CA2054014C - Low nox burner - Google Patents
Low nox burnerInfo
- Publication number
- CA2054014C CA2054014C CA 2054014 CA2054014A CA2054014C CA 2054014 C CA2054014 C CA 2054014C CA 2054014 CA2054014 CA 2054014 CA 2054014 A CA2054014 A CA 2054014A CA 2054014 C CA2054014 C CA 2054014C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- flame
- air
- burner
- gas mixture
- velocity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23D—BURNERS
- F23D14/00—Burners for combustion of a gas, e.g. of a gas stored under pressure as a liquid
- F23D14/46—Details, e.g. noise reduction means
- F23D14/72—Safety devices, e.g. operative in case of failure of gas supply
- F23D14/74—Preventing flame lift-off
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23D—BURNERS
- F23D14/00—Burners for combustion of a gas, e.g. of a gas stored under pressure as a liquid
- F23D14/26—Burners for combustion of a gas, e.g. of a gas stored under pressure as a liquid with provision for a retention flame
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
Abstract
A method of operating a burner to reduce the NOx emissions produced thereby is disclosed. Air and gas are premixed in a manner such that excess air exists in the resulting mixture and the velocity of the mixture is increased as it passes through the burner. By increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture, the "residence time"
associated with the formation of the flame is decreased, i.e., the combustion gases are in the reaction zone of the flame for a significantly shorter period of time, reducing the production of NOx. In order to prevent the flame from "lifting-off" the burner because of the high velocity of the air/gas mixture, flame stabilizing devices or techniques are utilized resulting in a high heat flux and low NOx production.
associated with the formation of the flame is decreased, i.e., the combustion gases are in the reaction zone of the flame for a significantly shorter period of time, reducing the production of NOx. In order to prevent the flame from "lifting-off" the burner because of the high velocity of the air/gas mixture, flame stabilizing devices or techniques are utilized resulting in a high heat flux and low NOx production.
Description
2 ~
LOW NOX BURNER
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates" in general, to combustion apparatus and, more particularly, to a combustion technique that produces an extremely low level of NOX
emissions.
BACKGROIJND ART
Recently, there has been a great deal of concern over the problem of air pollution. This problem is particularly acute in the urban areas of the country. There are many sources of air pollution such as the internal combustion engine, chemical processing plants, power generating facilities, etc. One of the more serious pollutants is the oxides of nitrogen, such as NO and NO2, which are collectively known as NOX and which contribute to air pollution by the formation of smog.
In fuel burning facilities, such as power generating stations, there are various sources of NOX emissions. One source of NOX emissions, refer~ed to as th~rmal NO, results from the oxidation of the nitrogen (N2) component of the combustion process air. Thermochemistry requires temperatures in the order of 2800~F. for the formation of NO
in this ~nn~r, The diatomic nitrogen (N2) component must first be dissociated into atomic nitrogen (N) prior to the formation of NO. Another source of NOX emissions, referred to as fuel NO, results from the fact that many fuels contain the single atomic nitrogen species, for example, ammonia ~NH3). In this case, N2 bond splitting is not a prerequisite to NO formation thereby allowing conversion of fuel-bound N to NO at temperature significantly below 2800~F. Conversion of fuel-bound nitrogen to NO can occur at temperatures as 1QW as 1300 F. A still another source of NOx emissions, referred to as prompt NO, results from high-speed reactions. Formation of NO by high speed reactions within the flame front have been report:ed and is the subject of ongoing research. No widely accept:ed mechanism for this mechanism has been developed. In those geographic areas where stringent air quality control regulations have been enacted, such as in Southern California, it has become extremely difficult to reach the standards established for NOx emissions by utilizing presently available burners and/or methods of operating same.
Various approaches have been developed for reducing ~~x emiss~ons, however, the resulting reduction is not sufficient in many cases to satisfy the foregoing stringent air quality standards. Some of these approaches are based on reducing NOx emissions by multi-stage combustion. For example, such ~ulti-stage combustion might involve burning a first fuel as a "lean mixture" and subsequently burning the resulting combustion products with a second fuel to form an atmosphere ~ which causes a reduction in NOx emissions.
Alternatively, fuel and air can be introduced into a burner so as to form two separate streams each having different ratios of fuel to air, i.e., one stream would have an excess of air while the other stream would have an excess of fuel. One of the streams is then ignited effecting a first stage of combustion which then ignites the second stream effecting ~a second stage of combustion. A third stage of combustion is provided by mixing and burning the excess fuel in one of the streams with the excess air in the other of the streams. A still another approach to reduce NOx emissions requires a plurality of burners disposed in a series connection with respect to the direction of flow of combustion air. In this case, the last burner in the series of burners utili2es a fuel having lower NO~ producing properties.
2~0~
Decreasing the temperature of combustion can also result in a reduction in NOx emissions. The combustion temperature can be reduced by direct flame cooling through water injection of the combustion gases or by adding a cooling gas to the air-gas mixture~ Flame temperature can also be reduced by utilizing radiant burners which are essentially surface burners often employing ceramic fibers, metallic fibers or reticulated ceramic foams as the radiant surface. A major disadvantage of most surface combustors is that because of their large size, a substantiaI volume of air/gas mixture is trapped within the burner. In the event of flashback, which is a distinct possibility, the deflagration created may be of explosive proportions.
Another disadvantage of surface combustors is that to achieve optimal radiant output for a given input (radiant efficiency), the surface temperature must remain extremely high. Surface combustion temperatures are very sensitive to air/fuel ratio~ velocity, and ~low uniformity. A
reduction in surface temperature diminishes the radiant output by the fourth power wh1ch would likely result in higher N~x emissions levels, via higher flame temperatures.
NOx emissions can also be reduced by recirculating the flue gases within the combustion chamber. In this approach, a portion of the flue gases can either be mixed with the combustion air prior to combustion, or delivered into the combustion zone separately. The recirculated flue gas acts as a diluent to lower the overall oxygen concentration and flame temperature. In essence, the combustion air supply is vitiated, thus reducing NOx, however, carbon monoxide (CO) emissions might increase.
Another approach for reducing the production of NOx involves changing the composition of the air-gas mixture.
For example, if a mixture of oxygen and an inert gas, other than nitrogen~ is utilized as the combustion atmosphere, NOx emissions are reduced. Alternatively, an additive can be introduced into the combustion chamber to form reducing agents which react with the nitrogen oxides to produce nitrogen, thus reducing the production of NOx. Thus, there are many approaches for reducing NOx emissions.
All of the foregoing approaches for reducing NOx emissions have certain inherent disadvantages with respect to cost, reliability, performance, etc. For example, reducing the combustion temperature to reduce the production of NOx may result in a reduction in the heat flux produced by the burner. Multi-stage combustion requires a significant amount of equipment and associated controls, all of which can become quite costly. Similarlyj flue gas recirculation techniques require additional equipment and might increase the production of carbon monoxide (CO), whereas the use of additives increases operating cost.
Radiant process ~ibrous materials are expensive, often fragile, and sensitive to blockage from airborne dust, thus requiring filtration equipment and associated maintenanceO
Such air filtration equipment will not prevent burner plugging problems inherent in the combustion of numerous fuel gases which contain contaminants, such as tar.
It is well established that thermal NO formation is the predominant NOx producing mechanism in the combustion of clean fuels, e.g., natural gas, and that the Zeldovich chain reaction mechanism applies to thermal NO formation. The chemical reaction kinetics of this analytical model predict that NOx production increases with time and temperature.
These trends have been verified in practical combustion 2 ~
systems with peak NOX formation rates occurring slightly to the fuel lean side of stoichiometric~ Predictions of the relative contributions of time and temperature in the ~ormation of NO using the Zeldovich chain reaction model are illustrated in Figure 1. This Figure also illustrates the contribution of "residence time" to the formation of NOx, i.e., the production of NOX takes a finite period of time.
Figure 1 illustrates the importance of "residence time" in the formation of NOX as calculated using the Zeldovich chain reaction model~ At a flame temperature of 3400~F., "residence times'l of 0.1, 0.7 and 4.5 seconds produce NOX
levels of 100 ppmv, 1000 ppmv and equilibrium levels, respectively, all of which exceed proposed emissions standards.
Reducing the combustion reaction (flame) temperature by using an excess of combustion air can, in certain cases, result in lower NOX formation. This effect can only be used to significant advantage with a homogeneous pre-mix type combustion apparatus; ln chemical parlance, a plug flow reactor. In the plug flow method, the peak fuel to air concentration equals the average concentration due to the premixing. This results in the average flame temperature being equal to the peak flame temperature. The NOX
emissions are then proportional to this temperature level.
In a nozzle mixing burner (stirred reactor), the mixing and combustion reactions occur virtually simultaneouslyl and due to mixing imperfections, wide variations in fuel to air concentrations occur. This results in mixture stratification with some localized peak fuel to air concentrations siynificantly in excess of the overall average value. Where the higher concentrations occur, high temperatures result, with concurrent high levels of NOX
formation.
~4~
Pre-mix combustion systems also offer the advantage of a high heat release rate per un~t of combustion volume as compared to nozzle mix systems. In other respects, they are inferior to nozzle mixing systems; particularly with respect to combustion stability limits. Beyond certain air to fuel ratio valuas, combustion moves away from the burner apparatus and the flame is extinguishea~ These effects are apparent in Figure 2, in which it can be seen that pre-mix ;
burners have a limited stability range in the more useful fuel lean non-polluting operating range. Also, for all burner types, as the stability limits are approached, the combustion efficiency decreases prior to flame extinction or "blow-out". The reduction in combustion efficiency produces large amounts of unburned combustible pollutants, predominately CO in the case of natural gas combustion.
In addressing the NOX problem, it is necessary that NOX
and CO be considered simultaneously, because a reduction in one pollutant may merely represent a compromise with regard to emissions of the other. For most conventional burners, CO and ~Ox emissions are generally produced in inverse proportions. Whereas the elimination of carbonaceous pollutants, e.g~, CO, etc., is amenable to relatively simple techniques, the simultaneous control oE both NOX and CO has presented problems using generally accepted control techniques. The foregoing occurs since CO requires time and a relatively high temperature, typically of the order of 2500~F., to oxidize such to carbon dioxide ~CO2).
Temperatures in excess of 2800~F. have been found to be conducive to NOX formation. These factors can be understood by referring to Figure 3 which is a graph of the NO versus x ~ combustible~, such as CO, and illustrates the "emissions - window" in which burners are considered to be operating at acceptable emission levels.
:
2 ~
To sustain clean, efficient combustion, a ragion of stable burning must be created~ In the a~sence of such, flame extinction or "blow-out" wil]L occur~ Combustion e~ficiency and flame stability are closely interrelated, the "blow-out" condition representing the case of zero combustion efficiency. Flame stabilization can be achieved by the use of a flame holding device or bluff body in the air/gas mixture stream. Typical flame stabilizing devices include metal screens, rods, and flame inserts. It has been found that these flame stabili~ing devices also reduce NOx emissions. Radiant fiber and ceramic sur~ace burners have also been used for similar reasons. In the foregoing cases, the rods or surfaces provide a heat absorbing mechanism capable of re-radiating the absorbed heat to an absorbing surface beyond the flame region. By such means the flame t~mperature is reduced with concurrent reductions in NOx formation. A key element in this approach is the ability of the radiant emitter surface to remove a substantial proportion of the heat generated, thereby controlling flame temperature. Experimental evidence of this phenomena sho~s an increase in NOx emissions as the heat flux to the emitter is increased. This since, for a fixed emitter geometry, i.e., surface area, the amount of heat radiation from the reaction zone is essentially constant, thereby impairing its ability to control the reaction temperature at the higher heat flux rates. Surface burners change from radiant to a blue flame mode as the heat flux (BTU/hr ins ) is increased. In general, at heat fluxes in excess of 1000 BTU/hr inS2~ the more common surface burners "blow-out"; prior to this large quantities of CO are also produced.
Because of the foregoing, it has become desirable to develop a burner system which minimizes the production of NOX and which produces low levels of CO. Referring again to Figure 3 what is required is operation inside the "emissions window". Furthermore, emissions should remain within the window throughout the firing range ~rom low to high fire.
SUMMARY OF THE lNV~NllON
It is known that the use of excess air in pre-mixed burners reduces NOX emissions since such excess air decreases the temperature of combustion. In accordance with the present invention, it has been found that increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture also reduces NOX emissions since "residence timel' is decreased. Increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture does, however, create a problem of flame "lift-off" from the burner. ~o prevent the occurrence of flame 'ilift-off" while ~in;~izing NOX
production, flame stabilizing~devices may be employed. The st bil~zers may be constructed from any suitable configuration of heat resistant materials. Figures 4 through 6 and 8 through 10 show various types of pre-mix burners that can utilize the methodology of the present invention. Burners of the type shown have been operated with port face loadings in the range of 5,000-100,000 BTU/hr ins2. Flame stabilization can also be achieved by aerodynamic means, e.g., opposed jet recirculation, wake flow, etc., eliminating the need for mechanical stabilizers.
What was not recognized in the prior art was the contribution of "residence time" in the formation of NOX.
By increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture, the "residence time" at the combustion reaction temperature is reduced. Port face loadings in the 5,000 - 100,000 BTU/hr ins range represent a ten to twentyfold reduction in "residence" time as compared to prior art burners. It should be recognized that the Poregoing port face loadings are based upon the total port face area and not the open or slot areas that form the air gas mixture passageways.
Experiments were conducted at the high heat flux rates using ribbon, ported ceramic, and porous ceramic burner types. soth ceramic rod and wire mesh flameholder types were also used. In all cases, the combustion emissions of both NOx and CO were very low; Figure 11 depicts typical results obtained.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows the theoretical concentration of NOx produced versus time and temperature as calculated using the Zeldovich chain reaction model.
Figure 2 is a graph of Air/Fuel Ratio versus Blow-Off Velocity for nozzle mix burners and premix burners.
Figure 3 is a graph of the Oxides of Nitrogen versus Combustibles, such as CO, and illustrates the "emissions window" in which burners are considered to be operating at acceptable emission levels.
Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view of one type of pre-mix burner utilizing external flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention.
Figure 5 is a cross-sectional view of another type of pre-mix burner utilizing externaI flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention.
Figure 6 is a cross-sectional view of still another type of pre-mix burner utilizing external flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology o~ the present invention.
Figure 7 is an enlarged partial cross-sectional view of the distributor plate illustrated in Figure 6 and illustrates the configuration of the ports therein.
Figure 8 is a cross-sectional view of one type of pre-mix burner utilizing internal flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of ths present invention.
Figure 9 is a cross-sectional view of another type of pre-mix burner utilizing internal flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention.
Figure 10 is a cross-sectional view of still another type of pre--mix burner utilizing internal ~1ame stabili ation apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention.
Figure 11 is a graph of NOx Emissions versus Percent xcess Air.
DESCRIPTION OF THE P~EFERRED EMBODIMENT
The production of NO is a function ~f combustion temperature and the time required to complete combustion.
In addition to the previously mentioned prior art methods for reducing NOx emissions, it is known that the use of excess air in the air/gas mixture also decreases the production of NOx- The reduction in NOx production in this case can be attri~uted to a decrease in the temperature oE
combustion as a result of the excess air. Alternatively, an increase in the velocity of the air/gas mixture can be utilized to reduce NOx emissions. Such an increase in velocity can be achieved by reducing the size of the orifices through which the air/gas mixture flows or by increasing the port face loadings. By increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture, the "residence time"
associated with the formation of a flame is decreased, i.e., the combustion gases are in the reaction zone of the flame for a significantly shorter period of time which, in turn, reduces the production of N9x. The velocity of the air/gas mixture can only be increased to a level where the flame begins to "lift-off" the burner. An increase in the velocity of the air/gas mixture beyond the foregoing level results in the flame being blown out. In order to increase the velocity of the air/gas mixture beyond the velocity where flame "lift-o~f" occurs, a flame stabilizing device must be utilized.
Referring again to the drawings, Flgure 4 is a view of one of a number o~ burner units 10 which utilizes a ~1ame stabilizing device and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention to produce a very low level of NOX emissions. The burner unit 10 includes a plenum 12 with a distribution plate 14 extending across its upper surface forming the outlet of the burner~ The distribution plate 14 has a plurality of orifices or ports 16 passing therethrough. A flame arrester/distributor matrix 18 is positioned adjacent the upper surface o~ the distribution plate 14. Another embodiment o~ a burner unit which utilizes a flame stabilizing device and which can utilize the methodology of the present invention so as to produce a very low level of NOX emissions is burner unit 20 illustrated in Figure 5. Burner unit 20 includes a burner body 22 and a plurality ~ of parallel flame arrester/distributor ribbons 24 adjacent its upper surface forming ports 26 therebetween. A still another embodiment of a burner unit which utilizes a flame stabilizing device and which can utilize the methodology of the present invention so as to produce a vexy low level of NOX emissions is burner unit 30 illustrated in Figure 6. Burner unit 30 2~
includes a ceramic tile distributor plate 32 having a plurality of ports 34 therein as shown in Figure 7. Each port 34 has a through portion 36 o~ substantially constant diameter or may incorporate a tapered portion 38 of increasing diameter from its junction with through portion 36 to the outer surface 40 of the distributor plate 32. The foregoing burner units are merely examples of some types of burners that can utilize the methodology of the present invention so as to produce very low lavels of NOX
emissions. Many other types of burners can be utilized with similar results and there are no restrictions as to burner size, shape, porting configuration, method of fabrLcation, or materials utilized for same. Regardless oE the type of burner utilized, the plenum or burner body is connected to an air-gas supply. In this manner, a combustibla mixture of air and gas is supplied to the plenum or burner body from the air-gas supply. In ~any event, one or more flame stabilizing devices are positioned a short ~istance above the ports in the burner units utilized. The flame stabilizing devices may include one or more ceramic flame rods, wire mesh flame screens, or any combination thereof, in order to stabili~e the flame above the ports provided in the burner utilized. It should be noted that in addition to stabilizing the flame above the ports, the flame stabilizing devices may also produce radiant heat which further serves to suppress NOX formation.
Experimentally, flame screens formed from 0.092 in.
Nichrome or Inconel wire have been used successfully with various types of burners. ~he optimum distance between the flame stabilizing means an~ the top of the burner to ; ni ~i ze the production of NO can be determined empirically or by experimentation.
Alternatively~ if the burner has a single or a relatively small number of outlet ports, a bluff body 60 can be located within the outlet 62 of the burner, shown generally by the numeral 64, in Figure 8~ The bluff body 60 can be formed from any of a variety of geometries, e.g., a weld cap having a generally semi-spherical configuration, or the like, which is held within the outlet 62 of the burner by means of set screws 66 which are threadably received through the bluff body 60 so that their ends contact the inner surface of the burner 64. ~luff body 60 is positioned within the outlet 62 so that the flow of the air/gas mixture contacts the convex surface of same. In this manner, the bluff body 60 presents a contoured obstruction to the flow of the air/gas mixture. In Figure 8 a separate pilot (not shown) is utilized to ignite the air/gas mixture and the velocity of the air/gas mixture approaches the velocity at which the flame begins to "lift-off'l the surface defining the outlet 62 of the burner 64~
It should be noted that flow of the air/gas mixture impinges upon the upstream face of the bluff body 60, and then recirculates counter to the air/gas flow direction in a zone on the downstream side of the bluff body creating a region which supports co~bustion before passing outwardly therefrom to the outlet 62 of the burner 64.
Another burner structure which incorporates flame stabili ation is shown in Figure 9 and includes a bluff body attached to the end of a pilot tube 72.~ Here again, the bluff body 70 can be formed from any of a variety of geometries, e.g., a weld cap having a generally semi-spherical configuration, or the like. Alternatively, the pilot tube 72 and the bluff body 70 oan be formed from a pipe and a reducing coupling. The pilot tube 72 and bluff body 70 are received within the outlet 74 of the burner, shown generally by the numeral 76, and are held within same by means of set screws 78 which are threadably received 2~
through the bluff body 70 so that their ends contact the inner surface of the burner 76. The pilot tube 72 and the bluff body 70 are positioned within t~he burner 76 so as to be substantially concentric therein. The aix/gas mixture passes through a passageway 80 between the outer surface of the pilot tube 72 and the inner surface of burner 76 and the mi~ture impinges upon the upstream face of the bluff body 70, and then recirculates counter to the air/gas flow direction in a zone on the downstream side of the bluff body creating a region which supports combustion. After ig~ition of the air/gas mixture by the pilot flame within th~, pilot tube 72, the resulting combustion gases pass to the outlet 74 of the burner 76. As in the burner structure illustrated in Figure 8, the velocity of the air/gas mixture approaches the velocity at which the flame begins to "lift-off" the surface forming the outlet 74 of the burner 76.
It has been found that the foreyoing bluff ~odies in Figures 8 and 9 provide flame stabilization, permitting the velocity of the air/gas mixture to be increased beyond the velocity at which flame "lift-off" would occur if a flame stabilizing device had not been used. It has also been found that the use of such bluff bodies negates the need for a flame stabilizing device exterior to the outlet of the burner.
A still another burner structure which incorporates flame stabilization is shown in Figure 10 and includes a flameholder 90 attached to the end of a pilot tube 92. The flameholder 90 can be cup-shaped and acts as a bluff body, as in the structure shown in Figures 8 and 9~ The pilot tube 92 is positioned within a pipe 94 so as to be substantially concentric therein. The circumferential end 96 of pipe 94 abuts a refractory diffuser 98 having a tapered opening 100 therein. The diameter of the tapered opening 100 increases from the inner surface 102 of the refractory diffuser 98 to the outer surface 104 thereof.
The inner diameter of pipe 94 is approximately the same as the diameter of the tapered opening 100 at the inner surface 102 of the refractory diffuser 98. The pipe 94 is aligned with the tapered opening 100 so that no discontinuities exist between thé surface defining the inner diameter of the pipe 94 and the surface defining the tapered opening 100 in the refractory di~fuser 98. A swirl vane assembly ~06 is positioned ad~acent the outlet 108 of the flameholder 90 and is interposed between the flameholder 90 and the surface defining the tapered opening 100 in the refractory diffuser 98. Air and fuel are provided through apertures 110 and 112, respectively, in the burner housing 114 and pass through a plurality of mixing venturis 116 into a chamber 118 before passing into pipe 94 through end 120 thereof.
The air/gas mixture passes through a passageway 122 between the inner surface of the pipe 94 and the outer surface of the pilot tube 92 into a passageway 124 between the surface defining the tapered opening 100 in the refractory diffuser 98 and the outer surface of the flameholder 90. As the air/gas mixture passes through the swirl vane assembly 106, the mixture recirculates counter to the aix/gas flow direction in a zone on the downstream side of the flameholder 90 creating a region which supports combustion.
After ignition of the air/gas mixture by the pilot flame within the pilot tube 92, the resulting combustion gases pass outwardly therefrom to the outlet 126 of the burner~
The velocity of the air/gas mixture approaches the velocity at which the flame begins to l'lift-off" the surface forming the outlet 12S of the burner. As in the previous burner structures, the flameholder 90 permits the velocity of the air/gas mixture to be increased beyond the velocity at which flame "lift-off'l would occur if a flameholder had not been used.
Regardless of whether a flame stabilizing device is utilized, it has been found that NOX emissions can be held to acceptable levels by operating the burner unit with high velocity excess air to keep the combustion temperature slightly below the temperature at which a significant amount of NOX is produced and to minimize the "residence time"
associated with the formation of a flame~ In the method of the presen-t invention, a high velocity premixed air and gas stream in combination with high heat flux rates, together with suitable proportions of excess air, has been shown to control the "residence time" and temperature thereby minimizing NOX emissions. However, because of the high velocity of the excess air, flame stabilizing devices in the form of flame rods, flame screens or bluff bodies might be required to ensure that the flame does not "lift-off" the burner. The use of a fl ame stabili~ing device increases the maximum flame extinction or "blow-out"'i velocity of the air-gas mixture. The device may also act as a radiator of heat thus keeping the resulting temperature from exceeding the temperature at which a significant amount of NOX is produced. It should be noted, however, that flame stabilization can also be achieved by aerodynamic means, e.g., opposed jet recirculation, wake flows, etc., eliminating the need for a stabilizing device. It has been found with foregoing operating conditions that a very high heat flux of approximately 5,000-100,000 BTU/hr in.2 can be achieved; the former heat flux of approximately 5,000 BTU/hr in~2 heing without the utilization of a flame stabilizing -17~
device, the latter heat flux of approximately 100,000 BTU/hr in.2 being achieved with the utilization of a flame stabilizing device. Referring now to the graph shown in Figure 11, it is apparent that NOX emissions decrease as the percent of excess air increases. If more than 20% excess air is utilized, NOX emissions will be held within recently proposed standards. Thus/ with the foregoing operating parameters, viz., 3~00 degrees F~ nominal operating temperature and high heat flux rates combined with suitable proportions of excess air, acceptable NOX levels can be achieved. It has been further found with the foregoing operating parameters that as heat flux increases, the production of NOX decreases if "residence time" is n; i zed. This was not the case with prior art burner systems wherein an increase in heat flux resulted in a commensurate increase in NOX emissions. This latter benefit, i.e., a decrease of NOX emissions with an increase in heat flux, has not been previously taught.
It has been found in oxygen enriched applications, ~hich generally have higher flame temperature resulting in increased NOX production, that an increase in the velocity of the air/gas mixture decreases "residence time" which, in turn, reduces NOX production. Similarly, in applications where the air/gas mixture has been preheated, which typically results in a higher flame temperature, pre-heating increases the velocity of the air/gas mixture resulting in decreased "residence time" and thus, reduced NOX production.
Another feature of the present invention is that the resulting production of NOX and CO are within the "emissions window" shown in Figure 3. As previously stated, conventional burners typically produce NOX and CO in inverse proportions since time and temperature, both o~ which are conducive to NOX formation~ are required to reduce CO to CO2. Test results using the methoclology of the present invention, i.e., 20% and greater excess air at a high velocity, reveal that even though extremely low levels of NOX are produced, approximately 20 ppmv, the production of CO is not excessive and is within the "emissions window".
Thus, the methodology of the present invention minimizes the production of NOX while producing low levels of CO.
Certain modifications and improvements will occur to those skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing. It should be understood that all such modifications and improvements have been deleted herein for the sake of conciseness and readability, but are properly within the scope of the following claims.
LOW NOX BURNER
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates" in general, to combustion apparatus and, more particularly, to a combustion technique that produces an extremely low level of NOX
emissions.
BACKGROIJND ART
Recently, there has been a great deal of concern over the problem of air pollution. This problem is particularly acute in the urban areas of the country. There are many sources of air pollution such as the internal combustion engine, chemical processing plants, power generating facilities, etc. One of the more serious pollutants is the oxides of nitrogen, such as NO and NO2, which are collectively known as NOX and which contribute to air pollution by the formation of smog.
In fuel burning facilities, such as power generating stations, there are various sources of NOX emissions. One source of NOX emissions, refer~ed to as th~rmal NO, results from the oxidation of the nitrogen (N2) component of the combustion process air. Thermochemistry requires temperatures in the order of 2800~F. for the formation of NO
in this ~nn~r, The diatomic nitrogen (N2) component must first be dissociated into atomic nitrogen (N) prior to the formation of NO. Another source of NOX emissions, referred to as fuel NO, results from the fact that many fuels contain the single atomic nitrogen species, for example, ammonia ~NH3). In this case, N2 bond splitting is not a prerequisite to NO formation thereby allowing conversion of fuel-bound N to NO at temperature significantly below 2800~F. Conversion of fuel-bound nitrogen to NO can occur at temperatures as 1QW as 1300 F. A still another source of NOx emissions, referred to as prompt NO, results from high-speed reactions. Formation of NO by high speed reactions within the flame front have been report:ed and is the subject of ongoing research. No widely accept:ed mechanism for this mechanism has been developed. In those geographic areas where stringent air quality control regulations have been enacted, such as in Southern California, it has become extremely difficult to reach the standards established for NOx emissions by utilizing presently available burners and/or methods of operating same.
Various approaches have been developed for reducing ~~x emiss~ons, however, the resulting reduction is not sufficient in many cases to satisfy the foregoing stringent air quality standards. Some of these approaches are based on reducing NOx emissions by multi-stage combustion. For example, such ~ulti-stage combustion might involve burning a first fuel as a "lean mixture" and subsequently burning the resulting combustion products with a second fuel to form an atmosphere ~ which causes a reduction in NOx emissions.
Alternatively, fuel and air can be introduced into a burner so as to form two separate streams each having different ratios of fuel to air, i.e., one stream would have an excess of air while the other stream would have an excess of fuel. One of the streams is then ignited effecting a first stage of combustion which then ignites the second stream effecting ~a second stage of combustion. A third stage of combustion is provided by mixing and burning the excess fuel in one of the streams with the excess air in the other of the streams. A still another approach to reduce NOx emissions requires a plurality of burners disposed in a series connection with respect to the direction of flow of combustion air. In this case, the last burner in the series of burners utili2es a fuel having lower NO~ producing properties.
2~0~
Decreasing the temperature of combustion can also result in a reduction in NOx emissions. The combustion temperature can be reduced by direct flame cooling through water injection of the combustion gases or by adding a cooling gas to the air-gas mixture~ Flame temperature can also be reduced by utilizing radiant burners which are essentially surface burners often employing ceramic fibers, metallic fibers or reticulated ceramic foams as the radiant surface. A major disadvantage of most surface combustors is that because of their large size, a substantiaI volume of air/gas mixture is trapped within the burner. In the event of flashback, which is a distinct possibility, the deflagration created may be of explosive proportions.
Another disadvantage of surface combustors is that to achieve optimal radiant output for a given input (radiant efficiency), the surface temperature must remain extremely high. Surface combustion temperatures are very sensitive to air/fuel ratio~ velocity, and ~low uniformity. A
reduction in surface temperature diminishes the radiant output by the fourth power wh1ch would likely result in higher N~x emissions levels, via higher flame temperatures.
NOx emissions can also be reduced by recirculating the flue gases within the combustion chamber. In this approach, a portion of the flue gases can either be mixed with the combustion air prior to combustion, or delivered into the combustion zone separately. The recirculated flue gas acts as a diluent to lower the overall oxygen concentration and flame temperature. In essence, the combustion air supply is vitiated, thus reducing NOx, however, carbon monoxide (CO) emissions might increase.
Another approach for reducing the production of NOx involves changing the composition of the air-gas mixture.
For example, if a mixture of oxygen and an inert gas, other than nitrogen~ is utilized as the combustion atmosphere, NOx emissions are reduced. Alternatively, an additive can be introduced into the combustion chamber to form reducing agents which react with the nitrogen oxides to produce nitrogen, thus reducing the production of NOx. Thus, there are many approaches for reducing NOx emissions.
All of the foregoing approaches for reducing NOx emissions have certain inherent disadvantages with respect to cost, reliability, performance, etc. For example, reducing the combustion temperature to reduce the production of NOx may result in a reduction in the heat flux produced by the burner. Multi-stage combustion requires a significant amount of equipment and associated controls, all of which can become quite costly. Similarlyj flue gas recirculation techniques require additional equipment and might increase the production of carbon monoxide (CO), whereas the use of additives increases operating cost.
Radiant process ~ibrous materials are expensive, often fragile, and sensitive to blockage from airborne dust, thus requiring filtration equipment and associated maintenanceO
Such air filtration equipment will not prevent burner plugging problems inherent in the combustion of numerous fuel gases which contain contaminants, such as tar.
It is well established that thermal NO formation is the predominant NOx producing mechanism in the combustion of clean fuels, e.g., natural gas, and that the Zeldovich chain reaction mechanism applies to thermal NO formation. The chemical reaction kinetics of this analytical model predict that NOx production increases with time and temperature.
These trends have been verified in practical combustion 2 ~
systems with peak NOX formation rates occurring slightly to the fuel lean side of stoichiometric~ Predictions of the relative contributions of time and temperature in the ~ormation of NO using the Zeldovich chain reaction model are illustrated in Figure 1. This Figure also illustrates the contribution of "residence time" to the formation of NOx, i.e., the production of NOX takes a finite period of time.
Figure 1 illustrates the importance of "residence time" in the formation of NOX as calculated using the Zeldovich chain reaction model~ At a flame temperature of 3400~F., "residence times'l of 0.1, 0.7 and 4.5 seconds produce NOX
levels of 100 ppmv, 1000 ppmv and equilibrium levels, respectively, all of which exceed proposed emissions standards.
Reducing the combustion reaction (flame) temperature by using an excess of combustion air can, in certain cases, result in lower NOX formation. This effect can only be used to significant advantage with a homogeneous pre-mix type combustion apparatus; ln chemical parlance, a plug flow reactor. In the plug flow method, the peak fuel to air concentration equals the average concentration due to the premixing. This results in the average flame temperature being equal to the peak flame temperature. The NOX
emissions are then proportional to this temperature level.
In a nozzle mixing burner (stirred reactor), the mixing and combustion reactions occur virtually simultaneouslyl and due to mixing imperfections, wide variations in fuel to air concentrations occur. This results in mixture stratification with some localized peak fuel to air concentrations siynificantly in excess of the overall average value. Where the higher concentrations occur, high temperatures result, with concurrent high levels of NOX
formation.
~4~
Pre-mix combustion systems also offer the advantage of a high heat release rate per un~t of combustion volume as compared to nozzle mix systems. In other respects, they are inferior to nozzle mixing systems; particularly with respect to combustion stability limits. Beyond certain air to fuel ratio valuas, combustion moves away from the burner apparatus and the flame is extinguishea~ These effects are apparent in Figure 2, in which it can be seen that pre-mix ;
burners have a limited stability range in the more useful fuel lean non-polluting operating range. Also, for all burner types, as the stability limits are approached, the combustion efficiency decreases prior to flame extinction or "blow-out". The reduction in combustion efficiency produces large amounts of unburned combustible pollutants, predominately CO in the case of natural gas combustion.
In addressing the NOX problem, it is necessary that NOX
and CO be considered simultaneously, because a reduction in one pollutant may merely represent a compromise with regard to emissions of the other. For most conventional burners, CO and ~Ox emissions are generally produced in inverse proportions. Whereas the elimination of carbonaceous pollutants, e.g~, CO, etc., is amenable to relatively simple techniques, the simultaneous control oE both NOX and CO has presented problems using generally accepted control techniques. The foregoing occurs since CO requires time and a relatively high temperature, typically of the order of 2500~F., to oxidize such to carbon dioxide ~CO2).
Temperatures in excess of 2800~F. have been found to be conducive to NOX formation. These factors can be understood by referring to Figure 3 which is a graph of the NO versus x ~ combustible~, such as CO, and illustrates the "emissions - window" in which burners are considered to be operating at acceptable emission levels.
:
2 ~
To sustain clean, efficient combustion, a ragion of stable burning must be created~ In the a~sence of such, flame extinction or "blow-out" wil]L occur~ Combustion e~ficiency and flame stability are closely interrelated, the "blow-out" condition representing the case of zero combustion efficiency. Flame stabilization can be achieved by the use of a flame holding device or bluff body in the air/gas mixture stream. Typical flame stabilizing devices include metal screens, rods, and flame inserts. It has been found that these flame stabili~ing devices also reduce NOx emissions. Radiant fiber and ceramic sur~ace burners have also been used for similar reasons. In the foregoing cases, the rods or surfaces provide a heat absorbing mechanism capable of re-radiating the absorbed heat to an absorbing surface beyond the flame region. By such means the flame t~mperature is reduced with concurrent reductions in NOx formation. A key element in this approach is the ability of the radiant emitter surface to remove a substantial proportion of the heat generated, thereby controlling flame temperature. Experimental evidence of this phenomena sho~s an increase in NOx emissions as the heat flux to the emitter is increased. This since, for a fixed emitter geometry, i.e., surface area, the amount of heat radiation from the reaction zone is essentially constant, thereby impairing its ability to control the reaction temperature at the higher heat flux rates. Surface burners change from radiant to a blue flame mode as the heat flux (BTU/hr ins ) is increased. In general, at heat fluxes in excess of 1000 BTU/hr inS2~ the more common surface burners "blow-out"; prior to this large quantities of CO are also produced.
Because of the foregoing, it has become desirable to develop a burner system which minimizes the production of NOX and which produces low levels of CO. Referring again to Figure 3 what is required is operation inside the "emissions window". Furthermore, emissions should remain within the window throughout the firing range ~rom low to high fire.
SUMMARY OF THE lNV~NllON
It is known that the use of excess air in pre-mixed burners reduces NOX emissions since such excess air decreases the temperature of combustion. In accordance with the present invention, it has been found that increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture also reduces NOX emissions since "residence timel' is decreased. Increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture does, however, create a problem of flame "lift-off" from the burner. ~o prevent the occurrence of flame 'ilift-off" while ~in;~izing NOX
production, flame stabilizing~devices may be employed. The st bil~zers may be constructed from any suitable configuration of heat resistant materials. Figures 4 through 6 and 8 through 10 show various types of pre-mix burners that can utilize the methodology of the present invention. Burners of the type shown have been operated with port face loadings in the range of 5,000-100,000 BTU/hr ins2. Flame stabilization can also be achieved by aerodynamic means, e.g., opposed jet recirculation, wake flow, etc., eliminating the need for mechanical stabilizers.
What was not recognized in the prior art was the contribution of "residence time" in the formation of NOX.
By increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture, the "residence time" at the combustion reaction temperature is reduced. Port face loadings in the 5,000 - 100,000 BTU/hr ins range represent a ten to twentyfold reduction in "residence" time as compared to prior art burners. It should be recognized that the Poregoing port face loadings are based upon the total port face area and not the open or slot areas that form the air gas mixture passageways.
Experiments were conducted at the high heat flux rates using ribbon, ported ceramic, and porous ceramic burner types. soth ceramic rod and wire mesh flameholder types were also used. In all cases, the combustion emissions of both NOx and CO were very low; Figure 11 depicts typical results obtained.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows the theoretical concentration of NOx produced versus time and temperature as calculated using the Zeldovich chain reaction model.
Figure 2 is a graph of Air/Fuel Ratio versus Blow-Off Velocity for nozzle mix burners and premix burners.
Figure 3 is a graph of the Oxides of Nitrogen versus Combustibles, such as CO, and illustrates the "emissions window" in which burners are considered to be operating at acceptable emission levels.
Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view of one type of pre-mix burner utilizing external flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention.
Figure 5 is a cross-sectional view of another type of pre-mix burner utilizing externaI flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention.
Figure 6 is a cross-sectional view of still another type of pre-mix burner utilizing external flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology o~ the present invention.
Figure 7 is an enlarged partial cross-sectional view of the distributor plate illustrated in Figure 6 and illustrates the configuration of the ports therein.
Figure 8 is a cross-sectional view of one type of pre-mix burner utilizing internal flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of ths present invention.
Figure 9 is a cross-sectional view of another type of pre-mix burner utilizing internal flame stabilization apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention.
Figure 10 is a cross-sectional view of still another type of pre--mix burner utilizing internal ~1ame stabili ation apparatus and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention.
Figure 11 is a graph of NOx Emissions versus Percent xcess Air.
DESCRIPTION OF THE P~EFERRED EMBODIMENT
The production of NO is a function ~f combustion temperature and the time required to complete combustion.
In addition to the previously mentioned prior art methods for reducing NOx emissions, it is known that the use of excess air in the air/gas mixture also decreases the production of NOx- The reduction in NOx production in this case can be attri~uted to a decrease in the temperature oE
combustion as a result of the excess air. Alternatively, an increase in the velocity of the air/gas mixture can be utilized to reduce NOx emissions. Such an increase in velocity can be achieved by reducing the size of the orifices through which the air/gas mixture flows or by increasing the port face loadings. By increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture, the "residence time"
associated with the formation of a flame is decreased, i.e., the combustion gases are in the reaction zone of the flame for a significantly shorter period of time which, in turn, reduces the production of N9x. The velocity of the air/gas mixture can only be increased to a level where the flame begins to "lift-off" the burner. An increase in the velocity of the air/gas mixture beyond the foregoing level results in the flame being blown out. In order to increase the velocity of the air/gas mixture beyond the velocity where flame "lift-o~f" occurs, a flame stabilizing device must be utilized.
Referring again to the drawings, Flgure 4 is a view of one of a number o~ burner units 10 which utilizes a ~1ame stabilizing device and which can be operated using the methodology of the present invention to produce a very low level of NOX emissions. The burner unit 10 includes a plenum 12 with a distribution plate 14 extending across its upper surface forming the outlet of the burner~ The distribution plate 14 has a plurality of orifices or ports 16 passing therethrough. A flame arrester/distributor matrix 18 is positioned adjacent the upper surface o~ the distribution plate 14. Another embodiment o~ a burner unit which utilizes a flame stabilizing device and which can utilize the methodology of the present invention so as to produce a very low level of NOX emissions is burner unit 20 illustrated in Figure 5. Burner unit 20 includes a burner body 22 and a plurality ~ of parallel flame arrester/distributor ribbons 24 adjacent its upper surface forming ports 26 therebetween. A still another embodiment of a burner unit which utilizes a flame stabilizing device and which can utilize the methodology of the present invention so as to produce a vexy low level of NOX emissions is burner unit 30 illustrated in Figure 6. Burner unit 30 2~
includes a ceramic tile distributor plate 32 having a plurality of ports 34 therein as shown in Figure 7. Each port 34 has a through portion 36 o~ substantially constant diameter or may incorporate a tapered portion 38 of increasing diameter from its junction with through portion 36 to the outer surface 40 of the distributor plate 32. The foregoing burner units are merely examples of some types of burners that can utilize the methodology of the present invention so as to produce very low lavels of NOX
emissions. Many other types of burners can be utilized with similar results and there are no restrictions as to burner size, shape, porting configuration, method of fabrLcation, or materials utilized for same. Regardless oE the type of burner utilized, the plenum or burner body is connected to an air-gas supply. In this manner, a combustibla mixture of air and gas is supplied to the plenum or burner body from the air-gas supply. In ~any event, one or more flame stabilizing devices are positioned a short ~istance above the ports in the burner units utilized. The flame stabilizing devices may include one or more ceramic flame rods, wire mesh flame screens, or any combination thereof, in order to stabili~e the flame above the ports provided in the burner utilized. It should be noted that in addition to stabilizing the flame above the ports, the flame stabilizing devices may also produce radiant heat which further serves to suppress NOX formation.
Experimentally, flame screens formed from 0.092 in.
Nichrome or Inconel wire have been used successfully with various types of burners. ~he optimum distance between the flame stabilizing means an~ the top of the burner to ; ni ~i ze the production of NO can be determined empirically or by experimentation.
Alternatively~ if the burner has a single or a relatively small number of outlet ports, a bluff body 60 can be located within the outlet 62 of the burner, shown generally by the numeral 64, in Figure 8~ The bluff body 60 can be formed from any of a variety of geometries, e.g., a weld cap having a generally semi-spherical configuration, or the like, which is held within the outlet 62 of the burner by means of set screws 66 which are threadably received through the bluff body 60 so that their ends contact the inner surface of the burner 64. ~luff body 60 is positioned within the outlet 62 so that the flow of the air/gas mixture contacts the convex surface of same. In this manner, the bluff body 60 presents a contoured obstruction to the flow of the air/gas mixture. In Figure 8 a separate pilot (not shown) is utilized to ignite the air/gas mixture and the velocity of the air/gas mixture approaches the velocity at which the flame begins to "lift-off'l the surface defining the outlet 62 of the burner 64~
It should be noted that flow of the air/gas mixture impinges upon the upstream face of the bluff body 60, and then recirculates counter to the air/gas flow direction in a zone on the downstream side of the bluff body creating a region which supports co~bustion before passing outwardly therefrom to the outlet 62 of the burner 64.
Another burner structure which incorporates flame stabili ation is shown in Figure 9 and includes a bluff body attached to the end of a pilot tube 72.~ Here again, the bluff body 70 can be formed from any of a variety of geometries, e.g., a weld cap having a generally semi-spherical configuration, or the like. Alternatively, the pilot tube 72 and the bluff body 70 oan be formed from a pipe and a reducing coupling. The pilot tube 72 and bluff body 70 are received within the outlet 74 of the burner, shown generally by the numeral 76, and are held within same by means of set screws 78 which are threadably received 2~
through the bluff body 70 so that their ends contact the inner surface of the burner 76. The pilot tube 72 and the bluff body 70 are positioned within t~he burner 76 so as to be substantially concentric therein. The aix/gas mixture passes through a passageway 80 between the outer surface of the pilot tube 72 and the inner surface of burner 76 and the mi~ture impinges upon the upstream face of the bluff body 70, and then recirculates counter to the air/gas flow direction in a zone on the downstream side of the bluff body creating a region which supports combustion. After ig~ition of the air/gas mixture by the pilot flame within th~, pilot tube 72, the resulting combustion gases pass to the outlet 74 of the burner 76. As in the burner structure illustrated in Figure 8, the velocity of the air/gas mixture approaches the velocity at which the flame begins to "lift-off" the surface forming the outlet 74 of the burner 76.
It has been found that the foreyoing bluff ~odies in Figures 8 and 9 provide flame stabilization, permitting the velocity of the air/gas mixture to be increased beyond the velocity at which flame "lift-off" would occur if a flame stabilizing device had not been used. It has also been found that the use of such bluff bodies negates the need for a flame stabilizing device exterior to the outlet of the burner.
A still another burner structure which incorporates flame stabilization is shown in Figure 10 and includes a flameholder 90 attached to the end of a pilot tube 92. The flameholder 90 can be cup-shaped and acts as a bluff body, as in the structure shown in Figures 8 and 9~ The pilot tube 92 is positioned within a pipe 94 so as to be substantially concentric therein. The circumferential end 96 of pipe 94 abuts a refractory diffuser 98 having a tapered opening 100 therein. The diameter of the tapered opening 100 increases from the inner surface 102 of the refractory diffuser 98 to the outer surface 104 thereof.
The inner diameter of pipe 94 is approximately the same as the diameter of the tapered opening 100 at the inner surface 102 of the refractory diffuser 98. The pipe 94 is aligned with the tapered opening 100 so that no discontinuities exist between thé surface defining the inner diameter of the pipe 94 and the surface defining the tapered opening 100 in the refractory di~fuser 98. A swirl vane assembly ~06 is positioned ad~acent the outlet 108 of the flameholder 90 and is interposed between the flameholder 90 and the surface defining the tapered opening 100 in the refractory diffuser 98. Air and fuel are provided through apertures 110 and 112, respectively, in the burner housing 114 and pass through a plurality of mixing venturis 116 into a chamber 118 before passing into pipe 94 through end 120 thereof.
The air/gas mixture passes through a passageway 122 between the inner surface of the pipe 94 and the outer surface of the pilot tube 92 into a passageway 124 between the surface defining the tapered opening 100 in the refractory diffuser 98 and the outer surface of the flameholder 90. As the air/gas mixture passes through the swirl vane assembly 106, the mixture recirculates counter to the aix/gas flow direction in a zone on the downstream side of the flameholder 90 creating a region which supports combustion.
After ignition of the air/gas mixture by the pilot flame within the pilot tube 92, the resulting combustion gases pass outwardly therefrom to the outlet 126 of the burner~
The velocity of the air/gas mixture approaches the velocity at which the flame begins to l'lift-off" the surface forming the outlet 12S of the burner. As in the previous burner structures, the flameholder 90 permits the velocity of the air/gas mixture to be increased beyond the velocity at which flame "lift-off'l would occur if a flameholder had not been used.
Regardless of whether a flame stabilizing device is utilized, it has been found that NOX emissions can be held to acceptable levels by operating the burner unit with high velocity excess air to keep the combustion temperature slightly below the temperature at which a significant amount of NOX is produced and to minimize the "residence time"
associated with the formation of a flame~ In the method of the presen-t invention, a high velocity premixed air and gas stream in combination with high heat flux rates, together with suitable proportions of excess air, has been shown to control the "residence time" and temperature thereby minimizing NOX emissions. However, because of the high velocity of the excess air, flame stabilizing devices in the form of flame rods, flame screens or bluff bodies might be required to ensure that the flame does not "lift-off" the burner. The use of a fl ame stabili~ing device increases the maximum flame extinction or "blow-out"'i velocity of the air-gas mixture. The device may also act as a radiator of heat thus keeping the resulting temperature from exceeding the temperature at which a significant amount of NOX is produced. It should be noted, however, that flame stabilization can also be achieved by aerodynamic means, e.g., opposed jet recirculation, wake flows, etc., eliminating the need for a stabilizing device. It has been found with foregoing operating conditions that a very high heat flux of approximately 5,000-100,000 BTU/hr in.2 can be achieved; the former heat flux of approximately 5,000 BTU/hr in~2 heing without the utilization of a flame stabilizing -17~
device, the latter heat flux of approximately 100,000 BTU/hr in.2 being achieved with the utilization of a flame stabilizing device. Referring now to the graph shown in Figure 11, it is apparent that NOX emissions decrease as the percent of excess air increases. If more than 20% excess air is utilized, NOX emissions will be held within recently proposed standards. Thus/ with the foregoing operating parameters, viz., 3~00 degrees F~ nominal operating temperature and high heat flux rates combined with suitable proportions of excess air, acceptable NOX levels can be achieved. It has been further found with the foregoing operating parameters that as heat flux increases, the production of NOX decreases if "residence time" is n; i zed. This was not the case with prior art burner systems wherein an increase in heat flux resulted in a commensurate increase in NOX emissions. This latter benefit, i.e., a decrease of NOX emissions with an increase in heat flux, has not been previously taught.
It has been found in oxygen enriched applications, ~hich generally have higher flame temperature resulting in increased NOX production, that an increase in the velocity of the air/gas mixture decreases "residence time" which, in turn, reduces NOX production. Similarly, in applications where the air/gas mixture has been preheated, which typically results in a higher flame temperature, pre-heating increases the velocity of the air/gas mixture resulting in decreased "residence time" and thus, reduced NOX production.
Another feature of the present invention is that the resulting production of NOX and CO are within the "emissions window" shown in Figure 3. As previously stated, conventional burners typically produce NOX and CO in inverse proportions since time and temperature, both o~ which are conducive to NOX formation~ are required to reduce CO to CO2. Test results using the methoclology of the present invention, i.e., 20% and greater excess air at a high velocity, reveal that even though extremely low levels of NOX are produced, approximately 20 ppmv, the production of CO is not excessive and is within the "emissions window".
Thus, the methodology of the present invention minimizes the production of NOX while producing low levels of CO.
Certain modifications and improvements will occur to those skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing. It should be understood that all such modifications and improvements have been deleted herein for the sake of conciseness and readability, but are properly within the scope of the following claims.
Claims (14)
1. A method of operating a burner to reduce the NOx emissions produced thereby comprising the steps of:
placing a flame stabilizing device adjacent the burner;
premixing air and gas in a manner such that excess air exists in the resulting mixture;
increasing the velocity of said air/gas mixture through the burner to decrease the time required for flame formation; and igniting said air/gas mixture.
placing a flame stabilizing device adjacent the burner;
premixing air and gas in a manner such that excess air exists in the resulting mixture;
increasing the velocity of said air/gas mixture through the burner to decrease the time required for flame formation; and igniting said air/gas mixture.
2. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said flame stabilizing device is positioned adjacent the outlet of the burner.
3. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said flame stabilizing device is positioned within the outlet of the burner.
4. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said flame stabilizing device is positioned exteriorly of the outlet of the burner.
5. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the velocity of said air/gas mixture is increased by reducing the size of the orifices through which said air/gas mixture passes within the burner.
6. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the velocity of said air/gas mixture is increased by increasing the port face loading of the burner.
7. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the velocity of said air/gas mixture approaches the velocity at which the flame begins to "lift-off" the outlet of the burner.
8. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said flame stabilizing device is at least one flame rod.
9. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said flame stabilizing device is a flame screen.
10. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said flame stabilizing device is a combination of a flame screen and at least one flame rod.
11. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said flame stabilizing device is a bluff body.
12. A method of operating a burner to reduce the NOx emissions produced thereby comprising the steps of:
premixing air and gas in a manner such that excess air exists in the resulting mixture;
increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture through the burner to decrease the time required for flame formation;
igniting said air/gas mixture; and stabilizing the resulting flame by aerodynamic means.
premixing air and gas in a manner such that excess air exists in the resulting mixture;
increasing the velocity of the air/gas mixture through the burner to decrease the time required for flame formation;
igniting said air/gas mixture; and stabilizing the resulting flame by aerodynamic means.
13. The method as defined in claim 9 wherein said aerodynamic means comprises opposed jet recirculation.
14. The method as defined in claim 9 wherein said aerodynamic means comprises wake flows.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US61458190A | 1990-11-16 | 1990-11-16 | |
| US614,581 | 1990-11-16 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2054014A1 CA2054014A1 (en) | 1992-05-17 |
| CA2054014C true CA2054014C (en) | 1998-01-20 |
Family
ID=24461877
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2054014 Expired - Fee Related CA2054014C (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1991-10-23 | Low nox burner |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0486169B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH06317308A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2054014C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69128768D1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH07505701A (en) * | 1991-12-30 | 1995-06-22 | ボウウィン テクノロジー ピーティワイ リミテッド | Gas-ignited heater with burner operated without secondary air |
| NL9301980A (en) * | 1993-09-28 | 1995-04-18 | Ingbureaup I Product Innovatie | Method and device for burning gas. |
| US6893252B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2005-05-17 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Fuel spud for high temperature burners |
| US6884062B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2005-04-26 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Burner design for achieving higher rates of flue gas recirculation |
| US6890172B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2005-05-10 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Burner with flue gas recirculation |
| US7476099B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2009-01-13 | Exxonmobil Chemicals Patents Inc. | Removable light-off port plug for use in burners |
| US6881053B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2005-04-19 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Burner with high capacity venturi |
| US6869277B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2005-03-22 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Burner employing cooled flue gas recirculation |
| US6887068B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2005-05-03 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Centering plate for burner |
| US6893251B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2005-05-17 | Exxon Mobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Burner design for reduced NOx emissions |
| US6986658B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2006-01-17 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents, Inc. | Burner employing steam injection |
| WO2003081132A2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2003-10-02 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Improved burner with low nox emissions |
| US7322818B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2008-01-29 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Method for adjusting pre-mix burners to reduce NOx emissions |
| US6866502B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2005-03-15 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Burner system employing flue gas recirculation |
| AU2003230652A1 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2003-10-08 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Burner tip and seal for optimizing burner performance |
| US6846175B2 (en) | 2002-03-16 | 2005-01-25 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Burner employing flue-gas recirculation system |
| US9388983B2 (en) | 2013-10-03 | 2016-07-12 | Plum Combustion, Inc. | Low NOx burner with low pressure drop |
| CN117490064B (en) * | 2023-12-05 | 2024-07-05 | 瓦兰热能设备(无锡)有限公司 | Low-nitrogen environment-friendly burner combustion head |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR2249583A5 (en) * | 1973-10-26 | 1975-05-23 | Gaz De France | Stable burner for gas torch - inner discharge ports give swirling flame inside main flame |
| GB2054822B (en) * | 1979-06-15 | 1983-04-07 | Urquhart Eng Co Ltd | Controlled combustion of gases |
| DE3042548A1 (en) * | 1980-11-12 | 1982-10-07 | Msk - Verpackungs-Systeme Gmbh, 4192 Kalkar | BURNER WITH WIDE SLOT NOZZLE FOR GENERATING A HOT GAS FLOW |
| DE3702415C1 (en) * | 1987-01-28 | 1988-04-21 | Babcock Werke Ag | burner |
| NL8900030A (en) * | 1989-01-06 | 1990-08-01 | Remeha Fabrieken Bv | NOX-POOR ATMOSPHERIC GAS BURNER. |
| GB2231949A (en) * | 1989-05-26 | 1990-11-28 | Burco Dean Appliances Ltd | Gas burner |
-
1991
- 1991-10-23 DE DE69128768T patent/DE69128768D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-10-23 CA CA 2054014 patent/CA2054014C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1991-10-23 EP EP19910309796 patent/EP0486169B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-11-14 JP JP32510291A patent/JPH06317308A/en not_active Withdrawn
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE69128768D1 (en) | 1998-02-26 |
| EP0486169A3 (en) | 1992-12-16 |
| EP0486169B1 (en) | 1998-01-21 |
| EP0486169A2 (en) | 1992-05-20 |
| JPH06317308A (en) | 1994-11-15 |
| CA2054014A1 (en) | 1992-05-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5658139A (en) | Low NOX burner | |
| CA2054014C (en) | Low nox burner | |
| US4505666A (en) | Staged fuel and air for low NOx burner | |
| US7175423B1 (en) | Air staged low-NOx burner | |
| US5256058A (en) | Method and apparatus for oxy-fuel heating with lowered NOx in high temperature corrosive environments | |
| US5044931A (en) | Low NOx burner | |
| EP0782681B1 (en) | Ultra low nox burner | |
| US5667374A (en) | Premix single stage low NOx burner | |
| US20040018461A1 (en) | Burner with low NOx emissions | |
| EP0575043B1 (en) | Fuel-burner method and apparatus | |
| US5551869A (en) | Gas staged burner | |
| EP0076036B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for burning fuel in stages | |
| US8454349B2 (en) | Removable light-off port plug for use in burners | |
| US6890171B2 (en) | Apparatus for optimizing burner performance | |
| US5681159A (en) | Process and apparatus for low NOx staged-air combustion | |
| US5516280A (en) | Apparatus and method for burning a lean, premixed fuel/air mixture with low NOx emission | |
| WO2001035022A1 (en) | AIR STAGED LOW-NOx BURNER | |
| Flanagan et al. | Low NO x burner | |
| US20240167679A1 (en) | Combustion system with mixing and flame arresting for pollution reduction | |
| EP0210313A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for burning fuel | |
| JP2761962B2 (en) | Low NO lower x boiler burner, low NO lower x boiler and operating method thereof | |
| Martin et al. | Staged fuel and air for low NO x burner | |
| Kostiuk et al. | Apparatus and method for burning a lean, premixed fuel/air mixture with low NOx emission | |
| Hemsath et al. | Ultra low NO x industrial burner |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |