CA2058856C

CA2058856C - Drilling fluid

Info

Publication number: CA2058856C
Application number: CA 2058856
Authority: CA
Inventors: Gregory Phillip Elliott
Original assignee: BP PLC
Current assignee: BP PLC
Priority date: 1991-01-12
Filing date: 1992-01-07
Publication date: 2003-03-11
Anticipated expiration: 2012-01-07
Also published as: NO920121L; GB9100699D0; EP0495579A2; EP0495579B1; EP0495579A3; NO300332B1; ES2083674T3; NO920121D0; SG44682A1; CA2058856A1; DE69208482T2; DE69208482D1

Abstract

A water based drilling fluid comprises:
(a) an aqueous medium, (b) a polyalkylene glycol of general formula:

wherein R is H or CH3, R1 is H or an alkyl group containing 1 to 4 carbon atoms, and n is a number in the range 4 to 200, and (c) a potassium salt.
In the case of tetra- and higher molecular weight polyalkylene glycols, there is a synergistic clay-stablising effect between these compounds and the potassium salt.

Description

2~~~~':~~
7683(2) DRILLING FLUID
This invention relates to water-based drilling fluids which are suitable for use in shale and clay formations.
A drilling fluid is used in conjunction with the rotary system of drilling. The drilling fluid is pumped from the surface down the inside of the rotating drill string, discharged through ports in the bit and returned to the surface via the annular space between the drill string and the hole.
The drilling fluid serves to cool and lubricate the bit and drill string, bring drill cuttings to the surface, consolidate the side of, the drilled hole, prevent squeezing-in or caving of the formation, control subsurface pressures, suspend drill cuttings when the column is static and minimise damage to any potential pay zone that might be encountered.
Drilling fluids generally contain a carrier, a weighting aE;ent and chemical additives. They are commonly divided Into two categories, water based muds (WBM) and oil based muds (OBM). Tn the former the carrier is an aqueous rnodl.um and In the latter it i:: an oil. Diesel oil was used in the past as the oil, but recently .low toxicity drilling oils have been developed for this purpose.
While WBM are more environmentally accoptab.le than OIiM (;since the latter still give rise to the problem of disposing of large quantities of oil contaminated drill cuttings, even i~ the oil is of low toxicity), they are recognised as being technically inferior in a number of important areas, such as thermal stability, lubricity, and shale inhibition.

w Although shale is soft and therefore relatively easy to drill through, it still causes many problems for the drilling engineer.
It disperses easily into the fluid, large lumps break off and fall into the hole, pores in the shale can contain fluids trapped under pressure, and in extreme cases, the borehole wall may collapse.
Since shale makes up a high proportion of the rocks drilled in exploratory and production wells for oil and gas, particularly in important producing areas such as the North Sea, it is important that drilling times and problems be kept to a minimum when drilling through such formations.
Many WBM formulations incorporating additives have been suggested in an attempt to control reactive shales. Such additives include:
(a) salts such as potassium chloride to limit water uptake, reduce the swelling of the shale, and reduce leaching of any salt deposits encountered, (b) chemically modified starch or cellulosic materials which are used to reduce fluid loss, (c) water soluble polyacrylamides or other water soluble polymers which adsorb on the surface of shale to bind it with a coating of polymer, thereby reducing dispersion of the shale, (d) lime or gypsum which, although sparingly soluble, act in a similar manner to (a), and (e) asphaltene derived products which assist in fluid loss control by acting as blocking agents for cracks and mlcrofractures.
To date, however, none of these formulations has been able to provido shale .inhibition to tho lovels achieved with OBM.
This is because an OBM does not roact with shale. A
conventional WBM will, however, react to a greater or lessor extant with many shales causing them to swo p and can give rise to problems such as stuck pipe, tight hole, overgauge bolo, poor directional control, poor cementing and poor mud condition (leading to extensive dumping and diluting and therefore high mud costs).
It is an object of the present invention to develop a WBM which approaches the technical performance of an OBM without sacrificing 2~~

its environmental advantages.
Although, as previously acknowledged, the use of potassium chloride as an additive to WBM is known, its effect is not always consistent and depends to a considerable extent on the other constituents of the drilling fluid.
We have found that this inconsistency is marked in the case of polyalkylene glycol additives, and particularly so with mono-, di-, tri- and polyalkylene glycol additives. In the case o~ these compounds, the addition of a potassium salt to the mono-, di- and tri-ethylene glycols has little positive effect and, indeed, can have a negative effect and can encourage the dispersion of certain clays and shales, e.g. London clay and to a lesser extent Oxford clay. In the case of tetra- and higher molecular weight polyalkylene glycols we have discovered that there is a synergistic clay - stabilising effect between these compounds and the potassium salt.
Thus according to the present invention there is provided a water based drilling fluid comprising:
(a) an aqueous medium, (b) a polyalkylene glycol of general formula:
R10 ~ CH2 - i H - O y H
R
wherein R 1s ii or CH3, R1 is H or an alkyl group containing 1 to 4 carbon atoms and n is a number in th~ range 4 to 200, .in amount O.S
to 60;G, profernbly 1 to 20;G, by volume o~ the fluid, and (c;) a potassium salt, in amount 5-50, pro~erably 10-30 ppb (pounds per barrel), le, 14.3-143, preferably 28.G-85.7 g/1.
The concentration of polyalkylene glycol required to achieve r.i desired effect .is dependent on the molecular weight of the glycol.
In general, the lower the molecular weight, the higher the concentration required, and vice versa.
Suitable polyalkylene glycols are polyethylene glycols.
Polyalkylene glycols containing various ratios of ethylene 2~~8~~~~

oxide (E0) to propylene oxide (PO) units are also suitable, e.g. 75%
E0, 25% P0; 50% E0, 50% P0; and 25% E0, 75% P0.
The salt is a potassium salt, preferably potassium chloride.
However, other potassium salts such as formate, acetate, carbonate and phosphate axe also suitable.
The fluid may also contain additional conventional ingredients such as weighting agents, e.g. barite, haematite or galena;
viscosifers, e.g. xanthan gum, fluid loss control agents, eg starch or cellulose derivatives, shale inhibitors, eg polyacrylamide, and pH control agents, e.g. sodium or potassium hydroxide.
The pII is suitably controlled to a value in the range 7 to 13.
The aqueous medium may be fresh or salt water.
The invention is illustrated with reference to the following Examples.
Examples In each experiment to evaluate the inhibitive properties of a fluid containing a polyalkylene glycol the procedure involved making up various water and solvent concentrations, adding a known amount of dispersive clay (2-4 mm fraction) and rolling the resulting mixture at room temperature and 20 rpm for 16 hours. At the end of this time, the non-dispersed clay fraction (>0.5 mm) was recovered, dried, weighed and any correlation between solvent type, concentration and sha h Inhibition noted.
In some exporlmonts, potassium chloride or other salt was added to the mixture.
The taste were carried out on London clay, a Tertiary clay rich in swelling minerals and roprosontativ~ of a North Sea gumbo.
Shale rnay be doflned us a fine grained sodlmentary rock composed of consolidated silt and clay or mud.
Tests on clay samples are equivalent to tests on shales.
Example 1 London Clay was dispersed in seawater containing differing concentrations of 'the polyethylene glycol materials mono, di, tri and tetra ethylene glycol and in the presence or absence of potassium chloride (10 ppb). The results are presented in Table 1.

Figures in brackets represent the results of experiments in which potassium chloride was present. The results indicate that the addition of potassium chloride to seawater appears to encourage the dispersion of London Clay for the mono, di and tri ethylene glycols. However for tetraethylene glycol this effect is reversed and the addition of potassium chloride inhibits the dispersion of London Clay.
Table 1 ~6 SHALE RECLAIMED (WITH KCl @ 10 PPB) VOL
~G
SOLVENT
IN
SEAWATER

SOLVENTn0 15 30 45 60 Mono 12(2)8(6) 7(11)41(18)86(72) EG

Di EG 22(2)5(6) 32(14)86(30)100(93) Tri 32(2)33(11)87(34)100(59)100(93) EG

Tetra 42(2)3(30)7(53)16(68)69(99) EG

EG s ethylene glycol.
n ~ value of n in formula on page 3.
Example 2 London Clay was dispersed in seawater containing differing concentrations of polyethylene glycols having valuoa of n greater than 4. These results are prosent,ed in Table 2, as in Table 1. '.L'ho results indicate that, for thes~ higher molecular weight rrraterlais, substantially Tower amounts of g:Lycol material are roc~uircd to inhibit the dispersion of London Clay and that the perforrntmce of these additives is enhanced In th~ presence of potassium chloride to the point at which T.ondon Clay may be completely prevented from dispersion.

2~~~~~

Table 2 % SHALE RECLAIMED (WITH KC1 @ 10 ppb) VOL
% SOLVENT
IN
SEAWATER

. SOLVENTn 2 5 10 A 5 9(99) 10(100)12(100) B 12 7(94) 9(100)10(100) C 90 39(100)42(100)46(100) D 180 48(100)43(100)52(100) Solvent A is a mixture of polyethylene glycols of average molecular weight 280, Solvents B, C, and D are polyethylene glycols sold under the Trade Name Breox by BP Chemicals Ltd.
Example 3 In order to assess whether the beneficial effect of adding potassium chloride results from the presence of potassium or simply from changing the ionic strength of the seawater, a variety of other salts of molar concentrations identical to lOppb KC.I (0.4M) were added to seawater. The polyglycol used was Solvent C in Table 2 1n a concentration of 0.5 volume %. The results of Example 3 are shown in Table 3 wh3.ch shows that the beneficial effect is duo to potassium.
Table 3.
Solvent % Sktalo Roclalmod Seawater (SW) 10 SW/PEG/CaCl2 65 SW/PEG/NaCl 81 SW/PEG/MgCl2 46 SW/PEG/FeCl3 90 SW/PEG/AlCl3 79 Example 4 In order to assess the effect of chemical composition on the dispersion of London Clay; two polyalkylene glycol fluids containing differing ratios of ethylene and propylene oxide were assessed. The results are presented in Table 4. The results indic ate that low amounts of polyalkylene glycol material are required to inhibit the dispersion of London Clay and that the performance of these additives is enhanced in the presence of potassium chloride to the point that London~Clay may be completely prevented from dispersion.
Table 4 x SHALE RECLAIMED (WITH KC1 @ 10 ppb) VOL x SOLVENT
IN SEAWATER

SOLVENTn 2 5 10 E 12 63(96) 74(89) 70(93) F 4.382(100) 87(99) 80(97) Solvents E and F are polyethylene/polypropylene glycols s old under the Trade Name Breox*by BP Chemicals Ltd.
Examvles 5-9 Having established the inhibitive nature of the base flu id, other components may then be added to provide a whole mud system.
Examples 5-9 are illustrative of mud formulations and the effect of adding a polyglycol. The following procedure was used for preparing muds and for evaluating the effect of adding a polyg 1 ycol.
Muds were prepared by dissolving the polymers in sea~rater (with the exception of Example 6) and allowing the mixture to age f o r a minimum of 30 minutes. All mixing was carried out on a Hamilt on Beach'~mixer. Potassium chloride was added to the solution of polymers and the pH finally adjusted with potassium hydroxide t o pH9.
*Trade-mark To assess highly inhibitive, fully formulated water based mud systems, a more aggressive dispersion test than that used in the previous experiments was adopted. The test uses approximately 100 grams of London Clay chips in the size range 4-8man. The chips are placed inside a cylindrical drum whose curved surface comprises a 5mm brass or steel mesh. The drum containing the shale is partly immersed (to half the diameter of the drum) in the mud under test and the drum rotated for 4 hours at ambient temperature. After this time the shale remaining is recovered, washed, dried and the amount of shale lost by dispersion into the fluid calculated. Examination of the amounts of shale recovered in differing mud systems provide comparisons of the relative inhibitive nature of the mud systems under test.
The results are shown in the following Table 5.
Table 5 COMPONENT Ex Ex Ex Ex Ex Seawater Base BaseBaseBase Oil 100x Xanthan Gum 1 1 1 1 Anionic Polyacrylamide 1 1 1 Polyglycol (Type/Amount) 3xA 3xF

Recovery from Cuttings Dispersion Test 15 98 40 87 8 - All concentrations axe in ppb (pounds per barrel) unless otherwise stated - X a re volume X
Oil ~ Low Toxicity drilling oil (ex BP 83HF* from BP Chemicals Ltd).
Xanthan = XC*polymer (ex Kelco).
*Trade-mark GMC = Na carboxpmethylcellulose - CMC LoVi~*(ex Baro id).
Anionic Polyacrylamide - Alcomer*~20L - ex Allied Colloids.
A = Solvent A of Example 2.
F = Solvent F of Example 4.
Example 5 is a basic iTBM, not according to the present invention.
Example 6 is illustrative of an oil baaed mud.
Example 7 is illustrative of an improved water based mud, not according to the present invention.
Example 8 is the mud according to Example 7 with 3X polyglycol A
added.
Example 9 is the mud according to Example 7 with 3X polyglycol F
added.
Examples 8 and 9 are in accordance with the present invention and show greatly improved properties in comparison with the other WBM and approach the standard of the OBM.
*Trade-mark

Claims

1. A water based drilling fluid comprising:
(a) an aqueous medium characterised by the fact that it also contains the combination of (b) a polyalkylene glycol of general formula wherein R is H or CH3, R1 is H or an alkyl group containing 1 to 4 carbon atoms, and n is a number in the range 4 to 200, in amount 0.5 to 60% by volume of the fluid, and (c) a potassium salt in amount 14.3-14 3 g/l.

2. A water based drilling fluid according to claim 1 wherein the concentration of the polyalkylene glycol is in the range 1 to 20% by volume of the fluid.

3. A water based drilling fluid according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the concentration of the potassium salt is in the range 28.6 to 85.7 g/l.

4. A water based drilling fluid according to claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein the polyalkylene glycol is a polyethylene glycol.

5. A water based drilling fluid according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the polyalkylene glycol contains ethylene oxide and propylene oxide units in a ratio in the range 1:3 to 3:1.

6. A water based drilling fluid according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the potassium salt is potassium chloride.

7. A water based drilling fluid according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the potassium salt is a formate, acetate, carbonate or phosphate.

8. A water based drilling fluid according to any one of claims 1 to 7 which also comprises one or more further ingredients selected from the group consisting of weighting agents, viscosifiers, fluid loss control agents, shale inhibitors, and pH control agents.