CA2026083A1 - Mechanical fastener and diaper construction - Google Patents

Abstract

Abstract of the Disclosure A diaper construction is provided having two points of attachment, an outer fastening means, and an inner shear resistant fastener, which fastener is formed of a backing having an array of upstanding stemlike projections distributed across at least one face. The stemlike projections are blunt or substantially pointed to allow easy penetration into a diaper topsheet.

WJBAPP1.8

Description

MEC~ANXCAL ~STENER AND DIAPER CONSTRUCTION

This invention relates to a hiqh shear strength 5 mechanical fastener for use in preventing shifting of foraminous substrates. Particularlyl the invention relates to a mechanical fastener for use in garments such as disposable diapers to prevent slippage of the garment adjacent a conventional closure.
Background and Field of the Invention Garments and disposable garments, such as diapers and related articles, are well known. For example, a conventional ~ype of diaper system used by both infants and incontinent adults is comprised of an absorbent core encased between a liquid permeable "top sheet" (the user contacting ~ace) and a liguid-impermeable "back sheet" (the outer shell portion), which generally rectangular shaped composite encircles the wearer's waist in association with closure systems. These closure systems are most fre~uently located so that they join front and rear ends or panels of the diaper. These closure systems are most commonly located at either side of the wearer to join opposing corners of the diaper. In order to improve the fit of 25 these diapers and prevent leakage, the side edge portions of the diapers are frequently elasticized which, when the diaper is joined by the side closure systems, provide elasticized ley openings which grip the wearer's thighs.
Conventional diaper closure systems are discussed in V.S. Patent No. 4,846,815 (Toussant et al.). Toussant et al. was concerned with the problem of diapers shifting on the wearer when used. More specifically, Toussant et al. stated this problem as where - 2~ c~3 "overlapping front and back waist portions were subjected to forces which tend to cause the front and back waist portion to assume a position relative to each other which is different from the position they assume when a diaper is initially fitted to the wearer."

10 Toussant et al.~s proposed solution to this problem is a two point closure system comprised of a convent;onal type "outer fastening means", which fixes overlapping corners of the front and rear diaper panels to each other. This outer fastening is preferably done with an adhesive fastening tab lS that will releasably attach to the diaper "backsheet", preferably on a front panel located at the waist engaging portion or area of the diaper. In addition to this outer fastening means, Toussant et al. proposes the use of an "inner fastening means" to prevent shifting of the overlapping corners of the diaper, each with respect to the other, from wearer movement forces and forces from the elasticized portions of the diaper. Preferably, the inner fastening means is disclosed as a mechanical type engaging material which is fixed to backsheet corners, at the front '- 25 panel portion of the diaper, and which is capable of entangling with, e.g., fibrous material typically used as the porous topsheet. The preferred material disclosed is that marketed by 3M Company, St. Paul, Minnesota under the trade name SJ-34g2.
Conventional mechanical fasteners are quite costly and are designed to engage loose weave loops or the like to provide significant peel force resistance. A
diaper inner liner is conventionally formed of a non-woven material. Although some non-woven materials can be engaged by most conventional mechanical fasteners, the fibers must have a fairly open structure to do so efficiently.

2 !~ J , 7~ ~

However, such a loose or open non-woven is not necessarily ~s effective in preventing contact of the diaper wearer with the absorbent core material.
As described in Toussant et al., a preferred non-woven is carded, then thermally bonded. This process can make the non-woven difficult to penetrate with conventional mechanical fastenlers, which have a relatively large cross sectional profile at their tips. If penetration is possible, often higher application pressures are required to penetrate closely associated non-woven fibers with a conventional mechanical fastener. Using high application pressures is obviously difficult with an infant diaper and as such conventional mechanical fastener~ are not likely to be effectively applied by the person fitting the diaper with preferred diaper topsheets.
Summary of the Invention In accordance with the invention, a high shear-strength mechanical fastener is provided. The fastener is formed of a backing having an array of upstanding stemlike projections distributed across at least one face. The stemlike projection tips are substantially pointed to allow for easy penetration into a foraminous substrate, such as is used as a diaper topsheet.
This high shear strength fastener finds par~icular use in a disposable diaper, as is disclosed in Toussant et al., as an inner fastener means. An inner fastener means formed from the high shear strength mechanical fastener is adapted to readily engage at least the top sheet of the diaper, which is preferably a non-woven material. Coupled with a conventional outer fastening means, this inner fastener will provide a secure two-point closure less likely to shift or twist on the wearer.

3~

~J&~ 2~

Brief Description o the Drawi~
Fig. l is a schematic view of a disposable diaper from the top sheet side.
Fig. 2 is a schematic view of a disposable diaper similar to that of Fig. 1 as it would appear while being 5 worn.
Fig. 3 is a schematic isometric view o a fastener in a partial cut away vertical cross section.

Description of the Preferred Embodiments Referring to the drawings, there is shown a preferred embodiment of the prlesent invention used in a disposable diaper, such as would be worn by an infant or an incontinent adult. The disposable diaper 10 shown in Fig. 1 would conventionally be at least a three-layer composite including a liquid permeable, user contacting top sheet 12, a liquid-impervious outer shell or back sheet 1 and an absorbent layer 16. At the back panel 18 of the diaper are corners 20 that overlap with corresponding corners 21 at the front panel 22 of the diaper when the diaper is worn. On the top sheet 12 side of the diaper at each of the corners 20 is loca-ted a release treated, non-woven release tab 24 and on the outer shell or backsheet 14 at the front corners 21 of the diaper 10 are mechanical type fasteners 26 of the invention.
For most conventional designs, the fastening tabs 28 are located at the back panel 18 attached at least to the back sheet 14 of the diaper 10. During non-use, the tabs 28 would be located on the non-woven release treated tabs 24. When in use, the fasterling tabs 28 would be removed from the release treated non-woven tabs 24 and attached to the front panel 22 of the diaper back sheet 14.
Generally, the diaper front panel 22 is provided with a landing or frontal strip 25, as shown in Pig. 2, which reinforces the diaper at the waist portion of the diaper front panel 22, allowing removal and replacement of the fastening tab as necessary. The side edge portions of the J . . j diaper are also provided with elasticizing elements 17, also shown in Fig. 2, which provide for engaging the leg or thigh of the wearer when the diaper is in use. The diaper can be constructed by any conventional means, as is disclosed in Toussant et al.
Conventionally, the top sheet 12 of the diaper is a soft, non-irritating fabric to prevent irritation of the wearer's skin. Further, the top sheet 12 is made liquid permeable to permit passage of liquids to the absorbent layer 16. Top sheet fabric is generally fibrous woven or non-woven sheets formed of, e.g., natural fibers, such as cellul~se, or synthetic fibers of polyester, polyethylene, or polypropylene sr a combination thereofO Further, the : fibers may or may not be treated or contain additives depending upon the surface characteristics of the fiber and lS the desired properties of the top sheet. Other materials capable of passing moisture to the absorbent inner layer are also possible, such as a formed film or foam, e.g., a reticulated foam, as is known in the art.
The topsheet 12 can be formed by any suitable method including woven manufacturing such as weaving~ and non-woven manufacturing such as spinbonding, bondingr carding, etc.
Fastening tab 28 will generally be permanently fixed to back sheet 19 at corners 20, although other placements are possible, by any suitable method.
Generally, pressure-sensitive adhesives are preferred to fix the tab 28 to the back sheet 14. However, in addition to using pressure-sensitive adhesives, the fastening tabs 28 can be directly heat sealed to the back sheet 14 or adhered using a heat or solvent activated adhesive, depending upon the nature of the back sheet. The mechanical fastener 26 and release tabs 24 (if separately attached) can similarly be attached by any conventional method as described above with respect to the fastening tabs. The opposite end of the fastening tab 28 will be releasably attached to the tabs 24 when not in use and ~ 3(~ 3 removed by the user for placement on, e.g., the frontal strip 25 on the back sheet 14 front panel portion. This will cause overlap of corners 20 and 21. Generally, the user or free end of the fastening tab 28 is provided with a pressure-sensitive adhesive which will releasa'oly adhere to the front panel portion.
In accordance with the above described preferred embodiment, the inner fastening means is provided on the back sheet 14 of the diaper at corners 21, which inner fastening means comprises the mechanical fastening means 26. This mechanical fastening means 26 is provided to primarily resist sheer forces which may cause the overlapping corners 20 and 21 to shift relative to each other when the diaper or incontinence article is worn.
Release tab 24 shown is located on the top sheet side of corner 20. The top sheet face of corner 20 will overlap with the back sheet face of corner 21 when the diaper is assembled as shown in Fig. 2.
The mechanical fastening tab of the invention is designed to permit ready penetration into non-woven and other foraminous substrates, as would likely be used as a diaper topsheet, or in like articles or garments. The mechanical fastener depicted in Fig. 3 comprises a backing 3~, which is preferably flexible. From at least one face of the backing projects an array of upstanding stems or projections 34 having, generally, blunt or pointed tips.
The projections as shown are in rows, however, any suitable arrangement can be employed which will permit ready penetration into the foraminous substrate being used.
The stems 34 and the backing 30 are preferably flexible with the stems somewhat resistant to compression or bending when in use. Materials suitable for forming this integral structure include substantially any thermoplastic material useful in the production of films.
Preferred of such thermoplastic materials are tough thermoplastic resins of polyethylene, polypropylene, polyesters, polyamides (e.g., nylon), and copolymers 3 ~
thereof. These materials can be used to form the mechanical fastener by any suitable methGd including cast or extrusion molding.
The backing can be quite thin depending on the application. Generally, a thickness of about 25~m is 5 needed to prevent breakage during use. Thicker backings can be used depending on the particular end use and the strength required therefore. Generally, thinner backings are preferred for disposable diapers and the like in terms of material flexibility, conformability and cost.
The stems can be of any shape which permits ready penetration into a foraminous substrate. This shape is preferably one which has an inward taper away from the backing face, such as a pyramidal or conical shape.
However, a shape with a slight inward or outward taper is contemplated if the shape does not significantly interfere with substrate penetration. Outward tapers or traditional mechanical fastener structures at the top of the stems are not preferred as they complicate fabrication and are not required for the invention high shear strength fastener.
The tip 35 mean diameter is generally from 0.5 to 15 mils (12.7 to 381 ~m) for use on a standard diaper non-woven material, with 2 to 8 mils (51 to 203 ~m) being preferred. The mean diameter of the stems at their base 36 is generally 1.5 to 20 mils (38 to 508 ~m), with 4.5 to 12 mils (114 to 305 ~m) being preferred. with preferred mean stem diameters, a minimum of approximately 25 stems per square inch (3.9 stems/cm2) is preferred, with up to 2,500 stems per square inch (388 stems/cm2) having been demonstrated as feasible, with a minimum of approximately 50 stems per square inch (7.75 stems/cm~ being most preferred. However, use of over at least 1,000 stems/in2 (155 stems/cm2) is generally not preferred as there is no significant increase, and generally a slight decrease, in performance over this stem density. Further, 3~ theoretically, performarce will decrease significantly at extremely high stem densities due to adjacent stem ~ ;3~
interference with fiber penetration. The lower stem densities, although functional, are not generally as desirable due to their coarse feel. The higher the stem density, the less noticeable is the fastener when in contact with the human body. An overall preferred range of stem densities would be from 75 to 1,000 stems/in2 (10.65 to 155 stems/cm2).
Stem height is also important, with a height of 5 to 20 mils ~127 to 508 ~m) beimg preferred, and with 10 to 15 mils (254 to 381 ~m) being more preferred. Stem heights lower than the preferred minimum do not easily penetrate foraminous substrates, specifically non-woven materials. A
stem height above the preferred maximum will have a tendency to bend when subjected to shear forces, particularly when the stems do not fully penetrate the foraminous substrate. Further, higher stems do not offer any significant performance increase for the added costs associated with their manufacture. A fastener formed of the stem-faced material preferably will be of size such that it will provide a shear force resistance of at least 500 grams, and preferably at least about 750 grams, when placed against a substrate at a pressure of approximately 17 grams/cm2. The fastener size is limited only by the substrate available for attachment. The fastener, however, is preferably small in terms of cost, conformability to the : 25 wearer, wearer comfort and ease of use.
The back face of the mechanical fastener is preferably substantially flat to permit application of an adhesive layer 38 for substrate attachment purposes. ~n advantage with the invention material when using an adhesive layer 38 is that the stems permit the adhesive backed fastening material to be formed into a roll prior to fabrication. The stems present a relatively low surface area available for adhesive contact such that the material can be wound as a roll then unwound without the necessity of treating the stem face with a low adhesion backsize.
This allows for convenient manufacture, storage and ~@ .~ ,3 shipment of the bulk material prior to formation and assembly of the mechanical fastener on the garment (e.g., such as a diaper as described above).
The mechanical fastener can be used in other garments for purposes similar to that in the diaper configuration described above. Generally, where a garment or the like re~uires a fastener with high shear resistance and little or no peel resistance, this mechanical fastener could find use. Further, the Eastener could be used in close conjunction with a conventional adhesive or mechanical fastener to provide shear enhancement. The fastener, in this case, could be integral with or closely adjacent the conventional fastener such as on a separate area of the same backing.
The following non-limiting examples serve to illustrate the invention, however, are not intended to be limiting thereof.

Example 1 One piece (2 in. by 3 in. (5.1 x 7.6 cm)) of film (4.5 mil (114 ~m)) thick prepared by cast extrusion of a polypropylene homopolymer resin (Fina Dypro 8771, 9 melt flow index) was placed on a metal plate which had the negative impression to produce a stem geometry and pattern as illustrated in Fig. 3 of the drawings. A flat metal plate was placed on top of the film. This was pressed in a platen press at 2500 psi (176 kg/cm) and 330F (151C) for 5 seconds. The press was then opened for 5 seconds, then closed again for 15 seconds. Then, after air cooling for 20-30 minutes, the embossed film was removed. Physical dimensions of the stems are reported in Table I.

~,~3'~ ,?'~

Table 1 Stem Center-to Stem Width Stem Center Height at saSeDensityStem Spacing Sample (~m) (~m)(per/cm )(~m) ~2 1. 152 189 25.1 2,145 2. 203 202 12.9 39002 3. 203 202 37.0 1,766 4O (1) 203 150 3~7.5 500 5. 254 ~14 62.0 1,250 6. 254 214 172.2 750 ; 7. ~3) 330 233 4.1 14 8. 330 233 8.2 3,753 9. 330 233 25.1 2,1~5 10. 330 233 41.5 1,668 ll. 457 26~ 12.9 3,002 12. ~57 264 37.0 1,766 13. 508 276 25.1 2,145 (1) Sample 4 was drilled with a 4 mil (101 ~m) stem tip while all others incorporated a 6 mil (152 ~m) tip.

(2) Samples 1-3 and 8 13 were drilled with staggered holes with uniform spacing between holes. Samples 4-6 were drilled in perpendicular rows with uniform spacing between rows.

(3) Sample 7 was created by removing every second stem on sample 8.

(4) This sample did not have uniform stem spacing due to the fact that it was produced by removing every second stem fro~ a staggered pattern.

.

ple 2 Molten resin (Dypro M 9618, an ethylene propylene copolymer from Fina Oil and Chemical Co., Dallas, Texas), was continuously cast onto a rotating steel forming roll using a standard single screw extruder. The forming roll had an array of holes drilled in it representing the negative of a desired projection geometry and spacing. The holes were formed in the forming roll with Minitool microdrilling heads, available from Minitool, Inc., Campbell, CA. To facilitate flow of the molten polymer into the holes, the surface of the forming roll was exposed to a vacuum (46.8 mm of mercury) during the casting process using a vacuum chamber preceding and attached to the extrusion die and seated directly on the forming roll. The temperature of the forming roll was maintained at about 35C by standard means of internal roll cooling with circulating water.
A gap was provided between the extrusion die and the forming roll to allow sufficient molten resin to be applied to the forming roll to fill the holes and provide a backing integral with the resulting projections when the quenched resin was stripped off of the forming roll to yield the backing of Example 2. The stems were pyramidal with approximately 26 stems/cm2, a stem height of 760 microns, a stem width at the base of 410 microns and a stem spacing center-to-center of 1,270 miorons.

Example 3 Various of the materials were tested for shear resistance in accordance with the method outlined in U.S.
Patent No. 4,699,622. The samples, 2.5 in. x 2.5 in., were placed on a friction sled. A piece of foam and the non-woven, with the foam underneath, were taped to the friction platform of the peel tester (Instrumentors, Inc.
Model 3M-90). The non-woven was a spunbond polypropylene with a basis wieght of 60 gm/m2 purchased from James River ~ 3 " ~

Corporation. The sled was then run over the platform and a shear value was obtained. A baseline value was obtained by placing standard diaper polyethylene on the sled. The wrapped sled was used alone, which had a weight of approximately 200 gm (5 gm/cm2), and with additional weightsr for a total of approximately 700 gm ~17 gm/cm2).
For the 700 gram weighted sled, this baseline shear value was 400 grams, and for the 200 gram sled, the baseline shear was 128 grams. The measured results were translated to what would be obtained with a 1 in. x 2.5 in. sample by the following equation:

2.5 in2 6.25 in2 sample size base [test result ~ . line ]
sample size 6.25 in2 value The shear resistance obtained for the tests run with the sled and the weighted sled are set forth in Table 2.

Table 2 Sled ShearWeighted Sled Sample ~m) _ _Shear (gm) 1. 389 691 2. 471 828 3. 461 856 4. 698 1,133 5. 578 1,011 6. 701 1,2~0 7. 263 683 ~. 463 868 9. 514 888 10. 463 1,093 11. 419 695 12. 556 745 13. 449 896 ~ r C~ fi) other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification or practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specifications and examples be considered as exemplary, with the true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.

Claims (13)

1. A diaper comprising a liquid-permeable foraminous topsheet, an absorbant batt and a liquid-impermeable backsheet, having at least two corners, at least one outer fastening means for securing two of said corners, and an inner fastening means comprising;
a backing having an array of upstanding stems distributed across at least one face, said stems having a tip adapted to penetrate a foraminous substrate wherein said inner fastening means is located on the backsheet such as to allow penetration of said foraminous substrate when said outer fastening means is closed.

2. The diaper of claim 1 wherein said stems have an inward taper away from said backing face.

3. The diaper of claim 2 wherein said stems are substantially conical or pyramidal.

4. The diaper of claim 1 wherein said stems have substantially no taper away from said backing face.

5. The diaper of claim 1 wherein said stems are 5 to 20 mils from said tip to the plane of the backing face.

6. A mechanical fastener comprising a backing having an array of upstanding stems distributed across at least one face, said stems having a tip adapted to penetrate a foraminous substrate wherein said stems extend 5 to 20 mils from the face of the backing with at least 25 stems per square inch.

7. The mechanical fastener of claim 6 wherein said stems have an inward taper away from said backing face.

8. The mechanical fastener of claim 7 wherein said stems are substantially conical or pyramidal.

9. The mechanical fastener of claim 6 wherein said stems have substantially no taper away from said backing face.

10. The mechanical fastener of claim 6 wherein said stems are present at less than 1,000 per square inch.

11. The mechanical fastener of claim 6 further comprising a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer on a face free of said array of upstanding stems.

12. The mechanical fastener of claim 6 wherein it is of a size that will give a shear value of at least about 500 grams when placed against a foraminous substrate at a pressure of approximately 17 gm/cm2.

13. The mechanical fastener of claim 6 further comprising a-separate pressure-sensitive adhesive fastening region, adjacent to a stem containing region, on the backing face having stems.