylated compounds are preferred activators. Suitable preferred activators are tetraacetyl ethylene diamine ("TAED"), pentaacetyl glucose and ethylidenebenzoate acetate.
2Q6~854 The activator usually i~teracts with the peroxygen compound to form a peroxyacid bleaching agent in the wash water.
The detergent formulation also contains a mixture of a proteolytic enzyme and an amylotytic enzyme and, optionally, a lipolytic enzyme that serve to attack and remove organic residues on glasses, plates, pots, pans and eating utensils.
Proteolytic enzymes attack protein residues, lipolytic enzymes fat residues and amylolytic enzymes starches. Proteolytic enzymes include the protease enzymes subtilism, bromelin, papain, trypsin and pepsin. Amylolytic enzymes include amylase enzymes. Lipolytic enzymes include the lipase enzymes. The preferred amylase enzyme is available under the name Maxamyl, derived from Bacillus licheniformis and is available from Gist-brocades of the Netherlands available in the form of a prill having an activity of about 6,000 TAU/g.
One of the preferred protease enzyme is available under the name Maxacal derived from Bacillus alcalophilus, and is supplied by Gist-brocades, of the Netherlands in a prill form (activity of about 329KADU/g.). Preferred enzyme activates per wash are Maxacal-300-700 KADU per wash and Maxamyl-2,000 to 4,000 TAU per wash.
Another preferred protease enzyme is available under the name Maxatase derived from a novel Bacillus strain designated "PB92" wherein a culture of the Bacillus i3 deposited with the ~aboratory for Microbiology of the Technical University of Del~t and has a number OR-60, and is supplied by from Gist-Brocades, of the Netherlands in a prill 2~8~
form (activity o~ about 40,000 DU/g.). Preferred enzyme activates per wash are Maxatase 250-600 KDU per wash.
The alkali silicate, which is a corrosion inhibitor, wherein sodium disilicate is preferred, will be present in an amount of about 0 to 30 percent by weight, more preferably about 3 to about 30 percent by weight and most preferably about 4 to about 28 percent by weight.
` The opacifier will be present in an amount of about 0 to about 1.0 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.1 to about 7 percent by weight and most preferably about 0.4 percent by weight.
The enzymes will be present in an arnount in a prill form as supplied by Gist-Brocades at a concentration of about 0.8 to 22.0 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.9 to 20.0 percent by weight, and most preferably about 1.0 to about 18.0 percent by weight. The protease enzyme prills in the automatic dishwashing composition will comprise about 0.5 to about 15.00 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.7 to about 13.0 weight percent and most preferably about 0.8 to about 11.0 percent by weight. The amylase enzyme prills will comprise about 0.3 to about 8.0 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.4 percent to about 7.0 weight percent and most preferably about 0.5 to about 6.0 weight percent. The lipase enzyme will comprise about 0.00 to about 8.0 percent by weight of the detergent composition. A typical lipase enzyme is Lipolase 100 T from Novo Corporation. The lipase enzymes are especially beneficial in reducing srease residues and related filming problems on glasses and dishware. Another 2~8~
useful lipase enzyme i9 Amano PS lipase provided by Amano International Enzyme Co., Inc.
Other components such as perfumes will comprise about 0.1 to about 5.0 percent by weight of the detergent composition.
One method o~ producing the powder detergent formulation having a bulk density of about 0.8 is to spray dry by any conventional means the nonionic surfactant and defoamer onto the perborate bleach compound and the builder salt. This spray dry materials can be used immediately, but it is preferred to age it for 24 hours. The spray dried materials are dry blended in any suitable conventional blender such as a tumble blender at about room temperature with the other ingredients of the composition until a homogenous blend is obtained.
The weight ratio of the proteolytic enzyme to the amylolytic enzyme in prill form the powdered automatic dishwasher detergent compositions is 6:1 to 1:1, and more preferably 4.5:1 to 1.1:1.
The detergent composition can have a fairly wi.de ranging composition. The surfactant can comprise 0 to 15 percent by weight of the composition, more preferably 0.1 to 15 percent by weight, and most preferably about 1 to 12 percent by weight. The anti-foaming agent will be present in an amount of about 0 to about 1.5 percent by weight, more preferably about 0.1 to about 1.2 percent by weight and most preferably about 0.1 to about 1 percent by weight. The builder system, which is preferably sodium carbonate and/or sodium citrate, is present in an amount of 2 to 40 percent by weight, more 206~8~4 preferably 4 to 40 percent by weight and most preferably 5 to 30 percent by weight. The builder system also preferably contains the low molecular weight polyacrylate type polymer at a concentration level of about 0 to 20 weight percent, more preferably 1.0 to 17 weight percent and most preferably a to 17 weight percent. The composition also includes the peroxygen bleaching agent at a concentration of about 0 to 20 wt. percent and the activator at a concentration of about 1 to 5 wt. percent.
The alkali silicate, which is a corrosion inhibitor, wherein sodium disilicate is preferred, will be present in an amount of 0 to 40 percent by weight, more preferably 3 to 40 percent by weight and most preferably 4 to 40 percent by weight.
The opacifier will be present in an amount of 0 to 1.0 percent by weight, more preferably 0.1 to 0.7 percent by weight and most preferably about 0.4 percent by weight.
The enzymes will be present in an amount in a prill form as supplied by Gist-Brocades at a concentration of 0.8 to 22.0 percent by weight, more preferably 0.9 to 20.0 percent by weight, and most preferably 1.0 to 18.0 percent by weight.
The protease enzyme prills in the automatic dishwashing composition will comprise 0.5 to 15.00 percent by weight, more preferably 0.7 to 13.0 weight percent and most preferably 0.8 to 11.0 percent by weight. The amylase enzyme prills will comprise 0.3 to 8.0 percent by weight, more preferably 0.4 percent to 7.0 weight percent and most preferably 0.5 to 6.0 welght percent. The lipase enzyme prills will comprise 0.00 2~98.5~
to ~.0 percent by weight of the detergent composition. A
;; typical lipase enzy~e is Lipolase 100T from Novo Corporation.
The lipase enzymes are especially beneficial in reducing grease residues and related filming problems on glasses and dishware. Another useful lipase en~yme is Amano PS lipase provided by Amano International Enzyme Co., Inc.
Other components such as perfumes will comprise 0.1 to 5.0 percent by weight of the detergent composition.
One method of producing the powder detergent formulation having a bulk density of 0.8 is to spray dry by any conventional means the nonionic surfactant and defoamer onto the perborate bleach compound and the builder salt. This spray dry materials can be used immediately, but it is preferred to age it for 24 hours. The spray dried materials are dry blended in any suitable conventional blender such as a tumble blender at about room temperature with the other ingredients of the composition until a homogenous blend is obtained.
The instant compositions also can be produced as low density powders according to the procedure as set forth in U.S. Patent 4,931,203, wherein these powders have a bulk density less than the bulk density of the bulk density of the standard powders which have a bulk density of about 0.8 kg/liter.
The concentrated powdered nonionic automatic dishwashing detergent compositions of the present invention disperses readily in the water in the dishwashing machine. The presently used home dishwashing machines have a measured 2~3~
capacity for 80 cc or 90 grams of detergent. In normal use, for example, for a full load of dirty dishes 60 grams of powdered detergent are normally used.
In accordance with the present invention only about 19 cc or about 15 grams of the concentrated powdered detergent composition is needed. The normal operation of an automatic dlshwashing machine can involve the following steps or cycles:
washing, rinse cycles with cold water and rin~e cycles with hot water. The entire wash and rinse cycles require about 60 minutes. The temperature of the wash water is 40C to 65C
and the temperature of the rinse water is 55C to 65C. The wash and rinse cycle~ use 4 to 7.5 liters of water for the wash cycle and 4 to 7.5 liters of water for the hot rinse cycle.
The highly concentrated powdered automatic dishwashing detergent compositions exhibit excellent cleaning properties and because of the high concentration of the detergent in the composition, the detergent is not totally consumed during the wash cycle or totally eliminated during the rinse cycle such that there is a sufficient amount of detergent remaining during the rinse cycle to substantially improve the rinsing.
The washed and dried dishes are free of undesirable traces, deposits or film due to the use of hot water in the rinse cycle.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Example~1 2 ~ 6 ~
The concentrated powdered nonionic ~urfactant detergent composition was formulated from the following ingredients in the amounts specified according to the previously defined and described dry blending process.
20~8~
H _ ~ ~ ~ -- = 'I
~ ~a 1~ ~h~ ~
I ~ I al ~ l l ~D l l o --o _ ~ ~ _~ l l , _~ __ __~
a _ ~ 9 ~ , ~ a a 2 a ~c a 9 ~ a q ~ a a ~-In o u~ o u, 2~8~
.. _ -- Ln Ln I
Ln o . . o I
Ln l ~ ~ ~D ~ O O ~ l l l o o 1 n Ln o I
Ln l ~ ~ ~I l o o ~ l l I
._ I
Ln Ln I
o o ~ . o I
Ln l ~ ~1 ~ ~ o o ~1 l l I
O N _ Ln Ln O
~1 ~ l l o ~ ~1 a~ l I ~`I
_..... ... ..... .... __ _ ~ I
o d~ Ln ~n o I
o ~ ,~ l l I
o ~r _ n Ln o _ ~
l l ,1 ~ l l o ~ ,~ l l I
. _ ---I
oi l o ~r Ln Ln o ' l o - rl, ' .__ l o ~, o l ~
l l ~ ~ l l o ~ ~ l l I
- -- ~ - - -o Ln Ln o o ~ ,i l l I
~_ _ __ __~ ~ _ ___ ~1 O ~ rd -I
X O O\o ~ ~ ~ al td Cq ~ I
L) ~) L) O h ~ L) O ~ ~I h a) 01 O :~ O O o t:n ~ ';S! ~ v h O h h ~ 11~ ~;
~ k O Q, O ~ ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ a O o O Ln ~ O
C~ X C~ X ~ t~l a) 1~ - h ~ ~1 rl o ~ ~ ~1 ~h ~ ::~ O E~
P3 ~ (n ~ rd ~ ~ O Ln r~ O O -rJ a) ~¢ rl ~ :~4 O a) o ~ r~ O
p~ ~ Ln ~ cn ~ 3 m v~ u~ ~ ~ E~ cn ~ u~ ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_ --......... ~=_ _ .__ _ _ ._ = _ Ln o Ln o Ln ~ ~ (~1 r`'3 2~g54 Example II
Formulas (~-I) of Example 1 were tested in a European style Philips 664 Dishwasher working at 55C with a charge of 15.0 grams per wash of the Formulas (A-I) and 3 ml./per wash of commercial Galaxy rinse aid sold by Colgate-Palmolive Co.
; The load of items placed in the dishwasher consisted of 6 plates soiled with 3.0 grams of a mixture of 12.0 grams of porridge oats with 188 grams of water and 3 plates soiled with 0.4 grams of calcium chloride denaturated egg yolk and three plates soiled with 5 grams of a microwave oven baked mixture of 177 grams of egg yolk with 50 grams of margarine and 3 CUp9 soiled with tea after overglaze removal wherein all the plates and cups were dried prior to being placed in the dishwasher.
The pH of the washing bath and the formulation were measured.
The hardness of the rin~e water was 38 (C~C03) ppm. Each formulation was evaluated for spotting and filming. The results were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 with the higher number being the better result.
2~8~
TABLE II
. _ _. - ' TEST CLEANING PERFORMANCE EVA~UATIONS (AT 55C) ~ ~_ __ __ _ __~ __ r---r--SOIL A B C D E ¦ F G H I
REMOVAL
_ _ .._ ~ .. _ __ . ..-= . ---I OATMEAL 7 7.5 8.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 _ MICROEGGS 5 7.5 9 5 7.5 9 8.8 8.2 9.0 CALCIUM 2 9 9.5 2 9.3 9 9.7 9.7 10 l 11 l FILMING 7.6 7.5 7.3 7.6 7.5 SPOTTING 6.0 7.5 6.3 8.2 7.5 _ __ GLASS 8.3 9.2 8.7 DAYLIGHT
. ._ .
BUILD-UP
STRAINER
_ _ _ i GREASY
BUILD-UP
_ 11 SPOTTING 8.5 7.2 8.2 ll l FILMING 7.7 7.5 7.3 . .__ 11 GLASS 8.5 8.5 9.8 DAYLIGHT
. . _ ll GREASY 9.0 9.0 9.0 BUILD-UP
STRAINER
=
The above described examples of illustrative compositions of the invention were evaluated for performance according to the following laboratory test methods.
All cleaning performance were carried out under European washing conditions in automatic dishwashers with a built-in heater and water softening ion-exchange resin, at a temperature range of about 50C to about 65C with 3ml of a rinse aid (Galaxy Rinse Aid) used in the later stages of the cycle (automatically dispersed by a built-in closing device 2~6~
during the last rinse cycle). Fifteen ~rams of the illustrative compositions were used as a simple dose per wash.
In the so-called soil cleaning test, 3 cups and 2 sets of plates were identically soiled with food (tea stain, oatmeal soil, hardened egg soil and microwave oven-cooked egg soil).
The cup staining was obtained by using 3 cups previously filled with a 5~ fluorhydric acid solution during 15 minutes in order to remove the protection. The cups were washed and dried just before staining. The tea stain was prepared by adding 90 ml boiling water to one 2g dose of LIPTON yellow label tea and leaving the system at test for 20 minutes.
After emptying, the cups were then allowed to dry for 12 hours.
Oatmeal soil was prepared by boiling 24 grams of Quaker oats in 400 ml of tap water for ten minutes and then homogenized with a high shearing device (Ultrawax). Three grams of this mixture was spread as thin film onto 7.5 inch china plates. The plates were aged for 2 hours at 80C, and then stored overnight at room temperature. Hardened egg 90il was prepared by mixing egg yolk with an equal amount of 2.5N
calcium chloride solution. 0.4 grams of this mixture was applied as a thin crosswise film to the usable surface of 7.5 inch china plates. Microwave-egg 90il was prepared by mixing hot egg yolk and cooked margarine with a homogenizer (Ultraturax device). Five grams of this mixture were spread as thin film onto 7.5 inch china plates, and the soiled plates were baked afterwards for one minute in a microwave oven. The two type of egg soils were stored overnight at room ~ ~ ~7~8 temperature. Six plates of oatmeal, 3 cups soiled with tea, and three plates of each egg were used per wash, together with six clean glasses. The twelve soiled plates, the three soiled cups, and the six glasses were always placed in the same positions in the dishwasher at each run. In each test four different compositions were assessed using a series of four dishwashers.
A11 washed plates were scored each run by determining the percent area cleaned (percentage of soil removal) with the aid of a reference scale of gradually cleaned plates. Average percentages of soil removal for each type of soil after four runs were converted in a 0 to lQ scale, 0 being for no soil removal and 10 for perfect cleaning. Glasses were rated in a viewing box for filming and spotting and under natural lighting for evaluation. They were rated according to a scale ranging from 0 (bad performance) to 10 (perfectly clean glasses) with the aid of reference glasses.
In the multisoil cleaning test different dishware/soil combinations were used. The dishwasher load included each run six plates of oatmeal, three cup~ soiled with tea, one dish of white sauce, one dish of rice, four glasses soiled with tomato juice, four glasses soiled with cocoa, and four soiled with milk. Pieces of cutlery (forks, knives and spoons, six each) were also included and soiled with porridge soil, rice and rice with cheese soils.
Same Latin Square procedure was used as for soil cleaning test. Percentages of soil removal on all the dishware and glasses were converted in 0 to 10 scale, 0 being for no soil 20~8~4 removal and 10 for perfect cleaning. Glasses were also scored for ~ilming, spotting redeposition of soils and global evaluation according to a 0 (bad performance) to 10 (very good performance) scale with the aid of reference glasses. A
different scale was used to distinguish the data from soil removal performance. Results tabulated were average of four runs.
In the greasy residue build-up test, the dishwasher load included six clean plates in the lower basket and six clean glasses in the upper basket. The soil load was consisting of 100 grams of a greasy soil mixture prepared by mixing mustard (42 weight ~) white vinegar (33 wt. %), corn oil (15 wt. ~), and lard (10 wt. ~) altogether.
In each test, four different compositions were assessed according to a Rubin Square procedure by using a series of four dishwashers during at the same time. 50 grams of greasy soil mixture were poured each run in the wash bath together with fifteen grams of the detergent composition used as a single dose per wash. After each run, the upper basket containing the six glasses, the cutlery basket with the plastic tiles as well as the dishwasher filter elements were moved from one dishwasher to the following one, before conducting the next run. Such a procedure was used to assess the performance of compositions on glasses and on plastic dishware surfaces under conditions of repeated washer in the presence of said greasy soil mixture.
After each cycle, glasses were scored in a viewing box for filming and spotting and under natural lighting for 966d 2 ~ 4 aspect according to the same O (bad performance) to 10 (perfectly clean glasses) scale as for the so-called soil cleaning test with the aid of reference glasses.
The same procedure was repeated three times using the same set of glasses so as to calculate average performance results for each composition after 4 cycles. The dishwashers filter parts were also inspected after each cycle to evidence greasy deposit build up differences between compositions.
Example 3 The concentrated powdered nonionic surfactant detergent composition was formulated from the following ingredients in the amounts specified according to the pre~iously defined and described dry blending process.
2 ~1 ~ e~ 8 ~i ~
TABLE III
~ . ~
: ¦RAW MATERIALS FORMULA CO~POSITIONS (IN
I PARTSJ
I A IB C D E F G
/ , Anhydrous 23 23 23 23 ¦Sodium IMetasilicate I
Sodium 23 23 23 Disilicate (at 122~ water) _ _ ....
Nonionic 8.0 16.0 coated Maxcal at 330 KADU/g Nonionic 6.9 6.9 11 coated Maxamyl at 5800 TAU/g cNoatediC 10.9 10.9 7 Maxatase at 440 KDU/g _ ....... _ _ PEG coated Maxacal at 350 KADU/g _ ._ .
206~8~
PEG coated .
Maxamyl at 5900 TAU/g .. _ .. _ PEG coated Maxapem CX30 ~at 600 KADU/g at 60~ water from BASE' SODA ASH 34.2 34.2 34.2 34.2 34.2 29.2 29 ._ .. __ Sodium Citrate Dihydrated TAED
SILICONE DB100 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 SYNPERONIC 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 PERBRATE
MONOHYDRATED
I
LIPOLASE 100T _ = _ = ~ =
205~5~
.
RAW MATERIALS FORMULA COMPOSITIONS (IN
PARTS) _ ~ r--~ ~--_~ __ H I J K L M N
:~ __ _ .
Anhydrous Sodium ¦Metasilicate ¦Sodium 23 23 23 23 23 26.1 25.1 ¦
¦Disilicate (at l22% water) I I
¦Nonionic coated ¦Maxcal at 330 KADU/g Nonionic coated 5 5 3 3 3 5 5 Maxamyl at 5 a o o TAU/g Nonionic coated 13 13 15 15 15 13 13 Maxatase at 440 KDU/g _ PEG coated Maxcal at 350 KADU/g PEG coated TAU/g .. _ _ __ ._ PEG coated Maxapen CX 30 at 600 KADU/g _ _ ~
at 60~ water from BASF
_ _ __ l SODA ASH 29 26 20.2 252.7 31 26 26 _ ._ .__ SODIUM CITRATE
DIHYDRATED
__ _ ... ... __ SILICONE DB100 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 SYNPERONIC 4.5 4.5 2.5 7.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 MONOHYDRATED
_ CAUSTIC SODA 5 5 5 5 5 1 9 1.9 . _ 2Q~9~
¦¦ LIPOLASE 100T
. ( NOVO ) __ . . _ .
' 2~3~
Example IV
Formulas (A-N) of Example II1 were tested in a European style Philips 664 Dishwasher working at 55C with a charge of 15.0 grams per wash of the Formulas (A-N) and 3 ml./per wash of commercial Galaxy rinse aid sold by Colgate-Palmolive Co.
The load of items placed in the dishwasher consisted of 6 plates soiled with 3.0 grams of a mixture of 12.0 grams of porridge oats with 188 grams of water and 3 plates soiled with 0.4 grams of calcium chloride denaturated egg yolk and three plates soiled with 5 grams of a microwave oven baked mixture of 177 grams of egg yolk with 50 grams of margarine and 3 cups soiled with tea after overglaze removal wherein all the plates and cups were dried prior to being placed in the dishwasher.
The pH of the washing bath and the formulation were measured.
The hardness of the rinse water was 38 (C2C03) ppm. Each formulation was evaluated for spotting and filming. The results were evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 with the higher number being the better result.
2~$~54 ~ TABBE IV
I
~EST CLEANING PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS (AT 55~) 1 r~
SOIL REMOVAL A ¦B C D E ¦F G
_ _ _ _= _ :1 : OATMEAL 7 7.5 8.5 10 10 10 10 MICROEGGS 5 7.5 9 5 7.0 7.4 7.2 CALCIUM EGGS 2 9 9.5 2 8.8 9.1 fl.9 _ FILMING 7.5 7.6 7.8 GLASS
DAYLIGHT
I
TEA STAIN
_ . __ .. __ 11 GREASY
BUILD-UP ON
STRAINER
. .. -- _ ._ 'I
GREASY
BUILD-UP
SPOTTING
FILMING _ _ _ DAYLIGHT
GREASY
BUILD-UP ON
STRAINER
.
2 ~ 5 ~
TABLE IV (Cont.) __ ,___ ¦TEST CLEANING PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS (AT
¦SOIL REMOVAL H II I J IK IL M IN
~ _= . _ ,. _ ~OATMEAL 10 10 10 101 10 10 10 MICROEGGS 7.5 7 7.8 7.8 1 7.8 6.2 6.8 CALCIUM EGGS 10 10 10 10 lo 10 9.8 .
FILMING 7.8 7.7 6.7 7.8 1 6.5 7.4 8.2 SPOTTING 7.7 7.8 6.3 8.2 7.3 7.8 9.0 GLASS DAYLIGHT - 8.8 9.7 ¦
ON STRAINER
_ . _ ._ - =
GREASY BUILD-UP
SPOTTING I I 7.1 8.3 FILMING_ ~ 7.4 1 7.7 GLASS DAYLIGHT 8.1 9.3 i GREASY BUILD-UP 8.0 1.3 ON STRAINER
_ . _ ._ _. _ The above described examples of illustrative compositions of the invention were evaluated for performance according to the following laboratory test methods.
All cleaning performance were carried out under European washing conditions in automatic dishwashers with a built-in heater and water softening ion-exchange resin, at a temperature range of about 50C to about 65C with 3ml of a rinse aid (Galaxy Rinse Aid) used in the later stages of the cycle (automatically dispersed by a built-in closing device during the last rinse cycle). Fifteen grams of the illustrative compositions were used as a simple dose per wash.
20~854 In the so-called soil cleaning test, 3 cups and 2 sets of plates were identically soiled with food (tea stain, oatmeal soil, hardened egg soil and microwave oven-cooked egg soil).
The cup staining was obtained by using 3 cups previously filled with a 5~ fluorhydric acid solution during 15 minutes in order to remove the protection. The cups were washed and dried just before staining. The tea stain was prepared by adding 90 ml boiling water to one 2g dose of LIPTON yellow label tea and leaving the system at test for 20 minutes.
After emptying, the cups were then allowed to dry for 12 hours.
Oatmeal soil was prepared by boiling 24 grams of Quaker oats in 400 ml of tap water for ten minutes and then homogenized with a high shearing device (Ultrawax). Three grams of this mixture was spread as thin film onto 7.5 inch china plates. The plates were aged for 2 hours at 80C, and then stored overnight at room temperature. Hardened egg soil was prepared by mixing egg yolk with an equal amount of 2.5N
calcium chloride solution. 0.4 grams of this mixture was applied as a thin crosswise film to the usable surface of 7.5 inch china plates. Microwave-egg 90il was prepared by mixing hot egg yolk and cooked margarine with a homogenizer (Ultraturax device). Five grams of this mixture were spread as thin film onto 7.5 inch china plates, and the soiled plates were baked afterwards for one minute in a microwave oven. The two type of egg soils were stored overnight at room temperature. Six plates of oatmeal, 3 cups soiled with tea, and three plates of each egg were used per wash, together with 20~8~
six clean glasses. The twelve soiled plates, the three soiled cups, and the six glasses were always placed in the same positions in the dishwasher at each run. In each test four different compositions were assessed using a series of four ~ishwashers.
All washed plates were scored each run by determining the percent area cleaned (percentage of soil removal) with the aid of a reference scale of gradually cleaned plates. Average percentages of soil removal for each type of soil after four runs were converted in a 0 to 10 scale, 0 heing for no soil removal and 10 for perfect cleaning. Glasses were rated in a viewing box for filming and spotting and under natural lighting for evaluation. They were rated according ~o a scale ranging from 0 (bad performance) to 10 (perfectly clean glasses) with the aid of reference glasses.
In the multisoil cleaning test different dishware/soil combinations were used. The dishwasher load included each run six plates of oatmeal, three cups soiled with tea, one dish of white sauce, one dish of rice, four glasses soiled with tomato juice, four glasses soiled with cocoa, and four soiled with milk. Pieces of cutlery (forks, knives and spoons, 9iX each) were also included and soiled with porridge soil, rice and rice with cheese soils.
Same Latin Square procedure was used as for soil cleaning test. Percentages of soil removal on all the dishware and glasses were converted in 0 to 10 scale, 0 being for no soil removal and 10 for perfect cleaning. Glasses were also scored for filming, spotting redeposition of soils and global ~9~
evaluation according to a o (bad performance) to 10 (very good performance) scale with the aid of reference glasses. A
different scale was used to distinguish the data from soil removal performance. Results tabulated were average of four runs.
In the greasy residue build-up test, the dishwasher load included six clean plates in the lower basket and six clean glasses in the upper basket. The soil load was consisting or 100 grams of a greasy soil mixture prepared by mixing mustard (42 weight ~) white ~inegar (33 wt. ~), corn oil (15 wt. ~), and lard (10 wt. ~) altogether.
In each test, four different compositions were assessed according to a Rubin Square procedure by using a series of four dishwashers during at the same time. 50 grams of yreasy soil mixture were poured each run in the wash bath together with fifteen grams of the detergent composition used as a single dose per wash. After each run, the upper basket containing the six glasses, the cutlery basket with the plastic tiles as well as the dishwasher filter elements were moved from one dishwasher to the following one, before conducting the next run. Such a procedure was used to assess the performance of compositions on glasses and on plastic dishware surfaces under conditions of repeated washer in the presence of said greasy soil mixture.
After each cycle, glasses were scored in a viewing box for filming and spotting and under natural lighting for 966d aspect according to the same O (bad performance) to 10 20S~8~4 (perfectly clean glasses) scale as for the so-called soil cleaning test wlth the aid of reference glasses.
The same procedure was repeated three times using the same set of glasses so as to calculate average performance results for each composition after 4 cycles. The dishwashers filter parts were also inspected after each cycle to evidence greasy deposit build up differences between compositions.
Claims (13)
1. A powdered detergent containing a mixture of a protease enzyme and an amylase enzyme which comprises 3 to 40 percent by weight of an alkali metal silicate, wherein said dishwashing composition has a pH of less than 11.75.
2. The powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 1 wherein said dishwashing composition contains 0.5 to 13.0 percent by weight of said protease enzyme and 0.3 to 8.0 weight percent of said amylase enzyme.
3. The powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 2 wherein said dishwashing composition further contains a lipase enzyme.
4. The concentrated powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 1 wherein said dishwashing composition includes 2.0 to 15.0 percent by weight of said nonionic surfactant.
5. The powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 1 which comprises an effective amount of one or more adjuvants selected from the group consisting of anti-encrustation agents, oxygen bleaching agents, sequestering agents, anti-corrosion agents, anti-foam agents, optical brighteners, opacifiers and perfumes.
6. The powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 1 which includes 0 to 20.0 percent by weight of a copolymerized polyacrylic acid.
7. The concentrated powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 6 which contains an alkali metal perborate.
8. The concentrated powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 6 which contains an alkali metal perborate activator.
9. The concentrated powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 1 which contains a lipase enzyme.
10. The concentrated powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 1 wherein said dishwashing composition comprises in percent by weight:
low molecular weight polyacrylate polymer - 0 - 20.0%
alkali metal silicate - 0 - 40.0%
liquid nonionic surfactant - 0 - 15.0%
phosphate-free builder salt - 2.0 - 40.0%
anti-foaming agent - 0 - 1.5%
protease enzyme - 0.5 - 15.0%
amylase enzyme - 0.3 - 8.0%
low molecular weight polyacrylate polymer - 0 - 20.0%
alkali metal silicate - 0 - 40.0%
liquid nonionic surfactant - 0 - 15.0%
phosphate-free builder salt - 2.0 - 40.0%
anti-foaming agent - 0 - 1.5%
protease enzyme - 0.5 - 15.0%
amylase enzyme - 0.3 - 8.0%
11. The concentrated powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 1 which includes 0.1 to 1.2 weight percent of an anti-foaming agent.
12. The concentrated powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 1, wherein said protease enzyme is Maxacal protease enzyme and said amylase enzyme is Maxamyl Amylase enzyme, a weight ratio of said protease enzyme to said amylase enzyme being 2:1 to 1.1:1, wherein said detergent dishwashing composition has a pH of less than 10.5.
13. The concentrated powdered dishwashing composition according to claim 10, wherein said protease enzyme is Maxatase protease enzyme and said amylase enzyme is Maxamyl Amylase enzyme, a weight ratio of said protease enzyme to said amylase enzyme being 2:1 about 1.1:1, wherein said detergent dishwashing composition has a pH of less than 9.5.
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US70855791A | 1991-05-31 | 1991-05-31 | |
| US70855991A | 1991-05-31 | 1991-05-31 | |
| US7/708,559 | 1991-05-31 | ||
| US7/708,557 | 1991-05-31 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2069854A1 true CA2069854A1 (en) | 1992-12-01 |
Family
ID=27108115
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2069854 Abandoned CA2069854A1 (en) | 1991-05-31 | 1992-05-28 | Powdered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2069854A1 (en) |
| FI (1) | FI922489A (en) |
| GR (1) | GR920100242A (en) |
| NO (1) | NO922048L (en) |
| NZ (1) | NZ242826A (en) |
| PT (1) | PT100539A (en) |
-
1992
- 1992-05-20 NZ NZ24282692A patent/NZ242826A/en unknown
- 1992-05-25 NO NO92922048A patent/NO922048L/en unknown
- 1992-05-28 CA CA 2069854 patent/CA2069854A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1992-05-29 GR GR920100242A patent/GR920100242A/en unknown
- 1992-05-29 PT PT10053992A patent/PT100539A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1992-05-29 FI FI922489A patent/FI922489A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| NO922048L (en) | 1992-12-01 |
| FI922489A0 (en) | 1992-05-29 |
| NZ242826A (en) | 1995-04-27 |
| FI922489A (en) | 1992-12-01 |
| NO922048D0 (en) | 1992-05-25 |
| GR920100242A (en) | 1993-03-31 |
| PT100539A (en) | 1994-01-31 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5173207A (en) | Powered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| AU655274B2 (en) | Nonaqueous liquid, phosphate-free, improved automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| AU656375B2 (en) | Powdered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| US5423997A (en) | Spray dried powdered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| EP0518720A1 (en) | Nonaqueous liquid automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| US5169553A (en) | Nonaqueous liquid, phosphate-free, improved automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| US5527483A (en) | Nonaqueous gelled automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| US5510048A (en) | Nonaqueous liquid, phosphate-free, improved autoamatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| US5468411A (en) | Powdered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| AU654184B2 (en) | Improved phosphate-containing powder automatic dishwashing composition with enzymes | |
| US5527484A (en) | Phosphate containing powdered automatic dishwashing composition with enzymes | |
| AU667600B2 (en) | Nonaqueous gelled automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| AU654009B2 (en) | Phosphate-containing powder automatic dishwashing composition with enzymes | |
| US5545344A (en) | Nonaqueous liquid, improved automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| US5618465A (en) | Nonaqueous liquid automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| US5693602A (en) | Spray dried powered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| US5474699A (en) | Phosphate containing powered automatic dishwashing composition with enzymes | |
| CA2069854A1 (en) | Powdered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| IE921756A1 (en) | Powdered automatic dishwashing composition containing¹enzymes | |
| IE921750A1 (en) | Improved phosphate-containing powder automatic dishwashing¹composition with enzymes | |
| AU651686B2 (en) | Nonaqueous liquid automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes | |
| IE921753A1 (en) | Nonaqueous liquid, phosphate-free, improved automatic¹dishwashing composition containing enzymes |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Dead |