CA2051415C - Interdiction method and apparatus with variable dwell time - Google Patents

Interdiction method and apparatus with variable dwell time

Info

Publication number
CA2051415C
CA2051415C CA002051415A CA2051415A CA2051415C CA 2051415 C CA2051415 C CA 2051415C CA 002051415 A CA002051415 A CA 002051415A CA 2051415 A CA2051415 A CA 2051415A CA 2051415 C CA2051415 C CA 2051415C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
jamming
unauthorized
cycle
time slots
channels
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CA002051415A
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
CA2051415A1 (en
Inventor
Lamar Edwin West, Jr.
David Paul Durand
Melvin Paulick
Guy Anthony Primiano
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BLONDER TONGUE INVESTMENT Co
Original Assignee
Scientific Atlanta LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Scientific Atlanta LLC filed Critical Scientific Atlanta LLC
Publication of CA2051415A1 publication Critical patent/CA2051415A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA2051415C publication Critical patent/CA2051415C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K3/00Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
    • H04K3/80Jamming or countermeasure characterized by its function
    • H04K3/82Jamming or countermeasure characterized by its function related to preventing surveillance, interception or detection
    • H04K3/825Jamming or countermeasure characterized by its function related to preventing surveillance, interception or detection by jamming
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
    • H04N21/20Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
    • H04N21/23Processing of content or additional data; Elementary server operations; Server middleware
    • H04N21/234Processing of video elementary streams, e.g. splicing of video streams or manipulating encoded video stream scene graphs
    • H04N21/2347Processing of video elementary streams, e.g. splicing of video streams or manipulating encoded video stream scene graphs involving video stream encryption
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K3/00Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
    • H04K3/40Jamming having variable characteristics
    • H04K3/41Jamming having variable characteristics characterized by the control of the jamming activation or deactivation time
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K3/00Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
    • H04K3/40Jamming having variable characteristics
    • H04K3/42Jamming having variable characteristics characterized by the control of the jamming frequency or wavelength
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N7/00Television systems
    • H04N7/16Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
    • H04N7/166Passage/non-passage of the television signal, e.g. jamming, band suppression
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K2203/00Jamming of communication; Countermeasures
    • H04K2203/10Jamming or countermeasure used for a particular application
    • H04K2203/14Jamming or countermeasure used for a particular application for the transfer of light or images, e.g. for video-surveillance, for television or from a computer screen

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Two-Way Televisions, Distribution Of Moving Picture Or The Like (AREA)
  • Vehicle Body Suspensions (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Magnetically Actuated Valves (AREA)

Abstract

A cable television interdiction apparatus (130) comprises a microprocessor actuation and control means (300) for actuating and controlling one or more frequency agile voltage controlled oscillators (341-344). The voltage controlled oscillators (341-344) selectively jam only unauthorized premium programming transmitted from a headend (100) to a particular subscriber. The method of interdiction comprises the steps of generating and storing voltage control words for operating the oscillators (341-344) consistent with a headend selected jamming factor for a particular channel to be jammed and addressably and stored premium programming authorization data.

Description

INTERDICTION METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH VARIABLE DWELL TIME

Cross Reference to Related Application This application is related to Canadian application No.
593,242 (issued to Patent No. 1,334,444 dated February 14, 1995) entitled "Off-Premises Cable Television Channel Interdiction Method and Apparatus", and to commonly owned applications entitled "Picture Carrier Control Circuit For Cable Television Interdiction or Jamming Apparatus" (Canadian application No.
2,071,501 filed December 6, 1990), "Optimum Amplitude And Frequency of Jamming Carrier in Interdiction Program Denial System" (Canadian application No. 2,071,500 filed December 6, 1990), "CATV Reverse Path Manifold System" (PCT application No.
PCT/US90/07117 filed December 6, 1990, issued to U.S. Patent 5,109,286 dated April 28, 1992) and "CATV Subscriber Disconnect Switch" (Canadian Patent No. 2,031,603 dated December 3, 1996).
~K~ROUND OF THE lNV~L. 1 lOIN

1. Technical Field This invention relates to cable television systems and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for applying remotely controlled and remotely applied interdiction or jamming signals to prevent reception of unauthorized television channels.

2. Background Art At a headend of a cable television system, a scrambler is normally provided to encode premium television channels. The applied scrambling precludes reception by an unauthorized converter/decoder at a connected premises. Data representing channels or tiers of programming are addressably transmitted to a particular converter/decoder and stored in an authorization memory. As a result of the addressed transmission, a subsequently transmitted program is authorized in that the decoder portion of the converter/decoder will be selectively enabled to decode the scrambled premium ch~nnel or program.

la ~ 4 t 5 Several varieties of scrambling techniques are applied today. Each manufacturer has its own scheme which may be incompatible with others. Nevertheless, most popular scrambling systems today are based on sync suppression, in which the sync information is hidden from the television receiver's sync separator, usually by moving it to a level occupied by picture information (moving the sync tip to an ~' WU Yl~l~Y4 PCT/US91/O~Un 2 2~ 5 ~ 4 ~ 5 ~' eguivalent picture level of 40 IRE units is common). Some systems modulate the picture carrier with a sine wave phased to ~u~less the horizontal blAnki ng interval. Most systems today switch to the suppressed level at the beginning of the 5 bl~nkin~ interval and switch out at the end. Most though not all suppress the vertical blanking interval. Some systems dynamically invert the video, either on a line-by-line or a field-by-field basis. ~his must be done carefully to avoid artifacts caused by inverting and re-inverting around 10 different levels, and by differential gain and phase of the system. Synchronization is restored either by the provision of synchronous amplitude modulated pulses on the sound carrier, by digital information placed in the vertical interval or by phase modulation on the picture carrier.
The provision of one scrambler per premium channel at the headend and the inclusion of a descrambler in each converter/decoder at the premises of the television receiver is particularly expensive. Furthermore, by providing the converter/~co~Pr on premises has turned out to be a great 20 temptation to service pirates who imaginatively seek ways to receive premium channels. As a result, cable television eguipment manufacturers have entered into a veritable war with such pirates resulting in complicated service authorization protocols in some instances involving multiple layers of 25 encryption by both in-band and out-of-band data transmission further increasing the costs of the converter/decoder.
Furthermore, all scrambling systems leave artifacts in the horizontal blanking interval in the form of steps on the front and back porches. Normally these are not a problem, but 30 if a television receiver does not have adequate overscan, then the steps can show up as light bars on one or both sides of the picture.i Further, if a television receiver uses back porch sampling for automatic gain CGlll LOl and/or black level restoration, and the sampling period extends into the time of 35 the descrambling step, the television will show the wrong black level and may show flicker in the picture. In systems in which pulse trains are applied to the sound carrier, a buzz carried by harmonics of a 59.94 Hz signal can be noticed in some television receivers.
Consequently, the cable industry has resorted to look for new technology and to take a second look at technology developed in the early stages of development of cable television such as the application of negative and positive traps and more recent tech~iques such as interdiction.

W~ Yl~ 4 PCT/US91/0W~
~ 20S1415 Negative trap technology is viewed by many manufacturers as a viable alternative to sync suppression scrambling methods. A negative trap is basically a narrow band reject filter. Traps are located at the drop to a subscriber's 5 dwelling and attenuate a significant portion of a premium - television channel rendering that ~h~n~el unusable by the subscriber.
In the conventional embodiment, negative traps are made using L-C filter technigues. The result is a notch with 10 finite quality Q and finite shape factor. In the case of a si chan!~l negative trap, ~ e center of the notch us y located at the picture carrier frequency of tne ch~ Q1 to be removed. This t~ch~ique, sometimes called a static negative trap, requires attenuation at the picture 15 carrier of at least 60 dB to be effective.
Negative trap systems have several advantages that make them attractive for cable television applications. One primary advantage is the ability to deliver a broadband cable television cpectrum to the cubscriber's converter/decoder.
20 Conventional sync suppression systems utilize descrambling set-to~ converter/decoders which deliver inherently narrowband signals. Negative tra~s are usually mounted outside the subscriber's home (typically at the tap) and thereby minimize the ex~osure associated with placing hardware inside the 25 subscriber's dwelling. Finally, some cable television operators view the negative trap as a more secure means of subscriber control than is sync suppression, as picture reconstruction is viewed as substantially more difficult.
However, the negative trap system requires hardware in 30 locations where no revenue is generated for the cable television system. Moreover, negative traps have several severe practical limitations. L-C band reject filters have Q and shape factor limitations. Quality factors Q for L-C
filters are typically limited to less than 30. This means 35 that for a negative trap located at channel 8 (picture carrier at 181.25 MHz) the 3 dB bandwidth of a negative trap is typically 6 MHz (or the bandwidth of a baseband television channel). This trap would result in significant deterioration of the lower adjacent channel. Then the television receiver 40 tuned to the lower adjacent channel, rather than having to contend with a 15 dB picture-to-sound ratio, may have to contend with a sound carrier reduced an additional 6 dB or so.
Frequency stability as a function of time and temperature is also a significant concern. Many cable television system WV ~ U~YIfW809 ~OSl~l~

operators have instituted a regular negative trap change-out program based on the assumption that after a certain period of time and temperature cycling, frequency drift will render negative traps useless.
s CAscA~Ahility is another significant concern. Finite return loss and non-zero insertion loss limit the number of single ~hAnnel negative traps which can be cascaded. As the number of services to be secured increases, the negative trap decreases in ArpeAl. Moreover a change in channel line-up 10 requires a significant investment in hardware and manpower in this scenario.
Recently, a new type of negative trap has been introduced. The dynamic negative trap consists of a notch filter that is designed to be modulated with respect to 15 frequency. The notch is centered about the picture carrier but is deviated slightly from side to side. The telev~sion ~hAnnel is rendered unusable by the introduction of unwanted amplitude and phase modulation on the picture carrier. This technique requires a notch depth significantly less than that 20 of static negative traps (typically 40 dB). Additionally, the intentionally introduced frequency modulation reduces somewhat the requirement for frequency stability.
The dynamic negative trap, however, has several disadvantages. A power source is required in order to 25 accomplish the frequency modulation. More significant is the parasitic modulation that this terhnique produces on the adjacent television channels.~
Positive trap systems also utilize a narrow band-rejector notch filter. However, unlike negative trap systems which are 30 used to attenuate or trap a premium chAnn~l transmission, the notch filter is used to restore the premium television r-hAn~el. In this sre~Ario, an interfering signal is placed inside the premium television chAn~el at the cable television headend. This interfering ~ignal is then removed at the 35 subscribers dwelling by use of the notch filter. Ideally this notch filter removes only the interference without removing a significant amount of television information.
The positive trap terhnique is seen as having several advantages by the cable television system operator. It is 40 considered advantageous to have the interference present in the secured chAn~els on the cable television distribution plant (unlike the negative trap system in which the channels to be secured are "in the clear" on the distribution plant).
It is very attractive from a financial stAn~roint to require W~J Yl~ 4 r~_l/U~YI/UWVY

5 2 0~
subscriber hardware only at those locations where a subscriber wishes to receive secure service. Thus, any capital invest-ment is associated with a point of revenue generation.
The conventional embodiment of the positive trap system 5 utilizes L-C notch filters to remove the interfering signal.
These L-C notch filters suffer from the same imitations as do L-C negative traps ~ above. Consequently, L-C based positive traps are limited to the lower end of the cable television spectrum. Qual ty Q and shape factors have also 10 restric'ed the number of i ~tions -or the interfering signal within the television cha. 1.
The location for t~ interfering signal in the conventional ~hoAiment of the positive trap system is midway between the picture carrier and sound carrier. The energy 15 density tand hence information density) in this area of the spectrum is relatively low. One reason this locatiori was chosen was that it minimized the impact of any television information removed along with the interfering signal by the notch filter, and thereby improved the quality of the 20 recovered television signal. It would be expected that the jamming carrier would normally have minimal effect on the adjacent channel television picture unless a ~elevision has unusually poor rejection 2.2S MHz above the p =ure carrier.
The jammer does add another carrier which the tuner will have 25 to contend with, which might cause some degradation in a marginally overloaded case.
Despite this location, the quality Q and shape factor limitations of conventional L-C positive traps do remove a significant amount of useful television information. The 30 result is a noticeable "softening" of the television picture as a result of attenuation of high frequency information.
Predistortion at the h~A~e~ can improve this performance but falls far short of being able to correct it completely. This location for the interfering signal also facilitates the job 35 of the video pirate. This pirate can easily tolerate a degraded signal and hence can recover a usable picture using techniques easily available (such as the classic twin lead quarter wave stub with an aluminum foil slider for fine tl~n i ng) . Also, positive trap systems require a higher per 40 premium chA~nel cost than a negative trap system.
A relatively recent tech~ique for premium chAnnel control is the interdiction system, so-called because of the introduction of an interfering signal at the subscribers location. Most embodiments consist of a pole-mounted WO9l/1~94 PCT/US91/0~K~
2 0 ~

enclosure designed to serve four or more subscribers. This enclosure contains at least one microprocessor controlled oscillator and switch control electronics to secure several television rhAnnPlc. Control is accomplished by injecting an 5 interfering or jamming signal into unauthorized channels from this pole-mounted enclosure.
For efficiency's sake, it is known to utilize one oscillator to jam several premium television chAnnels. This terhnique not only reduces the amount of hardware required, 10 but also maximizes the system flexibility. The oscillator output jamming signal frequency is sequentially moved from channel to rhAnnel. ronc~quently, the oscillator is frequency agile and hops from jamming one premium channel frequency to the next.
One such system is known from U.S. 4,450,481 in which a single frequency agile oscillator provides a hopping gain-controlled jamming signal output to four high frequency electronic switches. Each switch is associated with one subscriber drop. Under microproreCcor control and depending 20 on which subscribers are authorized to receive transmitted premium programming, the microproceCc~r selectively gates the jamming signal output of the single oscillator via the switches into the path of the incoming broadband television signal to each subscriber. Cons~quently, an unauthorized sub-25 scriber, upon t~n; ng to a premium channel, will receive thepremium channel on which a jamming signal at approximately the same frequency has been superimpos~.
In the known system, it is indicated that sixteen chA~nels may be jammed by a single voltage controlled 30 frequency agile oscillator. With respect to one premium chAn~el, this translates to a situation in which the jamming signal can only be present one sixteenth of the time or an approximately 6% jamming interval. The rate of hopping is also indicated at 100 bursts per sQcQn~ of jamming signal at 35 a particular frequency or a 100 hertz hopping rate.
Consequently, the effectiveness of the jamming signal is questionable.
Cable television rhAn~els and, of course, premium service may extend over a wide range of frequencies, for example, from 40 100 to 350 megahertz. In the known embodiment, the single oscillator provided must be frequently agile over a wide rage.
It is further recognized that the jamming signal o~uL of the single oscillator must be within a range of 100-500 KHz above or below the video carrier frequency. Consequently, a 7 7~4~5~
synthesizer having an internal reference is provided to assure the reasonable accuracy of the j~mmin~ signal output of the oscillator to the tolerable 100-500 KHz band above or below the video carrier.
It is indicated that the j:~mming signal is at a high relative power and is gaincontrolled to exceed the amplitude ofthe video carrier by S to 20 dB. Because ofthe high output power relative to the premium channel video carrier power and the difficulty of precisely j~mming the premium channel frequency, such an interdiction system leaves considerable opportunity for improvement. Because the oscillator is frequency hopping, its spectrum tends to spread out around the picture carrier, generating a slightly different situation as far as the required adjacent channel rejection characteristics ofthe television are concerned.
Firstly, it is important that the j~mminE frequency to be controlled so as to place the i~ r~lellce as close as possible to the picture carrier. Secondly, it is also important to limit the peak amplitude of the interfering signal so as not to significantly exceed the video peak envelope power in order to ensure that there are not residual artifacts on adjacent channels.
However, in the known system, adjacent channel artifacts are also created since the j~mming signal is intentionally placed below the video carrier and consequently proximate to an adjacent channel. Also, the rate of frequency hopping is limited in the known embodiment as a result of its application of conventional frequency control techniques during the hopping process.
The known interdiction system has proven to be particularly susceptible to adjacent channel artifacts from the above described amplitude and frequency and frequency selections which can ~ s~tisfy subscribers. Furthermore, the subjective perception ofthe depth of j:~mming an unauthorized premium channel is relatively ~m~ti~f~ctory resulting from the limited maximum six percent j~mmin~ interval when sixteen premium channels are jammed by a single oscillator and the relatively low rate of frequency hopping.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided an interdiction apparatus used in a cable television system having a headend for preventing unauthorized reception of progr~mmin~ transmitted to a subscriber comprising:
j~mmin~ means for j~mmin~ each of a plurality of unauthorized channels with a controlled j~mming signal; and A

7a ~ 4 ~ ~
control means for programmably controlling, during a j:~mming cycle wherein each of said plurality of unauthorized channels is jammed, said j~mming means to selectively jam each of said plurality of unauthorized channels for a variable proportion of said j~mming cycle, said variable proportion of said j~mming cycle being determined by a communication from said headend to said control means.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided an interdiction system for selectively j~mming a plurality of unauthorized channels in a cable television system comprising a headend and an interdiction apparatus having control means and controlled oscillator means for generating j~mmin~; signals which selectively interdict each of said unauthorized channels during a j~mming cycle, said j~mming cycle comprising a plurality of time slots, a method for varying the amount of time unauthorized channels are jammed within said j~mming cycle, said method comprising the steps of:
assigning a variable number of said time slots per j~mmin~ cycle to each unauthori~d ch~nnel, said variable number of said time slots per j~mming cycle assigned to each unauthori~d channel determined by a communication from said headend to said control means;
and j~mming each of said unauthorized channels by interdicting said channels with said j~mming signals for a variable proportion of said j~mmin~: cycle, said variable proportion based on the assignment of the time slots per j~mming cycle to each of said unauthorized channels.
In still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided an interdiction apparatus used in a cable television system having a headend for preventing unauthorized reception of progr~mming transmitted to a subscriber comprising:
means for interdicting a plurality of channels for which selective j~mming is desired with controlled j~mming signals;
control means, responsive to a communication from the headend, for programmably controlling the generation of said j~mming signals;
said interdicting means being capable of selectively j~mming a plurality of saidchannels, each for a predetermined amount of time during a j~mmin~; cycle, and wherein the amount of time that any channel is jammed within a cycle can be programmably varied; and means for ~ igning a predetPrmined number of time slots per j~mming cycle and means for assigning a number of said time slots to frequencies within said channels for which A

7b ~ S
selective j~mming is desired, wherein at least one of said time slots assigned to a particular channel does not occur consecutively in time with respect to another of said time slots assigned to said particular channel.
In still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided an interdiction apparatus used in a cable television system having a headend for preventing unauthorized reception of progr~mming transmitted to a subscriber, comprising:
j~mming means for j~mming each of a plurality of unauthorized channels with a controlled j~mming signal; and control means for programmably controlling, during a j~mming cycle wherein each of said plurality of unauthorized channels is jammed, said j~mming means to selectively jam each of said plurality of unauthorized channels for a variable proportion of said j~mming cycle, said variable proportion of said j~mming cycle being determined by a global communication from said headend to said control means.
Many of the above-stated problems and related problems of the prior art have been solved with the principles ofthe present invention, a television channel interdiction method and apparatus capable of remotely controlled jammed depth and A

WO gl/12694 Pcrrussl/oosos 2 0 5~

-frequency at reduced power. After considerable investigation into the known art and through experimentation, it has been determined that an optimum placement of a jamming signal is within the approximate range exten~ing from the video carrier 5 to 250 kiloherz above the video carrier, a jamming signal placement much below the video carrier creating artifacts in the next lower adjacent ch~n~el. Such a placement is between the video carrier and the audio carrier for the same premium channel. Also, from the head end, the j~mming carrier may be 10 precisely established at a frequency resolution of 50 KHz as a digitally step-wise selectable frequency within the 250 KHz range above the video carrier. A ten bit voltage control word is applied by way of a digital to analog converter to a voltage controlled oscillator to control the frequency of the 15 jamming signal within this frequency range or to provide a jamming signal outside the range, for example, if the aùdio carrier is to be intentionally jammed. Furthermore, to insure the accuracy of the frequency of the jamming signal and to limit jamming signal frequency harmonic interference, a 20 plurality of oscillators are provided, each operating within a particular narrow band of the cable television spectrum.
The sum of all such narrow bands shall be equivalent to the entire spectrum over which jamming is desired, recognizing that the cable television spectrum to be jammed may itself be 25 discontinuous or that some overlap in bands may be desired.
In particular, four separate oscillators are provided whose outputs are separately filtered to eliminate the appearance of harmonics of the jamming signal o~L~uL which can interfere with television reception on other ch~n~ls higher in the 30 spectrum. Each oscillator may be intentionally limited to jamming a maximum of four channels within its band resulting in approximately a factor of four improvement in jamming interval over the prior art. Furthermore, each plurality of oscillators is provided on a per subscriber or per drop basis.
Also, in accordance with the principles behind the present invention, the jamming signal power is limited within the range of -2.5 dB and + 6.5dB with a +2db nominal with respect to the video carrier power level. Consequently, there is less çh~nce of adjacent ch~nn~l interference than in the 40 known prior art system.
Furthermore, it has been determined that jamming depth, the subjective perception of one viewing a scrambled television channel on a number of different television receivers, is improved by improving the frequency hopping rate , .. '''~' WO91/1~94 PCT/US91/OWK~
2051~1~

to approximately four kilohertz, a factor of twenty increase in rate over the known system, all other parameters being equal such as amplitude and frequency of the jamming signal.
As will be ~;Ccll~se~ herein, the present embodiment is capable 5 of achieving frequency hopping rates of this magnitude because it is not limited by conventional frequency locking techniques. -~
The microprocessor of the present apparatus furthercontrols the provision of power to the plurality of lO oscillators. If the subscriber is authorized to receive all premium channels within 'he bard secured by a given oscillator, that oscillator may be powered down for the duration. Furthermore, no residual jamming signal output power will pass through an intentionally open switch during 15 a powered up condition as might occur in the prior art interdiction system.
Common circuitry is shared by a plurality of subscribers, for example, up to four, and is housed in a pole-mounted, strand-mounted or pedestal housing. The common circuitry 20 comprises automatic gain ~ol.L-ol circuitry for regulating the level of video carrier. The common ci-cuitry also comprises a data receiver, a data APcoAer and a microprocessor which may be individually addressed. The common circuitry separately decodes for each addressed and in service subscriber module 25 any commands and data transmitted from the headend. The microprocessor of the common circuitry communicates with the micropro~es-or of the subscriber module any decoded data related to the particular subscriber served by that subscriber module. The deco~P~ data, for example, indicates individually 30 addressed channel or program authorization data or globally transmitted chAnnel frequency and jamming depth data received from the headend for storage in microprocessor memory.
During a normal mode of operation, the microprocessor of the subscriber module actuates or powers up each reguired 35 oscillator and transmits frequency data toward all required oscillators for jamming any and all unauthorized channels at a jam factor selected for each particular premium channel.
In particular, a sixty-four position memory may be reserved for storing ten bit voltage control words. An algorithm of 40 the subscriber module microprocessor loads the voltage control word memory deF~n~ing on the level of service chosen by the subscriber. In one extreme where a particular subscriber is authorized to receive all premium channels but one, three of the oscillators may be powered down and the remaining ~-v ~ r~_l/ u~
2051 ~

oscillator is capable of continuously jamming the one unauthorized channel resulting in a 100% jamming interval.
If a parti¢ular ~llhcrriber at a given point in time has subscribed to none of the sixteen channels offered, all four 5 oscillators are sequentially triggered and sixty-four voltage control words are provided in a pseudo-random sequence toward the four oscillators. The application of such a pseudorandom sequence can thwart pi~ating.
Jam factor as defined herein is a parameter selectable 10 and globally transmitted by the headend to equate to the relative degree of jamming to ~e applied to different premium channels. For example, it may be appropriate to jam highly restricted programming at a higher jam factor. In accordance with the present invention, a total of sixteen voltage control 15 words may be allocated to one premium channel. Consequently, the sixteen control words are analogous to jamming time slot intervals which can be allocated by the headend to improve jamming depth. For example, if three premium programs are provided by the headend over rh~nnels within the allocated 20 band of one oscillator at a particular point in time, these sixteen time slots or their responsive jam factors may be allocated at eight, four and four respectively (totalling sixteen) to effectuate, for the least jammed channel and allowing a five percent overlap, a minimum 20% jamming 25 interval. As already indicated, if the subscriber subscribes to all of these three rhAnnels, the microprocessor algorithm will power down or deactuate the oscillator entirely or increase the jamming interval proportionate to the degree of premium service subscribed to and the assigned jamming 30 factors.
According to a novel aspect of the present invention, the amount of time a particular channel is jammed can be varied to enable an operator to more heavily jam (increase the jam factor) of certain çhAnnels which may require greater 35 security. Moreover, the dwell time can be varied randomly and/or more than one time slot per cycle can be associated with a particular shAnnel. Also, a plurality of consecutive time slots may be allocated to a particular rhAnnel.
Periodically, and at power up, the present apparatus 40 enters a calibration mode of operation, for example, at approximately thirty minute intervals. From the front end, premium rh~nnel frequency data is globally transmitted for storage in memory of the microprocessor of the common circuitry. The common circuitry microprocessor in turn -WO91/l~g4 PCT/US91/OW~
20~14i~

calculates a divide by factor for a programmable prescaler of the subscriber module and an expected time between frequency counts and forwards these çalculations to the microprocessor of each subscriber module.
The programmable prescaler or frequency divider is provided in a feedback path frDm the plural oscillators to the microprocessors of the subscriber module. During the calibra~ion mode, only one oscillator is powered at a time.
The transmitted and stored frequency data is translated into 10 a best guess voltage control word. As a result, the jamming signal frequency of the only powered-up oscillator is fed back through the prescaler which divides down the high frequency output for counting by the microprorQC~or. The microprocessor calculates a count in accordance with the known time interval 15 between received o~L~u~s of the prescaler. The count is then compared with the expected count and the voltage control word adjusted accordingly. After a maximum of ten such calculations, starting with the most significant bit of the ~31tage control word a particular control word is precisely 20 established in voltage control word memory. In sequence l sixteen control words of each oscillator or all sixty-rour words are precisely established, the entire procedure requiring only a fraction of a second. Consequently, no meAningful intelligence can be obtained during the calibration ,5 mode if a subscriber coincidentally attempts to view an unauthorized premium channel. Thus, the calibration mode combination with the provision of plural narrow ba oscillators assures jamming signal frequency control.
As a consequence of the calibration mode of operation and 30 the structure of the present apparatus, the jamming carrier can be practically positioned anywhere within the 250 kilohertz band above the video carrier or even elsewhere if desired, for example, for jamming the audio carrier. During the approximately thirty minute interval in times of 35 temperature variations, there is an opportunity for frequency drift of a given jamming signal frequency. However, the drift, if existent, is actually desirable in the sense that - such a drift will thwart any would be pirates attempting to trap the jamming signal with a notch filter. As alluded to 40 before, the jamming signal frequencies may also be intentionally varied by varying the voltage control words for jamming a given premium chAn~l. Furthermore, they may be applied in a pseudo-random sequence. Consequently, a would-be pirate would have to follow the same pseudo-random sequence WO91/1~94 PCT/US91/O~U9 2 0 S ~

and sequentially actuate a plurality of notch filters, all at the same frequencies as are represented by the associated voltage cG~IL~ol words as well as anticipate the natural fre-quency drift previously alluded to in order to pirate the 5 premium television signal.
Importantly also, the~application of a calibration mode of operation, as distinct from a normal mode of operation, permits the present apparatus to achieve much highe~ frequency hopping rates than the known system during the normal mode of 10 operation. Because there is no requirement for the appli-cation of slow conventional frequency locking techniques during the normal mode of operation, a desirable three to four kilohertz hopping rate is achievable.
These and other advantages of the present method and 15 apparatus~for providing remotely and addressably controlled interdiction will now be explained with reference to the drawings and the following detailed description of one embodiment.

2 0 BRIEF DE8CRIPTION OF l~E~ DRAWING~
Figure 1 is an overall system block diagram showing the inherent compatibility of the present interdiction apparatus with existent cable television systems comprising premium 25 channel scramblers, addressable data transmitters, and subscriber converter/decoders.
Figure 2 is a block schematic diagram of an addressable common ~on~ol circuit for the plurality of provided subscriber modules in accordance with the present invention 30 comprising a broA~h~n~ a signal tap, a microproceC~or, a data receiver and decoder and an automatic gain control circuit.
Figure 3 is a block schematic diagram of one subscriber module comprising a micropror~ssor for selectively actuating and controlling the ouLpu~ frequency provided by each of four 35 voltage ~onLlolled oscillators such that during a normal mode ~f operation sixteen premium rh~nnels may be jammed at a minimum twenty percent jamming interval and, during a calibration mode, a feedback path is provided to the microprores~or through a programmable prescaler to precisely 40 establish jamming signal frequencies.
Figure 4 is a frequency plan for allocating the broadband cable television spectrum among four separate bands, each of which bands comprising a plurality of channels greater than or equal to four but, of which plurality, only four channels ~ ~ ~ PCT/US91/OWU~
~0~14i5 may be jammed at a 20% jamming interval.
Figure 5 is a detailed block schematic diagram of one embodiment of a feedback loop structure for implementing the calibration mode of operation of the present invention.
Figure 6 is a block diagram of the voltage control word memory in connection with the sequential provision of oscill~tor jamming frequency signal ouL~u-s during a normal mode or operation.
Figure 7 is a timing diagram for the embodiment of Figure lo 3 during a normal mode of operation in which each interdiction control signal is particularly depicted.
_ _e 8 depicts several exemplary jamming patterns for jamm -~ plural channels with different dwell times.

MODE ~R) FOR CARRYING OUT THE lNV~ ION
Referring more particularly to Fig. 1, there is shown a general block diagram of a cable television system employing the principles of the present invention. By cable television 20 system is intended all systems involving the transmission of tele~sion signals over cable toward remote locationsJ For example, a cable televi~ion sy ~em may comprise a community antenna television distribution system, a satellite signal distribution system, a broadcast television system, a private 25 cable distribution network, ei~her industrial or educational, or other forms of such systems. Each remote location of a television receiver may comprise the location of a partic ar subscriber to a subscription television service, pl~ral subscribers, single subscribers having plural television 30 receivers or private locations in a private cable distribution network. Consequently, the term subscriber, when used in this application and the claims, refers to either a private subscriber or a commercial user of the cable television system. Headend 100 as used in the present application and 35 claims is defined as the connecting point to a serving cable 110 for distributing television c~An~els t~ subscriber locations.~ For reference purposes, an Electronic Industries - Association (E.I.A.) stAn~Ard cable television frequency allocation scheme is employed and referred to herein; however, 40 by means of the following disclosure of the present invention, one may apply the principles to other known standards or non-stAnAArd frequency allocations. Furthermore, a National Television Subcommittee (N.T.S.C.) standard ~omrocite tele-vision signal at baseband is generally considered in the WO91/1~94 PCT/US91/O~W~

~51~ 14 following description; however, the principles of the present invention apply equally to other stAnAArd and non-standard h~h~nA televi~ion signal formats.
Headend 100 comprises a source of television programming 5 101. Television program source 101 may be a satellite television receiver output, a program produced by a television studio, program material received over a microwave or broadcast television link, a cable television link output, or any other source of television programming consistent with the 10 present invention. The program source material need not bé
limited to conventional television but may comprise teletext, videotex, program audio, utility data, or other forms of communication to be delivered to a remote location over the serving cable 110.
~oy~am material provided by source 101 may be premium or otherwise restricted or desirably secured from receipt at unauthorized receiver locations. To this end, each channel or program to be secured is generally scrambled by scrambler 102 provided at headend 100. By the use of the term premium 20 ~h~nnel or premium programming in the present application and claims is intenA~A a channel or program which is desired to be secured from unauthorized receipt either because of its premium or restricted status.
Normally, all premium ~ o~Lamming in known cable 25 television systems is scrambled. However, in accordance with the present invention, premium programming is transmitted in the clear, and interdiction is applied at interdiction apparatus 130 to jam reception of unauthorized premium programming.
Consequently, during a transition period in which headend 100 provides scrambled television programming as well as premium programming in the clear, a scrambler 102 will be provided so long as converted/deco~Prs 150 are provided to subscribers for unscr~mhling scrambled/program transmission.
35 In certain instances, converter/AecoAers 150 may be entirely replaced by interdiction apparatus 130 of the present invention.
Also, at the he~A~n~, there is normally an addressable data transmitter 103 for transmitting global commands and data 40 to all subscribers or addressed communications for reception by a un~que subscriber. Such data transmission may be conducted over a separate data carrier from the cable television spectrum, for example, at 108.2 megahertz. It may also be transmitted over an unused default channel from the WO9l/1~94 PCT/US91/O~U~
- 20Sl~la _ 15 television spectrum. Global commands generally take the form of operation code and data while addressed communications further comprise the unique address of a particular subscriber.
In another alternative emhoAiment~ such communications may take the form of in-band signals sent with a television channel superim~_-e~ upon an audio carrier during, for example, the vertical interval of the video signal. Such data communications further complicàte data reception at 10 intervention apparatus 130 in accordance with the present invention and are desirably eliminated. However, in band signalling is sometimes required for the operation of certain converter/deroAers 150 known in the art.
Consequently, headend 100, cable television distribution 15 cable 110, and converter/decoders 150 and television receivers 170 at a typical cllh-criber premises 181 comprise a typical known cable television system. Channel program or authorization data is transmitted via an addressable data transmitter 103 over a cable 110. At a pole 120 or from a 20 pedestal 140 at undeLyLo~lld cable locations, the serving signal is dropped via drop 115 to a subscriber location. Drop 115 i connected to a conventional converter/decoder 150 which serves several functions. Responsive to an addressed communication from headend transmitter 103, channel or program 25 authorization data is updated in an authorization memory if the address associated with the addressed co~u~l,ication matches a unique address of the subscriber decoder 150. For example, the subscriber address may comprise a~plurality of bits over and above the actual number of subscribers in a 30 system, additional bits insuring the security of the address.
The premium ch~nnPl or program is then stored in the autho-rization memory of the converter/decoder 150. Television programming is normally converted to an otherwise unused chAnnel such as rh~nn~l 3 or 4 of the television spectrum by 35 a converter portion of converter/decoder 150. Its premium status is chPckeA against the data stored in authorization memory. If the programming is authorized, the decoder portion of the converter/~coAer is enabled to decode authorized scrambled premium ~loy~amming.
The provided television receiver may be a ~onventional television receiver 170 or may be a so-called cable ready television receiver 171. Because of the advent of cable ready television receivers 171, there is no longer a requirement at a subscriber premises 181 for the converter portion of the ~v ~ r~ u~Y~
2~14~

converter/A~coA~r 150 as a converter is built into such television receivers.
In accordance with a cable television system provided with interdiction apparatus 130 of the present invention, a 5 housing is mounted on a strand supporting cable 110, to a pole 120, or provided via a pedestal 140. Inside the housing is common control circuitry for tapping into the broadband television and data transmission spectrum. Referring to the first pole 120 from the left of Fig. 1, there is shown a 10 strand-mounted apparatus serving two drops 115 may be served by interdiction apparatus 130.~ Besides the common control circuitry, four plug-in sl~hccriber modules may be provided for one housing. Also, if desired, additional services may be provided via other plug-in units of the housing such as 15 impulse pay-per-view, subscriber polling involving two way data communication, meter re~A;ng, energy management or o.her services .
Desirably, all equipment 161 may be removed from the subscriber premises 182. However, for the provision of 20 additional services, some on-premises equipment may be unavoidable. For purposes of this description, premises 182 will be assumed to include at least one non-cable ready conventional television receiver 170. Consequently, subscriber equipment 161 must at least comprise a tunable 25 converter for converting a received cable television channel to an unused rhAnnel such as chAnn~l 3 or 4 for reception on convèntional television receiver 170.
Power for interdiction apparatus 130 may be provided over the cable from the h~A~A 100 or be provided via the 30 subscriber drop 115 or by a combination of such means.
ForeF~eAhly, power may be even provided by rechargeable means such as solar cells or other external or replaceable internal sources such as batteries. Con~equently, subscriber equipment 161 may also comprise a source of power for interdiction 35 apparatus 130.
Interdiction apparatus 130 may be secured in a tamper--resistant housing or otherwise secured such as a locked equipment closet of an apartment complex. If located in a place e~roC~A to the elements, the housing should be water--40 tight. Also, the housing should be designed to preclude radiofrequency leakage.
At pr~emises 183, the subscriber is presumed to have a cable-ready television receiver 171. Consequently, subscriber unit 162 may be entirely eliminated or comprise simply a power WO91/1~ ~ PCT/US91/OWU~
205141~

feed to interdiction apparatus 130.
Premises 184 pictorially represents a subscriber location served by an undeL~o~-d cable 110 via a plurality of pedestals 140, in which cable distribution amplification and 5 branchi ng equipment and drops 115 are normally provided. In accordance with the present invention, pedestal 140 may comprise an off-premises housing for interdiction apparatus 130. Subscriber equipment 162 may comprise a converter, an additional service device and a power unit as described in 10 reference to subscriber equipment 161 or nothing at all as described in reference to subscriber equipment 162.
Interdiction apparatus 130 is uniquely addressable by headend 100 just as is converter/d~coA~r 150. If two bits of a plural bit unigue subscriber address are associated with 15 uniquely identifying one plu~-in slot for one of four subscriber modules, common cont~-~-l circuitry may be uniquely addressed with remaining address data not used to secure the data communication. Just as premium programming is transmitted in the clear and since no data communication is 20 nec~ec~rily required with subscriber premises, a subscriber address need not be transmit'ed in a secure form in àccordance with the principles of the ~resent invention. Nevertheless, address security may be ~_sirable so long as converter~-decoders 150 or other unique address requisite equipment is 25 provided at a premises.
Interdiction apparatus 130 comprises addressable common control circuitry and up to four plug-in subscriber modules.
Upon receipt of subscriber specific premium program or channel authorization data, the data is stored at interdiction 30 apparatus 130. Interdiction apparatus 130 further comprises automatic gain control -circuitry of the common control circuitry. ~h~n~l interdiction circuitry associated with each subscriber module jams unauthorized premium programming d-v~ed via a particular drop 115 to a particular subscriber.
35 Consequently, interdiction apparatus 130 is reasonably compatible with addressable authorization data transmission known in the art. No scrambling of premium chAnnels (and no - resulting artifacts) is necesCAry or desirable. Furthermore, no additional forms of service security are necessary such as 40 c~annel en~y~Lion, in-band channel or tier verification or other security measures. The would-be ser~ice pirate must attempt to remove a particular pseudo-randomly timed jamming signal placed at a varying frequency or seek to tamper with the off-premises apparatus 130 or derive a signal from 2 0 3 ~ 4 ~ 5 PCT/US91/0~N~

shielded and bonded cable 110 which should likewise be maintained secure from radio frequency leakage.
The common control circuitry of interdiction apparatus 130 will not be described by means of the block diagram Fig.
5 2 for serving four subscriber modules in accordance with the block diagram Fig. 3. Referring particularly to Fig. 2, a feeder cable 110 is shown entering interdiction apparatus 130 at FEEDER IN and leaving at ~ OUT. Power PWR may be provided via the feeder cable by means of a subscriber drop 10 or locally by internal or external means. n~penAing on the source of power PWR, input power may be of alternating or direct current.J
A directional coupler 210 which may be in the form of a plug-in module taps into the bro~Ah~A serving cable 110. A
15 broadband of radio frequency signals is thus output to highpass filter 220. HighpA~c filter 220 pAC~~- a band of frequencies comprising at least the data carrier frequency or frequencies (in a bi-directional application) and the cable television channel spectrum. Referring briefly to Fig. 4, the 20 cable television spectrum may comprise a frequency band from at least 120 MHz to 350 MHz.
An automatic gain control circuit comprises variable attenuator 230, RF amplifier 233, directional coupler 232, and AGC control circuit 231. The automatic gain control circuit 25 appropriately regulates the broadband RF signal power to fall within established limits.
Also connected to directional coupler 232 is a data receiver 240 for receiving data from the addressable data transmitter 103 located at headend 100. Data receiver 240 30 receives data transmitted, for example, over a data carrier of 108.2 megahertz and provides unproceCceA data to data deco~er 250. In accordance with an established protocol, such data may be in the form of an operation code, a subscriber unique address~ and associated data.- Data AecoA~ 250 35 proc~cses the data and provides the separately transmitted data to microprocecsor 260 for further interpretation in accordance with a built-in algorithm~ Microprocessor 260 is most efficiently chosen to alleviate as many responsibilities from any microprocessor provided for an individual subscriber 40 module and so is most conveniently an eight bit micropracessor having eight kilobytes of internal code such as a Motorola 68HCOSC8.
Received data may be stored in uninterruptable memory 270 by microprocessor 260. Data may be temporarily stored in WO91/1~94 PCT/US91/OWU~
20514~

memory 270 or more permanently stored and subsequently downloaded when needed to a ~h-~riber module via a serial peripheral interface bus cQnnecting microprocessor 260 with separate microprocessors associated with each provided 5 subscriber module. ~
Microprocessor 260 consequently interprets both global communications addressed to common control circuitry or communications addressed to unigue subscriber modules. If appropriate, microproce~sor 260 ignores global or addressed lO communications to other interdiction apparatus 130 or to converter/~co~ers 150 'Fig. l). Examples of global communications peculiar to interdiction apparatus 130 are premium channel frequency data and jamming factor data~-for each premium channel or channels over which premium l5 programming at a particular point in time is provided via headend lO0.~ Examples of addressed communications include communications comprising premium chAn~el or programming authorization information or communications instructing the common control circuitry to deny or provide service to a par-20 ticular subscriber.
If two way servic~s over the ser~ing cable areanticipated, a data transcriber (not shown) must be provided in the common control circuitry of Fig. 2 or a separate telephone link from the subscriber location to the headend may 25 be provided. Serial peripheral interface bus 290 may be a two way communications link by way of which link microprocessors 300 (Fig. 3) associated with subscriber modules may, at least, provided status reports to micropror~ssor 260 upon inquiry.
Radio frequency splitter 280 provides bro~h~ radio 30 frequency signals comprising at least the cable television series spectrum of Fig. 4 separately to each subscriber module that is provided.
If a reverse path is required for special additional services, a signal combiner (not shown) or a plug-in special 35 service module may be provided for receiving communications from each of the four subscriber modules in an opposite manner to splitter 280. Certain data may be transmitted back toward the headend via the special service plug-in module (also, not shown) associated with the additional special service.
Referring more particularly to Fig. 3, there is shown an overall block schematic diagram of a subscriber module in accordance with the present invention. A microprocessor 300 is associated with a particular subscriber module and communicates with microprocessor 260 of Fig. 2 over a serial WO91/1~94 ~ i 4 1 5 PCT/US91/UUU~

peripheral interface bus. Microprocessor 300 may comprise an eight bit microprocessor equipped with only two kilobytes of microcode, this microprocessor being relieved of overall control responsibilities by microprocessor 300. Consequently, 5 microprocessor 300 may conveniently comprise a Motorola 68HC05C3 microprocessor or similàr unit.
A reverse path may be provided via a lowpass filter 392 to a special service module (not shown in Fig. 2) of common control circuitry as described in Fig. 2 from a corresponding 10 special service module on the subscriber premises. Such as reverse path is completed to the subscriber via terminal~OS.
Also power may be transmitted up the subscriber drop to the module of Fig. 3 and withdrawn at terminal OS.
The broadband radio frequency television spectrum signal 15 from Fig. 2 is provided to terminal IS. Referring to the path connecting terminal IS to terminal OS, there are connected in series a service denying switch 389, an amplifier 387, a jamming signal combiner 384, and a high pass filter 391. Ser-vice denying switch 389 is under control of microprocessor 20 300. In the event of an addressed communication from headend 100 indicating, for example, that a subscriber is to be denied service for non-payment of a bill, service denying switch 389 may be opened. In addition, a high frequency amplifier 387 may be powered down under control of microprocessor 3 87 25 whenever service is to be denied. Otherwise, amplifier 387 may be set at discrete gain levels, under microprocessor control, to provide supplemental gain to the broadband television signal if a subscriber has a plurality of television receivers over and above a nominal amount.
Jamming signals are interdicted at directional combiner 385 under microprocessor control. Because of the directional characteristic of amplifier 387, jamming signals cannot inadvertently reach the common co.lL~ol circuitry of Fig. 2 or the serving cable 110. Jamming signals are interdicted at a 35 level approximately within a range of -2.5 dB to +6.5 dB or +2dB nominal of the video carrier power level of the unauthorized premium chAnn~l frequency to be jammed. They are most conveniently interdicted for video carrier jamming approximately within a range of frequencies ext~n~ing from the 40 video carrier to + 250 Kilohertz above the video ~carrier toward the audio carrier of the channel to be jammed. In accordance with the present interdiction apparatus, the frequency is selectable by the headend 100 and so may be cho-sen to jam the audio carrier at a frequency closer to that W~l Yl/1ZO~4 ~_1/ ~1/(~U809 2 0 ~

carrier if desired. Also, the power level of the jamming signal may be varied via global data transmissions, if, for example, audio carrier jamming is desired. Such interdiction on a per channel basis between the video and audio carriers 5 minimizes adjacent rh~nn~l artifacts.
Hi~hpACc filter 391 prevents any return path signals from reaching combiner 385 and pAs~e- the broA~hAnA spectrum including sny jamming signals toward terminal OS. Reverse path signals, for example in this embodiment, if present, may ~0 be radio frequency signals below 100 megahertz. The broadband television spectrum is presumed to be in the 100-350 megahertz range consistent with Fig. 4. However, interdiction of premium channel viewing may be allocated anywhere desired within a broader or discontinuous cable television spectrum 15 to be jammed. Consequently, filters 391 and 392 are designed in accordance with this or similarly selected design criteria to block or pass broadband television or reverse path signals as required.
Micropro~ec or 300 controls one or more voltage 20 controlled oscillators. According to a preferred embodiment, four such oscillators (e.g., 341-344), each of which oscillators jams premium chA~nPl fre~uencies wlthin an allo-cated continuous range of frequencies, may be used. However, the teachings of this invention are applicable to any number 25 of oscillators. Since premium programming may be transmitted anywhere in the cable television ~pectrum, the sum of all such allocated portions comprises the entire television spectrum to be jammed. In accordance with the present invention, the television spectrum to be jammed may comprise discontinuous 30 portions or intentionally overlapping portions.
Referring briefly to Fig. 4, the spectrum allocation to the plurality of four voltage controlled oscillators in one embodiment will be discussed in view of certain principles.
Firstly, it is desirable to eliminate jamming signal harmonic 35 interference to authorized çhAnnels within the allocated band.
For example, a harmonic of a relatively low frequency signal, for example, 100 MHz can interfere with a chAnn~l at a ~ harmonic of this frequency in the upp~r part of the cable television spectrum. In other words, the allocated band 40 should be limited for an oscillator to fall within one third of an octave, and, consequently, all frequency harmonics may be blocked by filters 351, consequently all frequency harmonics may be blocked by filters 351, 352, 353 and 354 associated wi'h each oscillator. Oscillator 341 denoted OSC

WO91/1~ ~ PCT/US91/0~U~

1, for example, is active in a band exten~ing from 126 to 158 megahertz while filter 351 block harmonics above the included channels 15-20 of the midband.
Cable headend service providers tend to select premium 5 channel allocations in the midband range covering channels 15-22. Conc~quently, the band of oscillator 342, for example, may be selected to overlap the band allocated to oscillator 341.
In order to achieve a jamming interval of 20%, each 10 oscillator may be restricted to jamming only four premium rhAnnels. As will be described in connection with a ~;sruseion of Figs. 5, 6 and 7, jamming depth may be auto-matically increased for a particular subscriber dependent upon the subscriber's level of service. Also, by allocating an 15 overlap of bands as between first and second oscillators 341 and 342, for example, all eight channels of the midband may be jammed by mean of the present interdiction apparatus leaving two channels of the highhAn~ which still may be jammed via oscillator 342. Consequently, according to Fig. 4, 20 oscillator OSCl may jam four of the six allocated channel frequencies of the midband while oscillator OSC2 may jam an overlapping band comprising channels 19-22 of the midband and channels 7-10 of the highh~n~. The range of jamming signal frequencies for oscillator OSC2 is selected within the range 25 of 150-194 megahertz consistent with the desirable elimination of harmonic interference.
Consistent with these design principles, no band overlap is shown for oscillator OSC3 or oscillator OSC4.
Nevertheless, the respective frequency ranges of 198-254 30 megahertz and 258-326 megahertz of these oscillators eliminate any danger of harmonic interference. Low pass filters 353 and 354 cut off harmonic frequencies above the upper limits of these respective ranges. Oscillator OSC3 provides jamming signals for jamming four premium chAnnels selected from 35 chAnnelc 11-13 of the hi~hhAn~ and channels 23-29 of the superband. Eight premium channels may be jammed at a reduced jamming factor for these ten chAnnels. Oscillator OSC4 is provided for jamming from chAnnel 30 in the superband to chAnn~l 41 ex*~n~ing into the hyperband. Four channels of 40 these twelve may be jammed at a 20% jamming interval; however, eight may be jammed at a reduced jamming factor.
Microproceccor 300 is connected by a bus system to memory and buffer circuits comprising RAM's 311 and 312 and buffer 310. Mic~o~loces-cor 300 operates at a clock frequency of, for 2 ~ 5 ~

example, four megahertz provided by clock 336. Counter 335 is shown as a separate element; however, counter 335 is provided essentially for counting the output frequencies of jamming oscillators 341-344 during a calibration mode of 5 operation and so may comprise an element of microprocessor 300.
Microprocessor 300 is also connected to digital to analog converter 3 20 which converts a ten bit voltage control word to analog voltage outputs which are, in turn, provided to 10 analog multiplexer 330. The analog voltage outputs of the analog multiplexer 330 are stored and held at sample and hold circuits 337-340 for application to oscillator 341-344. Via a two bit parallel select bus, analog voltage signal outputs are sequentially gated by analog multiplexer 330 over leads 15 FREQ 1-4 toward the oscillators 341-344. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, these signals may be provided in a pseudorandom sequence to thwart pirating attempts as will be described in reference to Fig. 6.
Microprocessor 300 is connected to each oscillator 341-20 344 via respective oscillator power lines OPWR1-4 for actuating the oscillators. Each oscillator may be powered down during a normal mode of operation if a subscriber is authorized to receive all channels within its allocated band i' at one point in time. Furthermore, during a calibration mode, 25 one oscillator may be powered up for calibration while all other oscillators are powered down.
Microprocessor 300 is further connected to four high frequency PIN diode switches 361-364. During a normal mode of operation, these switches are selectively opened for a 30 brief interval for, for example, sixteen microseconds while an associated oscillator changes or hops from one jamming signal frequency output to another. Nevertheless, assuming four channel jamming by a particular oscillator at a jam factor of four, a four thousand hertz frequency hopping rate 35 is easily achievable via these PIN diode switches.
Also connected to the ou~u~s of each oscillator are associated low pass filters which serve to cut off all harmonics or jamming signal frequency outputs. These low pass filters may be connected either to the inputs or to the 40 outputs of switches 361-364 although connection in series between its associated oscillator and high frequency switch is shown in Fig. 3.
The jamming signal outputs of all four oscillators are combined at signal combiner 365. From signal combiner 365, '~ ~

r~ U;~
2~14i~
_ 24 the combined output is directionally coupled by coupler 370 to programmable prescaler 375 and to signal attenuator 380.
~ Loyr~mmable ~prescaler 375 is only powered via lead PREPWR when required during a calibration mode. In accordance 5 with a programmable divide-by factor, a divided down output frequency is provided to microprocecsor 300 for counting.
When powered down, no ouL~u~ signal results.
During a normal mode of operation, the combined jamming signal o~L~u~s of attenuator 380 are combined at directional 10 coupler 385 with the pAsse~ incoming bro~h~n~ television signai from the common ~G.IL~ol circuit of Fig. 2. As the subscriber is presumed to have paid their bill, switch 389 and amplifier 387 are assumed to be powered. As a result of the combining of jamming signals with the bro~hAn~ spectrum (thus 15 far transmitted in the clear), the subscriber will only receive in the clear premium or restricted programming which the subscriber is authorized to receive.
Referring more particularly to Fig. 5, there is shown a block schematic diagram of one embodiment of a feedback loop 20 useful in describing the calibration mode of operation. The calibration mode, Gc~u~ying a fraction of a second, assures relatively frequency stable operation during a normal mode of operation. Furthermore, because of the calibration mode, there is no requirement for the application of slow 25 conventional frequency locking terh~iques and a high operation frequency hopping rate of four thousand hertz may be achieved during the normal mode of operation. The embodiment shows the calibration of one particular oscillator OSC. The depicted loop indicates an application specific integrated circuit ASIC
30 connected to subscriber module microprocecsQr 300. This circuit ASIC may be clocked at twice the microprocessor rate and comprise the previously ~i~cllcc~ voltage control word memory RAM as well as ~-oy.ammable prescaler 375. A word adjust and select bus 501 is shown which may separately access 35 and adjust all voltage control words in voltage control word memory RAM. When addressed, the voltage co.l~lol word memory is connected via bus 511 to digital to analog converter 320.
Digital to analog converter 320 is co~ected via sample and hold circuit SH to oscillator OSC to which power is applied 40 under microprocessor control via lead OPWR. Via directional coupler 370, the jamming signal ouL~u~ of oscillator OSC is fed back toward microprocessor 300. At fixed prescaler 376, the high frequency output is divided down by a fixed divide-by factor. The divided down jamming frequency output is then WO 91/12694 Pcr/usgl/oo8o ~05 1~l3 output to programmable prescaler 375. ~Loylammable prescaler 375 is under control of microprocessor 300. Responsive to premium channel frequency data transmitted from the headend to microprocessor 260 of Fig. 2, microprocessor 260 in turn 5 generates divide by factor and time between count data for transmittal to microprocessor 300 via the serial peripheral interface bus (Figs. 2 and 3). Microprocessor 300 programs the divide by factor of programmable prescaler 375 via lead 502 and receives a countable frequency ou~uL of programmable 10 prescaler 375 via lead 503. Microprocessor 300 then counts the ou~uL at included counter 335.
The provision of application specific integrated circ it ASIC assists in miniaturizing the subscriber module of F g.
3 and relieves the outboard memory requirements of 15 microprocessor 300. On the other hand, the provision c~~ a limited voltage control word memory in circuit ASIC m_~
restrict the opportunity of microprocessor 300 to relocate addressable slots to other oscillators when one oscillator is powered down as will be described in greater detail in 20 reference to Fig. 6. The provision of a second or fixed prescaler in comparison with the single programmable prescaler shown in Fig. 3 is desirable if the frequency range of the television spectrum to be jammed extends into the hyperband.
Referring now to Fig. 6, there is shown one embodiment 25 of a voltage control word memory having sixty-four memory locations with addresses 1-64. At every fourth memory location 1, 5, 9 and so on is located a voltage control word associated with a first oscillator. For the convenience of establichi~g a convention for discussion, flO . . . flF will 30 be assumed to refer to sixteen frequency control words for a first oscillator OSCl and are numbered in hexadecimal notation from O-F. As indicated above in reference to circuit ASIC
memory requirements, the sixteen memory slots may be permanently associated with oscillator OSCl; however, such a 35 design choice limit~ the freedom of reallocating voltage control words to other oscillators.
Voltage control words are entered into voltage control word memory for each oscillator in sequence provided the oscillator will be applied for jamming. First, it will be 40 assumed that all four oscillators will be applied, each for jamming four premium channels. As will be seen, this is a simplified assumption which assumes a subscriber is authorized to receive no premium channels and, furthermore, it will be assumed that all premium channels are to be jammed at the same W~YI/I~Y4 PCT/US9l/0W~
20514~5 jam factor four.
In this example, sixteen voltage control words will be entered in memory for each oscillator, four of which control words may be the same, each four similar control words being 5 related to one premium rh~n~el frequency to be jammed. Thus, four y~OU~a of four similar control words are entered into sixteen memory locations or time slots 1, 5, 9, 13 . . . 61 for oscillator OSCl. These are indicated as of flO to flF.
In a similar manner, sixteen voltage control words are entered 10 into memory locations 2, 6, 10, 14 . . . 62 for oscillator OSC2. These are indicated as f20 . . . f2F. Then, sixteen voltage control words are entered into memory locations 3, 7, 11, lS . . . 63 for oscillator OSC3, indicated as f30 . . .
f3F. Lastly, sixteen voltage control words are entered into 15 memory locations 4, 8, 12, 16 . . . 64 for oscillator OSC4, indicated as f40 . . . f4F.
The calibration algorithm for loading a first ten bit voltage control word flO into a first memory location 1 for a first oscillator OSC 1 will now be described in some detail.
20 From the down-loaded frequency data from microprocessor 360, a first programmable divide-by factor is transmitted via lead 502 to set programmable prescaler 37S. All other oscillators OSC2-4 are powered down via leads OPWR2-4, and oscillator OSCl is powered up via lead OPWRl (shown in Fig. S as oscillator 25 OSC and lead OPWR respectively).
From the premium channel frequency data, a first ten bit voltage control word flO is stored in memory location 1 representing a first best estimate of jamming frequency by microprocessor 330 via bus 501. The word is transmitted to 30 digital to analog converter 320 where it is converted to an analog voltage. The analog multiplexer (not shown in Fig. 5) selects a lead FREQl from the multiplexer to oscillator OSCl.
Consequently, the analog voltage ouL~u~ of a digital to analog converter is provided to sample and hold circuit SH or 337 for 35 application to oscillator OSCl. Signal combiner 365 (not shown in Fig. 5 for simplicity) only passes the jamming signal output from oscillator OSCl to directional coupler 370 because all other oscillators OSC2-4 are powered down at this time.
Via directional coupler 370, the jamming signal output is 40 provided to fixed prescaler 376. Fixed prescaler 376 divides down the ouL~uL frequency of the oscillator OSC1 to a first frequency. According to the divide by factor loaded into programmable prescaler 375, the first frequency output of fixed prescaler 376 is further divided down to a frequency WO91/1~94 PCT/US91/o~U~
20~14~

which may be counted by counter 335 of microprocessor 300.
Recognizing that the oscillator o~L~u- frequency may be hundreds of-megahertz and the clock for microprocessor 300 runs at only four megahertz, the frequency provided via lead 5 503 should be sufficiently divided down to be counted with reasonable accuracy. Since the fixed time between counts is known to microprocessor 300 having been downloaded from microprocessor 260, counter 335 counts the frequency input on lead 503. The resulting count is compared with the expected 10 count and the microprocessor adjusts the control word accord-ingly. As a result, microproceC~or 300 repeatedly enters the algorithm until the voltage control word stored in memory as accurately as possible reflects t~he premium channel frequency to be jammed. Then, this process is repeated four times for 15 four premium channel frequencies to be jammed by the oscilla-tor OSC.
During the process of loading the four premium channel frequencies for a particular oscillator in to the voltage control word memory, there are two subordinate schemes by 20 which the four voltage control words for a single premium channel may be intentionally varied. In a irst subordinate scheme, via headend 100, four different frequencies may be intentionally selected with reference to one premium channel.
Given a resolution of 50 kilohertz provided by the least 25 significant bit positions of a ten bit voltage control word, the four different frequencies may be selected by headend 100 anywhere within the range of 100 KHz below to 250 KHz above the premium ch~nn~l video carrier for most effective premium rh~nnel jamming. In a r~con~ subordinate scheme 30 microprocessor 300 may be programmed to intentionally vary the entered voltage control word to be at or about the expe--ted downloaded frequency, for example, at fifty kilohertz above or below the expected frequency. Consequently, if the headend selects only one frequency for a first premium channel, for 3s example, at 200 kilohertz above the video carrier, then voltage control words will be entered into memory equivalen~
to video carrier plus 150 kilohertz, 200 kilohertz and 250 kilohertz. Both subordinate schemes thwart pirates attempting to notch out the jamming signal frequency which is 40 intentionally varied by these schemes.
Jamming factor is a term related to the loading of the sixteen voltage control words into voltage control word memory for a particular oscillator. A jamming factor is selected for each premium channel and is globally transmitted from the WU Yl/l;~OY4 r~ 1~ ILSYl~lJwo9 2 0 ~ 1 ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~

headend. If four premium channels are to be jammed by each of four oscillators OSCl-4 and all are to be jammed at the same jamming interval, each has a j~mming factor of four. If a subscriber subscribes to all four premium channels 5 associated with oscillator OSCl, then oscillator OSCl may be powered down and no voltage control words entered in memory during calibration for this oscillator. If a subscriber subscribes to two of the four rhAnnels, the microprocessor may allocate the sixteen rhAnnel words for the first oscillator 10 to the two unauthorized premium channel frequencies to be jammed. Consequently, the microprocessor may allocate eight control words each to jamming the two unauthorized premium channels thus automatically increasing the jamming interval or depth of jamming based on the jamming factor and the given 15 reduced level of premium program authorization. Jamming factor may be intentionally selected, for example, at a high level, for example, eight for one especially sensitive program in relation to two other rhAnn~ls to be jammed by the same oscillator which may be allocated jam factors of four each, 20 the total of all such jam factors being equal to the maximum number of voltage ~o..LLol words, in this example, sixteen, associated with the oscillator.
As disclosed above, each oscillator has a number of time slots which are allocated to jamming various frequencies which 25 the particular oscillator is assigned to jam. Preferably, there may be sixteen time slots per cycle with each time slot correspon~ing to a time duration equal to each other. Accord-ing to a novel aspect of the present invention, the dwell time (the amount of time a particular channel is jammed per cycle) 30 may be varied. Alternatively, or in addition thereto, the number of time slots per cycle allocated to a particular channel may be varied.
For example, a particular oscillator may have 16 time slots per cycle, with each time slot having a dwell time of 35 approximately sous. This would provide the same amount of jamming to each rhAnnol associated with that oscillator. If for example, that oscillator was responsible for jamming 4 chAnnels, it is possible that it may be desirable to jam one or more of the rhAnnels more than another channel to improve 40 the jam factor for that rh~nn~l. This increases the security of the rhAnnels selected thereby increasing their jam factor.
For example, pay-per-view channels and adult entertainment channels may preferably be provided more security than some other premium ch~nnels.

For purposes of example, the following will illustrate some examples of how the dwell time and/or time slots can be varied for an oscillator that jams 4 channels identified as A, B, C, D where for this example, channel A is a pay-per-view 5 channel, channel B is an adult entertainment channel, and channels C and D are premium channels.
Figure 8A shows an example of a jamming pattern where each of channels A, B, C and D are jammed equally and in an orderly manner. If it is desirable to provide the most 10 security to channel A, the next most to channel B and equal amounts to channels C and D, then, the number of time slots allocated to a particular channel may be varied as shown in Figure 8B. This enables greater security for channel A since - channel A now has a jam factor of approximately 50% (8/16).
15 Channel B has a jam factor of about 25% (4/16) while channels C and D each have a jam factor of about 12.5~ (2/16). These jam factors ignore the transition times between time slots but are useful approximations for sake of example.
It should be noted that these same jam factors may also 20 be accomplished by the configurations shown in Figures 8C and D. Moreover, a combination of two or more of these configurations can be used to randomly change the patterns while maintaining the same iam factors to further complicate ~' the pirating of signals by a would be pirate.
It should be noted that these jam factors can be accomplished by varying the number of time slots and concomitantly varying the duration of each slot. For example, with reference to Figure 8C, there may only be 8 time slots with the first time slot having a duration of 4T, a second 30 time slot with a duration of 2T, a third slot with a duration of T, a fourth slot with a duration of T and a fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth time slot with durations of 4T, 2T, T and T, respectively. T is preferably between 30-lOOus.
The amount of time allocated to jamming any channel can 35 be referred to as the dwell time. Therefore, the dwell time can be varied in a variety of ways as shown in Figures 8A-D.
Information regarding the desired dwell time and the order in which channels are to be jammed (jamming channel configu-ration) can be periodically changed by a headend operator.
40 For example, it may be desired to jam some channels more at night than during the day or more on weekends than on weekdays.
Voltage control words may be read from memory or written into memory so they may be read out in a particular pseudo WU Yl~ U~YI/U~UY
205 1 4~5 random sequence (as exemplified above) so that a pirate would have to know the pseudorandom sequence in order a to appropriately time any notch filtering. For example, let fll-f14 be the four premium channel frequencies to be jammed by 5 oscillator OSC1. Addresses 1, 5, 9, and 13 may store voltage control words for fll, fl2, fl3 and fl4, respectively.
However, the next four addresses 17, 21, 25, and 29 may store the voltage control words in a different order, for example, fl4, fl3, fl2, fll ~e~e~Lively. The order may be further 10 varied in the rem2i~ing eight addresses so, when the voltage control words are applied to oscillator OSC 1 during a normal mode of operation, the ou~uL frequency of the jamming signal will vary according to the pseudorandom sequence of data entry.
The calibration mode is entered at initial turn-on generate the sixty-four voltage control words storag~ in voltage control word memory correspon~ing to the desired jamming signal frequencies. Periodically, the subscriber module reenters the calibration mode to update the control 20 words for drift which may result from either the oscillator or the digital to analog converter operation. Such drift if maintained within, for example, 50 kilohertz of the selected frequency is actually desirable in that it further complicates the efforts of a would-be pirate. Also, as already indicated 25 the periodically performed calibration mode permits a higher rate of frequency hopping, for example, four kilohertz during normal operation than would be possible with conventional frequency control methods such as phase locked loops.
Calibration requires but a fraction of a second and, 30 consequently, little intelligible television information may be obtained at a television receiver tuned to an unauthorized premium ch~nnel.
Referring now more particularly to Figs. 6 and 7 with reference to the schematic block diagram of Fig. 3. the normal 35 mode of operation will now be explained. Referring first to Fig. 3, microprocessor 300 upon entering a normal mode of operation causes a first voltage control word stored in memory address 1 of the voltage control word memory of Fig. 6 to be transmitted toward oscillator OSCl. Digital to analog 40 converter 320 converts the ten bit word 0010110101 to an analog voltage level. Under control of a bit select bus, analog multiplexer 330 selects lead FREQl for transmitting the analog voltage signal for storage and holding at sample and hold circuit 337. All four oscillators are presumed OSCl W091/1~94 PCT/VS91/OWU~
20~14ia provides a jamming signal freguency u~uL FREQ2 consistent with the analog voltage signal input provided via analogy multiplexer 330.
Referring to Fig. 7, the normal mode of operation, for 5 the example under ~iscl~eion, is shown in the form of a timing diagram. At the ouL~ of the digital to analog converter is shown, at time tO, an analog voltage level representing frequency FREQ 1 for oscillator OSCl. Also, during time interval tO - tl the analog multiplexer 330 is shown 10 connecting the digital to analog converter 320 to oscillator OSCl. While the analog multiplexer is only connected to oscillator OSCl for the duration tO-tl, the applied analog voltage is stored and held for the duration tO-t4.
Consequently, the ou~u~ of oscillator OSCl is shown 15 continuously applied from time tO-t4.
Under control of microprocessor 300, via lead OSSWl, switch 361 is briefly opened while frequency FREQ 1 is established at the output of oscillator OSCl and then immediately closed. Switch 361 stays closed for the duration 20 until the output of oscillator OSCl hops from frequency FREQ
1 to FREQ 2. Ju~t prior to time t4, switch 361 is again opened in accordance with signal OSSWl. Consequently at the output of swilch 361, the jamming signal output of oscillator 341 is briefly interrupted.
At time t4, the digital to analog converter 320 is signaled to change the ouL~ frequency of oscillator OSCl to frequency FRE~ 2. As before, the analog multiplexer 330 gates an analog voltage level, this time representing frequency FREQ
2 to be held at sample and hold circuit 337. As a result, 30 oscillator OSC2 now provides a j~mming signal frequency output consistent with frequency FREQ 2 until time t8.
Meanwhile, switch 261 which was opened shortly before time t4 in accordance with switch control signal OSSWl is again closed at a point in time shortly after time t4. At any 35 point in time during a normal mode of operation when one of the hiqh frequency switches 361-364 is opened, there will result a loss of a portion of the overall jamming interval during which a jamming signal would be applied. Nevertheless, the resulting danger of the presence of no switches 361-364 40 is that during a hopping from one frequency to the next, an undesirable transition signal may result at a frequency and level which any distort authorized premium programming. If four premium program channel frequencies Gre to be jammed by a particular oscillator, each such period of an open state of 4 PCI'/USg1/OW~09 2 0 ~ 32 a normally closed high frequency switch 361-364 amounts to no more than 5% of the overall interval t0-t64 (not shown).
In a similar manner, a first frequency FREQ 1 is established for oscillator OSC2. Referring again to Fig. 6, 5 it will be seen that at memory address 2 is voltage control word 1010010110 which is provided toward oscillator OSC2. In accordance with Fig. 7, at time tl an analog voltage level is ou~l,L from digital to analog converter 320 representing this word. At a time just prior to time tl, switch 362 is opened 10 in accordance with signal OSSW2. Once frequency FREQ 1 is established at the u~ L~l of oscillator OSC2 or at a time just after time tl, switch 362 is again closed in accordance with signal OSSW2 provided by microprocessor 300.
As the normal mode of operation cont;nl~eE, all sixty-four 15 memory locations shown in Fig. 6 are sequentially addressed and provided for operating oscillators OSCl-4. In accordance with Fig. 7, only the first seven words are represented as having been provided for selecting the first three frequencies for oscillàtor OSCl and two frequencies each for oscillators 20 OSC2-4; however, the process for controlling all sixteen frequencies for each oscillator may follow in the sequence shown or intentionally vary.
In order to thwart pirates and referring to Fig. 7 for oscillator OSC1, it may be seen how frequencies may be output 25 in a pseudorandom sequence. OuL~uL frequencies FREQ 1, FREQ
2, FREQ 3, FREQ 4 are shown u~lL~uL in intervals t0-t4, t4-t8, t8-tl2, and inferentially, tl2-tl6 respectively. In the next intervals, the frequencies may be provided, in stead, in the sequence FREQ 4, FREQ 3, FREQ 2, and FREQ 1. Then, in the 30 next successive intervals the frequencies may be provided in yet a third different sequence, for example, FREQ 2, FREQ 3, FREQ 4, FREQ 1. During the last four s~creceive intervals exten~ing from t48 to t64, the order of applied frequencies may be altered again, for example, FREQ 3, FREQ 4, FREQ 1, 35 FREQ 2. The pseudorandom sequence may be defined and downloaded from the headend or developed internally by either microprocessor 260 of Fig. 2 or microprocessor 300 of Fig. 3.

Claims (19)

1. An interdiction apparatus used in a cable television system having a headend for preventing unauthorized reception of programming transmitted to a subscriber comprising:
jamming means for jamming each of a plurality of unauthorized channels with a controlled jamming signal; and control means for programmably controlling, during a jamming cycle wherein each of said plurality of unauthorized channels is jammed, said jamming means to selectively jam each of said plurality of unauthorized channels for a variable proportion of said jamming cycle, said variable proportion of said jamming cycle being determined by a communication from said headend to said control means.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said control means for determining said variable proportion of said jamming cycle comprises:
means for assigning a predetermined number of time slots per jamming cycle and means for assigning a variable number of said time slots per jamming cycle to frequencies within each of said plurality of unauthorized channels for which selective jamming is desired, said variable number of said time slots per jamming cycle assigned to said frequencies within each of said plurality of unauthorized channels determined by said addressed communication from said headend to said control means.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein at least one of said unauthorized channels is assigned a greater number of time slots than another of said unauthorized channels.
4. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the assignment of particular time slots to particular unauthorized channels creates a jamming pattern, further wherein said control means is capable of varying said jamming pattern by varying the assignment of one or more of said time slots from one jamming cycle to the next.
5. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein said time slots are of substantially equal duration and the amount of jamming per unauthorized channel per jamming cycle is based on the number of time slots assigned to respective channels per jamming cycle.
6. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein one or more of said time slots are not of equal duration with respect to the duration of another of said time slots and the amount of jamming per unauthorized channel per jamming cycle is based on the duration of the time slots assigned to each unauthorized channel per cycle.
7. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the duration of each time slot is between about 30-100 microseconds.
8. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the duration of each time slot is about 50 microseconds.
9. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the duration of each time slot ranges from about 30 microseconds to about 100 microseconds.
10. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the assignment of particular time slots to particular channels creates a jamming pattern, further wherein said control means is capable of varying said jamming pattern.
11. The apparatus of any one of claims 3, 5 or 6 wherein the number of time slots per cycle assigned to a particular unauthorized channel and the duration of one or more of said time slots may vary, and the amount of time a particular unauthorized channel is jammed in a given jamming cycle is base on the number and duration of time slots assigned to said unauthorized channel for said given jamming cycle.
12. In an interdiction system for selectively jamming a plurality of unauthorized channels in a cable television system comprising a headend and an interdiction apparatus having control means and controlled oscillator means for generating jamming signals which selectively interdict each of said unauthorized channels during a jamming cycle, said jamming cycle comprising a plurality of time slots, a method for varying the amount of time unauthorized channels are jammed within said jamming cycle, said method comprising the steps of:
assigning a variable number of said time slots per jamming cycle to each unauthorized channel, said variable number of said time slots per jamming cycle assigned to each unauthorized channel determined by a communication from said headend to said control means;

and jamming each of said unauthorized channels by interdicting said channels with said jamming signals for a variable proportion of said jamming cycle, said variable proportion based on the assignment of the time slots per jamming cycle to each of said unauthorized channels.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein each time slot is of substantially the same duration and the amount of time an unauthorized channel is jammed in a given jamming cycle depends on the number of time slots assigned to said unauthorized channel for said given jamming cycle.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein said time slots are not all of equal duration and the amount of time an unauthorized channel is jammed in a given jamming cycle is based on the duration of the time slot or slots assigned to said unauthorized channel for said given jamming cycle.
15. The method of claim 12 wherein the number of time slots assigned to any unauthorized channel and the duration of one or more time slots may vary, and the amount of time a particular unauthorized channel is jammed in a given jamming cycle is based on the number and duration of time slots assigned to said unauthorized channel for said given jamming cycle.
16. The method of any one of claims 12, 13, 14, or 15 further comprising the step of:
generating a varying jamming pattern by varying the number of adjacent time slots assigned to any unauthorized channel in any given, jamming cycle.
17. The method of any one of claims 12, 13, 14, or 15 further comprising the step of:
generating a varying jamming pattern by varying the time slots assigned to any unauthorized channel in any given jamming cycle.
18. An interdiction apparatus used in a cable television system having a headend for preventing unauthorized reception of programming transmitted to a subscriber comprising:

means for interdicting a plurality of channels for which selective jamming is desired with controlled jamming signals;
control means, responsive to a communication from the headend, for programmably controlling the generation of said jamming signals;
said interdicting means being capable of selectively jamming a plurality of saidchannels, each for a predetermined amount of time during a jamming cycle, and wherein the amount of time that any channel is jammed within a cycle can be programmably varied; and means for assigning a predetermined number of time slots per jamming cycle and means for assigning a number of said time slots to frequencies within said channels for which selective jamming is desired, wherein at least one of said time slots assigned to a particular channel does not occur consecutively in time with respect to another of said time slots assigned to said particular channel.
19. An interdiction apparatus used in a cable television system having a headend for preventing unauthorized reception of programming transmitted to a subscriber, comprising:
jamming means for jamming each of a plurality of unauthorized channels with a controlled jamming signal; and control means for programmably controlling, during a jamming cycle wherein each of said plurality of unauthorized channels is jammed, said jamming means to selectively jam each of said plurality of unauthorized channels for a variable proportion of said jamming cycle, said variable proportion of said jamming cycle being determined by a global communication from said headend to said control means.
CA002051415A 1990-02-06 1991-02-06 Interdiction method and apparatus with variable dwell time Expired - Fee Related CA2051415C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US47604190A 1990-02-06 1990-02-06
US476,041 1990-02-06

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2051415A1 CA2051415A1 (en) 1991-08-07
CA2051415C true CA2051415C (en) 1998-04-07

Family

ID=23890258

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002051415A Expired - Fee Related CA2051415C (en) 1990-02-06 1991-02-06 Interdiction method and apparatus with variable dwell time

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0466917A4 (en)
KR (1) KR100231088B1 (en)
AU (1) AU636021B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2051415C (en)
WO (1) WO1991012694A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5140633A (en) * 1991-03-22 1992-08-18 North American Philips Corporation Cable subscriber control device using shared jamming modules
US7433361B1 (en) 2003-05-20 2008-10-07 Mark Jeffrey Smith Wireless method for communication
CN110012332A (en) * 2019-04-17 2019-07-12 深圳蓝普视讯科技有限公司 A kind of physics 10Bit information collection play system based on wide colour gamut high dynamic range HDR technology

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4039954A (en) * 1975-05-27 1977-08-02 Oak Holland B.V. Signal distribution device for a cable television
US4434436A (en) * 1981-07-13 1984-02-28 Bruce Merrill Addressable premium channel obfuscation device for cable television systems
US4638357A (en) * 1984-01-20 1987-01-20 Home Box Office, Inc. Audio scrambler
JPS61139176A (en) * 1984-12-10 1986-06-26 Pioneer Electronic Corp Audio visual control device of catv
JPS61230487A (en) * 1985-04-04 1986-10-14 Pioneer Electronic Corp System for mixing intefering wave to specified channel in catv system
US4912760A (en) * 1988-03-10 1990-03-27 Scientific Atlanta, Inc. Off-premises cable television channel interdiction method and apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU7347491A (en) 1991-09-03
EP0466917A1 (en) 1992-01-22
AU636021B2 (en) 1993-04-08
CA2051415A1 (en) 1991-08-07
EP0466917A4 (en) 1992-09-16
KR920702159A (en) 1992-08-12
KR100231088B1 (en) 1999-11-15
WO1991012694A1 (en) 1991-08-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4912760A (en) Off-premises cable television channel interdiction method and apparatus
US5142574A (en) Optimum amplitude and frequency of jamming carrier in interdiction program denial system
EP0446280B1 (en) Off-premises cable television channel interdiction method and apparatus
US5303295A (en) Enhanced versatility of a program control by a combination of technologies
CA2036348C (en) Interdiction program denial system for jamming audio and video signals
AU655760B2 (en) Picture carrier controlled automatic gain control circuit for cable television interdiction or jamming apparatus
US5323462A (en) CATV subscriber disconnect switch
WO1993026124A1 (en) Interdiction method and apparatus with programmable jamming effectiveness
US5467397A (en) Interdiction method and apparatus with variable dwell time
CA2051415C (en) Interdiction method and apparatus with variable dwell time
US5265160A (en) Interdiction method and apparatus with pulsed mode jamming
CA2031603C (en) Catv subscriber disconnect switch

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
MKLA Lapsed
MKLA Lapsed

Effective date: 20080206