CA2045595A1 - Breath sampler - Google Patents

Abstract

An apparatus (200) for sampling volumetric quantities of human exhaled breath has three conduits and may be provided in a Y- or T-shaped configuration. The free end of conduits (262) is adapted to connect with the mouth of the subject being tested. Another of the conduits (214) is adapted to pass air to the subject, this conduit being provided with a suitable filtering mechanism (230) such as a charcoal inhalation canister, and an inlet check valve (215). The third (218) of the three conduits supports an appropriate sampling canister (250) for receiving exhaled breath from the subject, and this conduit is also provided with a one way check valve (217).

Description

W09~/09572 PC~/US90/00584 - BREATH SAMPLER
-Field of the Invention The presen~ invention relates to methods and de~ices for measuring and analyzing contents of gas samples, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for sampling volumetric quantities of human exhaled breath, and then either performing on-site analyses for measuring volatile compounds present in the sampled volume of breath, or stori~g the sampled ~olume so that appropriate analyses can be performed at a later time.
BACKGROUND OF ~HE INVENTION
For nearly two decades, there has been a grow-ing need for gas sampling devices capable of applications beyond the more typical uses, as ~or example achieving law enforcement objectives (e.g., breathalyzers~ and achieving medical objectives (e.g., patient breathing assist). Indeed, since 1970 when OSH~ was established, there has been an .increased awareness of the need to continuously monitor conditions in the workplace to assure compliance with Federal and State regulations.
Since breath is the only ~iological fluid that may be obtained non-invasively and on demand, it is currently the matrix of choice for a number of applica-tions as for example in law enforcement and medical evaluation such as breathalyzers and patient breathing assist. These uses generally rely on the fact that the concentration of the analyte of interest is in very high concentrations such as ethanol or carbon dioxide and can be analyzed with instrumentation that does not require separation of the analyte from other interferents.
~ .tial attempts at collecting exhaled breath samples for analyses of volatile substance content in-volved the use of two types of app~ratus, namely the glass sample tube and the gas sampling bag. The glass sample tube permitted only a limited sample volume to be collected, and its use was short-lived. On the other hand, the gas sampling bag enjoyed a far longer useful-ness for this purpose. Nevertheless, this apparatus has - - - . : . . . .

- , . ; ~ ... .. , . i I . .
" . . . . , , . . ~ , . :. , ~ .:
,: ,: : , .. , ~, . . .
:` -:: ', : , , ,i , , , , ""

WO9Q/09572 PCT/~90/00584 ~? ~ ~3~3~ ~ - 2 ~

- its shortcomings as well, and for those reasons its use also is inherently limited. Nost significant among the ob jections is that in most circumstances the bag becomes bulky after sample collection and must be almost immedi- r~
ately transfexred to a laborato~y in order ~hat desired analyses can be performed, Furthermore when using such gas collection containers, concentration of a gas component using an absorbent is generally not feasible and therefore measur-ing an analyte in large volumes of exhaled breath thatare contributed over a long period of time is not practi-cal.
For the purposes of this art, two different breath samples can be taken, namely a "mixed" and an nend" or alveolar breath sample. A solvent in the deep lung or alveolar region of the lung is in intimate con-tact with solvent in the bloodstream. If a sample of solvent in the deep lung air is obtained that sample will be referred to as an alveolar or end-expired sample. As the solvent is exhaled, the sample becomes diluted with air in the upper respiratory track and is known as a mixed expixed sample. Generally an alveolar sample is regarded as being indicati~e of bloodstream solvent con~
centrations since that sample is in intimate contact with solvent in the blood stream. The manual technique for end-expired sampling requires the subject to hold his breath for about 20 seconds then to exhale, discarding the first 30-50% of the sample; and finally collecting the end-exp~red portion of the sample with the sampling device. There are also automated techniques for sampling end~expired air.
The concentrations of solvents in an exhaled breath sample are normally very low. Therefore, it has been found necessary to have the analytes in the bag sufficiently concentrated on an appropriate sorbent prior to analysis. In addition, if the analytes are stored in the bag for extended periods, severe losses of analyte . .

W090/09~72 2 ~ 5 PCI /USgO/00584 ' - 3 -may occur by absorption of the analyte into the bag wall or permeation of the analyte through the ~ag wall. In using the gas sampling bag, it has become apparen~ that concentrations of the analytes on solid sorbent material is generally not feasible in the field. The only tech~
nique for concentrating the contents of the bag is via indirect means. The sample must first be trapped in the bag. A solid sorbent sampler is then connected at one end to the bag and the other end to a pump. A known volume of air in the bag is then sampled. Thus, outside of the laboratory, neither the gas sampling bag nor the glass sample tube has been found to facilitate either direct concentration of volatile analytes in the samples taken or storage of the taken samples for extended periods of time.
Subsequently, other devices have been developed or sampling volumes of exhaled breath. For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,046,014 to Boehring~r et al discloses a charcoal tube sample device for sampling respiratory gases in alveolar air. Another sampling device, which employs changes in pressure or flow rat~ in a main gas flow tube to initiate the sampling process as well as to terminate it, is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,297,871.
Still another gas sampling device, disclosed in U.S.
Patent No. 3,858,593 to Ryan et al, incorporates a cylindrical alveolar gas trapping device having check valves at opposite ends which are openable upon applica-tion of exhalation pressure, and a side wall valved access tubs for selective removal of the trapped gas from within the cylinder ~o a gas analyzer. Each of these subsequently developed devices also suffer disadvantages which make them undesirable for use. In particular, there is no provision for continuous mixed-expired sampling or filtering of inhalation air~ and no provision for storing the collected gas sample for analysis at a su~sequent time.

.. .
, ~ , . ,~, ~ . -2 PC~/US9~/00~84 - 4 - ;

Obiects of the Invention It is ~herefoxe an object of the invention to overcome deficiencies in the prior art, such as indicated above.
5It is a further object of the present in~ention to provide impro~ements in analysis and in gaseous sampling.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a breath sampling device capable of sampling trace amounts of compounds in large volumes of human breath for analysis by conventional gas analyzer apparatus or other analytical procedures to determine the presence of trace levels of volatile compounds.
It is still another object of the invention to sample ~race analytes using a layered sorbent sampling scheme. For example, high molecular weight analytes are collected on the first layer of the sampling stack using a carbon-type sorbent. Low-molecular weight compounds pass through the first stage and are collected on the second or tertiary stage using a sorbent such as molecular sieves.
It is still another object of this invention that the sidestream port may be used ~or purposes other than sampling. For example, in order to count the numbex of breaths, the port may be connected to a pressure sensor that converts positive or negative pressure impulses into a signal that is registered by a counter.
It is still another object of the invention to provide a mainstream- or sidestream sample canister that can be desc~bed by solvents or thermal desorption tech-niques or by supercritical fluid extraction.
Yet another object of the invention is to pro-vide a breath sampling device capable of collecting main-stream samples or sidestream samples using sorbents.
Suitable activated charcoal-based sorbents include any activated natural charcoal as well as synthetic char-coals. An example of a natural charcoal is coconut-based : . -: .:, . . ~.: : - ................... : :.. .
:. . . . . . .

,: . , , ~ .

WO 90/09572 ~ PCI/1,'590/00;84 .. ` _ 5 --charcoal. ~xamples of synthetic charcoals include activated charcoal cloth, activated petroleum or coal based charcoals, and other activated carbons which are commercially available such as Carbotrap~, Carbosieve~, and Car~opack~. Suitable inorganic sorbents include the molecular sieves (synthetic or natural zeolites), silica gel and diatomaceous earth sorbents. Suitable synthetic resin soxbents include porous polymers such as Tenax~, XAD-2~, the Porapak~ series polymers (e.g. Porapak S), and the Chromosorb~ series polymers te.g. Chromosorb 101 ) .
Another possible collection technique for both mainstream and sidestream sampling is to use a reagent-coated sorbent where the reagent reacts with the exhaled analyte to form a stable derivative. For example low-molecular weight aldehydes can be sorbed by contact with 2-(hydroxymethyl)piperidine-coated XAD-2. The unstable aldehydes are converted to oxazolidine derivatives which are ~table and can be stored for later analysis.
Yet another object of the invention is to pro-vide a breath sampling device capable of sidestream moni-toring of the breath concentrations using suitable detection means such as a mass-spectrometer ~or breath-by-breath measurements of the relevant analytes. No technique other than a face mask previously permitted such monitoring in a contaminated environment.
Yet another object of the invention is to obtain a multi-breath sample. In this case the exhaled breaths ar~ all passed through the same adsorbent bed so that the ~r~alyte from all the breaths are sorbed. This permits the measurement of very dilute concentrations of analyte which are sorbed from large volumes of breath over extended sampling periods.
Still another object is to provide a breath s~mpling device having alternative configurations which permit the collection of sidestream or mainstream samples, which facilitate purification of inhaled air or : :: . : : - .: ~ ' ' :
. , '' '' , ,- , ~. .: :

WO90/09572 PCT/US90/0058~

- 5 _ ~.

use a pre etermined breathing gas source such as pressur-ized air, and which enable collection of the samples without use of a facemask.
~et a fuxther object is to provide a breath sampling device having almost no plas~ic csmponents, o~her than a mou~hpiece and an inlet check valve dia-phragm, with which the breath sample comes. in contact.
However, the sampler could be made from PTFE (Teflon~) or any plastic which has minimal capacity to absorb solvents.
Still a further object of the invention is to provide a unified sampler which can be used for both mixed and alveolar breath sampling.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a system whereby collected samples of breath analytes can be analyzed at any convenient .
time, for example immediately on-site or after shipment of sorbent canisters to a laboratory having sophisticated equipment.
Yet another object is to provide a breath sampling device capable of being heated so that condensa-tion of water vapor and analyte are prevented.
Yet another embodiment of the invention i5 to test a subject in the.presence of contaminated air by not filtering the inhaled air. By measuring the amount exhaled, one can determine the amount or percent a~sorbed by the subject and thereby determine the dose received.
The invention is applicable to a number of situations -where monitoring one's breath may be desirable in accordance with the invention. These include:
a. Control of substance abuse by determination of the concentration of volatile solvents or other mater-ials that are present in the breath such as alcohol or toluene from inhalation of paint thinner vapors or glue sniffing.
b. Measurement of volatile compounds such as oral antiseptics in support of advertising efficacy , , "
,. . .
. .

WogO/09572 PC~/~S90/005~
:: 2 ~

claims by cosmetic manufacturers. Similarly, volatile compounds in the breath that are present from smokins, such as nicotine, may be measured for smoking-cessation or for other research purposes.
c. Measurement of trace levels of endogenous compounds in the breath that may be markers of a disease state such as breath acetone in diabetes.
d. Measurement of volatile endogenously-produced or used compounds such as carbon dioxide, oxygen or various other metabolites~
e. Monitoring workers or residents in the vicinity of hazardous areas, especially wastesites, for uptake of toxic chemicals.
f. Estimation of blood concentrations of absorbed organic solvents and of the volatile metabolites of these compounds that are excreted in the breath.
g. ~easurement of natural air gasses which are not metaboli~ally used or produced such as nitrogen to provide internal controls and comparisons.
h. Support of breath-based biological exposure indices (BEI,s) for control of worker exposur~ to hazardous compounds, especially solvents. The BEI's establish maximum concentrations for hazardous compounds in the various biological fluids. As such, this approach is superior to environmental monitoring of wor~er ~reath-ing zones to assure compliance with current State and Federally~mandated concentration standards. Breath based BEI's have been promulgated ~y the American Conference of Governmenta:l Industrîal Hygienists since 1981, and recog-nize that adsorption of hazardous chemicals by workers is quite variable due to dermal exposure and to ergonomic differences that affect individual ventilation rates.
The breath-based BEI's to be supported by this invention may rely on either or both mixed and alveolar sampling.
The Federal Republic of Germany currently has standards for maximal levels of chemicals in the breath of exposed workers.

... - .,, ~ . :

: ,. . - ~ ,.

Wog0/09~72 PCT/US90/00584 Generally, these situations demand ~hat the sample be stored for later analysis by sophisticated separation technology and analytical techniques. In addition, the analyte concentration is expected to be very low because ~he sample may be collected hours after exposure or it may be pre~ent in only trace amounts. For example breath levels of such analytes are measured in the parts-per-billion to parts-per-million range. In order to accurately measure such levels and to establish standards to deal with such small amounts, a breath sampling technique should permit concentration of the analyte. In addition, the device should be compact enough to allow shipment to the laboratory for analysis i~ on-site analysis is not performed.
The above and other objects and the nature and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of certain specific embodiments taken in conjunction with the draw-ing, wherein:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Figure 1 is a detailed schematic illustration of a first configuration o~ the sampling device of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a detailed schematic illustration of a second configuration of the sampling device of the present invention;
Figure 3 is a detailed schematic illustration of a modification of the sampling device configuration shown in Figure 2;
Figure 4 is an exploded view of the components of one embodiment of the sampling canister contemplated for use with any of the embodiments of the sampling devices shown in Figures 1, 2, or 3;
Figure 5 is an exploded view of the components of a second embodiment o~ a sampling canister which can be used with any of the embodiments of the sampling devices shown in Figures 1, 2, or 3;

,,,: : - ............. , ., .: .- .
. - -: . - ... ~:
-- - ~

W090/09;72 ~ A, ?"~Q~3 i..~ -_ g _ Figures 6 and 7 show a tool which can be usedto load the check valves used with ~he sampling devices of the present in~ention;
Figures 8 and 9 show another similar tool, Figure 9 being a schematic view showing use of such tool in use;
Figure lG is a schematic ~iew of an improved sample canister for granular sorbents and/or combination of charcoal cloth and granular sorbents;
Figure 11 is a schematic view of another improved sample canister for granular sorbents; and Figure 12 is a schematic view of another alveolar sampler using granular sorbents.
Figure 13 i5 a schematic view of a mainstream sample canister thak is primarily intended for perma-nently containing the charcoal cloth or granular sor-bents.
Figure 14 is an "L"-shaped configuration of the sampler, which further minimizes void volume.
Figure 15 is a schematic view of a square main-strea~ sample canister.
Figure 16 shows the construction of a removable square container for granular sorbents.
Figure 17 shows the construction of a square container fox use with removable charcoal cloth sorbents.
Figure 18 shows a dose receiving samplex designed for the subject to use while exposed to the analyte gas. However, in order for the dose to be extimated the inhalation canister is first removed.
Otherwise, this sampler may be used for mixed-expired sampling as the samplers described in Figures 1 and 2.
Figure 19 shows a sample canister wi~h sorbent for alternate use in the system oî Figure 4.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Referring now to the drawing, it will be under-stood that while the present invention may be embodied in a variety of configurations, for purposes of illustration .
` ' ~O90/09~72 PCT/US90/00;84 2 ~ o - i two oonfigurations will be discussed below, namely a "Y"
configuration and "T" configuration, as well as a varia-tion of the latter. All of these confiyurations can be used for di~ferent types of sampling, although a particu-5 lar configuration may provide advantages relative to aparticular type o sampling. Thus/ the "Y" configuration shown in Figure 1 minimizes the void volume as much as possi~le within manufacturing tolerances, thereby mini-mizing rebreathing of partially delivered samples from the ~oid volume of the sampler device. The "T" config-uration shown in Figure 2 enables collection of both mixed-expired and end-expired samples using a single collection canis~er~ The ~ariation of Figure 3 is primarily intended for single breath end-expired sampling, although it can also be used for single breath mixed-expired sampling. For all these configurations, the present invention contemplates that, subsequent to collection of the breath sample, analysis for the analytes contained in the collection canister will be made with conventional analysis equipment.
Looking first at Figure 1, the sampling device 100 involves a main body 110 having a tubular mouthpiece support portion 120 on which a bite wing mouthpiece, such as shown in Figure 2, may be mounted, an inhalation can-ister support portion 130 for attaching a charcoalinhalation canister 140, a sample canister attachment portion 150 for attachment of a sample canister 160, and a sidestream port 170 for collection of sidestream sam-ples. The port 170 is disposed substantially centrally of the main body and opens into the main body rom one side thereof. Sidestxeam samples may be collected on sorbents contained in stainless steel or glass tubes attached to the port 170 via appropriate ferrules and fittings, or other similar mechanical connec~ion means.
3s The inhalation canister support portion 130 comprises a two part structure including a first tubular part 132 formed as an integral part of the main body and extending ': ? - : .

W090/09572 - Pcr/us9o/oo584 ,: .
;L 9--5i (i.e. having a longitudinal axis extending) at an ~ngle of about 120 from the longitudinal axis of the tubular mouthpiece support portion 120. The fixst tubular part 132 includes an annular end face disposed in a plane S perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the first tubu-lar part 132.
The inhalation canister support portion 130 also includes a second tubular part 133 having at one end an annular face matching the surface area and configura-tion of the end face of the first tubular part. Thefirst and second tubular parts are secured to one another, with their annular end faces disposed in opposi-tion to one another, via a clamp means. In ef f ecting this connection, an annular gland or seal 134 is disposed and maintained between and spaces the end faces from one another. Various materials are effective for use as the seal; however, the preferred material is polytetrafluor-ethylene-covered silicone rubber.
The second tubular part includes an annular ~0 edge positioned forwardly of the clamped, sealed end faces, and the forwardmost end 136 of the second tubular part is provided with a threaded inner or outer surface 142 for making threaded engagement with a complementarily threaded outer or inner surface 142 on the charcoal inhalation canister 140, thereby insuring that the can-ister 140 is securely attached to ~he second tubular part. An inlet check valve 180, having a twofold func-tion, is disposed on the annular lsdge 135. The major functions of the inlet chec~ val~e 180 are: (1) to open under negative pressure (inhalation) thus permitting the user to inhale from the ambient through the inhalation canister 140; (2) to close under pressure and thereby prevent exhaled air from escaping from the main body of the sampler back through the inhalation canister 140; and (3) to direct the exhaled sample through the sample bed in section 160 of the sampler.
The sample canister support portion 150 W090/09372 PC~/US90/00584 .
2~ 5 - 12 _ includes a first ~anister housing part 151, a second can~
ister retaining part 152 and a third housing par~ 153 for engagement of a volume measuring d~vice (not shown, but to be discussed la~er~ The first housing part 151 com-prised a tubular member~ formed integrally with t~e mainbody and having a longitudinal axis disposed at approx-imately 120 from the longitudinal axis of both the inhalation canister support portion 132 and the mouth-piece support portion 120, and an annular sleeve 155 attached at the forward end of the tubular member.
Sleeve 155 is provided with a forward facing annular l~nd 154 for retaining a first polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE
or "Teflon") gasket Tl and a forwardly extending annular c~ff 156 bearing a set of internal threads.
Housed within a sleeve 155 forwardly of the land 154 is a sample canister 160. Secured by threads within cu~f 156 is the externally threaded, rearwardly facing, annular extension 157 of the canister retaining part 152. A second PTFE gasket T2 is supported on the forward facing land 150 of retaining part 152, and the sample canister is held securely between th~ PTFE gaskets Tl, T2 within sleeve 155 when the retaining part 152 is threaded tightly in a rearward direction and within the slee~e 155. The housing part 153, secured within the forward end of retaining part 152 by a welded connection, comprises an annular sleeve member having a forwardly facing annular seat 159 at its rearward end. Disposed on, and secured to, the annular seat 159 is an outlet check valve 190 having a constructiorL which is the same as that of inlet check valve 180 ~ 'he major functions of the outlet check valve 190 are as follows: (1) to close under negative pressure (inhalation) and prevent environmental contaminants from entering the sampler body; (2) to open under positive 3i pressure (exhalation) and thereby permit the sample stream to pass through the sample bed in section 150 of the sampler; and (3) to direct the exhaled sample through ,, - ~ , .
.
.

WO 90/09;7'' F'CI/US90/00584 ~r~

the sample bed in section 160 of the sampler.
Each check valve 180, 190 comprises a one-way diaphragm-type val~e with an integral cross-hatch support. Welded to the center of the support is a retainer bud for the valve diaphragm. The cross-hat~h support is of the type known as a "low flow resistance"
cross-hatch, is made of stainless steel, and is sil~er~
soldered to a land at the respective inlet ox outlet location. The purpose of the cross-hatch support is to provide a retention foundation for the respective diaphragm valve during inhalation or exhalation.
- Figure 2 illustrates a second breath sampler device 2G0 exhibiting the "T" configuration described above which facilitates obtaining mixed-expired breath samples. This second device includes a tubular main body 210 to which a stainless steel compression fitting 212 is secured (via welding) at an opening substantially cen-tered in the tubular main body 210. The fitting 212 is provided to facilitate the collection of sidestream sam-ples, and it is to be understood that the diameter of thefitting may be chosen as a function of the particular application or task to be accomplished. One side of the tubular main body 210 (hereinafter referred to as the "inlet" side) supports, via a first threaded connection means 214, an inhalation canister 230. An inlet check valve 215 is located downstream of the threaded connec-tion means 214. Directly opposite the inlet side of the main body is the "outlet" side where the sampling can-ister 240 i~; located and supportéd on the main body via a second threaded connection 216. An outlet check valve 217 is posîtioned downstream of the second threaded con-nection. In Figure 2, the inlet canis~er, the mol1thpiece support and the sample canister are shown attached to the sampler main body 210 by threaded connections~ However, these connections could also be accomplished by use of alternative fittings e.g. tapered sleeve- or O-ring type slip fittings.
i . . . .. : . - . -~
:~ , ' ' ~ ': --, ~.. . .
- : ~ . ~, ...

WO 90/09572 PCr/lJS90/00;~34 ,., 14 - ~

Typically, both the inlet ~d outlet check valve bodies are fabricated from stainless steel discs.
A plurality of openings (four equiangularly spaced open-ings in the preferred embodiment) are provided in the discs to form an ~rray which facilitates air flow through the discs. Retainer ~uds are welded directly to the center of the discs to assist in securing the silicone rubber diaphragms against dislodgement. On the down-stream side of outlet check valve 217 is a kapered con-nection 218 which connects directly to a respirometer 250used to measure and record the volumes of exhaled breath. This connection has been made to facilitate connection to the respirometer; but other volumetric devices may be used by connecting them with suitable fittings and connections to the tapered connection 218.
Through a third threaded connection 219, a tubular mouth-piece support portion 220 is coupled to the main body 210 of the sampler device. A bitewing mouthpiece 260 includes an elongated sleeve portion 262 adapted to be mounted over the tubular mouthpiece support portion 220, and a mouth engaging portion 264.
The mouthpiece support portion 220 may also be directly connected to the sampling canister 240, as seen in Figure 3. This modification of the Figure 2 configura~ion facilitates single-breath "end-expired"
collection of samples. It should therefore be clear that both the "mixed-expired" sampling device shown in Figure 2, and the "end-expired" sampling device shown in Figure 3, are desiS~ned so that either one will fit with the same mouthpiece support portion. The support acts as the mouthpiece for the configuration shown in Figure 3. In both of the Figure 2 and Figure 3 embodiments of the sampling device, the inlet and outlet check valves employed are substantially identical with those used in the sampling device of Figure 1. Moreover, the sampling canister 240 used in the embodiments of Figures 2 and 3 is preferably substantially the same as that described .
.. . ..

. .

WO90/09572 PCT/US90tO0584 1 -- 2 ~

above for use with the embodiment of Figure 1.
The design may be L-shaped s shown in Figure l4. This embodiment minimizes sampler void volume and permits the sample canister to be directly in the path of the exhaled sample so that there are not angles which produce bac~ pressure and turbulene which under certain circumstances may b~ undesirable.
Because of its construction, the Y-configured sampler shown in Figure 1 is particularly constructed for continuous mixed-expired breath sampling. This was the prototype sampler. It is the most expensive and least flexible of the illustrated embodiments. The inhalation canister 140 is attached to the main body of the sampler 110 via a Tri-clover clamp 134. This cl~mp permits the inhalation canister assembly to be removed from the main sampler body in order for the inlet check valve (180) to be replaced. Unless a single sampler is dedicated ~o each subject, the Y design, as configured in Figure 1, also requires that t~e sample canister (stack) be removed and stored immediately after sampling. This introduces the possibility of passive sampliny of contaminants in the industrial environmen~ by the charcoal cloth sorbent and may limit the reliability of the sample.
In order to avoid the use of the Tri-clover clamp, reduce fabrication costs and to make the sampler more flexible, the sampler shown in Figure 2 was created. In that sampler, the threaded inhalation can-ister support (214 of Figure 2) is welded to the main body of t~.e T, eliminating the need for a Tri-clover clamp and substantially reducing fabrication costs. A
conventional stainless steel pipe "T" may be used as the main body of the sampler. In addition, this construction places the removable sampling cup in a canister that may be removed from the main body of the sampler and shipped off for analysis. This canister may also be directly attached to the respirometer via the tapered fitting (218 of Figure 2). As configured in Figure 2, the sampler - - . ~ .
:

W090~9572 PCT/US90/00584 ~ 16 -permits continuous mixed-expired breath sampling ~main-stream or sidestream) just as does the sampler in Figure 1. However, when the sampler of Figure 2 is disassembled and re-configured to the sa~.pler of Figure 3, single breath end-expired (or for that matter single-breath mixed-expired) samples may be obtainedO
In the sampler of Figure 2, the inhalation canister support 214 cannot be separated from the main sampler body to permit loading of the inlet check valve. The outlet check valve 217 is in a deep, inacc~ssible chamber of the sample canister. There~ore, a means of loading the inlet check valve into the sampler body and the outlet check valve into the sample canister is desirable. That is the purpose of the loading tool shown in Figures 6 and 7. The use of this tool actually dictates the "T" configuration of the sampler in Figure 2, or the L-shaped configuration in Figure 18, because of the necessity to permit ready accessibility of the chec~
valve loading tool to the inlet check valve support through the opening at 216 in Figure 2. Hawever, a Universal Check Valve Loading Tool (see below) has been created to allow the inlet check valve to be loaded into a Y-shaped main body or an L-shaped main body that has no access port. There~ore, it is also possible to replace the T~shaped main body of the sampler in Figure 2 with a lower void volume L-shaped or Y-shaped main body, while still retaining the flexibility of the T-shaped design.
All that is required for this purpose is to machine the main samp~er body from a Y-shaped pipe fitting or fabri-cate the body in an L-shape or to cast the body in a Y or ~-shape.
In summary, the Y, the L and the T configura-tions permit mixed-expired sampling. The particular Y
design as shown in Figure l permits only mixed-expired sampling because it is not shown with a removable sample canister and mouthpiece as is the T-shaped design of Figure 2. However, there is nothing intrinsic in the ~ . . .

.' ' ' ' .. ' .

Wogo/09s72 PCT/US90/OOSB4 - 17 ~

design of a Y-shaped sampler that would pe~mit only mixed-expired sampling, e.g. the Y-shaped sampler of Figure 1 can be aasily adapted as noted above for obtaining single ~reath end-expired or mixed-expired samples.
Figure 4 illustrates the structural elements contained within one embodiment of the sampling canister used in the present invention. PTFE gaskets 402 and 402' are positioned at the top and bottom of the stack of elements. The gaskets provide a secure seal around the canister after it has been loaded into the sampler device. The sampling "stack" further includes ~ cylin-drical torous weight or retainer 404, a first stainless steel retainer screen 406, charcoal cloth sorbent bed 15 408, and a second stainless steel retainer screen 410.
The weight or retainer 404 retains sorbent bed 408 in the' canister by compressing the first retainer screen 406 against bed 408. To prevent inhalation of sorbent fines, a second retainer screen 410 having a fine mesh is placed 20 atop the array of openings 413 in the canister 412. The openings 413 preferably are provided in symmetrical array to form a grating.
~he sampler canister 412 into which the stack of elements fits is designed to accommodate a large plur-ality of wafers of charcoal cloth of which the sorbent bed 408 is comprised (one embodiment contemplates element (11) wafers), including if necessary or desired, stain- ' less stee~ screens for separating the adjacent sorbent wafers. kn anti-rotation lug 414 is provided (e.g., via spot welding) on the interior of the annular wall of the canister. The lug 414 engages with the cutout 405 pro-vided in the exterior annular surface of the torous weight 404 for preventing the weight from rotating the retainer screen 406 as the canisker is being loaded into the sampler housing. In this way, the sorbent bed is protected against being torn and the formation of fines during loading of the canister is prevented.

~` ' - - ' . .

~090/09572 P~T/US90/U0584 18 ~

A second embodiment of the sampler canister, which is illustrated in Figure 5, is contemplated for use with ~he embodiments o~ sampling devices shown in Figures 1, 2 ox 3. This embodiment shows the use of charcoal cloth sorbents, although granular sorbents, such as silica gels or porous polymers could also be used. The canistsr comprises an assembly of elements including a torous shaped weight or retainer 504, a ~irst retainer screen 506, a first sorbent bed 508, a second retainer screen 510, a second sorbent bed 516 and a third retainer screen 518. This assembly of elemen~s is disposed within a stainless steel canister cup 512 having a bottom per-forated with an array 513 of openings~ An anti-rotational lug 514 is provided on the annular surface of the cup for engagement in the anti-rotational cutout 505 provided on the annular outer surface of the torous retainer 504.
As with the first embodiment of sampler can-ister illustrated in Figure 4 and described above, two ~0 gaskets 502, 502' are positioned atop and below the sampler canister to provide a secure seal around the canister once it has been loaded into the sampler de~ice. By using this second embodiment o~ sampler can-ister, granular sorbents may be held in the cup 512 by 25 the first, second and third retainer screens (506, 510 and 518, respectively), or by the use of discs of very fine mesh stainless steel which are centered on, and soldered or welded to, a thin metal ring. Alternatively, the discs could be press-fit to and about the thin metal ring. Preferably, the outer diameter of the ring would be about equal to the inner diameter of the cup.
Sorbents may be separated into front and back sections, and may be retained in place using the discs or the screens.
In embodiments of the sampler device shown, the stainless steel canister cup may be eliminated from the canister housing or support member, and alternatively 9~v ~

perforated discs o stainless steel may be welded to the inside of the canister housing or support member to form an equivalent cup base or bottom, and ~herea~ter the sorbent beds and screens can be assembled to form the sampler canister.
In operation, the sampler devices shown in Figures l and 2 function in the sam2 manner as a respirator mask. The subject (user), wearing a nose clamp and biting a bitewing mouthpiece, is instructed to breathe by mouth only. At the beginning of inhalation, negative pressure created inside the main body of the sampler closes the outlet or exhalation check val~e and opens the inlet or inhalation check valve, thereby permitting fresh air to be drawn through the charcoal canister (140 in Figure 1 and 230 in Figure 2). When the subject exhales, the positive pressure created in the sampler main body forces the inlet bhec~ valve to close and the outlet check valve to open. Volatile compounds in the-subject's breath are adsorbed from the mainstream gas flow on the charcoal cloth sorbent medium or granular sorbent medium in the sample canister, or from the sidestream flow using other sorbents.
For collection of mainstream breath samples, exhaled volumes may be recorded using a Wright respiro-meter or other volumetric device. For sampling breathfrom the sidestream, the sample volume is recorded by multiplying the duration of sampling by the sampling flowrate, and then by a correction factor that accounts for the percent of time the subject spends exhaling.
Laboratory studies have shown that such a correction factor is approximately 0.65. Other techniques to esti-mate sidestream sample concentration may also be used.
Tests with volunteers have shown that sidestream carbon dioxide concentrations are approximately 71% of main-stream concentrations. Therefore, the sidestream sampleconcentration may be estimated by determining the mass sampled, dividing that mass by the volume sampled (i.e.

.
, . ~ . . .:, :

W090,'09~72 ~ PCT/US90/00584 actual sidestream flowrate x time), and then dividing that concentration by 0.71 to correct approximately to mainstream concentrations.
Either the mainstream, or the sidestream, mode of sampling permits large volu~es o~ mixed-exhaled breath to be sampled without prior collection in and concentra-tion from a yas-sample bagO In this way sufficient quantities of the absorbed compounds are permitted to be . collected for analysis.
The check valves disclosed in each of ~he embodiments of the sampler device, i.e., the embodiments shown in Figures 1-3, can either be removable or non-removable. Non-removable valves could be secured, as by a press-fit or by welding, to their respective supporting structures. Removable check valves might be desirable where frequent cleaning of the valves is required, or where the contemplated cleaning process for the valves would not be practically carried out with the valves secured within their respective sampling devices.
While the outlet check valve has been shown in each of the embodiments to be placed in a specif-ic loca-tion, it is possible to have the outlet check valve dis-posed in still other locations. For example it may be useful to place the outlet check valve upstream of the sampler canister. Without the sample canister attached the subject may flush his lungs free of environmentally-contaminated air for a prescri~ed period, by inhaling fresh purified air through the inhalation canister or other air source and venting the exhaled air to the atmosphere ~hrough the outlet check valve. Thereafter the sampler canister is attached to the sampler. The concentrations of the samples are then reflective only of bloodstream contamination levels and not of environmental contamination levels.
Figures 6 and 7 disclose a valve mounting tool, the use of which is for loading check valve diaphragms of the kind which can be removed from the sampler devices of ... . .. ...

.,..

WO90/09;7~ PCT/US90100584 the present invention. Figure 6 illustrates the tool in a position in which a check valve has been inserted in preparation or mounting in a sampler device, while Figure 7 illustrates the tool in a position in which the check valve has been mounted As shown in Figures 6 and 7, the tool 600 com-prises an elongated guide tube 610 having a first push rod insertion end 612 and a second check valve supporting end 614. The length of the guide tube 610 is signifi-cantly greater than its diameter, and supports in itsinterior an elonyated push rod 640. An elongated cutout or slot 620 extends, from a location adjacent the second end 614 of the guide tube, along a short length of the guide tube in a direction towards the first end 612 thereof. A narrow strap of thin gauge metal 611 (prefer-ably, stainless steel) is welded to one end of the push rod 640 which is inserted into and housed within the guide tube 610. Prior to insertion of the rod 640 into the guide tube 610, one free end of the strap is welded to the center of the circular peripheral edge surace of the one end of the push rod to lie adjacent to the longi-tudinal extent of the push rod. The other end of the strap further protrudes diametrically through the cutout and is welded to the inner annular surface of an outer sleeve member 650, which is disposed over and rides along the exterior of the guide tube 610.
In order to load the inlet or outlet check valves, the outer sleeve member 650 is moved rearwardly (to the right in Figures 6 and 7) over the guide tube 610 by the push rod 640. The check valve to be loaded is then pushed over the guide tube 610 and is retained in any suitable manner, e.g. the check valve can be made of a resilient or elastic material which deforms or makes a friction fit with the guide tube.
The second end 614 of guide tube 610 is inserted into the inlet or outlet check valve mounting structure (in each of the sampler embodiments disclosed : .
. . .
~: . ~ : : ,: -.
: . . :: . . -woso/09~72 PCT/US90/00584 - ~ - 22 -above) such that the guide tube is disposed over the retainer bud. The pushrod 640 is then pushed back through the guide tu~e 610 so that the outer sleeve mem-ber 650 engages ~he check valve and pushes it from the guide tube onto the retainer stem.
Removal of ~he check valve may be effected by using long term tweezers, or some equi~alent toolO
In the sampler devices described hereinabove, the exhaled volume of the mainstream sample is determined using an accurate volume measurement device, as for exam ple a Wright respirometer. ~olume measurements made are independent of the use of an inaccurate and imprecise technique e.g. collection of exhaled w~ter on a high pressure drop adsoxben~, such as molecular sieves, where the amount of exhaled water collected must be assumed to be directly proportional to the volume exhaled.
The foregoing sampler devices permit side-stream, as well as mainstream, sampling. Sidestream sampling is important, and a capability for conducting this mode of sampling has been designed into the sampler devices of the present invention, for several reasons:
(1) Although ~he pressure drop associated with a charcoal cloth sorbent bed is low, subjects with respiratory problems may not be able to exhale through a sorbent bed.
(2) Sampling from the sidestream enables the user to employ sorbents that are selective to the collec-tion and analysis of specific analytes. For example, research has indicated that alcohols are only poorly recovered ~rom charcoal cloth, and it may thus be neces-sary to use sidestream sampling for collection of such analytes.
(3) The capacity of the charcoal cloth sorbent bed for high vapor pressure solvents such as methylene chloride may be limited. Sidestream samples can be collected at any desired flowrate on the sorbent of choice, such that problems with breakthrough are . . .. . ~ .., ..~ .. -:- .:. : . ,,: .

WO90/0957~ PCT/US90/~0584 _ ~3 -minimized.

(4) Multiple, and theref ore replicate, samples may be obtained using the sidestre~m sampling option.
One or more sorbents may be used to trap selective analytes a~ a variety of flowrates.
(5~ The sidestream port enables the sampler to be connected to an appropriate continuous monitor for breath-by-breath measurements. In this manner, the side-stream port facilitates frequent and continuous analysis of hreath samples which are uncontaminated by the analytes in the work environment.
(6) Pressure- or flow-sensors may be connected to the sidestream port to measure the number of breaths and or the pressure/flow profile of each breath.
In order to permit a low void volume Y-shaped design for the main sampler body that does not have a removable chec~ valve assembly, it is necessary to employ a valve-loading tool as shown in Figure 8 similar in function to that shown in Figures 6 and 7.
Referring to Figure 8, two hollow cylinders (A) and (B) are used as guide tubes and are connected at a hinged joint (C). As configured, the two guide tubes (A) and (B) may be rotated relative to one another by approx-imately 120 in order to assure the proper angle of orientation of the tool relative to the retainer bud when the tool is inserted in the sampler body. However other angular orientations are also possible for example 90 for use with an ~-shaped sampler that has no side access port. The hinge (C) must be relatively "stiff" and a positive istop" attached to the guide tube (B) (see Figure g), in order to prevent the two guide tubes from being bent at an angle greater than 120 or other pre-ferred angle relative to one another. The ~top is a small metal stud welded to the body of tube (B), just above the hinge. The push rod (D) is a cylinder housed in a long (A) section of the guide tube. An outer sleeve (E) slides over the other (B) section guide tube and is , ",~"""~ ,.". ~,." ~

W090/09572 PC~/~S90/00584 ~ 24 -welded to a short metal tang (F). A slot (G~ has been cut înto guide tube (B). The tang slips ~hrough the slot (G) inside of tube (B). A relatively sti~f cable (H) connects khe pushrod (D) to the tang (G)o At one end, the cable is welded or press-fit to the push rod (D). At the other end, the cable is welded or pressfit to the tang (F)o The tool operates in the same way as the tool described in Figures 5 and 6. That is, the outer sleeve (E) is pulled back over the guide tube by pulling the push rod (D) back to the loading position. The check valve is then slipped onto tube (B)~ Section (B) of the tool is then inserted into the body of the sampler and forced up against the inner wall of the sampler body to bend the tool at the hinge (C) to approximately 120 or other preferred angle. The (B) section guide tube is then ~orced over the retainer bud. The pushrod ~D) is pushed, forcing the cable (H) through guide tubes ~A) and (B), causing the outer sleeve (E) to slide along outside of guide tube B, thus pushing the check valve onto the check valve support. To improve functioning, inner cable guides as shown in Figure 8 may also be used.
One embodiment of a sample canister for granu-lar sorbents and for combinations of granular sorbents and charcoal cloth is shown in Figure 10. In this con-figuration, the sorbent beds are retained in separate canisters of the type 517 shown in Figure 5. Alterna-tively, this embodiment may also be used to retain several, e.g. primary, secondary and even tertiary, beds of charcoal cloth sorbent. However, in order to minimize pressure d~ops caused by large amounts of granular sorbent, it is preferred that the retainer cup not be as deep as that used for charcoal cloth sampling in pre-viously discussed embodiments. The canisters are stacked atop one another as shown in Figure 10. This arrangement permits a more positive seal of granular sorbent beds into the canister than are provided by those in the ..
.

. , . :: . ~:, , :. . . : ~ :, ; .
.. :: ., ~ . - . ~ .
: , .... . .. :.. .. . .
~: .~ . : -: . :
.:, - .: -WO90/09i72 P~T/US90/00584 ,,,, ~, 25 ~ ' ,~ hi;,~

pre~ious embodimen~s of Figuxes 4 and 5. There should be no possibility of granular sorbent from one sorbent section being accidentally mixed together with that of another sorbent section by spillage. Granular sorbent is retained in each of the cups by the fine-mesh stainless steel screens that are spot welded to the inside base of the cup (over the grating) and to the bottom of the heavy retainer grating.
These heavy retainer gratinys serve to flatten the sorbent bed and thus prevent channeling during sampling. They essentially replace the torous weight of the previous embodiment. However, this construction does not include an anti-rotational lug in the sampler cup to engage a cut out on the heavy stainless steel grating as with the previous embodiment. Granular sorbents require a very tight seal to be held in place. ~he sorbent may be blown or fall out of the sampler past such an open-ing. Essentially, this is a cup-in-a-cup design. It may also be desirable to ensure that the individual sorbent beds be separated or sealed by Teflon gasXets as shown in Figure 10.
Alternatively, the granular sorbents may be used with a canister such as that shown in Figure 11, this canister has also been fabricated from two stainless steel cups~ an upper (A) and a lower (B). The outside diameter of the upper cup is approximately equal in the inside diameter of the lower cup. Fine-mesh retainer screens (C) (diameter = internal diameter of the upper cup) have ~een spot-welded over the grating in the inside of both CU~5 . In addition, a retainer ring (D) has been press fit into the upper cup as shown. The entire upper assembly is then inverted and press-fit into the lower cup. Once press-fit together the two cups, A and B, are permanently affixed to one another. The granular sor-bents may be added or removed from the canister from aport (E) that is drilled into the side of the assembled canister, the hole may be threaded. This port is plugged ; , - ~

,. .. . .
..

WO 90/09572 PCl /US90/00;~4 ~ ~ rl r, ~ 26 -with a threaded metal plug or a small plug of silanized glass wool or ~ teflon plug once the canister has been filled with sorbent. Dimensions are as shown on Figure 11 .
S Along thase same lines, another embodiment is shown in Figure 12 for another alveolar sampler which also employs granular sorbentsO This device is primarily intended for sampling extremely low concentrations of solvents in alveolar breath. Samples of alveolar air collected with the device are primarily intended to be analyzed by thermal desorption. Thermal desorbers are commercially available and used extensively in environ-mental monitoring. For sampling, stainless steel or glass ~ubes, generally ranging in diameter from 0.25" to 0.625N are loaded with a sorbent. The manual breath sampling technique is used with this device. The subject exhales the end portion of the breath sample into the sorbent bed. The contaminants present in the air are trapped on the sorbent. The tube is capped and returned to the laboratory for analysis. During analysis, the tube is inserted into the thermal desorber where it is heated under a stream of inert gas such as nitrogen.
This flushes the trapped sol~ent(s) from the sorbent into a gas chromatograph where it is analyzed. The major advantage of thermal de~orption is that all of the solvent is removed from the sorbent bed by the thermal desorption process, and injected into the chromatograph for analysis. ~his contrasts with solvent desorption where the sample is diluted with solvent and only a very small portion of the sample is injected into the analyti-cal instrument. Thus, thermal desorption significantly enhances sensitivity relative to solvent desorption and permits the analysis of much lower quantities of analyte than would be possible for analysis by solvent desorp-tion.
The sampler o~ Figure 12 described below isadapted for use with a 0.625" O.D. x 0.579" I,D. x 7.0"

. .. .: - , WogO/09572 PCT/US90/00i84 9 ~
- ~7 -long stainless steel thermal desorption tube, i.e. the type that is used with a ~ekmar~ thermal desorber. The solvents present in the breath are sampled on beds of a porous polymer such as ~enax~; however, many other sor-bents including charcoal cloth may be used for this pur-pose. This device is primaxily intended to be used where the concentration of sample in al~eolar breath is very low. Again, both ~ront and bacX absorbing sections are used. The device is configured similarly to the granular 10 sample canister shown in Figure 10. The 0.625" OD
thermal desorber tube is welded as shown to a 0.866" (22-mm) tapered adaptor (A), -to form the main body of the sampler. The tapered adaptor permits ready attachment of the sampler to a Wright respirometer. The sorbent is retained in primary and backup stainless steel cartridges (B and B' respectively) that are approximately 0.579"
OD. The bottom of each cartridge is a grating to which fine mesh stainless steel screen has been spot welded on the inside. At the top of each oartridge ar~ separate heavy stainless steel retainer grating (C and C' for the primary and backup sections respectively). Fine-mesh stainless steel screen i5 spot-welded to the bottom of each grating. These gratins slip inside the sample cartri~ges and retain the sorbenk bed in place. Alterna-tively, plugs of silanized glass wool may be used inplace of these gratings.
The sampler is loaded as follows: first, the backup cartridge (B') is slipped into the sampler body.
The backup cartridge rests on a land ~D) at the bottom of the cylinder housing. A Teflon gasket (E') is inserted above the backup cartridge. The primary sorbent cartridge (B) is then inserted. Another Teflon gasket (E) is placed behind the front cartridge. Once inserted, the cartridges are held in place in the sampler body by a retainer tube (approximately 0,579 a OD) (F) that com-presses against the upper stainless steel retainer grat-ing as shown. There are holes in the retainer tube (at . : .. .
~,, , -WOgO/09572 PCT/US90/0058 ~ 28 -I ) and in the main body of ~he sampler (at H). As the retainer tube is inserted into ~he main sampler body, the holes on the retainer tube and on the main samplex body are aligned and a small threaded retainer key (H) is inserted through the hole in the outer sampler body and int~ the matching hole on the inner ratainer tube. This arrangement locks the canisters into place and keeps ~he entire assembly tight.
Once sampling is completed, the sampler is returned to the laboratory for analysis. The sampler is disassembled by first removing the threaded retainer key. The entire assembly including the retainer cylin-der, the primary backup sample cartridges and the Teflon gaske~s are then removed by pushing the sample cartridges out of the sampler with a convenient tool (e.g., a solid rod) from the open end of the sampler body welded to the adaptor (A).
Each of the cartridges are then separately inserted into a 0.579" ID thermal desorber tube to which a land such as D of Figure 11 has been welded. The cartridges would be inserted such that they rested atop ~he land. Each cartridge is then separately analyzed by placing the assembly inside a thermal desorber oven unit for analysis.
Although I have specified thermal desorption as the mosk d~si~able desorption procedure, other techniques for recovering the solvent from the sorbent, e.g. solvent desorption or extraction with supercritical fluids, may also be used as applicable.
~lnlike some other sorbent containers, the con-tainer o~ Figure 13 can be made so it cannot be dis-assembled. It is primarily intended for use in an occupational health clinic where complaints regarding exposure may be substantiated, perhaps several days post-exposure by sampling a large volume of breath using such a container. Since the sorbent cannot be readily removed from the container for solvent desorption, it is -:

WO90/09572 PCT/US90tO0584 3~9 preferred that the sample be desorbed by thermal means or using supercritical fluids.
The canister of Figure 15 can essentially replace canister 240 in Figure 2. It is preferred th t this cannot be constructed of inert materials which do not sorb volatiles such as stainless steel, anodized aluminum, or PTFE (Teflon~). Here the body of the sample canister does not have to be dividsd into threaded male and female components as does the canister of Figures 1, 2 and 30 Rather than separating the two halves of the canister to insert the sorbent container(s) such as part 412 in Figure 4, the cover on the top of the sampling chamber is removed and individual sample containers - inserted. A retainer shim has also been included in the sampler arrangement. For ease of viewing, this retainer shim i5 shown outside the body of the sampler. Alterna-tively, the shim may be permanently held in place at the outlet end of the body of the sampler using the retainer bolts shown. Its purpose is to seal the individual sample containers against one another during use. The sorbent containers are loosely inserted into the can-ister. The two retainer bolts on the backside of the canister body are then tightened against the shim forcing it against the sorbent containers. ~his arrangement should also ~acilitate the recovery of the sorbent con-tainer from the canister, as the user would not need to forcibly xemove tight fitting sample containers from the canister, but simply release the retainer shim and xemove the sample containers. In addition, it allows ready use of oversized or multi-depth sample containers.
As shown in Figure 15, the cover is mounted to the sampler body with screws; a gasket is used to seal the cover with the body. Alternatively, the cover may be mounted to the sampler body by sliding it in a track mounted to the top or that body or sealed in place with a clamp. A reason for this arrangement is to permlt ready use of granular sorbents. The granular sorbent is ", ," ",~

WogO/09~72 PCT/US90/005~4 ~ 30 _ ~ , compressed in place with the weights shown to prevent channeling through the sorbent bed during sampling.
However, the sorbe~t container may also be used with charcoal such as charcoal cloth in three~wafer sections. In addition, this permits the use of double-size sorbent containers for granular sorbents weighted as necessary with oversize weights.
The arrangement has a further advantage of reducing waste of the charcoal cloth sorbent and of the fine mesh retalner screen. Cut~ing circular wafers of charcoal cloth or fine mesh screen from a rectangular roll of sheet stock does not allow all of that stock to be used whereas the use of square or rectangular wafexs will.
The container channel support of Figure l6 may be fabricated separately from stainless steel- or aluminum-channel stock. The front and back fine mesh stainless steel screens are approximately 40-mm square, giving approximately the same exposed surface area as that of the currently proposed 45 mm diameter wafers of charcoal cloth. These screens are inserted into the protruding arms of the channel support. The inner shim assembly is then forced as shown into the channel support to retain the screen in place. In order to stabilize the assembly, the outer channel support may be spot-welded or bolted to the inner retainer shim.
The container channel support of Figure 17 is fabxicated as described a~ove for granular sorbents;
however, it may not be as deep as the channel support since the charcoal wafers are very thin. The front fine-mesh stainless steel screen is inserted into the channel support. Typically, three 40 mm square wafers of the charcoal cloth are laid over the front fine mesh screen in the channel support, followed by a large mesh backup screen. A thin square inner shim assembly is then inserted over the large~mesh back screen to retain the sorbent assembly in place. Alternatively, a two-leafed ., . . :
.
-.~ `
.
, ,.. , . . . .. . - . :

WO90/09572 ~ PCT/US90/00584 ~ ...................................... . .
. .

spring-loaded thin inner shim assembly may be used for this purpose; the two legs axe compressed then inserted and allowed to expand to seal the bed in place.
One possible sampling configuration ~ould involve three sample containers of the type described by Figure 17 where the sample canister would contain front, middle and back sorbent sections of charcoal cIoth wafers or wafers of other sorbent material. This arrangement finds use for high-vapor pressure analytes that migrate from one sorbent section to the next during storage because it permits the individual sorbent sections to be separated from one another immediately after sampling.
Alternatively, it permits spacers such as thin 40 mm square sheets of stainless steel to be inserted between the three sorbent sections to minimize such migration.
Another obvious configuration is assembled as above except that the entire sorbent bed is placed in a triple-depth channel support. First, the front fine mesh retainer screen is inserted, followed by the front char-coal cloth sorbent bed, a large mesh spacer screen, the middle charcoal cloth b~d, another large-mesh spacer screen, and finally the backup charcoal cloth bed followed by the back large mesh screen, followed by the retainer clip.
Another variation on the sampler configuration is one which permits estimation of the total amount of analyte received by the subject. This is shown by Figura 18 which lacks a filter to remove the analyte from the ambient air and is specifically designed to be used in an area of contaminated air. The contaminated air is inhaled through an inhalation check valve and exhaled through a canister of sorbent. To ensure that all the exhaled air and none of the inhaled or ambient air passes through the sorbent canister, at least one and preferably two check valves, one on each side of the canister are added. The conduit leading from the mouthpiece may also optionally have an access port for sampling the air or , ~ : , ' ', ` ' WO90/09;72 PCT/US90/005B~
?.. ~ 32 - !

replacing the inlet check valYe(s).
The dose a subject receives can he calculated by measuring the total volume inhaled multiplied by the analyte concentration aP.d the percent absor~ed by the subject. The percentage absorbed can easily be calcu lated from the amount measured in the canister. From the does absorbed per breath one can thPn determine the total dose absorbed by the subject and act accordingly. Air concentrations of various analytes are fair measures of one's exposure to gasses and ~olatile chemicals but they do not indicate the actual amount received. In accord-ance with the invention one finally has an easy/ unobtru-sive, and readily repeatable technique on demand to determine the estimated amount the body actually absorbed.
Figure 19 shows a single sorbent retainer ring that may replace part 404. The retainer may fit into the sample canister 412. At the bottom, it engages the rear retainer screen 406 and at the top it engages the Teflon washer 402 in Figure 4. Along with the torous, the retainer ring may have a cutout to engage an anti-rotational lus in the sample canister. The system may use any particular sorbent or combination of sorbents.
The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the invention that others can, by applying current ~now-ledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applica-tions such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modi.fications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the dis-closed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.

. .

Claims (28)

1. Apparatus for collecting breath samples of a subject for subsequent determination of analyte con-tent, comprising:
a tubular body having a first and second ends;
first conduit means for selectively loading the tubular body with the subject's breath, said first conduit means communicating with said tubular body at a location intermediate said first and second ends;
second conduit means fluidly communicating with said first end of said tubular body, said second conduit means including air filtering means and selec-tively operable valve means for admitting ambient air through said filtering means and into said tubular body when a subject inhales through conduit means;
third conduit means fluidly communicating with said second end of said tubular body, said third conduit means including sample collection means and selectively operable valve means for admitting exhaled breath from said tubular body into said sample collection means when a user exhales through said first conduit means;
said valve means in said second conduit means being rendered inoperable when said valve means in said third conduit means is rendered operable, and said valve means in said third conduit means being rendered inoperable when said valve means in said second conduit means is rendered operable.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said tubular body has a substantially "T-shaped" configura-tion.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said first, second and third conduit means each define a longitudinal axis, the longitudinal axis of said first conduit means being disposed at an angle to said second and third conduit means of said tubular body.

4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said angle comprises at least 90 degrees.

5. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said angle is 120 degrees.

6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said valves in each of said second and third conduit means comprises a check valve.

7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein each of said check valves is removable from its respective con-duit means.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said sample collection means comprises a container including at least one bed of sorbents.

9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein said at least one bed of sorbents comprises a bed of charcoal cloth.

10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said tubular body includes an opening and connection means at said opening for connecting means for carrying out side-stream sampling.

11. Apparatus for inserting and mounting valves in a tubular conduit means, comprising:
an elongated guide tube having a first valve supporting end and a second open end, said guide tube including a slot formed at one side thereof and extending along the longitudinal axis of said guide tube, an elongated push rod slidably supported concentrically within said guide tube for movement along the longi-tudinal axis of said guide tube, said push rod having means, attached to one end thereof, which extends radially outwardly from the guide tube, and an outer sleeve member disposed concentri-cally about said guide tube for movement along the longi-tudinal axis of said guide tube, whereby, in order to mount a check valve in a tubular conduit means, the push rod is moved away from the first end of the guide tube so that the outer sleeve member is moved in a corresponding direction, the valve is disposed over and pushed onto said guide tube first end, and said push rod is moved back toward the guide tube first end so that the outer sleeve member forces the valve off the first end of the guide tube and into its mounting in a respective conduit means.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the guide tube is hinged.

13. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the sample collection means or air filtering means comprises a removable canister containing the sorbent.

14. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the sample collection means or air filter means comprises a square or rectangular cross section.

15. The apparatus of claims 13 or 14 wherein the sorbent comprises charcoal cloth.

16. A method for measuring volatile organic compound analytes in a sample of breath, comprising pass-ing a breath sample through a sorbent capable of retaining one or more of said analytes, desorbing at least one of the analytes from the sorbent, and measuring the volatile organic compound analytes released from the sorbent.

17. A method for measuring an analyte in a multi-breath sample, comprising passing multiple breaths through a sorbent capable of retaining one or more ana-lytes, desorbing the analyte from the sorbent, and mea-suring the analyte released from the sorbent.

18. The method of claim 16 or claim 17 further comprising prefiltering the gas inhaled by the subject with a sorbent capable of significantly removing either the analyte or the volatile organic compound be measured or a compound which may interfere with either the concen-tration, sorption, release, or measurement of the analyte.

19. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein a common exhaled gas is measured along with the analyte and the two amounts compared.

20. The method of claim 16 wherein the breath sample contains air from more than one exhalation.

21. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the analyte desorbed by thermal desorption.

22. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the breath sample is an alveolar breath sample.

23. Apparatus for collecting exhaled breath samples of a subject breathing air containing an analyte and for subsequent determination of the analyte in exhaled breath, comprising a tubular conduit having one opening adapted to receive exhaled gas from the subject, a second opening connected to sample collecting means, and a third opening to permit inhalation of ambient air, wherein the second and third openings contain valve means to permit only exhaled gas to pass through the sample collection means.

24. The apparatus of claim 23 wherein the sample collection means contains a sorbent capable of retaining at least one analyte.

25. The apparatus of claim 23 wherein the valve means are check valves.

26. The apparatus of claim 25 wherein sample collection means has a check valve at least upstream or on both sides of it to minimize ambient air or inhaled air from being collected.

27. The method of claim 16 or 17 wherein the subject is inhaling gas containing the analyte.

28. The method of claim 27 whereby one deter-mines the amount or percentage of analyte absorbed by the subject.