CA2019048C

CA2019048C - Cloth enzyme immunoassay

Info

Publication number: CA2019048C
Application number: CA 2019048
Authority: CA
Inventors: Hiroshi Yamazaki; Burton Walter Blais
Original assignee: 567782 Bc Ltd
Current assignee: 567782 Bc Ltd
Priority date: 1990-06-14
Filing date: 1990-06-14
Publication date: 2003-02-25
Anticipated expiration: 2010-06-14
Also published as: CA2019048A1

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Novel devices and techniques for carrying out immunoassay techniques on antibodies, antigens or haptens are provided here-in. The device is a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth having antibodies or antigens directly adsorbed therein and directly absorbed and immobilized thereon. The cloth has a thickness more than 200µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20µm in diameter, and preferably has a Frazier Air permeability, in CFM/ft2 at 0.5" H2O of from 215 to 750 for thickness of from 11 to 40 mils, the cloth thereby having a structure such that it can accommodate a large volume of liquid per surface area thereof, that it has a large surface area, and that it has minimum flow resistance. In addition, in two alter-native embodiments: antibodies may be directly adsorbed therein and directly absorbed and immobilized thereon, and specific anti-gens from a selected test sample, may then be captured by the adsorbed, absorbed and immobilized antibodies, to be detected conventionally; or antigens may be directly adsorbed therein and directly absorbed and immobilized thereon, and specific anti-bodies from a selected test sample, may be captured by the adsorbed, absorbed and immobilized antigens, to be detected con-ventionally.

Description

2 0 ~ 8 This invention relates to the detection of antibodies, anti-gens or haptens based on imrnunoassay techniques.
This invention also relates to a hydrophobic cloth useful as an adsorbent for field enzyme immunoassays.
This invention also relates to a cloth-based enzyme immuno-assay to obtain significant enzyme immunoassay signals during the initial stage of immunoreaction.
This invention also relates to a cloth-based enzyme immuno-assay to provide a rapid assay for any antibody in any bodyfluid, e.g., blood, saliva, for example for anti~ nella anti-bodies in chicken egg yolks.
This invention also relates to a cloth enzyme immunoassay for the concentration of dilute antigens by filtration of large volumes of test sample through antibody-coated cloth.
This invention also relates to the preparation and use of biotinylated antibodies and avidin- or streptavidin-enzyme con-jugates.
An antigen is an extraneous substance which, when introduced 2~ into the body of vertebrates, causes the production of an anti-body which can specifically complex with that antigen. Anv sub-substance, for example a protein, which is not normally present in certain organisms, can cause the formation of antibodies when it infiltrates into or is applied to an organism under suitable conditions. An antibody once produced is also capable of binding a hapten, i.e., a relatively small and simple compound which may 2 ~ 8 be the determinant group of a given antigen. The hapten is cap-able of binding with the specific antibody but is incapable it-self of giving rise to the production of an antibody, unless it is bound to an antigenic carrier. These small molecular weight antigens (haptens) may require conjugation with large molecular weight carriers in order to elicit antibody production. This antigen-antibody complexing is the basis of immunoassays.
The binding interaction between an antigen or a hapten and its antibody is specific and sensitive. Other types of materials that participate in similar specific and sensitive binding inter-actions are: enzymes and their substrates; hormones; vitamins;
metabolites; and pharmacological agents; and their receptors and binding substances.
Since virtually any foreign compound can be made immuno-genic, the domain of immunoassays is unlimited.
Diagnostic tests claim a large share of the health care market. In both human and veterinary medicine, the definitive diagnosis of infectious diseases require the demonstration of the infectious agents or their components. Traditional cultural methods for the detection of pathogens are slow, expensive and of uncertain sensitivity, and require extensive laboratory facili-ties. To overcome some of these disadvantages, specific binding assay techniques have provided analytical methods for determining various organic substances of diagnostic, medical, environmental and industrial importance which appear in liquid mediums at very low concentrations. Specific binding assays are based on the 2Q~ 9~8 specific interaction between the ligand, i.e. the bindable an-alyte under determination, and a binding partner therefor. When one of the ligand and its binding partner is an antibody and the other is a corresponding hapten or antigen, the assay is known as an immunoassay. In addition several immunological tests are now commercially available, namely: agglutination tests; immunofluor-escent tests; and enzyme immunoassays. However, many of these tests require the use of microscopes, spectrophotometers, or other laboratory facilities, limiting their use under field con-ditions. Prompt and effective control of diseases depends on rapid and simple field tests.
Radioimmunoassay employs a radioactive isotope as the label.
Such an assay necessarily must follow the heterogeneous format since the monitor character of the label is qualitatively un-changed in the free- and bound-species. Because of the incon-venience and difficulty of handling radioactive materials and the necessity of a separation step, homogeneous assay systems have been devised using materials other than radioisotopes as the label component, including enzymes, bacteriophages, metals and organometallic complexes, coenzymes, enzyme substrates, enzyme activators and inhibitors, cycling reactants, organic and inor-ganic catalysts, prosthetic groups, chemiluminescent reactants, and fluorescent molecules. Such homogeneous specific binding assay systems provide a detectable response, e.g., an electro-magnetic radiation signal, e.g. chemiluminescence, fluorescence 2 0 ~ 8 emission, or color change, related to the presence of amount of the ligand under assay in the liquid sample.
Immunoassays diagnose infectious diseases by detecting either increased titers of antibodies against pathogen antigens or the presence of the pathogens or their antigens. Antigen assays offer more definitive diagnosis of infectious diseases as the capacity to produce antibodies remains in subjects which have recovered from the disease or have previously been vaccinated.
Enzyme immunoassays use enzyme-labeled immunoreagents ~anti-bodies or antigens) for the detection of antigens or antibodies captured in a solid phase. Adsorption onto an easily recoverable solid phase is a simple and rapid means of immobilization of immunoreactants for the subsequent capture of antigens or anti-bodies from a test sample. Since antibodies and many antigens contain hydrophobic regions in their structures, they bind readily to hydrophobic surfaces. Most commonly used enzyme immunoassays depend on the adsorption of immunoreactants onto either a flat solid surface or a solid membrane. Solid phases, e.g. microtiter plates, tubes or beads, and plastics, e.g. poly-styrene, polyvinyl chloride, nylon, and polymethacrylate have commonly been used. Although nitrocellulose membranes have been - used to adsorb antigens as well as antibodies, these are thin and can only accommodate a small volume of test sample which has a limited contact with the surface area. Furthermore, since their pore sizes are small, their effective washing requires a vacuum suction apparatus which holds them airtight.

2 0 ~

Enzyme immunoassay is therefore now used for the detection of a variety of antigens (or haptens~, e.g., microbial contami-nants and pathogens, toxins, and environmental pollutants. The simplest form of the assay involves the immobilization of an immunoreactant (antibody or antigen) on a solid phase to capture the test substance which is then detected with a specific anti-body-enzyme conjugate. Commonly, and as normally presently used, the immunoreactant is immobilized by adsorption onto non-porous solid phases of microtiter plates, tubes or beads which are made of hydrophobic synthetic plastic materials, e.g., polystyrene, polyvinyl chloride or polymethacrylate. The quantitative enzyme immunoassay of specific antibodies as used in disease diagnoses is commonly performed by either of two methods using antigen immobilized on a microtiter plate. The first "endpoint'7 method involves serial dilutions of the test sample in order to deter-mine the highest dilution ("titer") which produces a signal near-est an arbitrarily assigned endpoint. The second method uses a fixed sample dilution and then measures the extent of immuno-reaction with a fixed amount of immobilized antigen. sothmethods rely on the compIetion of each immunoreaction which usually requires in excess of 30 minutes. It is theoretically - possible to assay antibodies on the basis of the initial rate of antibody binding to the immobilized antigen during the instanta-25 neous exposure of the antigen-coated solid phase to the antibody solution. However, such a strategy is rarely used because short immunoreactions on non-porous solid phases, e.g., microtiter 2~a4~

plates, do not yield significant signals. Because of limited surface areas, each immunoreaction on the non-porous phases usually requires more than an hour. Tests under field conditions (e.g. processing plants, farms, homes and doctor's offices) would benefit from faster and simpler enzyme immunoassay.
Biotinylated antibodies and avidin-~or streptavidin-) enzyme conjugates have become a popular combination for the detection of antigens captured by immobilized antibodies in enzyme immunoassay since it provides greater sensitivity than direct antibody-enzyme conjugates. Therefore, a variety of avidin-(or streptavidin-) enzyme conjugates are commercially available. The preparation of biotinylated antibodies involves the purification of the desired antibodies, which are then biotinylated in free solution. The entire procedure commonly requires a few days to complete.
The patent literature is replete with descriptions of tech-niques and means for effecting immunoassays. A representative selection of such patents include the following:
1) Canadian Patent 1,031,257 issued May 16, 1978 to R.
Dietrich, which was directed to a device comprising an immuno-logically-reactive material on an object carrier or a film, the immunologically-reactive material being in a lyophilised and self-adhering form.
2) Canadian Patent No. 1,060,342 issued August 14, 1979 to O. Lostia et al, which was directed to a polymeric structure comprising a porous artificial fibre where the substance occluded in the fibre was antibodies, antigens or antisera, and where the 2 9 ~

pores of the fibre were of such nature as to prevent escape of the occluded substance but to allow for the penetration of the agent that was to be reacted with that substance.

3) Canadian Patent No. 1,083,036 issued August 5, 1980 to G. Bolz, which was directed to a specifically-described procedure for determining reacted labeled antibodies.

4) Canadian Patent No. 1,107,195 issued August 18, 1981 to D. Wagner et al, which provided a specific binding assay method using nonion-exchange cross-linked polystyrene for determining a ligand in, or the ligand-binding capacity of, a liquid medium.

5) Canadian Patent No. 1,108,986 issued September 15, 1981 to D. Wagner et al, which provided a specific binding assay method using nonion-exchange cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol for determining a ligand in or the ligand binding capacity of a liquid medium.

6) Canadian Patent No. 1,152,430 issued August 23, 1985 to J. Gordon et al, which was directed to a solid support for pro-teins consisting of a porous nitrocellulose sheet containing an electrophoretically transferred replica of an electropherogram of proteins in a gel.

7) Canadian Patent No. 1,199,269 issued January 14, 1986 to V.A. Marinkovitch, which was directed to a diagnostic kit which included a support having a plurality of cotton threads supported in a predetermined spaced relation for simultaneous contact with a liquid test sample.

2~19~g 8) U.S. Patent 3,552,928, patented January 5, 1971 by M.C.
Fetter, which provided means for separating whole blood into a substantially-colorless fluid and the red cell components or residue. According to this patent, a matrix containing the amino acid or derivative thereof is positioned adjacent to a test reagent specifically reactable with, and giving a detectable res-ponse to, the soluble constituent of whole blood. The whole blood was first contacted with the amino acid. The colorless fluid thus obtained was then contacted with the test reagent.

9) U.S. Patent No. 3,917,527, patented November 4, 1975 by S. Shaltiel, which provided means for the selective and rever-sible binding of a macromolecule to a specifically-recited adsor-bent. It also provided a package containing a series of small chromagraphic columns which were said to be useful for rapid identification of the specific adsorbent most effective in the purification of a particular macromolecule. The adsorbent was a water-soluble porous solid matrix support having hydrocarbon arms attached thereto.
lO) U.S. Patent No. 3,951,741 patented April 20, 1976 by R.F. Devlin, which was directed to a specific sensitized matrix for diagnosing both infectious and non-infectious diseases, including an insoluble, inert, pliable and wettable matrix having a network of pores, and a protein polymer network immobilized in that network of pores.
11) U.S. Patent 4,013,514, patented March 22, 1977 by B.S.
Wilde, which provided water-insoluble, biologically-active con-20~9~4~

jugates for use in a reactor core of a flow-through reactor which were prepared by covalently bonding an enzyme directly to a fibrous dialdehyde cellulose, e.g., cotton, methylcellulose, car-boxymethyl cellulose, regenerated cellulose, and the like, atleast some glucoside units of which have been oxidized to dialde-hyde groups and which was substantially neutral, i.e. which was substantially freé from carboxyl groups.
12) U.S. Patent No. 4,168,146 patented September 18, 1979 by A.O. Grubb et al, which was directed to a diagnostic test device useful for immunochemical quantification, which was a carrier strip comprising a silica-modified micro-porous polymer having finely-divided silica substantially-uniformly embedded in a particularly-recited permeable, continuous polymeric matrix.
13) U.S. Patent 4,200,690, patented April 29, 1980 by D.M.
Root, et al, which provided a device for the detection of the presence of antigens. The device had an antibody immunochemi-cally reactive with the antigen bound to a first microporous membrane coated with an inert proteinaceous material and an anti-body immunochemically non-reactive with the antigen bound to a second mocroporous membrane coated with an inert proteinaceous material.
14) U.S. Patent 4,277,561 patented July 7, 1981 by D.
Monget et al, which was directed to a support for the determina-tion of enzyme activity in a biological extract wherein the sup-port comprised a fibrous material impregnated with a substrate and a particularly-recited water-soluble pH stabilizer.

2~g~

15) U.S. Patent No. 4,347,311 patented August 31, 1982 by H.H. Schmitz, which was directed to a highly sensitive enzyme immunoassay procedure for determining antibodies which were spe-cific to antigens by coating a particularly-recited solid support with an antibody.
16) U.S. Patent No. 4,442,204 patented April 10, 1984 by A.C. Greenquist, which was directed to a test device comprising a solid carrier member, e.g., a fibrous web matrix, e.g. paper, or a polymeric film or gel, incorporated with specifically-recited reagents for a homogeneous specific binding assay system.
The interrelationship between a substrate and an antibody should be such that non-specific binding of antibodies to a sub-strate should be reduced while allowing detection of immunologi-cally reactive protein levels when antigen antibodiy complexesare identified with an agent. (See Spinola et al, Journal of Immunological Methods, ~81 ~1985) 161-165). It is also known that the simple manipulations required to separate free antibody or antigen from immune compleses immobilized non-covalently on plastic solid phase is probably the most important reason for the rapid increase in popularity of enzyme immunoassay. Desired traits of the solid phase are: ~i) high capacity for binding immunoreactants ~high surface/volume ratio); ~ii) possibility of immobilization of many different immunoreactants; (iii) minimal dissociation; ~iv) negligible denaturation of immobilized mole-cule; and ~v) orientation of immobilized antibody with binding sites towards the solution and the Fe to the solid phase-.

2 ~ g Plastic is by far the most popular solid phase, since it makes the procedures extremely simple. However, plastics also have some important limitations: (i) they are immunoreactant-consumptive, i.e., often require 10 times more reactants than particulate solid phases or membranes; (ii) the avidity of immo-bilized antibodies for large antigens decreases by 1-2 orders of magnitude, probably due to the wide spacing of epitopes or para-topes; and (iii) the rate of antibody-antigen interactions is slower than in solution or with particulate solid phases (hours instead of minutes), due to the necessity of the free immunoreac-tant to diffuse to the solid phase (association kinetics is largely dictated by diffusior rates (See P. Tijssen, "Practice and Theory of Enzyme Immunology" p. 297, Elsevier, 1985, Amster-dam, New York, Oxford).
Accordingly, those concerned with the development and use of immunoassay techniques and related devices have recognized the desirability for further improvements and it is therefore one object of the invention to provide a rapid, accurate method for the quantitative determination of an antigen on a solid surface or for the quantitative aetermination of an antibody on a solid surface.
An object of a further aspect of the invention is to provide a method to provide rapid and sensitive immunoassays.
An object of a further aspect of the present invention is the provision of a relatively simple yet high effective and sen-2Q~90~8 sitive diagnostic test for the detection of specific disease states, both infectious and non-infectious.
An object of a further aspect of this invention is the use of the hydrophobic cloths to make immunoassays rapid and simple.
An object of a further aspect of this invention is to enable the use of hydrophobic cloths for immunoassays for antigens and haptens as well as for antibodies.
An object of a further aspect of this invention is to prove an adsorbent for enzyme immunoassay, which is superior to the conventional non-porous microtiter plate in that it can provide a much larger surface area for immunoreactions (thus, faster reactions), can accommodate a larger volume of sample per unit area (thus giving more extensive reactions), and permits easier washing.
An object of a further aspect of the present invention is to provide a method involving the use of body fluids for the rapid assay of specific antibodies to provide a simpler, and less time consuming procedure and would eliminate trauma to the animals incurred by bleeding, e.g., to provide a method involving the use of egg yolk rather than serum for the detection of specific anti-bodies in the routine monitoring of flocks for exposure to Sal-monella to provide a simpler, and less time consuming procedure and would eliminate trauma to the animals incurred by bleeding.
An object of a further aspect of the present invention is to provide a rapid and simple procedure for the affinity purifica-tion and biotinylation of antibodies on antigen-coated cloths, to 2 0 ~

enable the rapid and simple preparation of an immunoreagent suit-able for enzyme immunoassay.
By one aspect of this invention, an immunoassay device is provided comprising the combination of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth having a thickness of more than 200 ~m and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 ~m in diameter, the cloth preferably having a Frazier Air permeability, in CFM/ft2 at 0.5" H2O of from 215 to 750 for thickness of from 11 to 40 mls, the cloth having a structure such that it can accom-modate a large volume of liquid per surface area thereof, that it has a large surface area and that it has minimum flow resistance, and an antibody directly adsorbed thereon, and directly absorbed therein.
15 ` The present invention also provides, in another aspect, an enzyme immunoassay device comprising the combination of a macro-porous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth having a thickness of more than 200 ~m and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 ~m in diameter, the cloth preferably having a Frazier Air permeabil-ity, in CFM/ft2 at 0.5" H2O of from 215 to 750 for thickness of from 11 to 40 mls, the cloth having such a structure that it can accommodate a large volume of liquid per surface area thereof, it has a large surface area, and it has minimum flow resistance, and antigen directly adsorbed therein and directly absor~ed and immo-bilized thereon.
The term "macroporous" as applied to cloths when used herein is intended to mean textiles composed of hydrophobic synthetic 2~19~

polymeric fibers, which are either woven or non-woven into a physically structurally stable cloth of more than 200 ~m thick-ness, such that the pores (i.e., spaces between the fibers) exceed 20~m in diameter.
This invention also provides, in another aspect, an immuno-assay method for detecting an antigen, comprising: a) treating a surface of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth having a thickness of more than 200 ~m and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 ~m in diameter, the cloth preferably having a Frazier Air permeability, in CFM/ft2 at 0.5" H2O of from 215 to 750 for thickness of from 11 to 40 mls, the cloth having such a structure that it can accommodate a large volume of liquid per surface area thereof, it has a large surface area and it has minimum flow resistance, with an antibody, thereby to have an antibody directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed therein;
b) incubating that immunoassay cloth with a sample to be tested for the antigen to have antigen adsorbed therein; c) washing the incubated cloth with a buffer to remove unadsorbed material;
d) incubating the washed cloth with an enzyme-antibodv conjugate prepared by coupling purified antibodies specific for the antigen to an indicator enzyme; e) washing the incubated cloth with a - buffer solution to remove unreacted conjugate; and f) detecting remaining enzyme-antibody conjugate by incubation in a chromo-genic substrate indicator solution to produce a visible colour upon product formation.

2 0 ~

This invention also provides, in another aspect, an immunoassay method for detecting an antigen, comprising:
a) treating a surface of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth having a thickness of more than 200 ~m and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 ~m in diameter, the cloth preferably having a Frazier Air permeability, in CFM/ft2 at 0.5"
H2O of from 215 to 750 for thickness of from 11 to 40 mls, the cloth having such a structure that it can accommodate a large volume of liquid per surface area thereof, it has a large surface area and it has minimum flow resistance, with an antibody, there-by to have an antibody directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed therein; b~ applying, to the surface of the treated cloth, a mixture of the antigen being assayed and an enzyme-anti-body conjugate prepared by coupling purified antibodies specificfor the antigen being assayed to have antigen adsorbed thereon;
c) treating a control identical macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth with a mixture of the antigen being assayed and an enzyme-antibody conjugate prepared by coupling purified anti-bodies specific for the antigen being assayed to have antigenadsorbed thereon; d) incubating both the immunoassay cloth and the control cloth substantially simultaneously; e) washing both - the incubated cloth immunoassay cloth and the control cloth with an identical buffer solution; and f) detecting the antigen by incubation of both the cloths in a chromogenic substrate indi-cator solution to produce a visible colour upon product forma-tion, the amount of antigen being determined by the difference in ~019~

intensity of the colour between the control cloth and the immuno-assay cloth.
This invention also provides, in another aspect, an immuno-assay method for detecting an antibody, comprising: a~ treating a surface of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth having a thickness of more than 200 ~m and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 ~m in diameter, the cloth preferably having a Frazier Air permeability, in CFM/ft2 at 0.5" H20 of from 215 to 750 for thickness of from 11 to 40 mls, the cloth having such a structure that it can accommodate a large volume of liquid per surface area thereof, it has a large surface area and it has minimum flow resistance, with an antigen, thereby to have an antigen directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed therein;
b) applying, to the surface of the treated cloth, a mixture of the antibody being assayed and an enzyme-antigen conjugate pre-pared by coupling purified antigens specific for the antibodies being assayed to have antibody adsorbed thereon; c) treating a control identical macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth with a mixture of the antibody being assayed and an enzyme-anti-gen conjugate prepared by coupling purified antigens specific for the antibody being assayed to have antibody adsorbed thereon;
d) incubating both the immunoassay cloth and the control cloth substantially simultaneously; e) washing both the incubated cloth immunoassay cloth and the control cloth with an identical buffer solution; and f) detecting the antibody by incubation of both the cloths in a chromogenic substrate indicator solution to produce a ` 20190~8 visible colour upon product formation, the amount of antibody being determined by the difference in intensity of the colour between the control cloth and the immunoassay cloth.
S The present invention also provides, in another aspect, a method for the extraction of antigens from solid samples, and for the concentration of such antigens which are present in large volumes of sample, onto antibody-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloth for subsequent detection on the cloth by cloth enzyme immu-noassay techniques, the cloth having a thickness of more than 200 ~m and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 ~m in diameter, the cloth preferably having a Frazier Air permeability, in CFM/ft2 at 0.5" H20 of from 215 to 750 for thickness of from 11 to 40 mls, the cloth having such a structure that it can accommo-date a large volume of liquid per surface area thereof, it has a large surface area, and it has minimum flow resistance, and antigens directly absorbed therein and directly adsorbed and immobilized thereon, which method comprises: a~ heating a solid sample containing the antigen in the presence of a chelating agent for short period of time, thereby to chelate divalent cations, and to disrupt the antigen-containing outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria; b) recovering the antigens in non-sedi-- mentable form; c) separating the antigens to obtain a solid-free liquor; and d) using the solid-free liquor as the sample for the above-defined extraction of antigens.
The method of this embodiment of the invention provides for the extraction of antigens, e.g., lipopolysaccharide antigens, 201~

from solid samples, as well as for the concentration of such antigens, present in large volumes of sample, onto antibody-coated macroporous polyester cloth as hereinabove described for subsequent detection on the cloth by cloth enzyme immunoassay, to raise the effective sensitivity of the cloth enzyme immunoassay.
The present invention also provides, in another aspect, an immunoassay procedure comprising a) capturing specific anti-bodies, e.g., either in rabbit serum or in chicken egg yolk, onto a macroporous polyester cloth, the cloth preferably having a Frazier Air permeability, in CFM/ft2 at 0.5" H20 of from 215 to 750 for thickness of from 11 to 40 mls, the cloth having such a structure that it can accommodate a large volume of liquid per surface area thereof, it has a large surface area, and it has minimum flow resistance, the cloth being coated with a suitable antigen, e.g., _lmonella lipopolysaccharide; and b) detecting the antibodies using a suitable conjugate, e.g., an anti-chicken IgG-peroxidase conjugate.
It is believed that a cloth material as described above is advantageous for enzyme immunoassay since, unlilce microporous or - non-porous solid phases of the prior art (e.g., membranes, beads): ~1) it permits the easy passage of wash buffer for the - quick and effective washing of the cloth between immunoreactions to remove unreacted components, without the use of vacuum appara-tus, etc., (cloth can be washed simply by placing on an absorbent pad and rinsing with a few drops of wash buffer); (2) macroporous cloth can accommodate a larger volume of liquid sample per area 2~ 9~4~

for more extensive reaction with the immobilized immunoreagents;
and (3~ cloth provides a much larger surface area for immunoreac-tions than non-porous solid phases (e.g., plastic tubes, micro-titer plates, etc.). Macroporous cloths of hydrophobic fiberswould provide a much larger surface area, accommodate a larger volume of sample, and allow for easier washing. Furthermore, such cloths are readily available and economical.
By one feature of this invention, the above-described macro-porous synthetic polymer cloth is selected from the group con-sisting of woven or non-woven polypropylene, polyester, nylon, and polyethylene cloths.
One specific and preferred example of such non-woven poly-ester cloths is that known by the trade-mark SONT~RA of Dupont.
The following table lists some typical properties a SONTARAS~ in English Units.

UNITTHICKNESS SHEET GRAaTRAPEZOID MULLEN FRAZIER AIR ROLL SIZE
WEIGHT TENSILETEAR BURSTPERMEABILITY 17'' ID CORE) o~/yd.~ (mils) (Ibs) (Ibs) (pSI) (CFMIII' In. Iin.
MD XD MD XD @ 0 5" H~O) O O. yd5 S~yle 10ûZ Palycs~er B001 1 0 11 17 8 7 3 23 6no C4 5000 ~00 4.0 40 70 45 35 40 ~20 2~5 44 ~700 8103 .2.0 22 40 22 14 8 50 290 4.1 3500 8i22-- 2.4 27 45 25 15 7 57 320 44 2500 8~25-- ~.8 ~7 3~ 16 ~ ~ 5 44 420 4~'1 4000 In another feature of this invention, the specific anti-bodies captured on the cloth are detectable using a suitable conjugate, e.g., those specific antibodies are detectable using an antiglobulin antibody-enzyme conjugate, the conjugate binding 2~9~

to the captured antibodies, the conjugate being assayable using a chromogenic substrate.
The immunoassay device of another feature of this invention further comprises the combination of the above-described macro-porous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, bovine serum albumin (BSA) directly adsorbed therein and directly absorbed and immobi-lized thereon, and anti-BSA immunoglobulin G antibody (IgG) in rabbit serum captured therein by the BSA. In such immunoassay device, the captured anti-BSA IgG are detectable using an anti-rabbit IgG peroxidase conjugate.
The immunoassay device of yet another feature of the inven-tion further comprises the combination of the above-described macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, Salmonella lipopolysaccharide directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed and immobili~ed therein, and specific antibodies in egg yolk, which have been captured therein by the Salmonella lipopolysaccharide. In such immunoassay device, the captured specific antibodies in egg yolk are detectable using an anti-chicken IgG- peroxidase conjugate.
The immunoassay device of still another feature of the invention further comprises the combination of the above-des-cribed mac:roporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, Salmo-nella lipc~polysaccharide directly adsorbed and coated thereon and directly absorbed therein, and goat anti-Salmonella antibody standards which have been captured by the Salmonella lipopoly-saccharide. In such an immunoassay device, the captured anti-~19~8 bodies are assayable colourimetrically using an anti-goat anti-body-peroxidase conjugate.
The immunoassay device of a still further feature of the invention still further comprises the combination of the above-described macroporous synthetic polymer e.g., polyester, cloth, a coating of an appropriate antigen directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed therein, and antibodies in an antiserum immuno-adsorbed on the antigen coating.
The immunoassay device of a still further feature of the invention still further comprises the combination of the above-described macroporous synthetic polymer cloth, a coating of a lipopolysaccharide directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed therein, and antibodies in an antiserum immunoadsorbed on the lipopolysaccharide coating. In such an immunoassay device, the antibodies preferably are anti-Salmonella antibodies and the macroporous synthetic polymer cloth preferably is a polyester cloth.
By another feature of this invention, the above-described immunoassay devices may be treated with an antiserum containing an antibody specific for the antigen being tested.
By yet another feature such immunoassay devices may be treated with a purified antibody bearing the apprGpriate speci-ficity.
2~ By still another feature, such antibodies present in the antiserum may be partially denatured prior to being applied to the above-described macroporous hydrophobic cloth, e.g. by 2~1~0~

exposure to a low pH environment, e.g, a pH of 2.5, or by heating.
Alternatively, by yet another feature, the antibiodies may be affinity-purified prior to being so-applied to the hydrophobic cloth.
By still another feature, the antibody may be provided by diluted antiserum.
By yet another feature, it is preferred that the immunoassay device of embodiments of the invention, be in the form of the above-described macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth bonded to a different material, thereby to provide an antibody-coated test strip that may be handled throughout an assay pro-cedure. Thus, the present invention embraces the bonding, in any suitable manner, of the so-treated hydrophobic cloth to a dip-stick.
By yet another feature, it is preferred that the immunoassay device of embodiments of the invention, be in the form of a large sheet of the above-described macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth onto which multiple samples can be blotted thereby to provide an antibody-coated test sheet that may be used to test multiple samples in an assay procedure.
Consequently, there are three main aspects of the present invention. One aspect resides in the rapid assay of specific antibodies using antigen-coated cloth.
As an example, of such aspect, anti-Salmonella antibodies (either purified goat antibodies or from the serum of an immu-201~8 nized rabbit) may be rapidly captured and detected on Salmonella lipopolysaccharide-coated cloth. Another example may be the detection of anti-Salmonella antibodies in chicken egg yolk. The invention encompasses the rapid detection of any specific anti-bodies (in body fluid~ using antigen-coated cloth. Rapidity of the assay (immunoreactions) is a key feature.
Another aspect resides in the extraction and concentration of lipopolysaccharide antigens as antibody-coated cloth.
~ne example, of such aspect, is the extraction of 5almonella lipopolysaccharide antigens using ethylenediaminetetraacetate, and heat, followed by assay on antibody-cloth. The ethylene-diaminetetraacetate heat treatment should be applicable to the extraction of lipopolysaccharide antigens from any Gram negative lS bacteria. A second, important feature of this invention, is the ability concentrate antigens ~in general) present in large vol-umes of sample onto antibody-coated cloth followed by their cloth enzyme immunoassay thereupon.
A third aspect of this invention resides in the affinity purification and biotinylation of specific antibodies on antigen-coated cloth.
This aspect of the invention employs antigen-coated cloth.
This aspect provides a method for the preparation of a reagent useful for enzyme immunoassay. The reagent prepared is an affin-ity purified biotinylated antibody, useful in enzyme immunoassay(including the cloth enzyme immunoassay).

2~19~8 Consequentlyl the enzyme immunoassay procedure in one embo-diment of this invention may consist of the following: a macro-porous hydrophobic cloth having such porosity that it can accom-S modate a large volume of liquid per surface area, it has a largesurface area and it has a minimum flow resistance is treated to have directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed therein, either an antiserum containing antibodies specific for the anti-gen being tested, or purified antibodies bearing the appropriate specificity, and is subsequently incubated with the test sample purported to contain the antigen. The cloth is then washed with an appropriate buffer to remove any unadsorbed and unabsorbed material, and is then incubated with an enzyme-antibody conjugate prepared by coupling purified antibody specific for the antigen to a suitable indicator enzyme. The cloth is then washed with buffer to remove unreacted conjugate, and the remaining conjugate is detected by incubation in a chromogenic substrate-indicator solution which produces a visible colour upon product formation.
The immunoassay procedure of another embodiment of the invention may consist of the following: a test sample containing the antigen to be assayed is mixed with a suitable enzyme-anti-body conjugate, e.g. diluted horseradish peroxidase (HRP~-anti-body conjugate specific for the antigen of interes~, and an ali-quot of this mixture is incubated with an antigen-treated hydro-phobic cloth. A control hydrophobic cloth is treated with amixture of the same enzyme-antibody conjugate but without the free antigen. After washing with a suitable buffer solution, 2019~8 e~g. PBST, cloths incubated with an antigen-conjugate mixture fail to produce the same intensity of colours (upon incubation in ABTS-indicator) as cloths incubated with a control mixture con-sisting of the conjugate in the absence of free antigen.
While it is not desired to be bound by any theory, it is believed that antigen present in the test sample combines with the conjugate, thus preventing its interaction with the antigen-treated cloth. In this manner, the presence of antigen in a test sample will diminish the amount of colour produced in the test, while the control sample (minus free antigen) gives proof of the functional integrity of the conjugate.
The detection of B. abortus antigen LPS, using the immuno-assay with LPS-coated polyester cloth has thus been provided as another embodiment of this invention. The immunoassay, which requires only one incubation with the immunological reagent, provides an internal control for the quality of the reagent used.
The present invention thus provides a simple and rapid method for assaying anti-Salmonella IgG in chicken egg yolk.
Polyester cloth coated with Salmonella lipopolysaccharide is used to capture specific antibodies in egg yolk, which are then detected using an anti-chicken IgG-peroxidase conjugate. This assay thus provides a simple and economical means of monotoring the levels of Salmonella contamination in chicken rearing facili-ties.
The present invention provides a rapid antibody cloth enzymeimmunoassay which exploits the advantages of using a macroporous 2~9~

hydrophobic cloth ~polyester) as an adsorbent of antigens, which is then used to capture specific antibodies from a test sample, e.g., a patient's serum, saliva, or other fluids. The antibodies captured specifically on the cloth are then detected using an antiglobulin antibody-enzyme conjugate, which binds to the cap-tured antibody. The enzyme itself is assayed using an appro-priate chromogenic substrate.
The advantages of using such macroporous synthetic polymer cloth as the immunoadsorbent include the following: (1) because of its macroporosity, the antigen-coated cloth presents a larger surface for immunoreaction with specific antibodies present in a given volume of sample, thus yielding faster immunoreactions than conventional non-porous solid phases, e.g., a microtiter plates;
1~ (2) because of its macroporosity, the cloth shows excellent flow (or filtration) characteristics, which in turn enables easy and quick washing with a buffer between each immunoreaction step to remove unbound material (such washing being accomplished by simply placing the cloth on a water-absorbent pad, e.g., a disposable diaper, and allowing the wash buffer to be absorbed through the cloth and into the pad); (3) the ability to wash cloth quickly and easily in this manner allows for the instan-taneous exposure of the antigen-cloth to the test sample (such instantaneous exposure being accomplished by passively absorbing a volume of liquid sample through the cloth into the pad, fol-lowed immediately by washing with buffer which allows for the rapid and quantitative assay of (e.g.,) antibodies); (4) the ease 2~9Q~8 of effectively washing the cloth on a simple absorbent pad as above allows for the configuration of the assay into a convenient "Field" kit (in which the assay can be performed in the absence of laboratory facilities or sophisticated equipment) where an absorbent pad is packaged in such a way as to allow convenient washing and containment of the washings to prevent release of potentially hazardous sample material into the immediate environ-ment; and (5) the polyester cloth is economical to use as an immunoadsor-bent and easy to handle throughout the assay procedure, since the antigen-cloth can be used in the form of either a dipstick ~where a small segment of cloth is fixed to a strip of inert material which allows easy handling), or a large sheet onto which multiple . samples can be applied which, in conjuction with the use of a suitable enzyme substrate system yielding an insoluble product, can yield a qualitative test for screening large numbers of samples. In the latter type of assay, termed "dot blot", multi-ple samples are simultaneously applied as spots on the antigen-cloth sheet, the sheet is immediately washed with buffer, thensaturated with antiglobulin antibody-enzyme conjugate and incu-bated for a fixed period of time (which can vary from 2 to 30 . min), washed again with buffer, and then saturated with a solu-tion of indicator substrate which gives an insoluble product upon action of the enzyme. Areas on the sheet where specific antibody was spotted and bound will give a visible coloured spot against a 2 ~

colourless background. Samples in which specific antibodies are lacking will fail to produce visible spots.
The theory of the cloth enzyme immunoassay for the rapid assay of antibodies on the basis of the initial rate of immuno-raction is as follows: the the rate of association of an antigen with its specific antibody is, under ideal conditions of tempera-ture, ionic strength, and pH, very rapid and the overall rate of immunoreaction in solution is limited mainly by the frequency of intermolecular collisions between the said antigen and antibody.
This frequency, in turn, is dictated by: ~1) the distance over which the antibody must travel, by diffusion, before it can encounter the antigen in solution, the greater the distance, the lower the frequency of collisions, and therefore the slower the rate of immunoreaction; and (2) the concentration of either immunoreactant (antigen or antibody) in the solution. The lower the concentration of immunoreactant, the lower the frequency of collisions, etc.. When antigen is present in large excess, the rate of immunoreaction will depend chiefly on the concentration of antibody in the solution (i.e. proportionally faster rates with higher concentrations of antibody). This holds true also in the case of an antigen immobilized on a solid phase, which is then exposed to an antibody solution. However, when the antigen is immobilized on a non-porous solid phase, e.g., a microtiter plate, as in the prior art, it has a iimited spatial contact with the antibody solution, and diffusion becomes strongly rate-limit-ing. When the antigen is immobilized on a high-surface area 20~99~8 solid phase, e.g., a macroporous synthetic polymer cloth, as in the present invention, diffusion becomes less rate-limiting since the antigen-coated solid phase is in more intimate spatial con-tact with the test solution. In this case, the antibody willreact faster with the antigen-coated solid phase. Thus, for a fixed antibody concentration, a macroporous solid phase, e.g., as polyester cloth, as in the present invention, will react with a greater amount of antibody than a non-porous solid phase such as a mocrotiter plate during a short fixed incubation, consequently, according to the present invention, even during an instantaneous exposure of antigen-coated macroporous polyester cloth to an antibody solution a sufficient quantity of antibody should bind to the solid phase to provide a measurable signal in the cloth immunoassay. A microporous solid phase, e.g., nylon or nitro-cellulose membranes, as in the prior art, is not suitable for such an assay since the instanteous reaction with antibody requires that the solid phase be quickly and easily washed (e.g., by placing on an absorbent pad and washing as described above) immediately after application of the sample. This cannot be easily accomplished using microporous materials. secause of the microporosity, the rate of diffusion at the sample to the surface ~ is limited by the small size of the pores through which the sam-ple molecules must traverse to react with the solid phase. Fur-thermore, the amount of antibody bound (or extent of immunoreac-tion) under such circumstances will be directly proportional to 2~ 9~8 the concentration of antibody present initially in the solution, because of an inherent property of macroporous cloth.
Some of the uses of the cloth enzyme immunoassay device and method of the present invention include the serological diagnosis of infectious diseases in humans and animals, and the rapid screening of hybridoma cultures for the identification of desired specific monoclonal antibodies. As a diagnostic tool, the cloth enzyme immunoassay of the present invention, is also ideally suited for "field" tests, where small numbers of samples (e.g., a few dozen) must be assayed. This may preferably be accomplished by using a "dipstick" format where a small ~e.g., 6 x 6 mm) seg-ment of antigen-coated polyester cloth is fixed to a strip of inert material providing a convenient means of handling the latter, or by using a large sheet of antigen-coated polyester cloth capable of accommodating multiple samples, which can be spotted on, to give a qualitative test. This latter approach is also believed to be ideal for the screening of large numbers of hybridomas for specific monoclonal antibodies.
The advantages of the cloth enzyme immunoassay method of this invention, for measuring antibodies in test samples include the following: ~1) since this is a method based on the kinetics of the antigen-antibody reaction, quantitation is theoretically more accurate than the conventional methods, which rely on mea-suring immunoreactions at equilibrium; (2) because of the short exposure of the antigen-cloth to the test sample, only highly specific antibodies should bind significantly, giving a more reliable test result since non-specific reactions will be mini-mized and thus false-positive reactions are less likely; and ~3) the total time required to complete the assay is considerably shorter than that using conventional methods, which rely on lengthy incubations. This embodiment of the present invention required only 30 min to complete a test, whereas the conventional (microtiter plate) method required a minimum of 90 min. The time required to complete such a cloth enzyme immunoassay test can be further shortened to under 15 min by using a TMB substrate system which is more sensitive, instead of the ABTS system.
An enzyme immunoassay based on the initial rate of immuno-reaction is provided by another embodiment of this invention using a Salmonella antigen-antibody systém. Salmonella lipopoly-saccharide-coated polyester cloth is instantaneously exposed to goat anti-Salmonella antibody standards and the captured antibody is assayed colourimetrically using an anti-goat antibody-peroxi-dase conjugate. The colour intensity is proportional to the antibody concentration, thus providing a rapid and quantitative assay for antibodies.
Members of the genus Salmonella, the major cause of human enteritis worldwide, are often found associated with solid or semi-solid matter (e.g., food, feces, etc.) from which they spread to human hosts. Enzyme immunoassay of Salmonella antigens in solid-rich samples, e.g., foods or feces, requires that the antigens be extracted from the sample into a solid-free liquid in - 2~9~

order to allow for their free interaction with solid-phase-immo-bilized immunoreagents.
One specific embodiment of this method is for the detection of Salmonella Tvphimurium lipopolysaccharide antigens in chicken meat. The method is, however, not limited to this system, and it is applicable to most instances where it is desirable to separate Gram-negative lipopolysacchride antigens from solid or semi-solid samples, followed by concentration and detection by cloth enzyme immunoassay.
The basis for the method is as follows: it is often neces-sary to detect Gram-negative pathogens (e.g., Salmonella organ-isms) in solid or semi-solid samples ~e.g., foods e.g., chicken meat, thick broths, powders, or feces of sick humans or animals) in order to assess contamination or diagnose disease. Enzyme immunoassay is rapidly gaining popularity as a method for detect-ing such antigens. However, enzyme immunoassays which use anti-bodies immobilized on a solid phase to capture antigens present in samples as in the prior art require that the antibodies be in physical contact with these antigens. When the antigens are complexed with (or physically entrapped within~ the matrix of a solid or semi-solid sample, the proper interaction of the anti-bodies with the antigens cannot occur. It is therefore necessary to free the antigens from the sample solids so that solid-free samples for enzyme immunoassay can be prepared. For instances where lipopolysaccharide antigens are to be detected, the present invention provides a simple and economical method for the pre-paration of such solid-free samples for enzyme immunoassay. The method involves heating a solid sample (e.g., chicken meat) con-taining the pathogen of interest (e.g., Salmonella cells) in the presence of the chelating agent ethylenediaminetetraacetate for a short period of time. Ethylenediaminetetraacetate acts by che-lating divalent cations, which stabilize the lipopolysaccharide-containing outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, and when Gram-negative cells e.g., Salmonella are treated with ethylene-diaminetetraacetate in the presence of heat ~about 100C forabout 10 min) the lipopolysaccharide of the outer membrane is extracted from the cell surface and broken down into smaller units which remain in free solution. Thus, when cells present in a solid sample are immersed in a solution of ethylenediamine-tetraacetate, then heated at about 100C for about 10 min, the lipopolysaccharide antigens can be recovered in non-sedimentable form which can be easily separated from the sample solids by centrifugation or filtration to obtain a solid-free supernatant or filtrate. Another advantage of the ethylenediaminetetraace-tate-heat treatment is that, by breaking down the lipopolysac-charide antigens into smaller units, the smaller units react much faster and more efficiently with the antibody-coated cloth, giv-ing improved kinetrics of immunoraction (faster immunoreactions) and an increased sensitivity of detection in the c~oth enzyme immunoassay.
The dissociation of Salmonella antigens present in solid or semid-solid samples into non-sedimentable forms in a liquid would 2~9~

allow for the removal of sample solids by centrifugation. Fur-thermore, because of their smaller sizes the dissociated antigens obtained in the supernatant should exhibit faster immunoreactions with antibodies in the enzyme immunoassay than antigens associ-ated with intact cells.
Another way to accelerate immunoreactions in the enzyme immunoassay would be the use of a large-surfaced adsorbent for immunoreactants. Macroporous hydrophobic cloths, e.g., polyester cloth, according to the present invention, provide a much greater surface area for immunoreactions ~thus, faster reaction rates) than non-porous surfaces, e.g., as microtiter plates, as in the prior art. Furthermore, macroporous cloths exhibit better fil-tration characteristics than microporous membranes, e.g., nitro-cellulose and nylon membranes, as in the prior art, and thusallowing for the use of antibody-coated cloths for the capture of antigens from large volumes of sample by filtration. These advantages of macroporous cloth combined with a method for the preparation of solid-free antigen samples allows for a more rapid and simple enzyme immunoassay for Salmonella antigens in solid-rich samples.
Salmonella antigens are effectively extracted from a solid food sample into a non-sedimentable form by heating the sample in the presence of the chelating agent ethylenediaminetetraacete.
The heating of Salmonella in ethylenediametetraacetate also kills many of the viable Salmonella cells present in the sample, making it safer to handle. That the extracted antigens react much 21~9~8`

faster with antibodies adsorbed onto the cloth. The antibody-coated cloth is used to concentrate dilute antigens for detection by the enzyme immunoassay. The concentration of dilute antigens present in large sample volumes increases the effective sensi-tivity of the cloth enzyme immunoassay.
Heating Salmonella typhimurium in ethylenediaminetetraace-tate dissociates its,antigens into forms that are non-sediment-able at 100000 x g. The treatment causes a marked increase in the rate of immunoreaction and the sensitivity in an enzyme immu-noassay for the detection of Salmonella antigens. The method permits the extraction of Salmonella antigens from solid-rich samples and the preparation of solid-free samples by means of centrifugation. When the level of the antigens in the super-natant is too low for the immunoassay, the antigens are readilyconcentrated by passing a large volume of the supernatant through a macroporous hydrophobic cloth coated with anti-Salmonella anti-body. Using this method, the detection of as few as 10 Salmo-nella cells per gram of chicken meat was possible within a total of about 18 h, which included about 16 h of enrichment in either tetrathionate, selenite oystine, or nutrient broths, all such broths being supplied by Difco.
The ability to produce solid-free samples by this method has a further important consequence: a large volume of solid-free sample containing a dilute antigen can be filtered through anti-body-coated polyester cloth, which allows concentration of the antigens on the cloth for improved detectability by subsequent 2 ~ Lq ~3 cloth enzyme immunoassay. This is especially important when antigen present in a liquid sample is too dilute to be detected by incubation of a limited volume of sample with the antibody-coated solid phase. The ability to concentrate all of the anti-gen present in such a sample on antibody-coated cloth allows for the capture of more antigen from the total sample than by simply incubating with a limited volume. Such concentration depends on the porosity of the antibody-coated solid phase, since for effec-tive concentration the antigen solution must be passed throughthe capture surface. Concentration is therefore impossible using the conventional non-porous solid phases, e.g., microtiter plates, as in the prior art, and is difficult using microporous membranes, e.g., nylon or nitrocellulose, as in the prior art, which clog easily when large volumes of colloidal sample are filtered. On the other hand, the use of macroporous cloth, e.g., polyester, as in the present invention, is ideal for this pur-pose, since cloth provides a sufficiently large surface area for efficient antigen capture and yet is of such a loose fibrous ~0 structure as to experience little difficulty with clogging li.e., macroporous polyester cloth has exellent flow characteristics).
Also, because the ethylenediaminetetraacetate-heat treatment breaks the LPS antigens down into smaller units which react fas-ter with antibody-cloth, it is possible to pass a large volume of sample through the antibody-cloth at a reasonably fast flow rate, which is of practical importance.

2 ~

The entire procedure, including lipopolysaccharide antigen extraction, concentration, and assay by cloth enzyme immunoassay is summarized below using the extraction of Salmonella lipopoly-saccharide from chicken meat as an example: (1) a sample ofchicken meat containing Salmonella cells is homogenized to a paste using a Waring TM blender; (2) a small volume of ethylene-diaminetetraacetate solution tpH about 7.2) is added to the paste, mixed, then heated at about 100C for about 10 min ~this treatment also kills the cells, making the sample safer to handle); (3) the sample is then centrifuged at about 100000 x g for about 10 min to sediment the solids, and the solid-free supernatant is collected into a clean container by decanting;
(4) the supernatant is then passed through (by gravity flow) a 1 cm diameter anti-Salmonella antibody-coated polyester cloth disc inserted at the bottom of a 1 cm diameter glass or plastic column (flow rate 25 to 50 ml/h; (5) the cloth disc, with cap-tured antigen, is then washed in the column with a buffer to remove any unbound sample material; (6) the column is stoppered and a small volume of anti-Salmonella antibody conjugated to an enzyme is incubated with the cloth disc, typically for about 30 min, and the disc is again washed with buffer (as previously) to - remove unbound conjugate; (7) the column is stoppered again and a chromogenic enzyme substrate is added and incubated with the cloth disc in the column to measure bound enzyme activity; (8) the substrate is recovered from the column and the colour inten-sity of the solution is measured using a spectrophotometer.

2 0 ~ 8 Some uses of the combined extraction-concentration method of the present invention include the detection of Gram-negative pathogens in foods and animal feeds (e.g., Salmonella. Campy-lobacter), in tissue specimens from diseased animals (e.g.,detection of Brucella lipopolysaccharide antigens in lymph node specimens from cattle in autopsy~, and in feces from sick humans or animals (e.g., detection of Salmonella or enteropathogenic Escherichia coli LPS antigens in human feces for the purpose of diagnosis). In cases where the number of organisms pre~ent in a sample is expected to be too low to meet the minimum level required for detection by the cloth enzyme immunoassay, it may be necessary to first amplify the organisms by enrichment in a growth medium: the sample is incubated for several hours to over-night in a suitable nutrient growth medium, to allow for multi-plication of the organisms, and the whole is then extracted by the ethylenediaminetetraacetate-heat method and a solid-free sample is prepared. The antigen can then be detected by concen-trating the solid-free sample on antibody-cloth, followed by ~0 cloth enzyme immunoassay. The advantage of concentration is that, since it allows for the more efficient detection of dilute antigen in large volumes of sample, the time of the amplification stage by enrichment culture may be reduced since the ability to concentrate antigens eliminates the necessity of growing the cultures to high cell densities.
The present invention also provides, in another aspect, a rapid and simple procedure which allows for both affinity puri-2019~8 fication and biotinylation of antibodies on antigen-coated poly-ester cloth. Polyester cloth is inexpensive, provides a large surface area for immunoreagent adsorption, and can be easily washed after immunoreaction. These advantages make antigen-coated polyester cloth suitable as an adsorbent for the affinity purification of specific antibodies. Furthermore, biotinylation of immunoadsorbed antibodies directly on the cloth is possible.
Since the cloth can be easily washed after reaction, its use would eliminate the need for the dialysis or gel filtration steps which are required for the preparation of biotinylated antibodies in free solution. The present invention provides, as an example, the biotinylation of anti-Salmonella antibodies from an antiserum on Salmonella lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-coated polyester cloth.
EXAMPLES
Before describing various embodiments of this invention, a description of the reagents used will be given. Chemicals used were of the analytical reagent grade. Biochemicals were pur-chased from Sigma Chemical Co. Distilled water tH20) was employed as a universal solvent. Antigens and bovine antisera were provided by the Animal Diseases Research Institute (ADRI) in Nepean, Ontario, Canada. Some materials employed as solid phases - ~i.e., cellulose cotton and nylon cloths) were acquired locally, (i.e., in the Ottawa, Canada area), whereas non-woven polypropy-lene filter cloth was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. and a variety of polyester cloths (e.g., SONTARA ~M as ~ore fully des-cribed above) were obtained from DuPont.

2 0 ~

The following reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co.: bovine serum albumin (BSA) (No. A-7030); rabbit anti-BSA
serum (No. B-1520); normal rabbit serum (No. S-2632); anti-rabbit IgG antibody-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (No. A-61j4); and 2,2'-azino-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) (No. A-1888); biotinamidocaproate N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (BACHS) (No.B-2643), Salmonella typhimurium LPS (No. L-6511); p-nitro-phenyl phosphate (No. 104-0); bovine serum albumin (BSA)(No. A-7888), and anti-rabbit IgG antibody-alkaline phosphatase con-jugate ~No. A-8025A). Streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase con-jugate was obtained from Boehringer Manheim (No. 1089-616).
Affinity purified polyclonal antibodies (CSA-1) to heat-killed Salmonella cells were obtained from Kirkegaard and Perry Labora-tories, Inc. (No. 01-91-99), as was CSA-1 antibody-alkaline phos-phatase conjugate (No. 05-91-99).
Before use, all conjugate stock solutions were diluted in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered (pH 7.2)-0.85% NaCl (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween 20~ (PBST) at the manufacturer's recommended working dilution, except for the streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase con-jugate which was used at a dilution of 1:4000. Normal rabbit serum was a pre-immunization serum devoid of anti-Salmo~ella antibodies.

20t 9~

Enzyme Immunoassay Reaqents ? 0.06 M carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) NaHCO3 3.8g Na2CO3 1.93g Add H20 and ~aOH (if necessary) to 1,000 ml.

(hereinafter abbreviated PBS) NaH2PO~.2H20 0.31g Na2l~PO4 l.lg NaCl 8.5g (3) PBS with TWEEN 20~
(hereinafter abbreviated PBST) PBS 1000m lS TWEEN 20 [TWEEN 20 is the registered Trade Mark of an emulsifier comprising polyoxyethylene derivatives of fatty acid partial esters of sorbitol anhydrides of Atlas Chemical Industries] 0.5ml (4) Indicator system for horseradish peroxidase (ABTS-indicator) 0.05 M citrate buffer (pH 4.5) 20ml 40 nM 2,2'-Azino-di-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonic acid) (hereinafter abbreviated ABTS) 0.5ml 0.5 M H202 0.02ml (5) Indicator system for alkaline phosphatase diethanolamine 2.62g P-nitrophenyl phosphate .025g Add H20 and HCl to 25 ml to obtain a final pM 9.8.

2~19~8 The following adsorbents for immunoreagents were tested:
polyester non-woven cloth (DuPont, Sontara 8100); polypropylene filter (Aldrich Chemical Co., No. Z10425-6); polyethylene filter (Fisher Scientific Co., 1.5mm thickness); cellulose cotton cloth (obtained locally); and 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates (Bion-Rad Labs, No. 224-0096).

The following were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co.:
Salmonella typhimurium lipopolysaccharide (No. L-6511), S.
enteritidis lipopolysaccharide (No. L-6386), Escherichia coli strain K-235 lipopolysaccharide (No. L-2143), E~ coli serotype 0127:B8 lipopolysaccharide ~No. L-3129), Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide ~No. L-9143), and rabbit anti-chicken IgG-peroxidase conjugate (No. A-9046). The conjugate was diluted 1:1000 in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered (pH 7.2)-0.85% NaC1 (P8S) containing 0.05% TWEEN 2O~M before use.
(7) Eqqs A total of 113 fresh eggs were tested for anti-Salmonella IgG. Of these, 71 were purchased from several independent Ottawa Valley produce retailers, 24 were purchased from two major Eastern Ontario supermarket chains, and 18 were obtained from a small (i.e., less than 40 hens) Ottawa Valley farm.
(8) AntibodY Standard and En~vme Conjuqates The antibody standard used was a commercial preparation of affinity-purified polyclonal goat antibodies (CSA-1~ to heat-killed Salmonella cells (Kirdegaard and Perry Laboratories, Inc., 2 0 ~

No. 01-9l-99) suspended in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered ~pH 7.2)-0.85% NaC1 (PBS). Other immunoreagents used were an anti-goat IgG antibody-horseradish peroxidase conjugate solution (Sigma, No. A-3540) and an anti-rabbit IgG antibody-horseradish peroxi-dase conjugate solution (Sigma, No. A-6154). Before use, these stock solutions were diluted 1:1000 in PBS containing 0.05% TWEEN
20~.
(9) Bacteria Salmonella typhimurium strain LT 2 was grown in M ~3 minimal salts medium containing 0.5% glucose, at 37C. For use in the enzyme immunoassay, the S~a~monella cells were grown to 6 x 108 cells/ml, washed twice with 0.01 M phosphate-buffered (pH
7.2)/0.85% NaCl by centrifugation at 10000 x g for 10 min, 4C, and resuspended in the original volume of PBS. The cell suspen-sion was used in the enzyme immunoassay within a few hours of its preparation.

(10) Immunoreaqents The primary (capture) antibody used to coat the macroporous, hydrophobic cloth for enzyme immunoassay was a commercial prepar-ation of affinity-purified polyclonal antibody (CSA-1) to heat-killed Salmonella cells (Kirgegaard and Perry Laboratories, Inc., - No. 01-91-99) with a specificity for all known Salmonella sero-types.
The immunological specificity of a CSA-1 antibody-horse-radish peroxidase conjugate (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories, Inc., No. 04-91-99) was tested, and it was found that approxi-C 2û190~

mately 60% of the total enzyme activity bound to purified S.
typhimurium lipopolysaccharies. A stock of the conjugate (0.1 mg of protein per ml in PBS) was stored at -20~C. Before use, it was diluted 1:2000 in PBS containing 0.05% TWEEN 20S~.
~11) Preparation of Affinit~ Purified Anti-Brucella Antibodies from Bovine Antiserum Anti-Brucella antibodies were purified from bovine antiserum by the affinity purification method. It is based on the adsorp-tion of anti-Brucella antibodies onto the antigenic surface of whole killed B. abortus cells mixed with antiserum. Cells with adsorbed antibodies can then be separated from the serum by cen-trifugation, and the antibodies can be recovered by exposure to a low pH environment with subsequent removal of the cells by cen-trifugation. The method is simple to perform, inexpensive, and usually results in high yields of specific antibodies.
Ten milliliters of standard plate test antigen, consisting of whole heat-killed B. abortus cells (strain 413, biotype 1) suspended in phenol-saline (i.e., 0.85% NaCl and 0.5% phenol in H~O) at a concentration of 4 x 10" cells~ml, were dispensed in a 50 ml-capacity round bottom polycarbonate centrifuge tube. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 x g, for 10 minutes. The pellet was then washed twice in 0.1 M glycine-HCl (pH 2.24) to remove any acid-soluble material present on the cell surface, followed by two washings in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH
7.0). As used herein, the abbreviation means Tris(hydroxy-methyl)aminomethane Care was taken to disperse the cells as 2019~8 gently as possible during resuspension (a glass stirring rod is convenient for this purpose). To the final washed pellet was added 25 ml of bovine antiserum, in which the cells were dis-persed. The suspension was allowed to stand at room temperaturefor 30-40 minutes, with gentle stirring every 5-10 minutes. The suspension was then centrifuged as above and the supernatant discarded. The resulting pellet was washed three times in 25 ml of 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0~ to remove any loosely adsorbed material. Brucella-specific antibody was recovered by resuspend-ing the final washed pellet in 25 ml of 0.1 M glycine-HCl (pH
2.24). The cells were immediately removed by centrifugation and antibody-rich supernatant was transferred to a vessel containing 10 ml of 1.0 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) in order to abrogate the harsh low pH environment. The remaining cell pellet was pro-cessed in this manner a second time to improve antibody recovery, and the final supernatants were pooled. The antibody solution was then dialyzed against PBS for 24 hours at 4C, with at least three changes of buffer. Precipitate material arising in the dialysate was stored at -80C until use. Whenever necessary, the protein in the dialysate was concentrated using an AMICONTM pro-tein concentrator.
Unless otherwise specified, antiserum used in the Examples was serum obtained from chronically infected cattle which have high titers of anti-Brucella antibody. B. abortus cells used were heat-killed standard plate test antigen (whole cells) which is strain 413, biotype 1, suspended in phenol-saline.

' 2019~

~12) PreParation of Rabbit Anti-Salmonella Serum Salmonella typhimurium strain LT 2 was grown overnight in M63 minimal salts medium. Cells were then washed twice with PBS
containing 50 mM EDTA ~pH 7.2) to a density of 109 cells/ml. As used herein, the abbreviation EDTA means ethylenediaminetetra-acetate. The suspension was then autoclaved at 121C for 20 min, cooled to room temperature, and dialysed extensively against PBS
at 4-C. This antigen suspension was stored at 4~C.
For immunization, one male New Zealand White rabbit (3 months old) was inoculated intravenously with 0.5 ml of the anti-gen suspension ~day 1). After 20 days, the rabbit received a second 0.5 ml injection of the suspension. Serum samples were prepared from bleedings done on days 1 and 20 ~prior to the inocuulations) and at 10-day intervals thereafter.
(13) Preparation of an Enzvme-antibodv Coniuqate bv the Periodate Oxidation Method A modified version of the method developed by Nakane and Kawaoi was employed for con~ugating horseradish peroxidase with anti-Brucella antibody. For this, highly purified horseradish peroxidase (RZ=3) was used, where RZ is the light absorbance ratio of A403/A2~s for a given enzyme solution. Five milligrams of horseradish peroxidase ~Sigma, type VI, RZ=3.0) were dissolved in a mixture of 1.0 ml of 0.3 M sodium carbonate (pH 8.1) and 1.0 ml of 0.08 M NaIO4. The solution was mixed gently for 30 minutes at room temperature, and 1.0 ml of 0.16 M ethylene glycol was then added. This was further mixed at room temperature for 20~4~

l hour. The latter solution was then dialyzed against 5 l of 0.01 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH9.5) at 4C for 16-24 hours.
To this dialysate was added 0.5 ml of PBS containing ca. 5 mg of affinity purified anti-Brucella antibody and 0.5 ml of l.01 M
carbonate buffer (pH 9.5). The solution was incubated for 3 hours at room temperature, with gentle mixing. At the end of the incubation, 5 mg of~aBH4 were added to the solution which was then left to stand at 4C for 3 hours. The solution was then dialyzed extensively against PBS at 4C. Any precipitable material formed in the dialysate was removed by centrifuging for lO minutes in an eppendorf microfuge. The resulting supernatant constituted the stock conjugate, which was designated conjugate, and was stored at -20C until use.
(14) Collection of Antiserum An adult cow suffering from chronic brucellosis was bled at one-week intervals over a period of approximately three weeks.
At each bleeding, l l of blood was collected in glass bottles and immediately incubated at 37 for 2 hours, followed by overnight storage at 4C to allow for complete clot formation. The serous liquid was decanted into separate vessel and centrifuged at 8,000 X g to remove any remaining blood cells. The supernatant thus obtained was stored at -20C.
A large stock of antiserum, which was used as a source of antibody for all subsequent experiments, was prepared by pooling all serum samples obtained after the prescribed succession of bleedings, and was stored at -80DC until use.

201~

(15) PreParation of LPS-Coated Polvester Cloth Polyester cloth (DuPont, SONTARA 8100~M) was cut into 6 mm square segments. Before coating, S. tYphimurium lipopolysac-charide was dissolved in PBS containing 0.05 M EDTA ~pH 7.2~-~EDTA-PBS) and was then heated at 100C for 10 min. For use in affinity purification, 10 polyester cloth segments were incubated with 1 ml of the lipopolysaccharide solution (100 ~g/ml) for 16 h at room temperature, then washed with PBST on a macroporous fil-ter under suction. For use in enzyme im~unoassay, each polyestercloth segment was incubated as above with 50 ~1 of EDTA-heat-treated lipopolysaccharide solution (10~g/ml) in a closed petri dish, and then washed with PBST. The lipopolysaccharide-cloths were stored at 4C in PBS.
In the accompanying drawings, Figure 1 is a graph showing the effect of varying the treat-ing affinity purified antibody concentration on the signal gener-ated in the polypropylene cloth-based cloth enzyme immunoassay;
Figure 2 is a graph showing the partial denaturation of bovine antiserum antibodies by acidification;
Figure 3 is a graph showing the partial denaturation of bovine antiserum and affinity purified antibodies by heat; and Figure 4 is a graph showing diluted antiserum as a source of coating antibody.
Figure 5 is a graph showing the comparison of the enzyme immunoassay with a polyester cloth and a microtiter plate where 2019~4~

A4l4 is shown as the ordinate and log dilution of the serum is shown as the abscissa;
Figure 6 is a graph showing the effect of incubation times on the enzyme immunoassay where A4l4 is shown as the ordinate, and incubation (in minutes) as the abscissa;
Figure 7 is a graph showing the detection of egg yolk A IgG
to ~7arious Salmonella lipopolysaccharide showing A414 as ordinate and dilution as abscissa;
Figure 8 is a graph showing the measurement of anti-Sal-monella antibody by initial rate of immunoreaction with A4,4 is ordinate and concentration of antibody ~in ~g/ml) as abscissa;
Figure 9 is a graph showing the assay of anti-Salmonella antibody in rabbit serum with A414 as ordinate and time (in days) 15 as abscissa;
Figure 10 is a graph showing the effect of heating Salmo-nella cells in various concentrations of ethylenediaminetetra-acetate on the cloth enzyme immunoassay signal with A414 as ordinate and concentration (in Molar of ethylenediaminetetra-20 acetate) as abscissa;
Figure 11 is a graph showing the kinetics of the antibody-antigen reaction of ethylenediaminetetraacetate-heat-treated and - untreated Salmonella samples, with A414 as ordinate and time ~in minutes) as abscissa;
Figure 12 is a graph shown in the extraction of Salmonella antigents from chicken meat by ethylenediaminetetraacetate-heat 2 0 ~ 9 ~ ~ 8 treatment with A414 as ordinate and concentration (in Molar) of ethylenediaminetetraacetate as abscissa;
Figure 13 is a graph showing the concentration of dissoci-ated Salmonella antigens onto antibody-coated cloth with A4~4 as ordinate and log (cells/g) as abscissa; and Figure 14 is a graph of recovery of total proteins from LPS-cloth with protein (in ~g) as ordinate and dilution as abscissa;
Figure 15 is a graph of recovery of anti-Salmonella antibody titer in affinity purification, with recovery ~in %) as ordinate and dilution as abscissa;
Figure 16 is a composite graph of the conditions for the biotinylation of immunoadsorbed antibodies in which Figure 16A is drawn with A404 as ordinate and pH as abscissa, in which Figure 16B is drawn with A404 as ordinate and mg/ml as abscissa, and in which Figure 16C is drawn with A404 as ordinate and time (hrs) as abscissa; and Figure 17 is a graph of cloth enzyme immunoassay of Sal-monella antigens with A404 as ordinate and log ~cells/ml) as abscissa.
The following are Examples of this invention:
Experiments have been carried out on the use of antigen-- coated macroporous polyester cloth for the rapid enzyme immuno-assay of specific antibodies based on the initial rate of immuno-reaction between antibodies in a test sample and the antigen adsorbed onto the cloth surface. The experiments, to be des-cribed hereinafter, disclose a rapid method for the quantitative 2Q~ 9~

and qualitative assay of antigen-specific antibodies in serum ~or other clinical samples), which are an indicator of previous expo-sure to the pathogen or its antigens. Thus, the present inven-tion provides a method for the sero-diagnosis of infectious diseases using a rapid cloth-based enzyme immunoassay.
Ita) Determination of the_~ptimum Affinity Purified Coatinq Antibodv Concentration for the PolYpropvlene-based Cloth Enzyme Immunoassay of Brucella Antiqens Macroporous polypropylene filter cloth pieces (6 x 6 mm) were coated with 50 ~1 of various concentrations of affinity purified anti-Brucella antibody per piece ~a concentration range of 0.2 to 1.0 mg of protein/ml was chosen). After the required overnight incubation period, the cloths were washed with PBST and subseguently incubated with 30 ~1 of B. abortus cells ~strain 413, biotype 1) diluted to 4 x 108 cells/ml in PBS, for 30 minutes at room temperature. A series of negative control cloths (incubated without antigen) was also included. The cloths were then washed with PBST and probed with 25 ~1 of conjugate diluted 1:1,000 in PBST, and incubated for 30 minutes at room tempera-ture. After washing with PBST, the cloths were assayed for retained horseradish peroxidase activity by immersion in 0.5 ml of ABTS-indicator solution for 30 minutes, at room temperature, and the reaction was stopped by addition of 0.5 ml of 0.1 M NaF.
Absorbance was read at 650 nm.
As shown in Figure 1, the assay response peaks at a concen-tration of 0.2 mg/ml.

` 20~148 IItb) Pretreatment ~Partial Denaturation) of the Coatinq Antibody The use of antiserum for the direct coating of the cloth was S investigated as an effective and economical alternative to puri-fied antibody.
In order to achieve maximum immobilization of the antibodies present in the antiserum, a simple procedure was developed for the pretreatment of the coating antiserum to incur partial dena-turation of the antibodies, thus rendering them more capable of interacting with the hydrophobic cloth surface, to the exclusion of other serum proteins which might compete for binding sites on the cloth. In order to improve the detectability of the cloth enzyme immunoassay employing bovine antiserum as the source of coating antibody, partial denaturation procedures were developed using an acidic pH and heat. The following describes an investi-gation undertaken to determine the optimum time of exposure to a pH 2.5 environment for the improved immobilization of antibodies from antiserum on polypropylene.
Three separate 0.85 ml aliquots of antiserum were mixed with 0.3 ml each of 0.4 M glycine-HCl buffer ~pH 1.5) to produce a final pH 2.5. A zero-time exposure sample consisting of 0.85 ml - of antiserum plus 0.6 ml of 1.0 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) was also prepared as a control. Each acidified sample was allowed to stand at room temperature for either 5, 10, or 20 minutes, after which they were immediately neutralized by addition of 0.3 ml of 1.0 M Tris-HCl ~pH 8.0). These samples were then used to coat 2~04g macroporous polypropylene filter cloth pieces. The effect of time of exposure to pH 2.5 on the signal generated is presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2 shows that an approximate five-fold improvement in the assay's sensitivity was achieved by exposure of the antiserum to pH 2.5 for 10 ~inutes.
In a second experiment, the effect of exposing bovine anti-serum and affinity purified antibodies to heat on their abilities to serve as sources of coating antibodies was examined. One mil-liliter samples of antiserum and the affinity purified antibody dialysate ~containing 0.27 mg of protein/ml) were incubated for 10 minutes at either 25, 65, 70, 75, or 80-C.
These were then allowed to cool to room temperature and used to coat macroporous polypropylene cloths as previously. The assay protocol employed was the same as in the previous experi-ment, with the exception that the antibody-coated cloths were incubated with 30 ~l of 8. abortus plate test antigen diluted to 4 x 107 cells/ml in PBS. The results of this experiment are pre-sented in Figure 3, where the signal generated in the cloth enzyme immunoassay is plotted against temperature for both anti-serum and affinity-purified antibody.
- Figure 3 shows that an even greater improvement in sensi-tivity was obtained by heating the serum at 75'C for 10 minutes.
The sensitivity of the assay employing affinity purified antibody remained essentially unchanged over the range of temperatures tested.

2~ 904~

These experiments have demonstrated the usefulness of either exposure to a low pH or heat in improving the sensitivity of the assay using antiserum as the source of coating antibody.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the improvement in the sensitivity of the antiserum-based immuno-assay is a consequence of an increase in the hydrophobicity of the denatured Fc region of the antibodies, which in turn causes these to be adsorbed more strongly to the hydrophobic cloth sur-face and in greater numbers. The partially denatured state may also ensure that the antibodies adhere to the solid phase in a more ideal orientation, with the Fc region affixed to the cloth surface and the Fab segments free to interact with the antigen.
Treating the antibodies affinity-purified with heat did not seem to confer any particular advantage. Thus, these affinity-puri-fied antibodies cannot be beneficially altered further by heat treatment.
II(c) Diluted Bovine Antiserum as a ~ou~ 5Y~ 9L~n~l~95~
The feasibility of applying diluted antiserum in the cloth enzyme immunoassay was investigated in the following experiment.
Aliquots of bovine antiserum were diluted 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 times in PBS. The diluted samples were partially denatured by - heating at 75CC for lO minutes. These were then ccoled to room ; temperature and applied to 6x6 mm macroporous polypropylene fil-ter cloth pieces, which were subsequently employed in the cloth enzyme immunoassay according to the procedure used in the previ-ous example. The results are presented in Figure 4, where the 2 0 1 9 ~ ~ ~

cloth enzyme immunoassay signal generated is plotted against the serum dilution factor.
Figure 4 shows that there was no appreciable decline in the sensitivity of the assay throughout the range of coating serum dilutions examined. Therefore, it was concluded that bovine antiserum diluted l:lO in PBS, with subsequent heating at 75C
for 10 minutes, can serve as a suitable source of coating anti-body in the cloth enzyme immunoassay. The precise dilution fac-tor used for a given batch of antiserum will, of course, dependon the specific antibody titer of that serum.
II~d) Detectabilitv of the Cloth Enzvme ImmunoassaY For Brucella Antiqens The detectability of Brucella cells and lipopolysaccharide antigens by the polypropylene cloth enzyme immunoassay was examined in this Example. Unless otherwise stated, all antibody coated cloths used in the fo!lowing experiments were prepared with bovine antiserum diluted 1:10 in PBS and heated at 75C for lO minutes.
0 II(e~ Detectabilitv of the Whole Cell Assav Emplovinq Antibodv-Coated Polvpropylene Filter cloth Antibody-coated polypropylene filter cloth pieces were incu-bated for 30 minutes at room temperature with 30 ~l of B. abortus cell suspensions containing either 1.2 x 105, 1.2 x 104, or 1.2 x 103, cells in PBS. Each cloth in this series of experiments was prepared in quadruplicate, as were cloths to which 30 ~1 of PBS
containing no antigen was added. These were then washed with ~t~

PBST and probed with 25 ~l of conjugate diluted l:1000 in PBST, for 30 minutes at room temperature. At the end of this period, the cloths were washed with PBST and assayed for retained horse-radish peroxidase by immersion in ABTS-indicator solution for 3 hours, in order to optimize the final enzyme signal. The enzyme reaction was stopped by addition of 0.5 ml of O.l M NaF. Table l shows the relationship between the quantity of antigen added and the corresponding cloth enzyme immunoassay signal obtained.
Table l! Detectability of the Whole Cell Assay Employir.g Anti-Body-Coated Polypropylene Filter Cloth ~b. ~ ~ A650 1.2~iCs 0.1~ 0.213 0.2~ 1 o.~u~
1.~ ,o4 C.1~ 0.030 0.1C~ I -~
1.2x103 0.~ 0.~0 0.~0 1 0.
O O.C~O O.C51 0.~8 1 O.C~
-When used herein in any table hereinafter, the abbreviation LPS
means lipopolysaccharide.
Table l shows that the polypropylene cloth immunoassay can detect 104 cells using a 36 mm2 macroporous polypropylene cloth.
II(f) Detectability of Brucella LipopolYsaccharide by the Poly, propylene Cloth I3nmunoassay - The assay procedure employed for the detection of whole cells using antibody-coated polypropylene filter cloth was applied to the detection of B. abortus lipopolysaccharide. In this Example, antibody-coated cloths were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with 30 ~l of PBS containing either 201~8 3, 0.3, or 0.03 ng of lipopolysaccharide, or PBS alone. Each cloth was prepared in quadruplicate. These were then processed in the immunoassay as previously described. The results are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Detectability of Lipopolysaccharide by Polypropylene Cloth Immunoassay 1~ ~h (rg) ¦ 1 ¦ 2 l ~n 3 ~ 1.30 1.3C~ 1.~0 1.1C0 0 0 0.261 O.~ 0.~16 0.2~) O.Q3 0.~3 O.G58 0.065 o.os8 O 0.~ 0.040 0.043 0.~

Table 2 shows that the detectability of this assay occurred at approximately 0.3 ng (or 300 picograms) of lipopolysaccharide applied per cloth piece.
~g)_ Performance of the Immunoassay Under Simulated Clinical Conditions In the routine diagnosis of brucellosis, _ucella organisms are often recovered from infected animals in milk; vaginal secre-tions; supramammary, retropharyngeal, internal iliac, and lumbar lymph nodes; spleen tissue; uterine tissue; and in some instances, blood. As these materials constitute complex environ-ments for the detection of antigens, it was determined whether or not undefined sample components might be prohibitive to antigen detection by the immunoassay. Another aspect of clinical speci-mens examined was the interference of anti-Brucella antibodies 2~1904~3 present in the samples to the antigen assay by the immunoassay.
The ability of the macroporous polypropylene filter cloth-based assay to detect B. abortus antigens in body fluids and tissue homogenates of bovine origin was examined in Example II. Anti-body-coated cloth was prepared as in the previous Example.
II(h) Detection of B. Abortus in Bovine BodY Fluids and Tissue Homoqenates In order to ascertain the ability of the immunoassay to detect B. abortus antigens in simulated clinical specimens, tis-sues obtained from a cow which was a serological reactor for B.
abortus, but culture negative, were artificially innoculated with whole cells and assayed for the presence of antigen as described below. The presence of endogenous circulating antibody specific lS for B. abortus offered an opportunity to assess the performance of the assay under conditions which might theoretically interfere with the capture of antigen in such samples. The possible inhi-bitory effect of endogenous antibody was alleviated by subjecting the test samples to extreme heat (3 hours, 70C) prior to per-forming the assay.
Tissue homogenates were prepared by homogenizing in a stom-acher and adding sufficient PBS to produce a fluid consistency (approximately 0.5 ml per gram of tissue). Homogenates were made from the following bovine tissues; inguinal lymph nodes, spleen, and uterine horn.

A sample from each homogenate was inoculated with sufficient B. abortus cells to give a final concentration of 8 x 105 cells/-ml. Milk and serum samples from a healthy animal were likewise inoculated. These samples, along with their uninoculated coun-terparts, were heated at 70-C for 3 hours, after which they were cooled to room temperature. Antibody-coated macroporous poly-propylene filter cloths were then added to triplicate test tubes containing 0.5 ml of heated sample (one cloth/tube) and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with constant gentle shaking.
The cloths were then removed and processed in the immunoassay as previously described. Cloths were assayed for retained conjugate by immersion in 0.5 ml of ABTS-indicator solution for 30 minutes.
The results are shown below in Table 3.
Table 3. Detection of Antigens Suspended in Body Fluids and Tissue Homogenates.

.

~c~e ~ YD ¦ Ol~n~

_ 3 1 2 3 A 0.1~50.2~O.Z~ 0.070 0.~0 0.~3 3 0.1~0.1~ 0.1l0 0.~ 0.~0 0.~1 C 0.1~20.1700.162 o.oe2 0.~7 O.OE~
D 0.15g0.1~0.162 0.~ 0.030 0.~
~ E ~ 0.1l~0.1~ 0.1~ O.C45 0.042 0.00 -~ 25 a) Tissue homogenates from spleen ~A), inguinal lymph ~ nodes (B), unterine hore (C), plus, normal bovine serum ¦~ (D) and normal bovine milk (E).

.

, 20190~8 b) Cloths incubated with inoculated samples.
c) Cloths incubated with uninoculated samples.
Table 3 demonstrates the assay response for each sample tested. In most cases, the control signals (i.e., those obtained from the uninoculated samples) remained low, whereas those aris-ing from the corresponding inoculated samples were distinct. The experilnent demonstrates the ability of the cloth enzyme immuno-assay to detect B. abortus antigens suspended in various bio-logical samples.
III(a) Detection of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Antiqen The applicability of the ability of the immunoassay to detect antigens of bacterial origin to the detection of viral antigens will now be described in this Example. When used here-in, the abbreviation BVD means Bovine Viral Diarrhea.
Bovine viral diarrhea is an enteric disease posing a serious threat to exposed livestock. The etiological agent is a virus which is referred to as bovine viral diarrhea ~BVD) antigen. At present, the i~nmunoassay method is not used for the detection of BVD antigen in clinical specimens.
The strategy employed for the BVD assay was similar to that used previously for the detection of Brucella antigens: macro-porous polypropylene filter cloth was coated with anti-BVD anti-bodies and subsequently incubated with BVD antigen, and the cap-tured material was detected by probing with an enzyme-antibody conjugate (prepared by coupling antibodies from anti-BVD anti-serwn to horseradish peroxidase by the periodate oxidation 20190~8 method~. Whole antiserum was employed in order to make the required conjugate. The feasibility of using whole antiserum for this purpose was first tested by conjugating whole anti-Brucella antiserum with horseradish peroxidase and applying the resulting conjugate in the B. abortus cloth enzyme immunoassay, thus affording an apportunity to compare the performance of such a conjugate with an established system.
III(b) SYnthesis and Testinq of a Brucella-sPecific Enzyme-Antibod~ Coniuqate Made With Whole Bovine Antiserum Whole bovine anti-Brucella antiserum was conjugated to horseradish peroxidase according to the periodate oxidation method: 0.5 ml of whole serum was dialyzed overnight at 4C
against 0.01 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.5). The resulting dialysate was mixed with 5 mg of periodate-activated horseradish peroxidase and incubated for 2.5 hours at room temperature.
Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) was then added as prescribed, and incubated for 3 hours at 4C against PBS, and the final dialysate was microfuged (10 minutes, at 4C). The cleared dialysate con-stituted the conjugate stock.
The performance of this conjugate in the immunoassay was compared to that of the conjugate prepared with purified anti-body. Two series of Brucella~specific antibody-coated macro-porous polypropylene filter cloth pieces were incubated with 30 ~1 of B. abortus cells diluted to 4 x 10a, 4 x 10~, or 4 x 106 ce~ls/ml in PBS, for 30 minutes at room temperature. The cloths were then washed in PB~T, and one series was probed with 25 ~1 of the conjugate prepared with affinity purified antibody diluted l:lO0 in PBST while the other series was probed with 25 ~l of the conjugate prepared with whole antiserum diluted l:lO0 in PBST.
These were incubated for 30 minutes, at room temperature, and subsequently washed with PBST. The cloths were assayed by immer-sion in 0.5 ml of ABTS-indicator solution for 30 min. The results are shown below in Table 4.
Table 4. Relative Performance of Conjugate D in the Immuno-assay.

k~ n~i~ell ~ ' r~ 2 1.2x10 7 0.~,2 0.-~2 0.631 0.5,~
1.2x106 0.~5 d.~ 0.153 0.1~
12x10 0.~1 0.0~2 0.081 O.oQo O 0.010 0.012 0.~0 o.or~

~ prepared by coupling affinity purified antibody to HRP
*~ prepared by coupling whole antiserum to HRP
According to Table 4, the response of the immunoassay using conjugate2 was somewhat dampened throughout the series of antigen dilutions tested, as compared to the performance of conjugatel in the assay. However, the Example demonstrates the feasibility of employing such a conjugate.
III~c) Adapted Immunoassav for the Detection of BVD Antiqen A BVD-specific conjugate was prepared by coupling whole anti-BVD antiserum to horseradish peroxidase, in order to adapt the immunoassay for the direct detection of BVD antigen.

201904~

A sample of anti-BVD antiserum (precise titer unknown) was obtained from a cow vaccinated wtih killed BVD virus. An anti-BV~ serum protein-horseradish peroxidase conjugate was prepared by coupling 0.5 ml of anti-BVD antiserum dialyzed against sodium carbonate buffer to 5 mg of horseradish peroxidase as in the previous Example. The resulting product was designated conju-gate.
The standard antigen employed in the immunoassay originated from a commercial BVD vaccine, consisting of killed who]~e virus suspended in saline containing an unknown quantity of bovine serum albumin (added as a stabilizer) and a variety of anti-microbial agents. The quantity of viral antigen per unit volume of the vaccine was not disclosed by the manufacturer. The vac-cine was dialyzed overnight at 4C against PBS prior to use.
Macroporous polypropylene filter cloth pieces were coatedwith 60 ~l of partially denatured anti-BVD antiserum ~i.e., heated at 75C for 10 minutes) and incubated at room temperature as previously. Antibody-coated cloths were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with 30 ~l of dialyzed BVD vaccine diluted either 1:10, 1:100 or 1:1,000 in PBS. Undiluted vaccine and PBS alone were also included in the series, and each cloth - was prepared in quadruplicate. After the incubation period, the cloths were washed with PBST and probed with 25 ~l of conjugate3 2i diluted 1:100 in PBST, as previously. These were then assayed by immersion in 0.5 ml of ABTS-indicator solution for 30 minutes.
The results are shown below in Table 5.

2019~

Table 5. Detection of BVD Antigen by the Immunoassay ¦ 550 h~y~D~Lt~n ' ' , 2 1 3 1 4 1.2~ 1.1~ 1.0~ 1.2~
1:10 ~.2~ 0.2~0 0.2~ 0.210 1:1~ 0.091 0.110 0.115 0.~5 1:1~ 0.050 0.~1 0.~ 0.050 ~ ~ 0.~ 0.~3 0.~1 0.0~

Table 5 shows that the detectability of the BVD assay, in the form tested, was fixed somewhere in the range of l:l0 to l:l00 dilution of the dialyzed vaccine. These results clearly demonstrate the ability of the immunoassay to detect BVD antigen.
III~d) Alternative Solid Phases for Use in the Immunoassay A series of Examples was carried out to determine the use-fulness of other materials as solid phases for capture and detec-tion of B. abortus cells.
Macroporous polypropylene filter cloth was compared to a variety of other materials employed as solid phases in the immu-noassay. The materials tested were 100% macroporous nylon cloth(acquired locally, i.e., in the Ottawa, Canada area), woven macroporous polyester cloth ( acquired locally, i.e., in the Ottawa, Canada area), nonwoven macroporous polyester cloth (SONTARAT~ Dupont), cellulose acetate membrane (Gelman), cellulose nitrate membrane (Schleicher and Schuell), analytical paper (Schleicher and Schuell), and a macroporous 20~9~

polyethylene filter ~1.5 mm thick-ness). These were all cut into 6 x 6 mm square pieces, and coated with 60 ~1 of partially denatured bovine anti-Brucella antiserum diluted 1:10 in PBS, as previously described. The materials were then incubated with 30 ~l of B. abortus cells diluted to 4 x 10' cells/ml in PBS for 30 minutes at room tem-perature. A parallel series to which PBS containing no antigen was added was also included, and each solid phase was prepared in duplicate. After the incubation period, the materials were washed with PBST and probed with conjugate (prepared with affin-ity purified antibody~ as usual. These were then assayed by immersion in 0.5 ml of ABTS-indicator solution for 30 minutes.
The performance of each solid phase in the assay is shown below ~ in Table 6.
Table 6. Performances of Various Solid Phases Employed in the Immunoassay ~ A 650 ~ æ ~r ¦ c~ j Poi,~yl~e Lil ~r clc~ 0.~23 0.4 0 0.012 0.010 ~_onc_o'~ 0.~0 0.~ 0.011 0.0 ver, ~olyester c o~ 0.~0 0.~60 0.0 ~ o.~^G2~
~ e~ ~lye~erclc~.C O.ô10 0.7~2 C.O33 O.~J
G~_~e ~e'5~e ~ cr,e 0.~ 0.1~ 0.103 0.1 Cæulcserlit--5~e lTE~rcrP 0._82 0.23 0.1~; 0,1C~
Po1ye'~_~e~^_ter 0.450 0.4 0.061 0.U72 ~ t.c~ ræ r 0.416 0.~ 0.~0 0. 421 a) Cloths incubated with antigen 2019~48 b) Cloths incubated without antigen c) A variety of DuPont polyester cloths were examined and the results with these cloths were similar to data shown here Table 6 shows that of the solid phases tested, the highest signals were obtained with the woven macroporous polyester and nonwoven macroporous polyester cloths. Other materials that are useful in the immunoassay are macroporous nylon cloth and the macroporous polyethylene filter, which produce similar results to those obtained using polypropylene filter cloth.
The main advantage of macroporous hydrophobic cloths as supports in immunoassay is that they provide a large volume for adsorption per surface area for antigen-antibody interaction.
Macroporous polyethylene, macroporous nylon, and macroporous polyester cloths, by virtue of their hydrophobic characteristics, have been found to adsorb and absorb antibodies and thus provided a large surface area for antigen capture. Other materials amen-able to the cloth enzyme immunoassay concept should have included cellulose acetate and cellulose nitrate membranes and filter paper. However as the results above indicated, they are not useful according to aspects of the present invention.
IV(a) ComParison of the ImmunoassaY Usinq Polvpro~vlene Filter Cloth, a Flat PolyproPYlene Sheet and a Polystyrene Microtiter Plate Surface The immunoassay response arising from the use of an anti-body-coated plastic polypropylene sheet and a polystyrene micro-20190~) titer surface, which have very limited surface areas available for antibody adsorption, and hence antigen capture, to the assay response obtained using polypropylene filter cloth when various quantities of antigen are applied was compared.
A flat polypropylene sheet, cut into 6 x 6 mm pieces, was coated with anti-Brucella antibodies as were 6 x 6 mm pieces of polypropylene filter cloth. Several wells in a polystyrene microtiter plate were also coated. These were then incubated with 30 ~l of PBS containing either 1.2 x 107, 1.2 x 106, 1.2 x 105, 1.2 x 10 4, B. abortus cells (plate test antigen), or PBS
alone, for 30 minutes at room temperature. The materials were subsequently processed in the immunoassay as in the previous Example, with the exception that enzyme activity was assayed by immersion in 0.5 ml of ABTS-indicator solution for 3 hours. Each determination was done in triplicate, and the results are shown below in Table 7.
Table 7. Detectability of the Immunoassay Employing Three Different Solid Phases.

~ '; ~ p~ p~
A 650 1.2 x 10 71 1.2 x io6 1 1.2 x 105 ! 1.2 x 10 4 1 0 Poly~ 1 5.oe 1.æ o.~a O.G9 0 04 2 5. 12 1 .~4 0.2~ 0.~ o.Q3 Cot~ 3 5.~ 1.15 0.24 O C8 0.03 Plzs~ic 1 1.02 0.43 O.C6 0.03 O.C4 Pol~ 2 1.01 0.~ 0.07 o.oe 0.04 ~ 3 0.~6 0.87 o.aT 0.04 0.03 PolJs~e 1 1.08 0.28 0.08 o.oe 0.03 cr~tit~r P~-te 2 1.Z 0.~ 0.09 0.03 0.04 ~faæ 3 1.01 0.30 0.08 O.C~ 0.02 20~9~o Table 7 shows that the successful detection of very small quantities of antigen must require a sufficiently large capturing surface in order to increase the probability of interaction between the solid phase and the antigen during the limited incubation period involved. This expectation is confirmed by the results obtained using an antibody-coated plastic polypropylene sheet and a polystyrene microtiter plate surface as solid phases, which failed to detect small quantities of antigen to which the macroporous polypropylene cloth responded, and which showed a greatly diminished sensitivity throughout the range of antigen concentration tested.
V~a) Commercial Adaptation of the ImmunoassaY: Dipstick of Hydrophobic Cloth A commercial form of the immunoassay was developed for application of the assay in any number of circumstances ~e.g., diagnostic laboratory and field testing, etc.). One practical form consists of affixing a small rectangular piece of macro-porous polypropylene filter cloth to a strip, e.g. of cellulose acetate, which allows for the easy retrieval of the antibody-coated cloth from test samples and provides a convenient means of handling the cloth throughout the assay procedure. It is neces-sary to ensure that the bond created between the macroporous polypropylene cloth and the cellulose acetate does not alter the macroporous properties of the former or result in any structural features at the cloth/strip junction which might cause non-specific retention of the conjugate.

20~9~4~

A bond was created by first dissolving one edge of a cellu-lose acetate strip having the dimensions 2 1/2" x 1/4" polypro-pylene cloth piece of the same thickness, making sure not to allow any overlapping of one edge over the other. Upon evapora-tion of the acetone, a strong bond was formed between the cellu-lose acetate strip and the polypropylene filter cloth piece. The cloth portion of the resulting test strip was coated with anti-body by applying 100 ~l of partially denatured bovine anti-Bru-cella antiserum diluted l:lO in PBS and incubating overnight atroom temperature, followed by washing with PBST as previously.
The antibody-coated test strip was tested in the cloth enzyme immunoassay in the manner described below.
Test strips were incubated with either 30 ~l of PBS contain-ing 1.2 x 106 B. abortus cells (plate test antigen) or 30 ~l of PBS alone, for 30 minutes at room temperature. These were then washed with PBST and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with 25 ~l of conjugate' diluted 1:1 r 000 in PBST. The cloth por-tions of the test strips were then washed with PBST, and were subsequently assayed for retained enzyme activity by immersion in 1 ml ABTS-indicator solution for 30 minutes with gentle shaking.
The reaction was stopped by addition of 0.5 ml of 0.1 M NaF and absorbance was read at 650 nm. Each determination was performed in quadruplicate, and the results of the assay are shown below in Table 8.

201~

Table 8. Application of Antibody-Coated Test Strips in the Immunoassay _ A 6;0 ~
~T~ 1 ¦ 2 ¦ 3 4 1.2x10 0.411 ¦ 0.~ 0.41~ 0.
O `0.~3 1 0.016 1 0.~ 0.~1 The results of the assay demonstrate the ability of the antibody-coated test strips to detect B~ abortus antigens at the concentration tested. The background level of enzyme activity was negligible, thus satisfying one of the important requirements of the immunoassay. These results were reproducible.
5 VI(a) APPlication of a Hydrophobic Cloth as an Adsorbant and Absorbant of Antiqen in Competitive Immunoassay for B.
Abortus LPS.
The following experiment shows the application of macro-porous hydrophobic cloth as an adsorbent and absorbent of antigen for the competitive form of the immunoassay.
Macroporous polyester non-woven cloths (DuPont SONTARA~M
8100) were incubated with 50 ~l per 6 x 6 mm piece of 2 ~g/ml solution of B. abortus lipopolysaccharide in PBS, overnight at room temperature. The cloths were then washed with PBST. Each cloth was incubated for 30 min, at room temperature, with 25 ~l of either of the following preparations: 50 ~l of PBS containing 2019~

90 ng of B. abortus lipopolysaccharide plus 25 ~l of antibody-horseradish peroxidase conjugate diluted 10,000 X in PBST, 50 ~l of P~S containing a ng of lPS plus 25 ~l of diluted conjugate, 50 ~l of PBS containing 0.9 ng of lipopolysaccharide plus 25 ~l of diluted conjugate, or 50 ~l of PBS alone plus 25 ~l of diluted conjugate.
The cloths were then washed with PBST and assayed for HRP by immersion in 0.5 ml of ABTS-indicator for 90 min, at room tem-perature. The reaction was stopped by addition of 0.5 ml of O.lMNaF, and absorbances were read at 650 nm. The results of this experiment are recorded in Table 9 below.
Table 9 - Competitive Immunoassay for the Detection of B. Abortus Lipopolysaccharide LPS (ng) A,_ Visual observation applied per cloth 1 ~ 2 0.02 0.01 yes 3 O.lZ7 Q.11~ ves 0.3 0.22 0.20 no o o.~0 0.23 --The results show clearly that at least 30 ng and 3 ng of lipopolysaccharide were detectable by simple visual examination, where the corresponding samples produced less colour than the control. However, it is equally important to note that the assay might successfully detect even lower quantities of lipopolysac-charide by colorimetric measurement. The assay offers the dis-tinct advantages of providing an internal control for conjugate 2 ~ 8 quality and requiring only one incubation step for the decisive immunological reaction. Such advantages make the competitive assay more easily adaptable for field testing.
It is believed that the detectability limit of this assay may be improved by coating the macroporous polyester cloth with a limited quantity of antigen, making the free antigen present in the test sample more competitive for the conjugate.
An improved enzyme-antibody conjugate having a higher speci-fic activity has also been provided which should allow for the use of highly diluted conjugate in the assay, thus describing the quantity of free antigen required to prevent attachment of the conjugate to the cloth ~thus increasing the sensitivity of anti-gen detection).
VII Detection of Antibodies Usinq Antiqen-Coated Cloth VII(a) PreParation of BSA-Coated Cloths BSA was dissolved at 10 ~g/ml in 0.01 M sodium phosphate buffered (pH 7.2)-0.85% NaCl (PBS). As used herein, the abbre-viation BSA means Brucella Serum Antibody. Fifty microliters of BSA solution was added to a macroporous hydrophobic cloth segment ~6 mm square, numbered by pencil) placed in a Petri dish. After overnight incubation at room temperature, the cloth was washed 5 times with a total volume of 5 ml PBS containing 0.05% TWEEN~
20, and stored in PBS at 4C until use. The activity of the cloths remained unchanged for at least 3 months. For the purpose of comparison, each well of the microtiter plate was similarly coated with 100 ~1 of the BSA solution and washed.

20~9~

VII(b) Enzvme ImmunoassaY Procedure Fifty microliters of rabbit anti-BSA serum was added either to a BSA-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloth segment (placed over a plastic sheet) or to a microtiter well and incubated at room temperature for 0.5 to 30 min. The cloth segment was then placed on an absorbent pad (e.g., a disposable diaper) using forceps and washed 5 times dropwise with a total volume of 0.3 ml TWEENI~ 20. Each well of the microtiter plate was washed 5 times with a total volume of about 2 ml TWEENT~ 20. Fifty microliters of anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase conjugate (diluted 1:1000 in PBST) was added to each cloth segment or microtiter plate well. After incubation at room temperature for 1 to 30 min, each cloth or microtiter well was washed as above, and incubated with 250 ~l of the peroxidase substrate (10 mM ABTS and 0.5 mM hydrogen peroxide in 0.05 M sodium citrate buffer, pl~ 4.5). After 30 min incuba-tion at room temperature, signals (absorbance at 414 nm) were determined using an EIA plate reader (Bio-Tek Inc. Model No. EL
307).
0 VII(c) Comparison of Various Cloths as Enzvme Immunoassa~
Adsorbents Four types of commercially available cloths were compared for their capacity as enzyme immunoassay adsorbents of BSAC ~a model protein antigen). The cloths were coated with BSA, and were then incubated for 30 min with either anti-BSA rabbit serum (diluted 1:100,000 in PBST) or similarly diluted normal rabbit serum devoid of anti-BSA antibodies (negative control). After 20190~8 washing, the captured anti-BSA IgG (a model test substance) was assayed by incubation with the anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase con-jugate for 30 min followed by the peroxidase assay for 30 min as described above.
Table 10. Comparison of the Enzyme Immunoassay Performed on Various BSA-Coated Cloths Cloth type Abs~rbance at 414 nm (+ standard error, n=4) : anti-eSA serum nor~2~ serum polyester0.38 + 0.02 0.02 + 0.0 polypropylene 0.12 + 0.0~ 0.03 + 0.0 po 1 yethyl ene 0.30 + 0.02 0.03 + 0.0 ; cotton 0.25 + 0.04 û.l~ + 0.03 Table 10 shows that the highest specific signal (absorbance at 414 nm) was obtained with the BSA-coated macroporous polyester cloth, and that the cotton cloth was unsuitable since it gave a ~: :
high background. Thus, macroporous polyester cloth was used as a ~;~ solid phase in further examples of this invention in the subse-quent enzyme immunoassay.
VII(d) ComParison of Cloth and Plate Under 30-min ~20 Immunoreactions After 30 min incubations for the two immunoreactions, the ~; ~ signals of the enzyme immunoassay using the macroporous polyester cloth were then compared to those of a polystyrene microtiter plate over a wide range of concentrations of the test substance (anti-BSA IgG). A series of ssA-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloth segments and microtiter plate wells were incubated for 30 min with doubling dilutions of the anti-BSA serum in PBST (and 0 ~ 8 normal serum as a negative control~, starting with a 1:1000 dilution in the series. After washing, hoth adsorption supports were incubated for 30 min with the anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase conjugate as above. The signals of the 30-min peroxidase assay are shown in Fig. S. At the lower serum dilution, the macro-porous polyester cloth produced significantly greater signals than the microtiter plate. This difference decreased at the higher dilutions and both supports gave a similar limit of detection ~about 1:256,000). The negative controls exhibited very low signals for both supports.
VII(e) Comparison of Cloth and Plate Under Shorter Reaction Times Macroporous polyester cloth (Dupont SONTARA~ 8100) has a thickness of 1.02 mm and its 6 mm square segment totally absorbed the 50 ~1 sample, permitting all the sample molecules to react over a large surface area. On the other hand, the microtiter plate well provided only a partial contact with the sample mole-cules over a limited surface area. This accounts for the differ-ences observed in Fig. 5. Using this advantage of the macro-porous polyester cloth, it is possible to reduce immunoreaction times for the enzyme immunoassay using the method of this inven-tion.
BSA-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloth segments and micro-titer plate wells were incubated with either anti-BSA rabbit serum (diluted 1:100,000) or similarly diluted normal rabbit serum for 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20 min. They were then washed, 201904~

and incubated for 30 min with the IgG-peroxidase conjugate. The signals of the 30 min peroxidase assay are shown in Fig. 6A. Sig-nificant signals were observed in as short as 0.5 min incubation of the sample with the cloth and only after 5 min incubation with the microtiter plate.
The time for the enzyme immunoassay can be further reduced by reducing the time~of the second immunoreaction (between the captured IgG and the antibody-enzyme conjugate). The above com-parison was repeated using a fixed incubation period of 2 min forthe first immunoreaction ~with anti-BSA serum) and varying the period of the second immunoreaction. Fig. 6B shows that an incu-bation period of 10 min of the polyester cloth with the conjugate was sufficient to produce a significant ~ignal that can be used - for the enzyme immunoassay, whereas the microtiter plate produced only weak signals throughout the range of incubation periods tested.
In Fig. 5, the enzyme immunoassay signals of the macroporous polyester cloth and microtiter plate were compared over a range of serum dilutions using 30 min incubations for both immunoreac-tion steps (serum and conjugate incubations). In respect of incubation times, Fig. 6A shows the effect of varying the incuba-tion time with the serum from 0.5 to 20 min while keeping the conjugate incubation time fixed at 30 min. Fig. 6R shows the effect of keeping the serum incubation fixed at 2 min while vary-ing the conjugate incubation time from 1 to 20 min.

20190~8 VIII(a~ Preparation of Lipopolvsaccharide-Coated Cloth for Enzvme Immunoassav S~lmonella tvphimurium lipopolysaccharide (Sigma, No.
L-6511) was suspended in PBS-EDTA (pH 7.2) at 10 ~g~m~, then heated at 100C for 10 min. Segments (6 mm squares) of macro-porous polyester cloth ~DuPont SONTARAT~ 8100) were each incu-bated with 50 ~l of the LPS suspension for 16 h at room tempera-ture, then washed with PBST and stored at 4C in PBS. The anti-gen activity of the lipopolysaccharide-cloth remained stable for at least 3 months.
VIII(b) Determination of Initial Rate of Immunoreaction on LipoPolvsaccharide-Cloths The lipopolysaccharide-cloth segments were placed on an absorbent pad using forceps, and 100 ~l of goat antibody standard or rabbit serum diluted in PBS was pipetted onto each segment, one at a time, and al lowed to be drawn through the macroporous hydrophobic cloth by the absorbing action of the pad. The cloth segments were then immediately rinsed dropwise with ca. 0.5 ml of PBST, and transferred to a Petri dish. The segments were then incubated with 5.0 ~l of the anti-goat (or anti-rabbit) IgG
antibody-horseradish peroxidase conjugate for 2-10 min. The segments were then washed with PBST as before and incubated in 0.5 ml of 10 mM 2-2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and 0.5 mM H202 in 0.05 M sodium citrate ~pH 4.5) for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by addition of 0.5 ml of 0.1 M NaF, and the absorbance at 414 nm ~A414) was determined.

All immunoreactions and peroxidase reactions were carried out at room temperature (ca. 25C).
In experiments using Salmonella lipopolysaccharide antigen-coated polyester cloth and a standard preparation of purified goat anti-Salmonella antibody (CSA-l) as a model system Fig. 8 shows that, as antibody concentration is increased, the cloth enzyme immunoassay signal increases proportionally in an assay using an instantaneous exposure of the LPS-cloth to the antibody solution and three different incubation periods with conjugate.
Figure 8 also shows that significant cloth enzyme immunoassay signals can be produced on the cloth using conjugate incubations as short as 2 min, which will considerably shorten the total time required to complete the assay.
When applied to the detection of anti-Salmonella antibodies in the serum of a rabbit previously inoculated with Salmonella antigens, the instantaneous cloth enzyme immunoassay was able to quantitatively detect the antibodies in a manner paralleling the results obtained using the conventional "end point" method of determing antibody titers (Fig. 9). Thus, the instantaneous cloth enzyme immunoassay reliably provided quantitative results in an actual test subject.
IX(a) Enzvme ImmunoassaY Usinq a Microtiter Plate A 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate (Corning, No. 25805-96) was incubated with 200 ~l/well of 2 ~g/ml of heated Salmo-nella typhimurium lipopolysaccharide in PBS-EDTA for 16 h. The wells were then washed 4 x with PBST, and then incubated with 2~9~ ~8 100 ~l of serially diluted rabbit serum in PBS for 30 min. The plate was then washed with PBST as above, and incubated with 100 ~l/well of the anti-rabbit IgG antibody-horseradish peroxi-dase conjugate for 30 min. After washing with PBST, each wellwas then incubated with 200 ~l of ABTS indicator solution for 30 min, and the A414 was determined using a microtitier plate reader. Serum titiers were determined as the maximum dilution factor which produced a signal nearest an A~l~ value of 0.2.
0 IX(b) Assay of Goat Anti-Salmonella Antibody Based on the Initial Rate of Immunoreaction The advantages of the cloth-based enzyme immunoassay in providing rapid immunoreactions and ease of washing (1) were applied here to measure the initial rate of immunoreaction during an instantaneous exposure of the antibody to the immobilized antigen ~first immunoreaction). Segments (6 mm squares) of macroporous polyester cloth (1.0 mm thick) were coated with Sal-monella lipopolysaccharide and placed on a water absorbent pad.
One hundred ~l of affinity purified goat anti-Salmonella antibody at various concentrations was passively absorbed through the segments into the pad, and the segments were immediately washed 5 times dropwise. This process took about 8 seconds for each sample. After all the samples were processed, the segments were incubated for 2, 5 or 10 min with anti-goat IgG antibody-peroxi-dase conjugate (second immunoreaction), then washed and developedin the peroxidase chromogenic solution for 30 min. Fig. 8 shows that the resulting colour was proportional to the concentration 20~9~

of the antibody standard within certain ranges (which decreased with the time of the second immunoreaction). Therefore, this cloth enzyme immunoassay permits the quantitative assay of anti-bodies on the basis of the initial rate of immunoreactionobserved during the instantaneous exposure of the antibody to the immobilized antigen. Longer second immunoreactions produced higher signals, but the increase was not proportional to the time of the reaction since the amount of the conjugate used became rate-limiting with longer reactions. The use of more concen-trated conjugate should increase the signals and the range of proportionality, if desired.
IX(c) Assay of Anti-Salmonella Antibody in Serum Although the cloth enzyme immunoassay allowed for quanti-tation of the purified antibody, the following additional test was carried out in the assay of antibodies in serum. A rabbit was intravenously injected with ~ antigens to induce the formation of serum antibodies to the lipopolysaccharide antigen.
After 20 days from the first injection, a second injection of antigen was administered to allow for a rapid increase in anti-bodies (predominantly IgG). Serum sampled at different times was then assayed by both the cloth enzyme immunoassay and the end-point method using an lipopolysaccharide-coated microtiter plate as described above. Since the effective quantitation of antibody occurs within a certain range of concentrations ~Fig. 7), it was necessary to dilute the serum samples prior to assay in order to achieve a suitable sample concentration. Fig. 9A shows that when 2 ~ g serum was diluted 1:100 the cloth enzyme immunoassay was able to show definite increases in antibody levels in a manner reflecting the titers obtained by the endpoint method. Serum taken from the animal on day 1 (prior to immunization) was also tested in the cloth enzyme immunoassay at various dilutions and failed to pro-duce any detectable enzyme signal in the assay. When fixed serum dilutions were allowed to incubate with the wells of an LPS-coated microtiter plate using 30 min first and second immuno-reactions a similar pattern of antibody detection was o~tained ata serum dilution of 1:1000 (Fig. 9B). Thus, the cloth enzyme immunoassay was able to detect change in the serum antibody level of an immunized animal during progression of the immune response in a manner comparable to the two most common enzyme immunoassay methods.
The measurement of anti-Salmonella antibody by initial rate of immunoreaction is shown in Figure 8. Lipopolysaccharide-cloth segments were instantaneously reacted with a goat anti-SalmQnella antibody standard at various concentrations, and then incubated with an anti-goat IgG antibody-peroxidase conjugate for either 2, 5, or 10 min, then assayed for bound peroxidase activity as des-cribed in Methods. Bound enzyme activity is expressed as mean A4~4 + standard error (n=4).
Figures 9A and 9B show assays of anti-Salmonella antibody in rabbit serum. A rabbit was given two intravenous injections of a S. typhimurium antigen suspension twenty days apart. Serum was sampled on day 1 (prior to first injection), day 20 (prior to 20190~

second injectionJ, and at ten-day intervals thereafter. Serum samples were diluted 1:10, 1:100, 1:1000, 1:10,000, or 1:20,000 in PBS, and were then assayed for anti-Salmonella antibody using (A) the macroporous hydrophobic cloth enzyme immunoassay with instantaneous exposure of serum (using a 5 min. further immuno-reaction) as described above, or (B) by incubation of each sample with the well of an lipopolysaccharide-coated microtiter plate for 30 min followed by washing and a further 30 min incubation with anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase conjugate. Serum samples assayed by both methods prior to immunization (day lJ failed to produce detectable enzyme signals. Bound enzyme signals are expressed as mean A4,4 ~ standard error (n=4). Anti-Salmonella antibody titers were determined for each sample using the endpoint method.
Serum titiers were 0 (day 1); 3,260 (day 20); and 13,040 (days 30 and 40).
X Detection of Salmonella Antibodies in Eqq Yolk Usinq LPS-Coated Cloths X(a) Preparation of LPS-Coated Cloths In order to establish that cloth enzyme immunoassay using antigen coated macroporous hydrophobic cloths, e.g., lipopoly-saccharide coated macroporous polyester cloths, could be used for the rapid assay of specific antibodies in a viscous sample, the following example shows the use for the rapid assay of specific antibodies in an egg yolk sample, which is one possible appli-cation of the method.

20~9~

Nonwoven macroporous polyester cloth (DuPont, SONTARAT~
8100) was cut into 6 mm square segments. For coating the cloth segments, Salmonella typhimurium lipopolysaccharide was dissolved at 10 ~g/ml in PBS containing 0.05 M ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) (pH 7.2) and then heated at 100C for 10 min. Each clGth segment was then incubated with 50 ~l of the EDTA-heat-treated lipopolysaccharide solution for 16 h at room temperature, and then washed with a total of 5 ml of PBST on a filter under suction. The lipopolysaccharide-coated polyester cloth segments (LPS-cloth) were stored in PBS at 4C.
Xtb) Detection of Salmonella Chicken egg yolk was diluted 1:5 in PBS, and a 10 ~1 sample was incubated with each lipopolysaccharide-cloth for 5 min at room temperature in a Petri dish. The cloths were then placed on an absorbent pad (a disposable diaper) and each segment was washed 10 times dropwise with a total of about 1 ml of TWEEN~
20. The cloths were then returned to a clean Petri dish and incubated with 50 ~l of the anti-chicken IgG-peroxidase conjugate for 5 min at room temperature, then washed with TWEENs~ 20 as above. Peroxidase was assayed by shaking each cloth segment in 0.5 ml of substrate solution (10 mM 2-2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenz-thiazoline sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and 0.5 mM H2O2 in 0.05 M pH 4.5 sodium citrate buffer) for 15 min at room temperature. The enzyme reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.5 ml of 0.1 M
NaF, and the developed substrate solution was transferred to a 20~0~

1 ml-capacity cuvette (1 cm light path) and its absorbance at 414 nm (A414) was determined.
XI~a) Detection of IqG in Chicken Eqq Yolks.
In instances where the viscosity of the test sample (e.g., egg yolk) may affect the result of the assay (e.g., give limited diffusion rate), a longer (e.g., 5 min) incubation of the sample with the LPS-coated cloth should be used, rather than "instan-taneous" incubations as described above. This still provides a rapid assay.
XI(b) Specificity of Eqq Yolk Antibodies Adsorbed onto LPS-Cloth Ten macroporous polyester cloth segments (6 mm squares) were incubated with 1 ml of an S. tYphimurium lipopolysaccharide solu-tion (100 ~g/ml) prepared as above for 16 h at room temperature.
The cloths were then washed with PBS and incubated with 1 ml of egg yolk diluted 1:5 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, and then washed with PBS. They were then blotted, and the adsorbed anti-bodies were eluted by shaking the cloths in 1 ml of 0.1 M gly-cine-HCl (pH 2.2) for 5 min at room temperature. The liquid containing the eluted antibodies was then removed and neutralized by the addition of 0.2 volume of 1.0 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The eluted antibodies were assayed immediately by the cloth enzyme immunoassay on polyester cloth coated with various lipopolysac-charide antigens.

2~9~

XI~c~ Cloth-Based Enz~rme Immunoassay of Anti-LiPopolYsaccharide I~G in Eqq Yolk To demonstrate the presence of anti-lipopolysaccharide IgG
in egg yolk, the yolks of a number of chicken eggs collected from various local ~i.e., the Ottawa, Canada region) independent pro-duce retailers were screened by the cloth enzyme immunoassay.
Macroporous polyester cloth segments were coated with lipopoly-saccharide from either S. typhimurium, E. coli K-235, E. coli 0127: B8, or P. aeruginosa, and were used for the capture of IgG
from the yolks. The captured IgG was then detected with the anti-chicken IgG-peroxidase conjugate. Of the yolks screened initially, 2 (yolks A and B) produced considerable cloth enzyme immunoassay signals using the Salmonella lipopolysaccharide-cloth (see Table 11, below). These egg yolks also produced varying cloth enzyme immunoassay signals using the non-Salmonella lipo-polysaccharide-cloths. This suggests that in addition to anti-Salmonella IgG, the egg yolks also contain IgG specific for vari-ous non-Salmonella lipopolysaccharide antigens.
In order to confirm that the signals on the Salmonella lipo-polysaccharide-cloth were due to the presence of anti-Salmonella IgG, antibodies from yolk A or B adsorbed onto S. tvphimurium LPS-cloth were eluted with pH 2.2 buffer and immediately neu-tralized as described above. These eluted antibodies were then subjected to the enzyme immunoassay using the Salmonella lipo-polysaccharide-cloth or various non-Salmonella lipopolysaccha-ride-cloths for antibody capture as before. Table 12 ~below) 2 ~ 4 8 shows that IgG eluted from S. typhimurium lipopolysaccharide-cloth gave significant signals with the Salmonella lipopolysac-charide-cloth but not with the non-Salmonella lipopolysaccharide-cloths. This confirms that the cloth enzyme immunoassay signalsobtained using the Salmonella lipopolysaccharide-cloth (see Table 11) were due to the presence of anti-Salmonella IgG in the yolks.
The specificity of yolk A IgG for the lipopolysaccharide of Salmonella species other than S. typhimurium was also tested in the cloth enzyme immunoassay. Macroporous polyester cloth seg-ments were coated with lipopolysaccharide from three Salmonella species in addition to S. typhimurium and used in the assay of serial dilutions of yolk A. Fig. 7 shows that cloth segments coated with S. typhimurium lipopolysaccharide produced the highest signals at all dilutions, followed by those coated with S. typhosa, then S. enteritidis, and finally S. minnesota.
Uncoated cloth (no lipopolysaccharide) did not produce a signi-ficant signal at any dilution, confirming that the signals are due to the lipopolysaccharide on the cloth. Since S. typhimurium is one of the most common Salmonella contaminants of chickens, it is likely that the yolk ~ontains predominantly anti-S. tYphi-murium IgG which shows cross-reactivity with the other Salmonella species. Antibody reactivities to the antigens of Salmonella species which were not tested may also be present. Since the signals progressively decreased with increasing dilutions of the yolk, this enzyme immunoassay appears to be quantititive and is 2~9~&

believed to be useful for the measurement of anti-Salmonella IgG
levels in egg yolks.
XI(d) Relative Anti-Salmonella IqG Levels in Eqqs from ~ri~ r-e-Since macroporous polyester cloth coated with S. typhimuriwn lipopolysaccharide appears to be suitable for use in the cloth enzyme immunoassay of anti-Salmonella IgG in egg yolk, a number of eggs obtained from various sources were screened in order to determine if any fluctuation in anti-Salmonella IgG lev~ls could be detected. Egg yolks were screened by the enzyme immunoassay using S. t~phimurium lipopolysaccharide-cloth and a fixed dilu-tion of the yolk in order to measure differences in the extent of immunoreaction (as judged by the cloth enzyme immunoassay signal) according to the level of specific IgG present. Table 13 (below~
shows that out of 113 eggs screened, the majority of those obtained from 3 out of 4 local (i.e., in the Ottawa, Canada area) independent produce retailers and 2 major supermarket chains (also in the Ottawa, Canada area) produced lower cloth enzyme immunoassay signals (i.e., within an arbitrarily defined A414 range of 0-0.6). Signals from the egg yolks of the remaining independent produce retailers were also generally low, but at least 2 of the yolks gave high signals ~A4,4 > 1.0). On the other hand, the majority of eggs obtained from a small local farm produced generally high signals (A4~4 > 0.6), with only 6 out of 18 eggs tested responding in the lower ranges. Although no epi-demioLogical information was available, it is believed that those 2 ~

sources of eggs exhibiting a significant proportion of yolks giving high cloth enzyme immunoassay signals (hence, elevated anti-Salmonella IgG levels) have had some contact with Salmonella organisms. This is expecially likely in the case of the small local farm, where sanitary conditions may not meet the same stan-dards as rearing facilities supplying the larger retailers.
Figure 7 shows the detection of egg yolk A IgG to various _almonella species. Macroporous polyester cloth segments were coated with lipopolysaccharide from either S. tYPhimurium, S.
typhosa, S. minnesota, S. enteritidis, or no lipopolysaccharide.
The cloths were then used in the of various dilutions of egg yolk A in PBS.
Table 11. Cloth Enzyme Immunoassay of Anti-LPS IgG in Egg Yolk A j,~
LPS Yolk ~ Yolk ~

S . tvoh i mur i um 1 . 35 + 0 . 1 1 0 . 45 + 0 . 04 E. col i K-235 0.80 + 0.0~ 0.51 + 0.03 E. coli 0127:BB 0.37 + 0.05 0.31 + 0.05 P. aeruainosa 0.1~ + 0.01 0.25 + 0.03 ' Macroporous polyester cloth segments were coated with lipo-polysaccharide from either S. typhimurium or a variety of non-Salmonella Gram-negative bacteria. These lipopolysaccharide-cloths were then used in the enzyme immunoassay of IgG from two chicken egg yolks ~A and B), which had been identified as having 2 ~ L~

considerable levels of anti-Salmonella IgG during the preliminary screening of a number of eggs.
Mean A4l4 value + standard error (n=4).

Table 12. Specificity of Egg Yolk IgG After Elution from S.

Typhimurium LPS-Cloth ~

. Q b LPS Yolk Q Yolk 3 5 . tvoh i mur i um 0 . 51 + 0 . 04 0 . 20 + 0 . OZ
E. coli K-235 0.08 + 0.0 0.05 + 0.0 E. coli 0l27:B5 0.0~ + O.Ol 0.05 + 0.0 P . aeruo i nosa 0 . 06 + 0 . 0 0 . 04 + 0 . 0 ~ Antibodies from either egg yolk A or B adsorbed to S. t~phi-murium lipopolysaccharide-cloth were eluted with pH 2.2 buffer and then immediately neutralized.
The eluted samples were then subjected to the enzyme immuno-assay using macroporous polyester cloth segments coated with - lipopolysaccharide from S. typhimurium or various other non-Sal-monella Gram-negative bacteria.
~ Mean A414 value + standard error (n=4).

2 ~

Table 13. Relative anti-Salmonella IgG levels in eggs from various sources A

No. of eggs within absorbance range Source ~ 0-0.2 0.2-0.40.4-0.~0.~-0.8 0.8-1.0 >1.0 1 (1~) 11 4 1 0 0 0 2 (28) 17 ~ Z 1 0 2 3 (19) 15 4 0 0 0 0 4 (8) 1 5 2 0 0 0 5 (18) 3 3 0 1 4 7 ~ ~12) ~ 4 7 (12) 7 4 1 0 0 0 ~ Fresh egg yolks from a variety of sources were diluted 1:5 in PBS and assayed for anti-Salmonella IgG by the cloth enzyme immunoassay using S. typhimurium lipopolysaccharide-cloth. Yolks were assayed in triplicate ~n=3) and the mean A414 value was used to determine the absorbance range (in 0.2 absorbance unit incre-ments) assigned to each yolk.
Sources No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 are separate independent produce retailers, source No. 5 is a small local (i.e., in the Ottawa, Canada area) farm, and sources No. 6 and 7 are major supermarket chains. The numbers in brackets indicate the total number of eggs tested from each source.

2~1 9~4g XII(a) Detection of Salmonella Antiqens In Chicken Meat Usinq Cloth Enxvme Immunoassay The cloth enzyme immunoassay using macroporous polyester cloth as the adsorbent for the capture antibody was performed as follows.
Macroporous polyester cloth (DuPont, SONTARA~M 8100) was cut into 6-mm square segments. Each segment was incubated with 50 ~1 of the CSA-l antibody (50 ~g/ml in PBS) for 6-16 h at room tem-perature, then thoroughly washed with 5 ml PBST using a vacuum filtration apparatus. The antibody-coated cloths were stored in PBS at 4-C and remained stable for at least 3 months. 50~1 of antigen sample was pipetted onto each antibody-coated cloth in a petri dish and incubated for 30 min (unless otherwise stated) at room temperature, then the cloths were placed on an absorbent pad (a disposable diaper) and washed five times dropwise with a total of about 0.3 ml of TWEENTM 20. The cloths were returned to a clean Petri dish and incubated with 50 ~1 of the CSA-1 antibody-horseradish peroxidase conjugate for 30 min at room temperature.
The cloths were then washed with TWEEN~ 20 as before and incubated in 0.5 ml of 10 mM 2'-2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothi-azoline sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and 0.5 mM H202 in 0.05 M sodium citrate (pH 4.5) for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by addition of 0.5 ml of 0.lM ~aF, and the absorbance at 414 nm (A414) was determined.

2Q~sa~

XII(b) Chicken Breast Paste Fresh grade A chicken breast meat was obtained locally (i.e., in the Ottawa, Canada area) and blended to a paste using a food processor and inoculated with Salmonella, then analysed by the enzyme immunoassay immediately or after enrichment for 16 h at 37DC in tetrathionate and selenite cystine or nutrient broth.
XIII Enzvme Immunoassay After Concentration of Antiqens onto Antibody-Coated Cloth Macroporous polyester cloth was cut into 1-cm diameter discs and each was incubated with 100 ~1 of the CSA-1 antibody (50 ~g/ml in PBS) for 6-16 h, at room temperature. Each disc was then inserted at the bottom of an 1 cm diameter QUIK-SEP~ dis-posable polypropylene column (Isolab, Inc. No. QS-U). Solid-free samples were then passed (by gravity flow) through the columns at a flow rate of 25-50 ml/h. As unconcentrated controls, 100 ~1 aliquots of the samples were incubated with antibody-coated cloth discs in a petri dish for 60 min, then treated as below. Upon passage of the entire samples through the columns, the discs were then incubated in situ (in the column) with 100 ~1 of the CSA-1 antibody-horseradish peroxidase conjugate for 30 min, washed with PBST (4 ml per column), and incubated in situ with 1 ml of ABTS
for 30 min with gentle agitation of the column. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 1 ml of 0.1 M NaF, and the absorbance (414 nm) of the effluent from the column was determined.

~19~4~

XIV Effect of EDTA and Heat on Cloth EnzYme Immunoassay of Salmonella Antiqen Treatment with 10 mM EDTA at room temperature is known to release lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from ~ashgLiL~l~ coli~ Salmo-nella anatum, and S. minnesota. Also, heat-killed Salmonella cells have been widely used as an antigen source for antibody production. The effect of both EDTA and heat treatments on the detection of Salmonella antigens by cloth enzyme immunoassay was studied using S. ty~himurium as a model antigen. Washed S.
typhimurium cells were suspended at 3 x 107 cells/ml in various concentrations of EDTA in PBS (EDTA-PBS), and 1-ml portions were either heated at 100C for 10 min or left at room temperature.
50~1 suspensions (containing 1.5 x 106 cells) or EDTA-PBS alone ~negative control) were then incubated for 30 min with 6-mm squares of macroporous polyester cloths which had been pre-coated with anti-Salmonella antibody. The captured antigen was detected by the antibody-horseradish peroxidase conjugate. Fig. 10 shows that EDTA treatments at room temperature enhanced the cloth enzyme immunoassay signal (at all EDTA concentrations tested) in comparison with the untreated cells. However, a combination of EDTA and heat treatment gave even greater enhancement. The EDTA
enhancement was maximal at 50 mM EDTA and declined at the higher EDTA concentrations. Meating Salmonella cells in 50 mM EDTA
caused a four-fold increase in the cloth enzyme immunoassay signal as compared to the untreated cells. The negative controls show negligible signals which were not affected by the EDTA

treatment. At 50 mM EDTA, 2 min heating tof 1 ml of cell suspen-sion) was found to be sufficient, but heating for at least 10 min is recommended to ensure the killing of all Salmonella cells for safer handling.
When EDTA-heat-treated cells were centrifuged at 10 000 x g for 10 min approximately 85% of the total antigenic activity (determined by the cloth enzyme immunoassay) was found in the supernatant (data not shown). It is therefore believed that the treatment caused the dissociation of the cell-associated antigens into smaller non-sedimentable units.
XV Kinetics of Immunoreactions of the EDTA-Heat-Treated Antiqens In the above examples, the EDTA-heat-treated cells were allowed 30 min to react with antibody adsorbed onto the cloth.
The captured antigens were then detected by 30 min incubation with the conjugate followed by 30 min. incubation with the peroxidase substrate. Fig. 11 shows the effect of varying the immunoreaction time of EDTA-heat-treated and untreated cells with the adsorbed antibody, while maintaining other reaction condi-tions as above. After as little as 0.5 min immunoreaction, thetreated cells gave significant enzyme immunoassay signals, whereas the untreated cells produced only barely detectable signals. These results confirm that the EDTA-heat-treatment dissociates _almonella antigens into smaller units which react faster with the a~sorbed antibody.

2~190~

XVI Detection of Salmonella in Chicken Meat Since EDTA-heat treatment allows for the extraction of Sal-monella antigens into a supernatant after centrifugation, it should also be possible to prepare solid-free antigens from solid-rich Salmonella samples. As an example, the extraction of Salmonella antigens from chicken breast was examined. For this, _ concentrations of EDTA higher than 50 mM may be required since the effective concentration of EDTA will be reduced by the divalent ions present in the meat. Therefore, chicken breast paste was inoculated with Salmonella !6 x lOa cells per g of paste), and heated in various EDTA concentrations. The antigens ex-tracted in the supernatants were assayed by the cloth enzyme immunoassay. Fig. 12 shows that the EDTA-heat treatment extracted the antigens from the meat most efficiently in the range of 0.2 M to 0.5 M EDTA (judged from the cloth enzyme immunoassay signals) and that the uninoculated samples gave negligible signals ~above the background) which were unaffected by the different EDTA concentrations.
XVII Concentration of Dissociated Antiqens on Antibodv-Coated Cloths The above examples show that Salmonella antigens can be extracted into a solid-free liquid. However, in practice the concentration of the antigens in the sample liquid may not be sufficiently high to be detected by the cloth enzyme immunoassay.
Since larger volumes of the sample liquid can be passed through the antibody-coated cloth because of its macroporosity, it should 2 0 ~

be possible to concentrate the antigens on the cloth to a detect-able level. To demonstrate this, 10 9 of the chicken meat was inoculated with various numbers of Salmonella cells. The solid-free antigen samples were then prepared by EDTA-heat extraction and passed through the antibody-coated cloths. The concentrated antigens were assayed in situ ~i.e., in the columns) by the cloth enzyme immunoassay. Fig. 13 shows that the EDTA-heat-extracted samples could be readily concentrated by filtration through the antibody-coated cloth. After concentration the cloth enzyme immunoassay detected Salmonella in the meat inoculated at a den-sity of 2 x 103 cells/g whereas only 2 x 105 cells/g could be detected without concentration. The cloth enzyme immunoassay signals increased with increasing levels of inoculation. It is believed that even lower cell densities could be detected by this method by filtering larger volumes of liquid sample, as the macroporous polyester cloth of the present invention does not encounter difficulties with clogginy upon passage of colloidal samples, as do microporous filters, e.g., nitrocellulose and nylon membranes as in the prior art.
XVIII Detection of Salmonella Cells by Combined Enrichment-Cloth Enzyme Immunoassay The presence of extremely low num~er of viable Salmonella cells in food samples has traditionally required that the samples be enriched to higher cell densities by incubation in various growth media before identification. A series of pre-enrichment and selective enrichment steps which require a minimum of 2 days 20~90~

have previously been used to identify Salmonel~a by enzyme immu-noassay on non-porous supports. To demonstrate the possibility of detecting very low numbers of Salmonella cells, 5-g samples of the chicken meat were inoculated with approx. 50 Salmonella cells and were incubated for 16 h at 37C with lO ml of either one of two commonly used selective broths, tetrathionate and selenite cystine, or nutrient broth. The solid-free antigen samples were then prepared by EDTA-heat extraction, concentrated on the anti-body-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloths, and assayed by the cloth enzyme immunoassay. Table 14 (below) shows that all three broths tested easily allowed for the detection of the cells by the cloth enzyme immunoassay after the 16-h enrichment period, and all of these broths produced similar results in terms of the cloth enzyme immunoassay signals obtained. The reason for the elevated background signals observed in the uninoculated control samples is not clear, but the very large differences between the signals obtained for the inoculated samples and the controls allow for a very clear distinction between the two. Although nutrient broth seems adequate, in practice the use of a selective broth is preferred in order to avoid competition by other con-taminating microorganisms during enrichment. However, the sole use of a selective broth for enrichment may not permit the growth of damaged salmonella present in nutrient-deficient samples.

201~8 TABLE 14. Combined Enrichment-Cloth Enzyme Immunoassay for the Detection of Salmonella Cells in Chicken MeatA

Enrichment broth No. cells/g meat A4~4 b Tetrathionate 0 0.30 i 0 03 1.16~:0.08 Selenite cystine 0 0.25 i 0.03 1.28 i 0.06 Nutrient broth 0 0.30 i 0.02 1 .33 i 0.06 _ 0 A 5 g of the chicken breast paste was mixed with 1 ml of M 63 medium containing 0 or approx. 50 Salmonella cells, then with 10 ml of enrichment broth, and incubated for 16 h at 37C without shaking. The mixtures were then mixed with 2 ml of 1 M EDTA (pH 7.2) in PBS, autoclaved at 121C for 5 min, then centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min at 4C. The antigens in the supernatants were concentrated onto anti-body-coated cloth and assayed by the cloth enzyme immuno-assay.
~ Mean A4,4 value + standard error (n=3~.
Figure 10 shows the effect of heating Salmonella cells in various concentrations of EDTA on the cloth enzyme immunoassay signal. Washed Salmonella cells were suspended at 3 x 107 - cells/ml in PBS containing various concentrations of EDTA and heated at 100C for 10 min or left at room temperature. These samples were then processed in the cloth enzyme immunoassay as described above. A series of negative controls (no antigens), consisting of PBS containing various concentrations of EDTA

`~` 2 ~

alone, are also shown. The cloth enzyme immunoassay signals (A4~4) are plotted as mean value + standard error (n=3~.
Fig. 11 shows the kinetics of the antibody-antigen reaction fo EDTA-heat-treated and untreated Salmonella samples. Washed Salmonella cells were suspended at 3 x 107 cells/ml in PBS with or without 50 mM EDTA. The suspension in EDTA-PBS was heated at 100C for 10 min while the suspension in PBS (untreated sampleJ
was left at room temperature. The samples were then incubated with antibody-coated cloths for various lengths of time, then processed in the cloth enzyme immunoassay as described in Materi-als and Methods. The cloth enzyme immunoassay signals (A414) are plotted as mean value + standard error (n=3).
Fig. 12 shows the extraction of Salmonella antigens from chicken meat by EDTA-heat treatment. Samples (0.1 g) of chicken breast paste were mixed with 0.1 ml of PBS containing 6 x 107 Salmonella cells, or PBS alone, then heated at 100C for lO min in the presence of 0.5 ml of PBS containing various concentra-tions of EDTA. After cooling, the mixtures were centrifuged (lO,000 x g for lO min) and the antigens in the supernatants were assayed by the cloth enzyme immunoassay (30 min immunoreactions with the antigens). The cloth enzyme immunoassay signals (A414) are plotted as mean value + standard error (n=3).
Fig. 13 shows the concentration of dissociated Salmonella antigens onto antibody-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloth.
Several lO-g samples of chicken breast paste were inoculated with various numbers of Salmonella cells and then autoclaved at 121C

20~0~
- lnn -for 5 min in the presence of 50 ml of PBS containing 0.2 M EDTA
(pH 7.2). Sample solids were then removed by centrifugation ~lO,000 x g for lO min~ and the resulting supernatants were passed through antibody-coated cloth discs inserted at the bottom of columns. The captured antigens were then assayed by the cloth enzyme immunoassay after or before concentration on antibody-coated cloth.
XIX(a) AffinitY Purification and Biotinvlation of Antibodies Ten lipopolysaccharide-macroporous hydrophobic cloth seg-ments were blotted and incubated with l ml of anti-Salmonella serum in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. The segments were then washed with PBS and blotted. For biotinylation, the macro-porous hydrophobic cloth segments were suspended in l ml of 0.01 M borate-buffered (pH 8.0)-0.85% NaCl (BBS) and mixed with lO ~l of a BACHS solution (10 mg/ml in dimethylformamide). After 30-60 min incubation at room temperature wi,th occasional gentle stir-ring, the cloth segments were washed with PBS as above and blot-ted, and the bound biotinylated antibodies were eluted by shaking the segments in l ml of 0.1 M glycine-HCl (pH 2.2) for 5 min at room temperature. The eluted liquid sample was then removed with a pipette and neutralized by the addition of 0.2 volume of l.0 M
Tris-HCl (pH8.0). This solution could then be used immediately in the EIA of Salmonella antigens or stored at 4~C for at least 2 weeks. For prolonged storage at -20C, we recommend dialyzing the solution against PBS and adding bovine serum albumin (BSA) to a final concentration of 5% (w/v) as a stabilizer.

20~04~

XIX(b~ Protein Assav Proteins were measured using a commercial Coomassie protein assay (Pierce, No. 23201) which was not affected by Tris in the protein samples. BSA was used as the protein standard.
XIX(c) Determination of AntibodY Titers Fifty microliters of serially diluted antibody in PBS were applied on lipopolysaccharide marcroporous hydrophobic cloth segments and then incubated for 30 min ac room temperature in a petri dish. Each segment was then washed with PBST and then incubated with 50 ~l of anti-rabbit IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugate for 30 min as above. After washing with PBST, each segment was incubated for 30 min at 37C with 0.5 ml of 15 mM
p-nitrophenyl phosphate in 1.0 M diethanolamine buffer (pH 9.8) containing 0.5 mM mgCl2. The reaction was stopped by addition of 0.5 ml of 0.1 M Na2HP04,) and the absorbance at 404 nm (A404) was determined. Titer values were determined as the maximum dilution factor which produced an enzyme immunoassay signal nearest an A404 value of 0.2.
0 XX Test of Biotinvlated Antibodv in the Enzvme Immunoassav of Salmonella Antiqens S. tvphimurium strain LT2 was grown by shaking in DIFCO~M
buffered peptone water (BPW) at 37C to a density of about 109 cells/ml, and was then diluted with BPW to various cell densities (determined by viable counts). To solubilize the antigens (5), the samples were mixed with 0.1 volume of 0.5 M EDTA in PBS tpH
7.2), heated at 100CC for 10 min, then cooled to room temperature 2~0~

and used immediately for antigen assay by the cloth-based enzyme mmunoassay.
Macroporous polyester cloth segments (6mm squares) were incubated with 50~1 of CSA-1 antibody (50 ~g/ml in PBS) for 16 h at room temperature and then washed with PBST. The antibody-coated cloth segments were then incubated with 50 ~l of the Sal-monella samples (prepared as above) for 30 min at room tempera-ture, and washed with PBST. The cloth segments were then incu-bated with 50~1 of either biotinylated antibodies (0.05 ~g/ml in PBST) or the CSA-l and then washed with PBST. The segments treated with biotinylated antibodies were further incubated with 50 ~l of the streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate for 30 min at room temperature, then washed with PBST. Each segment was then assayed for bound alkaline phosphatase activity by incubat-ing with substrate as above.
XXI AffinitY Purification of AntibodY on Lipopolysaccharide-Cloth Salmonella LPS-coated macroporous polyester cloth was examined for its suitability as an immunoadsorbent for the purification of anti-Salmonella antibodies. Ten lipopolysac-charide-cloth segments were incubated with 1 ml of different dilutions of the antiserum and the amount of adsorbed protein eluted with pH 2.2 buffer was measured.
Figure 14 is a graph showing the recovery of total proteins from lipopolysaccharide-cloth. Ten S. typhimurium lipopolysac-2 Q ~

charide-coated macroporous polyester cloth segments (6 mm squares~ were incubated with 1 ml of different dilutions of either antiserum or normal serum in PBS for 30 min. The cloths were then washed and the antibodies eluted with 1 ml of pH 2.2 buffer, then neutralized. The samples were then assayed for total proteins. Figure 14 shows that the amount of protein recovered was maximal when the antiserum was diluted up to 4 times, but beyond this the protein recovery decreased with increasing dilutions. This indicates that antibody binding sites on the lipopolysaccharide-cloth were saturated at an input serum dilution of 1:4 and lower. Incubating the lipopolysaccharide-cloth segments with normal serum resulted in only minimal recov-ery of prot`eins at the lower serum dilutions and no measurable - recovery at serum dilutions of 1:8 and higher. This suggests that the proteins eluted from the LPS-cloth were mostly anti-Salmonella antibodies and that an antibody preparation free of non-specific serum proteins can be obtained when the antiserum is properly diluted prior to adsorption.
The recovery of the anti-Salmonella antibody titer during the affinity purification was examined by comparing the antibody titer eluted from the LPS-cloth with the original titer in the input antiserum. The antibody titer was determined in the EIA by measuring the binding of the serially diluted antibodies applied to LPS-cloth segments with an anti-rabbit igG-alkaline phospha-tase conjugate. Since the pH 2.2 buffer used in elution caused a five-fold reduction in the capacity of the antibodies to complex 20~9~

with the conjugate, it was necessary to first treat anti-Sal-monella antiserum with pH 2.2 buffer, and compare the titer of the treated antiserum with the titers of the pH 2.2 buffer-eluted samples. To avoid prolonged exposure to pH 2.2 the elution was performed only once, although repeated elution would have increased the recovery.
Figure 15 shows the recovery of anti-Salmonella antibody titer in affinity purification. Lipopolysaccharide-macroporous hydrophobic cloth segments were incubated with different dilu-tions of antiserum, and antibodies were eluted with pH 2.2 buffer then neutralized. The anti-Salmonella titers of the eluted samples were then measured by the enzyme immunoassay. Figure 15 shows that the recovery of anti-Salmonelia antibody from the original antiserum was maximal (approximately 30%) using an input serum dilution of 1:8. Thus, subsequent experiments in which antibodies were biotinylated on the lipopolysaccharide-cloth were performed.
To examine the reusability of the lipopolysaccharide macro-porous hydrophobic-cloth, the same lipopolysaccharide macroporous hydrophobic-cloth was used four times for the affinity purifi-cation of anti-Salmonella antibodies. There was no appreciable loss in the recovery of purified antibodies during the four cycles of use.

~ 201~

XXII Biotinylation of Anti-Salmonella Antibodies on b~
Biotinylation of the antibodies while immunoadsorbed on the lipopolysaccharide macroporous hydrophobic-cloth should prevent biotinylation of the antigen binding sites on the antibody mole-cules, which may reduce the affinity of the antibody for the antigen. It should also simplify the procedure since unused reaction mixture can be readily removed by washing. Therefore, the conditions for biotinylating antibodies immunoadsorbed on lipopolysaccharide macroporous hydrophobic-cloth were studied by varying the pH, biotinylating reagent concentration, and bio-tinylation time. The biotinylated antibodies were then eluted with pH 2.2 buffer and neutralized. The eluted biotinylated antibodies were reacted with Salmonella antigens captured on CSA-1 antibody-coated cloth segments to which 5 x 106 EDTA-heat-treated Salmonella cells had been applied. The bound biotinyl-ated antibodies were then detected with a streptavidin-Alkaline phosphatase conjugate.
Figure 16 is a composite graph showing the conditions for the biotinylation of i~nunoadsorbed antibodies. Antibodies adsorbed to 10 lipopolysaccharide macroporous hydrophobic-cloth segments were biotinylated using, in Figure 16A, 1 ml of BACHS
~0.2 mg/ml) suspended in either 0.01 M acetate ~pH 6.5)-0.85%
NaCl buffer, PBS (pH7.0-7.5), or BBS (pH 8.0-9.5), and a reaction time of 60 min; in Figure 16B, 1 ml of various concentrations of BACHS in BBS (pH 8.0) and a reaction time of 60 min; or in 2~a~

Figure 16C, using 1 ml of BACHS ~0.1 mg/ml in BBS (pH 8.0t and various reaction times. After pH 2.2 elution and neutralization, the biotinylated antibodies were tested in the cloth enzyme immu-noassay of Salmonella cells CEIA signals (A3,0) are plotted asmean value + S.E. (n=4).
Figure 16 shows that biotinylation (as judged by the cloth enzyme immunoassay signal) was maximal at a pH of B.0-8.5 (Fig.
16A), and a biotinylating reagent (BACHS) concentration of 0.1 mg/ml (Fig. 16B) after a reaction time of 30-60 min (Fig. 16C).
Therefore, subsequent biotinylation reactions were carried out using 0.1 mg/ml BACHS in BBS (pH 8.0) and a reaction time of 30 min. Under these conditions, the entire procedure (including the affinity purification) required less than 2 h to complete.
5 XXIII Performance of Biotinylated Antibodies in the Cloth EnzYme ImmunoassaY
The biotinylated anti-Salmonella antibodies prepared directly on lipopolysaccharide macroporous hydrophobic-cloth (B-Ab I) were compared with affinity-purified anti-Salmonella anti-bodies biotinylated in free solution (B-Ab II) and the CSA-1 antibody-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (CSA-1-AP) in the CEIA of S. typhimurium antigens. B-Ab II was prepared from antiserum by affinity-purification on lipopolysaccharide macroporous hydro-phobic-cloth as described in Methods, followed by extensive dialysis of the eluted antibodies against BBS and reaction with BACHS (0.1 mg/ml) for 30 min at room temperature, and further 2Q~ ~Q~g dialysis against PBS to remove unreacted BACHS. This procedure required a total of 2 days to complete.
The biotinylated antibodies (B-Ab I and B-Ab II~ used in combination with a streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate, and the CSA-l-AP conjugate, were tested in the cloth enzyme immu-noassay of EDTA-heat-treated Salmonella cells using CSA-l anti-body-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloth.
Figure 17 is a graph showing the cloth enzyme immunoassay of Salmonella antigens. EDTA-heat-treated S. typhimurium suspen-sions containing various cell concentrations were incubated with CSA-l antibody-coated cloth. The captured antigens were then detected using biotinylated antibodies (either B-Ab I or B-Ab II) in combination with a streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conju-gate, or a CSA-l antibody-alkaline phosphatase conjugate. Cloth enzyme immunoassay signals (A3,~) are plotted as mean value + S.E. (n=4).
Figure 17 shows that the limit of detection was about 106 Salmonella cells/ml using the B-Ab I system and about 5 x 106 cells/ml using the B-Ab II system or the CSA-1-AP conjugate.
Thus, biotinylation of the immunoadsorbed antibodies resulted in a preparation which was significantly more sensitive in the cloth enzyme immunoassay of Salmonella antigens than the antibodies biotinylated in free solution or a commercial antibody-enzyme conjugate. The higher cloth enzyme immunoassay signals obtained with the B-Ab I system may be due to protection of the antigen binding sites of the antibodies against biotinylation.

2 0 ~

7) General Observations The immunoassay device of this invention thus employs macro-porous hydrophobic cloths as surfaces. Macroporous hydrophobic fabrics (cloths) of plastics, e.g. polypropylene and polyester, are moderately priced because of their large commercial demand as textiles and filters. These cloths offer the following advan-tages over the previous adsorption supports: they can accommodate a larger volume of sample per area; have a larger surface area for binding immunoreactants and for immunoreactions; are easily washed because of minimum flow resistance; and have both strength and durability.
The immunoassay procedure for detecting antigens in test samples using antibody-coated cloths was found to be fast and simple, requiring only the most basic instruments found in most research and clinical laboratories. The assay is also designed so that a qualitative result can be obtained in field test situ-ations, where access to instrumentation is limited or non-exis-tant.
The immunoassay procedure is a rapid and simple procedure which can be applied for the direct detection of antigens in test samples. The assay can be easily and economically adapted for field testing, where a positive result could easily be distin-guished from a negative one by visual assessment of the sub-strate-indicator, (e.g. ABTS), which produces a blue-green colour in the presence of horseradish peroxidase. The "dipstick" format of the field kit makes the manipulation of antibody-coated 201~Q~3 macroporous hydrophobic cloth throughout the procedure simple and convenient, so that the test can be performed by untrained hands.
Furthermore, this format obviates the need for even common lab-oratory equipment, and all necessary reagents can be easily sup-plied in the form of a kit.
Although horseradish peroxidase was used as an indicator, any other suitable enzyme, e.g. alkaline phosphatase and galac-tosidase, can be employed in the enzyme-antibody conjugate for the detection of antigens. Also, monovalent antigens e.g. toxins (i.e., haptens) can be detected by a competitive assay form of the immunoassay method. In this form of the assay, a standard preparation of the monovalent antigen could be immobilized on the cloth surface by adsorption or via a hydrophobic carrier. A test lS sample suspected of harboring the antigen would then be mixed with an enzyme-antibody conjugate specific for that antigen and incubated with the antigen-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloth.
A negative control in which a representative sample devoid of antigen is mixed with the conjugate wou]d be incubated with a separate antigen-coated cloth. Since the presence of free anti-gen in the test sample should prevent binding of the conjugate to the macroporous hydrophobic cloth surface, the assay result would be obtained by comparing the amount of enzyme immobilized on the test cloth with that obtained on the negative control cloth.
Thus, the immunoassay is amenable to a variety of assay forms, the exact form being determined by the nature of the specific antigen being detected.

2~ 3 The results obtained indicate that several types of macro-porous hydrophobic cloths can be used as solid phases for the adsorption of antibodies. These include polypropylene, poly-ester, nylon, and polyethylene cloths, all of which were found to be suitable adsorbents for antibody, e.g. anti-Brucella antibody.
All those cloths have proven successful for the detection of antigens such as B. abortus antigens.
It has been found that whole bovine antiserum containing antibody with the appropriate antigen-specificity can be used to coat macroporous hydrophobic cloth when heated at 75C for 10 minutes. This obviates the need for purified antibody prepara-tions, which are time-consuming to produce and may entail some expense. However, in order to minimize the potential for cross-reactions it is preferred that enzyme-antibody conjugates be prepared using purified antibodies. Since the conjugate can be diluted up to 1,000 times, only a small amount of conjugate stock need be prepared in this manner, thus maintaining the ease and economy of each individual test.
The detection of Brucella abortus (the causative agent of bovine brucellosis) was used to test the utility of the method of an aspect of this invention. ~sing the hydrophobic cloth car-riers of this invention coated with whole antiserum preheated at 75C for 10 minutes, the immunoassay was able to detect 0.3 nano-grams of B. abortus lipopolysaccharide and 104 B. abortus whole cells. The macroporous polypropylene cloth-based 2 ~

immunoassay was also successfully adapted for the detection of bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) antigen.
As noted above Brucella abortus was used to examine the performance of hydrophobic cloth as adsorbents of immunoreac-tants. B. abortus causes brucellosis, a serious disease of humans and cattle. Confirmation of the brucellosis by the cul-tural diagnosis is a slow, complicated process of uncertain sensitivity. Rapid, simple and sensitive detection of Brucella antigens will facilitate confirmation and thus surveillance of brucellosis and its control.
Macroporous polypropylene cloth has been found to have excellent properties as a solid phase in the immunoassay. The fact that macroporous polypropylene filter cloth is available in a nonwoven filter cloth form gives it the added advantage of retaining a stable fabric structure (i.e., no loose edges) even under agitated conditions. Furthermore, macroporous polypro-pylene filter cloth is easily adapted for the preparation of commercial test kits.
The detection of B. abortus antigens by antibody-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloths is only one example of the method of this invention for the study of microbial antigen detection by - cloth enzyme immunoassay. The immunoassay method is amenable tothe detection of any given number of microbial antigens, provided that these are sufficiently small to be retained on the antibody-coated macroporous hydrophobic cloths throughout the assay pro-cedure. In cases where antigens, e.g. whole cells, are too large 20~0~8 for effective retention on the macroporous hydrophobic cloths, important antigenic components thereof might be dissociated from the surface by simple chemical or mechanical means so as to facilitate detection.
For example, the present invention is applicable to many immunologically reactive materials, e.g. proteins, peptides, polysaccharides, etc. which are of decisive significance for an immunological determination, i.e. the presence of these materials is the determining factor in the immunological test procedure.
These materials can be detected in the body fluids of humans and animals using immunological principles or can serve for their detection. Especially suitable immunologically-reactive materials are pathogenic and facultativeiy pathogenic organisms such as, for example, parasites, protozoa, bacteria or viruses or their immunologically active components, isolated antibodies from humans and animals, serum constituents, toxins, hormones, enzymes, alkaloids, cell and tissue extracts, substances with a small molecular weight such as, for example, insulin, anngio-;20 tensin and urokinase, biogenic amines, blood cells, particleschemically or physically covered with antigens or antibodies, such as, for example, erythrocytes or latex particles.
The following Table provides a selection of typical diseases or conditions which can be determined with the aid of the ` 2 0 ~

immunonoassay device in accordance with the present invention according to the immunologically reactive materials lyophilised thereon.
TABLE
Antiqen Disease Toxoplasma gondii Toxoplasmosis Entamoeba histolytica Amoebiasis Trypanosoma cruzi Chagas Trypanosoma gambiense/rhodesiense Sleeping sic~ness Leishmania donovani Leishmaniasis Schistosoma mansoni Schistosomiasis Echinococcus granulosus Echinococcosis Filariae Filariasis Fasciola hepatica Fascioliasis Plasmodia Malaria Candida species Candidiasis Aspergilli Asperigillosis Mycropolyspora faeni/Micromonospora vulgaris Farmer's lung Treponema pallidum Syphilis Neisseria gonorrhoeae Gonorrhea Neissseria meningitis Meningitis Brucella abortus Brucellosis Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia Australia antigen Acute hepatitis Herpes simplex virus Herpes simplex Influenza virus Flu 2 0 ~

Cell nuclei Systemic lupus erythrematosis or Scleroderma Cryptococci Cryptococcosis Torulopsis species Systemic mycosis H-antigen Salmonella (flagellar) According to aspects of the present invention, macroporous cloths of hydrophobic fibers, e.g., polyester, have advantages as adsorbents for immunoreactants in enzyme immunoassay. As com-pared to non-porous solid phases, e.g., microtiter plates, as in the prior art, they accommodate larger volumes of sample for immediate immunoreaction over a larger surface, thus yielding faster immunoreactions. The use of such cloths permits the development of rapid enzyme immunoassays that are much needed in the biotechnological and medical fields.
A second advantage of the macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloths is that they can be readily washed with small volumes of washing solutions without use of laboratory facili-ties. The method of the present invention involves washing the cloth on an absorbent pad-~e.g. a disposable diaper~ dropwise with a small volume (less than 0.5 ml) of the buffer. The absor-bent pad can be placed in a sealable disposable container if thetest sample is either toxic or pathogenic and must be contained.
These attributes are believed to make the cloth an ideal adsor-bent for enzyme immunoassay under field conditions where rela-tively small numbers of samples need to be tested.

201~

The present invention also provides, in another aspect, a simple and rapid assay for anti-Salmonella antibodies in serum or other fluids, e.g, for antibodies in chicken egg yolk. The method is believed to be useful as a tool for monitoring sanitary conditions in rearing facilities when it is firmly established that an elevated level of anti-Salmonella IgG in eggs is related to the extent of Salmonella contamination. When the use of individual cloth segments is too cumbersome for processing larger numbers of eggs, a dot blot format involving large sheets of lipopolysaccharide-cloth able to accommodate multiple samples can be used for qualitative testing.
The present invention also provides, in another aspect, a method for the application of antigen-coated polyester cloth to the rapid measurement of specific antibodies on the basis of the initial rate of immunoreaction of antibody with the immobilized antigen. This method requires only one third of the time neces-sary to complete the enzyme immunoassay using a microtiter plate as in the prior art. This time may be reduced further by the use of a more sensitive enzyme substrate system. Furthermore, this initial rate method is believed to eliminate problems with false positive reactions caused by non-specific interactions of test sample components with the solid phase, since only highly speci-fic antibodies would be expected to bind during the instantaneous incubation with the macroporous hydrophobic cloth. The rapid assay was made possible by the use of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth as the solid phase, since the macroporous 2 ~ 4 8 hydrophobic cloth provides a large surface for rapid immunoreac-tion with the antibody and allows for immediate washing after sample application to give an initial rate determination. The "instantaneous" cloth enzyme immunoassay approach is believed to have many useful applications for the rapid assay of smaller numbers (e.g., a few dozen) of antibody samples as well as other immunoreactive substances.
The present invention also provides, in another aspect, a method wherein heating Salmonella cells in EDTA leads to the dissociation of their antigens into a non-sedimentable form, which permits the preparation of solid-free liquid samples from solid-rich samples, e.g., poultry meat, for antigen detection by enzyme immunoassay. Furthermore, the dissociated antigens, because of their smaller sizes, interact more efficiently with the antibody adsorbed onto the cloth than cell-associated anti-gens. It is also believed that dissociation causes the exposure of additional epitopes which can react with the antibody used in the present studies.
The present invention also provides, in another aspect, a method for detecting low levels of antigens by concentration from large volumes of sample onto the antibody-coated cloth with or - without a prior brief enrichment step. In the case of solid-rich samples containing very high numbers of enterobacteria other than salmonellae, e.g., feces, potential problems with cross-reactions in the cloth enzyme immunoassay are believed to be eliminated by the use of a monoclonal antibody specific for Salmonella instead of the polyclonal reagent used presently. The procedure is also believed to be applicable to the detection of other EDTA-heat sensitive bacteria in solid-rich samples. Preliminary studies indicate its applicability to the detection of enteropathogenic Campylobacter.
The present invention also provides, in another aspect, a procedure wherein the anti-Salmonella antibodies in an antiserum were immunoadsorbed onto lipopolysaccharide-coated polyester cloth, biotinylated and then eluted. The biotinylated affinity purified antibody required less than 2 hours to prepare, and when used in combination with a streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate permitted the detection of 10~ Salmonella cells/ml in an enzyme immunoassay.
Thus, the present invention also provides, in another aspect, for the application of lipopolysaccharide-coated macro-porous polyester cloth in the affinity purification and biotiny-lation of anti-Salmonella antibodies. This method was not only rapid, simple and economical, but also resulted in the prepara-tion of a biotinylated antibody which permitted the sensitive detection of Salmonella antigens by the cloth enzyme immunoassay.
The method is applicable to the preparation of biotinylated anti-bodies not only to other Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Campvlo-bacter), but also to other hydrophobic antigens adsorbable to polyester cloth. In instances where antigens (e.g., some pro-teins) might be sensitive to the low pH exposure, alternative 201904~

elution conditions may be reguired if repeated use of the anti-gen-cloth is desired. Since macroporous polyester cloth has excellent flow characteristics due to its macroporosity and non-compressibility, its use in a large scale column operation forthe preparation of larger quantities of biotinylated antibodies should be feasible.

Claims

1. An immunoassay device for the detection of an antigen or the preparation of an immunoreagent, comprising the combination of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, and an antibody, specific for an antigen, directly adsorbed thereon, and directly absorbed and immobilized therein.

2. An immunoassay device for the detection of an antibody or the preparation of an immunoreagent, comprising the combination of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, and an antigen specific for an antibody directly adsorbed thereon, and directly absorbed and immobilized therein.

3. The immunoassay device of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said cloth is selected from the group consisting of woven or non-woven polypropylene, polyester, nylon, and polyethylene cloths.

4. The immunoassay device of claim 1, further comprising antigens from a selected test sample, having specificity for and being captured by said adsorbed, absorbed and immobilized antibodies.

5. The immunoassay device of claim 2, further comprising antibodies from a selected test simple, having specificity for and being captured by said adsorbed, absorbed and immobilized antigens.

6. The immunoassay device of claim 4 or claim 5, wherein said cloth is selected from the group consisting of woven or non-woven polypropylene, polyester, nylon, and polyethylene cloths.

7. The immunoassay device of claim .5, wherein said antibodies captured by said antigens may be biotinylated on said cloth.

8. The immunoassay device of claim 5, wherein said antibodies captured by said antigens on said cloth are detectable using an antiglobulin antibody-enzyme conjugate, said conjugate binding to said captured antibodies and being assayable using a chromogenic substrate.

9. The immunoassay device of claim 5, wherein said antigens are bovine serum albumin (BSA) and said antibodies are anti-BSA immunoglobulin G (IgG) from rabbit serum.

10. The immunoassay device of claim 9, wherein said anti-BSA IgG antibodies are detectable using an anti-rabbit IgG peroxidase conjugate.

11. The immunoassay device of claim 5, wherein said antigens are lipopolysaccharide.

12. The immunoassay device of claim 5, wherein said antigens are Salmonella lipopolysaccharide and said antibodies are from egg yolk.

13. The immunoassay device of claim 12, wherein said antibodies from egg yolk are detectable using an anti-chicken IgG-peroxidase conjugate.

14. The immunoassay device of claim 5, wherein said antigens are Salmonella lipopolysaccharide and said antibodies are goat anti-Salmonella antibody standards captured by said Salmonella lipopolysaccharide.

15. The immunoassay device of claim 14, wherein said captured antibodies are detectable using an anti-goat antibody-peroxidase conjugate.

16. The immunoassay device of claim 4, wherein said antibodies are from an antiserum containing an antibody specific for said antigens from a selected test sample.

17. The immunoassay device of claim 16, wherein said antibodies have been partially denatured.

18. The immunoassay device of claim 17, wherein said antibodies have been partially denatured by exposure to a low pH environment.

19. The immunoassay device of claim 17, wherein said antibodies have been partially denatured by heating.

20. The immunoassay device of claim 16, wherein said antibodies have been affinity-purified.

21. The immunoassay device of claim 4, wherein said antibodies are purified antibodies bearing a selected specificity.

22. The immunoassay device of claim 4, wherein said antibodies are from diluted antiserum.

23. The immunoassay device of claim 4, wherein said macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth is bonded to a piece of inert material other than macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, to provide an antibody-coated test strip that may be handled throughout an assay procedure.

24. A macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 p,m and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, in combination with a coating of an adsorbable antigen directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed therein, and antibodies specific for said antigen in an antiserum immunoadsorbed on said antigen coating, wherein said combination is for use in an immunoassay procedure.

25. A macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, in combination with a coating of a lipopolysaccharide directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed therein, and antibodies specific for said lipopolysaccharide from an antiserum, immunoadsorbed to said lipopolysaccharide coating, wherein said combination is for use in an immunoassay procedure.

26. The combination of claim 25, wherein said lipopolysaccharide is Salmonella lipopolysaccharide and said antibodies are anti-Salmonella antibodies specific for Salmonella lipopolysaccharide.

27. The combination of claim 25, wherein said macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth is a polyester cloth.

28. An immunoassay method for detecting an antigen, comprising: a) treating a surface of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 p.m in diameter, said cloth further having a. Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, with an antibody specific for antigen in a test sample, thereby to have said antibody directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed and immobilized therein, to provide an immunoassay cloth; b) incubating said immunoassay cloth with a, sample to be tested for the antigen, thereby to adsorb antigen thereon; c) washing said incubated cloth with a buffer to remove unadsorbed material; d) incubating said washed cloth with an enzyme-antibody conjugate prepared by coupling to an enzyme, purified antibodies specific for said antigen to be assayed; e) washing said incubated cloth with a buffer to remove unreacted conjugate; and f) detecting remaining enzyme-antibody conjugate by incubation in a chromogenic substrate indicator solution to produce a visible colour upon product formation.

29. The method of claim 28, wherein said macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth is selected from the group consisting of woven or non-woven polypropylene, polyester, nylon, and polyethylene cloths.

30. An immunoassay method for detecting an antigen, comprising: a) treating a surface of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 p,m in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability, in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, with an antibody specific for antigen in a test sample, thereby to have said antibody directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed and immobilized therein, thereby to provide an immunoassay cloth; b) applying to the surface of said immunoassay cloth, a mixture of the antigen being assayed and an enzyme-antibody conjugate prepared by coupling to an enzyme purified antibodies specific for said antigen being assayed; c) treating a control identical macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth with a mixture of said antigen being assayed and an enzyme-antibody conjugate prepared by coupling to an enzyme, purified antibodies specific for the antigen being assayed, to provide a control cloth; d) incubating both said immunoassay cloth and said control cloth substantially simultaneously; e) washing said incubated immunoassay cloth and said control with an identical buffer solution; and f) detecting said antigen by incubation of both said immunoassay cloth and said control cloth in a chromogenic substrate indicator solution to produce a visible colour upon product formation, the amount of antigen being determined by the difference in intensity of the colour between the control cloth and the immunoassay cloth.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein said cloth is selected form the group consisting of woven or non-woven polypropylene, polyester, nylon, and polyethylene cloths.

32. An immunoassay method for detecting an antibody, comprising: a) treating a surface of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, with an antigen specific for an antibody in a test sample, thereby to have said antigen directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed and immobilized therein, to provide an immunoassay cloth; b) incubating said immunoassay cloth with a sample to be tested for the antibody, thereby to adsorb antibody thereon; c) washing said incubated cloth with a buffer to remove unadsorbed material; d) incubating said washed cloth with an enzyme-antiglobulin antibody conjugate prepared by coupling to an enzyme, purified antiglobulin antibody specific for said antibody to be assayed; e) washing said incubated cloth with a buffer to remove unreacted conjugate; and f) detecting remaining enzyme-antiglobulin antibody conjugate by incubation in a chromogenic substrate indicator solution to produce a visible colour upon product formation.

33. The method of claim 32, wherein said cloth is selected from the group consisting of woven or non-woven polypropylene, polyester, nylon, and polyethylene cloths.

34. An immunoassay method for detecting an antibody, comprising: a) treating a surface of a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, with an antigen specific for an antibody in a test sample, thereby to have said antigen directly adsorbed thereon and directly absorbed and immobilized therein, thereby to provide an immunoassay cloth; b) applying to the surface of said immunoassay cloth, a mixture of the antibody being assayed and an enzyme-antiglobulin antibody conjugate prepared by coupling to an enzyme, purified antiglobulin antibody specific for said antibody being assayed; c) treating a control identical macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth with a mixture of said antibody being assayed and an enzyme-antiglobulin antibody conjugate prepared by coupling to an enzyme purified antiglobulin antibody specific for the antibody being assayed, to provide a control cloth;
d) incubating both said immunoassay cloth and said control cloth substantially simultaneously; e) washing said incubated immunoassay cloth and said control cloth with an identical buffer solution; and f) detecting said antibody by incubation of both said immunoassay cloth and said control cloth in a chromogenic substrate indicator solution to produce a visible colour upon product formation, the amount of antibody being determined by the difference in intensity of the colour between the control cloth and the immunoassay cloth.

35. The method of claim 34, wherein said cloth is selected from the group consisting of woven or non-woven polypropylene, polyester, nylon, and polyethylene cloths.

36. A method for the detection of lipopolysaccharide antigens in solid samples which method comprises: a) heating a solid sample containing Gram-negative bacteria in the presence of a chelating agent for a short period of time, thereby to chelate divalent canons, and to disrupt the lipopolysaccharide-containing outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria; b) recovering the lipopolysaccharide antigens in non-sedimentable form by separating said antigens into a solid-free liquor; c) passing said liquor through an antibody-coated macroporous hydrophobic; cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, such that the antigens in said liquor are immunoadsorbed to said antibody-coated cloth;
and d) detecting said antigens using a suitable cloth enzyme immunoassay technique.

37. A method for the detection of lipopolysaccharide antigens present in large volumes of sample which method comprises: a) using a solid-free liquor containing lipopolysaccharide antigen as the sample; b) passing said liquor through a macroporous hydrophobic cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, and being coated with antibodies specific for said lipopolysaccharide antigen such that said antigens are concentrated onto and immunoadsorbed to said antibody-coated cloth; and c) detecting said antigens using a suitable cloth enzyme immunoassay technique.

38. An immunoassay method for detecting an antigen comprising the steps of: a) treating a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than about 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2-.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, with antigen, thereby to provide an antigen surface-treated cloth; b) applying to the surface of said antigen treated cloth a mixture of the antigen to be detected and an enzyme-antibody conjugate, wherein the antibody is specific for both the antigen to be detected and the antigen adsorbed onto said cloth, thereby to provide an antigen/enzyme-antibody conjugate treated cloth; c) applying to a surface of a control cloth identical to said hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth treated with antigen, the same enzyme-antibody conjugate not mixed with free antigen, thereby to provide an enzyme-antibody conjugate treated control cloth; d) incubating both said antigen/enzyme-antibody conjugate treated cloth and said enzyme-antibody conjugate treated control cloth substantially simultaneously to provide incubated cloths; e) washing both said incubated antigen/enzyme-antibody conjugate treated cloth and said incubated enzyme-antibody conjugate treated control cloth with a buffer solution; and f) detecting said antigen by incubation of both said antigen/enzyme -antibody conjugate treated cloth and said enzyme-antibody conjugate treated control cloth in a chromogenic substrate indicator solution to produce a visible colour upon product formation, indicative of the presence of said antigen, the amount of said antigen being determined by the difference in intensity of the colour on said antigen/enzyme-antibody conjugate treated cloth and the colour on said enzyme-antibody conjugate treated control cloth.

39. The method of claim 38, wherein said antigen is B. abortus lipopolysaccharide and said antibodies are specific for B. abortus lipopolysaccharide.

40. The method of claim 39, wherein the enzyme-antibody conjugate is IgG-peroxidase conjugate.

41. A rapid method for assaying anti-Salmonella IgG in chicken egg yolk, which comprises: a) capturing antibodies, specific for Salmonella lipopolysaccharide, from egg yolk onto a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, coated with Salmonella lipopolysaccharide, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0; and b) detecting said antibodies using an anti-chicken IgG-peroxidase conjugate.

42. The method of claim 41, wherein said cloth is a polyester cloth.

43. The method of claim 36, wherein said chelating agent is ethylenediaminetetraacetate.

44. The method of claim 36, wherein the separation of said antigens is carried out by centrifugation or by filtration.

45. A rapid immunoassay method which comprises: a) adsorbing antigens onto a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 p,m and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0; b) capturing antibodies specific for said antigens from a test sample on said cloth; c) detecting said antibodies using an antiglobulin antibody-enzyme conjugate which binds to the captured antibody; and d) assaying said enzyme using a chromogenic substrate.

46. A method of using a macroporous hydrophobic cloth for preparing biotinylated, affinity-purified antibodies which comprises: a) immunoadsorbing anti-Salmonella antibodies in a serum onto a lipopolysaccharide-coated macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0; b) biotinylating said antibodies on said cloth; and c) eluting said biotinylated antibodies therefrom.

47. A method for the rapid assay of antibodies comprising: coating a macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 p,m and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability, in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, with an antigen specific for said antibodies, thereby to adsorb thereon, absorb and immobilize therein said antigen; and rapidly capturing and detecting antibodies in a body fluid through the use of said antigen-coated cloth.

48. A method for the detection of Gram-negative antigens which require extraction and concentration from large sample volumes, which comprises: coating a macroporous hydrophobic cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability, in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, with antibodies specific for said antigens; extracting said antigens from large sample volumes of bacteria by heating said antigens in the presence of an organic sequestering agent; and rapidly assaying said antigens using said antibody-coated cloth.

49. A method of using a macroporous hydrophobic cloth for the purification of biotinylated antibodies which comprises: coating a macroporous hydrophobic cloth, said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0, with antigens specific for said biotinylated antibodies; affinity purifying said biotinylated antibodies using said antigen-coated cloth; and using said affinity-purified biotinylated antibodies as a reagent in an enzyme immunoassay procedure.

50. A method of using a macroporous hydrophobic cloth for preparing biotinylated, affinity-purified antibodies which comprises: a) immunoadsorbing antibodies in a serum, onto an antigen-coated macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, said antigen having specificity for said antibodies and said cloth having a thickness of more than 200 µm and having spaces between fibres exceeding 20 µm in diameter, said cloth further having a Frazier Air permeability in m2/m2.S at 124 Pa of 0.4-4.0; b) biotinylating said antibodies on said cloth; and c) eluting said biotinylated antibodies therefrom.

51. The immunoassay device of claim 5, wherein said macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth is bonded to a piece of inert material other than macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth, thereby to provide an antigen-coated test strip that may be handled throughout an assay procedure.

52. The immunoassay device of claim 4, wherein said macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth is a sheet used to test multiple samples.

53. The immunoassay device of claim 5, wherein said macroporous hydrophobic synthetic polymer cloth is a sheet used to test multiple samples.