CA2041473A1 - Method and means for suppressing geomagnetically induced currents - Google Patents
Method and means for suppressing geomagnetically induced currentsInfo
- Publication number
- CA2041473A1 CA2041473A1 CA 2041473 CA2041473A CA2041473A1 CA 2041473 A1 CA2041473 A1 CA 2041473A1 CA 2041473 CA2041473 CA 2041473 CA 2041473 A CA2041473 A CA 2041473A CA 2041473 A1 CA2041473 A1 CA 2041473A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- common node
- transformers
- direct current
- air gap
- current flowing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E40/00—Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y02E40/50—Arrangements for eliminating or reducing asymmetry in polyphase networks
Abstract
Abstract of the Disclosure A polyphase electric power distribution system is protected from the effects of geomagnetic storms by countering the difference of potential between spaced grounding points in the system, and or by altering the magnetic circuits of transformers in the system to reduce half-cycle saturation and associated high peak currents.
Description
s ~ 3 ~E3~nn~ FOR
SU~PRESSING G~OM~G~TIC~Y INDUC~D CURRENTS
Back~round of the ~vention FiƧld of the Invention.
This invention relates to schemes for protecting electric power distribution systems from the effects of current surges attributable to geomagnetic storms, and more particularly to the method and apparatus for reducing the effects of large direct currents induced in electric power equipment, for e~ample, by geomagnetic storms.
Recently-published reports describe the problcms that electric power distribution systems are experiencing as a result of direct currents (D.C.) induced in power lines by geomagnetic storms. Currents of as high as one million amperes are reported to circulate in the ionsphere around shifting paths as a result of solar flares. These induce potential differences as high as 20 volts per kilometer of separation between points on the Earth's surface. (See, for eY~ample, "Bracing for the Geomagnetic Storms," I~E Spectrum, March 1990, pgs. 27-33.) As a result, large currents can flow in conductors of low impedance that connect the spaced points.
Typically, the points may be connected by a three-phase transmission line having Y-connected transformers at each end with their neutral connections grounded.
~,J3 'J~ 7 3 A portion of the current attributable to the difference of potential at the spaced neutral grounding points can Elow in each txansformer winding of a transmission system and can easily cause half-cycle saturation in the transEormer cores. This half-cycle saturatlon causes large harmonic currents, local heating, and other ad~erse effects which can precipitate system shutdown and regional power blackouts.
Summary of the Invention In accordance with the embodiments of the present invention, the effects of large direct currents from such differences of potentials between spaced points along electric power distribution systems are reduced by reducing the potential difEerence of the grounds in one embodiment and by altering the magnetic circuit of power-line transformers in response to this direct current in another embodiment.
Description of the D awinas Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a portion of an electric power distribution system between spaced ground points;
Figure 2 is a simplified schematic representation of the characteristics of a desirable filter in the ground connection at one spaced point;
p~ ~
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a graph illustrating the voltage, current and angular velocity with time associated with the D.C. motor in the embodiment of Figure 3;
Figure 5(a) is a representative diagram of the motor of Figure 3;
Fi.gure 5(b) is a representative equivalent circuit diagram of the motor of Figures 3 and 5(a);
Figure 6 is a pictorial view of a transformer according to the present invention for operation in one phase of a multiphase power distribution system;
Figure 7 is a partial sectional view of the core and variable air gap in the magnetic circuit of the transformer of Figure 6;
Figure 8 is a sectional view of the hydraulic actuator according to one embodiment of the present invention for altering the air gap in the transformer of Figure 6; and Figure 9 is a schematic diagram of a sensing circuit for controlling operation of the hydraulic actuator of Figure ~.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment Referring now to the schematic diagram of a distri~ution system illustrated in Figure 1, there is shown a plurality of Y-connected secondary windings 9, 11, 13 of a three-phase transformer system (primary windings not shown for simplicity) that are connected to a co~mon, grounded node 15.
The secondary windings are connected via transmission-line conductors 17 to corresponding Y-connected primary windings 19, 21, 32 of a three-phase transformer system (secondary windings are not shown for simplicity). The common connection node, or neutral, 25 of the windings 19, 21, 23 is grounded at a separate location from the ground connection or neutral 15, and this ground connection is illustrated as including switch 27 with a voltmeter 29 connected across the switch for purposes of the following discussion.
Assume that ground point A is at a positive potential with respect to ground point B in the sense that, if switch 27 is opened, the voltmeter connected across the open switch will read upscale b~ V volts. It should be noted that a transmission line 17 along a different route between points A
and B might indicate a different potential due to different magnetic fluY~ producing a different potential between the two points.
With the switch 27 closed, a current I=V/RL will flow around the loop, where RL is the loop resistance including 2/3 of the winding resistance of the transformers, 1/3 of the transmission line conductor resistance, and the ground resistance between points A and B, all in series. One third of this current will flow in each transformer winding and this , J 'i ~ 3 level of direct current can easily cause half-cycle saturation in the transformer cores. It is this half-cycle saturation that causes large harmonic currents, local heating, and the other effects often leading to system shutdown and regional blackouts. To eliminate these direct currents, all the Y-connected nodes (or, neutrals) in the entire system might be left unconnected to ground e~Acept, perhaps, at only one of the Y-connected nodes in the system. However, leaving the other neutrals ungrounde~ can have undesirable side effects. If there is a load unbalance, for eYample, a heavy load on Phase 1, then the effect of an ungrounded neutral (e.g. opening switch 27) will be to cause the neutral voltage Vn to follow the voltage V1 thus reducing the power on Phase 1 and at the same time increasing the voltages and load powers on Phases 2 and 3. In addition, the third harmonics of the magnetizing currents for the three phases are in phase and normally flow to ground through the neutral. Thus, if this path is opened, third harmonic voitages will appear on the lines. If none of the side effects were too serious, then the simple eY.pedient of opening the neutrals might avoid disaster. However, the emergency switching equipment, used to protect the system against severe load unbalances, line-to-ground shorts, lightning strikes, and other faults, makes use of devices that sense currents in the grounded neutral connection. This rl 3 protection equipment would be renderefl inoperative i~ the ground connection were broken.
Instead of leaving all the neutrals ungrounded, eY.cept perhaps for one neutral, another solution might be to tie them all back to the one grounded neutral via an additional conductor that followed the same route as the three-phase power lines 17. This fourth conductor would be a considerable adde~
e~pense were it not already present in the ~orm of the "ground"
line above the power conductors that provides lightning protection in typical transmission-line installations.
However, use of this line as a "neutral return" would require that it be insulated from each tower and then, to restore the lightning protection, the insulators would have to be shunted by spark gaps, or by thyrite semiconductor shunts, or the like. Then too, the resistance of the e~isting ground line might be too high, in wnich case it would have to be replaced by a conductor of larger diameter, all with concomitant retrofitting labor and e~.pense.
Generally, a desirable solution is to present a high resistance to ground at D.C. for all neutrals (save possibly one that is grounded directly) and at the same time present a low impedance to ground for alternating currents (A.C.). This suggests "grounding" all neutxals through a capacitor 31 having low reactance at 60 Hz in parallel with a high-value resistor 33, as shown in Figure 2. However the capacitor 31 is likely to be quite large and e~pensive and it must be able to withstand, at least momentarily, ~he full load current of a single phase due to loss of load on the other two phases, as well as withstand surge currents due to faults and lightning strikes without developing reactive vo]tages in excess of its voltage rating. This probably means a reactance of under one ohm at power line frequency, which means a capacitance of over 2666 microfarads at several hundred volts rating.
In accordance with the present invention, the need for such a capacitor is eliminated by connecting between the node, or neutral, and the ground point a device 35 which has very low A.C. impedance and which continually adjusts the D.C. voltage across its terminals to maintain the direct current flowing through it to or from the neutral essentially at zero, or at very low levels. Such a device, as illustrated in Figure 3, is a D.C. motor 35 connected between the neutral 25 and the grounding point B. In this embodiment of the present inven-tion, the D.C. motor 35 as illustrated with pictorial diagram of Figure 5(a), includes constant-field e~citation (or permanent-magnet field) 41 and an armature 47 having windings 43 which are connected via a commutator (not shown) and brushes 48 between the neutral and the grounding point.
Assume that a geomagnetically-induced current I = V/RL
suddenly appears, where the potential difference between grounding points is the (open circuit) voltage V that produces qo the current and RL is the loop r~sistance. Quickly, the motor starts turning and develops a counter emf, as shown in Figure 4, that is nearly equal to V. Thus, the D.C. voltags V on the neutral rises nearly to Vn, and the current drops nearly to zero. The time constant of this transient depends on the loop resistance RL and on the magnetic circuit and the moment of inertia of the armature 47, as described below. The armature of the D.C. motor in the embodiment of Figure 3 must be capable of conducting high alternating currents when rotating and when not rotating and thus must have large armature windings 43, commutator segments and brushes 48. Alternating current flowing in the windings 43 of -the armature within a constant magnetic field 41 causes perturbations in the torque of the armatura and generally produces vibration at the line frequency. The motor must therefore be sturdily mounted, and the armature windings 43 must be i'potted" in the structure of the armature to assure that they do not move about under the influence of magnetomotive force exerted upon the conductors while conducting alternating current within a static or constant magnetic field 41. Where such constant magnetic field is supplied by permanent magnets, care must also be taken to avoid de-magnetization of the field magnets under the influence of alternating magnetic fields attributable to the alternating currents flowing in the armature windings. In the embodiment ~8--~f~ L ~
of Figure 3, one or more of several different devices 50 may be connected across the brush terminals 48 to protect the motor in the circuit. For eY~ample, a circuit 'breaker'-type device may be connected across the brushes 48 to short the motor out on high levels of alternating currents. Alternatively, semiconductor devices and circuits may be connected across the brushes to short the motor for high levels of alternatlng currents while not shorting out D.C. potential across the brushes. Also, a capacitor may be connected across the brushes 48 to decrease high-frequency currents flowing through the motor and to suppress high frequency signals attributable to sparking between commutator and brushes.
Referring to Figure 5(b), there is shown the equivalent circuit of the motor in the embodiment of Figures 3 and 5(a) as seen at the terminals 37, 39 connected through the brushes 48 to the armature windings. Assume that the motor either is separately e~clted or has a permanent magnet field 41 of strength B, and that the armature winding 43 has total length L in this field and is at a distance a from the aV~is 45 of rotation. The torque produced by the motor is then:
T = a(BL)i (Eq. 1) while the counter emf is:
ec = a(BL)_~ (Eq- 2) where Q is the angular velocity of the armature 47. Dividing equation (1) by (2):
Ye = = 1 T - Zm z (Eq. 3) ec a (BL) Q a (BL) where Ye is the electrical admittance presented by the armatuxe 47 and Zm is the mechanical (rotational) impedance of the armature. In complex notation with p == j ~ :
Zm = Rw ~~ PIm (Eq. 4) where Rw is the ratio of steady state torque (due to windage and other frictional losses) to the angular velocity and Im is the moment of inertia of the rotating system. Also Im/a2 is the effective mass at a distance a from the aY.is 45~ The electrical admittance is thus:
Ye = g + pC (Eq. 5) where Rw 1 (Eq- 6) a~(BL ~ R
and Im (Eq. 7 a (BL) Since the windage torque or drag will normally increase faster than Q , Rw and g can be e~.pected to increase with speed so the syqtem is not entirely linear. However, this variation affects only the 3.C. behavior and is xelatively unimportant. Im and therefore C are constant, and the impedances are therefore inverted to admittances by the magnetic coupling.
To this reflected admittance Ye are added the actual armature resistance Ra and inductance La~ as well as the non-linear brush contact resistance Rb. These are normally small and may be neglected in what follows, although i~ should ~3J ~9 ~
be remembered that since the total brush-to-comutator drop is about 1/2 volt and occurs twice, the brush loss in watts is about equal to the armature current in amperes.
The equivalent capacitance of the motor 35 can be computed on the basis of some reasonab:Le assumed values.
Consider an armature o laminated stee:L to be a cylinder 12" in diameter and 20" long, to which the cotnutator adds another 12"
at the same diameter for a total length (h) of about .8 meters. Assume the armature conductors 43 make 50 passes (from brush to brush) under 20"-long field poles. Then L = 50 Y 0.5 meters = 25m and a = O.lSm. If the armature density (includinq the comutator) ~ = 7500 kg/m3, the moment of inertia will be approY~imately:
Im = j~ a4 h (Eq. 8) = ~ (7500) (0.15)4 0.8 (Eq- 9) = 4.77 kg m2 (Eq. 10) Taking B = 1.41 tesla (i.e., 14,000 Gauss), then from Equation 7:
C = 4.77 = .17 Farads (Eq. 11) (.15 x 1.4 Y 25) This level of capacitance yields eY~tremely low A.C. impedance at power line frequency. If this capacitance is too high, it may be lowered by: (a) decreasing the diameter of the armature; (b) increasing the field strength (to perhaps 2 Tesla with Permendur armature and field-pole laminations;
(c) lncreasing the length or adding more turns. With smaller motors, a flywheel might be added to increase the effective capacitance.
From equation (2), at 1800 rpm (i.e., Q = 2 ~ x l~QQ
ec = .15 X 25 ~ 60~ (Eq. 12) = 700 volts counter emf which is in the proper range for typical geomagnetic storms.
In another embodiment of the present inventiorl, half-cycle saturation of the magnetic cores of three-phase transformers can be attributable to direct current (for eY~ample, induced by geomagnetic storms) producing a high, steady fluY to which the A.C. fluY adds in one direction and subtracts in the other direction. Such half~cycle saturation can be avoided by including controlled air gaps in the magnetic cores of the transformers. This, of course, increases the magnetizing current (in the absence of D.C. in the winding) and may require additional power-factor correction to restore system performance. However, it should be noted that the additional magnetizing current caused by an air gap in the magnetic circuit of a transformer is free of harmonics, and is typically a small sinusoidal current in quadrature with the voltage applied to the transformer and does not of itself represent real power, only reactive power.
From the literature, a typical 600 MVA power transformer is believed to operate with a normal magnetizing current of about 5 amperes peak and about 2 amperes rms.
Introducing an air gap in the core that increased the normal magnetizing current to about 15 amps peak and 10 amps rms would greatly reduce the half cycle saturation by reducing the peak current levels of about 300 amps to peak currents levels of about 20 to 30 amps. Designi.ng the transformers to operate a-t a lower peak flux density would also reduce the half-cycle peak cu rrent s .
In accordance with the present invention the transformer core is not interleaved but is constructed of 'E' and 'I', or 'E' and 'E', or double 'C' laminations pre-assembled and glued or 'potted' together with the mating faces ground flat to minimize the air`gap. The transformer thus operates with low magnetizing current under normal operating conditions. Then, when direct currents appear, for e~ample, during geomagnetic storms, the core halves are separated hydraulically to provide sufficient air gap to prevent half-cycle saturation.
Referring now to the pictorial diagram of Figure 6, there is shown one embodiment of the present invention including upper and lower 'C'-shaped core sections forming the magnetic circuit with windings assembled thereon to form a transformer in one phase of a three-phase distribution system.
The core 51 is wound in this embodiment in conventional manner from insulated sheet steel tape that is grain oriented to provide easy magnetization . ~fter windingl the core 51 is solidly impregnated and cemented with epoxy or similar plastic adhesive. The core 51 is then cut into two 'C' sections with air gaps 53, 55 at the mating faces of the sections. These mating faces are lapped flat to form negligible air gaps for normal operation. Pr.imary and secondary windings are wound together within the sections 57, 59, 61, 63 of the windings that are distributed around the core. The respective sections of primary and secondary windings are connected in series or parallel. The variable air gaps 51, 53 are in the spaces between the bobbins of the pairs of windings 57, 63 and 59, 61 on each leg of the core. This arrangement minimizes stray flu~
from the transformer. In other embodiments of the present invention, an 'E'-shaped core may include windings on each leg of the 'E' shape for three-phase operation, with the magnetic circuit completed by an 'I'-shaped core section disposed across the pole ends of each leg of the 'E' shape.
Referring now to Figure 7 there is shown an enlarged view of one of the air gaps between mating pole faces in the core. The legs of the core are surrounded by a hard, strong plastic frame 65 containing a soft plastic boot or tire 67 that r ,,~
serves to seal the hydraulic chamber that is thus formed by the boot 67 about the core near the two po:Le faces. This obviates the need for additional pistons and cylinders which are thus provided by the design configuration oE the present embodiment. Figure 8 shows a cross section of the frame 65 where the hydraulic line 71 enters the hydraulic chamher 70.
Here the boot 67 is illustrated as clamped firmly between the hard plastic frame 65 and the core 51, and the chamber 70 is fitted with the hydraulic line 71. The seal between the boot and the pole pieces is formed by stretching the boot over the pole to prvvide initial resilient contact pressure, and the additional force needed to provide the seal is furnished by pressurized hydraulic fluid w}thin the chamber 70. The air gap between mating pole faces is thus filled with hydraulic oil having low permeability. In three-phase transformers for example, having 'E' and 'I'-shaped core sections as previously described, the air gaps should be maintained substantially e~ual during adjustments thereof.
Referring now to Figure 9, there is shown a simplified schematic diagram of a control circuit for controlling hydraulic fluid pressure within chamber 70 in response to direct current flowing in the neutral-to-ground connection of Y-connected three-phase transformers. A motor-driven pump 74 is connected to chamber 70 to provide hydraulic fluid under I~J~J t~
pressure to the chamber 70 associated with the core of each transformer in the Y-connection in response to the magnitude of direct current detected 75 within the neutral-to-ground connection 76. The detector 75 may include con~entional fluY.-switched sensors or Hall--Effect devices, or the like, which are disposed to detect direct currents 10wing in either direction to supply control signal to the pump 74 for increasing hydraulic pressure about the air gap 53, 55 to reduce the effects of direct current flowing in the connection 76. In one embodiment, the detector 75 detects the peaks of maynatizing current flowing in either direction and including direct current and half-cycle of alternating current for controlling the hydraulic pressure to alter the air gaps in order to rsduce the peaks of magnetizing current to values below preselected limitsO Of course, the direct current flowing in connection 76 may also power the pump 74 to eY.pand the air gaps 53, 55 in servo-controlled manner in proportion to the magnitude of the direct current.
Therefore, the present invention reduces the effects of direct currents induced, for eYample, by geomagnetic storms to flow in the transformers of a polyphase electric power distribution systems. This is accomplished in one embodiment by opposing the difference of potential between spaced ~ ~ ~s '~ 3 grounding points in the distribution systems, and in another embodiment by altering the air gap and associated saturation characteristics of the magnetic c.ircuits of such tran~formers.
SU~PRESSING G~OM~G~TIC~Y INDUC~D CURRENTS
Back~round of the ~vention FiƧld of the Invention.
This invention relates to schemes for protecting electric power distribution systems from the effects of current surges attributable to geomagnetic storms, and more particularly to the method and apparatus for reducing the effects of large direct currents induced in electric power equipment, for e~ample, by geomagnetic storms.
Recently-published reports describe the problcms that electric power distribution systems are experiencing as a result of direct currents (D.C.) induced in power lines by geomagnetic storms. Currents of as high as one million amperes are reported to circulate in the ionsphere around shifting paths as a result of solar flares. These induce potential differences as high as 20 volts per kilometer of separation between points on the Earth's surface. (See, for eY~ample, "Bracing for the Geomagnetic Storms," I~E Spectrum, March 1990, pgs. 27-33.) As a result, large currents can flow in conductors of low impedance that connect the spaced points.
Typically, the points may be connected by a three-phase transmission line having Y-connected transformers at each end with their neutral connections grounded.
~,J3 'J~ 7 3 A portion of the current attributable to the difference of potential at the spaced neutral grounding points can Elow in each txansformer winding of a transmission system and can easily cause half-cycle saturation in the transEormer cores. This half-cycle saturatlon causes large harmonic currents, local heating, and other ad~erse effects which can precipitate system shutdown and regional power blackouts.
Summary of the Invention In accordance with the embodiments of the present invention, the effects of large direct currents from such differences of potentials between spaced points along electric power distribution systems are reduced by reducing the potential difEerence of the grounds in one embodiment and by altering the magnetic circuit of power-line transformers in response to this direct current in another embodiment.
Description of the D awinas Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a portion of an electric power distribution system between spaced ground points;
Figure 2 is a simplified schematic representation of the characteristics of a desirable filter in the ground connection at one spaced point;
p~ ~
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a graph illustrating the voltage, current and angular velocity with time associated with the D.C. motor in the embodiment of Figure 3;
Figure 5(a) is a representative diagram of the motor of Figure 3;
Fi.gure 5(b) is a representative equivalent circuit diagram of the motor of Figures 3 and 5(a);
Figure 6 is a pictorial view of a transformer according to the present invention for operation in one phase of a multiphase power distribution system;
Figure 7 is a partial sectional view of the core and variable air gap in the magnetic circuit of the transformer of Figure 6;
Figure 8 is a sectional view of the hydraulic actuator according to one embodiment of the present invention for altering the air gap in the transformer of Figure 6; and Figure 9 is a schematic diagram of a sensing circuit for controlling operation of the hydraulic actuator of Figure ~.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment Referring now to the schematic diagram of a distri~ution system illustrated in Figure 1, there is shown a plurality of Y-connected secondary windings 9, 11, 13 of a three-phase transformer system (primary windings not shown for simplicity) that are connected to a co~mon, grounded node 15.
The secondary windings are connected via transmission-line conductors 17 to corresponding Y-connected primary windings 19, 21, 32 of a three-phase transformer system (secondary windings are not shown for simplicity). The common connection node, or neutral, 25 of the windings 19, 21, 23 is grounded at a separate location from the ground connection or neutral 15, and this ground connection is illustrated as including switch 27 with a voltmeter 29 connected across the switch for purposes of the following discussion.
Assume that ground point A is at a positive potential with respect to ground point B in the sense that, if switch 27 is opened, the voltmeter connected across the open switch will read upscale b~ V volts. It should be noted that a transmission line 17 along a different route between points A
and B might indicate a different potential due to different magnetic fluY~ producing a different potential between the two points.
With the switch 27 closed, a current I=V/RL will flow around the loop, where RL is the loop resistance including 2/3 of the winding resistance of the transformers, 1/3 of the transmission line conductor resistance, and the ground resistance between points A and B, all in series. One third of this current will flow in each transformer winding and this , J 'i ~ 3 level of direct current can easily cause half-cycle saturation in the transformer cores. It is this half-cycle saturation that causes large harmonic currents, local heating, and the other effects often leading to system shutdown and regional blackouts. To eliminate these direct currents, all the Y-connected nodes (or, neutrals) in the entire system might be left unconnected to ground e~Acept, perhaps, at only one of the Y-connected nodes in the system. However, leaving the other neutrals ungrounde~ can have undesirable side effects. If there is a load unbalance, for eYample, a heavy load on Phase 1, then the effect of an ungrounded neutral (e.g. opening switch 27) will be to cause the neutral voltage Vn to follow the voltage V1 thus reducing the power on Phase 1 and at the same time increasing the voltages and load powers on Phases 2 and 3. In addition, the third harmonics of the magnetizing currents for the three phases are in phase and normally flow to ground through the neutral. Thus, if this path is opened, third harmonic voitages will appear on the lines. If none of the side effects were too serious, then the simple eY.pedient of opening the neutrals might avoid disaster. However, the emergency switching equipment, used to protect the system against severe load unbalances, line-to-ground shorts, lightning strikes, and other faults, makes use of devices that sense currents in the grounded neutral connection. This rl 3 protection equipment would be renderefl inoperative i~ the ground connection were broken.
Instead of leaving all the neutrals ungrounded, eY.cept perhaps for one neutral, another solution might be to tie them all back to the one grounded neutral via an additional conductor that followed the same route as the three-phase power lines 17. This fourth conductor would be a considerable adde~
e~pense were it not already present in the ~orm of the "ground"
line above the power conductors that provides lightning protection in typical transmission-line installations.
However, use of this line as a "neutral return" would require that it be insulated from each tower and then, to restore the lightning protection, the insulators would have to be shunted by spark gaps, or by thyrite semiconductor shunts, or the like. Then too, the resistance of the e~isting ground line might be too high, in wnich case it would have to be replaced by a conductor of larger diameter, all with concomitant retrofitting labor and e~.pense.
Generally, a desirable solution is to present a high resistance to ground at D.C. for all neutrals (save possibly one that is grounded directly) and at the same time present a low impedance to ground for alternating currents (A.C.). This suggests "grounding" all neutxals through a capacitor 31 having low reactance at 60 Hz in parallel with a high-value resistor 33, as shown in Figure 2. However the capacitor 31 is likely to be quite large and e~pensive and it must be able to withstand, at least momentarily, ~he full load current of a single phase due to loss of load on the other two phases, as well as withstand surge currents due to faults and lightning strikes without developing reactive vo]tages in excess of its voltage rating. This probably means a reactance of under one ohm at power line frequency, which means a capacitance of over 2666 microfarads at several hundred volts rating.
In accordance with the present invention, the need for such a capacitor is eliminated by connecting between the node, or neutral, and the ground point a device 35 which has very low A.C. impedance and which continually adjusts the D.C. voltage across its terminals to maintain the direct current flowing through it to or from the neutral essentially at zero, or at very low levels. Such a device, as illustrated in Figure 3, is a D.C. motor 35 connected between the neutral 25 and the grounding point B. In this embodiment of the present inven-tion, the D.C. motor 35 as illustrated with pictorial diagram of Figure 5(a), includes constant-field e~citation (or permanent-magnet field) 41 and an armature 47 having windings 43 which are connected via a commutator (not shown) and brushes 48 between the neutral and the grounding point.
Assume that a geomagnetically-induced current I = V/RL
suddenly appears, where the potential difference between grounding points is the (open circuit) voltage V that produces qo the current and RL is the loop r~sistance. Quickly, the motor starts turning and develops a counter emf, as shown in Figure 4, that is nearly equal to V. Thus, the D.C. voltags V on the neutral rises nearly to Vn, and the current drops nearly to zero. The time constant of this transient depends on the loop resistance RL and on the magnetic circuit and the moment of inertia of the armature 47, as described below. The armature of the D.C. motor in the embodiment of Figure 3 must be capable of conducting high alternating currents when rotating and when not rotating and thus must have large armature windings 43, commutator segments and brushes 48. Alternating current flowing in the windings 43 of -the armature within a constant magnetic field 41 causes perturbations in the torque of the armatura and generally produces vibration at the line frequency. The motor must therefore be sturdily mounted, and the armature windings 43 must be i'potted" in the structure of the armature to assure that they do not move about under the influence of magnetomotive force exerted upon the conductors while conducting alternating current within a static or constant magnetic field 41. Where such constant magnetic field is supplied by permanent magnets, care must also be taken to avoid de-magnetization of the field magnets under the influence of alternating magnetic fields attributable to the alternating currents flowing in the armature windings. In the embodiment ~8--~f~ L ~
of Figure 3, one or more of several different devices 50 may be connected across the brush terminals 48 to protect the motor in the circuit. For eY~ample, a circuit 'breaker'-type device may be connected across the brushes 48 to short the motor out on high levels of alternating currents. Alternatively, semiconductor devices and circuits may be connected across the brushes to short the motor for high levels of alternatlng currents while not shorting out D.C. potential across the brushes. Also, a capacitor may be connected across the brushes 48 to decrease high-frequency currents flowing through the motor and to suppress high frequency signals attributable to sparking between commutator and brushes.
Referring to Figure 5(b), there is shown the equivalent circuit of the motor in the embodiment of Figures 3 and 5(a) as seen at the terminals 37, 39 connected through the brushes 48 to the armature windings. Assume that the motor either is separately e~clted or has a permanent magnet field 41 of strength B, and that the armature winding 43 has total length L in this field and is at a distance a from the aV~is 45 of rotation. The torque produced by the motor is then:
T = a(BL)i (Eq. 1) while the counter emf is:
ec = a(BL)_~ (Eq- 2) where Q is the angular velocity of the armature 47. Dividing equation (1) by (2):
Ye = = 1 T - Zm z (Eq. 3) ec a (BL) Q a (BL) where Ye is the electrical admittance presented by the armatuxe 47 and Zm is the mechanical (rotational) impedance of the armature. In complex notation with p == j ~ :
Zm = Rw ~~ PIm (Eq. 4) where Rw is the ratio of steady state torque (due to windage and other frictional losses) to the angular velocity and Im is the moment of inertia of the rotating system. Also Im/a2 is the effective mass at a distance a from the aY.is 45~ The electrical admittance is thus:
Ye = g + pC (Eq. 5) where Rw 1 (Eq- 6) a~(BL ~ R
and Im (Eq. 7 a (BL) Since the windage torque or drag will normally increase faster than Q , Rw and g can be e~.pected to increase with speed so the syqtem is not entirely linear. However, this variation affects only the 3.C. behavior and is xelatively unimportant. Im and therefore C are constant, and the impedances are therefore inverted to admittances by the magnetic coupling.
To this reflected admittance Ye are added the actual armature resistance Ra and inductance La~ as well as the non-linear brush contact resistance Rb. These are normally small and may be neglected in what follows, although i~ should ~3J ~9 ~
be remembered that since the total brush-to-comutator drop is about 1/2 volt and occurs twice, the brush loss in watts is about equal to the armature current in amperes.
The equivalent capacitance of the motor 35 can be computed on the basis of some reasonab:Le assumed values.
Consider an armature o laminated stee:L to be a cylinder 12" in diameter and 20" long, to which the cotnutator adds another 12"
at the same diameter for a total length (h) of about .8 meters. Assume the armature conductors 43 make 50 passes (from brush to brush) under 20"-long field poles. Then L = 50 Y 0.5 meters = 25m and a = O.lSm. If the armature density (includinq the comutator) ~ = 7500 kg/m3, the moment of inertia will be approY~imately:
Im = j~ a4 h (Eq. 8) = ~ (7500) (0.15)4 0.8 (Eq- 9) = 4.77 kg m2 (Eq. 10) Taking B = 1.41 tesla (i.e., 14,000 Gauss), then from Equation 7:
C = 4.77 = .17 Farads (Eq. 11) (.15 x 1.4 Y 25) This level of capacitance yields eY~tremely low A.C. impedance at power line frequency. If this capacitance is too high, it may be lowered by: (a) decreasing the diameter of the armature; (b) increasing the field strength (to perhaps 2 Tesla with Permendur armature and field-pole laminations;
(c) lncreasing the length or adding more turns. With smaller motors, a flywheel might be added to increase the effective capacitance.
From equation (2), at 1800 rpm (i.e., Q = 2 ~ x l~QQ
ec = .15 X 25 ~ 60~ (Eq. 12) = 700 volts counter emf which is in the proper range for typical geomagnetic storms.
In another embodiment of the present inventiorl, half-cycle saturation of the magnetic cores of three-phase transformers can be attributable to direct current (for eY~ample, induced by geomagnetic storms) producing a high, steady fluY to which the A.C. fluY adds in one direction and subtracts in the other direction. Such half~cycle saturation can be avoided by including controlled air gaps in the magnetic cores of the transformers. This, of course, increases the magnetizing current (in the absence of D.C. in the winding) and may require additional power-factor correction to restore system performance. However, it should be noted that the additional magnetizing current caused by an air gap in the magnetic circuit of a transformer is free of harmonics, and is typically a small sinusoidal current in quadrature with the voltage applied to the transformer and does not of itself represent real power, only reactive power.
From the literature, a typical 600 MVA power transformer is believed to operate with a normal magnetizing current of about 5 amperes peak and about 2 amperes rms.
Introducing an air gap in the core that increased the normal magnetizing current to about 15 amps peak and 10 amps rms would greatly reduce the half cycle saturation by reducing the peak current levels of about 300 amps to peak currents levels of about 20 to 30 amps. Designi.ng the transformers to operate a-t a lower peak flux density would also reduce the half-cycle peak cu rrent s .
In accordance with the present invention the transformer core is not interleaved but is constructed of 'E' and 'I', or 'E' and 'E', or double 'C' laminations pre-assembled and glued or 'potted' together with the mating faces ground flat to minimize the air`gap. The transformer thus operates with low magnetizing current under normal operating conditions. Then, when direct currents appear, for e~ample, during geomagnetic storms, the core halves are separated hydraulically to provide sufficient air gap to prevent half-cycle saturation.
Referring now to the pictorial diagram of Figure 6, there is shown one embodiment of the present invention including upper and lower 'C'-shaped core sections forming the magnetic circuit with windings assembled thereon to form a transformer in one phase of a three-phase distribution system.
The core 51 is wound in this embodiment in conventional manner from insulated sheet steel tape that is grain oriented to provide easy magnetization . ~fter windingl the core 51 is solidly impregnated and cemented with epoxy or similar plastic adhesive. The core 51 is then cut into two 'C' sections with air gaps 53, 55 at the mating faces of the sections. These mating faces are lapped flat to form negligible air gaps for normal operation. Pr.imary and secondary windings are wound together within the sections 57, 59, 61, 63 of the windings that are distributed around the core. The respective sections of primary and secondary windings are connected in series or parallel. The variable air gaps 51, 53 are in the spaces between the bobbins of the pairs of windings 57, 63 and 59, 61 on each leg of the core. This arrangement minimizes stray flu~
from the transformer. In other embodiments of the present invention, an 'E'-shaped core may include windings on each leg of the 'E' shape for three-phase operation, with the magnetic circuit completed by an 'I'-shaped core section disposed across the pole ends of each leg of the 'E' shape.
Referring now to Figure 7 there is shown an enlarged view of one of the air gaps between mating pole faces in the core. The legs of the core are surrounded by a hard, strong plastic frame 65 containing a soft plastic boot or tire 67 that r ,,~
serves to seal the hydraulic chamber that is thus formed by the boot 67 about the core near the two po:Le faces. This obviates the need for additional pistons and cylinders which are thus provided by the design configuration oE the present embodiment. Figure 8 shows a cross section of the frame 65 where the hydraulic line 71 enters the hydraulic chamher 70.
Here the boot 67 is illustrated as clamped firmly between the hard plastic frame 65 and the core 51, and the chamber 70 is fitted with the hydraulic line 71. The seal between the boot and the pole pieces is formed by stretching the boot over the pole to prvvide initial resilient contact pressure, and the additional force needed to provide the seal is furnished by pressurized hydraulic fluid w}thin the chamber 70. The air gap between mating pole faces is thus filled with hydraulic oil having low permeability. In three-phase transformers for example, having 'E' and 'I'-shaped core sections as previously described, the air gaps should be maintained substantially e~ual during adjustments thereof.
Referring now to Figure 9, there is shown a simplified schematic diagram of a control circuit for controlling hydraulic fluid pressure within chamber 70 in response to direct current flowing in the neutral-to-ground connection of Y-connected three-phase transformers. A motor-driven pump 74 is connected to chamber 70 to provide hydraulic fluid under I~J~J t~
pressure to the chamber 70 associated with the core of each transformer in the Y-connection in response to the magnitude of direct current detected 75 within the neutral-to-ground connection 76. The detector 75 may include con~entional fluY.-switched sensors or Hall--Effect devices, or the like, which are disposed to detect direct currents 10wing in either direction to supply control signal to the pump 74 for increasing hydraulic pressure about the air gap 53, 55 to reduce the effects of direct current flowing in the connection 76. In one embodiment, the detector 75 detects the peaks of maynatizing current flowing in either direction and including direct current and half-cycle of alternating current for controlling the hydraulic pressure to alter the air gaps in order to rsduce the peaks of magnetizing current to values below preselected limitsO Of course, the direct current flowing in connection 76 may also power the pump 74 to eY.pand the air gaps 53, 55 in servo-controlled manner in proportion to the magnitude of the direct current.
Therefore, the present invention reduces the effects of direct currents induced, for eYample, by geomagnetic storms to flow in the transformers of a polyphase electric power distribution systems. This is accomplished in one embodiment by opposing the difference of potential between spaced ~ ~ ~s '~ 3 grounding points in the distribution systems, and in another embodiment by altering the air gap and associated saturation characteristics of the magnetic c.ircuits of such tran~formers.
Claims (12)
1. A method for reducing the effects of direct currents that are induced to flow between spaced ground points in a polyphase electric power distribution system having a plurality of transformers with windings connected to a grounded common node, the method comprising the steps of:
detecting the direct current flowing in the grounded common node; and in response to detected direct current flowing in the grounded common node, reducing the flux density attributable to the additive direct current and half-cycle alternating current within the transformers having windings connected to the grounded common node.
detecting the direct current flowing in the grounded common node; and in response to detected direct current flowing in the grounded common node, reducing the flux density attributable to the additive direct current and half-cycle alternating current within the transformers having windings connected to the grounded common node.
2. A method for reducing the effects of direct currents that are induced to flow between spaced ground points in a polyphase electric power distribution system having a plurality of transformers with windings connected to a common node, the method comprising the steps of:
sensing current attributable to a difference of D.C.
potential of one polarity between spaced ground points; and generating a D.C. potential between the ground point and a common node of opposite polarity and substantially equal magnitude to the potential of said one polarity.
sensing current attributable to a difference of D.C.
potential of one polarity between spaced ground points; and generating a D.C. potential between the ground point and a common node of opposite polarity and substantially equal magnitude to the potential of said one polarity.
3. The method according to claim 2 wherein in the step of generating, a motor including an armature having conductors thereon is rotated within a unidirectional magnetic field in response to direct current flowing in the grounded common node to induce a potential in the conductors of the armature connected between the ground point and the common node that is substantially equal to the D.C. potential and of opposite polarity to said one polarity.
4. The method according to claim 3 wherein the magnetic field is maintained substantially constant.
5. The method according to claim 1 for operation with transformers that have separable core structures wherein in the step of reducing the flux density, an air gap is introduced into the magnetic circuit of each transformer having windings that are connected to the common node.
6. The method according to claim 5 wherein for a polyphase transformer having a plurality of pole sections in a common core, an air gap is introduced in each pole section of the common core.
7. The method according to claim 5 wherein in the step of introducing an air gap, the core structures of the transformers are separated in proportion to the magnitude of the direct current flowing in the common node.
8. The method according to claim 7 including the step of altering the air gap in response to pressurized fluid introduced into the air gap from a source of fluid under pressure in response to the direct current flowing in the common node.
9. Apparatus for reducing the effects of direct currents that are induced to flow between spaced ground locations in a polyphase electric power distribution system comprising;
a plurality of transformers with windings connected to a common node for grounding at a location; and a D.C. motor having substantially constant magnetic field and an armature having windings thereon mounted for rotation in the magnetic field, said motor connecting the common node to ground at said location.
a plurality of transformers with windings connected to a common node for grounding at a location; and a D.C. motor having substantially constant magnetic field and an armature having windings thereon mounted for rotation in the magnetic field, said motor connecting the common node to ground at said location.
10. Apparatus for reducing the effects of direct currents that are induced to flow between spaced ground locations in a polyphase electric power distribution system comprising:
a plurality of transformers with windings connected to a common node that is grounded at one location, each of said transformers including a core of magnetic material that includes a discontinuity in the magnetic circuit thereof which is alterable to include an air gap therein; and actuator means responsive to direct current flowing in the common node that is grounded at said one location for altering the air gap in the magnetic circuit of each of said plurality of transformers.
a plurality of transformers with windings connected to a common node that is grounded at one location, each of said transformers including a core of magnetic material that includes a discontinuity in the magnetic circuit thereof which is alterable to include an air gap therein; and actuator means responsive to direct current flowing in the common node that is grounded at said one location for altering the air gap in the magnetic circuit of each of said plurality of transformers.
11. Apparatus according to claim 10 wherein each transformer includes a core having a plurality of laminated elements that form the magnetic circuit thereof including a discontinuity that includes a pair of mating pole faces oriented in abutting relationship; and comprising;
means disposed about the mating pole faces forming a fluid-tight chamber thereabout; and control means disposed to supply fluid under pressure to the chamber in response to direct current flowing in the common node.
means disposed about the mating pole faces forming a fluid-tight chamber thereabout; and control means disposed to supply fluid under pressure to the chamber in response to direct current flowing in the common node.
12. Apparatus according to claim 11 wherein said control means includes a hydraulic pump connected to supply hydraulic fluid to the chamber; and comprising sense means coupled to the connection of the common node to ground at said one location for controlling the pump to supply hydraulic fluid under pressure to the chamber for introducing an air gap at the discontinuity in the core in response to direct current flowing in the common node.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2041473 CA2041473A1 (en) | 1991-04-30 | 1991-04-30 | Method and means for suppressing geomagnetically induced currents |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2041473 CA2041473A1 (en) | 1991-04-30 | 1991-04-30 | Method and means for suppressing geomagnetically induced currents |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2041473A1 true CA2041473A1 (en) | 1992-10-31 |
Family
ID=4147507
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2041473 Abandoned CA2041473A1 (en) | 1991-04-30 | 1991-04-30 | Method and means for suppressing geomagnetically induced currents |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2041473A1 (en) |
-
1991
- 1991-04-30 CA CA 2041473 patent/CA2041473A1/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5179489A (en) | Method and means for suppressing geomagnetically induced currents | |
US5136453A (en) | Method and means for suppressing geomagnetically induced currents | |
Wang et al. | Efficient grounding for modular multilevel HVDC converters (MMC) on the AC side | |
US5642249A (en) | Method and apparatus for limiting high current electrical faults in distribution networks by use of superconducting excitation in transverse flux magnetic circuit | |
US4368418A (en) | Apparatus for controlling high voltage by absorption of capacitive vars | |
EP2408093A2 (en) | Inverter filter including differential mode and common mode, and system including the same | |
US6891303B2 (en) | High voltage AC machine winding with grounded neutral circuit | |
US20070217103A1 (en) | Method and equipment for the protection of power systems against geomagnetically induced currents | |
US10224145B2 (en) | Earth surface potential and harmonic mitigating transformers | |
CA2949019C (en) | Protective device for protecting a transformer against geomagnetically induced currents | |
EP3251188A1 (en) | Fault current limiter | |
JP2007525933A (en) | Superconducting current limiting system and superconducting current limiting method | |
Clarke et al. | Overvoltages during power-system faults | |
Varshney et al. | Comparison between several mitigation techniques of inrush current in transformer | |
Asghar | Elimination of inrush current of transformers and distribution lines | |
CA2041473A1 (en) | Method and means for suppressing geomagnetically induced currents | |
Mohan et al. | Effects of geomagnetically-induced currents on HVDC converter operation | |
Naoe | Voltage compensation of permanent-magnet generator with capacitors | |
Stewart et al. | Transformer winding selection associated with reconfiguration of existing double circuit line to six-phase operation | |
RU2809838C1 (en) | Three-phase filter compensating device | |
CN216054241U (en) | Novel current transformer | |
KR100428458B1 (en) | power saving apparatus | |
Bronzeado et al. | Sympathetic interaction between transformers-A potential source of disturbances in electric power system | |
RU2134475C1 (en) | Reverse-sequence current filter device for three- phase electrical installation | |
EP0901706B1 (en) | A method and a device for reducing third harmonic phenomena in a rotating electric alternating current machine |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Dead |